The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, A.
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 167: 2343-2348.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Catalytic Subunit of Protein Kinase A Is an Interacting Partner of the Inflammation-Responsive Transcription Factor Serum Amyloid A-Activating Factor-11

Bimal K. Ray, Jing Chen and Alpana Ray2

Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Serum amyloid A-activating factor-1 (SAF-1) is a zinc finger transcription factor that is activated by many mediators of inflammation including IL-1, IL-6, and bacterial LPS. However, the mechanism of activation is not fully understood. To identify possible activation partners for SAF-1, we used a yeast two-hybrid system that detected interaction between the catalytic subunit of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA-C{alpha}) and SAF-1. Immunofluorescence and combined immunoprecipitation-Western blot analyses revealed colocalization and interaction between SAF-1 and PKA-C{alpha}. In vivo evidence of SAF-1 and PKA-C{alpha} interaction was further revealed by coimmunoprecipitation of these two proteins in cAMP-activated liver cells. We further show that SAF-1 is phosphorylated in vitro by PKA-C{alpha} and that addition of cAMP markedly induces in vivo phosphorylation of SAF-1 and transcription of SAF-regulated reporter genes. These results showed that SAF1-PKA-C{alpha} interaction is involved in functional activation of SAF-1.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Serum amyloid A (SAA),3 a family of plasma proteins, is linked with the pathophysiology of several inflammatory diseases, including secondary amyloidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and atherosclerosis. In response to inflammation, expression of some SAA isoforms is induced by as much as 1000-fold due to transcriptional induction (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Proinflammatory cytokines, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-{alpha}, either alone or in combination and inflammatory mediators like PMA can increase transcription of SAA. Regulation of SAA gene expression has been studied and characterized by different groups, including ours (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Multiple cis-acting elements have been defined to be important for transcriptional induction of SAA genes, which include CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP), NF-{kappa}B, YY-1, Sp1, and SAA-activating factor (SAF) transcription factor DNA-binding elements. Nonhepatic expression of rabbit SAA2 is primarily regulated by the SAF DNA-binding element given that mutation of this region abolishes 60–80% of the SAA2 promoter activity in many nonhepatic cells (9). Because nonhepatic expression of SAA seems to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of SAA-linked inflammatory diseases, SAF might have a significant role in the disease outcome.

SAF is a family of zinc finger transcription factors containing multiple Cys2-His2-type zinc finger motifs at their C terminus (10). DNA-binding activity of SAF is induced in response to LPS (11) or IL-1 and IL-6 treatment of cells (12). Structural analysis showed that one member of this family, SAF-1, is a homologue of human myc-associated zinc finger protein (MAZ) (13) and murine Pur-1 (14). To date, SAF-1/MAZ/Pur-1 is identified as a regulator of c-myc, insulin, serotonin 1A receptor, CD4, {gamma}-fibrinogen, phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase, and CLC-K1 genes (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). These findings suggest that the SAF-1/MAZ/Pur-1 family of proteins have a wide regulatory role in governing many cellular processes.

Protein-protein interaction between transcription factors and other accessory proteins is a unique mechanism through which strict cellular control of gene expression is maintained. We hypothesized that association of other proteins is necessary for SAF-1/MAZ/Pur-1 to regulate a variety of genes in a cell-type or stimulus-specific manner. The yeast two-hybrid system is a powerful tool for identifying protein-protein interactions that occur in vivo in the course of regulating many physiological activities including signal transduction process. By two-hybrid assay, we detected interaction between SAF-1 protein and the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA-C{alpha}). The interaction between these two proteins was subsequently demonstrated by both in vitro and in vivo analyses. Further studies showed that activation of endogenous PKA by intercellular elevation of cAMP leads to increased expression of SAF-1-regulated promoters.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Yeast two-hybrid screen and strains

A truncated form of SAF-1 (aa 187–477), hereafter designated as SAF-1187–477, was cloned into the pAS2-1 vector (CLONTECH Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA), and the resultant pAS2-1-SAF1187–477 plasmid was used as a bait to screen a mouse brain MATCHMAKER cDNA library (CLONTECH Laboratories) following the manufacturer’s protocol. CG1945 yeast cells were transformed with pAS2-1-SAF1187–477 plasmid DNA. A 200-µg sample of the cDNA library cloned in pACT2 plasmid was then transformed into CG1945 cells containing pAS2-1-SAF1187–477. Transformed cells were plated onto medium lacking tryptophan, leucine and histidine but containing 15 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole. Growth on His- plates indicated an interaction between SAF-1187–477 and the protein coded by an unknown cDNA. Selected colonies were further assayed for {beta}-galactosidase activity. After 3 rounds of selection, 20 colonies were chosen for further analysis by DNA sequencing.

Cell culture and transfection

BNL CL2 liver cells, a normal embryonic liver cell line derived from a BALB/c mouse, were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and cultured in DMEM containing high glucose (4.5 g/L) supplemented with 7% FCS. These cells retained many of the features of normal liver cells. Transient transfections were conducted by the calcium phosphate method (20). Reporter plasmids and expression vectors containing SAF-1 cDNA were transfected in duplicate, along with 1 µg pSV-{beta}-gal (Promega, Madison, WI). The pSV-{beta}-gal plasmid DNA was used as an internal control for measuring transfection efficiency. The amount of DNA in each transfection assay was kept same by using carrier DNA. Some cells were treated with 8-bromo (8-Br)-cAMP (0.4 mM), myristoylated cell-permeable PKA inhibitor 14–22 amide, (PKI) (5 µM), and H89 (5 µM). Cells were harvested 48 h posttransfection, and cell extracts containing equivalent amounts of {beta}-galactosidase activity were used for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) assay as described previously (9, 10, 11). {beta}-Galactosidase activity was assayed with the substrate O-nitrophenyl-{beta}-D-galactopyranoside as described (20). All transfection experiments were performed at least three times.

Plasmid constructs

The CAT reporter plasmids wtSAF-CAT and mtSAF-CAT were constructed by ligating three copies of wild-type or mutant SAF DNA-binding element, -254 to -226 bp, of the SAA promoter (9) into pBLCAT2 plasmid. The sequences of the wild-type and mutant SAF DNA-binding elements are 5'-CCCTTCCTCTCCACCCACAGCCCCCATGG-3' and 5'-CCATTACTGTCGACTGACAGCTACCATGG-3', respectively. Underlined bases represent altered sequences. The pCMV-SAF1 expression plasmid was prepared by inserting a full length SAF-1 cDNA (10) under the control of CMV promoter in pCDNA3 vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). Bacterially expressed SAF-1 protein was obtained by using FLAG-SAF1 plasmid constructed as described earlier (21) and affinity purified from anti-FLAG-agarose gel as described (21).

Immunoprecipitation, coimmunoprecipitation, and Western blotting

Bacterially expressed FLAG-SAF1 protein (0.5 µg) was incubated with 1.0 U (1.3 µg) of a purified preparation of catalytic subunit of PKA (Calbiochem-Novabiochem, La Jolla, CA) in 20 µl 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM PMSF, 0.5 mg/ml benzamidine buffer at 25°C for 1 h. After incubation, 0.5 ml immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM PMSF, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, 0.5 mg/ml benzamidine was added to the mixture, and proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-PKA Ab (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) at 4°C for 16 h. Next, 50 µl protein G-agarose slurry was added to the reaction mixture and incubated for 2 h at 4°C, and bound proteins were eluted and separated by SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and probed with anti-FLAG Ab (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Chemiluminescence reaction was performed with ECL detection kit using the manufacturer’s protocol (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).

For coimmunoprecipitation analysis, BNL CL2 liver cells were grown in duplicate in 100-mm dishes. One set of cells was not treated with any agent, and the other set was treated with 8-Br-cAMP (0.4 mM, final concentration) for 4 h. After incubation, cells were harvested, washed in PBS, and resuspended in a lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 2.5 mM PMSF, 0.5 mg/ml benzamidine, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 100 mM NaF. Clarified cell extracts were further immunoprecipitated with either anti-SAF1 Ab or anti-PKA Ab (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Immunoprecipitated proteins were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, and further probed with anti-PKA or anti-SAF1 Ab, as indicated in Figs. 2Go and 3Go. The migration position of PKA or SAF-1 in the immunoblot was verified by fractionating a sample of purified catalytic subunit of PKA (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) or bacterially expressed pure SAF-1 protein.



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Bacterially expressed SAF-1 protein interacts with catalytic subunit of PKA in vitro. FLAG-SAF-1 fusion protein was incubated with the catalytic subunit of PKA (Calbiochem-Novabiochem). Lanes 1 and 4 contain 0.5 µg FLAG-SAF-1 protein, lane 2 contains 0.5 µg FLAG-SAF1 protein plus 1.0 U (1.3 µg) PKA, and lanes 3 and 5 contain 1.0 U (1.3 µg) PKA. Proteins in lanes 1–3 were immunoprecipitated with anti-PKA Ab (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) before their separation by 10% SDS-PAGE. After transfer to a nitrocellulose membrane, all proteins were probed with anti-FLAG Ab.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Cellular SAF-1 interacts with the catalytic subunit of PKA in vivo. BNL. CL2 liver cells were treated with 8-Br-cAMP (0.4 mM) for 4 h. Cells were harvested and lysed as described in Materials and Methods. Lysates from both control and cAMP-treated cells were used in the immunoprecipitation reaction. As a control, the catalytic subunit of PKA (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) was used in lane 3 that was not immunoprecipitated. In a reciprocal experiment, purified SAF-1 protein was used in lane 6 as a control. Proteins in lanes 1 and 2 were immunoprecipitated with anti-SAF-1 Ab before their separation in 10% SDS-PAGE. Proteins in lanes 4 and 5 were immunoprecipitated with anti-PKA Ab (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) before their separation in a 10% SDS-PAGE. After transfer to a nitrocellulose membrane, proteins were probed with either anti-PKA (lanes 1–3) or anti-SAF (lanes 4–6) Abs.

 
Immunofluorescence analysis

BNL CL2 cells were transfected in duplicate, with pCMV-FLAG-SAF-1 plasmid DNA. After transfection, one set of cells was stimulated with 8-Br-cAMP (0.4 mM). The cells were fixed with acetone-chloroform (1:1), incubated at -20°C for 10 min, and permeabilized in PBS-0.2% Triton X-100 for 5 min at room temperature. After a washing in PBS, cells were blocked for 1 h in a blocking buffer (PBS-1% BSA-1% goat serum) and further incubated for another hour with anti-FLAG mouse IgG plus anti-PKA rabbit IgG in the blocking buffer. After three washings in PBS, cells were incubated with a mixture of goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 546, goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488, and DAPI (all three reagents were obtained from Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in the blocking buffer for 30 min in the dark and then washed three times in PBS. A few drops of Fluoromount-G (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) were added, the coverglass was placed, and the edges of the coverglass were sealed with clear nail polish. Fluorescent-labeled cells were visualized in an epifluorescence microscope (Axiophot; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

In vivo phosphorylation of SAF-1

BNL CL2 liver cells were transfected with pCMVSAF-1 expression plasmid. The cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate (32Pi; 0.5 mCi/ml) in phosphate free DMEM for 6 h in the absence or presence of 8-Br-cAMP (0.4 mM). Before the labeling, cells were grown in DMEM plus 5% FCS for 24 h. The 32Pi-labeled cells were harvested, washed quickly in phosphate-free DMEM, and lysed by adding hot lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 2.5 mM PMSF, 0.5 mg/ml benzamidine, 5 µg/ml leupeptin,10 µg/ml aprotinin, 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 100 mM NaF plus 1% SDS). After lysis, SDS concentration was reduced to 0.1% by adding lysis buffer without SDS. The 32P-labeled SAF-1 protein was isolated by immunoprecipitation with anti-SAF1 Ab, fractionated in an SDS-11% polyacrylamide gel, and detected by autoradiography.

In vitro phosphorylation and immunoprecipitation of SAF-1

The phosphorylation reaction was performed in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 100 µM unlabeled ATP, 10 µCi [{gamma}-32P]ATP (6000 Ci/mmol), 0.5 µg purified FLAG-SAF1 protein, 1.0 U (1.3 µg) of purified catalytic subunit of PKA (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) at 30°C for 30 min in a total volume of 50 µl. In some reactions, PKI inhibitor peptide (5 µM) was added (Calbiochem-Novabiochem). After incubation, one-half of in vitro phosphorylated reaction was immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG Ab (Sigma).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Yeast two-hybrid assay detected interaction between SAF-1 and PKA-C{alpha}

To identify proteins that might in vivo interact with SAF-1 and therefore be involved in regulating its activity, we used the yeast two-hybrid system. We generated a bait that produced a fusion protein containing the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (GAL4-DBD) and a truncated form of SAF-1187–477 protein using pAS2-1 vector. This bait construct did not autoactivate the HIS3 and lacZ reporter genes on transformation in CG1945 yeast cells. The GAL4DBD-SAF1187–477 bait (i.e., pAS2-1-SAF1187–477 plasmid) was used for screening a mouse brain MATCHMAKER cDNA library constructed using pACT2 vector that produces a fusion protein containing the GAL4 activation domain (GAL4-AD) and proteins coded by the cDNA molecules in the library. Of the 1 x 106 colonies screened, 20 clones displayed growth on His- medium and {beta}-galactosidase activity indicating interaction between SAF1187–477 and the selective cloned proteins. For further confirmation, DNA was isolated from these yeast colonies, transformed into bacteria, and reintroduced into freshly grown yeast with pAS2-1-SAF1187–477 and tested for growth on His- medium. Ten clones passed this final round of selection and were used for DNA sequence analysis. Four independent cDNAs were identified as coding for the catalytic subunit of PKA-C{alpha} (22). Two clones contained the full length sequence, and the other clones contained partial sequences of PKA-C{alpha}, 21–350 and 33–350 aa, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1Go, yeast containing both GAL4DBD:SAF1187–477 and pACT2- PKA-C{alpha} grew on plate lacking histidine. As a negative control, pAS2-1-SAF1187–477 was cotransformed with pACT2 empty vector, which did not grow on histidine-lacking plates. This data suggested that PKA-C{alpha} has affinity for SAF-1 that results in a protein-protein interaction between these two proteins.



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. SAF-1 interacts with the catalytic subunit of PKA in yeast. A, Bait plasmid used for screening. Sequences containing amino acids from 187 to 477 of SAF-1 were cloned into pAS2-1 vector (CLONTECH Laboratories) in frame with the GAL4-DBD. B, Yeast colonies that were transformed with pAS2-1-SAF1187–477 and pACT2 alone or pAS2-1-SAF1187–477 and pACT2-PKA-C{alpha} were streaked on selective plates with (+His) and without (-His) histidine.

 
SAF-1 interacts in vitro with PKA-C{alpha}

To test whether SAF-1 and PKA proteins might interact in vitro as well, we used a combined immunoprecipitation/Western blot analysis. Bacterially expressed FLAG-SAF1 protein was incubated with purified preparation of the catalytic subunit of PKA (Calbiochem-Novabiochem). After incubation, proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-PKA Ab and Western blotted with anti-FLAG Ab. As seen in Fig. 2Go, lane 2, FLAG-SAF1 was immunoprecipitated with anti-PKA and further detected by anti-FLAG Ab. In the absence of PKA (Fig. 2Go, lane 3), SAF-1 could not be immunoprecipitated and thus remained absent in Western blot analysis. We show that anti-FLAG Ab is specific because it detects only FLAG-SAF1 protein (lane 4) but not PKA (lane 5). These results showed that SAF-1 interacts with PKA under in vitro conditions.

PKA interacts with SAF in vivo

To test whether PKA-C{alpha} and SAF interact in vivo with each other, we used coimmunoprecipitation assay. Cellular proteins of BNL CL2 liver cells were treated with anti-SAF-1 Ab to selectively immunoprecipitate intracellular SAF-1 (Fig. 3Go). When anti-SAF-1 immunoprecipitated proteins were probed with anti-PKA Ab, a band (Fig. 3Go, lane 2) was preferentially detected in cAMP-treated cells that comigrated with the catalytic subunit of PKA (Fig. 3Go, lane 3). This result suggested that in vivo SAF and PKA interact with each other. Similar to our finding, a recent report showed interaction between PKA-C{alpha} and SOX-9, a transcription factor involved in chondrocyte differentiation (23). Surprisingly, the level of PKA coimmunoprecipitated with SAF-1 protein was much less in untreated BNL cells (Fig. 3Go, lane 1) indicating that cAMP treatment of the cells is necessary either for optimal release of the catalytic subunit of PKA from its native form or for optimal interaction of SAF-1 with PKA. In a reciprocal experiment, immunoprecipitation of cellular proteins with anti-PKA-C{alpha} Ab pulled down SAF-1 protein at a favorable level when cAMP was added to the medium (Fig. 3Go, compare lanes 4 and 5). The role of cAMP in SAF-PKA interaction in vivo is interesting and suggested that cAMP-mediated actions facilitate interaction between these two proteins.

Colocalization of SAF-1 and PKA in the cells after cAMP stimulation

For an interaction between two proteins to have a functional and physiological consequence, they must be expressed in the same cell. To address this, BNL CL2 cells were transfected with pCMV-FLAG-SAF-1 plasmid and grown on coverslips. Next, one set of cells was stimulated with 8-Br-cAMP and processed for immunofluorescence assay using both anti-FLAG and anti-PKA Abs. As seen in Fig. 4GoA, SAF protein was seen in the cytoplasm but also at a lower level in the nucleus of unstimulated cells. In contrast, PKA was seen predominantly in the cytoplasm of unstimulated cells. However, in response to cAMP stimulation (Fig. 4GoB), both PKA and SAF proteins were present at a higher level in the nuclei. These results demonstrated that SAF and PKA colocalize under some in vivo conditions.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Colocalization of SAF-1 and PKA-C{alpha} in liver cells. BNL CL2 cells were transfected with FLAG-SAF-1 expression plasmid DNA in duplicate and grown on coverslips. One set of cells was incubated in the presence of 8-Br-cAMP (0.4 mM) for 4 h (B), and the other was left untreated (A). Fluorescent microscopy was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were stained with 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for nuclear staining and probed with anti-FLAG and anti-PKA Ab.

 
cAMP increases and inhibitors of PKA block expression of an SAF-regulated reporter gene

Interaction of SAF-1 with PKA provided a clue for the involvement of the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in modulating SAF function. To that end, we sought to determine whether intracellular elevation of cAMP, an inducer of PKA activity in cells, has any effect on SAF activity. A CAT gene containing three tandem copies of SAF-binding elements present in the SAA gene was chosen as a reporter gene system to monitor the function of activated SAF. BNL CL2 liver cells were transfected in duplicate with SAF-CAT reporter alone or together with pCMV-SAF-1 expression plasmid DNA. After transfection, cells were incubated for 24 h with or without 8-Br-cAMP. As shown in Fig. 5Go, addition of 8-Br-cAMP markedly induced expression of SAF-CAT reporter while H89 and PKI14–22 amide (Calbiochem-Novabiochem), two specific inhibitors of endogenous PKA activity inhibited such induction. The effect of cAMP and the PKA inhibitors was significantly higher when exogenous SAF was provided to the cells by cotransfection with pCMV-SAF-1. In contrast, the reporter gene expression from mtSAF-CAT reporter remained virtually undetectable and unaffected by any of these agents (data not shown). The inhibitory effect of PKI and H89 and the stimulatory effect of 8-Br-cAMP were not due to a change in the expression of SAF1 protein because the level of SAF-1 protein remained same during these different treatments, as determined by Western immunoblot analysis (data not shown). This suggested that although SAF-1 is present in the cells, its activity is regulated by PKA on activation by cAMP.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Regulators of PKA affect SAF-mediated reporter gene expression. BNL CL2 liver cells were cotransfected in duplicate, with 1.0 µg wild-type SAF-CAT reporter constructs either alone or with 1.0 µg pCMV-SAF1 plasmid DNA. After transfection, one set of cells were incubated with 8-Br-cAMP (0.4 mM) or H89 (5 µM) or myristoylated PKI peptide14–22 amide (1 µM) (Calbiochem-Novabiochem). CAT activity was determined as described in Materials and Methods. The results represent averages of three separate experiments.

 
Phosphorylation of SAF-1 is increased by cAMP

To determine whether phosphorylation of SAF-1 in vivo is increased by cAMP, we labeled pCMVSAF-1-transfected BNL CL2 cells with 32Pi in the presence or absence of 8-Br-cAMP. The 32P-labeled cellular phosphoproteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-SAF-1 Ab and separated by SDS-PAGE. As seen in Fig. 6GoA, cells transfected with SAF-1 expression plasmid revealed a phosphorylated protein band, the intensity of which increased by severalfold when cells were labeled in the presence of cAMP (Fig. 6GoA, lane 2) and reduced in the presence of H89 (Fig. 6GoA, lane 3). This increase of phosphorylation was not due to any increase in the expression of the transfected SAF-1 gene, because the level of SAF-1 protein was the same during cAMP treatment (Fig. 6GoB, lanes 1–3).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Phosphorylation of SAF-1. BNL CL2 cells were transfected with pCMV-SAF-1 expression plasmid. A, The cells were metabolically labeled with 32Pi (0.5 mCi/ml) in phosphate-free DMEM for 6 h either in the presence of 0.4 mM 8-Br-cAMP (lane 2) or 0.4 mM 8-Br-cAMP 5 µM plus H89 (lane 3) or not (lane 1). The 32P-labeled cellular proteins were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-SAF-1 Ab and fractionated in a SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel. Arrow, Migration position of SAF-1. B, Western blot analysis of proteins. In a parallel experiment, similar to that in A, cells were grown in the presence of 8-Br-cAMP (0.4 mM) or 8-Br-cAMP (0.4 mM) plus H89 (5 µM) but without the addition of 32Pi. An equal protein amount of cell extract (50 µg of protein) was used for separation by SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and probed with an anti-SAF-1 Ab. Lane 1, Untreated; lane 2, 8-Br-cAMP; lane 3, 8-Br-cAMP (0.4 mM) plus H89-treated cell extracts. Arrow, Migration position of SAF-1. C, In vitro phosphorylation of SAF-1. Bacterially expressed FLAG-SAF-1protein (0.5 µg) was incubated with 1.0 U (1.3 µg) of the catalytic subunit of PKA (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) in the presence of [{gamma}-32P]ATP. After incubation, one-half of the radioactive proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG Ab, separated in a 10% SDS-PAGE, and autoradiographed. Lane 1, In vitro phosphorylated proteins before immunoprecipitation; lanes 2 and 3, immunoprecipitated proteins with anti-FLAG Ab. In lane 3, 0.5 µM PKI inhibitor peptide (Calbiochem) was included during in vitro phosphorylation.

 
For a more direct confirmation of whether SAF-1 is a substrate for PKA, we in vitro phosphorylated bacterially expressed FLAG-SAF1 protein with purified catalytic subunit of PKA and [{gamma}-32P]ATP (Fig. 6GoC). After incubation, a portion of in vitro phosphorylated samples were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG Ab (Fig. 6GoC, lanes 2 and 3). Two bands, one comigrating with FLAG-SAF1 protein and another comigrating with the catalytic subunit of PKA at 38 kDa position were detected (Fig. 6GoC, lane 2). No radioactivity was seen in the lane that contained PKI inhibitor during in vitro phosphorylation (Fig. 6GoC, lane 3). These results clearly indicated that SAF-1 is a substrate of PKA, and immunoprecipitation of both SAF-1 and PKA with anti-FLAG Ab further confirmed their association. Taken together, these results indicated that cAMP/PKA mediate cellular event regulates functional activity of SAF-1 protein.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our data show for the first time that in vivo, SAF-1 transcription factor interacts with PKA-C{alpha} and acts as a substrate for PKA. Interaction of PKA-C{alpha} with SAF-1 seems to induce its function because activators of PKA signaling pathway markedly increased expression of SAF-1-regulated reporter genes and in vivo phosphorylation of SAF-1 protein. Colocalization of PKA-C{alpha} and SAF-1 further correlated with the notion that interaction of these two proteins have biological implications for effective gene regulation.

Activation of transcription factors by extracellular signals is an important step in regulating gene expression and protein phosphorylation is a primary mechanism for rapid activation/deactivation of many transcription factors. Among various protein kinases, cAMP-dependent PKA is a key enzyme involved in the regulation of many biological processes (reviewed in Refs. 24 and 25). An increase in the intracellular levels of cAMP releases catalytic subunits of PKA from the regulatory subunits, resulting in the activation of PKA. Activated PKA mediates the effects of cAMP by phosphorylating various substrate transcription factors and thereby affects both the regulation of key metabolic enzymes and the expression of numerous target genes. CAT activity generated from SAF-regulated reporter was markedly higher in cells treated with PKA-activating agents. Reciprocally, specific inhibitors of PKA inhibited SAF-mediated gene expression. Further, we have shown that SAF-1 and the PKA-C{alpha} colocalize during cAMP stimulation of cells. SAF-1 protein is seen in nuclei of unstimulated cells. In contrast, PKA is predominantly present in the cytoplasm of unstimulated cells but migrates to the nucleus after 8-Br-cAMP treatment. Therefore, it seems that nuclear localization of SAF-1 is not dependent on its phosphorylation by PKA. These results are in agreement with previous observations, which detected SAF protein in nuclear extract of unstimulated cells (10) and migration of the PKA-C{alpha} in the nucleus on intracellular elevation of cAMP (26).

Several earlier studies speculated that function of SAF is modulated by serine/threonine phosphorylation (9, 10). Recently, we have shown that PKC plays a significant role in increasing the DNA-binding ability of SAF, which results in increasing SAF-regulated gene expression (21). Another study demonstrated increased level of DNA-binding activity of MAZ, a homologue of SAF-1, by casein kinase II (27). The results presented in this report strongly suggest a role of PKA in activating SAF and SAF-regulated metabolic processes. At present, although SAF is shown to be activated by PKC, casein kinase II, and PKA, it does not necessarily mean that this transcription factor is regulated only by these three protein kinases. In fact, because SAF is seen to be activated by different inflammatory signals, including LPS (11), cytokines (12), and minimally modified low density lipoprotein (28), we speculate that these diverse effects may be mediated by a combination of many signal transducing protein kinases. Further studies should reveal more about the regulatory mechanisms involving activation of SAF-1 protein.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Michael Blanar for providing FLAG vector, pAR({Delta}RI)59/60.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by U.S. Public Health Service Grant DK49205 and funds from the College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Alpana Ray, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. E-mail address: rayal{at}missouri.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: SAA, serum amyloid A; SAF, SAA-activating factor; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; MAZ, myc-associated zinc finger protein; PKA-C{alpha}, catalytic subunit {alpha} of PKA; C/EBP, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein; 8-Br, 8-bromo; PKI, PKA inhibitory amide; 32Pi, [32P]orthophosphate. Back

Received for publication April 17, 2001. Accepted for publication June 13, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Sipe, J. D.. 1994. Amyloidosis. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 31:325.[Medline]
  2. Uhlar, C. M., A. S. Whitehead. 1999. Serum amyloid A, the major vertebrate acute-phase reactant. Eur. J. Biochem. 265:501.[Medline]
  3. Betts, J. C., J. K. Cheshire, S. Akira, T. S., T. Kishimoto, P. Woo. 1993. The role of NF-{kappa}B and NF-IL6 transactivating factors in the synergistic activation of human serum amyloid A gene expression by interleukin-1 and interleukin-6. J. Biol. Chem. 268:25624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Li, X., W. S. L. Liao. 1991. Expression of rat serum amyloid A1 gene involves both C/EBP like and NF-{kappa}B like transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 266:15192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Huang, J. H., W. S. L. Liao. 1994. Induction of mouse serum amyloid A3 gene by cytokines requires both C/EBP family proteins and a novel constitutive factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ray, A., B. K. Ray. 1993. Analysis of the promoter element of serum amyloid A gene and its interaction with constitutive and inducible nuclear factors from rabbit liver. Gene Expr. 3:151.[Medline]
  7. Ray, A., B. K. Ray. 1994. Serum amyloid A gene expression under acute-phase condition involves participation of inducible C/EBP-{beta} and C/EBP-{delta} and their activation by protein phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ray, A., M. Hannink, B. K. Ray. 1995. Concerted participation of NF-{kappa}B and C/EBP heteromer in lipopolysaccharide induction of serum amyloid A gene expression in liver. J. Biol. Chem. 270:7365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ray, A., B. K. Ray. 1996. A novel cis-acting element is essential for cytokine-mediated transcriptional induction of the serum amyloid A gene in nonhepatic cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1584.[Abstract]
  10. Ray, A., B. K. Ray. 1998. Isolation and functional characterization of cDNA of serum amyloid A-activating factor that binds to the serum amyloid a promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:7327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ray, B. K., A. Ray. 1997. Induction of serum amyloid A (SAA) gene by SAA-activating sequence-binding factor (SAF) in monocyte/macrophage cells: evidence for a functional synergy between SAF and Sp1. J. Biol. Chem. 272:28948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ray, A., H. Schatten, B. K. Ray. 1999. Activation of Sp1 and its functional co-operation with SAF in synoviocyte cells trigger synergistic action of interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 in serum amyloid A gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 274:4300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bossone, S. A., C. Asselin, A. J. Patel, K. B. Marcu. 1992. MAZ, a zinc finger protein binds to c-myc and C2 gene sequences regulating transcriptional initiation and termination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:7452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kennedy, G. C., W. J. Rutter. 1992. Pur-1, a zinc finger protein that binds to purine rich sequences, transactivates an insulin promoter in heterologous cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:11498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Duncan, D. D., A. J. Stupakoff, S. M. Hedrick, K. B. Marcu, G. Siu. 1995. A myc associated zinc finger protein binding site in one of the four important functional regions in the CD4 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:3179.[Abstract]
  16. Parks, C. L., T. Shenk. 1996. The serotonin 1A receptor gene contains a TATA less promoter that responds to MAZ and Sp1. J. Biol. Chem. 271:4417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ray, A.. 2000. A SAF binding site in the promoter region of human {gamma}-fibrinogen gene functions as an IL-6 response element. J. Immunol. 165:3411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Uchida, S., Y. Tanaka, H. Ito, F. Saitoh-Ohara, J. Inazawa, K. K. Yokoyama, S. Sasaki, F. Marumo. 2000. Transcriptional regulation of the CLC-K1 promoter by myc-associated zinc finger protein and kidney-enriched Kruppel-like factor, a novel zinc finger repressor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:7319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Her, S., A. Bell, A. Bloom, B. J. Siddall, D. L. Wong. 1999. Phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase gene expression: Sp1 and Maz potential for tissue-specific expression. J. Biol. Chem. 274:8698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual 2nd Ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
  21. Ray, A., A. P. Fields, B. K. Ray. 2000. Activation of transcription factor SAF involves its phosphorylation by protein kinase C. J. Biol. Chem. 275:39727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Uhler, M. D., D. F. Carmichael, D. C. Lee, J. C. Chrivia, E. G. Krebs, G. S. McKnight. 1986. Isolation of cDNA clones coding for the catalytic subunit of mouse cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:1300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Huang, W., X. Zhou, V. Lefebvre, B. de Crombrugghe. 2000. Phosphorylation of SOX-9 by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A enhances SOX9’s ability to transactivate a Col2a1chondrocyte-specific enhancer. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:4149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lalli, E., P. Sassone-Corsi. 1994. Signal transduction and gene regulation: the nuclear response to cAMP. J. Biol. Chem. 269:17359.[Free Full Text]
  25. Taylor, S. S., J. A. Buchler, W. Yonemoto. 1990. cAMP-dependent protein kinase: framework for a diverse family of regulatory enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:971.[Medline]
  26. Harootunian, A. T., S. R. Adams, W. Wen, J. L. Meinkoth, S. S. Taylor, R. Y. Tsien. 1993. Movement of the free catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase into and out of the nucleus can be explained by diffusion. Mol. Biol. Cell 4:993.[Abstract]
  27. Tsutsui, H., C. Geltinger, T. Murata, K. Itakura, T. Wada, H. Handa, K. K. Yokoyama. 1999. The DNA-binding and transcriptional activities of MAZ, a myc-associated zinc finger protein, are regulated by casein kinase II. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 262:198.[Medline]
  28. Ray, B. K., S. Chatterjee, A. Ray. 1999. Mechanism of minimally modified LDL-mediated induction of serum amyloid A gene in monocyte/macrophage cells. DNA Cell Biol. 18:65.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Kumar, A. Ray, and B. K. Ray
Transcriptional Synergy Mediated by SAF-1 and AP-1: CRITICAL ROLE OF N-TERMINAL POLYALANINE AND TWO ZINC FINGER DOMAINS OF SAF-1
J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2009; 284(3): 1853 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Sastri, D. M. Barraclough, P. T. Carmichael, and S. S. Taylor
A-kinase-interacting protein localizes protein kinase A in the nucleus
PNAS, January 11, 2005; 102(2): 349 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Ray, D. Kumar, P. Ray, and B. K. Ray
Transcriptional Activity of Serum Amyloid A-activating Factor-1 Is Regulated by Distinct Functional Modules
J. Biol. Chem., December 24, 2004; 279(52): 54637 - 54646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Ray, P. Ray, N. Guthrie, A. Shakya, D. Kumar, and B. K. Ray
Protein Kinase A Signaling Pathway Regulates Transcriptional Activity of SAF-1 by Unmasking Its DNA-binding Domains
J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 2003; 278(25): 22586 - 22595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. K. Ray, R. Murphy, P. Ray, and A. Ray
SAF-2, a Splice Variant of SAF-1, Acts as a Negative Regulator of Transcription
J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2002; 277(48): 46822 - 46830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Schmitt and A. R. Nebreda
Inhibition of Xenopus oocyte meiotic maturation by catalytically inactive protein kinase A
PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4361 - 4366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Schmitt and A. R. Nebreda
Inhibition of Xenopus oocyte meiotic maturation by catalytically inactive protein kinase A
PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4361 - 4366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS