|
|
||||||||












Departments of
* Pharmacology and Therapeutics and
Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology, and Pharmacology, Research Center of Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
Departments of Pediatrics and Cell Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada;
¶ Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and
|| Research Center of Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B
binding to the DNA consensus sequence. COX-2 expression was prevented
by mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular
signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and NF-
B inhibitors. This study
describes for the first time the nucleus as a putative organelle
capable of generating PAF and expresses its receptor, which upon
stimulation induces the expression of the proinflammatory gene
COX-2. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although many responses induced by PAF can result from its interaction
with cell surface GPCR, intracrine effects of PAF have also been
proposed based largely on pharmacological binding studies
(5). But the mechanisms by which PAF can elicit gene
expression are unknown, as is the case with most ligands of GPCRs. Some
mechanisms recently uncovered to explain GPCR-mediated gene induction
implicate endocytosis-associated
-arrestin-c-Src interaction leading
to downstream activation of Ras and mitogen-activated protein kinases
(MAPKs) and possibly metalloprotease-dependent transactivation of
receptor tyrosine kinases involving de novo release of their ligand
(6). Alternatively, PAF may exert intracellular actions by
generating its own formation (7), inferring possible
active intracellular binding sites (8, 9).
There is circumstantial evidence for an intracrine mode of action of
PAF. Most newly generated PAF remains cell associated and retained
within its producing cells as shown for endothelium and leukocytes
(10, 11). Enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of PAF,
namely cytosolic phospholipase A2
(cPLA2) and acetyltransferase, have been detected
on the nuclear membrane (12, 13). Separate functions for
the intracellular and cell surface receptors have been suggested using
agents that putatively distinguish these receptors (8, 9).
Specifically, immediate effects have been proposed to be mediated by
cell surface receptors, whereas regulation of expression of specific
genes may be dependent upon intracellular receptors, consistent with
the presence of signaling effectors in nuclei, including G proteins
(14, 15), ionic channels (16, 17),
phospholipases (12, 18), adenylate cyclase
(19), kinases (20), and NF-
B
(21). However, the specific identification of
intracellular PAF receptors as well as their physiological functions,
especially on organelles, which may explain their presumed involvement
in gene regulation (8, 22) in particular nuclei, has never
been explicitly demonstrated. We hypothesized that PAF receptors may
also exist at the cell nucleus where they would contribute in serving
particular functions, specifically induction of major proinflammatory
genes cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and inducible NO synthase (iNOS). We
focused on endothelium and confirmed observations in Chinese hamster
ovary (CHO) cells. Our findings unveil 1) the generation of
PAF-molecular species and presence of functional PAF receptors at the
cell nucleus in situ (on freshly isolated tissue), 2) that stimulation
of these nuclear receptors induces expression of major inflammatory
immediate-early genes COX-2 and iNOS, and 3) that this induction is
MAPK kinase (MEK)- and NF-
B-dependent. This study establishes an
important new mechanism by which PAF regulates gene expression.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary cultures of porcine cerebral microvascular endothelial
cells (PCECs) were grown as described (23). CHO cells were
maintained in 1:1 DMEM/Hams F-12 nutrient mixture containing 10%
FBS, and cell transfection was performed (24). Briefly,
human PAF receptor cDNA tagged with c-myc at the 5' end was
subcloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) expression vector
resistant to geneticin. CHO cells (
2.5 x
105 cells/dish) were transiently transfected with
the constructs using 2 µg of DNA and 2 µl of FuGENE6 (Roche
Diagnostic Systems, Somerville, NJ). Cells were seeded 24 h after
transfection and stable CHO cell transfectants (termed CDL8) were
isolated by geneticin selection (1 mg/ml). Transfection efficiency was
6070%.
Preparation of isolated nuclei
Nuclei were isolated from PCECs at 4°C, and the morphological
integrity and purity (>98%) were assessed by electron microscopy
(Fig. 1
A) and by near absence
of plasma membrane marker 5' nucleotidase (<7%; Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO) (25). The protein content was measured using a
Bio-Rad assay system (Hercules, CA).
|
Isolated nuclei (100 µg) were stimulated with H2O2; the reaction was stopped by adding 4 vol of ethanol and the mixture was placed at -20°C for 1 h. PAF extraction was conducted (26) and PAF-molecular species were quantified by commercial kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ).
Flow cytometry
PAF receptor expression was determined by staining PCECs or nuclei (5 x 105) with a polyclonal goat anti-human PAF receptor Ab (1:25; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) or with control normal goat IgG (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 30 min at 4°C in PBS containing 2% FBS. Staining with FITC-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG (1:50; Cedarlane Laboratories, Hornby, Ontario, Canada) followed this procedure. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at 4°C before staining. The cognate blocking peptide (5-fold excess) was used to validate specificity of immunoreactivity. Cells were processed on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and results were analyzed by CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
Radioligand binding
Radioligand binding was conducted as previously reported (5). Briefly, 1-O-octadecyl,[octadecyl-9,10-[3H](N)]-2-acetyl-sn-glyceryl-3-phosphorylcholine (specific activity, 160 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) was used as labeled ligand, and 10 µM unlabeled methylcarbamate-PAF (C-PAF) (Biomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA), the nonmetabolizable form (27), was used for assessing nonspecific binding. Association-dissociation curve was achieved by incubating isolated nuclei with 1 nM [3H]PAF at different time intervals up to 20 min and was displaced with 1 µM C-PAF at 20 min. Saturation binding was initiated by adding resuspended nuclei (50 µg) to 100 µl of incubation mixture for 30 min at 25°C. Reactions were stopped with cold 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer and samples were filtered through GF/B glass microfiber filters (Whatman, Clifton, NJ). Binding specificity of [3H]PAF (5 nM) on nuclei was assessed by incubating nuclear suspension with closely related lipids: Lyso-PAF; CV 3988 (Biomol), a competitive PAF receptor antagonist; lysophosphatidic acid; and lysophosphatidylcholine (1 µM; Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL). PCECs subject to binding identified cell surface PAF binding sites. Values for receptor density (Bmax) and affinity constant (KD) were determined (PRISM software, GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
Immunoblot analyses
Nuclei (100 µg) were treated with C-PAF (1 µM) for various time points for phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (phospho-ERK1/2) immunoblot analyses (25). PAF receptor immunoblot (28) was conducted on nuclear and plasma membrane protein (50 µg) probed with rabbit anti-human PAF receptor (N terminus) Ab (1:10,000; Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI). Detection was accomplished with a goat anti-rabbit IgG Ab conjugated with HRP (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and enhanced by chemiluminescence (ECL kit; PerkinElmer, Wellesley, MA).
PAF receptor localization by immunofluorescence
As previously described (29), PCECs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min. A rabbit anti-human PAF receptor Ab (1:1000) incubation was followed by a goat anti-rabbit FITC-conjugated IgG (1:200) incubation. Nuclear staining was achieved with propidium iodide (PI) dye (3 µg/ml; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), and samples were mounted on glass slides with FluoroGuard (Bio-Rad). CDL8 cells were incubated with a mouse anti-Myc Ab (1:2) followed by a goat anti-mouse FITC-conjugated IgG incubation (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Isolated nuclei were placed on glass slides previously coated with 3% 3'-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (Sigma-Aldrich) in acetone and treated as above. Samples were examined with an epifluorescence microscope (Axioskop II; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and a Multi Probe 2001 confocal argon laser scanning system (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). The primary Ab was omitted for negative controls.
Electron microscopy of PAF receptors
For immunogold labeling, piglets were anesthetized with halothane (2%) and killed with pentobarbital (120 mg/kg, intracardiac) in accordance with regulations of the Canadian Council of Animal Care Committee and with approval of the Sainte-Justine Hospital Animal Care Committee. Animals were perfused via the right ventricle (dorsal aorta clamped) with 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1% glutaraldehyde/15% picric acid in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. This was followed with 4% paraformaldehyde/15% picric acid, and finally 10% sucrose. Brains were removed and immersed in 30% sucrose overnight at 4°C. Tissue sectioning and immunolabeling was done as described elsewhere (30). Rabbit anti-human PAF receptor (1:50) was incubated overnight at 4°C followed by another overnight incubation with goat anti-rabbit gold (1 nm)-conjugated IgG (1:50; British Biocell International, Cardiff, U.K.). After osmication and Epon flat-embedding and re-embedding of the selected areas, ultrathin sections were collected onto formvar-coated grids and contrast stained with uranyl acetate and lead nitrate. The ultrathin sections were observed using a transmission electron microscope (410 LS; Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). In control sections, the primary Ab was preabsorbed with its cognate peptide (500 µg/ml; Cayman Chemicals).
cAMP and inositol phosphate production assays
Decreases in cAMP formation were tested on plasma membrane and nuclei initially stimulated with forskolin (1 µM; Alomone Labs, Jerasulem, Israel). Effects of C-PAF on cAMP generation were determined over 510 min at 37°C as described (31), and production was measured by radioimmunoassay kit (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA).
For inositol phosphate generation, membranes and isolated nuclei were incubated with 2 µCi/ml myo-[2-3H]inositol (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 2436 h. Thereafter, preparations were treated with C-PAF (100 nM), in the presence or absence of neomycin sulfate (65 µM; Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) or pertussis toxin (PTX) (25 ng/ml) for 30 min at 37°C in DMEM without phenol red containing 20 mM LiCl/0.05% BSA for PCECs and in buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.05% BSA, 10 mM LiCl, 25 µM ATP, 90 mM KCl, 0.1 µM CaCl2, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM benzamidine, pH 7.4) for nuclei. Inositol phosphates were extracted on AG1-X8 columns (Bio-Rad).
Calcium signaling
Nuclear calcium mobilization was measured by a
spectrofluorometer (PerkinElmer LS 50) and calcium concentration was
calculated (32). Nuclei from PCECs, CHO, and CDL8 cells
were resuspended in cytosolic-comparable buffer (25 mM HEPES, 125 mM
KCl, 2 mM K2HPO4, 200 nM
CaCl2, 4 mM MgCl2, pH 7.0).
Nuclei were then loaded with 4 µM fura 2 and 0.05% pluronic F-127
(Calbiochem) for 45 min at 4°C. Nuclear suspension (
2 x
105 nuclei/ml) was incubated at 37°C and
stimulated thereafter with C-PAF in the absence or presence (15 min
before C-PAF) of preactivated PTX (20 µg/ml; Calbiochem) or PAF
receptor blockers CV 3988 and PCA 4248 (Biomol) (33).
Stimulation of COX-2 and iNOS gene expression
PCEC nuclei (100175 µg) were stimulated at 37°C with C-PAF
in the absence or presence of CV 3988, PD98059 (1 µM; Calbiochem),
and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) (100 µM; Sigma-Aldrich) at
different time points, and total nuclear RNA (nRNA) extraction
followed. PCECs starved overnight with DMEM were preincubated with
AACOCF3 (20 µM) or cytidine-5'-diphosphocholine
(1 µM) (Calbiochem) in HEPES-Tyrodes stimulation buffer
(34) containing 0.1% BSA for 30 min followed by C-PAF
(100 nM) incubation. Reactions were stopped by removing buffer and
total RNA extracted by RNeasy Protect Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).
For inhibition of receptor translocation treatments, C-PAF stimulation
was done under potassium-depleted conditions (DMEM:water, 1:1). Total
cellular RNA and nRNA (1 µg) were subject to RT-PCR for COX-2 (209
bp) and iNOS (417 bp) genes as described previously (35).
Each PCR cycle was 94°C, 30 s; 58°C, 45 s; 72°C, 1 min
and was repeated 40 times. 18S rRNA primer (324 bp; Ambion, Austin, TX)
was used as internal standard;
-actin (369 bp) was also used for
some COX-2 experiments. Primer sequences were
5'-ATGATGTACGCCACAATCTGG-3' and 5'-GTTGAAAAGCAGCTCTGGGTC-3' for COX-2
and 5'-GAGGAGGATCCACMTCTAYCAGGARGARATG-3' and
5'-GGGGAATTCRTARTCYTCRACYTGYTCYTC-3' for iNOS (Sheldon
Biotechnology Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Quantification of RNA
expression was analyzed by Bioanalyzer-Bio Sizing 2100 (Agilent
Technologies, Palo Alto, CA).
Binding of NF-
B to DNA consensus sequence
PCEC nuclei were stimulated with C-PAF (0.1 µM) for 1 h.
Nuclei were then lysed in high-salt buffer (400 mM NaCl) and
centrifuged for 30 min at 21,000 x g. Nuclear extracts
were dialyzed against buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, 20% glycerol, 100
mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 0.5 DTT, pH 7.8. Binding reactions were
conducted in a mixture containing 5 mM HEPES, 80 mM KCl, 8% glycerol,
2 mM DTT, pH 7.8, 20 µg of nuclear extract, 2.5 µg of
double-stranded poly(dI-dC), and 30 pmol of double-stranded
[32P]-labeled oligonucleotide probe with the
consensus NF-
B recognition sequence (5'-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC-3').
Competition binding was done by incubating a 20- to 50-fold molar
excess of nonradioactive double-stranded oligonucleotides, either wild
type or mutated (5'-AGTTGAGCTCACTTTCCCAGGC-3'). After
incubation (20 min at 30°C), the complexes were resolved by PAGE on
4% gel in 0.5x TBE buffer. Quantification was done by PhosphorImager
(Molecular Dynamics).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because PLA2 contributes significantly in the synthesis of PAF (36), is activated by peroxides (37), and is found in nuclei (12), isolated nuclear preparations from PCECs were stimulated with H2O2. H2O2 evoked in nuclei net PAF production in a dose-dependent manner: 1 µM, 4.8 ± 1.5 pg/min/mg protein; 10 µM, 12.5 ± 2.9 pg/min/mg protein.
PCECs expressed PAF receptors at the plasma membrane (mean fluorescence
intensity (MFI) = 5; 2.5-fold above background). Permeabilization
of cells allowed detection of both cell surface and intracellular PAF
receptors (MFI = 25; 6.25-fold above background). Purified nuclei
also expressed PAF receptors (MFI = 12; 3-fold above background)
(Fig. 1
B)
[3H]PAF binding to subcellular fractions and immunoblot of PAF receptor
Maximal binding on plasma membrane fraction was higher than on
nuclear fractions, whereas affinity constants for PAF in both
preparations were similar (Fig. 2
A). Nuclear binding sites for
[3H]PAF appear to be specific for PAF
surrogates (C-PAF, Lyso-PAF, and CV 3988), because neither
lysophosphatidic acid nor lysophosphatidylcholine was able to displace
the radioactive tracer (data not shown). Specific and saturable binding
of [3H]PAF were detected on both plasma
membrane and nuclear fractions. This binding reached equilibrium in 20
min at 25°C and was reversible (Fig. 2
B), disclosing
similar binding kinetics for PAF on nuclear and plasma membrane
fractions (38). In addition, immunoblotting revealed a
single PAF receptor-immunoreactive band at 48 kDa on both plasma
membrane and nuclear preparations (Fig. 2
C), consistent with
its glycosylation form (39) and suggestive of the same
intact protein at the nuclear level.
|
The intracellular PAF receptor distribution in PCECs was
identified by immunofluorescence (Fig. 3
). PAF receptors in PCECs localized to
the plasma membrane and to the nucleus (Fig. 3
IA); PAF
receptor immunodetection was confirmed in isolated nuclei of PCECs
(Fig. 3
IB). Merging of confocal micrographs (Fig. 3
, IB and IC; PAF receptor Ab and PI) supported the
presence of nuclear PAF receptors (Fig. 3
ID).
|
Perinuclear and intranuclear detection of PAF receptors by electron microscopy
Intracellular localization of PAF receptors was ascertained by
immunogold electron microscopy on brain tissue from piglets. PAF
receptor immunogold staining was identified on the plasma membrane
(Fig. 4
A) and nuclear envelope
(Fig. 4
B) of brain endothelial cells. Incidental
immunostaining possibly associated with euchromatin was observed (Fig. 4
B, inset). Neurons also exhibited consistently
nuclear immunostaining for the PAF receptor (data not shown), whereas
the abundant glia did not display PAF receptor immunoreactivity.
Occasional cytoplasmic detection of PAF receptor was observed, which at
higher magnification revealed predominant localization on vesicles as
reported (28). No specific immunostaining was noted when
the primary Ab was preabsorbed with its cognate peptide (Fig. 4
C).
|
PAF receptor may couple to various G proteins
(Gi, Gs, or
Gq) (2, 3, 4) affecting different
second messengers. We measured cAMP and inositol phosphates in response
to stimulation of cell surface and nuclear receptors with C-PAF. On
plasma membrane, but not on nuclei, C-PAF significantly augmented
inositol phosphate production in a PTX-insensitive manner. This effect
was inhibited by an inhibitor of phospholipase C, neomycin sulfate
(Fig. 5
A), suggesting a
Gq protein-coupling for the plasma membrane
receptor. C-PAF did not cause cAMP generation on both plasma membrane
and nuclei (Fig. 5
A) of PCECs, but rather attenuated
forskolin-induced cAMP only in nuclei, suggestive of
Gi coupling.
|
Gene transcription by PAF in isolated nuclei
Because calcium plays an instrumental role in DNA replication and
gene transcription (20), the functional significance of
the PAF receptor at the nucleus also capable of generating its ligand
locally was assessed by testing whether stimulation of isolated nuclei
with PAF could modulate the inflammatory immediate-early genes COX-2
and iNOS. Stimulation of isolated nuclei of PCECs with C-PAF induced
COX-2 and iNOS gene transcription. These effects were blocked by
selective PAF receptor antagonist CV 3988 (Fig. 6
, A and
B). Control 18S rRNA expression was unaffected.
|
B (43), complexes of the latter can be
found in the nucleus (21), and COX-2 gene promoter
contains NF-
B binding sequences (44), we tested whether
COX-2 expression induced by PAF stimulation is indeed NF-
B
dependent. Stimulation of nuclei with C-PAF (1 h) augmented specific
binding of NF-
B to its DNA consensus sequence (Fig. 6
B inhibitor PDTC prevented C-PAF-evoked rise in COX-2 nRNA in
isolated nuclei (Fig. 6
B binding to DNA preceded PAF-evoked COX-2 transcription,
concordant with effects of inhibition of these pathways on COX-2
expression.
Because extracellular PAF evokes COX-2 expression (8) and
the latter can also be induced by perinuclear stimulation, we attempted
to determine the relative contribution of PAF receptor and ligand
internalization and autoinduced PAF generation. Inhibitors of
clathrin-dependent GPCR internalization, hypotonic potassium-depleted
solutions, and brefeldin A (45) did not affect
C-PAF-induced COX-2 expression in PCECs (Fig. 6
F), whereas
inhibition of the critical PAF-generating cPLA2
(36) using AACOCF3 and
cytidine-5'-diphosphocholine diminished C-PAF-evoked COX-2 expression
(Fig. 6
F), suggesting a role for autostimulated PAF
generation (7) in gene induction.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the presence of some other GPCRs at the nucleus has been
reported (29, 46, 47, 48, 49), functionality has only been
documented for PGE2 and angiotensin II
receptors (29, 46, 50); however, the latter peptide is not
produced locally but possibly translocates to the nucleus as shown for
parathyroid hormone and somatostatin (51, 52). In
contrast, PAF could be generated locally and act on its adjacent
receptor in the nucleus (
Figs. 14![]()
![]()
![]()
). The mechanisms for nuclear
localization of PAF receptors are not known, but may involve nuclear
localization signal(s) as reported for other GPCRs (53).
Indeed a putative nuclear localization signal exists
(KKFRKH298303) at the C-terminal tail of PAF
receptors (54). Endoplasmic reticulum retention sequences
(55) present on PAF receptor C terminus
(NSLK338341) may also participate in PAF
receptor nuclear localization. These sequences may also be implicated
in vesicular trafficking (55) and translocation of
receptors to the nucleus, as suggested for angiotensin II
(56). However, deletion of these C-terminal segments does
not alter PAF receptor localization (data not shown). Alternatively,
PAF receptors can also undergo agonist-induced receptor internalization
via clathrin-coated pits (57). But using classical
experimental procedures that interfere with agonist-induced receptor
internalization, PAF-induced COX-2 expression was not affected (Fig. 6
F).
A noteworthy observation relates to signaling mechanisms that seem to
differ for the cell surface and nuclear PAF receptors. Stimulation of
the former was associated with a rise in inositol phosphate production
suggestive of coupling to PTX-insensitve Gq
protein, and activation of the latter was associated with a reduction
in cAMP formation consistent with coupling to a PTX-sensitive
Gi protein (Fig. 5
A). These findings
may imply distinct functions for the PAF receptor, depending on its
localization as previously proposed (8, 9). In addition,
C-PAF-induced COX-2 transcription in isolated nuclei seems to be
MEK/ERK1/2- and NF-
B dependent (Fig. 6
, CE).
MEK-1-dependent pathways have recently been reported in endothelial
cells (58), and this protein kinase has been found
localized at the nucleus (59), consistent with ERK1/2
phosphorylation (Fig. 6
C). MAPK can in turn activate NF-
B
(43), as seen with PAF (60, 61) and NF-
B
is an important regulator of COX-2 expression (44).
It may seem surprising that nuclear stimulation can lead to NF-
B
activation since NF-
B is mostly complexed to its inhibitory unit
I
B in cytoplasm, and upon stimulus-induced phosphorylation of I
B,
NF-
B is released to enter the nucleus (62). But like
NF-
B, (nondegraded) free I
B can also enter the nucleus (62, 63) and possibly reassociate with NF-
B. I
B and NF-
B
contain nuclear localization sequences that may explain shuttling of
these subunits between the nucleus and cytoplasm, thus having
activatable NF-
B complexes within the nucleus (Fig. 6
)
(21), and in turn regulation of COX-2 transcription.
Different mechanisms have recently been reported to explain MAPK
activation and gene induction by extracellular ligand stimulation of
GPCRs. It has been shown that upon endothelin and muscarinic
stimulation, an unknown matrix metalloprotease is activated to cleave a
receptor tyrosine kinase agonist, which in turn leads to ERK
phosphorylation (6). Another mechanism for GPCR-mediated
MAPK activation documented for
2-adrenergic
receptors includes the formation of
-arrestin-c-Src complexes, which
during internalization can recruit other signaling molecules to
phosphorylate ERK (6). However, our findings do not
support these processes in COX-2 induction upon extracellular PAF
stimulation (Fig. 6
F). Metalloprotease inhibitor
phenanthroline (data not shown) and blockers of internalization (Fig. 6
F) did not affect C-PAF-induced COX-2 expression; notably,
incorporation of choline-containing phospholipids such as PAF by
scramblases is not per se involved in internalization
(64). In contrast, contributions of autoinduced generation
of PAF (7) are suggested in extracellular PAF-evoked COX-2
expression (Fig. 6
F). Hence, because PAF formation is to a
large extent cPLA2-dependent (36)
and cPLA2 activation is associated with its
nuclear translocation (12), it is conceivable to suggest
based on data presented that PAF can be generated in the vicinity of
its nuclear envelope receptor to elicit MAPK activation and COX-2
induction. The present study not only describes the nucleus (envelope)
as a putative organelle for PAF generation and site expressing its
functional target receptor, but it also provides a novel mechanism for
MAPK and (proinflammatory) gene induction.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Sylvain Chemtob, Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology, and Pharmacology, Research Center of Sainte-Justine Hospital, 3175 Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1C5. E-mail address: sylvain.chemtob{at}umontreal.ca ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: PAF, platelet-activating factor; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; cPLA2, cytosolic phospholipase A2; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; iNOS, inducible NO synthase; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; MEK, MAPK kinase; PCEC, porcine cerebral microvascular endothelial cell; C-PAF, methylcarbamate-PAF; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PI, propidium iodide; PTX, pertussis toxin; PDTC, pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate; n, nuclear; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. ![]()
Received for publication May 6, 2002. Accepted for publication September 23, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in S49 lymphoma cells. FASEB J. 8:252.[Abstract]
-dependent activation, particulate association, and nuclear localization of phospholipase C-
1. J. Biol. Chem. 271:21187.
B between the nucleus and cytoplasm as a consequence of inhibitor dissociation. J. Biol. Chem. 275:41028.
on retinal vessels. Am. J. Physiol. 274:R1406.
receptor density in brain microvessels of pigs. Br. J. Pharmacol. 112:59.[Medline]
B activation but not for phagocytosis. J. Leukocyte Biol. 70:649.
/Janus kinase 2/MEK-1-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 276:1211.
B through a G protein-coupled pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 270:14928.
B activation in rat peritoneal macrophages. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1583:26.[Medline]
B activity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18:621.[Medline]
B
is mediated by the second ankyrin repeat: the I
B
ankyrin repeats define a novel class of cis-acting nuclear import sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2524.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. U. Schraufstatter, R. G. DiScipio, M. Zhao, and S. K. Khaldoyanidi C3a and C5a Are Chemotactic Factors for Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Which Cause Prolonged ERK1/2 Phosphorylation J. Immunol., March 15, 2009; 182(6): 3827 - 3836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Mir and G. C. Le Breton A Novel Nuclear Signaling Pathway for Thromboxane A2 Receptors in Oligodendrocytes: Evidence for Signaling Compartmentalization during Differentiation Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2008; 28(20): 6329 - 6341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Quiniou, P. Sapieha, I. Lahaie, X. Hou, S. Brault, M. Beauchamp, M. Leduc, L. Rihakova, J.-S. Joyal, S. Nadeau, et al. Development of a Novel Noncompetitive Antagonist of IL-1 Receptor J. Immunol., May 15, 2008; 180(10): 6977 - 6987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fillon, K. Soulis, S. Rajasekaran, H. Benedict-Hamilton, J. N. Radin, C. J. Orihuela, K. C. El Kasmi, G. Murti, D. Kaushal, M. W. Gaber, et al. Platelet-Activating Factor Receptor and Innate Immunity: Uptake of Gram-Positive Bacterial Cell Wall into Host Cells and Cell-Specific Pathophysiology J. Immunol., November 1, 2006; 177(9): 6182 - 6191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Boivin, C. Lavoie, G. Vaniotis, A. Baragli, L.-R. Villeneuve, N. Ethier, P. Trieu, B. G. Allen, and T. E. Hebert Functional {beta}-adrenergic receptor signalling on nuclear membranes in adult rat and mouse ventricular cardiomyocytes Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2006; 71(1): 69 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Gobeil Jr., T. Zhu, S. Brault, A. Geha, A. Vazquez-Tello, A. Fortier, D. Barbaz, D. Checchin, X. Hou, M. Nader, et al. Nitric Oxide Signaling via Nuclearized Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase Modulates Expression of the Immediate Early Genes iNOS and mPGES-1 J. Biol. Chem., June 9, 2006; 281(23): 16058 - 16067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. He and H. E. P. Bazan Synergistic Effect of Platelet-Activating Factor and Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} on Corneal Myofibroblast Apoptosis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 883 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. O. Melnikova, A. A. Mourad-Zeidan, D. C. Lev, and M. Bar-Eli Platelet-activating Factor Mediates MMP-2 Expression and Activation via Phosphorylation of cAMP-response Element-binding Protein and Contributes to Melanoma Metastasis J. Biol. Chem., February 3, 2006; 281(5): 2911 - 2922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Vazquez-Tello, L. Fan, X. Hou, J.-S. Joyal, J. A. Mancini, C. Quiniou, R. I. Clyman, F. Gobeil Jr., D. R. Varma, and S. Chemtob Intracellular-specific colocalization of prostaglandin E2 synthases and cyclooxygenases in the brain Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): R1155 - R1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rollin, C. Lemieux, R. Maliba, J. Favier, L. R. Villeneuve, B. G. Allen, S. Soker, N. G. Bazan, Y. Merhi, and M. G. Sirois VEGF-mediated endothelial P-selectin translocation: role of VEGF receptors and endogenous PAF synthesis Blood, May 15, 2004; 103(10): 3789 - 3797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. WARNER and J. A. MITCHELL Cyclooxygenases: new forms, new inhibitors, and lessons from the clinic FASEB J, May 1, 2004; 18(7): 790 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bouayad, J.-C. Fouron, X. Hou, M. Beauchamp, C. Quiniou, D. Abran, K. Peri, R. I. Clyman, D. R. Varma, and S. Chemtob Developmental regulation of prostaglandin E2 synthase in porcine ductus arteriosus Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): R903 - R909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Bazan Synaptic lipid signaling: significance of polyunsaturated fatty acids and platelet-activating factor J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 2221 - 2233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sennlaub, F. Valamanesh, A. Vazquez-Tello, A.M. El-Asrar, D. Checchin, S. Brault, F. Gobeil, M.H. Beauchamp, B. Mwaikambo, Y. Courtois, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 in Human and Experimental Ischemic Proliferative Retinopathy Circulation, July 15, 2003; 108(2): 198 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |