|
|
||||||||
1


*
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215; and
GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA 19406
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production. IL-18 binding protein
(IL-18BP) is a recently discovered inhibitor of IL-18 that is distinct
from the IL-1 and IL-18 receptor families. In this report we show that
IL-18BPa, the IL-18BP isoform with the highest affinity for IL-18, was
strongly induced by IL-12 in human PBMC. Other Th1 cytokines, including
IFN-
, IL-2, IL-15, and IL-18, were also capable of augmenting
IL-18BPa expression. In contrast, IL-1
, IL-1
, TNF-
,
IFN-
-inducible protein-10, and Th2 cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-10
did not induce IL-18BPa. Although monocytes were found to be the
primary source of IL-18BPa, the induction of IL-18BPa by IL-12 was
mediated through IFN-
derived predominantly from NK cells. IL-18BPa
production was observed in cancer patients receiving recombinant human
IL-12 and correlated with the magnitude of IFN-
production. The
IFN-
/IL-18BPa negative feedback loop identified in this study may be
capable of broadly controlling immune activation by cytokines that
synergize with IL-18 to induce IFN-
and probably plays a key role in
the modulation of both innate and adaptive
immunity. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-inducing factor (1), is a Th1
cytokine that plays a key role in regulating IFN-
production in
response to infectious pathogens (2). Produced in response
to endotoxin and LPS stimulation (3, 4), IL-18 synergizes
with cytokines such as IL-12 and IL-15 to stimulate IFN-
production
by NK cells and T cells during the early phase of an infection
(5). IL-18 also augments T cell activation in conjunction
with either IL-2 or CD3 ligation (6, 7) and therefore is
capable of influencing the development of adaptive as well as innate
immune responses. The antitumor effect of IL-18 has been demonstrated
in murine models of breast cancer, renal cell cancer, and melanoma
(8, 9, 10) and is greatly enhanced by the addition of IL-12
or IL-2 (10). The induction of tumor regression by the
combination of IL-18 and IL-12 has been shown to occur through an
antiangiogenic mechanism that is IFN-
dependent
(11).
IL-18 binding protein
(IL-18BP)3 is a
recently discovered inhibitor of IL-18 that is distinct from the IL-1
and IL-18 receptor families (12). A member of the Ig
superfamily with significant homology to a family of proteins encoded
by several poxviruses, IL-18BP has been shown to block IFN-
production by LPS and IL-18 or IL-12 and IL-18 in vitro and to block
LPS-induced IFN-
production in vivo (12). Located on
chromosome 11q13, the human IL-18BP gene encodes four distinct isoforms
derived from mRNA splice variants. The IL-18BPa and IL-18BPc isoforms
are neutralizing, with Kd of 400 pM
and 2.9 nM, respectively (13). In contrast, IL-18BPb and
IL-18BPd lack a complete Ig domain and are therefore unable to bind or
neutralize IL-18.
It has been postulated that IL-18BP may play a central role in the
control of Th1 immune responses by limiting the availability of IL-18
to activate lymphocytes in conjunction with IL-12 or IL-2. However,
while IL-18BPa mRNA has been shown to be constitutively expressed in
human spleen and leukocytes (12), nothing is known
regarding the control of IL-18BP expression by cytokines or the cell
type(s) responsible for IL-18BP synthesis. In this report we show that
those cytokines capable of synergizing with IL-18 to stimulate IFN-
production, most notably IL-12, are the primary inducers of IL-18BPa in
monocytes. In addition, we demonstrate that the induction of IL-18BPa
by IL-12 is IFN-
dependent, suggesting that IL-18BPa forms part of a
negative feedback loop designed to limit immune activation by
IL-12.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Heparinized blood samples were obtained from healthy donors. Blood samples enriched for white blood cells were also obtained from volunteers undergoing platelet pheresis in the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Blood Bank (Boston, MA) and were provided by Dr. D. Frank. PBMC were isolated from blood samples through density gradient centrifugation using Histopaque-1077 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). For experiments involving the use of cell subsets, purified populations of monocytes, CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, or B cells were isolated from PBMC by negative selection using the MACS system (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). The medium for cell culturing consisted of RPMI 1640 containing 5% human AB serum, 2% L-glutamine, 1% sodium pyruvate, 1% gentamicin, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin.
RNA isolation and semiquantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) following the manufacturers protocol. The resulting RNA precipitate from 5 x 106 cells was resuspended in 10 µl double distilled (dd)H2O. RNA (4 µl) was used for reverse transcription in a total volume of 20 µl containing 4 µl 5x buffer (Promega, Madison, WI), 2 µl DTT (0.1 M), 0.8 µl dNTP (2.5 mM each), 0.5 µl oligo(dT)15 (50 mM; Promega), 1 µl Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega), 1 µl RNasin (Promega), and 6.7 µl ddH2O. The reaction was incubated at 65°C for 5 min, at 37°C for 60 min, and at 95°C for 5 min. After the reaction was finished, 80 µl ddH2O was added to the mixture. PCR was performed using 10 µl of this mixture in a total volume of 20 µl, containing 2 µl 10x buffer, 1.04 µl MgCl2 (25 mM), 0.2 µl dNTP (2.5 mM each), 2 µl oligonucleotides (10 mM each), 0.2 µl AmpliTaq Gold (5 U/µl; PerkinElmer/Cetus, Norwalk, CT), 0.125 µl 32P-labeled dCTP (20 µCi/ml; NEN Lifescience, Boston, MA), and 4.435 µl ddH2O. PCR conditions included preincubation at 95°C for 10 min and a variable number of cycles (depending on primers used) of the following: 95°C for 1 min, annealing temperature (varied according to primers used) for 2 min, 72°C for 2 min, and an extension at 72°C for 4 min. Four microliters of 6x DNA loading buffer was then added, and 4 µl of that mix was run on a 4% polyacrylamide gel, dried, and exposed to X-OMAT AR film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Exposed films were scanned using a Bio-Rad densitometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and were analyzed using Molecular Analyst (Bio-Rad).
Primers
The following primers were used: human S9 ribosomal protein:
sense, 5'-GAT GAG AAG GAC CCA CGG CGT CTG TTC G-3'; antisense, 5'-GAG
ACA ATC CAG CCC AGG AGG GAC A-5'; human IL-18BP: sense, 5'-ACC ATG AGA
CAC AAC TGG ACA CCA G-3'; antisense, 5'-TTA ACC CTG CTG CTG TGG ACT GCT
G-3' (products: IL-18BPa, 583 bp; IL-18BPb, 284 bp; IL-18BPc, 815 bp);
human IFN-
: sense, 5'-TGG GTT CTC TTG GCT GTT ACT GCC-3'; antisense,
5'-TAC TGG GAT GCT CTT CGA CCT CGA-3'; human IFN-
-inducible
protein-10 (IP-10): sense, 5'-GGA ACC TCC AGT CTC AGC ACC-3';
antisense, 5'-CAG CCT CTG TGT GGT CCA TCC-3'; human IL-18: sense,
5'-GGC AAG CTT GAA TCT AAA TTA TCA GTC-3'; antisense, 5'-GCA TCT TAT
TAT CAT GTC CTG GGA CAC-3'; and human IL-12R
2: sense, 5'-GAC TTG GCA
GCC TCC CAG GAA AGA T-3'; antisense, 5'-CAC TCG GGG CTG GCT GTT
TAT T-3'.
Cytokines and Abs
Recombinant human IL-12 (rhIL-12) and IL-2 were provided by
Genetics Institute (Cambridge, MA) and Chiron (Emeryville, CA),
respectively. The following cytokines were purchased from R&D Systems
(Minneapolis, MN): IL-18, IFN-
, TNF-
, IL-1
, IL-1
, IL-4,
IL-10, and IP-10. IL-15 and GM-CSF were purchased from Pierce
(Rockford, IL). IFN-
2b was obtained from Schering-Plough
(Kenilworth, NJ). Neutralizing Abs to human IFN-
, IL-18, and
IL-2R
were purchased from R&D Systems. Abs to IFN-
and IFN-
were purchased from BioSource International (Camarillo, CA).
Measurement of plasma IFN-
and IL-18BPa in patients receiving
rhIL-12
Plasma for measurement of IFN-
and IL-18BPa was obtained from
patients with advanced renal cell cancer or melanoma treated on a trial
of twice weekly i.v. rhIL-12 injections (14). This study
was an open-label, nonrandomized, single-center, phase I, dose
escalation trial. The treatment protocol was approved by the Cancer
Therapy Evaluation Program of the National Cancer Institute (protocol
T97-0053) and by the human institutional review board at Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center (protocol 97-1083), and written informed
consent was obtained from each patient. Doses of rhIL-12 were
administered as an i.v. bolus 34 days apart, with a cycle of therapy
lasting 6 wk. Plasma was collected before as well as 12 and 24 h
after the first, second, and seventh rhIL-12 doses during cycle 1. An
ELISA kit was used to measure plasma IFN-
(sensitivity, <2 pg/ml;
Endogen, Cambridge, MA).
IL-18BPa was measured using an Origen assay. Two hybridoma cell lines producing anti-human IL-18BPa Abs were a gift from Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories (Fujisaki, Japan). One mouse anti-human IL-18BPa mAb (no. 36) was biotinylated, and the other anti-human IL-18BPa mAb (no. 13, blocking) was ruthenylated (Igen, Gaithersburg, MD). Biotinylated Ab (25 µl, 1 µg/ml) was mixed with ruthenium-labeled Ab (25 µl, 1 µg/ml) and the sample to be measured (25 µl) for 2 h with agitation. Magnetic Dynabeads M-280 (Igen) coated with streptavidin (50 µl, 300 µg/ml) were then added and agitated for 20 min. Two hundred microliters of assay buffer (Igen) was added, and the samples were analyzed on the Origen analyzer. The ruthenium and the surrounding tripropylamine assay buffer (Igen) undergo a double oxidation reaction that results in photon release. This resulting chemiluminescence was measured. A standard curve was constructed using rhIL-18BPa in assay diluent (1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS containing 0.5% Tween 20). The standard curve ranged from 6 to 400 ng/ml.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine whether IL-18BP gene expression was regulated by
cytokines, RNA was isolated from unstimulated or cytokine-stimulated
whole PBMC and RT-PCR was performed using primers designed to detect
transcripts for either the neutralizing IL-18BPa and IL-18BPc isoforms
or the nonneutralizing IL-18BPb isoform. Low-level constitutive
expression of IL-18BPa mRNA was detected in freshly isolated human PBMC
(Fig. 1
A, lanes 1
and 6) and in PBMC cultured for 2448 h in medium alone,
whereas IL-18BPc and IL-18BPb were absent. Following stimulation with
IL-12 the expression of IL-18BPa was strongly up-regulated, increasing
10- to 20-fold over baseline levels (Table I
). Peak expression was observed at
12 h and was only modestly attenuated at 48 h (Fig. 1
A, lanes 35). IFN-
augmented IL-18BPa
expression to a similar degree, whereas the up-regulation by IL-2 and
IL-15 averaged 5- to 10-fold over baseline. Although both IL-18 and
IFN-
were also capable of inducing IL-18BPa, this finding was less
consistent (Table I
) with PBMC from some healthy donors showing either
weak or no up-regulation in response to these cytokines. In addition,
as shown in Fig. 1
A (lanes 810), the
expression of IL-18BPa induced by IL-18 attenuated more rapidly
compared with IL-12.
|
|
, IL-1
, and TNF-
, had
no effect on IL-18BP expression. Th2 cytokines, including IL-10 and
IL-4, were incapable of inducing IL-18BP, as were GM-CSF and IP-10
(Table I
Induction of IL-18BPa by IL-12 is IFN-
dependent
The ability of IL-12 to eradicate infections and stimulate tumor
regression has been linked to the stimulation of IFN-
and IP-10
production (15, 16, 17). To determine whether IL-18BPa might
modulate the induction of IFN-
and IP-10 in response to IL-12, we
compared the time course of IL-12-induced IL-18BPa gene expression to
that of IFN-
and IP-10 gene expression (Fig. 1
B). Both
IFN-
and IP-10 expression peaked earlier than IL-18BPa in response
to IL-12. In addition, the attenuation of IFN-
and IP-10 expression
coincided with the peak of IL-18BPa induction. These findings suggested
not only that IL-18BPa may have interfered with the induction of
IFN-
and IP-10 by IL-12, but also that the induction of IL-18BPa by
IL-12 may have been indirectly mediated through IFN-
or IP-10.
As IP-10 itself was unable to induce IL-18BPa (Table I
), it could not
have been responsible for the effect of IL-12. To test whether IFN-
was required for the augmentation of IL-18BPa expression by IL-12, PBMC
were stimulated with IL-12 in the presence of a neutralizing
anti-IFN-
Ab. As shown in Fig. 2
, neutralization of IFN-
almost completely abrogated IL-18BPa
induction by IL-12 (Fig. 2
, upper panel, lanes 2
and 4). The anti-IFN-
Ab had a similar effect on the
induction of IL-18BPa by IL-2 and IL-18 (data not shown). Neutralizing
Abs to the IL-2R, IFN-
, and IFN-
had no effect, while a
neutralizing IL-18 Ab only modestly diminished the effect of IL-12 on
IL-18BPa induction (data not shown). In addition to its effect on
IL-18BPa, the neutralization of IFN-
completely abrogated the
up-regulation of both IP-10 and IL-12R
2 expression by IL-12.
Although IFN-
by itself did not stimulate IL-18 production by PBMC,
the neutralization of IFN-
partially inhibited the up-regulation of
IL-18 expression by IL-12 (Fig. 2
).
|
To determine which PBMC subset was producing IL-18BPa in response
to IL-12, PBMC were stimulated for 48 h with medium alone or IL-12
and then separated into purified populations of monocytes, NK cells,
and T cells. As shown in Fig. 3
, when
PBMC were stimulated with IL-12, IL-18BPa expression was due primarily
to its induction in monocytes (Fig. 3
, upper panel,
lane 4). Monocytes were also the source of low-level
constitutive IL-18BPa expression in unstimulated PBMC (Fig. 3
, upper panel, lane 3). Weak induction of IL-18BPa
was observed in NK cells (Fig. 3
, upper panel, lane
6), but there was no induction in either
CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3
, upper panel, lane 8). The constitutive
expression of IP-10 and IL-18 was strongly augmented in monocytes
following IL-12 stimulation (Fig. 3
). Although there was no expression
of IP-10 and very weak expression of IL-18 in NK cells derived from
unstimulated PBMC, the stimulation of PBMC with IL-12 also induced the
expression of both in NK cells. T cells, in contrast, exhibited weak
up-regulation of IP-10 and little or no up-regulation of IL-18 in
response to IL-12. NK cells were the main source of IFN-
following
the activation of PBMC by IL-12 and exhibited the strongest
up-regulation of IL-12R
2 expression. IL-12R
2 expression was
notably absent from monocytes both before and after the activation of
PBMC by IL-12 and was only weakly up-regulated in T cells following
IL-12 stimulation (Fig. 3
).
|
inhibited the induction of IL-18BPa by
IL-12 in PBMC, we examined whether IL-18BPa expression in monocytes
could be stimulated directly by either IFN-
or IL-12. Purified
populations of monocytes, NK cells, T cells, or B cells were isolated
from PBMC and stimulated with either IL-12 or IFN-
. None of these
leukocyte subsets expressed IL-18BPa in response to IL-12. IFN-
,
however, strongly induced IL-18BPa in monocytes but was unable to
induce IL-18BPa expression in the other cell types (data not shown).
These findings established that the induction of IL-18BPa by IL-12 in
monocytes is mediated through IFN-
. IL-18BPa is induced in cancer patients treated with rhIL-12
To determine whether IL-12 could induce IL-18BPa protein
production as well as gene expression, an Origen assay capable of
detecting IL-18BPa concentrations of
6 ng/ml was used to measure
IL-18BPa in cell culture supernatants and in the plasma of
rhIL-12-treated cancer patients. In cell culture supernatants from PBMC
stimulated with IL-12 for 2448 h, the IL-18BPa concentration was
below the limit of detection (<6 ng/ml) of the Origen assay. However,
in patients receiving a twice weekly schedule of i.v. rhIL-12 at a dose
of 500 ng/kg, IL-18BPa was induced 1224 h following rhIL-12 treatment
(Table II
). For two patients whose
pretreatment IL-18BPa plasma concentration was <6 ng/ml, IL-18BPa
levels subsequently peaked at 32.770.6 ng/ml following the first dose
of rhIL-12. A third patient, whose baseline IL-18BPa level was 28
ng/ml, had a more modest increase to 44 ng/ml after the first rhIL-12
dose. These peak levels were fairly well sustained 3 days later, when
patients had their IL-18BPa level checked before receiving the second
dose of rhIL-12. Following the second dose of rhIL-12, the plasma
IL-18BPa concentration again rose within 24 h to peak levels
ranging from 26.1 to 101.2 ng/ml (Table II
). At the time of the seventh
dose of rhIL-12, pretreatment levels had dropped to baseline, and
modest induction of IL-18BPa was observed in only one of the three
patients.
|
was also measured in the plasma of these patients receiving
rhIL-12. In the three patients tested, the magnitude of IFN-
induction over the 24-h period following each dose of rhIL-12
correlated with the magnitude of IL-18BPa induction. In most patients
treated with twice-weekly i.v. rhIL-12, IFN-
induction was usually
strongest after the second rhIL-12 dose and then attenuated
significantly with subsequent doses, becoming quite weak by the seventh
dose (14). This pattern of IFN-
induction was for the
most part observed in the three rhIL-12-treated patients shown in Table II| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
plays a key role in
regulating the expression of IL-18BPa, the IL-18BP isoform most capable
of neutralizing the activity of IL-18 by virtue of its high binding
affinity. As one of the primary functions of IL-18 is the stimulation
of IFN-
production, this link between IFN-
and IL-18BPa provides
a mechanism by which immune activation by a cytokine can be contained
by a negative feedback loop initiated through the primary by-product of
that activation. The finding that IL-12 is one of the most potent
inducers of IL-18BPa, acting indirectly through IFN-
, underscores
the important role that IL-18 probably plays in modulating T and NK
cell activation by IL-12 in vivo. This modulatory function of IL-18
probably applies to lymphocyte activation by IL-2 and IL-15 as well,
for they were also capable of inducing IL-18BPa via IFN-
. In fact,
one of the unique aspects of an IFN-
/IL-18BPa negative feedback loop
is that it is capable of inhibiting the activity of any cytokine that
synergizes with IL-18, thereby facilitating broad control over stimuli
of IFN-
production. This function of IL-18BPa resembles that of the
IL-1R antagonist (IL-1Ra), the expression of which is also induced by
IFN-
(18). Although there have been no studies of the
ability of IL-12 to induce IL-1Ra in vitro, the in vivo induction of
IL-1Ra by i.v. IL-12 has been demonstrated in primates
(19). As IFN-
production by IL-12 and IL-2 is augmented
by IL-1 (20, 21), there is a clear parallel between the
IFN-
/IL-18BPa and IFN-
/IL-1Ra negative feedback loops with regard
to their broad inhibitory effects on cytokine-mediated IFN-
production. While IFN-
is also a strong inducer of IL-1Ra
(18), we found that the induction of IL-18BPa by IFN-
was relatively weak and inconsistent compared with that by IFN-
.
Our analysis of IL-18BP induction in PBMC focused on gene expression.
As IL-18BPa does not require post-translational modification and is
produced only in a secreted form (12, 13), it is likely
that the mRNA detected by RT-PCR will correlate with the production of
biologically active IL-18BPa available for binding to IL-18. This is
further suggested by our observation that IL-12-induced IFN-
and
IP-10 gene expression declined at the time of peak IL-18BPa expression,
which may also point to the role that endogenous IL-18 plays in
modulating IFN-
production by IL-12. The inability of our IL-18BPa
Origen assay to detect protein in supernatants from IL-12-stimulated
PBMC may have been largely due to the low sensitivity of the assay,
which can only detect IL-18BPa concentrations
6 ng/ml. While we were
able to detect high concentrations of IL-18BPa in the plasma of
rhIL-12-treated patients, the in vitro conditions may not have been
suitable for the generation of high concentrations of IL-18BPa by
IL-12. Our failure to detect IL-18BPc, the other neutralizing human
IL-18BP isoform (12, 13), in either resting or
cytokine-stimulated PBMC suggests that this mRNA splice variant may not
be physiologically relevant. Alternatively, it may be under the control
of other stimuli that remain undefined.
When PBMC were stimulated with IL-12, we found that IL-18BPa was
produced almost exclusively by monocytes. NK cells did produce a small
amount of IL-18BPa when PBMC were stimulated with IL-12, although
purified NK cells did not produce IL-18BPa when stimulated directly
with either IL-12 or IFN-
. This suggests that a cytokine other than
IFN-
may mediate the weak IL-18BPa induction by IL-12 in NK cells.
While monocytes were the primary source of IL-18BPa in IL-12-stimulated
PBMC, most of the IFN-
was produced by NK cells. The
IFN-
/IL-18BPa negative feedback loop thus provides a functional link
between NK cells and monocytes and may therefore be especially relevant
to the control of the innate immune response. While IL-12 is central to
adaptive immune responses through its role in Th1 development, it is
produced by monocytes early in the course of an infection and therefore
is also crucial to the activation of innate immunity. We have shown
that IL-12 augments IL-18 gene expression in both monocytes and NK
cells. This corroborates the finding in both humans and primates that
i.v. IL-12 induces the production of IL-18 (14, 19).
Interestingly, this stimulation of IL-18 gene expression is only
partially dependent on IFN-
and may therefore also be mediated
directly by IL-12. The induction of IL-18 by IL-12 is thus another
early event in the development of an innate immune response, leading to
the synergistic activation of NK cells and T cells that results
in IFN-
production. We have shown that IFN-
, in turn,
up-regulates IL-12R
2 expression on NK cells and, to a lesser extent,
T cells, which would further sensitize these lymphocytes to IL-12
(22). In addition, IL-12 is known to up-regulate IL-18R
expression on T and NK cells (23), which would heighten
their responsiveness to IL-18. If left unchecked, the ensuing
augmentation of IFN-
production and amplification of the innate
immune response would probably result in prohibitive toxicity and
activation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis. By disarming IL-18, the
IFN-
/IL-18BPa negative feedback loop between NK cells and monocytes
may play an essential role, not necessarily in shutting off an immune
response, but in preventing the excessive activation of innate immunity
from interfering with the subsequent development of an adaptive immune
response.
The demonstration that IL-18BPa is induced in vivo in cancer patients
treated with rhIL-12 corroborates the in vitro effect of IL-12 on
IL-18BPa gene expression. Furthermore, the finding that the magnitude
of IL-18BPa induction parallels the magnitude of IFN-
induction by
rhIL-12 lends further support to the important role that IFN-
plays
in mediating IL-18BPa induction by IL-12. As plasma levels of IL-18 are
augmented in patients treated twice weekly with rhIL-12
(14), it is likely that this endogenous IL-18 works in
conjunction with rhIL-12 to stimulate IFN-
production. In patients
treated with rhIL-12, it is therefore possible that IL-18BPa serves to
limit the magnitude and duration of IFN-
induction occurring with
each rhIL-12 dose. However, it is important to note that the marked
attenuation of IFN-
production occurring at the time of the seventh
rhIL-12 dose in patients treated twice weekly with rhIL-12 (Table II
)
was not accompanied by an increase in IL-18BPa induction but, instead,
was associated with a similar attenuation of IL-18BPa induction.
Therefore, it appears that IL-18BPa is not responsible for the sharp
down-regulation of rhIL-12-induced IFN-
production observed after
3.5 wk of rhIL-12 therapy. While the IFN-
/IL-18BPa negative feedback
loop is likely to have an important impact on the modulation of
cellular immunity by cytokine-based antitumor therapies, other
mechanisms, including alterations in lymphocyte responsiveness to
cytokines (14), are probably operative in the
tachyphylaxis observed during chronic therapy with rhIL-12.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jared A. Gollob, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Kirstein Building, Room E/KS-158, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail address: jgollob{at}caregroup.harvard.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: IL-18BP, IL-18 binding protein; IL-1Ra, IL-1R antagonist; IP-10, IFN-
-inducible protein-10; rhIL-12, recombinant human IL-12; dd, double distilled. ![]()
Received for publication July 24, 2001. Accepted for publication January 2, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production by T cells. Nature 378:88.
inducing factor and regulates LPS-induced IFN-
production. Nature 386:619.[Medline]
production and activates IRAK and NF
B. Immunity 7:571.[Medline]
production, and expansion of natural killer cells. Cancer Res. 61:884.
-inducing factor is a costimulatory factor on the activation of Th1 but not Th2 cells and exerts its effect independently of IL-12. J. Immunol. 158:1541.[Abstract]
-inducing factor elicits antitumor immunity in association with interferon-
production. J. Immunother. 21:48.
induction is associated with clinical response. Clin. Cancer Res. 6:1678.
production. J. Immunol. 153:1697.[Abstract]
affect tumorigenicity and response to IL-12 therapy and antiangiogenesis. Immunity 9:25.[Medline]
costimulates interferon
production by human natural killer cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:792.[Medline]
is required for IL-12 to induce production of IFN-
by NK cells: a role for IL-1
in the T cell-independent mechanism of resistance against intracellular pathogens. J. Immunol. 155:4347.[Abstract]
2 subunit expression in developing T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells. J. Exp. Med. 185:817.
-inducing factor in enhanced production of IFN-
. J. Immunol. 159:2125.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. F. Fortin, T. Ear, and P. P. McDonald Autocrine role of endogenous interleukin-18 on inflammatory cytokine generation by human neutrophils FASEB J, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 194 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Robertson, J. W. Mier, T. Logan, M. Atkins, H. Koon, K. M. Koch, S. Kathman, L. N. Pandite, C. Oei, L. C. Kirby, et al. Clinical and biological effects of recombinant human interleukin-18 administered by intravenous infusion to patients with advanced cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 12(14): 4265 - 4273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Alberti, T. Bachelot, A. Duc, C. Biota, and J. Y. Blay A Spliced Isoform of Interleukin 6 mRNA Produced by Renal Cell Carcinoma Encodes for an Interleukin 6 Inhibitor Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 65(1): 2 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gatto, C. Berlato, V. Poli, S. Tininini, I. Kinjyo, A. Yoshimura, M. A. Cassatella, and F. Bazzoni Analysis of SOCS-3 Promoter Responses to Interferon {gamma} J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 13746 - 13754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. K. Banda, A. Vondracek, D. Kraus, C. A. Dinarello, S.-H. Kim, A. Bendele, G. Senaldi, and W. P. Arend Mechanisms of Inhibition of Collagen-Induced Arthritis by Murine IL-18 Binding Protein J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 2100 - 2105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |