|
|
||||||||

,

* Immunobiology Laboratory, Cancer Research U.K., London Research Institute, London, United Kingdom;
Immunobiology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita City, Osaka, Japan; and
RIKEN Research Center for Allergy and Immunology, Yokohama City, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
+ and CD8
-CD4- DC to
make IL-12 p70. In contrast, exposure of CD8
+,
CD4+ and CD8
-CD4- DC to
heat-killed yeasts leads to production of IL-10. In both cases,
secretion of high levels of cytokine requires a second signal from T
cells, which can be replaced by CD40 ligand. Consistent with their
differential effects on cytokine production, extracts from M.
tuberculosis promote IL-12 production primarily via Toll-like
receptor 2 and an MyD88-dependent pathway, whereas heat-killed yeasts
activate DC via a Toll-like receptor 2-, MyD88-, and Toll/IL-1R domain
containing protein-independent pathway. These results show that
T cell feedback amplifies innate signals for cytokine production by DC
and suggest that pattern recognition rather than ontogeny determines
the production of cytokines by individual DC
subsets. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dendritic cells (DC) are the major APC in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. DC can produce Th-polarizing cytokines, but it is still unclear how cytokine production by DC is regulated and matched to pathogen recognition (1, 5, 6). Given the existence of multiple DC subsets, it has been argued that some may be specialized to produce IL-12 and drive Th1 responses whereas others induce Th2 immunity. In this model, such DC1 and DC2 subsets possess mutually exclusive sets of PRR and respond to distinct groups of pathogens (7). This has been shown for human monocyte-derived vs plasmacytoid DC (8, 9, 10), although at present no publications have addressed whether mouse DC subsets also differ in PRR expression. An alternative model is that individual DC subsets are not necessarily preexisting DC1 or DC2 but respond in a flexible manner to distinct pathogens and make distinct cytokines depending on which PRR are triggered (1, 6, 11).
We have previously concentrated on the mechanisms leading to IL-12 production by DC (12, 13). Here, we focus on the roles of microbial stimulation and T cell feedback on production of two opposing cytokines, IL-12 and IL-10, by distinct DC subsets. We demonstrate that production of high levels of either IL-12 or IL-10 by murine splenic DC requires two signals, one from a microbe and the other from T cells. Microbial stimuli can act directly on DC via TLR and non-TLR PRRs, whereas T cell signals can be replaced by CD40 ligand (CD40L), but the microbial stimulus and not the T cell signal dictates which cytokine is produced. Importantly, we demonstrate that differential IL-10 and IL-12 production by DC is not attributable to the activity of specialized IL-12- or IL-10-producing DC subsets. Our results support the notion that DC subsets possess significant plasticity in their cytokine response and show that T cell feedback signals amplify a program established by pattern recognition.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Male and female 6- to 10-wk-old mice were obtained from Charles River (Margate, U.K.), Harlan U.K. (Bicester, Oxon, U.K.) or from the breeding unit of Cancer Research U.K. (Clare Hall, South Mimms, U.K.). C57BL/6 (B6), B10.BR, BALB/c, C3H/HeN, and C3H/HeJ mice were used interchangeably, after determining that the responses studied were strain independent (not shown). The strain used for each experiment is indicated in each figure legend. DO11.10 mice (14) on a BALB/c-scid background were bred at Cancer Research U.K.
To analyze DC genetically deficient for MyD88 or TLR2, bone marrow chimeras were made by reconstituting lethally irradiated CD45.1 B6.SJL mice with congenic bone marrow from CD45.2 TLR2-/- or MyD88-/- mice on a C57BL/6 x 129 background (15, 16). Control chimeras were made with bone marrow taken from control C57BL/6 mice. DC were purified from the spleens of recipients 58 wk after reconstitution (17).
Reagents
Soluble tachyzoite Ag (STAg) was prepared from tachyzoites of the RH 88 strain of Toxoplasma gondii (12). Zymosan (Sigma, Poole, U.K.) was boiled for 30 min and washed twice in PBS. Laboratory cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain K700) and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 513) were autoclaved and washed twice in PBS. Escherichia coli LPS was a gift from Dr. S. Vogel (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD). CpG-containing DNA was a phosphorothioate-linked oligonucleotide with the sequence TCC ATG ACG TTC CTG ATG CT (18). Purified protein derivative (PPD) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was obtained from Statens Serum Institut (Copenhagen, Denmark). All microbial stimuli were used at saturation unless otherwise indicated. The OVA peptide 323339 (OVA peptide; ISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR), Toll/IL-1R domain containing protein TIRAP peptide, and control peptide (19) were made by the Cancer Research U.K. peptide synthesis service. Endotoxin levels in all reagents were significantly lower than the minimum required for DC activation.
Cells
The cell lines 3T3-CD40L and 3T3-SAMEN (control) were a gift from Dr. P. Hwu (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) and were derived from NIH 3T3 by stable transduction with murine CD40L or empty vector.
Spleen cell suspensions were prepared by Liberase CI (Roche
Diagnostics, Lewes, U.K.) and Dnase I digestion (13).
DC-enriched fractions were prepared by labeling splenocytes with
anti-CD11c MACS beads (Miltenyi, Bisley, U.K.) for 10 min at 4°C,
followed by washing and positive selection using LS magnetic columns
(Miltenyi Biotec), as described (13). Resulting
preparations contained 7095% CD11cbright DC.
To obtain DC subsets, CD11c-enriched preparations were further stained
with PE-anti-CD11c, FITC-anti-CD4, and TriColor-anti-CD8
(Caltag, Burlingame, CA) and sorted on a MoFlo cytometer (Cytomation,
Fort Collins, CO). To obtain pure CD45.2+ DC from
bone marrow chimeras, CD11c-enriched splenocytes were stained with
PE-anti-CD11c and FITC-anti-CD45.1 and sorted for
CD11cbrightCD45.1- cells,
as described (17).
T cells were purified from the lymph nodes of DO-11.10/scid mice by negative selection of contaminating cells.
DC cultures and cytokine assays
For in vitro stimulation, MACS-enriched or FACS-sorted DC were cultured in 96-well flat-bottom plates alone or on a monolayer of CD40L-expressing or control fibroblasts. Cultures were incubated in the presence or absence of different stimuli in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), glutamine (2 mM), and 2-ME (5 x 10-7 M). Culture supernatants were collected at 1824 h and assayed for the presence of cytokines by sandwich ELISA. Ab pairs were (capture, detection): 9A5, C17.8 (biotinylated) for IL-12 p70; JES5-2A5, SXC-1 (biotinylated) for IL-10. Cells were recovered in PBS plus 5 mM EDTA for FACS analysis.
Antibody staining
For analysis of DC maturation, cells were washed and stained in
PBS containing 5 mM EDTA, 1% FCS, and 0.02% sodium azide (FACS wash).
Cells were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-CD40 or anti-CD86
plus PE-conjugated anti-CD11c in the presence of 5 µg/ml
anti-Fc
RII/III. In some experiments, biotinylated anti-CD40
was used, followed by streptavidin conjugated to an appropriate
fluorophore. The mAbs used were: HL3 and 16-10A1, hamster IgG mAbs
against CD11c and CD80, respectively; NLDC-145, RM4-5, 53-6.7, 3/23,
and GL1, rat IgG2a mAbs against DEC-205, CD4, CD8
, CD40, and CD86,
respectively; JES5-2A5, rat IgG1 neutralizing mAb against IL-10; A20,
mouse IgG2a mAb against CD45.1. All mAbs were from BD PharMingen (San
Diego, CA) or produced in house.
Single cell staining for IL-10 was performed using the mouse IL-10
secretion assay kit (Miltenyi Biotec). CD11c-enriched spleen cells were
divided into two fractions. One half was stained with
FITC-anti-CD11c and kept live; the remainder was stained with
TriColor-anti-CD11c and then fixed by treating with 1%
paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at room temperature, followed by
quenching with 1 mM glycine in PBS. A 1:1 mixture of live and fixed
cells in medium was then cultured with control fibroblasts or with
zymosan (50 µg/ml) plus CD40L-expressing fibroblasts for 4 h in
24-well plates. Cells were harvested and coated with anti-IL-10
capture reagent, then recultured at 2.5 x
105 DC/well in six-well plates with fresh
fibroblasts ± zymosan stimulation as above. After 60100 min,
cells were harvested once more, washed in PBS containing 2 mM EDTA plus
1% FCS, and stained with PE-conjugated anti-IL-10 (Miltenyi
Biotec) and APC-anti-CD8
.
Intracellular staining for IL-12 was performed as described (13) using anti-IL-12 p40 (clone C17.15.10), anti-IL-12 p70 (clone 9A5) or a mixture of isotype-matched RtIgG2a and RtIgG2b irrelevant control Abs, followed by biotinylated mouse anti-rat (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) and PE- or APC-streptavidin (BD PharMingen).
Cell acquisition was performed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several microbial stimuli were tested for their ability to act as
activators of primary mouse DC in vitro. DC-enriched spleen cells were
plated with or without test stimuli, and expression of the activation
markers CD40, CD80, and CD86 was measured on
CD11cbright cells after overnight culture.
Culture alone was sufficient to induce up-regulation of CD40, CD80, and
CD86 (not shown). Nevertheless, a wide range of products from bacteria,
fungi, or protozoa were able to increase CD40, CD80, and CD86
expression further (Fig. 1
). They
included mycobacterial PPD, heat-inactivated yeasts
(Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. pombe) and zymosan
(yeast cell walls), as well as established murine DC activators such as
STAg (12) and CpG-containing DNA oligonucleotides (CpG
DNA) (Fig. 1
). All test agents induced CD40, CD80, and CD86
up-regulation to a similar extent in DC from control C3H/HeN- and
TLR4-deficient C3H/HeJ mice, demonstrating that they did not contain
endotoxin (data not shown).
|
STAg and CpG DNA by themselves elicited modest levels of IL-12 p70
(<1 ng/ml) but no IL-10 from DC-enriched splenocyte populations (Fig. 2
A). However, little
accumulation of IL-12 p70 or IL-10 in culture supernatants was seen in
response to any of the other stimuli (Fig. 2
A,
top). Because IL-12 p70 production by DC is markedly
dependent on a second T cell-derived signal (13), we
assessed the effect of CD40 coligation on the cytokine response.
Culturing DC-enriched splenocytes on a monolayer of CD40L-expressing
fibroblasts was sufficient to induce low levels of IL-12 p70 and IL-10
(Fig. 2
A). Addition of STAg and CpG DNA caused a significant
increase in IL-12 p70 but not in IL-10 levels (Fig. 2
A,
bottom). Similar results were obtained with PPD, although IL-12
p70 production in response to PPD was consistently lower than to STAg
or CpG DNA (Fig. 2
A, bottom). In contrast, the combination
of zymosan or S. pombe together with CD40L led to an
increase primarily in IL-10 (Fig. 2
A, bottom). Similar
induction of IL-10 was seen with a pathogenic yeast, Candida
albicans, in combination with CD40L (data not shown). Neutralizing
Ab to IL-10 did not increase the levels of IL-12 p70 in response to
CD40L plus yeasts or zymosan (see below). When IL-12-promoting stimuli
(e.g., CpG DNA) and IL-10-promoting zymosan were combined in the
presence of CD40L, there was a significant decrease in IL-12 production
(Fig. 2
B), consistent with the known ability of IL-10 to
suppress IL-12 synthesis, and a slight decrease in IL-10 production
(Fig. 2
B). These results demonstrate that CD40 triggering in
DC does not inevitably lead to IL-12 synthesis but can reveal
production of IL-10.
|
Direct recognition of microbes by DC via TLR-dependent and -independent pathways
The use of partially purified DC preparations in the experiments
described above raised the possibility that the measured cytokines were
produced by contaminating leukocytes or indirectly by DC in response to
signals made by the contaminating cells. To address this issue,
CD11cbright pure DC were sorted by FACS and
stimulated with microbial products in the presence of CD40L-expressing
fibroblasts. Purified DC responded to CpG DNA and PPD by producing
IL-12 p70 but only small amounts of IL-10, whereas the converse was
seen with zymosan (Fig. 3
, A
and B). These results demonstrate that DC themselves can
directly recognize and discriminate among microbial stimuli and can
produce either IL-10 or IL-12 in response to the appropriate
combination of signals.
|
An additional adapter in TLR signaling, TIRAP/MAL, has been described
(19, 23). As expected, a TIRAP-inhibitory peptide but not
a control peptide containing the reversed TIRAP sequence
(19) abrogated the LPS-induced up-regulation of CD86 by DC
(Fig. 3
D). However, the TIRAP-inhibitory peptide did not
affect yeast conditioning for IL-10 production (Fig. 3
D).
These results demonstrate that TLR2 and MyD88 signaling mediate PPD
conditioning of DC for CD40-triggered IL-12 p70 production but suggest
that TLR signaling is not involved in conditioning by yeasts for IL-10
production.
Plasticity of DC subsets
Spleen DC contain several subsets, which may possess distinct
abilities to produce cytokines (24, 25). We addressed the
ability of three of these subsets to make IL-10 vs IL-12. Homogeneous
populations of
CD11cbrightCD8
+,
CD4+, and
CD8
-CD4-
(double-negative; DN) DC were isolated by cell sorting (Fig. 4
A). In the presence of
control fibroblasts, all DC subsets produced only negligible amounts of
IL-12 p70 or IL-10 (not shown). Coculture with CD40L-expressing
fibroblasts alone was sufficient to increase the basal production of
IL-12 p70 by CD8
+ DC and of IL-10 by all
subsets (Fig. 4
B). Nonetheless, basal cytokine levels were
markedly altered by addition of a microbial costimulus.
CD8
+ and DN DC produced primarily IL-12 p70 in
response to CpG DNA, STAg, or PPD in combination with CD40L although DN
DC produced less IL-12 p70 than CD8
+ DC (Fig. 4
B). Both CD4- subsets also increased
production of IL-10 in response to the combination of zymosan or
S. pombe plus CD40L (Fig. 4
B). This was less
obvious for CD8
+ DC, which displayed the
highest level of basal IL-10 (and IL-12 p70) production in response to
CD40L alone but remained statistically significant
(p < 0.01) (Fig. 4
B). Zymosan also
triggered a small amount of IL-12 p70 production by
CD8
+ DC in some experiments (Fig. 4
B). Interestingly, CD4+ DC failed to
make IL-12 p70 in response to any stimulus although they responded to
yeast or zymosan plus CD40L by producing high levels of IL-10 (Fig. 4
B).
|
+ DC has not previously
been reported. To assess the frequency of IL-10-producing
CD8
+ DC, we used a staining method involving
IL-10 capture by cell surface-bound Abs followed by detection with a
second anti-IL-10 Ab conjugated to a fluorophore (see
Materials and Methods). To confirm that the staining method
identified only those cells producing IL-10 and not
CD8
+ DC that passively captured cytokine
secreted by neighboring cells, the experiments were conducted with a
mixture of live and fixed DC; 2030% of live
CD8
+ DC stained for IL-10 after zymosan plus
CD40L stimulation, whereas fixed CD8
+ DC in
the same cultures did not stain for the cytokine (Fig. 5
+ DC and, under the conditions used here,
is not marred by paracrine effects. To determine the frequency of
CD8
+ DC producing IL-12, intracellular
staining was conducted for the p40 subunit after stimulation with CpG
plus CD40L. Compared with baseline staining with an isotype-matched
control Ab, essentially all CD8
+ DC stained
for IL-12 p40 (Fig. 5
15% of
CD8
+ DC could also be stained for the
bioactive heterodimer, IL-12 p70 (Fig. 5
|
+ DC, CD4+ DC
were unable to produce IL-12 p70 (Fig. 4
+ and DN DC in
response to PPD, which served as a positive control for neutralizing
activity. However, IL-10 neutralization did not reveal the ability of
CD4+ DC to make IL-12 p70 (Fig. 6
+ and DN DC to make IL-12 p70 (Fig. 6
+ and DN DC
are able to produce either IL-12 or IL-10 and show that IL-10 is not
responsible for the lack of IL-12 secretion by
CD4+ DC.
|
Differences in the cytokine response of DC subsets to yeasts vs
IL-12-promoting stimuli could conceivably arise from quantitative
differences in DC activation. In that scenario, the degree rather than
the quality of DC activation might determine IL-12 p70 vs IL-10
production in response to CD40 cross-linking. This could be especially
relevant because cytokine secretion requires CD40 signaling and CD40
expression is altered by the microbial stimulus itself (Fig. 1
). To
examine whether the quantity of DC activation affected cytokine
production, we chose two prototype IL-12 p70- and IL-10-promoting
stimuli (PPD and zymosan, respectively) and examined their ability to
1) induce up-regulation of CD40 and CD86 and 2) promote IL-12 and IL-10
production across a whole dose-response range. There were no obvious
differences among DC subsets in sensitivity to either zymosan or PPD in
terms of CD86 up-regulation, although CD8
+ DC
were more sensitive to PPD than either CD4+ or DN
DC when assessed for CD40 expression (Fig. 7
A). Importantly, PPD
conditioned CD8
+ and DN DC to make IL-12 p70
across the entire dose range (Fig. 7
B). Similarly, zymosan
conditioned all three subsets of DC to produce IL-10 at all doses (Fig. 7
B). The fact that at no point in the dose-response did PPD
become an IL-10 inducer or zymosan become an IL-12-promoting stimulus
(Fig. 7
B), demonstrates that qualitative rather than
quantitative differences in microbial recognition lie at the heart of
differential cytokine responses by DC subsets.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
+
and DN DC and to IL-10 production or lack thereof by
CD4+ DC. 2) Cytokine production can be dictated
by direct microbial recognition. Microbial structures from
Toxoplasma and Mycobacterium or CpG-containing
DNA condition DC to make IL-12 p70. In contrast, heat-killed yeasts
(brewers yeast, fission yeast, C. albicans) or yeast
derivatives (zymosan) condition DC to make primarily IL-10. 3)
Differential conditioning is dependent on distinct PRR; PPD and CpG DNA
act through TLRs and an MyD88-dependent pathway, whereas yeasts act via
a TLR-independent pathway. 4) PRR signaling results in limited cytokine
production unless is it followed by signals from T cells which amplify
DC activation but do not alter the type of cytokine that is
made.
TLRs have emerged as key players in DC activation (2, 3).
Consistent with this notion, the IL-12-promoting effects of PPD and
STAg are absolutely dependent on signaling via MyD88 (Fig. 3
and Ref.
26). PPD contains traces of bacterial DNA, and some of its
IL-12-promoting activity can be removed by DNase treatment (A. D.
Edwards and C. Reis e Sousa, unpublished observations). However, most
of the DC response to PPD appears to be due to TLR2 triggering (Fig. 3
C), consistent with the fact that this TLR is involved in
recognition of mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan and mannosylated
phosphatidylinositol (27, 28, 29). TLR2 has also been
implicated in the activation of macrophages by zymosan (21, 22). Given that DC express functional TLR2 (as determined by its
involvement in PPD recognition), it is therefore surprising that
zymosan failed to condition DC for IL-12 production even when IL-10 was
neutralized (Fig. 6
). It is possible that zymosan recognition in
macrophages involves heterodimerization with another TLR, which is not
expressed on mouse DC. Alternatively, recognition of zymosan by an
IL-10-promoting PRR on DC is dominant over TLR2 recognition of the same
particle and overwhelmingly conditions the cells for IL-10 production.
Indirect support for this hypothesis comes from two observations: 1) in
some experiments, the combination of zymosan plus CD40L slightly
increased the level of IL-12 production compared with CD40L alone (e.g.
Fig. 4
B); 2) TLR2-/- DC reproducibly
made more IL-10 in response to zymosan plus CD40L than controls, as if
the IL-10-promoting PRR was now acting unopposed (Fig. 3
B).
The identity of the IL-10-promoting PRR for yeasts on DC is unknown at
present, but it is unlikely to belong to the TLR family as it does not
signal via MyD88 or TIRAP/MAL (Fig. 3
). This would be consistent with
the notion that TLR signaling is involved primarily in induction of
IL-12 and type 1 adaptive immune responses (4).
We have previously suggested that CD40 signaling in DC acts to amplify
innate signals for IL-12 production (13). Here, we show
that CD40L is just as critical for amplifying IL-10 secretion (Fig. 2
).
This may seem contrary to the prevalent view that CD40 signaling leads
to IL-12 production by DC (30, 31). However, CD40
signaling also induces IL-10 in monocyte-CSF-primed monocytes
(32) and in human monocyte-derived DC exposed to
glucocorticoids (33). Furthermore, our data fit
with recent experiments showing that CD40 expression by bone
marrow-derived DC is critical for priming of a Th2 response to
Schistosoma mansoni eggs (34). Thus, CD40L and
other T cells signals appear to act as neutral amplifiers that are
critical for execution of cytokine production programs initiated by
pattern recognition. Indeed, analysis of a large panel of
IL-12-promoting stimuli shows that, like PPD, most trigger production
of the IL-12 p40 subunit but induce little IL-12 p70 until combined
with CD40L (A. D. Edwards and C. Reis e Sousa, unpublished
observations). Apparent exceptions are CpG DNA and STAg, which can
induce production of bioactive IL-12 p70 by murine
CD8
+ and DN DC in the absence of T cell
signals (Fig. 2
and Refs. 12, 13). However, CD40 ligation
still increases greatly IL-12 p70 production in response to these two
stimuli (Fig. 2
and Ref. 13).
The ability of microbes to influence production of IL-12 or IL-10 is not without precedent. Gram-negative bacteria preferentially induce IL-10 production in monocytes, whereas Gram-positive bacteria induce IL-12 (35). A recent report shows that a protein from Bordetella pertussis induces IL-10 production in DC (36). However, our use of inactivated microbes and microbial extracts as tools to dissect DC biology raises the question of whether our findings are of significance to natural infections with intact organisms. Production of IL-12 by DC in response to STAg, PPD, or CpG DNA has obvious implications for the development of protective type 1 immune responses to Toxoplasma, Mycobacterium, and other bacteria. The significance of IL-10 production in response to heat-killed yeasts is less clear. Protection from murine and human candidiasis involves primarily Th1-biased responses, even though a role for IL-10 has been suggested (37). Live Candida yeasts trigger IL-12 production by splenic DC (38), and live recombinant yeasts elicit IL-12 production by bone marrow-derived DC (39). Thus, conditioning of DC for IL-10 production in our experiments could reflect preferential destruction by heat treatment of IL-12-inducing yeast components.
It has been argued that different DC subtypes are specialized to make
different cytokines and drive distinct forms of T cell differentiation
(7). In support of this notion, human blood contains
monocytes and plasmacytoid cells that can generate distinct DC1 or DC2
that prime Th1 or Th2 responses, respectively (40). These
cells also express distinct TLR repertoires and respond to different
microbial stimuli (8, 9, 10). In mouse,
CD8
+ and CD8
-
subsets of spleen DC differ in their ability to make IL-12 in vitro and
in vivo and to prime Th1 and Th2 responses in vivo (12, 13, 24, 25, 41, 42). However, there is also evidence that individual DC
types are not necessarily precommitted DC1 or DC2. In both mice and
humans, the ability of DC to produce IL-12 p70 and prime Th1 responses
can be modulated by exposure to cytokines (24, 43, 44). In
addition, mouse DC can produce either IL-12 or IL-4 in response to
different forms of the fungus C. albicans and direct Th1 or
Th2 development (38). Similarly, murine bone
marrow-derived DC treated with LPS or Gram-negative bacteria
preferentially prime Th1 responses while cells exposed to certain worm
products direct Th2 development (34, 45). In the human
system, pathogen products have also been shown to dictate the cytokine
producing and Th-skewing capacity of monocyte-derived DC
(46). Even so-called DC2 plasmacytoid cells can make IL-12
in response to CpG DNA plus CD40L (9) and can prime Th1
responses after exposure to viruses (47, 48), arguing that
their Th2-directing ability is not hardwired. Consistent with the
notion of flexibility, here we show that DN and
CD8
+ DC subsets have a choice of effector
cytokines. It remains possible that these DC subsets are heterogeneous
and contain DC precommitted to either IL-12 p70 or IL-10 production.
However, using single-cell staining methods, we were able to show that
up to 30% of CD8
+ DC could produce IL-10 when
given zymosan plus CD40L (Fig. 5
A), and >90% of
CD8
+ DC could make IL-12 p40 in response to an
appropriate combination of stimuli (Fig. 5
B and data not
shown). Therefore, we suppose that at least 1520% of
CD8
+ DC are bipotential for IL-10 and IL-12
p40 production. This is probably an underestimate, as the staining
method for IL-10 involves cell resuspension, which disrupts continued
CD40 engagement and stops cytokine synthesis (A. D. Edwards and C.
Reis e Sousa, unpublished observations). Whether bipotentiality extends
to IL-12 p70 production could not be unambiguously determined as only
up to 15% of CD8
+ DC can be stained for the
cytokine (Fig. 5
). However, IL-12 p70 is produced at 10- to 50-fold
lower levels than IL-12 p40 (49) even after CD40-dependent
up-regulation of IL-12 p35 (13) and is extremely difficult
to detect by staining. Therefore, again, our staining is likely to
provide only a gross underestimate of the true frequency of IL-12
p70-producing cells. Thus, we favor the notion that most
CD8
+ and DN DC have the potential to produce
alternative cytokines in response to distinct stimuli. This does not
exclude the possibility that some DC subsets may have functional
specializations, exemplified by the apparent inability of
CD4+ DC to produce IL-12 p70 in response to a
large panel of stimuli (Figs. 4
, 6
, and 7
and data not shown),
also seen by Hochrein et al. (25).
CD4+ DC represent
50% of splenic DC and
constitute the majority of DC in the CD8
-
fraction, which may underlie the observed tendency of CD8
- DC to induce Th2 responses (24, 41, 42).
However, even CD4+ DC do not have a prewired
response to activation: they are activated to a similar degree by
zymosan and PPD as measured by CD40 and CD86 up-regulation, yet zymosan
conditions the cells to make IL-10 whereas PPD does not (Fig. 7
).
Altogether, these results suggest a model in which all DC irrespective
of subset can behave as flexible APC. The fact that innate signals and
T cell feedback are both necessary and sufficient for cytokine
production by all DC subsets can, therefore, explain Th polarization by
these APC without invoking the participation of third-party cells or
cytokines.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Caetano Reis e Sousa, Immunobiology Laboratory, Cancer Research U.K., London Research Institute, Lincolns Inn Fields Laboratories, 44 Lincolns Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, U.K. E-mail address: caetano{at}cancer.org.uk ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: PRR, pattern recognition receptor; PPD, purified protein derivative of Mycobacterium tuberculosis; DC, dendritic cells; STAg, soluble tachyzoite Ag; TLR, Toll-like receptor; CD40L, CD40 ligand; DN, double negative; TIRAP, Toll/IL-1R domain containing protein. ![]()
Received for publication April 18, 2002. Accepted for publication July 26, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
v
3 and
v
5 integrins are not essential for MHC class I cross-presentation of cell-associated antigen by CD8
+ murine dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 168:6057.
+ and CD8
- dendritic cells to prime Th1/Th2 cells in vivo. J. Immunol. 167:4345.
, and IFN-
by mouse dendritic cell subsets. J. Immunol. 166:5448.
+ and CD8
- subclasses of dendritic cells direct the development of distinct T helper cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 189:587.
/
-producing cells link innate and adaptive immunity. J. Exp. Med. 192:219.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Jordan, M. E. Woods, J. Olano, and D. H. Walker The Absence of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Signaling in C3H/HeJ Mice Predisposes Them to Overwhelming Rickettsial Infection and Decreased Protective Th1 Responses Infect. Immun., August 1, 2008; 76(8): 3717 - 3724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Jenkins, G. Perona-Wright, and A. S. MacDonald Full Development of Th2 Immunity Requires Both Innate and Adaptive Sources of CD154 J. Immunol., June 15, 2008; 180(12): 8083 - 8092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Fujiwara, B. Wei, L. L. Presley, S. Brewer, M. McPherson, M. A. Lewinski, J. Borneman, and J. Braun Systemic Control of Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells by CD8+ T Cells and Commensal Microbiota J. Immunol., May 1, 2008; 180(9): 5843 - 5852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Jiang, C.-C. Kuo, M. W. Berry, A. W. Lee, and L. A. Campbell Identification and Characterization of Chlamydia pneumoniae-Specific Proteins That Activate Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Production in RAW 264.7 Murine Macrophages Infect. Immun., April 1, 2008; 76(4): 1558 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Douin-Echinard, S. Laffont, C. Seillet, L. Delpy, A. Krust, P. Chambon, P. Gourdy, J.-F. Arnal, and J.-C. Guery Estrogen Receptor {alpha}, but Not {beta}, Is Required for Optimal Dendritic Cell Differentiation and CD40-Induced Cytokine Production J. Immunol., March 15, 2008; 180(6): 3661 - 3669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|