|
|
||||||||
(C/EBP
) Activates CCR5 Promoter: Increased C/EBP
and CCR5 in T Lymphocytes from HIV-1-Infected Individuals
Human Retrovirus Section, Basic Research Laboratory, National Cancer Institute- Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a member of a family of leucine zipper transcription
factors that are involved in regulating the expression of several
cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF, and macrophage-inflammatory
protein-1
. We identified multiple C/EBP
binding sites within the
gene for CCR5, suggesting that C/EBP
may be involved in its
regulation. Transient transfection experiments in both myeloid and
lymphoid cells showed an increase in CCR5 promoter-driven green
fluorescent protein production in the presence of C/EBP
. Deletion
analysis identified two C/EBP
-responsive regions in the
CCR5 gene, one in the promoter region and one at
the 3' part of the intron. We provide evidence that, in myeloid cells
(U937), C/EBP
independently activates CCR5 expression through sites
located either in the promoter region or in the intron of the
CCR5 gene. In contrast, in lymphoid cells (Jurkat) the
presence of the intronic cis-regulatory regions is
required for C/EBP
-mediated activation. In agreement with the
functional data, EMSA demonstrated that in both myeloid and lymphoid
cells C/EBP
binds specifically to sites present in the intron,
whereas interaction with the sites located in the promoter was cell
type specific and was detected only in myeloid cells. Analysis of
C/EBP
in primary PBMCs obtained from HIV-1-infected individuals
revealed a significant increase in C/EBP
expression. The enhanced
C/EBP
activity correlated with a higher frequency of circulating
CCR5+ lymphocytes in AIDS patients and with a decline in
CD4 lymphocyte numbers. Taken together, these results suggest that
C/EBP
is an important regulator of CCR5 expression and may play a
relevant role in the pathogenesis of HIV
disease. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, MIP-1
,
and RANTES, also serves as the coreceptor for the entry into target
cells of most HIV-1 primary isolates (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). CCR5 is
mainly expressed on a subset of T lymphocytes and cells of the
mononuclear phagocyte lineage (6, 7).
The importance of CCR5 in HIV-1 infection and disease progression was
clearly established with the finding that some HIV-1-exposed but
uninfected individuals harbor a 32-bp deletion in the coding region of
the CCR5 gene. This deletion leads to a frameshift and a
premature termination of the protein (8, 9) resulting in
lack of CCR5 cell surface expression. Individuals homozygous for the
32 mutation are resistant to infection with most HIV-1 clinical
isolates (8, 10), whereas HIV-1-infected individuals
heterozygous for the CCR5 mutation had a slower progression to AIDS
(10, 11, 12). Additional studies established that genetic
polymorphism in the promoter region of the CCR5 gene reduces
gene expression and influence progression to AIDS
(13, 14, 15).
The CCR5 gene consists of two exons separated by a 1.9-kb
intronic sequence (16). The existence of additional
transcripts from upstream promoter(s) and another intronic sequence
located upstream of exon 1 has been described (17, 18).
The CCR5 promoter is located immediately upstream of exon 1; this
region is characterized by the presence of functional binding sites for
regulators of transcription such as OCT1, OCT2, T cell-specific
factor-1a, GATA-binding protein (GATA), AP1, and p65(Rel) (17, 19, 20). CCR5 expression is influenced by many different factors
including
-chemokines, LPS, CD3/CD28 cross-linking, and ILs such as
IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 (21, 22, 23, 24, 25). Due to the importance of
CCR5 in the regulation of leukocyte trafficking and its role as the
main coreceptor for HIV-1 entry, the understanding of CCR5 regulation
at the molecular level is of special relevance for the prevention of
HIV-1 transmission.
C/EBPs are a family of transcription factors characterized by a basic
DNA-binding domain linked to a basic leucine zipper dimerization motif.
The C/EBP family includes transcription activators C/EBP
, C/EBP
,
and C/EBP-related protein 1, and negative regulators such as
C/EBP
, liver-enriched transcriptional inhibitory protein (LIP), and
C/EBP-homologous protein 10 (CHOP-10) (26, 27). Due
to the homology in their basic leucine zipper domains, all the members
of the family can form heterodimers with each other (27).
C/EBP
, also called NF-IL6, NF-M, liver activator protein,
IL-6-D-element binding protein/EBP, and C/EBP-related protein 2, is
expressed at low levels in normal tissues, but is significantly
up-regulated by inflammatory stimuli such as bacterial LPS and
cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-1 (28).
C/EBP
is an intronless gene producing several isoforms
with either activating or inhibitory function via a leaky ribosome
scanning mechanism (29). LIP, an N-terminally truncated
form of C/EBP
, lacks most of the transactivation domain and is a
dominant negative inhibitor of C/EBP-mediated transcription of the
target gene (29). C/EBP
functional responsive elements
have been identified in the promoter region of a large number of genes
expressed in myeloid and lymphoid cells, including IL-1
, IL-4, IL-6,
IL-8, MIP-1
, TNF-
, and CD14 (30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36). In addition,
expression of CCR2, a gene closely related to
CCR5, is strongly dependent on the presence of intact C/EBP
sites in the promoter of the gene (37). Cell type-specific
gene regulation by C/EBP
has been shown to depend on interactions
with other transcription factors, such as NF-
B, PU.1, and
glucocorticoid receptors (38, 39, 40). An important role for
C/EBP
in the regulation of immune responses has been established
through the study of knockout mice. C/EBP
-deficient mice display
abnormalities in humoral, innate, and cellular immunity, and are highly
susceptible to infection with Candida albicans,
Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella typhi
(41, 42). Low IL-12 levels and depressed delayed-type
hypersensitivity, consistent with an impaired Th1 immune response, are
seen in these mice. Elevated IL-6 levels in C/EBP
-deficient mice
coincide with splenomegaly, peripheral lymphadenopathy, plasmacytosis,
and extramedullary hemopoiesis, as seen also in Castlemans disease in
humans (42).
Several studies have shown that C/EBP
plays an important role in the
control of HIV-1 LTR transcriptional activity (43, 44). Of
particular relevance is the finding that C/EBP
is required for
efficient replication of HIV-1 in macrophages but not in
CD4+ T cells (45).
We have identified several functional C/EBP
responsive elements
located in the promoter region and in the intron of CCR5, suggesting
that C/EBP
is involved in the regulation of CCR5 expression.
Cotransfection experiments showed that C/EBP
activates CCR5
expression in both myeloid and lymphoid cells. In myeloid cells, CCR5
activation by C/EBP
takes place independently of the presence of the
intron. In contrast, in lymphoid cells the intron is essential for the
activation of CCR5 gene expression by C/EBP
. We further
demonstrated, by using EMSA, that C/EBP
and LIP bind to the
C/EBP
sites located in the promoter region and in the intron of the
CCR5 gene in a cell type-specific manner. Our findings
suggest that the C/EBP
/LIP ratio might be important in the
regulation of CCR5 expression. RNA analysis demonstrated a 5-fold
increase in C/EBP
expression in circulating T lymphocytes from
HIV-1-infected individuals compared with healthy blood donors.
Similarly, analysis of CCR5 expression in PBMCs demonstrated increased
numbers of CCR5+ T lymphocytes in HIV-1-infected
individuals as compared with healthy blood donors. The increase in
CCR5+ T lymphocytes found in all stages of the
disease correlates with the decline in CD4 counts. Taken together,
these results suggest that C/EBP
is an important factor in the
regulation of CCR5 expression and may be involved in AIDS
pathogenesis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 3-kb fragment of genomic DNA upstream of the CCR5 gene AUG initiator was isolated from human PBMCs by PCR with a High Fidelity kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). The primers used were: forward, 5'-GGCCTCAGTAATGCATTACGAGGCCACGGCT-3' and reverse, 5'-GACTCAGTACCGCGGCTTGTTCCACCCGTGTCA-3'. The 3-kb amplified fragment was first cloned in pCRvector II using the TA cloning system (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) to generate p3kbR5. In this paper we define as nucleotide +1 the start site of transcription identified by Guignard et al. (16). This is nucleotide 59531 in GenBank sequence gbU95626. From the starting plasmid, p3kbR5, two fragments containing the CCR5 major promoter were subcloned in an expression vector. A 3-kb SacI/SacII fragment containing the CCR5 promoter and the intron, and a 1.2-kb AfiII/NciI fragment containing the CCR5 promoter and part of the first exon. The fragments were inserted immediately upstream of the AUG initiator codon of a strong mutant of the GFP of the jellyfish Aequorea victoria to generate p(-1124)R5In and p(-1124)R5, containing the 3- and 1.2-kb fragments, respectively. These vectors express GFP under the control of the CCR5 promoter. They were generated by replacing the CMV promoter in vector pCMV-GFPsg143 (46).
Plasmids p(-424)R5In and p(-166)R5In, containing
deletions in the 5' of the CCR5 promoter, and
p(-1112)R5In(
MxPp), p(-1112)R5In(
PpxPf), and
p(-1112)R5In(
MxPf), with internal deletions in the intron, were
generated from p(-1112)R5In by digestion with the appropriate
restriction enzymes, followed by filling with T4 polymerase and
blunt-end ligation. To generate p(424)R5In and p(166)R5In
containing promoter deletions, p(1124)R5In was digested with
SnaBI/AfiII or BglII and ligated. To
generate p(1112)R5In(
MxPp), p(1124R5In(
PpxPf), and
p(1112)pR5In(DMxPf)intron deletion plasmids, p(1124)R5In was
digested with MunI/PpuMI,
PpuMI/PfiMI, or MunI/PfiMI,
respectively, and ligated.
The two intronless promoter deletion mutants, p(424)R5 and
p(166)R5 were generated by double digestion of p(1112)R5 with
SnaBI/AfiII or BglII,
respectively, and religated. To generate the promoterless GFP plasmid
pPLGFP (negative control), the CMV promoter was excised from
pCMV-GFPsg143 by double digestion with
MunI/SacII. The expression vectors for human
C/EBP
and LIP were provided by G. Scala (University of Catanzaro,
Catanzaro, Italy), and U. Schibler (University of Geneva, Geneva,
Switzerland), respectively, and have been previously described
(29, 34).
All constructs were verified by restriction enzyme digestion and DNA sequencing. A search for putative DNA binding sites for transcription factors in the CCR5 regulatory sequences was conducted using programs Transcription Element Search Software (http://dot.imgen.bcm.tmc.edu) and MatInspector (http://transfac.gbf.de/) using the TRANSFAC database (47).
Cells
The human cell lines U937 (myeloid) and Jurkat (lymphoid), were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% FBS, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 mg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies). Cells were split as needed to keep them in the logarithmic growth phase.
Blood samples from patients and healthy donors
All blood samples were obtained in anticoagulant acid citrate dextrose solution tubes, after informed consent, under protocols approved by the National Institutes of Health Office of Human Subjects Research. PBMCs were purified by centrifugation over a Ficoll gradient. All PBMC samples were immediately processed for immunostaining and/or RNA extraction.
Transient transfections
Transfections were performed by electroporation of
Qiagen-purified plasmid DNA into Jurkat or U937 cells using 0.4 cm gap
cuvettes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The electroporation conditions were
250 mV and 960 µF, using 107 viable cells and
50 µg of DNA. The plasmid mixture typically consisted of 45 µg of
the CCR5-GFP construct, and 5 µg of C/EBP
or LIP or pBSPL DNA
(vector plasmid added for maintaining the same DNA concentration). In
each experiment separate control samples were transfected with either a
GFP-containing vector (pPLGFP) without promoter (negative control) in
the presence or absence of C/EBP
or a GFP expression vector under
the control of the CMV promoter (pCMV-GFP, positive control and
additional indicator of transfection efficiency). GFP expression was
analyzed 48 h after transfection.
Flow cytometry
GFP expression in transfected cells was analyzed using a FACS (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). Dead cells were excluded by propidium iodide staining. Multiparameter flow cytometric analysis was performed with 106 PBMCs stained with directly conjugated mAbs specific for human CCR5, CD3, CD4, and CD8 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) as previously described (24). For all samples, at least 1.5 x 104 viable cells were collected. Quadrants were set according to the fluorescence of cells stained with isotype-matched control Abs. Collected data were analyzed using CellQuest software.
Preparation of nuclear extracts and EMSA
Nuclear extracts from transfected U937 and Jurkat cells were
prepared according to a previously published protocol
(48). The protein content in the nuclear extracts was
measured by the Bio-Rad protein assay. Binding experiments were
performed using the following labeled oligonucleotide
probes: P1 sense, 5'-GGGGAGAGTGGAGAAAAAGGGGGCACAGGG-3'
(C/EBP
site 1, Fig. 1
A); P2 sense,
5'-AGAATTTTCTTAACCTTTT-3' (C/EBP
site 2); P3 sense,
5'-AGCCTTACTGTTGAAAAGC-3' (C/EBP
site 3); P4 sense,
5'-AGTAATTTCTTTTACTAAAAATGTGGGCTTTTTGACTAGATGAATG-3' (C/EBP
site
4); P5 sense, 5'-TGTGGCTTTGAGCAAGTTACTCACCCTCTCTG-3' (C/EBP
site
5); P6 sense, 5'-GAGAGGATTGCTTGAGCCCGGGTTGATCCA-3' (C/EBP
site 6 in
Fig. 1
); and P7 sense, AGATTTTATTTGGTGAGATGGTGCTTTCATGAATTCCCCCAAC
(C/EBP
site 7). Each oligonucleotide was annealed to its
complementary strand and end labeled with
32-ATP (Amersham) using T4 polynucleotide
kinase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Binding experiments were
performed with 20 µg of nuclear extract and 104
cpm of each hot probe as previously described (49). The
binding reactions were resolved by electrophoresis in 5% nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gels. Supershift experiments were performed by adding 1
µg of an anti-C/EBP
rabbit polyclonal Ab (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) to the reaction mixture 20 min before
addition of the hot probe. The binding reactions were incubated on ice
for 20 min before electrophoresis.
|
Total RNA was extracted from uncultured PBMCs by the RNazol
procedure according to the manufacturers instructions. cDNAs were
generated in 50-µl reactions containing, 0.5 µg of RNA, 5 mM dNTPs,
100 µg/ml random hexamers, 5x avian myeloblastosis virus
buffer, 2.5 U RNase inhibitor (Promega, Madison, WI), and 2 U avian
myeloblastosis virus-reverse transcriptase (Boehringer). After a 90-min
incubation at 45°C, the cDNAs were used as templates to amplify
C/EBP
and GAPDH by PCR. The real time PCR was performed in an ABI
PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA)
using the SYBR Green PCR core reagent kit (PE Applied Biosystems)
following the manufacturers protocol. Amplification was for 40 cycles
at 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 1 min
using C/EBP
primers 5'-GCGCGAGCGCAACAACA-3' and
5'-TGCTTGAACAAGTTCCGCAG-3' or GAPDH primers 5'-GTCGTATTGGGCGCCTG-3' and
5'-GTGATGGGATTTCCATTGATG-3'.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
binding sites are present throughout the
CCR5 gene
To identify putative cis-acting regulatory
sequences in the CCR5 gene, we used Transcription Element
Search Software or MatInspector programs and the TRANSFAC database
(47). In agreement with previously published reports,
analysis of the promoter region identified several
cis-acting sites including GATA, Rel, AP-1, and NF-AT
(16, 17, 18, 19). In addition, several C/EBP
binding sites were
identified in the CCR5 gene, as shown in Fig. 1
A. All of these sites had a
strong homology with the C/EBP
binding site consensus motif
TKNNGNAAY (50).
To analyze whether C/EBP
affects the expression of CCR5, two CCR5
promoter constructs, p(-1124)R5In and p(-1124)R5, expressing a GFP
mutant with enhanced fluorescing properties (46) were
generated (Fig. 1
B). p(-1124)R5In contains the entire CCR5
region from -1124 to the initiator AUG, whereas p(-1124)R5 has the
intron sequence between nucleotides +40 to 1954 removed. U937 and
Jurkat cells were transiently transfected with the construct
p(-1124)R5In or p(-1124)R5, either in the presence or absence of the
expression plasmid hC/EBP
. A powerful advantage of this system is
that expression of GFP reporter can be measured in live cells by flow
cytometry without any additional manipulations. GFP expression per cell
can be determined and expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)
for the population. We found that the presence of the intron had a
negative effect (3-fold reduction) on CCR5 expression in both myeloid
and lymphoid cells (Fig. 2
). Coexpression
of C/EBP
led to activation (3- to 4-fold) of CCR5-driven GFP
expression as measured by the MFI of the GFP-positive cells (Fig. 2
, A and B). Removal of the intron in p(-1124)R5
resulted in loss of C/EBP
activation of CCR5 in Jurkat cells (Fig. 2
B), indicating that C/EBP
binding sites located in this
region are essential for C/EBP
transactivation in lymphoid cells. In
contrast, p(-1124)R5 was fully responsive to C/EBP
in U937 cells
(Fig. 2
A).
|
It has been shown that some members of the C/EBP family, such as
Ig/EBP and LIP, act as negative regulators and can inhibit the
stimulatory effects of other family members by the generation of
heterodimers (26, 29). To investigate whether LIP, a
negative isoform of C/EBP
lacking the amino-terminal domain, could
affect either basal CCR5 promoter activity or C/EBP
stimulation of
CCR5 expression, we performed cotransfection experiments in U937 or
Jurkat cells using a LIP expression vector and p(-1124)R5In or
p(-1124)R5. LIP was able to efficiently neutralize the positive effect
of C/EBP
on p(-1124)R5In expression in both cell types and on
p(-1124)R5 in U937 cells (Fig. 3
, A and B). In contrast, neither C/EBP
nor LIP
affected the expression of p(-1124)R5, which lacks the intronic
sequence, in Jurkat cells (Fig. 3
B). These data are
consistent with the results of Fig. 2
and support the hypothesis that
activation or repression of CCR5 expression depends on binding of these
factors to functional sites.
|
and LIP binding to sites located in the promoter region
and in the intron of CCR5 gene
To study whether C/EBP
and LIP bind to sites in the
CCR5 gene as predicted by the functional assays, we
performed EMSA with 32P-labeled oligonucleotide
probes containing each of the C/EBP
sites shown in Fig. 1
A. Nuclear extracts from U937 cells transfected with either
C/EBP
or LIP produced specific complexes with all seven probes (Fig. 4
A). Addition of
anti-C/EBP
Abs to the binding mixture induced a supershift of
the specific complexes, demonstrating that C/EBP
or LIP was present
in these complexes.
|
complexes with sites 5 and 6,
located at the 3' portion of the intron. In contrast to U937 extracts,
no specific complexes were observed with either site 7 or any of the
sites located in the promoter region (sites 1 through 4, Fig. 1
(50). Binding experiments with
probes 5 or 6 and nuclear extracts from Jurkat cells produced two
C/EBP
complexes with different electrophoretic mobilities. Both
complexes appear to be specific and were supershifted by
anti-C/EBP
Ab. These results are in contrast to those obtained
with U937 cells and indicate that the molecular interaction between
C/EBP
and its DNA-binding sites is cell type specific. Previous
studies of IL-4 promoter regulation in Jurkat cells by Davydov et al.
(31) demonstrated the formation of two distinct C/EBP
complexes with an oligonucleotide containing a single C/EBP
binding
site. One hypothesis explaining the presence of two complexes is that
additional factors may be present in the complexes of C/EBP
with
oligonucleotides P5 and P6 in lymphoid cells.
The C/EBP
functional elements required for activation in Jurkat
cells are located at the 3' part of the intron of the
CCR5 gene
To determine the specific sites required for C/EBP
transactivation of CCR5, a series of constructs with deletions in the
intron that do not affect the splice sites was generated (Fig. 5
). Transient transfection experiments
showed that, in the absence of C/EBP
, GFP expression was similar for
all three deletion mutants, indicating that the deleted regions do not
contribute significantly to the baseline expression levels of CCR5 in
either U937 or Jurkat cells (data not shown). Transfection experiments
in the presence of C/EBP
demonstrated that the sites located in the
3' portion of the intron are essential for C/EBP
activation in
Jurkat cells but not in U937 cells (Fig. 5
). Elimination of either site
5 or sites 6 and 7 abrogated C/EBP
-mediated activation of CCR5 in
Jurkat cells. Because site 7 did not show any binding by EMSA with
Jurkat cell nuclear extracts, we concluded that sites 5 and 6 are
required for activation. As expected from the data in Fig. 2
, all three
intron mutants were activated by C/EBP
in U937 cells. No significant
difference was observed in the expression of these intron mutants in
U937 cells.
|
To further characterize the CCR5 promoter sites important for
transactivation by C/EBP
, two series of deletion reporter plasmids
based on p(-1124)R5In and p(-1124)R5 were generated (Fig. 6
). Upon transfection in U937 or
Jurkat cells, GFP expression by the different deletion mutants in the
presence or absence of C/EBP
was measured by flow cytometry. In U937
cells, deletion of all upstream promoter sites (1, 2, 3, 4) did not eliminate
activation by C/EBP
, suggesting that sites within the intron are
sufficient for activation. Using the intronless constructs, we found
that the region containing sites 2, 3, and 4 is sufficient for
activation. Elimination of all C/EBP
binding sites in p(-166)R5
resulted in loss of response to C/EBP
.
|
, despite the presence of
the functional intron sites 5 and 6. These results suggest that
activation through sites 5 and 6 requires also the presence of
cis-acting regions other than the C/EBP
sites, located in
the region -424 to -166. The requirement of additional factors acting
in cooperation with C/EBP
has been described previously; for
example, it was shown that expression of CD11c requires the presence of
Sp1 together with C/EBP
(51).
Higher levels of C/EBP
and CCR5 in T lymphocytes from
HIV-1-infected individuals
Based on our results showing regulation of the CCR5 promoter by
C/EBP
and the important role of C/EBP
as a regulator of immune
responses and cytokine production, we studied whether C/EBP
expression in vivo is affected by HIV-1 infection. Total RNA was
purified from uncultured PBMCs from HIV-1-infected individuals and
healthy blood donors. The RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified by
PCR using primers specific for C/EBP
. The PCR products were resolved
by electrophoresis on agarose gels. C/EBP
was consistently detected
in samples from HIV-1-infected individuals. In contrast, samples from
healthy donors were either negative or low for C/EBP
amplification
(data not shown). Next, we quantified the expression of C/EBP
in
total PBMCs, purified CD3+ T cells, and monocytes
(CD14+ cells) from HIV-1-infected individuals and
blood donors by using a real time quantitative RT-PCR protocol (see
Materials and Methods). C/EBP
expression was 5-fold
higher in PBMC samples from HIV-1-infected individuals (Fig. 7
A). A similar increase in
C/EBP
expression was found in both monocytes and
CD3+ T cells from HIV-1-infected patients (data
not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The presence of multiple C/EBP
binding sites throughout the
CCR5 gene indicated that the transcription factor C/EBP
might regulate CCR5 expression. The experimental results presented here
demonstrate that C/EBP
indeed stimulates expression from the CCR5
promoter. We have found that in myeloid cells the activation by
C/EBP
is mediated independently either through sites located
upstream of the transcription initiation point or sites located in the
intron. In contrast, in lymphoid cells the upstream sites appear to be
nonfunctional for C/EBP
binding. Activation of CCR5 in lymphoid
cells requires the intron C/EBP
binding sites. Although all seven
binding sites shown in Fig. 1
A bound C/EBP
in U937 cells,
only sites 5 and 6 in the intron did so in Jurkat cells. The difference
in binding to C/EBP
probes observed between nuclear extracts from
U937 and Jurkat cells suggests that interaction of C/EBP
with
additional cell type-specific factors is required for CCR5 regulation.
Furthermore, EMSA experiments showed the presence of two specific
C/EBP
complexes using oligonucleotides 5 and 6 with Jurkat nuclear
extracts. This was not observed with U937 cell nuclear extracts,
suggesting that the molecular mechanisms resulting in CCR5 regulation
by C/EBP
are different in myeloid and lymphoid cells. Cell-type
specific regulation of gene expression by C/EBP
has been previously
demonstrated. It was found that C/EBP
regulation of CD11c in U937
cells required the functional interplay with additional cell-type
specific transcriptional factors, such as Sp1 (51).
Transcriptional synergy between C/EBP
and Sp1 in the regulation of
rat cytochrome CYP2D5 gene expression has also been
demonstrated (53); in that work, weak C/EBP
binding
sites were not recognized by C/EBP
unless a functional Sp1 site was
closely located.
We found that LIP, the transdominant negative isoform of C/EBP
, was
an efficient inhibitor of C/EBP
-dependent gene expression. The
inhibition of CCR5 promoter activity by LIP further supports the direct
involvement of C/EBP
in CCR5 regulation, because LIP is a specific
inhibitor. These results also suggest that C/EBP regulation of the
CCR5 gene is specific and tightly controlled. Two mechanisms
can explain the function of LIP as a dominant negative regulator:
competition with C/EBP
for the binding sites on the DNA, or
heterodimer formation between LIP and C/EBP
resulting in impaired
ability to stimulate gene expression. Both mechanisms have been
previously proposed to explain C/EBP
inhibition by Ig/EBP
(C/EBP
), another member of the C/EBP family of transcription
regulators (26). C/EBP
and LIP are translated from two
different AUGs in the same reading frame within a single mRNA molecule.
It has been suggested that the ratio of the two isoforms is important
for regulation of gene expression in vivo, and that this ratio is
regulated. For example, a marked increase in the C/EBP
/LIP ratio was
found in newborn rats during terminal hepatic maturation
(29). We propose that the balanced expression of the two
C/EBP isoforms is a key regulator of CCR5 expression in leukocytes.
C/EBP binding sites have also been identified in the promoter of CCR2,
a receptor closely related to CCR5 (37). Similar to CCR5,
CCR2 can function as a coreceptor for HIV-1 (4, 54).
Interestingly, a genetic polymorphism in CCR2 gene,
substitution V64I, is associated with delayed progression to AIDS
(55, 56, 57, 58). In addition, both CCR2 and CCR5 bind to monocyte
chemoattractant protein-2 (59) and are coexpressed in
similar lymphocyte subpopulations including intraepithelial lymphocytes
in the gut-associated lymphatic tissue (60). It has been
shown that lymphocyte activation increases the expression of both CCR5
and CCR2, suggesting that similar mechanisms regulate their expression
and that these receptors may be functionally linked (60, 61). The finding by Yamamoto et al. (37) that
mutations in the C/EBP binding sites result in strong down-regulation
of the CCR2 promoter activity supports the concept that C/EBP
is an
important regulator of a group of chemokine receptors that includes
CCR5 and CCR2.
C/EBP
is involved in the regulation of T helper responses and
macrophage activation. It has been shown that mice deficient in
C/EBP
have increased susceptibility to systemic candidiasis,
impaired production of IFN-
, IL-2, and IL-12, and increased IL-4 and
IL-6. This pattern of cytokine production, together with an expansion
of the B cell compartment in peripheral lymphatic tissues, indicates an
enhanced Th2 response in the absence of C/EBP
and emphasizes the
importance of C/EBP
in the regulation of polarized immune responses
(42). Similar defects in Th1 immune responses have been
described in CCR2-knockout mice, which are characterized by impaired
monocyte migration, delayed-type hypersensitivity, and a severe
decrease in IFN-
production by T lymphocytes (62). We
found elevated levels of C/EBP
in lymphocytes from HIV-1-infected
individuals. This increase correlates with a higher frequency of
circulating CCR5+ lymphocytes and is compatible
with the general immune activation present in HIV-1-infected patients.
Our findings on the CCR5 activation by C/EBP
together with increased
C/EBP
expression in peripheral blood from HIV-1-infected individuals
provides a molecular mechanism to explain the apparently paradoxical
expansion of CCR5+ lymphocytes in AIDS
patients.
The role of C/EBP
isoforms in HIV disease is not restricted to the
regulation of immune responses and CCR5 expression; it has been shown
that C/EBP
is a regulator of HIV-1 expression through its
interaction with the HIV LTR (43, 49). Furthermore, it has
been proposed that efficient HIV-1 replication in macrophages requires
the presence of C/EBP
binding sites, whereas such sites are
dispensable in infected T cells (45). In this context, it
has also been shown that type I IFN induces in macrophages a truncated
(16-kDa) inhibitory isoform of C/EBP
that represses the LTR activity
(63).
Roux et al. recently demonstrated that HIV-1 Vpr, a protein essential
for viral propagation in vivo, stimulates the production of IL-8
through the activation of NF-
B and C/EBP
(64).
C/EBP
induction by HIV may help the virus in two important ways: by
facilitating viral transcription in resting cells, and by increasing
the number of cells susceptible to infection via stimulation of CCR5 in
CD4+ cells. The broad range of biological effects
mediated by C/EBP
suggests that its increased production in
HIV-1-infected individuals may be important in the pathogenesis of
AIDS.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
and LIP expression plasmids, respectively; and
T. Jones for clerical assistance. | Footnotes |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: MIP, macrophage-inflammatory protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein; LIP, liver-enriched transcriptional inhibitory protein; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. ![]()
Received for publication May 30, 2000. Accepted for publication May 25, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, MIP-1
receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. Science 272:1955.[Abstract]
-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates. Cell 85:1135.[Medline]
-chemokine receptors CKR-5, CKR-3, and CKR-2b as fusion cofactors. Cell 85:1149.[Medline]
) is a transdominant negative inhibitor of C/EBP family transcriptional activators. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4371.
(IL-1
) gene by mycobacterial components and lipopolysaccharide is mediated by two nuclear factor-IL6 motifs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:3831.
B p65 (RelA) and NF-IL-6. J. Immunol. 153:153.[Abstract]
B synergistically activate transcription of the inflammatory cytokines, interleukin 6 and interleukin 8. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10193.
regulation of the tumor necrosis factor
gene. J. Clin. Invest. 94:1449.
B associates with the NF-IL6 transcription factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:8145.
(C/EBP
, CRP3). J. Immunol. 155:4330.[Abstract]
1-acid glycoprotein gene via direct protein-protein interaction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:1854.
and/or C/EBP
gene. EMBO J. 16:7432.[Medline]
-deficient mice: [Published erratum appears in 1995 EMBO J. 14:3596.]. EMBO J. 14:1932.[Medline]
B/Rel transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 271:22479.
but not C/EBP
to synergize with an Sp1 protein is specified by the leucine zipper and activation domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2038.[Abstract]
, repressing the HIV-1 long terminal repeat in macrophages: pulmonary tuberculosis alters C/EBP expression, enhancing HIV-1 replication. J. Exp. Med. 188:1255.
B and NF-IL-6 by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protein R (Vpr) induces interleukin-8 expression. J. Virol. 74:4658.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Mohan, P. P. Aye, J. T. Borda, X. Alvarez, and A. A. Lackner CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein {beta} Is a Major Mediator of Inflammation and Viral Replication in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Rhesus Macaques Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2008; 173(1): 106 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Weinberg, S. Barichievy, L. Schaffer, J. Han, and K. V. Morris An RNA targeted to the HIV-1 LTR promoter modulates indiscriminate off-target gene activation Nucleic Acids Res., December 18, 2007; 35(21): 7303 - 7312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mummidi, L. M. Adams, S. E. VanCompernolle, M. Kalkonde, J. F. Camargo, H. Kulkarni, A. S. Bellinger, G. Bonello, H. Tagoh, S. S. Ahuja, et al. Production of Specific mRNA Transcripts, Usage of an Alternate Promoter, and Octamer-Binding Transcription Factors Influence the Surface Expression Levels of the HIV Coreceptor CCR5 on Primary T Cells J. Immunol., May 1, 2007; 178(9): 5668 - 5681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Giri, V. Rajagopal, S. Shahi, B. V. Zlokovic, and V. K. Kalra Mechanism of amyloid peptide induced CCR5 expression in monocytes and its inhibition by siRNA for Egr-1 Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): C264 - C276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Hu, Z. Wu, H. Jin, N. Hashimoto, T. Liu, and S. H. Phan CCAAT/Enhancer-Binding Protein {beta} Isoforms and the Regulation of {alpha}-Smooth Muscle Actin Gene Expression by IL-1{beta} J. Immunol., October 1, 2004; 173(7): 4661 - 4668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Georgantas III, V. Tanadve, M. Malehorn, S. Heimfeld, C. Chen, L. Carr, F. Martinez-Murillo, G. Riggins, J. Kowalski, and C. I. Civin Microarray and Serial Analysis of Gene Expression Analyses Identify Known and Novel Transcripts Overexpressed in Hematopoietic Stem Cells Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 64(13): 4434 - 4441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Moriuchi and H. Moriuchi YY1 Transcription Factor Down-regulates Expression of CCR5, a Major Coreceptor for HIV-1 J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 13003 - 13007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mo, J. Chen, Y. Han, C. Bueno-Cannizares, D. E. Misek, P. A. Lescure, S. Hanash, and R. L. Yung T Cell Chemokine Receptor Expression in Aging J. Immunol., January 15, 2003; 170(2): 895 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |