|
|
||||||||



*
Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia;
Joint Experimental Oncology Program, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia;
Joint Transplantation Biology Program and Cooperative Research Centre for Vaccine Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; and
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ab (type 2-polarizing conditions) for 89 days. Under neutral
conditions, most clones produced IFN-
without IL-4 and were
cytolytic. Under type 2-polarizing conditions, most clones produced
IFN-
and IL-4 but displayed variable cytolytic activity and CD8
expression. Separation on the basis of surface CD8 levels revealed
that, compared with CD8high cells from the same cultures,
CD8low cells were poorly cytolytic and expressed low levels
of perforin mRNA and protein and granzyme A, B, and C mRNA. A similar,
smaller population of noncytolytic CD8low cells was
identified among CD8+ T cells activated in mixed lymphocyte
reaction with IL-4. Variable efficiency of generation of the
noncytolytic cells may account for the differing results of earlier
studies. We conclude that IL-4 promotes the development of a
noncytolytic CD8low T cell phenotype that might be
important in tumor- or pathogen-induced immune
deviation. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-2) cytokine synthesis in the presence of IL-12, IL-18, or
IFN-
and to type 2 (IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13) cytokine
synthesis in the presence of IL-4 (1, 2). A similar
phenomenon occurs in CD8+ T cells. Although
CD8+ cells are generally predisposed to the
production of IFN-
even in the absence of polarizing cytokines, they
can be readily induced to synthesize type 2 cytokines in vitro by
exposure to IL-4 during early activation (3, 4, 5, 6).
Preferential production of IFN-
or IL-4 by in vivo-activated human
CD8+ T cells has also been observed in some
disease states (7, 8). Although IL-4 unequivocally promotes de novo expression of type 2 cytokines by CD8+ T cells, the evidence for an effect on development of cytolytic function is conflicting. IL-4 has been reported to enhance, reduce, or exert no effect on CD8+ T cell cytolysis and Ag clearance in models of viral and tumor immunity (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). These variable results might reflect differences among the immune mechanisms invoked in each model or distinct effects of IL-4 on APCs and T cells that are difficult to dissect in vivo. In contrast, contradictory results have also been reported in experiments studying the effects of IL-4 on the differentiation of naive CD8+ T cells in vitro. Early studies showed that IL-4 enhanced the cytolytic activity of CD8+ T cells in several systems (19, 20, 21, 22). Erard et al. (4) subsequently described the development of noncytolytic CD8-CD4- populations from naive CD8+ T cells in short-term cultures activated in the presence of IL-4 either with the pharmacologic agents PMA and ionomycin or with allogeneic cells. These populations displayed a type 2 cytokine profile and low expression of perforin mRNA. Cronin et al. (23) established long-term alloreactive CD8+ T cell clones that secreted IL-4 and failed to lyse allogeneic target cells but that were lytic in a redirected cytolytic assay. In contrast, several groups reported that CD8+ T cell populations and clones generated in the presence of IL-4 retained CD8 expression, produced type 2 cytokines, and displayed strong cytolytic activity against Ag-bearing target cells (5, 24, 25, 26). The reasons for these differences between similar experimental systems are not clear.
Therefore, we have examined the relationship between the induction of IL-4 synthesis and the development of cytolytic function in a clonal system, which allows us to screen large numbers of individual primary T cell clones for multiple functions. This analysis has revealed marked heterogeneity in the functional response to IL-4 when CD8+ T cells of naive phenotype were activated with anti-receptor Abs or allogeneic cells. Variable proportions of cells displayed reduced expression of surface CD8, and this in turn was strongly associated with high IL-4 production, low cytolytic activity, and low expression of perforin and several granzymes. By contrast, other cells retained CD8 expression and displayed substantial cytolytic activity and expression of perforin and granzymes. We conclude that IL-4 promotes the development of a noncytolytic CD8low T cell phenotype. Differences between systems in the frequency of these CD8low T cell cells and their masking in heterogeneous cultures provide a means to reconcile the conflicting results of previous studies. Activation of these cells might be one mechanism by which some pathogens and tumors avoid immune destruction.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following Abs were obtained: PE- or FITC-conjugated rat
anti-mouse CD8
Ab (53.6; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA);
biotinylated anti-mouse CD44 Ab (IM7.81; BD PharMingen);
Tri-Color-, FITC-, or PE-conjugated streptavidin (Caltag, Burlingame,
CA); FITC-conjugated goat anti-rat Ig (BD PharMingen);
FITC-conjugated goat anti-hamster IgG (Kirkegaard & Perry
Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MA); rat anti-mouse IFN-
Abs
R4-6A2 and biotinylated XMG1.2 (BD PharMingen); HRP-conjugated rabbit
anti-rat Ig (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark); HRP-conjugated sheep
anti-mouse IgG (SILENUS Labs, Boronia, Australia); rat
anti-mouse perforin Ab (KM585 P1-8; Kamiya Biomedical, Seattle,
WA); mouse anti-actin Ab (AC-40; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO);
hamster anti-mouse Fas ligand (FasL)3/CD95
ligand (BD PharMingen); and biotinylated mouse anti-hamster
IgG (BD PharMingen). The following mAbs were protein G-purified from
cell supernatant: hamster anti-mouse CD3
(145-2C11), rat
anti-mouse CD8
(53.6), rat anti-mouse CD11a (I21/7.7), rat
anti-mouse IFN-
(XMG1.2), and rat anti-mouse IL-4 Abs BVD4-1D11 and
biotinylated BVD6-24G2. The rat anti-mouse CD3
Ab (KT3-1.1) and
rat anti-mouse L-selectin/CD62L Ab (Mel-14) were used as diluted
hybridoma supernatant. Cells (
106) were
incubated with 20 µl of diluted Ab for 30 min on ice, washed, and
resuspended in balanced salt solution supplemented with 5%
heat-inactivated FCS (CSL, Parkville, Victoria, Australia) and 1
µg/ml propidium iodide (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Cell surface
expression was analyzed by FACS (FACSCalibur flow cytometer using
CELLQuest V3.1f software, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).
T cell preparation
Specific pathogen-free female C57BL/6
mice were obtained from the Animal Resources Center (Perth, Western
Australia) and used at 69 wk of age. Cell suspensions from
brachial, axillary, inguinal, and lumbar lymph nodes were prepared by
passing through stainless steel mesh followed by Ficoll-Paque (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, Sydney, Australia) separation. Cells were stained
for fluorescence-activated cell sorting with PE- or FITC-conjugated
anti-CD8
Ab and biotinylated anti-CD44 Ab, followed by FITC-
or PE-conjugated streptavidin, respectively. For some experiments,
cells were stained with anti-CD62L Ab, followed by FITC-conjugated
goat anti-rat Ig Ab, followed by PE-conjugated anti-CD8
Ab
and biotinylated anti-CD44 Ab, and finally followed by
Tri-Color-conjugated streptavidin. Viable naive cells were sorted using
a FACS Vantage with Lysis II software (BD Biosciences) for
CD8+ and CD44low (bottom
30%) expression with >97% CD8+ purity. For
clonal analysis, individual cells were deposited in 96-well
round-bottom plates (Falcon, BD Biosciences) using an automated cell
deposition unit attached to the FACS. For purification of activated
CD8high and CD8low cells,
viable T cells were FACS sorted for high (mean fluorescence intensity,
>200) and low (mean fluorescence intensity, <20) CD8 expression.
Activation of CD8+ T cells
Ab-driven stimulation.
Naive CD8+ T cells were stimulated in an
accessory cell-free system as outlined in detail previously (27, 28) using immobilized anti-CD3 (2C11), anti-CD8, and
anti-CD11a Abs. Briefly, 96-well or 24-well plates (Falcon) were
incubated overnight with 40 µl or 250 µl, respectively, of the Ab
mix in PBS (anti-CD3 and anti-CD8 Abs, 10 µg/ml;
anti-CD11a Ab, 5 µg/ml) and then washed three times in PBS.
Single or 500-1000
CD8+CD44low T cells were
cultured in 200 µl (per 96-well) or in 2 ml (per 24-well) of
growth medium (modified DMEM supplemented with 50 µM 2-ME, 216 mg/L
L-glutamine and 10% heat-inactivated FCS) containing human
rIL-2 (120 IU/ml; Cetus, Emeryville, CA) in the absence or presence of
anti-IFN-
Ab (XMG1.2, 1 µg/ml) and mouse rIL-4 (3.3 U/ml,
supernatant of Sf9 insect cells infected with murine IL-4 cDNA-encoding
baculovirus (29)). One unit per milliliter of IL-4
activity was defined as the amount stimulating half-maximal
proliferation of the IL-4-dependent cell line CT.4S (29),
and 1 U/ml of baculovirus-derived IL-4 was equivalent to 7.7 ng/ml of
rIL-4 (Sigma-Aldrich). For clonal analysis, clone size was assessed
microscopically after 8 days of culture using the following scales: 0,
no cells; 1, 1102 cells; 2,
102103 cells; 3,
103104 cells; and 4,
>104 cells. Clones were then washed three times
in situ in Dulbeccos balanced salt solution with 2% FCS and once in
growth medium and incubated in the same wells (containing the
immobilized anti-CD3/8/11a Abs) overnight with 200 µl of
growth medium containing 120 IU/ml IL-2. After 1822 h, culture
supernatants were harvested for cytokine analysis, and clones were
assayed for cytolysis and cell surface receptor expression. Bulk
cultures were harvested after 7 or 8 days of culture for analysis.
MLR. CD8+CD44low T cells (15 to 20) from C57BL/6 mice were incubated with 58 x 105 allogeneic spleen cells (gamma-irradiated with 2000 rad) from DBA/2 mice in 200 µl of growth medium supplemented with 300 IU/ml IL-2 (this concentration provided optimal cell growth in the MLR) and with or without 3.3 U/ml IL-4 in 96-well round-bottom plates. After 8 days of culture, activated T cells were purified by Ficoll-Paque separation and analyzed.
Cytokine induction assays
For clonal assays, cytokine induction was induced overnight by
the plate-bound anti-CD3/8/11a Abs, and 50 µl of supernatant per
well was spot tested without further dilution. To reduce
stimulus-independent cytokine synthesis (Fig. 7
B), the
anti-CD3/8/11a Ab-stimulated T cells were rested in growth medium
and IL-2 for at least 4 days after primary activation before the cells
were stimulated for cytokine induction. T cell populations (5 x
104) were incubated for 2224 h in 200
µl of growth medium containing 120 U/ml IL-2 with the
following stimuli: 1) plate-bound anti-CD3/8/11a Abs; 2) allogeneic
P815 cells (5 x 104) with or without
soluble anti-CD3 Ab 2C11 (1 µg/ml); and 3) no stimulus. IL-4 and
IFN-
were assayed in duplicate serial titrations of supernatant (50
µl, pooled from at least three replicate samples) by ELISA using the
anti-IL-4 Abs BVD4 and biotinylated BVD6 (30) or the
anti-IFN-
Abs R4-6A2 and biotinylated XMG1.2, respectively. In
some experiments, IFN-
was measured by the growth inhibition of the
IFN-
-sensitive cell line WEHI-279, as described previously
(31). Measured IL-4 and IFN-
activities were
standardized by reference to titrations of baculovirus-derived murine
IL-4 or purified murine rIFN-
(Sigma-Aldrich).
|
Cells of the H-2d FcR+ mastocytoma line P815 were labeled with Na51CrO4 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 60 min at 37°C and then washed twice in growth medium. Labeled target cells (5 x 103) were incubated for 45 h at 37°C with T cells in 200 µl in round-bottom 96-well plates. In the case of anti-CD3/8/11a-stimulated T cells, anti-CD3 Ab (2C11; 13 µg/ml) was added to bridge T cells with target cells (redirected 51Cr release assay). Pooled clones or cells from bulk cultures were serially diluted for addition to target cells. In clonal assays, half of each T cell clone was spot tested without further dilution. Harvested supernatant was dried onto 96-well solid Lumaplates (Packard Instrument, Meriden, CT) before the radioactivity was counted in a Topcount microplate scintillation counter (Packard Instrument). For perforin inhibition experiments, T cells (110 µl) were preincubated with 91 ng/ml concanamycin A (Sigma-Aldrich; stock dissolved in DMSO at 100 µg/ml) or the DMSO diluent control for 23 h at 37°C before addition to the target cells. Spontaneous lysis of target cells was typically <12%, and differences in sample release, performed in duplicate, were within 5%. Total 51Cr release from target cells was obtained by lysis in 1% SDS. The percentage specific lysis was calculated by the following formula: 100 x [(sample cpm - spontaneous release cpm)/(total release cpm - spontaneous release cpm)].
Immunoblot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed essentially as described
(32). Briefly, cells were washed in PBS and lysed in
protein sample buffer (2% SDS; 5%
-monothioglycerol
(Sigma-Aldrich); 10% glycerol; 60 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8); 0.001%
bromophenol blue) with sonication and then boiling for 5 min. Total
protein samples of 3 x 105 cells and a
protein standard mix (Kaleidoscope; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) were
subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE and electro-transferred onto
ECL-nitrocellulose filters (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using a minigel
system (Bio-Rad). Filters were stained with Ponceau S (Sigma-Aldrich)
to reveal total protein and were then preincubated for 1 h in
Blotto buffer (PBS, 0.1% Tween 20, 5% skim milk) at room temperature.
Filters were incubated with anti-perforin Ab (10 µg/ml,
diluted in Blotto) for 3 h, then washed three times for 10 min
each in PBS-0.1% Tween 20, and finally incubated for 1 h with
HRP-conjugated anti-IgG at a 1/1000 dilution. The filters were
washed as outlined above,and the reactions were visualized
using the ECL Western blotting detection system (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). For detection of actin, the same filters were restained with
anti-actin Ab (0.5 µg/ml), followed by an HRP-conjugated
anti-IgG Ab (1/1000).
RT-PCR and quantitative competitive (QC)-PCR analysis
The detailed protocols for mRNA preparation, cDNA conversion,
and amplification were published previously (33, 34).
Briefly, RNA was extracted by Nonidet P-40 hypotonic lysis of 1000
cells, and cDNA was prepared using avian myeloblastosis virus
reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI), oligo(dT) primers, and
RNase inhibitors. For expression analysis of CD8
and the
housekeeping gene
2-microglobulin
(
2m), serial dilutions of cDNA (pooled from
three replicate preparations) were amplified by PCR using Red Hot
polymerase (Advanced Biotechnologies, Leatherhead, U.K.), dNTPs, and
the cDNA-specific primer pair CD8
-F2
(5'-TCCTTCAGAAAGTGAACTCTAC), CD8
-R2
(5'-AGATGTAAATATCACAGGCG), or m
2M-F
(5'-TGACCGGCTTGTATGCTATC), m
2M-R (5'-
CAGTGTGAGCCAGGATATAG), respectively. PCR products were analyzed by
agarose gel electrophoresis and sequenced. QC-PCR of three replicate
cDNA samples was performed with Red Hot polymerase, dNTPs, competitor
plasmid, and one of the primer pairs specific for cDNA of perforin
(In-F, 5'-CAAGCAGAAGCACAAGTTCGT; In-R, 5'-CGTGATAAAGTGCGTGCCATA),
granzyme A (In-F, CTCAAGACCGTATATGGCTCT; In-R,
5'-CCTGCACAAATCATGTTTAGT), granzyme B (In-F, 5'-ACTTTCGATCAAGGATCAGCA;
In-R, 5'-ACTGTCAGCTCAACCTCTTGT), granzyme C (In-F,
5'-GGCTCACAACATCAAGGCTAA; In-R, 5'-AACTTCGTGCAGTGTTTTTGG), and FasL
(In-F, 5'-GTTTTTCCCTGTCCATCTTG; In-R, 5'-TCCAGAGATCAGAGCGGTTC),
with the reverse primers being biotinylated at their 5' ends.
Each of the competitor plasmids encoded the corresponding PCR product
sequence with a small deletion and was tested in 5-fold dilutions
against a fixed amount of cDNA. PCR products were captured on
streptavidin-coated plates, hybridized with FITC-labeled probes
specific for either the cDNA or competitor product, and quantitated
with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-FITC Ab and
4-nitrophenylphosphate (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). PCR
amplification (25-µl assay in 96-well plates) was performed using an
Omnigene thermal cycler (Thermo Hybaid, Middlesex, U.K.) and the
following conditions: one cycle of 96°C for 4 min then 60°C for 1
min and 72°C for 1.5 min, followed by 39 cycles of 94°C for 0.5 min
then 60°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1.5 min. For CD8
amplification,
the annealing temperature was reduced to 56°C.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We investigated how IL-4 influences cytolytic activity and
production of IFN-
and IL-4 during the development of clones from
individual CD8+ T cells of naive phenotype. An
accessory cell-free culture system was used to limit the influence of
endogenous cytokines on cell differentiation. Single
CD8+CD44low T cells
purified from lymph nodes of normal C57BL/6 mice were stimulated with
IL-2 and immobilized Abs to CD3, CD8, and CD11a, either in the absence
of other cytokines (neutral conditions) or in the presence of IL-4 and
neutralizing anti-IFN-
Ab (type 2-polarizing conditions). After
8 days, cultures were scored microscopically for clone size, washed in
situ to remove exogenous IL-4 and soluble Ab, and then incubated for
another day in medium containing IL-2 to allow the secretion of
cytokines in response to the immobilized anti-receptor Ab. At day
9, supernatants were harvested for cytokine assay, and cytolytic
activity was measured by transferring clones into a redirected
51Cr release assay with the
FcR+ tumor P815 cells to which bridging
anti-CD3 Ab was added to bypass the requirement for peptide/MHC
recognition.
Fig. 1
A shows the relationship
between clone size and each of the three measured functions. In this
and other experiments, cloning efficiencies were routinely in the range
8697%, and most clones contained at least 1000 cells and therefore
had undergone at least 11 divisions at the time of assay. Cytolytic
activity and IL-4 and IFN-
production were generally undetectable in
clones of fewer than 100 cells. Both the frequencies of positive clones
and their mean activities in each assay rose with clone size above this
100-cell threshold.
|
; very few secreted IL-4. These cytolytic
clones and the rare IL-4-producing clones were contained within the
IFN-
-secreting group (Fig. 1
-producing clones in type 2-polarizing conditions were slightly
reduced compared with clones generated in neutral conditions (Fig. 1
+IL-4+CTL-,
IFN-
+IL-4+CTL+,
and
IFN-
-IL-4+CTL-
(Fig. 1
Table I
summarizes the functions of 871 T
cell clones derived from
CD8+CD44low cells in four
independent experiments. The type 2-polarizing conditions always
significantly reduced the frequency of cytolytic T cell clones and
increased the frequency of IL-4 producers compared with neutral
conditions. In contrast, the reduction in IFN-
-producing
clones was only statistically significant in two of four experiments.
Experiment 4 further showed that the effect of type 2-polarizing
conditions on both IL-4 production and cytolytic activity was mainly
due to the exogenous IL-4, not the anti-IFN-
Ab.
|
To investigate the mechanisms underlying the effect of IL-4 on
cytolytic function, we compared the surface phenotypes of pooled clones
grown in neutral and type 2-polarizing conditions (Fig. 2
). Whereas CD3 and CD11a expression
levels were similar in the two cell populations, many cells in the type
2-polarized population displayed markedly reduced levels of surface
CD8
. No significant difference in the viability of pooled clones
from the two culture conditions was detected by analysis of propidium
iodide uptake or expression of the early apoptotic marker annexin V. In
addition, CD44 expression was up-regulated on all cells, regardless of
CD8 levels (data not shown). The partial loss of surface CD8 was
consistently observed in pooled clones and polyclonal cultures of
CD8+ T cells activated with anti-receptor Ab
under type 2-polarizing conditions and was detectable as early as day 5
of stimulation. CD8 down-regulation was also seen when anti-IFN-
Ab or immobilized anti-CD8 Ab were omitted from the cloning
cultures and when the usual rIL-4 source was replaced with commercial
purified rIL-4 (data not shown).
|
in type 2-polarized clones correlates with
their low cytolytic activity
To determine whether the variation in surface CD8
levels among
pooled type 2-polarized clones shown in Fig. 2
was due to differences
between clones, we analyzed a series of randomly picked clones of
similar size (Fig. 3
). The majority of
clones grown in neutral conditions were CD8high
cells. Most of these clones were cytolytic and produced little or no
IL-4. The remaining four clones showed lower CD8 expression, low
cytolytic activity, and negligible IL-4 production. In contrast, most
clones grown in type 2-polarizing conditions displayed some reduction
in CD8 expression. The profiles of individual clones were extremely
variable, ranging from 4 to 98% CD8high. There
was a broad correlation among loss of CD8 expression, low cytolytic
activity, and IL-4 secretion. However, the finding that four of the 42
IL-4-producing clones expressed intermediate CD8 levels (between 48 and
65% CD8high cells per clone) but showed good
cytolytic activity (>28% specific lysis) and two other clones
expressed high (>89%) CD8 levels but were noncytolytic (<6.7%)
indicated that CD8 expression was not the only parameter affecting
cytolytic function. It is noteworthy that there was no difference
between CD8 T cells originating from the
CD44lowCD62Lhigh and
CD44low naive phenotype (Fig. 3
B,
compare squares with circles).
|
|
Ab
reduced lytic activity by 2.5- to 30-fold (data not shown).
Loss of CD8
expression is accompanied by low expression of
perforin and granzymes
The lytic activity of CD8+ T cells
stimulated in neutral or type 2-polarizing conditions was markedly
reduced (to background or at least 21-fold compared with controls) when
the T cells were preincubated with concanamycin A before addition to
the redirected 51Cr release assay (Fig. 4
B), indicating that lysis was mediated by the perforin
pathway (35). Therefore, we analyzed
CD8high and CD8low T cells
from neutral and type 2-polarized cultures for their expression of
perforin and the three most prominent granzymes found in activated
murine T cells, granzymes A, B, and C (36). The
70-kDa
perforin protein complex was readily detected by immunoblot analysis in
the CD8high populations purified from neutral and
type 2-polarized cultures but was not detected in the
CD8low cells from type 2-polarized cultures or in
control P815 cells (Fig. 5
A).
Subsequent staining with anti-actin Ab showed that protein loading
was comparable in all lanes.
|
2m mRNA were similar in all three populations
and IL-4 mRNA levels were 1.7-fold increased in the
CD8low population (data not shown).
To investigate whether the reduction in surface CD8 protein levels was
reflected at the mRNA level, expression of CD8
and the control gene
2m was analyzed by RT-PCR (Fig. 5
C). CD8
mRNA levels were at least 16-fold lower in the
sorted CD8low population from type 2-polarized
cultures than in the CD8high populations obtained
from these cultures or under neutral conditions. Sequencing of the PCR
products confirmed their identity (data not shown). The IL-4-dependent
reduction in surface CD8 levels therefore was likely to be due at least
partly to lower transcription and/or higher turnover of CD8
mRNA.
We also analyzed mRNA and cell surface protein expression of FasL/CD95
ligand by QC-PCR and FACS, respectively. To amplify the FasL signal
detected by FACS, a combination of anti-FasL Ab, biotinylated
anti-hamster IgG, and PE-conjugated streptavidin was used. However,
FasL mRNA and protein expression was very low in the
CD8high and CD8low cell
populations, regardless of the culture conditions (data not shown).
This result and the data in Fig. 4
B were consistent with a
previous report indicating that the perforin/granzyme pathway, rather
than FasL-Fas interaction, is the major mechanism by which P815 target
cells are lysed by activated CD8+ T cells
(37). Taken together, the data suggest that the effect of
IL-4 on the cytolytic function of primary CD8+ T
cell clones is mediated, at least in part, at the level of perforin and
granzyme expression.
The effect of IL-4 on cytolytic function is also observed in allogeneic MLR
To examine whether IL-4 also affected CD8 expression and cytolytic
function in Ag-stimulated T cells,
CD8+CD44low T cells from
lymph nodes of untreated C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were
stimulated in an MLR with irradiated DBA/2 (H-2d)
spleen cells and IL-2 with or without IL-4 for 7 days. When the
unfractionated populations were then assayed for cytolytic activity in
a 51Cr release assay with P815
(H-2d) target cells, no difference was observed
between cells grown in the presence or absence of IL-4 (Fig. 6
A), in contrast to results
presented above for cells activated with anti-receptor Ab. However,
FACS analysis revealed significant down-regulation of surface CD8
expression on a proportion of cells (18%) from type 2-polarized
cultures (Fig. 6
B). CD8low and
CD8high cells were therefore purified from
neutral and type 2-polarized cultures and assayed for cytolytic
activity against P815 target cells. Fig. 6
C shows that the
lytic activity of the CD8low population generated
with IL-4 was
10-fold lower than that of either of the two
CD8high populations. From this and three other
experiments, it was concluded that IL-4 down-regulated surface CD8
expression and depressed cytolytic function in a subpopulation of CD8 T
cells activated in the MLR.
|
Because IL-4-induced CD8low cells displayed
reduced lysis of P815 target cells via bridging anti-CD3 Ab or
alloantigens, we analyzed whether these cells were also impaired in
their ability to respond to target cells by producing cytokines.
CD8+CD44low T cells were
activated with anti-receptor Ab or allogeneic cells in the presence
or absence of IL-4, then sorted for high or low CD8 expression. The
sorted populations were restimulated with P815 cells in the presence or
absence of bridging anti-CD3 Ab or with immobilized Ab to CD3, CD8,
and CD11a for 24 h. As shown in Fig. 7
, all populations produced substantial
titers of IFN-
in response to both P815 and immobilized Ab;
CD8low cells produced 5- to 6-fold lower titers
than CD8high cells from the same cultures in
response to each type of stimulus. Significant IL-4 secretion, in
contrast, was only detected in supernatants of cells that had been
exposed to exogenous IL-4 during priming and was generally higher in
cultures of CD8low cells than in the
corresponding CD8high cells. The reciprocal
relationship between IL-4 and IFN-
production by
CD8low and CD8high cells
was observed in four different experiments. The results show that the
IL-4-induced CD8low populations generated in
response to anti-receptor Ab or allogeneic cells retained the
capacity to produce cytokines in response to target cells against which
they displayed a reduced lytic activity.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, have
minimal cytolytic activity, and synthesize both IL-4 and IFN-
. Cells
of this phenotype were identified in cultures activated with Abs to
CD3, CD8, and CD11a or with alloantigens. However, the coexistence of
variable proportions of CD8high, cytolytic
IFN-
+IL-4+ T cells in
the same cultures, and even within the same clones, often led to
masking of the noncytolytic phenotype and may explain why some previous
studies did not detect these cells. The finding that the noncytolytic
phenotype was associated with low expression of surface CD8 protein and
of perforin and granzyme mRNAs suggests that the poor cytolytic
activity of these cells in 51Cr release assays
reflected the dual impairment of target cell recognition and the
lethal hit.
Most of the experiments reported here were performed in clonal cultures
stimulated with anti-receptor mAb and IL-2 in which the great
majority of single
CD8+CD44low T cells give
rise to clones over
8 days. When IL-2 was the only cytokine added,
most clones were cytolytic and produced IFN-
without IL-4. Inclusion
of IL-4 with or without anti-IFN-
mAb in these cultures from day
0 did not interfere with clonal expansion but resulted in the formation
of clones of variable functional phenotype. Separation of cells from
pooled IL-4-exposed clones based on their surface CD8
levels showed
that this marker distinguished a noncytolytic
CD8low fraction from the typical cytolytic
CD8high population, with both populations
secreting IL-4. Similar cells could be identified in bulk cultures
stimulated with anti-receptor mAb and in one-way MLR established
with purified CD8+CD44low
responder cells.
Erard et al. (4) previously found that exposure to IL-4
during activation of murine CD8+ T cells with
either PMA and ionomycin or with alloantigens led to the development of
CD8- cells with low cytolytic activity, perforin
expression, and IFN-
production and elevated production of type 2
cytokines. However, other groups reported no differences in the
cytolytic activity or CD8 levels expressed by
CD8+ T cells activated in the presence or absence
of IL-4 in various Ag-driven systems, although IL-4 did induce IL-4
synthesis (5, 24, 25, 26). The CD8 marker appears to offer a
key to explaining these conflicting results. Data shown in two of these
reports reveal some loss of surface CD8 expression, by up to 22% of
cells activated in MLR in the study of Sad et al. (24) and
a small unspecified number in the study of Carter and Dutton
(25). In our hands, the percentage of
CD8low cells was affected by several parameters,
including the duration of culture and the initial ratio of responder to
stimulator cells in MLR (CD8 down-regulation increased with time and
lower ratio; data not shown). Later work by Erard et al.
(38) showing that TGF-
antagonized the effect of IL-4
on cytolysis and CD8 expression suggests another factor that might
contribute to the lesser effect of IL-4 in MLR and other APC-dependent
systems compared with the APC-free anti-receptor mAb system used
here. We observed in different MLR and anti-CD3/8/11a Ab
stimulation experiments (by varying culture time) that the effect of
IL-4 on cytolytic activity was generally undetectable in cultures where
fewer than
25% of cells had down-regulated CD8 (data not shown). In
these cases, FACS purification of the CD8low
cells was necessary to demonstrate the presence of a noncytolytic
population. Therefore, the presence of such cells might not have been
detected in some earlier studies.
Others have also reported that type 2-polarized CD8 T cells could
provide B cell help (4, 23, 24). In our hands, the
noncytolytic CD8low fraction induced
10-fold
higher levels of IgM and IgG1 when irradiated and cocultured with
splenic B cells in the presence of immobilized anti-CD3 Ab,
compared with CD8high cells derived from the same
type 2-polarized culture (N.K., unpublished observations).
The noncytolytic CD8low subpopulations we
identified in anti-receptor mAb-activated cultures and MLR secreted
IFN-
as well as IL-4, although average IFN-
titers were lower
than in type 2-polarized cultures of CD8high
cells. This finding calls into question the value of IFN-
as a
surrogate marker for CTL in systems where IL-4 may be present. In the
absence of a single-cell assay for cytolytic activity, ELISpot and FACS
analysis of intracellular IFN-
are widely used to count
CD8+ effector cells, based on the strong positive
correlation between IFN-
titers and cytolytic activity observed at
the population level in many responses. The results obtained here
indicate that such methods would overestimate CTL numbers if they
detected cells of the IFN-
-producing noncytolytic phenotype
described here.
Isolation of CD8low cells from IL-4-exposed cultures identified a poorly cytolytic population with significantly lower levels of mRNA for perforin and granzymes A, B, and C than the cytolytic CD8high fraction obtained from the same cultures or from cultures activated under neutral conditions. This suggests at least two mechanisms by which IL-4 may have reduced cytolytic activity.
The first is reduction of target cell recognition due to low CD8
coreceptor expression. Early work showing that cytolytic activity of T
cells activated in MLR can be reduced by blocking surface CD8 with
soluble Abs or by selective removal of CD8 with trypsin led to the
suggestion that CD8 stabilizes low-affinity interactions between TCR
and class I MHC complexes (39). Subsequent studies have
shown that CD8 reduces the off-rate of this interaction, indicating
that it is an active participant in the recognition complex
(40). The mechanism of the effect of IL-4 on CD8 levels is
not known. We show here that CD8
expression was down-regulated at
both the mRNA and surface protein levels, suggesting effects on
transcription rate and/or mRNA turnover. Given the role of the GATA-3
transcription factor in promoting IL-4 and IL-5 gene transcription and
potentiating type 2 T cell polarization (41, 42), it is notable that the murine CD8
promoter
contains three functional GATA-3 binding sites (43). The
loss of surface CD8 expression did not depend on CD8 ligation because
it was observed in the anti-receptor Ab-driven system when
anti-CD8 Ab was omitted, and it persisted for at least 6 days when
cells were transferred into IL-4-free medium, with or without
immobilized anti-CD3/8/11a Abs, after a week of IL-4 exposure (data
not shown). Therefore, the data we have to date suggest that the
CD8low characteristic is a stable differentiated
phenotype, rather than a transient response to IL-4 exposure or CD8
ligation.
The second candidate mechanism for the effect of IL-4 on cytolytic activity is a reduction of granule cytotoxicity due to low perforin and granzyme synthesis. Erard et al. (4) previously showed a correlation between low cytolysis and low perforin mRNA levels by Northern analysis. In the present study, analysis of perforin expression by RT-PCR and immunoblot demonstrated that this mediator was markedly lower at both the mRNA and protein levels in CD8low cells than in the CD8high fraction. Although granzyme expression could only be assessed at the mRNA level because of lack of reagents for protein detection, the data presented here suggest a substantial effect of IL-4 on the expression of three of these proteases, granzymes A, B, and C. This effect was most profound for granzyme C. Perforin is known to play a crucial role in the granule exocytic pathway of cytotoxicity (36, 44, 45), whereas granzyme B contributes to the rapid apoptotic death detected in 51Cr release assays (46, 47) and granzyme A has been proposed to act independently of granzyme B (48). The function of granzyme C, however, is enigmatic, and only one report has attributed any role to this mediator in lymphocyte cytotoxicity (49). For the moment, the significance of its inhibition by IL-4 is obscure.
The negligible expression of perforin and granzymes in the
CD8low population was not due to failed
activation because these cells secreted substantial titers of both
IFN-
and IL-4 in response to anti-CD3 Ab or Ag stimulation, and
they expressed high levels of the activation marker CD44. It is
difficult to ascertain whether the loss of surface CD8 impaired their
recognition of stimulator cells for cytokine production, but it is
notable that the opposite IFN-
/IL-4 ratios produced by
CD8low and CD8high cells
were observed in response to both types of stimulus, suggesting that
this reversal was intrinsic to the producing cells rather than a
differential response to different stimuli.
Whereas it is clear that IL-4 actively down-regulated expression of CD8
(because this coreceptor was expressed on all starting cells), it is
not clear whether it prevented the initial onset of perforin and
granzyme expression in newly activated CD8+ T
cells (for example, by counteracting signals that make these genes
available for transcription through demethylation or other processes)
or whether it down-regulated the expression of these genes after they
had been activated. Experiments are in progress to attempt to track
this pathway in developing clones. Similarly, it remains to be
determined whether there is a tight linkage between the loss of CD8
expression and low or absent perforin and granzyme expression.
Such a linkage is supported, however, by a study using
2m-deficient mice that found that failed
CD8-TCR engagement resulted in down-regulation of CD8 and granzyme B
mRNA in CD8+ T cells; CD8
expression was
silenced by promoter methylation (50). The fact that IL-4
was expressed by both CD8low and
CD8high cells indicates that the IL-4-induced
loss of CD8 expression was not tightly linked to the induction of IL-4
synthesis.
There are several previous studies that show the signature of IL-4-induced CD8 T cell immune deviation in vivo. For example, human CD8 T cells from HIV-infected patients produce IL-4 (8), and during HIV infection there is a switch of cytolytic type 1-polarized CD8 T cells to cells that make type 2 cytokines and lack cytolysis and/or CD8 expression (8, 51). In some viral immunity models in mice, expression of IL-4 down-regulates cytolytic T cell function with subsequent delay or even breakdown of virus clearance in the challenged animal (11, 12, 15, 17, 18). In light of the results reported here, further investigation on the linkage among CD8 expression, type 2 cytokine expression, and cytolytic function should lead to a deeper understanding of immune deviation of CD8 T cell responses in vivo.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Norbert Kienzle, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Post Office, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Qld 4029, Australia. E-mail address: norbertK{at}qimr.edu.au ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: FasL, Fas ligand; QC, quantitative competitive;
2m,
2-microglobulin. ![]()
Received for publication August 20, 2001. Accepted for publication December 6, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
but not IL-4 or IL-6. Int. Immunol. 4:475.
-producing CD8+ T cells. Immunology 93:341.[Medline]
production profile in the antigen-specific CD4+ T cell response to protein immunization. Int. Immunol. 6:1515.
(IFN-
) and interleukin 3 (IL-3) genes in newly activated primary CD8+ T lymphocytes: regional IFN-
promoter demethylation and mRNA expression are heritable in CD44high CD8+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 188:103.
determines IL-4-induced generation of type 1 or type 2 CD8 T cell subsets. J. Immunol. 162:209.
upstream regulatory sequences. J. Exp. Med. 178:941.