The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiffoleau, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cuturi, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiffoleau, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cuturi, M. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2002, 168: 5058-5069.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

Role for Thymic and Splenic Regulatory CD4+ T Cells Induced by Donor Dendritic Cells in Allograft Tolerance by LF15-0195 Treatment1

Elise Chiffoleau*, Gaëlle Bériou*, Patrick Dutartre{dagger}, Claire Usal*, Jean-Paul Soulillou* and Maria Cristina Cuturi2,*

* Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 437 and Institut de Transplantation et de Recherche en Transplantation, Nantes, France; and {dagger} Axe Immunologie, Laboratoires Fournier S.C., Daix, France


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A 20-day treatment with LF15-0195, a deoxyspergualine analogue, induced allograft tolerance in a fully MHC-mismatched heart allograft model in the rat. Long-term allografts displayed minimal cell infiltration with no signs of chronic rejection. CD4+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients were able to suppress in vitro proliferation of allogeneic CD4+ T cells and to transfer tolerance to second syngeneic recipients, demonstrating dominant suppression by regulatory cells. A significant increase in the percentage of CD4+CD25+ T cells was observed in the thymus and spleen from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipient. In vitro direct stimulation with donor APCs demonstrated that CD4+ regulatory T cells proliferated weakly and expressed low levels of IFN-{gamma}, IL-10, and IL-2. CD4+CD25+ cell depletion increased IL-2 production by CD4+CD25- thymic cells, but not splenic cells. Moreover, tolerance was transferable with splenic and thymic CD4+CD25+ cells, but also in 50% of cases with splenic CD4+CD25- cells, demonstrating that CD25 can be a marker for regulatory cells in the thymus, but not in the periphery. In addition, we presented evidences that donor APCs were required to induce tolerance and to expand regulatory CD4+ T cells. This study demonstrates that LF15-0195 treatment induces donor APCs to expand powerful regulatory CD4+CD25+/- T cells present in both the central and peripheral compartments.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The induction of donor-specific tolerance after cessation of treatment remains an elusive goal in human transplantation. Long-term allograft tolerance could be mediated by several nonexclusive mechanisms such as anergy (1), deletion (2), or suppression mediated by regulatory cells (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Evidence for the existence of regulatory CD4+ T cells in maintenance of allograft tolerance has emerged from the work of Hall et al. (3). Since then, several studies have described the existence of CD4+ or CD8+ or CD4-CD8- regulatory T cells in models of allograft tolerance (6, 10, 11). The characterization of regulatory cells has been difficult since they have been shown to be a heterogeneous population; they are defined mostly by their function and only partially by their phenotype. Indeed, regulatory cells are able, on adoptive transfer, to suppress graft rejection by naive T cells, a property termed infectious tolerance (5, 10, 12). Moreover, these cells are specific to the Ag that induced them, but they are able to suppress rejection directed to other Ags if these are located in the same cell, a process known as linked suppression (5, 13).

Recent reports support the hypothesis that CD25 could be a marker for thymic and splenic naturally suppressive CD4+ cells involved in self tolerance in mice, rats, and humans (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). These cells are generated in the thymus and then exported to the periphery to maintain self tolerance (15, 18, 20). Naturally suppressive CD4+CD25+ T cells have been described as having a low proliferative capacity in vitro and as expressing CTLA-4 and cell surface-bound TGF-{beta} that are required to exert suppression by cell-cell contact (19, 21, 22, 23, 24). Moreover, CD4+CD25+ T cells have been described as being able to inhibit IL-2 production by CD4+CD25- T cells, cytotoxic CD8+ responses, and B cell Ab production (24, 25). Expansion in the periphery of CD4+CD25+ T cells specific to foreign Ags (alloantigens, OVA) has been reported in models of tolerance (26, 27). However, several aspects of regulatory T cells remain to be elucidated particularly, whether they are derived from the same lineage, from a precommitted lineage, their mode of activation and amplification, and their Ag specificity.

In a rat MHC-mismatched heart allograft model, we have previously described long-term tolerance induction by a 20-day treatment with LF15-0195, a deoxyspergualine (DSG)3 analogue (28). DSG is a compound isolated from culture filtrates of Bacillus laterosporus that has been described as prolonging allograft survival in rats (29, 30, 31). Moreover, treatment with LF08-0299, another analogue of DSG, was previously shown to induce regulatory T cells in a Dark Agouti to Lewis cardiac allograft combination (32).

In this study, we investigated whether regulatory cells could be involved in the maintenance of tolerance induced by LF15-0195 treatment. We analyzed 100 days after transplantation, antidonor responses, allograft-infiltrating cells, and the phenotype and regulatory properties of thymus and spleen CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- cells, and we investigated the involvement of the thymus and microchimerism in tolerance induction and maintenance.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and transplantations

Eight-week-old male LEW.1W or Lewis rats served as heart donors and LEW.1A rats as allograft recipients (Center d’Elevage Janvier, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France). Rats were congenic and differed in haplotype. LEW.1W rats were RT1.u (A/B.u, C/D.u), Lewis rats were RT1.l (A/B.l, C/D.l), and LEW.1A rats were RT1.a (A/B.a, C/D.a). Heterotopic heart grafts were performed using the Ono and Lindsey technique (33). The grafts were evaluated daily for function by palpation, and rejection was defined as the day of cessation of heartbeat.

Immunosuppression

LF15-0195 (Laboratoires Fournier, Daix, France) was prepared in PBS and delivered to allograft recipients by i.p. injection at 3 mg/kg for 20 days starting the day of cardiac transplantation.

In vivo transfer experiments

Irradiation. LEW.1A secondary recipients were treated with 4.5 Gy whole body irradiation (Center René Gauduchau, Nantes, France) 1 day before transplantation.

Cell transfer. Total spleen (2 x 108) or CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25- thymus and spleen T cells (5 x 106) from naive rats or from LF15-0195-treated recipients (>100 days) were injected i.v. into a secondary syngeneic recipient the day of cardiac transplantation.

Depletion of passenger leukocytes in allografts

Donor LEW.1W (RT1.u) rats received a single i.p. dose (300 mg/kg) of cyclophosphamide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) 5 days before graft harvesting to deplete heart graft leukocytes, as previously described (34, 35). Grafts were extensively washed before transplantation.

Thymectomy of recipients

Thymectomy of LEW.1A recipients was performed 2 wk before cardiac transplantation.

Antibodies

The following hybridomas (mouse IgG) were obtained from the European Collection of Animal Cell Culture (Salisbury, U.K.) and were used to phenotype rat leukocytes: OX6 (anti-class II MHC), ED3 (recognizing sialoadhesin on macrophages), Ox33 (anti-CD45 present on B cells), OX1 and OX30 (anti-CD45), R7-3 (anti-TCR{alpha}{beta}), ED1 (recognizing CD68 on monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes, and dendritic cells (DCs)), W3/25 (anti-CD4), OX8 (anti-CD8{alpha}), Ox 39 (anti-CD25), and OX3 (anti-RT1.u). These mAbs were purified from hybridoma culture supernatants in our laboratory. OX7 and Ox39 were coupled to FITC or biotin and W3/25 was coupled to PE (Bioatlantic, Nantes, France). Secondary Abs included biotin-conjugated anti-mouse IgG, HRP-conjugated streptavidin, and VIP substrate, purchased from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). FITC affinity pure F(ab')2 mouse anti-rat IgG, Fc{gamma} fragment specific; mouse anti-rat IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b, Fc{gamma} fragment specific; and FITC goat anti-mouse IgG were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA).

Immunohistology

Immunohistology was performed on the grafts or thymi from untreated or LF15-0195-treated recipients harvested 5, 30, and 100 days after transplantation. Fragments were snap frozen, embedded in Tissue Tek (OCT compound; Bayer Diagnostics, Puteaux, France), cut into 5-µm sections, and fixed in acetone for 10 min at room temperature. Tissue sections were labeled using a three-step indirect immunoperoxidase technique with Ox1/Ox30, ED1, R7-3, and Ox3 as primary Abs. Tissue sections were then incubated with corresponding biotin-conjugated anti-mouse Ig Ab (30 min), then with HRP-conjugated streptavidin (30 min), and then developed with VIP substrate. The area of each immunoperoxidase-labeled tissue section infiltrated by cells was determined by quantitative morphometric analysis, as previously described (36). Results are expressed as the percentage of the area of the tissue section occupied by positive cells (±SD).

Histological assessment of long-term allografts was performed on paraffin-embedded sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin-saffron. Vascular lesions (percentage of obstruction, leukocyte infiltration, and medium lesions) were analyzed in at least 10 medium-size vessels.

Cell purification

Donor and third-party APC. APC were enriched from spleen fragments digested with collagenase D (2 mg/ml; Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) for 30 min at 4°C. A total of 10 µM EDTA was added for 5 min, and cells were washed and resuspended in 5 µM EDTA-PBS containing 2% heat-inactivated FCS. Four milliliters of this suspension was layered onto a 14.5% Nicodenz gradient (Nycomed Pharma, Roskilde, Denmark) and centrifuged for 13 min at 2800 rpm at 4°C.

Total spleen and thymus cells. Cell suspensions from spleens and thymi were prepared, as described previously (35), from naive rats, from untreated recipients, or from LF15-0195-treated recipients sacrificed 100 days after transplantation.

Spleen and thymus CD4+ T cell purification. T lymphocytes were purified from splenocytes and thymocytes by negative selection. Briefly, total spleen cells or thymocytes were incubated for 30 min on ice with a mixture of mouse anti-rat Abs: Ox6, ED3, Ox33, and Ox8. After two washes, cells were then incubated for 20 min under agitation with superparamagnetic beads with affinity-purified goat anti-mouse IgG covalently bound to the surface (Dynal, Oslo, Norway). These stained contaminating cells were then eliminated with a magnet. The purity of the collected CD4+ T cells was controlled by FACS analysis (FACScan; BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA) with an anti-TCR{alpha}{beta} mAb (R7-3) and an anti-CD4 (W3/25) (purity >95%).

CD25+ T cell purification. CD25-positive cells were enriched using the MACS system (Magnetic Cell Sorting; Miltenyi Biotec, Paris, France). Briefly, spleen- or thymus-purified CD4+ T cells were incubated with biotinylated Ox39 mAb (20 µg/1 x 108 cells, 30 min at 4°C). After two washes, cells were incubated with streptavidin Microbeads (200 µl/1 x 108 cells) for 30 min at 4°C. After two washes, bound cells were separated using a separation column placed in a strong magnetic field. The purity of the unbound or bound collected T cells was controlled by FACS analysis (FACScan; BD Biosciences) with a FITC anti-CD25 mAb (Ox39). Purity was ~90%.

Mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR)

Recovered low-density cells corresponding to APC-enriched cell populations from donor-type LEW.1W (RT1.u) or third-party Lewis (RT1.l) rats were irradiated and served as stimulator cells.

As a source of donor Ags for studies of indirect presentation, LEW.1W spleen cells were suspended at concentration of 1 x 106/ml in supplemented RPMI 1640 and lysated with three pulses of frozen step at -80°C, and then thawed at room temperature, as previously described (37). Any residual intact cells or cell membranes were removed by centrifugation at 1800 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. Then, LEW.1A syngeneic APC-enriched cell population was cultured for 4 h with LEW.1W splenocyte lysate before being irradiated.

Responder (T cells) (2 x 105) and stimulatory cells (5 x 104) were plated in 96-well round-bottom plates in triplicate in a volume of 200 µl of RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies), 1% nonessential amino acids, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, and 10% heat-inactivated (56°C, 30 min) FCS (Life Technologies).

The cultures were incubated at 37°C, in 5% CO2, and pulsed for the last 8 h with 0.5 µCi of [3H]TdR (Amersham, Les Ulis, France). The cells were then harvested on glass fiber filters, and [3H]TdR incorporation was measured using standard scintillation procedures (Packard Institute, Meriden, CT).

Determination of antidonor alloantibodies

LEW.1W splenocytes from untreated or LF15-0195-treated recipients were incubated with decomplemented sera and diluted 1/4 in PBS containing 0.5% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.02% sodium azide. To stain for IgG, cells were reacted with FITC affinity pure F(ab')2 mouse anti-rat IgG, Fc{gamma} fragment-specific Ab (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). For IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b, cells were reacted with mouse anti-rat Abs and then with FITC goat anti-mouse IgG. Cells were collected on a FACScan and analyzed using the CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).

Cytokine assays

Supernatants from triplicate cultures of MLR were harvested and combined 72 h after stimulation. IFN-{gamma}, IL-10, and IL-2 were measured using an ELISA from BD PharMingen OptEIA (San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

RNA extraction

Heart samples at 5 or 100 days after transplantation were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until RNA extraction. Total RNAs from whole allografts were extracted according to the technique of Chirgwin (38). Total RNAs from purified cells were extracted using the technique of Chomczynski and Sacchi (39). The RNAs were quantified by UV absorbance at 260 nm.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Quantitative RT-PCRs were performed on the Applied Biosystems Prism 7700 (PE-Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using the TaqMan chemistry (PE-Biosystems under license of Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA). This TaqMan system performed real-time kinetic PCR and true quantitative gene analysis. The sequences of the gene-specific primers are given in Table IGo. Standards were prepared by PCR amplification of each target sequence using these primers. PCR products were extracted, and the A260 allowed the quantification of the template in the standards. The standards were diluted to load 107–102 copies/well. Total RNAs from grafts or from cells were reverse transcribed using oligo(dT), as previously described (40). A constant amount of cDNA corresponding to the reverse transcription of 100 ng of total RNA, or each dilution of the standard, was amplified using the SYBR Green PCR Core kit (PE-Biosystems) containing the primers for hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT), IL-10, TGF-{beta}, or CTLA-4 (cf Table IGo). The PCR efficiencies of all of the standards were >99%, and the correlation index between the input copy numbers and the fluorescence was always >0.95. Data were expressed as ratios of the number of copies of the specific gene to the number of copies of the HPRT gene.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table I. Oligonucleotides sequences (5' to 3') used for quantitative RT-PCR

 
Statistical analysis

Statistical evaluation was performed using the Student’s t test for unpaired data, and results were considered significant if p values were <0.05. Data were expressed as mean ± SD.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Allografts from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients (>100 days) had no signs of chronic rejection

We previously described that a treatment for 20 days with LF15-0195 (3 mg/kg, i.p. daily) prolonged allograft survival to >100 days in a rat MHC-mismatched (LEW.1W to LEW.1A) heart allograft model (28) (see Table VGo). Acceptance of donor LEW.1W (RT1.u), but not of third-party Lewis (RT1.l) second heart allografts in the neck by tolerant long-term LF15-0195-treated recipients demonstrated donor-specific allograft tolerance (28).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table V. Effects of passenger leukocyte depletion of donor LEW.1W heart allografts or thymectomy of LEW.1A recipients on allograft survival

 
Immunohistological analysis of allografts from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients (100 days) demonstrated a weak infiltration (6% of area infiltrate) by leukocytes (CD45-positive cells) (Fig. 1Go). For comparison, 29 and 11% of area infiltrate was observed, respectively, in rejected grafts from untreated recipients and in allografts from LF15-0195-treated recipients at day 5 after grafting. Four percent of area infiltrate in allografts from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients were CD68-positive cells and 1% were T cells. At >250 days after grafting, vessels of allografts from LF15-0195-treated recipients were not obstructed, and the intima was not thick and contained no lymphocytes. No signs of fibrosis were observed (Fig. 2Go). These data demonstrated that tolerant allografts displayed no signs of chronic rejection.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Cellular infiltrate phenotype in allografts from untreated or LF15-0195-treated recipients (days 5 and 100 after transplantation). Phenotypic analysis of cellular infiltrates in heart allografts from untreated at day 5 ({blacksquare}), or LF15–0195-treated recipients at day 5 () or at day 100 ({square}) after transplantation. Sections were stained with Ox1/Ox30 (anti-CD45 present on all leukocytes), ED1 (recognizing CD68 present on monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes, and DCs), and R73 (anti-TCR{alpha}{beta}), and quantified as described in Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD of percentage area infiltrate of four recipients in each group. *, p < 0.05 (Student’s t test).

 


View larger version (179K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Histological analysis of long-term heart allografts from LF15-0195-treated recipients. Sections of long-term heart allografts from LF15-0195-treated recipients >250 days after transplantation were stained with hematoxylin-eosin-saffron. Micrograph is one allograft representative of five analyzed with the same procedure (objective x40). Arrows showed clean vessels not obstructed. One contains RBCs (arrow in middle west).

 
Quantitative analysis of cytokine mRNA expression in allografts

Cytokine mRNA expression analysis was performed in allografts from untreated or LF15-0195-treated recipients harvested 5 or 100 days after transplantation (n = 4). We demonstrated that IFN-{gamma} and IL-10 mRNA expression was decreased in allografts from LF15-0195-treated recipients compared with allografts from untreated recipients at day 5 after grafting, whereas the mRNA expression of IL-13 and TGF-{beta} was not different between the two groups (28) (Table IIGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table II. Cytokines mRNA expression in allografts from LF15-0195-treated recipients1

 
Low mRNA expression (100-fold less) of IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, and IL-13 was observed in allografts from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients at day 100 after grafting compared with those at day 5 after grafting (data not shown). Allografts from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients expressed a weak level of TGF-{beta} mRNA that was 20-fold less than at day 5 after grafting (Table IIGo). We observed a significant increase (2-fold, p < 0.05) in IL-10 mRNA expression in allografts from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients at day 100 after grafting compared with those at day 5 after grafting. IL-10 mRNA expression in allografts could be due to the restoration of IL-10 expression by CD68-positive cells (essentially macrophages) after treatment cessation, but also, IL-10 and TGF-{beta} mRNA expression could be due to their expression by Th2 or regulatory T cells that could progressively infiltrate allografts (41).

LF15-0195-treated recipients had decreased antidonor alloantibodies of the Th1-related isotype

We have previously demonstrated that LF15-0195 treatment totally inhibited antidonor alloantibody production during treatment (28). To determine whether the production of alloantibodies was restored after treatment cessation in tolerant recipients at days 30 and 100 after grafting, we assessed antidonor IgG and isotype subclasses in sera, as described in Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as mean fluorescence channel for total IgG or for isotypes. Fig. 3Go shows that 10 days after treatment cessation (day 30), the antidonor alloantibody response was totally inhibited in tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients compared with rejecting untreated recipients (n = 4, p < 0.001). On day 100 after transplantation, total antidonor IgG levels were only partially restored in LF15-0195-treated recipients in contrast to untreated recipients (n = 4, p < 0.01). Analysis of the isotypes of alloantibodies produced showed that Th1-related IgG2b production was partially restored (n = 4, p < 0.005), whereas IgG2a and Th2-related isotype IgG1 were fully restored (n = 4). These results suggest that following LF15-0195 treatment cessation, tolerant animals recovered a partial antidonor alloantibody response with a preferential development of IgG1 alloantibodies, a Th2-related isotype, at the expense of IgG2b alloantibodies, a Th1-related isotype. Thus, LF15-0195 treatment could have modulated helper CD4+ T cells to inhibit production of Th1-related isotype Abs by B cells.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients partially restored the antidonor alloantibody response. LEW.1W donor splenocytes were incubated with diluted sera (1/4) from untreated ({blacksquare}) (n = 4) or LF15-0195-treated recipients ({square}) (n = 4) at day 30 or 100 after transplantation, and then with FITC anti-rat IgG or anti-rat IgG1, IgG2a, or IgG2b, as described in Materials and Methods. Data are expressed as mean fluorescence channel. *, p < 0.05 (Student’s t test).

 
Decreased donor-specific response of spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients (>100 days) in MLR

Purified spleen T cells or total lymph node cells from LEW.1A (RT1.a)-untreated or LF15-0195-treated recipients (>100 days) were stimulated for 72 h with a donor LEW.1W (RT1.u) or third-party Lewis (RT1.l) APC-enriched population. We observed that spleen T cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients (>100 days) proliferated less (65% decrease) than those from untreated recipients when stimulated by donor LEW.1W APC (Fig. 4GoA). Proliferation was similar in the two groups when T cells were stimulated by third-party Lewis APC (Fig. 4GoB). In contrast, proliferation was similar when lymph node cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients or from untreated recipients were stimulated by donor (Fig. 4GoC) or third-party APC (Fig. 4GoD). These results demonstrated a compartmentalization of the donor-specific inhibition of the proliferative response of T cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients. This inhibition could be related to a clonal deletion of donor-specific T cells and/or the presence of regulatory cells.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. Proliferation of spleen T cells or lymph nodes from untreated or LF15-0195-treated recipients against donor and third-party Ags. Purified spleen T lymphocytes from untreated ({blacksquare}) or tolerant LF15-0195-treated ({square}) recipients (100 days after transplantation) were stimulated by a LEW.1W (RT1.u) donor (A) or Lewis (RT1.l) third-party (B) irradiated APC-enriched population. Lymph node cells from untreated ({blacksquare}) or tolerant LF15-0195-treated ({square}) recipients (100 days after transplantation) were stimulated by a LEW.1W (RT1.u) donor (C) or Lewis (RT1.l) third-party (D) irradiated APC-enriched population. Values represent the cpm ± SD of all triplicates after 3 days of culture for thymidine incorporation for two different recipients and are representative of three independent experiments.

 
Inhibition of in vitro proliferation of alloreactive CD4+ T cells by CD4+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients only with stimulation by donor APC (direct presentation of donor alloantigens)

To test the presence of regulatory cells able in vitro to inhibit alloreactive T cell proliferation, we performed a coculture system in which the same number of spleen CD4+ T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients was added to spleen CD4+ T cells from untreated recipients (100 days after grafting). These cells were stimulated by either donor LEW.1W APC (direct presentation) or syngeneic LEW.1A APC pulsed with LEW.1W Ags (indirect presentation), as described in Materials and Methods (Fig. 5Go). We observed that CD4+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients proliferated less (80% decrease) compared with CD4+ spleen T cells from untreated recipients stimulated by direct presentation of donor Ags. Moreover, CD4+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients mixed with the same number of CD4+ spleen T cells from untreated recipients and stimulated by direct presentation of donor Ags reduced the proliferation by 50% compared with that of CD4+ spleen T cells from untreated recipients alone. In contrast, although the proliferation of CD4+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients stimulated by the indirect pathway was reduced compared with those from untreated recipients (70% decrease), suppression of proliferation was not observed in coculture. These results demonstrated, in this model, an in vitro dominant suppression by CD4+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients only with stimulation by direct presentation of donor Ags.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. Spleen CD4+ T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients suppress in vitro proliferation of alloreactive CD4+ T cells only with stimulation by donor APC. A total of 2 x 105 spleen CD4+ T cells from untreated recipients ({blacksquare}) or 2 x 105 spleen CD4+ T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients ({square}) or both cocultured () was stimulated by LEW.1W donor-irradiated APC-enriched cell population (direct presentation) or LEW.1A syngeneic irradiated APC-enriched cell population pulsed with donor Ags (indirect presentation). Values represent the cpm ± SD of all triplicates after 3 days of culture for thymidine incorporation. Results are representative of three independent experiments.

 
Transfer of tolerance with splenocytes

To test the possibility of the involvement of regulatory cells in tolerance maintenance, we performed spleen cell transfers from LF15-0195-treated recipients (>100 days) into secondary syngeneic graft recipients. When no cells were injected, irradiated LEW.1A secondary recipients rejected LEW.1W heart allografts in 18.2 ± 4.4 days (n = 5), demonstrating the immunocompetence of recipients (Table IIIGo). When splenocytes (2 x 108) from naive rats were injected, LEW.1W heart allografts were rejected in 12.5 ± 2.9 days (n = 4). In contrast, when splenocytes (2 x 108) from LF15-0195-treated recipients were injected, LEW.1W heart allografts were definitively accepted (>100 days) (n = 4; p < 0.01), whereas Lewis third-party allografts were rejected in 9 days (n = 3; p < 0.01). Infectious tolerance by in vivo adoptive transfer demonstrated the presence of potent donor-specific regulatory cells in splenocytes from LF15-0195-treated recipients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table III. Survival of allografts in secondary LEW.1A recipients after transfer of splenocytes from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients1

 
Decreased percentage of CD4+ Thy-1+ T cells in the spleen and increased percentage of CD4+CD25+ T cells in the thymus and the spleen from long-term LF15-0195-treated tolerant recipients

To analyze whether a subpopulation of cells, which could be regulatory cells, was increased in LF15-0195-treated recipients, we performed a phenotypic analysis of cells from the thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes for different known markers of regulatory cells (41).

We observed no change in the absolute numbers of T cells, CD4+ T cells, or CD8+ T cells in spleen and lymph nodes from LF15-0195-treated recipients as compared with those from untreated recipients (data not shown). Interestingly, in the spleen T cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients, we observed a significant decrease in the percentage of Thy-1+ CD4+ T cells (recent thymic emigrants, RTE) (2.21% ± 1.39, n = 4) compared with spleens from either untreated recipients (>100 days) (6.9% ± 0.79, n = 4) (p < 0.001) or from naive rats (7.78% ± 1.74, n = 4) (p < 0.002) (Table IVGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table IV. Percentage of CD4+Thy1+ cells and CD4+CD25+ cells in thymocytes and CD4+ spleen T cells

 
In addition, we observed a higher percentage of CD25+ cells in CD4+ spleens T cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients (24.6% ± 6.21, n = 6) compared with those from naive rats (7.12% ± 0.63, n = 6) (p < 0.0003) or from untreated recipients (10.95% ± 2.36, n = 7) (p < 0.0003) (Table IVGo). A typical CD4 CD25 FACS analysis is shown in Fig. 6Go that illustrates the increase in percentage of these cells in spleen T cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients (25%) compared with those from naive rats (6%). Moreover, the absolute number of CD4+CD25+ T cells in spleens from LF15-0195-treated recipients was increased (37 x 106 ± 13 x 106 cells (n = 5)) compared with one from untreated recipients (13.2 x 106 ± 1.4 x 106, n = 3; p < 0.03) or naive rats (12.7 x 106 ± 0.7 x 106, n = 3; p < 0.03).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6. Representative FACS staining of CD4+CD25+ cells in spleen T cells from naive rats or LF15-0195-treated recipients. Spleen T cells from naive rats or from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients were purified and double stained for FACS analysis, as described in Materials and Methods, with W3/25-PE (anti-CD4) and Ox39-FITC (anti-CD25). Results are expressed as the percentage of CD4+CD25+ in spleen T lymphocytes from naive rats or from LF15-0195-treated recipients.

 
The same increase in percentage of CD4+CD25+TCR+ cells was observed in thymocytes from LF15-0195-treated recipients (19.30% ± 8.44, n = 3) compared with thymocytes from untreated recipients (2.28% ± 0.30, n = 3; p < 0.03) or naive rats (4.21% ± 2.14, n = 3; p < 0.04) (Table IVGo). The increase in CD4+CD25+ was not observed in lymph nodes from LF15-0195-treated recipients (data not shown). Moreover, a 20-day treatment with LF15-0195 on naive, ungrafted LEW.1A rats did not increase the percentage of CD4+CD25+ T cells in spleen and thymus (data not shown), demonstrating that the increase of CD4+CD25+ T cell number is specific of tolerance model induced by LF15-0195 treatment.

Weak secretion of IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, and IL-10 by CD4+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients on stimulation with donor APC (direct presentation)

Spleen CD4+, CD4+CD25-, or CD4+CD25+ cells were stimulated 3 days by LEW.1W donor APC-enriched populations. As previously demonstrated in Fig. 5Go, CD4+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients proliferated less (67 x 103 cpm) than CD4+ spleen T cells from either naive rats (172 x 103 cpm) or untreated recipients (>100 days) (289 x 103 cpm) (Fig. 7GoA). Total CD4+ T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients secreted less IFN-{gamma} (10 x 103 pg), IL-2 (1.6 x 103 pg), and IL-10 (5 x 103 pg) than CD4+ T cells from untreated recipients (55 x 103, 4 x 103, and 18 x 103 pg, respectively) (Fig. 7Go, B–D). Surprisingly, in contrast to CD4+CD25+ from naive rats that did not proliferate in MLR (data not shown), CD4+CD25+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients stimulated by donor APC were able to proliferate (105 x 103 cpm) as total CD4+ T cells (67 x 103 cpm), and depletion of this subpopulation (CD4+CD25- subpopulation only) did not increase proliferation (84 x 103 cpm) (Fig. 7GoA). CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- subpopulation of T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients secreted the same level of IFN-{gamma} (9 x 103 and 7 x 103 pg, respectively) and IL-10 (6 x 103 and 5 x 103 pg, respectively). No IL-2 was detected in supernatants of CD4+CD25+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients, and depletion of this subpopulation did not restore production of IL-2 by CD4+CD25- subpopulation (1.5 x 103 pg) (Fig. 7Go, B–D). These results demonstrated that splenic CD4+CD25+ T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients stimulated by donor APC (direct presentation) were able to proliferate, but did not produce IL-2. Moreover, the CD4+CD25- subpopulation produced low level of IL-2, suggesting that donor-specific regulatory cells maintaining the inhibition of IL-2 could also be present in the CD25- subpopulation.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 7. Proliferation and production of IFN-{gamma}, IL-10, and IL-2 by spleen CD4+, CD4+CD25+, and CD4+CD25- T cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients. Purified total CD4+ or CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25- spleen T cells from naive or from untreated or tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients (100 days after transplantation) were stimulated by a LEW.1W donor-irradiated APC-enriched cell population for 72 h. Values represent the cpm ± SD of all triplicates after 3 days of culture for thymidine incorporation (A). IFN-{gamma}, (B), IL-10 (C), and IL-2 (D) were measured in the supernatants of triplicates by ELISA, as described in Materials and Methods, and the results are expressed in picograms per milliliter. Results are representative of three independent experiments.

 
CD4+CD25+ thymocytes inhibited IL-2 production by CD4+CD25- thymocytes

CD4+ thymocytes from LF15-0195-treated recipients stimulated by donor APC proliferated as well as CD4+ thymocytes from naive rats (30 x 103 cpm vs 24 x 103 cpm, respectively) (Fig. 8GoA). However, we denoted that CD4+ thymocytes from naive rats proliferated less in MLR than spleen CD4+ T cells (30 x 103 cpm vs 172 x 103 cpm, respectively). CD4+ thymocytes from LF15-0195-treated recipients expressed the same level of IFN-{gamma} (1.9 x 103 pg) and IL-10 (1.6 x 103 pg), but less IL-2 (88 pg) than CD4+ thymocytes from naive rats (1.5 x 103, 1.2 x 103, 375 pg, respectively) (Fig. 8Go, B–D). As for spleen cells, no difference in proliferation was observed between CD4+CD25- (21 x 103 cpm) and CD4+CD25+ thymocyte subpopulation from LF15-0195-treated recipients (25 x 103 cpm) (Fig. 8GoA). However, CD4+CD25+ thymocytes produced 2-fold less IFN-{gamma} (420 pg) than CD4+CD25- thymocytes (950 pg) (Fig. 8GoB). No difference in production of IL-10 was observed between CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- thymocytes (Fig. 8GoC). Interestingly, CD4+CD25+ thymocytes produced no IL-2, and depletion of this population (CD4+CD25- cells only) restored the high production of IL-2 (540 pg) to the same level as the production in naive rats (375 pg) (Fig. 8GoD). These results demonstrate that CD4+CD25+ thymocytes from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients proliferated in vitro by stimulation by donor APC. However, CD4+CD25+ thymocytes expressed no IL-2, and depletion of the CD4+CD25+ population restored secretion of IL-2 by CD4+CD25- cells. These results demonstrated that CD4+CD25+ thymocytes from LF15-0195-treated recipients stimulated by donor APC were able to inhibit the IL-2 production by CD4+CD25- thymocytes.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 8. Proliferation and production of IFN-{gamma}, IL-10, and IL-2 by thymus CD4+, CD4+CD25+, and CD4+CD25- cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients. Purified total CD4+ or CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25- thymocytes from naive or from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients (100 days after transplantation) were stimulated by a LEW.1W donor-irradiated APC-enriched cell population for 72 h. Values represent the cpm ± SD of all triplicates after 3 days of culture for thymidine incorporation (A). IFN-{gamma} (B), IL-10 (C), and IL-2 (D) were measured in the supernatants of triplicates by ELISA, as described in Materials and Methods, and the results are expressed in picograms per milliliter. Results are representative of three independent experiments.

 
Transfer of tolerance with CD4+CD25+ thymocytes and spleen T cells

To determine in which CD25+ or CD25- subpopulation of CD4+ T cells were regulatory cells, we performed transfers of these cells into LEW.1A-irradiated recipients. When naive syngeneic irradiated recipients did not receive cell transfers, allografts were rejected in 18.2 ± 4.4 days (n = 5; Fig. 9Go). When 5 x 106 CD4+CD25- thymocytes from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients were transferred, allografts were rejected in ~19.8 ± 11.9 days (n = 5). When 5 x 106 CD4+CD25+ thymocytes from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients were transferred, grafts survived indefinitely in three of four recipients (n = 4, p < 0.02). One allograft was rejected at day 41. CD4+CD25+ spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients (5 x 106) were also able to transfer tolerance (>100 days, n = 3) as were CD4+CD25- spleen T cells (5 x 106), which were able to transfer tolerance (>100 days) in four of eight recipients (n = 8). These results demonstrate that spleen and thymus CD4+CD25+ cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients contained regulatory cells capable of transferring tolerance, demonstrating a dominant immune regulation. In the periphery, regulatory cells were also present in the CD4+CD25- T cell subpopulation, but these cells were less numerous or/and less efficient in transferring tolerance since 50% of recipients were tolerant. Moreover, regulatory cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients were donor specific since transfer of thymic and splenic cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients into secondary recipients induced Lewis third-party allograft rejection (18 ± 2.8 days, n = 2, and 9 days, n = 3 (Table IIIGo), respectively).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 9. Survival of allografts in secondary LEW.1A recipients after transfer of CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25- spleen or thymus T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients. Secondary LEW.1A recipients were irradiated with 4.5 Gy 1 day before transfer of 5 x 106 syngeneic CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25- spleen or thymus T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients and were transplanted with LEW.1W heart allografts. *, p < 0.05 (Student’s t test).

 
Transfer of the same number of thymic and splenic CD4+CD25+ T cells (5 x 106) from naive rats into syngeneic recipients did not protect from allograft rejection (18 ± 2.8 days, n = 2, and 21.5 ± 2.1 days, n = 2, respectively), demonstrating the specificity of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients in this model of tolerance.

Donor APC were required to mediate allograft tolerance

On day 5 after grafting, we observed, by immunohistology, numerous donor MHC class II-positive cells in allografts from LF15-0195-treated recipients in contrast to allografts from untreated recipients (data not shown). Moreover, the number of donor MHC class II-positive cells was dramatically increased at day 30 after grafting in allografts from LF15-0195-treated recipients, suggesting that donor APC had expanded (Fig. 10GoA). Subsequently, on day 100, donor MHC class II-positive cells were found in heart allograft (Fig. 10GoB) and the thymus (Fig. 10GoD). No donor MHC class II-positive cells were observed in the thymus from untreated recipients on day 100 after grafting (Fig. 10GoC).



View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 10. Presence of donor APC in allograft and thymus from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients. Sections of allograft at days 30 (A, x400) and 100 (B, x400) after transplantation from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients, and thymus at day 100 after transplantation from untreated (C, x200) or tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients (D, x200) were stained with Ox3 (anti-RT1.u), as described in Materials and Methods. Representative micrographs demonstrated the positive staining of donor MHC class II in the allograft (A and B) and thymus (D) of tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients.

 
These results demonstrated the presence of a microchimerism in tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients at >100 days after transplantation and suggested that donor APC could play a role in tolerance.

Therefore, to investigate the involvement of donor APC in allograft tolerance, LEW.1W heart allografts were depleted of passenger leukocytes by donor treatment with cyclophosphamide, as previously described (35). We observed that depletion of passenger leukocytes did not prolong allograft survival in untreated recipients (7.7 ± 0.8 days, n = 6, vs 7 ± 0.1 days, n = 12) (Table VGo). When donor grafts were depleted of APC, LF15-0195-treated recipients rejected their grafts in ~23.2 ± 12.2 days (n = 6) in contrast to >100 days for untreated donor grafts (p < 0.001). These results demonstrated that donor APC were required for allograft tolerance. Moreover, LF15-0195-treated, but APC-depleted graft recipients had dramatically decreased percentage of CD4+CD25+ cells in the spleen (8.6% ± 0.5) and thymus (9.8% ± 0.7) compared with the spleen (19.5% ± 4.7) (p < 0.02) and thymus (19.3% ± 8.4) from LF15-0195-treated recipients (n = 3). These results suggest that donor APC were able to expand and colonize lymphoid compartments, and that direct presentation of donor Ags was required to expand powerful regulatory cells in central and/or peripheral compartments.

Presence of the thymus was not required to induce allograft tolerance and to induce regulatory cells in the periphery

To determine whether the thymus was required for tolerance, we performed thymectomy of adult recipients 2 wk before transplantation.

Untreated thymectomized LEW.1A recipients rejected LEW.1W heart allografts in 7 days (n = 3; Table VGo). A 20-day treatment with LF15-0195 induced allograft tolerance, despite the absence of the thymus in two of three recipients, suggesting that the adult thymus was not essential for allograft tolerance. Moreover, the transfer of splenocytes from thymectomized tolerant animals to second syngeneic recipients led to transfer of tolerance, demonstrating that splenocytes contained regulatory cells and that the thymus was not required to induce regulatory cells (Table IIIGo). Moreover, we observed a higher percentage of CD4+CD25+ cells in purified CD4+ spleen T cells from thymectomized tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients (27% ± 1.41, n = 2) compared with those from untreated recipients (10.95 ± 2.36, n = 7). This percentage (27%) was similar to the percentage in nonthymectomized tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients (24.60% ± 6.21, n = 6) (Table VIGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table VI. Percentage of CD25+ cells in CD4+ spleen T cells from thymectomyzed LF15-0195-treated recipients

 
These results demonstrate that the presence of the thymus was not required to induce tolerance and expansion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in the periphery.

Thymic and splenic CD4+CD25+ T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients or from naive rats expressed the same level of CTLA-4, TGF-{beta}, and IL-10 mRNA

We performed quantitative analysis of mRNA expression of CTLA-4, TGF-{beta}, or IL-10 in unstimulated CD4+CD25+ or CD25- thymus and spleen T cells from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients or from naive rats. We observed in Fig. 11Go that CD4+CD25+ thymus cells from naive rats or from LF15-0195-treated recipients expressed more CTLA-4, TGF-{beta}, and IL-10 mRNA than thymus CD25- cells from naive rats or from LF15-0195-treated recipients, respectively. However, no difference in expression of CTLA-4 or TGF-{beta} was observed between thymic CD4+CD25+ from naive rats and CD4+CD25+ from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients. In the spleen, CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25- from naive rats or from LF15-0195-treated recipients expressed the same level of CTLA-4 and TGF-{beta} mRNA. In contrast, spleen CD4+CD25+ cells from naive rats or from LF15-0195-treated recipients expressed more IL-10 mRNA than CD4+CD25- from naive rats or from LF15-0195-treated recipients, respectively. However CD4+CD25+ from naive rats expressed the same level of IL-10 mRNA as CD4+CD25+ cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients. These results demonstrated that thymus and spleen CD4+CD25+ cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients expressed the same quantity of mRNA for CTLA-4, TGF-{beta}, and IL-10 as thymus and spleen CD4+CD25+ cells from naive rats, suggesting that they could be the same cell population as that described in other models as naturally suppressive cells (24). However, the lack of specific Abs for CTLA-4 in the rat did not allow us to perform analysis of cell surface expression of CTLA-4.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 11. TGF-{beta}, CTLA-4, and IL-10 mRNA expressions in CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25- spleen and thymus cells from naive rats or from LF15-0195-treated recipients. Unstimulated CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25- spleen and thymus cells from naive rats or from LF15-0195-treated recipients were purified, and TGF-{beta}, CTLA-4, and IL-10 mRNA expressions were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR, as described in Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as the number of specific gene-HPRT transcript ratio and are representative of three independent purifications.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In this study, we demonstrated that a short-term treatment with LF15-0195 induced donor-specific allograft tolerance. Allografts were poorly infiltrated by macrophages and T cells and developed no signs of chronic rejection. Allografts expressed no IL-2, no IFN-{gamma}, and a low quantity of IL-10 and TGF-{beta} mRNAs. IL-10 mRNA expression in allografts could be due to restoration of IL-10 expression by macrophages after treatment cessation, but also IL-10 and TGF-{beta} mRNA expression could be due to expression by Th2 or regulatory T cells that could progressively infiltrate allografts (28, 41). We demonstrated an inhibition in specific antidonor response and the presence of donor-specific regulatory cells in spleen from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients. Spleen regulatory CD4+ T cells were able in vitro to suppress the proliferation of allogeneic CD4+ T cells in a coculture system and were able in vivo to suppress allograft rejection after adoptive transfer, demonstrating their infectious tolerance properties. Regulatory cells were not present or not in a sufficient number in the lymph nodes from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients, suggesting compartmentalization of regulatory T cells in transplant recipients, as previously described in transplantation tolerance induced by CD4-targeted mAb therapy (42). Moreover, CD4+CD25+ cell subpopulation of thymus or spleen, but not of lymph nodes from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients was increased. Several reports have demonstrated splenic and thymic CD4+CD25+ naturally suppressive T cells as not secreting IL-2, as inhibiting IL-2 expression by CD4+CD25- cells, and as expressing CTLA-4, TGF-{beta}, and IL-10 (19, 21, 22, 23, 24). We demonstrated that thymic and splenic CD4+CD25+ cells from naive rats or from LF15-0195-treated recipients expressed the same level of mRNA for CTLA-4, TGF-{beta}, and IL-10, suggesting that these cells could derive from the same population. Moreover, CD4+CD25+ from tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients proliferated poorly, but did not produce IL-2. Depletion of CD4+CD25+ subpopulation restored the IL-2 production by CD4+CD25- thymocytes, but not spleen cells. In addition, allograft tolerance was transferable to a second recipient by splenic and thymic CD4+CD25+ T cells, but also in 50% of recipients with splenic CD4+CD25- T cells, demonstrating that in our model, CD25 is a marker of regulatory cells in the thymus, but not in the periphery. It has been shown that naturally suppressive CD4+CD25- T cell transfer can protect mice from the development of autoimmune disease in half the cases (43). Moreover, Mason et al. (15) have shown that in rat, CD4+CD25+ spleen and thymus T cells were able to protect from the development of autoimmune diabetes, but also spleen CD4+CD25- T cells when RTE were deleted. They suggested that the CD25-RTE+ cells contained diabetogenic cells that were insufficiently regulated by the CD25- regulatory cells; thus, the CD4+CD25- subpopulation of regulatory cells could have been therefore not in a sufficient number to protect from disease when RTE+ cells were present. They speculated that these cells could have been CD25+ cells that were generated in the thymus, which had lost the marker in the periphery. In our model, we observed a decrease in the percentage of RTE+ cells (Thy-1+) in spleens from tolerant recipients, and these results could explain why we succeeded in transferring tolerance in 50% of the recipients with peripheral CD4+CD25- T cells. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that peripheral CD4+CD25- regulatory T cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients come from a distinct lineage than CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells.

In models of allograft tolerance in mice, CD4+ regulatory T cells have been described as being generated by indirect presentation and as exerting their suppressive properties when stimulated by donor Ags presented in the context of recipient APC (44, 45). However, in our model, a high number of donor APCs was observed in allografts from LF15-0195-treated recipients and depletion of passenger leukocytes from grafts before transplantation abrogated tolerance, suggesting that direct presentation of donor Ags was required for tolerance. In addition, we observed a low percentage of CD4+CD25+ T cells in the thymus and spleen from APC-depleted allograft recipients, suggesting that donor APCs were required for regulatory CD4+CD25+ cell expansion and their presence in the thymus and in the periphery. In vitro, spleen regulatory CD4+ T cells proliferated poorly, expressed low levels of IFN-{gamma} and IL-2, and were able to suppress the proliferation of allogeneic CD4+ T cells, but only with stimulation by donor APC. Moreover, thymic CD4+ T cells from LF15-0195-treated recipients stimulated by donor APC poorly secreted IL-2, and CD4+CD25+ cells were able to suppress IL-2 production by CD4+CD25-, demonstrating that regulatory cells expanded or exerted their suppressive properties when they were stimulated by direct presentation. Recent reports have shown that regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells were able to expand ex vivo by direct stimulation with allogeneic APC (46, 47).

It has been described that donor interstitial DCs were able to proliferate in untreated rat cardiac allografts before migrating to the spleen (48). We suggested that donor APCs could proliferate under LF15-0195 treatment in allografts and could then, after treatment, be able to colonize other organs such as the thymus. Donor APCs could serve as a potent source of alloantigens in the thymus and in the periphery, and under particular conditions could lead to the deletion of alloreactive cells and/or the development of powerful donor-specific regulatory cells (2, 49, 50, 51, 52). Moreover, donor APCs could be involved in the homeostasis of regulatory CD4+ T cells to induce stable tolerance. Indeed, it has been described that regulatory CD4+ T cells required the continuous presence of tolerizing Ags to survive in allograft tolerance models and recently that CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells required interactions with MHC class II for in vivo proliferation and homeostasis (4, 53, 54).

DCs have been described to play a role in transplantation tolerance and to induce regulatory T cells by their tolerogenic properties (55, 56). Thomas et al. (57, 58) demonstrated that treatment with DSG combined with anti-CD3 immunotoxin induced transplantation tolerance in macaques and was associated with reduction in number of mature DC in graft. In addition, DSG has been described to inhibit APC Ag-processing and class I and class II expression (59, 60, 61). However, we observed no effect of LF15-0195 on in vitro splenic DC maturation (E. Chiffoleau and M. C. Cuturi, unpublished results). Moreover, preliminary studies showed that graft-infiltrating recipient DC expressed high levels of class II MHC and B7-2 costimulatory molecules. In contrast; donor interstitial resident DC showed low level of B7-2 expression, suggesting different effect of LF15-0195 on recipient or donor interstitial DC maturation (Chiffoleau et al., unpublished results). Further investigations will determine whether LF15-0195 could act directly on interstitial donor or recipient APC maturation or function to induce regulatory T cells.

Thymectomy was not essential for the induction of allograft tolerance and for the expansion of CD4+CD25+ T cells in the periphery. Therefore, presence of donor-specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in the thymus related to the presence of donor APC was not the only mechanism involved in allograft tolerance, and expansion of CD4+CD25+ T cells occurs in the periphery.

Naturally suppressive CD4+CD25+ T cells have been reported to be generated in the thymus since the postnatal development (15, 16, 18, 20), suggesting that peripheral CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells derive from thymic precursors, and their expansion and functional development could occur extrathymically dependent on the presence of Ags. Indeed, as previously reported in mice (26), thymic and splenic CD4+CD25+ T cells from naive rats were not able to transfer protection from allograft rejection, demonstrating that priming with alloantigen is required for their donor-specific expansion. It is difficult to imagine how CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in the periphery could be specific for alloantigens since they were generated in the thymus in their absence. However, it has been shown that Ag-specific regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells can be expanded in the periphery by i.v. or oral administration of foreign Ag as OVA (27). Moreover, expansion of donor-specific regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells able to transfer tolerance to second recipients has also been described in models of allograft tolerance (26, 45). Alloantigen-specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells were described as being able to expand ex vivo by direct stimulation via costimulatory blockade (46, 47). Indeed, a high frequency of T cells cross-reacting with foreign Ags whose alloantigens has been reported (62, 63, 64). Therefore, the natural repertoire of CD4+CD25+ cells could exhibit cross-reactions with limited sets of alloantigens, and in some circumstances and because of linked suppression, CD4+CD25+ would be able to tolerate a full organ with numerous alloantigens. Several studies have demonstrated that deletion or inactivation of alloreactive cells was necessary to induce allograft tolerance (9, 45, 53, 65, 66, 67). Deletion or inactivation of these alloreactive cells could occur during the induction phase and could enable regulatory cells to expand and establish a stable donor-specific tolerance. Indeed, we have previously described that under treatment, LF15-0195 modulates Th1-type alloreactive cell function (28). In our model, we speculated that the maintenance of the tolerance state could be linked to a beneficial balance in favor of expanded donor-specific CD4+ regulatory T cells compared with allogeneic reactive cells.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated in this work that tolerant LF15-0195-treated recipients displayed donor-specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells in the thymus and CD4+CD25+/- in spleen. Moreover, tolerance and expansion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells were dependent on donor-passenger leukocytes, suggesting that direct presentation of alloantigens led in part to the expansion of powerful CD4+ regulatory cells able to establish a stable tolerance.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank J. M. Heslan for primer choice and TaqMan Technology; H. Smith and E. Merieau for transplantations; K. Renaudin for heart analyses; C. Guillot and S. Brouard for technical advice; and R. Josien, J. Bluestone, and J. Ashton for advice and for editing this manuscript.


   Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Fournier Laboratories. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Maria Cristina Cuturi, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 437, 30 boulevard Jean Monnet, 44093 Nantes Cedex 01, France. E-mail address: ccuturi{at}nantes.inserm.fr Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DSG, deoxyspergualine; DC, dendritic cell; HPRT, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase; RTE, recent thymic emigrant; MLR, mixed leukocyte reaction. Back

Received for publication December 13, 2001. Accepted for publication March 4, 2002.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Alters, S. E., J. A. Shizuru, J. Ackerman, D. Grossman, K. B. Seydel, C. G. Fathman. 1991. Anti-CD4 mediates clonal anergy during transplantation tolerance induction. J. Exp. Med. 173:491.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Tomita, Y., A. Khan, M. Sykes. 1994. Role of intrathymic clonal deletion and peripheral anergy in transplantation tolerance induced by bone marrow transplantation in mice conditioned with a nonmyeloablative regimen. J. Immunol. 153:1087.[Abstract]
  3. Hall, B. M., M. E. Jelbart, K. E. Gurley, S. E. Dorsch. 1985. Specific unresponsiveness in rats with prolonged cardiac allograft survival after treatment with cyclosporine: mediation of specific suppression by T helper/inducer cells. J. Exp. Med. 162:1683.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chen, Z. K., S. P. Cobbold, H. Waldmann, S. Metcalfe. 1996. Amplification of natural regulatory immune mechanisms for transplantation tolerance. Transplantation 62:1200.[Medline]
  5. Davies, J. D., G. Martin, J. Phillips, S. E. Marshall, S. P. Cobbold, H. Waldmann. 1996. T cell regulation in adult transplantation tolerance. J. Immunol. 157:529.[Abstract]
  6. Hall, B. M., L. Fava, J. Chen, K. M. Plain, R. A. Boyd, S. T. Spicer, M. F. Berger. 1998. Anti-CD4 monoclonal Ab-induced tolerance to MHC-incompatible cardiac allografts maintained by CD4+ suppressor T cells that are not dependent upon IL-4. J. Immunol. 161:5147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Onodera, K., H. D. Volk, T. Ritter, J. W. Kupiec-Weglinski. 1998. Thymus requirement and antigen dependency in the "infectious" tolerance pathway in transplant recipients. J. Immunol. 160:5765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wekerle, T., M. H. Sayegh, J. Hill, Y. Zhao, A. Chandraker, K. G. Swenson, G. Zhao, M. Sykes. 1998. Extrathymic T cell deletion and allogeneic stem cell engraftment induced with costimulatory blockade is followed by central T cell tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 187:2037.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Wekerle, T., J. Kurtz, M. Sayegh, H. Ito, A. Wells, S. Bensinger, J. Shaffer, L. Turka, M. Sykes. 2001. Peripheral deletion after bone marrow transplantation with costimulatory blockade has features of both activation-induced cell death and passive cell death. J. Immunol. 166:2311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Zhou, J., R. Carr, R. Liwski, A. Stadnyk, T. Lee. 2001. Oral exposure to alloantigen generates intragraft CD8+ regulatory cells. J. Immunol. 167:107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Zhang, Z. X., L. Yang, K. J. Young, B. DuTemple, L. Zhang. 2000. Identification of a previously unknown antigen-specific regulatory T cell and its mechanism of suppression. Nat. Med. 6:782.[Medline]
  12. Qin, S., S. P. Cobbold, H. Pope, J. Elliott, D. Kioussis, J. Davies, H. Waldmann. 1993. "Infectious" transplantation tolerance. Science 259:974.[Abstract]
  13. Wong, W., P. J. Morris, K. J. Wood. 1997. Pretransplant administration of a single donor class I major histocompatibility complex molecule is sufficient for the indefinite survival of fully allogeneic cardiac allografts: evidence for linked epitope suppression. Transplantation 63:1490.[Medline]
  14. Sakaguchi, S., N. Sakaguchi, M. Asano, M. Itoh, M. Toda. 1995. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor {alpha}-chains (CD25): breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. 155:1151.[Abstract]
  15. Stephens, L. A., D. Mason. 2000. CD25 is a marker for CD4+ thymocytes that prevent autoimmune diabetes in rats, but peripheral T cells with this function are found in both CD25+ and CD25- subpopulations. J. Immunol. 165:3105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Stephens, L. A., C. Mottet, D. Mason, F. Powrie. 2001. Human CD4+CD25+ thymocytes and peripheral T cells have immune suppressive activity in vitro. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:1247.[Medline]
  17. Asano, M., M. Toda, N. Sakaguchi, S. Sakaguchi. 1996. Autoimmune disease as a consequence of developmental abnormality of a T cell subpopulation. J. Exp. Med. 184:387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Itoh, M., T. Takahashi, N. Sakaguchi, Y. Kuniyasu, J. Shimizu, F. Otsuka, S. Sakaguchi. 1999. Thymus and autoimmunity: production of CD25+CD4+ naturally anergic and suppressive T cells as a key function of the thymus in maintaining immunologic self-tolerance. J. Immunol. 162:5317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Takahashi, T., T. Tagami, S. Yamazaki, T. Uede, J. Shimizu, N. Sakaguchi, T. W. Mak, S. Sakaguchi. 2000. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells constitutively expressing cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. J. Exp. Med. 192:303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Jordan, M. S., A. Boesteanu, A. J. Reed, A. L. Petrone, A. E. Holenbeck, M. A. Lerman, A. Naji, A. J. Caton. 2001. Thymic selection of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells induced by an agonist self-peptide. Nat. Immun. 2:301.
  21. Thornton, A. M., E. M. Shevach. 1998. CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells suppress polyclonal T cell activation in vitro by inhibiting interleukin 2 production. J. Exp. Med. 188:287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Read, S., V. Malmstrom, F. Powrie. 2000. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 plays an essential role in the function of CD25+CD4+ regulatory cells that control intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 192:295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Liu, Z., K. Geboes, P. Hellings, P. Maerten, H. Heremans, P. Vandenberghe, L. Boon, P. van Kooten, P. Rutgeerts, J. Ceuppens. 2001. B7 interactions with CD28 and CTLA-4 control tolerance or induction of mucosal inflammation in chronic experimental colitis. J. Immunol. 167:1830.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Nakamura, K., A. Kitani, W. Strober. 2001. Cell contact-dependent immunosuppression by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells is mediated by cell surface-bound transforming growth factor {beta}. J. Exp. Med. 194:629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Piccirillo, C., E. Shevach. 2001. Cutting edge: control of CD8+ T cell activation by CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory cells. J. Immunol. 167:1137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gregori, S., M. Casorati, S. Amuchastegui, S. Smiroldo, A. Davalli, L. Adorini. 2001. Regulatory T cells induced by 1{alpha},25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and mycophenolate mofetil treatment mediate transplantation tolerance. J. Immunol. 167:1945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Thorstenson, K. M., A. Khoruts. 2001. Generation of anergic and potentially immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells in vivo after induction of peripheral tolerance with intravenous or oral antigen. J. Immunol. 167:188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Chiffoleau, E., G. Beriou, P. Dutartre, C. Usal, J. P. Soulillou, and M. C. Cuturi. 2002. Induction of donor specific allograft tolerance by short-term treatment with LF15-0195 after transplantation: evidence for a direct effect on T cell differentiation. Am. J. Transplant. In press.
  29. Dickneite, G., H. U. Schorlemmer, P. Walter, J. Thies, H. H. Sedlacek. 1986. The influence of (+/-)-15-deoxyspergualin on experimental transplantation and its immunopharmacological mode of action. Behring Inst. Mitt. :93.
  30. Ochiai, T., S. Hori, K. Nakajima, M. Nagata, T. Asano, K. Isono, H. Umezawa. 1987. Prolongation of rat heart allograft survival by 15-deoxyspergualin. J. Antibiot. 40:249.[Medline]
  31. Takeuchi, I., T. Chikaraishi, T. Seki, K. Kanagawa, T. Koyanagi. 1998. Immunological analysis of rat renal transplant recipients exhibiting long-term survival following treatment with 15-deoxyspergualin in the early postoperative phase. Int. J. Urol. 5:476.[Medline]
  32. Andoins, C., D. de Fornel, J. Annat, P. Dutartre. 1996. Tolerance in a rat cardiac allograft model after short-term treatment with LF 08-0299: absence of clonal deletion and evidence of CD4+ suppressor cells. Transplantation 62:1543.[Medline]
  33. Ono, K., E. S. Lindsey. 1969. Improved technique of heart transplantation in rats. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 57:225.[Medline]
  34. McKenzie, J. L., M. E. Beard, D. N. Hart. 1984. The effect of donor pretreatment on interstitial dendritic cell content and rat cardiac allograft survival. Transplantation 38:371.[Medline]
  35. Josien, R., M. Heslan, S. Brouard, J. P. Soulillou, M. C. Cuturi. 1998. Critical requirement for graft passenger leukocytes in allograft tolerance induced by donor blood transfusion. Blood 92:4539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. McWhinnie, D. L., J. F. Thompson, H. M. Taylor, J. R. Chapman, E. M. Bolton, N. P. Carter, R. F. Wood, P. J. Morris. 1986. Morphometric analysis of cellular infiltration assessed by monoclonal Ab labeling in sequential human renal allograft biopsies. Transplantation 42:352.[Medline]
  37. Benichou, G., A. Valujskikh, P. Heeger. 1999. Contributions of direct and indirect T cell alloreactivity during allograft rejection in mice. J. Immunol. 162:352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Chirgwin, J. M., A. E. Przybyla, R. J. MacDonald, W. J. Rutter. 1979. Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 18:5294.[Medline]
  39. Chomczynski, P., N. Sacchi. 1987. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 162:156.[Medline]
  40. Josien, R., C. Pannetier, P. Douillard, D. Cantarovich, S. Menoret, L. Bugeon, P. Kourilsky, J. P. Soulillou, M. C. Cuturi. 1995. Graft-infiltrating T helper cells, CD45RC phenotype, and Th1/Th2-related cytokines in donor-specific transfusion-induced tolerance in adult rats. Transplantation 60:1131.[Medline]
  41. Waldmann, H., S. Cobbold. 2001. Regulating the immune response to transplants: a role for CD4+ regulatory cells?. Immunity 14:399.[Medline]
  42. Zhai, Y., X. D. Shen, M. Lehmann, R. Busuttil, H. D. Volk, J. W. Kupiec-Weglinski. 2001. T cell subsets and in vitro immune regulation in "infectious" transplantation tolerance. J. Immunol. 167:4814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Annacker, O., R. Pimenta-Araujo, O. Burlen-Defranoux, T. C. Barbosa, A. Cumano, A. Bandeira. 2001. CD25+ CD4+ T cells regulate the expansion of peripheral CD4 T cells through the production of IL-10. J. Immunol. 166:3008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Wise, M. P., F. Bemelman, S. P. Cobbold, H. Waldmann. 1998. Linked suppression of skin graft rejection can operate through indirect recognition. J. Immunol. 161:5813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Hara, M., C. I. Kingsley, M. Niimi, S. Read, S. E. Turvey, A. R. Bushell, P. J. Morris, F. Powrie, K. J. Wood. 2001. IL-10 is required for regulatory T cells to mediate tolerance to alloantigens in vivo. J. Immunol. 166:3789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Taylor, P. A., R. J. Noelle, B. R. Blazar. 2001. CD4+CD25+ immune regulatory cells are required for induction of tolerance to alloantigen via costimulatory blockade. J. Exp. Med. 193:1311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Yamagiwa, S., J. Gray, S. Hashimoto, D. Horwitz. 2001. A role for TGF-{beta} in the generation and expansion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells from human peripheral blood. J. Immunol. 166:7282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Saiki, T., T. Ezaki, M. Ogawa, K. Matsuno. 2001. Trafficking of host- and donor-derived dendritic cells in rat cardiac transplantation: allosensitization in the spleen and hepatic nodes. Transplantation 71:1806.[Medline]
  49. Le Douarin, N., C. Corbel, A. Bandeira, V. Thomas-Vaslin, Y. Modigliani, A. Coutinho, J. Salaun. 1996. Evidence for a thymus-dependent form of tolerance that is not based on elimination or anergy of reactive T cells. Immunol. Rev. 149:35.[Medline]
  50. Modigliani, Y., A. Coutinho, P. Pereira, N. Le Douarin, V. Thomas-Vaslin, O. Burlen-Defranoux, J. Salaun, A. Bandeira. 1996. Establishment of tissue-specific tolerance is driven by regulatory T cells selected by thymic epithelium. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1807.[Medline]
  51. Bemelman, F., K. Honey, E. Adams, S. Cobbold, H. Waldmann. 1998. Bone marrow transplantation induces either clonal deletion or infectious tolerance depending on the dose. J. Immunol. 160:2645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Modigliani, Y., V. Thomas-Vaslin, A. Bandeira, M. Coltey, N. M. Le Douarin, A. Coutinho, J. Salaun. 1995. Lymphocytes selected in allogeneic thymic epithelium mediate dominant tolerance toward tissue grafts of the thymic epithelium haplotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:7555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Scully, R., S. Qin, S. Cobbold, H. Waldmann. 1994. Mechanisms in CD4 Ab-mediated transplantation tolerance: kinetics of induction, antigen dependency and role of regulatory T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:2383.[Medline]
  54. Gavin, M., S. Clarke, E. Negrou, A. Gallegos, A. Rudensky. 2002. Homeostasis and anergy of CD4+CD25+ suppressor T cells in vivo. Nat. Immun. 3:33.
  55. Jonuleit, H., E. Schmitt, G. Schuler, J. Knop, A. H. Enk. 2000. Induction of interleukin 10-producing, nonproliferating CD4+ T cells with regulatory properties by repetitive stimulation with allogeneic immature human dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 192:1213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Lechler, R., W. F. Ng, R. M. Steinman. 2001. Dendritic cells in transplantation: friend or foe?. Immunity 14:357.[Medline]
  57. Contreras, J. L., P. X. Wang, D. E. Eckhoff, A. L. Lobashevsky, C. Asiedu, L. Frenette, M. L. Robbin, W. J. Hubbard, S. Cartner, S. Nadler, et al 1998. Peritransplant tolerance induction with anti-CD3-immunotoxin: a matter of proinflammatory cytokine control. Transplantation 65:1159.[Medline]
  58. Thomas, J. M., J. L. Contreras, X. L. Jiang, D. E. Eckhoff, P. X. Wang, W. J. Hubbard, A. L. Lobashevsky, W. Wang, C. Asiedu, S. Stavrou, et al 1999. Peritransplant tolerance induction in macaques: early events reflecting the unique synergy between immunotoxin and deoxyspergualin. Transplantation 68:1660.[Medline]
  59. Waaga, A. M., K. Ulrichs, M. Krzymanski, J. Treumer, M. L. Hansmann, T. Rommel, W. Muller-Ruchholtz. 1990. The immunosuppressive agent 15-deoxyspergualin induces tolerance and modulates MHC-antigen expression and interleukin-1 production in the early phase of rat allograft responses. Transplant. Proc. 22:1613.[Medline]
  60. Takasu, S., K. Sakagami, F. Morisaki, T. Kawamura, M. Haisa, T. Oiwa, M. Inagaki, H. Hasuoka, Y. Kurozumi, K. Orita. 1991. Immunosuppressive mechanism of 15-deoxyspergualin on sinusoidal lining cells in swine liver transplantation: suppression of MHC class II antigens and interleukin-1 production. J. Surg. Res. 51:165.[Medline]
  61. Hoeger, P. H., M. A. Tepper, A. Faith, J. A. Higgins, J. R. Lamb, R. S. Geha. 1994. Immunosuppressant deoxyspergualin inhibits antigen processing in monocytes. J. Immunol. 153:3908.[Abstract]
  62. Lindahl, K. F., D. B. Wilson. 1977. Histocompatibility antigen-activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes. II. Estimates of the frequency and specificity of precursors. J. Exp. Med. 145:508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Mason, D.. 1998. A very high level of crossreactivity is an essential feature of the T-cell receptor. Immunol. Today 19:395.[Medline]
  64. Suchin, E. J., P. B. Langmuir, E. Palmer, M. H. Sayegh, A. D. Wells, L. A. Turka. 2001. Quantifying the frequency of alloreactive T cells in vivo: new answers to an old question. J. Immunol. 166:973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Saitovitch, D., A. Bushell, D. W. Mabbs, P. J. Morris, K. J. Wood. 1996. Kinetics of induction of transplantation tolerance with a nondepleting anti-CD4 monoclonal Ab and donor-specific transfusion before transplantation: a critical period of time is required for development of immunological unresponsiveness. Transplantation 61:1642.[Medline]
  66. Wells, A. D., X. C. Li, Y. Li, M. C. Walsh, X. X. Zheng, Z. Wu, G. Nunez, A. Tang, M. Sayegh, W. W. Hancock, et al 1999. Requirement for T-cell apoptosis in the induction of peripheral transplantation tolerance. Nat. Med. 5:1303.[Medline]
  67. Li, X. C., T. B. Strom, L. A. Turka, A. D. Wells. 2001. T cell death and transplantation tolerance. Immunity 14:407.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
P. Thebault, N. Lhermite, G. Tilly, L. Le Texier, T. Quillard, M. Heslan, I. Anegon, J.-P. Soulillou, S. Brouard, B. Charreau, et al.
The C-Type Lectin-Like Receptor CLEC-1, Expressed by Myeloid Cells and Endothelial Cells, Is Up-Regulated by Immunoregulatory Mediators and Moderates T Cell Activation
J. Immunol., September 1, 2009; 183(5): 3099 - 3108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JEMHome page
J. Li, J. Park, D. Foss, and I. Goldschneider
Thymus-homing peripheral dendritic cells constitute two of the three major subsets of dendritic cells in the steady-state thymus
J. Exp. Med., March 16, 2009; 206(3): 607 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
L. Le Berre, S. Bruneau, J. Naulet, K. Renaudin, F. Buzelin, C. Usal, H. Smit, T. Condamine, J.-P. Soulillou, and J. Dantal
Induction of T Regulatory Cells Attenuates Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 57 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
V. Jovanovic, A.-S. Dugast, J.-M. Heslan, J. Ashton-Chess, M. Giral, N. Degauque, A. Moreau, A. Pallier, E. Chiffoleau, D. Lair, et al.
Implication of Matrix Metalloproteinase 7 and the Noncanonical Wingless-Type Signaling Pathway in a Model of Kidney Allograft Tolerance Induced by the Administration of Anti-Donor Class II Antibodies
J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1317 - 1325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
N. Degauque, D. Lair, A. Dupont, A. Moreau, G. Roussey, F. Moizant, F. X. Hubert, C. Louvet, M. Hill, F. Haspot, et al.
Dominant Tolerance to Kidney Allografts Induced by Anti-Donor MHC Class II Antibodies: Cooperation between T and Non-T CD103+ Cells
J. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 176(7): 3915 - 3922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
V. Duplan, G. Beriou, J.-M. Heslan, C. Bruand, P. Dutartre, L. T. Mars, R. S. Liblau, M.-C. Cuturi, and A. Saoudi
LF 15-0195 Treatment Protects against Central Nervous System Autoimmunity by Favoring the Development of Foxp3-Expressing Regulatory CD4 T Cells
J. Immunol., January 15, 2006; 176(2): 839 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
H. Kitade, M. Kawai, O. Rutgeerts, W. Landuyt, M. Waer, C. Mathieu, and J. Pirenne
Early Presence of Regulatory Cells in Transplanted Rats Rendered Tolerant by Donor-Specific Blood Transfusion
J. Immunol., October 15, 2005; 175(8): 4963 - 4970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int ImmunolHome page
E. Nishimura, T. Sakihama, R. Setoguchi, K. Tanaka, and S. Sakaguchi
Induction of antigen-specific immunologic tolerance by in vivo and in vitro antigen-specific expansion of naturally arising Foxp3+CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells
Int. Immunol., August 1, 2004; 16(8): 1189 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
J. Yang, S. M. Bernier, T. E. Ichim, M. Li, X. Xia, D. Zhou, X. Huang, G. H. Strejan, D. J. White, R. Zhong, et al.
LF15-0195 generates tolerogenic dendritic cells by suppression of NF-{kappa}B signaling through inhibition of IKK activity
J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2003; 74(3): 438 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
E. Donskoy and I. Goldschneider
Two Developmentally Distinct Populations of Dendritic Cells Inhabit the Adult Mouse Thymus: Demonstration by Differential Importation of Hematogenous Precursors Under Steady State Conditions
J. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 170(7): 3514 - 3521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
T. Oida, X. Zhang, M. Goto, S. Hachimura, M. Totsuka, S. Kaminogawa, and H. L. Weiner
CD4+CD25- T Cells That Express Latency-Associated Peptide on the Surface Suppress CD4+CD45RBhigh-Induced Colitis by a TGF-{beta}-Dependent Mechanism
J. Immunol., March 1, 2003; 170(5): 2516 - 2522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
V. Duplan, P. Dutartre, L. T. Mars, R. S. Liblau, P. Druet, and A. Saoudi
LF 15-0195 Inhibits the Development of Rat Central Nervous System Autoimmunity by Inducing Long-Lasting Tolerance in Autoreactive CD4 T Cells
J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 2179 - 2185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
W.-P. Min, D. Zhou, T. E. Ichim, G. H. Strejan, X. Xia, J. Yang, X. Huang, B. Garcia, D. White, P. Dutartre, et al.
Inhibitory Feedback Loop Between Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells and Regulatory T Cells in Transplant Tolerance
J. Immunol., February 1, 2003; 170(3): 1304 - 1312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiffoleau, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cuturi, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiffoleau, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cuturi, M. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS