The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baba, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baba, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, Y.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 167: 875-883.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Functional CD4 T Cells after Intercellular Molecular Transfer of OX40 Ligand1

Eishi Baba2,*, Yoshiaki Takahashi{dagger}, Juliane Lichtenfeld*, Reiko Tanaka*, Atsushi Yoshida*, Kazuo Sugamura{ddagger}, Naoki Yamamoto{dagger} and Yuetsu Tanaka2,*

* Department of Infectious Disease and Immunology, Okinawa-Asia Research Center of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan; {dagger} Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; and {ddagger} Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OX40/OX40 ligand (OX40L) proteins play critical roles in the T cell-B cell and T cell-dendritic cell interactions. Here we describe the intercellular transfer of OX40L molecules by a non-Ag specific manner. After 2-h coculture of activated CD4+ T cell (OX40L-, OX40+) with FLAG peptide-tagged OX40L (OX40L-flag) protein-expressing COS-1 cells, the OX40L-flag protein was detected on the cell surface of the CD4+ T cells by both anti-OX40L and anti-FLAG mAbs. The intercellular OX40L transfer was specifically abrogated by pretreatment of the COS-1 cells with anti-OX40L mAb, 5A8. The OX40L transfer to OX40-negative cells was also observed, indicating an OX40-independent pathway of OX40L transfer. HUVECs, allostimulated monocytes, and human T cell leukemia virus type I-infected T cells, which all express OX40L, can potentially act as the donor cells of OX40L. The entire molecule of OX40L was transferred and stabilized on the recipient cell membrane with discrete punctate formation. The transferred OX40L on normal CD4+ T cells was functionally active as they stimulated latent HIV-1-infected cells to produce viral proteins via OX40 signaling. Therefore, these findings suggest that the intercellular molecular transfer of functional OX40L may be involved in modifying the immune responses.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Membrane proteins expressed on the immune cell surface play primary roles in cell-to-cell recognition and subsequent signal transduction. A variety of membrane proteins including TCR and MHC molecules are involved in the multiple phases of an immune reaction. It has been shown that they complete their specific function accompanied with dynamic lateral and vertical movements on the cell membrane during the period of cell-to-cell interaction. In an Ag-specific T cell-APC interaction, a supramolecular movement of the membrane proteins has been shown to form an immunological synapse at the T-APCs contacting site with the rapid clustering of membrane proteins, including TCR, CD4, CD8, LFA-1, CD28, and CD2, based on the microdomain of lipid rafts (1, 2, 3). This movement of membrane proteins is thought to constitute the efficient signal transduction mechanisms supporting sufficient duration and avidity of the molecular bindings. The vertical movements of the membrane proteins also provide an important mechanism for regulating the cell-to-cell recognition. Active internalization of the related proteins following the binding to their proper ligand has been suggested to function to limit the receptor-ligand binding and thus allow the cells to dissociate (4). In addition, membrane protein internalization was suggested to transfer a signal via activation of lysosomal proteins (5). It has been shown that T cells absorb several cell surface proteins from APCs along with the internalization of the TCR after T-APC interaction, providing a possible mechanism of fratricide in which Ag-specific T cells absorbing preformed MHC/viral peptide complex become target cells for the virus-specific CTLs (4, 6). Naive T cells after the acquisition of CD80 molecules from APCs were also reported to have a capacity as APCs (7). However, it remains to be investigated whether other immunoregulatory molecules are exchanged to regulate immune responses.

Various proteins belonging to TNF superfamily and TNFR superfamily expressed on the immune cells have functions in cell growth and death (8). OX40 (CD134), one member of the TNFR superfamily, is expressed on activated CD4+ T cells (9, 10). The costimulation of CD4+ T cells via OX40 by OX40 ligand (OX40L)3 results in enhancement of T cell growth and cytokine production (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). In addition to the costimulatory function, OX40 has been shown to be involved in T cell migration (15, 16). OX40L (gp34, CD134 ligand) has been shown to be expressed on restricted immune cell populations, including dendritic cells (DCs) and activated B cells, as well as endothelial cells (10, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). It has been shown that the stimulation via OX40L of DCs enhances their activation and maturation (20), and that that of B cells induces elevated response of humoral immunity (22, 23). Although the functional importance of OX40/OX40L interaction in the immune responses has been intensively investigated, the mechanism of the modification or the regulation of this reaction still remains unclear.

In this report, we describe an intercellular molecular transfer of functional OX40L to CD4+ from not only OX40L transfectants but also human T cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I)-infected cells, monocytes, and HUVECs. These findings provide us with a new idea to help clarify the regulation and modification mechanisms of OX40/OX40L interaction.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cells and Abs

RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% FCS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin was used as a basic medium (referred to as RPMI medium). Human PBMC were separated from heparinized peripheral blood obtained from volunteer healthy donors by using lympholyte-H (Cedarlane Laboratories, Hornby, Ontario, Canada). For preparation of CD4+ T cell-enriched cells, PBMC were depleted of CD8+ and CD14+ cells with anti-CD8 and -CD14 Abs-conjugated magnetic beads (Dynal, Lake Success, NY). CD4+ T cells were activated by immobilized OKT-3 mAb or the magnetic beads (Dynal) coated with OKT-3 and anti-CD28 mAb for 3–7 days in RPMI medium containing 50 U/ml recombinant human IL-2 (Shionogi, Osaka, Japan). Alternatively, CD4+ T cells were activated in RPMI medium containing either 20 ng/ml recombinant human IL-12 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), or 20 ng/ml recombinant human IL-4 (R&D Systems). Establishing and maintaining the IL-2-stimulated NK cell lines were described elsewhere (24). CD14+ monocytes were separated from normal PBMC by a monocyte-negative isolation kit (Dynal). Human monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA), human T lymphoma cell lines Jurkat and HUT-78, HTLV-I-infected human T cell line MT-2, human epithelial cell line HeLa-S3, and monkey kidney cell line COS-1 were also maintained in RPMI medium. Other HTLV-I-infected human T cell lines, ILT-AKI, ILT-626, and ILT-NIS, were maintained in RPMI medium containing 20 U/ml recombinant IL-2. Establishment and maintenance of human OX40L transfectants of Jurkat cell line J34-10-9 (N. Ishii, K. Murata, Y. Tanaka, K. Sugamura, manuscript in preparation), mouse fibroblast cell line transfected with cDNA of OX40L (SVT2/OX40L) or mock vector (SVT2/control), and HIV-1 latent infected T cell line transfected with cDNA of human OX40 (ACH2/OX40) or vector alone (ACH2/moc), will be described elsewhere (41). HUVECs were purchased (Kurabo, Osaka, Japan) and were cultured in Humedia-EG2 medium (Kurabo).

Purchased mAbs were anti-CD3 (OKT3; ATCC), anti-CD4 (OKT4; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), anti-CD14-FITC (Dako, Carpinteria, CA), anti-CD28-FITC (Dako), anti-CD40-FITC (Ancell, Bayport, MN), anti-CD69-FITC (Dako), anti-CD95-FITC (Dako), anti-HLA class I (W6/32; ATCC), anti-{beta}2-microglobulin (BBM.1; ATCC), anti-HLA-DR-FITC (Dako), anti-TNF-{alpha} (R&D Systems), anti-TNF-{beta} (R&D Systems), anti-OX40 (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan), goat anti-mouse IgG-FITC (American Qualex, San Clemente, CA), streptavidin-PE (Dako), streptavidin-PerCP (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and streptavidin-Cy3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Mouse anti-human OX40L mAbs, 5A8, 8F4, TAG34 (25), a new rat anti-OX40L IgG1 mAb, W9-14 and a new mouse anti-OX40 IgG1 mAb, B7B5 (41) were prepared in our laboratory. Rat anti-HTLV-I envelope gp46 mAb, Rey-7, was used for negative control staining (26). mAbs were purified from ascites fluids by gel filtration with Superdex G-200 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and were labeled with N-hydroxysuccinimide-FITC (Sigma), normal human serum-biotin (Sigma), or Cy5 Bis functional dye (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Expression vector construction and transfection of COS-1 cells

For the construction of the expression vector of OX40L with FLAG peptide on the C terminus of OX40L, complementary DNA of OX40L lacking the stop codon on the 3' end were amplified from pSGP34 (17) with OX40L specific primer set (5'-GGCAAGCTTCCATTCTTCATCTTCCC-3', 5'-GGCGGATCCAAGGACACAGAATTCACC-3') (Espec Oligo Service, Tsukuba, Japan) containing HindIII or BamHI recognition sequence by PCR (DNA thermal cycler, Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA). PCR product of OX40L-FLAG was cloned into the pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) by the TA cloning method and recloned into the transient mammalian expression vector pFLAG-CMV-5a (Sigma) after confirmation of their sequences by DNA sequencer 4200 (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE) using M13 reverse and forward primers (ALOKA, Tokyo, Japan). COS-1 cells were transfected with pFLAG-CMV-5a carrying OX40L cDNA (pFLAG-CMV-5a/OX40L) or vector alone using FuGENE (Boehringer-Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Two days after transfection, the expression of OX40L-FLAG proteins on the COS-1 cells were confirmed by staining with anti-OX40L mAb and biotinylated anti-FLAG peptide mAb (M2; Sigma) followed by staining with streptavidin-PE.

OX40L transfer and flow cytometry analysis

OX40L-expressing transfectants, SVT2/OX40L, COS/OX40L-flag, J34-10-9 and negative control cells treated with or without fixation by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Wako Biochemicals, Osaka, Japan) for 10 min at room temperature were cocultured with activated human CD4+ T cells, freshly isolated human PBMC, or other cell lines for 2 h at either 37°C or on ice. Alternatively, CD4+ T cells and SVT2 transfectants or J34-10-9 cells and SVT2 transfectants were cultured in separated chambers through a membrane with 0.4-µm pores (Transwell; Costar, Corning, NY). Transfer of OX40L protein onto the recipient cells was analyzed by multicolor staining. Anti-pan HLA class I mAb (W6/32) was used to distinguish recipient cells from the mouse SVT2 transfectants and other tumor cell lines, and anti-HLA class II mAb was used for distinguishing recipient cells from COS-1 transfectants. For staining of the cells, prewashed cell mixtures were incubated with 100 µg/ml human IgG in PBS containing 2% FCS and 0.1% NaN3 (referred to as FACS buffer) for 15 min at 4°C for blocking the FcR, and subsequently incubated with the appropriate concentration (5–10 µg/ml) of labeled mAbs for 30 min on ice. After washing with FACS buffer, cells were fixed with 1% PFA for 10 min and membrane staining was analyzed with FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). In the analysis of transferred OX40L under the acidic condition, for distinguishing SVT2 transfectants from CD4+ T cells, the donor cells were prelabeled with a PKH67 fluorescent kit (Zynaxis, Malvern, PA). The PFA-fixed prelabeled SVT2 transfectants were removed by Ficoll density gradient medium (Cedarlane Laboratories) after a 2-h coculture with CD4+ T cells on ice. Separated recipient CD4+ T cells were incubated in 1.0 ml of 0.2 M glycine-HCl buffer (pH 2.8) for 10 min on ice and then stained with mAbs as described above (27).

Immunoprecipitation

The transferred OX40L on the recipient cells was analyzed by immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting. After coculture of the CD4+ T recipient cells with PFA-fixed OX40L-expressing cells, the live recipient cells were separated by a gradient centrifugation followed by the positive separation of CD4+ T cells using immunobeads. Then, 5 x 105 of the sorted CD4+ T cells were surface biotinylated with Sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide-biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and solubilized in 500 µl of low-salt lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.14 M NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM PMSF, 0.5% Nonidet P-40). The postnuclear lysates were precleaned by incubating with 125 µl protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and then subjected to immunoprecipitation with 2 µg anti-OX40L mAb, 5A8, and 12.5 µl protein G-Sepharose. The Sepharose was washed four times and then eluted with the 12 µl of sample buffer (0.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.1% bromophenol blue, and 4% 2-ME) for 5 min at 100°C. The immunoprecipitates were separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto Clear Blot Membrane-p (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan) by the electric Western blotting system (ATTO). Biotinylated protein bands were visualized by streptavidin-HRP and ECL chemiluminescent substrate (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) followed by analysis with Fluor-S MAX MultiImager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

Detection of mRNA of OX40L by RT-PCR

For analysis of mRNA of OX40L in the OX40L-transferred cells after coculture with OX40L-expressing cells, RT-PCR experiments were performed. Two million stimulated CD4+ T cells or THP-1 cells after culture with fixed SVT2/control or SVT2/OX40L for 2 h were separated by gradient centrifugation and Ab-coated magnetic beads. After washing these cells with PBS, total RNA was isolated by TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies), and first-strand DNA was prepared by using reverse transcriptase with oligo(dT) primers (Life Technologies). These first-strand DNA were amplified with a OX40L specific primer set or G3PDH specific primer set (5'-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3', 5'-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3') with 30 cycles of PCR. The amplified products were determined on 1% agarose gel. The first-strand DNA from OX40L-expressing MT-2 cells was used as positive control.

HIV-1 induction assay

For studying the function of the transferred OX40L protein on the CD4+ T cells, we used the ACH2/OX40 cells. Cross-linking of OX40 on the ACH2/OX40 by stimulation with OX40L-expressing cells have been confirmed to induce the ACH2/OX40 cells to produce HIV-1 virions in the culture supernatants (41). In this study, ACH2/OX40 or ACH2/moc cells were cocultured with an equal numbers of PFA-fixed OX40L-transferred CD4+ T cells for 2 days in the presence of 10 µg/ml of both anti-TNF-{alpha} and anti-TNF-{beta} mAbs (R&D Systems) to avoid the effect of TNF. Then HIV-1 p24 released in the culture supernatants was measured by an ELISA kit (Zeptometrix, Buffalo, NY).

Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy

Coculture of CD4+ T cells and SVT2 transfectants were set by the same methods for FACS analysis of OX40L transfer as described above. After washing and blocking with human IgG, cells were incubated with FITC-labeled W9-1 and biotinylated OKT4 for 30 min at 4°C. Subsequently, cells were incubated with streptavidin-Cy3 for 30 min at 4°C, followed by resuspension with FACS buffer with 1% PFA. A volume of 5 µl of cell suspension was sealed between a glass slide and coverslip, and examined by confocal laser microscopy (Fluo View BX-50; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a x40 objective lens, using laser excitation at 488 and 543 nm. The widths of FITC and Cy3 emission channels were set such that bleed-through across channels was negligible.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Specific induction of OX40L expression on the CD4+ T cells by coculture with OX40L-expressing cells

Previously, we found that coculture of normal activated CD4+ T cells with OX40L+ HTLV-I-infected MT-2 cells induced OX40L expression on the CD4+ T cells that was specifically blocked by anti-OX40L mAb (our unpublished data). In these studies, we used a SVT2 mouse fibroblast cell line and a Jurkat cell line transfected with cDNA of human OX40L (designated as SVT2/OX40L and J34-10-9, respectively). For negative controls, the same fibroblast-transfected cell line with mock vector (SVT2/control) and a parental Jurkat cell line were used. The expression of OX40L proteins on these cells was confirmed by both flow cytometry and Western blotting analyses using mAbs specific for OX40L (Fig. 1GoA and data not shown). We first examined the modification of the cell surface expression levels of various costimulatory and related membrane proteins, including OX40L, OX40, CD25, CD40, CD69, CD95, and CD28, on the activated CD4+ T cells after coculture with the SVT2/OX40L. In the flow cytometry analysis, the mouse SVT2 transfectants were easily gated out from the mixed population, based on the HLA class I negative phenotype and the pattern of forward and side scatter (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 1GoB, CD4+ T cells became OX40L positive after coculture with SVT2/OX40L but not with SVT2/control cells. No significant change in the expression levels of CD25, CD40, CD69, CD95, and CD28 was observed on the surface of CD4+ T cells after coculture with SVT2 transfectants. The level of OX40 expression on CD4+ T cells was slightly down-regulated only after coculture with SVT2/OX40L.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. OX40L induction on the activated CD4+ T cells by coculture with OX40L-expressing cells. A, Expression of OX40L on SVT2 transfectants (SVT2/OX40L) and Jurkat transfectants (J34-10-9) are shown. SVT2 transfectants (SVT2/OX40L and SVT2/control) and Jurkat cells were stained with FITC-conjugated mAbs specific for OX40L (TAG34) (open histogram) and isotype control (filled histogram). B, Expression of various membrane proteins on CD4+ T cells after coculture with SVT2/OX40L cells or SVT2/control cells. Cells were two-color stained for HLA class I (W6/32) and for the markers indicated. The histograms show stainings of HLA class I-positive cells. CD4+ T cells cocultured with SVT2/control (dotted line) and those of the cells cocultured with SVT2/OX40L (solid line).

 
Transfer of the biotinylated or FLAG-tagged OX40L protein to CD4+ T cells

To determine the possibility that OX40L protein was transferred from the SVT2/OX40L cells during the period of coculture, we first surface-biotinylated OX40L+ J34-10-9 cells and Jurkat cells, and then cocultured with the recipient CD4+ T cells. After a 2-h coculture, CD4+ T cells were stained with Cy5-conjugated anti-CD4 mAb and PE-conjugated streptavidin. The cell mixtures were simultaneously stained with anti-OX40L mAb (TAG34-FITC) to confirm the expression of OX40L on CD4+ T cells. As shown in Fig. 2GoA, 16% of CD4+ T cells cocultured with J34-10-9 cells became OX40L positive. This OX40L acquisition on CD4+ T cells was almost completely abrogated by pretreatment of J34-10-9 cells with anti-OX40L mAb, W9-1. Although low levels of biotinylated substances (10–11%) were detected on the CD4+ T cell population cocultured with biotinylated Jurkat cells, 38% of the CD4+ T cells cocultured with biotinylated J34-10-9 cells expressed high levels of biotin-related substances on the cell surface. Acquisition of the biotinylated substances was significantly inhibited by the anti-OX40L, suggesting that OX40L is the major biotinylated protein transferred from the OX40L+ cells to CD4+ T cells. To confirm the intercellular molecular transfer of OX40L protein, we established COS-1 cells transiently expressing OX40L-FLAG peptide fusion protein (COS/OX40L-flag) and cocultured them with CD4+ T cells. The expression of OX40L-flag fusion protein was examined by flow cytometry using various anti-OX40L mAbs and M2 anti-FLAG Ab (Fig. 2GoB). Immunoprecipitation with these specific Abs was also performed (data not shown). These results showed that CD4+ T cells acquired OX40L from the donor COS-1 cell transfectant. Interestingly, the FLAG-labeled OX40L transfer was also observed on the human OX40-negative monocytic tumor cell line, THP-1 (Fig. 2GoC). These data indicate that the newly appeared OX40L protein on OX40-positive CD4+ T cells and OX40-negative THP-1 cells were produced in the donor OX40L transfectants and then transferred to the recipient cells.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Transfer of the biotinylated OX40L or the FLAG-tagged OX40L protein to the CD4+ T cells. A, Surface-biotinylated Jurkat cells (left) and J34-10-9 cells (right) cocultured with CD4+ T cells for 2 h at 37°C with or without anti-OX40L blocking mAb, W9-1. After coculture, cells were stained with Cy5-conjugated anti-CD4 mAb and anti-OX40L TAG34-FITC (upper figures) or PE-conjugated streptavidin (lower figures), and examined by flow cytometry. The percentages of cell numbers located in each quadrants are shown. B, Surface staining of the COS/OX40L-flag (open histogram) and COS/moc (filled histogram) cells with anti-OX40L W9-1-FITC or biotinylated FLAG peptide-specific mAb, M2, followed by FITC-conjugated streptavidin. C, CD4+ T cells or THP-1 cells cocultured with COS/OX40L-flag (open histograms) or COS/moc (filled histograms) for 2 h at 37°C. After coculture, CD4+ T cells were stained with OKT4-FITC and W9-1-Cy5 or M2-biotin followed by streptavidin-Cy5. THP-1 cells were stained with human {beta}2-microglobulin-specific mAb, BBM.1, followed by the FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and W9-1 or M2 mAbs. The data show staining on gated CD4+ T cells and BBM.1-positive THP-1 cells.

 
Intercellular molecular transfer of OX40L in various cell combinations

It has been reported that various human hemopoietic cell populations including HTLV-I-infected T cells, activated B cells, macrophages, and DCs, as well as endothelial cells, express OX40L (10, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25). We investigated whether various OX40L-expressing HTLV-I-infected T cell lines are capable of transferring OX40L onto activated CD4+ T cells. Fig. 3GoA shows that cells with high OX40L expression including MT-2, ILT-NIS, and ILT-626 successfully induced OX40L transfer on the CD4+ T cells, as in the case of SVT2/OX40L. Low levels of molecular transfer of OX40L were seen from ILT-AKI expressing low levels of OX40L. We also determined the capability of transferring OX40L of normal cells including monocytes and HUVECs. To enhance OX40L expression on monocytes, they were cocultured with allogenic Jurkat cells for 24 h before examining the capability of OX40L transfer. Coculture of CD4+ T cells with these two OX40L+ cells resulted in OX40L expression on the CD4+ T cells at low levels (Fig. 3GoB).



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Intercellular molecular transfer of OX40L in various cell combinations. A (top), Four HTLV-I-infected T cell lines and SVT2/OX40 were stained with TAG34-FITC (open histograms) or isotype-matched control (filled histograms). Bottom, Normal CD4+ T cells prestained with PKH67 and cocultured with each of these OX40L-expressing cells for 2 h and then stained with W9-1-Cy5. The data show the stainings on gated normal CD4+ T cells. Left, Staining profile of normal CD4+ T cells cocultured with SVT2/control (filled line) and with SVT2/OX40L (solid line) was shown. In the other figures, solid lines show the staining of normal CD4+ T cells cocultured with each of OX40L-expressing cells, and dotted lines show the normal CD4+ T cells without coculture. B (top), HUVECs stained with W9-1-Cy5 (solid line) or control rat IgG conjugated with Cy5 (Rey-7-Cy5) (dotted line). Fresh monocytes cocultured with Jurkat cells (CD3-, CD4-, CD14-) were stained with anti-CD14-FITC and W9-1-Cy5 (solid line) or Rey-7-Cy5 (dotted line). The data show the staining on gated CD14+ for monocytes. Bottom, CD4+ T cells cocultured with HUVECs or monocytes were stained with OKT4-FITC and W9-1-Cy5. The data show the staining of CD4+ T cells in the coculture (solid lines) or CD4+ T cells without coculture (dotted lines). C, Normal PBL, PHA-activated T cells, CD14+ monocytes, and IL-2-activated NK cells were cocultured with SVT2 transfectants. PBL and PHA-stimulated T cells were stained with W6/32-FITC, OKT3-Cy5, and TAG34-biotin followed by the streptavidin-PerCP and OKT4-PE or anti-CD8-PE for the T cell analysis. The data show staining on gated HLA class I+, CD3+, and CD4+ T cells or HLA class I+, CD3+, and CD8+ T cells. TAG34-FITC, anti-CD56-PE, and W6/32-Cy5 for NK cells and anti-CD14-FITC, TAG34-biotin, and W6/32-Cy5 for monocytes were used. The data show staining on gated CD56+, HLA class I+ NK cells or CD14+, HLA class I+ monocytes. D, CD4+ T cells activated with different cytokines were stained with TAG34-Cy5 (a; open bar) or B7B5-Cy5 (a; filled bar). After coculture with SVT2/OX40L (b; filled bar) or SVT2/control (b; open bar), each CD4+ T cell was stained with TAG34-Cy5. Mean fluorescence intensities of CD4+ T cell staining are shown. These data represent multiple independent experiments using T cells from different donors. E, Various cell lines cocultured with SVT2 transfectants for 2 h and then stained with W6/32-FITC and TAG34-Cy5. F, Determination of OX40L mRNA in the CD4+ T cells and THP-1 cells cocultured with PFA-fixed SVT2/OX40L or SVT2/control cells. After 2-h coculture, live cells were separated by Ficoll gradient centrifugation, and CD4+ T cells and THP-1 cells were positively collected by W6/32 with magnetic beads. Relative level of mRNA was measured by RT-PCR analysis using pairs of OX40L and G3PDH specific primers.

 
Next, we screened recipient cells for OX40L among hemopoietic cell subpopulations and various cell lines. Low levels of OX40L transfer were observed on the freshly isolated resting (OX40-) CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3GoC). Comparison of efficiency of OX40L transfer and the level of the OX40 expression among CD4+ T cells activated with different cytokines showed that IL-12-activated CD4+ T cells acquired slightly higher levels of OX40L than those activated with IL-4 (Fig. 3GoD). Interestingly, not only CD4+ T cells but also resting CD8+ T cells, fresh NK cells, and IL-2-stimulated NK cells from healthy donors became OX40L positive by coculture with SVT2/OX40L (Fig. 3GoC). Although PHA-activated CD14+ monocytes do not express detectable levels of OX40L or OX40, OX40L was also detected after coculture with SVT2/OX40L (Fig. 3GoC). Various cell lines without OX40 expression including THP-1, Molt-4, HUT-78, Raji, and HeLa-S3 cells were capable of receiving OX40L to significant levels (Fig. 3GoE).

To determine whether mRNA of OX40L was synthesized in CD4+ T cells and THP-1 cells during a 2-h coculture with SVT2/OX40L, total RNA of these cells was examined by RT-PCR. Whereas the OX40L mRNA was detected in positive control MT-2 cells, no OX40L mRNA was detected in either OX40L-positive normal CD4+ T cells nor THP-1 cells (Fig. 3GoF), suggesting that the induced expression of OX40L protein on the surface of the CD4+ T cells and THP-1 cells is independent of the de novo synthesis of OX40L protein. These observations indicate that intercellular molecular transfer of OX40L occurs regardless of the existence of the receptor OX40 on the cell surface even in an Ag-independent manner.

OX40L transfer occurs in various conditions

To determine the mechanism of OX40L transfer, the efficiency of transfer under different cell culture conditions was compared. As shown in Fig. 4GoA, the molecular transfer of OX40L from SVT2/OX40L to CD4+ T cells did not occur when they were cultured in separated chambers through a membrane with 0.4-µm pores. Neither the culture supernatants from SVT2/OX40L cells that contained soluble OX40L at a high level as determined by a sandwich ELISA nor immobilized anti-OX40L Ab-captured OX40L from SVT2/OX40L cell lysates on the culture plate induced OX40L transfer on CD4+ T cells (data not shown). These data indicate that cell-to-cell contact is necessary for OX40L transfer.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. OX40L transfer occurs in various conditions. A, CD4+ T cells and SVT2/control (left) or SVT2/OX40L (right) cultured in chambers separated by a membrane with 0.4-µm pores for 2 h at 37°C. CD4+ T cells were stained with OKT4-Cy5 and TAG34-FITC. The data show staining of gated CD4+ T cells. Filled histograms show the staining of CD4+ T cells from separated culture, and open histograms show the staining of CD4+ T cells from cell mixtures without a separation. B, CD4+ T cell staining with TAG34-FITC after coculture with PFA-fixed (thick line) or nonfixed (thin line) SVT2 transfectants (left, SVT2/control; right, SVT2/OX40L). C, CD4+ T cells and SVT2/control (upper figures) or SVT2/OX40L (lower figures) were cocultured at 37°C (left) or at 0°C in the presence of NaN3 (right), then stained with TAG34-FITC, B7B5-Cy5, and W6/32-biotin followed by the streptavidin-PerCP. The data show the staining of gated CD4+ T cells by the pattern of forward and side scatter and W6/32-positive phenotype. The percentages of cell numbers in each quadrant are shown. D, CD4+ T cells after culture with fixed SVT2/OX40L or SVT2/control were collected by Ficoll gradient centrifugation followed by the mAb-magnetic bead separation, and biotinylated. The lysates of surface-biotinylated CD4+ T cells and separately prepared SVT2 transfectants were immunoprecipitated with anti-OX40L mAb, 5A8. Subsequently, the precipitants were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to the membrane, and then visualized by streptavidin-HRP and chemiluminescent substrate. E, Separated CD4+ T cells after coculture with fixed SVT2 transfectants were incubated in glycine-HCl, pH 7.0 (filled histogram) or pH2.8 (open histogram) for 10 min on ice. After washing, the CD4+ T cells were stained with W9-1-Cy5. F, Activated CD4+ T cells and SVT2/OX40L or SVT2/control cells were cocultured for 2 h in 37°C and were stained with W9-1-FITC (green) and OKT4-biotin followed by streptavidin-Cy3 (red). Cells were then resuspended in FACS buffer containing 1% PFA, and were examined by confocal laser microscope. The data show representative stainings observed in multiple slices. Images of cell surface staining with W9-1-FITC were overlaid on Nomarski images (a–c), and the staining image of c was overlaid by that of the same cell with red color (d). a, SVT2/OX40L; b, CD4+ T cell cocultured with SVT2/control; c and d, CD4+ T cell cocultured with SVT2/OX40L.

 
Prefixation of SVT2/OX40L cells with 4% PFA did not alter the efficiency of transferring OX40L to CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4GoB), showing that the OX40L transfer occurs without being involved by the vesicle formed with detached membrane fragments. Based on the reports describing the proteolytic cleavage processes existing in other TNF family molecules (28, 29, 30, 31), we were concerned with the possibility that cleaved OX40L by activated metalloproteinase was transferred to CD4+ T cells. However, under the coculture conditions in the presence of various proteinase inhibitors, including aprotinin, pepstatin, leupeptin, epoxy, rhamno, bestatin, and captopril, no inhibition of OX40L transfer to CD4+ T cells or other cell lines was observed (data not shown). Furthermore, the efficiency of OX40L transfer was not affected by coculture on ice, avoiding the activation of possible proteinase (Fig. 4GoC). Thus it is unlikely that the mechanism of OX40L transfer was based on the cleavage of OX40L from the cells.

To confirm that the intact molecule of OX40L moved to CD4+ T cells without any cleavage, we compared the molecular mass between transferred OX40L protein expressed on CD4+ T cells and that of donor cells by immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting analysis. CD4+ T cells cocultured with prefixed SVT2/OX40L were separated by gradient centrifugation and were further purified by magnetic bead-conjugated anti-CD4 mAb for depletion of OX40L-expressing transfectants. These sorting procedures removed the fixed cells >99.5% as determined by flow cytometry (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 4GoD, a specific protein precipitated with 5A8 from OX40L-transferred CD4+ T cells was of the same molecular mass, 34 kDa, identical with that from SVT2/OX40L. Essentially the same results were obtained when we used COS/OX40L-flag as the source of OX40L and immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG Ab from OX40L-transferred CD4+ T cells (data not shown). Therefore, it is likely that a whole intact molecule of OX40L on the OX40L-expressing cells moves to the recipient cells by cell-to-cell contact. Acid treatment was used to distinguish surface-bound OX40L from OX40L stabilized in the transmembrane of recipient CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4GoE). No significant change of OX40L staining was observed in CD4+ T cells after treatment at pH 2.8 and pH 7.0. These results suggest that transferred OX40L on CD4+ T cell is stabilized in the transmembrane of the recipient cells.

To obtain more information about transferred OX40L on CD4+ T cells, cells after coculture were examined by confocal microscopy. Representative surface staining of individual cells is shown in Fig. 4GoF. The pattern of ring staining of OX40L on SVT2/OX40L (green) and that of CD4 on CD4+ T cells (red) denotes the cell surface. Images of cell surface staining were overlaid on the Nomarski images (Fig. 4GoF, a–c). Whereas no positive staining of OX40L was detected on CD4+ T cells cocultured with SVT2/control cell (Fig. 4GoFb), discrete punctate staining for OX40L was shown on CD4+ T cells cocultured with SVT2/OX40L (Fig. 4GoFd). An essentially identical discrete punctate pattern of cell surface staining for OX40L was observed on CD4+ T cells cultured with PFA-fixed SVT2/OX40L cells (data not shown). These results confirmed the existence of OX40L or CD4+ T cells and provided the pattern of distribution of transferred OX40L on CD4+ T cells.

Function of transferred OX40L

Finally, we examined the kinetics of transferred OX40L on the cell membrane of CD4+ T cells for understanding its biological function. The transferred OX40L on the surface of CD4+ T cells, after removal of cocultured SVT2/OX40L cells, could be detected even 24 h after coculture (Fig. 5GoA). The continued presence of OX40L on the cells led us to expect a possible biological function of transferred OX40L. To determine the stimulatory function of transferred OX40L, we used HIV-1 latently infected cells transfected with OX40 (ACH2/OX40), which produce HIV-1 under stimulation via OX40 in vitro. Fig. 5GoB shows that OX40L-transferred CD4+ T cells specifically stimulated HIV-1 production in the ACH2/OX40 cells. Coculture with the CD4+ T cells with OX40-untransfected ACH2 cells did not stimulate HIV-1 production. The HIV-1 production by the OX40L-transferred CD4+ T cells was efficiently inhibited by anti-OX40L mAb, 5A8. These data demonstrate that the transferred OX40L proteins are functional to stimulate OX40-expressing cells.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Expression kinetics and function of transferred OX40L. A, Activated CD4+ T cells cocultured with 4% PFA-fixed SVT2/OX40L for 2 h at 37°C. Then CD4+ T cells were collected by Ficoll gradient centrifugation and anti-CD4 mAb-magnetic beads. CD4+ T cells were cultured alone at 37°C for the intervals indicated before surface staining by TAG34-FITC. B, HIV-1 latently infected cells ACH2/OX40 were cocultured for 2 days with fixed SVT2 transfectants or fixed CD4+ T cells separated after the coculture with SVT2 transfectants. These cells were cultured with (open column) or without (filled column) anti-OX40L mAb, 5A8. Subsequently the concentration of HIV-1 p24 protein of each harvested culture medium was determined by ELISA.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OX40L and OX40 proteins are involved in T cell-APC and T cell-B cell interactions as a pair of costimulatory molecules (22, 23) and also in adhesion of activated or leukemic CD4+ T cells to endothelial cells (19, 32). The expression of OX40L on T cells was originally reported on HTLV-I-infected T cells (10, 25), and recently it was shown that OX40L was constitutively expressed on the T cells from OX40 knockout mouse of which the mechanism is unknown (33). In this study, we first showed the expression of OX40L on normal CD4+ T cell surface by means of intercellular molecular transfer mechanism. The intercellular transfer of TCR or MHC molecules in the Ag presentation has been investigated (34, 35, 36). Recently, Sprent et al. (37) also reported that a TCR- or CD28-dependent molecular transfer mechanism exists in T-APC interaction in the mouse system, and that several membrane proteins existing on the APC could be unidirectionally absorbed by T cells during Ag-specific immune reaction. Our findings revealed a unique feature of intercellular transfer of the OX40L molecule, which confers a new phenotype to CD4+ T cells and may contribute to modifying immune responses.

Various types of cells expressing high levels of OX40L such as HTLV-I-infected human T cell lines and OX40L transfectants of mouse fibroblast or monkey kidney cell origins were capable of transferring OX40L onto the surface of various types of recipient cells including normal CD4+ T cells. Therefore, it is likely that intercellular transfer is a general phenomenon for OX40L molecules; this is independent of the other cellular factors of the OX40L donor cells. Although it has been shown that OX40 is the primary counterreceptor of OX40L, we found that OX40L was transferred not only to OX40-expressing cells but also to OX40-negative cells. These data suggest that there are OX40-dependent and -independent pathways in the intercellular transfer of OX40L. The former pathway is supported indirectly by our observations. Activated CD4+ T cells that expressed high levels of OX40 on the cell surface had more capacity for acquiring OX40L than resting OX40- CD4+ T cells. Although the slight increase of the acquisition of OX40L by IL-12-activated CD4+ T cells seemed to depend on the higher OX40 expression, it also implies a possible relationship between the OX40L acquisition and helper T cell differentiation status. That the level of OX40 on the activated CD4+ T cells was slightly down-modulated by OX40L transfer indicates either that the epitope of OX40 recognized by the anti-OX40 Ab used was masked by binding with the transferred OX40L molecule, or that the conformation of the OX40 molecule might be changed. However, we failed to coprecipitate OX40L protein by immunoprecipitation of OX40 from OX40L-transferred CD4+ T cell lysates with anti-OX40 mAb, B7B5 (data not shown). Additional experiments using a variety of anti-OX40 mAbs may clarify a possible OX40 involvement in the intercellular OX40L transfer to activated CD4+ T cells. The kinetics of transferred OX40L protein indicated that the transferred OX40L remained longer on the surface of CD4+ T cells than the other reported molecules. Because the high affinity and slow kinetics of OX40/OX40L interaction has been reported by using the magnetic resonance method (BIAcore biosensor) (38), we speculate that the OX40L transfer and continued presence of OX40L may partially depend on OX40. However, the present results showing an OX40-independent OX40L transfer also suggested an involvement of a yet unknown mechanism.

Our present data showed that cell-to-cell contact was essential for OX40L transfer. Because we could detect a full length of OX40L protein on the recipient CD4+ T cells, it is unlikely that the molecular transfer is mediated by an enzymatic cleavage mechanism. The OX40L transfer occurred from PFA-fixed OX40L+ cells, suggesting that focal membrane fusion and membrane vesicle formation are not applicable either. Furthermore, acid treatment did not reduce the level of OX40L expression on the surface of the recipient CD4+ T cells, suggesting that transferred OX40L molecules were anchored onto the cell membrane. In addition, confocal laser microscopy revealed the discrete punctate formation of transferred OX40L, which is similar to the morphological features of acquired MHC or B7-1 molecules (36, 37). Taken together, it is more likely that the carboxyl terminus of type II membrane protein OX40L can penetrate the recipient cell membrane in association with the unknown membrane molecule.

The OX40L transfer, which we have observed in an Ag-independent cell-to-cell interaction system using OX40L single-positive transfectants, may occur more frequently or efficiently in the Ag-specific T-APC interaction system accompanied by OX40/OX40L costimulation and in the T cell adhesion onto the endothelial cells. However, because the expression level of OX40L on normal cells was much lower than that on the transfectants, it has been difficult to detect transferred OX40L protein on CD4+ T cells from normal OX40L+ cells. Nevertheless, HUVECs and allostimulated monocytes were capable of transferring OX40L onto CD4+ T cells at low levels, suggesting that OX40L transfer may occur in inflammation conditions.

Although there were some reports showing the intercellular molecular transfer and internalization of membrane proteins in the T-APC interaction (7, 34, 35, 36), the functional roles of these phenomena are still not clarified. One possible function of the transferred protein is to provide a new phenotype to the recipient cells. By the process of the acquisition of peptide-MHC complex from APC by T cells, it was shown that the T cells became sensitive to peptide-specific lysis by neighboring T cells (36). Naive T cells after acquisition of CD80 from APCs were also reported to be capable of acting as APCs (7). The intercellular transfer of the chemokine receptor CCR5 by membrane-derived microparticles to CCR5-negative cells has been reported to render them susceptible to infection with macrophage-tropic CCR5 using HIV-1 (39). In this study, the ability of transferred OX40L to stimulate OX40+ cells, as revealed by an HIV-1 induction assay, indicates that transferred OX40L retains the active binding site to OX40 and keeps its proper protein conformation on the recipient cells. These observations strongly suggest that the OX40L-transferred recipient cells may acquire new ability to stimulate bystander OX40-positive cells and thus may potentially give rise to enhance an immune response via T cell-to-T cell costimulation accompanied with interactions of TCR/peptide/MHC complex or other costimulatory molecules (7).

Another possible biological function of OX40L transfer is to terminate the cell-to-cell interaction for allowance of cell dissociation (4, 6). Recently impaired down-regulation of membrane TNFR1 and diminished shedding of potentially antagonistic soluble receptor in autosomal dominant periodic fever syndrome patients was reported to increase the inflammatory response (40). Because OX40L transfer may partially depend on OX40 on the recipient cells as mentioned above, it may be possible that transferred OX40L remains on the recipient cell surface and limits the further receptor-ligand interaction by blocking the binding site of OX40. For the verification of this hypothesis, analysis of the cells expressing the molecularly modified OX40L, which has an impaired capacity being transferred, may be suitable. These works and establishing a line of anti-OX40 or anti-OX40L mAbs with different blocking activities are now underway.

In conclusion, the findings of intercellular molecular transfer of OX40L protein provides us a new mechanism of modification of cell-to-cell interaction in a wide variety of immune responses.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful for critical discussion from Drs. Yasuhiko Terada (University of Minnesota) and Jonathan E. Boyson (Harvard University, Boston, MA), and for technical instruction from Drs. Fumioki Yasuzumi, Yoshihiro Jinno, and Jun Sugimoto (University of the Ryukyus). We also thank Dr. Lishomwa Ndhlovu for revising the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan; the Health Sciences of Organization for Drug ADR Relief; R&D Promotion and Product Review of Japan; Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan; the Japan Human Health Sciences Foundation, Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Japan Science and Technology Corporation; and Okinawa Medical Science Foundation. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Eishi Baba at the current address: Department of Cancer Therapy and Research, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. E-mail address: e-baba{at}tumor.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp, or Dr. Yuetsu Tanaka, Department of Infectious Disease and Immunology, Okinawa-Asia Research Center of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ryukus, 207 Uehara, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan. E-mail address: yuetsu{at}ma.kcom.ne.jp Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: OX40L, OX40 ligand; HTLV-I, human T cell leukemia virus type I; PFA, paraformaldehyde; DC, dendritic cell. Back

4 J. Lichetenfeld, Y. Takahashi, A. Yoshida, E. Baba, R. Tanaka, N. Yamamoto, and Y. Tanaka. Identification and measurement of OX40 ligand in various human cell lines using a library of specific monoclonal antibodies. Submitted for publication. Back

Received for publication November 27, 2000. Accepted for publication May 9, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Monks, C. R., B. A. Freiberg, H. Kupfer, N. Sciaky, A. Kupfer. 1998. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 395:82.[Medline]
  2. Grakoui, A., S. K. Bromley, C. Sumen, M. M. Davis, A. S. Shaw, P. M. Allen, M. L. Dustin. 1999. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285:221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Dustin, M. L., M. W. Olszowy, A. D. Holdorf, J. Li, S. Bromley, N. Desai, P. Widder, F. Rosenberger, P. Anton van der Merwe, P. M. Allen, A. S. Shaw. 1998. A novel adaptor protein orchestrates receptor patterning and cytoskeletal polarity in T-cell contacts. Cell 94:667.[Medline]
  4. Valiltutti, S., S. Muller, M. Cella, E. Padovan, A. Lanzavecchia. 1995. Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide-MHC complexes. Nature 375:148.[Medline]
  5. Kramer, H., R. L. Cagan, S. L. Zipursky. 1991. Interaction of bride of sevenless membrane-bound ligand and the sevenless tyrosine-kinase receptor. Nature 352:207.[Medline]
  6. Cai, Z., H. Kishimoto, A. Burnmark, M. R. Jackson, P. A. Peterson, J. Sprent. 1997. Requirements for peptide-induced TCR downregulation on naive CD8+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 185:641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Sabzevari, H., J. Kantor, A. Jaigirdar, Y. Tagaya, M. Naramura, J. W. Hodge, J. Bernon, J. Scholm. 2001. Acquisition of CD80 (B7-1) by T cells. J. Immunol. 166:2505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wallack, D., E. E. Varfolomeev, N. L. Malinin, Y. V. Goltsev, A. V. Kovalenko, M. P. Boldin. 1999. Tumor necrosis factor receptor and Fas signaling mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:331.[Medline]
  9. Paterson, D. J.. 1987. Antigens of activated rat T lymphocytes including a molecule of 50,000 Mr detected only on CD4 positive T blasts. Mol. Immunol. 24:1281.[Medline]
  10. Baum, P. R., R. B. Gayle, F. Ramsdell, S. Srinivasan, R. A. Sorensen, M. L. Watson, M. F. Seldin, E. Baker, G. R. Sutherland, K. N. Clifford, et al 1994. Molecular characterization of murine and human OX40/OX40 ligand systems: identification of a human OX40 ligand as the HTLV-1-regulated protein gp34. EMBO J. 13:3992.[Medline]
  11. Bretscher, P. A.. 1999. A two-step, two-signal model for the primary activation of precursor helper T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Godfrey, W. R., F. F. Fagnoni, M. A. Harara, D. Buck, E. G. Engleman. 1994. Identification of a human OX-40 ligand, a costimulator of CD4+ T cells with homology to tumor necrosis factor. J. Exp. Med. 180:757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Flynn, S., K. M. Toellner, C. Raykundalia, M. Goodall, P. Lane. 1998. CD4 T cell cytokine differentiation: the B cell activation molecule, OX40 ligand, instructs CD4 T cells to express interleukin 4 and upregulates expression of the chemokine receptor, Blr-1. J. Exp. Med. 188:297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kaleeba, J. A., H. Offner, A. A. Vandenbark, A. Lublinski, A. D. Weinberg. 1998. The OX-40 receptor provides a potent co-stimulatory signal capable of inducing encephalitogenicity in myelin-specific CD4+ T cells. Int. Immunol. 10:453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ohshima, Y., L. P. Yang, T. Uchiyama, Y. Tanaka, P. Baum, M. Sergerie, P. Hermann, G. Delespesse. 1998. OX40 costimulation enhances interleukin-4 (IL-4) expression at priming and promotes the differentiation of naive human CD4+ T cells into high IL-4-producing effectors. Blood 92:3338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Brocker, T., A. Gulbranson-Judge, S. Flynn, M. Riedinger, C. Raykundalia, P. Lane. 1999. CD4 T cell traffic control: in vivo evidence that ligation of OX40 on CD4 T cells by OX40-ligand expressed on dendritic cells leads to the accumulation of CD4 T cells in B follicles. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:1610.[Medline]
  17. Miura, S., K. Ohtani, N. Numata, M. Niki, K. Ohbo, Y. Ina, T. Gojobori, Y. Tanaka, H. Tozawa, M. Nakamura. 1991. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel glycoprotein, gp34, that is specifically induced by the human T-cell leukemia virus type I transactivator p40tax. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:1313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Calderhead, D. M., J. E. Buhlmann, A. J. van den Eertwegh, E. Claassen, R. J. Noelle, H. P. Fell. 1993. Cloning of mouse Ox40: a T cell activation marker that may mediate T-B cell interactions. J. Immunol. 151:5261.[Abstract]
  19. Imura, A., T. Hori, K. Imada, T. Ishikawa, Y. Tanaka, M. Maeda, S. Imamura, T. Uchiyama. 1996. The human OX40/gp34 system directly mediates adhesion of activated T cells to vascular endothelial cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:2185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ohshima, Y., Y. Tanaka, H. Tozawa, Y. Takahashi, C. Maliszewski, G. Delespesse. 1997. Expression and function of OX40 ligand on human dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 159:3838.[Abstract]
  21. Weinberg, A. D., K. W. Wegmann, C. Funatake, R. H. Whitham. 1999. Blocking OX-40/OX-40 ligand interaction in vitro and in vivo leads to decreased T cell function and amelioration of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 162:1818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Stuber, E., M. Neurath, D. Calderhead, H. P. Fell, W. Strober. 1995. Cross-linking of OX40 ligand, a member of the TNF/NGF cytokine family, induces proliferation and differentiation in murine splenic B cells. Immunity 2:507.[Medline]
  23. Stuber, E., W. Strober. 1996. The T cell-B cell interaction via OX40-OX40L is necessary for the T cell-dependent humoral immune response. J. Exp. Med. 183:979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Davis, D. M., O. Mandelboim, I. Luque, E. Baba, J. Boyson, J. L. Strominger. 1999. The transmembrane sequence of human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-C as a determinant in inhibition of a subset of natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med. 189:1265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Tanaka, Y., M. Yasumoto, H. Nyunoya, T. Ogura, M. Kikuchi, K. Shimotono, H. Shiraki, N. Kuroda, H. Shida, H. Tozawa. 1990. Generation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against multiple epitopes on the C-terminal half of envelope gp46 of human T-cell leukemia virus type-I (HTLV-I). Int. J. Cancer 46:675.[Medline]
  26. Fujii, M., K. Sugamura, K. Sano, M. Nakai, K. Sugita, Y. Hinuma. 1986. High-affinity receptor-mediated internalization and degradation of interleukin 2 in human T cells. J. Exp. Med. 163:550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tanaka, Y., T. Inoi, H. Tozawa, N. Yamamoto, Y. Himuma. 1985. Glycoprotein antigen detected with new monoclonal antibodies on the surface of human lymphocytes infected with human T-cell leukemia virus type-I. Int. J. Cancer 36:549.[Medline]
  28. Moss, M. L., S. L. Jin, M. E. Milla, D. M. Bickett, W. Burkhart, H. L. Carter, W. J. Chen, W. C. Clay, J. R. Didsbury, D. Hassler, et al 1997. Cloning of a disintegrin metalloproteinase that processes precursor tumour-necrosis factor-{alpha}. Nature 385:733.[Medline]
  29. Black, R. A., C. T. Rauch, C. J. Kozlosky, J. J. Peschon, J. L. Slack, M. F. Wolfson, B. J. Castner, K. L. Stocking, P. Reddy, S. Srinivasan, et al 1997. A metalloproteinase disintegrin that releases tumour-necrosis factor-{alpha} from cells. Nature 385:729.[Medline]
  30. Blobel, C. P.. 1997. Metalloprotease-disintegrins: links to cell adhesion and cleavage of TNF {alpha} and Notch. Cell 90:589.[Medline]
  31. Tanaka, M., T. Suda, K. Haze, N. Nakamura, K. Sato, F. Kimura, K. Motoyoshi, M. Mizuki, S. Tagawa, S. Ohga, et al 1996. Fas ligand in human serum. Nat. Med. 2:317.[Medline]
  32. Imura, A., T. Hori, K. Imada, S. Kawamata, Y. Tanaka, S. Imamura, T. Uchiyama. 1997. OX40 expressed on fresh leukemic cells from adult T-cell leukemia patients mediates cell adhesion to vascular endothelial cells: implication for the possible involvement of OX40 in leukemic cell infiltration. Blood 89:2951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Pippig, S. D., C. Pena-Rossi, J. Long, W. R. Godfrey, D. J. Fowell, S. L. Reiner, M. L. Birkeland, R. M. Locksley, A. N. Barclay, N. Killeen. 1999. Robust B cell immunity but impaired T cell proliferation in the absence of CD134 (OX40). J. Immunol. 163:6520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Nepom, J. T., B. Benacerraf, R. N. Germain. 1981. Acquisition of syngeneic I-A determinants by T cells proliferating in response to poly (Glu60Ala30Tyr10). J. Immunol. 127:888.[Abstract]
  35. Lorber, M. I., M. R. Loken, A. M. Stall, F. W. Fitch. 1982. I-A antigens on cloned alloreactive murine T lymphocytes are acquired passively. J. Immunol. 128:2798.[Abstract]
  36. Huang, J. F., Y. Yang, H. Sepulveda, W. Shi, I. Hwang, P. A. Peterson, M. R. Jackson, J. Sprent, Z. Cai. 1999. TCR-mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. Science 286:952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Hwang, I., J. F. Huang, H. Kishimoto, A. Brunmark, P. A. Peterson, M. R. Jackson, C. D. Surh, Z. Cai, J. Sprent. 2000. T cells can use either T cell receptor or CD28 receptors to absorb and internalize cell surface molecular derived from antigen-presenting cells. J. Exp. Med. 191:1137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Al-Shamkhani, A., S. Mallett, M. H. Brown, W. James, A. N. Barclay. 1997. Affinity and kinetics of the interaction between soluble trimeric OX40 ligand, a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily, and its receptor OX40 on activated T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272:5275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Mack, M., A. Kleinschmidt, H. Bruhl, C. Klier, P. J. Nelson, J. Cihak, J. Plachy, M. Stangassinger, V. Erfle, D. Schlondorff. 2000. Transfer of the chemokine receptor CCR5 between cells by membrane-derived microparticles: a mechanism for cellular human immunodeficiency virus 1 infection. Nat. Med. 6:769.[Medline]
  40. McDermott, M. F., I. Aksentijevich, J. Galon, E. M. McDermott, B. W. Ogunkolade, M. Centola, E. Mansfield, M. Gadina, L. Karenko, T. Pettersson, et al 1999. Germline mutations in the extracellular domains of the 55 kDa TNF receptor, TNFR1, define a family of dominantly inherited autoinflammatory syndromes. Cell 97:133.[Medline]
  41. Y. Takahashi, Y. Tanaka, A. Yamashita, Y. Koyanagi, M. Nakamura, and N. Yamamoto. OX40 stimulation by gp34/OX40 ligand enhances productive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol. In press.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
K. Brown, S. H. Sacks, and W. Wong
Extensive and bidirectional transfer of major histocompatibility complex class II molecules between donor and recipient cells in vivo following solid organ transplantation
FASEB J, November 1, 2008; 22(11): 3776 - 3784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Busch, T. Quast, S. Keller, W. Kolanus, P. Knolle, P. Altevogt, and A. Limmer
Transfer of T Cell Surface Molecules to Dendritic Cells upon CD4+ T Cell Priming Involves Two Distinct Mechanisms
J. Immunol., September 15, 2008; 181(6): 3965 - 3973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
L. F. Zhang, K. Okuma, R. Tanaka, A. Kodama, K. Kondo, A. A. Ansari, and Y. Tanaka
Generation of Mature Dendritic Cells with Unique Phenotype and Function by In Vitro Short-Term Culture of Human Monocytes in the Presence of Interleukin-4 and Interferon-{beta}
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2008; 233(6): 721 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
M. Shi, S. Hao, T. Chan, and J. Xiang
CD4+ T cells stimulate memory CD8+ T cell expansion via acquired pMHC I complexes and costimulatory molecules, and IL-2 secretion
J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2006; 80(6): 1354 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
K.-J. Li, M.-C. Lu, S.-C. Hsieh, C.-H. Wu, H.-S. Yu, C.-Y. Tsai, and C.-L. Yu
Release of surface-expressed lactoferrin from polymorphonuclear neutrophils after contact with CD4+T cells and its modulation on Th1/Th2 cytokine production
J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2006; 80(2): 350 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Bourbie-Vaudaine, N. Blanchard, C. Hivroz, and P.-H. Romeo
Dendritic Cells Can Turn CD4+ T Lymphocytes into Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Carrying Cells by Intercellular Neuropilin-1 Transfer
J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1460 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Soroosh, S. Ine, K. Sugamura, and N. Ishii
OX40-OX40 Ligand Interaction through T Cell-T Cell Contact Contributes to CD4 T Cell Longevity
J. Immunol., May 15, 2006; 176(10): 5975 - 5987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
E. Biagi, G. Dotti, E. Yvon, E. Lee, M. Pule, S. Vigouroux, S. Gottschalk, U. Popat, R. Rousseau, and M. Brenner
Molecular transfer of CD40 and OX40 ligands to leukemic human B cells induces expansion of autologous tumor-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes
Blood, March 15, 2005; 105(6): 2436 - 2442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
J. Sprent
Swapping Molecules During Cell-Cell Interactions
Sci. Signal., March 1, 2005; 2005(273): pe8 - pe8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. A. Wetzel, T. W. McKeithan, and D. C. Parker
Peptide-Specific Intercellular Transfer of MHC Class II to CD4+ T Cells Directly from the Immunological Synapse upon Cellular Dissociation
J. Immunol., January 1, 2005; 174(1): 80 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
I. Takeda, S. Ine, N. Killeen, L. C. Ndhlovu, K. Murata, S. Satomi, K. Sugamura, and N. Ishii
Distinct Roles for the OX40-OX40 Ligand Interaction in Regulatory and Nonregulatory T Cells
J. Immunol., March 15, 2004; 172(6): 3580 - 3589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H.-C. Wang and J. R. Klein
Multiple Levels of Activation of Murine CD8+ Intraepithelial Lymphocytes Defined by OX40 (CD134) Expression: Effects on Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity, IFN-{gamma}, and IL-10 Regulation
J. Immunol., December 15, 2001; 167(12): 6717 - 6723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
L. M. Carlin, K. Eleme, F. E. McCann, and D. M. Davis
Intercellular Transfer and Supramolecular Organization of Human Leukocyte Antigen C at Inhibitory Natural Killer Cell Immune Synapses
J. Exp. Med., November 19, 2001; 194(10): 1507 - 1517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baba, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baba, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, Y.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS