The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 167: 4511-4517.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists
IL-2 During In Vitro Priming Promotes Subsequent Engraftment and Successful Adoptive Tumor Immunotherapy by Persistent Memory Phenotypic CD8+ T Cells1
Oliver F. Bathe*,
Nava Dalyot-Herman
and
Thomas R. Malek2,
*
Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery and
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Adoptive T cell tumor immunotherapy potentially consists of two
protective components by the transferred effector cells, the immediate
immune response and the subsequent development of memory T cells. The
extent by which adoptively transferred CD8+ CTL are
destined to become memory T cells is ambiguous as most studies focus on
the acute effects on tumor shortly following adoptive transfer. In this
study we show that a substantial fraction of the input CTL develop into
memory cells that reject a s.c. tumor challenge. The use of exogenous
IL-2 or a combination of IL-2 and IL-4, but not solely IL-4, during the
ex vivo culture for the CTL inoculation was necessary for efficient
development of CD8+ memory T cells. Thus, an important
component of adoptive immunotherapy using CTL is the production of
CD8+ Ag-specific memory cells which is primarily favored by
IL-2 receptor signaling during ex vivo generation of the effector
CTL.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Adoptive
immunotherapy represents a novel therapeutic option for tumors. This
strategy involves removal of an individuals lymphocytes, generation
of tumoricidal immune effector cells, and reinfusion of these effector
cells into the tumor-bearing host. CTL are particularly attractive
effector cells for this purpose, as they are specific and potent
killers of all cells that bear the target Ag (1, 2, 3). Most
studies on adoptive immunotherapy focus on the acute effects on tumor
shortly following adoptive transfer. However, long-term protection
against tumor recurrence requires that the infused CTL survive long
after adoptive transfer, ideally without concomitant cytokine
administration. In addition, it is desirable that these persistent
donor T cells have characteristics of memory T cells, i.e., a very
quick and intense response to the reappearance of tumor.
Differentiation into memory cells is in part regulated by cytokines
(4, 5) and must result in some Ag-specific T cells that
are resistant to apoptosis (4, 6, 7). IL-7 and IL-15 are
two cytokines that have been implicated in the regulation of
homeostasis and survival of CD8+ memory cells in
vivo (5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Comparatively less is known concerning
how the cytokine environment during the initial priming of the naive T
cells programs the resulting effector CTL to develop into memory cells.
In most studies of adoptive immunotherapy, IL-2 has been typically used
for the ex vivo expansion of donor T cells that have been previously
encountered tumor. The present study, therefore, was initiated to
examine to what degree the ex vivo cytokine environment used to
activate naive Ag-specific CD8+ T cells
subsequently favored their development into memory cells and protect
against tumor activity in adoptive immunotherapy.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Animals
OT-I TCR transgenic mice (13) were
maintained by breeding heterozygous OT-I TCR transgenic mice to
wild-type C57BL/6J mice. The progeny were screened by PCR for the
expression of the TCR transgene. All recipient mice were C57BL/6J mice
(The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) and were used between 6 and 9
wk of age.
Biological reagents
EL-4 is a thymoma derived from the C57BL/6 mouse
(H-2b). E.G7 cells consist of EL-4 cells
transfected with OVA cDNA (14), and these were a gift from
Dr. M. Bevan (University of Washington, Seattle, WA). These cell lines
were maintained in complete medium
(CM)3 consisting of
RPMI 1640 containing 5% FCS, glutamine (30 µg/ml), penicillin (100
U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and 2-ME (5 x
10-5 M). OVA257264
(SIINFEKL) (13) was synthesized by Research Genetics
(Huntsville, AL). CyChrome-anti CD8
, PE-anti-V
2-TCR,
FITC-V
5.1,5.2-TCR, FITC-anti-CD8
(53.6.7),
biotin-anti-Ly6C, biotin-anti-CD44 (Pgp-1),
biotin-anti-CD62L (MEL-14), and biotin-anti-CD69 were purchased
from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Biotin-anti-CD25 (7D4) was
prepared in our laboratory. The PE-labeled MHC-peptide tetramer
(H-2Kb/SIINFEKL) was provided by the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases MHC Tetramer Facility
(Atlanta, GA).
Cell culture
Unless indicated otherwise, OT-I CTL used for adoptive transfers
were generated by the culture of OT-I splenocytes (1 x
106/well) in 24-well plates containing 1 ml of CM
containing OVA257264 (1 nM), IL-4 (175 U/ml),
and IL-2 (50 U/ml). After 3 days in culture, the cells were washed and
recultured at 0.5 x 106 cells/well in
24-well plates containing 1 ml of CM without
OVA257264, but with the same cytokines that
were present during initial culture. After an additional 2 days in
culture, the cells were harvested and used for in vitro analyses or for
adoptive transfer. CTL assays were performed as previously described
(15) using 51Cr-labeled E.G7 and
EL-4 cells as targets. For T cell proliferation, spleen cells (2
x 105 cells/well) were cultured with the
indicated concentration of OVA257264 in
flat-bottom 96-well culture plates for 13 days. Each well was pulsed
with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine, and 5 h
later, the cells were harvested with an automated harvester. The mean
of triplicate values that varied by less than 10% was calculated. Data
are expressed as
cpm (i.e., cpm from experimental condition -
cpm from cultures containing culture medium alone).
FACS analysis
Cells were stained with the various Ab conjugates as previously
described (15). Between 50,000 and 100,000 events were
collected and analyzed for each sample using a FACScan flow cytometer
(BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and CellQuest software (BD
Biosciences).
Adoptive immunotherapy
OT-I CTL were injected via the tail vein in 0.5 ml of HBSS into
normal C57BL/6J mice. Control mice for the adoptive transfers received
only HBSS. The proportion of input cells that consisted of OT-I CTL was
determined by staining for CD8
, V
2-TCR, and V
5.1,5.2-TCR, and
this information was used to calculate the number of OT-I CTL
adoptively transferred. E.G7 or EL-4 cells (1 x
106) were injected s.c. in 0.2 ml of HBSS at the
midline of the lower abdomen 2128 days after adoptive transfer of
OT-I CTL. The tumor cells were freshly thawed within 6 days of
inoculation. Tumor cell growth was recorded over time. Detectable tumor
was considered to be >0.5 cm2. Tumor-free
survival curves were compared by log-rank test. A p value of
<0.05 was considered significant.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Persistence, phenotype, and function of adoptively transferred CTL
We recently reported that naive T cells from the OT-I TCR
transgenic mice, specific for an OVA peptide,
OVA257264, in the context
H-2Kb, failed to recognize and respond to the
OVA-transfected E.G7 thymoma, i.e., were immunologically ignorant,
after adoptive transfer into mice bearing E.G7 as a solid tumor
(15). However, the adoptive transfer of OT-I effector
cells, generated in short-term cultures, inhibited the growth of E.G7
in a dose-dependent manner (15). In the current study we
have continued to use this model system to study the ability of in
vitro-derived OT-I CTL effector cells to develop into memory cells in
vivo and to then function in antitumor immunity.
Our past work indicated that the generation of primary tumor-specific
CTL in vitro was favored by culture with exogenous IL-2 and IL-4
(16). Therefore, splenocytes from naive OT-I transgenic
mice were stimulated with OVA257264 in the
presence of exogenous IL-2 and IL-4 for 3 days and were expanded in
these exogenous cytokines for an additional 2 days. On the fifth day,
greater than 90% of the cells consisted of CD8+
cells that coexpressed V
2 and V
5, characteristic of the OT-I TCR
(not shown). FACS analysis revealed that these activated cells typified
effector T lymphocytes, i.e., increased size, up-regulated expression
of CD69, CD25, and CD44, and down-regulated expression of CD62L and
Ly-6C (Fig. 1
).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 1. Phenotypic properties of naive, effector, and adoptively transferred
OT-I T cells. Cell surface phenotype by FACS analysis. Splenocytes from
a naive OT-I mouse were directly subjected to FACS analysis or
activated with OVA257264, IL-4 and IL-2 as described in
Materials and Methods. On the fifth day, the OT-I
effector cells were subjected to FACS analysis and were administered to
normal syngeneic recipients. Splenocytes from the recipient mice were
then harvested 28 days later for FACS analysis. OT-I CD8+ T
lymphocytes were identified by gating for expression of CD8 and
V 2-TCR and were then analyzing for the expression of the indicated
markers (shaded histograms). Negative controls are represented by
unshaded histograms. Data are representative of five experiments.
|
|
These CTL effector cells were adoptively transferred to syngeneic
C57BL/6 recipient mice. The number of OT-I CTL effector cells that
persisted 2128 days after adoptive transfer was assessed by the
fraction of cells that were "triple-stain positive" for CD8, V
2,
and V
5 (Fig. 2
A). This
analysis indicated that the number of triple-stain-positive cells in
the spleen and lymph nodes was proportional to the number of cells
administered (Fig. 3
, A and
B). In each animal, the spleen, two axillary lymph nodes,
and two inguinal lymph nodes were analyzed. In sum, in animals that
received 10 x 106 CTL, the mean number of
triple-stain-positive lymphocytes recovered from a pool of these organs
was 4.4 ± (1.6) x 106 (Fig. 3
B). Given that the mean number of triple-stain-positive
cells in control mice is 0.4 ± (0.2) x
106, the estimated recovery of OT-I cells in
these organs is 40% of the input cells. If one were to extrapolate
this number to the entire peripheral lymph tissue,
68% of the OT-I
cell persisted at this time, assuming there are 25 lymph nodes in a
mouse, all containing an equal number of OT-I cells in each
node.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 3. Persistence of adoptively transferred OT-I CD8+ T cells.
A, Number of triple-stain-positive cells expressed as a
percentage of all CD8+ cells. B, Number of
triple-stain-positive cells, calculated as the product of the total
number of lymphocytes recovered in the spleen plus four lymph nodes,
and the percentage of triple-stain-positive cells. The indicated
numbers of OT-I CTL were adoptively transferred, and 2128 days later,
the spleen and lymph nodes (inguinal and axillary) were analyzed by
FACS. Each group consisted of three to five recipient mice that were
individually analyzed.
|
|
FACS analysis revealed that these triple-stain-positive cells were
smaller than the adoptively transferred CTL as assessed by forward
light scatter (Fig. 1
). The phenotype of the OT-I cells was further
characterized for other surface markers by gating on
CD8+ and V
2+ cells (Fig. 1
). Unlike the in vitro-generated OT-I CTL effector cells, the in
vivo-retained cells no longer expressed elevated levels of CD69 or
CD25, but Ly6C was substantially up-regulated. In addition, CD44
remained up-regulated, whereas CD62L reverted to a higher degree of
expression. This cell surface phenotype is consistent with that
attributed to memory T cells (17, 18, 19). In three mice
tested at 7075 days after adoptive transfer, triple-stain-positive
(Fig. 2
B) or MHC-tetramer-positive (Fig. 2
C) OT-I
T cells were readily detected with a cell surface phenotype identical
(not shown) to that observed at 2128 days after adoptive transfer.
All of these features except the elevated Ly6C expression were detected
as early as 7 days after adoptive transfer (not shown). At 2128 days
after adoptive transfer, five of five mice tested expressed a high
level of Ly6C. However, in two mice tested at earlier time points, the
high Ly6C expression was not seen, suggesting that this aspect of the
phenotype appears relatively late.
Memory CD8 T cells often show more rapid proliferation to a lower
concentration of Ag when compared with naive T cells
(18, 19, 20, 21), and they retain CTL activity
(22, 23, 24). When compared with naive T cells, the recovered
adoptively transferred "memory" OT-I T cells proliferated to an
10-fold lower concentration (Fig. 4
A) of
OVA257264 and more rapidly (Fig. 4
B). Furthermore, the freshly prepared effector cells
exhibited potent and specific CTL activity to OVA-expressing targets
just before adoptive transfer (Fig. 4
C). With respect to CTL
activity by the "memory" OT-I T cells, the level of cytotoxicity
was proportional to the number of OT-I CD8+ cells
that persisted in the spleen (Fig. 4
D). Thus, collectively
these data demonstrate that 21 days after adoptive transfer, the OT-I
effector cells also exhibited functional properties characteristic of
memory CD8+ T cells.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 4. Functional properties of naive, effector, and adoptively transferred
OT-I T cells. A and B, Proliferative
responses by naive and persistent adoptively transferred OT-I T cells.
Dose response to OVA257264 48 h after culture
initiation. B, Time course of proliferative response
using 100 pM OVA257264. Persistent OT-I T cells were
analyzed 2128 days after adoptive transfer. Splenocytes from a naive
OT-I mouse were mixed with normal C57BL/6 splenocytes to contain a
fraction of OT-I cell equivalent to that in the spleen from the
adoptively transferred recipient (typically 4%). C
and D, CTL activity by ex vivo effector and persistent
adoptively transferred OT-I T cells. C, OT-I effector
cells were prepared as described in Materials and
Methods and were directly tested for CTL activity against E.G7
or EL4 targets. D, CTL activity by splenocytes from
adoptively transferred mice that received the indicated number of OT-I
CTL 2135 days previously. Data shown represent specific CTL activity
against E.G7 target cells at an E:T ratio of 100:1. Data are
representative of three experiments
(AC) or three mice per group
(D).
|
|
To assess the antitumor activity of the persistent OT-I T cells, mice
received E.G7 s.c. 2128 days after adoptive transfer of the OT-I CTL.
Unlike control-treated animals, mice that received OT-I CTL were
generally resistant to E.G7 tumor inoculation (Fig. 5
). This protection was specific to
OVA-expressing tumors, as these mice did not mount an antitumor
response when inoculated with the parental EL-4 thymoma. Furthermore,
mice (n = 2) adoptively transferred with OT-I CTL that
rejected a primary challenge with E.G7 remained tumor-free after a
second challenge with E.G7 when reinoculated 56 and 66 days after the
first inoculation (not shown). Thus, long-lasting protective
tumor-specific immunity was not prevented by the initial response by
the persistent OT-I T cells.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 5. Antitumor activity of memory OT-I T cells. Twenty-one to 28 days after
adoptive transfer of 10 x 106 OT-I CTL (prepared as
described in Materials and Methods), recipient mice were
inoculated with 1 x 106 E.G7 or EL-4 cells, s.c., as
indicated. As a control, some mice received HBSS rather than OT-I CTL.
Data are represented as tumor-free survival for 6 mice/group.
|
|
Development of OT-I memory T cells and antitumor response is
dependent upon the cytokines used to generate the effector cells
Recent data suggest that generation of CTL in the presence of IL-4
enhances their survival following adoptive transfer (25).
Therefore, we examined the effect of IL-2 and IL-4 during the in vitro
culture on the long-term fate and function of OT-I CTL. In these
experiments the OT-I T cells were stimulated with a lower dose (0.1 nM)
of OVA257264, as this was found to be necessary
for optimal cytokine expansion of these CTL (data not shown). The
proportion of cells staining for CD8, V
2, and V
5 did not differ
significantly between conditions and was typically 8795% of the
cells (not shown). When compared with naive OT-I T cells (see Fig. 1
),
all effector cells up-regulated CD69, CD25, and CD44, whereas the
levels of CD62L and Ly-6C were down-regulated regardless of the
exogenous cytokine(s) added during the priming cultures (Fig. 6
and data not shown). However, the
phenotype of these effector cells was not identical, as cells cultured
in only exogenous IL-4 exhibited lower levels of CD25 and CD44. The
former result likely represents the lack of endogenous IL-2 to
up-regulate CD25 (26). Intragroup variation was sometimes
noted for the level of expression of the early activation Ag CD69 and
Ly-6C, irrespective of the exogenous cytokine added to the cultures.
Furthermore, although all effector groups displayed strong CTL activity
to E.G7, effector cells generated in the presence of IL-4 or both IL-2
and IL-4 showed stronger activity than cells expanded with only IL-2
(Fig. 6
B).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 6. Phenotype and function of OT-I effector cells generated with IL-2
and/or IL-4. OT-I splenocytes were stimulated with
OVA257264 (0.1 nM) and IL-2 (50 U/ml) and/or IL-4 (50
U/ml) or with IL-4high (175 U/ml) as described in
Materials and Methods for 5 days. A, FACS
analysis before adoptive transfer. Staining for the indicated markers
(dark line) or negative controls (light line) is shown.
B, CTL activity just before adoptive transfer. Data are
representative of two experiments.
|
|
These effector OT-I CTL were adoptively transferred into C57BL/6 mice,
and their persistence in the spleen and lymph nodes was assessed 2128
days later. The largest number of OT-I cells was detected in recipients
of CTL generated with either IL-2 or a combination of both IL-2 and
IL-4 (Fig. 7
). In contrast, a markedly
lower number of triple-stain-positive cells was detected in recipients
of CTL generated in IL-4. The use of a higher dose of IL-4 did not
improve the degree of persistence of the OT-I. These findings were
confirmed by staining for the donor cells with MHC-peptide tetramer
(Fig. 7
). These data indicate that stimulation with IL-2 during the
generation of CTL optimally promotes the survival of these cells upon
adoptive transfer in vivo.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 7. The persistence of adoptively transferred OT-I CTL generated with IL-2
and/or IL-4. OT-I effector cells were generated as described in the
legend to Fig. 6 and then 10 x 106 effector cells
were adoptively transferred to normal C57BL/6 mice. The number of
persistent donor cells was determined 2128 days after adoptive
transfer as estimated by the product of the number of lymphocytes
harvested in spleen and four lymph nodes and the fraction of
triple-stain-positive cells or the fraction of cells staining with
anti-CD8 and H-2Kb/SIINFEKL tetramer. Data were derived
from three experiments.
|
|
FACS analysis revealed that the phenotype of the persistent OT-I CTL
generated in either IL-2 or both IL-2 and IL-4 was typical of a memory
phenotype, i.e., CD25low,
CD44high, and Ly6Chigh
(Fig. 8
). By contrast, only a small
proportion of the persistent OT-I cells generated in IL-4 expressed
high levels of CD44 and Ly6C (Fig. 8
). This finding, in conjunction
with the lower yield of persistent OT-I cells (Fig. 7
), indicates that
there are 4- to 6-fold fewer cells with a memory phenotype when the
naive OT-I were solely primed ex vivo with Ag and exogenous
IL-4.
To examine Ag-specific responsiveness, spleen cells from adoptively
transferred mice were stimulated with OVA257264
in vitro. In general, the magnitude of the resulting proliferative
response was proportional to the number of donor cells identified in
the spleen. However, this relationship was not linear, as the magnitude
of this response by the splenocytes in recipients of OT-I cells
generated in IL-4 was disproportionately low (Fig. 9
A).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 9. Functional activity of persistent adoptively transferred OT-I CTL
generated with IL-2 and/or IL-4. OT-I effector cells were adoptively
transferred as described in the legend to Fig. 6 A)
Proliferative response by splenocytes from adoptively transferred mice
that received OT-I CTL 2128 days previously. Data are derived from
three separate experiments. B, Tumor-free survival of
recipient mice that received OT-I CTL. Six to 7 mice/group were
inoculated with E.G7 tumor 2128 days after adoptive transfer. Day 0
refers to the day when the mice received E.G7.
|
|
At 2128 days after adoptive transfer, recipients of OT-I CTL
generated in each cytokine condition were inoculated s.c. with E.G7
cells. When compared with untreated cells, all treatment groups
exhibited a significant increase in tumor-free survival (IL-2,
p < 0.001; IL-4, p < 0.001,
IL-2/IL-4, p < 0.001; and
IL-4high, p = 0.006; Fig. 9
B). It is noteworthy that the IL-4-generated OT-I effector
cells developed a therapeutic effect even though these cells
inefficiently persisted and developed a memory phenotype. Thus, these
residual cells were still competent to affect E.G7 growth. Between the
treatment groups, the difference in tumor-free survival between mice
that received OT-I effector cells generated with IL-2 and recipients of
CTL generated in IL-2/IL-4 and IL-4 (50 U/ml) was not significant.
However, the greater tumor-free survival in mice that received OT-I
effector cells generated in IL-2 when compared with mice that received
CTL primed in a high dose of IL-4 (175 U/ml) was statistically
significant (p = 0.04). The greater therapeutic
efficacy of OT-I generated in IL-2 may be related to its ability to
optimally promote differentiation of the effector CTL into persistent
memory phenotypic cells, as these effector cells exhibited the weakest
CTL activity upon adoptive transfer to tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 6
).
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Many previous studies have demonstrated that protective memory
responses against tumor cells occur in vivo. In these cases, the memory
response is typically demonstrated after either naive or effector
tumor-specific T cells have first elicited a protective primary
antitumor response. For adoptive immunotherapy, it has been difficult
to ascertain whether the memory response is dependent upon encountering
tumor Ags in vivo or whether it reflects an intrinsic potential of the
transferred effector cells. Based on both phenotypic and functional
characteristics, our data support the notion that a substantial portion
of adoptively transferred CTL differentiate into memory T cells that
are then competent to reject a tumor challenge. At 2128 days after
adoptive transfer, the persistent OT-I T cells expressed a cell surface
phenotype of memory cells, i.e., CD44high,
CD62Lhigh, Ly-6Chigh,
CD25neg, and CD69neg
(17, 18, 19). Furthermore, unlike naive OT-I T cells, these
persistent OT-I cells expressed intrinsic CTL activity and exhibited
rapid proliferation to a relatively low dose of
OVA257264 upon in vitro challenge. These
functional properties have been reported to be features that
distinguish memory T cells (6, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24).
When studying cell populations thought to represent memory T cells, it
is imperative that the cells under study be distinguished from
chronically stimulated effector T cells that persist secondary to Ag.
Even cells present several months after adoptive transfer may display
characteristics more consistent with effector cells (27).
Identification of CD8+ memory cells is also
problematic in some models in which T cells are adoptively transferred
to lymphopenic mice. In this situation, naive
CD8+ T cells acquire the phenotypic and
functional characteristics of memory T cells in the absence of Ag by
the process of homeostatic proliferation (28, 29, 30). In our
model, we have avoided potential complications due to either Ag or
homeostatic proliferation by removing extraneous Ag by washing the
effector cells several days before adoptive transfer to mice with a
normal pool of lymphocytes.
A number of studies have documented that exogenous cytokines influence
the magnitude and quality of the resulting CD8+
effector CTL generated during in vitro culture (16, 31, 32, 33, 34). More recently, we demonstrated an essential role for
cytokines for the generation of effector CTL. In the absence of IL-2R
and IL-4R signaling in vitro, TCR-activated CD8+
T cells failed to differentiate into CTL, in part due to lack of
expression of granzyme B, and they exhibited limited proliferative
capacity (34 cell divisions) before apoptosis by the vast majority of
the cells (35). Comparatively little is known concerning
the long-term consequences of these culture conditions on CTL effector
cells in vivo. Our findings demonstrate a critical role for IL-2 during
in vitro generation of the effector CTL for the optimal in vivo
persistence of CTL with characteristics of memory T cells. Analysis of
allospecific T cells in autoimmune-prone IL-2-deficient mice and an
Ag-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cell line have
suggested that IL-2 favors the development of T memory cells (36, 37). Our data directly implicate signaling through the IL-2R for
development of CD8 T memory cells from naive normal Ag-specific
precursor T cells. In this regard, it is important to note that the
sole use of exogenous IL-4 resulted in the production of optimal
numbers of CTL. However, upon adoptive transfer, these effector cells
did not readily persist or express a memory phenotype. These
IL-4-driven effector CTL were correspondingly less effective in
antitumor immunity.
Several other studies have reported findings consistent with our
results. In a model of viral infection, Aung et al. (38)
showed that the presence of IL-4 at the time of activation diminishes
the expansion of viral Ag-specific CD8+ T cells
and inhibits the development of CD8+ T cell
memory. Similarly, Villacres and Bergmann (39)
demonstrated that the absence of IL-4 at the time of activation of CTL
increases the frequency of CD8+ memory cells 8 wk
later and enhances the effector functions of these memory cells. In our
experiments, coculture of T cells with exogenous IL-2 alone or both
IL-2 and IL-4 resulted in enhanced long-term survival and
differentiation to the memory phenotype, suggesting that signal
transduction through the IL-2R is sufficient to promote memory CTL upon
adoptive transfer in vivo. This result also indicates that IL-4 does
not actively prevent engraftment of CTL that persist with a memory
phenotype. However, our experiments do not rule out that signals
through other cytokine receptors or T cell surface proteins might also
favor the engraftment and expression of the memory phenotype by
CD8+ effector cells. Furthermore, our data do not
address whether IL-2 also functions in vivo to promote memory CTL.
IL-15, whose receptor also uses IL-2R
and the common
-chain for signaling, has been shown to play an important
role in the homeostasis of CD8+ memory cells
(5, 9, 10, 11) and is also a candidate to promote memory CTL
in vivo.
Although IL-2 and IL-4 redundantly function as T cell growth factors
and promote differentiation into CTL in vitro (35, 40, 41), our data suggest that IL-2 is mandatory for promoting
memory CTL. This finding was somewhat surprising because Huang et al.
(25) reported that CD8+ T cells
activated in the presence of IL-4 in vitro persisted to a greater
degree after adoptive transfer than CTL activated in IL-2. These
persistent cells expressed high levels of CD44 and produced large
amounts of IFN-
following re-exposure to peptide, suggesting that
they consisted of memory cells. However, it should be emphasized that
although these investigators initially stimulated the
CD8+ T cells in either IL-2 or IL-4 for 3 days,
all cells were expanded in IL-2 for an additional 2 days before
adoptive transfer. Thus, analogous to our experimental design, these T
cells also received signaling through the IL-2R before adoptive
immunotherapy, which we believe likely contributed to promoting memory
CTL in vivo.
Our study reveals an unappreciated potential value of adoptive
antitumor immunotherapy. Besides the initial antitumor response by
effector CTL, in vitro expansion using IL-2 promotes the production of
memory CD8+ T cells, which may favor long-term
protection against tumor recurrence. Furthermore, adoptive
immunotherapy with effector CTL has been shown to overcome
immunological ignorance (15), a phenomenon by which naive
tumor-specific T cells simply ignore tumor-associated Ag. Nevertheless,
despite these beneficial features, adoptive immunotherapy with ex vivo
IL-2-expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes that contain CTL is often
unsuccessful in cancer patients. In addition to tumor-induced
immunosuppression and outgrowth of tumor Ag escape variants, growth
factor deprivation is a problem after adoptive transfer, particularly
when CTL have been generated and expanded over longer periods of time
(1). In the model described in this study, unlike in most
therapeutic protocols, large numbers of effector cells were generated
over a much shorter time frame. Therefore, successful adoptive T cell
therapy may be linked to rapid production of effector T cells, using
the appropriate cytokines during the ex vivo culture.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank Aixin Yu and Paul Scibelli for technical assistance and
the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Tetramer
Facility for providing the tetramer.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
1 This research was supported by the Department of Defense (DAMD17-98-1-8208) and by the National Institutes of Health (AI40114). 
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas R. Malek, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami School of Medicine, P. O. Box 016960, Miami, FL 33101. E-mail address: tmalek{at}med.miami.edu 
3 Abbreviation used in this paper: CM, complete medium. 
Received for publication April 23, 2001.
Accepted for publication August 6, 2001.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Cheever, M. A., W. Chen. 1997. Therapy with cultured T cells: principles revisited. Immunol. Rev. 157:177.[Medline]
-
Greenberg, P. D.. 1991. Adoptive T cell therapy of tumors: mechanisms operative in the recognition and elimination of tumor cells. Adv. Immunol. 49:281.[Medline]
-
Wang, R. F., S. A. Rosenberg. 1996. Human tumor antigens recognized by T lymphocytes: implications for cancer therapy. J. Leukocyte Biol. 60:296.[Abstract]
-
Schober, S. L., C. T. Kuo, K. S. Schluns, L. Lefrancois, J. M. Leiden, S. C. Jameson. 1999. Expression of the transcription factor lung Kruppel-like factor is regulated by cytokines and correlates with survival of memory T cells in vitro and in vivo. J. Immunol. 163:3662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ku, C. C., M. Murakami, A. Sakamoto, J. Kappler, P. Marrack. 2000. Control of homeostasis of CD8+ memory T cells by opposing cytokines. Science 288:675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Garcia, S., J. DiSanto, B. Stockinger. 1999. Following the development of a CD4 T cell response in vivo: from activation to memory formation. Immunity 11:163.[Medline]
-
Somma, M. M. D., F. Somma, M. S. G. Montani, R. Mangiacasale, E. Cundari, E. Piccolella. 1999. TCR engagement regulates differential responsiveness of human memory T cells to Fas (CD95)-mediated apoptosis. J. Immunol. 162:3851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vella, A. T., S. Dow, T. A. Potter, J. Kappler, P. Marrack. 1998. Cytokine-induced survival of activated T cells in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhang, X., S. Sun, I. Hwang, D. F. Tough, J. Sprent. 1998. Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. Immunity 8:591.[Medline]
-
Lodolce, J. P., D. L. Boone, S. Chai, R. E. Swain, S. Trettin, A. Ma. 1998. IL-15 receptor maintains lymphoid homeostasis by supporting lymphocyte homing and proliferation. Immunity 9:669.[Medline]
-
Kennedy, M. K., M. Glaccum, S. N. Brown, E. A. Butz, J. L. Viney, M. Embers, N. Matsuki, K. Charrier, L. Sedger, C. R. Willis, et al 2000. Reversible defects in natural killer and memory CD8 T cell lineages in interleukin 15-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 191:771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schluns, K., W. Kieper, S. Jameson, L. Lefrancois. 2000. Interleukin-7 mediates the homeostasis of naive and memory CD8 T cells in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 1:426.[Medline]
-
Carbone, F. R., S. J. Sterry, J. Butler, S. Rodda, M. W. Moore. 1992. T cell receptor
-chain pairing determines the specificity of residue 262 within the Kb-restricted, ovalbumin257264 determinant. Int. Immunol. 4:861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Moore, M. W., F. R. Carbone, M. J. Bevan. 1988. Introduction of soluble protein into the class I pathway of antigen processing and presentation. Cell 54:777.[Medline]
-
Dalyot-Herman, N., O. F. Bathe, T. R. Malek. 2000. Reversal of CD8+ T cell ignorance and induction of anti-tumor immunity by peptide-pulsed APC. J. Immunol. 165:6731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liu, B., E. R. Podack, J. P. Allison, T. R. Malek. 1996. Generation of primary tumor-specific CTL in vitro to immunogenic and poorly immunogenic mouse tumors. J. Immunol. 156:1117.[Abstract]
-
Walunas, T. L., D. S. Bruce, L. Dustin, D. Y. Loh, J. A. Bluestone. 1995. Ly-6C is a marker of memory CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 155:1873.[Abstract]
-
Curtsinger, J. M., D. C. Lins, M. F. Mescher. 1998. CD8+ memory T cells (CD44high, Ly6C+) are more sensitive than naive cells (CD44low, Ly6C-) to TCR/CD8 signaling in response to Ags. J. Immunol. 160:3236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rogers, P. R., C. Dubey, S. L. Swain. 2000. Qualitative changes accompany memory T cell generation: faster, more effective responses at lower doses of Ag. J. Immunol. 164:2338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pihlgren, M., P. M. Dubois, M. Tomkowiak, T. Sjogren, J. Marvel. 1996. Resting memory CD8+ T cells are hyperreactive to antigenic challenge in vitro. J. Exp. Med. 184:2141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Veiga-Fernandes, H., U. Walter, C. Bourgeois, A. McLean, B. Rocha. 2000. Response of naive and memory CD8+ T cells to antigen stimulation in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 1:47.[Medline]
-
Cho, B. K., C. Wang, S. Sugawa, H. N. Eisen, J. Chen. 1999. Functional differences between memory and naive CD8 T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:2976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Opferman, J. T., B. T. Ober, P. G. Ashton-Rickardt. 1999. Linear differentiation of cytotoxic effectors into memory T lymphocytes. Science 283:1745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zimmerman, C., A. Prevost-Bolndel, C. Blaser, H. Pircher. 1999. Kinetics of the response of naive and memory CD8 T cells to Ag: similarities and differences. J. Immunol. 29:284.
-
Huang, L., F. Chen, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, J. Kung. 2000. Potent induction of long-term CD8+ T cell memory by short-term IL-4 exposure during T cell receptor stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:3406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Malek, T. R., J. D. Ashwell. 1985. Interleukin 2 upregulates expression of its receptor on a T cell clone. J. Exp. Med. 161:1575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ahmadzadeh, M., S. F. Hussain, D. L. Farber. 1999. Effector CD4 T cells are biochemically distinct from the memory subset: evidence for long-term persistence of effectors in vivo. J. Immunol. 163:3053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murali-Krishna, K., R. Ahmed. 2000. Cutting edge: naive T cells masquerading as memory cells. J. Immunol. 165:1733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cho, B. K., V. P. Rao, Q. Ge, H. N. Eisen, J. Chen. 2000. Homeostasis-stimulated proliferation drives naive T cells to differentiate directly into memory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 192:549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Goldrath, A. W., L. Y. Bogatzki, M. J. Bevan. 2000. Naive T cells transiently acquire a memory-like phenotype during homeostasis-driven proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 192:557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mehrotra, P. T., A. J. Grant, J. P. Siegel. 1995. Synergistic effects of IL-7 and IL-12 on human T cell activation. J. Immunol. 154:5093.[Abstract]
-
Yang, G., K. E. Hellstrom, M. T. Mizuno, L. Chen. 1995. In vitro priming of tumor-reactive cytolytic T lymphocytes by combining IL-10 with B7-CD28 costimulation. J. Immunol. 155:3897.[Abstract]
-
Lalvani, A., T. Dong, G. Ogg, A. A. Pathan, H. Newell, A. V. S. Hill, A. J. McMichael, S. Rowland-Jones. 1997. Optimization of peptide-based protocol employing IL-7 for in vitro restimulation of human cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors. J. Immunol. Methods 210:65.[Medline]
-
Ferrari, G., K. King, K. Rathbun, C. A. Place, M. V. Packard, J. A. Bartlett, D. P. Bolognesi, K. J. Weinhold. 1995. IL-7 enhancement of antigen-driven activation/expansion of HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors (CTLp). Clin. Exp. Immunol. 101:239.[Medline]
-
Malek, T. R., A. Yu, P. Scibelli, M. G. Lichtenheld, E. K. Codias. 2001. Broad programming by IL-2 receptor signaling for extended growth to multiple cytokines and functional maturation of Ag-activated T cells. J. Immunol. 166:1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dai, Z., B. T. Konieczny, F. G. Lakkis. 2000. The dual role of IL-2 in the generation and maintenance of CD8+ memory T cells. J. Immunol. 165:3031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ke, Y., H. Ma, J. A. Kapp. 1998. Antigen is required for the activation of effector activities, whereas interleukin 2 is required for the maintenance of memory in ovalbumin-specific, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 187:49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Aung, S., Y. Tang, B. S. Graham. 1999. Interleukin-4 diminishes CD8+ respiratory syncytial virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity in vivo. J. Virol. 73:8944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Villacres, M. C., C. C. Bergmann. 1999. Enhanced cytotoxic T cell activity in IL-4-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 162:2663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kung, J., D. Beller, S. Ju. 1998. Lymphokine regulation of activation-induced apoptosis in T cells of IL-2 and IL-2R
knockout mice. Cell. Immunol. 185:158.[Medline]
-
Zheng, L., C. L. Trageser, D. M. Willerford, M. J. Lenardo. 1998. T cell growth cytokines cause the superinduction of molecules mediating Ag-induced T lymphocyte death. J. Immunol. 160:763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Rolle, R. Carrio, and T. R. Malek
Modeling the CD8+ T Effector to Memory Transition in Adoptive T-Cell Antitumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Res.,
April 15, 2008;
68(8):
2984 - 2992.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhu, G. Zhu, L. Luo, A. S. Flies, and L. Chen
CD137 stimulation delivers an antigen-independent growth signal for T lymphocytes with memory phenotype
Blood,
June 1, 2007;
109(11):
4882 - 4889.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Vianello, N. Papeta, T. Chen, P. Kraft, N. White, W. K. Hart, M. F. Kircher, E. Swart, S. Rhee, G. Palu, et al.
Murine B16 Melanomas Expressing High Levels of the Chemokine Stromal-Derived Factor-1/CXCL12 Induce Tumor-Specific T Cell Chemorepulsion and Escape from Immune Control.
J. Immunol.,
March 1, 2006;
176(5):
2902 - 2914.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Polley, S. Stager, S. Prickett, A. Maroof, S. Zubairi, D. F. Smith, and P. M. Kaye
Adoptive Immunotherapy against Experimental Visceral Leishmaniasis with CD8+ T Cells Requires the Presence of Cognate Antigen
Infect. Immun.,
January 1, 2006;
74(1):
773 - 776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Parameswaran, R. Suresh, V. Bal, S. Rath, and A. George
Lack of ICAM-1 on APCs during T Cell Priming Leads to Poor Generation of Central Memory Cells
J. Immunol.,
August 15, 2005;
175(4):
2201 - 2211.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Carrio, O. F. Bathe, and T. R. Malek
Initial Antigen Encounter Programs CD8+ T Cells Competent to Develop into Memory Cells That Are Activated in an Antigen-Free, IL-7- and IL-15-Rich Environment
J. Immunol.,
June 15, 2004;
172(12):
7315 - 7323.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|