|
|
||||||||
Division of Infection, Immunity, Injury, and Repair, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
EBV, the human herpesvirus 4, infects the majority of humans and establishes latency in a small subset of the B lymphocyte compartment (1). In vitro, the virus activates B cells, triggering a classical, calcium-dependent activation cascade that is prerequisite for, but by itself insufficient for, subsequent growth transformation (2). Long-term growth transformation of the cells is associated with the coordinate expression of a selected repertoire of EBV-encoded genes, collectively known as the latency genes. Similar processes occur in vivo during acute infectious mononucleosis (3) and in healthy virus carriers (4), and they almost certainly play a role in the fulminant EBV-positive (EBV+) lymphomas of immunocompromised patients (5) or susceptible nonhuman primates (6, 7).
Thus, the analysis of differentially expressed genes in EBV-infected B cells has the dual goal to elucidate cellular signaling pathways involved in physiological B cell activation as well as those involved in B cell oncogenesis. It is important to understand which aspects of these two pathways overlap, and at what point and how they diverge toward oncogenic growth transformation. To this end, subtractive hybridization has been employed to delineate genes induced in primary B lymphocytes (8) or EBV-negative (EBV-) Burkitts lymphoma (BL)3 cell lines freshly infected with EBV. Several novel cellular genes associated with EBV-dependent growth transformation have been identified using this approach (9, 10, 11, 12).
We used cDNA subtraction cloning in the discovery of ZNFEB. It is a new element in B lymphocyte activation responses that EBV brings under viral control. Zinc finger proteins are usually DNA-binding transcription control proteins, and many function in cellular development and differentiation pathways. Members of this large protein family assume critical roles in cell cycle control, and their abnormal expression has been associated with the oncogenic transformation of host cells in which the protein resides. We believe that ZNFEB may serve a similar function in the EBV-driven growth transformation of B lymphocytes. Interestingly, the genomic localization of ZNFEB at 18q12 maps to a region in which chromosomal aberrations have been found in numerous different malignancies, including many of the B lineage (Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations in Cancer, http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman), suggesting that ZNFEB is a candidate molecule involved in an even broader range of tumors.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Except for the use of the Uni-ZAP XR vector (pBluescript phagemid; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), the preparation of a subtraction library containing cDNAs differentially expressed 6 h after EBV infection of normal tonsillar B cells in vitro was done as previously described (8). Briefly, purified mRNA of infected B cells was depleted of housekeeping transcripts through several cycles of hybridization to 20-fold excess of solid-phase cDNAs from noninfected B cells of the same tonsil. The remaining transcripts were cloned and plated at low density, and the inserts of randomly picked clones were directly amplified by PCR and sequenced on an automated DNA sequencer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada).
Cloning and chromosomal localization of ZNFEB
In addition to the initial 257-bp ZNFEB
cDNA clone isolated from the subtraction library, seven overlapping
cDNA clones were used to deduce the complete open reading frame (ORF)
of ZNFEB. Two expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were
obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). EST1
(I.M.A.G.E. CloneID 648205) (13) was isolated from a human
teratocarcinoma cDNA library (Stratagene), and EST2 (ATCC 157317) was
isolated from a Jurkat T cell cDNA library. Additional clones were
identified in a Jurkat T cell cDNA library (Stratagene) and a human
thymus
gt11 cDNA library (gifts of E. Arpaia, The Hospital for Sick
Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada). The chromosomal localization of
ZNFEB employed the basic local alignment
search tool algorithm (14) to search the National
Center for Biotechnology Information Human Genome Sequence
(15) and Celera Public Genome databases
(16).
Cell culture and EBV infection
Mononuclear cells were purified from tonsils by
Ficoll-Hypaque (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) density
centrifugation, and B lymphocytes were enriched (
95%) by rosette
depletion on a second Ficoll-Hypaque gradient. Cells were cultured in
RPMI 1640 medium (Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada)
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated bovine calf serum (HyClone
Sterile Systems, Logan, UT), L-glutamine (2 mM),
penicillin, and streptomycin (50 µg/ml each; Life Technologies,
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). HepG2 and 293 cell lines were cultured
in DMEM (Life Technologies) supplemented as above.
B95-8 is a semipermissive lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) and provided all EBV employed in this study (see below) (17). The 2D5 is an EBV+ LCL established in our laboratory. Raji, Daudi, and Akata (18) are EBV+ BL lines. Akata- is an EBV- cell line derived from Akata (gift of K. Takada, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan) (19). Ramos is an EBV- BL line. RI46 is an EBV- B cell line established in our laboratory from human PBMCs. Jurkat and CEM are human T cell leukemia lines. K562 (gift of N. Berinstein, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), U937, and HL60 (gifts of F. Tsui, University of Toronto) are human myeloid leukemia cell lines with erythroid, monocytic, and myeloblastic features, respectively. HeLa (gift of N. Berinstein) is a human uterine cervical carcinoma cell line. HepG2 is a human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, and 293 is an adenovirus E1-transformed human embryonic kidney cell line.
Plasmid p509 carries the genomic sequence of the immediate early EBV lytic gene BZLF1 under the control of the CMV promoter (gift of B. Sugden, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI) (20, 21). B95-8 cells were transfected with p509 (10 µg/106 cells) and cultured for 7 days in the presence of n-butyrate (3 mM; Sigma-Aldrich). Supernatants were filtered (0.45-µm pore size), concentrated 4-fold by ultracentrifugation (210,000 x g for 2 h at 10°C), and frozen at -80°C in complete RPMI 1640 media. In all experiments, 1 ml of concentrated EBV/106 B cells were used for infection. Where indicated, EGTA was added to fresh B cells (5 mM) 1 h before virus infection. Total cellular RNA was isolated at the indicated times postinfection, as described below.
B cell activation assay
Freshly isolated tonsillar B cells (4 x 106/ml) were incubated with either rabbit anti-human IgM F(ab')2 (10 µg/ml; DAKO, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) or a combination of PMA (10-8 M; Sigma-Aldrich) and ionomycin (0.5 µM; Sigma-Aldrich). Total cellular RNA was isolated at the indicated times posttreatment, as described below.
Nucleic acid isolation and analysis
Genomic DNA was isolated by standard protocols. Cellular RNA,
purified using TRIzol Reagent as instructed (Life Technologies), was
pretreated with
1 U DNase I (Life Technologies) and reverse
transcribed using 1 µg of poly(dT)1218,
80
U of RNAguard (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and 400 U of Moloney murine
leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies), as
recommended by the manufacturer. cDNAs from human thymocytes, thymus,
thyroid, exocrine pancreas, purified pancreatic islet cells, bone
marrow, brain, lung, and skeletal muscle were gifts of W. Karges (Ulm
University, Ulm, Germany) (22).
All RT-PCR reactions were conducted using the rTth DNA
Polymerase GeneAmp XL PCR kit (PerkinElmer, Mississauga, Ontario,
Canada) with the following primer pairs: ZNFEB
(41, 5'-CGGTGACCAAGTCGAGATGG-3'; or 67,
5'-CAAGACCAAGATTGGAAAGCC-3'; and 2041A, 5'-CCAGTGCGGTTTTAATGTAGC-3');
ZNFEB splice variant
(ZNFEBsv 57, 5'-GATTTTTCTGGTGGTCTAGTC-3' and
2041A); EBV nuclear Ag (EBNA)1 (109151, 5'-GTAGAAGGCCATTTTTCCAC-3';
and 109435A, 5'-TTTCTACGTGACTCCTAGCC-3');
-glucuronidase (GUS
1355, 5'-GTGATGTGGTCTGTGGCCAA-3'; and 1657A,
5'-TCTGCTCCATACTCGCTCTG-3');
-actin (actin 2445,
5'-ACTCTTCCAGCCTTCCTTCC-3'; and 3011A,
5'-TCATAGTCCGCCTAGAAGCA-3').
