HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McKenna, K. C. Articles by Kapp, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McKenna, K. C. Articles by Kapp, J. A.

Injection of Soluble Antigen into the Anterior Chamber of the Eye Induces Expansion and Functional Unresponsiveness of Antigen-Specific CD8⁺ T Cells¹

Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, and Winship Cancer Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The injection of soluble Ag into the anterior chamber (a.c.) of the eye induces systemic tolerance, termed a.c.-associated immune deviation (ACAID), characterized by Ag-specific inhibition of delayed-type hypersensitivity responses and a reduction in complement-fixing Abs. Recently, we have shown that CD8⁺ CTL responses are also inhibited in ACAID. In this study, we have used an adoptive transfer approach to follow the fate of Ag-specific CD8⁺ TCR transgenic (OT-I) T cells in vivo during the induction and expression of ACAID. C57BL/6 (B6) recipients of OT-I splenocytes that were injected with chicken OVA in the a.c. displayed reduced OVA-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity and CTL responses, compared with those of mice given OVA in the subconjunctiva or an irrelevant Ag human IgG in the a.c. OT-I T cells increased 9-fold in the submandibular lymph nodes and 3-fold in the spleen following an a.c. injection with OVA, indicating that expansion rather than deletion of Ag-specific CD8⁺ T cells was induced by this treatment. OT-I T cells expanded equivalently upon administration of OVA in CFA to mice previously given OVA in the a.c. or subconjunctiva. However, the lytic activity attributed to OT-I T cells was reduced on a per-cell basis in mice previously given OVA in the a.c. We conclude that tolerance of CTL responses in mice given Ag via the a.c. results from unresponsiveness of Ag-specific CD8⁺ T cells.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
An immune response in the eye is required to eliminate pathogens that might damage the delicate microanatomy of the eye and cause blindness. However, this immune response poses a threat to the eye, because nonspecific inflammation can lead to tissue damage. As an evolutionary adaptation, a highly regulated immune response, which is capable of eliminating pathogens while minimizing nonspecific inflammation, occurs in the eye. This phenomenon is reflected by extended survival of foreign tissues placed in the anterior chamber (a.c.),⁴ the vitreous cavity, and the subretinal space of the eye, compared with that of tissues grafted in conventional sites such as the peritoneal cavity or the skin (1, 2). In addition, the injection of antigenic material into the a.c. of the eye of mice and rats induces a unique form of systemic tolerance, termed a.c.-associated immune deviation (ACAID) (3). For example, recipients of soluble Ag, such as OVA, in the a.c. display inhibited delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) and CTL responses when an immunogenic form of OVA is injected s.c. (4). Nevertheless, total IgG production is unaffected, while the isotypes of IgG Abs that fix complement, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3, are inhibited in some strains of ACAID mice (5). The deficiency in DTH and IgG isotypes that fix complement suggest that Th1 functions of CD4⁺ T cells are inhibited in this form of tolerance to exogenous Ags.

In support of the theory that Th1 function is inhibited in ACAID, Takeuchi et al. (6) have shown that CD4⁺ T cells are deviated toward a Th2 phenotype when stimulated by TGF--treated peritoneal exudate cells (PEC). TGF- is an immune suppressive cytokine present in the aqueous humor (7), the fluid filling the a.c., and PEC cultured in aqueous humor or TGF- become ACAID inducing when transferred to naive mice (8). Qualitative changes to the APC, induced by TGF-, correlate with quantitative changes in the expression of costimulatory molecules and the production of cytokines. For instance, PEC cultured in the presence of aqueous humor or TGF- show decreased expression of CD40 and decreased production of IL-12 (6). CD4⁺ T cells stimulated with TGF--treated PEC secrete IL-4 but not IFN-, whereas CD4⁺ T cells stimulated with untreated PEC secrete IFN- exclusively (6). In addition, transgenic CD8⁺ T cells stimulated with Ag-pulsed TGF--pretreated PEC became efferent suppressors that inhibited DTH responses when transferred to naive mice (9). The deviation of CD4⁺ T cells from a Th1 to a Th2 phenotype combined with suppressor T cell generation explains, in part, the reduced DTH responses and the reduction in complement-fixing Abs observed in ACAID.

The mechanisms involved in the inhibition of CTL responses in ACAID are not yet understood. CD8⁺ T cells primarily recognize endogenously synthesized peptides presented by MHC class I molecules on the cell surface of APC (10). However, phagocytic cells have been shown to process exogenous proteins, load peptides onto MHC class I molecules, and stimulate CD8⁺ T cells (11). Moreover, mice given OVA emulsified in CFA display robust Ag-specific CTL responses (12, 13). Induction of this CTL response requires adjuvant and phagocytic cells (13). Therefore, ocular APC that have processed exogenous Ag may also activate CD8⁺ T cells.

The goal of the present study was to determine the mechanism of CTL inactivation in ACAID. Using an adoptive transfer approach, the fate of Ag-specific CD8⁺ T cells was monitored in vivo during the induction and expression of ACAID. We show that the injection of soluble Ag in the a.c. of the eye causes expansion of Ag-specific CD8⁺ T cells that have reduced lytic capacity. These data demonstrate that inhibited CTL responses in ACAID are due to functional unresponsiveness and not clonal deletion of Ag-specific CD8⁺ T cells.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Experimental animals

Female C57BL/6 (B6; H-2^b) mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, MD). C57BL/6J-TgN (TCR-1) (14) transgenic mice, also referred to as OT-I, were a generous gift of Dr. M. Bevan (University of Washington, Seattle, WA) and were bred and maintained in the animal facilities at Emory University. The transgenic mice have been backcrossed for >10 generations to B6 mice and are considered congenic with B6 mice. All procedures on animals were conducted according to the principles in the guidelines of the Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council, Washington, DC).

Ags and adjuvants

Grade VI chicken egg OVA and human IgG (HuIgG) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and dissolved in PBS at a concentration of 25 mg/ml. CFA containing heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Ra and IFA were purchased from Difco Laboratories (Detroit, MI). OVA (2 mg/ml) in CFA, and OVA (0.5 mg/ml) in IFA emulsions were prepared by mixing equal volumes of aqueous Ag and adjuvant.

Target cell lines

E.G7-OVA, an H-2^b tumor cell line that expresses the chicken OVA gene (15) (kindly provided by Dr. M. Bevan), was used as a CTL target in these studies. E.G7-OVA was cultured in standard growth medium (SGM) (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 µM 2-ME, gentamcyin, penicillin and streptomycin) at 37°C in a 5% CO₂ atmosphere. E.G7-OVA was maintained free of mycoplasma and periodically cultured with 250 µg/ml of neomycin to maintain expression of the transfected OVA gene.

Ag administration

For all Ag injections, mice were anesthetized with 0.1 ml of a solution containing 10 mg/ml ketamine (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2 mg/ml xylazine (Bayer, Shawnee Mission, KS) delivered i.m. in the thigh. For subconjunctival (scon) and a.c. injections, the eye was also anesthetized by topical drops of proparacaine HCl from Alcon Laboratories (Humacao, Puerto Rico). For scon injections, 50 µg of OVA or HuIgG in 2 µl of PBS was injected into the subconjunctiva at the base of the globe by reflecting the lid with forceps. For a.c. injections, the cornea was punctured by inserting a 30-gauge needle directly above the pupil and parallel to the iris. Aqueous humor was allowed to flow out and was removed by an ophthalmic sponge (Microsponge; Alcon Laboratories). An air bubble was then introduced into the a.c. by injecting a 1.5 µl volume of air with a Hamilton microsyringe (Hamilton, Reno, NV) fitted with a 33-gauge beveled needle. Next, 50 µg of OVA or HuIgG in 2 µl of PBS was injected with a microsyringe fitted with a 33-gauge blunt needle. The air bubble seals the corneal puncture and prevents leaking of Ag. For s.c. injections, 200 µg of OVA in CFA was injected into both hind footpads (100 µg per foot in 50 µl). For intradermal injections, 200 µg of OVA in CFA was administered in two injections (100 µg per injection in 50 µl) in the back.

Adoptive transfer and enumeration of OT-I T cells by flow cytometric analysis

Spleens from naive OT-I mice were removed and single cell suspensions were prepared. RBC were removed by hypotonic lysis and then splenocytes were washed and resuspended at 2.0–4.0 x 10⁷ cells/ml in Cellgro HBSS from Mediatech (Herndon, VA). More than 90% of CD8⁺ T cells in OT-I mice express the V5/V2 transgenic TCR and bind OVA_257–264 H-2K^b tetramers (data not shown). Due to a normal complement of B cells, transgenic T cells accounted for 10 ± 3% (n = 5) of total splenocytes in naive OT-I mice. OT-I T cells from naive OT-I mice were CD44^low and forward scatter (FSC)^low, which is indicative of a naive, unactivated phenotype (data not shown). OT-I splenocytes (1.0–2.0 x 10⁷) in 0.5 ml HBSS were then injected into naive B6 mice via the lateral tail vein. In some experiments, OT-I splenocytes were labeled with Cell Tracker Green 5- (6-)CFDA SE from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), by incubating a splenocyte suspension (2.0 x 10⁷ cells/ml) with Cell Tracker Green at a final concentration of 5 µM for 15 min at 37°C. Cells were then washed twice with HBSS before transfer.

B6 recipients of OT-I splenocytes were euthanized by CO₂ asphyxiation. Right and left axillary, brachial, inguinal submandibular, and popliteal lymph nodes and the spleen were then removed. These tissues were processed into single-cell suspensions, as described above, and then stained with FITC- or PerCP-labeled anti-CD8, PE-labeled TCR V5.1/V5.2 mAbs from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA), and APC-labeled OVA_257–264 H-2K^b tetramers (16). Tetramers were provided by Dr. J. Altman (Emory University, Atlanta, GA).

Flow cytometric analysis of stained cells was performed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). From a live lymphocyte gate, determined by forward and side scatter, a CD8⁺ gate was drawn by plotting CD8⁺ cells against side scatter and 1.0–2.0 x 10⁴ CD8⁺ events were collected. OT-I T cells were defined as CD8⁺TCRV5⁺OVA_257–264H-2K^b tetramer⁺, and the percentage of OT-I T cells in each tissue was determined by analysis using FlowJo version 3.3 data analysis software (Treestar, San Carlos, CA). Absolute numbers of OT-I T cells were determined by multiplying the percentage of OT-I T cells by the total cell yield in each respective tissue. In some experiments, CFSE incorporation by OT-I T cells was also measured. CFSE is a fluorescent molecule detected in the FL1 channel of flow cytometers that is distributed equally to daughter cells upon cell division (17). In these experiments, 2.5–5.0 x 10⁴ CD8⁺TCRV5⁺ cells were collected for analysis.

CTL assay

After injection of OVA in CFA, 1.0–3.0 x 10⁷ draining lymph nodes cells were incubated with the indicated concentration of OVA in 10 ml of SGM for 3 days in an upright 25-cm² tissue culture flask. Following incubation at 37°C in a 5% CO₂ atmosphere, the number of live cells was determined by trypan blue exclusion and a standard 4-h Cr⁵¹ release assay was performed at various E:T ratios using E.G7-OVA cells labeled with Na₂Cr₅₁O₄ (DuPont, Boston, MA) as targets (15).

To determine the lytic activity attributed to OT-I T cells on a per-cell basis, the percentage of OT-I T cells in each effector cell culture was determined by flow cytometric analysis as described above. To distinguish viable from nonviable cells, Via-Probe (7AAD) from BD PharMingen was added to stained cultures. Only Via-Probe-negative cells from a lymphocyte gate, determined by forward and side scatter, i.e., viable lymphocytes, were used to determine the percentage of the OT-I T cells. The percentage of OT-I T cells was then used to calculate the number of OT-I T cells added to the CTL assay. Data were corrected for differences in the number of OT-I T cells and are presented as lytic activity plotted against OT-I T cell number. In other experiments, OT-I T cells from OT-I-transferred mice receiving indicated treatments were added to draining lymph node cell cultures of similarly treated nontransferred mice.

DTH assay

Mice were given a s.c. injection with 100 µg OVA in CFA at the base of the tail. Seven days later, mice were injected s.c. in the right footpad with 12.5 µg OVA in IFA in 25 µl. An equivalent volume of PBS in IFA was injected in the left footpad. Twenty-four hours later, DTH was measured as footpad swelling using a micrometer (Mitutoyo 227-101; MTI, Paramus, NJ). The footpad swelling in response to OVA was calculated by the following formula: thickness of Ag-in-IFA footpad (mm) - thickness of PBS-in-IFA footpad (mm).

Statistical analysis

Differences in OT-I T cell numbers, lytic activity, or DTH responses between indicated groups of mice or cell cultures were compared by Student’s t test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
OVA-specific CTL and DTH responses are down-modulated in OT-I-recipient mice given soluble OVA in the a.c.

The injection of OVA in CFA primes for CTL responses that are mediated by CD8⁺ T cells specific for OVA_257–264 presented by H-2K^b (12). However, the frequency of these Ag-specific T cells in naive, as well as immunized, mice is below the threshold of detection by flow cytometry (data not shown). As a result, the adoptive transfer approach of Kearny et al. (18) was used with OT-I TCR transgenic mice (14) to increase the frequency of these OVA-specific CD8⁺ T cells in vivo.

Priming for CTL and DTH responses, generated by the administration of OVA in CFA, is inhibited if normal B6 mice are first given OVA in the a.c. (4). To determine whether B6 recipients of OT-I splenocytes developed immune responses that were similar to those of normal B6 mice, both CTL and DTH responses were measured in OT-I recipients. This is an important control because increasing the number of Ag-specific T cells might alter the regulation of DTH and CTL responses resulting from injection of Ag in the a.c. Consistent with our previous observations (4), the administration of OVA in CFA primed for robust CTL responses in the draining lymph nodes of OT-I-transferred mice, and these CTL responses were markedly reduced if recipients were first given OVA in the a.c. (Fig. 1A). In addition, both nontransferred and OT-I recipients that were previously injected with OVA in the a.c. showed significantly reduced DTH responses compared with mice that were untreated in the eye (Fig. 1B). Although the magnitude of the DTH response in untreated OT-I recipients (1.25 ± 0.12 mm) was significantly greater (p = 0.027) than that of untreated nontransferred mice (1.10 ± 0.17 mm), the percentage of inhibition of DTH responses in mice given OVA in the a.c. was equivalent between OT-I recipients (25% inhibition) and nontransferred mice (22% inhibition), and both were statistically different from control mice (Fig. 1B). These data indicate that increasing the frequency of OVA-specific CD8⁺ T cells did not change the priming for CTL responses in vivo or abrogate inhibition of CTL and DTH responses resulting from the administration of OVA in the a.c. Thus, the adoptive transfer model is an appropriate model for ACAID.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 1. OVA-specific CTL and DTH responses are down-modulated in adoptive recipients after administration of OVA in the a.c. Priming of CTL precursors was measured in the popliteal lymph nodes of B6 recipients of OT-I splenocytes. OT-I recipients (three mice per group) received either OVA or HuIgG in the a.c. on day 0 and then were given OVA in CFA s.c. in the rear footpads on day 7. Five days later, right and left popliteal lymph nodes were removed, pooled, and stimulated with 20 µg/ml OVA in vitro for 3 days. A standard Cr51 release assay was then performed with E.G7-OVA cells as targets (A). The displayed experiment is representative of two experiments with similar results. DTH responses were measured in groups of 11–12 B6 mice or B6 mice that received OT-I splenocytes that were injected with OVA in the a.c. or were left untreated. The data presented were combined from two experiments, and each symbol represents measurements from an individual mouse (B).

There are several potential mechanisms by which CTL responses might be inhibited by administration of Ag via the a.c. Inhibition might result from immune deviation of CD4⁺ T helper cells (6). However, CTL responses induced by OVA in CFA are independent of CD4⁺ T cells (12). Other potential mechanisms that could account for the inhibition of CTL activity include clonal deletion, functional unresponsiveness, immune deviation of CD8⁺ T cells, or activation of regulatory cells.

To determine the fate of CTL precursors after administration of OVA, OVA-specific CD8⁺ T cells were tracked in vivo by flow cytometric analysis. CD8⁺V5⁺OVA_257–264H-2K^b tetramer⁺ cells were easily visualized in the lymph nodes and spleens of B6 recipients of OT-I splenocytes where they consistently represented <1.0% of total cells in these tissues (Fig. 2; "No Ag"). Footpad administration of OVA in CFA induced OT-I T cell expansion in the popliteal lymph nodes and spleen, while OVA injected in the a.c. caused expansion in the submandibular lymph nodes and the spleen (Fig. 2).

View larger version (53K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 2. Enumeration of OT-I T cells in recipient mice following exposure to Ag. OT-I T cells, demarcated by a box, were enumerated in OT-I-recipient B6 mice 3 days after injection of OVA in the a.c. or OVA in CFA in the rear footpads. Events displayed are from a CD8+ gate. The percentage of OT-I T cells of total cells in each tissue is shown in the upper right corner of each plot. Right and left lymph nodes were combined for analysis. The plots are representative of one of four mice, all of which showed similar trends.

Previous work of Perez et al. (19) showed that injection of OVA into the subconjunctiva resulted in the expansion of Ag-specific CD4⁺ T cells in the submandibular lymph nodes of DO11.10 recipients. This route of Ag administration does not induce systemic tolerance (20). Therefore, OT-I T cells in the submandibular lymph nodes were measured after scon administration of OVA to determine whether CD8⁺ OT-I T cells also expanded following this treatment. A significant 15.6-fold increase in OT-I T cells was observed in the ipsilateral submandibular lymph nodes 3 days after the administration of OVA in the subconjunctiva (Table I, experiment 3). Like the administration of OVA in the a.c., the expansion of OT-I T cells was Ag-specific and confined to the ipsilateral submandibular lymph node.

The kinetics of OT-I T cell accumulation in the submandibular lymph nodes were similar between mice receiving OVA in the a.c. and those receiving OVA scon, peaking 3 days after Ag exposure and decreasing by day 5 (Fig. 3). The number of OT-I T cells on day 3 was 2.6-fold greater (p = 0.004) in mice given OVA scon (156 ± 16 x 10³ cells) compared with that of mice given OVA in the a.c. (60 ± 0.7 x 10³ cells). These data demonstrate that OT-I T cells expanded in the draining lymph nodes when OVA was given by a route that induces tolerance (a.c.) or immunity (scon).

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 3. Kinetics of expansion of OT-I T cells in the submandibular lymph nodes following the injection of OVA in the a.c. or OVA scon. Ipsilateral submandibular lymph nodes were harvested from groups of OT-I recipients (two to three mice per group) on indicated days following a scon or a.c. injection with OVA in the eye. The total number of OT-I T cells was determined by flow cytometric analysis as described in Fig. 2. The number of OT-I T cells in the submandibular lymph node on the day of challenge is indicated (). *, p < 0.05, comparing day-3 OT-I T cell number from mice given OVA in the a.c. and that of mice given OVA scon.

To determine whether the increased numbers of OT-I T cells in the lymph nodes and spleens of mice receiving OVA in the a.c. or OVA in CFA s.c. were the result of OT-I T cell division, OT-I spleen cells were labeled with CFSE before adoptive transfer. Decreased CFSE fluorescence intensity is an indicator of cell division. On day 0, groups of three transferred mice were given HuIgG in the a.c., OVA in the a.c., OVA in CFA s.c., or were left untreated. Three days later, lymph nodes and spleens were removed, pooled, and CFSE fluorescence intensity of gated OT-I T cells was measured by flow cytometry. OT-I T cells in untreated mice expressed high levels of CFSE (CFSE^high) in all tissues (Fig. 4). Using the fluorescence intensity of OT-I T cells in untreated mice as a baseline for CFSE incorporation, a marker of OT-I⁺CFSE^low cells was drawn. CFSE^low cells accounted for 4–5% of OT-I T cells in the submandibular and popliteal lymph nodes and spleens of untreated mice. Mice injected with HuIgG in the a.c. showed a similar percentage of CFSE^low cells to that of untreated mice in both the lymph nodes and spleens, indicating that OT-I T cells did not divide after the administration of an irrelevant Ag. This was consistent with the observation that OT-I T cells did not increase in mice given HuIgG a.c. (Table I; experiment 2). Mice injected with OVA in the a.c., however, showed a marked increase in CFSE^low cells in all lymph nodes tested, as well as in the spleen. However, the most pronounced increase in OT-I⁺CFSE^low cells occurred in the draining submandibular lymph node and in the spleen. Similarly, mice injected with OVA in CFA s.c. showed increases in OT-I⁺CFSE^low cells in the draining popliteal lymph node and spleen where OT-I T cells were also significantly increased (Table I; experiment 1). These data suggest that increases in OT-I T cells following the administration of OVA in the a.c. or OVA in CFA s.c. involved cell division. It is notable that injection of OVA in the a.c. induced proliferation of OT-I T cells in the nondraining (contralateral submandibular and popliteal) lymph nodes, yet this injection failed to cause a net increase in the number of OT-I T cells at these sites (Table I). The number of CFSE^highOT-I T cells decreased to similar levels in the draining and nondraining lymph nodes, but the nondraining lymph nodes did not accumulate as many CFSE^low cells as the draining nodes. This suggests that small amounts of OVA must reach all peripheral lymphoid tissues after injection in the eye but it reaches sufficient levels to stimulate a net expansion of OT-I T cells only in areas that directly drain the injection site. Whether cells that proliferated in nondraining lymph nodes failed to accumulate because they died or left the lymph node is not known.

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 4. Ag-specific expansion of OT-I T cells. CFSE-labeled OT-I splenocytes were transferred to naive B6 recipients 2 days before specific Ag exposure, and lymph nodes and spleens were removed for flow cytometric analysis 3 days later. Plots display CFSE fluorescence intensity of OT-I T cells from indicated tissues pooled from groups of three mice receiving the same treatment. The percentage of CFSElow cells of OT-I+ T cells is indicated by bars. This experiment was repeated three times with similar results.

Data from the previous experiments clearly demonstrated that OT-I T cells expanded following administration of OVA in the a.c., indicating that clonal deletion could not explain decreased CTL activity in these mice. To determine whether tolerance was induced by injection of OVA in the a.c., it was necessary to challenge the mice subsequently with OVA in CFA. Therefore, we next determined the fate of OT-I T cells upon a subsequent Ag exposure with OVA in CFA of mice previously given OVA in the a.c., OVA scon, or HuIgG in the a.c. Seven days after ocular administration of Ag, the number of OT-I T cells in axillary, brachial, and inguinal lymph nodes was equivalent between all treatment groups (Fig. 5). At this time point, the primary expansion of OT-I T cells in mice given OVA in the a.c. or scon had returned to baseline levels equivalent to those of mice that were given the irrelevant Ag HuIgG in the a.c. OT-I cells increased significantly in all treatment groups 3 days after injection of OVA in CFA. The number of OT-I T cells was similar in mice previously given OVA in the a.c. (152.7 ± 8.3 x 10³) or OVA scon (130.6 ± 43.4 x 10³), but significantly less than mice given HuIgG in the a.c. (538.4 ± 156.6 x 10³). These data are consistent with a previous report showing that, once T cells undergo clonal expansion and retraction, their expansion is not as great as the primary response upon secondary exposure with the same Ag (18).

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 5. OT-I T cell expansion following administration of OVA in CFA. Groups of six OT-I-recipient mice were injected with equivalent amounts of HuIgG or OVA in the a.c., or OVA in the subconjunctiva. Seven days later, OT-I T cells were enumerated in pooled axillary, brachial, and inguinal lymph nodes from three mice per group. The remaining mice were injected with OVA in CFA in the back, and OT-I T cells were enumerated in the same lymph nodes on day 10. This experiment was repeated twice with similar results.

Differences between CTL activity after OVA in CFA injection of mice previously given HuIgG or OVA in the a.c. could be attributed to decreased numbers of OT-I T cells, decreased functional activity, or both. Thus, the lytic activity of effector cell cultures was corrected to account for differences in OT-I T cell numbers between groups of mice given HuIgG or OVA in the a.c. Consistent with data shown in Fig. 5, a greater number of OT-I T cells was present in cultures from OVA in CFA-primed mice that were previously given HuIgG in the a.c. than in cultures from primed mice previously given OVA in the a.c. (data not shown). However, when the lytic activity was corrected for the differences in OT-I T cell numbers in the CTL assay, the lytic activity in cultures from primed mice previously given OVA in the a.c. was lower than that in cultures from primed mice given HuIgG in the a.c. (Fig. 6A). This suggests that OT-I T cells have decreased lytic capacity in mice given OVA in the a.c. However, there is a caveat to this experiment. The CTL precursors did not differentiate under identical conditions, because the number of OT-I T cells stimulated in vitro was not equal between the two treatment groups. Precursor frequency has been shown to effect the differentiation of OT-I T cells into lytic effectors (21). Therefore, a second approach was used in which an equivalent number of OT-I T cells from OVA in CFA-primed mice given OVA in the a.c. and from those given HuIgG in the a.c. were stimulated in vitro (Fig. 6B). In these experiments, draining lymph nodes were harvested 10 days after OVA-in-CFA administration. This time point was chosen because OT-I T cells have expanded to peak levels and contracted in the draining lymph node. However, the percentage of OT-I T cells was slightly higher in primed mice given HuIgG a.c. Therefore, draining lymph node cells containing 2.0 x 10⁴ OT-I T cells from OVA in CFA-primed OT-I-transferred mice receiving indicated treatments were diluted with draining lymph node cells from nontransferred mice primed with OVA in CFA after receiving the same treatments. This process equalized both the number of OT-I T cells and number of primed lymph node cells in cultures from mice given OVA in the a.c. or HuIgG in the a.c. This experiment also showed that CTL activity was significantly decreased in cultures from mice given OVA in the a.c. (Fig. 6B). Thus, OT-I T cells from mice given OVA in the a.c. display decreased lytic capacity as well as decreased numbers of OT-I T cells compared with those from mice receiving HuIgG via the a.c. before OVA in CFA.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 6. Decreased lytic capacity of Ag-specific CTL after administration of OVA in the a.c. Seven days after the administration of OVA or HuIgG in the a.c., OT-I-recipient mice were injected with OVA in CFA. A, Three days later, draining lymph nodes were harvested, and equal numbers of lymph node cells were stimulated in vitro with OVA for 3 days, and then a CTL assay was performed. The percentage of OT-I T cells was measured after in vitro stimulation and used to calculate the number of OT-I T cells added to the CTL assay. B, Ten days after administration of OVA in CFA, draining lymph nodes were harvested, equivalent numbers of OT-I T cells were stimulated in vitro for 3 days, and CTL activity was measured.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 7. Administration of OVA in the a.c. induces CD8+ T cell tolerance. Groups of three OT-I-transferred or nontransferred mice injected with OVA in the a.c. ( and ) or scon (• and ) 7 days earlier were then injected with OVA in CFA. Ten days later, draining lymph nodes were harvested and lymph node cells were stimulated with OVA for 3 days. CTL responses from lymph node cells of nontransferred mice ( and ) given indicated treatments were compared with lymph node cells from OT-I-transferred cultures containing 2 x 104 OT-I T cells ( and •) that were given similar treatments. Each symbol represents the mean of triplicate measurements. Error bars represent the SD of the mean. E.G7-OVA cells were used as targets. This experiment was repeated twice with similar results.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

To determine whether the reduction in CTL responses was the result of functional unresponsiveness of Ag-specific T cells, we used an adoptive transfer approach, involving the transfer of transgenic T cells of known specificity into naive syngeneic recipients to follow the fate of these cells in vivo during the induction and expression of ACAID. This approach has previously been used by two laboratories (19, 22) to track Ag-specific CD4⁺ T cells (DO11.10) in BALB/c recipients after the injection of whole OVA or OVA peptides in the a.c. of the eye. We used the same model Ag, OVA, to track CD8⁺ TCR transgenic cells (OT-I) (14) in B6 recipients. We extended the previous studies by determining the fate of Ag-specific T cells after OVA in CFA administration of mice previously given OVA in the a.c. or OVA scon. The number of OT-I T cells increased in the submandibular lymph nodes and spleen following the administration of OVA in the a.c. Thus, expansion rather than deletion of Ag-specific CD8⁺ T cells is elicited by delivery of Ag to the a.c. The increase was Ag specific and involved cell division.

The expansion of OT-I T cells in both the submandibular lymph nodes and spleen suggests that Ags delivered in the a.c. may be drained by both the afferent lymphatics and the venous system. In support of this interpretation, aqueous humor has been shown to flow directly into the venous system through the trabecular meshwork via Schlemm’s canal and also into the extracellular spaces of the ciliary body (23). This process is aided by an incomplete endothelial cell layer of the anterior part of the ciliary body, which is believed to provide access to the afferent lymphatics via the episcleral spaces (23). Dendritic cells are present in both the ciliary body and the trabecular meshwork (24, 25, 26). Thus, Ags injected into the a.c. that are processed by ocular APC, theoretically could exit the eye via Schlemm’s canal into the venous system and hence to the spleen, or via the uveal-scleral route through the ciliary body to the suprachoroidal space to the episcleral spaces, which are drained by the conjunctival lymphatics (23).

The increased number of OT-I T cells in the submandibular lymph nodes and spleen following an a.c. injection with OVA indicate that clonal deletion does not explain the decreased CTL responses in ACAID. Therefore, alternative mechanisms of CTL inactivation were tested. First, the magnitude of OT-I T cell expansion was evaluated between ACAID and non-ACAID mice. Ag delivered to the subconjunctiva, a route that drains into the submandibular lymph nodes but does not induce tolerance (20), induced greater expansion of OT-I T cells in the submandibular lymph nodes than did the administration of OVA in the a.c. This difference in T cell expansion may be explained by availability of Ag. Because Ag injected into the a.c. escapes the eye by both the afferent lymphatics and venous system, the amount of Ag present in the submandibular lymph node may be lower in mice given OVA in the a.c. than in those given OVA scon Conversely, Ag injected into the subconjunctiva is likely to drain exclusively to the lymph nodes, resulting in more available Ag to stimulate naive T cells. In support of this interpretation, Kaech et al. (27) have recently shown that the amount of available Ag determines the number of T cells that are recruited from the naive T cell pool for activation and proliferation. Nevertheless, the injection of OVA in the a.c. or scon induced OT-I T cell expansion in the draining lymph nodes with similar kinetics of expansion and contraction. Upon secondary stimulation with OVA in CFA, OT-I T cells expanded equivalently in mice previously given OVA in the a.c. or OVA scon, indicating again that clonal deletion could not explain decreased CTL activity in mice given OVA in the a.c.

Expansion of CD4⁺ T cells with a subsequent loss of effector function has been reported for CD4⁺ TCR transgenic T cells in recipient mice after tolerance induction by intravenous (18, 28) and mucosal administration (29) of Ags. In addition, viral immune evasion due to unresponsive CD8⁺ T cells has been observed in chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infections (30) and recently in response to polyoma virus-induced tumors (31). To determine whether Ag-specific CD8⁺ T cells were functionally unresponsive after ACAID induction, we stimulated equivalent numbers of OT-I T cells harvested from mice given OVA in CFA that were previously injected with OVA in the a.c. or OVA scon to assure that CTL precursors in each treatment group differentiated under similar conditions. In these experiments, the lytic activity attributed to OT-I T cells was significantly less in mice given OVA in the a.c. indicating that these cells were functionally unresponsive. We conclude that decreased CTL responses in ACAID are the result of functional unresponsiveness rather than of clonal deletion of Ag-specific CD8⁺ T cells.

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank Jing Wen for excellent technical assistance and Lily Wang for preparation of tetramers. We also thank R. Lee Reinhardt and Peter Reichert of Marc Jenkins laboratory for excellent training in essential techniques of visualizing Ag-specific T cells by the method of adoptive transfer of transgenic T cells. James Zimring contributed invaluable discussions on experimental design.

	Footnotes

 
¹ This work was supported by a research grant and a center grant from the Foundation for Fighting Blindness, a National Eye Institute core grant (P30 EYO06360), a research grant from the National Institutes of Health (EY13459), and a gift from Malcolm and Musette Powell. In addition, K.C.M. is the recipient of National Research Service Award Grant F32 EY07079, and J.A.K. is the recipient of the Jules and Doris Stein Professorship in Ophthalmology awarded by Research to Prevent Blindness.

² Current address: Center for Neurological Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.

³ Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Judith A. Kapp, Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University, School of Medicine, Building B, Room 2602, 1365 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail address: jkapp{at}emory.edu

⁴ Abbreviations used in this paper: a.c., anterior chamber; ACAID, a.c.-associated immune deviation; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity; HuIgG, human IgG; scon, subconjunctival(ly); PEC, peritoneal exudate cell.

Received for publication December 27, 2001. Accepted for publication September 16, 2002.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Jiang, L. Q., J. Marianela, J. W. Streilein. 1993. Subretinal space and vitreous cavity as immunologically privileged sites for retinal allografts. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 34:3347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Niederkorn, J. Y., J. W. Streilein, J. A. Shadduck. 1981. Deviant immune responses to allogeneic tumors injected intracamerally and subcutaneously in mice. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 20:355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Streilein, J. W.. 1999. Immunoregulatory mechanisms of the eye. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 18:357.[Medline]
4. Xu, Y., and J. A. Kapp. 2002. T cells are required for inhibition of CD8⁺ CTL responses by delivery of soluble antigen into the anterior chamber of the eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. In press.
5. Wilbanks, G. A., J. W. Streilein. 1990. Distinctive humoral immune responses following anterior chamber and intravenous administration of soluble antigen. Evidence for active suppression of IgG2-secreting B lymphocytes. Immunology 71:566.[Medline]
6. Takeuchi, M., P. Alard, J. W. Streilein. 1998. TGF- promotes immune deviation by altering accessory signals of antigen-presenting cells. J. Immunol. 160:1589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Cousins, S. W., M. M. McCabe, D. Danielpour, J. W. Streilein. 1991. Identification of transforming growth factor- as an immunosuppressive factor in aqueous humor. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 32:2201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Wilbanks, G. A., M. Mammolenti, J. W. Streilein. 1992. Studies on the induction of anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID). III. Induction of ACAID depends upon intraocular transforming growth factor-. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:165.[Medline]
9. Kezuka, T., J. W. Streilein. 2000. In vitro generation of regulatory CD8⁺ T cells similar to those found in mice with anterior chamber-associated immune deviation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 41:1803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Braciale, T. J., L. A. Morrison, M. T. Sweetser, J. Sambrook, M. J. Gething, V. L. Braciale. 1987. Antigen presentation pathways to class I and class II MHC-restricted T lymphocytes. Immunol. Rev. 98:95.[Medline]
11. Rock, K. L., S. Gamble, L. Rothstein. 1990. Presentation of exogenous antigen with class I major histocompatibility complex molecules. Science 249:918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Ke, Y., Y. Li, J. A. Kapp. 1995. Ovalbumin injected with complete Freund’s adjuvant stimulates cytolytic responses. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:549.[Medline]
13. Ma, H., J. A. Kapp. 2000. Antigenic epitopes regulate the phenotype of CD8⁺ CTL primed by exogenous antigens. J. Immunol. 164:5698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Hogquist, K. A., S. C. Jameson, W. R. Heath, J. L. Howard, M. J. Bevan, F. R. Carbone. 1994. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell 76:17.[Medline]
15. Moore, M. W., F. R. Carbone, M. J. Bevan. 1988. Introduction of soluble protein into the class I pathway of antigen processing and presentation. Cell 54:777.[Medline]
16. Altman, J. D., P. A. H. Moss, P. J. R. Goulder, D. H. Barouch, M. G. McHeyzer- Williams, J. I. Bell, A. J. McMichael, M. M. Davis. 1996. Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes. Science 274:94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Lyons, A. B., C. R. Parish. 1994. Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry. J. Immunol. Methods 171:131.[Medline]
18. Kearney, E. R., K. A. Pape, D. Y. Loh, M. K. Jenkins. 1994. Visualization of peptide specific T cell immunity and peripheral tolerance induction in vivo. Immunity 1:327.[Medline]
19. Perez, V. L., A. Biuckians, J. W. Streilein. 2000. In-vivo impaired T helper 1 cell development in submandibular lymph nodes due to IL-12 deficiency following antigen injection into the anterior chamber of the eye. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 8:9.[Medline]
20. Kosiewicz, M. M., S. Okamoto, S. Miki, B. R. Ksander, T. Shimizu, J. W. Streilein. 1994. Imposing deviant immunity on the presensitized state. J. Immunol. 153:2962.[Abstract]
21. Mintern, J. D., G. M. Davey, G. T. Belz, F. R. Carbone, W. R. Heath. 2002. Cutting edge: precursor frequency affects the helper dependence of cytotoxic T cells. J. Immunol. 168:977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Egan, R. M., C. Yorkey, R. Black, W. K. Loh, J. L. Stevens, J. G. Woodward. 1996. Peptide-specific T cell clonal expansion in vivo following immunization in the eye, an immune-privileged site. J. Immunol. 157:2262.[Abstract]
23. Bill, A.. 1977. Basic physiology of the drainage of aqueous humor. Exp. Eye Res. 25:(Suppl.):291.
24. McMenamin, P. G., J. Crewe, S. Morrison, P. G. Holt. 1994. Immunomorphic studies of macrophages and MHC class II-positive dendritic cells in the iris and ciliary body of the rat, mouse, and human eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 35:3234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. McMenamin, P. G., I. Holthouse. 1991. Immunohistochemical characterization of dendritic cells and macrophages in the aqueous outflow pathways of the rat eye. Exp. Eye Res. 55:315.
26. Flugel, C., R. W. Kinne, J. W. Streilein, E. Lutjen-Drecoil. 1992. Distinctive distribution of HLA class II presenting and bone marrow derived cells in the anterior segment of human eyes. Curr. Eye Res. 11:1173.[Medline]
27. Kaech, S. M., R. Ahmed. 2001. Memory CD8⁺ T cell differentiation: initial antigen encounter triggers a developmental program in naive cells. Nat. Immunol. 2:415.[Medline]
28. Pape, K. A., R. Merica, A. Mondino, A. Khoruts, M. K. Jenkins. 1998. Direct evidence that functional impaired CD4⁺ T cells persist in vivo following induction of peripheral tolerance. J. Immunol. 160:4719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Egan, R. M., C. Yorkey, R. Black, W. K. Loh, J. L. Stevens, E. Storozynski, E. M. Lord, J. G. Frelinger, J. G. Woodward. 2000. In vivo behavior of peptide-specific T cells during mucosal tolerance induction: antigen introduced through the mucosa of the conjunctiva elicits prolonged antigen-specific T cell priming followed by anergy. J. Immunol. 164:4534.
30. Zajac, A., J. N. Blattman, J. Murali-Krishna, D. J. D. Sourdive, M. Suresh, J. D. Altman, R. Ahmed. 1998. Viral immune evasion due to persistence of activated T cells without effector function. J. Exp. Med. 188:2205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Moser, J. M., J. D. Altman, A. E. Lukacher. 2001. Anti-viral CD8⁺ T cell responses in neonatal mice: susceptibility of neonatal mice to polyoma virus-induced tumors is associated with lack of cytolytic effector function by viral antigen-specific T cells. J. Exp. Med. 193:595.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. Dace, P. W. Chen, and J. Y. Niederkorn CD8+ T Cells Circumvent Immune Privilege in the Eye and Mediate Intraocular Tumor Rejection by a TNF-{alpha}-Dependent Mechanism J. Immunol., May 15, 2007; 178(10): 6115 - 6122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Ashour and J. Y. Niederkorn {gamma}{delta} T Cells Promote Anterior Chamber-Associated Immune Deviation and Immune Privilege through Their Production of IL-10 J. Immunol., December 15, 2006; 177(12): 8331 - 8337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. McKenna and J. A. Kapp Accumulation of Immunosuppressive CD11b+ Myeloid Cells Correlates with the Failure to Prevent Tumor Growth in the Anterior Chamber of the Eye J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1599 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Ashour and J. Y. Niederkorn Peripheral Tolerance Via the Anterior Chamber of the Eye: Role of B Cells in MHC Class I and II Antigen Presentation J. Immunol., May 15, 2006; 176(10): 5950 - 5957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Camelo, J. Kezic, A. Shanley, P. Rigby, and P. G. McMenamin Antigen from the Anterior Chamber of the Eye Travels in a Soluble Form to Secondary Lymphoid Organs via Lymphatic and Vascular Routes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 1039 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. F. H. M. Boonman, G. J. D. van Mierlo, M. F. Fransen, R. J. W. de Keizer, M. J. Jager, C. J. M. Melief, and R. E. M. Toes Maintenance of Immune Tolerance Depends on Normal Tissue Homeostasis J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4247 - 4254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Dullforce, K. L. Garman, G. W. Seitz, R. J. Fleischmann, S. M. Crespo, S. R. Planck, D. C. Parker, and J. T. Rosenbaum APCs in the Anterior Uveal Tract Do Not Migrate to Draining Lymph Nodes J. Immunol., June 1, 2004; 172(11): 6701 - 6708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Camelo, A. Shanley, A. S. P. Voon, and P. G. McMenamin The Distribution of Antigen in Lymphoid Tissues following Its Injection into the Anterior Chamber of the Rat Eye J. Immunol., May 1, 2004; 172(9): 5388 - 5395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. F. H. M. Boonman, G. J. D. van Mierlo, M. F. Fransen, K. L. M. C. Franken, R. Offringa, C. J. M. Melief, M. J. Jager, and R. E. M. Toes Intraocular Tumor Antigen Drains Specifically to Submandibular Lymph Nodes, Resulting in an Abortive Cytotoxic T Cell Reaction J. Immunol., February 1, 2004; 172(3): 1567 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Camelo, A. S. P. Voon, S. Bunt, and P. G. McMenamin Local Retention of Soluble Antigen by Potential Antigen-Presenting Cells in the Anterior Segment of the Eye Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 5212 - 5219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Skelsey, E. Mayhew, and J. Y. Niederkorn Splenic B Cells Act as Antigen Presenting Cells for the Induction of Anterior Chamber-Associated Immune Deviation Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 5242 - 5251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McKenna, K. C. Articles by Kapp, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McKenna, K. C. Articles by Kapp, J. A.