The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, R.
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 168: 4553-4558.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

Dominant Effects of Mutations in the Collagenous Domain of Mannose-Binding Protein1

Russell Wallis2

Department of Biochemistry, Glycobiology Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Individuals heterozygous for mutant alleles encoding serum mannose-binding protein (MBP, also known as mannose-binding lectin) show increased susceptibility to infections caused by a wide range of pathogenic microorganisms. To investigate the molecular defects associated with heterozygosity, wild-type rat serum MBP polypeptides (MBP-A: 56% identical in sequence to human MBP) and rat MBP polypeptides containing mutations associated with human immunodeficiency have been coexpressed using a well-characterized mammalian expression system. The resulting proteins are secreted almost exclusively as heterooligomers that are defective in activating the complement cascade. Functional defects are caused by structural changes to the N-terminal collagenous and cysteine-rich domains of MBP, disrupting interactions with associated serine proteases. The dominant effects of the mutations demonstrate how the presence of a single mutant allele gives rise to the molecular defects that lead to the disease phenotype in heterozygous individuals.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mannose-binding protein (MBP,3 also known as mannose-binding lectin) is the first component of the lectin pathway of complement activation (1, 2). It binds directly to carbohydrate structures on the surfaces of bacterial, fungal, and parasitic cells and initiates complement fixation by activating associated serine proteases designated MBP-associated serine proteases (MASPs). MBPs are members of the collectin family of animal lectins. These proteins all contain an N-terminal collagenous domain and C-terminal, Ca2+-dependent carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs) (3). Three identical polypeptide chains assemble to form subunits that in turn oligomerize to generate larger bouquet-like oligomers. MASPs bind to the N-terminal part of the collagenous domain, within the region that links the subunits together in the larger oligomers (4).

Serum MBP forms complexes with three different MASPs (MASP-1, MASP-2, and MASP-3) (5, 6, 7). MASPs have a common domain organization consisting of two N-terminal CUB domains (domains found in complement subcomponents C1r/C1s, Uegf, and bone morphogenetic protein 1) separated by an epidermal growth factor-like domain and followed by two complement control protein modules and a serine protease domain. MASPs circulate as zymogens attached to MBP that become activated when MBP binds to a target cell. Only MASP-2 has a clearly defined role in complement fixation (8). Upon autoactivation, it cleaves complement components C4 and C2 to generate fragments that form the C3 convertase. MASP-1 and MASP-3 are synthesized through alternative splicing of the MASP-1/3 gene (5). Their biological roles are not known. MASPs are homodimers stabilized through interactions involving the N-terminal CUB domain (9). The N-terminal CUB and epidermal growth factor-like domains are necessary and sufficient to reproduce the MBP-binding properties of the full-size proteins. MBP dimers bind single MASP dimers, whereas MBP trimers and tetramers bind up to two MASP dimers.

MBP-associated immunodeficiency is a common disorder that is linked to increased susceptibility to a wide range of infections (2). Individuals are particularly vulnerable in the first few years of life, before an effective adaptive immune response is established. The deficiency also manifests itself when adaptive immunity is compromised, for example, during HIV infection or following chemotherapy (10, 11). MBP-associated immunodeficiency can be caused by any one of three separate point mutations in the MBP gene. Each mutation leads to a single amino acid substitution within the first part of the collagenous domain. In both homozygous and heterozygous individuals, the disorder is characterized by reduced levels of serum MBP and structural changes to the N-terminal domains.

A model system in which the naturally occurring human variants have been recreated in rat serum MBP has proved to be very useful for characterizing the structural defects associated with homozygous genotypes (9, 12). The mutations decrease significantly the complement-fixing activities of rat MBP as a result of structural changes that disrupt interactions with MASPs. In homozygous individuals, immunodeficiency is caused by inefficient complement activation that compounds the effects of reduced serum MBP levels. However, the molecular basis of immunodeficiency in heterozygous individuals is poorly understood. Serum MBP levels are considerably higher than in homozygous subjects, implying that diminished ability to fix complement rather than decreased serum levels may be the major factor leading to immunodeficiency.

To determine whether MBPs of the type that would be produced by heterozygotes are functionally defective, wild-type and mutant rat MBPs have been coexpressed. The resulting heterooligomeric MBPs have significantly reduced complement-fixing activities as a result of structural changes that resemble the defects in homooligomeric mutant MBPs. Defective complement fixation resulting from the dominant effects of the mutations is likely to be a major cause of immunodeficiency in individuals with mutant MBP alleles.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials

Restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). All tissue culture media were obtained from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Promix cell-labeling mix (~70% [35S]methionineand 30% 35S-labeled cysteine) was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Little Chalfont, U.K.). Nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose, Sepharose 6B, and protein molecular mass markers were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Immulon 4 microtiter wells were purchased from Dynex Technologies (Chantilly, VA). Nitrocellulose membranes were purchased from Schleicher & Schuell (Keene, NH). Anti-hemagglutinin (HA) and anti-c-myc mAbs were purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN).

Production of fragments of MASP-1/3 and MASP-2

The N-terminal three domains of MASP-1 and MASP-2, which reproduce the MBP-binding properties of full-size MASPs, were produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells and were purified on nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose as described previously (13). The N-terminal three domains of MASP-1 and MASP-3 are identical (5).

Analytical methods

SDS-PAGE was performed using the method of Laemmli (14). Gel filtration chromatography was conducted on a BioSep-S3000 column (300 x 7.8 mm; Phenomenex, Belmont, CA ) as described previously for rat serum MBP (4). The composition of oligomers in each MBP was determined by fitting the gel filtration data to multiple Gaussian curves using Microcal Origin. Data are presented as means ± SE from two independent experiments. Complement-fixation activities of MBPs were determined using mannan-coated erythrocytes as targets, following the protocol described previously (4). Results are presented as means ± SE from two independent assays. Solid-phase competition assays were performed by incubating increasing concentrations of MBPs with immobilized fragments comprising the N-terminal three domains of either MASP-1/3 or MASP-2 using 35S-labeled MBP as the reporter ligand (13). Results are presented as means ± SE from two independent assays performed in duplicate.

Production and purification of MBPs

Mutations were introduced into the cDNA encoding rat serum MBP by substitution of synthetic double-stranded oligonucleotides for restriction fragments. Standard molecular biology techniques were conducted as described elsewhere (15). High selectivity for galactose was introduced into the CRD of MBP by incorporation of the following changes: Glu185->Gln, Asn187->Asp, His189->Trp, Gly190->Tyr, Ser191->Gly, and insertion of the sequence Gly-Leu-Gly-Gly between residues Ser191 and Gly192. The resulting CRDs have previously been designated QPDWG (16). In some cases, epitope tags were attached to the C termini of MBP polypeptides. Synthetic double-stranded oligonucleotides encoding the sequences Tyr-Pro-Tyr-Asp-Val-Pro-Asp-Tyr-Ala, derived from influenza HA and Glu-Gln-Lys-Leu-Ile-Ser-Glu-Glu-Asp-Leu, from the human p62c-myc protein (c-myc), were inserted immediately before the stop codon at the 3' end of the cDNA.

To coexpress wild-type and mutant MBPs, wild-type and modifiedcDNAs were inserted in tandem into the polylinker region of expression plasmid pEE14.1 using convenient restriction sites (17). A separate promoter derived from CMV was introduced upstream of each cDNA to ensure equivalent, high-level expression (Fig. 1Go). The resulting plasmids were used to transfect Chinese hamster ovary cell line K-1, using the calcium phosphate method. Cells containing the constructs were selected by growth in Glasgow MEM supplemented with the glutamine synthetase inhibitor methionine sulfoximine (25 µM) (17). For large-scale protein preparations, cells were grown to confluence in 225-cm2 tissue culture flasks containing 50 ml of culture medium. Medium was harvested and stored as described previously for wild-type MBP (4).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Tandem expression of wild-type and mutant MBP polypeptides. Mutations analogous to those associated with human immunodeficiency were introduced into the collagenous domain of rat serum MBP. Galactose selectivity was also introduced into MBP polypeptides by modifying the CRDs.

 
Recombinant wild-type MBP and wild-type/mutant MBPs containing wild-type CRDs were purified by affinity chromatography on mannose-Sepharose columns (4). MBP containing modified CRDs with galactose-binding specificity (designated wild-type (WT)* MBP) was purified on a galactose-Sepharose column (1 ml) and MBPs containing a mixture of wild-type CRDs and galactose-binding CRDs were purified on columns (1 ml) prepared by mixing mannose-Sepharose and galactose-Sepharose in equal amounts. Radiolabeled MBP was produced by incubating confluent cells in methionine-free MEM {alpha} supplemented with 10% dialyzed FCS, 0.5 µM methotrexate, and 0.1 mCi/ml [35S]methionine for 16 h. Radiolabeled protein was purified as for unlabeled wild-type MBP.

Quantification of the amounts of wild-type and mutant polypeptides in MBPs

Relative amounts of wild-type and mutant polypeptides in MBP preparations were determined by separating known amounts of purified HA and c-myc epitope-tagged proteins on 17.5% polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions. WT* MBP, containing a HA tag and the homozygous R23C/R23C protein with a c-myc tag, were also loaded on the gels as standards. Duplicate immunoblots were probed with Abs specific for the HA and c-myc epitopes. Radioactivity was quantified using a PhosphorImager SI from Molecular Dynamics (Sunnyvale, CA) after exposure for at least 18 h. Relative amounts of polypeptides were calculated from the levels of radioactivity normalized to the amounts of radioactivity detected in the corresponding standard. The proportion of WT* polypeptides in preparations of MBP purified from two separate cell lines were 0.40 ± 0.09 for the WT*/R23C protein, 0.52 ± 0.07 for the WT*/G25D protein, and 0.51 ± 0.07 for the WT*/G28E protein. Thus, there is no intracellular selection against MBPs containing mutant polypeptides.

Binding of MBPs on mannose-Sepharose and galactose-Sepharose affinity columns

MBPs (0.1 mg) were loaded onto mannose-Sepharose and galactose-Sepharose affinity columns (1 ml) in 1 ml of loading buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.8) containing 1.25 M NaCl and 25 mM CaCl2). Columns were washed with loading buffer (3 x 1-ml fractions), and protein was eluted in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.8) containing 1.25 M NaCl and 2.5 mM EDTA (3 x 1-ml fractions). Galactose (6 mM) was included in the loading buffer for the mannose-Sepharose affinity columns to prevent weak interactions with the CRDs of WT* MBP.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Heterooligomers produced by coexpression of wild-type and mutant MBPs

The first step toward understanding why MBPs produced by heterozygous individuals are functionally defective was to determine whether wild-type and mutant polypeptide chains associate with each other during biosynthesis. To address this question, the CRDs of wild-type chains, but not mutant chains, were modified to confer selectivity to galactose (Fig. 1Go). This strategy enabled selective purification of homooligomeric wild-type and mutant MBPs by affinity chromatography on galactose-Sepharose or mannose-Sepharose columns while heterooligomeric MBPs bound to both columns. Because CRDs are not involved in oligomerization of subunits, the changes were not expected to disrupt assembly of the MBPs.

As expected, wild-type MBP binds to a mannose-Sepharose column and can be eluted by chelating the Ca2+ required for binding (Fig. 2Go). It elutes in the unbound wash fractions from a galactose-Sepharose column, indicating that it does not interact significantly with galactose. In contrast, MBP with galactose-binding specificity (WT*) is completely retained on a galactose-Sepharose column, whereas it elutes in the wash fractions on a mannose-Sepharose column, confirming that it binds selectivity to galactose. As shown in Fig. 2Go, >=95% of the WT*/R23C, WT*/G25D, and WT*/G28E proteins bind to both mannose-Sepharose and galactose-Sepharose affinity columns, with only trace amounts of protein eluting in the wash fractions. Because WT* CRDs are selective for galactose whereas mutant CRDs are specific for mannose, nearly all of the MBP oligomers must contain both mutant and wild-type polypeptides. Thus, the proteins are secreted predominantly as heterooligomers.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Binding properties of wild-type MBP, MBP with galactose selectivity (WT*) and WT*/mutant MBPs on mannose-Sepharose and galactose-Sepharose affinity columns. Protein from load (L), wash, and elution fractions along with a duplicate sample equivalent to the total amount loaded onto the column (T) were concentrated by trichloroacetic acid precipitation and separated by SDS-PAGE on 17.5% gels.

 
Dominant effects on complement-fixation activities in heterooligomeric MBPs

To assess the ability of heteroligomeric MBPs to fix complement on mannose-containing surfaces, it was necessary to produce additional heterooligomeric MBPs containing mannose-binding CRDs in both types of polypeptides and without C-terminal tags. Complement-activation assays were conducted using mannan-coated sheep erythrocytes as targets for the MBPs. Compared with wild-type MBP, higher concentrations of heterooligomeric MBPs were required to cause equivalent lysis of the target erythrocytes, demonstrating that the heterooligomers have reduced complement-fixing activities (Fig. 3Go). The complement-fixing activity of the WT/R23C protein is reduced by 1.5- to 4-fold while the activities of the WT/G25D and WT/G28E proteins are reduced by ~5-fold and over 30-fold, respectively. By comparison, the complement-fixing activities of the homooligomeric R23C/R23C, G25D/G25D, and G28E/G28E proteins are reduced by 10-, 7-, and ~100-fold, respectively. Thus, mutations to just some polypeptide chains lead to dominant phenotypes. Because individuals heterozygous for the human disorder are likely to produce heterooligomeric MBPs, defective complement fixation is expected to be a major cause of immunodeficiency in such patients.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Complement activation by heterooligomeric MBPs comprising wild-type and mutant polypeptide chains. Specific lysis of mannan-coated sheep erythrocytes by guinea pig complement was calculated based on release of hemoglobin after incubations with MBP for 1 h at 37°C.

 
Molecular defects in the WT/R23C protein

Previous studies have revealed that the overall complement-fixing activity of MBP is a function of the distribution of oligomers and the specific activities of each oligomer (4). Wild-type rat MBP comprises covalent oligomers ranging from monomers to tetramers of subunits, of which trimers and tetramers have the highest complement-fixing activities. By contrast, the R23C/R23C protein consists of a lower proportion of dimers, trimers, and tetramers of subunits and higher amounts of single subunits, which leads to a reduction in the overall complement-fixing activity (18). Gel filtration analysis shows that the proportion of MBP trimers and tetramers is also reduced in the WT/R23C protein, although not to the same extent as in the R23C/R23C protein (Fig. 4Go). The major species consist of covalent oligomers that resemble those of wild-type MBP on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, indicating that the disulfide bonds that link individual polypeptide chains together at the N terminus are not disrupted significantly (Fig. 5Go). Based on the relative complement-fixing activities of oligomers in wild-type MBP (4), the WT/R23C protein would be expected to have ~50% of the activity of wild-type protein if the defect were due to changes in the relative proportion of oligomers alone. This value is consistent with the 1.5- to 4-fold reduction in complement-fixing activity observed, suggesting that the primary defect is due to aberrant assembly during biosynthesis, resulting in lower amounts of trimers and tetramers of subunits.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Gel filtration analysis of heterooligomeric MBPs. Gel filtration elution profiles of wild-type MBP and WT/mutant MBPs are shown by the solid lines. The dashed lines indicate the elution profiles of the corresponding homooligomeric mutant MBPs. Elution positions of monomers (M), dimers (D), trimers (T), and tetramers (TET) of subunits of wild-type MBP are shown. Peaks corresponding to elution of individual oligomers in heterooligomers are much broader than equivalent peaks observed for wild-type or homooligomeric mutant MBPs. Single MBP subunits appear to elute as multiple overlapping species. Because almost all of the MBP oligomers are formed from both wild-type and mutant polypeptides, it is likely that there are distinct subpopulations within each oligomer, in which the numbers of wild-type and mutant chains is different. The peak broadening is probably due to these different forms eluting at slightly different positions.

 


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. SDS-PAGE of homooligomeric and heterooligomeric MBPs. Proteins were separated under nonreducing conditions on 10% polyacrylamide gels and were detected with Coomassie blue. The migration positions of molecular mass markers and of covalent oligomeric forms of wild-type MBP are shown on the left and right, respectively. The covalent structure of WT* MBP resembles the structure of wild-type protein, demonstrating that changes to the CRDs do not affect oligomerization of subunits. As shown in Fig. 4Go., oligomers of the glycine mutants elute from a gel filtration column at comparable positions to oligomers of wild-type MBP, implying that they are assembled from trimeric subunits. However, these oligomers are assembled primarily from smaller covalent structures of 110, 45, and 26 kDa that comprise four and two polypeptide species, along with some single polypeptide chains. Possible arrangements of such covalent structures in MBP oligomers have been described previously (18 ). The apparent molecular mass of the smallest MBP species was determined from the migration position on 17.5% gels using molecular mass markers of 6.5–66 kDa as standards.

 
Defective complement fixation in the R23C/R23C protein arises because the smaller MBP oligomers have lower affinities for MASP-2 (18). To compare the WT/R23C protein with its homooligomeric counterpart, the binding affinity for MASP-2 was measured using a fragment consisting of the N-terminal three domains of MASP-2 that reproduces the binding properties of the full-size protein (9). Because the affinity of the MBP-MASP-1 complex is also sensitive to structural defects in the collagenous domain of MBP (13), interactions with the corresponding MASP-1/3 fragment were quantified as well. Solid-phase competition assays reveal that the WT/R23C protein binds to the N-terminal three domains of either MASP-1/3 or MASP-2 more weakly than wild-type MBP binds (Fig. 6Go). However, MASP binding by WT/R23C is less perturbed than MASP binding by the R23C/R23C protein (Table IGo), an effect that parallels the degree of disruption to oligomerization in homooligomeric and heterooligomeric MBPs (Fig. 4Go). Thus, defective binding to MASP-2 by the WT/R23C protein can also be accounted for by changes in the distribution of oligomers and probably leads directly to aberrant complement fixation.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Binding of wild-type and heterooligomeric MBPs to MASP fragments analyzed using a solid-phase competition assay. Increasing concentrations of MBP were incubated with immobilized fragments, comprising the N-terminal three domains of either MASP-1/3 or MASP-2 using 35S-labeled MBP as the reporter ligand.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Distribution of MBP oligomers in WT/mutant MBPs determined by gel filtration chromatography

 
The molecular defects in the R23C/R23C protein result from the presence of cysteine residues within the collagen-like domain (18). Adventitious disulfide bond formation between cysteine 23 residues is believed to disrupt association of the subunits during biosynthesis. The WT/R23C protein contains more of the larger oligomers than the R23C/R23C protein. Thus, incorporation of a cysteine residue into just some polypeptides of the collagen triple helix is less disruptive to oligomer formation than the presence of a cysteine residue in all three polypeptide chains.

Structural defects in the WT/G25D and WT/G28E proteins

Previous studies have shown that reductions in the proportion of trimers and tetramers of MBP subunits account for an ~3-fold decrease in the complement-fixing activities of the G25D/G25D and G28E/G28E proteins (18). Gel filtration analysis reveals that the distribution of oligomers in the WT/G25D and WT/G28E proteins is also perturbed compared with wild-type MBP (Fig. 4Go), although percentages of trimers and tetramers of subunits are somewhat higher than for the G25D/G25D and G28E/G28E proteins. Changes in the distribution of oligomers alone could only account for a reduction of ~25% in the complement-fixing activities, which is much less than the 5-fold and >30-fold reductions observed. Therefore, individual heterooligomers of the WT/G25D and WT/G28E proteins must also have lower specific complement-fixing activities than corresponding homooligomers of their wild-type counterparts.

Reduced specific complement-fixing activities of individual oligomers of the G25D/G25D and G28E/G28E proteins reflect perturbation of the MASP-2 binding site caused by local disruption to the collagen-like domain and the adjacent cysteine-rich domain (18). These changes lead to a 4-fold decrease in complement-fixing activity. Comparable structural defects in the cysteine-rich domains are detected in the WT/G25D and WT/G28E proteins, as evidenced by the pattern of bands observed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, in which the predominant covalent species comprise two and four polypeptide chains (Fig. 5Go). The covalent structures are also comparable to proteins isolated from the serum of immunodeficient individuals that consist of low molecular mass covalent forms.

A 4-fold decrease in complement-fixing activity due to structural perturbations in the N-terminal domains that disrupt the interaction with MASP-2 combined with the small reduction in complement-fixing activity due to the changes in the distribution of oligomers would account for the overall 5-fold decrease in complement-fixing activity of the WT/G25D protein. However, the WT/G28E protein is a further 8- to 10-fold less active at fixing complement than the WT/G25D protein. This reduction mirrors the 10-fold difference in complement-fixing activities between the G25D/G25D and G28E/G28E proteins. Thus, the additional defect caused by the G28E mutation is also a dominant effect.

As expected, the structural changes in the WT/G25D and WT/G28E proteins lead to defective interactions with MASPs. Indeed, solid-phase competition assays reveal that the affinities of the complexes are broadly comparable to those of complexes between the corresponding homooligomeric mutant MBPs and MASPs. Thus, the dominant nature of the phenotypes implies that replacing a glycine residue at the 25 or 28 position by an acidic residue in just one or two polypeptides of the collagen triple helix is almost as disruptive as when all three polypeptide chains contain the mutation. The mutation at the 28 position affects binding to either MASP-1 or MASP-2 more than the mutation at the 25 position. The simplest explanation to account for differences in affinities and complement-fixing activities between the two glycine mutants is that the MASPs bind closer to the 28 position, near the point at which individual subunits diverge from the central core in the bouquet-like structures.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results reported here suggest that inefficient complement fixation resulting from defective interactions with MASPs is likely to be a major cause of immunodeficiency in individuals heterozygous for mutant MBP alleles. On coproduction of wild-type and mutant polypeptides, MBPs are secreted predominantly as heterooligomers that have the same structural and functional defects as homooligomeric mutant proteins.

It has been suggested that immunodeficiency in heterozygous individuals arises because only a small fraction of the MBP oligomers will be normal (19). Thus, only 1 in 8 (1 in 2 x 2 x 2) single subunits, 1 in 64 dimers, 1 in 512 trimers, and 1 in 4096 tetramers will contain exclusively wild-type polypeptides, assuming random association of chains. This hypothesis is entirely consistent with data for the WT/G25D and WT/G28E proteins, because the specific complement-fixing activities of these heteroligomeric MBPs are equivalent to the activities of their homooligomeric mutant counterparts. The complement-fixing activity of the WT/R23C protein is less impaired than would be predicted from the model, implying that the defect results from the presence of more than one mutant polypeptide in an MBP oligomer.

Trimerization of MBP polypeptides is initiated by interactions between the C-terminal CRDs and the {alpha} helices that form the neck regions and proceeds in a C- to N-terminal direction (20, 21). Because WT/mutant MBPs form trimeric subunits and contain both wild-type and mutant polypeptides in comparable proportions, the mutations do not prevent subunit formation. All three mutations are near the N terminus of MBP and so it is likely that only the N-terminal part of the collagenous domain and the cysteine-rich domain are misfolded.

Reduced complement-fixing activities of the WT/R23C and R23C/R23C proteins can be accounted for by changes in the population of oligomers, resulting in a reduction in the amounts of the larger species, although oligomerization of the WT/R23C protein is less impaired. Previous studies have shown that at least some cysteine 23 residues are disulfide bonded to corresponding residues within individual subunits of the homooligomeric mutant MBPs (18). The disulfide bonds probably disrupt interactions between subunits by distorting the collagen triple helix, thus preventing oligomerization of subunits. In heteroligomeric MBPs, in which just half of the polypeptides contain cysteine 23 residues, only a fraction of subunits are likely to contain aberrant interchain disulfide bonds. This distinction probably accounts for the differences in the distribution of oligomers between the WT/R23C and R23C/R23C proteins.

Each protomer of a MASP dimer must bind to a separate subunit of a MBP oligomer to form a stable complex capable of fixing complement (9). Therefore, disruption of even a single MBP subunit due to the presence of a polypeptide containing a mutation is likely to destabilize a MBP-MASP complex. The dominant phenotype resulting from the G25D and G28E mutations in heterozygous individuals probably arises because almost all of MBPs will be heteroligomers that bind defectively to MASP-2.

Reduction in the affinities of MBP/MASP-2 complexes alone cannot account for the lower complement-fixing activities of the homooligomeric and heterooligomeric MBPs (Table IGo). Binding of MASP-1/3 is also affected by the mutations and the possibility that MASP-1, MASP-2, and MASP-3 function cooperatively cannot be completely ruled out. Because MASP-2 in complex with MBP autoactivates and can trigger complement activation, it is more probable that MASP-2 activation itself is defective in complexes with mutant MBPs. Defective interactions between MBP and MASP-2 probably prevent efficient zymogen activation, thus precluding complement fixation.

There is a complex relationship between disruption of the structure of the collagenous domain of MBP, formation of larger oligomers, MASP-2 binding, and complement activation. For example, the WT/G25D and WT/R23C proteins bind to MASP-2 with broadly comparable affinities but the complement-fixing activity of the WT/G25D protein is ~2.5-fold lower than the activity of the WT/R23C protein (Fig. 3Go). The discrepancy between affinities and complement-fixing activities probably arises because the principal molecular defect is different in these two MBPs. In the WT/R23C protein, reduced complement-fixing activity is due largely to defective oligomerization of subunits, whereas in the WT/G25D protein it is caused by structural changes in the collagenous domain. Although both changes affect MASP-2 binding affinity to comparable extents, the effects on MASP-2 activation must be different.

Serum MBP concentrations are considerably higher in heterozygous individuals than in homozygotes. For example, British Caucasoids heterozygous for the mutation equivalent to G25D in rat MBP have only 4- to 5-fold lower serum MBP levels than wild-type individuals, while trace amounts of MBP could be detected in the serum of homozygotes (22). Data reported here indicate that complement-fixation activities of WT/mutant MBPs are all significantly reduced. Thus, defective complement activation may make a more important contribution to the immunodeficient phenotype of heterozygotes than of homozygotes.


    Acknowledgments
 
I thank Kurt Drickamer, in whose laboratory this work was undertaken, for helpful discussions and for assistance in preparation of this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Grant 041845 from the Wellcome Trust. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Russell Wallis, Department of Biochemistry, Glycobiology Institute, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, U.K. E-mail address: rwallis{at}glycob.ox.ac.uk Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MBP, serum mannose-binding protein; WT, wild type; WT* MBP, MBP with galactose-binding selectivity; CRD, carbohydrate-recognition domain; MASP, MBP-associated serine protease; HA, influenza hemagglutinin. Back

Received for publication January 8, 2002. Accepted for publication March 6, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Weis, W. I., M. E. Taylor, K. Drickamer. 1998. The C-type lectin superfamily in the immune system. Immunol. Rev. 163:19.[Medline]
  2. Turner, M. W.. 1996. Mannose-binding lectin: the pluripotent molecule of the innate immune system. Immunol. Today 17:532.[Medline]
  3. Drickamer, K., M. E. Taylor. 1993. Biology of animal lectins. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 9:237.
  4. Wallis, R., K. Drickamer. 1999. Molecular determinants of oligomer formation and complement fixation in mannose-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 274:3580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dahl, M. D., S. Thiel, M. Matsushita, T. Fujita, A. C. Willis, T. Christensen, T. Vorup-Jensen, J. C. Jensenius. 2001. MASP-3 and its association with distinct complexes of the mannan-binding lectin complement activation pathway. Immunity 15:127.[Medline]
  6. Thiel, S., T. Vorup-Jensen, C. M. Stover, W. Schwaeble, S. B. Laursen, K. Poulsen, A. C. Willis, P. Eggleton, S. Hansen, U. Holmskov, et al 1997. A second serine protease associated with mannan-binding lectin that activates complement. Nature 386:506.[Medline]
  7. Takada, F., Y. Takayama, H. Hatsuse, M. Kawakami. 1993. A new member of the C1s family of complement proteins found in a bactericidal factor, Ra-reactive factor, in human serum. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 196:1003.[Medline]
  8. Rossi, V., S. Cseh, I. Bally, N. M. Thielens, J. C. Jensenius, G. J. Arlaud. 2001. Substrate specificities of recombinant mannan-binding lectin-associated serine proteases-1 and -2. J. Biol. Chem. 276:40880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Chen, C.-B., R. Wallis. 2001. Stoichiometry of complexes between mannose-binding protein and its associated serine proteases: defining functional units for complement activation. J. Biol. Chem. 276:25894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Neth, O., I. Hann, M. W. Turner, N. J. Klein. 2001. Deficiency of mannose-binding lectin and burden of infection in children with malignancy: a prospective study. Lancet 358:614.[Medline]
  11. Garred, P., H. O. Madsen, U. Balslev, B. Hofmann, C. Pedersen, J. Gerstoft, A. Svejgaard. 1997. Susceptibility to HIV infection and progression of AIDS in relation to variant alleles of mannose-binding lectin. Lancet 349:236.[Medline]
  12. Heise, C. T., J. R. Nicholls, C. E. Leamy, R. Wallis. 2000. Impaired secretion of rat mannose-binding protein resulting from mutations in the collagen-like domain. J. Immunol. 165:1403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wallis, R., R. B. Dodd. 2000. Interaction of mannose-binding protein with associated-serine proteases: effects of naturally occurring mutations. J. Biol. Chem. 275:30962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Laemmli, U. K.. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680.[Medline]
  15. Maniatis, T., E. F. Fritsch, J. Sambrook. 1982. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  16. Iobst, S. T., K. Drickamer. 1994. Binding of sugar ligands to Ca2+-dependent animal lectins: generation of high affinity galactose binding by site-directed mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 269:15512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Bebbington, C.. 1991. Expression of Ab genes in nonlymphoid mammalian cells. Methods 2:136.
  18. Wallis, R., J. Y. T. Cheng. 1999. Molecular defects in variant forms of mannose-binding protein associated with immunodeficiency. J. Immunol. 163:4953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sumiya, M., M. Super, P. Tabona, R. J. Levinsky, A. Takayuki, M. W. Turner, J. A. Summerfield. 1991. Molecular basis of opsonic defect in immunodeficient children. Lancet 337:1569.[Medline]
  20. Weis, W. I., K. Drickamer. 1994. Trimeric structure of a C-type mannose-binding protein. Structure 2:1227.[Medline]
  21. Wallis, R., K. Drickamer. 1997. Asymmetry adjacent to the collagen-like domain in rat liver mannose-binding protein. Biochem. J. 325:391.
  22. Lipscombe, R. J., M. Sumiya, A. V. S. Hill, Y. L. Lau, R. J. Levinsky, J. A. Summerfield, M. W. Turner. 1992. High frequencies in African and non-African populations of independent mutations in the mannose binding protein gene. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1:709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Rawal, R. Rajagopalan, and V. P. Salvi
Activation of Complement Component C5: COMPARISON OF C5 CONVERTASES OF THE LECTIN PATHWAY AND THE CLASSICAL PATHWAY OF COMPLEMENT
J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2008; 283(12): 7853 - 7863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Wallis, N. J. Lynch, S. Roscher, K. B. Reid, and W. J. Schwaeble
Decoupling of Carbohydrate Binding and MASP-2 Autoactivation in Variant Mannose-Binding Lectins Associated with Immunodeficiency
J. Immunol., November 15, 2005; 175(10): 6846 - 6851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Megia, L. Gallart, J.-M. Fernandez-Real, J. Vendrell, I. Simon, C. Gutierrez, and C. Richart
Mannose-Binding Lectin Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2004; 89(10): 5081 - 5087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS