The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schade, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schade, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, A. D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHOLESTEROL
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 168: 2233-2239.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

Lipid Raft Heterogeneity in Human Peripheral Blood T Lymphoblasts: A Mechanism for Regulating the Initiation of TCR Signal Transduction1

Andrew E. Schade* and Alan D. Levine2,*,{dagger},{ddagger}

Departments of * Pathology, {dagger} Medicine, and {ddagger} Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Lateral mobility and spatial organization of proteins within the plasma membrane are likely to mediate the initial events coordinating T cell activation. Lipid rafts, distinct cholesterol/sphingolipid-rich membrane microdomains, provide a mechanism for this regulation by concentrating or excluding signaling proteins. We demonstrate in peripheral blood T cell lymphoblasts that immediate early phosphotyrosine signal transduction through the TCR complex is functionally dependent on a distinct population of lipid rafts. Specifically, cholesterol extraction destabilizes the membrane microdomains containing Lck, while the rafts containing the adapter protein linker for activation of T cells remain intact. Heterogeneity in the partitioning of these proteins in resting cells was confirmed by immunoelectron microscopy. After T cell activation, both Lck and the linker for activation of T cells colocalize to 50–100 nm microdomains in the plasma membrane, indicating that sequestration of these proteins into distinct lipid rafts may function to regulate the initiation of T cell signal transduction.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
When T cells are stimulated through the TCR, a well-characterized sequence of biochemical events is initiated in which protein tyrosine phosphorylation is the earliest identifiable feature of T cell activation (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Upon TCR binding to an MHC/peptide complex on the surface of an APC, signal transduction commences with the activation of the Src family protein tyrosine kinase (PTK)3 Lck, which phosphorylates the immunoreceptor tyrosine activation motifs (ITAM) of the CD3 complex of polypeptides and the TCR-{zeta} chain (TCR-{zeta}) homodimer. This results in the membrane targeting of another PTK, ZAP-70, to phospho-ITAMs via Src homology 2 domain interactions, and its subsequent activation by Lck. ZAP-70 then phosphorylates several substrates, including the linker for activation of T cells (LAT). Phospho-LAT acts as a docking molecule for a variety of enzymes and adapter proteins, such as Vav, phospholipase C{gamma}, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (85 kDa subunit), and Grb2 (6). This cascade is required for efficient activation of second messenger pathways, including calcium mobilization and the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (7).

In contrast, the spatial-temporal organization of these enzymatic events is less well understood. For instance, the lateral organization of membrane associated proteins such as the TCR/CD3 complex, PTKs, and adaptor molecules within the lipid bilayer is only beginning to be elucidated (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16). The plasma membrane contains lipid assemblies enriched in cholesterol and glycosphingolipids, known as lipid rafts, which form distinct microenvironments for preferential enrichment and exclusion of certain molecules (17). Critical signaling molecules of the TCR/CD3 complex such as Src family PTKs (18), LAT (19), phosphoinositides (20), CD4 (21, 22), and the recently cloned phosphoprotein associated with glycosphingolipid-enriched microdomains/Cbp (23, 24) are targeted to lipid rafts. In the transformed Jurkat T cell line, disruption of rafts by cholesterol depletion reduces calcium mobilization (22, 25, 26). Therefore, it has been postulated that these microdomains are required for signal transduction in T cells.

Most of the studies in humans have been limited to the Jurkat T leukemia cell line. Therefore, we examined the peripheral blood T cell (PBT), which more closely reflects a physiological response. In this study, we report that the integrity of lipid rafts containing the kinase Lck is essential for the initiation of PBT signal transduction through the TCR. Furthermore, while both Lck and LAT are targeted to lipid rafts, we demonstrate heterogeneity in raft composition in the native plasma membrane of PBT, causing the physical sequestration of these critical signaling proteins in a resting T cell. However, after activation, both Lck and LAT coinhabit a localized region ~50–100 nm within the plasma membrane.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cells and reagents

PBMC were isolated from healthy donors by Ficoll-Hypaque density separation. T lymphoblasts were prepared by PHA (0.5%) stimulation for 48 h in the presence of IL-2 (20 U/ml; Chiron, Emeryville, CA) in RPMI 1640, 10% heat-inactivated FCS, and 2.5% HEPES, and thereafter carried in IL-2 (20 U/ml) for >8 days to obtain a population of CD4+CD45RO+ peripheral blood T lymphoblasts. The following Abs were used: rabbit anti-LAT, rabbit anti-Lck, and 3A5 mouse anti-Lck mAb, mouse anti-ZAP-70 (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), anti-phosphotyrosine (PY20; BD Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY), rabbit anti-CD4 and HRP-conjugated secondary Abs (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and mouse TCR-{zeta} (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA), rabbit anti-phospho-ZAP-70 (Y319), and rabbit anti-phospho-Lck (Y394; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA). Methyl {beta} cyclodextrin (M{beta}CD) and poly-L-lysine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Lysis buffer for lipid raft preparation and immunoisolation consisted of 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, protease and phosphatase inhibitor mixtures (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM PMSF, and 1% Brij 58 (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Colloidal gold-conjugated secondary Abs, 12 nm anti-mouse, and 6 nm anti-rabbit were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA).

T cell stimulation

PBT, rested overnight in the absence of IL-2 (RPMI 1640, 10% FCS, 2.5% HEPES) at 37°C, were resuspended (5 x 107 cells/ml) in RPMI 1640, 2.5% HEPES, and a protease inhibitor mixture with or without 10 mM M{beta}CD and incubated at 37°C for 5 min. Cells were then stimulated via OKT3 Ab (10 µg/ml; Ortho Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) with cross-linking (sheep anti-mouse F(ab')2, 10 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min at 37°C, immediately followed by the addition of 2x Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 min before Western blot analysis. Unstimulated cells received only the sheep anti-mouse F(ab')2.

LAT immunoisolation

Rabbit anti-LAT was incubated for 5 h at 4°C with M-280 superparamagnetic polystyrene beads (Dynal Biotech, Lake Success, NY) to which sheep anti-rabbit Abs are covalently attached to the surface. PBT were stimulated as described above, except that reactions were quenched by immediately pelleting the cells at 4°C and resuspending them in 0.5 ml ice-cold lysis buffer. Cells were lysed at 4°C on a rotating wheel for 30 min, after which the postnuclear supernatant was added to the beads bearing rabbit anti-LAT and incubated at 4°C for 90 min with gentle rotation. The M-280 beads were then separated from the cell lysate by magnetic isolation on an MPC-S magnet (Dynal Biotech), and washed four times in ice-cold lysis buffer. After the final wash, the beads were boiled in 50 µl of 1x Laemmli buffer.

Lipid raft fractionation

PBT were resuspended in 0.5 ml ice-cold lysis buffer and lysed at 4°C on a rotating wheel for 30 min. Postnuclear supernatants were gently mixed with an equal volume of cold 85% sucrose (w/v) in lysis buffer without detergent and placed in the bottom of a 4-ml ultracentrifuge tube (Sorvall TST-60.4; Newtown, CT). The sample was overlaid with 2 ml 35% sucrose and 1.2 ml 5% sucrose, all at 4°C in lysis buffer without detergent. Equilibrium centrifugation was performed at 200,000 x g, 4°C, for at least 3 h, as described (27). Fractions were collected as 0.4-ml samples from the top. A fixed volume from each fraction of the sucrose gradient (0.015 ml) was mixed with an equal volume of 2x Laemmli buffer and boiled for 8 min before Western blotting.

Western blotting

Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 10% gel under reducing conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in a transfer buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM glycine, and 20% methanol. Membranes were incubated at 4°C overnight in blocking buffer (5% nonfat milk, 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS). Primary and secondary Abs were diluted as recommended by the manufacturer in blocking buffer and incubated with the membranes for 1 h at room temperature with six washes in between. Detection of HRP-conjugated Abs was performed using SuperSignal (Pierce). Phosphotyrosine analysis was performed as follows. Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in blocking buffer (3% BSA, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.2), 100 mM NaCl, 1% Tween 20). HRP-conjugated PY20 Ab was diluted 1/2500 in blocking buffer and incubated with the membranes for 1 h at room temperature. Chemiluminescence of all membranes was detected using Hyperfilm ECL (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

PBT were either stimulated via OKT3 Ab (10 µg/ml) with cross-linking sheep anti-mouse (10 µg/ml) for 5 min at 37°C, as described above, or incubated with only the sheep anti-mouse F(ab')2 at 37°C. Reactions were stopped by placing the samples on ice. The stimulating Abs were then washed away and cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 at 4°C. Plasma membrane sheets were prepared as described by Sanan and Anderson (28) and Wilson et al. (29). PBT were settled onto poly-L-lysine-coated glass coverslips at 4°C for 45 min. The coverslips were then inverted onto nickel electron microscopy grids that had been previously floated on poly-L-lysine, washed in dH2O, and air-dried. Light finger pressure was distributed over a 15-mm rubber cork placed on the coverslip for 10 s. The grid was plucked off, allowing the apical portion of the adherent PBT plasma membrane to remain attached to the grid and leaving the rest of the cell on the coverslip. The grid containing the membrane sheet was immediately washed in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), 25 mM KCl, and 2.5 mM magnesium acetate for 5 s, to remove any cytosol and contaminants, before fixation in 2% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, followed by three 5-min washes in PBS. The grids were then blocked in 0.5% BSA-c (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA) in PBS for 30 min. To prevent cross-reactivity with any mouse OKT3 that may still be attached to the membrane, all samples (including controls) were incubated for 30 min in goat anti-mouse IgG Fab fragments (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Controls showed that this completely prevented secondary colloidal gold-conjugated Abs from binding any available OKT3 that may be present in the preparation. Samples were washed for 30 min in 0.5% BSA-c/PBS, with three exchanges between all Ab labeling steps. Primary Ab labeling of LAT (1:100 of rabbit anti-human LAT) and Lck (1:100 of mouse 3A5 anti-human Lck) were performed sequentially, with secondary colloidal gold-conjugated Abs immediately following their respective primary Ab. All Ab incubations were performed in the presence of 0.5% BSA-c/PBS at room temperature for 30 min. Following the final washing steps, samples were fixed overnight in 2% glutaraldehyde/PBS at 4°C. Samples were washed three times in PBS before a 10-min staining in 1% aqueous osmium tetroxide, followed by five 5-min washes in dH2O. Samples were subsequently processed in 1% aqueous tannic acid for 10 min, followed by two 5-min washes in dH2O, and then 10 min in 2% aqueous uranyl acetate, followed by two 1-min washes in dH2O. Samples were air-dried before analysis on a JEOL 1200CX TEM (Peabody, MA). Gold particle distributions were quantified as previously described (29). Singlet and clusters of either 6 or 12 nm gold particles were counted over 40–100 µm2 of membrane in both resting and activated T cells and scored for colocalization or not.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cholesterol extraction inhibits membrane proximal protein tyrosine phosphorylation in PBT

We hypothesized that if lipid rafts were essential for signaling through the TCR in PBTs, disruption of raft integrity via cholesterol extraction with M{beta}CD would inhibit the very earliest events in TCR-initiated signal transduction. Resting PBT exhibit a very low level of basal protein tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1Go, lane 1). Upon addition of 10 mM M{beta}CD to PBT for 10 min at 37°C, there is no induction of tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1Go, lane 2). As expected, when PBT are stimulated through the TCR via CD3 cross-linking for 5 min at 37°C, there is a pronounced increase in total protein tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1Go, lane 3). This robust induction of the membrane proximal signaling cascade is strongly inhibited when the PBT are treated with 10 mM M{beta}CD for 5 min at 37°C, before the 5-min stimulation (Fig. 1Go, lane 4). To confirm that the heavily phosphorylated protein in the 36–38 kDa range was in fact LAT, we immunoisolated LAT from control and TCR-stimulated cell lysates. Conventional protein A-agarose was not a viable option for this experiment, because the stimulating OKT3 Ab is capable of binding protein A (A. E. Schade and A. D. Levine, unpublished results), leading to erroneous conclusions. Therefore, we used an immunomagnetic approach in which sheep anti-rabbit Abs are covalently attached to the surface of superparamagnetic polystyrene beads and then rabbit anti-LAT was incubated with the beads. Lysates from TCR-stimulated cells or controls were incubated with the immunomagnetic beads and the bound LAT proteins were extracted by magnetic isolation and analyzed via SDS-PAGE and Western blotting initially for total phosphotyrosine and subsequently for LAT (Fig. 2Go). When PBT are stimulated through the TCR via CD3 cross-linking for 5 min at 37°C, there is a pronounced increase in LAT tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 2Go, lane 2). However, phosphorylation of LAT is strongly inhibited when the PBT are treated with 10 mM M{beta}CD for 5 min at 37°C, before the 5-min stimulation (Fig. 2Go, lane 4). These results demonstrate that disrupting lipid rafts in PBT inhibits membrane proximal signal transduction through the TCR, consistent with the reduction of calcium flux, a signaling event downstream from the tyrosine phosphorylation (22, 25, 26).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Lipid raft disruption inhibits TCR-activated PBT protein tyrosine phosphorylation. PBT (5 x 106) were left untreated (lanes 1 and 3) or treated with 10 mM M{beta}CD (lanes 2 and 4) for 5 min at 37°C. Cells were stimulated via anti-CD3{epsilon} cross-linking (OKT3, 10 µg/ml; lanes 3 and 4) for 5 min at 37°C. Reactions were quenched by the addition of 2x Laemmli buffer and immediately boiled for 5 min. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting for phosphotyrosine (PY20). Molecular weight markers are indicated. Immunoblot for LAT was used as a control for total protein loading. Results are representative of eight different donors.

 


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Reduced phosphorylation of LAT after cholesterol extraction is confirmed by immunoisolation. PBT (35 x 106) were left untreated (lanes 1 and 2) or treated with 10 mM M{beta}CD (lanes 3 and 4) for 5 min at 37°C. Cells were stimulated via anti-CD3{epsilon} cross-linking for 5 min at 37°C (lanes 2 and 4). Reactions were quenched by immediately pelleting the cells at 4°C and resuspending them in 0.5 ml ice-cold lysis buffer. Immunomagnetic isolation of LAT from postnuclear supernatants was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and membrane probed sequentially for phosphotyrosine (PY20) and then LAT.

 
Cholesterol extraction preferentially disrupts lipid rafts containing Lck

Recognizing the crucial role of the PTK Lck in the initiation of TCR signaling and the essential function of LAT in linking the TCR proximal signaling with the more generalized secondary signaling cascades, we assessed the membrane partitioning of Lck and LAT via biochemical fractionation after lysing PBT in 1% Brij-58 (Fig. 3Go). Both Lck and LAT are enriched in detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs), which represent the microdomains of the native plasma membrane (rafts) exhibiting liquid-ordered phase behavior. This property is in large part responsible for rendering these lipid rafts resistant to nonionic detergent disruption and therefore, capable of being isolated as low density membrane vesicles. As shown in the leftmost panel of Fig. 3Go, in PBT, both Lck and LAT are indeed associated with lipid rafts, although not to the same extent. Although Lck is distributed between lipid rafts and the more prevalent nonraft plasma membrane, LAT is exclusively partitioned to lipid rafts. Upon TCR stimulation (Fig. 3Go, third panel), both proteins remain raft-associated. However, when PBT are treated with 10 mM M{beta}CD under the same conditions that inhibit the induction of immediate early protein tyrosine phosphorylation, there is a prominent redistribution in the mass of Lck from lipid rafts to the nonraft plasma membrane. This change in the raft association for Lck is the same in both unstimulated and stimulated cells (Fig. 3Go, second and fourth panels). Approximately 80% of raft-associated Lck is displaced from rafts after cholesterol extraction (Table IGo). In contrast, >50% of LAT remains associated with lipid rafts in the presence of M{beta}CD (Fig. 3Go, Table IGo). Importantly, to prevent any systematic error in quantitating the immunoblots, Ab staining for both proteins was performed on the same nitrocellulose membrane. The partitioning of both Lck and LAT to lipid rafts was previously proposed to be essential for successful activation and propagation of TCR signal transduction (19, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40). However, this is the first report to link the inhibition of membrane proximal TCR signaling with the concurrent loss of Lck from lipid rafts in PBT. Furthermore, the relative lack of LAT redistribution after cholesterol depletion, weighed against an almost complete loss of Lck from lipid rafts, suggests that these proteins associate with biochemically distinct lipid raft microdomains in the plasma membrane, a concept we call heterogeneity.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. M{beta}CD treatment disrupts Lck rafts to a greater extent than LAT rafts; biochemical evidence for lipid raft heterogeneity. PBT (35 x 106) were left untreated (first and third panels) or treated with 10 mM M{beta}CD (second and fourth panels) and stimulated as in Fig. 1Go. Lipid rafts were isolated as DRMs by ultracentrifugation. Equal volumes from fractions 3 and 4 (raft) and fraction 10 (nonraft) of the sucrose gradient (15 µl) were analyzed by Western blot simultaneously for Lck and LAT. Results are representative of three different donors.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Redistribution of Lck or LAT from lipid rafts after cholesterol extraction

 
Lck and ZAP-70, two tyrosine kinases that activate TCR signal transduction, are under-phosphorylated after cholesterol extraction

Although we attribute the loss of proximal TCR signaling to dissolution of the Lck containing lipid rafts, the significant decline in total cellular protein and LAT phosphorylation upon M{beta}CD treatment may also be due to an event downstream of Lck. Therefore, we examined the tyrosine phosphorylation profile of Lck and ZAP-70, key PTKs whose activation precedes, and is necessary for, LAT phosphorylation (Fig. 4Go). After TCR engagement, one the earliest identifiable events of Lck activation is phosphorylation at tyrosine 394, leading to a conformational change in the catalytic domain that substantially increases kinase activity (41, 42, 43). Using an Ab that recognizes phospho-Y394 activated Lck, we demonstrate that Lck is prominently activated upon TCR cross-linking for 5 min at 37°C (Fig. 4GoA, lane 3). Dramatic inhibition (18-fold reduction normalized to total Lck protein) of stimulation-induced Lck kinase phosphorylation (Fig. 4GoA, lane 4) is observed after cholesterol extraction under the same conditions that lead to a global decrease in protein tyrosine phosphorylation, a decrease in LAT phosphorylation, and significant displacement of Lck from lipid rafts.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Inhibition of T cell phosphotyrosine induction by cholesterol extraction is concurrent with loss of activated phospho-Lck and phospho-ZAP-70. PBT (5 x 106) were left untreated (lanes 1 and 3) or treated with 10 mM M{beta}CD (lanes 2 and 4) for 5 min at 37°C. Cells were stimulated via anti-CD3{epsilon} cross-linking (OKT3, 10 µg/ml; lanes 3 and 4) for 5 min at 37°C. Reactions were quenched by addition of 2x Laemmli buffer and immediately boiled for 5 min. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting for (A) phospho-Y394 Lck or (B) phospho-Y319 ZAP-70. Immunoblotting for total Lck or ZAP-70 controlled for protein loading.

 
After TCR engagement, ZAP-70 is rapidly recruited to phosphorylated ITAM-bearing proteins of the TCR/CD3 complex, whereby it is subsequently activated by Lck initiating autophosphorylation on Y319. Phosphorylation of this residue is essential for positive regulation of ZAP-70 and its ability to phosphorylate LAT (44, 45). Using an Ab capable of recognizing only phospho-Y319 ZAP-70, we confirm that ZAP-70 is activated upon TCR cross-linking (Fig. 4GoB, lane 3). Pretreatment with M{beta}CD produces a 9-fold reduction in phospho-ZAP-70 after stimulation via TCR cross-linking (Fig. 4GoB, lane 4). Because Lck activation is necessary for ZAP-70 activation, and ZAP-70 activation is proximal to and required for LAT phosphorylation, it is unlikely that the reduction in LAT phosphorylation results from a portion of that protein being redistributed to the nonraft membrane, and is more likely due to an inhibition in the upstream signaling cascade.

Rafts containing CD4 and TCR-{zeta} are both sensitive to cholesterol extraction

To determine whether the association of LAT with an M{beta}CD-resistant raft is unique and to further explore lipid raft heterogeneity in the plasma membrane, we examined the sensitivity to M{beta}CD treatment of two additional transmembrane proteins, CD4 and TCR-{zeta}, involved in the initial events of TCR signal transduction. Approximately 30% of CD4 is raft-associated in resting PBT (Fig. 5Go, upper panel), and upon treatment with 10 mM M{beta}CD, there is a 70% loss of CD4 from rafts (Fig. 5Go, upper panel). TCR-{zeta} is an essential component on the TCR/CD3 signaling complex, yet its association with lipid rafts in PBT has not been reported. In this study, we show that slightly >30% of TCR-{zeta} associates with lipid rafts and upon cholesterol extraction is completely displaced (Fig. 5Go, lower panel). These findings confirm that several TCR signaling proteins reside in M{beta}CD-sensitive rafts in the native plasma membrane, while LAT is sequestered into distinct membrane microdomains. The significance of raft-associated CD4 and TCR-{zeta} proteins, compared with the more pronounced nonraft populations of these molecules, is currently under investigation.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. CD4 and TCR-{zeta} associate with lipid rafts that are destabilized by cholesterol extraction. PBT (35 x 106) were left untreated or treated with 10 mM M{beta}CD. Lipid rafts were isolated as DRMs by ultracentrifugation. Equal volumes from fractions 3 and 4 (raft) and fraction 10 (nonraft) of the sucrose gradient (15 µl) were analyzed by Western blot for CD4 or TCR-{zeta}. Results are representative of three different donors.

 
Identification of discrete clusters of lipid rafts in resting T cell by TEM

To directly demonstrate the presence of lipid raft heterogeneity within the native plasma membrane, we examined the inner leaflet of the PBT membrane using TEM at a resolution not approachable with conventional optical microscopy. Using immunogold-conjugated Abs to detect Lck (12 nm colloidal gold) and LAT (6 nm colloidal gold), we demonstrate for the first time that these proteins of the TCR signaling cascade associate with mutually exclusive microdomains in the plasma membrane of a resting PBT (Fig. 6Go). We consistently observe a strong agreement between the TEM analysis of native membranes and biochemical fractionation of DRMs, predicting the partitioning of Lck and LAT between the raft and nonraft domains of the T cell plasma membrane. For instance, Lck fractionates into both the detergent-resistant (raft) and detergent-soluble (nonraft) membrane domains after density gradient ultracentrifugation. Similarly, systematic analysis of transmission electron photomicrographs reveals that Lck (Fig. 6Go, squares) partitions both in a clustered distribution in osmiophilic (lipid rich) regions of the native membrane (75% of 12 nm particles in 105.5 µm2 of membrane) and to a lesser extent, in a more diffuse random pattern (25% of 12 nm particles in 105.5 µm2 of membrane). In contrast, LAT (Fig. 6Go, circles) is predominately clustered in microdomains of the native plasma membrane (>92% of 6 nm particles in 85.5 µm2 of membrane).



View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Immunogold electron microscopy reveals distinct clustering and segregation of Lck and LAT on the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane in PBTs. Electron microscopy of PBT plasma membrane sheets was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Two representative fields are provided in which Lck is labeled with 12 nm colloidal gold (squares) and LAT is labeled with 6 nm colloidal gold (circles). Original magnifications are noted in the micrographs. Scale bars = 120 nm.

 
After TCR engagement both Lck and LAT colocalize to discrete membrane domains

We hypothesize that the heterogeneity of lipid rafts regulates T cell activation and predict that after TCR engagement, relevant signaling molecules must colocalize. To document this redistribution, we analyzed membrane sheets from PBT that had been stimulated through the TCR/CD3 complex. Within 5 min of cross-linking the TCR, there is a pronounced shift in the membrane distribution of Lck and LAT relative to one another (Fig. 7Go). Upon stimulation, some of the dispersed heterogeneous clusters sequestering Lck or LAT converge into common domains (39% of 12-nm labeled Lck and 46% of 6-nm labeled LAT in 42.7 µm2 of membrane), characterized as osmiophilic membrane patches from 50 to 100 nm, which are likely to facilitate initiation of signal transduction (Fig. 7Go, hexagons).



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Upon TCR cross-linking, Lck and LAT converge into common microdomains. Electron microscopy of PBT plasma membrane sheets was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Two representative fields are provided in which Lck is labeled with 12 nm colloidal gold and LAT is labeled with 6 nm colloidal gold. Lck and LAT colocalization (hexagons); Lck only (squares); LAT only (circles). Original magnifications are noted in the micrographs. Scale bars = 100 nm.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The critical cell that orchestrates an acquired immune response is the T lymphocyte. In this report, we demonstrate in peripheral blood T lymphoblasts that 1) heterogeneous lipid rafts are identifiable based on biophysical properties and electron microscopy, and 2) that initiation of PBT signal transduction is dependent on a distinct population of lipid rafts to which the kinase Lck is targeted. We show that raft disruption induced by cholesterol extraction, specifically those rafts enriched in Lck, leads to a strong inhibition of membrane proximal protein tyrosine phosphorylation after activation through the TCR/CD3 complex. In support of this interpretation, we observe significant inhibition of both Lck and ZAP-70 activation concurrent with Lck displacement from lipid rafts. This suggests that Lck association with rafts is required for effective induction of kinase activity upon TCR engagement. Therefore, we propose that the mechanism for the inhibition of TCR signal transduction in PBT after raft disruption is directly linked to the displacement of Lck from lipid rafts.

In contrast, raft-bound LAT is not affected by cholesterol extraction to the same extent as Lck in the same population of cells. One possible difference is that Lck is membrane-associated via posttranslational acyl modifications and LAT is a transmembrane protein that is palmitoylated on membrane proximal cytoplasmic cysteine residues. It is conceivable that a more stable association of the integral membrane protein LAT with the plasma membrane confers this greater resistance to the perturbing effects of cholesterol depletion. To address this possibility, we analyzed the membrane compartmentalization of two additional transmembrane proteins involved in the earliest aspects of signaling through the TCR/CD3 complex, CD4 and TCR-{zeta}. Both proteins associate with lipid rafts and both exhibit a sensitivity to cholesterol extraction similar to that of Lck, suggesting that the relative affinity of a protein for association with lipid rafts is not simply dependent on being either a peripheral or integral membrane protein. We consider the unique biophysical properties of the LAT-associated rafts (that is, the relative resistance to cholesterol extraction) to be evidence that distinct heterogeneous populations of lipid rafts exist in the plasma membrane of PBT, and this may be another mechanism by which the T cell regulates the initiation of signal transduction.

TEM is a powerful tool to characterize the distribution and composition of microdomains within the native plasma membrane of T cells. This is significant because optical techniques that lack the resolving power of electron microscopy, such as confocal microscopy, have failed to distinguish between spatially distinct regions for Lck and LAT compartmentalization, potentially leading to the erroneous conclusion that these proteins are localized to a common microdomain. The identification of distinct clusters of Lck and LAT proteins at nanometer resolution in resting PBT membranes not exposed to detergents provides a strong confirmation of the biochemical data that lipid raft heterogeneity exists in vivo. Similarly, studies in resting RBL-2H3 mast cells have reported that Thy-1 does not colocalize with Lyn or the Fc{epsilon}RI (29) and that LAT rarely colocalizes with Fc{epsilon}RI (46). Furthermore, TCR stimulation-induced reorganization of the membrane microdomains, resulting in Lck and LAT residing in common domains, suggests a functional role for these specialized membrane compartments in T cell activation.

The physiological role of lipid raft heterogeneity in T cells remains to be uncovered, but we hypothesize that maintaining signaling molecules in distinct heterogeneous microdomains within the plasma membrane is a mechanism by which T cells orchestrate a rapid, controlled, and dynamic response to Ag exposure. In simple terms, lipid raft heterogeneity isolates an enzyme in lipid raft A from a substrate in lipid raft B in the nonactivated T cell. Upon TCR engagement, changes in the organization of the plasma membrane and its constituents, possibly mediated by the cytoskeleton, facilitate the rearrangement and redistribution of raft-associated proteins, thereby eliminating previous spatial constraints, thus catalyzing the initiation of the enzymatic cascade. In further support of this concept, Gomez-Mouton et al. (47) suggest that protein redistribution in polarized T cells involves raft partitioning. Heterogeneity in the composition, cholesterol-dependence, and localization of lipid rafts in the native membrane of the T cell may be a mechanism by which discrete signaling pathways can be differentially activated during an immune response, thereby modulating cytokine production patterns and T cell proliferation (48). Changes in the lateral mobility of enzymes, substrates, and adaptor proteins within the plasma membrane can regulate these functional differences within an activated T cell, eliciting dramatically different immunological effector functions.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK-54213 and AI-48189. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Alan D. Levine, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-4952. E-mail address: adl4{at}po.cwru.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: PTK, protein tyrosine kinase; DRM, detergent-resistant membrane; ITAM, immunoreceptor tyrosine activation motif; LAT, linker for activation of T cells; M{beta}CD, methyl {beta} cyclodextrin; PBT, peripheral blood T cell; TCR-{zeta}, TCR-{zeta} chain; TEM, transmission electron microscopy. Back

Received for publication October 9, 2001. Accepted for publication December 31, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cantrell, D.. 1996. T cell antigen receptor signal transduction pathways. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:259.[Medline]
  2. Qian, D., A. Weiss. 1997. T cell antigen receptor signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9:205.[Medline]
  3. Clements, J. L., N. J. Boerth, J. R. Lee, G. A. Koretzky. 1999. Integration of T cell receptor-dependent signaling pathways by adapter proteins. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:89.[Medline]
  4. van Leeuwen, J. E., L. E. Samelson. 1999. T cell antigen-receptor signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11:242.[Medline]
  5. Kane, L. P., J. Lin, A. Weiss. 2000. Signal transduction by the TCR for antigen. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12:242.[Medline]
  6. Zhang, W., J. Sloan-Lancaster, J. Kitchen, R. P. Trible, L. E. Samelson. 1998. LAT: the ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase substrate that links T cell receptor to cellular activation. Cell 92:83.[Medline]
  7. Finco, T. S., T. Kadlecek, W. Zhang, L. E. Samelson, A. Weiss. 1998. LAT is required for TCR-mediated activation of PLC{gamma}1 and the Ras pathway. Immunity 9:617.[Medline]
  8. Harder, T., K. Simons. 1997. Caveolae, DIGs, and the dynamics of sphingolipid-cholesterol microdomains. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9:534.[Medline]
  9. Brown, D. A., E. London. 2000. Structure and function of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. J. Biol. Chem. 275:17221.[Free Full Text]
  10. Delon, J., R. N. Germain. 2000. Information transfer at the immunological synapse. Curr. Biol. 10:R923.[Medline]
  11. Langlet, C., A. M. Bernard, P. Drevot, H. T. He. 2000. Membrane rafts and signaling by the multichain immune recognition receptors. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12:250.[Medline]
  12. Simons, K., D. Toomre. 2000. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1:31.[Medline]
  13. Leitenberg, D., F. Balamuth, K. Bottomly. 2001. Changes in the T cell receptor macromolecular signaling complex and membrane microdomains during T cell development and activation. Semin. Immunol. 13:129.[Medline]
  14. Bromley, S. K., W. R. Burack, K. G. Johnson, K. Somersalo, T. N. Sims, C. Sumen, M. M. Davis, A. S. Shaw, P. M. Allen, M. L. Dustin. 2001. The immunological synapse. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19:375.[Medline]
  15. Cherukuri, A., M. Dykstra, S. K. Pierce. 2001. Floating the raft hypothesis: lipid rafts play a role in immune cell activation. Immunity 14:657.[Medline]
  16. Viola, A.. 2001. The amplification of TCR signaling by dynamic membrane microdomains. Trends Immunol. 22:322.[Medline]
  17. Simons, K., E. Ikonen. 1997. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387:569.[Medline]
  18. Cinek, T., V. Horejsi. 1992. The nature of large noncovalent complexes containing glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane glycoproteins and protein tyrosine kinases. J. Immunol. 149:2262.[Abstract]
  19. Zhang, W., R. P. Trible, L. E. Samelson. 1998. LAT palmitoylation: its essential role in membrane microdomain targeting and tyrosine phosphorylation during T cell activation. Immunity 9:239.[Medline]
  20. Hope, H. R., L. J. Pike. 1996. Phosphoinositides and phosphoinositide-utilizing enzymes in detergent-insoluble lipid domains. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:843.[Abstract]
  21. Parolini, I., M. Sargiacomo, M. P. Lisanti, C. Peschle. 1996. Signal transduction and glycophosphatidylinositol-linked proteins (lyn, lck, CD4, CD45, G proteins, and CD55) selectively localize in Triton-insoluble plasma membrane domains of human leukemic cell lines and normal granulocytes. Blood 87:3783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Xavier, R., T. Brennan, Q. Li, C. McCormack, B. Seed. 1998. Membrane compartmentation is required for efficient T cell activation. Immunity 8:723.[Medline]
  23. Brdicka, T., D. Pavlistova, A. Leo, E. Bruyns, V. Korinek, P. Angelisova, J. Scherer, A. Shevchenko, I. Hilgert, J. Cerny, et al 2000. Phosphoprotein associated with glycosphingolipid-enriched microdomains (PAG), a novel ubiquitously expressed transmembrane adaptor protein, binds the protein tyrosine kinase csk and is involved in regulation of T cell activation. J. Exp. Med. 191:1591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Kawabuchi, M., Y. Satomi, T. Takao, Y. Shimonishi, S. Nada, K. Nagai, A. Tarakhovsky, M. Okada. 2000. Transmembrane phosphoprotein Cbp regulates the activities of Src-family tyrosine kinases. Nature 404:999.[Medline]
  25. Yashiro-Ohtani, Y., X. Y. Zhou, K. Toyo-Oka, X. G. Tai, C. S. Park, T. Hamaoka, R. Abe, K. Miyake, H. Fujiwara. 2000. Non-CD28 costimulatory molecules present in T cell rafts induce T cell costimulation by enhancing the association of TCR with rafts. J. Immunol. 164:1251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kabouridis, P. S., J. Janzen, A. L. Magee, S. C. Ley. 2000. Cholesterol depletion disrupts lipid rafts and modulates the activity of multiple signaling pathways in T lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:954.[Medline]
  27. Ostermeyer, A. G., B. T. Beckrich, K. A. Ivarson, K. E. Grove, D. A. Brown. 1999. Glycosphingolipids are not essential for formation of detergent-resistant membrane rafts in melanoma cells: methyl-{beta}-cyclodextrin does not affect cell surface transport of a GPI-anchored protein. J. Biol. Chem. 274:34459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sanan, D. A., R. G. Anderson. 1991. Simultaneous visualization of LDL receptor distribution and clathrin lattices on membranes torn from the upper surface of cultured cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 39:1017.[Abstract]
  29. Wilson, B. S., J. R. Pfeiffer, J. M. Oliver. 2000. Observing Fc{epsilon}RI signaling from the inside of the mast cell membrane. J. Cell Biol. 149:1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kabouridis, P. S., A. I. Magee, S. C. Ley. 1997. S-acylation of LCK protein tyrosine kinase is essential for its signalling function in T lymphocytes. EMBO J. 16:4983.[Medline]
  31. Brdicka, T., J. Cerny, V. Horejsi. 1998. T cell receptor signalling results in rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of the linker protein LAT present in detergent-resistant membrane microdomains. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 248:356.
  32. Stulnig, T. M., M. Berger, T. Sigmund, D. Raederstorff, H. Stockinger, W. Waldhausl. 1998. Polyunsaturated fatty acids inhibit T cell signal transduction by modification of detergent-insoluble membrane domains. J. Cell Biol. 143:637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Harder, T., K. Simons. 1999. Clusters of glycolipid and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in lymphoid cells: accumulation of actin regulated by local tyrosine phosphorylation. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:556.[Medline]
  34. Ilangumaran, S., S. Arni, G. van Echten-Deckert, B. Borisch, D. C. Hoessli. 1999. Microdomain-dependent regulation of Lck and Fyn protein-tyrosine kinases in T lymphocyte plasma membranes. Mol. Biol. Cell 10:891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Janes, P. W., S. C. Ley, A. I. Magee. 1999. Aggregation of lipid rafts accompanies signaling via the T cell antigen receptor. J. Cell Biol. 147:447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Zhang, W., B. J. Irvin, R. P. Trible, R. T. Abraham, L. E. Samelson. 1999. Functional analysis of LAT in TCR-mediated signaling pathways using a LAT-deficient Jurkat cell line. Int. Immunol. 11:943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Harder, T., M. Kuhn. 2000. Selective accumulation of raft-associated membrane protein LAT in T cell receptor signaling assemblies. J. Cell Biol. 151:199.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Lin, J., A. Weiss, T. S. Finco. 1999. Localization of LAT in glycolipid-enriched microdomains is required for T cell activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274:28861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Kosugi, A., F. Hayashi, D. R. Liddicoat, K. Yasuda, S. Saitoh, T. Hamaoka. 2001. A pivotal role of cysteine 3 of Lck tyrosine kinase for localization to glycolipid-enriched microdomains and T cell activation. Immunol. Lett. 76:133.[Medline]
  40. Patel, V. P., M. Moran, T. A. Low, M. C. Miceli. 2001. A molecular framework for two-step T cell signaling: Lck Src homology 3 mutations discriminate distinctly regulated lipid raft reorganization events. J. Immunol. 166:754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Abraham, N., A. Veillette. 1990. Activation of p56lck through mutation of a regulatory carboxy-terminal tyrosine residue requires intact sites of autophosphorylation and myristylation. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:5197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hardwick, J. S., B. M. Sefton. 1995. Activation of the Lck tyrosine protein kinase by hydrogen peroxide requires the phosphorylation of Tyr-394. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:4527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Brown, M. T., J. A. Cooper. 1996. Regulation, substrates and functions of src. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1287:121.[Medline]
  44. Di Bartolo, V., D. Mege, V. Germain, M. Pelosi, E. Dufour, F. Michel, G. Magistrelli, A. Isacchi, O. Acuto. 1999. Tyrosine 319, a newly identified phosphorylation site of ZAP-70, plays a critical role in T cell antigen receptor signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 274:6285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Williams, B. L., B. J. Irvin, S. L. Sutor, C. C. Chini, E. Yacyshyn, J. Bubeck Wardenburg, M. Dalton, A. C. Chan, R. T. Abraham. 1999. Phosphorylation of Tyr319 in ZAP-70 is required for T-cell antigen receptor-dependent phospholipase C-{gamma}1 and Ras activation. EMBO J. 18:1832.[Medline]
  46. Wilson, B. S., J. R. Pfeiffer, Z. Surviladze, E. A. Gaudet, J. M. Oliver. 2001. High resolution mapping of mast cell membranes reveals primary and secondary domains of Fc{epsilon}RI and LAT. J. Cell Biol. 154:645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Gomez-Mouton, C., J. L. Abad, E. Mira, R. A. Lacalle, E. Gallardo, S. Jimenez-Baranda, I. Illa, A. Bernad, S. Manes, A. C. Martinez. 2001. Segregation of leading-edge and uropod components into specific lipid rafts during T cell polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:9642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Germain, R. N., I. Stefanova. 1999. The dynamics of T cell receptor signaling: complex orchestration and the key roles of tempo and cooperation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:467.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Hebbar, E. Lee, M. Manna, S. Steinert, G. S. Kumar, M. Wenk, T. Wohland, and R. Kraut
A fluorescent sphingolipid binding domain peptide probe interacts with sphingolipids and cholesterol-dependent raft domains
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 1077 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. E. Schade, G. L. Schieven, R. Townsend, A. M. Jankowska, V. Susulic, R. Zhang, H. Szpurka, and J. P. Maciejewski
Dasatinib, a small-molecule protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibits T-cell activation and proliferation
Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1366 - 1377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. S. Van Komen, S. Mishra, J. Byrum, G. R. Chichili, J. C. Yaciuk, A. D. Farris, and W. Rodgers
Early and Dynamic Polarization of T Cell Membrane Rafts and Constituents Prior to TCR Stop Signals
J. Immunol., November 15, 2007; 179(10): 6845 - 6855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
S. Itoh, C. Susuki, K. Takeshita, K. Nagata, and T. Tsuji
Redistribution of P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) in chemokine-treated neutrophils: a role of lipid microdomains
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2007; 81(6): 1414 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
K. Drbal, M. Moertelmaier, C. Holzhauser, A. Muhammad, E. Fuertbauer, S. Howorka, M. Hinterberger, H. Stockinger, and G. J. Schutz
Single-molecule microscopy reveals heterogeneous dynamics of lipid raft components upon TCR engagement
Int. Immunol., May 1, 2007; 19(5): 675 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
C. M. Mutch, R. Sanyal, T. L. Unruh, L. Grigoriou, M. Zhu, W. Zhang, and J. P. Deans
Activation-induced endocytosis of the raft-associated transmembrane adaptor protein LAB/NTAL in B lymphocytes: evidence for a role in internalization of the B cell receptor
Int. Immunol., January 1, 2007; 19(1): 19 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. E. Schade, J. J. Powers, M. W. Wlodarski, and J. P. Maciejewski
Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate kinase pathway activation protects leukemic large granular lymphocytes from undergoing homeostatic apoptosis
Blood, June 15, 2006; 107(12): 4834 - 4840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
R. Geyeregger, M. Zeyda, G. J. Zlabinger, W. Waldhausl, and T. M. Stulnig
Polyunsaturated fatty acids interfere with formation of the immunological synapse
J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2005; 77(5): 680 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
K. Badizadegan, H. E. Wheeler, Y. Fujinaga, and W. I. Lencer
Trafficking of cholera toxin-ganglioside GM1 complex into Golgi and induction of toxicity depend on actin cytoskeleton
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): C1453 - C1462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. B. Fessler, P. G. Arndt, S. C. Frasch, J. G. Lieber, C. A. Johnson, R. C. Murphy, J. A. Nick, D. L. Bratton, K. C. Malcolm, and G. S. Worthen
Lipid Rafts Regulate Lipopolysaccharide-induced Activation of Cdc42 and Inflammatory Functions of the Human Neutrophil
J. Biol. Chem., September 17, 2004; 279(38): 39989 - 39998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. R. Marwali, M. A. MacLeod, D. N. Muzia, and F. Takei
Lipid Rafts Mediate Association of LFA-1 and CD3 and Formation of the Immunological Synapse of CTL
J. Immunol., September 1, 2004; 173(5): 2960 - 2967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Setterblad, S. Becart, D. Charron, and N. Mooney
B Cell Lipid Rafts Regulate Both Peptide-Dependent and Peptide-Independent APC-T Cell Interaction
J. Immunol., August 1, 2004; 173(3): 1876 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Ehrhardt, M. D. David, G. R. A. Ehrhardt, and J. W. Schrader
Distinct Mechanisms Determine the Patterns of Differential Activation of H-Ras, N-Ras, K-Ras 4B, and M-Ras by Receptors for Growth Factors or Antigen
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2004; 24(14): 6311 - 6323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. J. Rose, J. F. Foley, P. M. Murphy, and S. Venkatesan
On the Mechanism and Significance of Ligand-induced Internalization of Human Neutrophil Chemokine Receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2
J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 2004; 279(23): 24372 - 24386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
E C Jury and P S Kabouridis
T-lymphocyte signalling in systemic lupus erythematosus: a lipid raft perspective
Lupus, June 1, 2004; 13(6): 413 - 422.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. E. Schade and A. D. Levine
Cutting Edge: Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases 1/2 Function as Integrators of TCR Signal Strength
J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 5828