|
|
||||||||
Dermatology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
40% of injected CXCR5-BMDC
were observed in BCZ of draining LN. Mice were vaccinated with CXCR5-
and vector-BMDC that were pulsed with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH)
to induce Ag-specific cellular and humoral immune responses. Mice
injected with CXCR5-BMDC (vs vector-BMDC) demonstrated marginally less
footpad swelling in response to intradermal injection of KLH.
Interestingly, significantly higher levels of KLH-specific IgG
(p < 0.05) and IgM (p < 0.01)
were found in the serum of mice injected with CXCR5-BMDC compared with
mice immunized with vector-transduced BMDC. Thus, CXCR5 is
predominantly expressed by dermal-type DC. Moreover, CXCR5 directs BMDC
to BCZ of LN in vivo and modifies Ag-specific immune responses induced
by BMDC vaccination. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Other types of DC (i.e., ex vivo-generated follicular DC (FDC) and germinal center DC (GCDC)) also have direct effects on B cell growth and development (2, 5, 6, 7). Furthermore, DC capture and transfer unprocessed Ags to naive B cells to initiate a specific humoral response in vivo (8). Thus, in addition to the critical role of DC in the initiation of cellular immune responses (9), these studies support the direct involvement of DC in the initiation and regulation of humoral immune responses.
For DC to regulate B cell function, we hypothesize that physical contact between DC and B cells is likely to be important and that DC must traffic to B cell zones (BCZ) of secondary lymphoid organs. There are already several lines of evidence that support these hypotheses. DC form clusters with CD40-stimulated B cells in coculture in vitro (6), as was previously observed with DC and T cell interaction (10). Disruption of FDC-B cell clusters using mAb to LFA-1 (CD11a), VLA-4 (CD49d), ICAM-1 (CD54), or VCAM-1 (CD106) leads to apoptosis of the B cells, indicating that one or more adhesion pathways are involved in DC and B cell interactions (11). Finally, ligand-receptor interactions between CD21 on B cells and CD21 ligand (CD21L) on FDC mediate FDC accessory activity that leads to potent high affinity Ab production (12). As to whether DC can traffic to BCZ in vivo, there are several reports of DC populations that can migrate to BCZ in vivo (13, 14).
It has already been established that chemokines and chemokine receptors play specific roles in DC migration (15, 16). For example, DC expression of CCR7 is necessary for lymphatic entry and migration to the LN (17, 18, 19), and CCR6 likely influences the migration of DC in Peyers patches (20, 21). CXC ligand 13 (CXCL13, also known as B lymphocyte chemoattractant or BLC) is highly expressed in BCZ of secondary lymphoid organs (22, 23, 24). Recent results showed that CXCL13 and CXCR5 are required for B cell homing to the follicles of the LN and for the development of most LN and Peyers patches (25, 26). We previously showed that ex vivo-generated, skin-derived migratory DC also expressed CXCR5, responded to CXCL13 in vitro, and migrated to BCZ as well as T cell zones (TCZ) in draining LN in vivo (14). By contrast, bone marrow-derived DC (BMDC) lacked CXCR5 expression, did not respond to BLC in vitro, and migrated exclusively to TCZ in draining LN (14, 27). Herein, we transduced BMDC with CXCR5 to determine whether CXCR5 was involved in promoting migratory skin-derived DC to BCZ. We found that CXCR5-BMDC responded to CXCL13 in vitro, colocalized to BCZ in vivo, and, importantly, altered the immune response of the mouse as a consequence of their new trafficking pattern.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Female BALB/c mice (812 wk old) raised under specific pathogen-free conditions were used in all experiments, which were approved by the National Cancer Institute Animal Care and Use Committee. BMDC were cultured as previously described with modification (28). Briefly, bone marrow was flushed from the long bones of the limbs, filtered through a nylon mesh, and depleted of RBC with ammonium chloride. Bone marrow cells (BMC) were incubated for 30 min with a panel of mAb to murine CD45R/B220 (RA3-6B2, rat IgG 2a), CD90.2 (53-2.1, rat IgG2a), and I-Ad/I-Ed (2G9, rat IgG2a) (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) for the depletion of lymphocytes, granulocytes, and MHC class II-positive cells. Ab-labeled cells were then incubated with sheep anti-rat IgG-coated magnetic beads (Dynal, Oslo, Norway). Lineage marker-negative cells were plated in six-well culture plates (4 x 106 cells/ml; 1 ml/well) in complete RPMI medium (cRPMI) with following components: RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD); 5% heat-inactivated FCS; 50 µM 2-ME; 2 mM glutamine; 100 U/ml penicillin; 100 mg/ml streptomycin; supplemented with recombinant murine IL-4 (10 ng/ml); murine GM-CSF (10 ng/ml) (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ); and murine Flt3-L (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).
Construction of retroviral vectors and retroviral gene transduction
The vector MSCV-IRES-GFP (MIG, a gift from M. Mackey, National Institute of Arthritis and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), made by insertion of the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES)-green-fluorescent protein (GFP) sequence into MSCV 2.2 (29), was used for the retroviral-mediated CXCR5 gene transfer. CXCR5 cDNA (30) (a gift from D. D. Chaplin, Washington University, St. Louis, MO) was subcloned into the MIG restriction site upstream of IRES-GFP sequence to create the bicistronic retroviral vector CXCR5-MIG encoding both CXCR5 and GFP genes (31). Pantropic GP293 packaging cells (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA) in 150-mm dishes with 6080% confluence were cotransfected with 20 µg of either MIG or CXCR5-MIG and 20 µg of pVSV-G envelope protein vector (Clontech) using FuGene 6 transfection reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) to produce MIG and CXCR5-MIG retrovirus in supernatant. For retroviral-mediated transduction, 3 ml of retrovirus supernatant (freshly harvested or thawed from frozen stock) were filtered through a 0.45-µm pore low protein binding filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA), supplemented with Polybrene (8 µg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and added together with BMC in six-well plates on days 0, 1, and 2. Transduction was enhanced by centrifugation at 2500 x g at 25°C for 1 h. Supernatant was removed after centrifugation, and BMC were resuspended with complete medium supplemented with cytokines. Medium was replenished with cytokines on day 5, and nonadherent cells were harvested by gentle pipeting on day 7. BMDC surface phenotype were examined by flow cytometry with PE-conjugated murine CD11c mAb (HL3, hamster IgG; BD PharMingen) and anti-murine CXCR5 (a gift from J. G. Cyster, University of California, San Francisco, CA). CXCR5 transduction efficiency was also examined by expression of GFP by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry on day 7.
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR
RNA extraction and reverse transcription were performed as described (14). Real-time quantitative PCR (Perkin-Elmer ABI7700) was performed with duplicate samples using SybrGreen dye and the murine primer pairs for detection of CXCR5 dsDNA, 5'-ACTCCTTACCACAGTGCACCTT-3' and 5'-GGAAACGGGAGGTGAACCA-3'. Murine G3PDH primer pairs (5'-CGTGTTCCTACCCCCAATGT-3' and 5'-TGTCATCATACTTGGCAGGTTTCT-3'), were used as an internal control for loading. All primer pairs were designed to give products between 65 and 75 bp long, gave rise to single-band products, and had similar efficiencies of exponential amplification. Cycle threshold numbers (Ct) were derived from the exponential phase of PCR amplification. Fold differences in expression of gene x in cell populations y and z were derived by 2k, where k = (Ctx - CtG3PDH)population y - (Ctx - CtG3PDH)population z.
In vitro chemotaxis assay
Transduced (MIG or CXCR5-MIG) or nontransduced BMDC were used in
chemotaxis assays as previously described (14). Cells
(
20,000 cells in 25 µl cRPMI) were placed on top of the 5-µm
pore size filters in duplicate, whereas cRPMI with and without
chemokines were placed into the lower chamber. After 3 h at
37°C, migrated cells that had fallen to the bottom of the plate were
photographed using a 4x objective. Three random views from each of two
wells were counted using Image Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics, Silver
Spring, MD). Three independent experiments were performed with similar
results.
In vivo CXCR5-BMDC homing assay
CXCR5-BMDC or vector-BMDC (300,000 cells in 50 µl Hanks buffer with 0.1% BSA) were either labeled with PKH67 (Sigma) membrane dye according to manufacturers instructions or left unlabeled and injected into the left hind footpad of mice. The left popliteal LN was removed 24, 48, or 72 h later; sectioned (6 µm); air-dried without fixation; and stained with biotin-conjugated CD45R/B220 mAb (BD PharMingen) followed by streptavidin-Cy3 to identify BCZ. All analysis was performed with a Nikon PCM2000 laser scanning confocal microscope and Adobe Photoshop 6.0 software (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA).
Induction of Ag-specific immune responses
Induction of Ag-specific cellular and humoral immune responses using transduced BMDC was performed as previously described (32) with the following modifications. For cellular immune responses, CXCR5-BMDC or vector-BMDC were harvested on day 7, washed with PBS, and resuspended in cRPMI in the presence or absence of keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH; 100 µg/ml; Sigma) for 8 h. Mice (four groups, five mice in each group) were sensitized by s.c. injection (3 x 105 cells/animal) of CXCR5-BMDC or vector-BMDC, either pulsed with KLH or not, into the right flank. In another group serving as a positive control, animals received a s.c. injection of KLH in CFA (2 mg/ml, 100 µl/animal) instead of BMDC. Six days later, the mice were challenged with s.c. injection of KLH (50 µg/animal) in 30 µl PBS into the left footpad and 30 µl PBS alone into the right footpad. Footpad thickness of both feet was measured before and 24 h after KLH challenge by a blinded, experienced observer using a thickness gauge (Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan). Footpad swelling response was calculated as the swelling (thickness after challenge minus thickness before challenge) of the left footpad that received Ag minus the baseline swelling of the right footpad that received PBS.
For humoral immune responses, mice (five mice/group) were given weekly s.c. injections (300,000 cells per animal) of KLH-pulsed or nonpulsed CXCR5-BMDC or vector-BMDC. One week after the third and fifth injections, serum samples were collected, and relative concentrations of KLH-specific IgM, IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b were measured using a Mouse Hybridoma Subtyping ELISA Kit (Roche). OD405 ELISA readings from serum samples at 1/500 dilution (based on preliminary experiments showing OD405 readings between 0.1 and 0.6 from tested and reference serum samples at this dilution) were compared with reference serum samples (1/500 dilution) that were collected and pooled from five mice 10 days after a single immunization with a s.c. injection of KLH in CFA (2 mg/ml, 100 µl/animal).
Statistical analysis
Means and p values (Students t test, parametric, two-tailed analysis) for chemotaxis assays and immune response induction were obtained using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our previous results using quantitative RT-PCR methods
demonstrated that there was detectable expression of CXCR5 mRNA from
cells migrating out of murine skin explants. Most of these cells
(>85%) were DC as demonstrated by characteristic morphology and
uniformly high expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules.
Recently, Henri et al. (33) have shown that migratory
skin-derived DC, such as the ones we previously isolated, likely
consist of at least two subpopulations. One subpopulation has
high expression of both MHC class II and a lectin-like protein called
DEC205 (34), both of which are consistent with features of
epidermal DC (i.e., LC). The other subpopulation showed equally high
expression of MHC class II but displayed lower levels of DEC205, and
were thus identified as dermal DC. Using the expression of DEC205 as a
basis for distinguishing LC from dermal DC, we stained migratory
skin-derived DC with anti-CXCR5 Ab and I-Ad (or DEC205) (Fig. 1
) and analyzed expression by two-color
flow cytometry. From 15 to 35% of I-Adhigh cells
demonstrated expression of CXCR5 in two different experiments (Fig. 1
A). By comparison, BMDC, which express very low levels of
CXCR5 by RT-PCR (14), showed <6% CXCR5-positive cells
(Fig. 1
A). Whereas the majority of
I-Adhigh cells were DEC205 positive,
CXCR5high cells were low in DEC205 expression
(Fig. 1
B), suggesting that they were likely to be
dermal-type DC rather than LC.
|
From our earlier work, BMDC did not express CXCR5 and did not
migrate to BCZ (14). To determine whether the absence of
CXCR5 in the BMDC could account for their selective migration to TCZ,
we transduced BMDC with the gene for murine CXCR5 using the
MIG-retroviral vector. CXCR5-MIG or MIG-transduced BMC started to
express GFP as early as 24 h after transduction, which could be
conveniently observed by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 2
A). When examined by flow
cytometry 7 days after first transduction, both CXCR5-BMDC and
vector-BMDC demonstrated CD11c expression (
83%) (Fig. 2
B). Transduction efficiencies of CXCR5 from several
experiments were consistently
40% by GFP expression (Fig. 2
C) and
60% by CXCR5 expression (Fig. 2
D) on
day 7. The discrepancy in expression between upstream (cap-dependent)
and downstream (IRES-dependent) coding regions had also been previously
described from 0 to 75% due to different translational mechanisms
(35).
|
50%. CXCR5-BMDC migrate in response to CXCL13
To determine whether CXCR5 was functional in the transduced BMDC,
we performed chemotaxis assays using murine CXCL13 or CCL21(also known
as secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine (36)) as
chemoattractants. As shown in Fig. 3
, CXCR5-BMDC responded to CXCL13 with a
3-fold increase in migration
over either vector-BMDC or nontransduced BMDC. CXCR5-BMDC and
vector-BMDC, however, showed comparable levels of response to CC ligand
21 (CCL21) along with nontransduced BMDC, indicating normal expression
and function of CCR7 in retroviral-transduced BMDC. The response of
CXCR5-BMDC to CXCL13 was similar to that observed in skin-derived
migratory DC (14). Thus, CXCR5-BMDC, but not BMDC or
vector-BMDC, efficiently migrated to CXCL13 in vitro. Furthermore, the
response of the transduced BMDC to CCL21 (acting via CCR7) suggested
that the BMDC had an activated phenotype (19).
|
Given that nontransduced, wild-type BMDC migrated exclusively to
TCZ in draining LN (14, 27), we sought to determine
whether CXCR5 gene transduction would alter the migration dynamics and
homing pattern of BMDC within draining LN. First, we labeled day 7
CXCR5- or vector-BMDC with a stable membrane dye, PKH67 (green), and
injected them into the footpad of mice. After 24, 48, or 72 h,
draining popliteal LN were removed, sectioned, photographed to reveal
the location of DC (Fig. 4
, B
and C), and stained with an anti-B cell mAb and
rephotographed to delineate BCZ (Fig. 4
, A and
D). Labeled vector-CXCR5 DC migrated exclusively to T cell
zones (Fig. 4
B), whereas a significant proportion of
CXCR5-BMDC (green) migrated to BCZ in addition to TCZ (Fig. 4
C). At higher magnification, CXCR5-BMDC in the BCZ showed
dendritic morphology (Fig. 4
C, inset). CXCR5-BMDC were also
present at the border zones between BCZ and TCZ (not shown). The
percentage of CXCR5-BMDC detected within the BCZ was 39 ± 3.4%
(SD) at 72 h. CXCR5-BMDC migration to BCZ occurred in all sections
sampled from early (24 h) to late (72 h) time points. Because the
CXCR5-BMDC injected in the experiment described above did not uniformly
express CXCR5 and GFP (as shown in Fig. 2
), we repeated the experiment
with CXCR5-BMDC that were selected by flow cytometric sorting for a
positive GFP signal (>90% GFP+) and found
46 ± 7% of CXCR5-BMDC in BCZ at 48 h after injection, a
proportion that was not statistically different
(p = 0.1) compared with previous experiments
involving nonsorted BMDC. Unstained CXCR5-BMDC expressing GFP were also
observed in BCZ using alternative staining protocols (data not shown).
Thus, CXCR5-BMDC, but not vector-BMDC, were able to effectively migrate
to BCZ in draining LN in vivo.
|
To address whether trafficking of CXCR5-BMDC to BCZ could alter
Ag-specific immune responses, we pulsed the CXCR5-BMDC or vector-BMDC
with KLH and injected them into mice as described in Materials
and Methods to induce KLH-specific cellular or humoral immune
responses. Cellular immune responses were demonstrated by footpad
swelling after challenging the animals by injecting KLH intradermally
into the footpads. As shown in Fig. 5
, animals immunized with CXCR5-BMDC had 23% less footpad swelling
(p < 0.05) than those injected with
vector-BMDC. When GFP-sorted (as described above) CXCR5-BMDC were used
to immunize mice for cellular immune responses, a similar difference of
27% less swelling in the CXCR5-BMDC-injected mice was observed.
Humoral immune responses were measured by a quantitative ELISA-based
assay for KLH-specific Ig after 3 and 5 wk of weekly injections with
KLH-pulsed DC. In response to weekly injections of KLH-pulsed BMDC,
animals immunized with CXCR5-BMDC produced more IgM (2.9-fold OD
reading level, p < 0.05) and IgG2a (2-fold,
p < 0.01) compared with vector-BMDC after the third
injection and more IgM (4-fold, p < 0.01), IgG
(1.44-fold, p < 0.05), IgG2a (2.1-fold,
p < 0.01), and IgG2b (2.6-fold, p <
0.05) after the fifth injection (Fig. 6
A). GFP-sorted CXCR5-BMDC
were also used for assessment of humoral immune responses in a similar
protocol except that Ig was assessed 6 days after two weekly injections
of CXCR5-BMDC. Titration of sera from immunized mice showed
significantly more KLH-specific IgG (Fig. 6
C) and IgM (Fig. 6
B) from mice immunized with CXCR5-BMDC compared with
vector-transduced BMDC at the lower serum dilution ranges, similar to
results obtained with unsorted BMDC in Fig. 6
A. Thus,
although there were only modest changes in the cellular immune response
in mice immunized with CXCR5-BMDC, a consistent elevation of IgM and
IgG were observed in CXCR5-BMDC-vaccinated mice compared with those
vaccinated with vector-transduced BMDC.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The studies of Caux and colleagues (2) have shown
that certain subsets of DC can directly stimulate B cells. In
particular, interstitial/dermal-type, but not LC-type, DC have potent B
cell-stimulatory properties (4). This may partially
explain the high efficiency of Th2-type responses generated by the
intradermal route of plasmid DNA administration (37).
Although clear markers for dermal vs epidermal DC are available for
human skin-derived DC and for DC derived from human
CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (3, 4), these two types of skin-derived DC have previously been
virtually indistinguishable in mice (38). A recent report
by Henry et al. (33), however, demonstrated that dermal DC
and LC derived from murine skin explants were both similarly high in
MHC class II but that dermal DC showed low expression of DEC205, a
lectin domain-containing protein that may participate in the
endocytosis of potential Ags. Our observation showing that CXCR5 is
primarily expressed by DEC205low migratory skin
DC suggests that it is the dermal-type DC subpopulation that primarily
expresses CXCR5 (Fig. 1
). The proportion of
I-Adhigh cells that express CXCR5 appears to vary
depending on the skin preparations, perhaps because the preparative
procedure requires scraping and removing variable amounts of dermis
from the mouse ear. Our current results suggest that the dermal
component of the migratory skin DC expressed CXCR5 and migrated to BCZ
in our previous study (14). Thus, dermal DC may use CXCR5
as a migratory mechanism to migrate to BCZ, where they may play a
critical role in stimulating naive B cells (2).
To date, several subsets of DC have been found resting within or migrating to the lymphoid follicles. These include FDC (39), CD3-CD4+CD11c+ GCDC (2, 40), a population of CD11c+ DC characterized by binding to a mannose receptor fusion protein (13), as well as a subpopulation of migratory skin-derived DC (14). Although the trafficking mechanisms for FDC and GCDC homing to lymphoid follicles are still unclear, our current studies suggest that CXCR5 may be critical for the migration of DC subsets to BCZ. It has already been established that CXCR5/CXCL13 represent an important pathway for the migration of B cells to lymphoid follicles (25, 26), and recent data indicate that a certain subset of T cells termed "follicular B helper T cells" express CXCR5, localize to B cell follicles, and support Ab production in vitro (41). As suggested by the finding that transgenic expression of CXCL13 in pancreatic islets can lead to the formation of ectopic LN-like structures (42), it is likely that CXCR5/CXCL13 may play a role in coordinating the development of the humoral immune response by recruiting different types of CXCR5+ cells, including DC subsets, to BCZ to establish a functional immune microenvironment.
We can only speculate as to why only 4050% of CXCR5-BMDC (even those
that were positively sorted for GFP expression) became localized to the
BCZ. First, it is clear that CXCR5-BMDC still retain high, functional
levels of CCR7 as demonstrated by their strong response to CCL21 in
chemotaxis assays (Fig. 3
). Because we have no effective means for
down-regulating or blocking the action of CCR7 in the BMDC, a tendency
to retain CXCR5-BMDC in the TCZ via CCR7 may be present. Second, the
migration of DC to different areas of the LN may be one of a fine
regulation based on differential levels of receptors and ligands.
Although comparable with the expression of CXCR5 by dermal skin-derived
DC, there is a range of CXCR5 receptor expression in our transduced
cells (as well as on skin-derived migratory DC) that may affect the
ultimate localization of the DC. Low and medium expression of CXCR5 may
not be sufficient to allow these cells to get to the BCZ if the BMDC
express high levels of CCR7.
Given the potent capacity of DC to activate T cells, DC-based vaccine strategies have been widely used to generate Th1-mediated protective immunity against cancers (43) and infectious microorganisms (44), which can be further augmented by retroviral transduction of DC with IL-12 (45). Although the decrease in cellular immune responses found in the CXCR5-BMDC vs vector-BMDC mice was statistically significant, the quantitative difference was modest. Because only one-half of CXCR5-BMDC migrated to the BCZ, the fraction that remained in the T cell zone likely interacted with naive T cells and thus stimulated the development of cellular immune responses comparable with those of vector-BMDC.
We have shown, however, that retroviral transduction of BMDC with CXCR5 provides a feasible way to increase Ag-specific humoral immune responses. With DC-based vaccination, there has been limited success in the attempt to generate Th2-shifted or humoral immune responses using DC-based vaccination strategies. Hayashi et al. (32) had sought to induce Th2-directed immune responses using IL-4-transfected XS-106 DC, but with a 0.51% transfection rate, humoral responses were only modestly altered in their study. Using the approaches in the present study that resulted in >50% transduction, it is possible that higher titer, more durable humoral immune responses can be reached in future DC-based vaccination strategies by specifically altering DC migratory patterns with specific chemokine receptors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Sam T. Hwang, Dermatology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Building 10, Room 12N246, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1908, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail address: hwangs{at}mail.nih.gov ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; BMDC, bone marrow-derived dendritic cell; TCZ, T cell zone; BCZ, B cell zone; GFP, green-fluorescent protein; CXCR5-BMDC, CXCR5-transduced bone marrow-derived DC; vector-BMDC, vector only-transduced BMDC; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; SLC, secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine; BLC, B lymphocyte chemokine; IRES, internal ribosomal entry site, BMC, bone marrow cell MIG, MSCV-IRES-GFP; cRPMI, complete RPMI; CXCL, CXC ligand; LN, lymph node; LC, Langerhans cell; FDC, follicular DC; GCDC, germinal center DC; DEC205, dendritic and epithelial cell-205; CCL, CC ligand. ![]()
Received for publication June 5, 2001. Accepted for publication March 12, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. J. Exp. Med. 184:695.
. II. Functional analysis. Blood 90:1458.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Sansonno, F. A. Tucci, L. Troiani, G. Lauletta, M. Montrone, V. Conteduca, L. Sansonno, and F. Dammacco Increased serum levels of the chemokine CXCL13 and up-regulation of its gene expression are distinctive features of HCV-related cryoglobulinemia and correlate with active cutaneous vasculitis Blood, September 1, 2008; 112(5): 1620 - 1627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Raymond, P. Aucouturier, and N. A. Mabbott In Vivo Depletion of CD11c+ Cells Impairs Scrapie Agent Neuroinvasion from the Intestine J. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 179(11): 7758 - 7766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, H. Yuling, J. Yanping, T. Xinti, Y. Yaofang, Y. Feng, X. Ruijin, W. Li, C. Lang, L. Jingyi, et al. CCL19 and CXCL13 Synergistically Regulate Interaction between B Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia CD23+CD5+ B Cells and CD8+ T Cells J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 2880 - 2888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sugaya, L. Fang, A. R. Cardones, T. Kakinuma, S. H. Jaber, A. Blauvelt, and S. T. Hwang Oncostatin M Enhances CCL21 Expression by Microvascular Endothelial Cells and Increases the Efficiency of Dendritic Cell Trafficking to Lymph Nodes J. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 177(11): 7665 - 7672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Chunsong, H. Yuling, W. Li, X. Jie, Z. Gang, Z. Qiuping, G. Qingping, Z. Kejian, Q. Li, A. E. Chang, et al. CXC Chemokine Ligand 13 and CC Chemokine Ligand 19 Cooperatively Render Resistance to Apoptosis in B Cell Lineage Acute and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia CD23+CD5+ B Cells J. Immunol., November 15, 2006; 177(10): 6713 - 6722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |