|
|
||||||||
Trudeau Institute, Saranac Lake, NY 12983
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and does not depend on Ab. This effect is critically dependent on
CD8+ cells for the expansion of CD4+ T cells in
the lymph nodes and the recruitment of memory CD4+ T cells
to the lungs. Passive transfer of a CD8+ T cell supernatant
into CD8+ T cell-depleted, hemagglutinin-neuraminidase
(HN)421436-immune µMT mice substantially restored the
virus-specific memory CD4+ response and enhanced viral
control in the lung. Together, the data demonstrate for the first time
that in vivo primed CD4+ T cells have the capacity to
control a respiratory virus infection in the lung by an Ab-independent
mechanism, provided that CD8+ T cell "help" in the form
of soluble factor(s) is available during the virus infection. These
studies highlight the importance of synergistic interactions between
CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets in the generation
of optimal antiviral immunity. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
TNF-
, are able to induce cellular proteins that can decrease
transcription and/or replication of several viruses, including
influenza and parainfluenza virus, thus contributing to the termination
of viral infection (5, 6, 7). Recently, several studies have
shown that CD8+ T cells release both CC (
) chemokines,
such as RANTES, macrophage-inflammatory protein
(MIP)3-
and
MIP-
, and CXC (
) chemokines, such as IL-8 and inflammatory
protein-10, following TCR triggering by MHC class I/peptide complexes
(8, 9, 10). This suggests that CD8+ CTLs are not
only the end-product effector cells generated during antiviral immune
response, but that they may also be involved in regulation of immune
cell interactions as well.
Respiratory virus infection can also be controlled by CD4+
T cells and B cells in the absence of CD8+ T cells. For
example, it has been shown that viral clearance is normal or only
slightly delayed after a primary challenge of CD8+ T
cell-depleted C57BL/6 mice with either influenza virus or Sendai virus
(11, 12). Although the underlying mechanisms are not fully
understood, it is generally believed that virus-specific
CD4+ cells operate mainly by providing T cell help for B
cells to generate neutralizing Abs and/or secreting antiviral cytokines
(IFN-
). When both CD8+ and B cells are absent, it has
been shown that primary virus-specific CD4+ T cell
responses are unable to terminate an infection caused by either
influenza virus or Sendai virus (13, 14). Even influenza
virus-specific memory CD4+ T cells confer only a very
limited control of a secondary viral challenge in CD8+ T
cell-depleted mice (14). Therefore, it is generally
believed that CD4+ T cell-mediated mechanisms on their own,
or in conjunction with innate immunity, are ineffective at controlling
respiratory virus infections. However, this conclusion is based largely
on experiments in which the CD8+ T cell subset was depleted
in vivo by Ab and assumed that the Ab treatment did not impact on the
CD4+ T cell response.
As an alternative approach to understanding the role of
CD4+ T cells in antiviral immunity, we recently examined
the impact of selective CD4+ T cell vaccination on Sendai
virus infection (15). Thus mice were vaccinated with an
immunodominant class II-restricted hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN)
peptide to specifically prime virus-specific CD4+ T cells.
This strategy allowed us to assess the role of memory CD4+
T cells in the presence of an intact naive CD8+ T cell
population. Subsequent infection with Sendai virus resulted in
accelerated recruitment of CD4+ T cells to the lung and
accelerated clearance of Sendai virus in immune competent mice.
Interestingly, the primary CD8+ T cell response in this
system was suppressed, possibly due to the accelerated clearance of Ag
from the system. In addition, the virus-specific Ab response was only
slightly enhanced under these conditions. These data suggest that
primed CD4+ T cells may use Ab-independent mechanisms for
controlling respiratory virus infections. However, we could not
formally exclude a role for CD8+ T cells and/or Ab.
Therefore, in the present study, we evaluated the capacity of primed
CD4+ T cells to control a Sendai virus infection in B
cell-deficient µMT mice that were additionally depleted of
CD8+ T cells by treatment with anti-CD8 Abs. Our
results demonstrate for the first time that virus-specific memory
CD4+ T cells make a direct contribution to the clearance of
a respiratory virus in the absence of a concurrent CD8+ T
cell and Ab response, provided that soluble factor(s) produced by
CD8+ T cells are available during the virus infection.
These soluble factors are essential for rapid clonal expansion of the
virus-specific memory CD4+ T cells in draining mediastinal
lymph nodes (MLN) and their subsequent recruitment into the inflamed
lung. Furthermore, we show that the antiviral effect of primed
CD4+ T cells is mediated, at least in part, by IFN-
.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Male or female µMT (H-2b) or C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were purchased from either The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) or the Trudeau Institute (Saranac Lake, NY) and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions before infection with Sendai virus at 610 wk of age.
Peptide vaccination
Sendai virus peptides derived from HN and nucleoprotein (NP) (HN421436, HN559574, HN163178, NP324332) have been described elsewhere (16, 17) and were purchased from New England Peptide (Fitchburg, MA). Mice were vaccinated with HN421436 peptide as described previously (15) and successful priming was confirmed with a CD4+ T cell proliferation assay, as has been described in detail previously (15). Strong HN421436-specific CD4+ T cell-proliferative responses were routinely obtained after priming, demonstrating that B cell-deficient µMT mice can be successfully primed with the synthetic HN41436 peptide (data not shown).
Virus infections and determination of viral load in lung homogenates
The Enders strain of Sendai virus was grown, titrated, and stored as described previously (12). Mice that had been vaccinated with HN421436 peptide 2030 days before were infected intranasally under anesthesia with 500 egg infectious doses (EID50) of Sendai virus. All infected mice were held under Biosafety Level 3 conditions. Virus titers of lung tissues were determined from lung homogenates by endpoint titration in embryonated hen eggs as described previously (12).
In vivo depletion of CD8+ T cells with anti-CD8
mAb
Nonthymectomized mice were injected i.p. every third day with
320 µg of purified rat anti-mouse CD8
mAb (clone TIB210) or
the same amount of rat IgG2b isotype control (clone LTF-2) in PBS. The
depletion started 3 days before viral infection and continued until the
tissues were sampled. In some experiments, the depletion started 5 days
after viral infection to observe the effect of presence of
CD8+ T cells at the early stage of infection on
CD4+ T cell response. The efficiency and specificity of
CD8+ T cell depletion was monitored by flow cytometry using
noncross-reactive mAbs to CD8
as well as mAbs to CD4+ T
cells and B cells. CD8+ T cells were undetectable among
lymphocyte-gated populations from lung tissue, MLN, and spleen during
the entire 10- to 14-day period of observation, indicating that a
sustained deletion of CD8+ T cells was achieved by this
protocol. CD4+ and B220+ lymphocyte subsets
were not affected by the anti-CD8 mAb depletion.
Analysis of dendritic cell (DC) subpopulations after in vivo
treatment of mice with anti-CD8
mAb
Lymph nodes and spleens were pooled from two naive C57BL/6 mice
that had been treated with anti-CD8
mAb as described above.
Untreated animals from the same batch of mice were used as controls.
The organs were cut into small fragments, digested with collagenase D
(1 mg/ml; BoehringerMannheim, Mannheim, Germany) for 1 h at
37°C, and then prepared as single cell suspensions. Nonspecific
staining was blocked using purified anti-mouse CD16/CD32
(FcR
III/II receptor; PharMingen, San Diego, CA). The cells were then
stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD8
, FITC-conjugated
anti-CD11c, Tricolor-conjugated anti-CD8
, and PE-conjugated
I-Ab mAbs (PharMingen). Stained samples were
acquired on a BD Biosciences FACScan flow cytometer, and the data were
analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Immunocytometry Systems, San
Jose, CA). To calculate the absolute percentages of CD8+ T
cells as well as CD8
+CD11c+ and
CD8
-CD11c+ DC subpopulations in
the lymph nodes and spleens, CD8
+,
CD8
+CD11c+, and
CD8
-CD11c+ events were divided by
the total number of events in a live cell gate. The absolute cell
numbers of the three individual cell populations per organ were then
calculated by multiplying the total cell count per organ with their
corresponding percentages.
Passive transfer of CD8+ T cell culture supernatant (CD8+ sup) into recipient mice
CD8+ sup was generated from activated Sendai virus
NP324332-specific CD8+ T cells.
Briefly, CD8+ T cells were enriched by negative selection
with Dynabeads (Dynal, Oslo, Norway) from pooled spleens of C57BL/6
mice that had recovered from a Sendai virus infection (
3 months
postinfection). The enriched cell populations routinely comprised
8087% of CD8+ T cells, and <0.2% of CD4+ T
cells, as determined by flow cytometry. APCs were prepared from the
spleens of syngeneic naive mice by depleting the T cell population with
anti-Thy1.2 mAb plus a mixture of rabbit and guinea pig complement
(Cedarlane Laboratories, Hornby, Ontario, Canada). Flow cytometry
analysis confirmed that the resulting cell population contained <0.1%
of CD3+ cells. Enriched CD8+ T cells (5 x
105) were then incubated with T cell-depleted,
irradiated (3000 rad) APCs (5 x 105) in the
presence of Sendai virus NP324332 peptide (1
µg/ml) and 10 U/ml of IL-2 in 200 µl of complete tumor medium at
37°C with 10% CO2. The culture supernatants
were collected after a 5-day incubation, filtered through a 0.45-µM
filter, and then frozen at -80°C before use. Strong
NP324336/Kb-specific
cytolytic activity against NP324336
peptide-pulsed L-Kb fibroblasts (4575% of
specific 51Cr release) was detected in the
cultures before harvesting the supernatant. Parallel cultures in which
APCs and NP324332 peptide (1 µg/ml) were
cultured in the absence of enriched CD8+ T cells were used
to generate a control supernatant. Naive or
HN421436-vaccinated and CD8+ T
cell-depleted µMT mice were injected i.p. every other day with 300
µl of CD8+ sup, starting 1 day before infection with
Sendai virus. Control mice received the same amount of control
supernatant.
Intracellular IFN-
staining following peptide stimulation
Recruitment of Sendai virus-specific CD4+ T cells
into the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of infected mice was monitored by
intracellular IFN-
staining as described previously
(15). The percentage of IFN-
-secreting CD4+
T cells among total live cells in the BAL was calculated by dividing
the number of CD4+/IFN-
+ events by the total
number of events in a live cell gate. The results are expressed as the
absolute cell number of Sendai virus HN peptide-specific
IFN-
-secreting CD4+ T cells per lung. This was
calculated by multiplying the total cell count of each lung lavage with
the corresponding percentage of IFN-
-secreting CD4+ T
cells among the total live cells in the BAL after subtraction of the
background obtained with the no peptide control culture (this
background was routinely <0.1%).
ELISPOT analysis
The Sendai virus-specific CD4+ T cell response was
measured by IFN-
-ELISPOT assay. Ninety-six-well Multiscreen HA
plates (Millipore, Bedford, MA) were coated with 10 µg/ml of
anti-IFN-
capture Ab (clone R46A2; PharMingen). CD4+
effector T cells were enriched from the pooled MLN of infected µMT
mice (35 mice/group) with Dynabeads as described previously
(15). CD4+ T cells usually accounted for
9698% of enriched cell populations, as determined by flow cytometry.
Serially diluted numbers of enriched CD4+ T cells were
incubated with irradiated splenocytes from naive C57BL/6 mice (1
x 106 per well) in the presence of Sendai virus
HN421436 or HN163178
peptide (10 µg/ml). Each dilution of effector cells was assayed in
duplicate. After a 24-h incubation, the cells were washed with PBS
containing 0.05% Tween 20. Biotinylated rat anti-mouse IFN-
mAb
(10 µg/ml, clone XMG1.2; PharMingen) was added and the plates were
incubated overnight at 4°C. The plates were then washed with
PBS/Tween and developed with streptavidin-HRP using
3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) as substrate. The
spots in each well were counted using SZH Zoom Stereo Microscope System
(Olympus, New Hyde Park, NY). The results were expressed as the number
of spot-forming cells (SFC) in each 106
CD4+ T cells.
Neutralization of IFN-
with anti-IFN-
mAb
µMT mice were injected i.p. with either 300 µg of
anti-IFN-
mAb (clone XMG1.2; Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility,
Trudeau Institute) or the same amount of isotype control mAb (clone
HRPN) at days -1, 1, 3, 6, and 9 relative to the virus infection.
Analysis of cell-free BAL fluid from Sendai virus-infected mice by an
IFN-
ELISA showed that injection with the anti-IFN-
mAb
during the course of infection resulted in a complete neutralization of
IFN-
(data not shown). In contrast, injection with the isotype
control Ab did not affect the level of this cytokine in the BAL fluid
during infection with Sendai virus. In addition, flow cytometry
analysis of the BAL cells confirmed that neutralization of IFN-
with
the anti-IFN-
mAb did not have obvious influence on the
recruitment of either CD4+ or CD8+ T cell
subsets into the lung during the virus infection (data not shown).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously shown that mice vaccinated with an
immunodominant Sendai virus HN421436 peptide
had a significantly enhanced capacity to clear Sendai virus from the
lung following a primary challenge (15). The immune
response in the lungs of these mice was characterized by an accelerated
recruitment of CD4+ T cells to the lung and a significantly
reduced virus-specific CD8+ T cell response. In addition,
it was found that CD4+ T cell priming resulted in only a
slightly enhanced Ab response in the draining lymph nodes. Although
these data suggest that primed CD4+ T cells alone have the
potential to control a respiratory virus infection, we could not
completely rule out a role for CD8+ T cells and Ab in these
experiments. As a first step to determine the capacity of
CD4+ T cells to control a virus infection in the absence of
Abs, we analyzed immune responses in HN421436
peptide-vaccinated Ab-deficient µMT mice. As shown in Fig. 1
, A and B,
HN421436 peptide-vaccinated µMT mice were
able to control a sublethal Sendai virus infection in the lung much
more effectively than control (CFA-vaccinated) µMT mice. Thus, viral
loads were significantly reduced in the lungs of vaccinated mice
compared with control mice on day 7 of the infection. In addition,
virus was completely cleared by day 10 postinfection from the
vaccinated mice, whereas there were still high viral loads in the
control mice at this time (Fig. 1
, A and B).
Unprimed control µMT mice ultimately cleared virus from the lung by
day 14 (Fig. 1
A). These data formally demonstrate that the
CD4+ T cell-mediated clearance of a Sendai virus infection
does not depend on B cells.
|
Ab before infection.
Consistent with previous studies in the influenza virus system
(13, 14), CD8-depleted naive µMT mice failed to
terminate a primary infection with Sendai virus (Fig. 1The virus-specific memory CD4+ T cell response is severely impaired in the lung of µMT mice depleted of CD8+ T cell subset
The observation that primed CD4+ T cells were
ineffective in the CD8
-depleted mice could be explained by a failure
of CD4+ T cells in the lung to clear virus, or a failure to
recruit activated CD4+ T cells to the lung. To distinguish
these possibilities, we monitored the virus-specific CD4+ T
cell accumulation in the airways of HN421436
peptide-vaccinated µMT mice during infection with Sendai virus using
an intracellular IFN-
assay. As shown in Fig. 2
, the accumulation of CD4+ T
cells in the lungs of HN421436
peptide-vaccinated µMT mice was much greater than that of control
unvaccinated µMT mice on day 7 postinfection (6.9 x
104 vs 0.2 x 104
HN421436-specific CD4+ T cells per
lung). This difference is consistent with previous studies in
immunocompetent mice (15). In contrast, the enhanced
CD4+ T cell accumulation in the lungs of
HN421436 peptide-primed µMT mice on day 7
postinfection was significantly impaired if the mice were also treated
with an anti-CD8 Ab (6.9 x 104
HN421436 vs 0.6 x
104 specific CD4+ T cells per lung).
These data demonstrate that CD8+ T cell depletion prevents
the accumulation of CD4+ T cells to the lung rather than
blocking effector functions in the lung. However, this effect was not
permanent inasmuch as both naive and
HN421436-immune µMT mice mounted significant
and comparable CD4+ T cell responses in their lung on day
10 postinfection, irrespective of CD8+ T cell depletion
(Fig. 2
, middle panels). This result indicates that
CD8+ T cell depletion appears to preferentially affect the
rapid recall of memory CD4+ T cell cells rather than the
primary CD4+ T cell response. It is interesting that more
CD4+ T cells accumulate in the lungs of CD8-depleted vs
nondepleted control mice. This difference probably reflects differences
in viral load at this time point (Fig. 1
). There was no obvious
difference in terms of CD4+ T cell response to the
subdominant HN559574 and to the nonreactive
HN163178 peptide between naive and
HN421436-immune µMT mice in these
experiments.
|
Expansion of virus-specific memory CD4+ T cells is severely impaired in the draining MLN of µMT mice depleted of CD8+ T cell subset
Because influenza or Sendai virus-specific T cell responses are
initiated in the draining lymph nodes, we asked whether the
dramatically reduced numbers of virus-specific memory CD4+
cells in the lungs of CD8-depleted mice reflected an impaired expansion
of memory CD4+ T cells in the draining lymph nodes. Thus,
we determined the clone burst size of virus-specific CD4+ T
cells in the draining MLN using a single cell ELISPOT assay. As shown
in Fig. 3
, a high frequency of
HN421436-specific CD4+ T cells
could be detected in the MLN of HN421436
peptide-vaccinated µMT mice on day 7 postinfection with Sendai virus
(5200 SFC per 106 CD4+ T cells).
However, this expansion of HN421436-specific
CD4+ T cells was dramatically reduced in the MLN of
vaccinated mice that had been depleted of CD8+ T cells (500
SFC per 106 CD4+ T cells). When
examined on day 10 after infection, the frequency of
HN421436-specific CD4+ T cells was
higher in the MLN of CD8+ T cell-depleted
HN421436 peptide-vaccinated µMT mice than in
vaccinated control mice. This suggests that despite the loss of the
recall CD4+ T cell response due to CD8+ T cell
depletion, a primary CD4+ T cell response occurs normally
in these mice (peaking at day 10), as has been shown for
CD4+ T cell accumulation in the lung (Fig. 2
and Ref.
15). Together, the data show that the decreased numbers of
virus-specific memory CD4+ T cells in the airways at the
early stage of viral infection correlated with an impaired expansion of
these CD4+ T cells in the draining MLN of CD8+
T cell-depleted, vaccinated µMT mice.
|
|
The finding that the presence of CD8+ cells during the
first 5 days after infection failed to rescue a virus-specific memory
CD4+ T cell response suggests that CD8+ cells
may provide some form of "help" for memory CD4+ T cells
after they are activated. This help could be mediated by direct contact
between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, by releasing
soluble factors, or both. To test this, we generated a supernatant from
memory CD8+ T cells that had been stimulated in vitro with
Sendai virus NP324332 peptide. We then asked
whether this supernatant would restore the memory CD4+ T
cell response in HN421436-vaccinated mice that
had been CD8+ T cell-depleted. As shown in Fig. 5
A, repeated injection of the
CD8+ sup into anti-CD8-treated,
HN421436-immune µMT mice during infection
with Sendai virus resulted in nearly a complete restoration of the
virus-specific memory CD4+ T cell response in the draining
MLN of the recipients. The numbers of IFN-
-secreting
CD4+ T cells in the MLN of CD8+ T cell-depleted
µMT mice that received the CD8+ sup was 90% of that from control
µMT mice in which CD8+ T cells were present. In addition,
the numbers of CD4+ T cells accumulating in the lung were
substantially restored (Fig. 5
, B and C). In
contrast, a control supernatant generated from the same APCs and
NP324332 peptide, but which had been
CD8+ T cell-depleted, did not restore the CD4+
T cell response in the MLN or CD8+ T cell accumulation in
the lung. These data demonstrate for the first time that in vivo-primed
memory CD4+ T cells are able to control a Sendai virus
infection in the lung, but that they require help from CD8+
T cells in the form of soluble factors.
|
We next asked whether the supernatant-restored secondary
CD4+ T cell response in CD8+ T cell-depleted
µMT mice was able to clear a Sendai virus infection. Thus,
HN421436-vaccinated, CD8+ T
cell-depleted, µMT mice were treated with the CD8 supernatant and
then infected with Sendai virus. Ten days postinfection, the viral load
in lung homogenates was determined and compared with control naive
µMT mice that were CD8+ T cell-depleted, but did not
receive the CD8+ sup during the viral infection. As shown
in Fig. 6
, the CD8+ sup
substantially enhanced viral clearance. In contrast, the virus titers
in unvaccinated µMT mice that were depleted of CD8+ T
cell population but received CD8+ sup was comparable to
that of unvaccinated mice, indicating that the CD8+ sup
alone did not have any direct antiviral effects. Again, µMT mice
previously vaccinated with HN421436 peptide,
but not CD8+ T cell-depleted, cleared the virus effectively
on day 10 after infection in the presence of CD8+ T cells.
Together, the data demonstrate that primed CD4+ T cells can
make significant contributions to the clearance of Sendai virus in the
absence of both the CD8+ and B cell subsets, provided that
regulatory signals required for rapid clonal expansion of memory
CD4+ T cells are provided by virus-specific
CD8+ CTLs during viral infection.
|

The mechanism by which primed CD4+ T cells clear
Sendai virus is not known. However, we have shown that primed
CD4+ T cells are recruited rapidly to the lung and secrete
substantial amounts of IFN-
(Fig. 2
and data not shown), which is
reported to have strong antiviral effects (5, 6, 7). Thus, we
asked whether IFN-
contributed to viral clearance in this system by
neutralizing IFN-
during the course of the virus infection in
HN421436 peptide-vaccinated µMT mice. As
shown in Fig. 7
, control vaccinated µMT
mice completely cleared the virus from the lung tissues by day 10
postinfection. In contrast, vaccinated µMT mice that additionally
received neutralizing IFN-
Ab during the infection had variable
titers of Sendai virus in the lung at day 10 postinfection (an average
of 4.2 EID50/lung). As shown previously (Fig. 1
),
all unvaccinated µMT mice failed to clear the virus by day 10 after
infection. These data demonstrate that IFN-
plays an important role
in the control of Sendai virus infection in
HN421436 peptide-vaccinated mice.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Our observation that primed CD4+ T cells can mediate effective antiviral immunity appear to directly contradict the studies of other groups that have reported that CD4+ T cells are ineffective at controlling influenza or Sendai virus infections in mice (13, 14). A key difference between the two approaches lies in the use of anti-CD8 Abs to deplete CD8+ T cells in vivo. Thus, our studies used a peptide priming approach that allowed us to analyze a memory CD4+ T cell response in immunologically intact mice with a full complement of naive CD8+ T cells. In contrast, the other studies have relied on Ab depletion of CD8+ T cells in live virus-primed animals. However, the data presented in the current study indicate that CD8+ T cell depletion impairs the recall of memory CD4+ T cells. Thus, it is likely that studies involving CD8+ T cell depletion inadvertently miss the contribution of CD4+ T cells to the cellular immune response to respiratory virus infections. The data presented in the current report confirm that CD4+ T cells can mediate strong antiviral activity and resolve the discrepancy in the literature.
It currently remains unclear what role CD8+ T cells play in
promoting the CD4+ T cell response. One possibility is that
there is an effect of CD8+ T cell depletion on a non-T cell
population of cells. In this regard, it has been shown that DC can be
divided into CD8
+ and CD8
-
subpopulations (21, 22). Recent data suggests that
Ag-pulsed CD8
+ DCs may direct Th1 polarization of
CD4+ T cells after injection into mice (23, 24). Therefore, it is possible that the impaired
CD4+ T cell response observed under our experimental
condition might be due to the codeletion of the CD8
+ DC
subpopulation. However, this explanation is unlikely. First, although
we found that the anti-CD8
mAb can bind to the
CD8
+ DC population, this did not lead to physical
depletion of this DC population in vivo. Thus, the absolute numbers of
DC remained constant following CD8 depletion, although we could not
detect CD8
expression on these cells (data not shown). Second, in
vitro proliferation of HN421436-specific
CD4+ T cells from anti-CD8
mAb-treated µMT mice
was normal following restimulation with the corresponding peptide Ag,
indicating that in vivo depletion of CD8
+ DC (either
physically or functionally) does not appear to affect the proliferative
potential of the virus-specific CD4+ T cell population
(data not shown). Third, we found that only the secondary
HN421436-specific Th1 CD4+ T cell
response was impaired after treatment of the µMT mice with the
anti-CD8
mAb. Th1 polarization of naive CD4+ T cells
was normal following challenge with Sendai virus, independent of
treatment with the anti-CD8
mAb in vivo (data not shown).
Fourth, and most importantly, we found that a supernatant prepared from
Sendai virus-specific CD8+ T cells was able to restore the
recall CD4+ T cell response of
HN421436-immune µMT mice treated with
anti-CD8 mAb. This treatment was effective when given as late as 5
days into the infection and argues strongly against the idea that
CD8+ T cells are involved in the induction phase of the
response. Therefore, the impaired memory CD4+ T cell
response following in vivo treatment of the
HN421436-immune µMT mice with the
anti-CD8
mAb is most probably due to depletion of
CD8+ T cell subset, rather than the CD8
+ DC
subpopulation.
Although the recall of a memory CD4+ T cell response
appears to be dependent on CD8+ T cells, it is interesting
to note that the CD8+ T cell response in the lung is
actually suppressed in vaccinated mice that have been infected with
Sendai virus (15). This apparently contradictory effect is
actually consistent with the anatomical compartmentalization of the
immune response. Thus, the induction of CD4+ T cell
response occurs in the local draining lymph node and is apparently
dependent on CD8+ T cells at that site (Fig. 4
). In
contrast, the accelerated accumulation of CD4+ T cells in
the lung results in rapid clearance of the virus and, consequently, a
reduced or aborted recruitment of effector CD8+ T cells in
the lung airways (Fig. 3
). In this regard, it should be noted that the
primary CD8+ T cell response develops with slower kinetics
relative to the memory CD4+ T cell response, in this
system.
The finding that only the secondary, and not the primary,
HN421436-specific CD4+ T cell
response was impaired in the anti-CD8
mAb-treated mice following
viral challenge suggests that depletion of CD8+ T cells
preferentially impairs virus-specific memory Th1 CD4+
effector T cells. It has been well established that memory T cells
acquire distinct profiles of cell surface markers and possess the
potential to migrate to an inflammatory site with accelerated kinetics
(25, 26). Recent studies suggest that these properties of
T cells, at least for CD4+ T cells, are related to the
differential expression of chemokine receptors. For example, it has
been shown that CCR5, CCR7, and CXC chemokine receptor 3 are expressed
preferentially on Th1-polarized CD4+ T cells, and not on
naive T cells (27, 28, 29). These chemokine receptors
recognize type I chemokines, including RANTES, MIP-1
and MIP-1
,
and inflammatory protein-10 (30), suggesting that distinct
chemokine signals are required for the recruitment of Th1 cells to the
sites of inflammation. This idea is further supported by a recent study
showing that Th1-polarized, but not Th2-polarized vesicular stomatitis
virus glycoprotein G-specific transgenic CD4+ T cells
migrated to peripheral target organs in vivo in response to chemokines
produced at local inflammatory sites (31). In addition,
recent data suggest that CC chemokines not only play an important role
in regulating T cell trafficking to inflammatory sites, but also in
participating in T cell activation via costimulating these T
lymphocytes (32, 33). A biologically potent source of CC
chemokines in vivo has now been shown to be the CD8+ T cell
population (34, 35). Based on these recent findings, we
hypothesize that removal of the CD8+ T cell population
results in a diminished level of CC chemokines in vivo following
infection with Sendai virus. Therefore, the expansion of the
HN421436-specific memory CD4+ T
cells in draining lymph nodes and/or the recruitment into the
inflammatory lung are significantly impaired. Additional experiments
are currently under way in our laboratory to characterize the chemokine
receptor profiles of the primed
HN421436-specific CD4+ T cells and
to determine chemokine patterns and source in the pneumonic lung of the
CD8+ T cell-deleted and virus-infected animals. It is hoped
that these studies will provide new insight into the mechanisms of how
CD8+ T cells regulate the CD4+ T cell subset
during a respiratory virus infection.
The mechanism by which CD4+ T cells mediate viral control
in this system is poorly understood. Some studies have indicated that
cytolytic CD4+ T cells can be generated under certain
conditions (12). However, we have not been able to detect
cytolytic CD4+ T cells in this vaccination system following
virus infection (data not shown). In some viral infections, such as
those induced by HSV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, and mouse
hepatitis virus-68, the generation and maintenance of effective
antiviral CD8+ T cell immunity is dependent on
CD4+ T cell help (36, 37, 38). However, the
accelerated clearance of Sendai virus infection in this report could
not be attributed to an enhancement of the primary CD8+ T
cell response by primed CD4+ T cells, as both absolute
CD8+ T cell numbers and cytotoxic activity were
significantly reduced in HN421436-vaccinated
mice. Another possibility is that CD4+ T cells mediate
their effects through the production of antiviral cytokines. Our
previous studies have shown that primed CD4+ T cells in
this system are almost exclusively of the Th1 phenotype and produce
substantial amounts of IFN-
(15). In the present study,
we found that in vivo neutralization of IFN-
diminished the capacity
of peptide-vaccinated mice to clear Sendai virus from the lung.
However, the mechanism by which IFN-
mediates this effect is unclear
because this cytokine has multiple activities in vivo, including
effects on the recruitment of other cells to the lung. In addition, it
is unclear whether effector CD4+ T cells in the lung are
the key producers of IFN-
, or whether they simply enhance IFN-
production by other cell lineages. However, CD4+ T cells
have been shown to clear experimental vesicular stomatitis virus
infection by secreting antiviral cytokines such as IFN-
and TNF-
in an Ag-dependent manner (39, 40).
In summary, the present study documents for the first time that a secondary Sendai virus-specific CD4+ T cell response can make significant contributions to the viral clearance in the absence of functional B cells. However, soluble factors released by the CD8+ T cell subset are essential for the rapid expansion and subsequent recruitment into the inflammatory lung tissues of these CD4+ T cells. This represents the first demonstration that CD8+ T cells can regulate the functional properties of CD4+ T cell subset during a virus infection. Furthermore, the data again emphasize that caution must be used when conclusions on the role of individual lymphocyte populations in antiviral immunity are drawn based on the data generated from either knockout mice or mice depleted of T cell subsets with mAbs. Therefore, effective antiviral immunity appears to depend on synergistic interaction between individual arms of the immune system (41).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. David L. Woodland, Trudeau Institute, P.O. Box 59, Saranac Lake, NY 12983. E-mail address: dwoodland{at}trudeauinstitute.org ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MIP, macrophage-inflammatory protein; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; EID50, 50% egg infectious dose; HN, hemagglutinin-neuraminidase; MLN, mediastinal lymph node; NP, nucleoprotein; CD8+ sup, CD8+ T cell culture supernatant; SFC, spot-forming cells; DC, dendritic cell. ![]()
Received for publication March 2, 2001. Accepted for publication June 4, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
inhibit virus replication and synergize with interferons. Nature 323:819.[Medline]
, and MIP-1
as the major HIV-suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells. Science 270:1811.
-chemokines by anti-HIV-1 cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Curr. Biol. 8:355.[Medline]
-chemokines are released from HIV-1-specific cytolytic T-cell granules complexed to proteoglycans. Nature 391:908.[Medline]
+ and CD8
- dendritic cells in the induction of primary immune responses in vivo. J. Leukocyte Biol. 66:242.[Abstract]
+ and CD8
- subclasses of dendritic cells direct the development of distinct T helper cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 189:587.
chemokines costimulate lymphocyte cytolysis, proliferation, and lymphokine production. J. Leukocyte Biol. 59:81.[Abstract]
chemokines costimulate human T lymphocyte activation in vitro. J. Immunol. 156:2095.[Abstract]
, interleukin-8 and RANTES. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:751.[Medline]
in vivo. J. Immunol. 162:5423.
-herpesvirus in the absence of CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 184:863.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Davis, K. A. Hagan, L. A. Matthews, G. Bajwa, M. A. Gill, M. Gale Jr., and J. D. Farrar Blockade of Virus Infection by Human CD4+ T Cells via a Cytokine Relay Network J. Immunol., May 15, 2008; 180(10): 6923 - 6932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Brown, J. L. Hurwitz, A. Zirkel, S. Surman, T. Takimoto, I. Alymova, C. Coleclough, A. Portner, P. C. Doherty, and K. S. Slobod A Recombinant Sendai Virus Is Controlled by CD4+ Effector T Cells Responding to a Secreted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein J. Virol., November 15, 2007; 81(22): 12535 - 12542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Zhong, P. A. Reche, C.-C. Lai, B. Reinhold, and E. L. Reinherz Genome-wide Characterization of a Viral Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Epitope Repertoire J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 45135 - 45144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Cauley, T. Cookenham, T. B. Miller, P. S. Adams, K. M. Vignali, D. A. A. Vignali, and D. L. Woodland Cutting Edge: Virus-Specific CD4+ Memory T Cells in Nonlymphoid Tissues Express a Highly Activated Phenotype J. Immunol., December 15, 2002; 169(12): 6655 - 6658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |