The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catalina, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Luzuriaga, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Catalina, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Luzuriaga, K.
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 168: 4184-4191.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

Phenotypic and Functional Heterogeneity of EBV Epitope-Specific CD8+ T Cells1

Michelle D. Catalina, John L. Sullivan, Robin M. Brody and Katherine Luzuriaga2

Department of Pediatrics and Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
High frequencies of EBV-specific CD8+ T cells have been detected during acute EBV infection, yet persistent infection inevitably results. To address this issue, we characterized the phenotype and function of epitope-specific CD8+ T cell populations from presentation with acute through latent infection. Considerable phenotypic and functional heterogeneity within, as well as between, two different epitope-specific populations was observed over time following acute infection. B7 EBV-encoded nuclear Ag (EBNA)-3A-specific CD8+ T cells expressed only CD45RO from acute through latent EBV infection. A2 BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells expressed CD45RO during acute infection and either CD45RA or CD45RO during latent EBV infection. This difference in CD45 isoform expression between the two epitope-specific populations did not translate into differences in perforin content, the ability to produce IFN-{gamma}, or the ability to proliferate in response to Ag in vitro. In individuals with latent EBV infection, the frequencies of A2 BMLF-1- or B7 EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells that expressed CD45RA, CD45RO, CD62 ligand, CCR7, and perforin were stable over time. However, the expression of CD62 ligand and CCR7 was significantly higher among EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells than among BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells. Further work is necessary to understand how phenotypic and functional differences between EBV epitope-specific CD8+ T cells are related to the biology of the virus and to the equilibrium between the virus and the host during persistent infection.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Epstein-Barr virus infects >90% of the world’s population. During acute EBV infection, the virus replicates in the tonsillar epithelium and B cells, expressing an array of >100 lytic and latent proteins (1). The infection of B cells results in a lifelong EBV carrier state in which EBV gene expression is thought to be limited (reviewed in Ref. 2). Viral and host factors that contribute to the establishment of this carrier state are not completely understood.

Several lines of evidence suggest that memory EBV-specific CD8+ T cells play an important role in controlling viral replication or preventing disease in established (or latent) infection, and EBV is an important source of morbidity and mortality in individuals with compromised cell-mediated immunity. For this reason several groups, including our own, have thought it important to characterize the development and maintenance of these CD8+ T cell responses over the course of infection.

Adolescents and adults with acute EBV infection frequently present with acute infectious mononucleosis (AIM)3 syndrome and may be easily distinguished by the detection of heterophile Abs in peripheral blood. It has long been recognized that CD8+ T cells are markedly expanded and highly activated during primary infection. Callan et al. (3) were among the first to report that the majority of these CD8+ T cells are EBV-specific. They and others (4, 5) have documented preferential recognition of lytic as opposed to latent epitopes early in acute EBV infection. EBV lytic and latent epitope-specific memory CD8+ T cell responses have also been persistently detected in established (or latent) infection (4, 6, 7).

Characterization of the evolution of the CD8+ T cell repertoire and effector functions should help us to better understand virus-host interactions that contribute to persistent EBV infection. Murine models of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection (a nonpersistent viral infection) suggest that the memory CD8+ T cell repertoire largely reflects the repertoire generated during acute infection, but less is known regarding the relationship between acute and memory epitope-specific CD8+ T cells responses in persistent human viral infections. We have recently reported that the epitope specificity of EBV-specific memory CD8+ T cells varies over the course of infection, and is not simply reflective of CD8+ T cell responses detected during primary infection (5). This suggests that the generation of memory EBV epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses does not fit the stochastic model proposed on the basis of murine models of viral infection.

The use of HLA class I peptide tetramers together with mAb staining to cell surface Ags and functional (cytokine secretion or cytolysis) assays has allowed examination of the phenotype and function of epitope-specific CD8+ T cells at the single cell level. Using this approach, several investigators have proposed that differential cell surface expression of the CD45 isoforms (RA vs RO), CD27, CD28, and CCR7 delineates a maturational pathway for CD8+ T cell responses (8, 9). Although these studies provide provocative evidence for the heterogeneity of memory CD8+ T cell surface phenotype, strict correlation of these phenotypes with function has been called into question. Recently, Hislop and colleagues (10) have reported a relationship between memory CD8+ T cell phenotype and EBV epitope specificity (lytic vs latent) in individuals with latent infection. EBV latent epitope-specific CD8+ T cells were polarized toward a CD45ROhighCD45RA-CD28+ phenotype, whereas EBV lytic epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses were CD45RA+ or CD45RO+ and were more commonly CD28-. These phenotypic differences did not correlate with cytokine secretion or cytolytic activity. Lytic and latent epitope-specific CD8+ T cells were heterogeneous for CCR7 expression, but there was a trend toward greater CCR7 expression in the latent epitope-specific CD8+ T cells. Interestingly, effector cell function appeared to be limited to the CCR7- subset of cells.

In our prior studies evaluating EBV epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses, most of the changes in epitope specificity and epitope-specific CD8+ T cell activation occurred over the first year following presentation with symptoms of AIM. Therefore, we felt it important to begin to evaluate epitope-specific CD8+ T cell phenotype and function at presentation with AIM through at least 1 year following infection. Using an HLA-A2 tetramer made with an epitope derived from BMLF-1 (an early lytic gene; Refs. 1, 11 and 12) and an HLA-B7 tetramer made with an epitope derived from the EBV-encoded nuclear Ag-3A latent protein (13, 14), we sequentially characterized EBV epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses in HLA-A2 and HLA-B7 individuals presenting with AIM and compared them with memory CD8+ T cell responses detected in HLA-matched individuals with established infection. Phenotypic and functional differences were observed over time within and between these two epitope-specific populations. The potential implications for the establishment of persistent EBV infection are discussed.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

These studies were conducted in adolescents (aged 17–24 years old) presenting to the clinic at the University of Massachusetts/Amherst Student Health Service (Amherst, MA) with clinical symptoms consistent with AIM (fever, rash, fatigue, and hepatosplenomegaly). Following informed consent, students gave five blood samples (50 ml each) at the following time points: at presentation with symptoms (V-1), and 1 wk (V-2), 2 wk (V-3), 6 mo (V-4), and 1 year (V-5) following presentation. Entry to the study was based on a positive Monospot test and presence of atypical lymphocytes. Acute EBV infection was confirmed through the detection of IgM for the EBV viral capsid Ag.

All participants were analyzed using HLA class I tetramers upon blood receipt (within 4 h of blood draw) and participants with tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells were further analyzed using a panel of activation and adhesion markers (see below). The HLA type of all study participants was confirmed through molecular HLA class I typing, and there was a 100% correspondence between tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells and HLA type.

Healthy, EBV seropositive adults >30 years of age were also studied. Non-HLA A2 and HLA B7, EBV seropositive individuals served as negative controls in all studies. Prior EBV infection was confirmed through the detection of EBV capsid Ag-specific IgG Abs in the peripheral blood. All of these individuals likely experienced EBV infection a minimum of 10 years before study; none had prior history of AIM. Following informed consent, study participants provided blood samples (~50 ml) at entry and every 3 mo thereafter.

These studies were approved by the Human Studies Committee at the University of Massachusetts Medical School (Worchester, MA).

Molecular HLA class I typing

Molecular HLA class I typing was done on all study participants by Microdiagnostic (Nashville, TN).

Generation of HLA class I tetramers

HLA class I tetramers with EBV peptides (A2 BMLF-1/GLCTLVAML, B7 EBNA-3A/RPPIFIRLL, and A2 LMP-2/CLGGLLTMV were made as previously described; Ref. 15). Refolded monomers were mixed with streptavidin-allophycocyanin conjugate (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) at a molar ratio of 4:1 to form tetramers. These tetramers stained non-HLA-A2 or non-HLA-B7 individuals with acute EBV infection and HLA-A2 and/or HLA-B7 EBV seronegative individuals at 0.02 ± 0.01%. Tetramer staining greater than the mean of the background plus three SD, or 0.05% of CD8+ T cells, was considered significant.

HLA-peptide tetramer staining to enumerate and characterize EBV epitope-specific CD8+ T cells

All four-color flow cytometry analysis was performed using fresh, whole EDTA-anticoagulated blood. Samples were analyzed on a BD Biosciences FACSort with an added laser and FACSCaliber software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). A tetramer screen was performed using the A2 BMLF-1-specific and B7 EBNA-3A-specific tetramers on all patients’ whole blood within 4 h of blood draw, and activation marker studies were performed within 14 h of blood draw. Patients with tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells were analyzed for activation marker expression immediately pending confirmation of HLA type. HLA class I tetramers can bind nonspecifically to non-T cell populations, thus cells were first gated through both CD3 and CD8 to insure that the tetramer-positive cells were all CD8+ T cells. Cells were analyzed with a tetramer conjugated to allophycocyanin, CD8 FITC (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), CD3 PerCP (BD Biosciences), and one of the following Abs: HLA-DRPE, CD45ROPE, CD45RAPE, CD69PE, CD62 ligand (CD62L)PE, CD28PE, CD27PE, and CD38PE (BD PharMingen). Isotope controls IgG1 FITC, IgG2b PerCP, and one of each IgG1PE, IgG2aPE, and IgG2bPE were done on each patient at each time point. Permeabilization for staining with perforin (BD PharMingen) was done after tetramer staining and lysis of the RBC (FACSlyse, BD Biosciences). Permeabilized isotope control Abs were run alongside each analysis for perforin; 100,000 lymphocyte events were collected per sample.

Detection of cytokine-secreting CD8+ T cells following in vitro stimulation with EBV peptides

Fresh whole blood (0.3 ml/test, heparin) was incubated for 1 h at 37°C with 0.5–10 µM EBV or control HIV-1 peptides. Because staphylococcal enterotoxin B (Toxin Technology, Sarasota, FL) is able to nonspecifically stimulate T cells to secrete IFN-{gamma}, it was used as a positive control. None of the HLA-A2 latent donors used in this study was HIV-1 infected, so the HIV-1 gag (SLYNTVATL) peptide was used as a negative control. After a 1-h incubation with peptide, Golgiplug (BD PharMingen) was added to the cells and they were incubated an additional 5 h. After incubation the cells were incubated with 2 µM EDTA for 15 min with vigorous vortexing every few minutes. Cells to be analyzed by tetramers were then stained with the allophycocyanin-A2 BMLF-1, allophycocyanin-B7 EBNA-3A, allophycocyanin-A2 latent membrane protein-2, or an allophycocyanin-HIV-1 gag tetramer for 20 min. After tetramer staining, the cells were lysed with BD lyse (BD Biosciences), fixed, and permeabilized using Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences). The cells were stained with combinations of the following Abs for tetramer staining: CD8 CyChrome, IFN-{gamma} FITC, CD69 PE, CD69 FITC, CD28 PE, CD62L PE, CD45RA PE, and CD45RO PE (BD PharMingen). For cells not stained with tetramers, after the permeabilization step the cells were stained with IFN-{gamma} allophycocyanin, CD3 PerCP, CD69PE, and CD8 FITC. The cells were incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and then washed with 1% FBS in PBS. Samples were analyzed immediately by four-color flow cytometry. Appropriate isotope-negative and -positive controls were used to define positive and negative cell populations. Background IFN-{gamma} production in this assay was 0.02 ± 0.01% for stimulation of individuals with either a peptide derived from HIV-1 or EBV-derived non-HLA binding peptides. Significant IFN-{gamma} production was considered to be greater than the mean of the background plus three SD, or 0.05% of CD8+ T cells.

In vitro culture and generation of cell lines

Cell lines were generated from Ficoll separated, and in some cases sorted PBMC and cultured in RPMI with 10% FCS (R-10) and 20 U/ml of IL-2 by adding 5 µM EBV-specific peptide or control HIV-1 gag peptide. These cell lines were fed twice weekly and maintained for 1 mo. Alternatively, Ficoll-separated and in some cases sorted PBMC were incubated with EBV peptide or control peptide-pulsed, psoralen-fixed autologous B lymphoblastoid cell lines (BLCL) at a ratio of 1 BLCL:5 PBMC. These cell lines were also fed twice weekly with 20 U/ml of IL-2 in R-10 and restimulated with peptide-pulsed BLCL once every 2–3 wk. These cell lines were maintained for up to 3 mo.

Statistical analysis

Means and SDs were calculated and compared with each other using the Student t test to determine p values. The Wilcoxon signed rank test, a nonparametric paired t test, was used to determine p values for the differences in the range of tetramer-staining CD8+ T cells between study time points for the group with acute EBV infection. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine p values between the range of tetramer-staining cells between study time points for the acute EBV infection group and the long-term latently infected group.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have previously used two EBV epitope-specific HLA class I tetramers to characterize the generation and maintenance of epitope-specific memory CD8+ T cells in acute and latent EBV infection. Responses to these two epitopes are detected in the majority of EBV-infected individuals (5). Four-color flow cytometry was done to determine the percentage of tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells coexpressing phenotypic markers (Fig. 1Go). A total of 18 (10 HLA-A2, 4 HLA-B7, and 4 HLA-A2 and HLA-B7) individuals with AIM were studied. For comparison, 16 (9 HLA-A2, 2 HLA-B7, and 5 HLA-A2 and HLA-B7) healthy EBV seropositive individuals were studied.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. a, Percentage of CD8+ T cells binding to the A2BMLF-1 tetramer in an HLA-A2 individual. b, Percentage of CD8+ T cells binding to the B7EBNA-3A tetramer in an HLA-B7 individual. Small lymphocytes were gated through both CD3+ and CD8+ (c) for analyses of activation marker expression on tetramer binding CD3+ and CD8+ T cells (d).

 
Differential expression of the CD45 isoforms by A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding effector and memory T cells

Analyses of individuals with acute EBV infection showed that all HLA-A2-restricted, BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells coexpressed CD45RO at presentation with AIM. By 2 wk postpresentation, 3–15% of the A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells expressed CD45RA and were CD45RO negative. There were significant differences in the expression of CD45RO and CD45RA by BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells at presentation, and at 6 mo or 1 year following acute infection (RO, p = 0.001; RA, p = 0.001; Fig. 2Go, a and b). By 6 mo and 1 year, there was no statistically significant difference between the acute patients and healthy EBV seropositive donors in the percentages of A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells that expressed CD45RA vs CD45RO. Indeed, varying percentages of CD45RA+A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding cells were detected in all of the EBV seropositive donors (range 14.8–76.8%; Fig. 2Gob). None of the BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells in the long-term EBV seropositive donors coexpressed both CD45RA and CD45RO (data not shown). The percentages of CD45RO+ and CD45RA+A2 BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells remained stable in individuals with latent infection over four measurements repeated during an 18-mo time period.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Expression of CD45RO (a) and CD45RA (b) on BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells. For presentation through 1 year, each symbol represents the same donor. Latent donors were a minimum of 10 years post acute EVB infection.

 
At presentation, all B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells expressed CD45RO (n = 3). However, in contrast to the A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells, all of the B7 EBNA-3A CD3+CD8+ tetramer-binding cells detected one and two weeks postpresentation expressed only CD45RO. Additionally, all B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells detected in individuals at 6 mo postpresentation (8/8; 99 ± 0.5%), 1 year postpresentation (5/5; 99 ± 0.5%), and in EBV, seropositive individuals (7/7; 99 ± 0.3%) coexpressed CD45RO.

Because the peptides used were not only derived from different proteins, but also restricted by different HLA molecules, we wanted to determine whether CD8+ T cells that bound to HLA-A2 peptide tetramers made with latent protein epitopes also expressed only the CD45RO isoform. Analyses of HLA-A2 latent donors with an A2 LMP-2 tetramer revealed that 100% of the CD8+ cell populations binding to these tetramers also expressed only CD45RO (n = 8; data not shown). These data demonstrate that for two latent epitopes restricted by distinct HLA alleles, the coexpression of the CD45RO isoform predominated.

Differential expression of cell surface homing molecules on A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells

The lymphocyte cell surface molecule CD62L has been shown to play a role in the specific homing of T cells to peripheral lymph nodes (16). CD62L expression on A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding cells varied from individual to individual during acute EBV infection (Fig. 3Goa). Significant differences were not discerned in the percentage of A2 BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells that coexpressed CD62L over time. Higher frequencies of B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells that coexpressed CD62L were detected at the 6-mo time point (71.8 ± 17.8%; p < 0.01) and the 1-year time point (78.8 ± 8.2%; p < 0.001) when compared with A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells at the 6-mo (43.3 ± 11.6%) and one-year (44.8 ± 14.2%) time points (Fig. 3Gob). The frequencies of CD62L+B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells (74.7 ± 11.1%) detected in the long-term EBV seropositive population were also significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the frequencies of CD62L+A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding cells (34.4 ± 10.4%; Fig. 3Goc) in the long-term EBV seropositive population.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Expression of CD62L on A2BMLF-1 (a) and B7EBNA-3A (b) tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells of study patients from presentation through 1 year. Each symbol represents one donor. CD62L expression (c) and CCR7 expression (d) on BMLF-1 or B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells in latent donors a minimum of 10 years post acute EBV infection. *, Significant difference in expression of CD62L (p < 0.05) (c) or CCR7 (p < 0.001) (d) between A2BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells.

 
CCR7, like CD62L, is necessary for entrance into peripheral lymph nodes (17) and a differentiation pathway for CD4 T cells (8) and CD8 T cells (9) has recently been proposed based on the coexpression of CCR7 and the CD45 isoforms. Because B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells exclusively expressed the CD45RO isoform, and also expressed very high levels of CD62L, we wanted to determine whether there were differences in the coexpression of CCR7 on A2 BMLF-1 compared with B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells. Fig. 3God demonstrates that B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells in latent individuals more commonly expressed CCR7 (54 ± 24% CCR7+) than A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells (18 ± 10% CCR7+; p < 0.001). For each individual, the percentage of CCR7+ tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells was always less than the percentage of CD62L-positive tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells. For HLA-A2 individuals, the small percentages of CCR7-positive tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells were distributed between both the CD45RA and CD45RO populations.

No differences in IFN-{gamma} production by A2 BMLF-1 or B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells

Because of the observed differences of A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A with respect to the expression of the CD45RO isoform over time, we wanted to determine whether these phenotypic differences corresponded with the ability to produce IFN-{gamma} during AIM and latent EBV infection. AIM study participants and long-term EBV seropositive individuals were studied by tetramer staining combined with the in vitro stimulation assay for cytokine production to determine the percentage of tetramer-binding cells expressing CD69 and IFN-{gamma}. IFN-{gamma} production by A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells was lowest at presentation with symptoms (V-1; 33 ± 12%), and was significantly different (p < 0.05) from 6 mo postpresentation (V-4, 48 ± 11%) and from the long-term latent individuals (65 ± 17%; p < 0.001; Fig. 4Goa). There was also a significant difference (p < 0.05) in IFN-{gamma} production between the 6-mo time point and the long-term latent individuals. Although all IFN-{gamma} producing A2 BMLF-1 CD8+ T cells coexpressed CD69, many CD69-positive T cells did not produce IFN-{gamma} (Table IGo).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Percentage of A2BMLF-1 (a) or B7EBNA-3A (b) tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells producing IFN-{gamma}. *, Significant difference in the percentage of IFN-{gamma}-producing tetramer positive cells between presentation and 6 mo (p < 0.05); **, A significant difference (p < 0.05) between presentation, 6 mo, and the latent EBV seropositive population (a). *, A significant difference (p < 0.05) between the production of IFN-{gamma} during presentation and both the 6 mo and latent individuals (b).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells coexpressing CD69 and IFN-{gamma}1

 
Similar to the data for the A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells, IFN-{gamma} production by B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells was lowest at presentation with symptoms (V-1; 41 ± 12%), increased by 6 mo postpresentation (V-4, 66 ± 17%; not significant) and was significantly different from the long-term latent individuals (82 ± 17%; p < 0.01; Fig. 4Gob). There was no significant difference between the 6-mo time point and the long-term latent individuals for B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells. There were also no significant differences in the percentage of IFN-{gamma} producing B7 EBNA-3A and A2 BMLF-1 CD8+ T cells when compared at similar time points.

As shown in Fig. 2Go, we detected populations of A2 BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells that coexpressed either CD45RA or CD45RO, but only populations of CD45RO+B7 EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells. Because we determined that not all tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells produced IFN-{gamma}, we wanted to determine which subpopulations of epitope-specific CD8+ T cells did not produce IFN-{gamma}, or express CD69. Fig. 5Go shows a representative analysis (n = 8) to evaluate the ability of A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-staining cell subsets to produce IFN-{gamma}. This figure clearly demonstrates that both CD45RO+ (Fig. 5Goa) and CD45RA+ (Fig. 5Gob) BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells were able to produce cytokines in the short-term assay at the 2 µM concentration of peptide.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. IFN-y production by CD45RO+ (a), CD45RA+ (b), and CD28+ (c) subsets of A2BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells.

 
Cell surface expression of CD28 by A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells was variable. CD28+ and CD28- CD8+ T cell populations of both specificities were able to produce cytokines in the short-term assay at concentrations of peptide ranging from 0.5–10 µM. Because CD62L is rapidly lost upon in vitro Ag stimulation, evaluation of IFN-{gamma} production by CD62L+ cells could not be determined by this method.

The perforin content Of A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells does not correlate with cell surface expression of the CD45 isoform

We were not able to determine significant differences in the abilities of the A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells to produce IFN-{gamma}, nor were we able to detect differences in IFN-{gamma} production by the subpopulations of CD45RA+, CD45RO+, or CD28+ positive tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells. Thus, we wanted to determine whether differences in perforin content existed between A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells. Fig. 6Goa demonstrates that A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells had variable levels of perforin at presentation (V-1) and 6 mo post EBV infection. Perforin was detected in up to 50% of tetramer-binding cells through 1-year post EBV infection and in latent individuals (Fig. 6Goa). No statistically significant differences between the perforin content of A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells were detected during presentation (V-1) through 6 mo (V-4). However, HLA-B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding cells containing perforin were uncommonly detected after 6 mo and the overall percentage of perforin containing B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells was significantly lower (1.9 ± 3.2%; p < 0.05; Fig. 6Gob) than the percentage of perforin containing A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells (19.1 ± 17.8%; Fig. 6Goa) at 1 year. Additionally, the percentage of perforin containing B7 EBNA-3A CD8+ T cells in long-term EBV seropositive individuals (5.8 ± 8.7%; Fig. 6Gob) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the percentage of perforin containing A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells in long-term EBV seropositive individuals (17.7 ± 12.9%; Fig. 6Goa). Interestingly, the percentage of perforin containing A2 BMLF-1 or B7 EBNA-3A CD8+ T cells remained stable over three repeated measurements over a 1-year time period for all of our long-term EBV seropositive donors.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Perforin content of A2BMLF-1 tetramer-staining CD8+ T cells in patients during presentation and 6 mo postpresentation with acute EBV infection (a). Comparison of perforin content of A2BMLF-1 and B7EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells in patients’ 1-year (V5) post acute EBV infection and in long-term EBV seropositive individuals (latent) (b).

 
Given the difference in CD45 isoform expression by the A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-staining cells, we went on to examine whether CD45 isoform expression correlated with perforin content. Fig. 7Go shows an example of FACS analysis of two long-term EBV seropositive individuals (both HLA-A2, B7) and the perforin content of A2 BMLF-1 (donor 001) or B7 EBNA-3A (donor 006) tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells within the CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ subsets. Table IIGo demonstrates the variability in the percentages of perforin containing A2 BMLF-1 CD8+ T cells for 14 HLA-A2 long-term EBV seropositive individuals tested, and like Fig. 7Go, shows that for this epitope the majority of perforin-containing cells were within the CD45RA+CD62L- populations of CD8+ T cells. Thirteen of 14 had detectable perforin in their BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells (range 0–34%). Only donor 007 had more CD45RO+ than CD45RA+ BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells containing perforin. Table IIIGo demonstrates low percentages of perforin-containing cells in HLA-B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-staining cells; four of seven HLA-B7 long-term EBV seropositive donors had no detectable perforin.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Perforin content of the CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ subsets of A2BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells in donor 003 and B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells in donor 006. The gating for positive perforin content was set by running a permeabilized isotype control alongside each sample. All events shown were first gated through both CD3 and the tetramer used. Numbers shown represent the percentages of tetramer-binding CD3+ T cells expressing perforin.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Perforin content of A2 BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cell subsets

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Perforin content of B7 EBNA-3A tetramer-binding CD8+ T cell subsets

 
Both CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ CD8+ T cells are capable of in vitro proliferation

Because we could not distinguish functional differences between A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells directly ex vivo, we derived cell lines from individuals who were both HLA-A2+ and HLA-B7+ to determine whether differences existed between the abilities of CD45RA+ and CD45O+ T cells to proliferate in vitro. CD3+ T cells from three HLA-A2+B7+ individuals were sorted into CD45RA+ or CD45RO+ populations (Fig. 8Go, a, e, and i; representative donor 003). The sorted cells were then stimulated with either peptide-pulsed autologous BLCL or peptide only and propagated in vitro. Fig. 8Go, b–d, shows that after only 4 days in culture the small population of CD45RA+BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells present after sorting (Fig. 8Goa) had expanded and switched their CD45 isoform expression to CD45RO (Fig. 8Go, b and c). The expansion with peptide only was smaller, but still resulted in the expression of CD45RO by BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells (Fig. 8God). Because BLCL express 10 latent proteins from EBV, we detected a switch in isoform expression for many non-tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells which were cultured with BLCL (Fig. 8Go, b and c), but not for many non-tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells when the cultures were just stimulated with peptide (Fig. 8God).



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. In vitro stimulation of sorted CD45RA+ (a–d) and sorted CD45RO+ (e–l) CD3+ T cells in an HLA-A2, B7 individual. Cells were sorted and stained with the A2BMLF-1 (a and e) or B7EBNA-3A (i) tetramer. Cells were then incubated with A2BMLF-1 peptide-pulsed BLCL (b, c, f, and g), BMLF-1 peptide (d and h), B7EBNA-3A peptide-pulsed BLCL (j and k), or B7EBNA-3A peptide (1 ). Results shown are 3 days poststimulation. The percentages of cells staining with tetramers are shown for each plot.

 
The CD45RO+BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells also expanded after culturing, although the expansion was much less pronounced than for the CD45RA+BMLF-1 tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells. Fig. 8Goe shows the percentage of tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells after sorting, and Fig. 8Go, f and g, shows after culture with A2 BMLF-1 peptide-pulsed BLCL. Of note, none of these cells switched their isoform to CD45RA in culture.

Culture of the sorted CD45RO+ (Fig. 8Goi) or CD45RA+ T cells with B7 EBNA-3A-pulsed BLCL (Fig. 8Go, j and k) or with B7 EBNA-3A peptide only (Fig. 8Gol) showed expansion only in cultures derived from the CD45RO+ T cells, as expected. Similarly, the CD45RO+ B7 EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells expanded quite readily in vitro and all retained their CD45RO+ phenotype (Fig. 8Go, j and k).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The availability of HLA class I peptide tetramers has provided the tools to distinguish populations of effector and memory CD8+ T cells on the basis of their epitope specificity (18). To our knowledge, this is the first study to follow a large cohort of individuals from acute through established EBV infection to characterize the phenotype of effector and memory CD8+ T cells. Considerable phenotypic and functional heterogeneity within, as well as between two different EBV epitope-specific CD8+ T cell populations was observed over time following acute infection.

Many groups have begun to evaluate the cell surface phenotype of Ag-specific CD8+ T cells. Champagne and colleagues (9) have reported a correlation between cell surface phenotype and function in HIV-1-specific CD8+ T cells, and from this have proposed a differentiation model for CD8+ T cells in which fully differentiated effector cells are of the CD45RA+, CD27-, CD28-, and CCR7- phenotype. The present study does not support this model for EBV infection. At presentation with AIM, 100% of lytic and latent epitope-specific CD8+ T cells expressed only the CD45RO isoform (Fig. 2Go); as acute infection resolved, the BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells coexpressed either the RA or the RO isoform, while the EBNA-3A- and LMP2-specific CD8+ T cells continued to express only the RO isoform. Others have shown that lytic protein-specific CD8+ T cells (HLA A2-restricted, BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells and HLA B8-restricted, BZLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells from individuals with established infection can express either the CD45RA or CD45RO isoforms; Refs. 3, 6). The CD45RO+B7 EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells were capable of IFN-{gamma} production and contained perforin. The CD45RA+BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells were clearly not end stage differentiated effector cells, as has been suggested, because they were easily expanded in culture (8, 9).

Lytic epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses are detected earlier in AIM than latent epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses and are generally higher in magnitude (5). The differences in CD45 isoform expression on memory CD8+ T cells might simply reflect differences in the magnitude of the epitope-specific CD8+ T cell response generated during acute infection. However, the frequencies of BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cell responses measured 1–2 wk following presentation with AIM varied 100-fold among individuals (5), and there was no discernible relationship between the magnitude of the epitope-specific response measured during acute infection and expression of CD45RA during convalescence.

Coexpression of either the CD45RA or RO isoforms by epitope-specific CD8+ T cells has also been reported in individuals with established cytomegalovirus infection (19). High early viral replication concurrent with the generation of the epitope-specific response might contribute to the observed differences in CD45 isoform expression. In acute EBV infection, up to 25% of circulating B cells may be infected with EBV (2). In this regard, it is interesting to note that the CD45RA+ A2 BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells reverted to CD45RO (Fig. 8Go, a–d) following reexposure to Ag in vitro.

The production of IFN-{gamma} by BMLF-1 and EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells was low in early infection but increased with time. Variability was noted in IFN-{gamma} production by epitope-specific CD8+ T cells in latently infected individuals. In mice infected with low doses of LCMV, IFN-{gamma} production appears to correlate well with the number of tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells detected during acute infection (20, 21, 22). However, in mice infected with high doses of LCMV, with resultant persistent infection, this concordance is lost (23). This same discordance between tetramer-staining cells and the ability to produce IFN-{gamma} has been shown in acute SIV infection (24) and acute hepatitis C virus infection (25), and has been proposed as a mechanism for the establishment of persistent infection.

It is possible that the in vitro assay might not accurately reflect the in vivo functional capabilities of the EBV epitope-specific CD8+ T cells. During acute EBV infection, Ag-specific CD8+ T cells are already highly activated (5) and either may not be capable of producing IFN-{gamma} or may enter apoptotic pathways following reexposure to Ag in vitro. As the viral load diminishes, the cells detected during latent infection are not highly activated and may be more capable of producing IFN-{gamma} in the in vitro assay.

Cell surface CD62L and CCR7 expression was significantly higher on EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells, than on BMLF-1-specific CD8+ T cells from convalescent or latently infected individuals. These data are compatible with data from Hislop et al. (10), who also reported differences in CCR7 and CD62L expression between lytic and latent epitopic-specific CD84 T cells. Murine models have shown that there are phenotypic differences between memory CD8+ T cells in the lamina propria and other tissues (26), and this suggests that subpopulations of memory cells will express receptors which allow them to interact with APCs and/or a specific microenvironment. The ligands for CD62L (L-selectin), peripheral lymph node addressin, are expressed at very high levels in tonsillar tissue (27). It could be that the B7 EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cell populations retain CD62L and CCR7 expression to gain re-entry into this site. Other recently published studies also suggest that CCR7 expression on T cells (and its ligand, EBV-induced molecule 1 ligand chemokine, expression on lymph node and tonsillar tissue) are important for the trafficking of lymphocytes to these lymphoid sites (28, 29).

While both of the epitope-specific CD8+ T cell populations we studied demostrated in vitro function, EBV is never eliminated. One important caveat of persistent infections in humans is that the virus may persist for years with limited gene expression. Thus, even though the host has functional virus-specific CD8+ T cells, virus-infected cells might be unapparent to immune surveillance.

In individuals with latent EBV infection, the percentages of A2 BMLF-1 or B7 EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells remain remarkably stable over time (5). Interestingly, analysis of the perforin content of A2 BMLF-1 and B7 EBNA-3A-specific CD8+ T cells in long-term EBV seropositive donors showed that similar percentages of perforin-containing epitope-specific CD8+ T cells were always found within the same individual over a period of 1 year. This is similar to the consistency in the overall percentages of tetramer-binding CD8+ T cells coexpressing CD45 RA or RO in these individuals. Work by Khan et al. (30), has elegantly shown that the peripheral blood EBV load remains constant in individuals over time periods of several years. Thus, for the two populations of EBV-epitope-specific CD8+ T cells studied, the expression of CD45RA, CD45RO, CD62L, CCR7, and perforin appears to be stable over time, reflecting equilibrium between the virus and the host immune system. Further work is necessary to understand how perturbations in the EBV-specific CD8+ T cell repertoire relate to disease manifestations in individuals with compromised cell-mediated immunity.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Rose Cicarelli for her assistance with obtaining patient samples at the University of Massachusetts/Amherst Student Health Service. We are also indebted to Dr. David Garboczi (National Institutes of Health) for the HLA-A*0201 H chain construct, and to Dr. Eric Pamer (Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY) for the B*0702 HLA class I H chain construct. We thank Drs. Liisa Selin and Raymond Welsh for helpful discussions and review of the manuscript. We also thank Kate Bak, Richard Hudson, and Linda Lambrecht for technical support, and Wanda DePasquale for preparation of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Grants AI 32391 (to K.L.), HD 01489 (to K.L.), and AI 49320 (to M.D.C., J.L.S., and K.L.) from the National Institutes of Health and Grant IRG 93-033 from the American Cancer Society (to M.D.C.). K.L. is an Elizabeth Glaser Scientist of the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Katherine Luzuriaga, Pediatrics/Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 373 Plantation Street, Suite 318, Worcester, MA 01605. E-mail address: katherine.luzuriaga{at}umassmed.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: AIM, acute infectious mononucleosis; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; BLCL, B lymphoblastoid cell lines; CD62L, CD62 ligand. Back

Received for publication November 9, 2001. Accepted for publication February 1, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rickinson, A., E. Kieff. 1996. Epstein-Barr virus. D. Knipe, and B. N. Fields, and P. M. Howley, eds. Field’s Virology 2397. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.
  2. Thorley-Lawson, D. A.. 2001. Epstein-Barr virus: exploiting the immune system. Nat. Immunol. Rev. 1:75.
  3. Callan, M. F. C., L. Tan, N. Annels, G. S. Ogg, J. D. K. Wilson, C. A. O’Callaghan, N. Steven, A. J. McMichael, A. B. Rickinson. 1998. Direct visualization of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells during the primary immune response to Epstein-Barr virus in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 187:1395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Steven, N. M., N. E. Annels, A. Kumar, A. M. Leese, M. G. Kurilla, A. B. Rickinson. 1997. Immediate early and early lytic cycle proteins are frequent targets of the Epstein-Barr virus-induced cytotoxic T cell response. J. Exp. Med. 185:1605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Catalina, M., J. Sullivan, K. Bak, K. Luzuriaga. 2001. Differential evolution and stability of epitope-specific CD8+ T cell responses in EBV infection. J. Immunol. 167:4450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Tan, L. C., N. Gudgeon, N. E. Annels, P. Hansasuta, C. A. O’Callaghan, S. Rowland-Jones, A. J. McMichael, A. B. Rickinson, M. F. Callan. 1999. A re-evaluation of the frequency of CD8+ T cells specific for EBV in healthy virus carriers. J. Immunol. 162:1827.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Khanna, R., D. Moss, S. R. Burrows. 1999. Vaccine strategies against Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases: lessons from studies on cytotoxic T-cell-mediated immune regulation. Immunol. Rev. 170:49.[Medline]
  8. Sallusto, F., D. Lenig, R. Forster, M. Lipp, A. Lanzavecchia. 1999. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 401:708.[Medline]
  9. Champagne, P., G. S. Ogg, A. S. King, C. Knabenhans, K. Ellefsen, M. Nobile, V. Appay, G. P. Rizzardi, S. Fleury, M. Lipp, et al 2001. Skewed maturation of memory HIV-specific CD8 T lymphocytes. Nature 410:106.[Medline]
  10. Hislop, A. D., N. H. Gudgeon, M. F. C. Callan, C. Fazou, H. Hasegawa, M. Salmon, A. B. Rickinson. 2001. EBV-specific CD8+ T cell memory: relationships between epitope-specificity, cell phenotype, and immediate effector function. J. Immunol. 167:2019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Prang, N. S., M. W. Hornef, M. Jager, H. J. Wagner, H. Wolf, F. M. Schwarzmann. 1997. Lytic replication of EBV in the peripheral blood: analysis of viral gene expression in B lymphocytes during infectious mononucelosis and in the normal carrier state. Blood 89:1665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Gonnella, R., A. Angeloni, A. Calogero, A. Farina, R. Santarelli, G. Gentile, W. Arcese, P. Martino, F. Mandelli, L. Frati, A. Faggioni, G. Ragona. 1997. Transcription of latent and replicative Epstein-Barr-virus genes in bone-marrow and peripheral-blood mononuclear cells of healthy donors. Int. J. Cancer 70:524.[Medline]
  13. Babcock, G. J., L. L. Decker, R. B. Freeman, D. A. Thorley-Lawson. 1999. Epstein-Barr virus-infected resting memory B cells, not proliferating lymphoblasts, accumulate in the peripheral blood of immunosuppressed patients. J. Exp. Med. 190:567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Qu, L., D. T. Rowe. 1992. Epstein-Barr virus latent gene expression in uncultured peripheral blood lymphocytes. J. Virol. 66:3715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Luzuriaga, K., M. McManus, M. Catalina, S. Mayack, M. Sharkey, M. Stevenson, J. L. Sullivan. 2000. Early therapy of vertical HIV-1 infection: control of viral replication and absence of persistent HIV-1 specific immune responses. J. Virol. 74:6984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Butcher, E. C., L. J. Picker. 1996. Lymphocyte homing and homeostasis. Science 272:60.[Abstract]
  17. Forster, R., A. Schubel, D. Breitfeld, E. Kremmer, I. Renner-Muller, E. Wolf, M. Lipp. 1999. CCR7 coordinates the primary immune response by establishing functional microenvironments in secondary lymphoid organs. Cell 99:23.[Medline]
  18. Altman, J. D., P. A. H. Moss, P. J. R. Goulder, D. H. Barouch, M. G. McHeyzer-Williams, J. I. Bell, A. J. McMichael, M. M. Davis. 1996. Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes. [Published erratum appears in 1998 Science 280:1821.]. Science 274:94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wills, M. R., A. J. Carmichael, M. P. Weekes, K. Mynard, G. Okecha, R. Hicks, J. G. Sissons. 1999. Human virus-specific CD8+ CTL clones revert from CD45ROhigh to CD45RAhigh in vivo: CD45RAhighCD8+ T cells comprise both naive and memory cells. J. Immunol. 162:7080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Murali-Krishna, K., J. D. Altman, M. Suresh, D. J. D. Sourdive, A. J. Zajac, J. D. Miller, J. Slansky, R. Ahmed. 1998. Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. Immunity 8:177.[Medline]
  21. Butz, E. A., M. J. Bevan. 1998. Massive expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells during an acute virus infection. Immunity 8:167.[Medline]
  22. Selin, L. K., M. Y. Lin, K. A. Kraemer, D. M. Pardoll, J. P. Schneck, S. M. Varga, P. A. Santolucito, A. K. Pinto, R. M. Welsh. 1999. Attrition of T cell memory: selective loss of LCMV epitope-specific memory CD8 T cells following infections with heterologous viruses. Immunity 11:733.[Medline]
  23. Moskophidis, D., F. Lechner, H. Pircher, R. M. Zinkernagel. 1993. Virus persistence in acutely infected immunocompetent mice by exhaustion of antiviral cytotoxic effector T cells. Nature 362:758.[Medline]
  24. Xiong, Y., M. A. Luscher, J. D. Altman, M. Hulsey, H. L. Robinson, M. Ostrowski, B. H. Barber, K. S. MacDonald. 2001. Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection of a rhesus macaque induces SIV-specific CD8+ T cells with a defect in effector function that is reversible on extended interleukin-2 incubation. J. Virol. 75:3028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Lechner, F., N. H. Gruener, S. Urbani, J. Uggeri, T. Santantonio, A. R. Kammer, A. Cerny, R. Phillips, C. Ferrari, G. R. Pape, P. Klenerman. 2000. CD8+ T lymphocyte responses are induced during acute hepatitis C virus infection but are not sustained. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:2479.[Medline]
  26. Masopust, D., J. Jiang, H. Shen, L. Lefrancois. 2001. Direct analysis of the dynamics of the intestinal mucosa CD8 T cell response to systemic virus infection. J. Immunol. 166:2348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Berg, E. L., M. K. Robinson, R. A. Warnock, E. C. Butcher. 1991. The human peripheral lymph node vascular addressin is a ligand for LECAM-1, the peripheral lymph node homing receptor. J. Cell Biol. 114:343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Campbell, J. J., K. E. Murphy, E. J. Kunkel, C. E. Brightling, D. Soler, Z. Shen, J. Boisvert, H. B. Greenberg, M. A. Vierra, S. B. Goodman, et al 2001. CCR7 expression and memory T cell diversity in humans. J. Immunol. 166:877.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Baekkevold, E. S., T. Yamanaka, R. T. Palframan, H. S. Carlsen, F. P. Reinholt, U. H. von Andrian, P. Brandtzaeg, G. Haraldsen. 2001. The CCR7 ligand elc (CCL19) is transcytosed in high endothelial venules and mediates T cell recruitment. J. Exp. Med. 193:1105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Khan, G., E. M. Miyashita, B. Yang, G. J. Babcock, D. A. Thorley-Lawson. 1996. Is EBV persistence in vivo a model for B cell homeostasis?. Immunity 5:173.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. L. Elliott, A. Suhrbier, J. J. Miles, G. Lawrence, S. J. Pye, T. T. Le, A. Rosenstengel, T. Nguyen, A. Allworth, S. R. Burrows, et al.
Phase I Trial of a CD8+ T-Cell Peptide Epitope-Based Vaccine for Infectious Mononucleosis
J. Virol., February 1, 2008; 82(3): 1448 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
V. Hadinoto, M. Shapiro, T. C. Greenough, J. L. Sullivan, K. Luzuriaga, and D. A. Thorley-Lawson
On the dynamics of acute EBV infection and the pathogenesis of infectious mononucleosis
Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1420 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. S. Cush, K. M. Anderson, D. H. Ravneberg, J. L. Weslow-Schmidt, and E. Flano
Memory Generation and Maintenance of CD8+ T Cell Function during Viral Persistence
J. Immunol., July 1, 2007; 179(1): 141 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
M. L. Precopio, M. R. Betts, J. Parrino, D. A. Price, E. Gostick, D. R. Ambrozak, T. E. Asher, D. C. Douek, A. Harari, G. Pantaleo, et al.
Immunization with vaccinia virus induces polyfunctional and phenotypically distinctive CD8+ T cell responses
J. Exp. Med., June 11, 2007; 204(6): 1405 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
F. Bihl, M. Narayan, J. V. Chisholm III, L. M. Henry, T. J. Suscovich, E. E. Brown, T. M. Welzel, D. E. Kaufmann, T. M. Zaman, S. Dollard, et al.
Lytic and Latent Antigens of the Human Gammaherpesviruses Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Induce T-Cell Responses with Similar Functional Properties and Memory Phenotypes
J. Virol., May 1, 2007; 81(9): 4904 - 4908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. J. Obar, S. Fuse, E. K. Leung, S. C. Bellfy, and E. J. Usherwood
Gammaherpesvirus persistence alters key CD8 T-cell memory characteristics and enhances antiviral protection.
J. Virol., September 1, 2006; 80(17): 8303 - 8315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
D. A. Price, J. M. Brenchley, L. E. Ruff, M. R. Betts, B. J. Hill, M. Roederer, R. A. Koup, S. A. Migueles, E. Gostick, L. Wooldridge, et al.
Avidity for antigen shapes clonal dominance in CD8+ T cell populations specific for persistent DNA viruses
J. Exp. Med., November 21, 2005; 202(10): 1349 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Woodberry, T. J. Suscovich, L. M. Henry, M. August, M. T. Waring, A. Kaur, C. Hess, J. L. Kutok, J. C. Aster, F. Wang, et al.
{alpha}E{beta}7 (CD103) Expression Identifies a Highly Active, Tonsil-Resident Effector-Memory CTL Population
J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4355 - 4362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
W. N. Haining, D. S. Neuberg, H. L. Keczkemethy, J. W. Evans, S. Rivoli, R. Gelman, H. M. Rosenblatt, W. T. Shearer, J. Guenaga, D. C. Douek, et al.
Antigen-specific T-cell memory is preserved in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Blood, September 1, 2005; 106(5): 1749 - 1754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. J. Gross, D. Hochberg, W. M. Rand, and D. A. Thorley-Lawson
EBV and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A New Perspective
J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 6599 - 6607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
E. M. Aandahl, M. F. Quigley, W. J. Moretto, M. Moll, V. D. Gonzalez, A. Sonnerborg, S. Lindback, F. M. Hecht, S. G. Deeks, M. G. Rosenberg, et al.
Expansion of CD7low and CD7negative CD8 T-cell effector subsets in HIV-1 infection: correlation with antigenic load and reversion by antiretroviral treatment
Blood, December 1, 2004; 104(12): 3672 - 3678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Z. Wang, M. A. Brehm, and R. M. Welsh
Preapoptotic Phenotype of Viral Epitope-Specific CD8 T Cells Precludes Memory Development and Is an Intrinsic Property of the Epitope
J. Immunol., October 15, 2004; 173(8): 5138 - 5147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. R. Piriou, K. van Dort, N. M. Nanlohy, F. Miedema, M. H. van Oers, and D. van Baarle
Altered EBV Viral Load Setpoint after HIV Seroconversion Is in Accordance with Lack of Predictive Value of EBV Load for the Occurrence of AIDS-Related Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
J. Immunol., June 1, 2004; 172(11): 6931 - 6937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Wang, J. Epstein, Y. Charoenvit, F. M. Baraceros, N. Rahardjo, T. Gay, J.-G. Banania, R. Chattopadhyay, P. de la Vega, T. L. Richie, et al.
Induction in Humans of CD8+ and CD4+ T Cell and Antibody Responses by Sequential Immunization with Malaria DNA and Recombinant Protein
J. Immunol., May 1, 2004; 172(9): 5561 - 5569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Gibson, G. Piccinini, D. Lilleri, M. G. Revello, Z. Wang, S. Markel, D. J. Diamond, and K. Luzuriaga
Human Cytomegalovirus Proteins pp65 and Immediate Early Protein 1 Are Common Targets for CD8+ T Cell Responses in Children with Congenital or Postnatal Human Cytomegalovirus Infection
J. Immunol., February 15, 2004; 172(4): 2256 - 2264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. J. Obar, S. G. Crist, D. C. Gondek, and E. J. Usherwood
Different Functional Capacities of Latent and Lytic Antigen-Specific CD8 T Cells in Murine Gammaherpesvirus Infection
J. Immunol., January 15, 2004; 172(2): 1213 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. M. Koelle, Z. Liu, C. L. McClurkan, R. C. Cevallos, J. Vieira, N. A. Hosken, C. A. Meseda, D. C. Snow, A. Wald, and L. Corey
Immunodominance among herpes simplex virus-specific CD8 T cells expressing a tissue-specific homing receptor
PNAS, October 28, 2003; 100(22): 12899 - 12904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. Sauce, N. Rufer, P. Mercier, M. Bodinier, J.-P. Remy-Martin, A. Duperrier, C. Ferrand, P. Herve, P. Romero, F. Lang, et al.
Retrovirus-mediated gene transfer in polyclonal T cells results in lower apoptosis and enhanced ex vivo cell expansion of CMV-reactive CD8 T cells as compared with EBV-reactive CD8 T cells
Blood, August 15, 2003; 102(4): 1241 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. E. Gamadia, E. B. M. Remmerswaal, J. F. Weel, F. Bemelman, R. A. W. van Lier, and I. J. M. Ten Berge
Primary immune responses to human CMV: a critical role for IFN-gamma -producing CD4+ T cells in protection against CMV disease
Blood, April 1, 2003; 101(7): 2686 - 2692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. M. Aandahl, J. K. Sandberg, K. P. Beckerman, K. Tasken, W. J. Moretto, and D. F. Nixon
CD7 Is a Differentiation Marker That Identifies Multiple CD8 T Cell Effector Subsets
J. Immunol., March 1, 2003; 170(5): 2349 - 2355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
U. Karrer, S. Sierro, M. Wagner, A. Oxenius, H. Hengel, U. H. Koszinowski, R. E. Phillips, and P. Klenerman
Memory Inflation: Continuous Accumulation of Antiviral CD8+ T Cells Over Time
J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 2022 - 2029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. M. van Leeuwen, L. E. Gamadia, P. A. Baars, E. B. Remmerswaal, I. J. ten Berge, and R. A. van Lier
Proliferation Requirements of Cytomegalovirus-Specific, Effector-Type Human CD8+ T Cells
J. Immunol., November 15, 2002; 169(10): 5838 - 5843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catalina, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Luzuriaga, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Catalina, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Luzuriaga, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS