The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bathe, O. F.
Right arrow Articles by Malek, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bathe, O. F.
Right arrow Articles by Malek, T. R.
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 167: 4511-4517.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

IL-2 During In Vitro Priming Promotes Subsequent Engraftment and Successful Adoptive Tumor Immunotherapy by Persistent Memory Phenotypic CD8+ T Cells1

Oliver F. Bathe*, Nava Dalyot-Herman{dagger} and Thomas R. Malek2,{dagger}

* Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery and {dagger} Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adoptive T cell tumor immunotherapy potentially consists of two protective components by the transferred effector cells, the immediate immune response and the subsequent development of memory T cells. The extent by which adoptively transferred CD8+ CTL are destined to become memory T cells is ambiguous as most studies focus on the acute effects on tumor shortly following adoptive transfer. In this study we show that a substantial fraction of the input CTL develop into memory cells that reject a s.c. tumor challenge. The use of exogenous IL-2 or a combination of IL-2 and IL-4, but not solely IL-4, during the ex vivo culture for the CTL inoculation was necessary for efficient development of CD8+ memory T cells. Thus, an important component of adoptive immunotherapy using CTL is the production of CD8+ Ag-specific memory cells which is primarily favored by IL-2 receptor signaling during ex vivo generation of the effector CTL.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adoptive immunotherapy represents a novel therapeutic option for tumors. This strategy involves removal of an individual’s lymphocytes, generation of tumoricidal immune effector cells, and reinfusion of these effector cells into the tumor-bearing host. CTL are particularly attractive effector cells for this purpose, as they are specific and potent killers of all cells that bear the target Ag (1, 2, 3). Most studies on adoptive immunotherapy focus on the acute effects on tumor shortly following adoptive transfer. However, long-term protection against tumor recurrence requires that the infused CTL survive long after adoptive transfer, ideally without concomitant cytokine administration. In addition, it is desirable that these persistent donor T cells have characteristics of memory T cells, i.e., a very quick and intense response to the reappearance of tumor.

Differentiation into memory cells is in part regulated by cytokines (4, 5) and must result in some Ag-specific T cells that are resistant to apoptosis (4, 6, 7). IL-7 and IL-15 are two cytokines that have been implicated in the regulation of homeostasis and survival of CD8+ memory cells in vivo (5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Comparatively less is known concerning how the cytokine environment during the initial priming of the naive T cells programs the resulting effector CTL to develop into memory cells. In most studies of adoptive immunotherapy, IL-2 has been typically used for the ex vivo expansion of donor T cells that have been previously encountered tumor. The present study, therefore, was initiated to examine to what degree the ex vivo cytokine environment used to activate naive Ag-specific CD8+ T cells subsequently favored their development into memory cells and protect against tumor activity in adoptive immunotherapy.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

OT-I TCR transgenic mice (13) were maintained by breeding heterozygous OT-I TCR transgenic mice to wild-type C57BL/6J mice. The progeny were screened by PCR for the expression of the TCR transgene. All recipient mice were C57BL/6J mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) and were used between 6 and 9 wk of age.

Biological reagents

EL-4 is a thymoma derived from the C57BL/6 mouse (H-2b). E.G7 cells consist of EL-4 cells transfected with OVA cDNA (14), and these were a gift from Dr. M. Bevan (University of Washington, Seattle, WA). These cell lines were maintained in complete medium (CM)3 consisting of RPMI 1640 containing 5% FCS, glutamine (30 µg/ml), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and 2-ME (5 x 10-5 M). OVA257–264 (SIINFEKL) (13) was synthesized by Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL). CyChrome-anti CD8{alpha}, PE-anti-V{alpha}2-TCR, FITC-V{beta}5.1,5.2-TCR, FITC-anti-CD8{alpha} (53.6.7), biotin-anti-Ly6C, biotin-anti-CD44 (Pgp-1), biotin-anti-CD62L (MEL-14), and biotin-anti-CD69 were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Biotin-anti-CD25 (7D4) was prepared in our laboratory. The PE-labeled MHC-peptide tetramer (H-2Kb/SIINFEKL) was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases MHC Tetramer Facility (Atlanta, GA).

Cell culture

Unless indicated otherwise, OT-I CTL used for adoptive transfers were generated by the culture of OT-I splenocytes (1 x 106/well) in 24-well plates containing 1 ml of CM containing OVA257–264 (1 nM), IL-4 (175 U/ml), and IL-2 (50 U/ml). After 3 days in culture, the cells were washed and recultured at 0.5 x 106 cells/well in 24-well plates containing 1 ml of CM without OVA257–264, but with the same cytokines that were present during initial culture. After an additional 2 days in culture, the cells were harvested and used for in vitro analyses or for adoptive transfer. CTL assays were performed as previously described (15) using 51Cr-labeled E.G7 and EL-4 cells as targets. For T cell proliferation, spleen cells (2 x 105 cells/well) were cultured with the indicated concentration of OVA257–264 in flat-bottom 96-well culture plates for 1–3 days. Each well was pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine, and 5 h later, the cells were harvested with an automated harvester. The mean of triplicate values that varied by less than 10% was calculated. Data are expressed as {Delta}cpm (i.e., cpm from experimental condition - cpm from cultures containing culture medium alone).

FACS analysis

Cells were stained with the various Ab conjugates as previously described (15). Between 50,000 and 100,000 events were collected and analyzed for each sample using a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).

Adoptive immunotherapy

OT-I CTL were injected via the tail vein in 0.5 ml of HBSS into normal C57BL/6J mice. Control mice for the adoptive transfers received only HBSS. The proportion of input cells that consisted of OT-I CTL was determined by staining for CD8{alpha}, V{alpha}2-TCR, and V{beta}5.1,5.2-TCR, and this information was used to calculate the number of OT-I CTL adoptively transferred. E.G7 or EL-4 cells (1 x 106) were injected s.c. in 0.2 ml of HBSS at the midline of the lower abdomen 21–28 days after adoptive transfer of OT-I CTL. The tumor cells were freshly thawed within 6 days of inoculation. Tumor cell growth was recorded over time. Detectable tumor was considered to be >0.5 cm2. Tumor-free survival curves were compared by log-rank test. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Persistence, phenotype, and function of adoptively transferred CTL

We recently reported that naive T cells from the OT-I TCR transgenic mice, specific for an OVA peptide, OVA257–264, in the context H-2Kb, failed to recognize and respond to the OVA-transfected E.G7 thymoma, i.e., were immunologically ignorant, after adoptive transfer into mice bearing E.G7 as a solid tumor (15). However, the adoptive transfer of OT-I effector cells, generated in short-term cultures, inhibited the growth of E.G7 in a dose-dependent manner (15). In the current study we have continued to use this model system to study the ability of in vitro-derived OT-I CTL effector cells to develop into memory cells in vivo and to then function in antitumor immunity.

Our past work indicated that the generation of primary tumor-specific CTL in vitro was favored by culture with exogenous IL-2 and IL-4 (16). Therefore, splenocytes from naive OT-I transgenic mice were stimulated with OVA257–264 in the presence of exogenous IL-2 and IL-4 for 3 days and were expanded in these exogenous cytokines for an additional 2 days. On the fifth day, greater than 90% of the cells consisted of CD8+ cells that coexpressed V{alpha}2 and V{beta}5, characteristic of the OT-I TCR (not shown). FACS analysis revealed that these activated cells typified effector T lymphocytes, i.e., increased size, up-regulated expression of CD69, CD25, and CD44, and down-regulated expression of CD62L and Ly-6C (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Phenotypic properties of naive, effector, and adoptively transferred OT-I T cells. Cell surface phenotype by FACS analysis. Splenocytes from a naive OT-I mouse were directly subjected to FACS analysis or activated with OVA257–264, IL-4 and IL-2 as described in Materials and Methods. On the fifth day, the OT-I effector cells were subjected to FACS analysis and were administered to normal syngeneic recipients. Splenocytes from the recipient mice were then harvested 28 days later for FACS analysis. OT-I CD8+ T lymphocytes were identified by gating for expression of CD8 and V{alpha}2-TCR and were then analyzing for the expression of the indicated markers (shaded histograms). Negative controls are represented by unshaded histograms. Data are representative of five experiments.

 
These CTL effector cells were adoptively transferred to syngeneic C57BL/6 recipient mice. The number of OT-I CTL effector cells that persisted 21–28 days after adoptive transfer was assessed by the fraction of cells that were "triple-stain positive" for CD8, V{alpha}2, and V{beta}5 (Fig. 2GoA). This analysis indicated that the number of triple-stain-positive cells in the spleen and lymph nodes was proportional to the number of cells administered (Fig. 3Go, A and B). In each animal, the spleen, two axillary lymph nodes, and two inguinal lymph nodes were analyzed. In sum, in animals that received 10 x 106 CTL, the mean number of triple-stain-positive lymphocytes recovered from a pool of these organs was 4.4 ± (1.6) x 106 (Fig. 3GoB). Given that the mean number of triple-stain-positive cells in control mice is 0.4 ± (0.2) x 106, the estimated recovery of OT-I cells in these organs is 40% of the input cells. If one were to extrapolate this number to the entire peripheral lymph tissue, ~68% of the OT-I cell persisted at this time, assuming there are 25 lymph nodes in a mouse, all containing an equal number of OT-I cells in each node.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. FACS identification of adoptively transferred OT-I CD8+ T cells. Spleen cells were analyzed for OT-I T cells 23 (A) and 74 days (B and C) after control injection of HBSS or adoptive transfer of OT-I CTL (10 x 106) into C57BL/6 mice, as listed above each dot plot. OT-I T cells were enumerated by triple staining with Abs to CD8, V{alpha}2-TCR, and V{beta}5.1,5.2-TCR (A and B, triple stain positive) or by double staining with anti-CD8 and the H-2Kb/SIINFEKL tetramer. The fractions of the gated cells fluorescent positive for the indicated surface markers are listed in the dot plots and histograms. Data are representative of three to five mice per group.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Persistence of adoptively transferred OT-I CD8+ T cells. A, Number of triple-stain-positive cells expressed as a percentage of all CD8+ cells. B, Number of triple-stain-positive cells, calculated as the product of the total number of lymphocytes recovered in the spleen plus four lymph nodes, and the percentage of triple-stain-positive cells. The indicated numbers of OT-I CTL were adoptively transferred, and 21–28 days later, the spleen and lymph nodes (inguinal and axillary) were analyzed by FACS. Each group consisted of three to five recipient mice that were individually analyzed.

 
FACS analysis revealed that these triple-stain-positive cells were smaller than the adoptively transferred CTL as assessed by forward light scatter (Fig. 1Go). The phenotype of the OT-I cells was further characterized for other surface markers by gating on CD8+ and V{alpha}2+ cells (Fig. 1Go). Unlike the in vitro-generated OT-I CTL effector cells, the in vivo-retained cells no longer expressed elevated levels of CD69 or CD25, but Ly6C was substantially up-regulated. In addition, CD44 remained up-regulated, whereas CD62L reverted to a higher degree of expression. This cell surface phenotype is consistent with that attributed to memory T cells (17, 18, 19). In three mice tested at 70–75 days after adoptive transfer, triple-stain-positive (Fig. 2GoB) or MHC-tetramer-positive (Fig. 2GoC) OT-I T cells were readily detected with a cell surface phenotype identical (not shown) to that observed at 21–28 days after adoptive transfer. All of these features except the elevated Ly6C expression were detected as early as 7 days after adoptive transfer (not shown). At 21–28 days after adoptive transfer, five of five mice tested expressed a high level of Ly6C. However, in two mice tested at earlier time points, the high Ly6C expression was not seen, suggesting that this aspect of the phenotype appears relatively late.

Memory CD8 T cells often show more rapid proliferation to a lower concentration of Ag when compared with naive T cells (18, 19, 20, 21), and they retain CTL activity (22, 23, 24). When compared with naive T cells, the recovered adoptively transferred "memory" OT-I T cells proliferated to an ~10-fold lower concentration (Fig. 4GoA) of OVA257–264 and more rapidly (Fig. 4GoB). Furthermore, the freshly prepared effector cells exhibited potent and specific CTL activity to OVA-expressing targets just before adoptive transfer (Fig. 4GoC). With respect to CTL activity by the "memory" OT-I T cells, the level of cytotoxicity was proportional to the number of OT-I CD8+ cells that persisted in the spleen (Fig. 4GoD). Thus, collectively these data demonstrate that 21 days after adoptive transfer, the OT-I effector cells also exhibited functional properties characteristic of memory CD8+ T cells.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Functional properties of naive, effector, and adoptively transferred OT-I T cells. A and B, Proliferative responses by naive and persistent adoptively transferred OT-I T cells. Dose response to OVA257–264 48 h after culture initiation. B, Time course of proliferative response using 100 pM OVA257–264. Persistent OT-I T cells were analyzed 21–28 days after adoptive transfer. Splenocytes from a naive OT-I mouse were mixed with normal C57BL/6 splenocytes to contain a fraction of OT-I cell equivalent to that in the spleen from the adoptively transferred recipient (typically ~4%). C and D, CTL activity by ex vivo effector and persistent adoptively transferred OT-I T cells. C, OT-I effector cells were prepared as described in Materials and Methods and were directly tested for CTL activity against E.G7 or EL4 targets. D, CTL activity by splenocytes from adoptively transferred mice that received the indicated number of OT-I CTL 21–35 days previously. Data shown represent specific CTL activity against E.G7 target cells at an E:T ratio of 100:1. Data are representative of three experiments (AC) or three mice per group (D).

 
To assess the antitumor activity of the persistent OT-I T cells, mice received E.G7 s.c. 21–28 days after adoptive transfer of the OT-I CTL. Unlike control-treated animals, mice that received OT-I CTL were generally resistant to E.G7 tumor inoculation (Fig. 5Go). This protection was specific to OVA-expressing tumors, as these mice did not mount an antitumor response when inoculated with the parental EL-4 thymoma. Furthermore, mice (n = 2) adoptively transferred with OT-I CTL that rejected a primary challenge with E.G7 remained tumor-free after a second challenge with E.G7 when reinoculated 56 and 66 days after the first inoculation (not shown). Thus, long-lasting protective tumor-specific immunity was not prevented by the initial response by the persistent OT-I T cells.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Antitumor activity of memory OT-I T cells. Twenty-one to 28 days after adoptive transfer of 10 x 106 OT-I CTL (prepared as described in Materials and Methods), recipient mice were inoculated with 1 x 106 E.G7 or EL-4 cells, s.c., as indicated. As a control, some mice received HBSS rather than OT-I CTL. Data are represented as tumor-free survival for >=6 mice/group.

 
Development of OT-I memory T cells and antitumor response is dependent upon the cytokines used to generate the effector cells

Recent data suggest that generation of CTL in the presence of IL-4 enhances their survival following adoptive transfer (25). Therefore, we examined the effect of IL-2 and IL-4 during the in vitro culture on the long-term fate and function of OT-I CTL. In these experiments the OT-I T cells were stimulated with a lower dose (0.1 nM) of OVA257–264, as this was found to be necessary for optimal cytokine expansion of these CTL (data not shown). The proportion of cells staining for CD8, V{alpha}2, and V{beta}5 did not differ significantly between conditions and was typically 87–95% of the cells (not shown). When compared with naive OT-I T cells (see Fig. 1Go), all effector cells up-regulated CD69, CD25, and CD44, whereas the levels of CD62L and Ly-6C were down-regulated regardless of the exogenous cytokine(s) added during the priming cultures (Fig. 6Go and data not shown). However, the phenotype of these effector cells was not identical, as cells cultured in only exogenous IL-4 exhibited lower levels of CD25 and CD44. The former result likely represents the lack of endogenous IL-2 to up-regulate CD25 (26). Intragroup variation was sometimes noted for the level of expression of the early activation Ag CD69 and Ly-6C, irrespective of the exogenous cytokine added to the cultures. Furthermore, although all effector groups displayed strong CTL activity to E.G7, effector cells generated in the presence of IL-4 or both IL-2 and IL-4 showed stronger activity than cells expanded with only IL-2 (Fig. 6GoB).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Phenotype and function of OT-I effector cells generated with IL-2 and/or IL-4. OT-I splenocytes were stimulated with OVA257–264 (0.1 nM) and IL-2 (50 U/ml) and/or IL-4 (50 U/ml) or with IL-4high (175 U/ml) as described in Materials and Methods for 5 days. A, FACS analysis before adoptive transfer. Staining for the indicated markers (dark line) or negative controls (light line) is shown. B, CTL activity just before adoptive transfer. Data are representative of two experiments.

 
These effector OT-I CTL were adoptively transferred into C57BL/6 mice, and their persistence in the spleen and lymph nodes was assessed 21–28 days later. The largest number of OT-I cells was detected in recipients of CTL generated with either IL-2 or a combination of both IL-2 and IL-4 (Fig. 7Go). In contrast, a markedly lower number of triple-stain-positive cells was detected in recipients of CTL generated in IL-4. The use of a higher dose of IL-4 did not improve the degree of persistence of the OT-I. These findings were confirmed by staining for the donor cells with MHC-peptide tetramer (Fig. 7Go). These data indicate that stimulation with IL-2 during the generation of CTL optimally promotes the survival of these cells upon adoptive transfer in vivo.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. The persistence of adoptively transferred OT-I CTL generated with IL-2 and/or IL-4. OT-I effector cells were generated as described in the legend to Fig. 6Go and then 10 x 106 effector cells were adoptively transferred to normal C57BL/6 mice. The number of persistent donor cells was determined 21–28 days after adoptive transfer as estimated by the product of the number of lymphocytes harvested in spleen and four lymph nodes and the fraction of triple-stain-positive cells or the fraction of cells staining with anti-CD8 and H-2Kb/SIINFEKL tetramer. Data were derived from three experiments.

 
FACS analysis revealed that the phenotype of the persistent OT-I CTL generated in either IL-2 or both IL-2 and IL-4 was typical of a memory phenotype, i.e., CD25low, CD44high, and Ly6Chigh (Fig. 8Go). By contrast, only a small proportion of the persistent OT-I cells generated in IL-4 expressed high levels of CD44 and Ly6C (Fig. 8Go). This finding, in conjunction with the lower yield of persistent OT-I cells (Fig. 7Go), indicates that there are 4- to 6-fold fewer cells with a memory phenotype when the naive OT-I were solely primed ex vivo with Ag and exogenous IL-4.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. The phenotype of persistent adoptively transferred OT-I CTL generated with IL-2 and/or IL-4. Expression of CD44 and Ly6C (dark line) or negative controls (light line) by persistent OT-I T cells gated for expression of both CD8 and V{alpha}2-TCR. OT-I effector cells were adoptively transferred as described in the legend to Fig. 7Go and recipient spleen cells were analyzed 21–28 days after adoptive transfer. Data are representative of three experiments

 
To examine Ag-specific responsiveness, spleen cells from adoptively transferred mice were stimulated with OVA257–264 in vitro. In general, the magnitude of the resulting proliferative response was proportional to the number of donor cells identified in the spleen. However, this relationship was not linear, as the magnitude of this response by the splenocytes in recipients of OT-I cells generated in IL-4 was disproportionately low (Fig. 9GoA).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9. Functional activity of persistent adoptively transferred OT-I CTL generated with IL-2 and/or IL-4. OT-I effector cells were adoptively transferred as described in the legend to Fig. 6GoA) Proliferative response by splenocytes from adoptively transferred mice that received OT-I CTL 21–28 days previously. Data are derived from three separate experiments. B, Tumor-free survival of recipient mice that received OT-I CTL. Six to 7 mice/group were inoculated with E.G7 tumor 21–28 days after adoptive transfer. Day 0 refers to the day when the mice received E.G7.

 
At 21–28 days after adoptive transfer, recipients of OT-I CTL generated in each cytokine condition were inoculated s.c. with E.G7 cells. When compared with untreated cells, all treatment groups exhibited a significant increase in tumor-free survival (IL-2, p < 0.001; IL-4, p < 0.001, IL-2/IL-4, p < 0.001; and IL-4high, p = 0.006; Fig. 9GoB). It is noteworthy that the IL-4-generated OT-I effector cells developed a therapeutic effect even though these cells inefficiently persisted and developed a memory phenotype. Thus, these residual cells were still competent to affect E.G7 growth. Between the treatment groups, the difference in tumor-free survival between mice that received OT-I effector cells generated with IL-2 and recipients of CTL generated in IL-2/IL-4 and IL-4 (50 U/ml) was not significant. However, the greater tumor-free survival in mice that received OT-I effector cells generated in IL-2 when compared with mice that received CTL primed in a high dose of IL-4 (175 U/ml) was statistically significant (p = 0.04). The greater therapeutic efficacy of OT-I generated in IL-2 may be related to its ability to optimally promote differentiation of the effector CTL into persistent memory phenotypic cells, as these effector cells exhibited the weakest CTL activity upon adoptive transfer to tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 6Go).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Many previous studies have demonstrated that protective memory responses against tumor cells occur in vivo. In these cases, the memory response is typically demonstrated after either naive or effector tumor-specific T cells have first elicited a protective primary antitumor response. For adoptive immunotherapy, it has been difficult to ascertain whether the memory response is dependent upon encountering tumor Ags in vivo or whether it reflects an intrinsic potential of the transferred effector cells. Based on both phenotypic and functional characteristics, our data support the notion that a substantial portion of adoptively transferred CTL differentiate into memory T cells that are then competent to reject a tumor challenge. At 21–28 days after adoptive transfer, the persistent OT-I T cells expressed a cell surface phenotype of memory cells, i.e., CD44high, CD62Lhigh, Ly-6Chigh, CD25neg, and CD69neg (17, 18, 19). Furthermore, unlike naive OT-I T cells, these persistent OT-I cells expressed intrinsic CTL activity and exhibited rapid proliferation to a relatively low dose of OVA257–264 upon in vitro challenge. These functional properties have been reported to be features that distinguish memory T cells (6, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24).

When studying cell populations thought to represent memory T cells, it is imperative that the cells under study be distinguished from chronically stimulated effector T cells that persist secondary to Ag. Even cells present several months after adoptive transfer may display characteristics more consistent with effector cells (27). Identification of CD8+ memory cells is also problematic in some models in which T cells are adoptively transferred to lymphopenic mice. In this situation, naive CD8+ T cells acquire the phenotypic and functional characteristics of memory T cells in the absence of Ag by the process of homeostatic proliferation (28, 29, 30). In our model, we have avoided potential complications due to either Ag or homeostatic proliferation by removing extraneous Ag by washing the effector cells several days before adoptive transfer to mice with a normal pool of lymphocytes.

A number of studies have documented that exogenous cytokines influence the magnitude and quality of the resulting CD8+ effector CTL generated during in vitro culture (16, 31, 32, 33, 34). More recently, we demonstrated an essential role for cytokines for the generation of effector CTL. In the absence of IL-2R and IL-4R signaling in vitro, TCR-activated CD8+ T cells failed to differentiate into CTL, in part due to lack of expression of granzyme B, and they exhibited limited proliferative capacity (3–4 cell divisions) before apoptosis by the vast majority of the cells (35). Comparatively little is known concerning the long-term consequences of these culture conditions on CTL effector cells in vivo. Our findings demonstrate a critical role for IL-2 during in vitro generation of the effector CTL for the optimal in vivo persistence of CTL with characteristics of memory T cells. Analysis of allospecific T cells in autoimmune-prone IL-2-deficient mice and an Ag-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cell line have suggested that IL-2 favors the development of T memory cells (36, 37). Our data directly implicate signaling through the IL-2R for development of CD8 T memory cells from naive normal Ag-specific precursor T cells. In this regard, it is important to note that the sole use of exogenous IL-4 resulted in the production of optimal numbers of CTL. However, upon adoptive transfer, these effector cells did not readily persist or express a memory phenotype. These IL-4-driven effector CTL were correspondingly less effective in antitumor immunity.

Several other studies have reported findings consistent with our results. In a model of viral infection, Aung et al. (38) showed that the presence of IL-4 at the time of activation diminishes the expansion of viral Ag-specific CD8+ T cells and inhibits the development of CD8+ T cell memory. Similarly, Villacres and Bergmann (39) demonstrated that the absence of IL-4 at the time of activation of CTL increases the frequency of CD8+ memory cells 8 wk later and enhances the effector functions of these memory cells. In our experiments, coculture of T cells with exogenous IL-2 alone or both IL-2 and IL-4 resulted in enhanced long-term survival and differentiation to the memory phenotype, suggesting that signal transduction through the IL-2R is sufficient to promote memory CTL upon adoptive transfer in vivo. This result also indicates that IL-4 does not actively prevent engraftment of CTL that persist with a memory phenotype. However, our experiments do not rule out that signals through other cytokine receptors or T cell surface proteins might also favor the engraftment and expression of the memory phenotype by CD8+ effector cells. Furthermore, our data do not address whether IL-2 also functions in vivo to promote memory CTL. IL-15, whose receptor also uses IL-2R{beta} and the common {gamma}-chain for signaling, has been shown to play an important role in the homeostasis of CD8+ memory cells (5, 9, 10, 11) and is also a candidate to promote memory CTL in vivo.

Although IL-2 and IL-4 redundantly function as T cell growth factors and promote differentiation into CTL in vitro (35, 40, 41), our data suggest that IL-2 is mandatory for promoting memory CTL. This finding was somewhat surprising because Huang et al. (25) reported that CD8+ T cells activated in the presence of IL-4 in vitro persisted to a greater degree after adoptive transfer than CTL activated in IL-2. These persistent cells expressed high levels of CD44 and produced large amounts of IFN-{gamma} following re-exposure to peptide, suggesting that they consisted of memory cells. However, it should be emphasized that although these investigators initially stimulated the CD8+ T cells in either IL-2 or IL-4 for 3 days, all cells were expanded in IL-2 for an additional 2 days before adoptive transfer. Thus, analogous to our experimental design, these T cells also received signaling through the IL-2R before adoptive immunotherapy, which we believe likely contributed to promoting memory CTL in vivo.

Our study reveals an unappreciated potential value of adoptive antitumor immunotherapy. Besides the initial antitumor response by effector CTL, in vitro expansion using IL-2 promotes the production of memory CD8+ T cells, which may favor long-term protection against tumor recurrence. Furthermore, adoptive immunotherapy with effector CTL has been shown to overcome immunological ignorance (15), a phenomenon by which naive tumor-specific T cells simply ignore tumor-associated Ag. Nevertheless, despite these beneficial features, adoptive immunotherapy with ex vivo IL-2-expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes that contain CTL is often unsuccessful in cancer patients. In addition to tumor-induced immunosuppression and outgrowth of tumor Ag escape variants, growth factor deprivation is a problem after adoptive transfer, particularly when CTL have been generated and expanded over longer periods of time (1). In the model described in this study, unlike in most therapeutic protocols, large numbers of effector cells were generated over a much shorter time frame. Therefore, successful adoptive T cell therapy may be linked to rapid production of effector T cells, using the appropriate cytokines during the ex vivo culture.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Aixin Yu and Paul Scibelli for technical assistance and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Tetramer Facility for providing the tetramer.


    Footnotes
 
1 This research was supported by the Department of Defense (DAMD17-98-1-8208) and by the National Institutes of Health (AI40114). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas R. Malek, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami School of Medicine, P. O. Box 016960, Miami, FL 33101. E-mail address: tmalek{at}med.miami.edu Back

3 Abbreviation used in this paper: CM, complete medium. Back

Received for publication April 23, 2001. Accepted for publication August 6, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cheever, M. A., W. Chen. 1997. Therapy with cultured T cells: principles revisited. Immunol. Rev. 157:177.[Medline]
  2. Greenberg, P. D.. 1991. Adoptive T cell therapy of tumors: mechanisms operative in the recognition and elimination of tumor cells. Adv. Immunol. 49:281.[Medline]
  3. Wang, R. F., S. A. Rosenberg. 1996. Human tumor antigens recognized by T lymphocytes: implications for cancer therapy. J. Leukocyte Biol. 60:296.[Abstract]
  4. Schober, S. L., C. T. Kuo, K. S. Schluns, L. Lefrancois, J. M. Leiden, S. C. Jameson. 1999. Expression of the transcription factor lung Kruppel-like factor is regulated by cytokines and correlates with survival of memory T cells in vitro and in vivo. J. Immunol. 163:3662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ku, C. C., M. Murakami, A. Sakamoto, J. Kappler, P. Marrack. 2000. Control of homeostasis of CD8+ memory T cells by opposing cytokines. Science 288:675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Garcia, S., J. DiSanto, B. Stockinger. 1999. Following the development of a CD4 T cell response in vivo: from activation to memory formation. Immunity 11:163.[Medline]
  7. Somma, M. M. D., F. Somma, M. S. G. Montani, R. Mangiacasale, E. Cundari, E. Piccolella. 1999. TCR engagement regulates differential responsiveness of human memory T cells to Fas (CD95)-mediated apoptosis. J. Immunol. 162:3851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Vella, A. T., S. Dow, T. A. Potter, J. Kappler, P. Marrack. 1998. Cytokine-induced survival of activated T cells in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Zhang, X., S. Sun, I. Hwang, D. F. Tough, J. Sprent. 1998. Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. Immunity 8:591.[Medline]
  10. Lodolce, J. P., D. L. Boone, S. Chai, R. E. Swain, S. Trettin, A. Ma. 1998. IL-15 receptor maintains lymphoid homeostasis by supporting lymphocyte homing and proliferation. Immunity 9:669.[Medline]
  11. Kennedy, M. K., M. Glaccum, S. N. Brown, E. A. Butz, J. L. Viney, M. Embers, N. Matsuki, K. Charrier, L. Sedger, C. R. Willis, et al 2000. Reversible defects in natural killer and memory CD8 T cell lineages in interleukin 15-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 191:771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Schluns, K., W. Kieper, S. Jameson, L. Lefrancois. 2000. Interleukin-7 mediates the homeostasis of naive and memory CD8 T cells in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 1:426.[Medline]
  13. Carbone, F. R., S. J. Sterry, J. Butler, S. Rodda, M. W. Moore. 1992. T cell receptor {alpha}-chain pairing determines the specificity of residue 262 within the Kb-restricted, ovalbumin257–264 determinant. Int. Immunol. 4:861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Moore, M. W., F. R. Carbone, M. J. Bevan. 1988. Introduction of soluble protein into the class I pathway of antigen processing and presentation. Cell 54:777.[Medline]
  15. Dalyot-Herman, N., O. F. Bathe, T. R. Malek. 2000. Reversal of CD8+ T cell ignorance and induction of anti-tumor immunity by peptide-pulsed APC. J. Immunol. 165:6731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Liu, B., E. R. Podack, J. P. Allison, T. R. Malek. 1996. Generation of primary tumor-specific CTL in vitro to immunogenic and poorly immunogenic mouse tumors. J. Immunol. 156:1117.[Abstract]
  17. Walunas, T. L., D. S. Bruce, L. Dustin, D. Y. Loh, J. A. Bluestone. 1995. Ly-6C is a marker of memory CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 155:1873.[Abstract]
  18. Curtsinger, J. M., D. C. Lins, M. F. Mescher. 1998. CD8+ memory T cells (CD44high, Ly6C+) are more sensitive than naive cells (CD44low, Ly6C-) to TCR/CD8 signaling in response to Ags. J. Immunol. 160:3236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Rogers, P. R., C. Dubey, S. L. Swain. 2000. Qualitative changes accompany memory T cell generation: faster, more effective responses at lower doses of Ag. J. Immunol. 164:2338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Pihlgren, M., P. M. Dubois, M. Tomkowiak, T. Sjogren, J. Marvel. 1996. Resting memory CD8+ T cells are hyperreactive to antigenic challenge in vitro. J. Exp. Med. 184:2141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Veiga-Fernandes, H., U. Walter, C. Bourgeois, A. McLean, B. Rocha. 2000. Response of naive and memory CD8+ T cells to antigen stimulation in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 1:47.[Medline]
  22. Cho, B. K., C. Wang, S. Sugawa, H. N. Eisen, J. Chen. 1999. Functional differences between memory and naive CD8 T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:2976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Opferman, J. T., B. T. Ober, P. G. Ashton-Rickardt. 1999. Linear differentiation of cytotoxic effectors into memory T lymphocytes. Science 283:1745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Zimmerman, C., A. Prevost-Bolndel, C. Blaser, H. Pircher. 1999. Kinetics of the response of naive and memory CD8 T cells to Ag: similarities and differences. J. Immunol. 29:284.
  25. Huang, L., F. Chen, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, J. Kung. 2000. Potent induction of long-term CD8+ T cell memory by short-term IL-4 exposure during T cell receptor stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:3406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Malek, T. R., J. D. Ashwell. 1985. Interleukin 2 upregulates expression of its receptor on a T cell clone. J. Exp. Med. 161:1575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ahmadzadeh, M., S. F. Hussain, D. L. Farber. 1999. Effector CD4 T cells are biochemically distinct from the memory subset: evidence for long-term persistence of effectors in vivo. J. Immunol. 163:3053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Murali-Krishna, K., R. Ahmed. 2000. Cutting edge: naive T cells masquerading as memory cells. J. Immunol. 165:1733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Cho, B. K., V. P. Rao, Q. Ge, H. N. Eisen, J. Chen. 2000. Homeostasis-stimulated proliferation drives naive T cells to differentiate directly into memory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 192:549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Goldrath, A. W., L. Y. Bogatzki, M. J. Bevan. 2000. Naive T cells transiently acquire a memory-like phenotype during homeostasis-driven proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 192:557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Mehrotra, P. T., A. J. Grant, J. P. Siegel. 1995. Synergistic effects of IL-7 and IL-12 on human T cell activation. J. Immunol. 154:5093.[Abstract]
  32. Yang, G., K. E. Hellstrom, M. T. Mizuno, L. Chen. 1995. In vitro priming of tumor-reactive cytolytic T lymphocytes by combining IL-10 with B7-CD28 costimulation. J. Immunol. 155:3897.[Abstract]
  33. Lalvani, A., T. Dong, G. Ogg, A. A. Pathan, H. Newell, A. V. S. Hill, A. J. McMichael, S. Rowland-Jones. 1997. Optimization of peptide-based protocol employing IL-7 for in vitro restimulation of human cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors. J. Immunol. Methods 210:65.[Medline]
  34. Ferrari, G., K. King, K. Rathbun, C. A. Place, M. V. Packard, J. A. Bartlett, D. P. Bolognesi, K. J. Weinhold. 1995. IL-7 enhancement of antigen-driven activation/expansion of HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors (CTLp). Clin. Exp. Immunol. 101:239.[Medline]
  35. Malek, T. R., A. Yu, P. Scibelli, M. G. Lichtenheld, E. K. Codias. 2001. Broad programming by IL-2 receptor signaling for extended growth to multiple cytokines and functional maturation of Ag-activated T cells. J. Immunol. 166:1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Dai, Z., B. T. Konieczny, F. G. Lakkis. 2000. The dual role of IL-2 in the generation and maintenance of CD8+ memory T cells. J. Immunol. 165:3031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ke, Y., H. Ma, J. A. Kapp. 1998. Antigen is required for the activation of effector activities, whereas interleukin 2 is required for the maintenance of memory in ovalbumin-specific, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 187:49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Aung, S., Y. Tang, B. S. Graham. 1999. Interleukin-4 diminishes CD8+ respiratory syncytial virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity in vivo. J. Virol. 73:8944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Villacres, M. C., C. C. Bergmann. 1999. Enhanced cytotoxic T cell activity in IL-4-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 162:2663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Kung, J., D. Beller, S. Ju. 1998. Lymphokine regulation of activation-induced apoptosis in T cells of IL-2 and IL-2R{beta} knockout mice. Cell. Immunol. 185:158.[Medline]
  41. Zheng, L., C. L. Trageser, D. M. Willerford, M. J. Lenardo. 1998. T cell growth cytokines cause the superinduction of molecules mediating Ag-induced T lymphocyte death. J. Immunol. 160:763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. E. Rolle, R. Carrio, and T. R. Malek
Modeling the CD8+ T Effector to Memory Transition in Adoptive T-Cell Antitumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 68(8): 2984 - 2992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Y. Zhu, G. Zhu, L. Luo, A. S. Flies, and L. Chen
CD137 stimulation delivers an antigen-independent growth signal for T lymphocytes with memory phenotype
Blood, June 1, 2007; 109(11): 4882 - 4889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Vianello, N. Papeta, T. Chen, P. Kraft, N. White, W. K. Hart, M. F. Kircher, E. Swart, S. Rhee, G. Palu, et al.
Murine B16 Melanomas Expressing High Levels of the Chemokine Stromal-Derived Factor-1/CXCL12 Induce Tumor-Specific T Cell Chemorepulsion and Escape from Immune Control.
J. Immunol., March 1, 2006; 176(5): 2902 - 2914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
R. Polley, S. Stager, S. Prickett, A. Maroof, S. Zubairi, D. F. Smith, and P. M. Kaye
Adoptive Immunotherapy against Experimental Visceral Leishmaniasis with CD8+ T Cells Requires the Presence of Cognate Antigen
Infect. Immun., January 1, 2006; 74(1): 773 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Parameswaran, R. Suresh, V. Bal, S. Rath, and A. George
Lack of ICAM-1 on APCs during T Cell Priming Leads to Poor Generation of Central Memory Cells
J. Immunol., August 15, 2005; 175(4): 2201 - 2211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Carrio, O. F. Bathe, and T. R. Malek
Initial Antigen Encounter Programs CD8+ T Cells Competent to Develop into Memory Cells That Are Activated in an Antigen-Free, IL-7- and IL-15-Rich Environment
J. Immunol., June 15, 2004; 172(12): 7315 - 7323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bathe, O. F.
Right arrow Articles by Malek, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bathe, O. F.
Right arrow Articles by Malek, T. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS