| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
,¶,||,
Departments of
*
Medicine,
Microbiology and Immunology, and
Microbiology and Molecular Genetics,
Division of Dermatology,
¶ Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, and
||
Molecular Biology Institute, University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In order for DC to carry out their duties during an adaptive immune response, they must first be activated to begin the maturation process. When an appropriate maturational cue is received, DC are signaled to undergo rapid morphological and physiological changes that facilitate the initiation and development of immune responses (8). Among these are the up-regulation of molecules involved in Ag presentation; production of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-12, key to the generation of Th1 responses; and secretion of chemokines that help to drive differentiation, expansion, and migration of surrounding naive Th cells (7, 9, 10). Collectively, these up-regulated molecules facilitate the ability of DC to coordinate the activation and effector function of other surrounding lymphocytes that ultimately provide protection for the host. Although the process of DC maturation is commonly associated with events that lead to the generation of adaptive immunity, many stimuli derived from the innate branch of the immune system are also capable of activating DC to initiate this process. In this manner, DC provide a link between the two branches of the immune response, in which their initial activation during the innate response can influence both the nature and magnitude of the ensuing adaptive response (11).
Several independent pathways have been characterized that induce DC
maturation, all of which enhance the ability of DC to initiate and
direct the immune response. One such pathway involves the interaction
between CD40 on the surface of the DC, and CD40 ligand (CD40L)
expressed on activated Th cells (12). The importance of
CD40 signaling in the context of the development and establishment of
an immune response has been clearly documented. Previous studies using
CD40-/- and CD40L-/-
mice have demonstrated that these mice are more susceptible to
Leishmania major infection and have severe defects in the
production of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-12, TNF-
, and
IFN-
, compared with wild-type mice (13, 14, 15, 16, 17). These mice
also appear to have impaired T cell proliferative responses, as well as
decreased primary and secondary humoral responses (17, 18). In humans, CD40-activated DC are known to be endowed with
an enhanced ability to stimulate CD4+ T cells,
primarily by up-regulating Ag presentation and costimulatory molecules
and by the release of proinflammatory cytokines (19).
Because of the importance of CD40-CD40L signaling events in the
establishment of inflammatory immune responses, we investigated genes
that are up-regulated during DC maturation that contribute to their
effector function. In this study, we used a subtractive hybridization
technique to identify genes induced in CD40L-matured DC. Through this
analysis, we have identified signaling lymphocytic activation molecule
(SLAM; also known as CDw150, IPO-3), an unusual costimulatory molecule
previously characterized on T and B cells (20, 21). SLAM
belongs to the Ig superfamily of receptors, and has been shown to
enhance cellular proliferation, production of inflammatory cytokines,
and Ig secretion. In T cells, engagement of SLAM was shown to augment
production of IFN- from cells of the Th1 lineage. Interestingly,
committed Th2 cells appeared to be reprogrammed to become Th1/Th0-like
following SLAM engagement, down-regulating their production of IL-4 in
favor of IFN-. In this study, we show that transcripts encoding both
membrane-bound and secreted isoforms of SLAM were detected in DC
treated with CD40L. SLAM protein was also found to be highly expressed
on the surface of DC activated by CD40L, LPS, or poly(I:C), a synthetic
dsRNA molecule. SLAM receptor engagement on DC augmented the production
of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-12, pivotal in the
differentiation of T cell responses toward the Th1 pattern, but had no
effect on production of IL-10, a cytokine involved in the
down-regulation of Th1 responses. Together, our data suggest that the
expression of SLAM on DC facilitates the generation of proinflammatory
Th1 responses.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Peripheral blood taken from healthy donors was enriched for CD14+ cells using the RosetteSep monocyte enrichment kit (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). Blood was then centrifuged over a Ficoll gradient (Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) to isolate PBMC. Adherent cells were isolated by culturing in complete medium (RPMI 1640, 0.1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin; Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 1% FCS (Omega Scientific, Tarzana, CA) for 2 h. Remaining nonadherent cells were removed by washing with 1x PBS. To generate immature DC, adherent cells were cultured in a CO2 incubator at 37°C for 7 days in complete medium containing 10% FCS, 800 U/ml GM-CSF (Genetics Institute, Cambridge, MA), and 1000 U/ml IL-4 (Schering-Plough, Madison, NJ) as previously described (22). These cells were nonadherent, displaying typical DC morphology. Purity of the DC was typically >95%, as determined by flow cytometry.
For DC maturation, cells were harvested from flasks after 7 days using
PBS-EDTA (1 mM), and washed twice in complete medium. Cells were
counted and plated at a concentration of 2.5–5 x
105 DC/ml in either T75 or T25 tissue culture
flasks or 96-well tissue culture plates (Corning Glass Works, Corning,
NY). DC were treated with 1 µg/ml soluble CD40L trimer (generously
provided by Immunex, Seattle, WA) for 24 h to induce maturation.
Other maturation stimuli/cytokines used in this study were the
following: purified Salmonella minnesota-derived LPS
(10 ng/ml) and poly(I:C) (20 µg/ml), both purchased from Sigma (St.
Louis, MO); recombinant IL-12 (5 ng/ml) and IL-18 (1 ng/ml), both
purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ); and TNF- (50 ng/ml),
purchased from Endogen (Woburn, MA).
RNA isolation and purification
DC (5 x 106) cultured in the presence or absence of CD40L for 24 h were harvested, and total RNA was isolated using guanidinium isothiocyanate buffer as previously described (23). RNA was resuspended in RNase-free water, and treated with 10 U DNase I (Promega, Madison, WI) for 1 h at 37°C to remove contaminating genomic DNA. RNA was further purified by standard phenol-chloroform extraction and precipitated overnight in isopropanol at -20°C. RNA pellets were resuspended in RNase-free water containing RNase inhibitor and stored at -80°C.
Subtractive hybridization and identification of differentially expressed cDNA fragments
Subtractive hybridization was performed using the PCR Select Subtractive Hybridization kit (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA). This kit contains all necessary reagents for cDNA synthesis, normalization, and subtraction. Total RNA (3 µg) isolated from DC cultured with or without CD40L was used as starting material for this technique, which generated a subtracted population of partial cDNA fragments representing differentially expressed genes enriched in CD40L-stimulated DC.
To identify gene fragments isolated in the subtraction, cDNA taken from
our subtracted pool was cloned using the Topo-TA cloning system
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Ligations were then transformed into DH5 competent
cells (Life Technologies) and plated on selective medium containing
ampicillin and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) for use in blue-white
screening. Colonies containing an insert were grown in selective medium
and miniprepped using the Wizard Plus kit (Promega). Cloned cDNA
inserts were then sequenced by Applied Biosystems Prism (PerkinElmer,
Foster City, CA), and resulting sequences were searched against the
BLAST database at the National Center for Biotechnology
Information.
Northern blotting and cDNA probe radiolabeling
Total RNA was isolated as described above, and 20 µg of each sample was separated on a 1% agarose gel containing 5% formaldehyde, transferred to nylon membranes (ICN Pharmaceuticals, Irvine, CA) in 10x SSC overnight, and covalently linked to the membrane by UV irradiation using a Stratalinker (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). To generate probes, cDNA fragments cloned into the Topo-TA vector were amplified using M13 forward and reverse oligonucleotides that flank the cloning site. Resulting PCR products were then gel purified using a Qiaex II kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and radiolabeled by random priming. After incubation with probes, blots were washed and visualized by autoradiography.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated as described above and reverse
transcribed using Superscript II RT (Life Technologies) to generate
cDNA for use in RT-PCR. Reactions were conducted for a total of 35
cycles, consisting of a denaturation at 94°C for 30 s and
annealing/extension at 65°C for 1 min. RT-PCR typically contained 2.5
mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP, 2 U Taq
polymerase, and 20 pM 5' and 3' oligonuclotide primers (Life
Technologies). The sequences of the primer pairs used, 5' and 3', were
the following: mcvSLAM, sSLAM, vSLAM, and cSLAM, as described
(24); IL-12 (p40), CCCTGACATTCTGCGTTCAGGTCC and
TGGGTCTATTCCGTTGTGTC; -actin, GGACGACATGGAGAAGATCTGG and
ATAGTAATGTCACGCACGATTTCC; M13 forward, GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACG;
and M13 reverse, CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC. Reactions were run on agarose
gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Flow cytometry
To assess the cell surface expression of SLAM, standard flow cytometric analysis was performed. Cells were harvested and blocked with human serum for 1 min at 25°C to reduce nonspecific FcR binding. Cells were then stained with an unconjugated anti-SLAM mAb (IPO-3, IgG2a; Kamiya Biomedical, Seattle, WA). All other Abs used were purchased from Caltag Laboratories (South San Francisco, CA), PE CD1a (VIT 6b, IgG1), CD3 (S4.1, IgG2a); or BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA), PE CD80 (L307.4, IgG1), PE CD86 (2331, IgG1), PE HLA-DR (G46-6, IgG2a). Appropriate isotype control Abs (mouse PE IgG1, PE IgG2a, or unconjugated IgG2a) were used in all experiments. A FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary was used to detect all unconjugated mAb used. After staining, cells were washed and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed on a BD Biosciences (Mountain View, CA) FACScan flow cytometer. For all data acquisition, live cells were gated on and 5000 gated events were collected from each sample. All data analysis was conducted using WinMDI 2.8 (J. Trotter, The Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, CA).
In vitro stimulation of DC
DC were harvested on day 7 and plated in six-well tissue culture plates in 2 ml of complete medium. All cells were stimulated with CD40L trimer (1 µg/ml) for 24 h to induce SLAM expression. Cells were then washed thoroughly with complete medium, and fresh medium containing a sterile anti-SLAM mAb (IPO-3), an isotype-matched control, or LPS (10 ng/ml) were added. Abs used for tissue culture did not contain azide and contained <1 ng/ml LPS contamination, as determined by a Limulus-amoebocyte assay (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD). Following cell stimulation, supernatants were harvested at various time points and analyzed for the presence of IL-12, IL-10, and IL-8 cytokines using a standard sandwich ELISA. Abs and protein standards used for IL-12 and IL-10 ELISA were purchased from BioSource International (Camarillo, CA). IL-8 ELISA reagents were purchased from BD PharMingen.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
It has previously been shown that CD40L is one of many stimuli capable of inducing DC maturation and subsequent expression of genes involved in directing the adaptive T cell response toward the Th1 lineage (10, 25). To better understand the role of DC in inflammatory responses, we used subtractive hybridization to identify genes up-regulated by CD40L in DC. To this end, DC from healthy donors were cultured in the presence or absence of soluble CD40L trimer, and total RNA was isolated for use in subtractive hybridization. Activation of the DC by CD40L was confirmed by assaying for up-regulation of IL-12 p40 by RT-PCR and ELISA (data not shown).
We performed three separate subtractive hybridization experiments and
isolated a total of 2300 cDNA fragments from the CD40L-stimulated DC. A
portion of these cDNA fragments was sequenced and identified using the
BLASTN database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. A
partial list of the genes identified is shown in Table I
, organized into five general categories
based on either cellular location or proposed function. Some of the
genes identified, such as IL-1, IL-12, and macrophage-derived
chemokine, are known to be up-regulated in mature DC (26, 27), providing an internal control for the reliability of this
technique. Of particular interest to us were known or novel genes
having immunological relevance, specifically those that may participate
in regulating Th1 responses. One such gene was SLAM, which encodes a
protein that has been previously characterized in activated T and B
cells, but not DC (20, 21). Therefore, we decided to
investigate the potential relevance of SLAM expression on DC
function.
|
To confirm SLAM mRNA was up-regulated in DC stimulated with CD40L,
we performed Northern blot analysis on CD40L-treated and untreated DC.
Cells were stimulated in the presence or absence of soluble CD40L
trimer, and total RNA was isolated. RNA was transferred to nylon
membranes and hybridized with radiolabeled gene-specific probes. Fig. 1 shows that SLAM mRNA is significantly
up-regulated in CD40L-stimulated DC. Similar results were obtained for
the characteristic Th1 cytokine IL-12 and for the chemokines,
macrophage-derived chemokine and monokine induced by IFN-, used as
positive controls. All blots were normalized to -actin to ensure
equal RNA loading. These data corroborate the results obtained by
subtractive hybridization, indicating the up-regulation of SLAM in
CD40L-activated DC.
|
-actin mRNA
levels. As shown in Fig. 2, mRNA encoding
both the membrane-bound and secreted isoforms of SLAM was strongly
up-regulated by DC in response to CD40L. No message encoding the
variable or cytoplasmic SLAM isoforms was detected (data not
shown).
|
A shows that
CD40L induced the expression of SLAM protein, as well as the expression
of CD1a, CD80, CD86, and HLA-DR molecules, known to be up-regulated in
mature DC. To confirm that SLAM was expressed on DC and not a
contaminating subpopulation, cells were labeled with anti-SLAM and
anti-CD1a mAbs conjugated with either FITC or PE dye and analyzed
by two-color flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 3B, 74% of
the CD1a+ DC cell population was also positive
for SLAM expression following maturation with CD40L. These levels are
relatively high when compared with the expression levels observed in
previous studies using both activated T and B cells, which seem to be
between 25 and 50% positive (20, 21). Fetal thymocytes,
however, express SLAM at levels comparable with DC, approaching 80%
positive. Finally, to ensure that the SLAM protein detected was not the
result of a DC/T cell aggregate, cells were then labeled with mAbs to
CD1a and CD3 conjugated with either FITC or PE dye. Only 7.4% of the
CD1a+ population was also
CD3+, suggesting that SLAM expression on DC was
not a result of T cell contamination.
|
C, SLAM is first detectable on the
surface of DC as early as 12 h poststimulation with CD40L. SLAM
expression observed at this time appears to approach maximal levels, as
no significant increase in expression could be detected even after 2
days. Four days after the initial stimulation with CD40L, SLAM
expression begins to diminish and ultimately reaches baseline levels on
day 6. These kinetics appear to closely mirror those observed in B
cells, in which SLAM expression is observed as early as 6 h and
reaches maximal levels 24–48 h following stimulation (21, 24). Thus, SLAM expression appears to be rapidly up-regulated on
DC during the maturation process. SLAM expression is up-regulated in response to other known DC maturation stimuli
In addition to CD40L, other stimuli have been shown to have the ability to drive DC activation and maturation. Several microbial ligands are believed to be potent mediators of DC maturation, LPS being one of the best characterized. Recently, it has also been shown that the 19-kDa lipoprotein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis mediates DC maturation via Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR) (28), a determination made based on changes in cell surface protein expression, uptake and presentation of Ag, and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-12 that characterize this process. Another stimulus having the ability to drive DC maturation is poly(I:C) (29), a synthetic molecule originally designed to induce production of type I IFNs important for the control of viral infections (30, 31). Much like CD40L and LPS, poly(I:C) is also capable of inducing DC to secrete high levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-12; however, its receptor has not yet been identified.
To determine whether these ligands also induce SLAM expression in DC,
immature DC were cultured in the presence of different maturation
stimuli and assayed for cell surface expression of SLAM by flow
cytometry. Fig. 4A shows that
both CD40L and poly(I:C) up-regulated SLAM expression on DC to similar
levels. Of the microbial ligands we tested, only LPS was capable of
inducing expression of SLAM on DC, whereas the 19-kDa lipoprotein from
M. tuberculosis (19 kDa), the OspA lipoprotein from
Borrelia burgdorferi (OspA), and the 47-kDa lipoprotein from
Treponema pallidum (Tp47) had no effect. However, all the
microbial stimuli added to immature DC cultures were able to induce
high levels of IL-12 production (Fig. 4B), suggesting that
the lack of SLAM expression observed under some conditions was not due
to DC unresponsiveness. Additionally, cytokines typically secreted by
DC during maturation, such as IL-12 and IL-18, had no effect on SLAM
expression when added alone or in combination. Minimal up-regulation of
SLAM was observed on DC in response to TNF-; however, this effect
was inconsistent and never equivalent to the levels observed following
stimulation with CD40L, LPS, or poly(I:C). Collectively, our data
suggest that SLAM is up-regulated by DC during their maturation with
CD40L, poly(I:C), or LPS, and is not the result of secondary events,
such as cytokine release, that occur during the maturation process.
|
Previous studies describing SLAM expression on activated T and B
cells have shown that this molecule exhibits a number of costimulatory
properties, including the ability to enhance cellular proliferation and
inflammatory cytokine release (20, 21, 24, 32). Evidence
also exists to suggest that SLAM serves as its own ligand, exhibiting
weak homophilic binding properties in vitro (33). It is
therefore possible that interacting DC and T cells expressing SLAM
could be activated simultaneously through this molecule. Given the
ability of SLAM engagement to affect T cell function, we wanted to
determine whether SLAM receptor ligation had an effect on DC function.
To this end, DC were treated with soluble CD40L trimer to induce
expression of SLAM and thoroughly washed before restimulation with
agonistic anti-SLAM mAbs. As a positive control for the ability to
restimulate DC after their initial exposure to CD40L, LPS was added to
some samples. Supernatants from these cultures were collected and
analyzed for cytokine release by ELISA. As shown in Fig. 5, retreatment of SLAM-expressing DC with
anti-SLAM mAbs, but not an isotype control mAb, augmented the
amount of IL-12 produced by these cells. Similar results were obtained
for IL-8 production, albeit to a lesser degree. The increase in IL-12
produced in response to SLAM engagement appeared to peak at 12 h,
tapering off at the 24-h point. The kinetics of IL-8 production were
somewhat different, with levels still increasing after 24 h and
beginning to diminish 48–72 h poststimulation (data not shown). These
changes in cytokine production were dose dependent, as lower
concentrations of the anti-SLAM Ab had more modest, yet still
significant, effects. The amount of IL-10 produced by these cells was
not affected by the anti-SLAM or isotype control mAbs,
although LPS was able to induce low levels of IL-10. These results
suggest that the engagement of SLAM enhances the ability of DC to
secrete proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines that contribute to the
development of the Th1 response.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
that are secreted during DC activation and maturation had
no effect on SLAM expression. Functionally, SLAM receptor engagement on
DC augmented production of IL-12 and IL-8, but not IL-10. These data
suggest that SLAM expression on mature DC may play a role in
facilitating the ability of DC to initiate inflammatory immune
responses by increasing local cytokine concentrations that impact the
nature and magnitude of the adaptive T cell response. During the course of maturation, DC are transformed into highly specialized immune cells with an enhanced ability to affect the activation and differentiation of surrounding lymphocytes (6, 7, 10). This ability of mature DC is largely a result of their increased expression of costimulatory molecules and cytokines that facilitate the activation of T cells. We investigated the process of DC maturation by activating immature DC with CD40L and characterizing the types of genes that are induced in these cells once maturation is triggered. Using subtractive hybridization, we observed the up-regulation of a number of genes encoding cytokines (e.g., IL-12), chemokines, and cell surface receptors (e.g., CD80 and CD86) that are known to be associated with DC maturation (17, 19). We also discovered that mature DC expressed SLAM, a molecule previously believed to be restricted to activated T and B cells (20, 21). These data implicate SLAM as a new marker of CD40L-mediated DC maturation.
In addition to their ability to receive signals from activated T cells during the adaptive immune response, DC are also integrally involved in innate immunity to microbial pathogens. We found that two microbial ligands that have been shown to drive DC maturation, namely the TLR4 ligand LPS and poly(I:C), a synthetic dsRNA molecule used to mimic viral RNA, up-regulated SLAM expression on DC. Interestingly, microbial lipoproteins, TLR2 ligands, were unable to induce SLAM expression in DC, despite the fact that 19 kDa has recently been shown to drive DC maturation (28). Given our current understanding that LPS mediates signaling via TLR4 (34) and lipoproteins via TLR2 (35), it is tempting to speculate that TLR4, but not TLR2, selectively mediates the up-regulation of SLAM expression on DC during maturation. Alternatively, it is possible that LPS-mediated induction of SLAM expression on DC occurs through a TLR-independent pathway (36, 37). Collectively, these data suggest that SLAM may also be expressed on DC that undergo maturation in response to bacterial and viral pathogens during the innate immune response.
One of the most influential roles of DC in establishing protective immunity is to help drive the expansion and commitment of surrounding T cells toward either the Th1 or Th2 lineage (7). The mechanisms surrounding these events are believed to be partially dependent on the pattern of cytokines secreted by DC into the local microenvironment (5). Activation of SLAM on DC using an agonist mAb augmented the release of the Th1 cytokine IL-12, but not IL-10, a Th2-inducing cytokine. SLAM engagement also enhanced DC production of IL-8, a chemotactic cytokine for neutrophils and T cells (38). The effects resulting from SLAM receptor engagement on DC may contribute to their ability to help initiate Th1 responses.
Previous studies have described that SLAM engagement on activated T
cells leads to the generation of a Th1 cytokine response. In one study,
SLAM was shown to augment the production of IFN- from cells of the
Th1 lineage (20). Given that homophilic SLAM-SLAM
interactions have been shown to occur in binding assays
(33), it is tempting to speculate that DC and T cells, or
any other pair of SLAM-expressing cells, may interact via SLAM-SLAM
interactions. An interaction of this sort could lead to the
bidirectional activation of these cells, synergizing in the generation
of a Th1 response. We suspect that SLAM is one part of a matrix of
receptors expressed on activated DC that can be engaged upon
interaction with a T cell to aid in potentiating immune responses.
Alternatively, the existence of a secreted isoform of SLAM suggests
that receptor engagement does not necessarily involve direct
cell-to-cell contact, and may be mediated instead through an indirect
mechanism (24, 39).
Developing our overall understanding of SLAM function may also have clinical benefits, in light of several studies that have correlated its expression with human disease. First, in patients affected with acute multiple sclerosis, a neurological disorder believed to result in part from the unchecked activation of cell-mediated immunity, SLAM expression on CD4+ T cells was higher compared with patients with stable multiple sclerosis and healthy controls (40). Second, a recently discovered gene that maps to the same chromosome locus for X-linked lymphoproliferative disease has been identified as SLAM-associated protein, a protein shown to negatively regulate signaling events through SLAM (41). Mutations in the gene encoding SLAM-associated protein were found in three X-linked lymphoproliferative disease patients, and it is believed that the inability of these patients to control B cell proliferation is partially due to a lack of regulation of SLAM-mediated signaling events. Finally, SLAM has been implicated as a receptor for the measles virus, known to cause severe immunosuppression (42), possibly due to the impairment of receptor function upon binding (43). Given that both expression and function of SLAM have been correlated with the pathogenesis of these diseases, further investigation of SLAM expression profiles and function is warranted. The knowledge obtained from these and future studies may yield clinical benefits, in which activation or blockade of SLAM on immune cells may provide useful therapeutic strategies for treatment of these and other human diseases.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Robert L. Modlin, Division of Dermatology, University of California, 52-121 CHS, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail address: rmodlin{at}mednet.ucla.edu
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; CD40L, CD40 ligand; SLAM, signaling lymphocytic activation molecule; TLR, Toll-like receptor.
Received for publication May 14, 2001. Accepted for publication July 12, 2001.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
. J. Exp. Med. 179:1109. production. J. Immunol. 158:4036.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Ohno, N. Ono, F. Seki, M. Takeda, S. Kura, T. Tsuzuki, and Y. Yanagi Measles Virus Infection of SLAM (CD150) Knockin Mice Reproduces Tropism and Immunosuppression in Human Infection J. Virol., February 15, 2007; 81(4): 1650 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. L. Brogdon, Y. Xu, S. J. Szabo, S. An, F. Buxton, D. Cohen, and Q. Huang Histone deacetylase activities are required for innate immune cell control of Th1 but not Th2 effector cell function Blood, February 1, 2007; 109(3): 1123 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Stasiolek, A. Bayas, N. Kruse, A. Wieczarkowiecz, K. V. Toyka, R. Gold, and K. Selmaj Impaired maturation and altered regulatory function of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in multiple sclerosis Brain, May 1, 2006; 129(5): 1293 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Rethi, P. Gogolak, I. Szatmari, A. Veres, E. Erdos, L. Nagy, E. Rajnavolgyi, C. Terhorst, and A. Lanyi SLAM/SLAM interactions inhibit CD40-induced production of inflammatory cytokines in monocyte-derived dendritic cells Blood, April 1, 2006; 107(7): 2821 - 2829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Bhat, P. Eissmann, J. Endt, S. Hoffmann, and C. Watzl Fine-tuning of immune responses by SLAM-related receptors J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 79(3): 417 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. McIlroy, S. Tanguy-Royer, N. Le Meur, I. Guisle, P.-J. Royer, J. Leger, K. Meflah, and M. Gregoire Profiling dendritic cell maturation with dedicated microarrays J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 78(3): 794 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Q. Li, A. C. Grover, E. J. Donald, A. Carr, J. Yu, J. Whitfield, M. Nelson, N. Takeshita, and A. E. Chang Simultaneous Targeting of CD3 on T Cells and CD40 on B or Dendritic Cells Augments the Antitumor Reactivity of Tumor-Primed Lymph Node Cells J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1424 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Grutz New insights into the molecular mechanism of interleukin-10-mediated immunosuppression J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2005; 77(1): 3 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F. Quiroga, G. J. Martinez, V. Pasquinelli, M. A. Costas, M. M. Bracco, A. Malbran, L. M. Olivares, P. A. Sieling, and V. E. Garcia Activation of Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule Triggers a Signaling Cascade That Enhances Th1 Responses in Human Intracellular Infection J. Immunol., September 15, 2004; 173(6): 4120 - 4129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Farina, D. Theil, B. Semlinger, R. Hohlfeld, and E. Meinl Distinct responses of monocytes to Toll-like receptor ligands and inflammatory cytokines Int. Immunol., June 1, 2004; 16(6): 799 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Perrier, F. O. Martinez, M. Locati, G. Bianchi, M. Nebuloni, G. Vago, F. Bazzoni, S. Sozzani, P. Allavena, and A. Mantovani Distinct Transcriptional Programs Activated by Interleukin-10 with or without Lipopolysaccharide in Dendritic Cells: Induction of the B Cell-Activating Chemokine, CXC Chemokine Ligand 13 J. Immunol., June 1, 2004; 172(11): 7031 - 7042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Koschella, D. Voehringer, and H. Pircher CD40 Ligation In Vivo Induces Bystander Proliferation of Memory Phenotype CD8 T Cells J. Immunol., April 15, 2004; 172(8): 4804 - 4811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Pasquinelli, M. F. Quiroga, G. J. Martinez, L. C. Zorrilla, R. M. Musella, M. M. Bracco, L. Belmonte, A. Malbran, L. Fainboim, P. A. Sieling, et al. Expression of Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule- Associated Protein Interrupts IFN-{gamma} Production in Human Tuberculosis J. Immunol., January 15, 2004; 172(2): 1177 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Li, N. Udagawa, M. Takami, N. Sato, Y. Kobayashi, and N. Takahashi p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Is Crucially Involved in Osteoclast Differentiation But Not in Cytokine Production, Phagocytosis, or Dendritic Cell Differentiation of Bone Marrow Macrophages Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4999 - 5005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Seki, N. Ono, R. Yamaguchi, and Y. Yanagi Efficient Isolation of Wild Strains of Canine Distemper Virus in Vero Cells Expressing Canine SLAM (CD150) and Their Adaptability to Marmoset B95a Cells J. Virol., September 15, 2003; 77(18): 9943 - 9950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ohno, F. Seki, N. Ono, and Y. Yanagi Histidine at position 61 and its adjacent amino acid residues are critical for the ability of SLAM (CD150) to act as a cellular receptor for measles virus J. Gen. Virol., September 1, 2003; 84(9): 2381 - 2388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Fossetta, J. Jackson, G. Deno, X. Fan, X. K. Du, L. Bober, A. Soude-Bermejo, O. de Bouteiller, C. Caux, C. Lunn, et al. Pharmacological Analysis of Calcium Responses Mediated by the Human A3 Adenosine Receptor in Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells and Recombinant Cells Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2003; 63(2): 342 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Sieling, W. Chung, B. T. Duong, P. J. Godowski, and R. L. Modlin Toll-Like Receptor 2 Ligands as Adjuvants for Human Th1 Responses J. Immunol., January 1, 2003; 170(1): 194 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Howie, S. Okamoto, S. Rietdijk, K. Clarke, N. Wang, C. Gullo, J. P. Bruggeman, S. Manning, A. J. Coyle, E. Greenfield, et al. The role of SAP in murine CD150 (SLAM)-mediated T-cell proliferation and interferon gamma production Blood, September 26, 2002; 100(8): 2899 - 2907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Bieback, E. Lien, I. M. Klagge, E. Avota, J. Schneider-Schaulies, W. P. Duprex, H. Wagner, C. J. Kirschning, V. ter Meulen, and S. Schneider-Schaulies Hemagglutinin Protein of Wild-Type Measles Virus Activates Toll-Like Receptor 2 Signaling J. Virol., July 29, 2002; 76(17): 8729 - 8736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Roth, J. Schwartzkopff, and H. Pircher CD40 Ligation in the Presence of Self-Reactive CD8 T Cells Leads to Severe Immunopathology J. Immunol., May 15, 2002; 168(10): 5124 - 5129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
MFI) relative to the negative control
for each time point. These data are also shown graphically.
2.5
ng/ml (IL-12), 300 pg/ml (IL-8), and 100 pg/ml (IL-10). All data are
representative of three independent experiments.