The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ulmansky, R.
Right arrow Articles by Naparstek, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ulmansky, R.
Right arrow Articles by Naparstek, Y.
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 168: 6463-6469.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

Resistance to Adjuvant Arthritis Is Due to Protective Antibodies Against Heat Shock Protein Surface Epitopes and the Induction of IL-10 Secretion1

Rina Ulmansky*, Cyril J. Cohen{dagger}, Fanny Szafer*, Eli Moallem*, Zvi G. Fridlender*, Yechezkel Kashi{dagger} and Yaakov Naparstek2,*

* Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel; and {dagger} Department of Food Engineering and Biotechnology, Technion, Haifa, Israel


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adjuvant arthritis (AA) is an experimental model of autoimmune arthritis that can be induced in susceptible strains of rats such as inbred Lewis upon immunization with CFA. AA cannot be induced in resistant strains like Brown-Norway or in Lewis rats after recovery from arthritis. We have previously shown that resistance to AA is due to the presence of natural as well as acquired anti-heat shock protein (HSP) Abs. In this work we have studied the fine specificity of the protective anti-HSP Abs by analysis of their interaction with a panel of overlapping peptides covering the whole HSP molecule. We found that arthritis-susceptible rats lack Abs to a small number of defined epitopes of the mycobacterial HSP65. These Abs are found naturally in resistant strains and are acquired by Lewis rats after recovery from the disease. Active vaccination of Lewis rats with the protective epitopes as well as passive vaccination with these Abs induced suppression of arthritis. Incubation of murine and human mononuclear cells with the protective Abs induced secretion of IL-10. Analysis of the primary and tertiary structure of the whole Mycobacterium tuberculosis HSP65 molecule indicated that the protective epitopes are B cell epitopes with nonconserved amino acid sequences found on the outer surface of the molecule. We conclude that HSP, the Ag that contains the pathogenic T cell epitopes in AA, also contains protective B cell epitopes exposed on its surface, and that natural and acquired resistance to AA is associated with the ability to respond to these epitopes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adjuvant arthritis (AA)3 is an experimental model of autoimmune arthritis that can be induced in susceptible inbred strains of rats such as Lewis or Wistar strains upon immunization with heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MT) in CFA (1, 2). The disease cannot be induced in resistant strains of rats (e.g., Brown-Norway (BN), Fisher) (3, 4), and Lewis rats develop resistance to reinduction of the disease after recovery from arthritis (5, 6).

The role of the 65-kDa heat shock protein (HSP)65 of the MT (7, 8) in the pathogenesis of autoimmune arthritis, both in experimental animals (9, 10) and in humans (11, 12, 13), has been intensively investigated in the past. AA can be passively transferred by a T cell clone reactive to residues 180–188 of the HSP65 (10). An association between T cell responses to HSP65 and early stages of joint inflammation has been also found in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (14, 15, 16). Preimmunization of susceptible rats with the mycobacterial HSP65 leads to resistance to induction of the disease by MT. This protective effect is believed to be mediated by T cells specific for HSP65 (3, 7, 17, 18). Likewise, although arthritic rats develop vigorous T cell responses to self-HSP and to peptide 180–188 of the MT HSP65, neither of these molecules is arthritogenic when administered to arthritis-susceptible rats (19, 20). This suggests that HSP65 may contain different epitopes, some of which are responsible for its pathogenicity, whereas others confer resistance to disease induction (3, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24).

We have previously shown that resistance to AA is due to the presence of Abs against HSP65 and can be transferred to susceptible rats by i.v. infusion of these Igs derived from resistant strains (25). In this study we have analyzed the fine epitope specificity of the anti-HSP Abs of arthritis-susceptible and -resistant rats. We found that resistant BN rats have natural Abs to certain epitopes of the mycobacterial HSP65 that are not found in the young arthritis-susceptible Lewis rats. These Abs are also present in old naive Lewis rats and are acquired by young Lewis rats after recovery from the disease.

Vaccination of Lewis rats with some of these peptide epitopes before disease induction resulted in the production of Abs against the whole molecule as well as resistance to disease induction. These Abs were shown to skew the cytokine profile of mononuclear cells toward an anti-inflammatory response in vitro and to suppress disease upon in vivo treatment.

Analysis of the primary and tertiary structure of the whole HSP65 molecule indicated that the protective peptides are potential B cell epitopes found on the outer surface of the molecule.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

Female inbred Lewis rats were obtained from Harlan Laboratories (Jerusalem, Israel). Female BN rats were obtained from Harlan Sprague Dawley (Indianapolis, IN).

Ags and Abs

Recombinant HSP65 of MT was a kind gift from Dr. M. Singh (World Health Organization Recombinant Protein Bank, Braunschweig, Germany). Recombinant mammalian HSP60 was purchased from StressGen Biotech (Victoria, British Columbia, Canada). Synthetic 16-mer peptides overlapping by 10 amino acids of HSP65 were a kind gift from Dr. L. Adorini (Roche Milano Ricerche, Milan, Italy) (26). Synthetic 20-mer peptides overlapping by five amino acids of the mammalian HSP60 were a kind gift from Dr. I. Cohen (Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel) (27). Goat anti-rat IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase was purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). R83D is an unrelated control rat mAb.

Induction and clinical assessment of AA

Lewis rats were injected s.c. at the base of the tail with 1 mg of MT H37Ra (Difco, Detroit, MI) in CFA (Difco). Severity of arthritis (arthritis index) was assessed every other day by a blinded observer as follows: 0, no arthritis; 1, redness of the joint; 2, redness and swelling of the joint. The ankle and tarsal-metatarsal joints of each paw were scored. A maximum score of 16 could be obtained.

Dot blot assay

Ags were dissolved in PBS and samples of 1 µg were adsorbed on nitrocellulose paper (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The paper was air-dried and incubated with 1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 20 min to block nonspecific binding. The samples were then washed in 0.05% PBS-Tween 20 and incubated with rat sera diluted 1/100 in 1% BSA for 90 min at room temperature (RT). The membranes were washed and incubated with goat anti-rat Ab conjugated to alkaline phosphatase diluted 1/1000 in 1% BSA for 90 min at RT. After rewashing the color reaction was developed by adding a mixture of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate-nitroblue tetrazolium (Sigma-Fast; Sigma-Aldrich). The reaction was stopped by the addition of tap water.

ELISA

Flat-bottom 96-well plates (Corning Glass, Corning, NY) were coated overnight with mammalian HSP60 or mycobacterial HSP65 (10 µg/ml) in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at 4°C. After extensive washing with 0.05% PBS-Tween 20 plates were blocked with 1% BSA for 60 min at RT. HSP peptides were attached to plates pretreated with glutaraldehyde according to Kasprzyk et al. (28). Briefly, plates were treated with 100 µl/well of 5% (w/v) glutaraldehyde in PBS for 1 h at RT. Plates were washed thoroughly with PBS and peptides (1 µg/100 µl) were added to each well and incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were shaken dry and blocked with 1% BSA. Plates coated with either whole HSP or peptides were washed again and incubated with rat sera diluted 1/100 in 0.01% PBS-Tween 20 for 90 min at RT. After rewashing the plates were incubated with goat anti-rat IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase for 60 min at RT. The presence of Abs was detected by addition of the substrate p-phenylphosphate (p-NPP; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) to the plates. OD was measured photometrically at 405 nm by an ELISA reader (Microwell System; Organon Teknika, Turnhout, Belgium).

Competitive inhibition was performed by incubation of the Abs with various concentrations (1, 10, and 100 µg/ml) of the inhibitors for 1 h and then tested for the residual binding by ELISA.

Modulation of AA by mycobacterial and mammalian HSP peptides

Mycobacterial and mammalian HSP-derived peptides were tested for their ability to modulate the incidence and severity of AA in Lewis rats. Rats were vaccinated i.p. three times at weekly intervals with 100 µg of each peptide in PBS before induction of AA. Control rats were treated with PBS. Rats were bled for testing Ab presence before injection of MT and 30 days later.

Purification of polyclonal anti-peptide 6 Abs

Naive Lewis rats were vaccinated i.p. three times with 100 µg peptide 6 in PBS at weekly intervals. Rats were bled and their sera (diluted 1/100) were tested for Abs to peptide 6 and to HSP65 by ELISA (as described in Materials and Methods). Polyclonal rat anti-peptide 6 Abs were purified on a 5-ml column of HiTrap NHS-activated Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) to which we coupled peptide 6 covalently, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Rat serum (1/5 in PBS) was applied on the column and the flow-through was collected. Bound Abs were eluted with 0.1 M glycine-HCl (pH 2.5). Fractions of 1 ml were collected and immediately neutralized with 30 µl 2 M Tris (pH 12) to avoid denaturation. Protein concentration was measured by absorbance at 280 nm, and the protein-rich fractions were dialyzed against PBS and concentrated to 1 mg/ml.

Modulation of AA by anti-peptide 6 polyclonal Abs

Lewis rats were immunized with CFA to induce AA and treated with 10 µg polyclonal anti-peptide 6 Igs, naive Lewis rats polyclonal Igs, or an unrelated rat mAb (R83D). Control rats were treated with PBS. The Abs were injected i.v. on the day of disease induction and i.p. the day after.

Cytokine secretion by murine and human PBMC in vitro

PBMC from naive Lewis rats and human volunteers were collected with heparin, layered on top of a Ficoll-Paque solution (Amersham Biosciences), and centrifuged for 25 min at 1800 rpm. PBMC were collected and washed with PBS. A total of 2 x 106 rat or human cells were incubated in 1 ml DMEM or RPMI consecutively (Beit-Haemek, Beit-Haemek, Israel) in a 24-well tissue culture dish (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) with 10 ng/ml LPS (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 µg/ml polyclonal anti-peptide 6 Ab, or 10 µg/ml naive Lewis rat Igs, or without Ag (control), at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 24 h the supernatants were collected and kept frozen. Rat and human TNF-{alpha} and IL-10 were measured by ELISA (Quantikine M; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Structure analysis

RasMol v. 2.6 program and the known three-dimensional (3D) structure of the GroEL molecule (Escherichia coli HSP60; Brookhaven Protein Data Bank no. 1AON) (29) were used to analyze the position of the relevant epitopes. As the crystal structure of MT HSP65 has not been solved yet, we used a 3D model for the tertiary structure of MT HSP65 based on the crystal structure of the E. coli GroEL (Brookhaven Protein Data Bank no. 1GRL) (30) as template. This model was built by programs for comparative protein modeling (31, 32, 33).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The binding of rat Igs to the whole MT HSP65 and its derived peptides

We have previously shown that Igs from naive AA-resistant rats (i.e., BN or Fisher) and from Lewis rats that recovered from AA (post-AA Lewis rats) are able to prevent the induction of AA in naive Lewis rats and that this is due to a subpopulation of anti-HSP65 Abs. To further analyze the fine specificity of this reaction we tested the binding of Igs from these rats with the whole molecule of the mycobacterial HSP65, as well as with a panel of overlapping peptides covering the whole molecule.

We found that Igs from arthritis-resistant rats (i.e., 6- to 8-wk-old BN rats, 9-mo-old Lewis rats, and post-AA Lewis rats) reacted strongly with the whole MT HSP65. Igs derived from arthritis-susceptible naive young (up to 4 mo) Lewis rats did not bind to this molecule in the native or heat-denatured form (Table IGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Binding of rat Igs to HSP65 peptides1

 
To define the epitopes recognized by the antibacterial HSP65 Abs we tested the interaction of Igs from these rats with a panel of 16-mer overlapping peptides of the MT HSP65 by dot blot and ELISA tests.

Only 10 of the 90 peptides tested were recognized by the Igs tested (Table IGo). Igs from 6-wk-old naive Lewis rats reacted with two peptides (40 and 63). Four-month-old naive Lewis rats acquire Abs against two additional peptides (36 and 45), and 9-mo-old naive Lewis rats acquire, in addition, Abs to peptides 6, 7, and 31, as well as to the whole HSP65 molecule. The Ab profile of the old Lewis rats is similar to that found in young naive BN rats, which react in addition with peptide 59. Lewis rats immunized with CFA (post-AA) reacted in addition with peptides 21 and 84. Although Igs derived from naive young Lewis rats interact with some of the peptides of this molecule, they do not recognize the whole HSP65 molecule, and they do not have any effect on susceptibility to AA.

As recognition of the whole HSP65 was acquired together with binding to peptides 6, 7, and 31, we have tested the ability of peptides 6 and 31 (at 1, 10, and 100 µg/ml) to inhibit the binding of Igs from CFA-immunized Lewis rats to HSP65 by a competitive inhibition ELISA. We found that 100 µg/ml peptide 6 reduced the binding by 59% and 100 µg/ml peptide 31 reduced it by 40%. The mixture of both peptides inhibited 75% of the binding to HSP65, indicating that these epitopes are the dominant epitopes of the anti-HSP Ab response (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Competitive inhibition of the binding of CFA-immunized rat Abs to HSP65 by HSP peptides. Post-AA rat sera (1/100 in 0.01% PBS/Tween) were incubated with 100 µg peptide 6 or 31 or with both peptides for 1 h. Control sera were incubated with PBS. The residual binding to HSP65 was tested by ELISA on HSP65-coated plates as detailed in Materials and Methods.

 
The binding of rat Igs to mammalian HSP60 and its derived peptides

It has been previously shown that the mycobacterial HSP65 can trigger self-HSP-reactive T cells with disease-suppressive regulatory potential (24). To analyze the anti-mammalian self-HSP60 Ab repertoire of these rats we tested Igs derived from naive and post-AA Lewis rats as well as from naive BN rats for their reactivity with the whole mammalian HSP60 by ELISA.

We found that naive young Lewis rats do not have anti-mammalian HSP60 Abs, whereas 9-mo-old Lewis rats, young BN rats, and post-AA Lewis rats had significant binding to the self-HSP molecule (Table IIGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Binding of rat Igs to mammalian HSP60 peptides1

 
The Igs were then tested for their binding specificity to 38 synthetic 20-mer peptides of the mammalian HSP60. We found that Igs derived from BN, old naive Lewis rats, and post-AA Lewis rats, but not from young naive Lewis rats, reacted with only two mammalian peptides: peptide M5 (aa 61–80) and peptide M30 (aa 436–455) (Table IIGo).

Vaccination of Lewis rats with HSP-derived peptides

To test whether active vaccination with HSP peptides recognized by protective Igs can prevent AA induction, we vaccinated Lewis rats with the MT HSP65-derived peptides 6, 7, 21, 31, 36, 45, and 84 and with the mammalian HSP60-derived peptide M5 recognized by Abs from resistant Lewis rats. Control vaccination was performed with the following nonreactive mycobacterial HSP65 peptides: peptides 26 (aa 151–166), 28 (aa 163–178), and 70 (aa 415–430).

We found that vaccination of rats with the bacterial peptides 6 and 7 and the mammalian peptide M5 resulted in a significant suppression of disease severity (Fig. 2Go). Vaccination with these protective peptides also resulted in the production of Abs against peptide 6 as well as against the whole mycobacterial HSP65 molecule (data not shown). Neither protection nor anti-HSP response was observed after vaccination with mycobacterial peptide 31 as well as with the rest of the peptides.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Modulation of AA by active vaccination with HSP65 peptides. Lewis rats were injected i.p. with 100 µg of peptides 6, 7, and 31 of the MT HSP65 or with peptide 5 of the mammalian HSP60, at three weekly intervals, before AA induction. Control rats received PBS. Disease severity was evaluated every other day as detailed in Materials and Methods. Arthritis score is the mean of 8–16 animals. *, p < 0.01 compared with PBS-treated rats.

 
The effect of treatment with rat anti-peptide 6 Abs on AA severity

As active vaccination with peptide 6 induced anti-peptide 6 Abs and suppressed the severity of AA we tested the effect of passive treatment with these polyclonal Abs on AA. Lewis rats were immunized with CFA to induce AA and were treated concomitantly i.v. with 10 µg of Lewis rat polyclonal anti-peptide 6 Abs, naive Lewis rat polyclonal Igs, or an unrelated rat mAb (R83D). The same Ab treatment was given i.p. the following day. Control rats received PBS.

We found that treatment with anti-peptide 6 Abs reduced arthritis severity by 44% on day 22 and by 64% on day 29 (Fig. 3Go). Treatment with Igs from naive Lewis rats also reduced the severity of the disease. However, this effect was not significant statistically. The rat mAb had no effect on the severity of AA.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Modulation of AA by polyclonal rat anti-peptide 6 Abs. Lewis rats were immunized with CFA and treated with 10 µg polyclonal anti-peptide 6 Igs, 10 µg naive Lewis polyclonal Igs, 10 µg rat mAb R83D, or PBS. Injections were given i.v. on the first day and i.p. on the next day. Disease severity was evaluated every other day. Arthritis score is the mean of six animals. *, p < 0.05 compared with PBS-treated rats; **, p < 0.01 compared with PBS-treated rats.

 
The effect of anti-peptide 6 Abs on cytokine secretion by murine and human PBMC

To test whether the protective effect of anti-peptide 6 Abs is due to their effect on inflammatory cytokines we analyzed the effect of these Abs on cytokine secretion in vitro. PBMC from naive Lewis rats and human volunteers were incubated for 24 h at 37°C with LPS (10 ng/ml), naive Lewis rat polyclonal Igs (10 µg/ml), or polyclonal anti-peptide 6 Abs (10 µg/ml). Cells in medium without Ag served as control. Supernatants were collected to measure the secretion of IL-10 and TNF-{alpha}.

As can be seen in Table IIIGo, the anti-peptide 6 Abs induced at least a 6-fold higher secretion of IL-10 and a 3.7-fold higher secretion of TNF-{alpha} by rat PBMC compared with the control. The increase in secretion of human IL-10 and TNF-{alpha} was 50.3 and 7.4, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. The effect of anti-peptide 6 Abs on cytokine secretion by murine and human PBMC1

 
The effect was specific to the anti-peptide 6 Abs, as Igs from naive Lewis rats did not show a similar effect (data not shown).

Analysis of the peptide location on the 3D structure of the HSP65

Fig. 4Go shows the location of bacterial peptides 6 and 31 on a model of the mycobacterial HSP65 based on the structure of the E. coli GroEL monomer with a space filling and secondary structure representations (29). As can be seen in Fig. 4Go, the linear peptides 6 and 31 are completely exposed on the outer surface of the HSP molecule.



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. 3D structure models of monomeric HSP65. The models are based on the structure of GroEl of E. coli built by comparative protein modeling programs (29 30 31 ): a, the ribbon presentation of the molecule. b, The space-filled presentation of the molecule. Peptide 6 (aa 31–46) in green and peptide 31 (aa 181–176) in red are shown on both models.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study we have shown that MT HSP65, the Ag that contains the T cell epitopes that induce AA, also contains B cell epitopes that can vaccinate against the disease. The identification of these protective epitopes resulted from the analysis of the anti-MT HSP65 Ab repertoire of arthritis-resistant vs arthritis-susceptible rats in the AA model.

We have found that Abs from arthritis-resistant rats bind to the whole MT HSP65 as well as to several HSP peptides, which are not recognized by Abs from arthritis-susceptible rats.

Vaccination of the susceptible rats with some of these peptides resulted in the production of anti-HSP65 Abs and induced resistance to arthritis. The Abs were found to induce IL-10 secretion in vitro and to suppress arthritis upon in vivo inoculation to naive susceptible rats.

Structural analysis of these protective HSP epitopes revealed that they are potential B cell epitopes, mainly located on the outer surface of the HSP molecule.

It has been previously reported that the T cell response to bacterial HSP shows determinant spreading (22). In the present data we show that there is a clear B cell determinant spreading as well, and this spreading can occur also naturally, namely without intentional vaccination. The B cell epitopes, as we will discuss later, are different from the T cell epitopes.

Abs derived from young naive Lewis rats bound to two bacterial peptides, whereas Abs from 9-mo-old Lewis rats reacted with five additional peptides as well as with the whole molecule. Immunization with CFA resulted in recognition of three additional epitopes. The Ab repertoire of the naive young BN rats was similar to that of naive old Lewis rats.

Although we refer to all the anti-HSP peptide Abs found in naive old Lewis rats and in naive young BN rats as natural Abs, it is possible that they are indeed a response to the exposure of these rats to environmental microorganisms (as "natural" Abs may always be) (34), and that the epitope spreading in response to these pathogens occurs in the BN rat earlier and reaches a higher titer than in the Lewis rat. Lewis rats have to be immunized with CFA to mimic the natural response of the BN rats. The similarity of the Ab repertoire of the naive BN rats to that of the immunized Lewis rats supports this possibility.

The T cell response of the Lewis rat to the bacterial HSP65 has been thoroughly studied. It has been shown that in the early postimmunization stages the Lewis T cells respond to several determinants found in the N terminus as well as in the carboxyl terminus of the molecule, whereas later a shift to recognition of carboxyl-terminal epitopes develops (22). The B cell epitopes, in contrast, were found all along the molecule without any predilection for either the carboxyl or the N terminus of the molecule. This is not surprising, as in the tertiary structure of the molecule the carboxyl- and the N-terminal sites are located in the same domains.

A comparison between the published dominant T cell epitopes upon immunization with MT (22) and the B cell epitopes described here in naive Lewis rats did not reveal common epitope recognition. On the contrary, the lack of natural Abs to certain peptide epitopes like 6, 7, or 31 in the naive Lewis rat is associated with an early T cell response to these epitopes upon immunization, whereas the presence of Abs to peptides like 40 and 63 is associated with lack of an early T cell response. Based on these correlations we suggest that the presence of natural Abs to certain epitopes may actually inhibit T cell response to them, whereas the lack of Abs enables the T cells to respond to these epitopes. For example, AA-susceptible Lewis rats lack natural Abs to the bacterial peptide 31 and can therefore develop a T cell response to this peptide; these pathogenic T cells may induce arthritis.

The nature of the B cell epitopes and the correlation between recognition of certain epitopes and the whole molecule can be better understood from the primary and tertiary structure analysis of the molecule. Based on the primary structure of MT HSP65, we looked for potential B cell epitopes composed of nine amino acids or more that include neither proline (P), which can cause secondary structure molecular bending, nor any short-chain residue (glycine (G), alanine (A), and serine (S), molecular spacers). This model was used previously by Warren et al. (35) to locate potential B cell epitopes in the myelin basic protein.

A similar analysis of the HSP65 molecule identified six peptides of consecutive long-chain residues (side chains of two carbons or more) that satisfied the same structural rules (Table IVGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Potential B cell epitopes in MT HSP65

 
Five of the six peptides fit amino acid sequences that were found to be recognized by Abs from rats that were immunized with CFA (Table IGo, experimental peptides). Interestingly, two more epitopes that were recognized by these Abs (peptides 31 and 45) can be included if we allow the presence of only one glycine residue in the epitope sequence of at least 12 amino acids.

We did not notice any particularity concerning the secondary structure and the repartition of hydrophobic/polar residues in these epitopes (both experimentally and computer recognized). Generally, the experimentally recognized epitopes tend to be hydrophobic (9–12 hydrophobic residues of 16) except for peptide 59, which is highly polar (13 residues of 16).

Tertiary structure plays an important role for B cell epitope recognition. To better understand the implications of the tertiary structure of MT HSP65 and to locate these different amino acid sequences on the whole molecule, we used a model for the tertiary structure of MT HSP65 based on the crystal structure of E. coli GroEL (Fig. 4Go).

Structure analysis confirms that the experimentally recognized linear epitopes are mainly located on the surface of the protein and can provide a potential site for Ab binding. Peptides 6, 7, 21, 31, and 59 were those that were found to be the most exposed, whereas peptides 36, 40, 45, 63, and 84 are only partially exposed in the MT HSP65 molecule.

Recognition of the exposed peptides 6, 7, and 31 by Abs from 9-mo-old Lewis rats, as well as young BN and post-AA Lewis rats, was associated with binding to the whole molecule, whereas recognition of the partially exposed peptides by Abs from young (6-wk-old and 4-mo-old) Lewis rats was not associated with recognition of the whole HSP molecule.

As we have tested only linear epitopes from the HSP molecule, there are probably many additional conformational nonlinear epitopes recognized by the anti-HSP Abs that we have not depicted. The relevance of the epitopes recognized by Abs that do not bind to the whole HSP molecule is less clear. As T cells respond to linear nonconformational epitopes processed by APCs, it is possible that such T cell help will lead to the production of Abs to epitopes that are not completely exposed without inducing an anti-HSP response; alternatively, these Abs may be cross-reactive Abs, originally directed at other peptides.

HSPs are a family of highly conserved proteins. An amino acid comparison of HSP65 molecules among >70 microbial species shows that most of the mycobacterial epitopes recognized by the murine Abs are relatively conserved (data not shown). There is also ~50% amino acid identity between the mycobacterial HSP65 and the mammalian HSP60 (36). Despite this homology, most of the bacterial peptides that were found to be recognized by the anti-MT HSP65 Abs did not share high homology with the mammalian HSP. This may be due to the tolerance to self that protects the rats from developing an autoimmune autoantibody response to their own HSP60.

Analysis of the anti-self (rat) HSP Ab repertoire indeed showed that there is a limited number of self-HSP molecule epitopes recognized by the rat Igs. Naive young Lewis rats did not respond to any self-HSP peptide or to the whole molecule. BN and post-AA Lewis rats that reacted with 8–10 bacterial HSP epitopes responded to only two epitopes in the self-HSP, the mammalian peptides M5 and M30, as well as to the whole self-HSP molecule.

To see whether the anti-HSP protective Abs can be induced by vaccination with the peptides recognized by these Abs, we have vaccinated Lewis rats with these peptides without Freund’s adjuvant. Vaccination with three peptides (bacterial peptides 6 and 7 and mammalian peptide 5) led to production of Abs against bacterial peptide 6 as well as to an anti-HSP response, confirming the hypothesis that Abs against a peptide located on the surface of the molecule will lead to recognition of the whole molecule. Induction of these Abs was also associated with disease resistance. Preliminary results have shown that vaccination with peptide 6 also suppresses collagen arthritis in the Lewis rat and that treatment with anti-peptide 6 Ab suppresses collagen arthritis in the DBA/1j mouse (data not shown).

As we have shown in this work, there was a clear correlation between disease resistance and the presence of anti-HSP Abs. Young naive Lewis rats did not have detectable Abs against the HSP molecule, whereas 9-mo-old Lewis rats developed these Abs in a significant titer. Parallel to the development of the anti-HSP response the old rats also became resistant to induction of arthritis. Young Lewis rats acquired both the Abs and disease resistance after immunization with CFA or with certain HSP epitopes, and the naturally resistant BN rats had anti-HSP Abs spontaneously, without the need for immunization.

The mechanism of disease resistance induced by the natural as well as the induced anti-HSP Abs has not been yet clarified. It is possible that the Abs against the MT HSP inhibit the early steps of induction of pathogenic T cells to the peptide by intervening in the Ag processing or the T cell recognition of the pathogenic epitopes. Alternatively, they may prevent the effector steps of the pathogenic response by binding to the self-HSP cross-reacting target Ag.

Expression of the mammalian (or self) HSP is up-regulated in inflamed synovia of rats with AA (37), and cross-reactive immune recognition has been found between the mycobacterial HSP65 and endogenous self-HSP60 at the T cell level (13, 38). As the anti-self-HSP Abs were found only in the resistant rats, it is possible that Abs that cross-react with the self-HSP may hide it from the pathogenic T cells and thus act as protective Abs. However, the preliminary results showing that the vaccination suppresses murine collagen arthritis as well suggests that the mechanism is not directly related to the induction of the disease by the HSP Ag.

Another possibility is that Abs against the HSP molecule suppress inflammation by inhibiting the proinflammatory effect of the HSP on the innate immune system. Mycobacterial HSP65 has been shown to induce release of proinflammatory cytokines from human monocytic cells (39), and the mammalian HSP60 has been shown to synergize with IFN-{gamma} and to promote proinflammatory cytokines like IL-12 and IL-15 (40). Analysis of the effect of the protective Abs on cytokine secretion by murine and human mononuclear cells showed that the Abs induce secretion of both IL-10 and TNF-{alpha}, and that the increase in IL-10 secretion by murine and human cells was 1.6- to 6.8-fold greater than that of TNF-{alpha}. The increase in IL-10 secretion in the inflammatory site can skew the local cytokine profile from an inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory response and thus explain the mechanism of protection against inflammation by these Abs. The mechanism of induction of the various cytokines by anti-peptide 6 Abs is now under study and the preliminary results show that the effect of the Abs is in the level of mRNA of these cytokines.

It is interesting to notice that one of the two self-HSP60 epitopes is the self-peptide 5, which is the rat homologous epitope of the bacterial protective peptide 6. Moreover, vaccination with the bacterial peptides 6 and 7 and with the mammalian peptide 5 led to the production of antibacterial peptide 6 and antibacterial HSP65 Abs as well as protection against disease induction. Looking at the primary structure of these three peptides leads to the conclusion that they express a common motif (VEWGP), which might be the protective motif of these peptides (Table VGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V. Amino acid comparison of MT HSP65 peptides and the rat homolog HSP60 peptides1

 
In summary, we suggest that the humoral immune response to the bacterial HSP is aimed at a limited number of potential B cell epitopes. These linear epitopes are found in nonconserved parts of the molecule. Recognition of B cell epitopes that are exposed on the surface of the molecule leads to binding to the whole molecule and is associated with resistance to induction of arthritis. The mechanism of resistance may be due to a local skewing of the cytokine profile toward an anti-inflammatory response. Resistance to AA occurs naturally in some strains of rats, whereas in others it can be acquired with age or upon immunization with HSP. Vaccination with some of the protecting epitopes can lead both to disease resistance and to the serological profile that is present in the resistant strains.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was partially funded by the Riva Foundation and by the Adolfo and Evelyn Blum Endowment Fund. Y.N. is the incumbent of the Leiferman Chair for Rheumatology. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Yaakov Naparstek, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Hadassah University Hospital, P.O. Box 1200, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. E-mail address: yakovn{at}cc.huji.ac.i Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: AA, adjuvant arthritis; HSP, heat shock protein; RT, room temperature; 3D, three-dimensional; MT, Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Back

Received for publication December 13, 2001. Accepted for publication April 10, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Pearson, C. M.. 1956. Development of arthritis, periarthritis and periostitis in rats given adjuvants. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 91:95.
  2. Pearson, C. M., F. D. Wood. 1959. Studies of polyarthritis and other lesions induced in rats by injection of mycobacterial adjuvant: general clinical and pathological characteristics and some modifying factors. Arthritis Rheum. 2:440.
  3. Hogervorst, E. J. M., C. J. P. Boog, J. P. A. Wagenaar, M. H. M. Wauben, R. van der Zee, W. Van Eden. 1991. T cell reactivity to an epitope of the mycobacterial 65-kDa heat shock protein (HSP65) corresponds with arthritis susceptibility in rats and is regulated by hsp65-specific cellular responses. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:1289.[Medline]
  4. Griffiths, M. M., G. W. Cannon, P. A. Leonard, R. Van Reese. 1993. Induction of autoimmune arthritis in rats by immunization with homologous rat type II collagen is restricted to the RT1av1 haplotype. Arthritis Rheum. 36:254.[Medline]
  5. Taurog, J. D., D. C. Argentieri, R. A. McReynolds. 1988. Adjuvant arthritis. Methods. Enzymol. 162:339.[Medline]
  6. Wauben, M. H. M., J. P. A. Wagenaar-Hilbers, W. Van Eden. 1994. Adjuvant arthritis. I. R. Cohen, and A. Miller, eds. Autoimmune Disease Models 201. Academic, New York.
  7. Thole, J. E. R., W. J. Keulen, A. H. Kolk, D. G. Groothuis, L. G. Berwald, R. H. Tiesjema, J. D. A. van Embden. 1987. Characterization, sequence determination, and immunogenicity of a 64-kilodalton protein of Mycobacterium bovis BCG expressed in Escherichia coli K-12. Infect. Immun. 55:1466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cohen, I. R.. 1991. Autoimmunity to chaperonins in the pathogenesis of arthritis and diabetes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9:567.[Medline]
  9. Van Eden, W., J. E. R. Thole, R. van der Zee, A. Noordzij, J. D. A. Van Embden, E. J. Hensen, I. R. Cohen. 1988. Cloning of the mycobacterial epitope recognized by T lymphocytes in adjuvant arthritis. Nature 331:171.[Medline]
  10. Holoshitz, J., Y. Naparstek, A. Ben-Nun, I. R. Cohen. 1983. Lines of T lymphocytes induce or vaccinate against autoimmune arthritis. Science 219:56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Holoshitz, J., A. Klajman, I. Drucker, Z. Lapidot, A. Yaretzky, A. Frenkel, W. Van Eden, I. R. Cohen. 1986. T lymphocytes of rheumatoid arthritis patients show augmented reactivity to a fraction of mycobacteria cross-reactive with cartilage. Lancet 2:305.[Medline]
  12. Gaston, J. S. H., P. F. Life, L. C. Bailey, P. A. Bacon. 1989. In vitro responses to a 65-kilodalton mycobacterial protein by synovial T cells from inflammatory arthritis patients. J. Immunol. 143:2494.[Abstract]
  13. Res, P. C. M., C. G. Schaar, F. C. Breedveld, W. Van Eden, J. D. A. Van Embden, I. R. Cohen, R. R. P. De Vries. 1988. Synovial fluid T cell reactivity against 65 kD heat shock protein of mycobacteria in early chronic arthritis. Lancet 2:478.[Medline]
  14. Gaston, J. S. H., P. F. Life, P. J. Jenner, M. J. Colston, P. A. Bacon. 1990. Recognition of a mycobacteria-specific epitope in the 65-kD heat-shock protein by synovial fluid-derived T cell clones. J. Exp. Med. 171:831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Quayle, A. J., K. B. Wilson, S. G. Li, J. Kjeldsen-Kragh, F. Oftung, T. Shinnick, M. Sioud, O. Forre, J. D. Capra, J. B. Natvig. 1992. Peptide recognition, T cell receptor usage and HLA restriction elements of human heat-shock protein (hsp) 60 and mycobacterial 65-kDa hsp-reactive T cell clones from rheumatoid synovial fluid. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:1315.[Medline]
  16. Henwood, J., J. Loveridge, J. I. Bell, J. S. H. Gaston. 1993. Restricted T cell receptor expression by human T cell clones specific for mycobacterial 65-kDa heat-shock protein: selective in vivo expansion of T cells bearing defined receptors. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:1256.[Medline]
  17. Lider, O., N. Karin, M. Shinitzky, I. R. Cohen. 1987. Therapeutic vaccination against adjuvant arthritis using autoimmune T cells treated with hydrostatic pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 84:4577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Billingham, M. E. J., S. Carney, R. Butler, M. J. Colston. 1990. A mycobacterial 65-kD heat shock protein induces antigen-specific suppression of adjuvant arthritis, but is not itself arthritogenic. J. Exp. Med. 171:339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Yang, X. D., J. Gasser, U. Feige. 1990. Prevention of adjuvant arthritis in rats by a nonapeptide from the 65-kD mycobacterial heat-shock protein. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 81:189.[Medline]
  20. Anderton, S. M., R. van der Zee, A. Noordzij, W. Van Eden. 1994. Differential mycobacterial 65-kDa heat shock protein T cell epitope recognition after adjuvant arthritis-inducing or protective immunization protocols. J. Immunol. 152:3656.[Abstract]
  21. Anderton, S. M., R. van der Zee, B. Prakken, A. Noordzij, W. Van Eden. 1995. Activation of T cell recognizing self 60-kD heat shock protein can protect against experimental arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 181:943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Moudgil, K. D., T. T. Chang, H. Eradat, A. M. Chen, R. S. Gupta, E. Brahn, E. E. Sercarz. 1997. Diversification of T cell responses to carboxy-terminal determinants within the 65-kD heat shock protein is involved in regulation of autoimmune arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 185:1307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Haque, M. A., S. Yoshino, S. Inada, H. Nomaguchi, O. Tokunaga, O. Kohashi. 1996. Suppression of adjuvant arthritis in rats by induction of oral tolerance to mycobacterial 65-kDa heat shock protein. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:2650.[Medline]
  24. Van Eden, W., R. van der Zee, A. G. A. Paul, B. J. Prakken, U. Wendling, S. M. Anderton, M. H. M. Wauben. 1998. Do heat shock proteins control the balance of T-cell regulation in inflammatory diseases?. Immunol. Today 19:303.[Medline]
  25. Ulmansky, R., Y. Naparstek. 1995. Immunoglobulins from rats that are resistant to adjuvant arthritis suppress the disease in arthritis susceptible rats. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:952.[Medline]
  26. Trembleau, S., P. Giacomini, J. C. Guery, A. Setini, J. Hammer, A. Sette, E. Appella, L. Adorini. 1995. DR{alpha}:E{beta} heterodimers in DRA transgenic mice hinder expression of E{alpha}:E{beta} molecules and are more efficient in antigen presentation. Int. Immunol. 7:1927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Könen-Waisman, S., M. Fridkin, I. R. Cohen. 1995. Self and foreign 60-kilodalton heat shock protein T cell epitope peptides serve as immunogenic carriers for a T cell-independent sugar antigen. J. Immunol. 154:5977.[Abstract]
  28. Kasprzyk, P. G., F. Cuttitta, I. Avis, Y. Nakanishi, A. Treston, H. Wong, J. H. Walsh, J. L. Mulshine. 1988. Solid-phase peptide quantitation assay using labeled monoclonal antibody and glutaraldehyde fixation. Anal. Biochem. 174:224.[Medline]
  29. Xu, Z., A. L. Horwich, P. B. Sigler. 1997. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEl-GroES L-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388:741.[Medline]
  30. Braig, K., Z. Otwinowski, R. Hedge, D. C. Boisvert, A. Joachimiak, A. L. Horwich, P. B. Sigler. 1994. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371:578.[Medline]
  31. Peitsch, M. C.. 1995. Protein modelling by E-mail. Bio/technology 13:723.
  32. Peitsch, M. C.. 1996. Promod and Swiss-Model: Internet-based tools for automated comparative protein modelling. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 24:274.[Medline]
  33. Guex, N., M. C. Peitsch. 1997. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modelling. Electrophoresis 18:2714.[Medline]
  34. Moudgil, K. D., E. Kim, O. J. Yun, H. H. Chi, E. Brahn, E. E. Sercarz. 2001. Environmental modulation of autoimmune arthritis involves the spontaneous microbial induction of T cell responses to regulatory determinants within heat shock protein 65. J. Immunol. 166:4237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Warren, K. G., I. Catz, L. Steinman. 1995. Fine specificity of the antibody response to myelin basic protein in the central nervous system in multiple sclerosis: the minimal B-cell epitope and a model of its features. Proc. Natl. Acad. Science 92:11061.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Jindal, S., A. K. Dubani, B. Singh, C. B. Harley, R. S. Gupta. 1989. Primary structure of a human mitochondrial protein homologous to the bacterial and plant chaperonins and to the 65-kilodalton mycobacterial antigen. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:2279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Kleinau, S., K. Soderstrom, R. Kiessling, L. A. Klarskog. 1991. A monoclonal antibody to the mycobacterial 65 kDa heat shock protein (ML 30) binds to cells in normal and arthritic joints of rats. Scand. J. Immunol. 33:195.[Medline]
  38. Anderton, S. M., R. van der Zee, J. A. Goodacre. 1993. Inflammation activates self hsp60-specific T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:33.[Medline]
  39. Friedland, J. S., R. Shattock, D. G. Remick, G. E. Griffin. 1993. Mycobacterial 65-kD heat shock protein induces release of proinflammatory cytokines from human monocytic cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 91:58.[Medline]
  40. Chen, W., U. Syldath, K. Bellmann, V. Burkart, H. Kolb. 1999. Human 60-kDa heat-shock protein: a danger signal to the innate immune system. J. Immunol. 162:3212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. R. Kim, R. Rajaiah, Q.-L. Wu, S. R. Satpute, M. T. Tan, J. E. Simon, B. M. Berman, and K. D. Moudgil
Green Tea Protects Rats against Autoimmune Arthritis by Modulating Disease-Related Immune Events
J. Nutr., November 1, 2008; 138(11): 2111 - 2116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. R. Kim, E. Y. Kim, J. Cerny, and K. D. Moudgil
Antibody Responses to Mycobacterial and Self Heat Shock Protein 65 in Autoimmune Arthritis: Epitope Specificity and Implication in Pathogenesis
J. Immunol., November 15, 2006; 177(10): 6634 - 6641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. J. Quintana and I. R. Cohen
Heat Shock Proteins as Endogenous Adjuvants in Sterile and Septic Inflammation
J. Immunol., September 1, 2005; 175(5): 2777 - 2782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Md. Y. Mia, M. Durai, H. R. Kim, and K. D. Moudgil
Heat Shock Protein 65-Reactive T Cells Are Involved in the Pathogenesis of Non-Antigenic Dimethyl Dioctadecyl Ammonium Bromide-Induced Arthritis
J. Immunol., July 1, 2005; 175(1): 219 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Durai, H. R. Kim, and K. D. Moudgil
The Regulatory C-Terminal Determinants within Mycobacterial Heat Shock Protein 65 Are Cryptic and Cross-Reactive with the Dominant Self Homologs: Implications for the Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Arthritis
J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 181 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Durai, R. S. Gupta, and K. D. Moudgil
The T Cells Specific for the Carboxyl-Terminal Determinants of Self (Rat) Heat-Shock Protein 65 Escape Tolerance Induction and Are Involved in Regulation of Autoimmune Arthritis
J. Immunol., March 1, 2004; 172(5): 2795 - 2802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
K. Uray, F. Hudecz, G. Fust, and Z. Prohaszka
Comparative analysis of linear antibody epitopes on human and mycobacterial60-kDa heat shock proteins using samples of healthy blood donors
Int. Immunol., October 1, 2003; 15(10): 1229 - 1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. J. Quintana, P. Carmi, F. Mor, and I. R. Cohen
DNA Fragments of the Human 60-kDa Heat Shock Protein (HSP60) Vaccinate Against Adjuvant Arthritis: Identification of a Regulatory HSP60 Peptide
J. Immunol., October 1, 2003; 171(7): 3533 - 3541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ulmansky, R.
Right arrow Articles by Naparstek, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ulmansky, R.
Right arrow Articles by Naparstek, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS