The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowrey, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lowrey, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, J. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 169: 1869-1875.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

Sonic Hedgehog Promotes Cell Cycle Progression in Activated Peripheral CD4+ T Lymphocytes1

Jacqueline A. Lowrey2,*,{dagger}, Gareth A. Stewart*,{dagger}, Susannah Lindey*,{dagger}, Gerard F. Hoyne*,{dagger}, Margaret J. Dallman§, Sarah E. M. Howie*,{ddagger} and Jonathan R. Lamb*,{dagger}

* Immunobiology Group, Medical Research Council Center for Inflammation Research, {dagger} Respiratory Medicine Unit, and {ddagger} Department of Pathology, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; and § Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, United Kingdom


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling is important in the growth and differentiation of many cell types and recently has been reported to play a role in T cell development in the thymus. This prompted us to investigate whether or not Shh contributes to the clonal expansion of peripheral CD4+ T cells. In this study, we demonstrate that Shh and other components of the signaling pathway patched, smoothened, and Gli1 (glioma-associated oncogene) are expressed in peripheral CD4+ T cells. The addition of the biologically active amino-terminal Shh peptide had no effect on resting CD4+ T cells, but significantly enhanced proliferation of anti-CD3/28 Ab-activated CD4+ T cells. This was not due to antiapoptotic effects, but by promoting entry of T cells into the S-G2 proliferative phase of the cell cycle. Neutralizing anti-Shh Ab reduced T cell proliferation by inhibiting cell transition into the S-G2 phase, suggesting that endogenously produced Shh plays a physiological role in the clonal expansion of T cells. Furthermore, we have observed a significant up-regulation of Shh and Gli1 (glioma-associated oncogene) mRNA in activated CD4+ T cells with or without addition of exogenous Shh, which corresponds with maximal CD4+ T cell proliferation, whereas bcl-2 was only up-regulated in activated cells in the presence of Shh. Our findings suggest that endogenously produced Shh may play a role in sustaining normal CD4+ T cell proliferation and exogenously added Shh enhances this response.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hedgehog (Hh)3 proteins are a highly conserved family of secreted intercellular signaling molecules (1, 2). Originally described in Drosophila as a segment polarity gene (3), several vertebrate homologues have now been discovered, the most extensively characterized being sonic hedgehog (Shh).

Shh is synthesized as a 45-kDa precursor protein, which undergoes autoproteolysis to yield the biologically active amino-terminal domain protein (Shh-N), and a 27-kDa carboxyl-terminal Shh-C protein responsible for the autoprocessing (4, 5). The biologically active Shh-N remains associated with the membrane through cholesterol modification in the autoprocessing step and can exert short-range signaling in this way. There is also evidence for a freely diffusible form of Shh, which would mediate long-range signaling (6, 7, 8). Shh signals to neighboring cells via two multitransmembrane proteins patched (ptc) and smoothened (smo). They exist as a receptor complex in which ptc is the ligand-binding subunit and smo is the signaling component. Upon binding of Shh to ptc, an inhibitory effect of ptc on smo is released, allowing smo to transduce the Shh signal across the plasma membrane (9). The signal is then mediated by the Gli family of zinc finger transcription factors, of which three members have now been identified in vertebrates. Gli1 is up-regulated by Shh-secreting cells, while Gli2 and Gli3 appear to be more broadly expressed, suggesting they may also play a role in other pathways (1, 2, 10).

Shh signaling in vertebrates is critical in development, patterning, and cell fate induction in a number of tissues including CNS, limb buds, gut, and lung (1, 11), pituitary gland (12), and pancreas (13). More specifically, it has been reported that Shh induces proliferation in several cell types in vitro such as skin keratinocytes (14), hemopoietic stem cells (15), lung squamous carcinoma cells (16), and neuronal precursor cells (17). Furthermore, mutations in ptc and smo, resulting in constitutive activation of the Shh signaling pathway, are associated with several forms of malignant disease including basal cell carcinoma, medulloblastoma, and rhabidomyosarcoma (18).

Collectively, these results confirm that the Shh pathway is linked to proliferation in many adult cell types, including hemopoietic stem cells (15). Members of the Shh signaling pathway are expressed in the thymus where they appear to function in thymocyte development. They regulate differentiation from the double-negative (CD4-CD8-) to the double-positive (CD4+CD8+) stage of T cell development (19). Shh is also associated with the proliferation of human hemopoietic stem cells and Shh, ptc, and smo transcripts are present in primitive and mature CD19+, CD33+, and CD3+ cell populations (15). Shh has also previously been shown to induce bcl-2 (20), an important regulator of T cell survival (21, 22, 23, 24).

Therefore, since the Shh signaling pathway is associated with several aspects of lymphoid cell development, differentiation, and survival, this prompted us to investigate whether or not Shh contributes to the expansion of peripheral CD4+ T cells. In this study, we report the presence of members of the Hh signaling pathway in peripheral CD4+ T cells and secondary lymphoid tissues at both mRNA and protein levels. In addition, we demonstrate that biologically active amino-terminal Shh peptide amplifies the proliferation of activated CD4+ T cells by enhanced cell entry into the S-G2 phase of the cell cycle. Neutralizing anti-Shh Ab caused G1 arrest of the cell cycle. We also report that ligation of the TCR increases transcription of Shh and Gli1 after 72 h of culture. In contrast, in the presence of exogenous Shh, these genes and bcl-2 are up-regulated by 48 h.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Harlan Orlac (Bicester, U.K.) and maintained in the Medical Faculty Animal Area Animal Unit at the University of Edinburgh. All experiments were performed in accordance with the animal ethics regulations of the Home Office in the United Kingdom.

Antibodies

Functional grade anti-CD3e and anti-CD28 Abs were purchased from Insight Biotechnology (Wembley, U.K.). The neutralizing anti-Shh Ab 5E1 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) and the IgG1 isotype control Ab (cell name P3X63Ag8; European Cell Culture Collection, Wiltshire, U.K.) were purified from hybridoma supernatants using protein G columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, U.K.). Western blotting confirmed that 5E1 but not the isotype control Ab bound to Shh peptide (data not shown). Anti-CD4FITC Ab (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) was used at a dilution of 1/100 for FACS staining. Both anti-Shh N-19 (1/40 dilution) and anti-ptc C-20 (1/60 dilution) Abs for use in immunocytochemistry were goat polyclonal Abs (Autogen Bioclear, Wiltshire, U.K.). Both anti-Shh and anti-ptc are completely blocked by use of the relevant peptide (data not shown). The secondary Ab for immunocytochemistrywas a biotinylated rabbit anti-goat Ab (DAKO, Cambridgeshire, U.K.) used at a dilution of 1/400.

Isolation of CD4+ T cells

Single-cell suspensions from pooled C57BL/6 mouse spleens were applied to negative selection CD4+ T cell columns (R&D Systems Europe, Abingdon, U.K.) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Purity was checked using FACS staining with an anti-CD4FITC Ab and this ranged between 88 and 93%.

Culture of CD4+ T cells

CD4+T cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Paisley, U.K.) supplemented with 10% FCS (Life Technologies), 2 mM L-glutamine, (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, U.K.), 20 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies), and 50 mM 2-ME (Sigma-Aldrich). Anti-CD3/28 Ab activation was conducted at two concentrations, namely, suboptimal (anti-CD3 at 0.25 µg/ml and anti-CD28 at 0.1 µg/ml) and optimal (anti-CD3 at 1 µg/ml and anti-CD28 at 5 µg/ml). Tissue culture plates (Corning Glass, Corning, NY) were coated with the anti-CD3 Ab for 90 min at 37°C before addition of the CD4+ T cells. Recombinant mouse Shh, a 180-aa residue amino-terminal peptide (R&D Systems Europe) was added into cultures at a concentration of 500 ng/ml. 5E1 Ab was used at either 20 or 50 µg/ml and the isotype control was used at 20 µg/ml. The concentrations used were based on the results of dose-response curves (data not shown).

T cell proliferation assays

The CD4+ T cells were cultured as above in 96-well plates with and without the addition of exogenous Shh or 5E1. They were pulsed after 48 h of anti-CD3/28 activation with 20 µl of [3H]TdR (50 µCi/ml; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), harvested at 72 h, and read on a betaplate scintillation counter (Wallac, Milton Keynes, U.K.).

Immunocytochemistry

Paraffin sections of mouse lymph node and spleen were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated through descending alcohols. Ag retrieval was carried in a microwave using Vector Ag Retrieval solution (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). After blocking endogenous peroxidase in 3% hydrogen peroxide, the sections were loaded onto a Sequenza (Shandon Scientific, Cheshire, U.K.). Nonspecific binding was blocked using normal rabbit serum, and endogenous biotin was blocked using the Vector blocking kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primary and secondary Abs were applied to the sections for 30 min at room temperature. After washing, Vectastain Elite avidin-biotin complex (Vector Laboratories) was then applied according to kit instructions before addition of the substrate diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich).

Cell cycle analysis

The CD4+ T cells were cultured as above in 48-well plates with and without the addition of exogenous Shh or 5E1. At 72 h postactivation, the cells were spun at 13,000 rpm for 7 min, then resuspended in citrate buffer. Cell cycle analysis was conducted using the Vindelov method (25). Briefly, the cells were trypsinized (Sigma-Aldrich) to expose the nucleus before being stained with propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich). Cell cycle analysis was then performed on an Epics XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter U.K., Buckinghamshire, U.K.). The machine counted 30,000 nuclei in each sample and the software analyzed the percentage of cells in each stage of the cell cycle sub-G1, G1, S, and G2-M phases. From these values, the percentage of live cells (G1, S, and G2-M) was calculated and, from this, the percentage of live cells in the G1 and S-G2 phases.

Statistical analyses

A paired t test using a one-tailed p value was used to test the significance of differences in [3H]TdR incorporation or percentage of CD4+ T cells in the proliferative S-G2 phase with and without the addition of Shh or anti-Shh Ab. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be significant.

RNA isolation

CD4+ T cells were cultured as above in 48-well plates with and without the addition of exogenous Shh or 5E1. At various time points (24, 48, 72 h) postactivation, the CD4+ T cells were spun at 300 x g for 7 min and then resuspended in lysis buffer provided as part of the RNeasy kit used for the RNA isolation (Qiagen, Crawley, U.K.). Any contaminating DNA was then digested by treating the RNA with DNase I (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To check that no contaminating DNA remained, a PCR was conducted using genomic {beta}-actin primers (forward primer (fp), 5'-CCACCAACTGGGACACATG-3' and reverse primer (rp), 5'-GTCTCAAACATGATCTGGGTCATC-3') (MWG Biotec, Ebersburg, Germany). The PCR program was as follows: 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min at 58°C, 2 min at 72°C, followed by a 5-min 72°C extension then 4°C hold. This was conducted on a PTC-200 Peltier thermal cycler (MJ Research, Cambridge, MA).

RT-PCR

Reverse transcription of RNA was conducted using Moloney murine leukemia virus-reverse transcriptase (all components Promega, Southampton, U.K.). Tubes were incubated at 37°C for 45 min, then at 95°C for 5 min to allow the reverse transcription to take place. The following primer pairs were used for the PCR: Shh fp, AGGGGGTTTGGAAAGAGG; Shh rp, GGATTCATAGTAGACCCAGTCG; ptc fp, ATCGGAGTGGAGTTCACC; ptc rp, CTGCTGTGCTTCGTATTGCC; smo fp, CATCAAGTTCAACAGTTCAGGA; smo rp, ATAGGTGAGGACCACGAACCACACTACTCC; Gli1 fp, GAGAAGCCACACAAGTGC; and Gli1 rp, AACAGTCAGTCTGCTCTCTTCC. The PCR conditions used were: 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 65°C (60°C for Shh and Gli1), 2 min at 72°C followed by an extension of 5 min at 72°C and a 4°C hold.

Real-time PCR

Unless otherwise stated, all materials for real-time PCR were supplied by Applied Biosystems U.K. (Cheshire, U.K.). Four hundred nanograms of RNA was reverse transcribed using the Multiscribe RT kit. Samples were incubated for 10 min at 25°C, 40 min at 48°C, then 5 min at 95°C to allow the reverse transcription to take place. cDNA samples were then diluted 1/5 in nuclease-free water (Promega). The PCR step was conducted using Taqman Universal PCR Mastermix, a primer/probe mix specific to the gene of interest and a primer/probe mix specific to 18S rRNA control reagent. The following primer/probe sequences were used: Shh fp, TGACCCCTTTAGCCTACAAGCA; Shh rp, TTCTTGTGATCTTCCCTTCATATCTG; Shh probe, TTTATTCCCAACGTAGCCGAGAAGACCC; ptc fp, CTCCAAGTGTCGTCCGGTTT; ptc rp, TGTACTCCGAGTCGGAGGAATC; ptc probe, CGTGCCTCCTGGTCACACGAACAA; Gli1 fp, GGCTGTCGGAAGTCCTATTCAC; Gli1 rp, CAACCTTCTTGCTCACACATGTAAG; Gli1 probe, CGCACCTTCGGTCGCACACG; bcl-2 fp, GCCCTGTGCCACCATGTG; bcl-2 rp, CGGTAGCGACGAGAGAAGTCA; and bcl-2 probe, CCATCTGACCCTCCGCCGGG.

These probes were all labeled with the fluorescent dye FAM. The primer/probe mix for 18S was supplied by Applied Biosystems which was labeled with the fluorescent dye vic. Each cDNA sample was run in duplicate 25-µl volumes on a capped 96-well optical reaction plate. The plate was run in the Applied Biosystems Prism 7700 sequence detector using SDS software. The PCR conditions were as follows: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, then 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C. The software then analyzed the data and output a pair of cycle threshold (ct) values for each sample. ct is the number of cycles needed to result in a signal crossing a set threshold. Each sample yielded two ct values, one for the gene of interest and one for the 18S housekeeping control. The ct values were then transported to a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed to give a value representing the relative mRNA levels present for the gene of interest linearly as per the manufacturer’s instructions.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression of Hh signaling pathway components in resting and activated peripheral CD4+ T cells and secondary lymphoid tissue

Expression of mRNAs encoding Shh, ptc, Smo, and Gli1 was investigated using RT-PCR. RNA from adult thymus was used as a positive control and was compared with the expression of these genes in both resting (t = 0) and anti-CD3/CD28 Ab-activated (t = 72 h) CD4+ T cells. Specific transcripts for Shh, ptc, Smo, and Gli1 were detected in both resting and activated CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Expression of components of the Hh signaling pathway in peripheral CD4+ T cells. A, RT-PCR analysis of the expression of Shh (S), Gli1 (G), smo (Sm), and ptc (P) for adult mouse normal thymus (a, as positive control), activated CD4+ T cells (b), and resting CD4+ T cells (c), with size of product given (bp). H2O = negative control (d). B–D, Protein expression of Shh (C) and ptc (D) in the spleen as determined by immunocytochemistry. An isotype control is also shown (B). Original magnification, x400.

 
To verify the presence of components of the Hh signaling pathway in the peripheral immune system, expression of the Shh and ptc proteins was investigated in the spleen and lymph node using immunocytochemistry. Both ptc- and Shh-expressing cells were present in the spleen (Fig. 1Go, B–D) and lymph nodes (data not shown).

Shh peptide promotes peripheral CD4+ T cell proliferation

Given that the Shh signaling pathway is both present in peripheral CD4+ T cells and has proliferative effects on many cell types, we investigated whether or not Shh modulates peripheral CD4+ T cell proliferation. Purified peripheral CD4+ T cells were cultured with and without the addition of the biologically active amino-terminal Shh peptide. An initial titration curve established that 500 ng/ml was the optimal dose of the Shh peptide to enhance proliferation of peripheral CD4+ T cells (data not shown), and this concentration was used in all subsequent experiments. Shh was added to CD4+ T cells that were resting, maximally stimulated with anti-CD3 (1 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (5 µg/ml) Abs or suboptimally activated with anti-CD3 (0.25 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (0.1 µg/ml).

No significant difference in the degree of proliferation was observed following the addition of the Shh peptide in resting CD4+ T cells (Fig. 2GoA). In maximally stimulated T cells, the Shh peptide was added at two time points, namely, 24 h before (t = -24 h) or at the time of anti-CD3/28 activation (t = 0). However, no significant difference in the level of proliferation as determined by [3H]TdR incorporation was detected at either time point (Fig. 2GoA).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Exogenous Shh increases proliferation of suboptimally activated CD4+ T cells. Proliferation of CD4+ T cells was measured by [3H]TdR incorporation at 72 h postactivation. Data given are mean cpm counts from three separate experiments in each case. Those graphs showing significantly higher proliferation of CD4+ T cells with addition of Shh are marked with an asterisk. *, p < 0.01; **, p < 0.04. A, Proliferation of resting CD4+ T cells in medium alone ({square}) or cultured with 500 ng/ml Shh peptide added at t = 0 ({blacksquare}); CD4+ T cells optimally activated with anti-CD3 (1.0 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (5 µg/ml) Abs alone ({square}) or with 500 ng/ml Shh added ({blacksquare}) at either time 0 or 24 h before activation. B, Proliferation of CD4+ T cells suboptimally activated with anti-CD3 (0.25 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (0.1 µg/ml) Abs alone ({square}) or in the presence of 500 ng/ml Shh peptide ({blacksquare}) added at time 0 or 24 h before activation.

 
Since Shh appeared to have no modulatory effects on CD4+ T cells that had been maximally stimulated with anti-CD3/28 Ab treatment, these experiments were repeated in the presence of suboptimal anti-CD3 (0.25 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (0.1 µg/ml) stimulation. The Shh peptide was added into culture at t = -24 h and t = 0 relative to activation as before. Fig. 2GoB shows the increase in [3H]TdR incorporation with addition of the Shh peptide from which it was calculated that Shh peptide at t = 0 produced a significant increase in CD4+ T cell proliferation ranging from 76.2 to 128% (mean, 101.6%; n = 3; p < 0.01). Addition of Shh peptide 24 h before suboptimal anti-CD3/28 activation also produced a significant increase in proliferation ranging from 16 to 63% (mean, 46%; n = 3; p < 0.04; Fig. 2GoB).

Shh peptide promotes cell entry into S-G2 phase

The effect of Shh on CD4+ T cell proliferation was investigated further using cell cycle analysis to allow us to examine whether Shh affected cell survival or promoted entry in the S-G2 proliferative phase of the cell cycle. As with the [3H]TdR incorporation studies, this analysis was conducted on resting CD4+ T cells and those optimally and suboptimally activated. Exogenous Shh was added at the time of (t = 0) or 24 h before (t = -24 h) anti-CD3/28 Ab activation and the T cells were analyzed 72 h later. In the case of resting CD4+ T cells, Shh peptide was added at t = 0, and the cells were analyzed at 24, 48, and 72 h. The percent cells distributed in sub-G1, G1, S, and G2 phases of the cell cycle was analyzed, and from this the percentage live cells in G1 and S-G2 phases was calculated. Fig. 3Go, A and B, shows a representative plot of the cell cycle distribution in the presence or absence of Shh (500 ng/ml) to demonstrate how the cell cycle was analyzed.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Shh promotes entry of activated but not resting CD4+ T cells into the S-G2 phase. A and B, Representative plots demonstrate how the cell cycle was analyzed in this study. CD4+ T cells activated with anti-CD3 (1 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (5 µg/ml) in the absence (A) or presence of 500 ng/ml Shh peptide added at t = 0 (B). The percentage of CD4+T cells present in each stage of the cell cycle was then calculated by computer software. C, Resting CD4+ T cells were cultured in the absence or presence of 500 ng/ml Shh peptide added at t = 0. Cell cycle analysis was then performed after 24, 48, and 72 h in culture. Representative data from three independent experiments are shown. D, CD4+ T cells were optimally activated by anti-CD3 (1 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (5 µg/ml) Abs or suboptimally activated by anti-CD3 (0.25 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (1 µg/ml) Abs in the absence of Shh or in the presence of 500 ng/ml Shh peptide added at time 0 or 24 h before activation. Cell cycle analysis was performed 72 h postactivation. Representative data from three independent experiments are shown.

 
The addition of Shh to resting CD4+ T cells had minimal effects on cell survival. The percentage of live, nonactivated CD4+ T cells was very similar in cultures with and without Shh added (Fig. 3GoB). The difference in the percentage of cells in the S-G2 phase was negligible.

In optimally activated CD4+ T cells (anti-CD3, 1 µg/ml; anti-CD28, 5 µg/ml), the addition of Shh at t = 0 promoted CD4+ T cell entry into the S-G2 proliferative phase of the cell cycle. The percentage of live cells is very similar with and without Shh added, but of those live cells, the addition of exogenous Shh promotes increased proliferation by entry into S-G2 phase (Fig. 3GoD). However, this percent increase in live cells in the S-G2 phase showed a variable range from 9 to 144% (mean, 63.7%; n = 3) and did not reach statistical significance. Adding Shh 24 h before optimal activation also promoted CD4+T cell entry into the S-G2 proliferative phase of the cell cycle. Again, the percentage of live cells is very similar with and without Shh added, but addition of Shh showed an increase in cells in the S-G2 phase that ranged from 53.1 to 97.1% (mean, 71.5%; n = 3; p < 0.01).

To investigate whether or not this increase in CD4+ T cell proliferation in response to exogenous Shh could be further augmented in the absence of maximal anti-CD3/28 Ab treatment, cell cycle analysis was also performed in suboptimally activated CD4+ T cells. In these CD4+ T cells, addition of Shh peptide at time = 0 also resulted in an increase in proliferation (Fig. 3GoD). As before with the optimally activated CD4+T cells, the percent live cells is similar with and without addition of Shh, but of those live cells, adding Shh peptide at t = 0 promotes cell entry into the proliferative S-G2 phase, with the percent increase in live cells in the S-G2 phase ranging from 27.8 to 77.8% (mean, 55.8%; n = 3; p < 0.02). Addition of the Shh peptide 24 h before suboptimal activation revealed an increase in the percentage of live CD4+ T cells (p < 0.02). However, as Fig. 3GoD shows, the pattern of the previous experiments was repeated, as a significantly higher percentage of those live cells entered the proliferative S-G2 phase with addition of exogenous Shh ranging from 34.6 to 110% (mean, 61.5%; n = 3; p < 0.03).

Anti-Shh Ab inhibits TCR-mediated CD4+ T cell proliferation in vitro

Given that exogenous Shh promotes the proliferation of activated CD4+ T cells, we were prompted to investigate whether CD4+ T cells produce Shh following TCR-mediated signaling. CD4+ T cells were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 Abs in the presence of a neutralizing anti-Shh Ab (5E1). The suboptimally activated CD4+ T cells were used in this set of experiments because under these conditions the cells showed increased proliferation as determined by both [3H]TdR incorporation and enhanced entry into the S-G2 phase of the cell cycle. The addition of anti-Shh Ab at the time of activation resulted in dose-dependent inhibition of proliferation. In the presence of 50 µg/ml anti-Shh Ab, the decrease ranged from 71.3 to 85.1% (mean, 77%; n = 3; p < 0.03; Fig. 4Go). Inhibition of proliferation was not detected in the presence of the isotype control Ab. These results demonstrate that endogenous Shh is produced by activated CD4+ T cells since the neutralizing Ab binds to Shh but not to the receptor, ptc.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Neutralizing anti-Shh Ab inhibits TCR-mediated CD4+ T cell proliferation. CD4+ T cells were suboptimally activated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 Abs and the neutralizing anti-Shh Ab (5E1) or isotype control added at the time of activation. The 5E1 Ab was added at a concentration of either 20 or 50 µg/ml to observe a dose-dependent effect, and the isotype Ab at 20 µg/ml. Proliferation as measured by [3H]TdR incorporation was determined at 72 h postactivation. Representative data from three independent experiments are shown.

 
Anti-Shh Ab blocks cell entry into S-G2 phase

The effect of the anti-Shh Ab on the cell cycle was also investigated (Table IGo). As with the Shh peptide studies, the anti-Shh Ab does not alter the percent live cells in the culture but exerts its effect by blocking the entry of the CD4+ T cells into the proliferative S-G2 phase of the cell cycle. The percent decrease in the proportion of CD4+ T cells in S-G2 with addition of the anti-Shh Ab (50 µg/ml) ranged from 66.2 to 81.6% (mean, 73.4%; n = 3; p < 0.02). This effect was not seen with the isotype control Ab, in which the percentage of CD4+ T cells in the S-G2 phase was very similar (either a slight increase or decrease) compared with medium-only activated CD4+ T cells. The percent alteration in the proportion of CD4+ T cells in S-G2 with addition of the isotype control Ab ranged from 19 to 25% (mean, 23%; n = 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Neutralising anti-Shh Ab inhibits CD4+ T cell entry into the S-G2 phase1

 
Kinetic analysis of expression of Shh, ptc, Gli1, and bcl-2 in activated CD4+ T cells in the presence and absence of exogenous Shh

To analyze the mechanisms of Shh amplification of TCR-mediated activation in CD4+ T cells, the kinetics of expression of components of the Shh signaling pathway and bcl-2 were analyzed in activated CD4+ T cells in the presence and absence of exogenous Shh. CD4+ T cell cultures were set up as before, suboptimally activated with anti-CD3/CD28, and Shh was added at t = 0. RNA was extracted at 24, 48, and 72 h postactivation. It has been reported that a two times or greater increase in the transcription of any gene on at least two occasions is considered to be significant (26, 27). Proliferation assays and cell cycle analyses were also performed concurrently to ensure that the Shh peptide showed enhanced proliferation in these CD4+ T cell cultures.

To perform a time course analysis, the 48- and 72-h samples were normalized to the 24-h RNA sample, assigned a value of 1. In suboptimally anti-CD3/CD28-activated CD4+ T cells in the absence of Shh, we detected a significantly increased transcription of Shh and Gli1, no significant changes were measured for the expression of either ptc or bcl-2 (Fig. 5GoA). In the presence of exogenous Shh, Shh transcription was increased at both 48 and 72 h. Gli1 transcription increased at 48 h and was maintained at 72 h. Bcl-2 transcripts increased at 48 and at 72 h. However, although ptc transcription was marginally higher at 72 h it did not reach significance (Fig. 5GoB).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Kinetic analysis of Shh, ptc, Gli1, and bcl-2 gene expression in activated CD4+ T cells with and without exogenous Shh. A and B, CD4+ T cells were activated with suboptimal concentrations of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 in medium alone (A) or with exogenous Shh added at the time of activation (B). Cells were collected at 24, 48, and 72 h and RNA was isolated for the measurement of transcripts by real-time PCR. In each case, to perform a time course analysis, the 48- and 72-h RNA samples were normalized to the 24-h RNA sample, assigned a value of 1.

 
To examine the effect of the Shh peptide on transcription of the various genes, the RNA samples from activated CD4+ T cell cultures with addition of the Shh peptide were normalized against the medium-only activated cultures at equivalent time points (24, 48, and 72 h). No difference in the level of transcription of ptc or Gli1 was seen between activated CD4+ T cells with and without exogenous Shh peptide throughout the time course. Transcription of Shh was significantly reduced at 24 h in activated CD4+ T cells with exogenous Shh peptide added compared with medium-only activated CD4+ T cells (Fig. 6GoA). Transcription of bcl-2 was significantly increased at 72 h in activated CD4+ T cells with exogenous Shh peptide added compared with medium-only activated CD4+ T cells (Fig. 6GoB).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Relative level of Shh and bcl-2 gene expression in activated CD4+ T cells with and without exogenous Shh. A and B, CD4+ T cells were activated with suboptimal concentrations of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 in medium alone or with exogenous Shh added at the time of activation. Cells were collected at 24, 48, and 72 h and RNA was isolated for the measurement of transcripts by real-time PCR. To examine the effect of exogenous Shh peptide on the transcription of Shh (A) and bcl-2 (B), the RNA samples from activated CD4+ T cell cultures with addition of Shh peptide were normalized against the medium-only activated cultures at equivalent time points.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we report that peripheral CD4+ T cells express components of the Shh signaling pathway and that activation of this pathway by Shh enhances TCR-induced proliferation by promoting cell entry into the S-G2 phase of the cell cycle.

Shh has a proliferative effects on a variety of cell types including hemopoietic stem cells (14, 15, 16, 17, 19). We have reported that Shh and ptc protein are expressed in peripheral lymphoid tissue by immunocytochemistry and that the Shh signaling pathway components Shh, ptc, smo, and Gli1 are present in both resting and activated peripheral CD4+ T cells by RT-PCR. It has been demonstrated that members of the Shh signaling pathway are expressed in the thymus (19). Shh was present on the thymic epithelial cells but not thymocytes, whereas, the receptors, smo and ptc were detected on thymocytes at various stages of development (19). Furthermore, transcripts for Shh, ptc, and smo have been detected in mature CD3+ T cell populations (15), which is in agreement with the findings reported here.

We observed that the addition of exogenous Shh increased CD4+ T cell proliferation significantly in response to suboptimal stimulation with anti-CD3/28 Abs. This enhancement of proliferation was also noted following the addition of Shh 24 h before activation. In contrast, exogenous Shh failed to amplify T cell proliferation induced by optimal doses of anti-CD3/CD28 Abs. It is unlikely that in vivo Ag would be encountered in an environment that would result in the level of activation mediated by saturating doses of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 Abs in vitro. Thus, Shh may function as a cofactor and contribute to clonal expansion of T cells under physiological conditions of stimulation.

These studies were extended to cell cycle analysis, and, with this more sensitive technique, we observed that exogenous Shh increased proliferation in activated CD4+ T cells if the Shh peptide was added either 24 h before or at the time of activation. Shh appears to promote CD4+ T cell entry into the proliferative S-G2 phase of the cell cycle. The exception to this was the increase in the percentage of live CD4+ T cells observed with addition of exogenous Shh 24 h before suboptimal anti-CD3/28 Ab activation. However, a significantly higher percentage of those live cells entered the proliferative S-G2 phase of the cell cycle with the addition of Shh. This effect of Shh has been reported for several other cell types (14, 17). For example, it has been demonstrated that Shh induced a disproportionate number of keratinocytes in the S-G2 phase of the cell cycle (14). Kenney and Rowitch (17) found that Shh increased the number of neuronal precursor cells in S phase. They also noted that Shh was unable to recruit quiescent cells into the cell cycle and could only sustain cell cycle progression. This may also be true for CD4+ T cells since we found that Shh has no effect on resting, nonactivated CD4+ T cells. Shh increased cell cycle progression only in cells that had been activated and which would have already entered the G1 phase of the cell cycle. The increased proliferation induced by Shh is not reflected in decreased levels of apoptosis as shown by cell cycle analysis. However, addition of Shh peptide did significantly increase the transcription of bcl-2. Shh has previously been shown to induce expression of bcl-2 (20). Bcl-2 is known to play an important role in the regulation of postthymic T cell survival (21, 22, 23, 24) and Shh may act, at least in part, by promoting survival of activated cells through the induction of bcl-2.

TCR-mediated signaling in CD4+ T cells can be blocked with anti-Shh-neutralizing Ab; therefore, this would suggest that Shh may be a normal component of the proliferative response. The proposed mechanism by which Shh exerts its proliferative effect was supported by the antiproliferative effect of the anti-Shh Ab. Again, no change was seen in the level of CD4+ T cell death, but the anti-Shh Ab executed its antiproliferative effect by blocking CD4+ T cell entry into the S-G2 phase of the cell cycle with the majority of cells arresting at G1 phase. Since this Ab binds to Shh, but not to its receptor ptc, this indicates that the Ab is blocking effects of endogenous Shh present in the CD4+ T cell culture. Therefore, it would appear that endogenous Shh maintains proliferation perhaps in an autocrine fashion, since blocking of this endogenous Shh results in decreased proliferation. Exogenous Shh serves to enhance this proliferation. This is supported by the quantitation of the Shh signaling pathway components by real-time PCR. Transcription of Shh mRNA was maximal at 72 h, corresponding to maximal proliferation in activated CD4+ T cells both with and without Shh peptide added to the culture. Therefore, it appears that even in normal activation conditions, Shh may function to maintain proliferation. When comparing the relative level of expression of transcripts of Shh in CD4+ T cell cultures in the presence and absence of Shh peptide, expression was reduced at 24 h in CD4+ T cell cultures to which exogenous Shh had been added. Thus, the presence of exogenous Shh may negatively regulate endogenous production by CD4+ T cells. Further evidence to support the theory that the Shh signaling pathway is involved in normal CD4+ T cell proliferation is the maximal transcription of Gli1 at 72 h.

Cell cycle progression is largely dependent on a regulatory network whose key components include the cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks) (28, 29, 30, 31, 32). It has previously been shown that Shh expression is associated with increased activity of cdk2 and cdk4, important in G1-S transition, in keratinocytes under normal growth conditions (14). It has also been shown that Shh promotes cell cycle progression in proliferating neuronal precursors by maintaining expression of G1 phase cyclins such as cyclin D1, D2, and E, thought to be via synthesis of unknown protein intermediates (17). Recently, Hh signaling in Drosophila has been shown to promote DNA replication by up-regulation of cyclins D and E (33). These mechanisms may account for the ability of Shh to promote CD4+ T cell entry into the S-G2 phase of the cell cycle.

An alternative mode by which Shh can promote cell cycle progression, namely, entry into mitosis requires the activation and nuclear translocation of the M phase promoting factor (MPF) (34, 35). The MPF consists of two proteins, cdc2 and cyclin B1. ptc1 can interact with cyclin B1 and prevent nuclear translocation of the MPF and thereby prevent cell cycle progression. With addition of Shh to bind ptc, the release of cyclin B1 is facilitated, and nuclear import of the MPF and subsequently cell cycle progression can take place (36). However, we observed that the effects of Shh on the cell cycle in CD4+ T cells occurred in S phase, which implies that repression of MPF (which controls the latter G2-M phase) cannot fully account for our findings. The repressive effect of ptc on cell cycle progression could perhaps explain why the transcription of ptc mRNA does not increase throughout the course of proliferation as in the case of Shh mRNA and Gli1 mRNA. In summary, we have presented evidence for a link between Shh signaling and sustained and enhanced peripheral CD4+ T cell proliferation. This appears to via promotion of CD4+T cells into S-G2 phase of the cell cycle. Furthermore, Shh can be produced in an autocrine fashion by the CD4+ T cells themselves, functioning to amplify and maintain clonal expansion.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank June Stewart and Anne Grant for their expert technical assistance and Judith Gordon for expert secretarial assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This research was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Council, and the British Lung Foundation. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jacqueline A. Lowrey, Immunobiology Group, Medical Research Council Center for Inflammation Research, Respiratory Medicine Unit, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, U.K. E-mail address: J.A.Lowrey{at}ed.ac.uk Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Hh, hedgehog; ptc, patched; smo, smoothened; Shh, sonic Hh; fp, forward primer; rp, reverse primer; ct, cycle threshold; cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; MPF, M phase promoting factor. Back

Received for publication March 25, 2002. Accepted for publication June 17, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hammerschmidt, M., A. Brook, A. P. McMahon. 1997. The world according to hedgehog. Trends Genet. 13:14.[Medline]
  2. Ingham, P. W.. 1998. Transducing hedgehog: the story so far. EMBO J. 17:3505.[Medline]
  3. Nüsslein-Volhard, C., E. Wieschaus. 1980. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287:795.[Medline]
  4. Bumcroft, D. A., R. Takada, A. P. McMahon. 1995. Proteolytic processing yields two secreted forms of sonic hedgehog. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2294.[Abstract]
  5. Lee, J. J., S. C. Ekker, D. P. Kessler, J. A. Porter, B. I. Sun, P. A. Beachy. 1994. Autoproteolysis in hedgehog protein biogenesis. Science 266:1528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Porter, J. A., D. P. von Kessler, S. C. Ekker, K. E. Young, J. J. Lee, K. Moses, P. A. Beachy. 1995. The product of hedgehog auto-proteolytic cleavage active in local and long-range signalling. Nature 374:363.[Medline]
  7. Williams, K. P., P. Rayhorn, G. Chi-Rosso, E. A. Garber, K. L. Strauch, G. S. B. Horan, J. O. Reilly, D. P. Baker, F. R. Taylor, V. Koteliansky, R. Blake Pepinsky. 1999. Functional antagonists of sonic hedgehog reveal the importance of the N terminus for activity. J. Cell Sci. 112:4405.[Abstract]
  8. Zeng, X., J. A. Goetz, L. M. Suber, Jr W. J. Scott, C. M. Schreiner, D. J. Robbins. 2001. A freely diffusible form of sonic hedgehog mediates long-range signalling. Nature 411:716.[Medline]
  9. Murone, M., A. Rosenthal, F. J. de Sauvage. 1999. Sonic hedgehog signalling by the patched-smoothened receptor complex. Curr. Biol. 9:76.[Medline]
  10. Theil, T., S. Kaesler, L. Grotewold, J. Bose, U. Ruther. 1999. Gli genes and limb development. Cell Tissue Res. 296:75.[Medline]
  11. Van den Brink, G. R., J. C. H. Hardwick, G. N. J. Tytgat, M. A. Brink, F. J. Ten Kate, S. J. H. Van Deventer, M. P. Peppelenbosch. 2001. Sonic hedgehog regulates gastric gland morphogenesis in man and mouse. Gastroenterology 121:317.[Medline]
  12. Treier, M., S. O’Connell, A. Gleiberman, J. Price, D. P. Szeto, R. Burgess, P. Chuang, A. P. McMahon, M. G. Rosenfeld. 2001. Hedgehog signalling is required for pituitary gland development. Development 128:377.[Abstract]
  13. Thomas, M. K., N. Rastalsky, J. H. Lee, J. F. Habener. 2000. Hedgehog signalling regulation of insulin production by pancreatic {beta}-cells. Diabetes 49:2039.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fan, H., P. Khavari. 1999. Sonic hedgehog opposes epithelial cell cycle arrest. J. Cell Biol. 147:71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bhardwaj, G., B. Murdoch, D. Wu, D. P. Baker, K. P. Williams, K. Chadwick, L. E. Ling, F. N. Karanu, M. Bhatia. 2001. Sonic hedgehog induces the proliferation of primitive human hematopoietic cells via BMP regulation. Nat. Immunol. 2:172.[Medline]
  16. Fujita, E., Y. Khoroku, K. Urase, T. Tsukahara, M. Y. Momoi, H. Kumagai, T. Takemura, T. Kuroki, T. Momoi. 1997. Involvement of sonic hedgehog in the cell growth of LK-2 cells, human lung squamous carcinoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 238:658.[Medline]
  17. Kenney, A. M., D. H. Rowitch. 2000. Sonic hedgehog promotes G1 cyclin expression and sustained cell cycle progression in mammalian neuronal precursors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:9055.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ruiz I Altaba, A.. 1999. Gli proteins and hedgehog signalling in development and cancer. Trends Genet. 15:418.[Medline]
  19. Outram, S. V., A. Varas, C. V. Pepicelli, T. Crompton. 2000. Hedgehog signalling regulates differentiation from double-negative to double-positive thymocyte. Immunity 13:187.[Medline]
  20. Fan, H., A. E. Oro, M. P. Scott, P. A. Khavari. 1997. Induction of basal cell carcinoma features in transgenic human skin expressing sonic hedgehog. Nat. Med. 3:788.[Medline]
  21. Strasser, A., A. W. Harris, S. Cory. 1991. Bcl-2 transgene inhibits T cell death and perturbs thymic self-censorship. Cell 67:889.[Medline]
  22. Katsumata, M., R. M. Siegel, D. C. Louie, T. Miyashita, Y. Tsujimota, P. C. Nowell, M. I. Green, J. C. Reed. 1992. Differential effects of bcl-2 on T and B cells in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:11376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Nakayama, K. I., K. Nakayama, I. Negishi. 1993. Disappearance of the lymphoid system in bcl-2 homozygous mutant chimeric mice. Science 261:1584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Veis, D. J., C. M. Sorenson, J. R. Shutter, S. J. Korsmeyer. 1993. Bcl-2-deficient mice demonstrate fulminant lymphoid apoptosis, polycystic kidneys, and hypopigmented hair. Cell 75:229.[Medline]
  25. Vindelov, L., I. J. Christensen. 1990. An integrated set of methods for routine flow cytometric DNA analysis. Methods Cell Biol. 33:127.[Medline]
  26. Chtanova, T., R. A. Kemp, A. P. Sutherland, F. Ronchese, C. R. Mackay. 2001. Gene microarrays reveal extensive differential gene expression in both CD4+ and CD8+ type 1 and type 2 T cells. J. Immunol. 167:3057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Granucci, F., C. Vizzardelli, E. Virzi, M. Rescigno, P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli. 2001. Transcriptional reprogramming of DCs by differentiation stimuli. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:2539.[Medline]
  28. Lees, E.. 1995. Cyclin dependent kinase regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7:773.[Medline]
  29. Morgan, D. O.. 1995. Principles of CDK regulation. Nature 374:131.[Medline]
  30. Sherr, C. J.. 1994. G1 phase progression: cycling on cue. Cell 79:551.[Medline]
  31. Sherr, C. J.. 1996. Cancer cells cycles. Science 274:1672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Elledge, S. J.. 1996. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274:1664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Duman-Scheel, M., L. Weng, S. Xin, W. Du. 2002. Hedgehog regulates cell growth and proliferation by inducing cyclin D and cyclin E. Nature 417:299.[Medline]
  34. Borgne, A., A. C. Ostvold, S. Flament, L. Meijer. 1999. Intra-M phase-promoting factor phosphorylation of cyclin B at the prophase/metaphase transition. J. Biol. Chem. 274:11977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Peter, M., J. Nakagawa, M. Doree, J. C. Labbe, E. A. Nigg. 1990. In vitro disassembly of the nuclear lamina and M phase-specific phosphorylation of laminas by cdc2 kinase. Cell 61:591.[Medline]
  36. Barnes, E. A., M. Kong, V. Ollendorff, D. J. Donoghue. 2001. Patched 1 interacts with cyclin B1 to regulate cell cycle progression. EMBO J. 20:2214.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
G. V. Hegde, K. J. Peterson, K. Emanuel, A. K. Mittal, A. D. Joshi, J. D. Dickinson, G. J. Kollessery, R. G. Bociek, P. Bierman, J. M. Vose, et al.
Hedgehog-Induced Survival of B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells in a Stromal Cell Microenvironment: A Potential New Therapeutic Target
Mol. Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 6(12): 1928 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
A. Varas, C. Hernandez-Lopez, J. Valencia, S. Mattavelli, V. G. Martinez, L. Hidalgo, C. Gutierrez-Frias, A. G. Zapata, R. Sacedon, and A. Vicente
Survival and function of human thymic dendritic cells are dependent on autocrine Hedgehog signaling
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2008; 83(6): 1476 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
G. V. Hegde, C. M. Munger, K. Emanuel, A. D. Joshi, T. C. Greiner, D. D. Weisenburger, J. M. Vose, and S. S. Joshi
Targeting of sonic hedgehog-GLI signaling: a potential strategy to improve therapy for mantle cell lymphoma
Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2008; 7(6): 1450 - 1460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Ji, F. C. Mei, B. H. Johnson, E. B. Thompson, and X. Cheng
Protein Kinase A, not Epac, Suppresses Hedgehog Activity and Regulates Glucocorticoid Sensitivity in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells
J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37370 - 37377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. J. Rowbotham, A. L. Hager-Theodorides, M. Cebecauer, D. K. Shah, E. Drakopoulou, J. Dyson, S. V. Outram, and T. Crompton
Activation of the Hedgehog signaling pathway in T-lineage cells inhibits TCR repertoire selection in the thymus and peripheral T-cell activation
Blood, May 1, 2007; 109(9): 3757 - 3766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
V. S. F. Chan, S.-y. Chau, L. Tian, Y. Chen, S. K. Y. Kwong, J. Quackenbush, M. Dallman, J. Lamb, and P. K. H. Tam
Sonic hedgehog promotes CD4+ T lymphocyte proliferation and modulates the expression of a subset of CD28-targeted genes
Int. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 18(12): 1627 - 1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. C. Martinez, F. Larbret, F. Zobairi, J. Coulombe, N. Debili, W. Vainchenker, M. Ruat, and J.-M. Freyssinet
Transfer of differentiation signal by membrane microvesicles harboring hedgehog morphogens
Blood, November 1, 2006; 108(9): 3012 - 3020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. F. Bijlsma, M. P. Peppelenbosch, and C. A. Spek
Hedgehog Morphogen in Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation, October 31, 2006; 114(18): 1985 - 1991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Willinger, T. Freeman, M. Herbert, H. Hasegawa, A. J. McMichael, and M. F. C. Callan
Human Naive CD8 T Cells Down-Regulate Expression of the WNT Pathway Transcription Factors Lymphoid Enhancer Binding Factor 1 and Transcription Factor 7 (T Cell Factor-1) following Antigen Encounter In Vitro and In Vivo
J. Immunol., February 1, 2006; 176(3): 1439 - 1446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Sacedon, B. Diez, V. Nunez, C. Hernandez-Lopez, C. Gutierrez-Frias, T. Cejalvo, S. V. Outram, T. Crompton, A. G. Zapata, A. Vicente, et al.
Sonic Hedgehog Is Produced by Follicular Dendritic Cells and Protects Germinal Center B Cells from Apoptosis
J. Immunol., February 1, 2005; 174(3): 1456 - 1461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Gutierrez-Frias, R. Sacedon, C. Hernandez-Lopez, T. Cejalvo, T. Crompton, A. G. Zapata, A. Varas, and A. Vicente
Sonic Hedgehog Regulates Early Human Thymocyte Differentiation by Counteracting the IL-7-Induced Development of CD34+ Precursor Cells
J. Immunol., October 15, 2004; 173(8): 5046 - 5053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Kobune, Y. Ito, Y. Kawano, K. Sasaki, H. Uchida, K. Nakamura, H. Dehari, H. Chiba, R. Takimoto, T. Matsunaga, et al.
Indian hedgehog gene transfer augments hematopoietic support of human stromal cells including NOD/SCID-{beta}2m-/- repopulating cells.
Blood, August 15, 2004; 104(4): 1002 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
R. Sacedon, A. Varas, C. Hernandez-Lopez, C. Gutierrez-deFrias, T. Crompton, A. G. Zapata, and A. Vicente
Expression of Hedgehog Proteins in the Human Thymus
J. Histochem. Cytochem., November 1, 2003; 51(11): 1557 - 1566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. A. Stewart, J. A. Lowrey, S. J. Wakelin, P. M. Fitch, S. Lindey, M. J. Dallman, J. R. Lamb, and S. E. M. Howie
Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Modulates Activation of and Cytokine Production by Human Peripheral CD4+ T Cells
J. Immunol., November 15, 2002; 169(10): 5451 - 5457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowrey, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lowrey, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, J. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS