|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



Departments of
* Pathobiology and
Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the search for T. pallidum subspecies pallidum virulence factors, members of a family of 12 genes called Treponema pallidum repeat (tpr)3 genes AL were identified (7, 8, 9). In an organism that lacks major biosynthetic capacity, devoting 2% of its small genome to the tpr gene family is quite remarkable and suggests the importance of the tpr gene family to the organism. We have reported that when one member of this family, Treponema pallidum repeat protein K (TprK), is used as an immunogen, lesion development is attenuated following homologous challenge in the rabbit model (7). Although Hazlett et al. (10) failed to corroborate these results, we have confirmed and expanded the original results to show that immunizing with the N-terminal portion (aa 37273) of TprK retards lesion development (manuscript in preparation) as previously seen with a larger fragment (aa 37348) (7). Therefore, there is evidence that TprK does play an important role in the immune response. Comparison of TprK sequences from various T. pallidum isolates has shown that TprK varies in seven discrete variable regions among and within all isolates examined except the Nichols strain (11). We hypothesize that TprK elicits a protective immune response, but, due to its variability, aids subsets of treponemes to escape the immune response. In support of our hypothesis we show here that during infection with T. pallidum, Abs are specifically directed toward the discrete variable regions of TprK. In contrast to the Ab response, the T cell response is directed to the conserved regions of TprK, which may be useful in a multicomponent vaccine.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twenty outbred adult male New Zealand White rabbits (R & R Rabbitry, Stanwood, WA) were infected intratesticularly with 1 x 108 T. pallidum, Nichols strain; four uninfected rabbits were used as controls. The T. pallidum Nichols strain (obtained from J. N. Miller (University of California, Los Angeles, CA) and brought to Seattle in 1979) was propagated intratesticularly in rabbits as previously described (12). At 10, 30, 90, 175, and 280 days after infection, blood and splenocytes were harvested from groups of four animals for lymphocyte proliferation and Ab assays.
Immunization
The open reading frame of tprK was divided into three sections: fragment 1, encoding aa 37273; fragment 2, encoding aa 274348; and fragment 3, encoding aa 349478. The amplicons from T. pallidum Seattle Nichols strain DNA were cloned into the pRSET expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), the sequence was verified, and the peptide was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified as previously described (7, 13). The proteins were dialyzed into PBS, pH 7.2, size confirmation and purity were evaluated by SDS-PAGE, and concentrations were determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL). New Zealand White male rabbits (R & R Rabbitry) were immunized with 125 µg of the three recombinant fragments in Ribi Adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) administered s.c., intradermally, i.m., and i.p. every 3 wk for six consecutive immunizations. Four rabbits were immunized with each fragment except for fragment 2 (n = 3) due to an unrelated early death of one rabbit. Serum was collected from each rabbit 1014 days after the last boost, pooled, and used in Ab assays.
Peptides for epitope mapping
Overlapping 20-aa synthetic peptides were designed based on the
Seattle Nichols strain sequence (GenBank accession no. AF194369).
Starting after the signal sequence cleavage site (10, 11)
a total of 39 synthetic peptides (spanning aa 30429; Table I
) generally overlapping by 10 aa were
made using a Rainin-PTI Symphony instrument and Sephadex desalting step
to a minimum purity of 70% analyzed by HPLC trace and mass
spectrometry (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA) and
rehydrated in PBS, pH 7.2. The conserved 3' tprK region
(encoding aa 425478) was cloned, expressed in E. coli, and
purified as described in the previous section.
|
Spleen cells obtained from uninfected and infected rabbits were
tested for proliferative activity as previously described (12, 14). Quadruplicate cultures of 200 µl cells from each animal
tested separately were inoculated with 5 µg synthetic peptides, 2.5
µg recombinant peptide, 10 µl sonicated T. pallidum
(treponeme-specific positive control), 4 µg Con A (T cell mitogen
used as a positive control; Sigma-Aldrich), or 10 µl PBS (control for
background). Proliferation was measured as the amount of tritiated
thymidine taken up by new cells. The mean ± SE of the
quadruplicate test wells minus the mean of quadruplicate wells with no
Ag from each animal was calculated. The data presented in Fig. 1
are the mean ± SE for each
condition from four different animals per time point.
|
Ninety-six-well Maxisorb Immunoplates (Nunc, Naperville, IL)
were coated with 50 µl of 10 µg/ml peptides in PBS and incubated at
4°C overnight. Plates were washed with PBS and 0.05% Tween 20 and
blocked with 3% nonfat dry milk (NFM) in PBS. Sera were preadsorbed
with crude lysate of E. coli expressing an unrelated
recombinant protein to remove Abs directed against E. coli
and vector-encoded peptides within recombinant peptide 40. One hundred
microliters of serum diluted to a final concentration of 1/20 in PBS
with 1% NFM were added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 1
h. The plates were washed as described above, and 100 µl goat
anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) alkaline phosphatase conjugate
(Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 1/2000 in PBS and 1% NFM were added to each
well and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Plates were
washed, developed with 50 µl/well of 1 mg/ml
para-nitrophenylphosphate substrate (Sigma-Aldrich), for 15 min for
recombinant peptide and 1 h for synthetic peptides, and absorbance
was measured at OD405. A bicinchoninic acid
protein assay (Pierce) was performed in plates coated with Ag and
washed to demonstrate that all peptides bound to the plates (data not
shown). The mean ± SE of triplicate experimental wells minus the
mean of the wells with no peptide was calculated for all conditions
tested with serum from each animal. Each graph in Fig. 2
represents the mean ± SE for each
condition from four different rabbits infected for the same amount of
time. The graphs in Fig. 3
represent the
mean ± SE for triplicate wells minus the mean of wells with no
peptide for all conditions tested with sera that were pooled from
immunized rabbits before testing in ELISAs.
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine the peptide targets of the T cell response,
splenocytes were isolated from outbred rabbits that were not infected
or were infected for varying lengths of time: peak orchitis was
observed at 10 days, orchitis was resolving at 30 days, rabbits become
immune to homologous challenge between 90175 days, and 280 days
represents long term infection (1, 5). Lymphocytes from
uninfected rabbits did not proliferate significantly when exposed to
any peptide (Fig. 1
). At each time point postinfection, the lymphocytes
from each of the four rabbits tested responded to peptides representing
conserved regions of TprK. Some reactivity was seen to adjacent
peptides 2 and 16, which contain portions of the conserved regions of
reactive peptides 1, 3, and 15 (Table I
). For peptides 15 and 40,
proliferative responses were seen as early as 10 days postinfection and
persisted until the last time point tested, 280 days (Fig. 1
).
Individual rabbits recognized the same subset of peptides, e.g.,
peptides 1, 3, 9, 10, 15, and 40, although the magnitude of the
response varied among these outbred animals (data not shown). All
infected rabbits developed responses equivalent to at least 20,000 cpm
in response to sonicated T. pallidum and 30,000 cpm in
response to Con A; the uninfected control rabbits developed responses
of <1,000 cpm to sonicated T. pallidum and at least 30,000
cpm to Con A (data not shown).
Ab responses during infection are primarily directed to the variable regions
To identify B cell epitopes of TprK throughout infection, ELISAs
were performed with sera from the same 20 experimentally infected and
four uninfected outbred rabbits used in the T cell epitope-mapping
experiments. No response was seen with sera from uninfected rabbits or
rabbits infected for only 10 days (data not shown). At 30 days
postinfection Ab responses were directed to a conserved and
several variable portions of TprK (Fig. 2
). By day 90, however, all
peptides recognized by Abs contained amino acids representative of
variable regions, in contrast to conserved T cell epitopes. In
confirmatory studies with two additional groups of rabbits, Abs to
conserved peptides were also recognized only at 30 days postinfection
and only to variable regions later in infection (data not shown). Ab
responses to some peptides were detectable for at least 280 days
postinfection (Fig. 2
). Unlike the consistent T cell responses, Abs
from individual rabbits recognized different subsets of variable region
peptides (data not shown).
TprK immunized rabbits develop Abs to conserved and variable regions
To demonstrate which peptides were capable of eliciting Ab
responses, sera were collected from rabbits immunized with recombinant
TprK fragments, pooled, and tested in ELISAs. In contrast to Abs
resulting from infection, both conserved and variable peptides
throughout TprK were recognized by antisera (Fig. 3
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After 30 days postinfection the Ab response is directed only against
peptides that contain amino acids representing variable
regions. It is likely that the Abs are reacting to the
variable amino acids within these peptides because the adjacent
peptides that overlap with those conserved sequences are not recognized
(Table I
and Fig. 2
). In a few instances, however, such as Ab
reactivity to peptides 21 and 26, both the conserved and variable amino
acids within a peptide seem necessary to constitute the proper epitope,
because neither the peptides overlapping only the variable or only the
conserved amino acids are reactive. It is also possible that this
striking lack of response to conserved sequences may be due in part to
the fact that conformational epitopes are not detected by this peptide
assay. Nevertheless, in distinct contrast to the T cell response,
several peptides representing variable regions are targets of the
humoral response.
Also in contrast to the T cell response, which consistently
recognizes the same peptides, Abs recognize different epitopes at
different times postinfection (Figs. 1
and 2
). The diversity in the
humoral response is probably not due to TprK variation in these
studies, because the peptides are homologous to the Seattle Nichols
laboratory strain that was used to infect the rabbits. Unlike most
T. pallidum isolates that have heterogeneous TprK sequences
within an isolate, the laboratory Nichols strain seems to have only one
TprK sequence (8, 10, 11). In separate experiments groups
of rabbits were infected, and serial sera were collected from each
animal. In these studies after 30 days of infection there was no shift
in peptides recognized during the course of infection by sera from each
individual. There were, however, differences in the peptides recognized
by sera from the different outbred rabbits. Similar variation might
exist among genetically diverse humans.
In rabbits immunized with recombinant TprK, Abs are raised against
peptides from both the conserved and variable regions (Fig. 3
). The
recombinant TprK fragments are most likely folded and exposed to the
immune system in a different manner than native TprK, thus allowing the
conserved regions of recombinant TprK to be more exposed. These data
suggest that the conserved regions are inherently as immunogenic as the
variable regions, but are not readily exposed later in infection. In
infected rabbits, Abs to conserved regions are demonstrable only at 30
days postinfection, immediately following massive treponemal killing
and clearance (Fig. 2
). During bacterial clearance conserved regions of
TprK may be available in larger quantity for B cell recognition, while
the variable regions may be more accessible for B cell stimulation in
intact organisms later in infection. After the antigenic mass is
cleared during resolution of the primary stage, the B cell response may
be refocused to those regions exposed on the surface of persistent,
intact treponemes and thus more readily available to B cells. The fact
that both T and B cell responses were detectable for at least 280 days
suggests that TprK is expressed throughout the course of infection
(Figs. 1
and 2
).
That TprK diversity is limited to discrete regions of the protein is consistent with the hypothesis that the conserved regions may be essential for structural integrity. Analogies to other bacteria with molecules that have similar discrete variable regions suggest a possible surface exposure for the variable regions while the conserved regions are intramembrane domains. The discrete variable regions in neisserial Por and Opa, H. influenzae P2 and P5, C. trachomatis MOMP, and B. burgdorferi VlsE are all predicted to be surface-exposed loops (15, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27). Under immunological pressure it is advantageous for antigenic targets not essential for structural integrity to be hypermutable. The mutations may also give the pathogen functional advantages as seen with the surface-exposed variants of the neisserial Opa proteins that specifically bind to different tissues (23).
Because Abs are directed toward the variable regions of TprK, treponemes that express a new variant of TprK may escape recognition. The Ab response directed to variable regions of TprK may help explain the lack of heterologous protection in rabbits and humans (5, 6), as heterologous isolates do not have identical TprK variants (11). Another protein with similar discrete variable regions, C. trachomatis MOMP, has been implicated in conferring strain-specific immunity in humans (28).
It is known, however, that the Ab response alone does not confer
complete protection. Passive Ab transfers from rabbits that are immune
to homologous infection (infected for >3 mo) have indicated that Abs
can delay and alter lesion development, but do not prevent infection
(29). Although the lack of complete protection may in part
be due to treponemes with new TprK variants escaping the Ab responses,
it is likely that a T cell response is also important to protect
against syphilis. Although adoptive transfer of T cells is impossible
because the animal model is outbred, there is clear evidence of the
involvement of a strong T cell response during infection. Activated T
cells and macrophages infiltrate primary and secondary syphilitic
lesions and clear opsonized treponemes, resulting in lesion resolution
(1, 2, 3, 4). The T lymphocyte responses to TprK were directed
against conserved regions that were recognized by all infected rabbits
(Fig. 1
). These conserved TprK T cell epitopes may prove useful in a
subunit vaccine. However, it is most likely that complete heterologous
protection would require not only a T cell response, but also a
cross-protective B cell response that would be unlikely with a
single TprK.
Despite its small genome, T. pallidum evades the immune system and invades a variety of tissues. Perhaps because of its minimal genome and its metabolic dependence on the host, it is under great pressure to develop mechanisms for antigenic diversity, thus enhancing survival within the host. We demonstrated that the Ab responses during infection are directed to variable regions, which may affect tissue tropism, persistence, and the lack of heterologous protection. Our identification of vigorous T cell responses to conserved epitopes may be exploited in a multicomponent vaccine.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Wesley C. Van Voorhis, University of Washington, Box 357185, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail address: wesley{at}u.washington.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: tprK, Treponema pallidum repeat K gene; TprK, Treponema pallidum repeat K protein; MOMP, Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein; NFM, nonfat dry milk; Opa, neisserial opacity protein; Por, neisserial protein I; VlsE, Borrelia burgdorferi VMP-like sequence protein. ![]()
Received for publication January 24, 2002. Accepted for publication May 10, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Strouhal, D. Smajs, P. Matejkova, E. Sodergren, A. G. Amin, J. K. Howell, S. J. Norris, and G. M. Weinstock Genome Differences between Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum Strain Nichols and T. paraluiscuniculi Strain Cuniculi A Infect. Immun., December 1, 2007; 75(12): 5859 - 5866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Giacani, B. Molini, C. Godornes, L. Barrett, W. Van Voorhis, A. Centurion-Lara, and S. A. Lukehart Quantitative Analysis of tpr Gene Expression in Treponema pallidum Isolates: Differences among Isolates and Correlation with T-Cell Responsiveness in Experimental Syphilis Infect. Immun., January 1, 2007; 75(1): 104 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. LaFond, B. J. Molini, W. C. Van Voorhis, and S. A. Lukehart Antigenic Variation of TprK V Regions Abrogates Specific Antibody Binding in Syphilis Infect. Immun., November 1, 2006; 74(11): 6244 - 6251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. LaFond, A. Centurion-Lara, C. Godornes, W. C. Van Voorhis, and S. A. Lukehart TprK Sequence Diversity Accumulates during Infection of Rabbits with Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum Nichols Strain Infect. Immun., March 1, 2006; 74(3): 1896 - 1906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. LaFond and S. A. Lukehart Biological Basis for Syphilis Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2006; 19(1): 29 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. O. Hazlett, D. L. Cox, M. Decaffmeyer, M. P. Bennett, D. C. Desrosiers, C. J. La Vake, M. E. La Vake, K. W. Bourell, E. J. Robinson, R. Brasseur, et al. TP0453, a Concealed Outer Membrane Protein of Treponema pallidum, Enhances Membrane Permeability J. Bacteriol., September 15, 2005; 187(18): 6499 - 6508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |