|
|
||||||||







Departments of
* Cellular Pharmacology and
Dermatology, and
Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; and
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whether histamine is involved in the promotion or inhibition of the
inflammation process in the whole animal remains controversial, and it
is difficult to deduce the conclusion from in vitro experiments. As an
example for the promotion, histamine is reported to induce inflammatory
cytokines such as IL-6 in vitro (6). In contrast, in
support of an inhibitory action, histamine has been reported to inhibit
the LPS-induced production of inflammatory cytokines TNF-
(7) and IL-1 (8). The limitations of in vitro
experiments for elucidating the overall effect of histamine on
inflammatory responses led us to assess the activity of histamine in an
experimental peritonitis model.
As a mouse model we induced experimental bacterial peritonitis by E. coli injection into the peritoneal cavity (9) and monitored the clearance of bacteria, the accumulation of neutrophils and macrophages, and the production of cytokines and chemokines. The results indicate that histamine delays the clearance of E. coli, presumably through the inhibition of phagocyte recruitment.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Histamine-deficient mice were prepared as described using the homologous recombination method in embryonic stem cells (5). The knockout construct lacks the putative pyridoxal phosphate-binding site within exon 8. For the comparison between wild-type and knockout animals, wild-type littermate controls were matched for age (810 wk) and gender (male). Studies were performed according to Tohoku University guidelines for animal use and care.
Bacterial peritonitis model
Mice were injected with a sublethal dose of live E.
coli (1 x 108 CFU) into the abdominal
cavity (9). The mice were anesthetized by the inhalation
of diethylether and were sacrificed by dislodging the cervical
vertebrae. Blood was collected from the carotid artery for the TNF-
,
macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2), and monocyte chemoattractant
protein-1 (MCP-1) assay. Five milliliters of PBS was injected into the
peritoneal cavity and, after slight massage, was collected as the
peritoneal lavage fluid. E. coli CFU were calculated from
the colony numbers on the Luria-Bertoni agar plates after overnight
culture with serial 10-fold dilutions.
Evaluation of neutrophil and monocyte accumulation
Myeloperoxidase (MPO) and nonspecific esterase (NSE) activities in peritoneal lavage fluid were measured as previously described (10, 11). Briefly, 1 ml of the fluid was centrifuged at 1000 x g for 5 min at 4°C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml of 1.0% Triton X-100 and incubated for 1 h to extract the enzymes. MPO activity was calculated from the spectrophotometric absorbance at 470 nm with guaiacol as the substrate. NSE activity was determined from the rate of hydrolysis of o-nitrophenyl butyrate by measuring the decrease in absorbance at 414 nm in the presence of eserine (10 mM), which would eliminate any possible interference by cholinesterase. Cytocentrifuge preparations of peritoneal cells at 1 h after E. coli inoculation were stained with May-Grünwald/Giemsa for the identification of neutrophils and macrophages.
TNF-
, chemokine, and histamine assay
Serum TNF-
, MCP-1, and MIP-2 levels were measured with ELISA
kits (Endogen (Cambridge, MA) for TNF-
; R&D Systems (Minneapolis,
MN) for MCP-1 and MIP-2) according to the manufacturers
specifications. To assess the extent of E. coli-induced
histamine release, we measured the amounts of residual (releasable)
histamine in peritoneal cells instead of measuring the released
histamine (11), because histamine once released from the
peritoneal cells is rapidly metabolized. At the designated time points
after inoculation, mice peritonea were instilled with 5 ml cold PBS to
stimulate the peritoneal cells to release histamine. The peritoneal
lavage fluid was recovered and centrifuged to remove cells. The amount
of histamine in the fluid was determined using an HPLC system as
previously described (12).
Administration of histamine agonists and antagonists
For assessment of the effect of histamine via H1 and H2 receptors, we used an H1 receptor agonist (6-[2-(4-imidazolyl)ethylamino]-N-(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)hepatanecarboxamide (HTMT; 10 mg/kg body weight; Tocris, Ballwin, MO) (13, 14) and an H2 receptor agonist (dimaprit, 200 mg/kg body weight; Tocris) (15, 16) in HDC-/- mice. These agonists were administered i.p. concomitantly with E. coli inoculation to determine their effects on E. coli elimination, phagocyte infiltration, and the amount of chemoattractants in the peritoneal cavity. The doses of these agonists were determined in preliminary dose-response experiments. We also assessed the effect of histamine receptor blockade by concomitant introduction of an H1 antagonist (pyrilamine, 5 mg/kg body weight) or H2 antagonist (cimetidine, 20 mg/kg body weight) into the peritoneal cavity of HDC+/+ mice. The dose chosen for pyrilamine was most effective in the preliminary experiment and was the same dose used previously (11). The dose for cimetidine was adjusted to the dose used in past reports (17, 18).
Phagocytic activity of peritoneal cells
The peritoneal cavity was washed with 5 ml PBS containing 0.1% BSA and 10 mM EDTA. The peritoneal cells were collected and resuspended in HBSS as 106 cells/ml. After 5 min of preincubation, the cell suspension was incubated with E. coli (107/ml) at 37°C for 1 h with mild shaking. The cells were removed as the pellet after centrifugation at 200 x g for 10 min, and E. coli number in the supernatant was counted.
In vitro direct effect of histamine, histamine agonists, and histamine antagonists on E. coli proliferation
CFU of E. coli (1 x 104) was incubated in Luria-Bertoni medium with histamine (0.1 mg/ml), HTMT (0.05 mg/ml), dimaprit (0.5 mg/ml), pyrilamine (0.025 mg/ml), or cimetidine (0.1 mg/ml) for 6 h at 37°C with shaking to assess the direct effect of histamine-related agents on the proliferation of E. coli. The dose chosen for each agent was 10100 times higher than the dose used in previous reports (19, 20, 21) to attain effects from these agents. The CFU of live E. coli were determined as stated above.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of most data was performed using unpaired Students t test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant and is indicated expressed as an asterisk in all figures.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mice were injected with 1 x 108 CFU of
E. coli into the peritoneal cavities, and the numbers of
live E. coli at 1, 3, and 6 h after inoculation were
monitored (Fig. 1
A). The
clearance of bacteria from the peritoneal cavity was quite rapid in
HDC-/- mice (Fig. 1
A). The number of
E. coli in HDC-/- mice had fallen
below 5 x 106 CFU/ml by 1 h after the
inoculation. On the other hand, the number in
HDC+/+ mice was >5 x
106 CFU/ml even at 3 h after inoculation.
HDC-/- mice eliminated E. coli
rapidly.
|
50 pmol/ml before the
inoculation (Fig. 1
The effect of the knockout could be attributed to not only the
deficiency of the enzymatic product, but also to the deficiency of the
enzyme and/or the gene. The numbers of peritoneal mast cells were
similar in HDC+/+ and
HDC-/- mice (3.78 ± 0.91 x
104 for HDC+/+ and
3.23 ± 0.54 x 104 for
HDC-/- mice). However, as stated in the
previous report, the character of the secretory granule of the
peritoneal mast cell was quite different in the two groups of mice
(5). We therefore administered both the
H1 receptor agonist HTMT and the
H2 receptor agonist dimaprit to
HDC-/- mice concomitant with the E.
coli suspension to assess the effect of the stimulation of
histamine receptors on E. coli clearance. The amount of
E. coli was significantly (p < 0.05)
increased at 1 h after inoculation by HTMT or dimaprit treatment
(Fig. 1
C). The activation of both H1
and H2 receptors suppressed the clearance of
E. coli in the peritoneal cavity. In contrast, the
H1 and H2 receptor
antagonists, cimetidine and pyrilamine, promoted the clearance of
E. coli in HDC+/+ mice (Fig. 1D
). In
HDC-/- mice there appeared to be no significant
difference in the clearance of E. coli after histamine
receptor antagonist administration. These data confirm that histamine
causes a delay in the elimination of bacteria from the peritoneal
cavity.
Dominant migration of neutrophils into the peritoneal cavity of HDC-/- mice
The migration of macrophages and neutrophils into the peritoneal
cavity was observed by histological examination at 1 h after
E. coli inoculation (Fig. 2
).
In the peritoneal lavage fluid, phagocytic (granulocytes, macrophages)
infiltrates were seen extensively in HDC-/-
mice. The total macrophage numbers per lavage per mouse were 2.47
± 0.30 x 106
(HDC+/+) and 3.57 ± 0.37 x
106 (HDC-/-). The total
neutrophil numbers were 8.17 ± 0.31 x
104 (HDC+/+) and 26.17
± 3.42 x 104
(HDC-/-). Both types of phagocytes were
significantly more abundant in the peritoneal cavity of
HDC-/- mice (p < 0.05 for
macrophages, p < 0.01 for neutrophils). On the other hand,
the total macrophage numbers were 3.38 ± 0.29 x
106 (HDC+/+) and 3.51
± 0.18 x 106
(HDC-/-), and the total neutrophil number was
<5 x 103 in both genotypes before E.
coli inoculation (p > 0.05 for each cell
lineage). Therefore, the migration of neutrophils was enhanced in
HDC-/- mice.
|
|
, MIP-2, and MCP-1 in
HDC-/- mice
TNF-
, one of the crucial mediators in peritonitis, triggers
inflammatory responses partly through the influx of neutrophils
(3, 22, 23). Therefore, we measured the level of TNF-
as one of the factors for the augmented neutrophil recruitment seen in
HDC-/- mice. The serum TNF-
level in
HDC-/- mice was about 2-fold higher than that
in HDC+/+ mice at 1 h after E.
coli injection (Fig. 4
A).
In rodents, MIP-2 and MCP-1 are two of the representative chemokines
with direct chemotactic activities to neutrophils and mononuclear
phagocytes. The concentrations of both chemokines in the serum were
significantly higher in HDC-/- mice than in
HDC+/+ mice at 1 h after inoculation (Fig. 4
A). These cytokines in the peritoneal cavity showed a
similar tendency as those in serum (Fig. 4
B). However, the
differences were not significant in peritoneal lavage fluid.
|
To compare the phagocytic activities of the peritoneal cells of
each genotype, they were incubated with E. coli for 1
h, and E. coli free from the cells were counted with colony
formation. The colony number indicated that there were no significant
differences in phagocytic activity between the peritoneal cells of
HDC+/+ mice and those of
HDC-/- mice (Fig. 5
A).
|
The results reported above indicate that histamine inhibits the
clearance of E. coli in the peritoneal cavity. It is
possible that histamine directly enhances the proliferation of E.
coli. To address this possibility, we incubated E. coli
in Luria-Bertoni medium with histamine, histamine agonists, or
histamine antagonists and counted the number of E. coli
after 6-h incubation at 37°C with shaking. There were no significant
differences in E. coli numbers among these different
conditions (Fig. 5
B), indicating that histamine does not
directly stimulate the proliferation of E. coli. The direct
effect of histamine on E. coli proliferation seems to be
negligible.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanism behind the histamine-delayed elimination of E. coli with histamine may be very complex, but it seemed at least to involve suppressed phagocyte recruitment and activation. It was reported that phagocytic recruitment was inhibited by a histamine receptor antagonist in a staphylococcal enterotoxin peritonitis model (18) and in the reaction to implanted biomaterials (11). In contrast, there is a report that histamine suppresses the effect of chymase for the recruitment of neutrophils and macrophages (24). Therefore, we could not have anticipated whether histamine acts for the inhibition or the promotion of phagocyte recruitment in this E. coli inoculation model. To elucidate the mechanism behind the augmented phagocyte recruitment, we used the H1 and H2 agonists and confirmed the suppression of the recruitment in HDC-/- animals.
TNF-
is known to be released from mast cells and cause an influx of
neutrophils in the peritoneal cavity in immune complex peritonitis
(22) and in Klebsiella pneumoniae-infected
peritonitis (3). Assuming that TNF-
is derived
predominantly from mast cells, it is conceivable in the present case
that the released histamine from the mast cells autoregulates the
release of TNF-
via its own cell surface histamine receptor
(7). In this experiment TNF-
was detectable in the
plasma only at 1 h after inoculation in both genotypes. The level
of TNF-
in the knockout mice was higher than that in the wild-type
mice, suggesting that a part of the recruitment of neutrophils was
triggered by the action of TNF-
. TNF-
is known not only to induce
the influx of neutrophils in vivo (22), but also to
stimulate endothelial cells and macrophages to release chemokines such
as MIP-2, a mouse IL-8 equivalent, and MCP-1 (25). In an
experimental peritonitis model, MIP-2 and MCP-1 were shown to attract
phagocytes into the peritoneal cavity, resulting in the efficient
elimination of E. coli (26, 27, 28, 29). Therefore, it
is possible that cytokines, including TNF-
, MIP-2, and MCP-1,
cooperatively acted for the recruitment of phagocytes into the
peritoneal cavity. However, it is also possible that the inhibitory
effect of histamine on the migration of phagocytes
(30, 31, 32) works in this model.
The increased amount of these cytokines in
HDC-/- mice seemed not to be attributed to the
increased releasability from mast cells, because we observed the
dose-response fashion of bone marrow-derived mast cells using
-hexosaminidase as the indicator of the intragranular enzyme and
found that the dose-response relations are very similar between the
mast cells of HDC+/+ and
HDC-/- mice (33). The amount of
TNF-
and MCP-1 released from mast cells of
HDC-/- mice was smaller than those of
HDC+/+ mice (our unpublished observations).
Therefore, we tentatively assume that the source of the augmented
release of cytokines is not mast cells.
Histamine has been discussed as an important chemical mediator that prompts both hyperemia and the enhanced expression of endothelial adhesion molecules such as P-selectin (34, 35). Up-regulation of endothelial adhesion molecules enhances the arrest and diapedesis of phagocytic cells through the endothelial barrier. Accordingly, it was expected that histamine would enhance phagocytic recruitment, but our data definitely indicate that, on the contrary, the clearance of E. coli was delayed in the presence of histamine. We still do not know what kind of cell is the target of histamine to reduce the amount of chemokines. Relevant in vitro evidence is still lacking. Although further information on the role of histamine in this experimental peritonitis model is needed, histamine-deficient mice will enable progress toward elucidating the role of histamine in various physiological and pathological conditions.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Hiroshi Ohtsu, Department of Cellular Pharmacology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Seiryo-cho 2-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Japan. E-mail address: ohtsu{at}mail.cc.tohoku.ac.jp ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HDC, histidine decarboxylase; HTMT, 6- [2-(4-imidazolyl)ethylamino]-N-(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)hepatanecarboxamide; MIP-2, macrophage inflammatory protein-2; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MPO, myeloperoxidase; NSE, nonspecific esterase; PLF, peritoneal lavage fluid. ![]()
Received for publication April 12, 2002. Accepted for publication June 12, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Nature 381:77.[Medline]
via histamine H2 receptors. J. Exp. Med. 174:281.
-methylhistamine inhibits intestinal transit in mice by central histamine H1 receptor activation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 237:155.[Medline]
. J. Immunol. 159:3595.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Carlos, C. Fremond, A. Samarina, V. Vasseur, I. Maillet, S. G. Ramos, F. Erard, V. Quesniaux, H. Ohtsu, C. L. Silva, et al. Histamine Plays an Essential Regulatory Role in Lung Inflammation and Protective Immunity in the Acute Phase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Infect. Immun., December 1, 2009; 77(12): 5359 - 5368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Mulero, M. P. Sepulcre, J. Meseguer, A. Garcia-Ayala, and V. Mulero Histamine is stored in mast cells of most evolutionarily advanced fish and regulates the fish inflammatory response PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19434 - 19439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Thakurdas, E. Melicoff, L. Sansores-Garcia, D. C. Moreira, Y. Petrova, R. L. Stevens, and R. Adachi The Mast Cell-restricted Tryptase mMCP-6 Has a Critical Immunoprotective Role in Bacterial Infections J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2007; 282(29): 20809 - 20815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Hoffman and S. I. Miller The systems biology of infection in animal models bears fruit PNAS, June 20, 2006; 103(25): 9377 - 9378. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Handley, P. H. Dube, and V. L. Miller From the Cover: Histamine signaling through the H2 receptor in the Peyer's patch is important for controlling Yersinia enterocolitica infection PNAS, June 13, 2006; 103(24): 9268 - 9273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Musio, B. Gallo, S. Scabeni, M. Lapilla, P. L. Poliani, G. Matarese, H. Ohtsu, S. J. Galli, R. Mantegazza, L. Steinman, et al. A Key Regulatory Role for Histamine in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis: Disease Exacerbation in Histidine Decarboxylase-Deficient Mice J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 17 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Kozma, G. Losonczy, M. Keszei, Z. Komlosi, E. Buzas, E. Pallinger, J. Appel, T. Szabo, P. Magyar, A. Falus, et al. Histamine deficiency in gene-targeted mice strongly reduces antigen-induced airway hyper-responsiveness, eosinophilia and allergen-specific IgE Int. Immunol., August 1, 2003; 15(8): 963 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |