|
|
||||||||
Leucine-Based Receptor-Sorting Motif Is Required for Efficient Ligand-Mediated TCR Down-Regulation1
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
di-leucine-based
receptor-sorting motif. Previous studies have failed to demonstrate a
connection between ligand- and PKC-induced TCR down-regulation. Thus,
although an apparent paradox, the dogma has been that ligand- and
PKC-induced TCR down-regulations are not interrelated. By analyses of a
newly developed CD3
-negative T cell variant, freshly isolated and
PHA-activated PBMC, and a mouse T cell line, we challenged this dogma
and demonstrate in this work that PKC activation and the CD3
di-leucine-based motif are indeed required for efficient ligand-induced
TCR down-regulation. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
di-leucine-based (L-based)
receptor-sorting motif (4, 5). The dogma has been that
these pathways are not interrelated. Accordingly, several studies have
demonstrated that ligand-mediated TCR down-regulation is functional in
cell lines with a disrupted CD3
L-based motif and, vice
versa, that PKC-mediated TCR down-regulation can take place
independently of tyrosine kinase activation (1, 6, 7, 8, 9). It
has been a puzzle that ligand- and PKC-mediated TCR down-regulations
should be two separate, independent processes, as it is known that TCR
ligation induces PKC activation with subsequent CD3
phosphorylation
and activation of the CD3
L-based receptor-sorting motif
(10, 11, 12, 13). Thus, TCR ligation would, in addition to the
tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent pathway, be expected to activate the
PKC/CD3
-dependent pathway. The aim of this study was to determine
whether an interplay between ligand- and PKC-mediated TCR
down-regulation exists. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The human T cell line Jurkat, the Burkitts lymphoma cell line
Raji (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA), and the mouse
DO11.10 T cell hybridoma (14) were cultured in complete
medium (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 0.5 IU/L penicillin, 500
mg/L streptomycin, and 10% FCS) at 37°C in 5%
CO2. PBMC were isolated from healthy donors by
density centrifugation using Lymphoprep (Nycomed, Oslo, Norway) as
previously described (15). Jurkat cells were mutagenized
by incubation in complete medium containing methanesulfonic acid ethyl
ester (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at a final concentration of
100 µg/ml for 24 h. The cells were washed and rested for 72
h, and TCR cell surface-positive cells were subsequently depleted by
incubation with the anti-TCR Ab F101.01 (16) and
Dynabeads (Dynal Biotech, Oslo, Norway) as previously described
(17). This procedure was repeated four times resulting in
a TCR-negative subpopulation of
25% of the cell population. The
cells were subsequently cloned, and TCR-negative clones were selected
for further characterization by metabolic labeling and
immunoprecipitation as previously described (18). Purified
and fluorochrome-conjugated mAb were obtained from BD PharMingen (San
Diego, CA) and DAKO (Glostrup, Denmark). Phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PDB)
was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The broad PKC inhibitor Ro 31-8220
(19) was a gift from Dr. D. Bradshaw (Roche Research
Center, Welwyn Garden City, U.K.). The anti-mouse V
8.2 mAb F23.1
variant 31 with a Kd of
9.5 µM
was produced as previously described (20). Superantigen
Staphylococcus enterotoxin E (SEE) was purchased from Toxin
Technology (Sarasota, FL), and
2',7'-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein, acetoxymethyl
ester (BCECF/AM) was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene,
OR).
RT-PCR and sequencing
RNA was isolated using the RNeasy kit from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany), and RT-PCR was performed using the Reverse-iT kit from Abgene (Surrey, U.K.) as described by the manufacturers. The PCR products were sequenced using the BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit and analyzed on an ABI 310 genetic analyzer from Applied Biosystems (Warrington, U.K.).
TCR down-regulation and phosphotyrosine blots
Flat-bottomed Nuclon MicroWell Plates (Life Technologies,
Paisley, U.K.) were coated with the indicated concentrations of
anti-TCR mAb F101.01 for 16 h at 4°C and subsequently washed
three times with PBS. The cells were adjusted to 4 x
105/ml complete medium and incubated in the
mAb-precoated wells for the time indicated. The cells were
subsequently transferred to 4°C and analyzed for TCR expression by
incubation with saturating amounts of F101.01 for 30 min at 4°C,
followed by FITC- or PE-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig Ab from
Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). For experiments
with DO11.10 cells, the F23.1 variant 31 was coated on protein
A-precoated plates as previously described (20), and TCR
expression was analyzed using FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3
mAb
145-2C11. For stimulation with SEE, Raji cells were pulsed for 2 h
with the indicated concentrations of SEE, stained with BCECF/AM for 10
min, washed four times, and cocultured with Jurkat cells at a ratio of
1:1 for the time indicated. The cells were subsequently transferred to
4°C and analyzed for TCR expression by incubation with PE-conjugated
anti-CD3
mAb and gating out cells with green fluorescence
(BCECF/AM). The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was determined by
flow cytometry and used calculating the percentage of anti-TCR
binding: (MFI of treated cells/MFI of untreated cells) x 100%.
Phosphotyrosine blots were performed as previously described
(21)
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-negative Jurkat variant
The fact that TCR ligation leads to activation of PKC with
subsequent CD3
serine 126 phosphorylation and activation of the
CD3
L-based motif combined with the observation that
CD3
does not play a role in ligand-induced TCR down-regulation has
been an apparent paradox for several years. However, most of the
studies on CD3
have been performed using the CD3
-negative Jurkat
variant JGN (1, 4, 6, 22, 23). This variant was produced
by exposing Jurkat cells to 250 rad of gamma radiation
(18), and the possibility existed that other genes beside
CD3
were affected by this treatment. Therefore, we decided to
produce new, independently derived CD3
-negative Jurkat variants to
further study the role of CD3
in ligand-induced TCR
down-regulation.
To produce new CD3
-negative variants Jurkat cells were mutagenized
using methanesulfonic acid ethyl ester. TCR cell surface-negative
clones were isolated and screened by metabolic labeling,
immunoprecipitation, and SDS-PAGE. One clone (E3) that failed to
express the CD3
protein was isolated (Fig. 1
A). Full-length CD3
cDNA
could be isolated from E3 cells by RT-PCR (data not shown), and this
was subsequently sequenced. The E3 cells carried the same frameshift
mutation as the JGN variant, namely a deletion of one of the nine
adenines (bases 242250) in exon 3 encoding most of the extracellular
domain of CD3
(18). The position of the mutation in E3
supported the proposal that the human CD3
gene has a mutational hot
spot in the nucleotide sequence of nine adenosines in exon 3
(24).
|
cDNA into E3, normal TCR
assembly and TCR cell surface expression were obtained (Fig. 1
-negative variant, in which the
role of CD3
in ligand-induced TCR down-regulation could be studied,
had been isolated.
The CD3
L-based motif is required for PKC-mediated
TCR down-regulation
Detailed studies using the JGN variant have pinpointed the
essential amino acids in the CD3
L-based
receptor-sorting motif in PKC-mediated TCR down-regulation. Thus,
CD3
serine 126 is the phosphoacceptor, and leucine 131 and 132 are
essential docking sites for the adaptor proteins of clathrin-coated
vesicles (4, 22, 23, 25). Selected CD3
constructs were
transfected into E3 cells (Fig. 2
), and
TCR-positive transfectants expressing comparable amounts of TCR were
subsequently analyzed for their ability to down-regulate their TCR
following PDB-induced PKC activation. As shown in Fig. 2
B,
PKC-mediated TCR down-regulation was almost abolished in the E3-LLAA
and E3-S126V cells and was preserved in E3-WT and E3-S123V cells
exactly as previously found for JGN cells (1). Thus, these
analyses confirmed the general composition and role of the CD3
L-based motif in PKC-mediated TCR
down-regulation.
|
L-based motif is required for
efficient ligand-induced TCR down-regulation
To determine whether the CD3
L-based motif was
involved in ligand-mediated TCR down-regulation, cells were stimulated
with plate-bound anti-TCR mAb for 30 min. Cells with an intact
CD3
L-based motif (E3-WT and E3-S123V) clearly
down-regulated TCR more efficiently than cells with a disrupted motif
(E3-LLAA and E3-S126V). Thus, 3- to 10-fold less ligand was required to
induce the same degree of TCR down-regulation in cells with an intact
CD3
L-based motif compared with cells with a disrupted
motif (Fig. 3
A). Time-course
experiments using low concentrations of ligand further demonstrated
that an intact CD3
L-based motif was
absolutely required for fast and efficient ligand-induced TCR
down-regulation (Fig. 3
, B and C).
|
-dependent TCR
down-regulation pathway was not functional following TCR ligation in
JGN cells. PKC activation is required for efficient ligand-induced TCR down-regulation
The CD3
L-based motif is activated by PKC-mediated
phosphorylation of CD3
serine 126 (4, 23). If the
CD3
L-based motif is required for fast and efficient
ligand-induced TCR down-regulation, it follows that activation of the
relevant PKC must also be required. To determine whether PKC activation
was required for efficient ligand-induced TCR down-regulation, cells
were pretreated for 30 min with the broad PKC inhibitor Ro 31-8220 at a
final concentration of 4 µM or were left untreated. The cells were
next stimulated with plate-bound anti-TCR mAb as described above
and tested for TCR down-regulation. PKC inhibitor treatment of E3 cells
with an intact CD3
L-based motif reduced their
sensitivity to ligand stimulation to the same level as E3 cells with a
disrupted CD3
L-based motif (Fig. 4
, A and B). In
contrast, E3 cells with a disrupted CD3
L-based motif were unaffected by PKC inhibitor
treatment (Fig. 4
B). As previously found, JGN-WT cells were
unaffected by PKC inhibitor treatment (data not shown)
(1). These results indicated that the PKC inhibitor only
affected the PKC/CD3
L-based part of
ligand-induced TCR down-regulation and left the
phosphotyrosine-dependent part unaffected. To further analyze whether
the PKC inhibitor affected tyrosine phosphorylation, Jurkat cells were
stimulated with anti-TCR mAb in the absence or the presence of 4
µM Ro 31-8220. The cells were subsequently lysed, and the lysates
were analyzed by Western blotting using the anti-phosphotyrosine
mAb 4G10. As judged from the blots, Ro 31-8220 in the concentrations
used in this study did not affect ligand-induced tyrosine
phosphorylation (Fig. 4
C). Likewise, phosphotyrosine blots
of anti-CD3 immunoprecipitates of cells stimulated with
anti-TCR mAb did not indicate any effect of Ro 31-8220 on tyrosine
phosphorylation (data not shown).
|
L-based motif for efficient ligand-induced TCR
down-regulation was a general characteristic of T cells or an isolated
trait of E3 cells, freshly isolated PBMC, PHA-stimulated PBMC, and the
mouse T cell hybridoma DO11.10 were next studied. The cells were
stimulated with plate-bound anti-TCR mAb in the presence or the
absence of the PKC inhibitor Ro 31-8220 at a final concentration of 4
µM. Inhibition of PKC caused a similar reduction in sensitivity for
ligand-induced TCR down-regulation in all these cells as observed for
E3 cells (Fig. 5
|
L-based motif and PKC are required for
efficient superantigen-induced TCR down-regulation
To further extend our analyses we next examined whether the CD3
L-based motif was involved in superantigen/APC-mediated TCR
down-regulation. Jurkat cells were incubated for 60 min with Raji cells
prepulsed with SEE. Cells with an intact CD3
L-based
motif (E3-WT) clearly down-regulated the TCR more efficiently
than cells with a disrupted motif (E3-LLAA and E3-S126V),
especially during exposure to low concentrations of SEE (Fig. 6
A). Time-course experiments
using SEE at 50 ng/ml further demonstrated that an intact CD3
L-based motif was absolutely required for fast
and efficient ligand-induced TCR down-regulation (Fig. 6
B).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
L-based motif
and PKC are required for efficient ligand-induced TCR down-regulation.
Thus, although ligand-induced TCR down-regulation can take place in the
absence of the CD3
L-based motif and PKC (this study and
Refs. 1 and 3), PKC activation and the CD3
L-based motif augment the sensitivity for ligand-induced
TCR down-regulation 3- to 10-fold. It has been demonstrated that
activated PKC phosphorylates the CD3
-chain at serine 126
(4). This phosphorylation induces a conformational change
in the TCR that allows binding of adaptor proteins to the
L-based motif of CD3
(23), and the TCR is
subsequently internalized. Knowing that TCR triggering results in PKC
activation and translocation of at least PKC
and PKC
to the
plasma membrane (10, 11, 12, 13, 26, 27), it has been a puzzle
that previous studies have failed to demonstrate any role of PKC and
the CD3
L-based motif in ligand-induced TCR
down-regulation. As most of these studies have been based on the
CD3
-negative Jurkat mutant JGN, our idea was that JGN might be
affected not only by the mutation in CD3
, but also by mutations in
at least one other component involved in PKC-induced TCR
down-regulation. The production of a new CD3
-negative variant E3
confirmed previous studies demonstrating that CD3
is required for
efficient TCR expression (18, 28) and that CD3
serine
126 and leucine 131 and 132 are required for PKC-induced TCR
down-regulation (4, 22). In contrast to JGN transfectants,
in which ligand-induced TCR down-regulation was unaffected by mutations
in the CD3
L-based motif, E3 transfectants with an
intact CD3
L-based motif required 3- to 10-fold less
ligand to induce the same degree of TCR down-regulation as E3 cells
with a disrupted CD3
L-based motif and JGN cells. The
dependency of an intact CD3
L-based motif for efficient
TCR down-regulation was most obvious for short time incubations with
low doses of ligand. Although a 3- to 10-fold difference in ligand
sensitivity might not seem very much at first sight, it could be very
important during physiological T cell activation, where few specific
peptide/MHC complexes are presented at the APC surface.
Treatment of E3 cells with an intact CD3
L-based motif
(E3-WT and E3-S123V) with a PKC inhibitor reduced their sensitivity to
ligand to the same level as E3 cells with a disrupted CD3
L-based motif showing that, in addition to an intact CD3
L-based motif, PKC activation was required for efficient
ligand-induced TCR down-regulation. In contrast, PKC inhibitor
treatment of E3 cells with a disrupted CD3
L-based motif
and JGN cells did not affect ligand-induced TCR down-regulation,
demonstrating that the PKC inhibitor did not affect
PKC/CD3
-independent TCR down-regulation. In agreement with this, we
found that the PKC inhibitor did not affect ligand-induced tyrosine
phosphorylation at the concentrations used in this study.
Previous studies have probably not been able to demonstrate the
dependency of PKC and the CD3
L-based motif for
efficient ligand-induced TCR down-regulation, as these studies either
have examined the JGN variant or have applied too high concentrations
of ligand for long time intervals (1, 6, 7, 8, 9). We believe
that identifying the defect in JGN could significantly contribute to
our understanding of the connection between ligand- and PKC-induced TCR
down-regulation, and we are presently in the process of identifying
this defect.
Several important roles can be envisioned for the CD3
L-based motif in ligand-induced TCR down-regulation, e.g.,
it could be required for optimal T cell activation by allowing serial
triggering (29), or it could be required as a negative
feedback mechanism to prevent detrimental over-stimulation of T cells,
etc. Further clarification of this issue awaits analyses of the CD3
di-leucine-mutated knockin mice (C. Menné, M. C. Haks,
A. M. Kruisbeek, and C. Geisler, manuscript in preparation).
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Carsten Geisler, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, The Panum Institute, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail address: cgtcr{at}biobase.dk ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: PKC, protein kinase C; BCECF/AM, 2',7'-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein, acetoxymethyl ester; L-based, di-leucine based; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; PDB, phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate; SEE, Staphylococcus enterotoxin E; WT, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication January 7, 2002. Accepted for publication March 6, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
contains a phosphoserine-dependent di-leucine motif involved in down-regulation of the T cell receptor. EMBO J. 13:2156.[Medline]
and CD3
cytoplasmic domains in cytolytic T lymphocyte functions and TCR/CD3 down-modulation. J. Immunol. 158:4162.[Abstract]
or CD3
cytoplasmic domains, necessary in response to anti-CD3 Ab. Int. Immunol. 11:1731.
chain is phosphorylated at serine 126 in response to T lymphocyte activation. J. Biol. Chem. 262:10918.
chain: consequences for T cell antigen receptor assembly, processing, and expression. J. Immunol. 148:2437.[Abstract]
RIIIA
is involved in signalling by the low affinity receptor for IgG. J. Biol. Chem. 271:22815.
DxxxLL motif: a binding site for adaptor protein-1 and adaptor protein-2 in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 138:271.
-negative human T cell variants. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:614.[Medline]
to membrane rafts is required for T cell activation. Nat. Immunol. 2:556.[Medline]
chain is essential for development of both the TCR
and TCR
lineages. EMBO J. 17:1871.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Boding, C. M. Bonefeld, B. L. Nielsen, J. P. H. Lauritsen, M. R. von Essen, A. K. Hansen, J. M. Larsen, M. M. Nielsen, N. Odum, and C. Geisler TCR Down-Regulation Controls T Cell Homeostasis J. Immunol., October 15, 2009; 183(8): 4994 - 5005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. D. Schneider, A. A. Weiss, and W. E. Miller Pertussis Toxin Signals through the TCR to Initiate Cross-Desensitization of the Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 J. Immunol., May 1, 2009; 182(9): 5730 - 5739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Bonefeld, M. Haks, B. Nielsen, M. von Essen, L. Boding, A. K. Hansen, J. M. Larsen, N. Odum, P. Krimpenfort, A. Kruisbeek, et al. TCR Down-Regulation Controls Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses J. Immunol., December 1, 2008; 181(11): 7786 - 7799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Szymczak and D. A. A. Vignali Plasticity and Rigidity in Adaptor Protein-2-Mediated Internalization of the TCR:CD3 Complex J. Immunol., April 1, 2005; 174(7): 4153 - 4160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Wreden, M. Wlizla, and R. J. Reimer Varied Mechanisms Underlie the Free Sialic Acid Storage Disorders J. Biol. Chem., January 14, 2005; 280(2): 1408 - 1416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. von Essen, C. M. Bonefeld, V. Siersma, A. B. Rasmussen, J. P. H. Lauritsen, B. L. Nielsen, and C. Geisler Constitutive and Ligand-Induced TCR Degradation J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 384 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Nguyen, I. Moisini, and T. L. Geiger Identification of a murine CD28 dileucine motif that suppresses single-chain chimeric T-cell receptor expression and function Blood, December 15, 2003; 102(13): 4320 - 4325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Bonefeld, A. B. Rasmussen, J. P. H. Lauritsen, M. von Essen, N. Odum, P. S. Andersen, and C. Geisler TCR Comodulation of Nonengaged TCR Takes Place by a Protein Kinase C and CD3{gamma} Di-Leucine-Based Motif-Dependent Mechanism J. Immunol., September 15, 2003; 171(6): 3003 - 3009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Torres, A. Alcover, D. A. Zapata, J. Arnaud, A. Pacheco, J. M. Martin-Fernandez, E. M. Villasevil, O. Sanal, and J. R. Regueiro TCR Dynamics in Human Mature T Lymphocytes Lacking CD3{gamma} J. Immunol., June 15, 2003; 170(12): 5947 - 5955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. R. Carrasco, M. N. Navarro, and M. L. Toribio A Role for the Cytoplasmic Tail of the Pre-T Cell Receptor (TCR) alpha Chain in Promoting Constitutive Internalization and Degradation of the Pre-TCR J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 14507 - 14513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Badran, S. M. Wolinsky, A. Burny, and K. E. Willard-Gallo Identification of Three NFAT Binding Motifs in the 5'-Upstream Region of the Human CD3gamma Gene That Differentially Bind NFATc1, NFATc2, and NF-kappa B p50 J. Biol. Chem., November 27, 2002; 277(49): 47136 - 47148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Torres, D. A. Zapata, A. Pacheco-Castro, J. L. Rodriguez-Fernandez, C. Cabanas, and J. R. Regueiro Contribution of CD3{gamma} to TCR regulation and signaling in human mature T lymphocytes Int. Immunol., November 1, 2002; 14(11): 1357 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |