|
|
||||||||





*
Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114;
Chair of Semeiotica Medica, Catholic University, Largo A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy;
Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead, Australia; and
Division of Molecular Biology, Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden, The Netherlands
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is ample evidence to demonstrate that tumor cells use many
strategies to evade immune destruction by the host
(13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). A frequent finding is that the HLA-restricting
element is lost, sometimes via an allele-specific mechanism that may
include loss of heterozygosity or mutations within the coding exons
(13, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29). In other cases, there is a more global
down-regulation of expression of HLA molecules, such as those resulting
from mutations in the TAP or
2-microglobulin
genes (14, 30). Recently, the proto-oncogene promyelocytic
leukemia-1 has been implicated in the modulation of MHC
expression via control of TAP and latent membrane protein genes,
thereby providing for tumor escape from T cell recognition
(31). In addition, the selective loss of immunodominant
tumor Ags will also result in immune escape (19, 32, 33).
Such tumor cells are no longer recognized by T cells specific for these
elements, and thus are probably responsible, at least in part, for the
observed loss of lymphocyte infiltrates in tumors with associated poor
prognosis (34). Yet, those cases of melanoma in which
progression occurs in the presence of tumor-specific cytotoxic TIL
present an enigma (1): clinically apparent tumor cells
that evoke a cytotoxic immune response must also be able to implement a
mechanism to elude the immune response.
In this study, we describe a novel mechanism of autocrine down-regulation of an immunodominant tumor-associated Ag that explains how a melanoma cell can escape immune destruction in the presence of cytotoxic T cells directed against a widely expressed melanocyte lineage Ag, Melan-A/MART-1. Previously, we have shown that spontaneous down-modulation of Melan-A/MART-1 expression was observed when melanoma cells were grown at high density, whereas this Ag continued to be expressed by tumor cells cultured at low density, and could be rejuvenated by low density culture (35). The reduced expression of Melan-A/MART-1 protein at high density correlated with decreased T cell recognition (35). These observations suggested that expression of Melan-A/MART-1 could be down-modulated in vitro during melanoma cell growth through an autocrine pathway. In the current work, we demonstrate that several Melan-A/MART-1-deficient melanoma cell lines produce a soluble protein factor(s), the activity of which ultimately results in down-regulation of Melan-A/MART-1 protein expression in autologous and allogeneic melanoma cell lines. This down-regulation, which we shall refer to as melanoma Ag-silencing activity (MASA), prevents immune recognition of Melan-A/MART-1 by suppressing the activity of the gene promoter for this Ag. Of note, neither cell surface expression of HLA class I molecules nor the HLA-A2 promoter was affected by MASA. This loss of a T cell-recognized Ag may have significant biological and therapeutic implications. The reversibility of Ag silencing may hold a key to the maintenance of effective cell-mediated immunity.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Melanoma cells and TIL from the melanoma tissues were obtained according to approved Massachusetts General Hospital guidelines, and propagated in vitro, as previously described (1). Briefly, tumors were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS, and TIL were propagated in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% human serum containing human rIL-2 at 100 U/ml (Cetus, Emoryville, CA). TIL clones were isolated by limiting dilution, as previously described (1). Tumors MU and EW were obtained from cutaneous metastatic melanoma deposits. Melan-A/MART-1-negative variant MU-X was obtained by culture of MU tumor cells at high density (>5 x 105 cells/ml) for several days before immunoselection with Melan-A/MART-1-specific TIL. After 1 wk of coculture of tumor cells and lymphocytes in the presence of human rIL-2, the tumor cells that propagated were collected and maintained in culture in the absence of T cells. These MU-X, Melan-A/MART-1-negative tumor cells have remained negative in the intervening 2-year period. (Melan-A/MART-1 expression was tested as described below.)
Generation of conditioned medium
Conditioned medium from Melan-A/MART-1-deficient melanoma cell lines was generated by culturing cells at a starting concentration of 5 x 105 cells/ml in DMEM medium supplemented with between 1 and 10% FBS. Supernatants were collected after 72 h by centrifugation of the cell cultures and filtration of the medium through a 0.2-µm filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Conditioned medium containing 1% FBS was concentrated between 10- and 20-fold by collecting the retentate from a nominal 30-kDa YM membrane (Centriprep; Millipore, Bedford, MA). In addition to tumor cell lines MU-X, EW, and IGR39D, three nonmelanoma cell lines were also used to generate conditioned medium under similar conditions. These human tumor cell lines were Daudi (B cell lymphoma), Jurkat (T cell lymphoma), and MCF-7 (breast carcinoma). These three cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA).
Assessment of Ag-silencing activity
To monitor alterations in Ag expression by melanoma cells, MU
tumor cells were cultured for varying periods of time in conditioned
medium from melanoma cell lines, or purified fractions from such
supernatant fluids. MU tumor cells were established at 1 x
105/ml in 1-ml aliquots in individual wells of
24-well culture plates, as previously described (35),
which were then incubated at 37°C for between 1 and 7 days, before
harvesting cells for fluorescent staining and cytotoxicity assays, as
described below. Although production of MASA was constitutive, titers
increased as long as tumor cells remained viable, generally proving
most potent in supernatants collected after 34 days. Promoter assays
were performed as described below. The following cytokines were
quantified by ELISA (Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA): IL-1
,
IL-2, IL-12, IL-15, TNF-
, IFN-
, IL-6, IL-8, and monocyte
chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). These assays have a sensitivity of
10 pg/ml when performed according to the manufacturers protocols. In
addition, we evaluated the following recombinant cytokines (Genzyme
Diagnostics) for silencing activity: IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, growth-related
oncogene-
, epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth
factor (PDGF)A, PDGFB, TGF
, TGF
, nerve growth factor, RANTES,
macrophage-inflammatory protein-1
, LIF, platelet factor-4,
neutrophil-activating peptide-2, and
-melanocyte-stimulating hormone
obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Staining of tumor cells: flow cytometric analysis
To evaluate the expression of cytoplasmic Melan-A/MART-1 Ag in melanoma cell lines, cells were first fixed for 10 s in 1% paraformaldehyde; the cells are pelleted and incubated for 5 min in 0.1% saponin before washing and addition of mAb specific for Melan-A/MART-1, A-103 (36) (a kind gift of E. Stockert and L. J. Old, Ludwig Institute, New York, NY), for 45 min at 22°C. Following two washes, cells were stained for 30 min with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig Ab (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) before fixation in 1% paraformaldehyde and analysis by flow cytometry (FACScan; BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). Histograms of fluorescence staining were generated for comparison of anti-Melan-A/MART-1 staining of various cell populations. Mean channel fluorescence was calculated using the LYSIS software provided by the manufacturer. Staining for cytoplasmic tyrosinase was performed using mAb T311 (37), also a kind gift of E. Stockert and L. J. Old. Staining of surface HLA-A2 was conducted using the anti-HLA-A2-specific mAb, BB7.2 (ATCC), as previously described (24, 35).
Cytotoxicity assays
TIL were assayed for the ability to lyse melanoma target cells in 4-h 51Cr release assays, as previously described (1). The melanoma target cells with high constitutive expression of Melan-A/MART-1 (MU-Hi) were generated by low density culture (12 x 105/ml). These Melan-A/MART-1-expressing cells were compared with respect to their susceptibility to cytolysis with the same cells cultured for 3 to 6 days in the presence of conditioned medium from the Melan-A/MART-1-negative variant, MU-X, to derive target cells with low Melan-A/MART-1 expression. Low Melan-A/MART-1-expressing cells were further assayed after pulsing with Melan-A/MART-1 peptide aa 2735 (AAGIGILTV) (4, 5, 6, 7), by culturing these target cells at 37°C for 2 h in 1 ml medium containing 5 µg peptide before labeling with 51Cr for use in cytolytic assays to demonstrate renewed susceptibility to specific T cell recognition.
Promoter activity
Assessment of the promoter activity for Melan-A/MART-1 in melanoma cells was made in transient transfection experiments using the 233-bp minimal promoter sequence coupled to the firefly luciferase reporter gene (38) (kindly provided by L. Butterfield, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA). A 230-bp HLA-A firefly luciferase construct (pGL3-A230) (39) was transfected in parallel into the melanoma cells. An SV40 renilla-luciferase reporter gene was cotransfected to provide an internal control, using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System, as described by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison, WI). Transient transfections were conducted using the CaCl2 precipitation method, as previously described (39). After 16 h, the cultures were washed, and after an additional 48 h, cells were lysed and luciferase assays were performed. All assays were performed in quadruplicate, with the SV40 renilla control used to standardize for transfection efficiency. Data shown are means (±SD) of the corrected luciferase activity, standardized to 100% for optimal promoter activity of control Melan-A/MART-1-expressing tumor cells.
Assessment of mRNA transcripts for Melan-A/MART-1
To determine whether down-modulation of Melan-A/MART-1 Ag
expression was accompanied by a concomitant decrease in mRNA
transcripts for this protein, we performed RT-PCR analysis of cDNAs
transcribed from mRNAs extracted from MU tumor cells before and after
addition of MASA-containing supernatants. Assays were set up in a
comparable manner with the Ag-silencing assay above in 24-well plates
(5 x 104 cells/well). We analyzed and
compared the responses of low defined numbers of treated and control
cells based as described by Kurokawa et al. (40). Briefly,
for extraction of cytoplasmic mRNA, cells were harvested from each
well, washed once with PBS, once with 40 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 60 mM KCl, 3
mM MgCl2, and resuspended in
25 µl of the
latter buffer. The cellular concentration of each resuspended pellet
was determined, and an equalized number for each experiment (in the
range of 1036 x
103 cells) in 10 µl was mixed with 10 µl RNA
extraction buffer (to give final 40 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 60 mM KCl, 3 mM
MgCl2, 2 mg/ml linear acrylamide, 10 mM DTT,
0.5% Nonidet P-40, 2 U/µl RNase inhibitor (RNAsin; Promega). After a
10-min incubation at room temperature, 20 µl reverse transcription
buffer was added (40 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 60 mM KCl, 3 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 200 µg/ml BSA, 1 mM dNTPs, 8
µM dT18 primer, 16 U/µl Moloney murine
leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (RNaseH-,
point mutant; Promega). Reactions were incubated for 1.5 h at
42°C, and then for 20 min at 37°C following addition of 1 U RNaseH
(Promega), and supernatants were taken after centrifugation and stored
at -80°C. Equal volumes (1 µl) of reaction supernatants (taken
following centrifugation) were analyzed by PCR, using AmpliTaq Gold
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in 50-µl reactions with
buffering conditions, dNTPs as recommended by the manufacturer, and
primers at 300 µM. Cycling conditions were: (95°C/10 min) x
1; (60°C/1 min; 95°C/15 s) x N; (60°C/5 s; 72°C 1
min) x 1, in which N was varied over a range from 25 to 40
cycles. Primers for Melan-A/MART-1 were
5'-CAAGATGCCAAGAGAAGATGCTCACT (exon 2) and
5'-GCTTGCATTTTTCCTACACCATTCCA (exon 5); and
-actin primers were
5'-GAGATCACTGCCCTGGCACCCA and 5'-GCTCCAACCGACTGCTGTCACCTTCAC.
The authenticity of the PCR products was confirmed in all cases by
automated DNA sequencing on both strands.
PCR products were analyzed by gel densitometry scanning. Imaging and densitometric scanning were performed, respectively, with Quantity One and Molecular Analyst computer software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
Partial purification of MASA and protease digestion
To characterize the active components of the tumor-conditioned
medium, we collected supernatants from the most active tumor cell line,
the Melan-A/MART-1-negative tumor, EW. The supernatants, which
contained 1% FBS, were concentrated by first passing the material over
a column of Red-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ).
The majority of the activity bound to Red-Sepharose and was eluted
using 1.5 M KCl in 10 mM KPO4 buffer, pH 7. An
aliquot of this material was then equilibrated to 1 mM in
CaCl2 before loading onto a 1-ml Con A-Sepharose
column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at
1 ml/min. The column was then
washed with 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM
MnCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4.
The bound material was then eluted with 0.5 M
-methyl mannoside in
20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 7.4. Before use in assays, the
column-passaged material was buffered exchanged vs PBS and concentrated
using 15 ml Centriprep YM10 centrifugal filtration devices (Millipore,
Bedford, MA), 10-kDa nominal cutoff. Finally, the activity was
fractionated on a G-50 Sephadex (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) sizing
column. Fractions were tested for Ag-silencing activity, and active
fractions were subjected to nonreducing SDS-PAGE on 12% gels.
To demonstrate the protein character of the active material, it was
subjected to proteinase K digestion. After buffer exchanging with PBS
and concentrating to
1 ml, 300 µl of the concentrate was added to
the washed pellet from 50 µl of a suspension of solid-phase
proteinase K (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). This mixture was incubated at
37°C for
18 h, at which time 15 µl 100 µg/ml
-1
anti-trypsin (Sigma) was added and the solid-phase enzyme was
pelleted by centrifugation. The supernatant was removed for testing of
MASA by FACS, as previously described. As a control, an aliquot of
solid-phase proteinase K had protease inhibitors added before addition
of the 300 µl of concentrate. This control mixture was stored at
4°C for 18 h before removal of supernatant for MASA
evaluation.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fig. 1
demonstrates that the tumor
cell line MU-X has stable, constitutive, low expression of the
Melan-A/MART-1 Ag, as indicated by staining with the mAb, A-103
(36). In contrast, the cell line MU displays a high level
of Melan-A/MART-1 Ag expression when cultured at 1 x
105/ml. Three additional melanoma cell lines, EW,
IGR39D, and A375, were also found to have deficient Melan-A/MART-1
staining (data not shown).
|
|
|
|
The active material in EW supernatant can be shown to bind to
Red-Sepharose and to Con A-Sepharose, which allowed for over 100-fold
enrichment of the activity. Red-Sepharose-bound and Con
A-Sepharose-bound and eluted material was then subjected to size
fractionation on G-50 Sephadex. The down-modulating activity in
fractions collected from the G-50 column comigrated with a single band
on SDS-PAGE at
25 kDa (data not shown). The MASA could be destroyed
by treatment of the supernatants at 80°C for 60 min. A similar
treatment at 60°C did not influence the activity (data not shown).
Treatment of the partially purified MASA (G-50 fractions) with
proteinase K destroyed its activity (Fig. 4
). Together these observations reveal
that the Melan-A/MART-1-deficient tumor cells produce a soluble protein
factor(s), the activity of which ultimately results in silencing of
Melan-A/MART-1 expression.
|
that has been demonstrated to
have a partial down-regulatory activity directed at the Melan-A/MART-1
promoter (38). Moreover, the most prevalent proteins
identified, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1, did not mimic the Ag-silencing
activity of the whole supernatant, either individually over a 3-log
dosage, or when recombinant forms of these cytokines were combined to
approximate the levels detected in the active supernatants (data not
shown). In all, we have assessed over 20 proteins, including many known
to be secreted by melanoma cells (41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46), for their
capacity to mimic the Ag-silencing activity. Other than TNF-
, which
was not present in the active supernatants, none of the following
proteins impacted cytoplasmic Melan-A/MART-1 expression (using flow
cytometric detection of cytoplasmic staining with mAb A-103, as noted
above), and promoter activity (using the luciferase assay for promoter
activity): MSG/growth-related oncogene-
, epidermal growth factor,
PDGFA, PDGFB, TGF
, TGF
, nerve growth factor, RANTES,
macrophage-inflammatory protein-1
, LIF, platelet
factor-4, neutrophil-activating peptide-2. The following
cytokines were not detected in the active supernatants by ELISA (with
sensitivity limits of
10 pg/ml): IL-1
, IL-2, IL-12, IL-15,
TNF-
, and IFN-
. In addition, heparin, which is known to
bind to several growth factors, did not affect Melan-A/MART-1
expression, and did not impact the silencing activity of active
supernatants. Down-modulation of the promoter of the Melan-A/MART-1 gene
To correlate lack of Melan-A/MART-1 Ag expression with a lack of
Melan-A/MART-1 gene promoter activity, we have performed transient
transfection assays with the 233-bp minimal promoter of the
Melan-A/MART-1 gene (38). Using this minimal promoter
fused to the luciferase reporter gene, the impact of the Ag-silencing
activity on the Melan-A/MART-1 promoter was assessed. As shown in Fig. 7
A, there was baseline
promoter activity in Melan-A/MART-1-negative tumor cells (MU-X),
whereas this promoter showed abundant activity in tumor cells that
expressed Melan-A/MART-1. The addition of conditioned medium from
Melan-A/MART-1-negative tumor cells (either MU-X or EW) abolished the
high level of constitutive Melan-A/MART-1 promoter activity in the MU
tumor cells that express high levels of cytoplasmic Melan-A/MART-1. The
promoter activity was down-modulated in a dose-dependent fashion.
Although these supernatants displayed rather modest activity, as the
promoter-silencing activity quickly diluted out, the activity could be
concentrated, as it was retained by a nominal 30-kDa cutoff membrane
(Millipore, Bedford, MA). This concentrated material retained virtually
all of the activity in the starting material, as a 10-fold concentrate
could be diluted 10-, 20-, or 40-fold and showed activity almost
identical with 100, 50, and 25% supernatant fluids. The fact that the
activity could be diluted, so that it constituted only a small
proportion of the original cell culture medium, demonstrated that the
Ag silencing was not due simply to nutrient deprivation.
|
Down-modulation of T cell recognition
The diminution of expression of the Melan-A/MART-1 Ag correlated
with reduced susceptibility of the target cells to lysis by
HLA-A2-restricted, Melan-A/MART-1-specific CTL (Fig. 6
). Thus, as the level of Melan-A/MART-1
Ag expression by tumor cells diminished, whereas levels of HLA-A2 cell
surface expression did not decrease, the T cell recognition of these
targets decreased. However, when the target cells were pulsed with the
Melan-A/MART-1 peptide (aa 2735, AAGIGILTV), normal levels of cell
lysis were observed, indicating that the tumor cells had not become
resistant to cell-mediated lysis.
|
As shown in Fig. 8
, the
down-modulation of Melan-A/MART-1 protein expression, as reflected in
decreased cytoplasmic staining with mAb A-103, was accompanied by a
decrease in the steady state levels of mRNA encoding this Ag in MU
tumor cells treated for 3 days with EW supernatants before extraction
of mRNA and RT-PCR amplification. A pronounced diminution in the
amounts of Melan-A/MART-1 product was seen in the supernatant-treated
cells, which was not observed for the
-actin controls. This effect
was independent of cycle number (from the threshold of detection up to
product saturation) and was repeated in four independent experiments,
indicating real differences in steady state levels of the
Melan-A/MART-1 target mRNA between the treated and untreated cellular
populations. The Melan-A/MART-1 mRNA diminution mediated by the EW
supernatants was detectable on day 1 post treatment (but was less
pronounced than at day 3) and still notable 7 days post treatment (data
not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the Ag-silencing activity, as measured by cytoplasmic staining with Ab, is apparent after 24 h of culture, maximal effect is not seen until 72 h. A similar kinetic was noted for diminution in mRNA transcript levels for Melan-A/MART-1. The transfection assay with the luciferase-linked promoter construct indicates that down-modulation of the promoter is maximal by the earliest time point we could examine, namely 24 h. We interpret these data to indicate that the promoter is turned off rather quickly, but protein expression is altered more gradually, perhaps as a reflection of the t1/2 of the protein, or continued synthesis by a stable mRNA.
We hypothesize that, at any given time, some of the tumor cells are producing Melan-A/MART-1-positive progeny, which continue to stimulate infiltration with Melan-A/MART-1-specific T cells. However, at the same time, some of the tumor progeny down-modulate Melan-A/MART-1, rendering them resistant to immune recognition by Melan-A/MART-1-specific T cells. Unfortunately, when the T cell response against such melanocyte Ags is enhanced, as in vaccine trials, the resulting outgrowth of Ag-negative variants could be a frequent outcome (13, 15, 19). As tyrosinase expression is also reduced by the same supernatants, it is possible that the changes in Melan-A/MART-1 expression reflect an alteration in the differentiation status of the tumor cells, suggesting that multiple lineage Ags may be altered by the activity we describe.
As we have shown, the in vitro expression of Melan-A/MART-1 is regulated, at least in part, by a soluble protein factor (or factors) that is produced by tumors with low Melan-A/MART-1 expression. In vivo such protein(s) could down-modulate Melan-A/MART-1 expression on neighboring cells. Our in vitro data suggest that these tumor variants are not mutants that have lost the Melan-A/MART-1 gene, but rather cells in which Melan-A/MART-1 expression is down-regulated, perhaps reversibly, by targeting the promoter for this gene. It is noteworthy that the four Melan-A/MART-1-deficient melanoma cell lines we studied all produced strong Ag-silencing activity, whereas nonmelanocyte tumors, such as Daudi (B cell lymphoma), Jurkat (T cell lymphoma), and MCF-7 (breast carcinoma), did not produce MASA (data not shown). Thus, in nonmelanocyte cells, there is no selective advantage to actively down-regulate the promoter for Melan-A/MART-1, whereas the melanocytes that normally express this Ag must be down-regulated to shut off transcription of this protein. In a tumor variant that has lost the gene or its promoter, there would be no selective advantage for the cell to continue to produce an Ag-silencing factor. Thus, whether such a factor is involved in differentiation of the melanocyte lineage, or perhaps maintenance of a less mature phenotype, the active production of MASA seems to be characteristic of tumors that have lost expression of Melan-A/MART-1.
A variety of autocrine and paracrine factors has been described that alter the phenotype and behavior of melanoma cells (47), but the activity described in our study, which selectively down-regulates the expression of a tumor-related Ag critical to T cell recognition, represents a heretofore unrecognized mechanism for immune escape by tumors. Admittedly, this Ag-silencing pathway does not account for all of the pathways of immune escape manifested by melanoma cells, but the spontaneous, reversible nature of this tumor Ag expression represents a novel pathway for possible therapeutic intervention. Further characterization of the regulatory pathways involved in this autocrine down-modulation of T cell-recognized Ags will perhaps allow for the design of novel therapeutics to limit tumor progression or to enhance the effectiveness of antimelanoma vaccines (15, 18, 48, 49). Further studies will clarify whether this Ag-silencing mechanism for tumor escape is characteristic only of specific melanoma-associated Ags, such as Melan-A/MART-1, or whether it is also relevant for other melanoma-associated Ags, as well as in the immune escape and progression of other types of tumors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte(s); MASA, melanoma Ag-silencing activity; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor. ![]()
Received for publication November 8, 2000. Accepted for publication May 18, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-microglobulin in metastatic melanomas from five patients receiving immunotherapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 88:100.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. S. Dunn, T. J. Haggerty, M. Kono, P. J. Durda, D. Butera, D. B. Macdonald, E. M. Benson, L. B. Rose, and J. T. Kurnick Enhancement of Human Melanoma Antigen Expression by IFN-beta J. Immunol., August 15, 2007; 179(4): 2134 - 2142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kono, I. S. Dunn, P. J. Durda, D. Butera, L. B. Rose, T. J. Haggerty, E. M. Benson, and J. T. Kurnick Role of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway in the Regulation of Human Melanocytic Antigen Expression Mol. Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 4(10): 779 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Filaci, M. Fravega, M. Setti, P. Traverso, E. Millo, D. Fenoglio, S. Negrini, F. Ferrera, A. Romagnoli, M. Basso, et al. Frequency of telomerase-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes in patients with cancer Blood, February 15, 2006; 107(4): 1505 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Barrow, J. Browning, D. MacGregor, I. D. Davis, S. Sturrock, A. A. Jungbluth, and J. Cebon Tumor Antigen Expression in Melanoma Varies According to Antigen and Stage Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 12(3): 764 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. van Dinten, N. Pul, A. F. van Nieuwpoort, C. J. Out, M. J. Jager, and P. J. van den Elsen Uveal and Cutaneous Melanoma: Shared Expression Characteristics of Melanoma-Associated Antigens Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 24 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Durda, I. S. Dunn, L. B. Rose, D. Butera, E. M. Benson, F. Pandolfi, and J. T. Kurnick Induction of "Antigen Silencing" in Melanomas by Oncostatin M: Down-Modulation of Melanocyte Antigen Expression Mol. Cancer Res., April 1, 2003; 1(6): 411 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||