The ZNFEB 67 sequence is present in both
ZNFEB and ZNFEBsv. The
ZNFEB 41 primer is specific for sequences that
flank the extra exon in ZNFEBsv, while the
ZNFEBsv 57 primer is specific for sequences
within this extra exon, and thus each will differentiate between splice
variants as well as genomic DNA. RT-PCR products were
electrophoretically separated. Where indicated, gels were blotted to
Hybond-N+ membranes (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) and hybridized with the following
-32P-end-labeled reporter probes (23, 24): ZNFEB and
ZNFEBsv (ZNFEB 1858,
5'-CCATTGTGGAGAAGACAGTC-3'); EBNA1 (109194,
5'-TGAATACCACCAAGAAGGTG-3'); and
-glucuronidase (GUS 1405,
5'-CTACTACTTGAAGATGGTGATCG-3'). Photography of gels/blots was performed
using a Chemi Imager (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA).
Recombinant protein production and 65Zn(II) blotting
DNA encoding the C-terminal (zinc finger) portion of
ZNFEB (residues 252423) was PCR amplified and
cloned into the KpnI/XbaI sites of the GST fusion
expression vector pGEX-4T-2 (GST-Cterm; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
All constructs were sequence confirmed. GST-Cterm or pGEX-4T-2 vector
alone was expressed in Escherichia coli
BL21-CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL (Stratagene) at midlog growth phase by
induction with 1 mM isopropyl
-D-thiogalactoside for 2 h. Soluble
protein was extracted (B-PER; Pierce, Rockford, IL) and added to
glutathione Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), washed, and
eluted with 10 mM reduced glutathione in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.
65Zn(II) blotting was performed essentially as
described (25), with the following modifications. Eluted
protein, GST-Cterm, or GST alone (0.4 µg each) was separated by
SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose in 10 mM 3-cyclohexylamino
1-propanesulfonic acid, pH 11 (Sigma-Aldrich). Duplicate samples were
stained in a 0.25% (w/v) solution of Coomassie brilliant blue R250.
Blotted membrane strips were equilibrated in three changes (20 min
each) of 1x metal-binding buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7), 50 mM NaCl,
1 mM DTT), and probed with
1 µCi
65ZnCl2 (2 µM final
Zn(II) concentration; NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) in 3 ml of
1x binding buffer without DTT for 1 h. Strips were washed twice
in the same buffer and exposed to Kodak Biomax MR film (Kodak,
Rochester, NY) for
10 days at -80°C with intensifying
screens.
Growth inhibition by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides
Unmodified sense and antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (10 µM)
were added to triplicate cultures of purified tonsillar B cells (5
x 104/well) 1 h before EBV infection. In
some experiments, a second dose of oligodeoxynucleotides of the same
concentration was added 3 h (actin, p56lck,
5'/3' ZNFEB) or 16 h (BRLF1, BLLF3, BcLF1)
after EBV infection. After 14 days, growth transformation was measured
as [3H]thymidine uptake by liquid scintillation
counting (2). Oligodeoxynucleotides used: BARF0 (160513,
5'-CCGCCAGAGTTCCAATAGAG-3'; 160533A, 5'-CTCTATTGGAACTCTGGCGG-3');
BARF1 (165571, 5'-CTTTCTTGGGTGAGCGAGTC-3'; 165590A,
5'-GACTCGCTCACCCAAGAAAG-3'); BLLF1 (gp350 92146,
5'-CTGACACACAAGCAAGGCTG-3'; 92127A, 5'-CTGACACACAAGCAAGGCTG-3');
EBNA1 (109401, 5'-TTTAAGAGCTCTCCTGGCTA-3'; 109420A,
5'-TAGCCAGGAGAGCTCTTAAA-3'); EBNA2 (48442,
5'-CAGGTACATGCCAACAACCT-3'; 48461A, 5'-AGGTTGTTGGCATGTACCTG-3');
BRLF1 (Rta 104900, 5'-GATGGAACATGCGTCGTTGC-3'; 104881A,
5'-GCAACGACGCATGTTCCATC-3'); BLLF3 (dUTPase 88460,
ACACATACGCTACGCCTTCC-3'; 88441A, 5'-GGAAGGCGTAGCGTATGTGT-3');
BcLF1 (major capsid Ag 137041A, 5'-ATGCAGGATCTCCAGATCCA-3');
-actin
(actin 846, 5'-CATGAAGTGTGACGTGGACA-3'; 1139A,
5'-TCATAGTCCGCCTAGAAGCA-3'); p56lck
(lck 1223, 5'-CGCCAGAAGCCATTAACTA-3'; 1721A,
5'-GACAATGTGCAGAGTCCAC3'); 5' ZNFEB
(67, 67A, 5'-GGCTTTCCAATCTTGGTCTTG-3'); 3'
ZNFEB (1795, 5'-CCAGTGTGTTCAGTGCAGC-3',
2041A).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
The GenBank accession numbers for ZNFEB, HZF7 (26), the ZNFEBsv clones, ZNF-dp and PLACE1001304, ZNFphex133, and murine Zfp-35 (27, 28) are AF159567, X78930, AF153201, AK023456, AF373036, and X17617, respectively. The National Center for Biotechnology Information accession number and the Celera accession number for the chromosome 18 genomic contigs containing ZNFEB sequence are NT 010974 and Ga x2KMHMRU89G, respectively. Numbers designated for all oligodeoxynucleotides of EBV genes are based on the human herpesvirus 4, complete genome sequence (National Center for Biotechnology Information accession no. NC 001345).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A subtraction library enriched for genes induced in human B cells 6 h after infection with EBV was previously made and successfully screened in our laboratory (8). In this study, we performed a second screening, randomly selecting and PCR-amplifying over 100 clones, of which 27 were fully sequenced. Four of the 27 had unknown gene sequences, including ZNFEB, which contained unique sequence as well as a consensus C2H2 (Krüppel-type) zinc finger motif. Since numerous zinc finger proteins have been implicated in cell differentiation and proliferation, we further characterized ZNFEB.
Cloning and sequence analysis of ZNFEB cDNAs
Sequence data obtained from the subtraction library, additional
ESTs, and overlapping clones isolated from Jurkat T cell and human
thymus cDNA libraries (see Materials and Methods) predict
the ZNFEB mRNA to be at least 2195 bp long (Fig. 1
). HZF7, a small clone of 199 bp
(corresponding to bp 399597 of the ZNFEB
sequence), was previously isolated from the human monoblast cell line
U937 (26). RT-PCRs performed on a human thymus cDNA
library consistently gave two products when primers specific for the 5'
untranslated region (UTR) of ZNFEB mRNA were used
(Fig. 2
A). We confirmed the
existence of ZNFEBsv when two unpublished
sequences in GenBank, ZNF-dp and PLACE1001304, were found to be
identical to ZNFEB except for an extra 223 bp
within this amplified 5' UTR region (Fig. 1
). However, PCR analysis of
the major ZNFEB ORF revealed that both reverse
transcriptase and genomic amplicons were of identical size, suggesting
that the coding portion of this gene is intronless (Fig. 2
A). This lack of introns is not unprecedented among zinc
finger genes (see Refs. 29, 30, 31).
|
|
Analysis of the ZNFEB genomic
sequence in the National Center for Biotechnology Information and
Celera public databases confirmed the intronless structure of the
ZNFEB coding sequence and mapped the gene to
chromosome 18q12 (Fig. 2
B). The
ZNFEB gene spans 18 kb of genomic sequence
and is flanked by two known genes, the microtubule-associated protein
RP/EB family member 2 (MAPRE2) (32, 33, 34) and
another C2H2 zinc finger
protein, ZNF24/KOX17 (35, 36) (Fig. 2
B).
ZNFEB is a member of the C2H2 zinc finger protein family
The major ORF of ZNFEB and
ZNFEBsv encodes a protein of 423 aa (Fig. 1
) with
a deduced mass of 48 kDa. The N-terminal portion of
ZNFEB does not contain known sequence motifs. The
C-terminal portion of the protein contains five putative zinc-binding
finger domains (Fig. 1
). These domains reveal a high conformity to the
consensus
CX2CX3FX5LX2HX3H
sequence of the C2H2, or
Krüppel-type, family of zinc finger proteins (Fig. 3
A). Also highly conserved are
the intervening 7 aa that separate each domain (the H/C-link)
(37).
|
Human and mouse ZNFEB protein variants
Early on in our analysis of the complete cDNA sequence, we
realized that ZNFEB possesses an unusual feature:
13 C2H2 zinc finger domains
present in an alternate reading frame (one nucleotide shift; Fig. 4
A). These domains are
noncoding, due to the lack of an initiation codon and the presence of a
stop codon within the ninth finger domain. However, a survey of
ZNFEB-like cDNAs in GenBank brought our attention
to a recently submitted, unpublished sequence, ZNFphex133, which,
remarkably, does contain an ORF for these 13 zinc finger domains (Fig. 4
B). This is made possible by both a 5-nt deletion that
shifts the coding frame of ZNFphex133 to the alternate frame containing
the 13 domains, and a transversion from a guanosine to a cytidine
that changes the stop codon in the ninth finger domain to a serine
residue (Fig. 4
B). Besides these minor changes, the
ZNFphex133 cDNA sequence is identical to ZNFEBsv.
In an alternate reading frame of ZNFphex133, the
ZNFEB protein sequence is still encoded
(Fig. 4
B).
|
81 and
83% contiguous with the corresponding
ZNFEBsv and ZNFphex133 sequences, respectively,
and
78% in the unique (nonzinc finger) region (data not shown). ZNFEB expression in human cell lines and tissues
RT-PCR data revealed a restricted expression pattern of
ZNFEB in human cell lines and tissues (Fig. 5
, A and B).
Amplification of
-glucuronidase served as a control since it is
constitutively expressed at similar, but low, levels in most tissue
(38). Highest expression of ZNFEB is
seen in T lymphocytes, both in cell lines (Jurkat, CEM) (Fig. 5
A) and in primary human thymocytes (Fig. 5
B).
Moderate expression is present in the monoblast cell line, U937, while
other hemopoietic cell lines (K562, HL60), as well as nonhemopoietic
cell lines (293, HeLa, HepG2), appear to express little, if any,
ZNFEB (Fig. 5
A).
ZNFEB transcripts are present in human thymus,
thyroid, and pancreatic islet cells, but not in bone marrow, brain,
lung, skeletal muscle, and exocrine pancreatic tissue (Fig. 5
B).
|
Because ZNFEB was first isolated from a B
lymphocyte cDNA library, we next analyzed gene expression patterns in
freshly isolated and in acutely activated tonsillar B cells. RT-PCR
analysis of fresh tonsillar B cells demonstrated low
ZNFEB expression levels (Fig. 6
). We then measured
ZNFEB expression in B cells stimulated with
anti-IgM F(ab')2, or a phorbol ester plus
calcium ionophore combination. As shown in Fig. 6
, transient, high
level expression of ZNFEB is seen 6 h after
B cell Ag receptor stimulation, after which expression declines.
Similarly, PMA/ionomycin-induced B cell activation results in the
up-regulation of ZNFEB transcripts, albeit with
faster kinetics; gene induction peaks at 2 h and returns to near
basal levels by 12 h posttreatment. Thus,
ZNFEB appears to be a new transiently induced B
cell activation molecule.
|
EBV infection causes morphological and phenotypical changes in B
cells that resemble those transiently induced in cells activated by Ag
(reviewed in Ref. 39). However, the
ZNFEB response to EBV infection was distinctly
different from responses to nontransforming activation signals observed
above. Thus, progressively rising ZNFEB gene
expression was consistently observed 612 h postinfection, but levels
continued to rise, reaching high steady state levels over the ensuing 2
wk in culture (Fig. 7
A). As
shown in this study for the EBNA1 viral latency gene, the
ZNFEB expression kinetics in EBV-infected primary
B cells approximate those of viral latency genes (40).
|
Comparison of ZNFEB expression in various B cell
lines revealed that high level ZNFEB expression
is sustained in EBV+ but not
EBV- B cell lines (Fig. 7
C).
Akata-, the EBV- subclone
of the EBV+ Akata parental line
(19), shows reduced ZNFEB
expression. These data demonstrate that EBV not only causes the
induction of ZNFEB, but also maintains its
expression in growth-transformed B cells.
ZNFEB functions in the EBV-dependent transformation process
The induced expression of ZNFEB by
EBV implied that this cellular gene may play a direct role in the
growth transformation program of the virus. To test this hypothesis, we
targeted ZNFEB gene expression by
antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Sense and antisense
oligodeoxynucleotides were chosen from unique (non-zinc finger)
sequences in both the 5' and 3' regions of ZNFEB
to help increase the probability of finding an active transcript target
site (42). Sense or antisense oligodeoxynucleotides were
added to freshly purified tonsillar B cells 1 h before, and, in
some experiments, again at 3 or 16 h after EBV infection to ensure
maximum cytosolic levels during the initial period of
ZNFEB induction. Sense and antisense
oligodeoxynucleotides from the EBV latency genes, BARF0, BARF1, EBNA1,
and EBNA2; the lytic cycle genes, BLLF1 (gp350), BRLF1 (Rta), BLLF3
(dUTPase), and BcLF1 (major capsid Ag); and the cellular genes,
p56lck and
-actin, were employed as controls.
Targeting of EBNA1, EBNA2, and p56lck by
antisense oligodeoxynucleotides was previously demonstrated to abrogate
growth transformation, while the high level expressed
-actin protein
is expected to be impervious to this form of antisense targeting
(40, 43).
Two weeks after EBV infection, growth transformation was assessed by
[3H]thymidine uptake (Fig. 8
A) and Ig secretion (data not
shown) with similar results. Data in Fig. 8
A were pooled
from several experiments and expressed as a percentage of EBV-infected
control B cells (set at 100%). As expected (40, 43),
antisense, but not sense oligodeoxynucleotides from EBNA1, EBNA2, and
p56lck sequences inhibited EBV-induced growth
transformation (Fig. 8
A). In this study, we show a similar
inhibition of growth transformation with ZNFEB
antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Antisense targeting of all the
nontransforming EBV lytic cycle genes, or of
-actin, showed no
effect on the growth of infected cells (Fig. 8
A). Antisense
targeting of the latently expressed BARF0 and BARF1 gene products also
showed no effect on EBV-mediated B cell transformation consistent with
data gathered from rEBV carrying deletions in either of these genes
(44, 45). In addition, microscopic analysis of
cultures treated with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides against
ZNFEB or other known
transformation-prerequisite genes contained evidence of extensive
cell death, and very few LCL could be established compared with control
cultures (data not shown). These observations assign an essential role
to ZNFEB in the EBV-mediated transformation
process.
|
-glucuronidase expression was affected by
ZNFEB antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, nor did
any of the sense oligodeoxynucleotides have detectable effects.
Collectively, these data led us to conclude that sustained
ZNFEB expression may be a critical element in the
transition of B cell activation to growth transformation by EBV, while
transient expression is part of the normal lymphocyte activation
program. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is in the context of lymphoid malignancies that many zinc finger proteins have been identified and studied. This was accomplished, in large part, through the cloning of chromosomal junctions of genomic translocations in different types of lymphomas. For instance, BCL-5 and BCL-6 are both C2H2 zinc finger genes that were localized to clusters of breakpoints at 3q27 in non-Hodgkins B cell lymphomas (48, 49), and ZNF198 was found to be fused with the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene in the t(8;13) leukemia/lymphoma syndrome (50). The chromosomal localization of ZNFEB at 18q12 maps a hot spot for structural cytogenetic changes in numerous different malignancies (Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations in Cancer, http://cgap. nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman). Predominant in the list of over 100 cases are myeloid and lymphoid leukemias, with acute B lineage lymphoblastic leukemia being the largest single class. Four separate cases in this group have translocations involving 18q12 with 12p1113 (51, 52, 53). In line with the expression pattern of ZNFEB, there is the possibility that ZNFEB represents a new candidate oncogene that may be altered in these malignancies.
Flanking the ZNFEB gene on 18q12 are MAPRE2 (RP1) and ZNF24 (KOX17). Both of these genes, like ZNFEB, are expressed in lymphocytes. MAPRE2 was cloned from differential display of CD3/CD28-activated vs nonactivated T cells, and its expression was shown to correlate with high proliferative states in multiple cell types (33). This report stated that B cells, like T cells, show an induction of MAPRE2. ZNF24 was one of 30 zinc finger genes isolated from human T cell lines. The presence of ZNF24 in close proximity to ZNFEB is consistent with the fact that genomic locations for zinc finger genes tend to cluster (54, 55, 56, 57).
Analysis of the cDNA and genomic sequences of
ZNFEB reveals a lack of introns throughout
most of the gene, including the complete coding sequence. Typically,
within a C2H2 zinc finger
protein, zinc finger domains are arranged in tandem, and are organized
in a single exon in the genomic locus (58). Although it
appears that the 13 zinc finger domains present in an alternate reading
frame of ZNFEB are noncoding, it is tempting to
speculate that at one point these domains may have been translated
along with the 5' ORF zinc finger domains in the context of a larger
protein. Arguments for this stem from the fact that the amino acid
sequence connecting these two groups of zinc finger domains (noncoding
and coding) represents a consensus, intrazinc finger H/C-link with the
addition of only a single guanosine nucleotide responsible for the
possible frameshift (see Fig. 4
A). The 18 domains span most
of the transcribed ZNFEB sequence, and their
corresponding single exon could account for the intronless genomic
structure of ZNFEB. Indeed, the mouse
homolog is transcribed as a single, 18 zinc finger protein. If it is
correct that the human sequence variants identified reflect derivatives
evolved from an ancestral single gene resembling the 18 zinc finger
murine gene, it would imply that the function of this ancestral gene
was replaced by two new human genes with different DNA-binding regions
and unrelated N- and C-terminal unique fragments.
Introns are present in the 5' UTR of ZNFEB and
allow for differential splicing and production of a variant transcript
containing an extra noncoding exon of 223 bp. Two unpublished cDNA
sequences in GenBank, one isolated from human placenta (PLACE1001304)
and the other from a human dermal hair papilla cell library (ZNF-dp),
were of this variant. The reason for the production of these two mRNA
species is not known. When tested, for instance in the induction by EBV
infection in B cells (Fig. 7
A), their expression appears to
be virtually equivalent. ZNFEB transcript
analysis using commercially available multiple tissue Northern blots
was unsuccessful due to lack of sensitivity. Both variants code for the
same protein, but regulation of translation may differ between the two.
Unfortunately, ZNFEB protein expression in cells
and tissues, like the majority of zinc finger-containing transcription
factors (59), was at extremely low levels, precluding
purification and analysis.
Although we were unable to isolate full-length protein, we could still gain an understanding of the function of ZNFEB through antisense oligodeoxynucleotide-mediated gene inhibition. Previous studies in our laboratory demonstrated the remarkable ability of human B cells to import oligodeoxynucleotides and the high degree of gene specificity of these unmodified molecules (8, 40, 43). The inhibition of ZNFEB expression during EBV infection of primary B cells shows striking effects on the subsequent growth transformation of the cells, similar to that seen with inhibition of genes known to participate in the growth transformation process, such as the viral EBNA1 and EBNA2 genes and the cellular tyrosine kinase, p56lck (40, 43). Importantly, all tested genes that are known not to play important roles in EBV-dependent B cell transformation were appropriately not affected by antisense targeting, including the lytic cycle and the nonessential latent genes, BARFO and BARF1 (44, 45).
There is currently no prescribed method for choosing the most effective antisense oligomers for any given gene, so selection of optimum target sites continues to be done on a trial-and-error basis (42). In our experiment, we would conclude that the 5' ZNFEB antisense oligodeoxynucleotide was superior over the 3' antisense reagent, as evidenced by its greater negative effect on EBV-induced proliferation.
The mechanism of action of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides involves
RNase H-mediated degradation of transcripts carrying an RNA-DNA duplex,
thus leading to specific gene inhibition (60). The RT-PCR
analysis of cells incubated with ZNFEB antisense
oligodeoxynucleotides confirmed the specific degradation of the
ZNFEB transcripts and showed a complete
disappearance of the mRNA by 24 h posttreatment (Fig. 8
B). Essentially then, the effect of
ZNFEB antisense treatment was the conversion of
ZNFEB expression in these cells to a transient
activation pattern, reminiscent of the profiles of
ZNFEB expression in primary B cells stimulated by
anti-IgM or PMA/ionomycin (Fig. 5
). This is contrary to that seen
in freshly EBV-infected cells and EBV+ BL lines.
A steady rise in ZNFEB expression follows the
primary EBV infection of B cells in vitro (Fig. 7
A), and
high level ZNFEB expression is maintained in
EBV+ BL lines but not in
EBV- B cell lines (Fig. 7
B). Like the
EBV+ cell lines, the primary B cells infected
with EBV can live and multiply indefinitely. In this respect, the
endurance of the ZNFEB signal correlates with the
growth potential of the cells. This is not unlike malignancies that
arise due to the deregulated expression of other zinc finger genes, as
mentioned above.
Several lines of evidence make it tempting to speculate that ZNFEB may be a downstream effector of EBV latent protein(s) function. First, previous studies in our laboratory have shown that although calcium chelation effectively blocks transformation-prerequisite postreceptor-binding events, including the rapid induction of p56lck, hsp70, and hsp90, expression of the viral latent genes in such treated cells is unaffected (40). In this study, we show that ZNFEB induction is also resistant to EGTA treatment, suggesting that the alteration of its normal expression pattern in EBV-infected cells may be controlled by an EBV latency protein rather than as part of the postreceptor-binding signaling program. The kinetics of ZNFEB induction correlates well with that of the EBV latency genes (40). Finally, we have obtained preliminary evidence that ZNFEB may indeed be trans-activated by a critical, early EBV latency gene, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) (61, 62, 63). These experiments employed stable EBV-negative B cell transfectants with inducible LMP1 expression. We are in the process of characterizing the potential role of LMP1 in the induction of ZNFEB.
Collectively, we believe that by virtue of its sequence homology with other C2H2 (Krüppel-type) zinc finger family members and its ability to bind zinc, ZNFEB can transcriptionally activate (or repress) genes that are required for (or prevent) the transition of B lymphocyte activation to growth transformation. It will be important to delineate the molecular pathways that are activated by ZNFEB to understand why EBV uses this cellular gene for its own purposes, and for determining whether ZNFEB plays a broader role in cell cycle control. If the ZNFEB locus was found to be targeted in the lymphoma/leukemia-associated genomic accidents mapped to 18q12, this would be consistent with and strengthen this premise.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. H.-Michael Dosch, Division of Infection, Immunity, Injury, and Repair, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: BL, Burkitts lymphoma; EBNA, EBV nuclear Ag; EST, expressed sequence tag; hsp, heat shock protein; LCL, lymphoblastoid cell line; LMP1, latent membrane protein 1; ORF, open reading frame; UTR, untranslated region; ZNFEBsv, ZNFEB splice variant. ![]()
Received for publication August 13, 2001. Accepted for publication November 12, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
interferon secretion from mononuclear cells. J. Virol. 73:7627.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Harper, L. Yan, R. M. Loureiro, I. Wu, J. Fang, P. A. D'Amore, and M. A. Moses Repression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression by the Zinc Finger Transcription Factor ZNF24 Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8736 - 8741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||