|
|
||||||||
Laboratory of Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
sequences to
form rearranged V
J
(4), but then, during an Ag-specific immune response in
germinal centers (GCs) of adult rabbit spleen, gene conversion further
alters both rearranged H (5, 6) and L chain
(7) sequences. Gene conversion as a mechanism for diversifying rearranged H and L chain sequences was first described in chickens, where the introduction of homologous sequences from upstream donor genes initiates during embryonic development in a hind-gut organ, the bursa of Fabricius (8, 9). The appendix and other gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT) of rabbits have a homologous function. However, whereas diversification starts in chickens before exposure to exogenous Ags, the process in rabbits occurs only after birth and only in the presence of normal gut flora. Moreover, development of a normal complement of preimmune B cells in rabbits is dependent upon the presence of both normal GALT and gut flora. Just as bursectomy leads to deficiencies in numbers of chicken B cells and their repertoire of specificities, neonatal appendectomy and removal of other GALT early in life leads to B cell deficiency (10) and diminished diversity of VHDHJH gene sequences in B cells of young rabbits (11). Remarkable development and expansion of B cells takes place in rabbit appendix between birth and 6 wk of age (10, 12, 13, 14). It is accompanied by diversification of rearranged VHDHJH sequences (14, 15) and dependent upon the presence of normal gut flora (16, 17, 18).
Growth and expansion of B cells is also accompanied by apoptotic death, suggesting that both negative and positive selective processes affecting the B cell repertoire are at work (12, 13, 19, 20). Previously, existing technology did not permit determination of rearranged VHDHJH gene sequences within single cells (15). Only a few clonally related appendix cell sequences from 6-wk-old rabbits could be obtained after cloning products of hemi-nested PCR amplification of a portion of the rearranged VHDHJH sequences extending from the second framework region through the JH region. We found that the sequences in clonally related cells were undergoing changes that could be explained by both gene conversion-like mechanisms and somatic hypermutation (15).
Now, using both hydraulic micromanipulation and laser capture
microdissection (LCM) to collect single B cells, we
returned to a more comprehensive analysis of rearranged
VHDHJH sequences in
developing appendix. B cells were collected at 0.5- or 1-wk intervals
between 3 and 9 wk of age. We analyzed the diversification of
rearranged H and L chain gene sequences in appendix tissues
of young rabbits after nested PCR amplification and sequencing of
VHDHJH and
V
J
from single cells. For
the first time we have been able to analyze
L chain sequence
diversification in appendix tissue and find that the diversification
patterns parallel those seen for H chains. Our analyses reveal that the
diversification of sequences is strikingly different from what we
previously found in adult spleen after immunization with the specific
hapten-protein conjugate DNP-bovine
-globulin
(5, 6, 7). There, where a specific Ag was driving the
expansion and selection process toward high affinity, we found that
dominant clones underwent few changes in the CDR3 while changes in CDR1
and CDR2 continued to occur in both H and L chain sequences. In
contrast, in the appendix, we find that clonally related cells develop
very different amino acid sequences in each CDR including CDR3. This
suggests that a variety of potentially different combining sites exist
within a single expanding clone. We hypothesize that rather than being
driven by specific Ag, the cells are being driven by less specific
mechanisms dependent upon the presence of normal gut flora.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rabbits were from our National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases allotype-defined colony. The rabbits used here were
homozygous for H chain VHa2 (haplotype F-I)
and L chain C
b5 allotypes. All animal
experiments were in compliance with institutional guidelines and
regulations and were reviewed and approved by the animal care and use
committees of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
and Spring Valley Laboratories (Woodbine, MD).
Immunohistochemistry
Appendices of 3- to 9-wk-old rabbits were cut into
2-mm
slices, submerged in OCT, and quickly frozen in a slurry of dry ice and
isopentane. Five-micrometer serial sections were cut at -24°C in an
IEC cryostat microtome (Sakura Finetek USA, Torrance, CA), kept
overnight in the desiccator, and fixed in acetone for 10 min at room
temperature. Tissues were stained for Ig H chain isotypes using goat
anti-rabbit IgM (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham,
AL), goat anti-rabbit IgA (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX),
and mouse anti-rabbit IgG (Spring Valley Laboratories). For the B
cell-specific marker CD79a, we used mouse anti-human CD79a that
cross-reacts with rabbit ((IgG1 clone HM47; BD PharMingen, San Diego,
CA). Proliferating cells within GCs were identified with mouse mAb
(Ki-S5) to the human nuclear proliferation Ag Ki-67 which cross-reacts
with rabbit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Biotinylated rabbit
anti-goat IgG (Southern Biotechnology Associates) was used for
identifying primary Abs raised in goat and biotinylated goat
anti-mouse IgG (Southern Biotechnology Associates) was used for
identifying primary Abs raised in mice. Cells were then visualized with
avidin-biotin complex (ABC) conjugated to alkaline phosphatase or
peroxidase (ABC-peroxidase) and Vector Blue or 3,3'-diaminobenzidine in
nickel chloride chromogens (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). For
photography, ABC-alkaline phosphatase-stained slides were coverslipped
with aqua mount (Lerner Laboratories, Pittsburgh, PA);
3,3'-diaminobenzidine-nickel chloride-stained slides were dehydrated
and coverslipped with permount (Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn,
NJ).
Microdissection of frozen tissue sections by hydraulic micromanipulation or LCM
Tissue sections (8 µm) were cut and stained for CD79a or Ki-67
as described above. Sections were dehydrated in five changes of graded
alcohol (once in 75% ethanol for 30 s, once in 95% ethanol for
30 s, and three times in 100% ethanol for 2 min each) and then
cleared in three changes of xylene for 2 min each (21).
Single cells from GCs were collected from sections stained with
anti-CD79a or Ki-67 using a hydraulic micromanipulator (Narishige,
Greenvale, NY) assembled on an inverted microscope (Olympus, Lake
Success, NY) or by LCM with a PixCell II and PixCell II Image Archiving
Workstation (Arcturus Engineering, Mountain View, CA) (Ref.
21 ; details of LCM methods can be found on the National
Institutes of Health LCM web site at
http://dir.nichd.nih.gov/lcm/lcm.htm). Individual GCs were designated
by uppercase letters, sections within a GC by lowercase letters, and
single cells by numbers. A suffix of -H or -k was added to the
designation of a sequence from a single cell to indicate H or
L
chain sequence. Each individual cell was transferred to a 0.2-ml
microfuge tube containing 2.5 µl of alkaline lysing solution (200 mM
KOH/50 mM DTT). Tubes were incubated at 65°C for 10 min before adding
5 µl of neutralizing solution (900 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3)/300 mM
KCl/200 mM HCl) (5, 6, 7).
DNA amplification and sequencing
Direct sequencing of PCR products from single cells without cloning was used to minimize two known and potentially serious artifacts: Taq DNA polymerase errors and in vitro recombination during PCR (22, 23, 24, 25). Even with single-cell PCR, there could theoretically be some artifactual recombinants between a germline V gene sequence and the rearranged VHDHJH or VLJL sequence.
For L chains, we chose to only amplify the rearranged
V
J
sequences because in
the homozygous b5 rabbits which were used here,
85% of B cells have
surface Ig bearing
L chain. Rearranged
VHDHJH and
V
J
sequences were
amplified from single cells from GCs using primers and nested PCR
strategies described previously (5, 6, 7). Briefly, in the
first round of PCR, sequences were amplified using a mixture of
external primers: one set specific for the rearranged
VHDHJH and one set
for V
J
. A 2.5-µl aliquot
of the first-round PCR product served as the template for the second
round of nested PCR, which was performed separately for the rearranged
VHDHJH and
V
J
sequences using
internal primers (5, 6, 7). The temperature conditions for
the first and second round of touchdown PCR were the same as described
previously (5, 6, 7). PCR was performed on a PTC-100
programmable thermal cycler (96-well model with hot bonnet; MJ
Research, Watertown, MA). Throughout this report the amino acid
positions are numbered according to the Kabat numbering system
(26).
Recovery of PCR products for sequencing was done as described previously (5, 6, 7). The Prism Ready Reaction DyeDeoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was used following the manufacturers instructions to sequence both strands using the second round primers on an Applied Biosystems model 377 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The sequences were analyzed using Autoassembler version 1.4.0 (Applied Biosystems) and MacVector software version 7.0 (Accelrys, San Diego, CA).
Sequence analyses
In the rabbits of VHa2 (F-I) haplotype used in this study, the majority of B cells rearrange the VH1a2 gene and a few cells rearrange VHx or VHy genes. Thus, we were able to determine the VH, DH, and JH genes used in each VHDHJH rearrangement and most gene conversion blocks by aligning the sequences of the known rabbit VH, DH, and JH genes in the GenBank database and our laboratory databases. Each nucleotide addition, deletion, or mismatch was scored to determine the numbers of single base differences from the rearranged germline VH gene. Mismatches at the last codon of VH that could be attributable to exonuclease activity during the joining process were not scored as single base changes in the VH gene. Many of the observed nucleotide changes could be accounted for by one or more gene conversion-like events in which the donor for the block was a known germline VH gene. After scoring total base changes from the germline sequence, we also scored events. The introduction of a gene conversion block was counted as one event. In a few instances, a tight cluster of nucleotide substitutions that appeared likely to be due to a block of gene conversion was also scored as a single event despite the fact that we could not find a known germline VH gene donor. An initial gene conversion block was identified if there were no more than two superimposed point mutations. Such point mutations were counted as additional events. We cannot rule out the possibility that we may have missed identifying a few gene conversion blocks and in a few instances may have over estimated the number of events because not all rabbit germline VH genes have been identified. Replacement and silent base changes were counted in all sequences that were not members of clones and ratios of replacement to silent changes were tabulated.
The criteria for identification of DH gene segments were that at least six consecutive nucleotides were identical to a known DH gene segment or at least seven nucleotides of identity were interrupted by no more than a single nucleotide substitution. Most DH gene sequences had 10 or more base pairs identical to a known germline gene. A clone was counted only once in tabulating the DH gene usage. Both functional and nonfunctional VDJ sequences were included in the analyses.
In general, the approach adopted for identifying the germline
V
J
, point mutations and
gene conversion events was the same as that used for the H chain. The
recovered VJ sequence was first aligned to the germline
V
database (4). The best
match was identified as the rearranging germline
V
gene. The rearranging germline
V
gene thus identified was used as the
reference to identify point mutations and gene conversion events by
searching the same germline V
database.
In rabbits of b5 allotype, all rearrangements involve the only
functional J
gene
J
2.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fig. 1
A shows appendix
tissue sections from 3-, 6-, and 9-wk-old rabbits stained with Abs to
the nuclear proliferation Ag Ki-67, the B cell receptor-specific marker
CD79a (Ig
), and three Ig H chain classes. There is some variability
among animals in the degree of appendix development at a given age. For
example, we reported earlier that absolute numbers of lymphoid cells in
appendix increased sooner in litters with four or fewer pups
(27). The first three rows in Fig. 1
show stained appendix
tissue sections from three different animals collected at 3 wk of age.
The sections from two animals in the same litter show some difference
in appendix follicle development. The larger 3-wk GC shown in the
top row is referred to as GC RX in Table I
and Fig. 2
and is analyzed separately.
At each time point, Ki-67-positive
proliferating cells are evident. Staining for CD79a confirms previous
reports that the majority of cells in young rabbit appendix are of the
B lineage. IgM- and IgA-positive cells are seen at each time point and
IgG-positive cells appear by 6 wk of age.
|
|
|
Increasing diversification of rearranged Ig H chain sequences during development of the young rabbit appendix
In developing appendix from 3 to 5 wk of age, we found small
clones but most of the sequences were unique and unrelated (Table I
).
We collected a large number of single cells from appendix tissue taken
at 5.5 wk because sequence diversification was becoming much more
extensive. One hundred fourteen H chain sequences were obtained from
four serial sections of one GC (GC RU, Table I
). Sixty-eight were
unique and unrelated to others (59.6%, Table I
). The remaining
recovered sequences fell into nine groups with 221 members that were
clonally related. Twenty-six
L chain sequences were also analyzed
from the same GC. Eighteen were members of clones with 210 members
(69.2%).
Fig. 2
shows the number of sequences at each time point with a given
number of total base changes from the germline
VH gene that had rearranged (hatched bars).
Gene conversion introduces multiple base changes during a single
conversion event. The black bars represent the total number of events
counting gene conversions as one event. The shift of black bars to the
left graphically emphasizes that conversions introduce multiple changes
in one event.
At 3 weeks, the sequences of
VHDHJH from three of
four GC differed by 13 bp from the rearranged germline gene
(VH1a2). One example of a possible gene
conversion was observed (hatched bar that shifted left to black bar).
The D and J region sequences were also
close to those of the respective rearranged germline genes with 01 bp
mismatches in 1723 bp from the germline DH
genes. The base changes from the germline sequence all led to amino
acid replacements occurring mainly in CDRs 1, 2, and 3 (a total of
seven replacements in five sequences). The fourth GC appeared to be
larger and more developed, (GC RX, Fig. 1
, top row). It
yielded VHDHJH
sequences that were more diversified and the results are shown in a
separate panel (GC RX, Fig. 2
). The shift of black bars to the left
again indicates that in several sequences, one gene conversion led to
multiple base changes. As previously described (28), most
gene conversion blocks introduce replacement changes into the
VH portion of the VDJ at most
or all positions where a base change is introduced. In GC RX, seven
sequences contained 44 replacements (R) and only 4 silent (S) base
changes, leading to a ratio (R:S) of 11. This differs from the
situation in mouse and man where high R:S ratios found after somatic
hypermutation are thought to reflect selection events. The panels
showing total base changes or events in sequences from 4- to 9-wk
appendix tissue illustrate that this trend continued. Although
replacement changes may occur by somatic hypermutation, the remarkable
predominance of R vs S changes seen in the unique
VH sequences at all ages (R:S ranges from 5.5 to
11) raises the possibility that even some single base changes were
introduced as gene conversions from germline donor sequences. Thus, the
numbers of gene conversion events are probably underestimated.
Fig. 3
summarizes
DH gene usage at 39 wk of age. We
previously reported that 41% of
VHDHJH in cDNA from
15- to 28-day rabbit fetal liver and bone marrow utilized the
Df gene, with the D2 and
D5 genes accounting for another 21 and 14%,
respectively (29). These were also the most commonly
rearranged DH genes in appendix B cells
through 5.5 wk of age. At 6 and 9 wk, a broader representation of
DH genes was evident. Over the 3- to 9-wk
period, JH2 was found in 10.7% and
JH4 in 89.3% of the 234 independently
rearranged sequences (data not shown).
|
|
|
L chain during
clonal expansion of B cells in young rabbit appendix
Fig. 6
shows examples of clones
found among V
J
sequences
obtained from 3-, 4-, 5.5-, and 6-wk appendices. The sequences obtained
from the cells of the 6-wk clone RZ-1 are shown to illustrate the gene
conversion blocks observed. In each clonal group, examples of one or
more gene conversion blocks as well as single base changes were
observed. Amino acid replacement changes predominated and are shown
beneath each sequence. Silent base changes are shown by lowercase
letters.
|
At days 7 and 10 during Ag-driven expansion and selection in
splenic GCs specific for the hapten DNP, we found small clones and the
majority of recovered sequences were unique and unrelated
(6). However, by day 15 when switching to IgG was evident
by immunohistochemistry, only 10% of sequences from
anti-DNP-specific splenic GCs were unrelated and clones with up to
42 members were found (5, 6, 7). In 3- to 5-wk-old rabbit
appendix, we also found mainly unique unrelated sequences, but by 5.5
wk we found more clonally related sequences (Table I
). Whereas few
replacement changes were found in the HCDR3 and LCDR3 of dominant
clones from splenic GCs, the clones from appendix had striking
diversity in CDR3. Fig. 7
shows the
contrast between the HCDR3 sequences in different members of large
clones recovered from 5.5-wk appendix (Fig. 4
, C and
D, and Ref. 5) and the HCDR3
sequences of members of large clones from anti-DNP splenic GCs
collected on day 15 (5). The marked contrast between the
sequences from cells in expanding Ag-specific clones from spleens and
those from young appendix suggests that the latter are developing a
diverse set of combining sites consistent with their proposed role as a
source of the rabbits preimmune repertoire (13, 14, 18).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been known for many years that GALT of rabbits play a key
role in development of B lymphocytes (10). More recently,
the importance of GALT as a site for diversification of the rearranged
genes that encode Ab H chains was demonstrated (11, 14, 15). The present study considerably extends these earlier
observations by presenting an extensive analysis of sequence
diversification during the development of rabbit appendix follicles and
GCs between 3 and 9 wk after birth. These results were obtained by LCM
or manual microdissection of single B cells from frozen appendix tissue
sections, cell lysis, PCR amplification of rearranged H and L chains,
and direct sequencing. We demonstrate here that diversification of both
rearranged H and L chain gene sequences occurs during the period when B
cells in rabbit appendix are expanding in numbers to generate the large
follicles found by 6 wk of age (Fig. 1
and Refs. 12, 13, 14, 15).
These cells are the hypothesized source of the primary repertoire,
i.e., B cell precursors generated to exit to the periphery and respond
to specific Ags (14). The sequence changes that we find
during clonal expansion are accounted for by gene conversions as well
as likely superimposed point mutations. We find a remarkably high
proportion of replacement changes (Fig. 2
). This may be because the
majority of base changes introduced by gene conversion lead to amino
acid replacements (28). The possibility that some single
base changes may actually be due to gene conversions is raised by the
fact that we find an excess of replacement changes even where single
base changes occur. However, the extensive single base changes from
germline D region sequences observed in HCDR3, are more
likely due to somatic hypermutation because there are no known donor
genes that could donate the changes.
What drives B cell expansion in appendix GCs?
A key role for gut flora in driving expansion of appendix B cells was suggested by early studies which showed that surgical ligation of newborn appendix to interrupt normal contact with intestinal contents interfered with normal lymphoid development (30). Later studies of germfree rabbits (16, 17) also demonstrated that lymphoid development in GALT required gut flora. More recent studies indicate that specific species of gut flora are necessary to obtain development of a normally diversified primary repertoire (18, 31).
How similar are the biochemical mechanisms of somatic hypermutation and gene conversion?
A recent report (32) supports the idea that gene
conversion and somatic hypermutation constitute distinct pathways for
processing or resolving a common molecular lesion (e.g., single- or
double-stranded breaks) in rearranged Ig VH
and VL gene segments (33, 34, 35).
We found that on a B cell population basis, the machinery for both gene
conversion and somatic hypermutation is active in rabbit appendix
lymphocytes as early as 3 wk of age, although somatic hypermutation may
predominate when judged on a cell-cell basis. However, as discussed
earlier, we cannot rule out that some of the single base changes we
observed did not result from gene conversions. Therefore, base changes
in the D regions are a more reliable indicator of
somatic hypermutation. Examples of gene conversions with no changes in
germline D were observed as well as base changes from
germline D region sequences with no other changes in the
rearranged VDJ. Based on our limited data, the gene
conversion and somatic hypermutation machineries appear to be acting on
the rearranged VH and
VL genes simultaneously. Both continue to be
active at least as late as the ninth week, the last time point assessed
in this study. We observed that the odd GC that was more developed than
its neighbors tended to have sequences that were more diversified (Fig. 1
and GC-RX in Fig. 2
). Thus, our data only allow us to conclude that
in the young rabbit appendix these two mechanisms of V
gene diversification appear to be occurring in parallel and that the
factors required for gene conversion and somatic hypermutation can
coexist in the progeny of a single B cell.
The patterns of sequence changes in expanding appendix clones contrast with patterns of sequence changes in splenic GCs during Ag-specific responses
As we analyzed the sequences recovered from appendix GCs, we were
struck by the difference between the patterns of sequence changes that
occurred in clonally related appendix B cells and in dominant clones
from adult DNP-specific splenic GCs (Fig. 7
and Ref. 5).
In spleen, where a specific Ag was driving the expansion and selection
process toward high affinity, we found that dominant clones underwent
few changes in the CDR3, while changes in CDR1 and CDR2 continued to
occur in both H and L chain sequences. In contrast, clonally related
appendix B cells developed very different amino acid sequences in each
CDR including CDR3. Such diversification results in a variety of
potentially different combining sites within a single expanding clone.
Although it remains possible that some IgA- or IgG-positive appendix B
cells may have developed specificities for commensal gut flora, in the
context of classical (10) and recent (11, 12, 13, 14, 15)
studies of the young rabbit appendix that demonstrate a major role in
primary repertoire development and seeding of peripheral sites such as
spleen, lymph nodes, and Peyers patches, we consider it likely that
the clonal sequences we observed reflect preimmune repertoire
development. We believe it is unlikely (as suggested by one reviewer)
that the variety of different combining sites we find within a single
expanding clone are specific for different epitopes of intestinal
flora. We favor the hypothesis that rather than being driven by
specific Ag, these cells are being stimulated by less specific
mechanisms. These could include interactions between B cell receptor
framework regions and endogenous superantigens such as CD5 (13, 19, 20, 27) or superantigens from components of the gut flora.
In addition, or alternatively, more indirect mechanisms such as via
interactions between components of the gut flora and receptors of the
innate immune system could lead to release of cytokines or chemokines
and stimulation of B cells.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Rose G. Mage, Laboratory of Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 11N311, 10 Center Drive-MSC 1892, Bethesda, MD 20892-1892. E-mail address: rm3z{at}nih.gov ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CDR, complementarity-determining region; GC, germinal center; GALT, gut-associated lymphoid tissue; LCM, laser capture microdissection; ABC, avidin-biotin complex; R, replacement; S, silent. ![]()
4 For simplicity, we refer to the mechanism in rabbits as gene conversion although it should be termed gene conversion-like because nonreciprocal exchange has not been formally shown in rabbits. ![]()
Received for publication November 1, 2001. Accepted for publication March 28, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Yang, H. Obiakor, R. K. Sinha, B. A. Newman, B. L. Hood, T. P. Conrads, T. D. Veenstra, and R. G. Mage Activation-induced deaminase cloning, localization, and protein extraction from young VH-mutant rabbit appendix PNAS, November 22, 2005; 102(47): 17083 - 17088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stoel, H.-Q. Jiang, C. C. van Diemen, J. C. A. M. Bun, P. M. Dammers, M. C. Thurnheer, F. G. M. Kroese, J. J. Cebra, and N. A. Bos Restricted IgA Repertoire in Both B-1 and B-2 Cell-Derived Gut Plasmablasts J. Immunol., January 15, 2005; 174(2): 1046 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-J. Rhee, P. J. Jasper, P. Sethupathi, M. Shanmugam, D. Lanning, and K. L. Knight Positive selection of the peripheral B cell repertoire in gut-associated lymphoid tissues J. Exp. Med., January 3, 2005; 201(1): 55 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mehr, H. Edelman, D. Sehgal, and R. Mage Analysis of Mutational Lineage Trees from Sites of Primary and Secondary Ig Gene Diversification in Rabbits and Chickens J. Immunol., April 15, 2004; 172(8): 4790 - 4796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-J. Rhee, P. Sethupathi, A. Driks, D. K. Lanning, and K. L. Knight Role of Commensal Bacteria in Development of Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissues and Preimmune Antibody Repertoire J. Immunol., January 15, 2004; 172(2): 1118 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |