|
|
||||||||
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Significant progress has been made toward understanding how microbial molecules are recognized by the immune system. The family of Toll-like receptors (TLR)3 has evolved to establish a combinatorial repertoire to detect a large number of pathogen-associated molecules (3). Based on TLRs there is hope to define agents that activate selected immune responses without causing general toxicity. One of the most intriguing microbial molecules used to trigger antitumor immune responses is bacterial DNA (4). The vertebrate immune system uses TLR9 to detect bacterial DNA (5, 6, 7) based on the presence of unmethylated CG dinucleotides within particular base contexts (CpG motifs) (8). The identification of CpG motifs allowed the development of CpG motif-containing oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN) that mimic bacterial DNA (9). CpG ODN represent a major improvement over bacterial DNA, since they are well-defined molecules that can be protected chemically against degradation by nucleases and synthesized in large quantities. CpG ODN are potent vaccine adjuvants with less toxicity compared with other adjuvants, such as Freunds adjuvant (10, 11, 12, 13, 14). CpG ODN promote the development of a Th1 response and the generation of Ag-specific CTL (15, 16, 17).
CpG DNA has been described to activate innate, humoral, and cellular immune responses (18, 19, 20). Dendritic cells at the interface between the innate and the acquired immune system play a key role in the modulation of immune responses by CpG ODN. Both murine dendritic cells (21, 22) and human dendritic cells (23, 24, 25) are activated by CpG ODN. The optimal CpG motif differs between mouse and human (26). Furthermore, distinct types of CpG ODN exist that have markedly different immunological characteristics (27, 28).
Several concepts have been proposed to use CpG ODN for immunotherapy of cancer. CpG ODN are effective immune adjuvants in tumor vaccines (29, 30, 31) and enhance the efficacy of mAb therapy (32). CpG ODN increase primary malignant B cell expression of costimulatory molecules and target Ags (33, 34). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that NK cell activation, but not CD8 T cells, are involved in CpG ODN-induced tumor rejection in a NK cell-sensitive murine model of neuroblastoma (35).
In a previous study we found that maturation of dendritic cells with CpG ODN increased IL-12 production and the T cell stimulatory potential of dendritic cells in vitro and enhanced the therapeutic activity of a dendritic cell-based tumor vaccine in vivo (36). In this earlier protocol, CpG ODN was used in vitro, but was not present in vivo. Here we examined the effects of CpG ODN monotherapy on anti-tumor immunity in vivo in a syngeneic colon carcinoma model. We found that weekly injections of CpG ODN into the margins of the tumor lead to a systemic anti-tumor response, with rejection of established tumors at the injection site as well as at distant sites. Peritumoral CpG ODN monotherapy resulted in a strong activation of Ag-specific CD8 T cells, explaining the potent antitumor activity of peritumoral CpG ODN treatment.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BALB/c-derived C26 colon carcinoma and Renca renal carcinoma cells (Cell Lines Service, Heidelberg, Germany) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% L-glutamine, penicillin (100 U/L), and streptomycin (0.1 mg/ml). Female BALB/c mice, 68 wk old, were purchased from Harlan Winkelmann (Borchen, Germany). Animal studies were approved by the local regulatory agency. For tumor induction, tumor cells were washed in Hanks serum-free medium, and 2 x 105 cells (volume, 200 µl) were injected s.c. into the flank. CpG ODN (100 µg) in 100 µl PBS was injected s.c. either on the opposite side of the body from the tumor (contralateral) or into the margins of the tumor (peritumoral) at the time points indicated. In some experiments irradiated C26 tumor cells (1 x 106 cells; 100 Gy) were injected as indicated. Tumor volume (length x width2 x 0.52, in cubic millimeters) was measured three times weekly. The tumor was monitored until tumor volume exceeded 2500 mm3. In some experiments CD8 T cells or CD4 T cells were depleted in vivo by four i.p. injections (every 5 days; first injection 0.5 mg, then 0.1 mg) of the anti-CD8 mAb RmCD8/2 (31) or the anti-CD4 mAb GK1.4 (37) (provided by R. Mocikat, Munich, Germany) starting 1 day before CpG ODN treatment. Depletion of CD8 T cells and CD4 T cells was confirmed in spleen cell preparations by flow cytometry. Since CD8 is also expressed on a murine DC subset, we also confirmed that the frequency of CD8-positive DC in spleen was not affected by the anti-CD8 Ab used.
Reagents
ODN were completely phosphorothioate-modified. The following sequences were used (CG dinucleotides underlined): CpG ODN 1826, 5'-TCCATGACGTTCCTGACGTT-3' (38); and the non-CpG control ODN 1982, 5'-TCCAGGACTTCTCTCAGGTT-3' (same length and base content). No endotoxin could be detected in ODN preparations (<0.03 endotoxin units/ml; LAL assay; BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD). ODN were obtained from Coley Pharmaceutical Group (Wellesley, MA).
Spleen cell preparations
Single-cell suspensions were obtained by passing spleen through a 70-µm pore size cell strainer (Falcon, Heidelberg, Germany), followed by lysis of erythrocytes (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Neckargemund, Germany). Splenocytes were stained with magnetically labeled anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 Abs and applied to a separation column according to the manufacturers instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). CD4-negative, CD8-negative, or CD4/CD8 double-negative fractions were recovered (<4% remaining CD4 or CD8 cells). To determine lytic activity, total splenocytes and splenocyte fractions were used without prior coculture or were first cocultured with irradiated (100 Gy) C26 cells in a splenocyte to target cell ratio of 10:1 for 5 days in culture medium. Recombinant IL-2 (10 IU/ml) was added after 24 h.
Analysis of lytic activity
In a nonradioactive assay, 2.5 x 104 C26 target cells were washed twice in PBS, resuspended in PBS containing CFSE (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml, and incubated for 10 min at 37°C. Target cells were washed three times, and splenocytes were added as effector cells. After 20 h cells were harvested, and dead cells were stained with TO-PRO-3 iodide (Molecular Probes). CFSE/TO-PRO-3 iodide double-positive target cells were measured, and flow cytometric data were acquired on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) equipped with two lasers (excitation at 488 and 635 nm wave lengths). Results are presented as absolute values (percentage of CFSE/TO-PRO-3 iodide double-positive target cells). As control group, spleen cells from untreated, non-tumor-bearing mice were used as effector cells.
Detection of cytokines by ELISA
Plasma samples were obtained by centrifugation of blood
(postmortem intracardial puncture) from heparinized mice. Plasma
concentrations of IFN-
were measured by a specific ELISA (OptEIA
murine IFN-
ELISA; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA; range, 51000
pg/ml).
Statistics
A two-tailed Student t test was applied to determine differences in tumor growth and lytic activity of spleen cell preparations between different treatment groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using StatView 4.51 software (Abacus Concepts, Calabasas, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We investigated whether CpG ODN administered to mice in vivo have
antitumor effects. In the prophylactic setting, mice were injected s.c.
with CpG ODN 1826 (100 µg) 7 days before challenge with C26 tumor
cells. Injection of CpG ODN alone delayed tumor growth compared with
the group without treatment (p = 0.02), but all
mice developed tumors and finally died (Fig. 1
A). In contrast, the non-CpG
control ODN 1982 showed no antitumor effect (p
= 0.66). In a second series of experiments, a vaccine consisting of
irradiated tumor cells and CpG ODN 1826 was more effective than the CpG
ODN 1826 alone (Fig. 1
B), but only two of the eight mice
were protected against tumor growth (not in figure), demonstrating the
aggressive nature of the tumor model.
|
and
). In contrast,
when CpG ODN was injected into the margin of the tumor, 17 of 20 mice
completely rejected the tumor
(Fig. 2
), demonstrating that additional
exogenous tumor Ag was not required when CpG ODN were administered
directly into the tumor area. The difference in tumor size between the
two groups with peritumoral and contralateral injections of CpG ODN was
highly significant (p < 0.001 on day 24, the
day when the first mouse in these groups reached a tumor volume of 2500
mm3).
|
). To examine whether peritumoral
CpG ODN injections were also effective against larger tumors, the start
of therapy was further delayed. On day 10 after tumor challenge mice
had developed tumors with an average tumor volume of 65
mm3. Mice that received weekly peritumoral
injections of CpG ODN starting on day 10 showed a significant delay in
tumor growth (day 24; p < 0.001; n =
10), and four of 10 mice completely rejected the tumor and remained
tumor free for >100 days (Fig. 2Peritumoral injections of CpG ODN induce systemic immune responses effective against tumors at distant sites
Eradication of established tumors and long term control of tumors
in mice with peritumoral CpG treatment suggested the development of a
systemic antitumor immune response. To test this hypothesis, mice were
challenged with tumor cells on both flanks. Five days after induction
of the tumor, CpG ODN was injected into the margin of the tumor at one
flank, but not at the other flank. As expected from the experiments
described above, the tumor on the flank that was injected with CpG ODN
disappeared after an initial increase in tumor size (Fig. 3
A,
). Unexpectedly, the
tumor on the nontreated flank also responded to treatment (Fig. 3
A, ). This suggests that the mechanisms responsible for
inhibition of tumor growth on the treated side are also effective on
the nontreated side. All mice with tumors on both flanks and
peritumoral CpG treatment of only one tumor controlled excessive tumor
growth until therapy was stopped on day 38. Sixty-nine percent of these
mice completely rejected both tumors and remained tumor free for a long
period of time (Fig. 3
B). In contrast, 95% of control mice
exceeded the fixed tumor volume of 2500 mm3 by
day 38 (Fig. 3
B,
). Coinjection of CpG ODN and irradiated
tumor cells into the contralateral flank of mice with only one tumor
(half the total tumor mass at the start of therapy compared with the
other groups) showed only small prolongation of the time to the fixed
volume of 2500 mm3 (Fig. 3
B,
).
Thus, the generation of an effective systemic antitumor response
depended on the presence of CpG ODN in the area of vital tumor tissue,
rather than administration in conjunction with nonproliferating
irradiated tumor cells. These results demonstrate that peritumoral CpG
treatment induces a systemic immune response effective against both the
local tumor and tumors at distant sites.
|
We studied a second tumor model with characteristics similar to
the C26 model. Mice that were injected with the kidney cancer
cell line Renca succumbed to rapid tumor growth (maximum tumor volume,
2500 mm3) within 32 days (Fig. 4
,
). In analogy to C26 tumors, mice
with peritumoral CpG treatment of Renca tumors rejected the tumor, and
all mice had a tumor size <2500 mm3 when
treatment was stopped on day 38. Eighty-three percent of these mice
remained tumor free for a long period of time (Fig. 4
,
). Again, the
efficacy of treatment depended on the peritumoral site of injection,
since treatment with CpG ODN injected into the opposite flank was less
active (all mice exceeded maximum tumor volume by day 45; Fig. 4
,
). The
therapeutic activity of peritumoral CpG injections in both tumor
models, C26 and Renca, suggests that the immunological mechanisms
responsible for this effect are not limited to a certain tumor
type.
|
Next we examined whether treatment of a C26 tumor would also lead
to an anti-tumor effect against the Renca tumor. Mice were
challenged with C26 tumor on the one flank and with Renca tumor on the
other flank. CpG ODN was injected only into the flank with the C26
tumor, but not into the other flank with the Renca tumor. We observed
that besides the expected rejection of the C26 tumor, the growth of the
Renca tumor on the untreated flank was also partially inhibited (tumor
size not shown in figure), leading to a prolonged time until the
maximum tumor volume was reached (Fig. 4
, indicated by x). These
results demonstrate that the immune response that is responsible for
eradicating the C26 tumor includes a tumor type-independent activity
that is partially effective against the Renca tumor on the
untreated side.
Peritumoral CpG injections lead to tumor-specific, long term memory protecting mice against tumor rechallenge
If acquired immunity is involved in the antitumor effects of
peritumoral CpG treatment, mice that remained tumor free after tumor
rejection should be protected against rechallenge with the same tumor,
but not with another tumor type. Mice that had rejected a C26 tumor or
a Renca tumor during the course of peritumoral CpG treatment and were
tumor free for >3 mo were rechallenged with C26 cells without any
further treatment. In the group rechallenged with C26, no tumor
development occurred in 88% of mice (Fig. 5
, A and B,
).
In contrast, mice that had previously rejected a Renca tumor were not
protected against challenge with C26 (Fig. 5
, A and
B,
). Thus, mice that received peritumoral CpG treatment
mounted a tumor-Ag specific T cell response with long term memory.
|
CD8 T cells and innate effector cells contribute to the antitumor activity of CpG ODN treatment
As demonstrated above, peritumoral CpG ODN treatment is associated
with the development of memory CD8 T cells that protect against tumor
rechallenge. We were interested in whether CD8 T cells are not only
involved in protection against tumor rechallenge, but are also involved
in the rejection of established tumors upon peritumoral CpG ODN
treatment. Mice with established C26 tumors were treated with weekly
peritumoral injections of CpG ODN. In the group of mice that was
depleted of CD8 T cells by repeated injections of an anti-CD8 Ab
prior to and during treatment, control of tumor growth was weak, and a
decreased survival similar to that of untreated control mice was
observed (Fig. 6
A). In
contrast, all mice depleted of CD4 T cells were able to completely
reject the tumor leading to a long term, tumor-free survival of >100
days (Fig. 6
A). Therefore, CD8 T cells, but not CD4 T cells,
were required for the antitumor activity of peritumoral CpG ODN
treatment.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunotherapeutic approaches against cancer have always been more efficient in the prophylactic setting than in the therapeutic setting. The intriguing finding in this study is that monotherapy with CpG ODN was ineffective in the prophylactic setting, but was highly active to eradicate established tumors. Of note, irradiated tumor cells coinjected with CpG ODN were unable to substitute for the presence of a vital tumor at the site of injection of CpG ODN. As a consequence, provided the same therapeutic scheme (CpG ODN injection in one flank), mice with double the tumor load (two tumors, one at each flank) achieved excellent control of tumor growth, in contrast to mice with only one tumor (at the noninjected flank), which rapidly died. The need of peritumoral rather than distant placement of injections of CpG ODN highlights the pivotal role of the appropriate site of CpG ODN treatment. This support the concept that the immune system is highly effective to control tumor growth as long as the tumor colocalizes with CpG ODN as an indicator of bacterial infection.
Similar to the consequences of bacterial infection, mobilization of
innate and adaptive immune responses seemed to contribute to the
powerful antitumor activity of peritumoral CpG ODN therapy in our
model. Indicative of innate immune system activation, mice that were
injected with CpG ODN showed elevated plasma levels of IFN-
independent of prior exposure to tumor Ag. Furthermore, in mice bearing
two different tumor entities at the same time, cross-over antitumor
activity was observed in response to peritumoral CpG ODN injections.
This was not seen in rechallenged mice that did not receive CpG ODN
therapy at that time. Furthermore, in the prophylactic model, antitumor
activity was observed in the absence of CD8 T cells. CpG ODN-mediated
activation of innate immunity has also been reported by others who
demonstrated that CpG ODN induces systemic levels of IL-12 and IFN-
and protects against intracellular pathogens (39, 40, 41).
Besides activation of innate effector mechanisms, treatment with CpG ODN resulted in the development of tumor-specific T cells. CD8 T cells, but not CD4 T cells, were critical for the antitumor activity of CpG ODN. Mice that rejected the tumor remained tumor free even after the end of therapy and were protected against rechallenge with the same tumor, but not another tumor entity. Spleen cells of mice that were protected against rechallenge displayed a CD8 T cell-dependent lytic activity against tumor cells. Studies by others revealed that, depending on the model, either NK cells or CD8 T cells were involved in the antitumor activity of CpG ODN (35, 43, 44).
The priming of tumor Ag-specific T cells is essential for the initiation of successful antitumor immune responses, yet the fate of such cells during tumor progression is unknown. Therapeutic manipulation of the immune response to tumors in tumor-bearing hosts might be actively frustrated by the tumor itself, as it has been reported that tumors can induce tumor-specific T cell nonresponsiveness (45). The mechanism of tolerization might mimic tolerance induction to peripheral tissue Ags (42). Peripheral tolerance induction of both Ag-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells to Ags expressed outside the lymphoid system has been described in several models (46, 47, 48). In these cases tolerance is mediated by cross-presentation of the Ag on nonstimulated, bone marrow-derived APC (47, 48). As development and growth of tumors are initially not accompanied by inflammatory stimuli or activation of the immune system, Ag derived from the tumor might be shunted in the same cross-tolerizing pathway as reported for peripheral tissue Ags. In this way tumors, as close mimics of the normal tissue from which they are derived, may take advantage of the T cell tolerizing state of bone marrow-derived APCs that normally guarantees tissue tolerance. This tolerization hampers immune intervention schemes that are based on the induction or propagation of the T cell immune system in tumor-bearing hosts. In our study the presence of CpG ODN in the area of the tumor might represent an effective means not only to prime tumor-specific T cells, but also to overcome tolerization of tumor-specific T cells by providing the appropriate costimulation for local APC such as dendritic cells (21, 23).
A key feature of most immune adjuvants is the stimulation of APC. In humans the use of some of the most effective immune adjuvants (such as LPS or CFA, which are well tolerated in mice) is limited by toxicity. Other adjuvants that were found to be highly effective in rodents have been found to be much less so in humans, and commonly used adjuvants, such as alum or IFA, promote a Th2-type response the opposite of that required for inducing an anti-tumor response. One way to circumvent the toxicity of immunostimulatory agents in vivo is to stimulate Ag-pulsed dendritic cells ex vivo before injecting them back into the host. This way the activity of immunostimulatory agents is restricted to cells inside the test tube and does not cause toxicity in vivo. Several studies demonstrate the feasibility of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy, but ex vivo manipulation of dendritic cells is time and cost intensive, and the therapeutic results obtained in clinical trials are still limited. With respect to toxicity, CpG ODN represent a major improvement compared with other adjuvants. Studies in primates (13, 14) and preliminary results from a first clinical trial (49) confirmed that CpG ODN present a broad therapeutic window and show low systemic toxicity.
Due to major differences in CpG ODN effects in murine and human immune systems, one has to be cautious in predicting the anti-tumor activity of peritumoral CpG ODN treatment in cancer patients. Several points have to be considered if peritumoral CpG monotherapy from the murine tumor model is translated into the clinical setting. First, the appropriate CpG ODN have to be selected, since the CpG motif that is optimal to activate human immune cells is different from the CpG motifs for the murine system (12, 26). Second, major differences exist between mice and humans regarding the existence of different dendritic cell subsets and their susceptibility to stimulation by CpG ODN (23, 28, 50). Third, the tumor load in most patients with cancer is higher than that in animal tumor models used to test immunotherapies.
Since in our study the efficacy of peritumoral CpG ODN monotherapy declined when the start of therapy was delayed, it is unlikely that peritumoral CpG ODN will be sufficient to eradicate large tumors in patients. However, peritumoral injections of CpG ODN may complement other immunotherapeutic approaches as well as standard treatment of cancer, such as surgery and chemotherapy. In particular, peritumoral CpG ODN monotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant setting) may induce a systemic immune response that might be capable of eliminating remaining tumor cells and micrometastases and thus preventing recurrence of the tumor.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gunther Hartmann, Division of Clinical Pharmacology Medizinische Klinik Innenstadt, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336 Munich, Germany. E-mail address: ghartmann{at}lrz.uni-muenchen.de ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: TLR, Toll-like receptor; CpG ODN, oligodeoxynucleotide with CpG motif. ![]()
Received for publication March 29, 2002. Accepted for publication July 29, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/-
in plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:2154.[Medline]
or cytidine-phosphate-guanosine DNA drives T cell activation in vitro and therapeutic anti-tumor immune responses in vivo. J. Immunol. 165:6278.
B
and I
B
and sustained activation of nuclear factor-
B/c-Rel. J. Immunol. 160:1240.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Klinman, H. Shirota, D. Tross, T. Sato, and S. Klaschik Synthetic oligonucleotides as modulators of inflammation J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2008; 84(4): 958 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. N. Haining, J. Davies, H. Kanzler, L. Drury, T. Brenn, J. Evans, J. Angelosanto, S. Rivoli, K. Russell, S. George, et al. CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides Alter Lymphocyte and Dendritic Cell Trafficking in Humans Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 14(17): 5626 - 5634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nierkens, M. H. den Brok, R. P.M. Sutmuller, O. M. Grauer, E. Bennink, M. E. Morgan, C. G. Figdor, T. J.M. Ruers, and G. J. Adema In vivo Colocalization of Antigen and CpG within Dendritic Cells Is Associated with the Efficacy of Cancer Immunotherapy Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 68(13): 5390 - 5396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H.M.G.M. den Brok, R. P.M. Sutmuller, S. Nierkens, E. J. Bennink, L. W.J. Toonen, C. G. Figdor, T. J.M. Ruers, and G. J. Adema Synergy between In situ Cryoablation and TLR9 Stimulation Results in a Highly Effective In vivo Dendritic Cell Vaccine. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 66(14): 7285 - 7292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Tormo, A. Ferrer, P. Bosch, E. Gaffal, E. Basner-Tschakarjan, J. Wenzel, and T. Tuting Therapeutic Efficacy of Antigen-Specific Vaccination and Toll-Like Receptor Stimulation against Established Transplanted and Autochthonous Melanoma in Mice. Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 66(10): 5427 - 5435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Chaperot, A. Blum, O. Manches, G. Lui, J. Angel, J.-P. Molens, and J. Plumas Virus or TLR Agonists Induce TRAIL-Mediated Cytotoxic Activity of Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 248 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Avogadri, C. Martinoli, L. Petrovska, C. Chiodoni, P. Transidico, V. Bronte, R. Longhi, M. P. Colombo, G. Dougan, and M. Rescigno Cancer Immunotherapy Based on Killing of Salmonella-Infected Tumor Cells Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 65(9): 3920 - 3927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Guiducci, A. P. Vicari, S. Sangaletti, G. Trinchieri, and M. P. Colombo Redirecting In vivo Elicited Tumor Infiltrating Macrophages and Dendritic Cells towards Tumor Rejection Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 65(8): 3437 - 3446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Jahrsdorfer, L. Muhlenhoff, S. E. Blackwell, M. Wagner, H. Poeck, E. Hartmann, R. Jox, T. Giese, B. Emmerich, S. Endres, et al. B-Cell Lymphomas Differ in their Responsiveness to CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2005; 11(4): 1490 - 1499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Chagnon, S. Tanguay, O. L. Ozdal, M. Guan, Z. Z. Ozen, J.-S. Ripeau, M. Chevrette, M. M. Elhilali, and L. A. Thompson-Snipes Potentiation of a Dendritic Cell Vaccine for Murine Renal Cell Carcinoma by CpG Oligonucleotides Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 11(3): 1302 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Mason, H. Ariga, R. Neal, D. Valdecanas, N. Hunter, A. M. Krieg, J. K. Whisnant, and L. Milas Targeting Toll-like Receptor 9 with CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides Enhances Tumor Response to Fractionated Radiotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 11(1): 361 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hiraoka, S. Yamamoto, S. Otsuru, S. Nakai, K. Tamai, R. Morishita, T. Ogihara, and Y. Kaneda Enhanced Tumor-Specific Long-Term Immunity of Hemaggluttinating Virus of Japan-Mediated Dendritic Cell-Tumor Fused Cell Vaccination by Coadministration with CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides J. Immunol., October 1, 2004; 173(7): 4297 - 4307. [Abstract] |