The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Espinosa, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fournié, J.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Espinosa, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fournié, J.-J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 168: 6336-6343.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

Synaptic Transfer by Human {gamma}{delta} T Cells Stimulated with Soluble or Cellular Antigens1

Eric Espinosa, Julie Tabiasco, Denis Hudrisier and Jean-Jacques Fournié2

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
B, {alpha}{beta} T, and NK lymphocytes establish immunological synapses (IS) with their targets to enable recognition. Transfer of target cell-derived Ags together with proximal molecules onto the effector cell appears also to occur through synapses. Little is known about the molecular basis of this transfer, but it is assumed to result from Ag receptor internalization. Because human {gamma}{delta} T cells recognize soluble nonpeptidic phosphoantigens as well as tumor cells such as Daudi, it is unknown whether they establish IS with, and extract molecules from, target cells. Using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy, we show in this work that Ag-stimulated human V{gamma}9/V{delta}2 T cells conjugate to, and perform molecular transfer from, various tumor cell targets. The molecular transfer appears to be linked to IS establishment, evolves in a dose-dependent manner in the presence of either soluble or cellular Ag, and requires {gamma}{delta} TCR ligation, Src family kinase signaling, and participation of the actin cytoskeleton. Although CD45 exclusion characterized the IS performed by {gamma}{delta} T cells, no obvious capping of the {gamma}{delta} TCR was detected. The synaptic transfer mediated by {gamma}{delta} T cells involved target molecules unrelated to the cognate Ag and occurred independently of MHC class I expression by target cells. From these observations, we conclude thatm despite the particular features of {gamma}{delta} T cell activation, both synapse formation and molecular transfer of determinants belonging to target cell characterize {gamma}{delta} T cell recognition of Ags.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Upon Ag recognition, B and T cells establish with target cells a tight and dynamic area of contact termed immunological synapse (IS).3 Within IS, proteins rearrange into supramolecular complexes organized in a central core of TCR signaling modules surrounded by a ring of adhesion molecules that maintain cell contact (1, 2, 3, 4). Consequent to their recognition, peptide/MHC complexes (5, 6) or membrane Ags (7) appear to be internalized by T and B lymphocytes, respectively. This phenomenon is presumably the result of engaged receptor down-modulation (8). Along with this acquisition, not only Ags but also unrelated molecules from target cell surface are transferred onto the effector lymphocyte surface (6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12). Capture of membrane fragments occurs within minutes after conjugate formation, passes through the IS, depends on TCR signaling, and takes place before functional responses (9). Like B and T cells, NK cells establish IS with target cells lacking appropriate MHC class I expression (13, 14). In this case as well, NK cell activation by target cell induces the capture of target cell membrane fragments (67) and MHC proteins (15, 16). Both activatory and inhibitory surface signals and remodeling of the cytoskeleton control this transfer (10, 17, 18).4 Thus, activation-induced synaptic transfer constitutes a novel aspect of the molecular dynamics at the IS of B, {alpha}{beta} T, and NK cells.

Whether or not {gamma}{delta} T cells share these properties is unknown. Around 1–5% of lymphocytes in peripheral blood of healthy human adults consist in {gamma}{delta} T cells, most of which express TRGV2/TRDV2-encoded {gamma}{delta} TCR (referred to here as {gamma}9{delta}2 lymphocytes) (see Ref. 19 for recent review). The reactivity of this subset is mostly MHC unrestricted (20, 21, 22, 23) and is directed toward a broad spectrum of Ags comprising, on the one hand, soluble nonpeptidic ligands and, on the other hand, activated, virally infected, or cancer cells such as the {beta}2-microglobulin ({beta}2m)- Burkitt lymphoma Daudi (24, 25, 26, 27, 28). Surface receptors for MHC class I (NK cell MHC receptor (NMR)) expressed by most {gamma}{delta} T cells regulate the recognition process (29, 30, 31, 32).

Although structurally diverse, the nonpeptide Ags activating {gamma}9{delta}2 cells have low m.w. and hydrophilic structures. These comprise either natural or synthetic pyrophosphoesters referred to as phosphoantigens (33, 34), therapeutic aminobisphosphonates (35), and natural or synthetic alkylamines (36). Natural phosphoantigens such as 3-formyl-1-butyl pyrophosphate (3fbPP) were isolated from various bacteria including Mycobacterium tuberculosis (37) and Escherichia coli (38). Among other powerful phosphoantigens, isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) is a ubiquitous metabolite (39), and the synthetic agonist bromohydrin pyrophosphate (BrHPP) was recently produced in our laboratory (40). The phosphoantigen receptor on {gamma}{delta} T cells was unambiguously demonstrated as the V{gamma}9/V{delta}2 TCR (41, 42), but the molecular basis of this recognition remains unclear. Presumably, the V{gamma}9/V{delta}2 TCR might accommodate distinct phosphoantigens thanks to the direct binding of phosphate groups to the positive charges of adequately exposed germline residues at the surface of the Ag-binding region (42, 43, 44). Activation of {gamma}9{delta}2 T cells also requires cell-to-cell contact but not MHC class I expression, and thus might involve presentation by an as-yet-unidentified molecule (22, 23). An attractive candidate in this respect is the uncharacterized phosphatase activity involved in activation by phosphoantigens (45). In marked contrast with {alpha}{beta} T cells, {gamma}{delta} T cell activation by phosphoantigens does not result in TCR down-modulation (46, 47), which questions the ability of the {gamma}{delta} T cell to mediate synaptic capture of target cell Ags. We sought to investigate this point using {gamma}{delta} T cells stimulated with either soluble or cellular Ags. This paper reports flow cytometry and confocal microscopy data evidencing synaptic transfer by Ag-stimulated {gamma}9{delta}2 T cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ags and Abs

BrHPP and 3fbPP were synthesized in our laboratory as previously described (37, 40). Synthetic IPP was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Mouse mAb against human V{gamma}9 TCR, human IgM (clone AF6), and secondary goat anti-mouse Ab (F(ab')2) conjugated to rhodamine were from Immunotech (Marseille, France). Mouse mAb 10G10 against human CD45 was a kind gift of P. Valitutti (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Toulouse, France).

Cell culture

PBL from healthy donors were separated by density centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque PLUS (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), washed three times, and then resuspended at 106/ml in RPMI complete culture medium (RPMI 1640 with Glutamax-I (Life Technologies, Paisley, U.K.), supplemented with 10% FCS, 25 mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 1 mM sodium pyruvate).

Polyclonal {gamma}9{delta}2 T cell lines were specifically raised by incubating PBL (106/ml) in culture medium with 3fbPP (10 nM) plus 100 U/ml IL-2 (Sanofi-Synthélabo, Labège, France) during 20 days. The expansion of {gamma}9{delta}2 T cells was followed by cytometric analysis, and only cultures showing >95% TCR V{delta}2-positive cells were used for subsequent experiments.

The THP-1 cell line was cultivated in RPMI complete culture medium plus 50 µM 2-ME. Raji, Daudi, OCI-Ly8, VAL, and C1R cell lines were grown in complete RPMI culture medium.

TNF-{alpha} release assay

TNF-{alpha} release by {gamma}{delta} T cell lines was measured using a bioassay described elsewhere (40).

Analysis of membrane capture by flow cytometry

Cells were stained with green lipophilic dye PKH67 (Sigma-Aldrich) or orange chloromethylbenzoylaminotetramethyl-rhodamine (CMTMR; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PKH-labeled target cells were cocultured at various ratio (1:1 when unspecified) with CMTMR-labeled T cells in 96-well U-bottom tissue culture plates at a final concentration of 4 x 105 cells in 100 µl with the indicated concentration of phosphoantigen. Cells were centrifuged for 1 min at 700 rpm to promote cell contact and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Cells were then washed twice with PBS containing 0.5 mM EDTA and analyzed by flow cytometry. When specified, {gamma}{delta} T cells were pretreated with cytochalasin D (CytD), 10-6 M (Calbiochem, Merck-Eurolab, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France) for 1 h at 37°C or with 20 µM pyrophosphate (PP)2 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min at 37°C before addition of target cells, and then cocultured with these drugs.

Analysis of synaptic transfer or IS by confocal microscopy

Cells were stained as described above. Equal numbers of {gamma}{delta} T cells and target cells (usually 2 x 105) were cocultured after centrifugation (1 min at 700 rpm) in 96-well U-bottom tissue culture plates for 1 h at 37°C (synaptic transfer experiments) or for 15 min (IS analysis) in specified conditions. Cells were then gently resuspended and plated on poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich)-coated slides for 5 min at 37°C. After fixation with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde, cells were washed, blocked in PBS supplemented with 1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich), and processed for immunofluorescence. Primary Abs were added in PBS/1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature and then washed extensively. Secondary Ab were added in PBS/1% BSA for 30 min, washed extensively in PBS, and then mounted in PBS containing 90% glycerol and 2% 1–4-diazabicyclo (2.2.2) octane (Sigma-Aldrich). Samples were examined using a Zeiss LSM 410 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The presented pictures were representative of results from at least three different experiments.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Phosphoantigen-stimulated {gamma}{delta} T cells actively capture membrane fragments from accessory THP-1 cells

It is well known that, while {gamma}{delta} T cells can be stimulated with soluble Ags, the presence of accessory cells, including the {gamma}{delta} T cells themselves, is required. The myelomonocytic THP-1 cell line exerts such accessory function for the response of polyclonal {gamma}9{delta}2 T cells to nonpeptide Ags (48). Because recognition of target cell by {alpha}{beta} T, B, and NK cells involved the capture of target cell molecules, we determined whether such a molecular transfer occurred in conditions where THP-1 cells were cocultured with {gamma}{delta} T lymphocytes activated by the soluble Ag BrHPP. To unambiguously identify each cell type, THP-1 were stained green with the lipophilic dye PKH67, which inserts in cell membrane, while {gamma}{delta} T cells were stained orange with the cytoplasmic dye CMTMR. The PKH67 fluorescence of gated live cells allowed us to discriminate between the PKH67bright population corresponding to THP-1 cells and the PKH67low population corresponding to {gamma}{delta} T lymphocytes (Fig. 1Goa). After 1 h of coculture, the MFIPKH67 of the {gamma}{delta} T cells cultured with THP-1 cells alone (mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) = 11 measured on gated CMTMR-positive T cells) reproducibly increased when BrHPP was added to the coculture (MFI = 18), indicating the capture of THP-1-derived membrane lipids by activated {gamma}{delta} T cells. The MFIPKH67 of {gamma}{delta} T cells dropped to 6 in cocultures where both BrHPP and the Src family kinase inhibitor PP2 were added (Fig. 1Goa). The capture of THP-1 membrane fragment by unstimulated {gamma}{delta} T cells was weak but reproducible and was lowered by the addition of PP2 to the coculture (see Fig. 4Gob). Increasing the ratio of THP-1:{gamma}{delta} T cells also increased the amount of target cell lipids acquired by BrHPP-stimulated {gamma}{delta} T cells; the MFIPKH67 reached 44 at the highest E:T ratio tested (Fig. 1Gob). As expected from the weak reactivity of unstimulated {gamma}{delta} T cells to THP-1 cells alone, this capture measured in these conditions was marginally affected by the above cell ratio. When a large excess of THP-1 cells was used the effect of PP2 on membrane capture by activated {gamma}{delta} T cells was slightly less marked, possibly reflecting consumption by THP-1 cells (Fig. 1Gob). Nevertheless, PP2 reduced membrane capture to levels observed with unstimulated {gamma}{delta} T cells. Altogether, these data indicated that, like other lymphocyte populations, {gamma}{delta} T cells activated by soluble phosphoantigens capture membrane fragments of accessory THP-1 cells.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. {gamma}{delta} T cells actively capture THP-1 membrane fragments. THP-1 cells and {gamma}{delta} T cells were labeled with the membrane PKH67 dye and cytoplasmic CMTMR dye, respectively. Equal numbers of labeled THP-1 and {gamma}{delta} T cells were cocultured in the specified conditions (200 nM BrHPP and 10 µM PP2) for 1 h at 37°C. a, transfer of PHK67 staining followed by flow cytometry of the cocultured THP-1 and {gamma}{delta} T cells. Numbers indicate MFIPKH67 for {gamma}{delta} T cells (gated as CMTMR+ cells). b, Effect of the THP-1:{gamma}{delta} T cell ratio on PKH67 capture in the same conditions as above. These data are representative of four experiments.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Phosphoantigen inhibitors reduce synaptic transfer by BrHPP-activated {gamma}{delta} T cells. a, Levamisole (•) and PPi ({blacktriangleup}) inhibit BrHPP-induced but not PHA-induced ({circ} and {triangleup}, respectively) {gamma}{delta} T cell activation as monitored in a standard TNF-{alpha} release assay. Percentage of inhibition was calculated by normalizing the values obtained for each experimental measurement to the maximal (300 pg/ml) and basal (4 pg/ml) levels. b, MFIPKH67 of gated {gamma}{delta} T cells in the indicated culture conditions. PKH67+ THP-1 cells and CMTMR+ {gamma}{delta} T cells (at a 1:1 ratio) were cocultured for 1 h at 37°C alone or in the presence of the indicated drugs. These data are representative of three experiments.

 
Ag density controls the extent of membrane capture by activated {gamma}{delta} T cells

{gamma}{delta} T cells respond to different concentrations of the soluble phosphoantigens IPP, BrHPP, and 3fbPP as well as to the {beta}2m-deficient Burkitt’s lymphoma cell line Daudi (24, 49). To probe the qualitative and quantitative relationship between antigenic stimulation of {gamma}{delta} T cells and membrane capture further, we tested various doses of these Ags in cocultures of {gamma}{delta} T cells and THP-1 cells as above. The transfer of THP-1 membrane fragments onto {gamma}{delta} T cells augmented with increasing concentrations of BrHPP, IPP, or 3fbPP in a dose-dependent manner. Half-maximal capture correlated well to the known biological activity of these compounds, as assessed in functional assays (33, 37, 39). Thus, BrHPP or 3fbPP induced half-maximal THP-1 membrane capture at roughly 103-fold lower concentrations than IPP (i.e., 200 or 50 nM vs 200 µM, respectively; Fig. 2Goa).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Ag density controls membrane transfer by {gamma}{delta} T cells. a, Dose effect of phosphoantigen concentration. The indicated concentrations of phosphoantigens were added to cocultures of equal proportions of PKH67-labeled THP-1 and CMTMR-labeled {gamma}{delta} T cells. The MFIPKH67 on gated {gamma}{delta} T cells is reported. Phosphoantigens were BrHPP (•), IPP ({diamond}) and 3fbPP (shaded circles). Negative control ({circ}) was obtained by measuring the MFIPKH67 of gated {gamma}{delta} T cells without phosphoantigen. b, Effect of Daudi:{gamma}{delta} T cell ratio on PKH67 transfer to {gamma}{delta} T cells. Experiments were conducted as above by replacing THP-1 and phosphoantigens with Daudi cells alone. {circ}, MFIPKH67 of {gamma}{delta} T cells before exposure with Daudi cells.

 
Then PKH67-labeled Daudi cells alone were used as a stimulus instead of soluble Ags. As a control, {gamma}{delta} T cells and Daudi tumor cells were incubated separately and mixed immediately before flow cytometric analysis (duration of cell contact: 0 min; Fig. 2Gob, {circ}). By comparison, after 1 h of coculture, the MFIPKH67 of {gamma}{delta} T cells was markedly increased. As observed above with soluble Ags an increase in Ag density, as obtained in increasing the Daudi:{gamma}{delta} T cell ratio, resulted in a more efficient transfer of Daudi determinants on {gamma}{delta} T cells (Fig. 2Gob). Interestingly, at the same target cell:{gamma}{delta} T cell ratio, the capture of THP-1 membrane fragment in the presence of high phosphoantigen concentrations was equivalent to the capture of Daudi cell membrane alone. Thus, regardless of the stimulus (soluble or cellular), {gamma}{delta} T cell activation resulted in a marked capture of membrane fragments from cells to which they were conjugated.

{gamma}{delta} T cells acquire molecules from target cells after synapse formation

To visualize the process of molecular transfer between {gamma}{delta} T cells and either THP-1 or Daudi cells, we repeated the experiments presented above and analyzed them by confocal microscopy. A hallmark of IS performed by {alpha}{beta} T and B lymphocytes in the presence of Ag is the exclusion of CD45 from the area of contact with target cells. Thus, we used an anti-CD45 mAb to analyze conjugates between {gamma}{delta} T and THP-1 cells in the presence or absence of BrHPP. As shown in Fig. 3Go, the uniform CD45 staining observed on {gamma}{delta} T cells conjugated to THP-1 in the absence of BrHPP was replaced by a discontinuous staining, CD45 being largely excluded from the contact area when BrHPP was added. A comparable CD45 exclusion was observed in conjugates formed between {gamma}{delta} T cells and Daudi (Fig. 3Go, a and b). Thus, CD45 exclusion applies to {gamma}{delta} T cell synapse as well.



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Confocal microscopy analysis of synaptic transfer by {gamma}{delta} T cells. a and b, Fluorescence and differential interference contrast overlays of unstained THP-1 (a) or Daudi (b) and {gamma}{delta} T cells left for 15 min at 37°C in culture medium, fixed on poly-L-lysine-coated slides, stained with primary anti-CD45 or anti-TCRV{gamma}9 plus rhodamine-conjugated secondary Ab, and then analyzed by confocal microscopy. Arrows indicate CD45 exclusion from the {gamma}{delta} T cell contact surface. c and d, PKH67-labeled THP-1 cells (c) or PKH67-labeled Daudi cells (d) were cocultured with {gamma}{delta} T cells stained red with CMTMR for 1 h at 37°C in the presence of the indicated drugs, then fixed onto poly-L-lysine-coated slides and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Arrows indicate PKH67 patches transferred onto {gamma}{delta} T cells. e, Fluorescence and differential interference contrast overlays of unstained Daudi and {gamma}{delta} T cells prepared as for b in the presence of the indicated drugs, then labeled with anti-IgM mAb and rhodamine-conjugated secondary Ab. Arrows indicate IgM patches. For clarity, {gamma}{delta} T cells, Daudi, and THP-1 are respectively indicated by {gamma}{delta}, D, and THP labels.

 
However, this highly typical characteristic of IS (50) was not associated with capping of {gamma}{delta} TCR at the contact area (Fig. 3Go, a and b). When PKH67-labeled THP-1 cells were cocultured with CMTMR-labeled {gamma}{delta} T cells, a clear PKH67 staining was observed on T cells when BrHPP was present but not in its absence. Interestingly, the presence of PKH67 on T cells was the most noticeable at the level of the IS (Fig. 3Goa). Captured membrane patches spread out of the contact area at the {gamma}{delta} T cell surface, localizing at the membrane and submembrane levels of the IS (Fig. 3Goc, arrows). In the presence of PP2 or CytD, BrHPP-induced membrane capture was markedly inhibited (Fig. 3Goc). Conjugates of {gamma}{delta} T cells and THP-1 cells were observed in each experiment, although they were more frequent with BrHPP. In contrast, PP2 and CytD significantly prevented conjugate formation (Table IGo). In agreement with the former cytometry experiments, membrane capture by unstimulated T cells was very limited, whereas large green patches derived from THP-1 membranes were observed at the surface of BrHPP-stimulated {gamma}{delta} T cells. Similarly conjugated {gamma}{delta} T cells were less abundant in cocultures containing BrHPP and PP2 or BrHPP and CytD (Table IGo). In neither condition did {gamma}{delta} T cells without synaptic engagement harbor any green patch of THP-1 membrane (data not shown). The {gamma}{delta} T cells conjugated to Daudi cells also led to a synaptic transfer of PKH67 dye, which increased in the presence of BrHPP and decreased in the presence of PP2 or CytD as found above with THP-1 cells (Fig. 3God). To document the molecular transfer of membrane markers from Daudi to {gamma}{delta} T cells further, the conjugates were analyzed for surface expression of IgM. For comparison, these cocultures were also done in medium containing either PP2 or CytD. As shown in Fig. 3Goe, a clear transfer of IgM from Daudi to {gamma}{delta} T cell surface was observed except when PP2 or CytD was added (Fig. 3Goe).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Percentage of conjugated {gamma}{delta} T cells in cocultures and of conjugates exhibiting synaptic transfer1

 
Altogether these results indicated that activated {gamma}{delta} T cells establish an IS with target or accessory cells through which theycapture target cell surface molecules including lipids and proteins such as IgM. This process was referred to as synaptic transfer.

Phosphoantigen inhibitors reduced synaptic transfer by {gamma}{delta} T cells

We had previously shown that phosphoantigen recognition involves dephosphorylation by an as-yet-unidentified phosphatase (45). Because the efficiency of synaptic transfer by {gamma}{delta} T lymphocytes correlated with Ag potency, we tested the effect of phosphatase inhibitors on the capture process. At millimolar (nontoxic; data not shown) concentrations, levamisole and inorganic PP (PPi) severely inhibited the release of TNF-{alpha} by BrHPP-stimulated {gamma}{delta} T cells but did not affect mitogenic (PHA) activation of {gamma}{delta} T cells (Fig. 4Goa). When tested in membrane capture assays, levamisole and PPi markedly inhibited synaptic transfer. In addition, a strong inhibition of PKH67 transfer was also obtained when the Src family kinase inhibitor PP2 or the cytoskeleton remodeling inhibitor CytD were used (Fig. 4Gob). Altogether, the pharmacological control of membrane capture indicates that synaptic transfer requires the selective recognition by the TCR of phosphoantigens and subsequent {gamma}{delta} T cell activation involving Src family kinase activity and remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton.

Activation-induced synaptic transfer from Daudi cells

As indicated by the above results, {gamma}{delta} T cells readily capture membrane fragments from the Daudi lymphoma in the absence of phosphoantigen added. Addition of PP2 or BrHPP, respectively, inhibited and enhanced the synaptic transfer by {gamma}{delta} T cells in 1 h of coculture with Daudi (Fig. 5Goa). As the {beta}2m-deficient Burkitt’s lymphoma Daudi does not express MHC class I molecules, its recognition by T cells may be controlled not only by the {gamma}9{delta}2 TCR but also by NK receptors for MHC class I expressed at the {gamma}{delta} T cell surface (29, 30, 31, 32). Therefore, we compared the extent of synaptic transfer exerted by {gamma}{delta} T cells coincubated either with Daudi or with {beta}2m transfectants of Daudi cells that express surface MHC class I molecules (51). The MHC class I molecule expression was verified before each transfer assay by immunofluorescence using W6/32 mAb (data not shown). When cocultured for 1 h with {beta}2m+ Daudi, PKH67 was transferred onto {gamma}{delta} T cells in quantitatively similar extent as with untransfected Daudi. This active capture process was again reduced by PP2 and increased by BrHPP (Fig. 5Gob). Therefore, surface expression of MHC class I molecules by engaged targets did not affect synaptic transfer by {gamma}{delta} T cells, which appears to be mediated mainly by the {gamma}9{delta}2 TCR.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Daudi Burkitt lymphoma and several other tumor cells stimulate synaptic transfer by {gamma}{delta} T cells. a, Daudi lymphoma cells were labeled with PKH67 and {gamma}{delta} T cells were labeled with CMTMR. Equal numbers of {gamma}{delta} T cells and Daudi cells were cultured separately for 1 h at 37°C, then mixed and immediately analyzed by cytometry (t = 0 min) or cocultured for 1 h at 37°C (t = 60 min) in medium containing the specified drugs before flow cytometry. b, The same assays as above, using Daudi-{beta}2m+ cells instead of Daudi cells. c, The same series of experiments as above using the specified tumor cell lines.

 
Synaptic transfer from other tumor cells

The above data suggested that activated {gamma}{delta} T cells capture membrane fragments from tumor cells regardless of MHC class I expression. To strengthen this observation, we tested other tumoral cell lines that elicit different biological responses from {gamma}{delta} T cells. We used the MHC class I-negative K562 cell line, which is lysed by {gamma}{delta} T cells in an NK-like TCR-independent fashion (52). The non-Hodgkin lymphomas VAL and OCI-Ly8 were chosen as efficiently killed targets by {gamma}{delta} T cells (28), and Raji (29) and C1R (data not shown) were chosen as nonlysed cell lines. The {gamma}{delta} T cell responses to those tumor cell lines are summarized in Table IIGo. Only a marginal synaptic transfer from C1R occurred, which was PP2 resistant and increased by BrHPP. All other tumor cells induced a strong transfer onto {gamma}{delta} T cells, which was moderately increased in the presence of BrHPP. In addition, the membrane capture observed for these tumor cell lines was only slightly inhibited by PP2 (Fig. 5Goc). Thus, in agreement with the former results, {gamma}{delta} T cells captured membrane fragments from most of their conjugated tumor targets, regardless of whether these latter expressed MHC class I molecules.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Biological responses of {gamma}{delta} T cells to tumor cells used in this study

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The conjugation of activated {alpha}{beta} T cells (5, 6, 9), B cells (7, 53), and NK cells (15, 16, 18)4 by their respective Ags involves the stripping of target cell membrane fragments that convey cell surface proteins including Ags. The present study demonstrates for the first time that, once activated by either soluble or cellular Ags, human {gamma}{delta} T cells also capture target cell molecules. Because cell-to-cell contact is required for {gamma}{delta} T cell activation by soluble nonpeptide Ags, we first used the THP-1 myelomonocytic cell line (providing a convenient accessory cell) in the presence of phosphoantigens (48, 54) as a {gamma}{delta} T cell stimulus. Activation by phosphoantigens triggered an active transfer of THP-1 membrane patches by the {gamma}{delta} T cell effectors. We also analyzed this process in a second model involving the innate {gamma}{delta} T cell reactivity for tumor cells such as Daudi, in the absence of exogenously supplied phosphoantigens. In this case as well, {gamma}{delta} T cells conjugated to Daudi acquired molecules from the target cell surface.

ISs are tight contact zones that reactive lymphocytes establish with their cell targets. In this contact area, some molecules are enriched and others are excluded. For instance, exclusion of CD45 from the cell-cell contact region is a hallmark of IS (4, 50). Based on this criterion, {gamma}{delta} T cells seem to establish authentic IS with their conjugated targets. The building of IS also relies upon the highly dynamic remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, mediated by inter alia ATP, Ca2+, and protein kinase C (2, 17). Consequently, inhibitors targeting the cytoskeleton such as CytD profoundly affect the ability of lymphoid cells to set ISs, to transduce activation signals, and to internalize ligands from their surface receptors (10, 55). In this respect, the synaptic transfer by {gamma}{delta} T cells was crucially sensitive to inhibitors of actin cytoskeleton. This is very reminiscent of TCR- and CD28-mediated ligand uptake as performed by {alpha}{beta} T cells (10) or NMR-mediated capture by NK cells.4 Because an IS may appear in the absence of Ag (56), we wanted to ascertain whether cognate phosphoantigen recognition was necessary in our model. {gamma}{delta} T cell activation by BrHPP involves hydrolysis of the PP group by an unidentified phosphatase and release of the inactive monophosphate byproduct (45). We thus used levamisole as phosphohydrolase inhibitor (57) and PPi. Presumably by competing with PP moiety of phosphoantigens, PPi was found to specifically inhibit phosphoantigen-induced activation. Both molecules inhibited phosphoantigen activation and impaired BrHPP-induced membrane capture. Hence, the synaptic transfers was subordinated to the Ag recognition mechanism, including phosphoantigen hydrolysis.

In line with previous studies (9),4 the potent inhibition caused by PP2 demonstrated that synaptic transfer required Src family kinase activity. For T cells, the level of TCR occupancy by Ag is usually translated into an Ag dose-dependent activation of protein tyrosine kinases (58); therefore, we assume that Src family kinase activation was triggered by {gamma}{delta} TCR engagement. The occupancy of {gamma}{delta} TCR by phosphoantigens cannot be monitored as for {alpha}{beta} T cells (46, 47). Nevertheless, synaptic transfer strictly followed the dose-dependent {gamma}{delta} T cell activation by either soluble or cell Ags, and was markedly inhibited by inhibitors of phosphoantigen recognition. Furthermore, the experimental conditions allowing synaptic transfer to occur had previously been shown to induce a sustained signaling in polyclonal {gamma}{delta} T cell (46). Altogether, these results allow us to conclude that {gamma}{delta} T cells do not apparently differ from other lymphocyte populations in their manner to interact with targets and to capture surface molecules from them (4). Thus, in {gamma}{delta} T cell-target cell conjugates, TCR triggering led {gamma}{delta} T cells to establish an IS, to reorganize their actin cytoskeleton, and to initiate sustained intracellular signaling, enabling synaptic transfer of target cell molecules onto the {gamma}{delta} T cell.

However, the following lines of evidence seem to diverge from this standard concept. Synapse formation by {alpha}{beta} T cells is thought to concentrate locally both TCR and signaling molecules at central supramolecular activation clusters (1, 3, 59). Although {gamma}{delta} T cells apparently established typical IS with target cells, no macroscopic {gamma}{delta} TCR polarization at the IS was noticed. However, this situation was previously reported, and either high dissociation rates of cognate complexes or different kinetics of synapse establishment and TCR polarization were proposed to explain the absence of TCR enrichment in IS (50, 60). In the present model, it is also possible that the phosphoantigen concentration or Ag density at the tumor cell surface was high enough to trigger both sustained signaling and synaptic transfer without the need for enrichment of {gamma}{delta} TCR. In the case of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, ligand uptake is thought to be the consequence of {alpha}{beta} TCR internalization (5, 7, 9). However, recognition of potent phosphoantigen agonists by cell surface {gamma}{delta} TCR does not involve {gamma}{delta} TCR down-modulation (46, 47). Therefore, {gamma}{delta} T cell-mediated synaptic transfer induced by antigenic stimulation is not the mere consequence of TCR internalization.

The recognition of Daudi cells is mediated by the {gamma}{delta} TCR (24, 25, 26, 61). Accordingly, coculture of Daudi cells with {gamma}9{delta}2 T cells led to a synaptic transfer that was slightly increased by adding BrHPP to the coculture or was abrogated by {gamma}{delta} T cell treatment with PP2. As already reported for {alpha}{beta} CTL (9) and NK cells,4 the capture of target cell membrane fragments by {gamma}{delta} T cells occurred via the IS. Thus, synaptic transfer is unrelated to the nature of the {gamma}{delta} TCR ligand, as soluble or cellular Ags activated a comparable membrane capture by {gamma}{delta} T cells.

Exposure of {gamma}{delta} T cells to increasing numbers of Daudi targets increased synaptic transfer correspondingly. This observation is consistent with the so-called "kiss and run" phenomenon underlying the serial target cell killing by CTL. During this process we observed the capture of target cell markers such as B cell-derived Ig on the {gamma}{delta} T cell surface. This capture can be visualized as small IgM aggregates distributed on the surface of {gamma}{delta} T cells. The role that IgM or other surface molecules may play once they are acquired by T cells is elusive and requires further investigation.

Recognition of Daudi by {gamma}{delta} T cells involves the {gamma}9{delta}2 TCR (26) but consequent activation is controlled by NMR, as testified by the higher sensitivity of Daudi as compared with Daudi-{beta}2m+ transfectants to {gamma}{delta} T cell-mediated lysis (29, 30, 31, 32). In contrast to cytotoxicity assays, {gamma}{delta} T cells captured membrane material from Daudi and Daudi-{beta}2m+ tumor cells to similar extents. Therefore, the expression of MHC class I molecules at the Daudi cell surface does not hamper the synaptic transfer. A panel of tumor cell lines, selected according to their MHC class I molecule expression and effector responses (Table IIGo), reinforced theses observations. As for Daudi cells, synaptic transfer occurred with these tumor cells regardless of their MHC class I molecule expression. Furthermore, no correlation appeared between the ability of those cell lines to be subject to synaptic transfer and their ability to trigger cytotoxicity or amplification. This dissociation from effector responses was already noticed using perforin-deficient T cells (9) or B cell models (7). So human {gamma}{delta} T cells exerted synaptic transfer from tumor cells, but without strong inhibitory effect delivered by their NMR. This suggests that synaptic transfer is an early process occurring while the T cell is scanning its conjugated cell surface. Nevertheless, as shown with C1R cells, not all tumoral cell lines allow this phenomenon. The difference with the highly controlled synaptic transfer performed by NK cells (18)4 may be due to the dominant activatory signal delivered by {gamma}{delta} TCR. In addition, {gamma}{delta} T cell response to lymphoma often involves CD28 coengagement (62, 63, 64), which also potentiates the synaptic transfer (6). {gamma}{delta} TCR-mediated or NK receptor-mediated target cell recognition may lead to synaptic transfer. Phosphoantigen addition frequently enhances the {gamma}{delta} T cell responses to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (28). Also, {gamma}{delta} T cells exert quantitatively similar synaptic transfer from TCR-dependent and -independent cell targets Daudi and K562, respectively. Current studies in our laboratory aim at delineating the respective contributions and outcomes of TCR and NK receptor signals in this IS and the associated transfer.

By visualizing membrane bridges between CTL and target cell surface, Stinchcombe et al. (11) proposed that the continuity of fused membrane bilayers enabled the direct molecular diffusion from target to effector cell at the level of the IS. Taken together, our observations fully agreed with Stinchcombe’s model of membrane ripping by nonselective lateral diffusion (11). Furthermore, this process permits the transfer of target cell surface molecules such as IgM in proper orientation. Synaptic transfer induced by activation of {gamma}{delta} T cells depended upon the highly active establishment of a functional IS. By allowing the local formation of membrane continuities, the synapse most likely enables lateral diffusion of surface molecules originating from the target, regardless of TCR internalization. However, the physiological role of this process still remains unclear. By acquiring target cell-derived Ags, {gamma}{delta} T cells like {alpha}{beta} T cells may become themselves subjected to CTL lysis or fratricide killing (5). Hence, synaptic transfer could favor the termination of immune responses via lymphocyte exhaustion (6). Alternatively, a competition between reactive T cells for Ag stripping from APC surfaces might drive affinity maturation of the in vivo immune response (65). However, in the present context this hypothesis seems unlikely because no biased selection of lymphocytes bearing higher-affinity receptors was observed in response to phosphoantigen stimulation evaluated by the size profiles of their TCRV{delta}2 CDR3 (66). Future work will now focus on the elucidation of the physiological role of synaptic transfer by {gamma}{delta} T cells.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank P. S. Valitutti (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale) and Sanofi-Synthélabo for providing mAbs and IL-2, and we acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Sabina Mueller for confocal microscopy imaging.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by institutional grants from Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, l’Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (contract no. 5665), and the European Union Cluster for Tuberculosis Vaccine. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jean-Jacques Fournié, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, BP3028 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, 31024 Toulouse, France. E-mail address: fournie{at}toulouse.inserm.fr Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: IS, immunological synapse; PP, pyrophosphate; BrHPP, bromohydrin PP; CMTMR, chloromethylbenzoylaminotetramethyl-rhodamine; 3fbPP, 3-formyl-1-butyl-PP; IPP, isopentenyl PP; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; NMR, NK cell MHC receptor; {beta}2m, {beta}2-microglobulin; CytD, cytochalasin D; PPi, inorganic PP. Back

Received for publication February 11, 2002. Accepted for publication April 8, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Monks, C. R., B. A. Freiberg, H. Kupfer, N. Sciaky, A. Kupfer. 1998. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 395:82.[Medline]
  2. Dustin, M. L., A. S. Shaw. 1999. Costimulation: building an immunological synapse. Science 283:649.[Free Full Text]
  3. Grakoui, A., S. K. Bromley, C. Sumen, M. M. Davis, A. S. Shaw, P. M. Allen, M. L. Dustin. 1999. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285:221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bromley, S. K., W. R. Burack, K. G. Johnson, K. Somersalo, T. N. Sims, C. Sumen, M. M. Davis, A. S. Shaw, P. M. Allen, M. L. Dustin. 2001. The immunological synapse. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19:375.[Medline]
  5. Huang, J. F., Y. Yang, H. Sepulveda, W. Shi, I. Hwang, P. A. Peterson, M. R. Jackson, J. Sprent, Z. Cai. 1999. TCR-mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. Science 286:952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hwang, I., J. F. Huang, H. Kishimoto, A. Brunmark, P. A. Peterson, M. R. Jackson, C. D. Surh, Z. Cai, J. Sprent. 2000. T cells can use either T cell receptor or CD28 receptors to absorb and internalize cell surface molecules derived from antigen-presenting cells. J. Exp. Med. 191:1137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Batista, F. D., D. Iber, M. S. Neuberger. 2001. B cells acquire antigen from target cells after synapse formation. Nature 411:489.[Medline]
  8. Valitutti, S., S. Muller, M. Cella, E. Padovan, A. Lanzavecchia. 1995. Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide-MHC complexes. Nature 375:148.[Medline]
  9. Hudrisier, D., J. Riond, H. Mazarguil, J. E. Gairin, E. Joly. 2001. Cutting edge: CTLs rapidly capture membrane fragments from target cells in a TCR signaling-dependent manner. J. Immunol. 166:3645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hwang, I., J. Sprent. 2001. Role of the actin cytoskeleton in T cell absorption and internalization of ligands from APC. J. Immunol. 166:5099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Stinchcombe, J. C., G. Bossi, S. Booth, G. M. Griffiths. 2001. The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges. Immunity 15:751.[Medline]
  12. Davis, S. J., P. A. van der Merwe. 2001. The immunological synapse: required for T cell receptor signalling or directing T cell effector function?. Curr. Biol. 11:R289.[Medline]
  13. Davis, D. M., I. Chiu, M. Fassett, G. B. Cohen, O. Mandelboim, J. L. Strominger. 1999. The human natural killer cell immune synapse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:15062.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Vyas, Y. M., K. M. Mehta, M. Morgan, H. Maniar, L. Butros, S. Jung, J. K. Burkhardt, B. Dupont. 2001. Spatial organization of signal transduction molecules in the NK cell immune synapses during MHC class I-regulated noncytolytic and cytolytic interactions. J. Immunol. 167:4358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sjostrom, A., M. Eriksson, C. Cerboni, M. H. Johansson, C. L. Sentman, K. Karre, P. Hoglund. 2001. Acquisition of external major histocompatibility complex class I molecules by natural killer cells expressing inhibitory ly49 receptors. J. Exp. Med. 194:1519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Carlin, L. M., K. Eleme, F. E. McCann, D. M. Davis. 2001. Intercellular transfer and supramolecular organization of human leukocyte antigen C at inhibitory natural killer cell immune synapses. J. Exp. Med. 194:1507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Dustin, M. L., J. A. Cooper. 2000. The immunological synapse and the actin cytoskeleton: molecular hardware for T cell signaling. Nat. Immunol. 1:23.[Medline]
  18. Zimmer, J., V. Ioannidis, W. Held. 2001. H-2D ligand expression by Ly49A+ natural killer (NK) cells precludes ligand uptake from environmental cells: implications for NK cell function. J. Exp. Med. 194:1531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hayday, A. C.. 2000. {gamma}{delta} cells: a right time and a right place for a conserved third way of protection. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18:975.[Medline]
  20. Schild, H., N. Mavaddat, C. Litzenberger, E. W. Ehrich, M. M. Davis, J. A. Bluestone, L. Matis, R. K. Draper, Y. H. Chien. 1994. The nature of major histocompatibility complex recognition by {gamma}{delta} T cells. Cell 76:29.[Medline]
  21. Holoshitz, J., N. C. Romzek, Y. Jia, L. Wagner, L. M. Vila, S. J. Chen, J. M. Wilson, D. R. Karp. 1993. MHC-independent presentation of mycobacteria to human {gamma}{delta} T cells. Int. Immunol. 5:1437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lang, F., M. A. Peyrat, P. Constant, F. Davodeau, J. David-Ameline, Y. Poquet, H. Vie, J. J. Fournie, M. Bonneville. 1995. Early activation of human V{gamma}9V{delta}2 T cell broad cytotoxicity and TNF production by nonpeptidic mycobacterial ligands. J. Immunol. 154:5986.[Abstract]
  23. Morita, C. T., E. M. Beckman, J. F. Bukowski, Y. Tanaka, H. Band, B. R. Bloom, D. E. Golan, M. B. Brenner. 1995. Direct presentation of nonpeptide prenyl pyrophosphate antigens to human {gamma}{delta} T cells. Immunity 3:495.[Medline]
  24. Fisch, P., M. Malkovsky, S. Kovats, E. Sturm, E. Braakman, B. S. Klein, S. D. Voss, L. W. Morrissey, R. De Mars, W. J. Welch, et al 1990. Recognition by human V{gamma}9/V{delta}2 T cells of a GroEL homolog on Daudi Burkitt’s lymphoma cells. Science 250:1269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Davodeau, F., M. A. Peyrat, M. M. Hallet, J. Gaschet, I. Houde, R. Vivien, H. Vie, M. Bonneville. 1993. Close correlation between Daudi and mycobacterial antigen recognition by human {gamma}{delta} T cells and expression of V9JPC1{gamma}/V2DJC{delta}-encoded T cell receptors. J. Immunol. 151:1214.[Abstract]
  26. Bukowski, J. F., C. T. Morita, Y. Tanaka, B. R. Bloom, M. B. Brenner, H. Band. 1995. V{gamma}2V{delta}2 TCR-dependent recognition of non-peptide antigens and Daudi cells analyzed by TCR gene transfer. J. Immunol. 154:998.[Abstract]
  27. Kobayashi, H., Y. Tanaka, J. Yagi, H. Toma, T. Uchiyama. 2001. {gamma}{delta} T cells provide innate immunity against renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 50:115.[Medline]
  28. Sicard, H., T. Al Saati, G. Delsol, J. J. Fournie. 2001. Synthetic phosphoantigens enhance human V{gamma}9V{delta}2 T lymphocytes killing of non-Hodgkin’s B lymphoma. Mol. Med. 7:711.[Medline]
  29. Fisch, P., E. Meuer, D. Pende, S. Rothenfusser, O. Viale, S. Kock, S. Ferrone, D. Fradelizi, G. Klein, L. Moretta, et al 1997. Control of B cell lymphoma recognition via natural killer inhibitory receptors implies a role for human V{gamma}9/V{delta}2 T cells in tumor immunity. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:3368.[Medline]
  30. Poccia, F., B. Cipriani, S. Vendetti, V. Colizzi, Y. Poquet, L. Battistini, M. Lopez-Botet, J. J. Fournie, M. L. Gougeon. 1997. CD94/NKG2 inhibitory receptor complex modulates both anti-viral and anti-tumoral responses of polyclonal phosphoantigen-reactive V{gamma}9V{delta}2 T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 159:6009.[Abstract]
  31. Halary, F., M. A. Peyrat, E. Champagne, M. Lopez-Botet, A. Moretta, L. Moretta, H. Vie, J. J. Fournie, M. Bonneville. 1997. Control of self-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes expressing {gamma}{delta} T cell receptors by natural killer inhibitory receptors. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:2812.[Medline]
  32. Carena, I., A. Shamshiev, A. Donda, M. Colonna, G. D. Libero. 1997. Major histocompatibility complex class I molecules modulate activation threshold and early signaling of T cell antigen receptor-{gamma}/{delta} stimulated by nonpeptidic ligands. J. Exp. Med. 186:1769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Espinosa, E., C. Belmant, H. Sicard, R. Poupot, M. Bonneville, J. J. Fournié. 2001. Y2K+1 state-of-the-art on non-peptide phosphoantigens, a novel category of immunostimulatory molecules. Microbes Infect. 3:645.[Medline]
  34. Tanaka, Y., M. B. Brenner, B. R. Bloom, C. T. Morita. 1996. Recognition of nonpeptide antigens by T cells. J. Mol. Med. 74:223.[Medline]
  35. Kunzmann, V., E. Bauer, J. Feurle, F. Weissinger, H. P. Tony, M. Wilhelm. 2000. Stimulation of {gamma}{delta} T cells by aminobisphosphonates and induction of antiplasma cell activity in multiple myeloma. Blood 96:384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Bukowski, J. F., C. T. Morita, M. B. Brenner. 1999. Human {gamma}{delta} T cells recognize alkylamines derived from microbes, edible plants and tea: implication for innate immunity. Immunity 11:57.[Medline]
  37. Belmant, C., E. Espinosa, R. Poupot, M. A. Peyrat, M. Guiraud, Y. Poquet, B. M., and J. J. Fournié. 1999. 3-formyl-1-butyl diphosphate, a novel mycobacterial metabolite stimulating human {gamma}{delta} T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274:32079.
  38. Feurle, J., E. Espinosa, S. Eckstein, F. Pont, V. Kunzmann, J. J. Fournie, M. Herderich, M. Wilhelm. 2002. Escherichia coli produces phosphoantigens activating human {gamma}{delta} T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277:148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Tanaka, Y., C. T. Morita, E. Nieves, M. B. Brenner, B. R. Bloom. 1995. Natural and synthetic non-peptide antigens recognized by human {gamma}{delta} T cells. Nature 375:155.[Medline]
  40. Espinosa, E., C. Belmant, F. Pont, B. Luciani, R. Poupot, F. Romagné, H. Brailly, M. Bonneville, J. J. Fournié. 2001. Chemical synthesis and biological activity of bromohydrin pyrophosphate, a potent stimulator of human {gamma}{delta} T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:18337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Davodeau, F., M. A. Peyrat, M. M. Hallet, I. Houde, H. Vie, M. Bonneville. 1993. Peripheral selection of antigen receptor junctional features in a major human {gamma}{delta} subset. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:804.[Medline]
  42. Bukowski, J. F., C. T. Morita, H. Band, M. B. Brenner. 1998. Crucial role of TCR{gamma} chain junctional region in prenyl pyrophosphate antigen recognition by {gamma}{delta} T cells. J. Immunol. 161:286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Allison, T. J., C. C. Winter, J. J. Fournié, M. Bonneville, D. N. Garboczi. 2001. Structure of a human {gamma}{delta} T cell receptor. Nature 411:820.[Medline]
  44. Miyagawa, F., Y. Tanaka, S. Yamashita, B. Mikami, K. Danno, M. Uehara, N. Minato. 2001. Essential contribution of germline-encoded lysine residues in J{gamma}1.2 segment to the recognition of nonpeptide antigens by human {gamma}{delta} T cells. J. Immunol. 167:6773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Belmant, C., E. Espinosa, F. Halary, Y. Tang, M. A. Peyrat, H. Sicard, A. Kozikowski, R. Buelow, R. Poupot, M. Bonneville, J. J. Fournié. 2000. A chemical basis for recognition of nonpeptide antigens by human {delta} T cells. FASEB J. 14:1669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Sireci, G., E. Espinosa, C. Di Sano, A. Salerno, J. J. Fournié, F. Dieli. 2001. Differential activation of human {gamma}{delta} cells by nonpeptide phosphoantigens. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:1628.[Medline]
  47. Lafont, V., J. Liautard, M. Sable-Teychene, Y. Sainte-Marie, J. Favero. 2001. Isopentenyl pyrophosphate, a mycobacterial non-peptidic antigen, triggers delayed and highly sustained signaling in human {gamma}{delta} T lymphocytes without inducing down-modulation of T cell antigen receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 276:15961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Miyagawa, F., Y. Tanaka, S. Yamashita, N. Minato. 2001. Essential requirement of antigen presentation by monocyte lineage cells for the activation of primary human {gamma}{delta} T cells by aminobisphosphonate antigen. J. Immunol. 166:5508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Sturm, E., E. Braakman, P. Fisch, R. J. Vreugdenhil, P. Sondel, R. L. Bolhuis. 1990. Human V{gamma}9-V{delta}2 T cell receptor-{gamma}{delta} lymphocytes show specificity to Daudi Burkitt’s lymphoma cells. J. Immunol. 145:3202.[Abstract]
  50. Leupin, O., R. Zaru, T. Laroche, S. Muller, S. Valitutti. 2000. Exclusion of CD45 from the T-cell receptor signaling area in antigen-stimulated T lymphocytes. Curr. Biol. 10:277.[Medline]
  51. Quillet, A., F. Presse, C. Marchiol-Fournigault, A. Harel-Bellan, M. Benbunan, H. Ploegh, D. Fradelizi. 1988. Increased resistance to non-MHC-restricted cytotoxicity related to HLA A, B expression: direct demonstration using {beta}2-microglobulin-transfected Daudi cells. J. Immunol. 141:17.[Abstract]
  52. Ferrarini, M., S. Heltai, E. Toninelli, M. G. Sabbadini, C. Pellicciari, A. A. Manfredi. 1995. Daudi lymphoma killing triggers the programmed death of cytotoxic V{gamma}9/V{delta}2 T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 154:3704.[Abstract]
  53. Batista, F. D., M. S. Neuberger. 2000. B cells extract and present immobilized antigen: implications for affinity discrimination. EMBO J. 19:513.[Medline]
  54. Ottones, F., J. Dornand, A. Naroeni, J. P. Liautard, J. Favero. 2000. V{gamma}9V{delta}2 T cells impair intracellular multiplication of Brucella suis in autologous monocytes through soluble factor release and contact-dependent cytotoxic effect. J. Immunol. 165:7133.