The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephan, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stephan, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, M. D.
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 167: 3734-3739.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Analysis of VpreB Expression During B Lineage Differentiation in {lambda}5-Deficient Mice1

Robert P. Stephan*,{dagger}, Eynav Elgavish*, Hajime Karasuyama#, Hiromi Kubagawa* and Max D. Cooper2,*,{dagger},{ddagger},§,||

* Division of Developmental and Clinical Immunology, and Departments of {dagger} Medicine, {ddagger} Pediatrics, § Microbiology, and Pathology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294; || The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294; and # Department of Immune Regulation, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The VpreB/{lambda}5 surrogate L chain complex is an essential component of the pre-B cell receptor, the expression of which serves as an important checkpoint in B cell development. Surrogate L chains also may serve as components of murine pro-B cell receptors whose function is unknown. We have produced two new mAbs, R3 and R5, that recognize a different VpreB epitope than the one recognized by the previously described VP245 anti-mouse VpreB Ab. These Abs were used to confirm the expression of surrogate L chains on wild-type pro-B and pre-B cell lines. Although undetectable on the cell surface, VpreB was found to be normally expressed within B lineage cells of {lambda}5-deficient mice. Nevertheless, VpreB expression was extinguished at the B cell stage of differentiation in these mice. The normal pattern of VpreB expression in {lambda}5-deficient mice excludes an essential role for pro-B and pre-B cell receptors in VpreB regulation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
During B lineage development, H chain V(D)J rearrangements typically occur before the L chain V-J gene segment rearrangements (reviewed in Ref. 1). A key checkpoint in B lineage development is the ability of the newly generated µ H chains (µHCs)3 in pre-B cells to associate with the surrogate L chain (SLC) and the Ig-associated signaling molecules, Ig{alpha} and Ig{beta}, to form a signal-transducing pre-B cell receptor (BCR) (reviewed in Ref. 2). The SLC is composed of two proteins, VpreB and {lambda}5, extended regions of which exhibit homology with V and C regions of Ig L chains (3, 4). The pre-BCR has been implicated in the clonal expansion of pre-B cells, the prevention of apoptosis, mediation of µHC allelic exclusion, and the induction of L chain gene rearrangement (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). Mice and humans incapable of forming the pre-BCR because of mutations in their µHC, {lambda}5, Ig{alpha}, or Ig{beta} genes have impaired B lineage development manifested by a partial or complete block in differentiation at the pro-B to pre-B cell stage (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19).

VpreB and {lambda}5 gene expression is initiated in pro-B cells (20, 21), and their protein products rapidly associate to form the SLC in pro-B and pre-B cells (3, 4, 22). The VpreB protein shares significant sequence homology with the L chain V region, and includes eight of the nine {beta} strands of an Ig fold. However, the 26 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of VpreB have no homology with Ig L chain, and their tertiary structure is unknown (4). Reminiscent of this nonhomologous C-terminal portion of VpreB, the first 62 amino acids of the {lambda}5 protein also share no homology with known proteins, although the remainder of {lambda}5 shares homology with both the {lambda} L chain J and C{lambda}1 regions (3). The {lambda}5 carboxyl-terminal end forms a separate Ig domain, while the {beta}7 strand in the amino-terminal {lambda}5 region may complete the VpreB Ig domain to allow formation of the combined VpreB/{lambda}5 SLC unit (23). The intact SLC can displace the chaperone H chain binding protein from nascent µHC to allow completion of pre-BCR assembly, release from the endoplasmic reticulum, and cell surface expression (reviewed in Ref. 24). Pro-B cells do not produce µHC because they have not yet undergone productive VDJH gene rearrangement, but murine pro-B cells may express the SLC with a surrogate H chain protein complex to form a pro-BCR on the cell surface (25, 26, 27, 28), and BILL (B lineage, intestine, leukocytes, and liver) cadherin has been identified as one component of the pro-BCR complex (29). Although a pro-BCR functional role has been proposed in pro-B cell development (2, 28), convincing evidence for this hypothesis has not been forthcoming. The apparently normal pro-B cell development in {lambda}5-/- mice (13) would argue against an important physiologic role for the pro-BCR. In addition, whether or not a pro-BCR exists in humans has been difficult to resolve (30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36).

Consistent with an essential pre-BCR role in B lineage differentiation, {lambda}5-deficient mice have a block in differentiation at the pro-B to pre-B cell stage. However, this is a leaky phenotype in that B cell accumulation has been observed with increasing age of the {lambda}5-/- mice (13). Another interesting feature in the characterization of these mice was the inability to detect VpreB protein in their pro-B cells using the VP245 anti-VpreB Ab (37, 38). This observation suggested that in the absence of its {lambda}5 companion, the VpreB protein may be rapidly degraded. Alternatively, the VpreB protein produced by the {lambda}5-deficient pro-B cells could have eluded detection by the VP245 Ab, which is the only anti-VpreB Ab previously reported. In the present studies, we have produced and characterized two new anti-VpreB mAbs, compared their epitope specificity with the VP245 Ab, and used this panel of anti-VpreB mAbs to examine VpreB expression by pro-B cells from wild-type and {lambda}5-deficient mice.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals, cells, and Abs

BALB/c and {lambda}5-/- mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), and the CD (Sprague Dawley) rat was obtained from Charles River Breeding Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). The SCID7 pro-B, 70Z/3 pre-B, 18-81 pre-B, BC77 transitional pre-B/B, A20 mature B, J558 plasmacytoma, and S1A mature T cell lines were grown at 37°C with 8% CO2 in IMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 50 µM 2-ME, 2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics. SCID7 and BC77 cell cultures were supplemented with IL-7 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ). X63 cells transfected with the murine VpreB gene (25) were grown with hygromycin B as the selection agent. Goat Abs to mouse µHC, FITC-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG, alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat Abs to rat IgG, streptavidin-PE, and streptavidin-allophycocyanin were obtained from Southern Biotechnology Associates (Birmingham, AL). The unconjugated LM34 (rat anti-mouse {lambda}5) and VP245 (rat anti-mouse VpreB) mAbs were produced as described (25). PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD19 and unconjugated anti-CD79a mAbs were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Unconjugated hamster anti-mouse Ig{beta} (HM79) was a gift from T. Nakamura (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan). FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse kLC (187.1) and lLC (JC5) mAbs were kindly provided by J. Kearney (University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL).

Production of rVpreB proteins

A full-length mouse VpreB1 DNA was obtained by PCR amplification of the corresponding cDNA (provided by F. Alt, Harvard University, Boston, MA) as a template, using the following primers: upstream, 5'-AATATCGGATCCCAGCCCATGGT-3' and downstream, 5'-CTTGAAGCTTCTAAGATCCCAAATC-3'. A truncated mouse VpreB DNA was obtained by PCR amplification of the VpreB DNA clone as a template, using the upstream primer indicated above and 5'-CTTGAAGCTTGGCACAGTAATACAC-3' as the downstream primer. Primer sets were designed to incorporate BamHI and HindIII restriction sites on the product ends, and the amplified products were subcloned into the pQE-30 expression vector (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) using the BamHI and HindIII restriction sites. The construct was sequenced to confirm insert fidelity before being transformed into Escherichia coli (M15 strain). After induction with 0.1 mM isopropyl {beta}-D-thiogalactoside, the His-tagged rVpreB protein was purified from 8 M urea-denatured cell lysates by passage over a nickel column and elution with a low-pH 8-M urea solution before extensive dialysis against PBS (pH 7.4).

Hybridoma production

Five weekly injections of rVpreB protein (150 µg) were given before a booster immunization of the CD rat with 70Z/3 pre-B cells 1 day before fusion of regional lymph node cells with the Ag8.653 plasmacytoma (39). Heterohybridomas were grown in hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine medium for 10 days, and the supernatants were screened 5 days later for anti-VpreB activity by an ELISA in which rVpreB was directly coated to the wells. Secondary screening involved immunofluorescence analysis of supernatant reactivity with the 70Z/3 pre-B cell line. Selected hybridomas were subcloned, and the Ig isotype of anti-VpreB Abs was determined by indirect capture ELISA (Zymed Laboratory, South San Francisco, CA). Biotinylation of the anti-VpreB Abs was performed with EZ-link sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Pierce, Rockford, IL).

Immunochemical analysis

For Western blot analysis, recombinant proteins (0.5 mg) or 1% Nonidet P-40 cell lysates were separated on a 13% reducing SDS polyacrylamide gel before protein transfer onto nitrocellulose membranes by electrophoresis. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in PBS plus 0.1% Tween 20 before incubation with test Abs. Washed membranes were then incubated with goat anti-rat IgG Abs conjugated with alkaline phosphatase for 1–2 h at room temperature, and reactive bands were visualized by Western Blue Stabilized Substrate for Alkaline Phosphatase (Promega, Madison, WI). In immunoprecipitation assays, 70Z/3 pre-B cells were preincubated in Met- and Cys-free RPMI 1640 for 2 h, then labeled with 500 mCi of both [35S]Met and [35S]Cys for 5 h before harvesting and lysis in 1% digitonin lysis buffer (22). Cell lysates were incubated in plastic wells coated with control or test Abs, and bound material eluted with Laemmli sample buffer for analysis by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.

Immunofluorescence analysis

Viable cells incubated with hybridoma supernatant were washed before staining with FITC-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG Abs for immunofluorescence analysis. In anti-VpreB epitope discrimination experiments, viable 70Z/3 cells were preincubated with or without the unlabeled test anti-VpreB Ab (3 µg) before washing and incubation with a biotinylated anti-VpreB Ab. Cell-bound biotinylated Ab was revealed with streptavidin-PE. For intracellular immunofluorescence, cells were fixed in 0.25% paraformaldehyde for 1 h at 4°C before permeabilization with 0.1% saponin in PBS. Subsequent staining and washing procedures were performed in the presence of 0.1% saponin.

Analysis of bone marrow cells expressing surface VpreB used an enhanced immunofluorescence detection system in which magnetofluorescent liposomes were conjugated to Fabs of sheep anti-digoxigenin Abs (40). To block nonspecific FcR binding, viable cells were preincubated with 200 µg/ml IgG and 20 µg/ml anti-Fc{gamma}IIR mAb in PBS containing 0.5% BSA for 10 min at 4°C. A digoxigen-conjugated Ab was then added for an additional 15 min before washing and resuspension in washing buffer containing the anti-digoxigenin-conjugated liposomes in a final volume of 200 µl. After a 1-h incubation on ice with agitation, the cells were washed and analyzed by FACS. The liposome-staining specificity was assessed by preincubation with a 100- to 1000-fold excess of unlabeled primary Ab (data not shown).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Generation of anti-VpreB mAbs

Recombinant VpreB protein was used as an immunogen in rats to generate six hybridomas that were shown by ELISA to produce anti-mouse VpreB Abs. Ab reactivity with VpreB was confirmed by immunofluorescence assessment of reactivity with 70Z/3 cells that express the pre-BCR. All six of the anti-VpreB mAbs were found to be of IgG2a isotype. Two of these, R3 (IgG2a, {kappa}) and R5 (IgG2a, {lambda}), were selected for further characterization on the basis of their robust VpreB reactivity and usage of different L chains.

The R3 and R5 Abs reacted with rVpreB protein and not with control recombinant proteins by Western blot analysis (Fig. 1Go, lanes 6 and 7, and data not shown). The R3 and R5 Abs were also reactive with a native protein of expected VpreB molecular size in pre-B cell lysates, but not with proteins produced by mature B cells or T cells (Fig. 1Go, lanes 1–4, and data not shown). The R5 Ab was also found to be reactive with a ~16-kDa protein in lysates of VpreB-transfected plasmacytoma cells and not with proteins produced by {lambda}5-transfected cells (data not shown). The R3 and R5 Abs were capable of immunoprecipitating VpreB proteins together with associated µHC, Ig{alpha}, and Ig{beta} pre-BCR components in pre-B cell lines (Fig. 2Go), thereby indicating that these Abs can recognize VpreB within the context of the pre-BCR complex. Immunofluorescence analysis further indicated that the R3 and R5 Abs recognize cell surface molecules expressed by early B lineage cells, including cell lines of pro-B, pre-B, and pre-B/B phenotypes, and do not recognize cell surface molecules expressed by mature B, plasma cell, or T cell lines (Fig. 3Go). The pattern of cell surface reactivity is thus identical for the R3, R5, and VP245 anti-VpreB Abs (Fig. 3Go) (25). Notably, however, the VP245 Ab of proven VpreB specificity (25) failed to react with VpreB proteins in the Western blot assays described above.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Western blot analysis of the R5 anti-VpreB Ab specificity. Nonidet P-40 lysates of pre-B and T cell lines (lanes 1–4), 0.5 µg mouse rVpreB (lane 6), and 0.5 µg recombinant chicken TCR V{gamma}1 (lane 7) were separated by gel electrophoresis, transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane, and analyzed by immunoblotting with the R5 anti-VpreB mAb. Arrows indicate VpreB protein in monomeric and, in the case of rVpreB, dimeric forms. The same reactivity pattern was observed for the R3 anti-VpreB mAb (data not shown).

 


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Reactivity of the R3 and R5 anti-VpreB Abs and the LM34 anti-{lambda}5 Ab with native pre-BCR. Aliquots of digitonin lysates of metabolically labeled 70Z/3 pre-B cells were immunoadsorbed with the anti-{lambda}5 mAb LM34 (lane 2), anti-VpreB mAbs R5 and R3 (lanes 3 and 4, respectively), polyclonal anti-µHC (lane 5), and control (Co) rat IgG2a mAbs (lane 1). Identity of the immunoadsorbed VpreB, µHC, Ig{alpha}, and Ig{beta} proteins, indicated by arrows, was confirmed by Western blotting (data not shown). A {lambda}5 band was visible in lanes 2–5 on longer exposure (data not shown).

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Cell surface immunofluorescence analysis of VpreB expression by B lineage and T lineage cell lines. Viable cells of pro-B (SCID7), pre-B (70Z/3), transitional pre-B/B (BC77), mature B (A20), plasmacytoma (J558), and mature T (S1A) lines were examined for reactivity with the R5 (A) and VP245 (B) anti-VpreB Abs. Open histograms represent indirect immunofluorescence staining with the anti-VpreB Ab, and shaded histograms represent background immunofluorescence with an isotype-matched control Ab. The same reactivity pattern was observed for the R3 Ab (data not shown).

 
Epitope analysis of the panel of anti-VpreB Abs

In a competitive binding assay, the R3 and R5 Abs were found to be capable of reciprocally inhibiting pre-B cell binding, while the VP245 Ab did not inhibit binding by either the R3 or R5 Ab and vice versa (Fig. 4Go). Abs directed against the µHC and {lambda}5 components of the pre-BCR had no effect on the pre-B cell reactivity of the three anti-VpreB Abs (data not shown). These findings suggested that the R3 and R5 Abs recognize the same epitope or neighboring VpreB epitopes in the pre-BCR, while the VP245 Ab recognizes a different epitope.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Competitive binding assays of the anti-VpreB Abs R3, R5, and VP245. Viable 70Z/3 pre-B cells were incubated with the R5 (A) or VP245 (B) Abs before immunofluorescence analysis of reactivity with biotinylated R3 Ab revealed with streptavidin-PE. Shaded histograms represent background immunofluorescence with isotype-matched control mAbs; solid-line histograms represent the R3 Ab staining in the absence of a competitive anti-VpreB mAb; and dashed-line histograms represent R3 staining after prior incubation with the competitor anti-VpreB mAb indicated. Reciprocal experiments with the anti-VpreB mAbs gave identical results. Identical reactivity patterns were observed in experiments using the SCID7 pro-B cell line.

 
Because the VpreB protein has one domain with L chain V region homology and another domain lacking V region homology (4), a truncated VpreB protein lacking the nonhomologous region was produced to assess epitope specificity of the R3, R5, and VP245 Abs. Whereas the R3 and R5 Abs recognized the intact VpreB protein, neither Ab was found to be reactive with the truncated VpreB protein by ELISA (Fig. 5GoA). Selective reactivity with the intact VpreB protein was confirmed by Western blot assay (Fig. 5GoB), thereby inferring that the R3 and R5 Abs may recognize the nonhomologous region of VpreB. In contrast, VP245 Ab reactivity could not be demonstrated with either the intact or truncated forms of rVpreB in these assays (Fig. 5Go). The composite results of these experiments thus indicate that the VP245 Ab and the R3/R5 Abs recognize different VpreB epitopes.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Analysis of R3, R5, and VP245 reactivity with full-length and truncated forms of VpreB. Reactivity of the anti-VpreB mAbs with full-length VpreB and truncated VpreB ({Delta}VpreB) lacking the non-Ig-like region was examined by ELISA (A) and Western blotting (B). B, The solid arrow indicates the location of full-length VpreB protein, and the open arrow indicates truncated VpreB. Coomassie blue staining of the gel reveals both proteins, whereas the R5 Ab recognizes only the full-length VpreB protein in the Western blot assay.

 
Analysis of intracellular and extracellular VpreB expression by {lambda}5+/+ and {lambda}5-/- B lineage cells

Having demonstrated the distinctive reactivity patterns of the R3, R5, and VP245 anti-VpreB Abs, we used this panel of anti-VpreB Abs to examine the intracellular and cell surface expression of VpreB by {lambda}5-deficient and sufficient B lineage cells. In permeabilized pre-B and pro-B cell lines derived from wild-type mice, all three anti-VpreB Abs yielded similar staining patterns and intensities when optimal concentrations of the Abs were used (Fig. 6GoA and data not shown). However, when a plasmacytoma cell line transfected with a VpreB construct was analyzed, the intracellular staining with the VP245 Ab was much lower relative to staining with the R3 and R5 Abs (Fig. 6GoB). This result suggests that the VP245 epitope is greatly enhanced within the context of the intact surrogate L chain complex, a finding that may help to explain why VP245 does not react well with the VpreB protein in ELISA or Western blot assays.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Comparative analysis of the ability of the anti-VpreB Abs to stain permeabilized cells expressing the complete SLC or VpreB alone. The 70Z/3 pre-B cell line, which expresses the complete SLC, and the X63 plasmacytoma cell line, which was transfected with an expression vector for VpreB, were used in these experiments in which the cells were fixed, permeabilized with 0.1% saponin, and stained with the different anti-VpreB Abs at the optimal staining concentrations. Solid-line histograms represent staining with the VP245 Ab, dashed-line histograms represent staining with the R3 Ab, and shaded histograms represent control staining. Similar results were obtained in experiments using the R5 Ab (data not shown).

 
Because the R3 and R5 Abs reacted equally well with VpreB protein in the presence or absence of the {lambda}5 protein, they were used to readdress the issue of VpreB expression by bone marrow B lineage cells of {lambda}5-deficient mice. As previously reported (37, 38), we could not detect VpreB on CD19+ B lineage cells from {lambda}5-/- mice (Fig. 7GoA). However, when the {lambda}5-/- cells were permeabilized before staining with the R3 and R5 Abs, VpreB could easily be detected in B lineage cells within the {lambda}5-/- bone marrow (Fig. 7GoB). The absence of intracellular VP245 staining in these cells was confirmed, although all three anti-VpreB Abs yielded similar staining patterns for permeabilized B lineage cells from normal mice (data not shown). Intracellular immunofluorescence analysis further confirmed the VpreB expression by the CD19+ pro-B cells (µHC-) and pre-B cells (µHC+) in {lambda}5-/- bone marrow (Fig. 7GoC). In keeping with previous evidence indicating that B cell differentiation is not completely blocked in the {lambda}5-/- mice (13), VpreB+ and VpreB- subpopulations of the µHC-producing cells were observed, and VpreB synthesis was shown to be normally extinguished in the bone marrow surface IgM-positive B cells in these mice (Fig. 7GoD). These findings indicate that while VpreB is normally expressed within the pro-B and pre-B cells in the bone marrow of {lambda}5-deficient mice, the VpreB molecules alone do not associate with surrogate H chains to form pro-BCR or associate with the µHC to form pre-BCR. Nevertheless, VpreB expression is extinguished before L chain expression by newly formed B cells even in {lambda}5-/- mice.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Analysis of VpreB expression by B lineage cells of normal and {lambda}5-deficient mice. A, Immunofluorescence analysis of cell surface VpreB expression by normal and {lambda}5-/- bone marrow cells. VpreB expression on bone marrow lymphoid cells was detected using an enhanced magnetofluorescent liposome-staining method described in Materials and Methods. B, Analysis of intracellular VpreB expression by {lambda}5-/- B lineage cells. CD19+ L chain- cells were isolated from {lambda}5-/- bone marrow before fixation, permeabilization, and immunofluorescence staining for VpreB. Open histograms represent staining with the anti-VpreB Abs, and shaded histograms represent control staining. C, Analysis of VpreB vs µHC expression by permeabilized B lineage cells in {lambda}5-/- mice. Data are gated on CD19+ cells in normal and {lambda}5-/- bone marrow samples. The percentages of bone marrow cells that expressed CD19 were 18% in 1-mo-old {lambda}5+/+ mice, 8% in 1-mo-old {lambda}5-/- mice, and 4% in 8-mo-old {lambda}5-/- mice. D, Analysis of intracellular VpreB expression by B cells in {lambda}5-/- mice. The CD19+{kappa}{lambda}+ bone marrow cells were gated in this analysis. Open histograms represent staining with the anti-VpreB Abs, and shaded histograms represent control staining. The percentages of CD19+{kappa}{lambda}l+ bone marrow cells were 6% (1-mo-old {lambda}5+/+), 0.2% (1-mo-old {lambda}5-/-), and 0.7% (8-mo-old {lambda}5-/-). Note the absence of VpreB in the B cells of {lambda}5-/- and wild-type mice.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The definition of two new anti-mouse VpreB Abs with differing epitope specificity than the previously available VP245 anti-VpreB mAb (25) will facilitate analysis of SLC expression and function during murine B lymphopoiesis. In contrast with the VP245 Ab, the R3 and R5 anti-VpreB Abs recognize recombinant and native VpreB molecules in both ELISA and Western blot assays. Competitive immunofluorescence-binding assays, analysis of VpreB transfectants, and epitope-mapping experiments confirm that the R3/R5 epitope and the VP245 epitope are different. The R3 and R5 Abs appear to recognize the non-Ig-like domain of VpreB, because truncated VpreB molecules lacking this VpreB region are not reactive with these Abs. In contrast, the epitope recognized by the VP245 Ab is preferentially displayed or otherwise enhanced within the context of the VpreB/{lambda}5 SLC complex. This difference in epitope specificity may reflect the different strategies used to produce these anti-VpreB Abs. The R3 and R5 Abs were produced through fusion of lymphocytes from a rat immunized with rVpreB protein, whereas the VP245 Ab was produced by fusion of lymphocytes from a rat immunized with an intact pre-BCR complex (25).

The issue of cell surface expression of surrogate L chain by B lineage cells before they express µHC has been complicated by an inconsistency in the results of mouse and human pro-B cell analyses (25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38). Although anti-human VpreB mAbs against the non-Ig-like domain of recombinant and native VpreB proteins have failed to identify VpreB on human pro-B cells (23, 34), the present analysis with the R3, R5, and VP245 anti-VpreB Abs confirms previous studies in which the VP245 Ab was used to demonstrate cell surface VpreB on murine pro-B cell lines and, at lower levels, on primary pro-B cells from wild-type mice (25, 26) and from Rag-1- and Rag-2-deficient mice (our unpublished observations). The failure of VpreB to reach the cell surface in the {lambda}5-deficient mice thus indicates this component is required for the surrogate L chain interaction with BILL-cadherin and possibly other murine pro-BCR components (29).

Because the R3 and R5 Abs recognize VpreB equally well in the presence or absence of its {lambda}5 SLC partner, these Abs could be used to show that VpreB is expressed normally within early B lineage cells in the {lambda}5-deficient mice. VpreB nevertheless failed to reach the cell surface of B lineage cells in these mice, a finding that indicates the VpreB/{lambda}5 SLC complex is required for the assembly and plasma membrane expression of both the pro-BCR and the pre-BCR. This analysis of {lambda}5-deficient mice also reveals that the normal on and off pattern of VpreB expression during B lineage differentiation is not compromised in {lambda}5-deficient mice. In these mice, VpreB expression was found to be initiated normally during the pro-B cell stage, to persist into the pre-B cell stage, and to be extinguished before the IgM+ B cell stage. This normal profile of VpreB expression indicates that pre-BCR competency is not essential for the down-regulation of VpreB and, perhaps, {lambda}5 as well, although the latter possibility was not addressed in these experiments. The Pax-5 and early B cell factor transcription factors have been implicated in the initiation of VpreB and {lambda}5 transcription (41, 42, 43), and both are expressed through the mature B cell stage, making it unlikely that either is solely responsible for the termination of SLC transcription (reviewed in Ref. 44). Although the coordinate regulation of these genes has been ascribed to a locus control region (45), the VpreB and {lambda}5 regulatory mechanism is still incompletely defined. A role for signaling via the pro-BCR and pre-BCR in VpreB and {lambda}5 regulation would appear to be excluded by the present results.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Fred Alt for the gift of the VpreB cDNA; Drs. Peter Burrows, John Kearney, Tetsuya Nakamura, and Yui-Hsi Wang for providing helpful suggestions and reagents; and Ann Brookshire and Marsha Flurry for help in preparing the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants AI39816 (to M.D.C.) and AI42127 (to H.K.) and National Institutes of Health Training Grant AI07051 (to R.P.S.). M.D.C. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Max D. Cooper, University of Alabama, WTI 378, 1824 Sixth Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-3300. E-mail address: Max.Cooper{at}ccc.uab.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: µHC, Ig µ H chain; BCR, B cell receptor; SLC, surrogate L chain. Back

Received for publication May 17, 2001. Accepted for publication July 25, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Tonegawa, S.. 1983. Somatic generation of antibody diversity. Nature 302:575.[Medline]
  2. Melchers, F., H. Karasuyama, D. Haasner, S. Bauer, A. Kudo, N. Sakaguchi, B. Jameson, A. Rolink. 1993. The surrogate light chain in B-cell development. Immunol. Today 14:60.[Medline]
  3. Sakaguchi, N., F. Melchers. 1986. {lambda}5, a new light-chain-related locus selectively expressed in pre-B lymphocytes. Nature 324:579.[Medline]
  4. Kudo, A., F. Melchers. 1987. A second gene, VpreB in the {lambda}5 locus of the mouse, which appears to be selectively expressed in pre-B lymphocytes. EMBO J. 6:2267.[Medline]
  5. Kitamura, D., K. Rajewsky. 1992. Targeted disruption of the µ chain membrane exon causes loss of heavy-chain allelic exclusion. Nature 356:154.[Medline]
  6. Grawunder, U., T. M. J. Leu, D. G. Schatz, A. Werner, A. G. Rolink, F. Melchers, T. H. Winkler. 1995. Down-regulation of RAG1 and RAG2 gene expression in preB cells after functional immunoglobulin heavy chain rearrangement. Immunity 3:601.[Medline]
  7. Loffert, D., A. Ehlich, W. Muller, K. Rajewsky. 1996. Surrogate light chain expression is required to establish immunoglobulin heavy chain allelic exclusion during early B cell development. Immunity 4:133.[Medline]
  8. Kato, I., T. Miyazaki, T. Nakamura, A. Kudo. 2000. Inducible differentiation and apoptosis of the pre-B cell receptor-positive pre-B cell line. Int. Immunol. 12:325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hess, J., A. Werner, T. Wirth, F. Melchers, H.-M. Jack, T. H. Winkler. 2001. Induction of pre-B cell proliferation after de novo synthesis of the pre-B cell receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Marshall, A. J., H. E. Fleming, G. E. Wu, C. J. Paige. 1998. Modulation of the IL-7 dose-response threshold during pro-B cell differentiation is dependent on pre-B cell receptor expression. J. Immunol. 161:6038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Constantinescu, A., M. S. Schlissel. 1997. Changes in locus-specific V(D)J recombinase activity induced by immunoglobulin gene products during B cell development. J. Exp. Med. 185:609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kitamura, D., J. Roes, R. Kuhn, K. Rajewsky. 1991. A B-cell deficient mouse by targeted disruption of the membrane exon of the immunoglobulin µ chain gene. Nature 350:423.[Medline]
  13. Kitamura, D., A. Kudo, S. Schaal, W. Muller, F. Melchers, K. Rajewsky. 1992. A critical role of {lambda}5 protein in B cell development. Cell 69:823.[Medline]
  14. Torres, R. M., H. Flaswinkel, M. Reth, K. Rajewsky. 1996. Aberrant B cell development and immune response in mice with a compromised BCR complex. Science 272:1802.[Abstract]
  15. Gong, S., M. C. Nussenzweig. 1996. Regulation of an early developmental checkpoint in the B cell pathway by Ig{beta}. Science 272:411.[Abstract]
  16. Cronin, F. E., M. Jiang, A. K. Abbas, S. A. Grupp. 1998. Role of µ heavy chain in B cell development. I. Blocked B cell maturation but complete allelic exclusion in the absence of Ig{alpha}/{beta}. J. Immunol. 161:252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Minegishi, Y., E. Coustan-Smith, Y.-H. Wang, M. D. Cooper, D. Campana, M. E. Conley. 1998. Mutations in the human {lambda}5/14.1 gene result in B cell deficiency and agammaglobulinemia. J. Exp. Med. 187:71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Yel, L., Y. Minegishi, E. Coustan-Smith, R. H. Buckley, H. Trubel, L. M. Pachman, G. R. Kitchengman, D. Campana, J. Rohrer, M. E. Conley. 1996. Mutations in the µ heavy chain gene in patients with agammaglobulinemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 355:2486.
  19. Minegishi, Y., E. Coustan-Smith, L. Rapalus, F. Ersoy, D. Campana, M. E. Conley. 1999. Mutations in Ig{alpha} (CD79a) result in a complete block in B cell development. J. Clin. Invest. 104:1115.[Medline]
  20. Martensson, I.-L., F. Melchers, T. H. Winkler. 1997. A transgenic marker for mouse B lymphoid precursors. J. Exp. Med. 185:653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ogawa, M., E. ten Boekel, F. Melchers. 2000. Identification of CD19-B220+c-kit+Flt3/Flk-2+ cells as early B lymphoid precursors before pre-B-I cells in juvenile mouse bone marrow. Int. Immunol. 12:313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lassoued, K., H. Illges, K. Benlagha, M. D. Cooper. 1996. Fate of surrogate light chains in B lineage cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Minegishi, Y., L. Hendershot, M. E. Conley. 1999. Novel mechanisms control the folding and assembly of {lambda}5/14.1 and VpreB to produce an intact surrogate light chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:3041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Melchers, F.. 1999. Fit for life in the immune system? Surrogate L chain tests H chains that test L chains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:2571.[Free Full Text]
  25. Karasuyama, H., A. Rolink, F. Melchers. 1993. A complex of glycoproteins is associated with VpreB/{lambda}5 surrogate light chain on the surface of µ heavy chain-negative early precursor B cell lines. J. Exp. Med. 178:469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Winkler, T. H., A. Rolink, F. Melchers, H. Karasuyama. 1995. Precursor B cells of mouse bone marrow express two different complexes with the surrogate light chain on the surface. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:446.[Medline]
  27. Shinjo, F., R. R. Hardy, J. Jonstra. 1994. Monoclonal anti-{lambda}5 antibody FS1 identifies a 130 kDa protein associated with {lambda}5 and VpreB on the surface of early pre-B cell lines. Int. Immunol. 6:393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Misener, V., G. P. Downey, J. Jongstra. 1991. The immunoglobulin light chain related protein {lambda}5 is expressed on the surface of mouse pre-B cell lines and can function as a signal transducing molecule. Int. Immunol. 3:1129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ohnishi, K., T. Shimizu, H. Karasuyama, F. Melchers. 2000. The identification of a nonclassical cadherin expressed during B cell development and its interaction with surrogate light chain. J. Biol. Chem. 275:31134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Lassoued, K., C. A. Nunez, L. Billips, H. Kubagawa, R. C. Monteiro, T. W. LeBien, M. D. Cooper. 1993. Expression of surrogate light chain receptors is restricted to a late stage in pre-B cell differentiation. Cell 73:73.[Medline]
  31. Guelpa-Fonlupt, V., C. Tonnelle, D. Blaise, M. Fougereau, F. Fumoux. 1994. Discrete early pro-B and pre-B stages in normal human bone marrow as defined by surface pseudo-light chain expression. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:257.[Medline]
  32. Meffe, E., M. Fougereau, J.-N. Argenson, J.-M. Aubaniac, C. Schiff. 1996. Cell surface expression of surrogate light chain ({Psi}L) in the absence of µ on human pro-B cell lines and normal pro-B cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:2172.[Medline]
  33. Sanz, E., A. de la Hera. 1996. A novel anti-VpreB antibody identifies immunoglobulin-surrogate receptors on the surface of human pro-B cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:2693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Wang, Y.-H., J. Nomura, O. M. Faye-Petersen, M. D. Cooper. 1998. Surrogate light chain production during B cell differentiation: differential intracellular versus cell surface expression. J. Immunol. 161:1132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Tsuganezawa, K., N. Kiyokawa, Y. Matsuo, F. Kitamura, N. Toyama-Sorimachi, K. Kuida, J. Fujimoto, H. Karasuyama. 1998. Flow cytometric diagnosis of the cell lineage and developmental stage of acute lymphoblastic leukemia by novel monoclonal antibodies specific to human pre-B-cell receptor. Blood 92:4317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Lemmers, B., L. Gauthier, V. Guelpa-Fonlupt, M. Fougereau, C. Schiff. 1999. The human ({Psi}L+µ-) proB complex: cell surface expression and biochemical structure of a putative transducing receptor. Blood 93:4336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Rolink, A., H. Karasuyama, U. Grawunder, D. Haasner, A. Kudo, F. Melchers. 1993. B cell development in mice with a defective {lambda}5 gene. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:1284.[Medline]
  38. Karasuyama, H., A. Rolink, Y. Shinkai, F. Young, F. W. Alt, F. Melchers. 1994. The expression of Vpre-B/{lambda}5 surrogate light chain in early bone marrow precursor B cells of normal and B-cell deficient mutant mice. Cell 77:133.[Medline]
  39. Kearney, J. F., A. Radbruch, B. Liesegang, K. Rewjewsky. 1979. A new mouse myeloma cell line that has lost immunoglobulin expression but permits the construction of antibody-secreting hybrid cell line. J. Immunol. 123:1548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Scheffold, A., M. Assenmacher, L. Reiners-Schramm, R. Lauster, A. Radbruch. 2000. High-sensitivity immunofluorescence for detection of the pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines {gamma} interferon and interleukin-10 on the surface of cytokine-secreting cells. Nat. Med. 6:107.[Medline]
  41. Okabe, T., T. Watanabe, A. Kudo. 1992. A pre-B- and B cell-specific DNA-binding protein, EBB-1, which binds to the promoter of the VpreB1 gene. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:37.[Medline]
  42. Tian, J., T. Okabe, T. Miyazaki, S. Takeshita, A. Kudo. 1997. Pax-5 is identical to EBB-1/KLP and binds to the VpreB and {lambda}5 promoters as well as the KI and KII sites upstream of the J{kappa} genes. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:750.[Medline]
  43. Persson, C., A. Martensson, I.-L. Martensson. 1998. Identification of a tissue- and differentiation stage-specific enhancer of the VpreB1 gene. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:787.[Medline]
  44. Reya, T., R. Grosschedl. 1998. Transcriptional regulation of B-cell differentiation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10:158.[Medline]
  45. Sabbattini, P., A. Georgiou, C. Sinclair, N. Dillon. 1999. Analysis of mice with single and multiple copies of transgenes reveals a novel arrangement for the {lambda}5-VpreB1 locus control region. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
C. Mundt, S. Licence, G. Maxwell, F. Melchers, and I.-L. Martensson
Only VpreB1, but not VpreB2, is expressed at levels which allow normal development of B cells
Int. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 18(1): 163 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Mielenz, C. Vettermann, M. Hampel, C. Lang, A. Avramidou, M. Karas, and H.-M. Jack
Lipid Rafts Associate with Intracellular B Cell Receptors and Exhibit a B Cell Stage-Specific Protein Composition
J. Immunol., March 15, 2005; 174(6): 3508 - 3517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
G. R. Galler, C. Mundt, M. Parker, R. Pelanda, I.-L. Martensson, and T. H. Winkler
Surface {micro} Heavy Chain Signals Down-Regulation of the V(D)J-Recombinase Machinery in the Absence of Surrogate Light Chain Components
J. Exp. Med., June 7, 2004; 199(11): 1523 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Schuh, S. Meister, E. Roth, and H.-M. Jack
Cutting Edge: Signaling and Cell Surface Expression of a {micro}H Chain in the Absence of {lambda}5: A Paradigm Revisited
J. Immunol., October 1, 2003; 171(7): 3343 - 3347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. de Andres, P. Gonzalo, S. Minguet, J. A. Martinez-Marin, P. G. Soro, M. A. R. Marcos, and M. L. Gaspar
The first 3 days of B-cell development in the mouse embryo
Blood, December 1, 2002; 100(12): 4074 - 4081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Y.-H. Wang, R. P. Stephan, A. Scheffold, D. Kunkel, H. Karasuyama, A. Radbruch, and M. D. Cooper
Differential surrogate light chain expression governs B-cell differentiation
Blood, April 1, 2002; 99(7): 2459 - 2467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephan, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stephan, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, M. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS