The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 168: 3910-3914.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

Regulation of IL-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases by Lipopolysaccharide1

Jean Hu, Randy Jacinto, Charles McCall and Liwu Li2

Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IL-1R-associated kinase (IRAK) plays a pivotal role in IL-1R/Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated signaling and NF-{kappa}B activation. IRAK from leukocytes undergoes rapid activation and inactivation/degradation following IL-1 or LPS stimulation. The rapid degradation of IRAK may serve as a negative feedback mechanism of down-regulating IL-1R/TLR-mediated signaling and cytokine gene transcription. Although IL-1/IL-1R-triggered IRAK degradation has been studied in detail, the mechanism of LPS-induced IRAK activation and degradation is not clearly defined. In this study, we demonstrate that the IRAK N-terminal 186-aa region is required for LPS-induced degradation. The N-terminally truncated IRAK protein expressed in human monocytic THP-1 cells remains stable upon LPS challenge. In comparison, IRAK as well as the IRAK mutant with C-terminal truncation undergo degradation with LPS stimulation. We demonstrate that pretreatment with protein kinase C inhibitor calphostin inhibits LPS-induced IRAK degradation. Furthermore, we observe coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous IRAK and protein kinase C-{zeta} protein. We show that functional TLR4 is required for LPS-mediated IRAK degradation. IRAK protein in the murine GG2EE cells harboring a mutated TLR4 gene does not undergo degradation upon LPS treatment. In sharp contrast, we observe that the IRAK homolog, IRAK2, does not undergo degradation upon prolonged LPS treatment, suggesting complex regulation of the innate immunity network upon microbial challenge.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Interleukin-1R-associated kinase (IRAK)3 is a putative serine/threonine kinase with a centrally located kinase domain (1). Besides its kinase domain, IRAK also possesses an N-terminal death domain and a C-terminal serine/threonine-rich region. Originally, IRAK was identified as an important mediator of IL-1 signaling process via IL-1R (1). Upon IL-1 stimulation, IRAK is recruited to the intracellular domain of the IL-1R (2). Although the mechanism of IRAK activation as well as the direct substrate of IRAK kinase are not clear, the subsequent activation of IRAK ultimately leads to NF-{kappa}B activation and trans activation of many inflammatory cytokine genes, which regulate host innate immune response (3, 4).

IRAK also participates in Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated signaling. Recent studies reveal a group of mammalian TLRs that respond to diverse microbial stimulants including LPS and trigger NF-{kappa}B activation as well as cytokine gene transcription (5). The distinct extracellular leucine-rich-repeat structures of various TLRs enable them to respond to different microbial stimulants (5). Interestingly, all TLRs share sequence similarity in their intracellular domain with the IL-1R (Toll/IL-1R-like (TIR) domain). Accumulating evidence indicates that IRAK is also used by the TLR signaling in response to microbial stimulants. For example, we and others showed that LPS can activate host innate immune response through TLR4 and IRAK (6, 7). In addition, Gram-positive bacterial stimulants such as lipoprotein can activate human innate immunity through TLR2 and IRAK (8, 9). Recently, we showed that a bacterial flagella protein FliC triggers cytokine production in human leukocytes through TLR5 and IRAK (10). Therefore, IRAK most likely serves as one of the central mediators of host innate immune response upon various microbial stimulations.

Perhaps developed as a negative feedback mechanism, IRAK becomes quickly degraded and unresponsive to further IL-1/LPS stimulation following prolonged IL-1/LPS treatment (7, 11). The unresponsiveness of IRAK is at least partly responsible for the repressed cytokine gene transcription commonly seen in LPS and/or IL-1{beta} tolerant leukocytes (7, 12). Although most researchers usually generate tolerance cells with overnight LPS challenge, it is worth noting that endotoxin tolerance can be developed as early as 2 h after pretreatment with LPS (13, 14), coinciding with the timing of IRAK degradation. Several studies using IL-1{beta} as stimulant in HEK293 cells and other nonleukocyte cells indicate that IRAK is degraded through phosphorylation-induced ubiquitin/proteosome pathway (11, 15). Application of kinase inhibitors or proteosome inhibitors can prevent IL-1{beta}-induced IRAK degradation (11). Recently, two research groups reported that two regions of IRAK are involved in IL-1-induced IRAK degradation (aa 103–198 located between the N-terminal death domain and the central kinase domain (16), as well as aa 514–543 at the end of the kinase domain (17)). IRAK mutant with deletion of either region resists IL-1{beta}-induced IRAK degradation. However, the aa 514–543 region is most likely not directly involved in IL-1-induced IRAK phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitination, because mutations of any putative phosphorylation sites (Ser, Tyr, Thr) and/or putative ubiquitination sites (Lys) within this region fail to stabilize IRAK upon IL-1 challenge (17).

IRAK degradation upon IL-1{beta} challenge in several nonleukocyte cell lines (such as kidney 293 cells, fibroblast MRC-5 cells, liver HepG2 cells) has been studied in detail (11, 16, 17). However, the biochemical mechanism of IRAK degradation and unresponsiveness in LPS tolerant leukocytes have not been determined. The 293 cells do not express TLR4, and are therefore not suitable for studying the effect of LPS on IRAK stability. We chose to use the relevant human promonocytic THP-1 cells to examine the regulation of IRAK by LPS. Undifferentiated THP-1 cells express functional TLR4, but not type 1 IL-1R (18, 19); therefore, IL-1 stimulation has been shown not to cause IRAK degradation in THP-1 cells (7, 20). We can thus study specifically the effect of LPS challenge on IRAK. As shown previously by us and others in THP-1 cells, IRAK is a constitutively expressed protein (7, 17, 20). Upon LPS stimulation, IRAK is quickly activated and then degraded. In the presence of LPS, IRAK protein level constantly remains at a very low level after 2 h of LPS stimulation (7, 17, 20). We generated various IRAK truncation mutants and tested their stabilities inside THP-1 cells upon 2-h LPS treatment. We observe that the N-terminal 186 aa of IRAK is required for LPS-induced IRAK degradation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that application of the protein kinase (PK)C inhibitor calphostin inhibits LPS-induced IRAK degradation. In addition, our study shows that functional TLR4 is required for LPS-induced IRAK degradation in THP-1 cells. Interestingly, we observe that the close homolog of IRAK, IRAK2, does not undergo degradation upon prolonged LPS challenge in THP-1 cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals and reagents

CKI-7 was purchased from Seikagaku (Falmouth, MA). Calphostin and 5,6-dichloro-1-b-D-ribofuranosyl-benzimidazole were obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). H-89 was obtained from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA).

Recombinant plasmids and cell lines

The mammalian expression plasmids encoding IRAK were obtained from X. Li (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH) (15). A PCR fragment encoding the flag tag was inserted at the 5' end of the IRAK coding sequence to generate pflag-IRAK. To make the pflag-IRAK1–547, the 3' end of the IRAK coding sequence (from base 1641 to the end) was excised out using BsaAI and SmaI. The pflag-IRAK186–217 was generated by substituting the nucleotides from 1–571 with an adapter oligonucleotide. The NF-{kappa}B-luciferase reporter plasmid pNF-{kappa}B-luc was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). Human promonocytic THP-1 cells were obtained through American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The mouse GG2EE and HeNC2 cells were provided by A. Ding (Cornell University Medical College, Ithaca, NY).

THP-1 cell transfection

THP-1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine. A total of 1 x 106 cells was transfected using Effectin reagent (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) with 0.8 µg of the indicated IRAK expression constructs. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were harvested and the lyses were used in the subsequent assays.

Generation of polyclonal anti-IRAK2 Ab

A peptide TQLRKIKSMERVQG corresponding to the IRAK-2 protein aa 40–53 was synthesized and conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin through our peptide synthesis core lab. Such peptide was used to immunize rabbit and generate antiserum through Pocono Rabbit Farm (Canadensis, PA).

Immunoprecipitation, Western blot, and in vitro kinase assay

THP-1 cells transiently transfected with indicated IRAK expression plasmids were harvested and lysed, as described previously (7). Cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation for 20 min at maximum speed in a microcentrifuge. The protein concentration in the supernatant was determined using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Extracts with equal amount of proteins were used for the immunoprecipitation. A total of 5 µl anti-flag mAb (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added to 800 µl each of the isolated cell extracts and incubated at 4°C for 3 h on a rotator. A total of 50 µl of a 50% slurry of prewashed protein G agarose beads was then added to each sample, followed by incubation for an additional 2 h at 4°C. The samples were spun briefly in a microcentrifuge and washed for four times in lysis buffer. Samples were subsequently solubilized by SDS sample buffer (80 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 50% glycerol, 0.05% bromphenol blue, 0.2 M DTT), separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad), Western blotted with anti-flag Ab, and detected by ECL reagent.

A similar procedure, as described above, was used to prepare cell extracts from GG2EE and HeNC2 cells. Endogenous IRAK proteins from these cells were immunoprecipitated using polyclonal anti-IRAK Ab (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY). SDS-PAGE and Western blot analyses were performed, as described above.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression and characterization of IRAK truncation mutants

Upon transient transfection of the pflag-IRAK, pflag-IRAK186–712, or pflag-IRAK1–547 construct into THP-1 cells, cell lyses were prepared and the various flag-IRAK fusion proteins expressed were immunoprecipitated using anti-flag mAb. Due to inherent low transfection efficiency of THP-1 cells, the levels of expressed flag-IRAK proteins are low, as shown on the gel (Fig 1GoB). Two separate studies reported that low levels of transient expressions of IRAK in EL-4 cells and HeLa cells result in a single 80-kDa protein band (21, 22). In agreement with such studies, we consistently observed that the full-length flag-IRAK protein transiently expressed in THP-1 cells runs at the expected size of ~80 kDa (Fig. 1GoB). Accordingly, the truncated flag-IRAK186–712 or flag-IRAK1–547 protein runs at the expected size of ~60 kDa (Fig. 1GoB).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. The N terminus of IRAK is responsible for LPS-induced degradation. A, Schematic illustration of various IRAK constructs. B, Various flag-IRAK fusion constructs were transfected into THP-1 cells, as described in Materials and Methods. Twenty-four hours after transfection, THP-1 cells were treated with 500 ng/ml LPS for 2 h. Cells with and without LPS treatment were harvested, and cell lyses were prepared. Various expressed pflag-IRAK fusion proteins were analyzed through immunoprecipitation and Western blot, as described.

 
Because endogenous IRAK protein in leukocytes is degraded upon 1- to 2-h LPS stimulation, we further examined the stability of these various IRAK truncation proteins within THP-1 cells upon LPS treatment. THP-1 cells transiently expressing various flag-IRAK fusion proteins were treated with 500 ng/ml LPS for 2 h. The flag-IRAK proteins were subsequently immunoprecipitated from the cell lyses using anti-flag Ab and analyzed on SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blot. We consistently observed that the levels of the full-length flag-IRAK as well as the flag-IRAK1–547 with C-terminal deletion are dramatically reduced following 2-h LPS stimulation (Fig. 1GoB). Strikingly, the flag-IRAK186–712 with deletion of N-terminal 186 aa survives the 2-h LPS treatment (Fig. 1GoB). We could not detect the phosphorylated form(s) of the expressed flag-IRAK proteins following 2-h LPS challenge, suggesting that these forms may be rapidly degraded once generated in THP-1 cells. This is in agreement with two other independent studies using THP-1 cells, showing that the amount of endogenously phosphorylated IRAK forms following prolonged LPS stimulation is very low and not readily detectable (20, 23). Our results indicate that the LPS-induced IRAK degradation requires the N-terminal 186 aa of IRAK, and the C terminus region is not necessary for IRAK degradation. Our observation agrees with the recent independent report showing that the aa 103–198 is required for IL-1{beta}-induced IRAK phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and degradation (16).

IRAK phosphorylation by PKC-{zeta} is necessary for LPS-induced IRAK degradation

Based on studies by us and others, it is speculated that LPS-induced IRAK phosphorylation may facilitate its degradation through ubiquitin pathway (11). Realizing the surmounting task of identifying the phosphorylation sites through phospho-amino acid sequencing analysis, we took a shortcut approach by studying the effect of various protein kinase inhibitors on LPS-induced IRAK degradation. THP-1 cells were pretreated for 20 min with either 1 mM CK1–7 (specific inhibitor of casein kinase-1; Seikagaku), 500 µM 5,6-dichloro-1-b-D-ribofuranosyl-benzimidazole (specific inhibitor of casein kinase II; Calbiochem), 5 µM H-89 (specific inhibitor of PKA; Biomol), or 5 µM calphostin (specific inhibitor of all PKC isozymes; Calbiochem). The above-mentioned concentrations for the specified inhibitors have been shown to be selective in inhibiting the corresponding kinases (24, 25, 26, 27). Inhibitor-pretreated cells were subsequently challenged with 500 ng/ml LPS for 2 h. The endogenous IRAK protein levels were analyzed through Western blot. As shown in Fig. 2Go, 2Go-h LPS treatment renders dramatic decrease of the IRAK protein level (Fig. 2Go). Pretreatments with CK-1-, CK-II-, or PKA-specific inhibitors do not interfere with LPS-induced IRAK degradation (Fig. 2Go). Strikingly, pretreatment of THP-1 cells with general PKC inhibitor calphostin consistently renders endogenous IRAK stable upon LPS challenge (Fig. 2Go). We have also tested the effect of another general PKC inhibitor RO31-8220 on LPS-induced IRAK degradation and obtained similar results (data not shown).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. PKC inhibitor specifically prevents LPS-induced IRAK degradation. THP-1 cells were pretreated with either DMSO (lane 1) or specific inhibitors of CK-I (lane 2), CK-II (lane 3), PKA (lane 4), or PKC (lane 5) for 20 min, followed with or without 2-h 500 ng/ml LPS stimulation, as indicated. Extracts from untreated control THP-1 cells were loaded in lane 0. Endogenous IRAK protein levels were analyzed through SDS-PAGE and Western blot. This gel is a representation of three independent experiments.

 
PKC family kinases consist of three subgroups: conventional PKC ({alpha}, {beta}, and {gamma} isozymes), novel PKC ({delta}, {epsilon}, {eta}, and {theta} isozymes), and atypical PKC ({zeta} and {iota}{lambda} isozymes) (reviewed in Ref. 28). It has been reported that LPS-treated monocytes/THP-1 cells have an elevated atypical PKC activity (29, 30). Further study demonstrated that PKC-{zeta} is specifically activated in THP-1 cells upon LPS stimulation (29). Therefore, we have examined whether PKC-{zeta} interacts with IRAK in vivo inside THP-1 cells. Total protein extracts were prepared from LPS-treated THP-1 cells and used to immunoprecipitate IRAK protein. Immunoprecipitated IRAK protein complex was separated on SDS-PAGE and blotted to PVDF membrane. The membrane was probed for the presence of PKC-{zeta} using polyclonal anti-PKC-{zeta} Ab. As shown in Fig. 3Go, we can detect the presence of PKC-{zeta} in the immunoprecipitated IRAK complex.



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. PKC-{zeta} interacts with IRAK in vivo. A total of 1 x 107 THP-1 cells was stimulated with 500 ng/ml LPS for 5 min. Total protein extracts were prepared and used for immunoprecipitation with polyclonal anti-IRAK Ab. Immunoprecipitated complex was resolved on lane 2 of the SDS-PAGE. A total of 1 µg of the standard human rPKC-{zeta} protein (Calbiochem) was loaded on lane 1 of the gel. The separated proteins were transferred onto PVDF membrane and probed for the presence of IRAK or PKC-{zeta} using anti-IRAK (upper panel) or anti-PKC-{zeta} Ab (lower panel).

 
Functional TLR4 is necessary for LPS-induced IRAK degradation

Because LPS can activate leukocyte innate immune response both extracellularly through TLR4 (31) and intracellularly through an unknown mechanism (32), we would like to determine whether functional TLR4 is required for LPS-induced IRAK degradation. To test this, mouse GG2EE as well as HeNC2 macrophage cells were used. GG2EE cell line derives from the C3H/HeJ mouse that harbors a point mutation in TLR4 gene, rendering TLR4 unable to mediate LPS signaling (31). HeNC2 cell line derives from the isogenic C3H/HeN wild-type mouse strain. GG2EE as well as HeNC2 cells with or without LPS treatment were harvested, and protein lyses were extracted. IRAK proteins were immunoprecipitated and analyzed through Western blot using polyclonal anti-IRAK Ab that can recognize both the human as well as the mice form of IRAK (Upstate Biotechnology). As shown in Fig. 4Go, LPS treatment causes rapid IRAK level decrease in the wild-type HeNC2 cells. However, the IRAK level remains constant in the GG2EE cells harboring a mutant TLR4 gene with or without LPS stimulation (Fig. 4Go). As a control, we treated GG2EE and HeNC2 cells with 500 ng/ml murine IL-1{beta} and observed that IL-1{beta} causes similar IRAK degradation in both cells. Our data indicate that functional TLR4 is necessary for mediating LPS-induced IRAK degradation.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Functional TLR4 is necessary for LPS-induced IRAK degradation. GG2EE and HeNC2 cells were treated with or without 500 ng/ml LPS or mouse IL-1{beta} for 2 h. Endogenous IRAK proteins were immunoprecipitated and analyzed through SDS-PAGE and Western blot, as described in Materials and Methods.

 
The close IRAK homolog, IRAK2, remains stable upon prolonged LPS challenge

IRAK2 shares with IRAK sequence similarities in the N-terminal 10–100 aa death domain and the central 200–500 aa kinase domain. However, IRAK2 bears no homology with IRAK within the 103–186 aa region, which is required for IRAK degradation (Fig. 2Go). There has been no report regarding the stability and physiological function of IRAK2 upon LPS or IL-1{beta} challenge. We developed specific polyclonal Ab against IRAK2 through Pocono Rabbit Farm (see Materials and Methods) and performed Western analysis using whole protein extracts prepared from THP-1 cells treated with or without LPS. Equal amount of total protein extracts was separated on SDS-PAGE and blotted with anti-IRAK2 Ab. As shown in Fig. 5Go, the anti-IRAK2 Ab, not the preimmune serum, specifically detected a protein band of ~60 kDa, the expected size of IRAK2. Interestingly, we observed that the endogenous IRAK2 level remains constant following prolonged LPS stimulation.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Unlike IRAK, IRAK2 levels remain constant upon LPS stimulation. A, Schematic comparison of IRAK and IRAK-2 protein. B, THP-1 cells treated with or without 500 ng/ml LPS for 24 h were harvested, and the total protein extracts were prepared. Equal amounts of protein extracts were resolved on SDS-PAGE and blotted with either preimmune or anti-IRAK2 antiserum.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Several significant observations regarding IRAK and IRAK2 in promonocytic THP-1 cells are provided in this work. First, we demonstrated that the IRAK N-terminal 186 aa region is critical for LPS-induced degradation. Second, LPS-induced IRAK degradation requires functional TLR4. Third, certain PKC is involved in LPS-induced IRAK degradation. Last, but not least, the close IRAK homolog IRAK2 is stable upon prolonged LPS challenge.

Our results agree with the recent report, using IL-1{beta} as stimulant in HEK293 cells, that IRAK mutant with deletion of aa 103–198 completely abolishes IL-1{beta}-induced IRAK phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and degradation (16). This region resides between the N-terminal death domain and the central kinase domain (Fig. 1Go). Besides the aa 103–186 region, it is reported that aa 514–543 located at the end of the kinase domain is also involved in IL-1{beta}-induced IRAK degradation (17). Complete deletion of this region renders IRAK stable and resistant to IL-1{beta}-induced modification and degradation. However, the exact role of the aa 514–543 region is not clear. IRAK point mutations of all putative phosphorylation sites (Ser, Tyr, Thr) and putative ubiquitination sites (Lys) within this region still undergo IL-1{beta}-induced phosphorylation and ubiquitination (17). This suggests that the aa 514–543 region is not directly involved in IRAK phosphorylation/ubiquitination. Rather, this region might indirectly contribute to IRAK degradation, for example, by modifying the overall secondary structure of the protein, or through interaction with other protein(s) involved in IRAK phosphorylation and ubiquitination.

Our work is the first to determine that functional TLR4 is necessary for LPS-induced IRAK degradation. Previous work regarding IRAK solely characterized the IRAK response upon IL-1{beta}/IL-1R challenge. Although TLR4 bears similarity with IL-1R intracellular TIR domain, there are distinct amino acid differences. In addition, unlike IL-1{beta} signaling, which solely goes through type 1 IL-1R, LPS is known to undergo internalization and signal through other intracellular receptor (such as NOD-1 receptor) (32). Therefore, TLR4- or LPS-mediated intracellular events through NOD-1 may contribute to IRAK protein degradation. Our work using TLR4-defective murine GG2EE cells clearly indicates that LPS-induced IRAK degradation requires functional TLR4.

Previous study using general kinase inhibitor suggests that LPS-induced IRAK phosphorylation contributes to its subsequent degradation (11). Our data presented in this study further suggest that putative IRAK phosphorylation by PKC might be responsible for its degradation. Pretreatment of THP-1 cells with PKC inhibitor calphostin prevents LPS-induced IRAK degradation. It is noteworthy that LPS specifically activates PKC-{zeta} isoform in THP-1 cells (29). Correspondingly, we have documented binding of IRAK and PKC-{zeta} upon LPS stimulation. Although PKC-{zeta} binding with IRAK is intriguing, we are aware of the fact that binding alone could not prove that IRAK has indeed been phosphorylated by PKC-{zeta} in vivo. Future extensive work using transgenic mice with PKC-{zeta} deletion is needed to test the involvement of PKC in IRAK phosphorylation and degradation. Nevertheless, our study reported in this work provides important lead for the elucidation of the mechanism of LPS-induced IRAK phosphorylation/degradation.

Another interesting finding provided in this work is that the close homolog of IRAK, IRAK2, apparently does not undergo degradation upon LPS challenge. Homologous to IRAK, IRAK2 possesses a similar death domain and a kinase domain. In contrast, the IRAK N-terminal 103–186 aa region required for IRAK degradation is not conserved in IRAK2 (Fig. 5Go). Our observation that IRAK2 is stable indicates that the region for LPS-induced IRAK degradation resides within the aa 100–186 region. We are the first to report in this study that IRAK2 protein is stable upon prolonged LPS treatment. To date, there have been very few studies regarding the regulation and physiological function of IRAK2. A previous study using transient expression of IRAK2 in 293 cell suggests that IRAK2 may play a redundant role as IRAK in signaling (33). However, it was recently reported that IRAK2 selectively binds with another adapter protein Mal/TIRAP instead of MyD88 upon LPS stimulation, and selectively participates in MyD88-independent dendritic cell activation (34). This clearly indicates that IRAK2 plays distinct roles in mediating innate immune response. Our finding that IRAK2 protein remains stable upon LPS challenge further reveals the complexity of the innate immunity regulation upon microbial stimulations.

Taken together, our data indicate that LPS-induced IRAK degradation requires functional TLR4. The IRAK N-terminal region is required for LPS-induced degradation. Putative IRAK phosphorylation by PKC may contribute to its subsequent degradation. Strikingly, IRAK2 protein does not undergo degradation upon prolonged LPS challenge. Our findings provide valuable basis for future analysis of the complex network of innate immunity regulation.


    Footnotes
 
1 This study is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AI50089 (to L.L.) and AI09169 (to C.M.). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Liwu Li, Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. E-mail address: lwli{at}wfubmc.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: IRAK, IL-1R-associated kinase; PK, protein kinase; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TIR, Toll/IL-1R-like. Back

Received for publication November 30, 2001. Accepted for publication February 13, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cao, Z., W. J. Henzel, X. Gao. 1996. IRAK: a kinase associated with the interleukin-1 receptor. Science 271:1128.[Abstract]
  2. Wesche, H., W. J. Henzel, W. Shillinglaw, S. Li, Z. Cao. 1997. MyD88: an adapter that recruits IRAK to the IL-1 receptor complex. Immunity 7:837.[Medline]
  3. Kanakaraj, P., K. Ngo, Y. Wu, A. Angulo, P. Ghazal, C. A. Harris, J. J. Siekierka, P. A. Peterson, W. P. Fung-Leung. 1999. Defective interleukin (IL)-18-mediated natural killer and T helper cell type 1 responses in IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK)-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 189:1129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kanakaraj, P., P. H. Schafer, D. E. Cavender, Y. Wu, K. Ngo, P. F. Grealish, S. A. Wadsworth, P. A. Peterson, J. J. Siekierka, C. A. Harris, W. P. Fung-Leung. 1998. Interleukin (IL)-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) requirement for optimal induction of multiple IL-1 signaling pathways and IL-6 production. J. Exp. Med. 187:2073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Schuster, J. M., P. S. Nelson. 2000. Toll receptors: an expanding role in our understanding of human disease. J. Leukocyte Biol. 67:767.[Abstract]
  6. Swantek, J. L., M. F. Tsen, M. H. Cobb, J. A. Thomas. 2000. IL-1 receptor-associated kinase modulates host responsiveness to endotoxin. J. Immunol. 164:4301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Li, L., S. Cousart, J. Hu, C. E. McCall. 2000. Characterization of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase in normal and endotoxin-tolerant cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275:23340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Brightbill, H. D., D. H. Libraty, S. R. Krutzik, R. B. Yang, J. T. Belisle, J. R. Bleharski, M. Maitland, M. V. Norgard, S. E. Plevy, S. T. Smale, et al 1999. Host defense mechanisms triggered by microbial lipoproteins through Toll-like receptors. Science 285:732.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yang, R. B., M. R. Mark, A. L. Gurney, P. J. Godowski. 1999. Signaling events induced by lipopolysaccharide-activated Toll-like receptor 2. J. Immunol. 163:639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Moors, M. A., L. Li, S. B. Mizel. 2001. Activation of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase by Gram-negative flagellin. Infect. Immun. 69:4424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Yamin, T. T., D. K. Miller. 1997. The interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase is degraded by proteasomes following its phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 272:21540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Medvedev, A. E., K. M. Kopydlowski, S. N. Vogel. 2000. Inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced signal transduction in endotoxin-tolerized mouse macrophages: dysregulation of cytokine, chemokine, and Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 gene expression. J. Immunol. 164:5564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fenton, M. J., B. D. Clark, K. L. Collins, A. C. Webb, A. Rich, P. E. Auron. 1987. Transcriptional regulation of the human prointerleukin 1{beta} gene. J. Immunol. 138:3972.[Abstract]
  14. van der Poll, T., S. M. Coyle, L. L. Moldawer, S. F. Lowry. 1996. Changes in endotoxin-induced cytokine production by whole blood after in vivo exposure of normal humans to endotoxin. J. Infect. Dis. 174:1356.[Medline]
  15. Li, X., M. Commane, C. Burns, K. Vithalani, Z. Cao, G. R. Stark. 1999. Mutant cells that do not respond to interleukin-1 (IL-1) reveal a novel role for IL-1 receptor-associated kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:4643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Li, X., M. Commane, Z. Jiang, G. R. Stark. 2001. IL-1-induced NF{kappa}B and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation diverge at IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:4461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jensen, L. E., A. S. Whitehead. 2001. IRAK1b, a novel alternative splice variant of interleukin-1 receptor associated kinase (IRAK), mediates interleukin-1 signaling and has prolonged stability. J. Biol. Chem. 276:29037.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Martin, M., J. Katz, S. N. Vogel, S. M. Michalek. 2001. Differential induction of endotoxin tolerance by lipopolysaccharides derived from Porphyromonas gingivalis and Escherichia coli. J. Immunol. 167:5278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Spriggs, M. K., P. J. Nevens, K. Grabstein, S. K. Dower, D. Cosman, R. J. Armitage, C. J. McMahan, J. E. Sims. 1992. Molecular characterization of the interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) on monocytes and polymorphonuclear cells. Cytokine 4:90.[Medline]
  20. Ferlito, M., O. G. Romanenko, S. Ashton, F. Squadrito, P. V. Halushka, J. A. Cook. 2001. Effect of cross-tolerance between endotoxin and TNF-{alpha} or IL-1{beta} on cellular signaling and mediator production. J. Leukocyte Biol. 70:821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Knop, J., M. U. Martin. 1999. Effects of IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) expression on IL-1 signaling are independent of its kinase activity. FEBS Lett. 448:81.[Medline]
  22. Cooke, E. L., I. J. Uings, C. L. Xia, P. Woo, K. P. Ray. 2001. Functional analysis of the interleukin-1-receptor-associated kinase (IRAK-1) in interleukin-1{beta}-stimulated nuclear factor {kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B) pathway activation: IRAK-1 associates with the NF-{kappa}B essential modulator (NEMO) upon receptor stimulation. Biochem. J. 359:403.[Medline]
  23. Maeda, S., M. Akanuma, Y. Mitsuno, Y. Hirata, K. Ogura, H. Yoshida, Y. Shiratori, M. Omata. 2001. Distinct mechanism of Helicobacter pylori-mediated NF-{kappa}B activation between gastric cancer cells and monocytic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:44856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Chijiwa, T., M. Hagiwara, H. Hidaka. 1989. A newly synthesized selective casein kinase I inhibitor, N-(2-aminoethyl)-5-chloroisoquinoline-8-sulfonamide, and affinity purification of casein kinase I from bovine testis. J. Biol. Chem. 264:4924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Zandomeni, R., R. Weinmann. 1984. Inhibitory effect of 5,6-dichloro-1-{beta}-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole on a protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 259:14804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Chijiwa, T., A. Mishima, M. Hagiwara, M. Sano, K. Hayashi, T. Inoue, K. Naito, T. Toshioka, H. Hidaka. 1990. Inhibition of forskolin-induced neurite outgrowth and protein phosphorylation by a newly synthesized selective inhibitor of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase, N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide (H-89), of PC12D pheochromocytoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 265:5267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Houde, M., P. Tremblay, S. Masure, G. Opdenakker, D. Oth, R. Mandeville. 1996. Synergistic and selective stimulation of gelatinase B production in macrophages by lipopolysaccharide, trans-retinoic acid and CGP 41251, a protein kinase C regulator. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1310:193.[Medline]
  28. Dekker, L. V., P. J. Parker. 1994. Protein kinase C: a question of specificity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 19:73.[Medline]
  29. Herrera-Velit, P., K. L. Knutson, N. E. Reiner. 1997. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent activation of protein kinase C-{zeta} in bacterial lipopolysaccharide-treated human monocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 272:16445.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Liu, M. K., P. Herrera-Velit, R. W. Brownsey, N. E. Reiner. 1994. CD14-dependent activation of protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein kinases (p42 and p44) in human monocytes treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J. Immunol. 153:2642.[Abstract]
  31. Poltorak, A., I. Smirnova, X. He, M. Y. Liu, C. Van Huffel, O. McNally, D. Birdwell, E. Alejos, M. Silva, X. Du, et al 1998. Genetic and physical mapping of the Lps locus: identification of the Toll-4 receptor as a candidate gene in the critical region. [Published erratum appears in 1999 Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 25:78.]. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 24:340.[Medline]
  32. Inohara, N., Y. Ogura, F. F. Chen, A. Muto, G. Nunez. 2001. Human nod1 confers responsiveness to bacterial lipopolysaccharides. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Wesche, H., X. Gao, X. Li, C. J. Kirschning, G. R. Stark, Z. Cao. 1999. IRAK-M is a novel member of the Pelle/interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) family. J. Biol. Chem. 274:19403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Fitzgerald, K. A., E. M. Palsson-McDermott, A. G. Bowie, C. A. Jefferies, A. S. Mansell, G. Brady, E. Brint, A. Dunne, P. Gray, M. T. Harte, et al 2001. Mal (MyD88-adapter-like) is required for Toll-like receptor-4 signal transduction. Nature 413:78.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
U. Maitra, S. Davis, C. M. Reilly, and L. Li
Differential Regulation of Foxp3 and IL-17 Expression in CD4 T Helper Cells by IRAK-1
J. Immunol., May 1, 2009; 182(9): 5763 - 5769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Windheim, M. Stafford, M. Peggie, and P. Cohen
Interleukin-1 (IL-1) Induces the Lys63-Linked Polyubiquitination of IL-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase 1 To Facilitate NEMO Binding and the Activation of I{kappa}B{alpha} Kinase
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(5): 1783 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
M. Majewski, T. O. Bose, F. C. M. Sille, A. M. Pollington, E. Fiebiger, and M. Boes
Protein kinase C delta stimulates antigen presentation by Class II MHC in murine dendritic cells
Int. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 19(6): 719 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. V. Lasker and S. K. Nair
Intracellular TLR Signaling: A Structural Perspective on Human Disease
J. Immunol., July 1, 2006; 177(1): 11 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
K. Z. Q. Wang, N. Wara-Aswapati, J. A. Boch, Y. Yoshida, C.-D. Hu, D. L. Galson, and P. E. Auron
TRAF6 activation of PI 3-kinase-dependent cytoskeletal changes is cooperative with Ras and is mediated by an interaction with cytoplasmic Src
J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2006; 119(8): 1579 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. De Nardo, P. Masendycz, S. Ho, M. Cross, A. J. Fleetwood, E. C. Reynolds, J. A. Hamilton, and G. M. Scholz
A Central Role for the Hsp90{middle dot}Cdc37 Molecular Chaperone Module in Interleukin-1 Receptor-associated-kinase-dependent Signaling by Toll-like Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 9813 - 9822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. B. Pruett, C. Schwab, Q. Zheng, and R. Fan
Suppression of Innate Immunity by Acute Ethanol Administration: A Global Perspective and a New Mechanism Beginning with Inhibition of Signaling through TLR3
J. Immunol., August 15, 2004; 173(4): 2715 - 2724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Siedlar, M. Frankenberger, E. Benkhart, T. Espevik, M. Quirling, K. Brand, M. Zembala, and L. Ziegler-Heitbrock
Tolerance Induced by the Lipopeptide Pam3Cys Is Due to Ablation of IL-1R-Associated Kinase-1
J. Immunol., August 15, 2004; 173(4): 2736 - 2745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Teusch, E. Lombardo, J. Eddleston, and U. G. Knaus
The Low Molecular Weight GTPase RhoA and Atypical Protein Kinase C{zeta} Are Required for TLR2-Mediated Gene Transcription
J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 507 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Noubir, Z. Hmama, and N. E. Reiner
Dual Receptors and Distinct Pathways Mediate Interleukin-1 Receptor-associated Kinase Degradation in Response to Lipopolysaccharide: INVOLVEMENT OF CD14/TLR4, CR3, AND PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASE
J. Biol. Chem., June 11, 2004; 279(24): 25189 - 25195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Kollewe, A.-C. Mackensen, D. Neumann, J. Knop, P. Cao, S. Li, H. Wesche, and M. U. Martin
Sequential Autophosphorylation Steps in the Interleukin-1 Receptor-associated Kinase-1 Regulate its Availability as an Adapter in Interleukin-1 Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., February 13, 2004; 279(7): 5227 - 5236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Mamidipudi, C. Lin, M. L. Seibenhener, and M. W. Wooten
Regulation of Interleukin Receptor-associated Kinase (IRAK) Phosphorylation and Signaling by Iota Protein Kinase C
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2004; 279(6): 4161 - 4165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
M Ogasa, Y Miyazaki, S Hiraoka, S Kitamura, Y Nagasawa, O Kishida, T Miyazaki, T Kiyohara, Y Shinomura, and Y Matsuzawa
Gastrin activates nuclear factor {kappa}B (NF{kappa}B) through a protein kinase C dependent pathway involving NF{kappa}B inducing kinase, inhibitor {kappa}B (I{kappa}B) kinase, and tumour necrosis factor receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF6) in MKN-28 cells transfected with gastrin receptor
Gut, June 1, 2003; 52(6): 813 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
Liwu Li, R. Jacinto, B. Yoza, and C. E. McCall
Distinct post-receptor alterations generate gene- and signal-selective adaptation and cross-adaptation of TLR4 and TLR2 in human leukocytes
Innate Immunity, February 1, 2003; 9(1): 39 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
K. Burns, S. Janssens, B. Brissoni, N. Olivos, R. Beyaert, and J. Tschopp
Inhibition of Interleukin 1 Receptor/Toll-like Receptor Signaling through the Alternatively Spliced, Short Form of MyD88 Is Due to Its Failure to Recruit IRAK-4
J. Exp. Med., January 20, 2003; 197(2): 263 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. A. Dobrovolskaia, A. E. Medvedev, K. E. Thomas, N. Cuesta, V. Toshchakov, T. Ren, M. J. Cody, S. M. Michalek, N. R. Rice, and S. N. Vogel
Induction of In Vitro Reprogramming by Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 Agonists in Murine Macrophages: Effects of TLR "Homotolerance" Versus "Heterotolerance" on NF-{kappa}B Signaling Pathway Components
J. Immunol., January 1, 2003; 170(1): 508 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
C. Wietek and L. A. O'Neill
IRAK-4: A New Drug Target in Inflammation, Sepsis, and Autoimmunity
Mol. Interv., July 1, 2002; 2(4): 212 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS