The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grigoriadou, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grigoriadou, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, P.
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 169: 3736-3743.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

T Cell Receptor-{gamma} Allele-Specific Selection of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 Cells in the Intestinal Epithelium1

Kalliopi Grigoriadou, Laurent Boucontet and Pablo Pereira2

Unité du Développement des Lymphocytes, Center National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité de Recherche Associée, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Previous genetic analyses have shown that the relative representation of subsets of {gamma}{delta} intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (i-IELs) is influenced by genes linked to the TCR{gamma}, TCR{delta}, and MHC loci. Here, we have analyzed V-gene use in {gamma}{delta} i-IELs from C57BL/6 (B6) and C57BL/10 (B10) mice and from their F1 and F2 progenies with a larger panel of V{gamma}- and V{delta}-specific mAbs and have shown that the influence of TCR{gamma}-linked genes operates at two levels: one influencing the representation of V{gamma}1 (or V{gamma}7) i-IELs and other acting specifically on the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subset, which represents 3% and 15% of the {gamma}{delta} i-IELs in B6 and B10 mice, respectively. Analysis of mice transgenic for a rearranged V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain of B6 origin demonstrated that the TCR{gamma}-linked genes influencing the representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subset are the structural genes of TCR{gamma} chains. This influence is allele specific and cell autonomous, as evidenced by the different behavior of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells bearing either parental allele in F1 mice. The representation of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells among {gamma}{delta} thymocytes is similar in B6 and B10 mice, demonstrating that the V{delta}4 chain can pair well with both alleles of the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain and strongly suggesting that a cellular selection mechanism is responsible for the observed differences. The V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 junctional amino acid sequences of B6 V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs are diverse but display less variation in length than those found in similar cells from B10 mice, indicating that B6 V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells are the target of this cellular selection event.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All throughout its life span, an {alpha}{beta} T cell is submitted to selective pressures based on the specificity of its TCR. During its intrathymic differentiation, a combination of positive and negative selection ensures that a mature T cell can recognize peptide Ags presented by self-MHC molecules without overtly reacting with self-Ags (1, 2, 3, 4). Once in the periphery, naive T cells need continuous interaction with self-MHC molecules to survive and compete with peripheral resident cells (5, 6, 7). Encounter with Ag in the appropriate context will expand and differentiate Ag-specific cells, whereas clearance of the Ag is accompanied by a drastic elimination of the specifically activated cells by apoptosis (8, 9).

Several lines of evidence suggest that {gamma}{delta} T lymphocytes also undergo selection, although the mechanisms remain quite elusive. Studies with mice transgenic (Tg)3 for a TCR-{gamma}{delta} specific for the MHC class Ib molecule T10/T22b have provided evidence for both positive and negative selection of {gamma}{delta} cells (10, 11, 12, 13). However, {gamma}{delta} cells recognizing MHC Ags appear to be the exception rather than the rule. Thus, in studies of mice lacking the {beta}2-microglobulin molecule or MHC class II Ags, the presence at normal levels of {gamma}{delta} cells in various lymphoid organs has rather ruled out a strict and direct role of MHC molecules in the development of {gamma}{delta} cells (14, 15). Furthermore, the frequency of {gamma}{delta} cells recognizing the molecule T10/T22b is ~0.5% (16).

To analyze the impact of TCR selection in {gamma}{delta} cells and as an important step in the search for endogenous ligands for {gamma}{delta} cells, we (17) and others (18, 19) have used available V{gamma}- and V{delta}-specific mAbs to study the representation of different {gamma}{delta} T cell subsets in different organs and in different strains of mice. In the intestine, the presence of a high frequency of cells expressing the V{delta}4 chain correlated with the expression of a gene closely linked to the I-E region of the MHC class II locus (18), although additional experiments with mice Tg for the I-E molecule showed that I-E expression was not sufficient to dictate the V{delta}4-high phenotype (20, 21). Similarly, an influence of MHC-linked genes in the repertoire of TCRs expressed by {gamma}{delta} intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (i-IELs) was also evident in analyses of recombinant inbred strains generated from C57BL/6 (B6) and DBA/2 founders, although cells not expressing the V{delta}4 chain appeared to be the targets of the selective event (17). In these experiments, and in similar experiments performed in the same recombinant inbred strains but analyzing the representation of different {gamma}{delta} T cell subsets among splenic {gamma}{delta} cells (19), the influences of genes linked to the TCR{gamma} and TCR{delta} loci were also evident.

Although these experiments were interpreted as indicative of cellular selection mechanisms operating on {gamma}{delta} cells, they could not precisely define the cell target of the selection. This was mostly due to the limited number of V{gamma} and V{delta} genes commonly used by {gamma}{delta} cells to form their TCRs and to the fact that only one V{delta}-specific Ab was used in those experiments. Thus, an increased or decreased representation of a given subset is always compensated by decreased or increased representation of other subsets, respectively. Therefore, differences in a given subset may result from a selective mechanism operating directly on this subset or may reflect a compensatory mechanism to a selective event acting on a different subset. Furthermore, structural mechanisms rather than cellular selection mechanisms may be at the basis of the influence of the structural genes for TCR{gamma} and {delta} in the representation of {gamma}{delta} T cell subsets.

To circumvent these problems and to analyze further the role of TCR{gamma} polymorphism in the representation of {gamma}{delta} i-IEL subsets, we have used a larger panel of V{delta}-specific mAbs that we have recently produced (22) to analyze the V{gamma}/V{delta} usage by {gamma}{delta} i-IELs from B6 and C57BL/10 (B10) mice and their F1 and F2 progenies. B6 and B10 are genetically related strains of mice (differing by <10% of their genome) (23), which share the same MHC and TCR{delta} loci but differ in their TCR{gamma} haplotype (24, 25).


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

C57BL/6JIco (B6), BALB/cByJIco, 129/SvPasIco, CBA/JIco, DBA/2Jico, and FVB/Nico were obtained from Iffa Credo (L’Abresle, France). C57BL/10SnJ (B10), C57BL/10J, and B10.D2/nSnJ mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). C3H/HePas, A/J, DBA/1J, CBA/N, and NOD/Lt were obtained from the Pasteur Institute (Paris, France). AKR/OlaHsd, NZB/OlaHsd, NZW/OlaHsd, SJL/JHanHsd, SWR/OlaHsd, and 129/OlaHsd were obtained from Harlan (Gannat, France). B6 mice Tg for a rearranged V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain have been previously described (26, 27). (B10 x B6)F1 hybrid mice (B10B6F1) and B10B6F2 mice were produced in our animal facilities. All animals were used between 6 and 12 wk of age.

Cell preparation and cultures

Single-cell suspensions were prepared from thymus and inguinal and axillary lymph nodes (LNs) according to standard procedures. CD4-CD8- double negative (DN) thymocytes were prepared by complement-mediated killing as described (28), and i-IELs were prepared as described (29). To expand {gamma}{delta} cells, total LN cells (5 x 106 cells/ml) from individual mice were cultured in 24-well plates previously coated with 10 µg/ml anti-C{delta} mAb (3A10) in 2 ml of either DMEM or RPMI 1640 with Glutamax-1 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with sodium pyruvate, 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME, nonessential amino acids, and antibiotics (all from Life Technologies), 10% FCS (Boeringer Mannheim, Meylan, Germany) and 100 U/ml of mouse rIL-2. After 3 days cells were further expanded for 2–4 days in flasks in the presence of rIL-2.

Abs, staining, and cell sorting

Anti-CD4 (RL.174), anti-CD8 (HO 2.2), anti-C{delta} (3A10), anti-V{gamma}1 (2.11), anti-V{delta}6.3/4 (clone 9D3) (27), anti-V{gamma}7 (F2.67), anti-V{delta}6B (F4.22; V{delta}6B refers to the Vd6 genes that have >90% identity at the nucleotide level with the previously described p{lambda}12) (30), and anti-V{delta}5 (F45.145) were prepared and used as described (22). These V{delta} Abs were described by Pereira et al. (22). The 7C10 mAb was obtained in the same fusion as 9D3 (27) and its specificity was partially described by Azuara and Pereira (31). PE- and biotin-labeled anti-V{delta}4 (GL2) and PE-labeled anti-V{delta}6.2/6.3 (8F4H7B7) were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA).

Cells (105–106) were incubated in staining buffer (PBS, 3% FCS, 0.1% NaN3) with the indicated labeled mAbs for 30 min on ice and were washed twice. When biotin-conjugated Abs were used, the cells were further incubated with PE-labeled streptavidin (Southern Biotechnology, Birmingham, AL) or allophycocyanin-labeled streptavidin (BD PharMingen) for another 15 min on ice. After two washes, cells were analyzed using a FACScan or a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). Dead cells were gated out by their forward and side scatter profiles and by their staining with propidium iodide. Data were analyzed using the CellQuest program.

For FACS sorting, i-IELs and DN thymocytes were prepared as above, incubated with the appropriate mAb as described above, and sorted in a FACStarPlus (BD Biosciences). Purity of the sorted populations was >98%.

PCR, cloning, and sequencing

Total cellular RNA from FACS-sorted cells was extracted with RNA-B (Bioprobe Systems, Montreuil, France). cDNA was synthesized as described by Azuara et al. (28). The sequences of the V{gamma}1-, C{gamma}-, V{delta}4-, C{delta}-, and FAM-labeled J{delta}1 primers are described by Azuara et al. (28). The sequence of the FAM-labeled J{gamma}4 primer used was CAAATATCTTGACCCTGA and that of the C{gamma}4 was CTTTCCAATACACCCTTA. PCR and run-off reactions were performed as in Refs. 28 and 32 . The TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) was used for cloning and the ABI PRISM dye terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (PerkinElmer, Wellesley, MA) was used for sequencing according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The C{gamma} primer was used to sequence the V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 junctions.

Genetic and statistical analyses

Male and female B10B6F2 mice (n = 83) were separated into three groups according to their TCR{gamma} haplotype as defined by the anti-V{gamma}1 and 7C10 mAbs. Mice having all of their V{gamma}1+ cells stained by the 7C10 mAb were defined as having both TCR{gamma} loci of B10 haplotype. Mice in which a fraction of the V{gamma}1+ cells were stained by the 7C10 mAb were considered to have inherited one TCR{gamma} allele from the parental B10 strain and the other from the B6 strain. Mice whose V{gamma}1+ cells did not stain with the 7C10 mAb were defined as having inherited both TCR{gamma} alleles from the parental B6 strain. The TCR{gamma} haplotype thus defined was confirmed by the analyses of the same F2 mice with the D13 Mit3 marker. This marker is polymorphic between the B6 and the B10 strains (23) and maps at the same genetic distance from the centromere as the TCR{gamma} locus. Consistent with this predicted genetic localization, only one recombinant between the D13 Mit3 marker and the TCR{gamma} haplotype defined by the 7C10 mAb was found among the 83 F2 animals tested. These data provided genetic evidence indicating that the gene encoding the protein recognized by the 7C10 mAb is located in the vicinity of the TCR{gamma} locus. Polymorphism at the D13 Mit3 marker was analyzed by PCR as described (31). For each of these three groups the mean values ± SD of the percentages of each {gamma}{delta} i-IEL subset were calculated and compared by ANOVA followed by unpaired Student’s t tests using the StatView program.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Representation of different {gamma}{delta} i-IEL subsets in B6, B10, B10B6F1, and B10B6F2 mice

To estimate the relative proportion of different V{gamma}/V{delta} i-IEL subsets in B6 and B10 mice, we performed three-color immunofluorescence analysis with mAbs recognizing the C{delta} chain together with available mAbs specific for different V{gamma} (V{gamma}1 and V{gamma}7) and V{delta} (V{delta}4, V{delta}5, V{delta}6.3, and V{delta}6B) chains (22). The V{gamma}1 and V{gamma}7 mAbs recognize >85%, whereas the four V{delta}-specific Abs recognize ~70% of the {gamma}{delta} i-IELs in B6 and B10 mice. A representative staining experiment of B6 and B10 {gamma}{delta} i-IELs is shown in Fig. 1Go, whereas the relative proportions of each V{gamma}/V{delta} subset defined by these mAbs in B6 (n = 32), B10 (n = 24), and B10B6F1 (n = 18) mice are compared in Fig. 2Go, A–C. Similarly to DBA/2 {gamma}{delta} i-IELs (17), B10 {gamma}{delta} i-IELs contain a relatively high proportion (>15%) of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells, whereas the same cell subset represents only ~2% of the {gamma}{delta} i-IELs in B6 mice (Fig. 2GoB, top left panel). This different representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 subset between the B6 and B10 mouse strains is likely to result from two mechanistically different events. One is a V{delta}-independent event influencing the relative representation of cells bearing different V{gamma} chains in a strain-specific manner. The existence of such an event is supported by the fact that the representations of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}5 and of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}6 subsets are also higher in B10 than in B6 mice (Fig. 2GoB, top panels). Accordingly, B10 mice contain a higher proportion of V{gamma}1+ i-IELs than do B6 mice (Fig. 2GoA). The second event operates specifically on V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells and is readily evident when the representation of the different V{gamma}1/V{delta} subsets in the parental strains are calculated as a fraction of the total V{gamma}1+ i-IELs present in each strain (thus minimizing the differences in the representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 subset due to the V{delta}-independent mechanism previously defined). Thus, whereas the representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}5 and the V{gamma}1/V{delta}6 subsets among V{gamma}1+ i-IELs in B6 and B10 mice are comparable, that of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 subset is threefold higher in B10 than in B6 mice (Fig. 2GoC, top panels).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. FACS profiles of {gamma}{delta} i-IELs stained with different V{gamma}- and V{delta}-specific Abs. i-IELs from B6 (top panels) and B10 mice (bottom panels) were stained with the indicated FITC-labeled anti-V{gamma} Abs, PE-labeled anti-C{delta} Ab, and biotin-labeled anti-V{delta} Abs followed by allophycocyanin-labeled streptavidin and were analyzed in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer. Dot plots represent the indicated V{gamma}- and V{delta}-specific staining among electronically gated {gamma}{delta}+ cells. Numbers indicate percent of positive cells in each quadrant.

 


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Representation of different {gamma}{delta} T cell subsets in i-IELs from B6, B10, B10B6F1, and B10B6F2 mice. i-IELs from B6 (n = 32) and B10 (n = 24) mouse strains, B10B6F1 hybrids (n = 18), or B10B6F2 progeny (n = 83) either were incubated with FITC-labeled anti-V{gamma} and biotin-labeled anti-C{delta} or anti-V{delta} mAbs followed by streptavidin-PE and analyzed in a FACScan or were labeled as described in Fig. 1Go and analyzed in a FACSCalibur. A and D, Fraction of {gamma}{delta}+ i-IELs expressing the V{gamma}1 or the V{gamma}7 chains in the indicated strains (A) or in F2 animals separated on the basis of their TCR{gamma} haplotype (D). B and E, Fraction of {gamma}{delta}+ i-IELs expressing the V{gamma}1 (top) or the V{gamma}7 chain (bottom) together with the indicated V{delta} chains. C and F, Fraction of V{gamma}1+ (top) or V{gamma}7+ (bottom) i-IELs expressing the indicated V{delta} chains. Results are shown as the mean ± SEM (A–C) or as the mean ± SD of the F2 animals grouped according to whether they have inherited their TCR{gamma} locus from the B6 parental strain (B6), the B10 parental strain (B10), or both (F1) (D–F). Statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA followed by Student’s t tests. ***, p < 0.0001; **, 0.0001 < p < 0.001; *, 0.001 < p < 0.01.

 
For both phenotypic traits (levels of V{gamma}1 i-IELs and of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells), the frequencies observed in B10B6F1 animals were intermediate between the two parental strains (Fig. 2Go), indicating that nonrecessive B10 genes are responsible for high V{gamma}1 and V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 phenotypes. Furthermore, both phenotypic traits are genetically controlled by an element(s) physically linked to the TCR{gamma} locus, as indicated by the correlation between the levels of V{gamma}1 and V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells and the inheritance of the TCR{gamma} haplotype observed in B10B6F2 (n = 83) mice (Fig. 2Go, D–F). Thus, F2 animals that inherited two B10 alleles, two B6 alleles, or one allele from each parental strain at the TCR{gamma} locus show levels of V{gamma}1 and V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs similar to those found in B10, B6, and B10B6F1 mice, respectively (Fig. 2Go).

The representation of the V{gamma}7/V{delta} i-IEL subsets in the two parental strains is not exactly the reciprocal of that of the V{gamma}1/V{delta} subsets, suggesting that additional "selective" events operate specifically on V{gamma}7/V{delta} cells (likely V{gamma}7/V{delta}6B and/or V{gamma}7/V{delta}4 subsets) (Fig. 2Go, B and C, lower panels). The representation of both subsets in B10B6F1 animals is intermediate between B6 and B10 mice, similar to that of the V{gamma}1/V{delta} subsets. In contrast, their representation is not influenced by an element(s) linked to the TCR{gamma} locus, further indicating that their differences result from different selective events (Fig. 2Go, E and F, lower panels). Such selective events appear to be specific to the B10 substrain used in these experiments (C57BL/10SnJ) because the representation of the V{gamma}7/V{delta} subsets in C57BL/10J mice was comparable to those found in B6 mice (data not shown). The mechanisms responsible for the different representation of V{gamma}7/V{delta} subsets between B10 and B6 were not studied further.

Altogether, these experiments extend previous observations on the genetic influence of an element(s) closely linked to the TCR{gamma} locus in the representation of {gamma}{delta} i-IEL subsets (17). They demonstrate that this influence operates at two different levels: one influencing the representation of V{gamma}1 (or V{gamma}7) i-IELs and the other acting specifically on the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subset. The following experiments were aimed at characterizing the selective mechanisms responsible for the different representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subset in B6 and B10 mice.

Evidence for V{gamma}1 allele-dependent selection of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subset

Obvious candidate genes that could influence the representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subset are the structural genes of TCR{gamma} chains. If that were the case, the different levels of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs observed in B6 and B10 mice must relate to polymorphism at the regions coding for their V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chains, implying that the B6 and B10 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 alleles must behave differently with regard to whatever mechanism is responsible for high or low levels of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs. Alternatively, the representation of the V{gamma}1V{delta}4 i-IEL subset may be influenced by a gene(s) unrelated to the structural genes of TCR{gamma} chains but closely linked to them. The analysis of the V{delta} repertoire expressed by V{gamma}1+ i-IELs isolated from B6 and B10B6F1 mice Tg for a rearranged V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain of B6 origin (Tg-{gamma}) may distinguish between these two alternative possibilities, because the vast majority of the {gamma}{delta} cells in these mice express the transgenic chain (Ref. 31 and data not shown). Thus, if the former hypothesis is correct, the levels of V{delta}4+ i-IELs among Tg+ i-IELs would be expected to be similar in B6 and in B10B6F1 Tg-{gamma} mice, and it should compare well with the fraction of V{delta}4+ cells among V{gamma}1+ i-IELs found in normal B6 mice. In contrast, if the latter hypothesis is correct, the levels of V{delta}4+ i-IELs among Tg+ cells would differ in B6 and B10B6F1 Tg-{gamma} mice and should compare well with the fraction of V{delta}4+ cells among V{gamma}1+ i-IELs found in normal B6 and B10B6F1 mice, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3Go, the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 subset represents ~9% of the V{gamma}1+ i-IELs in B6 and B10B6F1 Tg-{gamma} mice as well as in wild-type B6 mice, whereas the same population represents >20% of the V{gamma}1+ i-IELs in non-Tg B10B6F1 mice. These results strongly suggest that the allelic form of the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain dictates the representation of the V{gamma}1V{delta}4 subset among {gamma}{delta} i-IELs in these strains.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Levels of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs in wild-type and V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 Tg-{gamma} animals. i-IELs from the indicated mouse strains were stained with FITC-labeled anti-V{gamma}1 and biotin-labeled anti-V{delta}4 mAb followed by streptavidin-PE and were analyzed in FACScan. Data are shown as the fraction of V{gamma}1+ cells expressing the V{delta}4 chain and represent the mean ± SEM of 4–32 animals analyzed individually. Data from B6, B10, and B10B6F1 mice are the same as in Fig. 2Go and are shown for comparison. Levels of V{delta}4+ cells among V{gamma}1+ i-IELs in B10B6F1 Tg mice are significantly different (p < 0.0001) from those found in wild-type B10B6F1 mice but are not significantly different (p > 0.05) from those obtained in wild-type or B6 Tg-{gamma} mice.

 
The previous statement would predict that the intermediate phenotype observed in F1 mice results from a different and independent behavior of the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chains encoded in the parental TCR{gamma} haplotypes. We have recently produced a mAb (7C10) that appears to recognize the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain present on the TCR{gamma}a haplotype (i.e., B10) but not the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain present in any other TCR{gamma} haplotype tested, including the B6 TCR{gamma}b haplotype (Ref. 31 and Fig. 4Go). To further characterize the specificity of this mAb, we isolated seven V{gamma}1-bearing hybridomas (four 7C10+ and three 7C10-) originated from (B6 x DBA/2)F1 thymocytes and sequenced their functional V{gamma}1C{gamma}4 chains. All four 7C10+ hybridomas expressed a functionally rearranged V{gamma}1C{gamma}4 chain of the parental DBA/2 allele, whereas the three 7C10- hybridomas expressed a V{gamma}1C{gamma}4 chain of the parental B6 allele (p < 0.02, according to a Spearman rank correlation coefficient test with the null hypothesis that the two variables, reactivity to the 7C10 mAb and expression of the V{gamma}1a allele, are independent of each other).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. The 7C10 mAb recognizes the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain present in the TCR{gamma}a haplotype. DN thymocytes from B10 (TCR{gamma}a; see Refs. 24 , 25 , and 33 for TCR{gamma} haplotypes), B6 (TCR{gamma}b), AKR (TCR{gamma}c), and 129/Sv (TCR{gamma}e) were stained with PE-labeled anti-C{delta}, FITC-labeled 7C10, and biotin-labeled anti-V{gamma}1 (2.11) followed by allophycocyanin-labeled streptavidin and were analyzed in a FACSCalibur. Dot plots represent 7C10 and V{gamma}1 staining among electronically gated {gamma}{delta}+ thymocytes. Numbers represent percent of cells in each quadrant. Other TCR{gamma}a strains tested and positive for 7C10 were C57BL/10J, B10.D2, C3H/He, CBA/J, CBA/N, DBA/1, and DBA/2. Also, NOD/Lt mice were positive for 7C10. Tested 7C10-negative strains were BALB/c, SJL, SWR, NZW, NZB (TCR{gamma}b), A/J, and 129/Ola (TCR{gamma}e) and FVB (unknown TCR{gamma} haplotype).

 
With this mAb we separated the V{gamma}1a- (V{gamma}1+7C10+) and the V{gamma}1b-expressing (V{gamma}1+7C10-) i-IELs from B10B6F1 animals, analyzed independently their TCR{delta} repertoires, and compared them with those found in V{gamma}1 i-IELs present in B10 and B6 mice. The results of these analyses are shown in Fig. 5Go. In B10B6F1 mice, different levels of V{delta}4+ cells among V{gamma}1+7C10+ and V{gamma}1+7C10- i-IELs were readily evident, whereas the levels of V{delta}5+ or V{delta}6+ cells among V{gamma}1+7C10+ and V{gamma}1+7C10- i-IELs were comparable. Interestingly, similar levels of V{delta}4+ cells were found among V{gamma}1+7C10+ i-IELs in B10B6F1 and B10 mice on one hand and among the V{gamma}1+7C10- cells in B10B6F1 and B6 mice on the other.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. V{delta} chain expression among V{gamma}1+7C10+ and V{gamma}1+7C10- i-IELs from B10B6F1 mice. i-IELs from B10B6F1 (n = 7) were stained with FITC-labeled 7C10, PE-labeled anti-V{delta}, and biotin-labeled anti-V{gamma}1 mAbs followed by allophycocyanin-labeled streptavidin and were analyzed in a FACSCalibur. Results represent the fraction of V{gamma}1+ cells bearing the indicated V{delta} chains among cells expressing the B10 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain (V{gamma}1+7C10+ cells, top panels) or the B6 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain (V{gamma}1+7C10- cells, bottom panels). Data from B10 (7C10+) and B6 (7C10-) V{gamma}1+ i-IELs are the same as in Fig. 2Go and are shown for comparison. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.

 
Altogether, these results demonstrate that polymorphism at the regions coding for the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain influence the representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subset and, consequently, strongly suggest that the TCR{gamma}-linked gene influencing this phenotypic trait is the structural gene encoding the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain.

Sequence polymorphism at the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chains of B6 and B10 mice

Nucleotide sequences of the B10 and B6 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chains obtained in our laboratory were identical with those previously published (34, 35). They differ by two nucleotides, which result in two amino acid substitutions: an Ala to Glu in the V-domain (position 12) and a Lys to Glu in the C-domain (position 157), with the B6 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain containing Glu at these positions. In a homology-based modeling of the B6 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain, these two polymorphic residues between the B6 and the B10 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 alleles are predicted to be solvent exposed but far away from any complementarity-determining region (CDR). Thus, Glu12 is predicted to lie near the peptide loop that separates the V and the C domains, whereas Glu157 is located within the contact area between the V and C domains (Fig. 6Go).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6. Schematic representation of the B6 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain. A model of the B6 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain based on homology with the human V{gamma}9/V{delta}2 TCR was obtained from SwissModel (http://www.expasy.ch/swissmod/SWISS-MODEL.html). The side chains of the two residues polymorphic between the B6 and the B10 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chains are shown as atom representations.

 
The V{delta}4 chain can pair equally well with V{gamma}1a and V{gamma}1b chains

The different representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subset in B6 and B10 mice and its dependence on the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 allele could be easily explained without the need for invoking a cellular selection mechanism if the V{delta}4 chain could not pair correctly with the B6 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain. Although the fact that ~2% of {gamma}{delta} i-IELs in B6 mice express the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 TCR seems incompatible with this hypothesis (see Fig. 2Go), it could be argued that this low fraction of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs may result from the expansion of even rarer V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ cells. Therefore, we sought to analyze the levels of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells in a situation in which mature {gamma}{delta} cell expansion is limited, which is usually the case in the organs where the cells develop. Because the origin of the {gamma}{delta} i-IEL is still a controversial matter, we decided to analyze this issue in the thymus. As shown in Fig. 7Go, B6, B10, or B10B6F1 {gamma}{delta} thymocytes contain similar levels (~8%) of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells, strongly suggesting that the V{delta}4 chain can pair well with both alleles of the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 7. Representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 subset in the thymus of B10, B6, and B10B6F1 mice. DN thymocytes from B10 (n = 7), B6 (n = 8), and B10B6F1 (n = 10) mice were stained with FITC-labeled anti-V{gamma}1, PE-labeled anti-V{delta}4, and biotin-labeled anti-C{delta} Abs followed by allophycocyanin-labeled streptavidin and were analyzed in a FACScan. Results are shown as the fraction of V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ cells among electronically gated {delta}-positive cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM.

 
B6 V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs are the target of the selective event

Lack of pairing constraints for the B6 V{gamma}1 and V{delta}4 chains makes it likely that cellular selection events are responsible for the differences in the representation of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs in B6 and B10 mice and for the strong overrepresentation of the B10 allele of the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain among V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs in B10B6F1 animals (>90% of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs in B10B6F1 animals expressed the V{gamma}1a allele, whereas the same allele was expressed in ~65% of the V{gamma}1+V{delta}4- i-IELs; data not shown). However, the experiments presented here are compatible with an increased expansion and/or survival of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs in B10 mice as well as with a specific deletion or decreased survival of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs in B6 mice. Although intermediate levels of {alpha}{beta} or {gamma}{delta} cell populations expressing defined TCR V-gene segments in F1 mice have been currently used as suggestive of positive selection of the cells studied (19, 36, 37), the fact that the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells expressing distinct V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 alleles are submitted to different selective pressures precludes such a conclusion.

The target cell at which selection operates and, consequently, the nature of the selection may be inferred from the analyses of the junctional diversity of the V{gamma}1 and V{delta}4 chains expressed by the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subsets present in B6 and B10 mice. These analyses can be performed at the population level by studying the distributions of the length of the CDR3 in TCR{gamma} and TCR{delta} junctions (38). In polyclonal populations, CDR3 lengths distribute in a Gaussian-like curve with a well-defined number of peaks that is characteristic of each TCR chain, whereas such Gaussian distribution is lost in less diverse populations.

As shown in Fig. 8Go (left panels), the profiles of the distribution of CDR3 lengths observed on V{delta}4-(D{delta})-J{delta}1 junctions expressed by sorted V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ i-IELs isolated from B6 and B10 mice are quite similar. Both contain ~12 defined peaks differing in length by three nucleotides, thus corresponding to in-frame rearrangements. These profiles are typical of polyclonal TCR{delta} junctions. In contrast, CDR3 length distributions of V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 junctions expressed by the same sorted populations in both mouse strains were clearly different (Fig. 8Go, right panels). In B10 mice, the typical profile of polyclonal V{gamma}-J{gamma} junctions was evident, with three to five defined peaks forming a Gaussian-type curve and centered on a CDR3 of 9 aa in length (39). In contrast, the profile obtained from sorted V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ i-IELs from B6 mice was not Gaussian and showed a prominent peak at a CDR3 length of 10 aa. This profile was unique to the V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ i-IEL subset, as indicated by the Gaussian-type profile centered on a CDR3 of 9 aa obtained from sorted V{gamma}1+ i-IELs from B6 mice (which contains >97% V{gamma}1+V{delta}4- cells).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 8. CDR3 length distribution analyses of V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 and V{delta}4-(D)-J{delta}1 rearrangements expressed by different i-IEL subsets from B6 and B10 mice. Total RNA from sorted V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ and V{gamma}1+V{delta}4- i-IELs from pools of eight B6 and B10 mice or from total V{gamma}1+ i-IELs of B6 mice were amplified by RT-PCR with either V{delta}4- and C{delta}-specific primers or with V{gamma}1- and C{gamma}4-specific primers. An aliquot of each amplification product was submitted to a run-off reaction with either a FAM-labeled J{delta}1 primer or a FAM-labeled J{gamma}4 primer, and the final products were resolved in an automated sequencer. Plot shows the profiles of fluorescence intensity vs the length of the fragments of V{delta}4-J{delta}1 (left panels) or V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 (right panels) from one representative experiment. At least seven independent amplifications were performed with different amounts of cDNAs and/or different primers with similar results. The prominence of the peak at a CDR3 length of 10 aa in the V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 junctions present in V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ i-IELs from B6 mice was also observed in similar analyses performed on V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ i-IELs sorted from two individual B6 mice. CDR3 length was defined as in Ref. 39 and represents the number of amino acid residues between the second Cys present in all V segments and the Gly-Lys-Gly (or Ala-Lys-Gly) motif present in all J segments minus four.

 
From these experiments we conclude that B6 V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs, rather than the B10 V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells, are the target of the cellular selection event described here. Because B6 mice contain very low levels of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs, these experiments suggest that the selective event results in the reduction of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 subset among B6 i-IELs. Such a selective event appears to spare a fraction of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells that are enriched in V{gamma}-J{gamma} junctions with relatively long CDR3.

To investigate whether, besides their CDR3 length, other structural features were apparent in the V{gamma}-J{gamma} junctions present in the B6 V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs, their expressed V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 rearrangements were cloned and sequenced. Consistent with the population analyses shown above, 11 of 26 clones (42.3%) contained a CDR3 of 10 aa in length. Their junctional nucleotide sequences are shown in Fig. 9GoA, whereas their predicted amino acid sequences are shown in Fig. 9GoB. Most nucleotide and amino acid sequences were unique. The frequent presence of Ile at position 4 of the CDR3 is likely due to the usual presence of the last codon of the V{gamma}1 (ATA) in these junctions. Similarly, that of Ser at position 6 results from the presence of the first codon of the J{gamma}4 (TCA) in the junctions. Finally, the overrepresentation of Gly and Arg at position 5 is mainly due to the presence in the junctions of the P nucleotides of the J{gamma}4 segment (GA). Comparable frequencies of the same amino acids at these positions were also found in V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 junctions of the same CDR3 length isolated from B10 V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs or from B6 V{gamma}1 i-IELs (data not shown).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 9. Junctional sequences of V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chains expressed by the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subset of B6 mice. Total RNA from sorted V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ i-IELs from a pool of eight B6 mice was amplified as described in the legend of Fig. 8Go, and the PCR products were cloned and sequenced as described in Materials and Methods. A, Nucleotide sequences of V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 junctions with a CDR3 length of 10 aa (see Fig. 8Go) expressed by V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ i-IELs of B6 origin. B, Predicted amino acid sequences corresponding to the nucleotide sequences shown in A. Dashes denote identity.

 
Tissue-specific selection of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells

To investigate whether similar selective events also operate in other peripheral sites, we evaluated and compared the representation of the V{gamma}1+ and the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 populations among LN {gamma}{delta} cells in B6, B10, and B10B6F1 mice (Fig. 10GoA). The representation of both cell populations among LN {gamma}{delta} cells was significantly lower in B6 than in B10 mice, although the differences were less pronounced than those previously observed among {gamma}{delta} i-IELs. Thus, V{gamma}1+ cells represented 62% and 42% of the LN {gamma}{delta} cells in B10 and B6 mice, respectively (Fig. 10GoA, left panel), whereas less than a twofold difference was observed in the representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 subset in these mouse strains (Fig. 10GoA, middle panel). B10B6F1 animals displayed intermediate levels of these two populations, and analyses of B10B6F2 mice showed that the different representation of these {gamma}{delta} populations is influenced by TCR{gamma}-linked genes (data not shown). The representation of V{delta}4+ cells among V{gamma}1+ LN cells in both strains of mice was also significantly different, although these difference appeared too small to be of major biological significance (V{delta}4+ cells represented 32% and 26% of the V{gamma}1+ cells in B10 and B6 mice, respectively; Fig. 10GoA, right panel). Taken together, these data indicate that most of the differences observed in the representation of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 LN subset between these two strains of mice can be attributed to the V{delta}-independent selective event. Consistent with this interpretation, the CDR3 length distribution of the V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 junctions present in V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 LN cells in B6 mice contains a predominant peak at a CDR3 of 9 aa (Fig. 10GoB), although a slight increase in the frequency of junctions with a CDR3 of 10 aa was noticed in some mice (data not shown). Altogether, these results suggest that the V{delta}-dependent selection mechanism operating on V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells is more prevalent in, if not confined to, the intestinal epithelium.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 10. Selective events operating on LN {gamma}{delta} cells. A, LN cells from the indicated strains were expanded in vitro as detailed in Materials and Methods and stained as indicated in Fig. 2Go. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM of five to ten animals analyzed individually for each strain. Statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA followed by Student’s t tests (***, p < 0.0001; **, 0.0001 < p < 0.001; *, 0.001 < p < 0.01). B, Total RNA from sorted V{gamma}1+V{delta}4+ and V{gamma}1+V{delta}4- LN cells from a pool of four B6 mice were amplified with V{gamma}1- and C{gamma}4-specific primers. An aliquot of each amplification product was submitted to a run-off reaction with a FAM-labeled J{gamma}4 primer, and the final products were resolved in an automated sequencer. Plot shows the profiles of fluorescence intensity vs the length of the fragments.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Previous experiments analyzing V-gene use by {gamma}{delta} i-IELs or splenocytes with a limited number of V{gamma}- and V{delta}-specific mAbs have shown that genes closely linked to the TCR{gamma}, TCR{delta}, and MHC loci influence the representation of {gamma}{delta} cell subsets (17, 18, 19). These experiments provided indirect evidence suggesting that peripheral {gamma}{delta} cells may be submitted to cellular selection mechanisms. However, neither the selective mechanisms nor the target cell of the selective events could be unambiguously defined in those experiments. By analyzing V-gene use in {gamma}{delta} i-IELs from B6 and B10 mouse strains and in their F1 and F2 progenies with a large panel of V{gamma}- and V{delta}-specific mAbs, we have shown that the linkage to the TCR{gamma} locus of the representation of {gamma}{delta} i-IEL subsets results from two mechanistically different events possibly acting on two distinct target cells. The first event influences the representation of cells expressing different V{gamma} chains independently of the {delta} chain and is evident not only in the different representation of cells expressing the V{gamma}1 or the V{gamma}7 chains among i-IELs (Fig. 2Go), but also in the representation of cells expressing the V{gamma}1 or the V{gamma}4 chains among {gamma}{delta} thymocytes (data not shown) and LN cells (Fig. 10Go). Such an event may be responsible, at least in part, for the observed influence of the TCR{gamma} locus in the representation of V{gamma}4-V{delta}4+ splenocytes (likely representing V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells) in crosses between B6 and DBA/2 parental strains (19). A mechanistically simple hypothesis to explain these results postulates that rearrangements involving the J{gamma}1 or the J{gamma}4 gene segments occur at different frequencies in {gamma}{delta} precursors from different mouse strains. This possibility is currently under investigation. Alternatively, a V{gamma}-dependent, V{delta}-independent selective mechanism can also be invoked.

The second event is likely a cellular selection event acting specifically on V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs, and it has two major consequences. First, animals carrying the TCR{gamma}b haplotype contain a reduced proportion of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs. Second, the remaining V{gamma}1/V{delta}4-bearing i-IELs in TCR{gamma}b mice contain V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chains that are selectively enriched for CDR3 lengths longer by 1 aa than the prevalent size of V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chains observed in other V{gamma}1-bearing cells in the same mice. Our experiment excluded structural pairing constraints as a possible mechanism to explain the low abundance of V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 in the intestinal epithelium of B6 mice, because V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 cells expressing a very diverse repertoire of TCRs are present in similar numbers in the thymus and in the periphery of B6 and B10 mice. There are at least three possible explanations for these observations. First, V{gamma}1b/V{delta}4 i-IELs may be actively deleted. Alternatively, V{gamma}1a/V{delta}4 i-IELs may be truly positively selected by an endogenous ligand, whereas V{gamma}1b/V{delta}4 i-IELs fail to react with the same ligand and are passively deleted. Finally, V{gamma}1a/V{delta}4 i-IELs but not V{gamma}1b/V{delta}4 i-IELs may be expanded in situ via specific Ag stimulation. Analysis of germ-free mice and mice deficient in molecules involved in death and survival of lymphocytes (currently underway) may help to clarify this issue. Whatever the mechanism, our results indicate a differential reactivity of V{gamma}1a/V{delta}4 and V{gamma}1b/V{delta}4 i-IELs that has a physiological consequence.

The different reactivities of the V{gamma}1a/V{delta}4 and the V{gamma}1b/V{delta}4 i-IELs, as well as the overrepresentation of V{gamma}1 chains containing CDR3s of 10 aa in length in the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IEL subset in B6 mice must relate to polymorphisms at the coding region of the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain. Based on the sequence identity and on the expected structural homology of the V and C domains of the mouse V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain with the V{gamma}9C{gamma} chain of the recently crystallized human receptor TCR V{gamma}9V{delta}2 (40), a model of the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain was simulated (Fig. 6Go). In this model, the two polymorphic residues between the B6 and the B10 V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 alleles are disposed far away from any CDR. Given that the human V{gamma}9C{gamma} chain and the mouse V{gamma}1C{gamma}4 share 47% identity at the amino acid level, it is very likely that the model predicts accurately the position of these residues in the mouse V{gamma}1C{gamma}4 chain. How polymorphism at any of these two residues affects CDR3 length in B6 V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs is not readily evident from these analyses. Given their predicted localization, the possibility that they exert a direct effect in the structure of the CDR3 appears unlikely. However, because their side chains are predicted to be exposed to the solvent, they could participate in the overall recognition through a putative interaction with a distinct site of the ligand.

The fact that the V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4 junctions present in the V{gamma}1/V{delta}4 i-IELs of B6 mice are enriched in relatively long but highly diverse in-sequence CDR3 suggests that selection operates more on the overall CDR3 structure than on their primary amino acid sequence. This suggests that germline-encoded elements present in the Ag-binding site of the V{gamma}1V{delta}4 TCR are determinant in ligand recognition and specificity, as has been proposed for the recognition of prenyl pyrophosphates by human V{gamma}9V{delta}2 cells (40, 41). This may be a general feature of ligand recognition by {gamma}{delta} T cells, which often correlates with V and/or J segment usage but allows a high degree of diversity at the V to J junction (42, 43, 44, 45). The experiments presented here should provide a good experimental model to analyze {gamma}{delta} T cell reactivity in vivo. Unraveling the specificity of {gamma}{delta} cells, their mechanisms of Ag recognition, and the consequences of such recognition may be the keys to the understanding of their unique functions.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank P. Alzari and G. Bentley for their help in the construction of the structural model of the V{gamma}1J{gamma}4C{gamma}4 chain.


   Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by institutional grants and by grants from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer. K.G. was supported by a fellowship from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Pablo Pereira, Unité du Développement des Lymphocytes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité de Recherche Associée 1961, Institut Pasteur, 25 Rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France. E-mail address: ppereira{at}pasteur.fr Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Tg, transgenic; i-IEL, intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte; LN, lymph node; DN, double negative; CDR, complementarity-determining region. Back

Received for publication April 22, 2002. Accepted for publication August 1, 2002.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bevan, M. J.. 1977. In a radiation chimaera, host H-2 antigens determine immune responsiveness of donor cytotoxic cells. Nature 269:417.[Medline]
  2. Zinkernagel, R. M., G. N. Callahan, A. Althage, S. Cooper, P. A. Klein, J. Klein. 1978. On the thymus in the differentiation of "H-2 self-recognition" by T cells: evidence for dual recognition?. J. Exp. Med. 147:882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sha, W. C., C. A. Nelson, R. D. Newberry, D. M. Kranz, J. H. Russell, D. Y. Loh. 1988. Positive and negative selection of an antigen receptor on T cells in transgenic mice. Nature 336:73.[Medline]
  4. Kisielow, P., H. Bluthmann, U. D. Staerz, M. Steinmetz, H. von Boehmer. 1988. Tolerance in T-cell-receptor transgenic mice involves deletion of nonmature CD4+8+ thymocytes. Nature 333:742.[Medline]
  5. Tanchot, C., F. A. Lemonnier, B. Perarnau, A. A. Freitas, B. Rocha. 1997. Differential requirements for survival and proliferation of CD8 naive or memory T cells. Science 276:2057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kirberg, J., A. Berns, H. von Boehmer. 1997. Peripheral T cell survival requires continual ligation of the T cell receptor to major histocompatibility complex-encoded molecules. J. Exp. Med. 186:1269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Brocker, T.. 1997. Survival of mature CD4 T lymphocytes is dependent on major histocompatibility complex class II-expressing dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 186:1223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Webb, S., C. Morris, J. Sprent. 1990. Extrathymic tolerance of mature T cells: clonal elimination as a consequence of immunity. Cell 63:1249.[Medline]
  9. Van Parijs, L., A. K. Abbas. 1998. Homeostasis and self-tolerance in the immune system: turning lymphocytes off. Science 280:243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bonneville, M., I. Ishida, S. Itohara, S. Verbeek, A. Berns, O. Kanagawa, W. Haas, S. Tonegawa. 1990. Self-tolerance to transgenic {gamma}{delta} T cells by intrathymic inactivation. Nature 344:163.[Medline]
  11. Dent, A. L., L. A. Matis, F. Hooshmand, S. M. Widacki, J. A. Bluestone, S. M. Hedrick. 1990. Self-reactive {gamma}{delta} T cells are eliminated in the thymus. Nature 343:714.[Medline]
  12. Pereira, P., M. Zijlstra, J. McMaster, J. M. Loring, R. Jaenisch, S. Tonegawa. 1992. Blockade of transgenic {gamma}{delta} T cell development in {beta}2-microglobulin deficient mice. EMBO J. 11:25.[Medline]
  13. Wells, F. B., S. J. Gahm, S. M. Hedrick, J. A. Bluestone, A. Dent, L. A. Matis. 1991. Requirement for positive selection of {gamma}{delta} receptor-bearing T cells. Science 253:903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Correa, I., M. Bix, N. S. Liao, M. Zijlstra, R. Jaenisch, D. Raulet. 1992. Most {gamma}{delta} T cells develop normally in {beta}2-microglobulin-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bigby, M., J. S. Markowitz, P. A. Bleicher, M. J. Grusby, S. Simha, M. Siebrecht, M. Wagner, C. Nagler-Anderson, L. H. Glimcher. 1993. Most {gamma}{delta} T cells develop normally in the absence of MHC class II molecules. J. Immunol. 151:4465.[Abstract]
  16. Crowley, M. P., A. M. Fahrer, N. Baumgarth, J. Hampl, I. Gutgemann, L. Teyton, Y. Chien. 2000. A population of murine {gamma}{delta} T cells that recognize an inducible MHC class Ib molecule. Science 287:314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Pereira, P., J. J. Lafaille, D. Gerber, S. Tonegawa. 1997. The T cell receptor repertoire of intestinal intraepithelial {gamma}{delta} T lymphocytes is influenced by genes linked to the major histocompatibility complex and to the T cell receptor loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:5761.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lefrançois, L., R. LeCorre, J. Mayo, J. A. Bluestone, T. Goodman. 1990. Extrathymic selection of TCR {gamma}{delta}+ T cells by class II major histocompatibility complex molecules. Cell 63:333.[Medline]
  19. Sperling, A. I., R. Q. Cron, D. C. Decker, D. A. Stern, J. A. Bluestone. 1992. Peripheral T cell receptor {gamma}{delta} variable gene repertoire maps to the T cell receptor loci and is influenced by positive selection. J. Immunol. 149:3200.[Abstract]
  20. Lefrançois, L.. 1991. Extrathymic differentiation of intraepithelial lymphocytes: generation of a separate and unequal T-cell repertoire?. Immunol. Today 12:436.[Medline]
  21. Schleussner, C., R. Ceredig. 1993. Analysis of intraepithelial lymphocytes from major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-deficient mice: no evidence for a role of MHC class II antigens in the positive selection of V{delta}4+ {gamma}{delta} T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:1615.[Medline]
  22. Pereira, P., V. Hermitte, M. P. Lembezat, L. Boucontet, V. Azuara, K. Grigoriadou. 2000. Developmentally regulated and lineage-specific rearrangement of T cell receptor V{alpha}/{delta} gene segments. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:1988.[Medline]
  23. Slingsby, J. H., M. B. Hogarth, E. Simpson, M. J. Walport, B. J. Morley. 1995. New microsatellite polymorphisms identified between C57BL/6, C57BL/10 and C57BL/KsJ inbred mouse strains. Immunogenetics 43:72.
  24. Klotz, J. L., R. K. Barth, G. L. Kiser, L. E. Hood, M. Kronenberg. 1989. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms of the mouse T-cell receptor gene families. Immunogenetics 29:191.[Medline]
  25. Nobuhara, H., K. Kuida, M. Furutani, T. Shiroishi, K. Moriwaki, Y. Yanagi, T. Tada. 1989. Polymorphism of T-cell receptor genes among laboratory and wild mice: diverse origins of laboratory mice. Immunogenetics 30:405.[Medline]
  26. Malissen, M., P. Pereira, D. J. Gerber, B. Malissen, J. P. DiSanto. 1997. The common cytokine receptor {gamma} chain controls survival of {gamma}/{delta} T cells. J. Exp. Med. 186:1277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Gerber, D. J., V. Azuara, J. P. Levraud, S. Y. Huang, M. P. Lembezat, P. Pereira. 1999. IL-4-producing {gamma}{delta} T cells that express a very restricted TCR repertoire are preferentially localized in liver and spleen. J. Immunol. 163:3076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Azuara, V., J. P. Levraud, M. P. Lembezat, P. Pereira. 1997. A novel subset of adult {gamma}{delta} thymocytes that secretes a distinct pattern of cytokines and expresses a very restricted T cell receptor repertoire. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:544.[Medline]
  29. Ishikawa, H., Y. Li, A. Abeliovich, S. Yamamoto, S. H. Kaufmann, S. Tonegawa. 1993. Cytotoxic and interferon {gamma}-producing activities of {gamma}{delta} T cells in the mouse intestinal epithelium are strain dependent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:8204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Chien, Y. H., M. Iwashima, K. B. Kaplan, J. F. Elliott, M. M. Davis. 1987. A new T-cell receptor gene located within the {alpha} locus and expressed early in T-cell differentiation. Nature 327:677.[Medline]
  31. Azuara, V., P. Pereira. 2000. Genetic mapping of two murine loci that influence the development of IL-4-producing Thy-1dull {gamma}{delta} thymocytes. J. Immunol. 165:42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Azuara, V., M. P. Lembezat, P. Pereira. 1998. The homogeneity of the TCR{delta} repertoire expressed by the Thy-1dull {gamma}{delta} T cell population is due to cellular selection. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:3456.[Medline]
  33. Owen, F. L., B. A. Taylor, A. Zweidler, J. G. Seidman. 1986. The murine {gamma}-chain of the T cell receptor is closely linked to a spermatocyte specific histone gene and the beige coat color locus on chromosome 13. J. Immunol. 137:1044.[Abstract]
  34. Iwamoto, A., F. Rupp, P. S. Ohashi, C. L. Walker, H. Pircher, R. Joho, H. Hengartner, T. W. Mak. 1986. T-cell-specific {gamma} genes in C57BL/10 mice: sequence and expression of new constant and variable region genes. J. Exp. Med. 163:1203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kalataradi, H., C. L. Eyster, A. Fry, M. K. Vollmer, Y.-X. Fu, W. B. Born, R. L. O’Brien. 1994. Allelic differences in TCR {gamma}-chains alter {gamma}{delta} T cell antigen reactivity. J. Immunol. 153:1455.[Abstract]
  36. Blackman, M., J. Kappler, P. Marrack. 1989. Influence of the major histocompatibility complex on positive thymic selection of V{beta}17a T cells. Science 244:214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Blackman, M., J. Kappler, P. Marrack. 1990. The role of the T cell receptor in positive and negative selection of developing T cells. Science 248:1335.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Pannetier, C., S. Delassus, S. Darche, C. Saucier, P. Kourilsky. 1993. Quantitative titration of nucleic acids by enzymatic amplification reactions run to saturation. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Rock, E. P., P. R. Sibbald, M. M. Davis, Y. H. Chien. 1994. CDR3 length in antigen-specific immune receptors. J. Exp. Med. 179:323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Allison, T. J., C. C. Winter, J. J. Fournie, M. Bonneville, D. N. Garboczi. 2001. Structure of a human {gamma}{delta} T-cell antigen receptor. Nature 411:820.[Medline]
  41. Morita, C. T., H. K. Lee, H. Wang, H. Li, R. A. Mariuzza, Y. Tanaka. 2001. Structural features of nonpeptide prenyl pyrophosphates that determine their antigenicity for human {gamma}{delta} T cells. J. Immunol. 167:36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Fournie, J. J., M. Bonneville. 1996. Stimulation of {gamma}{delta} T cells by phosphoantigens. Res. Immunol. 147:338.[Medline]
  43. Bukowski, J. F., C. T. Morita, H. Band, M. B. Brenner. 1998. Crucial role of TCR{gamma} chain junctional region in prenyl pyrophosphate antigen recognition by {gamma}{delta} T cells. J. Immunol. 161:286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Born, W., L. Hall, A. Dallas, J. Boymel, T. Shinnick, D. Young, P. Brennan, R. O’Brien. 1990. Recognition of a peptide antigen by heat shock-reactive {gamma}{delta} T lymphocytes. Science 249:67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Groh, V., A. Steinle, S. Bauer, T. Spies. 1998. Recognition of stress-induced MHC molecules by intestinal epithelial {gamma}{delta} T cells. Science 279:1737.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
K. Nakazato, H. Yamada, T. Yajima, Y. Kagimoto, H. Kuwano, and Y. Yoshikai
Enforced Expression of Bcl-2 Partially Restores Cell Numbers but Not Functions of TCR{gamma}{delta} Intestinal Intraepithelial T Lymphocytes in IL-15-Deficient Mice
J. Immunol., January 15, 2007; 178(2): 757 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
E. Fronkova, O. Krejci, T. Kalina, O. Horvath, J. Trka, and O. Hrusak
Lymphoid Differentiation Pathways Can Be Traced by TCR {delta} Rearrangements
J. Immunol., August 15, 2005; 175(4): 2495 - 2500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grigoriadou, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grigoriadou, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, P.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS