|
|
||||||||
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The signals and cellular compartments underlying dendritic cell (DC)
development are also unclear (reviewed by Banchereau et al.
(1)). Although controversial, several studies suggest that
functionally unique subsets of DCs arise from distinct pools of
lineage-restricted progenitors. For instance, putative lymphoid DCs,
defined by a CD8
+CD11b- surface phenotype,
are selectively reduced following removal or inhibition of certain
lymphoid-specific transcription factors (2, 3). This
contrasts with mice lacking RelB or PU.1, which exhibit specific
defects in myeloid development and selective reductions in
CD8
-CD11b+ DCs (4, 5).
Furthermore, early thymocyte precursors lacking detectable myeloid
potential, including a B/T/NK precursor population and a downstream
progenitor pool lacking B and NK cell potential, each give rise to
CD8
+ DCs (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). However, recent studies
indicate that different DC surface phenotypes are not determined by
ontogeny. For instance, Martin et al. report that thymic
CD4low progenitors give rise to both
CD8
- and CD8
+ DCs (12), and
Traver et al. recently demonstrated that a myeloid-restricted
progenitor population gives rise to CD8
+ DCs
(13). These observations suggest that DC expression of
CD11b and CD8
may be determined by signals unique to particular
microenvironments.
In this report we take advantage of a culture system previously
described to support DC differentiation from early thymocytes
(9) to assess DC precursor potential among a wide spectrum
of B-lineage progenitor populations representing varying degrees of
B-lineage commitment. These include pluripotent HSCs, common lymphoid
progenitors (CLPs) and pre-pro- and pro-B cells previously shown to
give rise to B cells, but not T or NK cells. First, we confirm and
extend previous reports by Kondo et al. (14, 15) by
showing that CLPs can be defined among lineage marker
(Lin)- BM cells via coexpression of IL-7R
and the C1q
receptor (C1qR/AA4). Second, we show that both CLPs and a subset of
pre-pro-B cells, defined previously by their expression of sterile
transcripts derived from the IgH locus and a
CD4+B220+CD19- surface phenotype,
rapidly differentiate into DCs in culture. Furthermore, among B-lineage
precursor populations, the capacity to give rise to DCs was clearly
restricted to CD4+B220+ pre-pro-B cells, as
CD4- pre-pro-B cells as well as more mature B-lineage
cells failed to differentiate into DCs. Together, these findings reveal
a previously unrecognized common developmental pathway for early B and
DC ontogeny and demonstrate that loss of DC differentiative potential
in the final step in the onset of B-lineage commitment.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Six- to 10-wk-old C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), and B6.Ly5.1 (referred to herein as B6.Ly5SJL) mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute animal facility (Frederick, MD). BM cells were flushed from tibias and femurs of 8- to 10-wk-old C57BL/6 mice with FACS buffer (PBS containing 3% FCS 1 mM EDTA and 0.05% sodium azide). Following lysis of RBCs with 0.165 M NH4Cl2, cells were washed, then stained with the appropriate Abs before sorting.
CD4+ T cells were prepared by perfusing spleens from C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice with cold PBS containing 3% FCS. Following RBC lysis, cell suspensions were incubated with ascites containing anti-B220 Abs (RA3-6B2) and purified CD8, CD11b, and CD14 (PharMingen, La Jolla, CA) before washing and depletion with sheep anti-rat Ig-coated magnetic microspheres (Dynal, Lake Success, NY) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Abs, cell sorting, and analytical flow cytometry
For cell sorting experiments BM suspensions were stained with
optimal dilutions of directly conjugated fluorescent Abs for 30 min on
ice, then washed twice in FACS buffer. For HSCs, cells were stained
with fluorescein (FL) anti-Sca-1/Ly6 A/E (E13-161.7), PE-labeled
lineage markers (B220 (RA3-6B2), CD11b/Mac-1 (M1/70), Gr-1 (8C5),
Ter-119, and CD3 (2C11), and allophycocyanin
anti-CD117/c-kit (2B8). For CLPs, cells were stained
with FL-anti-Sca-1, PE-anti-Lin, PE-Cy5-anti-IL-7R
(A7R34) (16), and allophycocyanin-anti-C1qR/AA4.1
(17, 18). For pre-pro-B cell subsets, cells were stained
with FL-anti-B220, PE-anti-AA4.1, biotin (BI)-anti-CD24/HSA
(30F1), and allophycocyanin-anti-CD4 (GK1.5). For pro- and pre-B
cells, cells were stained with FL-anti-CD43 (S7), PE-anti-CD19
(1D3), and BI-anti-sIgM (R6-60). Biotinylated Abs were revealed
with streptavidin-coupled PE-Cy5, and all reagents were purchased from
PharMingen except for B220, A7R34, AA4.1, and GK1.5, which were
purified and conjugated by standard methods in our laboratory.
Each cell population was purified on a 10-parameter MoFlo cell sorter (Cytomation, Fort Collins, CO) equipped with Summit software and three lasers, including an I-90C argon laser tuned to 488 nm and an I-70C Spectrum argon/krypton laser (both obtained from Coherent, Santa Clara, CA) tuned to 647 nm for excitation of allophycocyanin and its derivatives.
The following Abs were purchased from PharMingen and used for analysis
of adoptive transfers and culture assays described below:
FL-anti-I-Ab (AF6-120.1),
anti-Ly5B6 (104), and
anti-Ly5SJL (A20); PE-anti-CD11c (HL3),
CD19, or CD3 (2C11); BI-anti-CD11b; and
allophycocyanin-anti-CD8
(53-6.7), CD11b, or TCR
(H57). After
staining, propidium iodide (final concentration, 1 µg/ml) was added
for dead cell exclusion, and cells were analyzed on a dual laser
FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) equipped with CellQuest
software. All flow cytometric data were analyzed by uploading files
into FlowJo (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA).
Adoptive transfers
For each recipient, 3000 sorted CLPs or HSCs from C57BL/6 mice were mixed with 105 unfractionated BM cells from B6.Ly5SJL mice, then transferred i.v. into B6.Ly5SJL recipients given 900 rad 20 h previously. Twenty to 30 days later, recipient peripheral blood was stained with FL-anti-Ly5B6, PE-anti-CD19, BI-anti-CD11b (revealed with PE-Cy5 streptavidin), and allophycocyanin-anti-CD3, and CLP or HSC-derived cells were identified by gating on Ly5B6+ cells.
Stromal cell cultures
Single HSCs or CLPs were sorted directly onto 96-well flat-bottom plates containing pre-established monolayers of S17 stromal cells and 200 µl complete medium (Opti-MEM with 5% FCS (Irvine, CA, Santa Ana, CA), 10 mM glutamine, 10 mM HEPES, 0.5 mg/ml gentamicin, and 5 x 10-5 2-ME) supplemented with 100 ng/ml rIL-7 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Single-cell sorting was accomplished using single-sort mode with a one-drop sort envelop and the CyCLONE automated cell cloner (Cytomation). Fourteen days later wells containing cell growth were counted, and cells were stained for flow cytometry.
Myeloid lymphoid progenitor (MLP) assay
A variation of the MLP assay originally described by Kawamoto et al. (19) was used to simultaneously assess B cell, T cell, and myeloid activities from individual HSCs or CLPs. For these experiments single-sorted cells were microinjected into day 15 fetal thymi given 2700 rad 20 h previously, and individual inoculated thymi were placed onto polycarbonate filters (Millipore, Bedford, MA) and floated in 2 ml complete medium containing 3 µg/ml IL-3, 10 ng/ml IL-7, and 10 ng/ml stem cell factor (SCF; R&D Systems). After 7 days medium was replaced with complete medium containing IL-3 and IL-7, but not SCF. Seven days later single-cell suspensions were prepared from individual thymi and stained for flow cytometric analysis.
DC precursor cultures
Progenitor cells were sorted directly into complete medium
containing 2 ng/ml IL-1
, 400 ng/ml IL-3, 10 ng/ml IL-7, 10 ng/ml
SCF, 100 ng/ml Flt3L, and 1 ng/ml TNF-
(R&D Systems) as previously
described (20). After sorting, 1000 cells/well in 200 µl
were added to V-bottom 96-well plates and incubated for 46 days
before harvesting and determination of viable cell numbers and
expression of indicated cell surface molecules by flow cytometry.
MLR
DC precursor cultures were initiated with 5000 cells/well and extended to 9 days to generate sufficient numbers of DCs. Fifty percent of the medium was exchanged with fresh cytokine-containing medium every 3 days. On day 9 viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion and graded doses of DCs mixed in quadruplicate at a final volume of 200 µl with 100,000 purified CD4+ splenic T cells in 96-well round-bottom plates containing complete medium. Six days later cultures were pulsed with 1 µCi [3H]thymidine for 18 h before scintillation counting.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fig. 1
illustrates our strategy for
the resolution of several early B-lineage precursor populations in
adult mouse BM. These include a Lin- IL-7R
+
C1qR/AA4+ Sca-1low population
representing 0.04% of total BM, which we will show below to correspond
to CLPs (21) (Fig. 1
A), and two subsets of
early B-lineage cells (pre-pro-B cells, fractions (Fr.)
A1 and A2). Significantly,
each pre-pro-B cell subset represents 0.1% of total BM (Fig. 1
B) and is characterized by the expression of sterile IgH
locus transcripts but lack of the pan-B cell marker CD19
(15), and was shown previously to give rise to pro-B
cells, but not T or NK cells or cells of the myeloid or erythroid
lineage (14).
|
and
AA4
Several lines of evidence suggest that the
Lin-IL-7R
+C1qR/AA4+
Sca-1low population illustrated in Fig. 1
A corresponds to the BM CLP population described by Kondo
et al. (21). First, in competitive adoptive transfer
experiments Lin- IL-7R
+
C1qR/AA4+ Sca-1low cells gave rise to
donor-derived B and T cells, but not CD11b+ myeloid lineage
cells (Fig. 2
). This finding contrasted
with recipients of
Lin-c-kit+Sca-1+HSCs,
in which CD11b+ cells were readily detected. Second, single
Lin-IL-7R
+
AA4+Sca-1low cells gave rise to B cells, but
not macrophages, when cultured on S17 stromal cells, and this also
contrasted with cultures seeded with HSCs that typically contained both
CD19+ CD11b- B cells and
CD19-CD11b+ macrophages (Table I
). Third, because S17 cultures do not
support T cell development, we injected single HSCs vs CLPs into the
MLP assay previously shown to support B cell, T cell, and myeloid
development from HSCs (19). As shown in Fig. 3
, donor-derived
(Ly5SJL+) CD11b+ myeloid as well as
TCR
+ T cells and CD19+ B cells were detected
when fetal thymi were seeded with single HSCs. In contrast, seven of
seven thymi seeded with BM CLPs (Lin-IL-7R
+
AA4+Sca-1low cells) contained detectable
numbers of donor-derived TCR
+ T cells and
CD19+ B cells, but not CD11b+ myeloid
cells. Finally,
Lin-IL-7R
+AA4+Sca-1low
cells also expressed a c-kitlow
CD24/HSAintermediate Thy-1.2- surface
phenotype as previously described for BM CLPs (data not shown)
(21). Together, these data confirm the existence of a CLP
population in adult mouse BM and support the possibility that
particular combinations of environmental stimuli can drive CLPs and
perhaps early B-lineage cells to adopt different cell fates.
|
|
|
We assessed the degree to which several lymphoid precursor populations differentiated into DCs in culture by exposing 1000 sorted cells from each population to a cytokine combination previously shown to promote lymphoid DC development from thymic progenitors (9). The progenitor populations tested include HSCs, CLPs, CD4+B220+ (Fr. A1), and CD4-B220+ (Fr. A2) pre-pro-B cells and pro-B cells (Frs. B/C) defined by a CD19+CD43+sIgM- surface phenotype and readily detectable heavy chain rearrangements (20, 22). Significantly, pre-pro-B cells and pro-B cells each lack detectable T-lineage progenitor activity when derived from wild-type mice (14) and thus serve as a test of whether DC progenitor activity is maintained after loss of T-lineage potential during BM lymphopoiesis. We chose this in vitro DC progenitor assay over in vivo adoptive transfer experiments for several reasons. First, these cultures allow a direct and immediate assessment of DC differentiative potential and thus avoid complications arising from the potential maturation of multipotent progenitors into more immediate DC precursors. Second, unlike adoptive transfer of CLPs, we have found that detection of donor cells derived from Fr. A1 requires the transfer of at least 20,000 cells/recipient, making it difficult to control for small numbers of contaminating HSCs. Therefore, we controlled for potential contamination by directly comparing parallel short term cultures seeded with as few as 1000 cells derived from a wide array of progenitor populations. Finally, with this system we can readily assess differences in proliferation, surface phenotype, and function that result from exposure of different progenitors to the combination of cytokines used.
Although all DC subsets in mice can be identified via surface
coexpression of MHC class II and CD11c (23), we did not
find detectable class II surface expression in any of the progenitor
populations examined (data not shown). However, as shown in Fig. 4
, among HSCs and the lymphoid-restricted
progenitor populations tested, both CLPs and
CD4+B220+ (Fr. A1)
pre-pro-B cells gave rise to class II+CD11c+
cells after 4 days in culture. Significantly, these cells also
exhibited a high forward and side light scatter profile typical of DCs
(data not shown), and cultures seeded with CLPs and
CD4+B220+ (Fr. A1)
pre-pro-B cells contained 6070% and nearly 100% class
II+CD11c+ cells, respectively (Fig. 4
). These
data clearly contrasted with those for cultures seeded with equivalent
numbers of CD4-B220+ pre-pro-B cells (Fr.
A2) and CD19+CD43+ pro-B
cells (Frs. B/C), in which significant numbers of DCs were not detected
(Figs. 4
and 5
). There were also
significant differences in numbers of viable cells and DCs recovered
from cultures seeded with Fr. A1 vs CLPs, with
4-fold increases in numbers of CLP-derived DCs over input cell numbers
compared with no more than 2-fold increases in cultures seeded with Fr.
A1 pre-pro-B cells (Fig. 5
). Although
CD19+CD43+ pro-B cells readily expanded in
response to these culture conditions on day 4, and we were unable to
detect class II+ CD11c+ cells in these
cultures. Furthermore, most of these cells remained CD19+
and also failed to up-regulate expression of surface molecules
associated with DC function such as CD80 and CD86 (Fig. 5
and data not
shown). Thus, among these early B-lineage precursor populations, we
found that only CLPs and CD4+ B220+ pre-pro-B
cells contained significant numbers of cells susceptible to
cytokine-induced DC differentiation.
|
|
To examine DC function, we tested whether graded doses of CLP- and
Fr. A1-derived DCs could stimulate the
proliferation of resting allogeneic T cells and tested for
up-regulation of CD80 and CD86. Because Fr. A1
yields limiting numbers of DCs in these cultures (Fig. 5
), only three
doses of Fr A1-derived DCs were used in these
experiments compared with six doses of CLP-derived DCs. As shown in
Fig. 6
, C57BL/6
(H-2b) CLP-derived (Fig. 6
A) and Fr.
A1-derived (Fig. 6
B) class
II+ CD11c+ cells readily stimulated the
proliferation of CD4+ T cells purified from BALB/c
(H-2d), but not C57BL/6 splenocytes. Second,
class II+ cells induced from both CLPs and Fr.
A1 also expressed the CD28 costimulatory ligands
CD80 and CD86 (Fig. 7
). Together, these
data demonstrate that exposure of CLPs and
CD4+B220+ (Fr. A1)
pre-pro-B cells to cytokines known to induce DC differentiation
resulted in the generation of functional DCs.
|
|
+CD11b-
peripheral DCs were a functionally unique DC subset derived exclusively
from the lymphoid lineage, Traver et al. recently reported that
CD8
+ DCs can also develop from common myeloid
progenitors (13), raising the possibility that different
DC phenotypes, and perhaps functions, are a consequence of unique
environmental stimuli as opposed to ontogeny. Indeed, while
CD8
+ splenic DCs are reportedly poor stimulators in
MLRs, we found that CLP and Fr. A1-derived DCs
readily induce proliferation of allogeneic CD4+ T cells
(Fig. 6
and CD11b on CLP- and Fr. A1-derived DCs.
As shown in Fig. 7
relatively to what is typically found on
splenic CD8
+ DCs (23) and surprisingly high
levels of CD11b. These data, together with the capacity of CLP-derived
DCs to stimulate alloreactive T cells, indicate that different DC
phenotypes and functions may result from exposure to unique
combinations of cytokines. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
+ CD11b- DCs with a marginal
ability to stimulate alloreactive T cells, we found that CLP and
CD4+B220+ pre-pro-B cell-derived DCs each
exhibited a CD8
lowCD11b+ surface
phenotype and readily stimulated the proliferation of allogeneic
CD4+ T cells. Thus, our data further support the idea that
DC phenotype and function are dictated, in part or in whole, by unique
environmental stimuli rather that ontogeny (13).
We also confirm and extend previous reports characterizing CLPs in
adult BM (21). In particular, we show that B/T-restricted
progenitors can be identified among Lin- BM cells based on
an
IL-7R
+C1qR/AA4+Sca-1low
surface phenotype and suggest that these cells correspond to the BM CLP
population described by Kondo et al. (21). Supporting this
conclusion, each population expressed a
Lin-IL-7R
+Sca-1lowCD117/c-kitlow
Thy-1- CD24/HSAintermediate surface
phenotype (Fig. 1
and data not shown) (21), and both
populations gave rise to B and T cells, but not myeloid lineage cells,
in a competitive adoptive transfer assay (Fig. 2
) and in fetal thymic
organ culture under conditions previously shown to support multilineage
progenitor differentiation (Fig. 3
) (19). In addition,
single CLPs, as defined here, exhibited highly efficient cloning
efficiencies and failed to give rise to detectable numbers of myeloid
lineage cells on S17 stromal cells (Table I
), yet gave rise to clonal
populations of B and T cells in fetal thymic organ culture. Therefore,
these cells coupled with each pre-pro-B cell subset constitute pivotal
stages of early B cell development and B-lineage commitment.
Our data support the idea that loss of DC differentiative potential is
the final step in B-lineage commitment, because CD4+
B220+ pre-pro-B cells (Fr. A1) yield
DCs (Figs. 4
and 5
), but not T or NK cells (14).
Interestingly, a potentially analogous relationship has been reported
for T-lineage commitment in the adult thymus, because both an early B/T
progenitor and a more restricted downstream progenitor lacking
B-lineage potential reportedly give rise to DCs (10).
Regarding DC precursors among early B-lineage cells, it is noteworthy
that cells within Fr. A1 were previously shown to
express transcripts for several B-lineage-restricted genes, including
Pax5 (15), a zinc finger transcription factor associated
with maintaining and perhaps inducing B cell commitment (24, 25). Although this finding might appear to be at odds with the
capacity of Fr. A1 to give rise to DCs, we would
point out that the precise activity of Pax5 in CLPs and early B-lineage
precursors remains to be determined.
DC differentiation potential of several B-lineage progenitors clearly
correlated with developmental maturity, with the least mature of two
subsets of pre-pro-B cells (Fr. A1) defined by
low CD4 expression clearly giving rise to DCs, while later stages did
not (Figs. 4
and 5
). Indeed, we did not observe measurable numbers of
DCs when later B-lineage subpopulations, including CD4-
pre-pro-B cells (Fr. A2) and
CD19+CD43+ pro-B cells, were introduced into
this system. At present it is difficult to reconcile these data with a
previous report using this culture system in which low frequencies of
DC precursors were detected among CD19+ CD43+
pro-B cells (20). However, because disparate results might
result from differences in sorting gates, cytokine concentrations,
and/or duration of cultures, we were particularly careful to use
consistent sorting gates, single-use aliquots of each cytokine, and to
restrict our phenotypic analyses to 4- to 5-day cultures. In fact, we
have been able to detect small numbers of class
IIbright CD11cdull cells by
extending pro-B cultures to 8 days (data not shown), suggesting that
small numbers of contaminating cells may be responsible for this
discrepancy. We would also point out that while early CD4+
pre-pro-B cells readily differentiated into DCs, more mature
CD4- pre-pro-B cells, which have been shown to readily
differentiate into pro-B cells in culture (14), failed to
either proliferate or adopt a DC phenotype (Figs. 4
and 5
). Therefore,
these data suggest that loss of DC precursor potential accompanies the
development of late (CD4-) pre-pro-B cells and their
CD19+ progeny and should therefore serve as a baseline for
studies exploring the signals that induce and prevent B-lineage
progenitors from adopting a DC fate.
Certain previous studies suggest that lymphoid-restricted progenitors
yield exclusively CD8
+ CD11b- DCs. However,
both CLP and Fr. A1-derived DCs were
CD8
low CD11b+ (Fig. 7
), suggesting
that environmental stimuli can dictate or modulate DC phenotype and
perhaps function. Supporting this model, two recent studies demonstrate
that BM common myeloid progenitors and thymic CLPs each give rise to
CD8
+ and CD8
- DCs (12, 13).
This idea is also supported by recent experiments showing induction of
CD8
expression in Langerhans cells (26) and
CD11b+ DCs (27). However, it is noteworthy
that a recent report from Kamath et al. failed to find evidence for
frequent interconversion of these phenotypes among splenic DCs
(28). Together these studies suggest that signals inducing
unique DC phenotypes and functions are probably restricted to unique
microenvironmental niches associated with initiation and/or maintenance
of T cell responses in situ.
The in vitro DC progenitor assay used here also revealed differences in
proliferative responses to the cytokines used. We suggest that this
difference might be accounted for by previous reports demonstrating
that B-lineage commitment correlates with loss in expression of
receptors for pro-proliferative cytokines such as IL-7 or SCF
(29, 30, 31). In fact, we previously reported that
CD4+ B220+ (Fr. A1)
pre-pro-B cells specifically lack detectable levels of the SCF receptor
c-kit and the IL-7R
-chain (14), suggesting
that down-regulation of these receptors may be a key factor in DC vs B
cell differentiation from early B-lineage progenitors. Indeed, compared
with Fr. A2, cells within Fr.
A1 yield low frequencies of pro-B cell precursors
(14), suggesting that cells in Fr.
A1 may be more likely to yield DCs rather than
pro-B cells.
In summary, we find that both CLPs and a subset of pre-pro-B cells readily differentiate into functional DCs in culture when exposed to the appropriate cytokines. These data provide the first clear evidence for a shared pathway for DC and early B cell ontogeny and support a model in which the onset of B-lineage commitment coincides with the loss of DC differentiative potential. Therefore, these findings should lead to studies to enhance our understanding of DC and B cell ontogeny and may lead to novel approaches for selectively expanding and functionally manipulating lymphoid-derived DCs.
Note added in proof:
A recent paper from (32) demonstrates that CLPs but not CD19+CD43+ pro-B cells differentiate into DCs.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. David Allman, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Biomedical Research Buildings II and III, 421 Curie Boulevard, Room 553, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6160. E-mail address: dallman{at}mail.med.upenn.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HSC, hemopoietic stem cell; BI, biotin; BM, bone marrow; CLP, common lymphoid progenitor; DC, dendritic cell; FL, fluorescein; Fr., fraction; Lin, lineage marker; MLP, myeloid lymphoid progenitor; SCF, stem cell factor. ![]()
Received for publication March 19, 2001. Accepted for publication June 5, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and CD8
+ dendritic cells are generated from CD4low lymphoid-committed precursors. Blood 96:2511.
-positive dendritic cells from a common myeloid progenitor. Science 290:2152.
-positive dendritic cells in vivo. Blood 96:1865.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Rathinam and R. A. Flavell The hematopoiesis paradigm: clarity or ambiguity? Blood, November 1, 2008; 112(9): 3534 - 3535. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Welner, R. Pelayo, Y. Nagai, K. P. Garrett, T. R. Wuest, D. J. Carr, L. A. Borghesi, M. A. Farrar, and P. W. Kincade Lymphoid precursors are directed to produce dendritic cells as a result of TLR9 ligation during herpes infection Blood, November 1, 2008; 112(9): 3753 - 3761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Karsunky, M. A. Inlay, T. Serwold, D. Bhattacharya, and I. L. Weissman Flk2+ common lymphoid progenitors possess equivalent differentiation potential for the B and T lineages Blood, June 15, 2008; 111(12): 5562 - 5570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Kuo, R. M. Gerstein, and L. H. Castilla Cbf{beta}-SMMHC impairs differentiation of common lymphoid progenitors and reveals an essential role for RUNX in early B-cell development Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1543 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-J. Wils, E. Braakman, G. M. G. M. Verjans, E. J. C. Rombouts, A. E. C. Broers, H. G. M. Niesters, G. Wagemaker, F. J. T. Staal, B. Lowenberg, H. Spits, et al. Flt3 Ligand Expands Lymphoid Progenitors Prior to Recovery of Thymopoiesis and Accelerates T Cell Reconstitution after Bone Marrow Transplantation J. Immunol., March 15, 2007; 178(6): 3551 - 3557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Harman, J. P. Miller, N. Nikbakht, R. Gerstein, and D. Allman Mouse plasmacytoid dendritic cells derive exclusively from estrogen-resistant myeloid progenitors Blood, August 1, 2006; 108(3): 878 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Maillard, B. A. Schwarz, A. Sambandam, T. Fang, O. Shestova, L. Xu, A. Bhandoola, and W. S. Pear Notch-dependent T-lineage commitment occurs at extrathymic sites following bone marrow transplantation Blood, May 1, 2006; 107(9): 3511 - 3519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Borghesi, J. Aites, S. Nelson, P. Lefterov, P. James, and R. Gerstein E47 is required for V(D)J recombinase activity in common lymphoid progenitors J. Exp. Med., December 19, 2005; 202(12): 1669 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-X. Yang, Z.-X. Lian, K. Kikuchi, Y. Moritoki, A. A. Ansari, Y.-J. Liu, S. Ikehara, and M. E. Gershwin Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells of Different Origins Have Distinct Characteristics and Function: Studies of Lymphoid Progenitors versus Myeloid Progenitors J. Immunol., December 1, 2005; 175(11): 7281 - 7287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lu, R. Tayu, T. Ikawa, K. Masuda, I. Matsumoto, H. Mugishima, H. Kawamoto, and Y. Katsura The Earliest Thymic Progenitors in Adults Are Restricted to T, NK, and Dendritic Cell Lineage and Have a Potential to Form More Diverse TCR{beta} Chains than Fetal Progenitors J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 5848 - 5856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pelayo, J. Hirose, J. Huang, K. P. Garrett, A. Delogu, M. Busslinger, and P. W. Kincade Derivation of 2 categories of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in murine bone marrow Blood, June 1, 2005; 105(11): 4407 - 4415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Hengesbach and K. A. Hoag Physiological Concentrations of Retinoic Acid Favor Myeloid Dendritic Cell Development over Granulocyte Development in Cultures of Bone Marrow Cells from Mice J. Nutr., October 1, 2004; 134(10): 2653 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Burke, A. J. Stagg, P. A. Bedford, N. English, and S. C. Knight IL-10-Producing B220+CD11c- APC in Mouse Spleen J. Immunol., August 15, 2004; 173(4): 2362 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Franchini, H. Hefti, S. Vollstedt, B. Glanzmann, M. Riesen, M. Ackermann, P. Chaplin, K. Shortman, and M. Suter Dendritic Cells from Mice Neonatally Vaccinated with Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Transfer Resistance against Herpes Simplex Virus Type I to Naive One-Week-Old Mice J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 6304 - 6312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Borghesi, L.-Y. Hsu, J. P. Miller, M. Anderson, L. Herzenberg, L. Herzenberg, M. S. Schlissel, D. Allman, and R. M. Gerstein B Lineage-specific Regulation of V(D)J Recombinase Activity Is Established in Common Lymphoid Progenitors J. Exp. Med., February 17, 2004; 199(4): 491 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Borghesi and R. M. Gerstein Developmental Separation of V(D)J Recombinase Expression and Initiation of IgH Recombination in B Lineage Progenitors In Vivo J. Exp. Med., February 17, 2004; 199(4): 483 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bhandoola, A. Sambandam, D. Allman, A. Meraz, and B. Schwarz Early T Lineage Progenitors: New Insights, but Old Questions Remain J. Immunol., December 1, 2003; 171(11): 5653 - 5658. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Chennathukuzhi, J. M. Stein, T. Abel, S. Donlon, S. Yang, J. P. Miller, D. M. Allman, R. A. Simmons, and N. B. Hecht Mice Deficient for Testis-Brain RNA-Binding Protein Exhibit a Coordinate Loss of TRAX, Reduced Fertility, Altered Gene Expression in the Brain, and Behavioral Changes Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2003; 23(18): 6419 - 6434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Miller and D. Allman The Decline in B Lymphopoiesis in Aged Mice Reflects Loss of Very Early B-Lineage Precursors J. Immunol., September 1, 2003; 171(5): 2326 - 2330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D'Amico and L. Wu The Early Progenitors of Mouse Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Predendritic Cells Are within the Bone Marrow Hemopoietic Precursors Expressing Flt3 J. Exp. Med., July 21, 2003; 198(2): 293 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Karsunky, M. Merad, A. Cozzio, I. L. Weissman, and M. G. Manz Flt3 Ligand Regulates Dendritic Cell Development from Flt3+ Lymphoid and Myeloid-committed Progenitors to Flt3+ Dendritic Cells In Vivo J. Exp. Med., July 21, 2003; 198(2): 305 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nikolic, M. F. T. R. d. Bruijn, M. B. Lutz, and P. J. M. Leenen Developmental stages of myeloid dendritic cells in mouse bone marrow Int. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 15(4): 515 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Donskoy and I. Goldschneider Two Developmentally Distinct Populations of Dendritic Cells Inhabit the Adult Mouse Thymus: Demonstration by Differential Importation of Hematogenous Precursors Under Steady State Conditions J. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 170(7): 3514 - 3521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kouro, V. Kumar, and P. W. Kincade Relationships between early B- and NK-lineage lymphocyte precursors in bone marrow Blood, November 15, 2002; 100(10): 3672 - 3680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Miller, D. Izon, W. DeMuth, R. Gerstein, A. Bhandoola, and D. Allman The Earliest Step in B Lineage Differentiation from Common Lymphoid Progenitors Is Critically Dependent upon Interleukin 7 J. Exp. Med., September 2, 2002; 196(5): 705 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Comeau, A.-R. Van der Vuurst de Vries, C. R. Maliszewski, and L. Galibert CD123bright Plasmacytoid Predendritic Cells: Progenitors Undergoing Cell Fate Conversion? J. Immunol., July 1, 2002; 169(1): 75 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |