|
|
||||||||
Cutting Edge |
Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CBA.Ca (CBA; H2k), C57BL/10 (B10; H2b), New Zealand White (NZW; H2z), and BALB/c (H2d) mice were purchased from Harlan (Bicester, U.K.). CBA.Ca recombinase-activating gene (RAG)3-1 knockout (CBA RAG-/-) mice were a generous gift of Dr. D. Kioussis (Mill Hill, London, U.K.). BM3 TCR-transgenic mice (BM3; H2k) were kindly provided by Prof. A. L. Mellor (Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Augusta, GA) and have been described previously (12). All mice were bred and housed in the Biomedical Services Unit of John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford, U.K.) in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedure) Act 1986 of the U.K. All experiments were performed with 6- to 12-wk-old mice.
Surgical procedures
Heterotopic heart transplantation. Abdominal vascularized heterotopic heart transplants were performed essentially as documented by Corry et al. (13). Rejection was defined as a complete cessation of palpable cardiac contraction and was confirmed by direct visualization after laparotomy.
Skin transplantation. Full-thickness tail skin was transplanted to graft beds prepared on the left lateral thorax of anesthetized CBA RAG-/- recipient mice. Graft rejection was defined as complete destruction of the skin.
Graft survival data were analyzed by the log rank method (14) using a statistical application developed and kindly provided by Dr. S. Cobbold (Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, Oxford, U.K.). Values of p <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Ab treatment
CBA mice were treated with either anti-CD154 mAb (MR1; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) or hamster control Ab (hamster Ig (HIg); Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) at 500 µg/day i.p. on days 0, 2, and 4 posttransplantation. For the depletion of CD8+ T cells, recipients were thymectomized 14 days before transplantation followed by anti-CD8 mAb treatment (100 µg i.p. on days -12 and -11 (hybridoma YTS169; a generous gift from Prof. H. Waldmann, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology)).
Cell purification and adoptive transfer (AT)
One hundred days posttransplantation, spleen cells from CBA mice were isolated by passing the tissue through a stainless steel mesh. Spleen cells were depleted of erythrocytes by osmotic shock, washed twice in RPMI, resuspended in sterile saline, and either injected i.v. or used to purify CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+CD25+ T cells using the MACS system (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) (15), typically to >95% purity. CD8+ T cells from BM3 TCR-transgenic mice were positively selected using this MACS system. For tracing experiments, CD8+ T cells from BM3 TCR-transgenic mice bred on a CBA RAG-/- background were used. Transplantation procedures were performed 24 h after transfer.
Flow cytometric analysis
Leukocytes were first stained with anti-CD8-APC (BD PharMingen, Oxford, U.K.) and anti-clonotypic-TCR-biotin mAb (Ti98; kindly provided by Prof. A. L. Mellor). The biotin-labeled Ti98 mAb was developed with streptavidin-conjugated CyChrome (BD PharMingen). Finally, the samples were stained with anti-CD44-PE (IM7; BD PharMingen).
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To investigate the impact of these regulatory cells on CD8+ T cell-mediated responses to alloantigen we established an in vivo model in which the rejection of a skin allograft was mediated solely by TCR-transgenic CD8+ T cells specific for MHC class I alloantigen H2Kb (16).
