The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Rudensky, A. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Rudensky, A. Y.
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 168: 2618-2625.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

A Role for Cathepsin L and Cathepsin S in Peptide Generation for MHC Class II Presentation1

Chyi-Song Hsieh*, Paul deRoos{dagger}, Karen Honey{dagger}, Courtney Beers{dagger} and Alexander Y. Rudensky2,{dagger}

* Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, and {dagger} Department of Immunology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The enzymes that degrade proteins to peptides for presentation on MHC class II molecules are poorly understood. The cysteinal lysosomal proteases, cathepsin L (CL) and cathepsin S (CS), have been shown to process invariant chain, thereby facilitating MHC class II maturation. However, their role in Ag processing is not established. To examine this issue, we generated embryonic fibroblast lines that express CL, CS, or neither. Expression of CL or CS mediates efficient degradation of invariant chain as expected. Ag presentation was evaluated using T cell hybridoma assays as well as mass spectroscopic analysis of peptides eluted from MHC class II molecules. Interestingly, we found that the majority of peptides are presented regardless of CL or CS expression, although these proteases often alter the relative levels of the peptides. However, for a subset of Ags, epitope generation is critically regulated by CL or CS. This result suggests that these cysteinal proteases participate in Ag processing and generate qualitative and quantitative differences in the peptide repertoires displayed by MHC class II molecules.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The processes of MHC class II maturation and peptide loading have been extensively examined (reviewed in Refs. 1, 2, 3). The class II {alpha}{beta} heterodimer is assembled in the endoplasmic reticulum, where it associates with invariant chain (Ii),3 a chaperone molecule that promotes proper folding of class II, protects the peptide binding groove for loading in a later compartment, and directs class II to the endosomal pathway. In the endosomes, Ii is proteolytically degraded until only the fragment called class II-associated leupeptin-induced peptide (CLIP) remains associated with class II (reviewed in Refs. 4 and 5). Exchange of CLIP for antigenic peptides is then catalyzed by H-2M before peptide:class II transport to the cell surface for interaction with the TCR.

The enzymes involved in Ii degradation have been recently characterized. Reports using protease inhibitors (6) and knockout mice (reviewed in Refs. 4 and 5) have demonstrated a significant role for the lysosomal cysteinal proteases cathepsin L (CL) and cathepsin S (CS) in Ii processing. Deficiency of CL and CS results in a block in generation of mature SDS-stable class II dimers due to an accumulation of Ii intermediates, namely p12, or small leupeptin-induced peptide (SLIP). Within the immune system, CS is found in bone marrow-derived APCs, i.e., macrophages, dendritic cells, and B cells, whereas CL is found in thymic cortical epithelial cells and macrophages (4). Because of this cell type-restricted expression, CL deficiency results in diminished positive selection of CD4+ T cells but does not significantly affect Ag presentation by bone marrow-derived APCs (7). In contrast, CS deficiency impairs Ag presentation by bone marrow-derived APCs but does not affect CD4+ T cell development (8, 9). While CL and CS appear to be the predominant proteases processing Ii, cathepsin F has also been implicated in Ii degradation in macrophages (10).

In contrast to Ii degradation, little is known about Ag processing, i.e., the proteolytic mechanisms that generate particular T cell epitopes. Early studies found that inhibition of lysosomal acidification interferes with proteolysis and Ag presentation, implicating lysosomal proteases (reviewed in Ref. 3). However, subsequent studies have not clearly defined these proteases. One report found an asparagine-specific cysteinal protease to be important for processing tetanus toxoid (11), although asparagine-specific cysteinal protease’s overall importance for the bulk of Ag processing remains to be determined. Using purified lysosomal enzymes and protease inhibitors of relatively broad specificity, cathepsin B (CB) and cathepsin D (CD) were implicated in Ag processing. However, CB and CD knockout mice were not deficient in Ii processing or Ag presentation (12, 13). Recently, CB, and less so CS, were found to be important for degradation of F(ab')2 internalized via FcR, but generation of peptides for presentation on class II was not assessed (14). Lastly, evaluation of CL and CS has focused on their roles in Ii degradation and not in Ag processing (5, 7, 8, 9).

We have chosen to examine the roles of CL and CS in Ag processing because these proteases are already known to have an important immune cell function, the degradation of Ii. To avoid the heterogeneity of ex vivo-derived APC populations and to allow for large-scale peptide analysis, we used in vitro cell lines expressing CL, CS, or neither. Expression of CL and CS mediates efficient Ii processing as expected. Although the peptide repertoire bound to I-Ab, as assessed by mass spectroscopy, is qualitatively similar regardless of CL or CS expression, a distinct subset of peptides is created or destroyed by the presence of CL or CS. Thus, the generation of a specific epitope may be critically regulated by the presence or the absence of a particular protease. This direct effect of CL and CS on Ag processing may have an important impact on immune responses to particular Ags, such as type II collagen in collagen-induced arthritis (8), and on peptide repertoires displayed by different types of APC, i.e., thymic epithelial cells vs dendritic cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents and mice

CL knockout mice have been previously described (7). The following Abs were used: anti-I-Ab mAb Y3P (15) and M5/114 (16), anti-CLIP:I-Ab mAb 15G4 (C. Beers, P. Wong, and A. Rudensky, manuscript in preparation) (8), anti-CD22:I-Ab mAb A8 (G. Barton and A. Rudensky, manuscript in preparation), polyclonal rabbit Abs specific for lumenal domain of Ii (gift from L. Karrlson, R. W. Johnson Research, San Diego, CA), polyclonal rabbit Abs against the A{alpha} and A{beta} cytoplasmic tails (A. Rudensky, unpublished observation), anti-Ii-In-1 (17, 18), goat anti-rabbit IgG biotin (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME), streptavidin-allophycocyanin (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA), streptavidin-CyChrome 5 (The Jackson Laboratory), and goat anti-rat IgG Texas Red (Caltag Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA). OVA , keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), IgM, hen egg lysozyme (HEL), and sperm whale myoglobin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). SA85 peptide (1102) and SA85 Ag (His) were gifts from Dr. S. Kahn (University of Washington, Seattle, WA). The culture medium was RPMI 1640 containing 5% FCS, 2-ME, penicillin/streptomycin, sodium pyruvate, L-glutamine, and HEPES (all from Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Trypsin/EDTA were used at 1 mg/ml and 53 mM, respectively (Life Technologies).

Generation of fibroblast lines

Day 16 embryos were harvested from CL-deficient mice, mechanically disrupted, and digested by trypsin/EDTA. Immortalized cells were generated by transfection of SV40 large T Ag (SV3-neo) (19) using Fugene 6 (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and selection for neomycin resistance. Cells were cloned by limiting dilution, and one clone was selected for further use (MEF9). Class II, H-2M, and Ii expressions were induced by cotransfection of human class II trans-activator (CIITA) gene under a CMV promoter (20) and a plasmid with a hygromycin resistance gene. A clone with high level I-Ab expression was selected (MEF9.C2). CL- or CS-expressing cell lines were generated using retroviral infection (21, 22). The CL retroviral vector was made by cloning CL cDNA into BamHI sites in pMI2 (23), which uses an internal ribosome entry site to express a tail-less human CD2 marker (gift from Dr. M. Bevan, University of Washington). The CS retroviral vector was made by cloning CS cDNA into EcoRI sites in MigR1 (24), which uses an internal ribosome entry site to express green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker (gift from Dr. W. Pear, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). Cell lines were cloned before analysis. Expression of class II, human CD2, and GFP remained stable for at least 1 mo. Cell cultures were routinely refreshed from frozen stocks monthly.

Lysosomal cysteine protease active site labeling

Cells were harvested by treatment with trypsin/EDTA and incubated in culture medium for 2 h at 37°C with 0.25 µM Cbz-[125I]Tyr-Ala-CN2 (25), which irreversibly binds to the active site cysteine via a thiol-ester bond. Cells were lysed in 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.15 M NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, and 50 mM Tris in the presence of protease inhibitors N-{alpha}-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone, aprotinin, and PMSF (Sigma-Aldrich). After centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min, lysates were boiled for 5 min in SDS reducing buffer and run on a 12% w/v polyacrylamide gel. 125I-labeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography.

Pulse chase

Fibroblasts were cultured in a six-well plate at 6–7.5 x 105/well overnight at 37°C. Cells were then cultured in methionine/cysteine-free RPMI 1640 with 5% dialyzed FCS for 90 min, pulsed with 0.125 mCi/well 35S-methionine (Trans 35S-label; ICN Pharmaceuticals, Costa Mesa, CA) for 40 min, and chased in the presence of 30x unlabeled methionine/cysteine for the indicated time. Cells were lysed on the plate with 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.01 M Tris (pH 7.3), 0.15 M NaCl with protease inhibitors as above, and I-Ab molecules immunoprecipitated with M5/114 and protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by PAGE in 7.5–20% gradient SDS polyacrylamide gels under nonreduced/nonboiled, or reduced/boiled conditions, and visualized by autoradiography.

Surface biotinylation

Fibroblasts were plated at 4 x 106 in a T75 flask overnight, washed with cold PBS, and incubated with 1 mg/ml NHS-LC-biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL) for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were washed with PBS followed by 5% FCS/PBS and lysed in 1% Nonidet P-40 with protease inhibitors. Lysates were precipitated with streptavidin-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) or M5/114 mAb and protein G-Sepharose. Samples were run under boiled/reduced conditions on a 12% Tris/glycine gel, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, immunoblotted with anti-Ii-In-1 or rabbit anti-class II Abs followed by anti-rat or anti-rabbit Ig Abs conjugated with HRP, and visualized by chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

T cell hybridoma assay

T cell hybridomas were previously described (7). T cell hybridomas (5 x 104/well) were cocultured in 96-well flat-bottom plates (Costar) with APCs (2.5 x 104/well) and the indicated Ags for 24–30 h. Supernatants were assayed for IL-2 production using the CTLL-2 indicator cell line and Alamar blue colorimetric assay (Trek, Medina, NY). Data are expressed as OD units (OD570–600). In some experiments, APCs were washed with PBS and fixed in 0.4% paraformaldehyde for 7 min at room temperature. Glycine was added at 0.2 M final concentration to stop the reaction, and the cells were washed three times with culture medium.

I-Ab purification and analysis of I-Ab-bound peptides by mass spectroscopy

Cells were harvested by trypsin/EDTA, washed with PBS, and stored at -70°C until lysis with 1% Nonidet P-40, 25 mM iodoacetamide, PMSF, N-{alpha}-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone, and aprotinin in PBS (pH 7.4). Peptide isolation was performed as previously described (26). I-Ab was purified by affinity chromatography using Y3P, and peptides eluted from 50–100 µg purified I-Ab bound to Y3P-Sepharose by 2.5 M acetic acid.

Microcapillary HPLC and automated tandem mass spectrometry were performed as previously described (26). Briefly, 12-cm-long microcapillary columns were prepared from 100-µm internal diameter fused silica capillary tubing (Polymicro Technologies, Phoenix, AZ) and packed with POROS 10R2 reverse phase resin (PerSeptive Biosystems, Framingham, MA) as previously described (27). Microcapillary HPLC was performed using Shimadzu LC-10AD pumps (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD) with flow splitting to achieve a rate of 1 µl/min with a gradient from 2.5% acetonitrile/0.1% acetic acid to 40% acetonitrile/0.1% acetic acid over 40 min. The column was inserted directly into the electrospray needle (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA), and eluted peptides were analyzed on a Thermo Finnigan TSQ 7000 tandem mass spectrometer. For experiments comparing peptide species isolated from different cell lines, scans across the range of peptide elution were summed and averaged using Thermo Finnigan software to generate a profile of the top peptide ions from each sample. Most of these peptide ions are doubly and triply charged, with a few quadrupally charged species. Each peptide ion was screened for coelution of alternatively charged species, and the relative peptide amount was determined by summing the area under the curve for each charge species. The values presented are normalized within the sample such that the most abundant peptide equals 100. The level of detection is ~1% of the most abundant peptide. Sequencing was performed using Thermo Finnigan ICL procedures, which automatically collect tandem mass spectra for the three most abundant ions found in two consecutive scans in m/z range 400-1800. The acquired mass spectral data were analyzed using Thermo Finnigan ICIS 8.3 software and by searching National Center for Biotechnology Information databases using SEQUEST (28).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Generation of CL- or CS-expressing APC lines

To study the roles of CL and CS in Ag processing, we used in vitro cell lines. This facilitated large-scale analysis of class II-associated peptides, allowed analysis of both CL and CS under the same conditions, and eliminated the variability found in ex vivo APC populations. Thus, we generated an I-Ab-expressing (Fig. 1GoA) embryonic fibroblast cell line (MEF9.C2) from CL knockout mice (see Materials and Methods). This line is deficient in both CL and CS, as revealed by active site labeling, although it does express CB as fibroblasts normally do (Fig. 1GoB). We then expressed either CL or CS using retroviral bicistronic vectors with the human CD2 or GFP marker. Clones were screened for the marker gene, and CL or CS expression was verified by active site labeling (Fig. 1GoB). The level of expression of these enzymes is comparable to that observed in ex vivo isolated cells (data not shown). Surface I-Ab expression is slightly enhanced by CL or CS expression (Fig. 1GoA).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. MHC class II and CL and CS expression in CL, CS, and MEF9.C2 cells. Fibroblast lines expressing CL, CS, or neither (MEF9.C2) were generated as described in Materials and Methods. A, Cell lines were stained for surface I-Ab expression using biotinylated-Y3P followed by streptavidin-allophycocyanin and were analyzed on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). B, Cell lines were harvested, and 5 x 105 cells were incubated with [125I]Cbz-Tyr-Ala-CN2 for 2 h and processed as described in Materials and Methods. The locations in the gel of CB, CS, and CL are indicated.

 
Analysis of Ii degradation

It is known that in CL- and CS-deficient APCs, there is significant inhibition of Ii processing and class II maturation (7, 8, 9). Similarly, we found using biosynthetic labeling experiments that CL- and CS-deficient MEF9.C2 cells accumulate the SLIP (p12) fragment of Ii and inefficiently generate SDS-stable I-Ab complexes (Fig. 2GoA). The processing of SLIP to CLIP is reconstituted upon expression of CL or CS (Fig. 2GoA). The kinetics of Ii degradation and SDS-stable class II dimer generation are slightly faster in cells expressing CS than in cells expressing CL. We have also analyzed these cell lines by confocal microscopy to localize class II-bound Ii fragments using 15G4, an mAb raised against the CLIP:I-Ab complex that also recognizes SLIP:I-Ab (C. Beers, P. Wong, and A. Rudensky, manuscript in preparation). The overall levels of lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP) class II and Ii are not markedly different between the cell lines (data not shown). In contrast, 15G4 shows intense staining of lysosome–associated membrane protein (LAMP)-positive vesicles in the CL- and CS-deficient MEF9.C2 cells, but only limited punctate staining in the CL- or CS-expressing cells (Fig. 2GoB). The latter vesicles show little staining with anti-LAMP1 Abs, suggesting that a relatively early LAMP-negative endosomal compartment serves as the site for early stages of Ii degradation in both CL- and CS-positive cells. H-2M does localize to the 15G4- and LAMP-positive compartments (data not shown), consistent with previous observations in CS-deficient dendritic cells (29). Thus, 15G4 staining reveals the accumulated SLIP:I-Ab complexes observed by pulse chase (Fig. 2GoA), which reside in lysosomal/late endosomal vesicles in CL- and CS-deficient cells.



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Analysis of the effects of CL and CS on Ii processing. A, Pulse-chase analysis of MHC class II maturation was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Briefly, the cell lines were pulsed with [35S]methionine for 40 min and chased with cold cysteine/methionine for the indicated time (measured in hours). Class II was then immunoprecipitated, split, and run under nonboiled/nonreduced or boiled/reduced conditions in a 7.5–20% gradient gel. The positions of SLIP, SDS-stable dimers ({alpha}{beta}:pep), and free class II {alpha}- and {beta}-chains and Ii (p31) in the gel are indicated. We believe that the band above {alpha}{beta}:pep is the SLIP:I-Ab complex ({alpha}{beta}:SLIP). Molecular mass markers (measured in kilodaltons) are on the left. B, Intracellular localization of SLIP:I-Ab complexes by confocal microscopy using 15G4 Ab. Cells were adhered overnight (105/well) on coverslips, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, permeabilized, and stained with biotinylated 15G4 and anti-LAMP1 1D4B Ab, followed by strepavidin-CyChrome 5 and goat anti-rat Texas Red. Confocal microscopy was performed using a Bio-Rad MRC-1024 instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

 
Ag presentation to T cell hybridomas

We then assessed the ability of these cell lines to present exogenous Ags to T cell hybridomas (Fig. 3Go). We examined the responses of hybridomas specific to OVA (OB4 and OB15), KLH (2BH11), sperm whale myoglobin, Trypanosoma cruzi SA85 Ag (71.5), IgM (77.1), and HEL peptide (BO4). Previous work in I-Ab mice suggested a global inhibition of exogenous protein presentation in CS-deficient APCs, presumably due to defective Ii processing (8, 9), whereas peptide presentation was not affected (9). We found that expression of CL or CS enhances the presentation of five of six Ag-derived epitopes studied (Fig. 3GoA). However, the effect of CL or CS ranges from a mild, 3- to 9-fold augmentation of Ag presentation for two OVA epitopes and KLH to a marked, >80-fold augmentation for myoglobin and SA85. Interestingly, the expression of CS significantly diminishes the presentation of one Ag, murine IgM, but not that of the corresponding peptide (Fig. 3Go, A and B). As expected, fixed fibroblast lines present only IgM peptide and not protein (data not shown), suggesting that the IgM peptide may escape the effects of CS by directly binding to surface class II. The effects of CL and CS on Ag presentation may thus be categorized in three patterns: 1) mild augmentation, 2) marked augmentation or dependence on, and 3) inhibition. If CL and CS only affect Ag presentation via Ii degradation, such disparate patterns would not be expected, suggesting a role for CL and CS in Ag processing.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Functional analysis of Ag presentation by CL, CS, and MEF9.C2 cells. Presentation of intact protein (A and C) or peptide (B and C) to T cell hybridomas was analyzed. T cell hybridomas (5 x 104) were activated with Ag and 2.5 x 104 APCs as indicated. Supernatants were harvested at 24–30 h, and IL-2 production was assayed by the CTLL-2 cell line using the colorometric readout Alamar Blue. Data are expressed as OD units (OD570–600). C, LB27.4, a B cell hybridoma expressing I-Ab, was used either nonfixed or paraformaldehyde-fixed at 5 x 104/well as the APC.

 
Curiously, the presentation of several peptides (IgM, HEL, OVA) is also augmented by CL or CS expression to a degree similar to that seen for intact OVA (OB4 and OB15, Fig. 3Go). This apparent reduction in peptide loading of class II molecules on CL- and CS-deficient cells was directly confirmed by analysis of the binding of exogenous CD22 peptide to surface class II using a peptide:I-Ab complex-specific mAb A8 (Fig. 4GoA). Fixation does not alter the pattern of A8 staining of these cells, consistent with a defect in peptide binding at the cell surface (data not shown). Given the impairment of Ii processing in the absence of CL and CS (Fig. 2Go), we asked whether the inhibition of peptide binding was due to the blockade of cell surface class II by larger Ii fragments. Indeed, surface SLIP, but not larger Ii fragments, is increased in the MEF9.C2 cells, as assessed by flow cytometry and surface biotinylation, followed by class II or streptavidin immunoprecipitation (Fig. 4Go). This result is consistent with prior analysis of CS-deficient B cells and dendritic cells (8, 9). However, the surface staining of 15G4, which recognizes both CLIP:I-Ab and SLIP:I-Ab, is enhanced by the expression of CL or CS, presumably due to the increased surface expression of CLIP:I-Ab resulting from efficient degradation of SLIP (Fig. 4GoA; also see Fig. 6Go, upper panel; molecular mass (m) = 1987.9). We hypothesize that increased SLIP:I-Ab explains inefficient surface peptide loading on the CL- and CS-deficient MEF9.C2 cells, although other possibilities cannot be excluded, such as a decreased amount of "empty" class II due to an altered peptide repertoire.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Analysis of peptide binding and expression of class II-bound Ii fragments on the surface of CL, CS, and MEF9.C2 cells. A, Flow cytometric analysis of exogenously added CD22 peptide binding to surface I-Ab molecules using peptide complex:I-Ab-specific A8 Ab. Analysis of surface expression of endogenous Ii fragments was performed by flow cytometry using 15G4 Ab and polyclonal rabbit Ab against luminal domain of Ii. There was no difference in staining when versene, instead of trypsin/EDTA, was used to harvest the cells (data not shown). The class II-negative parental cell line MEF9 was used as a control. B, Analysis of surface expression of SLIP:I-Ab complexes using cell surface biotinylation. Samples were processed, then split and run under boiled/reduced conditions before Western blotting with anti-Ii In-1 (top) and rabbit anti-class II (bottom) as a control. The first three lanes represent whole cell class II-associated material, i.e., M5/114 immunoprecipitation. The next three lanes represent total surface material, subject to strepavidin precipitation.

 


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Relative levels of expression of the 18 most abundant peptides eluted from class II molecules from CL, CS, and MEF9.C2 cells. Top panel, The normalized expression of each of the top 18 peptides from one cell line compared with the other two cell lines, sorted according to expression in MEF9.C2 cells. Relative peptide levels were derived from the sum of the area under the curve of intensity by scan number for each ion species derived from the original peptide. Data shown are the percentage of the maximal value found in each cell line and are averaged between two independent mass spectroscopy runs of the same sample. Eighteen represented the number of peptides with >10% maximum expression in MEF9.C2. Bold type indicates discordant effects of CL and CS (>2-fold difference). Bottom panel, The fold change in CL or CS peptides over MEF9.C2 levels. An asterisk indicates when 1% of the maximum value was used for undetectable peptides (<1%). The identities of several peptides isolated from different cell lines were determined by analysis of collision-induced dissociation tandem mass spectra. The sequences of some peptides identified using the SEQUEST software package are as follows: m = 1599.4, fibronectin precursor 1738–1751; m = 1987.9, Ii 85–101; m = 1845.4, fibronectin 1828–1843.

 
Interestingly, the SA85 peptide, like the intact protein SA85, is also markedly dependent on CL or CS for presentation to the 71.5 T cell hybridoma (Fig. 3GoB). This suggests that CL and CS cleave within the peptide. Consistent with this interpretation, we find that the SA85 peptide is much more efficiently presented by live, rather than fixed, APCs, whereas the IgM peptide is presented equally well (Fig. 3GoC). The IgM T cell hybridoma 77.1 was generated against a defined, naturally occurring class II-bound peptide (26, 30). In contrast, the 71.5 hybridoma was generated against a protein Ag and the SA85 peptide later identified by screening overlapping synthetic peptides (31). Thus, it is reasonable that the SA85 peptide behaves like a protein, requiring active CL or CS for efficient presentation. Although consensus sites are not established, cleavage could occur between L-V or E-A in the SA85 peptide (SHNFTLVASVIIEEA) based on proteolysis of other proteins by CL and CS (32, 33).

Effect of CL and CS on class II peptide repertoire

The observation that CL and CS expression has diverse effects on Ag presentation suggests a role for these enzymes in Ag processing, in addition to their role in Ii degradation. To assess the global effect of CL or CS on epitope generation, we analyzed peptides eluted from class II by electrospray mass spectrometry. We found that the peptide repertoire is diverse regardless of CL or CS expression (Fig. 5Go). A three-dimensional representation of the mass spectroscopy data with the scan number on the x-axis reflecting approximate hydrophobicity of the peptide, mass/charge (m/z) on the y-axis, and signal intensity on the z-axis shows differences in the spectrum of prominent peptides presented by each cell line. To analyze the specific effects of CL and CS, we identified the 18 most abundant peptides from each line and determined their relative levels of expression in the other lines (Fig. 6Go, upper panel). Surprisingly, the majority of the peptides in each set of 18 were also found within the other sets of top 18 peptides, suggesting that the qualitative peptide repertoire is not markedly altered by the expression of CL or CS. After accounting for peptides found in more than one set of 18, we are left with a pool of 24 unique peptides, 21 of which are expressed at detectable levels in all three cell lines. However, the effect of CL or CS on the expression of an individual peptide is quite variable, significantly enhancing or diminishing relative peptide expression (Fig. 6Go, lower panel). In fact, one peptide (m = 2804) appears to be created by CL or CS, as it is easily found in CL- and CS-expressing cells, but is undetectable in MEF9.C2 cells. Two peptides appear to be destroyed by either CL or CS, as they are found in MEF9.C2 cells, but are undetectable in CL-expressing (m = 2114.4) or CS-expressing (m = 2052.9) cells. The patterns we see by mass spectroscopy correlate with the T hybridoma presentation assays, as presentation of some Ags are augmented and others diminished (Fig. 3Go). Therefore, although the bulk of peptides can be generated without CL or CS, these proteases appear to play an important role in the processing of a subset of Ags, shaping the repertoire of class II-associated peptides.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Effect of CL or CS on peptide repertoire as assessed by mass spectroscopic analysis of peptide ions eluted from class II. Peptides were purified from equivalent amounts of whole cell class II from CL, CS, or MEF9.C2 lines and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. Peptide ions are identified on the x-axis by their scan number (an approximation of elution time from a C10 column) and on the y-axis by m/z (mass of the peptide over the charge acquired during ionization). The signal intensity is represented on the z-axis (millions of ions per scan). The differences in peak signal intensity are considered within the variability of the peptide isolation procedure.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The generation of peptides for presentation on MHC class II molecules is a controlled process. On the one hand, the proteolytic enzymes involved in Ag processing must be able to generate enough distinct peptides from a particular Ag to allow its recognition by the repertoire of T cells. On the other hand, they cannot be so efficient that the majority of epitopes are destroyed. CL and CS are candidate proteases for Ag processing because biochemical experiments with purified CL or CS show that these proteases can cleave proteins in a partially selective and overlapping manner, although a consensus cleavage site has not been identified. For example, in osteocalcin, the major cleavage site for both CL and CS is Gly7-Ala8 (32). CL has an additional minor cleavage site at Arg43-Arg44. In insulin, CS cleaves between Glu13-Ala14, Leu17-Val18, and Phe25-Tyr26, whereas CL cleaves predominately at Tyr26-Thr27, although it has minor cleavage sites that are identical with the major cleavage sites of CS (33). However, the ability to cleave Ag in a cell-free assay does not mean that the protease is important for Ag processing in vivo, as illustrated by studies in CB- and CD-deficient mice (12, 13).

In this paper we show that the presence of CL or CS is not required for the generation of most epitopes, although CL or CS can affect the level of presentation, presumably through their effects on Ii processing. However, CL or CS can strongly affect the generation of a subset of antigenic epitopes in both a positive and a negative fashion, suggesting a direct role for these proteases in Ag processing. This would support the idea that Ag processing within the endosomal compartment is the action of multiple proteases with overlapping, but not entirely redundant, specificities.

The use of embryonic fibroblast lines in this study allowed us to directly compare the effects of CL and CS in the same cell type. If we had used ex vivo-derived APCs we would have been restricted to macrophages, as they are the only cell type that expresses both CL and CS. However, macrophages are a heterogeneous cell population and may have diverse levels of cathepsin and class II expression. Variability in cathepsin expression in these cells is also enhanced by exposure to cytokines (C. Beers and A. Rudensky, manuscript in preparation) (34). Furthermore, it is likely that IFN-{gamma}-induced macrophages express less mature CL compared with cortical thymic epithelial cells, as suggested by a defect in Ii processing in CS-deficient macrophages despite the expression of CL (C. Beers and A. Rudensky, manuscript in preparation) (7, 8).

We found that CL- and CS-expressing fibroblast cell lines process Ii and present Ag in a manner consistent with previous studies using ex vivo-isolated APCs (8). For example, IgM presentation is diminished by the presence of CS, in agreement with our previous report (8). Analysis of the peptides eluted from class II by mass spectroscopy showed that, as observed in the functional studies with T cell hybridomas, certain peptides are enhanced/generated in the presence of CL or CS, whereas other peptides are diminished/eliminated. Therefore, these data suggest a direct role of CL and CS in the processing of a subset of Ags.

It is possible, however, that CL or CS may not directly affect Ag processing. Rather, by accelerating SLIP degradation, these proteases may facilitate class II loading in a different compartment with a potentially different peptide pool. If this were the case, we would expect the effects of CL and CS on Ag presentation to be concordant, as suggested by the similar effects of CL and CS on Ii processing and class II maturation revealed by both biochemical analysis and microscopy (Figs. 2Go and 3Go). Thus, both CL and CS should enhance or diminish the presentation of a particular peptide. In general, this appears to be true, as the expression of 11 of 24 peptides is affected concordantly by CL and CS, e.g., within 2-fold of each other (Fig. 6Go, lower panel). This could therefore be due to the effects of CL and CS on either Ii or Ag processing. However, 13 peptides are discordantly affected by CL or CS. For example, the relative levels of peptides 2434, 1987.9, 2493.4, 1804.8, 1669.5, 1756.5. 2052.9, 2349.2, and 2332 are significantly diminished by CS expression compared with CL. In contrast, peptide 2114.4 is rendered undetectable by the expression of CL but is only mildly diminished by CS. Similarly, other peptides (m = 1359.8, 1845.4, and 1698.6) are enhanced by CS disproportionately. This argues that CL and CS play an important role in the processing of a subset of Ags.

The most straightforward interpretation of the roles of CL and CS in Ag processing is that they directly cleave proteins, for which there is good in vitro evidence (32, 33). However, we cannot formally exclude the possibility that CL or CS affects the processing of protein Ags indirectly, e.g., by activating or inhibiting other proteases. Identification of other proteases involved in Ag processing will be required to evaluate this possibility.

The finding that these cathepsins selectively affect a subset of peptide epitopes suggests that the roles of other cathepsins, e.g., CB and CD, should be reevaluated. Previous testing was based on the presentation of several specific Ags (12, 13). As the nature of the Ags that require processing by individual cathepsins is not known, a more global approach may be more appropriate, e.g., mass spectroscopic analysis of class II-bound peptides from CB- or CD-deficient cells.

Our data indicating a role for CL and CS in Ag processing are consistent with several other observations. For example, H-2q CS-deficient mice are resistant to collagen-induced arthritis. In contrast to I-Ab mice, CS deficiency in I-Aq mice does not result in significant Ii fragment accumulation or delayed class II maturation (8). Nevertheless, CS deficiency inhibits the presentation of collagen II to a T cell hybridoma, suggesting a role for CS in processing collagen II rather than Ii. Secondly, CL x Ii double-knockout mice show a substantial additive defect in positive selection compared with Ii or CL deficiency alone (K. Honey and A. Rudensky, manuscript in preparation). This suggests an Ii-independent effect on positive selection by CL, presumably through diminished generation of MHC class II-bound peptides on thymic epithelial cells.

Taken together, these data suggest a potential new role for CL and CS in Ag presentation. Much of the previous work has focused on the roles of these proteases in Ag presentation and Ii processing in the I-Ab haplotype (7, 8, 9). However, the Ii-degrading function of CL and CS may not be necessary for efficient class II maturation in many other haplotypes, such as I-Ak, I-As, I-Aq, and I-Ag7 (C. Hsieh, unpublished observations) (8, 12, 35), where SLIP can easily dissociate from MHC class II molecules. Thus, CL and CS may be used by the immune system to broaden the array of epitopes generated during Ag processing, with Ii processing being a fortuitous coincidence. Further definition of the specificity of these enzymes may facilitate a greater understanding of their role in Ag processing and the particular immune responses in which they participate.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Cheong-Hee Chang (University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN), Lars Karrlson (R.W. Johnson Research, San Diego, CA), Mike Bevan (University of Washington), Terry Nakagawa (University of Washington), Sue Eastman (University of Washington), Stuart Kahn (University of Washington), and Warren Pear (University of Pennsylvania) for graciously providing reagents and/or technical assistance. We thank Terry Nakagawa and Sue Eastman for help and technical assistance at the initial stages of the project.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Pfizer Inc., and the National Institutes of Health. C.-S.H. is a Pfizer Postdoctoral Fellow in Immunology and Rheumatology. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Alexander Y. Rudensky, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Room I604J, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail address: aruden{at}u.washington.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Ii, invariant chain; CB, cathepsin B; CD, cathepsin D; CS, cathepsin S; CL, cathepsin L; CIITA, class II trans-activator; CLIP, class II-associated leupeptin-induced peptide; GFP, green fluorescent protein; HEL, hen egg lysozyme; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; SLIP, small leupeptin-induced peptide; LAMP, lysosome-associated membrane protein; m, molecular mass. Back

Received for publication October 19, 2001. Accepted for publication January 10, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cresswell, P.. 1996. Invariant chain structure and MHC class II function. Cell 84:505.[Medline]
  2. Germain, R. N.. 1994. MHC-dependent antigen processing and peptide presentation: providing ligands for lymphocyte activation. Cell 76:287.[Medline]
  3. Watts, C.. 1997. Capture and processing of exogenous antigens for presentation on MHC molecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15:821.[Medline]
  4. Nakagawa, T. Y., A. Y. Rudensky. 1999. The role of lysosomal proteinases in MHC class II-mediated antigen processing and presentation. Immunol. Rev. 172:121.[Medline]
  5. Villadangos, J. A., H. L. Ploegh. 2000. Proteolysis in MHC class II antigen presentation: who’s in charge?. Immunity 12:233.[Medline]
  6. Riese, R. J., R. N. Mitchell, J. A. Villadangos, G.-P. Shi, J. T. Palmer, E. R. Karp, G. T. De Sanctis, H. L. Ploegh, H. A. Chapman. 1998. Cathepsin S activity regulates antigen presentation and immunity. J. Clin. Invest. 101:2351.[Medline]
  7. Nakagawa, T., W. Roth, P. Wong, A. Nelson, A. Farr, J. Deussing, J. A. Villadangos, H. L. Ploegh, C. Peters, A. Y. Rudensky. 1998. Cathepsin L: critical role in Ii degradation and CD4 T cell selection in the thymus. Science 280:450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Nakagawa, T., W. H. Brissette, P. D. Lira, R. J. Griffiths, N. Petrushova, J. Stock, J. D. McNeish, S. E. Eastman, E. D. Howard, S. R. M. Clarke, et al 1999. Impaired invariant chain degradation and antigen presentation and diminished collagen-induced arthritis in cathepsin S null mice. Immunity 10:207.[Medline]
  9. Shi, G.-P., J. A. Villadangos, G. Dranoff, R. Riese, H. L. Ploegh, H. A. Chapman. 1999. Cathepsin S required for normal MHC class II peptide loading and germinal center development. Immunity 10:197.[Medline]
  10. Shi, G.-P., R. A. R. Bryant, R. Riese, S. Verhelst, C. Driessen, Z. Li, D. Bromme, H. L. Ploegh, H. A. Chapman. 2000. Role for cathepsin F in invariant chain processing and major histocompatibility complex class II peptide loading by macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 191:1177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Antoniou, A. N., S.-L. Blackwood, D. Mazzeo, C. Watts. 2000. Control of antigen presentation by a single protease cleavage site. Immunity 12:391.[Medline]
  12. Villadangos, J. A., R. J. Riese, C. Peters, H. A. Chapman, H. L. Ploegh. 1997. Degradation of mouse invariant chain: roles of cathepsins S and D and the influence of major histocompatibility complex polymorphism. J. Exp. Med. 186:549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Deussing, J., W. Roth, P. Saftig, C. Peters, H. L. Ploegh, J. A. Villadangos. 1998. Cathepsins B and D are dispensable for major histocompatability complex class II-mediated antigen presentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:4516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Driessen, C., A.-M. Lennon-Dumenil, H. L. Ploegh. 2001. Individual cathepsins degrade immune complexes internalized by antigen-presenting cells via Fc-{gamma} receptors. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:1592.[Medline]
  15. Janeway, C. J., P. J. Conrad, E. A. Lerner, J. Babich, P. Wettstein, D. B. Murphy. 1984. Monoclonal antibodies specific for Ia glycoproteins raised by immunization with activated T cells: possible role of T cellbound Ia antigens as targets of immunoregulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 132:662.[Abstract]
  16. Bhattacharya, A., M. E. Dorf, T. A. Springer. 1981. A shared alloantigenic determinant on Ia antigens encoded by the I-A and I-E subregions: evidence for I region gene duplication. J. Immunol. 127:2488.[Abstract]
  17. Koch, N., S. Koch, G. J. Hammerling. 1982. Ia invariant chain detected on lymphocyte surfaces by monoclonal antibody. Nature 299:644.[Medline]
  18. Lipp, J., B. Dobberstein. 1986. Signal recognition particle-dependent membrane insertion of mouse invariant chain: a membrane-spanning protein with a cytoplasmically exposed amino terminus. J. Cell Biol. 102:2169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Southern, P. J., P. Berg. 1982. Transformation of mammalian cells to antibiotic resistance with a bacterial gene under control of the SV40 early region promotor. J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 1:327.[Medline]
  20. Chang, C.-H., J. D. Fontes, M. Peterlin, R. A. Flavell. 1994. Class II transactivator (CIITA) is sufficient for the inducible expression of major histocompatibility complex class II genes. J. Exp. Med. 180:1367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kinoshita, S., L. Su, M. Amano, L. A. Timmerman, H. Kaneshima, G. P. Nolan. 1997. The T cell activation factor NF-ATc positively regulates HIV-1 replication and gene expression in T cells. Immunity 6:235.[Medline]
  22. Pear, W. S., G. P. Nolan, M. L. Scott, D. Baltimore. 1993. Production of high-titer helper-free retrovirus by transient transfection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:8392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Deftos, M. L., Y.-W. He, E. W. Ojala, M. J. Bevan. 1998. Correlating notch signaling with thymocyte maturation. Immunity 9:777.[Medline]
  24. Pear, W. S., J. P. Miller, L. Xu, J. C. Pui, B. Soffer, R. C. Quackenbush, A. M. Pendergast, R. Bronson, J. C. Aster, M. L. Scott, et al 1998. Efficient and rapid induction of a chronic myelogenous leukemia-like myeloproliferative disease in mice receiving p210 bcr/abl-transduced bone marrow. Blood 92:3780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Mason, R. W., L. T. Bartholomew, B. S. Hardwick. 1989. The use of benzyloxycarbonyl[125I]iodotyrosylalanyldiazomethane as a probe for active cysteine proteinases in human tissues. Biochem. J. 263:14697.
  26. Dongre, A. R., S. Kovats, P. deRoos, A. L. McCormack, T. Nakagawa, V. Paharkova-Vatchkova, J. Eng, H. Caldwell, III J. R. Yates, A. Y. Rudensky. 2001. In vivo MHC class II presentation of cytosolic proteins revealed by rapid automated tandem mass spectrometry and functional analyses. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:1485.[Medline]
  27. McCormack, A. L., J. K. Eng, P. deRoos, A. Y. Rudensky, III J. R. Yates. 1996. Microcolumn liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. A. P. Snyder, ed. In Biochemical and Biotechnological Applications of Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Vol. 619:207. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
  28. Eng, J., A. L. McCormack, III J. R. Yates. 1994. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5:976.
  29. Driessen, C., R. A. R. Bryant, A.-M. Lennon-Dumenil, J. A. Villadangos, P. W. Bryant, G.-P. Shi, H. A. Chapman, H. L. Ploegh. 1999. Cathepsin S controls the trafficking and maturation of MHC class II molecules in dendritic cells. J. Cell Biol. 147:775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kovats, S., C. E. Grubin, S. E. Eastman, P. deRoos, A. Dongre, L. Van Kaer, A. Y. Rudensky. 1998. Invariant chain-independent function of H-2M in the formation of endogenous peptide-major histocompatibility complex class II complexes in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 187:245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kahn, S. J., M. Wleklinski. 1997. The surface glycoproteins of Trypanosoma cruzi encode a superfamily of variant T cell epitopes. J. Immunol. 159:4444.[Abstract]
  32. Baumgrass, R., M. K. Williamson, P. A. Price. 1997. Identification of peptide fragments generated by digestion of bovine and human osteocalcin with the lysosomal proteinases cathepsin B, D, L, H, and S. J. Bone Miner. Res. 12:447.[Medline]
  33. Bromme, D., A. Steinert, S. Friebe, S. Fittkau, B. Wiederanders, H. Kirschke. 1989. The specificity of bovine spleen cathepsin S: a comparison with rat liver cathepsins L and B. Biochem. J. 264:475.[Medline]
  34. Fiebiger, E., P. Meraner, E. Weber, I.-F. Fang, G. Stingl, H. L. Ploegh, D. Maurer. 2001. Cytokines regulate proteolysis in major histocompatibility complex class II-dependent antigen presentation by dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 193:881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Villadangos, J. A., M. Cardoso, R. J. Steptoe, D. van Berkel, J. Pooley, F. R. Carbone, K. Shortman. 2001. MHC class II expression is regulated in dendritic cells independently of invariant chain degradation. Immunity 14:739.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. M. Weaver, C. A. Lazarski, K. A. Richards, F. A. Chaves, S. A. Jenks, P. R. Menges, and A. J. Sant
Immunodominance of CD4 T Cells to Foreign Antigens Is Peptide Intrinsic and Independent of Molecular Context: Implications for Vaccine Design
J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 3039 - 3048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. L. Podolin, B. J. Bolognese, D. C. Carpenter, T. G. Davis, R. A. Johanson, J. H. Fox, E. Long III, X. Dong, R. W. Marquis, S. M. LoCastro, et al.
Inhibition of Invariant Chain Processing, Antigen-Induced Proliferative Responses, and the Development of Collagen-Induced Arthritis and Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis by a Small Molecule Cysteine Protease Inhibitor
J. Immunol., June 15, 2008; 180(12): 7989 - 8003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Mihelic, A. Dobersek, G. Guncar, and D. Turk
Inhibitory Fragment from the p41 Form of Invariant Chain Can Regulate Activity of Cysteine Cathepsins in Antigen Presentation
J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2008; 283(21): 14453 - 14460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Marturano, R. Longhi, V. Russo, and M. P. Protti
Endosomal Proteases Influence the Repertoire of MAGE-A3 Epitopes Recognized In vivo by CD4+ T Cells
Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 68(5): 1555 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Kakehashi, T. Nishioku, T. Tsukuba, T. Kadowaki, S. Nakamura, and K. Yamamoto
Differential Regulation of the Nature and Functions of Dendritic Cells and Macrophages by Cathepsin E
J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 5728 - 5737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
S. P. M. Lutgens, K. B. J. M. Cleutjens, M. J. A. P. Daemen, and S. Heeneman
Cathepsin cysteine proteases in cardiovascular disease
FASEB J, October 1, 2007; 21(12): 3029 - 3041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Sa-Nunes, A. Bafica, D. A. Lucas, T. P. Conrads, T. D. Veenstra, J. F. Andersen, T. N. Mather, J. M. C. Ribeiro, and I. M. B. Francischetti
Prostaglandin E2 Is a Major Inhibitor of Dendritic Cell Maturation and Function in Ixodes scapularis Saliva
J. Immunol., August 1, 2007; 179(3): 1497 - 1505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
Y. A. Bulynko, L. C. Hsing, R. W. Mason, D. J. Tremethick, and S. A. Grigoryev
Cathepsin L stabilizes the histone modification landscape on the y chromosome and pericentromeric heterochromatin.
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2006; 26(11): 4172 - 4184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
R. M Nepal, S. Mampe, B. Shaffer, A. H Erickson, and P. Bryant
Cathepsin L maturation and activity is impaired in macrophages harboring M. avium and M. tuberculosis
Int. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 18(6): 931 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I-C. Huang, B. J. Bosch, F. Li, W. Li, K. H. Lee, S. Ghiran, N. Vasilieva, T. S. Dermody, S. C. Harrison, P. R. Dormitzer, et al.
SARS Coronavirus, but Not Human Coronavirus NL63, Utilizes Cathepsin L to Infect ACE2-expressing Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 10, 2006; 281(6): 3198 - 3203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Wang, R. M. Baron, G. Zhu, M. Joo, J. W. Christman, E. S. Silverman, M. A. Perrella, R. J. Riese, and M. Cernadas
PU.1 Regulates Cathepsin S Expression in Professional APCs
J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 275 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
T. Zavasnik-Bergant, U. Repnik, A. Schweiger, R. Romih, M. Jeras, V. Turk, and J. Kos
Differentiation- and maturation-dependent content, localization, and secretion of cystatin C in human dendritic cells
J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2005; 78(1): 122 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
E. J. Beswick, D. A. Bland, G. Suarez, C. A. Barrera, X. Fan, and V. E. Reyes
Helicobacter pylori Binds to CD74 on Gastric Epithelial Cells and Stimulates Interleukin-8 Production
Infect. Immun., May 1, 2005; 73(5): 2736 - 2743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. M. Chain, P. Free, P. Medd, C. Swetman, A. B. Tabor, and N. Terrazzini
The Expression and Function of Cathepsin E in Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., February 15, 2005; 174(4): 1791 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Beers, A. Burich, M. J. Kleijmeer, J. M. Griffith, P. Wong, and A. Y. Rudensky
Cathepsin S Controls MHC Class II-Mediated Antigen Presentation by Epithelial Cells In Vivo
J. Immunol., February 1, 2005; 174(3): 1205 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Yang, M. Kala, B. G. Scott, E. Goluszko, H. A. Chapman, and P. Christadoss
Cathepsin S Is Required for Murine Autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis Pathogenesis
J. Immunol., February 1, 2005; 174(3): 1729 - 1737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Thai, G. Moine, M. Desmadril, D. Servent, J.-L. Tarride, A. Menez, and M. Leonetti
Antigen Stability Controls Antigen Presentation
J. Biol. Chem., November 26, 2004; 279(48): 50257 - 50266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page