The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savoldo, B.
Right arrow Articles by Rooney, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Savoldo, B.
Right arrow Articles by Rooney, C. M.
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 168: 909-918.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

Generation of EBV-Specific CD4+ Cytotoxic T Cells from Virus Naive Individuals1

Barbara Savoldo*,{dagger}, Michael L. Cubbage*,{dagger}, April G. Durett*,{dagger}, John Goss{dagger},{ddagger}, M. Helen Huls*,{dagger}, Zhensheng Liu*,{dagger}, Lopez Teresita*,{dagger}, Adrian P. Gee*,{dagger}, Paul D. Ling§, Malcolm K. Brenner*,{dagger}, Helen E. Heslop*,{dagger} and Cliona M. Rooney2,*,{dagger}

* Center for Cell and Gene Therapy and Departments of {dagger} Pediatrics, {ddagger} Surgery, and § Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adoptive immunotherapy with EBV-specific CTL (EBV-CTL) effectively prevents and treats EBV-driven lymphoproliferation in immunocompromised hosts. EBV-seronegative solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk of EBV-driven lymphoproliferation because they lack EBV-specific memory T cells. For the same reason, standard techniques for generating EBV-CTL in vitro from EBV-naive individuals are unsuccessful. To overcome this problem, we compared several methods of expanding EBV-CTL from seronegative adults and children. First, the standard protocol, using EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid B cell lines (LCL) as the source of APC, was compared with protocols using EBV-Ag-loaded dendritic cells as APC. Surprisingly, the standard protocol effectively generated CTL from all seronegative adults. The additional finding of EBV-DNA in the peripheral blood of three of these four adults suggested that some individuals may develop cellular, but not humoral, immune responses to EBV. By contrast, LCL failed to reactivate EBV-CTL from any of the six EBV-seronegative children. EBV-Ag-loaded dendritic cells could expand EBV-CTL, but only in a minority of children. However, the selective expansion of CD25-expressing T cells, 9–11 days after activation with LCL alone, proved to be a simple and reliable method for generating EBV-CTL from all seronegative children. The majority of these CTL were CD4+ (71 ± 26%) and demonstrated HLA class II-restricted, EBV-specific killing. Our results suggest that a negative EBV serology does not accurately identify EBV-negative individuals. In addition, our method for selecting EBV-specific CTL from naive individuals by precursor cell enrichment may be applicable to the immunotherapy of cancer patients with a low frequency of tumor- or virus-specific CTL.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Epstein-Barr virus is a ubiquitous gammaherpesvirus that causes lifelong infections in humans (1). EBV-driven posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD)3 are a major problem following T lymphocyte-depleted HLA-mismatched hemopoietic stem cell transplant or solid organ transplant (SOT) (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Because of the use of high doses of immunosuppressive agents and/or T cell depletion, these patients have impaired cellular immune responses and therefore cannot control the proliferation of EBV-infected B cells (6). The incidence of PTLD is a particular problem in the pediatric population, because a high proportion of young children are EBV seronegative and cannot mount a primary immune response to EBV while receiving immunosuppressive drugs (7, 8, 9). PTLD can be aggressive, with a rapidly lethal course, and current therapies have limited success (10).

Restoration of T cell immunity by infusion of ex vivo expanded EBV-specific CTL has been shown to be safe and effective in treating and preventing EBV-related PTLD after hemopoietic stem cell or SOT (11, 12, 13, 14, 15). EBV-specific CTL can be reactivated from EBV-seropositive individuals by stimulation of peripheral blood T cells with autologous irradiated EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid B cell lines (LCL) (11, 16). Although LCL are potent APCs, they seem incapable of inducing a primary immune response to EBV in vitro (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). This has been a major problem for the high-risk seronegative recipients of EBV-seropositive organ grafts, who are the individuals most at risk (8). Although it has been possible to reactivate and expand ex vivo EBV-specific CTL from SOT recipients after their primary infection, CTL generation takes ~12 wk, leaving patients highly vulnerable during this time (15). Ideally, CTL for high risk patients should be generated prophylactically, preferably before transplant. Because partially HLA-matched CTL lines from CTL banks are unlikely to survive for long after the adoptive transfer into the allogeneic host, we have considered alternative strategies for the ex vivo production of autologous EBV-specific CTL from seronegative patients.

One approach is to use APCs, such as dendritic cells (DC), that are assumed to be more potent than LCL. DC have been considered to be the only APC type capable of inducing primary responses in vitro (18). An alternative approach is to selectively expand the rare circulating EBV-specific precursors, present even in EBV-seronegative patients. It has been suggested that only 30–70% of the T cells in CTL lines reactivated from seropositive individuals by stimulation with the autologous LCL are EBV specific, while the remaining cells are most likely nonspecific bystander T cells (19). Because the precursor frequency of EBV-specific T cells in seropositive individuals is high (0.1–2% of circulating T cells), the specific cells remain in the majority and their function is readily detected. In contrast, the precursor frequency of EBV-specific CTL in seronegative individuals is extremely low (<1:100,000), so that nonspecific bystander cells may dominate the cultures, and the function of the specific CTL may not be detected (20).

The aim of this study was to identify a reliable method for the generation of EBV-specific CTL from the peripheral blood of EBV-seronegative individuals awaiting SOT for future clinical application. We compared LCL with three formulations of APCs (DC pulsed with apoptotic/necrotic LCL, or with freeze-thaw lysates of LCL, or DC fused to LCL). We also analyzed the effects of selectively expanding CD25-positive T cells after activation with LCL alone, an approach previously applied in EBV-seropositive donors to enrich the population for EBV-specific CTL (19). Our results demonstrate a biologic difference between EBV-seronegative adults and EBV-seronegative children. Thus, the standard protocol for EBV-CTL generation effectively reactivated EBV-specific CTL lines from seronegative adults, but for seronegative children, an additional CD25 selection step was required. Because we were able to detect EBV-DNA in the peripheral blood of three of the four seronegative adults, we conclude that many seronegative adults may in fact have been exposed to EBV. Our method of expanding Ag-specific CTLs from naive donors may also be applied generally to the generation of tumor-specific CTL from cancer patients whose tumors have poor Ag-presenting function.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Blood donors

Peripheral blood samples were collected from 10 EBV-seronegative donors (six children, 1–8 years old; four adults, 28–44 years old). Eight adult EBV-seropositive donors were used as controls in some experiments. Informed consent was given in all these cases by the donors themselves or by their respective guardians. The characteristics and serology of the seronegative individuals are summarized in Table IGo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Characteristics of the EBV-seronegative donors at the time of peripheral blood collection for CTL generation

 
Samples

PBMC, enriched using Ficoll gradient centrifugation (Lymphoprep medium 1.077, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), were directly processed or frozen for further analysis. Serum or plasma samples were collected and stored.

Detection of anti-VCA and anti-EBNA Abs in serum/plasma. Both IgG and IgM anti-viral capsid Ag (VCA) and anti-nuclear EBV (EBNA) Abs were determined on serum/plasma samples, using routine ELISA (Department of Pathology, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX) or immunofluorescence staining (21). Donors were considered EBV seronegative if the anti-VCA and anti-EBNA titers were <1:10 (below the level of detection).

Detection of EBV-DNA in PBMC. DNA was isolated from 5 x 106 PBMC using an anion exchange column (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Five hundred nanograms of DNA were then tested by real-time PCR to quantitate EBV genome numbers, as previously reported (22). The sensitivity of our PCR was four genomes per microgram of DNA. The median EBV copy number detected in normal seropositive individuals was <4 (range <4–200) copies/µg DNA.

Generation of EBV-transformed B cell lines (LCL)

For LCL generation, five million fresh or frozen PBMC were infected with concentrated supernatant from the B95-8 EBV producer cell line, as previously reported (22, 23). All cell lines were cultured in complete medium consisting of RPMI 1640 (HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone) and 2 mmol/L L-glutamine (Life Technologies).

Generation of DC

DC were generated from frozen PBMC. Briefly, PBMC were cultured in AIM-V medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% human serum type AB (HABS; C-SIX Diagnostics, Germantown, WI), 1000 U/ml human rIL-4 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), and 800 U/ml human rGM-CSF (Leukine; Immunex, Seattle, WA) for 3 days, and then applied on a 48.2% Percoll gradient (v/v; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) for DC enrichment (recovery of 0.5–1%). DC were then plated at 1 x 106/ml in AIM-V medium supplemented with 10% HABS and fresh IL-4/GM-CSF. On day 7, the DC were induced to mature by culture in 50% monocyte-conditioned medium (MCM) (24). Using this procedure, we were reproducibly able to obtain a population of large cells (40–66%), positive for HLA-DR and negative for lineage (CD3 for T cells, CD19 for B cells, CD16 for NK cells, CD56 for lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells, and CD14 for monocytes) markers (80 ± 7%). In addition, >90% of these cells expressed CD80, CD86, CD40, and HLA-ABC Ags. After maturation, the percentage of CD83+ cells ranged from 15 to 40% of the large cells.

DC loading. To induce apoptosis/necrosis, LCL were irradiated at 4000 rad and then cultured in serum-free medium for 24–72 h, after which 47 ± 14% of the cells were apoptotic and 22 ± 15% were necrotic, as measured by annexin V and propidium iodide staining, according to manufacturer’s instructions (BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA). The LCL were then incubated with DC at a 1:1 ratio for 24 h, before maturation in MCM. After a 48-h maturation, the LCL-pulsed DC were used to stimulate autologous PBMC. Freeze-thaw lysates of LCL were generated as reported by Herr et al. (25), and the lysate was added to autologous DC obtained after Percoll enrichment. After maturation for 48 h with MCM, DC were used for CTL activation.

Fusion of LCL to DC. LCL that had been transduced with a retrovirus vector expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) and selected for eGFP expression were used as the fusion partner, to allow for further analysis. Percoll-enriched DC were fused to eGFP-LCL using 50% polyethylene glycol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), following the procedure of Gong et al. (26). Fusion hybrid DC/LCL were then plated for 48 h in AIM-V medium plus 10% HABS and fresh IL-4/GM-CSF, then used for CTL activation. Hybrid DC-LCL formation (43%) was demonstrated by acquisition of green fluorescent protein positivity by an HLA-DR-positive, lineage-negative large cell population.

Determination of cellular immunity to EBV

Cellular immunity to EBV was measured by regression assay, which measures the number of PBMC required to produce complete regression of autologous EBV-infected B cells; ELISPOT, which measures the number of cells that secrete cytokines in response to stimulation with the LCL; and by generation of EBV-specific CTL, which determines the presence and function of T cells that can be expanded in culture in response to EBV Ags.

Regression assay. The precursor frequency of EBV-specific CTL was measured by regression assay (27). Briefly, after infection with concentrated supernatant from the EBV producer cell line, B95-8 EBV, PBMC were plated in complete medium (without cyclosporin A) at doubling dilutions, from 6 x 105 to 1 x 104 cells/well of a flat-bottom 96-well plate, using six replicates per dilution. Cultures were maintained by regular feeding and examined for foci of virus-induced transformation and subsequent regression over 6 wk. The regression was expressed in terms of the minimum initial cell number required per well for a 50% frequency of regression.

ELISPOT for IFN-{gamma}-secreting cells. The frequency of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells in response to LCL-specific stimulation was assessed on PBMC in toto by ELISPOT assay, as reported by Ambinder et al. (28). Briefly, MAHA S45 plates (Millipore, Bedford, MA) were coated with anti-IFN-{gamma} Ab 1 DIK (Mabtech, Stockholm, Sweden) overnight and blocked with complete medium for 1 h at 37°C. PBMC were added at doubling dilution from 1 x 105/well in presence of autologous LCL for 24 h at 37°C and washed off, and then plates were incubated with biotin anti-IFN-{gamma} Ab 7-B6-1 (Mabtech). Appropriate controls consisting of PBMC, LCL, and medium alone were plated and incubated with biotin anti-IFN-{gamma} Ab 7-B6-1 as well. Streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (Life Technologies) was added for 1 h at room temperature, and spots were developed with nitroblue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate substrate mix (Life Technologies). Spots were counted (Zellnet Consulting, New York, NY) and expressed as number of spots/1 x 105 cells when dilution was linear.

Generation of EBV-specific T cell lines

Activation with LCL. As previously reported (11, 22), PBMC were activated with autologous, irradiated (4000 rad) LCL, at an E:S ratio of 40:1, in complete medium. After 10 days, viable cells were restimulated with LCL at a 4:1 E:S ratio. From days 15–17, 40 U/ml human rIL-2 (Proleukin; Chiron, Emeryville, CA) was added. Cells were then expanded by weekly restimulation with LCL (4:1 ratio) and twice weekly addition of IL-2 (40–100 U/ml) until numbers sufficient for specificity analysis were obtained. This was referred to as the standard protocol.

Activation using DC. PBMC were cocultured with irradiated (4000 rad) DC that had been loaded with apoptotic/necrotic LCL, or with LCL lysate, or fused with LCL, all used at an E:S ratio of 20:1. At 10-day intervals, cells were restimulated using irradiated, autologous LCL in the presence of IL-2, as per the standard protocol.

Activation using LCL and selection of CD25-positive cells. PBMC cultured for 9–11 days with irradiated, autologous LCL at an E:S ratio of 40:1 were stained with CD25-PE Ab (20 µl for 107 cells; BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA) for 30 min at 4°C, washed, resuspended in 500 µl of sterile PBS supplemented with 1% FBS, and sorted using a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). From seronegative children, an average of 4.4 ± 3.4% of bright CD25+ cells were selected (purity from 90 to 97%). After sorting, CD25-enriched cells were expanded using the standard protocol. In some cases, CTL culture medium contained 10% HABS instead of FBS.

Immunophenotyping

For phenotypic evaluation, cells were stained with combinations of the following Abs: CD83 and CD56 from Immunotech (Miami, FL); CD80 and CD86 from BD PharMingen; CD3, CD4, CD8, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD25, TCR{alpha}{beta}, TCR{gamma}{delta}, HLA-DR, and HLA-ABC from BD Biosciences. Control samples labeled with appropriate isotype-matched Abs (BD Biosciences) were used in each experiment. After staining, cells were evaluated on a FACScan analyzer (BD Biosciences) equipped with the filter set for triple fluorescence signals. In addition, the TCR-V{beta} region of the expanded CTL was studied using the TCR-V{beta} repertoire kit (IOTest {beta} Mark kit; Immunotech), according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Chromium release assays

The cytotoxic activity of each CTL line was evaluated in a standard 5-h 51Cr release assay, as previously reported (22, 23). Autologous LCL, HLA class I- and/or II-mismatched LCL, and autologous PHA blasts were used as the target cells. In addition, the EBV-negative K562 chronic-erythroid-leukemia or the HSB-2 T cell lymphoma cell lines were used as indicators of NK and LAK cells, respectively. Preincubation for 30 min with either the mAb W6/32 (DAKO, Carpenteria, CA) or the mAb CR3/43 (DAKO) was used to determine whether the killing was HLA class I or II restricted, respectively. If cytolytic activity against HSB-2 or K562 was high, CTL were depleted of CD56-positive cells using magnetic cell sorting, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (MACS-CD56 MicroBeads, and AS column for negative selection; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). CD56-depleted CTL were then tested for cytotoxic specificity. In some experiments, cold target inhibition assays were performed as follows: 2-fold dilutions of unlabeled competitor cells, ranging from 3.2 x 105 to 2 x 104, were incubated with a constant number (104) of 51Cr-labeled target cells and a constant number of effector cells (105 cells) in a standard 5-h 51Cr release assay.

ELISA

The IFN-{gamma} human ELISA system (BD PharMingen) was used to measure the release of cytokines in culture medium. Supernatant was collected 24 h after specific antigenic stimulation and analyzed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Student’s t test was used to determine the statistical significance of differences between samples. All data are presented as mean ± 1 SD.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
EBV-specific CTL could be generated from EBV-seronegative adults, but not EBV-seronegative children, using the standard protocol

To assess the ability of LCL to induce EBV-specific CTL expansion from naive individuals, the standard protocol was first tested in our series of EBV-negative donors.

When LCL-activated cell lines from the six EBV-seronegative children were evaluated after their fourth LCL stimulation, the majority of the expanded cells were CD3+CD4+ (51 ± 19%), with <10% of the cells CD8+ or CD56+ (mean of 8 ± 8% and 7 ± 9%, respectively). The remaining cells were CD19-positive LCL (Table IIGo). The total expansion over this period ranged from 0.3- to 5-fold (mean of 2.7 ± 2.1). These T cells lysed neither the autologous LCL (12 ± 11% at 40:1 ratio) nor allogeneic LCL (11 ± 10%, at 40:1 E:T ratio) (Fig. 1GoA). However, high lysis of the HSB-2 cell line was observed in three cases (54, 73, and 90% at the 40:1 ratio), suggesting the presence of nonspecific LAK cells. The lack of specific killing by T cell lines from seronegative children correlated with negligible IFN-{gamma} release in response to autologous or allogeneic LCL, as measured by ELISA (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Phenotype of CTL lines generated from EBV-seronegative donors using different approaches1

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. LCL can activate EBV-specific CTL from seronegative adults but not seronegative children. Shown here is the cytotoxic specificity of T cell lines expanded by multiple stimulations of PBMC with the autologous LCL, in presence of IL-2 from day 15 (standard protocol). Figure shows the percentage of specific chromium release from target cells. HSB-2 ({square}), autologous LCL ({diamondsuit}), and HLA class I- and II-mismatched LCL (x) were labeled with 51Cr and incubated with CTL for 5 h at the E:T ratios indicated. A, The mean activity of T cell lines expanded from six EBV-seronegative children. B, The mean activity of T cell lines expanded from four EBV-seronegative adults. HSB-2 provides a measure of lymphokine-activated cell-mediated killing.

 
Unexpectedly, we were able to generate EBV-specific CTL from all four EBV-seronegative adults. As shown in Fig. 1GoB, the expanded lymphocytes demonstrated significant killing of the autologous LCL (68 ± 14% at a 20:1 ratio) compared with allogeneic LCL (6 ± 9% at a 20:1 ratio) or the HSB-2 cell line (17 ± 17% at a 20:1 ratio). This killing was MHC class I restricted, because it was inhibited by the anti-HLA class I mAb, W6/32 (mean inhibition, 39%; range, 17–82%). The majority of the T cells were CD3+CD8+ (88 ± 8%), with fewer CD3+CD4+ T cells (11 ± 9%). A significant percentage of the CD3+ cells had a LAK cell phenotype, coexpressing the CD8 and CD56 Ags (30 ± 11%, Table IIGo). Depletion of CD56 cells reduced the lysis of the HSB-2 cell line to 2%, while killing of autologous LCL remained unmodified. In no case was lysis of autologous PHA blasts or fibroblasts observed (data not shown), an important specificity requirement if these CTL lines are to be used clinically. The specific cytolytic activity correlated with high IFN-{gamma} release in response to stimulation with the autologous LCL (2140 ± 540 pg/ml x 106 cells). Although the CTL from seronegative adults demonstrated a phenotype and cytotoxic activity comparable with CTL generated from our series of normal healthy EBV-seropositive donors, they grew with slower kinetics. The total fold expansion after the fourth stimulation was 2.8 ± 0.5 (range 2.3–3.3) vs 5.5 ± 4.2 (range 0.6–12) in CTL generated from healthy donors.

EBV-seronegative adults may be EBV carriers

To investigate why LCL were able to activate and expand EBV-specific CTL in the group of EBV-seronegative (and presumed uninfected) adults, we tested our donors for the presence of EBV-DNA and EBV-specific T cell memory.

As shown in Table IGo, Abs to VCA and EBNA were undetectable in plasma or serum samples from all EBV-seronegative donors. However, EBV-DNA was sporadically detected in the peripheral blood of three EBV-seronegative adults (10–60 genome copies/µg DNA). The mean level of EBV-DNA that we have previously found in normal seropositive individuals was 10 genomes/µg DNA (median <4, range <4–200 copies/µg DNA). Negative controls run for each PCR assay excluded the possibility of contamination or cross-contamination. EBV-DNA was never detected in the fourth adult or in any of the seronegative children.

To further quantitate the EBV-specific immune response, we used the regression assay, developed by Rickinson et al. (27). In both seropositive and seronegative donors, PBMC exposed to EBV in vitro developed foci of proliferating EBV-transformed B cells within the first 2 wk of culture. Regression of the culture was seen in all EBV-seropositive donors and in three of the four EBV-seronegative adults: the foci of EBV transformation degenerated in the following 3 wk and failed to give rise to LCL (Table IGo). In contrast, none of the EBV-seronegative children showed regression, even in the presence of a high number of PBMC. This suggested that at least three of the four EBV-seronegative adults tested had recent or persistent infection with EBV, without developing serological evidence of this encounter. Finally, we investigated the frequency of EBV-specific CTL by ELISPOT assay (Table IGo). In three seronegative adults, the number of T cells that secreted IFN-{gamma} in response to LCL stimulation was 651 ± 110/105 PBMC. Similar frequencies were detected in EBV-seropositive healthy donors (723 ± 180 spots/105 PBMC). The fourth adult had a frequency of EBV-specific precursor (20 spots/105 cells) within the range observed in the EBV-seronegative children (101 ± 100 spots/105 cells). These low numbers indicate a lack of EBV-specific memory T cells in the peripheral blood of these individuals. For the fourth seronegative adult, the presence of regression and the ability to develop an EBV-specific CTL using the standard protocol, despite negativity for EBV-DNA and low frequency of IFN-{gamma} spots, may be explained by the presence of CTL precursors that cross-react with EBV Ags (molecular mimicry).

EBV-Ag-loaded DC induce EBV-specific CTL from some, but not all, EBV-seronegative donors

To determine whether more potent APCs would be able to activate EBV-specific CTL from the EBV-negative children, unresponsive to standard LCL expansion, we used DC loaded with EBV Ags as stimulators. Strategies for the loading of these DC with EBV Ags were to coculture them with apoptotic/necrotic LCL (29), or with lysates of LCL (25), or to fuse them with LCL (26).

EBV-specific CTL could be generated from only two of the four EBV-seronegative children tested, using DC loaded with apoptotic/necrotic LCL. The CTL lines from these two children were predominantly CD4+ T cells (72 ± 12%) (Table IIGo) and killed the autologous LCL more then the allogeneic LCL and the HSB-2 cell line (78 ± 19% vs 11 ± 11% vs 33 ± 15% at 20:1 ratio, respectively) (Fig. 2GoA). These CTL lines also secreted IFN-{gamma} in response to the autologous LCL (528 vs 159 pg/ml x 106 cells in presence of autologous LCL vs allogeneic LCL, respectively). No lysis of autologous PHA blasts was observed (data not shown). In the other two individuals, there was no difference in the killing of autologous or allogeneic LCL and HSB-2, suggesting that only NK/LAK cell-mediated activity had been expanded (data not shown). Failure to generate EBV-specific T cells was also observed when PBMC from EBV-seronegative children were activated with DC loaded with autologous LCL lysates (data not shown). When hybrid DC-LCL were used as activators, EBV-specific CTL were generated in just one of the EBV-seronegative children tested, and in this child the killing of the autologous LCL (94% at 20:1 ratio) was blocked by Abs to both MHC class II and MHC class I (killing reduced to 44 and 75%, respectively).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. CTL generated from EBV-seronegative individuals using DC loaded with different strategies do not reproducibly induce EBV-specific CTL lines. Shown is the cytotoxic activity of CTL generated by stimulation with autologous DC pulsed with apoptotic/necrotic LCL from EBV-seronegative children (A, mean data from two successful of four attempts) and two of two seronegative adults (B). Target cells were: HSB-2 ({square}), autologous LCL ({diamondsuit}), and HLA class I- and II-mismatched LCL (x).

 
As expected, DC were able reproducibly to expand EBV-specific CTL in the seronegative adult group, regardless of the method of Ag loading chosen. As shown in Fig. 2GoB, the expanded T cell lines exhibited specific cytotoxic activity.

EBV-specific CTL were generated reproducibly from EBV-seronegative children by selection of CD25-positive T cells

While EBV-Ag-loaded DC were able to expand EBV-specific CTL in some EBV-seronegative children, the procedure was not reproducible and therefore not suitable for use in a clinical trial. Therefore, we determined whether EBV-specific CTL activity could be revealed by selectively expanding T cells that expressed activation markers in response to stimulation with autologous LCL. The CD25 Ag is the {alpha}-chain of the IL-2R, which is up-regulated on the surface of T lymphocytes after they encounter cognate Ag. In the past, this Ag has been used to deplete alloreactive T cells from stem cell allografts. Several groups have demonstrated that the depletion of donor CD25-positive cells after coculture with recipient cells is able to eliminate alloreactive response and reduce the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (30, 31). Recently, Ibisch et al. (19) demonstrated that EBV-specific CTL can be purified from EBV-seropositive donors by positive selection for CD25 expression 6 days after stimulation with autologous LCL. Therefore, we selected CD25-positive cells 9–11 days after stimulation by cell sorting, in the anticipation that this would select the EBV-specific CTL precursors.

At the time of selection, the percentage of CD25+ T cells in the cultures was 4.4 ± 3.4%, compared with 37 ± 20% in seropositive or adult-seronegative donors. After the CD25 selection, the CTL lines expanded rapidly even when very few cells were recovered (the total expansion from sorting on day 9–11 up to the seventh stimulation was 240-fold, range from 20 to 769). Fig. 3Go shows the gate used for the CD25 sorting and the expansion of a representative CTL line generated from one of the six EBV-seronegative children. Using this procedure, EBV-specific CTL were successfully generated from all six EBV-seronegative children. In addition, this procedure was successfully repeated in two of these children, confirming its reproducibility. Interestingly, the majority of the CTL were CD3+CD4+ (71 ± 27; Table IIGo), although in three cases 19–25% of the cells expressed CD3+CD8+. In all cases, the CTL demonstrated specific killing of the autologous LCL compared with allogeneic LCL (46 ± 20% vs 2 ± 3% at a 20:1 ratio; Fig. 4GoA), which was reduced in the presence of MHC class II Abs (mean 29 ± 13%). In the three lines containing CD8+ T cells, the killing was also blocked by anti-class I Abs (data not shown). LAK activity (mean 21 ± 20% at 20:1 ratio) was seen in three CTL lines that had >10% of CD56+ T cells. Depletion of these CD56+ cells eliminated LAK killing of HSB-2 (7 ± 5%), without significant modification of autologous LCL lysis (42 ± 18%) (Fig. 4GoB). Moreover, lysis of the autologous LCL was not inhibited by the presence of increasing concentration of cold HSB-2 cells or of cold allogeneic LCL (Fig. 5GoC). As suggested by the cytotoxicity assay, supernatant collected 24 h after stimulation with autologous LCL showed high IFN-{gamma} release (2471 ± 1190 pg/ml x 106 cells) compared with allogeneic LCL (872 ± 12 pg/ml x 106 cells). The TCR-combinatorial diversity of these CD25-selected CTL was analyzed by mAbs recognizing TCR-V{beta}-specific regions. As observed for CTL generated from our series of normal donors, CTL generated using the CD25 selection procedure presented considerable heterogeneity, with no specific over- or underrepresentation of any V{beta} family (Table IIIGo).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. CTL sorted 9–11 days after LCL stimulation for expression of CD25 Ag expand easily. Figure shows the EBV-specific CTL line generated from a representative EBV-seronegative child. Nine days after stimulation with autologous LCL, CTL were gated as shown in A. Gated cells were selected for CD25 expression using a FACScan flow sorter (90% purity), as shown in B. CD25-enriched cells were then weekly expanded with autologous LCL in the presence of IL-2. The expansion rate of the sorted cells is presented in C.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. CTL generated from EBV-seronegative individuals by selection of CD25-positive T cells show EBV-specific cytotoxic activity. Figure shows a chromium release assay using seronegative effectors against target cells HSB-2 ({square}), autologous LCL ({diamondsuit}), and HLA class I- and II-mismatched LCL (x). Figures show the cytotoxic characteristics of T cell lines expanded by selection of CD25-positive cell 9–11 days after LCL stimulation. A, Results from all six EBV-seronegative children (mean ± SD of eight of eight experiments). C, Results of one EBV-seronegative adult. B, The cytotoxic activity of the CTL from the six EBV-seronegative children after depletion of CD56-positive cells shows that removal of NK/LAK cells does not affect the killing of autologous LCL.

 


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. EBV-specific CTL are elicited from seronegative children even when activated in medium supplemented with FBS. A–C, The cytotoxic activity of EBV-specific CTL generated in FBS against labeled (hot) autologous LCL grown in FBS in the presence of increasing numbers of cold competitors: HSB-2 ({square}), HLA class I- and II-mismatched LCL (x), autologous LCL grown in FBS ({diamondsuit}), or autologous LCL grown in HABS ({diamond}). The competitor:target cell ratio is indicated on the x-axis. D–F, The standard 51Cr release assay against FBS-grown autologous LCL (filled bars) and HABS-grown autologous LCL (gray bars). A and D, CTL generated using the standard protocol from one representative EBV-seronegative adult. B and E, CTL from the same individual generated using the CD25 selection protocol. C and F, CTL generated by the CD25 selection approach from one representative EBV-seronegative child. This assay shows that CD25-selected CTL exhibit a strong EBV-specific component beyond the FBS-specific response.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Repertoire analysis of CTL lines generated from six EBV-seronegative donors using the CD25 selection protocol1

 
The CD25 protocol was also tested in one EBV-seronegative adult and, as expected, the phenotypic and cytotoxic profiles of these CTL were comparable with those of CTL generated with the standard protocol or with DC, with CD8+ T cells being present in CTL lines generated by all methods (Fig. 4GoC and Table IIGo). When the CD25-selected CTL line was evaluated for TCR-V{beta} subsets, the pattern of the T cell repertoire was superimposable with CTL generated with the standard protocol (Table IIIGo, donor 6).

CD25-sorted CTL are EBV specific, even when FBS is present in the culture medium

It has been suggested that stimulation of CTL in the presence of FBS can result in FBS-specific killing (32, 33). When PBMC from EBV-seropositive donors were reactivated with LCL in presence of either 10% FBS or 10% HABS, there was little difference in the increase in expression of CD25, which peaked at ~9–11 days (Table IVGo). However, the possibility of activation of FBS-specific CTL is greater when the initial frequency of the responding EBV-specific T cells is low. To determine whether EBV-specific CTL generated in FBS medium contained FBS-specific CTL, we tested the CD25-sorted CTL for the ability to kill autologous LCL grown in HABS. For comparison, CTL generated by the standard protocol were tested in parallel. All CTL were able to lyse both FBS-grown and HABS-grown LCL, although the latter were lysed less well (Fig. 5Go, D, E, and F). However, as shown in Fig. 5Go, cold target competition experiments clearly showed that HABS-grown autologous competitor LCL inhibited the lysis of autologous FBS-grown target LCL. This was true for CTL generated from the EBV-seronegative adult, when either the standard protocol or the CD25 selection approach was used (Fig. 5Go, A and B, respectively). A similar high level of inhibition was seen when CTL from EBV-seronegative children were tested (Fig. 5GoC).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Expression of CD25 on PBMC from seropositive adults after stimulation with autologous LCL in the presence of FBS or HABS culture medium1

 
Finally, because our ultimate goal is to adoptively transfer such EBV-specific CTL to SOT recipients, we demonstrated that EBV-specific CTL could be generated in HABS culture medium using the CD25-sorting procedure. Fig. 6Go shows CTL expanded from two EBV-seronegative children in the presence of FBS (A and C) or HABS (B and D). Interestingly, as observed for normal EBV-seropositive donors (data not published), CTL generated in HABS usually have lower cytotoxic activity against the HSB-2 (Fig. 6GoB) compared with CTL generated in FBS-containing medium (Fig. 6GoA). However, in one of the CTL lines expanded in HABS medium, a higher number of CD16+ cells was observed (16% resulting in HSB-2 killing of 30% at a 20:1 ratio, Fig. 6GoD) as compared with the CTL expanded from the same individual in presence of FBS (5% resulting in HSB-2 lysis of 9% at 20:1 ratio, Fig. 6GoC). However, this LAK activity is not a concern since our previous experience with hemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients showed that infusion of CTL demonstrating in vitro HSB-2 killing was not associated with in vivo toxic effects or signs of graft-versus-host disease (11).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. CD25-selected T cell lines retain good EBV specificity in HABS-containing medium. A and C, The cytotoxic profile of CD25-selected CTL generated from two seronegative children in medium supplemented with FBS. The cytotoxic activity of CD25-selected CTL generated from the same children in medium supplemented with HABS is presented in B and D, respectively. Target cells are HSB-2 ({square}), HLA class I- and II-mismatched LCL (x), autologous LCL grown in HABS ({diamondsuit}), and autologous LCL grown in FBS ({diamond}).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
EBV-seronegative children and adults are at high risk for the development of EBV-driven lymphoproliferation after SOT, and it is difficult to generate protective immune responses in these patients. Our data illustrate that there is a biological distinction between EBV-seronegative adults and EBV-seronegative children, but that LCL can be used to activate EBV-specific CTL in both groups. In the adult-seronegative group, our standard protocol, involving multiple stimulations of PBMC with the autologous LCL, and the addition of IL-2 from day 15, was sufficient to activate and expand EBV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ CTL. However, in seronegative children, EBV-specific CTL generation could be demonstrated only if CD25-positive T cells were selectively expanded. In most cases, the majority of these CTL were CD4+ and HLA class II restricted. While DC loaded with LCL Ags were effective in reactivating EBV-specific CTL from seropositive or seronegative adults, they could not routinely activate CTL lines from seronegative children. Thus, the most reliable method of generating EBV-specific CTL from seronegative patients is to stimulate PBMC with the autologous LCL, followed by a selection step on days 9–11.

The relative ease of generating CTL from seronegative adults compared with children may be explained by their increased exposure to multiple environmental Ags. As a result, the CTL repertoire of adults becomes so wide that CTL precursors that cross-react with EBV Ags are elicited (molecular mimicry). This might be true for one of the seronegative adults, from whom we were able to grow EBV-specific CTL lines, but who tested EBV negative by PCR and by ELISPOT (Table IGo). In three other adults, the more likely explanation is that they have in fact been exposed to EBV, but have failed to mount a serological response to the virus, because EBV-DNA could be detected in peripheral blood. Furthermore, using the regression assay, which is a quantitative measure EBV-specific immunity, T cells from three of the four seronegative adults produced regression of virus-transformed B cells, with estimated CTL precursor frequencies within the range detected in normal seropositive individuals. EBV has previously been detected in a seronegative adult (34). This individual carried an EBV transformation deletion mutant that was detected in saliva for more than 7 years.

Conversely, in the EBV-seronegative children, neither EBV-DNA nor LCL regression was observed at any cell concentration, indicating that they were truly naive. The consequence of this difference was that multiple stimulations with the autologous LCL (standard protocol) reactivated EBV-specific CTL from the four seronegative adults but from none of the six children. The effector cells from the seronegative adults are true CTL, showing clear evidence of MHC restriction and target cell specificity. Several investigators have previously reported that LCL can enhance NK or LAK activity in EBV-seronegative donors, and apparent EBV-specific cytotoxic activity obtained from seronegative donors has often not been clearly differentiated from NK- or LAK-mediated activity (17, 33, 35). We observed a similar phenomenon in three of our seronegative children from whom cytolytic T cell lines were elicited using the standard protocol. The cytotoxic activity was unrestricted by HLA Ags, was increased in the presence of blocking Abs to HLA, and was completely removed by depletion of CD56+ cells (data not shown). The clinical value of cells with NK/LAK properties or containing predominantly NK/LAK activity remains questionable.

Our comparison of different approaches for reactivation of EBV-specific CTL from EBV-seronegative individuals revealed several unanticipated results. Initially, we assumed that reactivation of EBV-specific CTL from genuinely naive pediatric donors would require Ag presentation by DC, since they are reported to be the APCs most capable of activating primary immune responses in vitro (18). Therefore, we used a variety of techniques to load DC with EBV Ags for presentation. But although our loaded DC had the phenotypic characteristics of mature APC (large lineage-negative, DR+ cells expressing CD80, CD86, and CD83), and readily reactivated EBV-specific CTL from adults, the induction of primary responses to EBV was not reproducibly obtained in the seronegative children. Instead we found that LCL alone were sufficient for the pediatric samples, provided there was early selection of CD25+ cells. While our results do not prove that DC are unnecessary for the activation of a primary immune response in vitro (since DC precursors were not eliminated from the cultures), they indicate that enrichment or specialized activation and maturation of these cells is not required. It is also likely that activation of PBMC with loaded DC, followed by a CD25+ selection step, would reproducibly produce EBV-specific CTL from seronegative children. However, use of LCL represents a simpler strategy for generating EBV-specific CTL from small children and babies, from whom the large amounts of blood required for DC generation may be difficult to obtain.

There are means other than the use of CD25 selection by which EBV-specific precursor cells could be selected and expanded. Cloning approaches have successfully been applied for similar purposes, but they are laborious and have a significant failure rate. Moreover, polyclonal responses are less likely to permit the outgrowth of epitope loss variants than monoclonal T cells (36). The CD25 (IL-2R) activation marker is particularly useful for the application we propose, because it is expressed only on T cells that have encountered cognate Ag. In fact, it was recently shown that LCL-activated T cells from EBV-seropositive donors that were positively selected for CD25 have increased overall EBV specificity with only slight decrease of the overall diversity of the T cell line (19). From all EBV-seronegative donors tested in our study, the selective expansion of CD25+ cells 9–11 days after LCL stimulations allowed the successful and reproducible generation of EBV-specific T lymphocytes from fresh or frozen PBMC. For optimum protection, these CD25-sorted cells should recognize a wide spectrum of EBV-associated Ags. The antigenic repertoire may be more restricted when this technique is applied to EBV-seronegative individuals, because fewer precursor clones may be available for selection and expansion. However, analysis of TCR-V{beta} usage showed that these CTL were highly heterogeneous. The most remarkable difference when this approach was applied in EBV seronegatives was the prevalent expansion of CD4+ cells. This difference is more likely to be due to true naivety, rather than to an age difference, since the CTL lines we generated from EBV-seropositive children contained normal CD8+ T cell numbers (22). Limited experience of the antitumor and antiviral activity of CD4+ EBV-specific T cell lines exists. Therefore, only in vivo administration will provide definitive data on the efficacy of the CD4+ T cells expanded from the EBV-seronegative individuals using the CD25 selection. Recently, Metes et al. (35) reported the successful generation of EBV-specific CTL from two EBV-seronegative individuals by adding rIL-12 during the first round of stimulation. Although promising, this approach requires testing in EBV-seronegative children. We also show that DC, which indeed produce IL-12, can induce the generation of CTL in EBV-seronegative individuals, but in our hands this technique was not reproducibly effective in children. If CD4+ cells generated with the CD25 procedure do not have in vivo effects, IL-12 can be added to increase the frequency of CD8+ cells.

The characteristics of the T lymphocytes expanded from EBV-seronegative individuals by stimulation with autologous LCL have previously been evaluated, and it was found that when FBS was used in the culture medium many of the expanded lymphocytes recognize FBS-associated Ags (33). The risk of expanding FBS-specific CTL may not be relevant when the frequency of the precursors to be expanded is high, as for EBV-seropositive individuals. In the hemopoietic stem cell transplant setting, we have extensively demonstrated the antiviral and antitumor effects of EBV-specific CTL, even though they were expanded in FBS-containing medium (11, 12). In contrast, when EBV-specific CTL precursor frequencies are low, competing expansion of FBS-specific CTL is more likely. This problem was ruled out, since autologous LCL grown in HABS medium were lysed at similar levels to FBS-grown LCL and acted as competitive target.

In conclusion, the definition of the immune status of both donor and recipient at the time of transplant is crucial for specifically identifying patients at high risk for developing PTLD. The correct identification of EBV-negative individuals will also avoid the necessity of generating EBV-specific CTL using alternative and more expensive approaches. For truly EBV-negative individuals, the selection of cells expressing CD25 after stimulation with LCL represents a reproducible, simple, and effective protocol for the generation of EBV-specific CTL from naive individuals. This technique may be applied to immunotherapy of other disease and malignancies in which the Ag-specific precursor frequency is low, either because a tumor fails to present Ags to the immune system or because a patient is immunologically naive.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful for the consistent and reliable support of Brian Newsom and Tatiana Gotsolva of the Flow Cytometry Core Facility for FACS analyses. We thank the Quality Assurance/Quality Control group of Good Manufacturing Practice facility in the Center for Cell and Gene Therapy at Baylor College of Medicine for excellent technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA61384 and the Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine. B.S. was the recipient of the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Research Foundation Clinical Investigator Fellowship. A Distinguished Clinical Scientist Award was given to H.E.H. from the Doris Duke Foundation. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Cliona M. Rooney, Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin Street, MC 3-3320, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail address: crooney{at}bcm.tmc.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: PTLD, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder; DC, dendritic cell; EBNA, anti-nuclear EBV; eGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; HABS, human serum type AB; LAK, lymphokine-activated killer; LCL, lymphoblastoid B cell line; MCM, monocyte-conditioned medium; SOT, solid organ transplant; VCA, viral capsid Ag. Back

Received for publication June 5, 2001. Accepted for publication November 2, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Miller, G.. 1990. Epstein-Barr virus: biology, pathogenesis and medical aspects. B. N. Fields, and D. M. Knipe, eds. Virology 1921. Raven, New York.
  2. Shapiro, R. S., K. McClain, G. Frizzera, K. J. Gajl-Peczalska, J. H. Kersey, B. R. Blazar, D. C. Arthur, D. F. Patton, J. S. Greenberg, B. Burke, et al 1988. Epstein-Barr virus associated B cell lymphoproliferative disorders following bone marrow transplantation. Blood 71:1234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Heslop, H. E., C. Li, R. A. Krance, S. K. Loftin, C. M. Rooney. 1994. Epstein-Barr infection after bone marrow transplantation. Blood 83:1706.[Free Full Text]
  4. Niedobitek, G., L. S. Young. 1994. Epstein-Barr virus persistence and virus-associated tumors. Lancet 343:333.[Medline]
  5. Swinnen, L. J., M. R. Costanzo-Nordin, S. G. Fisher, E. J. O’Sullivan, M. R. Johnson, A. L. Heroux, G. J. Dizikes, R. Pifarre, R. I. Fisher. 1990. Increased incidence of lymphoproliferative disorder after immunosuppression with the monoclonal antibody OKT3 in cardiac-transplant recipients. N. Engl. J. Med. 323:1723.[Abstract]
  6. Rickinson, A. B., D. J. Moss. 1997. Human cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to Epstein-Barr virus infection. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15:405.[Medline]
  7. Sokal, E. M., H. Antunes, C. Beguin, M. Bodeus, P. Wallemacq, J. de Ville de Goyet, R. Reding, M. Janssen, J. P. Buts, J. B. Otte. 1997. Early signs and risk factors for the increased incidence of Epstein-Barr virus-related posttransplant lymphoproliferative diseases in pediatric liver transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus. Transplantation 64:1438.[Medline]
  8. Younes, B. S., S. V. McDiarmid, M. G. Martin, J. H. Vargas, J. A. Goss, R. W. Busuttil, M. E. Ament. 2000. The effect of immunosuppression on posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in pediatric liver transplant patients. Transplantation 70:94.[Medline]
  9. Ho, M., R. Jaffe, G. Miller, M. K. Breinig, J. S. Dummer, L. Makowka, R. W. Atchison, F. Karrer, M. A. Nalesnik, T. E. Starzl. 1988. The frequency of Epstein-Barr virus infection and associated lymphoproliferative syndrome after transplantation and its manifestations in children. Transplantation 45:719.[Medline]
  10. Paya, C. V., J. J. Fung, M. A. Nalesnik, E. Kieff, M. Green, G. Gores, T. M. Habermann, P. H. Wiesner, J. L. Swinnen, E. S. Woodle, J. S. Bromberg. 1999. Epstein-Barr virus-induced posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders: ASTS/ASTP EBV-PTLD Task Force and The Mayo Clinic Organized International Consensus Development Meeting. Transplantation 68:1517.[Medline]
  11. Rooney, C. M., C. A. Smith, C. Y. Ng, S. K. Loftin, J. W. Sixbey, Y. Gan, D. K. Srivastava, L. C. Bowman, R. A. Krance, M. K. Brenner, H. E. Heslop. 1998. Infusion of cytotoxic T cells for the prevention and treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-induced lymphoma in allogeneic transplant recipients. Blood 92:1549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Heslop, H. E., C. Y. Ng, C. Li, C. A. Smith, S. K. Loftin, R. A. Krance, M. K. Brenner, C. M. Rooney. 1996. Long-term restoration of immunity against Epstein-Barr virus infection by adoptive transfer of gene-modified virus-specific T lymphocytes. Nat. Med. 2:551.[Medline]
  13. Gustafsson, A., V. Levitsky, J. Z. Zou, T. Frisan, T. Dalianis, P. Ljungman, O. Ringden, J. Winiarski, I. Ernberg, M. G. Masucci. 2000. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) load in bone marrow transplant recipients at risk to develop posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease: prophylactic infusion of EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells. Blood 95:807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Haque, T., P. L. Amlot, N. Helling, J. A. Thomas, P. Sweny, K. Rolles, A. K. Burroughs, H. G. Prentice, D. H. Crawford. 1998. Reconstitution of EBV-specific T cell immunity in solid organ transplant recipients. J. Immunol. 160:6204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Khanna, R., S. Bell, M. Sherritt, A. Galbraith, S. R. Burrows, L. Rafter, B. Clarke, R. Slaughter, M. C. Falk, J. Douglass, et al 1999. Activation and adoptive transfer of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T cells in solid organ transplant patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:1039.
  16. Rickinson, A. B., D. J. Moss, D. J. Allen, L. E. Wallace, M. Rowe, M. A. Epstein. 1981. Reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus specific cytotoxic T cells by in vitro stimulation with autologous lymphoblastoid cell line. Int. J. Cancer 27:593.[Medline]
  17. Moretta, A., P. Comoli, D. Montagna, A. Gasparoni, E. Percivalle, I. Carena, M. G. Revello, G. Gerna, G. Mingrat, F. Locatelli, et al 1997. High frequency of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lymphoblastoid cell line-reactive lymphocytes in cord blood: evaluation of cytolytic activity and IL-2 production. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 107:312.[Medline]
  18. Banchereau, J., R. M. Steinman. 1998. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392:245.[Medline]
  19. Ibisch, C., X. Saulquin, G. Gallot, R. Vivien, C. Ferrand, P. Tiberghien, E. Houssaint, H. Vie. 2000. The T cell repertoire selected in vitro against EBV: diversity, specificity, and improved purification through early IL-2 receptor {alpha}-chain (CD25)-positive selection. J. Immunol. 164:4924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Bourgault, I., A. Gomez, E. Gomard, J. P. Levy. 1991. Limiting-dilution analysis of the HLA restriction of anti-Epstein Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 84:501.[Medline]
  21. Henle, W., G. Henle. 1978. The immunological approach to study of possibly virus-induced human malignancies using Epstein-Barr as an example. Prog. Exp. Tumor Res. 21:17.
  22. Savoldo, B., J. Goss, Z. Liu, M. H. Huls, S. Doster, A. P. Gee, M. K. Brenner, H. E. Heslop, C. M. Cooney. 2001. Generation of autologous Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTL) for adoptive immunotherapy in solid organ transplant recipients. Transplantation 72:1078.[Medline]
  23. Roskrow, M. A., N. Suzuki, Y. J. Gan, J. W. Sixbey, C. Y. Ng, S. Kimbrough, M. Hudson, M. K. Brenner, H. E. Heslop, C. M. Rooney. 1998. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes for the treatment of patients with EBV-positive relapsed Hodgkin’s disease. Blood 91:2925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Reddy, A., M. Sapp, M. Feldman, M. Subklewe, N. Bhardwaj. 1997. A monocyte conditioned medium is more effective than defined cytokines in mediating the terminal maturation of human dendritic cells. Blood 90:3640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Herr, W., E. Ranieri, W. Olson, H. Zarour, L. Gesualdo, W. J. Storkus. 2000. Mature dendritic cells pulsed with freeze-thaw cell lysates define an effective in vitro vaccine designed to elicit EBV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte responses. Blood 96:1857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gong, J., D. Chen, M. Kashiwaba, D. Kufe. 1997. Induction of antitumor activity by immunization with fusions of dendritic and carcinoma cells. Nat. Med. 3:558.[Medline]
  27. Rickinson, A. B., M. Rowe, I. J. Hart, Q. Y. Yao, L. E. Henderson, H. Rabin, M. A. Epstein. 1984. T-cell-mediated regression of "spontaneous" and of Epstein-Barr virus-induced B-cell transformation in vitro: studies with cyclosporin A. Cell. Immunol. 87:646.[Medline]
  28. Yang, J., V. M. Lemas, I. W. Flinn, C. Krone, R. F. Ambinder. 2000. Application of the ELISPOT assay to the characterization of CD8+ responses to Epstein-Barr virus antigens. Blood 95:241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Albert, M. L., B. Sauter, N. Bhardwaj. 1998. Dendritic cells acquire antigen from apoptotic cells and induce class I-restricted CTL. Nature 392:86.[Medline]
  30. Cavazzana-Calvo, M., C. Fromont, F. Le Deist, M. Lusardi, L. Coulombel, J. M. Derocq, I. Gerota, C. Griscelli, A. Fischer. 1990. Specific elimination of alloreactive T cells by an anti-interleukin-2 receptor B chain-specific immunotoxin. Transplantation 50:1.[Medline]
  31. Garderet, L., V. Snell, D. Przepiorka, T. Schenk, J. G. Lu, F. Marini, E. Gluckman, M. Andreeff, R. E. Champlin. 1999. Effective depletion of alloreactive lymphocytes from peripheral blood mononuclear cell preparations. Transplantation 67:124.[Medline]
  32. Misko, I. S., T. D. Soszynski, R. G. Kane, J. H. Pope. 1984. Factors influencing the human cytotoxic T cell response to autologous lymphoblastoid cell lines in vitro. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 32:285.[Medline]
  33. Misko, I. S., T. B. Sculley, C. Schmidt, D. J. Moss, T. Soszynski, K. Burman. 1991. Composite response of naive T cells to stimulation with the autologous lymphoblastoid cell lines is mediated by CD4 cytotoxic T cell clones and includes an Epstein-Barr virus-specific component. Cell. Immunol. 131:295.
  34. Sixbey, J. W., P. Shirley, M. Sloas, N. Raab-Traub, V. Israele. 1991. A transformation-incompetent, nuclear antigen 2-deleted Epstein-Barr virus associated with replicative infection. J. Infect. Dis. 163:1008.[Medline]
  35. Metes, D., W. Storkus, A. Zeevi, K. Patterson, A. Logar, D. Rowe, M. A. Nalesnik, J. J. Fung, A. S. Rao. 2000. Ex vivo generation of effective Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes from the peripheral blood of immunocompetent Epstein Barr virus-seronegative individuals. Transplantation 70:1507.[Medline]
  36. Gottschalk, S., C. Y. Ng, M. Perez, C. A. Smith, C. Sample, M. K. Brenner, H. E. Heslop, C. M. Rooney. 2001. An Epstein-Barr virus deletion mutant associated with fatal lymphoproliferative disease unresponsive to therapy with virus-specific CTL. Blood 97:835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
H. M. Long, J. Zuo, A. M. Leese, N. H. Gudgeon, H. Jia, G. S. Taylor, and A. B. Rickinson
CD4+ T-cell clones recognizing human lymphoma-associated antigens: generation by in vitro stimulation with autologous Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B cells
Blood, July 23, 2009; 114(4): 807 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Quintarelli, G. Dotti, B. De Angelis, V. Hoyos, M. Mims, L. Luciano, H. E. Heslop, C. M. Rooney, F. Pane, and B. Savoldo
Cytotoxic T lymphocytes directed to the preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME) target chronic myeloid leukemia
Blood, September 1, 2008; 112(5): 1876 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Liu, H.-E. Claesson, Y. Mahshid, G. Klein, and E. Klein
Leukotriene B4 activates T cells that inhibit B-cell proliferation in EBV-infected cord blood-derived mononuclear cell cultures
Blood, March 1, 2008; 111(5): 2693 - 2703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
T. Tanijiri, T. Shimizu, K. Uehira, T. Yokoi, H. Amuro, H. Sugimoto, Y. Torii, K. Tajima, T. Ito, R. Amakawa, et al.
Hodgkin's Reed-Sternberg cell line (KM-H2) promotes a bidirectional differentiation of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells and CD4+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes from CD4+ naive T cells
J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 82(3): 576 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
W. H. Lim, S. Kireta, G. R. Russ, and P. T. H. Coates
Human plasmacytoid dendritic cells regulate immune responses to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and delay EBV-related mortality in humanized NOD-SCID mice
Blood, February 1, 2007; 109(3): 1043 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
O. Beck, M. S. Topp, U. Koehl, E. Roilides, M. Simitsopoulou, M. Hanisch, J. Sarfati, J. P. Latge, T. Klingebiel, H. Einsele, et al.
Generation of highly purified and functionally active human TH1 cells against Aspergillus fumigatus
Blood, March 15, 2006; 107(6): 2562 - 2569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
N. H. Gudgeon, G. S. Taylor, H. M. Long, T. A. Haigh, and A. B. Rickinson
Regression of Epstein-Barr Virus-Induced B-Cell Transformation In Vitro Involves Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells as the Principal Effectors and a Novel CD4+ T-Cell Reactivity
J. Virol., May 1, 2005; 79(9): 5477 - 5488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Liu, J. L. Arbiser, A. Holmgren, G. Klein, and E. Klein
PSK and Trx80 inhibit B-cell growth in EBV-infected cord blood mononuclear cells through T cells activated by the monocyte products IL-15 and IL-12
Blood, February 15, 2005; 105(4): 1606 - 1613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A.-L. Ponsonby, I. van der Mei, T. Dwyer, L. Blizzard, B. Taylor, A. Kemp, R. Simmons, and T. Kilpatrick
Exposure to Infant Siblings During Early Life and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis
JAMA, January 26, 2005; 293(4): 463 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
J. E. Davis, M. A. Sherritt, M. Bharadwaj, L. E. Morrison, S. L. Elliott, L. M. Kear, J. Maddicks-Law, T. Kotsimbos, D. Gill, M. Malouf, et al.
Determining virological, serological and immunological parameters of EBV infection in the development of PTLD
Int. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 16(7): 983 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
G. Li Pira, L. Bottone, F. Ivaldi, R. Pelizzoli, F. Del Galdo, L. Lozzi, L. Bracci, A. Loregian, G. Palu, R. De Palma, et al.
Identification of new Th peptides from the cytomegalovirus protein pp65 to design a peptide library for generation of CD4 T cell lines for cellular immunoreconstitution
Int. Immunol., May 1, 2004; 16(5): 635 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
I. Kang, T. Quan, H. Nolasco, S.-H. Park, M. S. Hong, J. Crouch, E. G. Pamer, J. G. Howe, and J. Craft
Defective Control of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
J. Immunol., January 15, 2004; 172(2): 1287 - 1294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
K. Bickham, K. Goodman, C. Paludan, S. Nikiforow, M. L. Tsang, R. M. Steinman, and C. Munz
Dendritic Cells Initiate Immune Control of Epstein-Barr Virus Transformation of B Lymphocytes In Vitro
J. Exp. Med., December 1, 2003; 198(11): 1653 - 1663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Nikiforow, K. Bottomly, G. Miller, and C. Munz
Cytolytic CD4+-T-Cell Clones Reactive to EBNA1 Inhibit Epstein-Barr Virus-Induced B-Cell Proliferation
J. Virol., November 15, 2003; 77(22): 12088 - 12104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. J. Amrolia, G. Muccioli-Casadei, E. Yvon, H. Huls, U. Sili, E. D. Wieder, C. Bollard, J. Michalek, V. Ghetie, H. E. Heslop, et al.
Selective depletion of donor alloreactive T cells without loss of antiviral or antileukemic responses
Blood, September 15, 2003; 102(6): 2292 - 2299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. M. Posavad, A. Wald, N. Hosken, M. L. Huang, D. M. Koelle, R. L. Ashley, and L. Corey
T Cell Immunity to Herpes Simplex Viruses in Seronegative Subjects: Silent Infection or Acquired Immunity?
J. Immunol., April 15, 2003; 170(8): 4380 - 4388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. C.M. Straathof, C. M. Bollard, C. M. Rooney, and H. E. Heslop
Immunotherapy for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Cancers in Children
Oncologist, February 1, 2003; 8(1): 83 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. Savoldo, M. H. Huls, Z. Liu, T. Okamura, H.-D. Volk, P. Reinke, R. Sabat, N. Babel, J. F. Jones, J. Webster-Cyriaque, et al.
Autologous Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific cytotoxic T cells for the treatment of persistent active EBV infection
Blood, December 1, 2002; 100(12): 4059 - 4066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Omiya, C. Buteau, H. Kobayashi, C. V. Paya, and E. Celis
Inhibition of EBV-Induced Lymphoproliferation by CD4+ T Cells Specific for an MHC Class II Promiscuous Epitope
J. Immunol., August 15, 2002; 169(4): 2172 - 2179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savoldo, B.
Right arrow Articles by Rooney, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Savoldo, B.
Right arrow Articles by Rooney, C. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS