|
|
||||||||


Departments of
* Internal Medicine and
Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, and
Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We recently reported that murine T cells induce apoptosis in syngeneic stimulating macrophages through the proapoptotic ligands TRAIL, TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), and Fas ligand (FasL; Ref. 10). We also found that the same molecules are expressed on lupus-inducing murine T cells made autoreactive with DNA methylation inhibitors (11), suggesting that these pathways could also be involved in the autoimmune response in this model. Whether these proapoptotic molecules are similarly involved in the T cell-mediated monocyte apoptosis that occurs in human lupus is unknown.
In this report, we investigated the pathways involved in autologous monocyte apoptosis induced by lupus T cells. Expression of TWEAK, TRAIL, and FasL on lupus T cells was determined, and the role of these molecules in the monocyte apoptotic response was examined. We report that multiple apoptotic pathways mediate the autologous monocyte death induced by lupus T cells and that this cytotoxicity is associated with increased expression of apoptotic ligands on activated T cells, rather than with increased susceptibility of lupus monocytes to apoptosis induced by these ligands. These results thus define novel mechanisms contributing to the increased monocyte apoptosis characterizing patients with lupus. We propose that this mechanism could provide a source of potentially antigenic material for the autoimmune response. Because cells from the monocytic/macrophage lineage are responsible for clearing apoptotic material, we also propose that this mechanism could contribute to decreased clearance of apoptotic debris in patients with lupus.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FN14: Fc (murine), a newly characterized receptor for the
apoptotic ligand TWEAK (12), was a kind gift from
Genentech (San Francisco, CA). Purified PHA was from Murex (Norcross,
GA). The following reagents were all obtained from BD PharMingen (San
Diego, CA) and, unless specified otherwise, the Abs were all mouse
anti-human mAbs: FITC-annexin-V kit, FITC-anti-CD2,
PE-anti-CD14, CYC-anti-CD3, purified anti-CD3, APC- and
CYC-anti-CD4, purified anti-HLA-ABC, PE-anti-CD29, CYC- and
FITC-anti-CD8, anti-human TRAIL/TNFSF10 mAb,
biotin-anti-FasL, PE-anti-TRAIL, purified anti-TRAIL,
APC-mouse IgG2a, PE mouse IgG1, FITC-goat anti-rabbit Ig-specific
polyclonal Ab, FITC-goat anti-mouse Ig-specific polyclonal,
streptavidin-CYC conjugate, affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit-human
death receptor (DR) 4 (C-terminal) and affinity-purified polyclonal
rabbit-human DR3 Abs, purified rat anti-human IL-4, purified mouse
anti-human IFN-
, purified rat anti-human IL-10, and purified
mouse anti-human IFN-
. PE mouse anti-human CD19 was obtained
from Coulter (Miami, FL). Recombinant human TRAIL R1/Fc chimera,
recombinant human TRAIL and TRAIL inhibitor, and rabbit anti-human
TRAIL R2/DR5 were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Purified
mouse anti-human CD28 was from Southern Biotechnology Associates
(Birmingham, AL). FITC-conjugated and PE-conjugated affinity-purified
F(ab')2 goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L)
were obtained from Immunotech (Marseille, France). FITC-conjugated
affinity-purified F(ab')2 donkey anti-goat
IgG (H + L), HRP-conjugated Affinipure F(ab')2
donkey anti-goat IgG (H + L), purified goat anti-mouse-TWEAK,
and recombinant human TWEAK were obtained from RDI (Flanders, NJ). FITC
goat F(ab'2) anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) was from Caltag Laboratories
(Burlingame, CA). Recombinant human FasL, recombinant human TRAIL kit
(including TRAIL enhancer), and ApoSENSOR ADP/ATP Ratio Assay kit were
obtained from Alexis Biochemicals (San Diego, CA). Pan T cell isolation
kit, CD4 T cell isolation kit, monocyte isolation kit, and CD8
microbeads were obtained from Miltenyi Biotec (Auburn, CA). The
pancaspase inhibitor Ac-VAD-CHO was from Biosource International
(Camarillo, CA). Chloroquine, hydrocortisone, indomethacin,
6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), PMSF, sodium orthovanadate, leupeptin,
and aprotinin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
51Cr was obtained from PerkinElmer (Boston, MA).
Hoechst 33342 was from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). The CellTiter 96
aqueous one solution cell proliferation assay was from Promega
(Madison, WI).
Patient selection
Patients with active SLE, inactive SLE, and rheumatoid arthritis
(RA) were recruited from the outpatient Rheumatology clinic and
inpatient services at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI), and
from the Michigan Lupus Cohort (Ann Arbor, MI). Healthy controls
were obtained by advertising. All SLE and RA patients fulfilled the
American College of Rheumatology criteria for these diseases
(13, 14). SLE activity was assessed by the SLE disease
activity index (SLEDAI; Ref. 15), and those with SLEDAI
>5 were considered to have active disease. RA activity was assessed by
the modified disease activity score (16). Patient and
control T cells were paired and studied in parallel. Information
regarding the demographics, disease activity, and use of medications by
the subjects is provided in Table I
.
|
PBMCs were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) gradient centrifugation as described (9). T cells were isolated by negative selection using magnetic beads and instructions provided by the manufacturer (pan T cell isolation kit; Miltenyi Biotec), or by rosetting with sheep erythrocytes (Colorado Serum, Denver, CO) as described (9).
Drug treatment
Unstimulated and PHA-stimulated human T cells were cultured in 24-well plates in RPMI/5% FBS (100,000 cells/ml) in the presence or absence of graded concentrations (0.1100 µM) of indomethacin, chloroquine, hydrocortisone, or 6-MP (17, 18). A stock solution of 6-MP was prepared in dimethylformamide at a concentration of 10 mg/ml. The stock solution was diluted in assay diluent (80% culture medium/20% ethanol) to yield a 6-MP working solution of 80 µg/ml or less as indicated. The working solution of 6-MP as well as the other materials prepared in assay diluent were then further diluted 1/40 into the cell cultures for the tests. The final concentrations of ethanol (0.5%) or dimethylformamide (<0.02%) do not yield significant effects on the cell cultures (19). Indomethacin was prepared in a concentration of 500 mM in absolute ethanol then diluted to final concentrations in the cell culture medium immediately before. Control cells were treated with an equal volume of the solvent; the highest concentration of ethanol in the cell culture medium was 0.1%.
Immunofluorescent staining
PBMCs or purified T cells and monocytes (isolated with magnetic beads) were washed with standard buffer (PBS, 2% horse serum, 0.1% sodium azide) and incubated for 30 min at 4°C with 0.060.15 µg/ml fluorochrome-conjugated mAb following the manufacturers directions, washed three times again with standard buffer, then fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde and analyzed in a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA) using previously described protocols (9). For identification of B cells and monocytes, fluorochrome-conjugated anti-CD19 and anti-CD14 were used, respectively.
Where indicated, purified T cells from seven healthy controls were stimulated using 96-well plates coated with 10 µg/ml human anti-CD3 and 1 µg/ml human-anti-CD28 in PBS. Cells were cultured at 37°C overnight, harvested then incubated with human FN14:Fc (anti-TWEAK), anti-TRAIL, anti-FasL-biotin, or control Ig for 30 min, washed and then incubated with goat anti-mouse-FITC, goat-anti-mouse PE, or streptavidin-APC, respectively, for an additional 30 min. Cells were washed and fixed in 1% formaldehyde and analyzed using flow cytometry using a FACScan flow cytometer.
Monocyte purification
Monocytes were purified by adherence to plastic petri dishes and
eluted with cold PBS/EDTA (20). Monocyte yield was usually
10% of the starting number of PBMC. For further purification, negative
selection with a magnetic bead monocyte isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec)
was used. Typical purity was
9396% by CD14 staining.
Measurement of apoptosis
Annexin V staining. Monocytes were isolated using negative selection with magnetic beads. Approximately 50,000 cells were suspended in 100 µl of 1x annexin V binding buffer (0.1 M HEPES/NaOH (pH 7.4), 1.4 M NaCl, 25 mM CaCl2). Cells were then stained with 5 µl of annexin V-FITC and 10 µl propidium iodide (PI; 0.05 µg/ml) for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Cells were analyzed immediately using a FACScan flow cytometer. In additional experiments, monocyte apoptosis was measured in unfractionated PBMCs by labeling cells with anti-CD14-PE, washing in PBS, and then staining with annexin V/FITC and PI as above. To measure monocyte apoptosis induced by lupus T cells, lupus and control monocytes were isolated using negative selection with magnetic microbeads. Monocytes were cultured with autologous T cells using a ratio of 25:1 T cell:monocyte. Cells were cultured together for 18 h (9) in the presence or absence of increasing concentrations of blocking Abs or fusion proteins to TRAIL, TWEAK, or FasL. Cells were then stained with anti-CD2PE and anti-CD14 APC, washed, resuspended in 1x annexin V binding buffer, and stained with annexin V/FITC as described above. Cells were analyzed immediately using a FACScan flow cytometer.
ADP:ATP ratio. The ApoSENSOR ADP/ATP Ratio Assay kit was used to measure ADP:ATP ratios. This kit uses bioluminescent detection of the ATP level via luciferase catalyzed reaction for a rapid screening of apoptosis and cell viability in mammalian cells (21). A total of 50,000 monocytes were added to 96-well plates in RPMI/10% FBS in the presence or absence of human recombinant FasL (Alexis Biochemicals), TRAIL soluble (human) recombinant fusion protein or TWEAK soluble (human) recombinant fusion protein (Research Diagnostics, Flanders, NJ), or isotype control (BD PharMingen). Where indicated, an affinity-purified rabbit anti-mouse Ig (Alexis Biochemicals) was added to optimize cross-linking. The cells were cultured for 18 h after which the medium was removed and cells were treated with 100 µl nuclear releasing agent as per manufacturers instructions for 5 min at room temperature with gentle shaking. ATP and ADP levels were measured, and ADP:ATP ratios calculated according to the manufacturers instructions.
Hoechst 33342 staining. Monocytes from lupus patients and controls were isolated using negative selection with magnetic beads. A total of 50,000 cells were then cultured in the presence or absence of 1100 ng/ml TRAIL soluble (human) recombinant fusion protein, human recombinant FasL, TWEAK soluble (human) recombinant fusion protein, or isotype control for 18 h in a total volume of 200 µl RPMI/3% FBS/penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were then washed, resuspended in 1 ml PBS, and incubated with 1 µl Hoechst 33342 stock solution and 10 µl PI. Cells were then incubated on ice for 2030 min and analyzed immediately using a FACScan flow cytometer.
Cytotoxicity assays
For direct cytotoxicity assays, 50,000 monocytes/well were incubated with FasL, TRAIL, TWEAK, or a control mAb (mouse IgG1 or IgG2; BD PharMingen) in a total volume of 200 µl/well. Following manufacturers instructions, a specific enhancer Ab was added for cross-linking after incubation with TRAIL and FasL recombinant proteins. These enhancers are Abs that interact with TRAIL and FasL recombinant proteins, increasing their activity. The enhancers were used at 2 µg/ml following the manufacturers instructions. As additional negative controls, cells were stimulated with enhancer without TRAIL or FasL. The cells were cultured for 18 h, then cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Quantitative analysis of apoptosis was done with annexin V/PI staining and/or ADP:ATP ratio calculation (see ADP:ATP ratio).
For cell-mediated cytotoxicity, 51Cr release assays were performed as previously described by our group (9). Briefly, 250,000 PBMC were adhered to round bottom microtiter wells in 100 µl RPMI/10% FBS for 12 h, after which the nonadherent cells were removed. The adherent cells were labeled with 2 µCi 51Cr/well for 3 h, and then washed. T cells were obtained by rosetting or negative selection using magnetic beads and added to the labeled monocytes at a ratio of 25:1. Cr release was determined 18 h later as described (9).
T cell proliferation assay
T cells from healthy controls or lupus patients were suspended in RPMI/5% FBS/penicillin/streptomycin media and treated with immobilized anti-CD3 (10 µg/ml) for 3 days in 96-well plates in the presence or absence of the following inhibitory Abs or fusion proteins: anti-human TRAIL, human Fn14:Fc (anti-TWEAK), anti-human FasL, and isotype control Ig at concentrations of 1100 ng/ml. A total of 50,000 T cells/well were used, in a total volume of 200 µl RPMI/3% FBS/penicillin/streptomycin/well. At 72 h, T cell proliferation was measured using a colorimetric method (cell titer 96 Aqueous one solution cell proliferation assay; Promega) following manufacturers instructions (22). In brief, 20 µl of the CellTiter 96 solution reagent was pipetted into each well and the plate was incubated for 3 h at 37°C in a humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a 96-well plate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT).
Statistical analysis
The difference between means was analyzed using Students t test or ANOVA, using Systat 10 software (Systat, Evanston, IL) and Stata 6.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). To determine whether current treatment with immunosuppressives was associated with markers of apoptosis, univariate linear regression was performed. Each marker of apoptosis was modeled separately as a dependent variable, with medications modeled as dichotomous independent predictors. Control subjects were excluded from this portion of the analysis because a high degree of colinearity existed between case/control status and treatments due to the lack of immunosuppressive use in controls.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Monocytes from 16 lupus patients with active lupus (SLEDAI >5)
and 8 controls were isolated by negative selection with magnetic beads,
incubated with annexin V/FITC and PI, then analyzed by flow cytometry.
Fig. 1
A shows a representative
histogram. Patients with lupus had significantly greater percentages of
apoptotic monocytes (annexin V+,
PI-) relative to controls (Fig. 1
B).
To exclude the possibility that the isolation procedure induced
apoptosis in lupus monocytes, these findings were confirmed in
unfractionated PBMCs staining with anti-CD14+
and annexin V/PI. Apoptotic monocytes in six controls represented
4 ± 2.5% of CD14+ cells. In six patients
with SLE, 45 ± 15.2% of CD14+ cells were
apoptotic, p < 0.01. We also confirmed that lupus T
cells kill autologous monocytes and that this phenomenon correlates
with disease activity. In addition, we found that this phenomenon
appears to be disease-specific. Fig. 2
shows that T cells from patients with lupus, but not from RA patients
or controls, spontaneously kill autologous monocytes
(p < 0.0001, SLE vs RA and controls). In
addition, T cells from patients with active SLE kill monocytes better
than those from patients with inactive disease
(p < 0.001, active SLE vs inactive
SLE).
|
|
We then proceeded to investigate the pathways involved in T
cell-mediated monocyte death in SLE. Because we had previously reported
that the apoptotic ligands TRAIL, TWEAK, and FasL mediate T
cell-induced cytotoxicity of Ag-specific macrophages in murine systems
(10), we compared expression of these apoptotic ligands on
T cells from 35 healthy controls, 52 patients with SLE, and 15
individuals with RA. Using flow cytometry, we found that SLE patients
had significantly greater expression of TRAIL, TWEAK, and FasL on
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells when
compared with controls. Representative histograms for
CD4+ T cells are
shown in Fig. 3
. Fig. 4
A shows
that the percentage of CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells expressing TRAIL, TWEAK, and FasL is
significantly increased. When mean channel fluorescence (MCF) was
analyzed, FasL was significantly increased on lupus
CD4+ T cells, and TRAIL was significantly
increased on lupus CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells when compared with controls (Fig. 4
B). RA patients showed increased levels of TRAIL on
CD4+ and CD8+ cells when
compared with controls (control CD4 81 ± 20 vs RA CD4 475.6
± 48, and control CD8 89 ± 12 vs RA CD8 362 ± 54 by MCF;
mean ± SE; p < 0.01), but not of TWEAK or FasL.
However, there were no differences in the percentage of cells
expressing these ligands when compared with controls.
|
|
Association of ligand expression with disease activity and T cell activation
When percentage of expression was analyzed according to disease
activity, patients with active lupus (SLEDAI >5) had greater
expression of TRAIL and FasL on CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells compared with individuals with
inactive disease (SLEDAI
5; Fig. 4
C). When
expression of apoptotic ligands was analyzed by MCF according to
disease activity, lupus patients with more active disease had a higher
expression of TRAIL and FasL, but not TWEAK, on
CD4+ T cells than patients with inactive lupus
(Fig. 4
D). To determine whether these molecules are
overexpressed on activated T cells, two-color flow cytometry was
performed using CD25 and CD29 as activation markers. CD29
(
1 integrin) is the
-chain associated with
the integrin
subunits 16 known as very late Ags, and is expressed
very late after T cell stimulation (23). The lupus
patients had higher numbers of activated T cells than controls (for
CD29, 3.8% ± 2.1 vs 32.5 ± 7.9, controls vs lupus, mean ±
SEM, p < 0.01; for CD25, 1.2 ± 0.8 vs 10.8
± 2.4 control vs lupus, mean ± SEM, p < 0.05).
TRAIL, TWEAK, and FasL were increased on a subset of activated T cells,
as measured by CD29+ T cells and
CD25+ T cells, when compared with controls. Fig. 5
shows the average increase of the
proapoptotic ligands on the activated cells. Our findings for FasL
confirm previous observations by Kovacs et al. (24).
|
|
To exclude the possibility that medications altered the expression of these apoptotic ligands, unstimulated and stimulated human T cells were cultured in the presence or absence of graded concentrations (0.1100 µM) of medications that are commonly used in lupus treatment: indomethacin (for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), chloroquine (for antimalarials), hydrocortisone (for steroids), and 6-MP (for azathioprine), or combinations, as previously reported (17, 18, 19). After culture for 1, 6, 12, and 24 h, TRAIL, TWEAK, and FasL expression was determined by flow cytometry and compared with untreated cells. None of these medications caused significant changes in the expression of these ligands, suggesting that medications do not account for the differences in expression (data not shown). To determine whether current treatment with immunosuppressives was associated with markers of apoptosis, univariate linear regression was performed. Each marker of apoptosis was modeled separately as a dependent variable, with medications modeled as dichotomous independent predictors. Control subjects were excluded from this portion of the analysis because a high degree of collinearity existed between case/control status and treatments due to the lack of immunosuppressive use in controls. There was no correlation of specific medications with proapoptotic molecule expression in these patients. In addition, there was no correlation between medications and SLEDAI, which also correlates with the ability of the T cells to kill monocytes (9).
Lupus monocytes have equal susceptibility to cell death induced by apoptotic ligands when compared with controls
To evaluate whether these apoptotic pathways are functional in
monocytes from patients with SLE, and whether they differ from normal
controls, we treated monocytes from five lupus patients and five
controls with graded concentrations of TRAIL, TWEAK, or FasL
recombinant proteins for 18 h. Using 51Cr
release assays, we found a significant increase in cell death induced
by these ligands (Fig. 7
A,
p < 0.05 for the three apoptotic ligands at a
concentration of 100 ng/ml, relative to control Ig). There was no
statistically significant difference between lupus and control patient
monocytes in their susceptibility to apoptosis secondary to recombinant
protein stimulation. In addition, TRAIL cytotoxicity was inhibited by
adding a specific TRAIL inhibitor (human recombinant TRAIL-R1:Fc),
confirming specificity (25 ± 1.2% cytotoxicity for TRAIL agonist
vs 1.8 ± 0.9% for TRAIL antagonist + agonist, mean ± SEM).
The change in ADP:ATP ratios has been used to differentiate different
modes of cell death and viability. Decreased levels of ATP and
increased levels of ADP are recognized markers of apoptotic cells
(25). Using ADP:ATP ratio assays, we confirmed that
monocyte cell death after ligand stimulation demonstrates an apoptotic
pattern (Fig. 7
B). This was also confirmed using Hoechst
33342:PI staining (data not shown).
|
We next asked if lupus T cells use these proapoptotic molecules to
kill autologous monocytes. Monocytes from lupus patients and controls
were radiolabeled with 51Cr and cultured with
autologous T cells at a ratio of 25:1 T cells:monocytes in the presence
or absence of graded concentrations of blocking Abs or fusion proteins
to TRAIL, TWEAK, FasL, or a control Ig. A pancaspase inhibitor
(Ac-VAD-CHO) was used as a positive control. Inhibiting these molecules
partially blocked T cell-mediated macrophage killing (Fig. 8
A), with anti-FasL being
the most potent (p < 0.005). Anti-TRAIL and
anti-TWEAK also gave significant inhibition
(p < 0.05 at 100 ng/ml). The combination of
anti-FasL, TRAIL, and TWEAK was not more inhibitory than any of the
Abs alone.
|
Because we had previously reported that inhibiting T cell activation
with mAb to molecules such as LFA-1 or class II MHC also prevents APC
killing (9), it was important to exclude the possibility
that the anti-TWEAK and TRAIL reagents were inhibiting T cell
activation. In addition, a recent study reported that TRAIL-expressing
T cells that bind to DR might transmit a reverse signal and undergo
increased proliferation (26). To exclude the possibility
that blocking these apoptotic ligands could inhibit T cell
proliferation/activation, we stimulated lupus T cells with anti-CD3
for 3 days, in the presence or absence of graded concentrations of
blocking Abs or fusion protein to TRAIL, TWEAK, FasL, or a control Ig.
We then measured T cell proliferation using a colorimetric method. As
seen in Fig. 8
B, these molecules had no effect in inhibiting
T cell proliferation, suggesting that an inhibition in T cell
activation did not account for the inhibition of monocyte apoptosis
by these blocking Abs.
Finally, the cytokines IL-10, IL-4, IFN-
, and IFN-
have been
reported to be involved in monocyte cytotoxicity (20, 27, 28, 29, 30). To exclude a role for soluble cytokines in
inducing/blocking monocyte apoptosis in this model, we tested whether
mAb to IL-4, IL-10, IFN-
, and IFN-
could inhibit lupus T
cell-mediated monocyte killing. No significant inhibition was observed
using concentrations up to 100 ng/ml, as previously reported by our
group for Ag-specific monocyte killing by human T cells
(31) (maximum inhibition = 4.5 ± 2.2% for
anti-IL-10, 5.5 ± 3.1% for anti-IL-4, 6% ± 3.4 for
anti-IFN-
, and 6% ± 4.2 for anti-IFN-
, mean ±
SEM, p > 0.05 for all values when compared with
isotype control). This suggests that the T cell-mediated cytotoxicity
occurs largely through the proapoptotic ligands on the lupus T
cells.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These studies also demonstrate that lupus T cells mediate autologous
monocyte cytotoxicity using the same apoptotic ligands and receptors as
those used by normal murine T cells to kill Ag-presenting macrophages.
These results also indicate that TRAIL can induce cytotoxicity in a
percentage of normal human monocytes, further supporting other reports
that this molecule, although primarily toxic on transformed lines, has
also an effect on nontransformed cells (10, 37, 38, 39, 40).
Although a slight increase in cytotoxicity inhibition was observed when
the blocking Abs were used in combination (data not shown), no clear
synergism was found when multiple pathways were blocked. This suggests
that the signals given by one of these ligands might be sufficient to
inhibit apoptotic signals given by other members of the TNF family.
Although FasL and TRAIL have been proposed to act in a cooperative way
in inducing cytotoxicity (41), a lack of true synergism
for these molecules has previously been reported in cancer lines
(42). Our results confirm these findings. The apparent
redundancy in apoptotic pathways involved in T cell-mediated monocyte
cytotoxicity in normal states, as well as in lupus, may indicate that
each of these molecules could have a different role in APC apoptosis
that still remains to be characterized. It has been shown that other
cell types, such as keratinocytes, can be target of multiple CTL
responses that may have distinct roles in tissue injury
(43). The residual monocyte death after blocking TRAIL,
TWEAK, and FasL could be secondary to another apoptotic ligand or
pathway as yet unidentified. Our group has previously shown that
TNF-
was not involved in monocyte/macrophage cytotoxicity induced by
Ag-specific CD4+ T cells (10, 31).
Investigations on the role of other molecules including perforin and
granzymes are currently underway, and could potentially explain the
residual monocyte death induced by lupus T cells that was observed in
this study.
Importantly, both control and lupus monocytes are equally susceptible to apoptosis mediated by these ligands. We found no significant difference in the susceptibility of these cells to apoptosis after treatment with TRAIL, TWEAK, or FasL recombinant proteins, suggesting that the increased susceptibility of lupus monocytes to undergo apoptosis is not associated with a decreased threshold for apoptotic signals.
Other mechanisms of monocyte death, such as complement toxicity, could contribute to increased monocyte apoptosis in lupus, as lupus sera are known to induce apoptosis of normal monocytes, possibly through complement-mediated damage (44). However, this phenomenon was observed only by a minority of lupus patients sera, suggesting that serum factors do not play a dominant role in the monocyte apoptosis seen in SLE patients. We considered the possibility that medications could contribute to the increase in the T cell apoptotic ligands. No effect on their expression was seen in short-term cultures. Although it is possible that this approach does not reflect chronic in vivo exposure, we also could not find any association between specific medications the lupus patients were taking and the expression of apoptotic ligands on their T cells. The monocyte apoptosis induced by autologous T cells seems to be specific for SLE, since this phenomenon was not observed in PBMC from patients with RA. This raises the possibility that the killing is mediated by a uniquely autoreactive subset present in lupus but not RA patients. Although RA T cells had higher levels of TRAIL than controls, there were no significant increases in the other apoptotic ligands, suggesting that the increase in this molecule is not sufficient to induce cytotoxicity. Multiple groups including our own have reported that T cells from patients with active lupus overexpress LFA-1 (9). We have previously reported that the T cells overexpressing LFA-1 mediate the monocyte killing in lupus (9). In other studies, we have shown that LFA-1 overexpression induces T cell autoreactivity and identical monocyte killing in vitro, and a lupus-like disease in vivo (11). The autoreactivity caused by LFA-1 overexpression is due in part to overstabilization of TCR-MHC interactions, permitting T cell activation by class II MHC molecules presenting inappropriate Ags (45). It is possible that LFA-1 overexpression in lupus T cells similarly overstabilizes TCR-MHC interactions in lupus patients, resulting in T cell activation by the monocytes with subsequent killing. An alternative interpretation is that the T cells are responding to as yet unidentified Ags presented by the lupus monocytes. However, the lack of a similar response in patients with RA, another autoimmune disease with T cell participation, argues for a different mechanism.
Our data demonstrate that monocyte apoptosis induced by lupus T cells
is mediated by an increased expression of apoptotic ligands on
autoreactive T cells, rather than to an increased sensitivity of SLE
monocytes to these ligands. It is certainly possible that their
overexpression could be due to T cell activation. Augmentation of
monocyte apoptosis could account for an increase in the source of
autoantigens and potentiate the immune response seen in SLE. An
increase in the apoptosis of cells involved in phagocytosis, such as
monocytes and macrophages, could also induce an increase in
apoptotic cells by both augmenting apoptotic load and interfering
with apoptotic clearance. In the absence of phagocytes, apoptotic cells
eventually undergo necrosis (46, 47). Such necrosis may
promote the maturation of dendritic cells that could then present the
apoptotic material to T cells (48). It is known that
dendritic cells, but not macrophages, efficiently cross present Ag
derived from apoptotic cells to autologous cytotoxic T cells and induce
class I-restricted CTLs after acquiring Ag from apoptotic cells
(49). Interestingly, dendritic cells are known to engulf
apoptotic monocytes (49). It has also been proposed that
failure of efficient phagocytic clearance of cells dying by apoptosis
results in tissue injury, and tissue protective mechanisms operating in
interstitial fluid can be inactivated during apoptosis. The available
evidence supports the contention that phagocyte clearance of intact
cells dying by apoptosis protects tissues from inflammatory and
coagulative injury initiated by cellular constituents
(50). Finally, the combination of apoptotic monocytic
lines cells and lupus IgG is known to be a potent IFN-
inducer
(51), a molecule that has recently been shown to promote
monocyte differentiation into dendritic cells in SLE (52),
and to induce increased expression of TRAIL on T cells
(53). These suggest additional mechanisms potentially
contributing to the autoimmune response.
In conclusion, we have identified a novel mechanism by which lupus monocytes undergo accelerated apoptosis. This phenomenon could be involved in inducing an increased apoptotic load in lupus, which could provide an increased source of autoantigens. In addition, increased apoptosis of cells of the monocytic/macrophage lineage could potentially interfere with clearance of other apoptotic material, which in turn would further potentiate an autoimmune response. Having identified some of the molecules involved in this phenomenon indicates that potential therapeutic interventions could be designed.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Mariana J. Kaplan, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, 5520 Medical Science Research Building I, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0680. E-mail address: makaplan{at}umich.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; TWEAK, TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis; FasL, Fas ligand; DR, death receptor; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SLEDAI, SLE disease activity index; 6-MP, 6-mercaptopurine; PI, propidium iodide; MCF, mean channel fluorescence. ![]()
Received for publication June 12, 2002. Accepted for publication September 5, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-stimulated monocyte cytotoxicity. J. Exp. Med. 192:1373.
production in T cells by signal transduced through TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. J. Immunol. 167:1347.
RIII) whose engagement blocks the cell death programme and facilitates differentiation. Immunology 102:331.[Medline]
. Oncogene 19:4255.[Medline]
1 secretion and the resolution of inflammation. J. Clin. Invest. 109:41.[Medline]
inducer. J. Immunol. 165:3519.
in systemic lupus erythematosus. Science 294:1540.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y Dai, C Hu, Y Huang, H. Huang, J Liu, and T Lv A proteomic study of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus, September 1, 2008; 17(9): 799 - 804. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Zheng and L. C. Burkly No end in site: TWEAK/Fn14 activation and autoimmunity associated- end-organ pathologies J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2008; 84(2): 338 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Sanz, P. Justo, M. D. Sanchez-Nino, L. M. Blanco-Colio, J. A. Winkles, M. Kreztler, A. Jakubowski, J. Blanco, J. Egido, M. Ruiz-Ortega, et al. The Cytokine TWEAK Modulates Renal Tubulointerstitial Inflammation J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 695 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhao, L. C. Burkly, S. Campbell, N. Schwartz, A. Molano, A. Choudhury, R. A. Eisenberg, J. S. Michaelson, and C. Putterman TWEAK/Fn14 Interactions Are Instrumental in the Pathogenesis of Nephritis in the Chronic Graft-versus-Host Model of Systemic Lupus erythematosus J. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 179(11): 7949 - 7958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||