First, we determined that AT of 1 x 105
H2Kb-specific CD8+
TCR-transgenic T cells into CBA RAG-/-
mice was sufficient to reject a H2Kb+ (B10) skin
allograft (Table I
; MST = 16 days;
n = 5). Unreconstituted CBA
RAG-/- mice all accepted B10 skin grafts
over 50 days (data not shown). Next, we confirmed that anti-CD154
mAb treatment had no effect on the ability of this monospecific
population of CD8+ T cells to mediate rejection
of a B10 skin graft (MST = 16 days; n = 3; data
not shown). The ability of the immunoregulatory T cells that developed
in mice treated with anti-CD154 mAb at the time of transplantation
to influence CD8+ T cell-mediated rejection was
then examined by cotransferring increasing numbers of
CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (Table I
) and then CD4+CD25+ and
CD4+CD25- T cells (Fig. 2
A) along with 1 x
105 CD154-independent
H2Kb-specific CD8+ T cells
into CBA RAG-/- recipients the day before
skin grafting. Cotransfer of purified CD4+ T
cells and CD4+CD25+ T cells
prevented B10 skin allograft rejection mediated by
H2Kb-specific CD8+ T cells
in a dose-dependent manner (Table I
and Fig. 2
A,
respectively). In contrast, purified CD8+ T cells
or CD4+CD25- T cells
lacked any evidence of suppressive activity (Table I
and Fig. 2
A). Indeed, cotransfer of
CD4+CD25- T cells at a
10:1 ratio resulted in more rapid rejection of the B10 skin grafts
(Fig. 2
A).
|
|
Finally, we evaluated whether the mechanism by which
CD4+CD25+ T cells prevent
H2Kb-specific CD8+ T
cell-mediated skin allograft rejection was due to the deletion of
CD8+ T cells. All CBA
RAG-/- mice were reconstituted with
1 x 105 H2Kb-specific
CD8+ T cells from
BM3-RAG-/- mice. One group was left
untransplanted. Other mice received a B10 skin allograft either alone
or in combination with 5 x 105
CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells
from B10 LTS. At 25 days posttransplantationa time when all B10 skin
allografts had been rejected in the groups that received 1 x
105 H2Kb-specific
CD8+ T cells only, but 80% of grafts on mice
that received both CD8+ T cells and regulatory
cells remained intactthe spleen and draining axillary lymph nodes
were examined. It was found that cotransfer of
CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells
did not result in the deletion of alloantigen-specific
CD8+ T cells (Fig. 2
B). Similar
numbers of CD8+Ti98+T cells
were present in the spleens of untransplanted mice that only received
H2Kb-specific CD8+ T cells
(0.71 x 104 ± 0.20 x
104) and the group of reconstituted mice that
have been transplanted after cotransfer of
CD4+CD25+ T cells
(0.91 x 104 ± 0.40 x
104). Similar findings were observed in the
axillary lymph nodes (data not shown). Interestingly, a 5-fold higher
number of CD8+Ti98+ T cells
was found in the spleens of reconstituted CBA
RAG-/- mice that received a B10
transplant compared with transplanted CBA
RAG-/- mice that also received
CD4+CD25+ regulatory T
cells.
Recently, it has been demonstrated that
CD4+CD25+ T cells have the
capacity to control homeostatic expansion of both
CD4+ and CD8+ T cell
subsets (17, 18). However, control of homeostatic
expansion of H2Kb-specific
CD8+ T cells by the
CD4+CD25+ T cells is
unlikely to be the mechanism by which allograft rejection can be
prevented in this model, because the cotransfer of
CD4+CD25+ T cells taken
from CBA mice with LTS BALB/c cardiac allografts failed to show any
suppressive activity, indicating an alloantigen-specific component to
the regulation (Fig. 2
A).
Phenotype analysis revealed that, in the absence of a transplanted B10
skin allograft, 36.3 ± 4.4% of gated
CD8+Ti98+ T cells expressed
CD44, a marker of previous Ag exposure (Fig. 2
C). As
expected, after B10 skin allograft transplantation most
CD8+Ti98+ T cells were
positive for CD44 expression (93.0 ± 2.0%). In contrast, after
B10 skin transplantation in the presence of
CD4+CD25+ T cells, CD44
expression on gated
CD8+Ti98+ T cells was
reduced (57.3 ± 10.3%).
The finding that the majority of the regulated
CD8+ T cells express the activation/memory marker
CD44 (Fig. 2
C) but are present in much lower numbers than in
mice that did not receive regulatory cells (Fig. 2
B)
supports the hypothesis that suppression of graft rejection by
CD4+CD25+ T cells is not
due to deletion but may be attributed to the suppression of clonal
expansion and/or the acquisition of effector function of alloreactive
CD8+ T cells. Analysis at earlier time points is
currently being performed to determine the precise response of the
alloreactive CD8+ T cells under conditions of
regulation.
This is the first report demonstrating directly that anti-CD154 mAb monotherapy at the time of transplantation enables the development of CD4+CD25+ T cells that have the capacity to inhibit CD154-resistant alloreactive CD8+ T cell-mediated rejection. These findings highlight the need for controlling the destructive response initiated by donor alloantigen-specific CD8+ T cells during the early phase of the rejection response. Our data suggest that this might be possible by establishing or infusing sufficient numbers of CD4+CD25+ donor alloantigen-specific regulatory T cells at the time of transplantation, by eliminating CD8+ T cells before transplantation, or by targeting costimulatory molecules that are used by CD8+ T cells (4, 5, 6, 7, 8). Clearly, once sufficient numbers of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells have developed, therapies targeting CD8+ T cell responses could be discontinued, because endogenously generated CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells have the capacity to control alloreactive CD8+ T cell responses.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Nick D. Jones, Nuffield Department of Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, U.K. E-mail address: nicholas.jones{at}surgery.ox.ac.uk ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: RAG, recombinase-activating gene; HIg, hamster Ig; AT, adoptive transfer; MST, median survival time; LTS, long-term survivor. ![]()
Received for publication May 20, 2002. Accepted for publication September 23, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and CTLA4. J. Clin. Invest. 101:2446.[Medline]
-globulin gene promoters. Int. Immunol. 6:227.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. M. Porrett, X. Yuan, D. F. LaRosa, P. T. Walsh, J. Yang, W. Gao, P. Li, J. Zhang, J. M. Ansari, W. W. Hancock, et al. Mechanisms Underlying Blockade of Allograft Acceptance by TLR Ligands J. Immunol., August 1, 2008; 181(3): 1692 - 1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Carvalho-Gaspar, N. D. Jones, S. Luo, L. Martin, M. O. Brook, and K. J. Wood Location and Time-Dependent Control of Rejection by Regulatory T Cells Culminates in a Failure to Generate Memory T Cells J. Immunol., May 15, 2008; 180(10): 6640 - 6648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Razmara, B. Hilliard, A. K. Ziarani, Y. H. Chen, and M. L. Tykocinski CTLA-4{middle dot}Ig converts naive CD4+CD25- T cells into CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells Int. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 20(4): 471 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Demirkiran, B. M. Bosma, A. Kok, C. C. Baan, H. J. Metselaar, J. N. M. IJzermans, H. W. Tilanus, J. Kwekkeboom, and L. J. W. van der Laan Allosuppressive Donor CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells Detach from the Graft and Circulate in Recipients after Liver Transplantation J. Immunol., May 15, 2007; 178(10): 6066 - 6072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Golshayan, S. Jiang, J. Tsang, M. I. Garin, C. Mottet, and R. I. Lechler In vitro-expanded donor alloantigen-specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells promote experimental transplantation tolerance Blood, January 15, 2007; 109(2): 827 - 835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Toda and C. A. Piccirillo Development and function of naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2006; 80(3): 458 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. A. Coenen, H. J. P. M. Koenen, E. van Rijssen, L. Boon, I. Joosten, and L. B. Hilbrands CTLA-4 Engagement and Regulatory CD4+CD25+ T Cells Independently Control CD8+-Mediated Responses under Costimulation Blockade J. Immunol., May 1, 2006; 176(9): 5240 - 5246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Jones, M. Carvalho-Gaspar, S. Luo, M. O. Brook, L. Martin, and K. J. Wood Effector and Memory CD8+ T Cells Can Be Generated in Response to Alloantigen Independently of CD4+ T Cell Help J. Immunol., February 15, 2006; 176(4): 2316 - 2323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Zheng, L. Meng, J. H. Wang, M. Watanabe, M. L. Barr, D. V. Cramer, J. D. Gray, and D. A. Horwitz Transfer of regulatory T cells generated ex vivo modifies graft rejection through induction of tolerogenic CD4+CD25+ cells in the recipient Int. Immunol., February 1, 2006; 18(2): 279 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W Chalermskulrat, K P McKinnon, W J Brickey, I P Neuringer, R C Park, D G Sterka, B R Long, P McNeillie, R J Noelle, J P Ting, et al. Combined donor specific transfusion and anti-CD154 therapy achieves airway allograft tolerance Thorax, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 61 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Lunsford, M. A. Koester, A. M. Eiring, P. H. Horne, D. Gao, and G. L. Bumgardner Targeting LFA-1 and CD154 Suppresses the In Vivo Activation and Development of Cytolytic (CD4-Independent) CD8+ T Cells J. Immunol., December 15, 2005; 175(12): 7855 - 7866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ghiringhelli, C. Menard, M. Terme, C. Flament, J. Taieb, N. Chaput, P. E. Puig, S. Novault, B. Escudier, E. Vivier, et al. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells inhibit natural killer cell functions in a transforming growth factor-{beta}-dependent manner J. Exp. Med., October 17, 2005; 202(8): 1075 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Mekala, R. S. Alli, and T. L. Geiger IL-10-dependent infectious tolerance after the treatment of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis with redirected CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes PNAS, August 16, 2005; 102(33): 11817 - 11822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Quezada, K. Bennett, B. R. Blazar, A. Y. Rudensky, S. Sakaguchi, and R. J. Noelle Analysis of the Underlying Cellular Mechanisms of Anti-CD154-Induced Graft Tolerance: The Interplay of Clonal Anergy and Immune Regulation J. Immunol., July 15, 2005; 175(2): 771 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Karim, G. Feng, K. J. Wood, and A. R. Bushell CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells generated by exposure to a model protein antigen prevent allograft rejection: antigen-specific reactivation in vivo is critical for bystander regulation Blood, June 15, 2005; 105(12): 4871 - 4877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Nardelli, J. P. Cloute, K. H. K. Luk, J. Torrealba, T. F. Warner, S. M. Callister, and R. F. Schell CD4+ CD25+ T Cells Prevent Arthritis Associated with Borrelia Vaccination and Infection Clin. Vaccine Immunol., June 1, 2005; 12(6): 786 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Heuer, T. Zhang, J. Zhao, C. Ding, M. Cramer, K. L. Justen, S. L. Vonderfecht, and S. Na Adoptive Transfer of In Vitro-Stimulated CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells Increases Bacterial Clearance and Improves Survival in Polymicrobial Sepsis J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 7141 - 7146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bushell, E. Jones, A. Gallimore, and K. Wood The Generation of CD25+CD4+ Regulatory T Cells That Prevent Allograft Rejection Does Not Compromise Immunity to a Viral Pathogen J. Immunol., March 15, 2005; 174(6): 3290 - 3297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Mekala and T. L. Geiger Immunotherapy of autoimmune encephalomyelitis with redirected CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes Blood, March 1, 2005; 105(5): 2090 - 2092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Metzler, P. Gfeller, M. Bigaud, J. Li, G. Wieczorek, C. Heusser, P. Lake, and A. Katopodis Combinations of Anti-LFA-1, Everolimus, Anti-CD40 Ligand, and Allogeneic Bone Marrow Induce Central Transplantation Tolerance through Hemopoietic Chimerism, Including Protection from Chronic Heart Allograft Rejection J. Immunol., December 1, 2004; 173(11): 7025 - 7036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Weiss, V. Donkova-Petrini, L. Caccavelli, M. Balbo, C. Carbonneil, and Y. Levy Human immunodeficiency virus-driven expansion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells, which suppress HIV-specific CD4 T-cell responses in HIV-infected patients Blood, November 15, 2004; 104(10): 3249 - 3256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Zheng, B. Wang, and A. Chen The 4-1BB Costimulation Augments the Proliferation of CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells J. Immunol., August 15, 2004; 173(4): 2428 - 2434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Graca, A. Le Moine, C.-Y. Lin, P. J. Fairchild, S. P. Cobbold, and H. Waldmann Donor-specific transplantation tolerance: The paradoxical behavior of CD4+CD25+ T cells PNAS, July 6, 2004; 101(27): 10122 - 10126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Karlsson, J. Rugtveit, and P. Brandtzaeg Allergen-responsive CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells in Children who Have Outgrown Cow's Milk Allergy J. Exp. Med., June 21, 2004; 199(12): 1679 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Tang, K. J. Henriksen, M. Bi, E. B. Finger, G. Szot, J. Ye, E. L. Masteller, H. McDevitt, M. Bonyhadi, and J. A. Bluestone In Vitro-expanded Antigen-specific Regulatory T Cells Suppress Autoimmune Diabetes J. Exp. Med., June 7, 2004; 199(11): 1455 - 1465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Sumpter and D. S. Wilkes Role of autoimmunity in organ allograft rejection: a focus on immunity to type V collagen in the pathogenesis of lung transplant rejection Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): L1129 - L1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Joffre, N. Gorsse, P. Romagnoli, D. Hudrisier, and J. P. M. van Meerwijk Induction of antigen-specific tolerance to bone marrow allografts with CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes Blood, June 1, 2004; 103(11): 4216 - 4221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Choi, J. S. Bae, E. M. Choi, W. J. Kang, S. Sakaguchi, D. S. Vinay, and B. S. Kwon 4-1BB-dependent inhibition of immunosuppression by activated CD4+CD25+ T cells J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2004; 75(5): 785 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. van Maurik, B. F. de St. Groth, K. J. Wood, and N. D. Jones Dependency of Direct Pathway CD4+ T Cells on CD40-CD154 Costimulation Is Determined by Nature and Microenvironment of Primary Contact with Alloantigen J. Immunol., February 15, 2004; 172(4): 2163 - 2170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stanzani, S. L. R. Martins, R. M. Saliba, L. S. St. John, S. Bryan, D. Couriel, J. McMannis, R. E. Champlin, J. J. Molldrem, and K. V. Komanduri CD25 expression on donor CD4+ or CD8+ T cells is associated with an increased risk for graft-versus-host disease after HLA-identical stem cell transplantation in humans Blood, February 1, 2004; 103(3): 1140 - 1146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Karim, C. I. Kingsley, A. R. Bushell, B. S. Sawitzki, and K. J. Wood Alloantigen-Induced CD25+CD4+ Regulatory T Cells Can Develop In Vivo from CD25-CD4+ Precursors in a Thymus-Independent Process J. Immunol., January 15, 2004; 172(2): 923 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Dubois, L. Chapat, A. Goubier, M. Papiernik, J.-F. Nicolas, and D. Kaiserlian Innate CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are required for oral tolerance and inhibition of CD8+ T cells mediating skin inflammation Blood, November 1, 2003; 102(9): 3295 - 3301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yamazaki, T. Iyoda, K. Tarbell, K. Olson, K. Velinzon, K. Inaba, and R. M. Steinman Direct Expansion of Functional CD25+ CD4+ Regulatory T Cells by Antigen-processing Dendritic Cells J. Exp. Med., July 21, 2003; 198(2): 235 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Pearson, T. G. Markees, D. V. Serreze, M. A. Pierce, M. P. Marron, L. S. Wicker, L. B. Peterson, L. D. Shultz, J. P. Mordes, A. A. Rossini, et al. Genetic Disassociation of Autoimmunity and Resistance to Costimulation Blockade-Induced Transplantation Tolerance in Nonobese Diabetic Mice J. Immunol., July 1, 2003; 171(1): 185 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. E. Phillips, T. G. Markees, J. P. Mordes, D. L. Greiner, and A. A. Rossini Blockade of CD40-Mediated Signaling Is Sufficient for Inducing Islet But Not Skin Transplantation Tolerance J. Immunol., March 15, 2003; 170(6): 3015 - 3023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||