The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishiyama, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ra, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishiyama, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ra, C.
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 168: 4546-4552.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

Regulation of Human Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-Chain Gene Expression by Multiple Transcription Factors

Chiharu Nishiyama1,*, Masanari Hasegawa*, Makoto Nishiyama§, Kyoko Takahashi2, Yushiro Akizawa*, Toyokazu Yokota, Ko Okumura*,{dagger}, Hideoki Ogawa*,{ddagger} and Chisei Ra2,*

* Allergy (Atopy) Research Center, Departments of {dagger} Immunology and {ddagger} Dermatology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; § Biotechnology Research Center, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; and Foods and Pharmaceuticals Research and Development Laboratory, Asahi Breweries, Ibaraki, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Transcriptional regulation of the gene-encoding human Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain was analyzed in detail. EMSA revealed that either YY1 or PU.1 bound to the region close to that recognized by Elf-1. The {alpha}-chain promoter activity was up-regulated ~2-fold by exogenously expressed YY1 or PU.1 and ~7-fold by GATA-1, respectively, in KU812 cells. In contrast, coexpression of GATA-1 with either of PU.1 or YY1 dramatically activated the promoter ~41- or ~27-fold, respectively. Especially synergic activation by GATA-1 and PU.1 was surprising, because these transcription factors are known to inhibit the respective transactivating activities of each other. These up-regulating effects of PU.1 and YY1 with GATA-1 were inhibited by overexpression of Elf-1, indicating that Elf-1 serves as a repressor for the {alpha}-chain gene expression. Transcriptional regulation of the {alpha}-chain gene through four transcriptional factors is discussed.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Binding of allergen-IgE Ab complexes to the Fc{epsilon}RI triggers the release of a variety of chemical mediators from activated mast cells, which results in allergic responses. Fc{epsilon}RI is a tetrameric receptor composed of one {alpha}-, one {beta}-, and two {gamma}-chains. Among three subunits of Fc{epsilon}RI, the {gamma}-chain is found in various kinds of cells, serving as a component of other receptors, such as Fc{gamma}RIII, Fc{gamma}RI, and Fc{alpha}RI, which is in contrast with the expression of Fc{epsilon}RI in limited cells. The {beta}-chain is shown to be unnecessary for the expression of functional human Fc{epsilon}RI on the cell surface. In contrast, the {alpha}-chain is necessary for the functional Fc{epsilon}RI on cell surface, and is expressed in only Fc{epsilon}RI-positive cells. Recently, the expression of Fc{epsilon}RI was found to be up-regulated by IL-4 in human mast cells, eosinophils, or monocytes (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). In those studies, increases in {alpha}-chain mRNA and its product in response to IL-4 stimulation were demonstrated. Those results suggest that {alpha}-chain expression specifies the cell-type specific expression of Fc{epsilon}RI and determines Fc{epsilon}RI expression by IL-4 stimulation. Therefore, elucidation of the mechanisms for the Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain expression could give us the important information on the prevention against the allergic diseases.

Recently, we analyzed the regulation of the Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain gene expression and found that Elf-1 and GATA-1 were involved in the regulation (7). In that study, we found that introduction of nucleotide substitution at putative Elf-1 binding site of the {alpha}-chain gene, which diminished the specific-binding of Elf-1 to the DNA fragment, caused a significant decrease in the promoter-enhancing ability (7). Therefore, we had speculated that Elf-1 could serve as a transcriptional activator of the gene. However, we later found that overexpression of Elf-1 in Fc{epsilon}RI-positive cells did not increase but decreased the {alpha}-chain gene expression (8). This suggests the possibility that other transcriptional activator(s) whose recognition sequence overlaps with that of Elf-1 is involved in the regulation of the {alpha}-chain gene expression.

In this report, we describe that two additional transcription factors PU.1 and YY1 could serve as the transactivators for Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain gene expression.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell culture

PT18 and KU812 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) supplemented with 10% FCS (Life Technologies) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). RBL-2H3 cells were grown in {alpha}-MEM (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS and penicillin-streptomycin at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator.

Plasmid construction

All of the constructs, pGV-B2-{alpha}NN0.6/M1–M10, in which 3–6 bp were replaced with others were generated from pGV-B2-{alpha}NN0.6 (9), which contains 634 bp (from -605 to +29) of 5'-flanking region of human Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain gene, by site-directed mutagenesis using a Quickchange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).

Plasmids, pCR-Elf-1/type 1 and pCR-GATA-1, generated in our previous study (7, 8) were used to produce Elf-1 and GATA-1, respectively. Plasmid for the expression of YY1 or PU.1 was constructed as follows; rat cDNA was obtained by using mRNA from RBL-2H3 cells which was prepared by using TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies) and an RT-PCR kit (Takara Shuzo, Kyoto, Japan). Two oligonucleotides, 5'-GGCCGTGGCGGCGGAGCCCTCAGCC-3' and 5'-GGTCGAGAAGGTCTTCTCTCTTCTTT-3', which were designed to have the nucleotide sequences of 5' and 3' noncoding regions based on the sequences of human and mouse YY1 cDNAs (10, 11), were used as the primers for PCR to clone rat YY1 cDNA, because the nucleotide sequence of rat YY1 has not been available until now. To amplify rat PU.1 cDNA, the following two oligonucleotides were used, 5'-GCTGGATGTTACAGGCGTGCAAAATG-3' and 5'-CCGGGCGAGGGCTTAATGCTATGGCC-3', which contained portions of human and mouse PU.1 cDNA sequences (12, 13). PCR was conducted by using an Advantage cDNA PCR kit (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA). The amplified cDNA fragments were inserted into pCR3.1 (Invitrogen, Leek, The Netherlands) to generate expression plasmids pCR-YY1 and pCR-PU.1.

Transfection and luciferase assay

Harvested cells were suspended in the culture medium including an additional 10% FCS. The cells (5–10 x 106 cells in 0.5 ml) were cotransfected with 5 µg of the test construct and 25 ng of pRL-CMV (Promega, Madison, WI) by electroporation using Bio-Rad Gene Pulsar II (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) set at 300 V and 950 µF. The pRL-CMV plasmid was used for normalizing the transfection efficiency. The cells were harvested after a 24-h incubation, and treated with a PicaGene Dual SeaPansy Luminescence kit (Toyo Ink, Tokyo, Japan) for the measurement of luciferase activity. The luminescence was measured by a luminometer, MicroLumat Plus (Berthold, Postfach, Germany).

To analyze the transactivating abilities of Elf-1, GATA-1, PU.1, and YY1, the coexpression experiment was conducted as follows: cells were cotransfected with 3 µg of each expression plasmid and 3 µg of reporter plasmid pGV-B2-{alpha}NN0.6 under the same conditions as described above. Total amount of the plasmid used for the transfection was adjusted to 12 µg by the addition of the appropriate amount of the empty plasmid pCR3.1-self (8, 9), because the transfection efficiency is affected by the amount of plasmid DNA used. The cells harvested after a 24-h cultivation were lysed by PicaGene Cell Culture Lysis Reagent Luc (Toyo Ink), and the luciferase activity was measured by a PicaGene Luminescence kit (Toyo Ink).

In vitro transcription and translation

In vitro transcription and translation were performed with TNT T7 Quick coupled transcription/translation system (Promega) using pCR-Elf-1 or pCR-PU.1 as the template for the reaction.

EMSA

Probe for EMSA was prepared by annealing rhodamine-labeled synthetic oligonucleotides, 5'-GATACAGAAAACATTTCCTTCTGCTTTTTGGTTTTAA-3' and 5'-TTAAAACCAAAAAGCAGAAGGAAATGTTTTCTGTATC-3'. Nuclear extract of PT18 cells was prepared as described previously (7, 9). EMSA was performed under the conditions almost the same as described previously (7); 10 µg instead of 4 µg of nuclear extract was used in this study. Anti-Elf-1, anti-GATA-1, anti-PU.1, anti-YY1, anti-USF1, and anti-USF2 Abs were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). For competition experiments, nonlabeled competitor oligonucleotides were added to the reaction mixture. Band shift on polyacrylamide gel was analyzed by a fluorescence detector, FMBIO-100 (Takara Shuzo) (9, 14).

Western blot analysis

Amount of transcription factors produced in recombinant cells was analyzed as follows. A volume of 1/40 of each total cell lysate was subjected to Western blotting analysis. The Abs the same as those for EMSA analyses were used as the primary Abs. Peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse goat Abs were used as the secondary Abs. Membrane was soaked with the ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection Reagent (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ), and its chemiluminescence was detected by LAS-1000 (Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Essential element for the transcription activity of human Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain promoter

Ten mutant plasmids, pGV-B2-{alpha}NN0.6/M1–M10, each containing 3–6 bp replacements that were introduced into the region between -91 and -22 of the {alpha}-chain gene, were constructed because this region was shown to be necessary for the cell-type specific expression of the gene in our previous study (7). Among them, the luciferase activities directed by three altered promoters, M5, M6, and M7 were markedly decreased in {alpha}-chain producing cells, PT18 and RBL-2H3 (Fig. 1Go). This suggested that the region around -56/-42 played an important role in the transcription of the {alpha}-chain gene. A significant decrease in the luciferase activity was also found in the cells transfected with the plasmid M2 carrying the base substitution at the GATA motif around the -70 region. In contrast, the substitution of the AGATC sequence for the TATAT sequence that was indicated as the putative TATA-box did not decrease the activity in PT18 cells, but remarkably increased the activities in both RBL-2H3 and KU812 cells (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Determination of critical elements of Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain promoter by site-directed mutagenesis. The relative promoter activities are represented as the ratio to wild-type promoter activity. Each experiment was conducted in duplicate for each sample, and the results are expressed as mean + SE for more than three independent experiments. The transcription start site (17 ) is expressed as +1. Mutations were introduced into -91 to -24 of Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain promoter region (-605/+30). Only the nucleotides that differ from the original were shown. Lines represent unchanged nucleotides.

 
Nuclear proteins binding to -56/-42

To identify the nuclear protein(s) binding to the region required for transcriptional activation, EMSA was conducted by using a double-stranded oligonucleotide -68/-29 as the probe. As shown in Fig. 2Go, two major shift bands (shown by single and double asterisks) were observed in this assay. These bands lost their intensity by addition of the cold probe, competitor 1 containing the original sequence, indicating that the competition analysis on EMSA worked quite well. The upper band also lost intensity by the addition of competitors 4 (lanes 9 and 10) and 5 (lanes 11 and 12). However, the upper band was still found even when two oligonucleotides, competitors 2 (lanes 5 and 6) and 3 (lanes 7 and 8), were added. This indicated that the nuclear protein responsible for this band shift recognized the region (-56/-50) into which the base substitutions were introduced in competitors 2 and 3. In contrast, another shift band (shown by an arrow with double asterisks) disappeared by addition of competitors 1, 2, and 3, but was not significantly affected by addition of competitors 4 and 5, indicating that the nuclear protein causing the lower band shift bound to the regions -52/-42. In addition, a band (an arrow with triple asterisks; see also Fig. 3Go) with very weak intensity was found in the absence of any competitors or in the presence of competitors 3, 4, and 5. Similar EMSA profiles were also observed using nuclear extract from KU812 cells and RBL-2H3 cells (data not shown).



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Competition assay on -56/-42. EMSAs were performed with a rhodamine-labeled probe (see Materials and Methods) and nuclear extracts from PT18. Competition binding assays were performed with unlabeled competitor 1 (same sequence as probe), competitor 2 (mutation same as M5 in Fig. 1Go was introduced), competitor 3 (mutant probe {Delta}Ets-motif), competitor 4 (mutant same as M6), and competitor 5 (mutant same as M7). Lane 1, probe only; lanes 2–12, probe with nuclear extracts; lanes 3 and 4, with competitor 1; lanes 5 and 6, with competitor 2; lanes 7 and 8, with competitor 3; lanes 9 and 10, with competitor 4; lanes 11 and 12, with competitor 5. The amount of competitor was 30-fold molar excess than probe in lanes 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11, and 60-fold excess in lanes 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. The specific binding of nuclear proteins to -56/-42 in the probe are shown with arrows.

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Identification of the nuclear proteins binding to -56/-42 by using anti-transcription factor Abs. Additives are: lane 1, none; lane 2, anti-Elf-1; lane 3, anti-YY1; lane 4, anti-PU.1. Specific shifted bands are marked by arrows.

 
Identification of nuclear proteins with Abs

To identify the nuclear protein binding to the region shown by the above analysis, Abs against various transcription factors, Elf-1, YY1, or PU.1, were added to the reaction mixture for EMSA and analyzed for their effects on mobility shift. As shown in Fig. 3Go, addition of the anti-YY1 Ab caused disappearance of the shift band shown by double asterisks. In contrast, the upper band (corresponding to the single asterisk in Fig. 2Go) disappeared by addition of the Ab against Elf-1, which coincided well with our previous observation (7). The faint band marked with triple asterisks disappeared in the presence of anti-PU.1 Ab. In contrast, addition of anti-GATA-1, -USF1, or -USF2 Abs did not affect the EMSA profile (data not shown). These results indicate that three shift bands, each of which is shown by single, double, and triple asterisks, correspond to specific binding of Elf-1, YY1, and PU.1, respectively, to the probe DNA.

Binding regions of two Ets-related proteins, Elf-1 and PU.1

For further confirmation of the identity of the nuclear protein binding to the region, EMSA using in vitro translated transcription factors was conducted. As shown in Fig. 4GoB, in vitro translated products of Elf-1 and PU.1 caused distinct band shift. Both shift bands showed the gel mobility which were the same as those observed with the nuclear extract (data not sown). When a series of oligonucleotides with 3 bp substitution were used as competitors for EMSA, MB and MC did not compete with the labeled probe upon Elf-1 protein binding. This indicates that Elf-1 binds -55/-50 region of the {alpha}-chain gene. Similarly, PU.1 was shown to bind -52/-47 region. Thus, each transcription factor belonging to the Ets family bound to the closely located and overlapping portion of the {alpha}-chain promoter.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Elf-1 and PU.1 recognize overlapping regions. A, Sequences of wild-type and mutant competitor double-stranded oligonucleotides. B, EMSAs were performed with the probe same as used in Fig. 2Go. Lane 1, probe only; lanes 2–10, probe with in vitro transcription and translation products (3 or 0.5 µl of products were used for analysis of Elf-1 or PU.1, respectively); lanes 3–10, with competitor DNAs. Each competitor was added to the reaction mixture at 100-fold excess.

 
As for YY-1, we have tried to express YY-1 in vitro. However, we could not obtain the in vitro preparations having the activity to cause band shift.

Transcription-activating ability of Elf-1, GATA-1, PU.1, and YY1

By the transient reporter assay (Fig. 1Go) and EMSA ( Figs. 2–4GoGoGo), three transcription factors, Elf-1, PU.1, and YY1 were shown to recognize the portions overlapping with each other. These findings suggest that these three transcription factors regulate the expression of the {alpha}-chain gene in a complicated manner, in combination with another transcriptional activator GATA-1 that recognizes the GATA motif at -74/-69 (7). To investigate the roles of these transcription factors on the {alpha}-chain gene expression, Elf-1, GATA-1, PU.1, and YY1 were expressed in various combinations in KU812 cells and their effects on the {alpha}-chain promoter activity were analyzed by using luciferase gene as the reporter. To confirm that these effects on the luciferase activity actually correlated to overproduction of each factor, the amount of each factor was analyzed by Western blotting using the Abs. As shown in Fig. 5GoA, all the factors were overproduced at least 10 times more, when compared with endogenous ones. The exogenously expressed GATA-1, PU.1, or YY1 up-regulated the promoter ~7-, ~2-, or 2-fold, respectively (Fig. 5GoB, top). Surprisingly, the promoter activity was dramatically increased (27-fold) when GATA-1 was coexpressed with YY1. Moreover, the coexpression of GATA-1 with PU.1 up-regulated the promoter activity up to 41-fold. These results indicate that GATA-1 up-regulates the {alpha}-chain promoter in combination with YY1 or PU.1. In contrast, overexpression of Elf-1 decreased up-regulating effects by YY1 and PU.1; especially the inhibitory effects of Elf-1 are apparent when coexpressed with GATA-1.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Cooperation between GATA-1 and PU.1 or YY1 in the transcription activation of Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain promoter. A, Western blot analysis of transfected cells. To examine protein levels of transcription factors, 1/40 volumes of whole lysate of the transfected cell were subjected to Western blot analysis. B, Cotransfection analysis. KU812 cells were transfected with 3 µg of the {alpha}-chain promoter-reporter plasmid (pGV-B2-{alpha}NN0.6, pGV-B2-{alpha}NN0.6-M6, or pGV-B2-{alpha}NN0.6-M7) and 3 µg each of the expression plasmids carrying Elf-1 (pCR-Elf-1 type 1), GATA-1 (pCR-GATA-1), YY1 (pCR-YY1), and PU.1 (pCR-PU.1). The total amount of the plasmids used for the transfection was adjusted to 15 µg by addition of the empty plasmid pCR3.1-self. Relative luciferase activities were expressed as the ratio of the activity to that in the cells carrying only the empty plasmids and each promoter construct. Average values obtained from three independent experiments are shown.

 
To confirm further that these synergic effects by YY1 or PU.1 with GATA-1 are actually caused by the specific binding of these factors to the putative binding sites in the {alpha}-chain gene, we constructed two different plasmids in which base-substituted promoters were placed upstream of the luciferase gene, and used as the reporters for the coexpression analysis. Promoters M6 and M7 carry the nucleotide sequences almost similar to that of the original promoter, but contain the base substitutions which are the same as those in the constructs M6 and M7 in Fig. 1Go. As shown in Fig. 5GoB, all three promoters responded to exogenously expressed GATA-1 to an almost equal extent. However, the up-regulating effect of exogenously expressed YY1 and PU.1 was drastically decreased for M7 and M6 promoters, respectively. Similarly, the synergic up-regulating effect by GATA-1 with PU.1 was drastically decreased in M6 promoter and the cooperative up-regulation by GATA-1 with YY1 was markedly decreased in M7 promoter, while it was also moderately decreased in M6 promoter. These results coincide well with the observations in Figs. 2Go and 4Go where PU.1 and YY1 are suggested to bind -52/-47 and -52/-42 in the {alpha}-chain promoter.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Previously, we reported that base substitutions around -75 and -50 of the {alpha}-chain promoter caused a marked decrease in the promoter-enhancing activity. Those regions contained the sequences recognizable by GATA-1 and Elf-1. EMSA containing Ab against GATA-1 and Elf-1 affected profiles of shifted bands. From these observations, we had concluded that GATA-1 and Elf-1 were involved in the up-regulation of Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain (7). However, the detailed analysis in the present study is emerging a more complex mechanism for the regulation of the {alpha}-chain gene expression mediated by two additional transcription factors, PU.1 and YY1. Both Elf-1 and PU.1 belong to Ets-family proteins that bind their target DNA sequences through their conserved Ets domains. Ets-family proteins recognize a dsDNA with the sequence of 5'-GGAA-3' as the core. EMSA using the nuclear protein and anti-transcription factor Abs revealed that Elf-1 and PU.1 mainly recognize -55/-50 and -52/-47 in the {alpha}-chain promoter, respectively ( Figs. 2–4GoGoGo). Considering the consensus motif of the Ets-family protein, Elf-1 binds -54/-51 (5'-TTCC-3'), and PU.1 recognizes -50/-47 (5'-TTCT-3').

YY1 is a transcriptional regulator which has the DNA binding consensus sequence motif of 5'-CCA/TTNTTNNNA/T-3' (15). Similar sequence is found at the region -52/-42 as 5'-CCTTcTgcttT-3'. Considering the difference in the EMSA profiles between the results using competitors 3 and 4 in Fig. 2Go, T(-49) was suggested to be essential for the recognition by YY1. This result coincides with the report that the oligonucleotide with mutation at the core sequence (CA/TT) of YY1 motif from CAT to CAG was not recognized by YY1 in terminal transferase (TdT) promoter (16).

The {alpha}-chain gene is thought to be transcribed by using 5'-TATATTT-3' (-28/-22) as the "TATA-box" (17) (Fig. 6Go). However, the base substitutions to alter the TATA sequence did not show apparent negative effect (M10 in Fig. 1Go). On the contrary, the luciferase activity directed from this altered promoter was much higher than that of the wild-type promoter in RBL-2H3 and KU812 cells. This result suggests that the {alpha}-chain gene can be transcribed in a TATA-box-independent way. YY1 is known to recognize the region close to the transcription start site of a TATA-less promoter and initiate the transcription (18, 19). PU.1 is also shown to play an indispensable role in transcriptional initiation by binding to the element at just upstream of the transcription initiation site of a TATA-less promoter (20, 21). Interestingly, both PU.1 and YY1 are the transcription factors capable of binding TATA-binding protein (22, 23). It would be interesting to test the transcription effect of the promoter region -40/+1, which contains only the putative TATA-box, and none of the enhancer elements, to see whether the TATA-box is functional. We assume that further analysis of the mechanism for the YY1- and PU.1-mediated transactivation of the {alpha}-chain promoter might elucidate the mechanism for TATA-independent transcription.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Schematic drawing of human Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain promoter.

 
The role of these transcription factors recognizing the key element of the {alpha}-chain promoter was investigated by the transient coexpression experiment (Fig. 5Go). Overexpression of GATA-1, PU.1, or YY1 significantly up-regulated the {alpha}-chain promoter. The up-regulation was synergically accelerated by coexpression of GATA-1 with either PU.1 or YY1. In contrast, in the coexpression experiment, overexpression of Elf-1 decreased the positive effect induced by PU.1 and YY1, but did not affect the positive effect directed by GATA-1. Based on the EMSA analysis, we assume that Elf-1 functions as a repressor competing with PU.1 and/or YY1 for the overlapping binding site (Fig. 6Go). YY1 and PU.1 also bind to the overlapping regions of the {alpha}-chain promoter for the up-regulation. Therefore, these transcription factors might not be able to bind the region at the same time. The EMSA profile using the nuclear extract suggests that YY1 is more abundant in cells than PU.1 (Fig. 2Go). This may indicate that YY1 is a natural transactivator for the {alpha}-chain gene. In contrast with the case for YY1 that is ubiquitously expressed in every cell, PU.1 is known to be expressed in limited cells, B cells, macrophages, mast cells, neutrophils, and early erythroblasts (24). Elf-1 is also a cell type-specific transcriptional factor expressed in T cells, B cells, megakaryocytes, mast cells, and macrophages (7, 8). Considering that human Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain is expressed in mast cells, basophils, megakaryocytes/platelets, eosinophils, Langerhans cells, and monocytes, the cell type-specific expression of the {alpha}-chain is regulated probably by transcription factors which are expressed in a cell type-specific manner. Therefore, we assume that PU.1 is still a candidate of the factors which are involved in the regulation of the expression of the {alpha}-chain gene.

Recently, inhibitory effects of PU.1 (GATA-1) on GATA-1 (PU.1)-associated transcriptional activation were reported from several laboratories (25, 26, 27, 28). This might contradict our results. However, cell lines used in those studies produce only either of the two transcription factors, and the promoters analyzed have only either of the recognition sequences for the factors. On the contrary, the {alpha}-chain-producing cells are known to produce both of the transcription factors, and the {alpha}-chain promoter has the sequences recognizable by these factors. We assume that these differences could be the causes for the apparently contradicting results. It should be noted that similar synergic transcriptional activation by GATA-1 and PU.1 in mast cell was also found for the enhancer elements in the second intron of IL-4 gene (29).

In this study, Elf-1, YY1, and PU.1 were identified to bind the overlapping regions which are essential for the expression of human Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain gene. In addition to the two regions around -70 and -50, base substitution around the region -40 also resulted in a moderate decrease in the luciferase activity (see M8 in Fig. 1Go), suggesting the presence of another unidentified transcription factor involved in the regulation of the {alpha}-chain gene expression. Considering that the activity of transcription factors of the Ets family is regulated by phosphorylation of several Ser residues, a more complicated mechanism would be present in the {alpha}-chain gene expression. For detailed elucidation of the regulation of the {alpha}-chain promoter, analysis with a knockout mouse of either of the transcription factors in combination with site-directed mutant at the phosphorylation sites would be required.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank members of the Allergy Research Center and Department of Immunology for helpful discussions.


    Footnotes
 
1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Chiharu Nishiyama, Allergy Research Center, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan. E-mail address: chinishi{at}med.juntendo.ac.jp Back

2 Current address: Department of Molecular Cell Immunology and Allergology, Advanced Medical Research, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Ohyaguchikami-machi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan. Back

Received for publication November 15, 2001. Accepted for publication February 21, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Terada, N., A. Konno, Y. Terada, S. Fukuda, T. Yamashita, T. Abe, H. Shimada, K. Ishida, K. Yoshimura, K. Tanaka, et al 1995. IL-4 upregulates Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain messenger RNA in eosinophils. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 96:1161.[Medline]
  2. Toru, H., C. Ra, S. Nonoyama, K. Suzuki, J.-I. Yata, T. Nakahata. 1996. Induction of the high-affinity IgE receptor (Fc{epsilon}RI) on human mast cells by IL-4. Int. Immunol. 8:1367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Pawankar, R., M. Okuda, H. Yssel, K. Okumura, C. Ra. 1997. Nasal mast cells in perennial allergic rhinitics exhibit increased expression of the Fc{epsilon}RI, CD40L, IL-4, and IL-13, and can induce IgE synthesis in B cells. J. Clin. Invest. 99:1492.[Medline]
  4. Xia, H.-Z., Z. Du, S. Craig, G. Klisch, N. Noben-Trauth, J. P. Kochan, T. H. Huff, A.-M. A. Irani, L. B. Schwartz. 1997. Effect of recombinant human IL-4 on tryptase, chymase, and Fc{epsilon} receptor type I expression in recombinant human stem cell factor-dependent fetal liver-derived human mast cells. J. Immunol. 159:2911.[Abstract]
  5. Bischoff, S. C., G. Sellge, A. Lorentz, W. Sebald, R. Raab, M. P. Manns. 1999. IL-4 enhances proliferation and mediator release in mature human mast cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:8080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gosset, P., C. Lamblin-Degros, I. Tillie-Leblond, A.-S. Charbonnier, M. Joseph, B. Wallaert, J. P. Kochan, A.-B. Tonnel. 2001. Modulation of high-affinity IgE receptor expression in blood monocytes: opposite effect of IL-4 and glucocorticoids. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 107:114.[Medline]
  7. Nishiyama, C., T. Yokota, K. Okumura, C. Ra. 1999. The transcription factors Elf-1 and GATA-1 bind to cell-specific enhancer elements of human high-affinity IgE receptor {alpha}-chain gene. J. Immunol. 163:623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Nishiyama, C., K. Takahashi, M. Nishiyama, K. Okumura, C. Ra, Y. Ohtake, T. Yokota. 2000. Splice isoforms of transcription factor Elf-1 affecting its regulatory function in transcription: molecular cloning of rat Elf-1. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 64:2601.[Medline]
  9. Takahashi, K., C. Nishiyama, M. Nishiyama, K. Okumura, C. Ra, Y. Ohtake, T. Yokota. 2001. A complex composed of USF1 and USF2 activates the human Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha} chain expression via CAGCTG element in the first intron. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:590.[Medline]
  10. Shi, Y., E. Seto, L. S. Chang, T. Shenk. 1991. Transcriptional repression by YY1, a human GLI-Kruppel-related protein, and relief of repression by adenovirus E1A protein. Cell 67:377.[Medline]
  11. Hariharan, N., D. E. Kelley, R. P. Perry. 1991. {Delta}, a transcription factor that binds to downstream elements in several polymerase II promoters, is a functionally versatile zinc-finger protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:9799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Klemsz, M. J., S. R. McKercher, A. Celada, C. V. Beveren, R. A. Maki. 1990. The macrophage and B cell-specific transcription factor PU.1 is related to the ets oncogene. Cell 61:113.[Medline]
  13. Ray, D., S. Culine, A. Tavitain, F. Moreau-Gachelin. 1990. The human homologue of the putative proto-oncogene Spi-1: characterization and expression in tumors. Oncogene 5:663.[Medline]
  14. Nishiyama, C., M. Hasegawa, M. Nishiyama, K. Takahashi, T. Yokota, K. Okumura, C. Ra. 2001. Cloning of full length genomic DNA encoding human Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-chain and its transcriptional regulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 284:1056.[Medline]
  15. Shrivastava, A., K. Calame. 1994. An analysis of genes regulated by the multi-functional transcriptional regulator Yin Yang-1. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:5151.[Free Full Text]
  16. Javahery, R., A. Khachi, K. Lo, B. Zenzie-Gregory, S. T. Smale. 1994. DNA sequence requirements for transcriptional initiator activity in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Pang, J., G. R. Taylor, D. G. Munroe, A. Ishaque, W.-P. Fung-Leung, C. Y. Lau, F.-T. Liu, L. Zhou. 1993. Characterization of the gene for the human high affinity IgE receptor (Fc{epsilon}RI) {alpha}-chain. J. Immunol. 151:6166.[Abstract]
  18. Thomas, M. J., E. Seto. 1999. Unlocking the mechanisms of transcription factor YY1: are chromatin modifying enzymes the key?. Gene 236:197.[Medline]
  19. Johansson, E., K. Hjortsberg, L. Thelander. 1998. Two YY-1-binding proximal elements regulate the promoter strength of the TATA-less mouse ribonucleotide reductase R1 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 273:29816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Feinman, R., W. Q. Qiu, R. N. Pearse, B. S. Nikolajczyk, R. Sen, M. Sheffery, J. V. Ravetch. 1994. PU.1 and an HLH family member contribute to the myeloid-specific transcription of the Fc{gamma}RIIIA promoter. EMBO J. 13:3852.[Medline]
  21. Eichbaum, Q. G., R. Iyer, D. P. Raveh, C. Mathieu, R. A. B. Ezekowitz. 1994. Restriction of interferon {gamma} responsiveness and basal expression of the myeloid human Fc{gamma}R1b gene is mediated by a functional PU.1 site and a transcription initiator consensus. J. Exp. Med. 179:1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hagemeier, C., A. J. Bannister, A. Cook, T. Kouzarides. 1993. The activation domain of transcription factor PU.1 binds the retinoblastoma (RB) protein and the transcription factor TFIID in vitro: RB shows sequence similarity to TFIID and TFIIB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:1580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Austen, M., B. Luscher, J. M. Luscher-Firzlaff. 1997. Characterization of the transcriptional regulator YY1: the bipartite transactivation domain is independent of interaction with the TATA box-binding protein, transcription factor IIB, TAFII55, or cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CBP). J. Biol. Chem. 272:1709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lloberas, J., C. Soler, A. Celada. 1999. The key role of PU.1/SPI-1 in B cells, myeloid cells and macrophages. Immunol. Today 20:184.[Medline]
  25. Rekhtman, N., F. Radparvar, T. Evans, A. I. Skoultchi. 1999. Direct interaction of hematopoietic transcription factors PU.1 and GATA-1: functional antagonism in erythroid cells. Genes Dev. 13:1398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Nerlov, C., E. Querfurth, H. Kulessa, T. Graf. 2000. GATA-1 interacts with the myeloid PU.1 transcription factor and represses PU.1-dependent transcription. Blood 95:2543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Zhang, P., G. Behre, J. Pan, A. Iwama, N. Wara-Aswapati, H. S. Radomska, P. E. Auron, D. G. Tenen, Z. Sun. 1999. Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU.1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:8705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Matsumura, I., A. Kawasaki, H. Tanaka, J. Sonoyama, S. Ezoe, N. Minegishi, K. Nakajima, M. Yamamoto, Y. Kanakura. 2000. Biolobic significance of GATA-1 activities in Ras-mediated megakaryocytic differentiation of hematopoietic cell lines. Blood 96:2440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Henkel, G., M. A. Brown. 1994. PU.1 and GATA: components of a mast cell-specific interleukin 4 intronic enhancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7737.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
T. Ito, C. Nishiyama, N. Nakano, M. Nishiyama, Y. Usui, K. Takeda, S. Kanada, K. Fukuyama, H. Akiba, T. Tokura, et al.
Roles of PU.1 in monocyte- and mast cell-specific gene regulation: PU.1 transactivates CIITA pIV in cooperation with IFN-{gamma}
Int. Immunol., July 1, 2009; 21(7): 803 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Sawada, C. Nishiyama, T. Kishi, T. Sasazuki, S. Komazawa-Sakon, X. Xue, J.-H. Piao, H. Ogata, J.-i. Nakayama, T. Taki, et al.
Fusion of OTT to BSAC Results in Aberrant Up-regulation of Transcriptional Activity
J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2008; 283(39): 26820 - 26828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y.-T. Juang, Y. Wang, G. Jiang, H.-B. Peng, S. Ergin, M. Finnell, A. Magilavy, V. C. Kyttaris, and G. C. Tsokos
PP2A Dephosphorylates Elf-1 and Determines the Expression of CD3{zeta} and FcR{gamma} in Human Systemic Lupus Erythematosus T Cells
J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 3658 - 3664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Kanada, N. Nakano, D. P. Potaczek, K. Maeda, N. Shimokawa, Y. Niwa, T. Fukai, M. Sanak, A. Szczeklik, H. Yagita, et al.
Two Different Transcription Factors Discriminate the -315C>T Polymorphism of the Fc{epsilon}RI{alpha} Gene: Binding of Sp1 to -315C and of a High Mobility Group-Related Molecule to -315T
J. Immunol., June 15, 2008; 180(12): 8204 - 8210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. Nakano, C. Nishiyama, S. Kanada, Y. Niwa, N. Shimokawa, H. Ushio, M. Nishiyama, K. Okumura, and H. Ogawa
Involvement of mast cells in IL-12/23 p40 production is essential for survival from polymicrobial infections
Blood, June 1, 2007; 109(11): 4846 - 4855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. Maeda, C. Nishiyama, T. Tokura, H. Nakano, S. Kanada, M. Nishiyama, K. Okumura, and H. Ogawa
FOG-1 represses GATA-1-dependent Fc{epsilon}RI beta-chain transcription: transcriptional mechanism of mast-cell-specific gene expression in mice
Blood, July 1, 2006; 108(1): 262 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
C. Nishiyama, T. Ito, M. Nishiyama, S. Masaki, K. Maeda, N. Nakano, W. Ng, K. Fukuyama, M. Yamamoto, K. Okumura, et al.
GATA-1 is required for expression of Fc{varepsilon}RI on mast cells: analysis of mast cells derived from GATA-1 knockdown mouse bone marrow
Int. Immunol., July 1, 2005; 17(7): 847 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Ito, C. Nishiyama, M. Nishiyama, H. Matsuda, K. Maeda, Y. Akizawa, R. Tsuboi, K. Okumura, and H. Ogawa
Mast Cells Acquire Monocyte-Specific Gene Expression and Monocyte-Like Morphology by Overproduction of PU.1
J. Immunol., January 1, 2005; 174(1): 376 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Nishiyama, Y. Akizawa, M. Nishiyama, T. Tokura, H. Kawada, K. Mitsuishi, M. Hasegawa, T. Ito, N. Nakano, A. Okamoto, et al.
Polymorphisms in the Fc{epsilon}RI{beta} Promoter Region Affecting Transcription Activity: A Possible Promoter-Dependent Mechanism for Association between Fc{epsilon}RI{beta} and Atopy
J. Immunol., November 15, 2004; 173(10): 6458 - 6464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Su, X. Li, J. C. Edberg, J. Wu, P. Ferguson, and R. P. Kimberly
A Promoter Haplotype of the Immunoreceptor Tyrosine-Based Inhibitory Motif-Bearing Fc{gamma}RIIb Alters Receptor Expression and Associates with Autoimmunity. II. Differential Binding of GATA4 and Yin-Yang1 Transcription Factors and Correlated Receptor Expression and Function
J. Immunol., June 1, 2004; 172(11): 7192 - 7199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Hasegawa, C. Nishiyama, M. Nishiyama, Y. Akizawa, K. Mitsuishi, T. Ito, H. Kawada, S. Furukawa, C. Ra, K. Okumura, et al.
A Novel -66T/C Polymorphism in Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-Chain Promoter Affecting the Transcription Activity: Possible Relationship to Allergic Diseases
J. Immunol., August 15, 2003; 171(4): 1927 - 1933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
Y. Akizawa, C. Nishiyama, M. Hasegawa, K. Maeda, T. Nakahata, K. Okumura, C. Ra, and H. Ogawa
Regulation of human Fc{epsilon}RI {beta} chain gene expression by Oct-1
Int. Immunol., May 1, 2003; 15(5): 549 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Hasegawa, C. Nishiyama, M. Nishiyama, Y. Akizawa, K. Takahashi, T. Ito, S. Furukawa, C. Ra, K. Okumura, and H. Ogawa
Regulation of the Human Fc{epsilon}RI {alpha}-Chain Distal Promoter
J. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 170(7): 3732 - 3738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Maeda, C. Nishiyama, T. Tokura, Y. Akizawa, M. Nishiyama, H. Ogawa, K. Okumura, and C. Ra
Regulation of Cell Type-Specific Mouse Fc{epsilon}RI {beta}-Chain Gene Expression by GATA-1 Via Four GATA Motifs in the Promoter
J. Immunol., January 1, 2003; 170(1): 334 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishiyama, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ra, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishiyama, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ra, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS