The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjaergaard, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shu, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kjaergaard, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shu, S.
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 167: 6669-6677.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Augmentation Versus Inhibition: Effects of Conjunctional OX-40 Receptor Monoclonal Antibody and IL-2 Treatment on Adoptive Immunotherapy of Advanced Tumor1

Jørgen Kjaergaard*, Liaomin Peng*, Peter A. Cohen*, Judith A. Drazba{dagger}, Andrew D. Weinberg{ddagger} and Suyu Shu2,*

* Center for Surgery Research and {dagger} Lerner Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195; and {ddagger} Providence Portland Medical Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR 97213


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Therapeutic efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy of malignancies is proportional to the number of effector T cells transferred. Traditionally, exogenous IL-2 treatment has been used to promote the survival and function of transferred cells. Recently, we described the therapeutic effects of in vivo ligation of the costimulatory receptor, OX-40R, on activated T cells during early tumor growth. In this study, we examined the effects of IL-2 and OX-40R mAb on adoptive immunotherapy of advanced tumors. For treatment of 10-day 3-methylcholanthrene 205 pulmonary metastases, systemic transfer of 50 x 106 activated tumor-draining lymph node T cells resulted in >99% reduction of metastatic nodules. With either IL-2 or OX-40R mAb conjunctional treatment, only 20 x 106 cells were required. Advanced 10-day 3-methylcholanthrene 205 intracranial tumors could be cured by the transfer of 15 x 106 L-selectinlow T cells derived from draining lymph nodes. In this situation, IL-2 administration inhibited therapeutic effects of the transferred cells. By contrast, 5 x 106 T cells were sufficient to cure all mice if OX-40R mAb was administrated. Studies on trafficking of systemically transferred T cells revealed that IL-2, but not OX-40R mAb, impeded tumor infiltration by T cells. Tumor regression required participation of both CD4 and CD8 T cells. Because only CD4 T cells expressed OX-40R at cell transfer, direct CD4 T cell activation is possible. Alternatively, OX-40R might be up-regulated on transferred T cells at the tumor site, rendering them reactive to the mAb. Our study suggests OX-40R mAb to be a reagent of choice to augment T cell adoptive immunotherapy in clinical trials.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Immunotherapy of malignant tumors relies on strategies to boost host T cell-specific tumor immunity to a sufficient level that is capable of eradicating existing disease. The most common approach has been vaccination to enhance minimal but existing immunity in tumor-bearing animals and in cancer patients (1, 2, 3, 4). Alternatively, immunotherapy by the transfer of tumor-reactive lymphocytes has demonstrated potent antitumor effects (5, 6). An important goal of adoptive immunotherapy is to augment immune responses over and above that achievable by vaccination alone. Although a variety of effector populations can contribute to the antitumor activity, studies in many tumor models have confirmed the superior therapeutic effects of tumor-immune T cells. One source of such tumor-sensitized T cells studied extensively in the 1980s was tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL)3 (7, 8, 9). Such TIL were typically generated from solid tumors by culturing single cell suspensions in medium containing unphysiologically high concentrations of rIL-2. Because cultured TIL express IL-2R, a prevalent strategy has been to coadminister exogenous IL-2 during treatment in the hope of bolstering therapeutic potency (10). However, in clinical trials, high doses of IL-2 administration often caused considerable toxicity while transferred cells themselves produced only relatively mild toxic side effects in patients (8). Therefore, identification of reagents that are capable of enhancing T cell reactivity without serious toxicity will likely improve the clinical applicability of adoptive immunotherapy.

In our laboratory, a potent source of tumor-immune T cells has been identified to be the lymph node (LN) draining a progressively growing tumor (11, 12). Following a short period of in vitro activation with anti-CD3 and IL-2, these LN cells develop into potent effector cells capable of curing syngeneic mice of tumors established at all tested anatomic locations, including the lung, skin, peritoneal cavity, and brain (13, 14, 15). Studying murine tumors without characterized Ags, we recently identified that the down-regulation of L-selectin expression, a peripheral LN-homing receptor, is associated with T cell acquisition of antitumor immunity (16, 17, 18). The use of activated L-selectin (L-sel)low tumor-draining LN T cells has demonstrated at least a 30-fold increase in therapeutic effects over that of unfractionated LN cells. Although concomitant IL-2 administration enhanced therapeutic potency in some situations, it is important to note that transfer of activated draining LN T cells in sufficient numbers could mediate tumor eradication without coadministration of IL-2.

The therapeutic efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy is subject to both up- and down-regulation by a number of factors. An early example is the use of adjunctive exogenous IL-2 to augment the treatment of pulmonary metastases (7, 19, 20). However, in the model system of intracranial tumors, administration of systemic IL-2 reduced the benefit of adoptive immunotherapy (21). To augment T cell-specific responses, we recently studied the effects of in vivo ligation of costimulatory molecules such as 4-1BB and OX-40R on T cells with specific mAb (22, 23, 24). This approach has shown contrasting results, depending on the immunogenicity as well as anatomical location of the tumor. In our study, the systemic administration of either 4-1BB or OX-40R mAb alone during tumor growth resulted in prolongation of survival and cure of mice with intracranial tumors but not of mice with pulmonary metastases. Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy of in vivo Ab ligation alone was limited to minimal tumor burdens (i.e., 3 days after tumor inoculation). However, during these studies we observed that the coadministration of 4-1BB mAb enhanced the therapeutic effects of adoptively transferred tumor-specific T cells (22).

In the present study, we compared the effects of conjunctional use of OX-40R mAb and IL-2 on the therapeutic outcomes for treatment of well-established 10-day 3-methylcholanthrene (MCA) 205 pulmonary metastases and intracranial tumors. While the effects of IL-2 depended on the location of the tumor, OX-40R mAb augmented adoptive immunotherapy regardless of the anatomic site of tumor growth. Mechanistic studies revealed distinct modes of action by OX-40R mAb and IL-2 on the transferred tumor-immune T cells, leading variously to enhancement or inhibition of therapeutic effects.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

Female C57BL/6N (B6) mice, 6–8 wk old, were purchased from the Biologic Testing Branch, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). They were maintained in a specific pathogen-free environment according to National Institutes of Health guidelines and were used for experiments at the age of 8–12 wk.

Tumors

The MCA 205 and MCA 207 fibrosarcomas are MCA-induced tumors of B6 origin (25). The tumors have been routinely passed in vivo by serial s.c. transplantation in syngeneic mice and were used within the fifth to the tenth transplantation generation. Single cell suspensions were prepared from solid tumor by digestion with a mixture of 0.1% collagenase, 0.01% DNase, and 2.5 U/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 2 h at room temperature. The cells were filtered through a layer of number 100 nylon mesh, washed, and resuspended in HBSS for inoculation. B16/D5 is a poorly immunogenic subclone of the spontaneously arising B16/BL6 melanoma (26). The B16/D5 tumor does not exhibit a detectable level of MHC class I (H-2 Db and Kb) or class II molecules. These tumor cells were maintained in culture in complete medium (CM). CM consisted of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 1 µM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM fresh L-glutamine, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml gentamicin, 0.5 µg/ml fungizone (all from Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), and 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME (Sigma-Aldrich). GL261 glioma, originally induced by intracranial implantation of MCA pellets in a B6 mouse, was obtained from the Division of Cancer Treatment Repository (Frederick, MD) (27). The GL261 tumor cells were maintained in continuous culture in CM. Cultured B16/D5 or GL261 tumor cells were harvested after a short incubation at 37°C with a solution containing 0.25% trypsin and 0.02% EDTA (Life Technologies). The tumor cells were washed and resuspended in HBSS for challenging tumor-free mice.

Tumor-draining LN cells and in vitro anti-CD3/IL-2 activation

B6 mice were inoculated s.c. with 1.5 x 106 MCA 205 or MCA 207 tumor cells on both flanks. Twelve days later, tumor-draining inguinal LNs were harvested, and single-cell suspensions were prepared mechanically by teasing with needles and pressing tissue fragments with the blunt end of a 10-ml plastic syringe. Tumor-draining LN cells were activated with anti-CD3 mAb (145-2C11) immobilized on 24-well tissue culture plates at 4 x 106 cells/2 ml/well of CM. After 2 days of activation the cells were harvested, washed, and further cultured in gas-permeable culture bags (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL) at 2 x 105 cells/ml of CM supplemented with 4 U/ml IL-2. Three days later the cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in HBSS for adoptive immunotherapy.

Depletion of CD4+ or CD8+ T cell subset

Culture-activated tumor-draining LN cells were depleted of CD4 or CD8 T cells by negative separation using L3T4 or Lyt2 Dynabeads, respectively (Dynal Biotech, Oslo, Norway) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Purification of L-sellow T cells from tumor-draining LN

Isolation of L-sellow cells from single-cell suspensions of tumor-draining LN was performed by negative selection using rat T cell enrichment columns (Cytovac Technologies, Edmonton, Canada). Tumor-draining LN cells were preincubated for 20 min at 4°C with the L-selectin hybridoma (Mel-14) ascites fluid at 1/3000 dilution. The cells were washed in Ca2+/Mg2+-free HBSS and then applied to the columns to collect effluent L-sellow cells. Isolated L-sellow cells (90–95%) were CD3+ by direct fluorescent analysis. Alternatively, L-sellow cells were isolated using mouse anti-CD62L-loaded MACS (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). In this case, T cells were first purified using mouse T cell enrichment columns (Cytovac Technologies), then incubated for 15 min at 4°C with MACS anti-CD62L-microbeads according to the manufacturer’s instructions. L-sellow T cells were allowed to flow through the column attached to a magnet. The positive fraction (L-selhigh T cells) was eluted from the column using a plunger while off the magnet. Purified L-sellow or L-selhigh T cells were washed, resuspended in CM at 1 x 106 cells/ml, and activated by the anti-CD3/IL-2 method as described.

Adoptive immunotherapy

To establish pulmonary metastases, mice were given i.v. injection of 3 x 105 MCA 205 or MCA 207 tumor cells suspended in 1 ml of HBSS. To establish intracranial tumors, B6 mice were anesthetized with 0.8 mg of pentobarbital i.p. and inoculated with 1 x 105 MCA 205 or GL261 (1 x 103 for D5) tumor cells suspended in 10 µl of HBSS transcranially using a 27-gauge needle and glass tuberculin syringe (Perfectum; Popper & Sons, New Hyde Park, NY). The needle insertion was perpendicular to the skull and in line with the anterior margin of the ear and the medial half of the right eye. The depth of insertion was controlled by placement of electric wire insulation as a collar over the needle with exposure of the terminal 4 mm. Ten days after tumor inoculation, all mice received 500 cGy sublethal whole body irradiation (WBI) followed by i.v. transfer of activated tumor-draining LN through the tail vein. Animals with pulmonary metastases were sacrificed on day 21, and metastatic tumor nodules on the surface of the lung were estimated after counterstaining with india ink. For animals with intracranial tumors, therapeutic effects were evaluated by survival time.

mAb to OX-40R and adjunct treatment protocol

Hybridoma that produced the anti-murine OX-40R-specific mAb (termed OX-86) was obtained from the European Collection of Animal Cell Culture (Salisbury, U.K.) (28). In most experiments, animals with 10-day established tumors treated by adoptive immunotherapy received two i.p. injections of 150 µg of OX-40R mAb in 1 ml of HBSS 2 days apart, commencing on day of T cell transfer. Human rIL-2 was kindly supplied by Chiron (Emeryville, CA). Adjunct IL-2 treatment was given for 4 days following T cell transfer by i.p. injection of 10,000 U of rIL-2 in 1 ml of HBSS twice daily.

Flow cytometric analysis

The following mAb were used for direct or indirect staining: biotin-conjugated CD134 and FITC- or PE-labeled streptavidin (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA); OX40L:Fc-Ig protein and FITC-conjugated human IgG (Caltag Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA); CyChrome-labeled anti-TCR, FITC- or PE-labeled anti-CD4, FITC- or PE-labeled anti-CD8, and FITC- or PE-labeled anti-Mel-14 (all from BD PharMingen). Controls were performed with labeled anti-rat isotype-matched Abs and analyses were conducted on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA).

In vivo trafficking assay

For analysis of in vivo trafficking, activated tumor-draining LN T cells were labeled with CFSE (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Cells were washed twice with HBSS, and 1 x 107 cells/ml were incubated with CFSE (5 µM) in HBSS for 10 min at 37°C. Labeling was stopped by adding ice-cold HBSS, and cells were washed twice with HBSS containing 5% FCS before adoptive transfer into mice bearing 10-day intracranial tumors. At 24 and 48 h after transfer of labeled cells, brains were harvested and fixed with 4% formalin for 24 h and subsequently placed in 30% sucrose for an additional 24 h. After fixation, the tissue was snap-frozen in N-hexane at -70°C and cut into 8-µm sections on a cryostat. The section was dried and examined under a fluorescent microscope (Olympus, Melville, NY) equipped with a filter combination of bandpass 490 for CFSE detection. In the sections, the area of tumor tissue was identified and the number of labeled cells in the tumor was counted using a x40 objective.

Statistical analysis

The significance of differences in numbers of pulmonary metastases between groups was analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Differences of numbers of cells infiltrating brain tumor tissues were analyzed by the Student t test. A two-tailed p value of <= 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Therapeutic effects of immune T cells for the treatment of advanced pulmonary metastases are enhanced by conjunctional IL-2 or OX-40R mAb administration

We recently demonstrated that OX-40R mAb treatment alone mediated therapeutic effects against small tumor burdens, probably through the in situ ligation of tumor-infiltrating OX-40R+ cells (23, 24). Therefore, we investigated the potential use of OX-40R mAb following adoptive immunotherapy to augment in vivo T cell antitumor reactivity in comparison to the traditional use of IL-2. As demonstrated in Table IGo, conjunctional administration of either OX-40R mAb or IL-2 resulted in a significant enhancement of antitumor reactivity against 10-day established MCA 205 pulmonary metastases. Treatment with activated tumor-draining LN cells alone at a dose of 50 x 106 was able to reduce >250 metastatic nodules to 2 ± 2. Similar antitumor effects were observed when 20 x 106 T cells were transferred to tumor-bearing mice if either OX-40R mAb or IL-2 was provided.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Effects of conjunctional IL-2 or OX-40R mAb treatment on adoptive immunotherapy of 10-day established MCA 205 pulmonary metastases

 
Because OX-40R expression was reportedly confined to primed T cells of the CD4 subset, we analyzed the role of both CD4 and CD8 T cells in response to OX-40R mAb treatment. Activated tumor-draining LN T cells consisted of approximately four times as many CD8+ as CD4+ T cells. Depletion of each T cell subset in vitro before transfer resulted in a significantly diminished antitumor response judging by the numbers of metastases in treated animals (Table IIGo). It is noteworthy that despite the small proportion of CD4 cells in the transferred T cell population, depletion of this subset had a significantly greater impact on the therapeutic effects than did CD8 T cell depletion. Also, the administration of OX-40R mAb did not seem to change the requirement for both CD4 and CD8 T cells for tumor regression because in the absence of mAb administration, depletion of either T cell subset also resulted in inhibition of therapeutic responses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Analysis of the requirement for CD4 and CD8 T cells in adoptive immunotherapy of 10-day established MCA 205 pulmonary metastases with or without conjunctional OX-40R mAb treatment

 
Tumor regression after adoptive immunotherapy with activated tumor-draining LN cells has repeatedly been reported to be immunologically specific to the tumor that stimulates the draining LN in vivo (13, 14, 15, 29). Whether the conjunctional treatment with OX-40R mAb maintained the specificity of the adoptive immunotherapy was therefore examined. In the criss-cross experiment summarized in Table IIIGo, two immunogenically distinct tumors were used. The transfer of activated draining LN cells derived from the MCA 205 sarcoma mediated antitumor responses against the MCA 205 but not MCA 207 tumors in the absence or presence of OX-40R mAb treatment, although conjunctional OX-40R mAb treatment greatly enhanced the therapeutic efficacy. Similar results were observed when MCA 207 tumor-draining LN cells were used for the treatment of the MCA 205 and MCA 207 tumors. Therefore, despite the ability of OX-40R mAb to augment adoptive immunotherapy, the specificity of the immunologically mediated reactions was not altered.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Specificity of adoptive immunotherapy mediated by activated tumor-draining LN cells in conjunction with administration of OX-40R mAb

 
Treatment efficacy of advanced intracranial tumors with L-sellow tumor-draining LN T cells is enhanced by OX-40R mAb administration but inhibited with IL-2 adjunct treatment

Our previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of treating experimental intracranial tumor by the systemic transfer of activated tumor-draining LN T cells (14). Clearly, the blood-brain barrier did not inhibit the ability of transferred cells to traffic and to infiltrate the tumor mass to initiate immune responses that lead to tumor rejection (30). Although treatment of early (3-day) established intracranial tumor was effective, attempts to treat 10-day advanced intracranial tumor with the same activated T cells proved to be difficult even with the transfer of >100 x 106 cells (data not shown). We recently identified that in the draining LN, a small population of T cells (~20%) with down-regulated L-selectin possessed all the antitumor reactivity (16). In preliminary experiments, the transfer of purified L-sellow tumor-draining LN T cells was able to prolong survival and cure mice bearing 10-day established intracranial tumors. Therefore, we investigated the possible enhancement of T cell therapeutic efficacy by conjunctional OX-40R mAb administration, considering that in previous experiments IL-2 administration reduced the antitumor effects of transferred T cells for intracranial tumors (21). Titration of cell numbers that were sufficient to mediate the regression of 10-day established intracranial MCA 205 tumors revealed that the transfer of 10 x 106 L-sellow draining LN cells significantly prolonged survival of treated mice, but very few animals were cured. However, by increasing the cell number to 15 x 106, all mice were cured. The effects of conjunctional IL-2 or OX-40R mAb treatment were investigated in this experimental model. As depicted in Fig. 1Go, treatment of advanced intracranial MCA 205 tumors was greatly enhanced if OX-40R mAb was used conjunctionally. In this case, as few as 5 x 106 activated L-sellow tumor-draining LN cells were capable of curing all mice. In contrast, conjunctional IL-2 administration resulted in the inhibition of adoptive immunotherapy. The dose and regimen of IL-2 used in these experiments were identical with those for adoptive immunotherapy of pulmonary metastases (see Table IGo).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Effects of conjunctional OX-40R mAb or IL-2 treatment on adoptive immunotherapy of 10-day established intracranial MCA 205 tumors with activated L-sellow tumor-draining LN T cells. All mice were treated with sublethal WBI (500 cGy) before i.v. infusion of effector cells. OX-40R mAb (150 µg) was given i.p. twice on days 0 and 3 after cell transfer. IL-2 (10,000 U) was given i.p. twice daily for four consecutive days commencing on the day of cell transfer. Each group consisted of six mice.

 
The ability of OX-40R mAb to enhance the antitumor effects of L-sellow tumor-draining LN T cells prompted us to investigate whether L-selhigh LN cells could mediate an antitumor response if OX-40R mAb were used as an adjunct treatment. Therefore, mice with 10-day established intracranial MCA 205 tumor were treated with 15 x 106 activated, purified L-selhigh draining LN cells along with or without conjunctional OX-40R mAb administration (see Fig. 2Go). In either condition, L-selhigh cells did not affect tumor progression and all mice succumbed to tumors similar to mice without treatment. In this experiment, it is clear that 5 x 106 L-sellow cells alone prolonged survival and the therapeutic effects were augmented in mice also treated with OX-40R mAb.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Failure of OX-40R mAb treatment to modulate the therapeutic inefficacy of activated L-selhigh tumor-draining LN T cells. Experiment was designed identically to that described in Fig. 1Go. B6 mice with 10-day established MCA 205 intracranial tumor were WBI and treated i.v. with L-selhigh T cells followed by OX-40R mAb administration. As positive control, a group of mice received i.v. infusion of 5 x 106 L-sellow T cells. Each group consisted of six mice.

 
Treatment of intracranial MCA 205 tumors with L-sellow tumor-draining LN cells and OX-40R mAb resulted in the cure of mice. Ninety days after adoptive immunotherapy, cured mice were challenged intracranially with either the cognate MCA 205 or with syngeneic but antigenically distinct GL261 glioma or B16/D5 melanoma to study the specificity of long-term immunity (see Fig. 3Go). While mice cured of MCA 205 tumors rejected challenge with the MCA 205 tumor, all mice challenged with either the GL261 or B16/D5 tumors succumbed to growing tumors. These results thus demonstrated that effective adoptive immunotherapy is accompanied by the development of long-lasting, tumor-specific immunity. Therefore, the effects of OX-40R mAb are likely the results of interactions with tumor-specific T cells.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Long-term specific immunologic memory following successful adoptive immunotherapy. Eighteen mice cured of intracranial MCA 205 90 days after therapy (Fig. 1Go experiment) were challenged intracranially with MCA 205 (1 x 105) or antigenically distinct GL261 glioma (1 x 105) or B16/D5 melanoma (1 x 103). Control, naive mice received intracranial injection of same numbers of tumor cells. Each group consisted of six mice.

 
In all of the experiments described above, OX-40R mAb was given at a dosage of 150 µg on the day of adoptive immunotherapy and 3 days thereafter, based on earlier studies (23, 24). The optimal dose and schedule of OX-40R mAb when used in conjunction with T cell adoptive immunotherapy still remained to be determined. Mice with 10-day established intracranial MCA 205 tumors given 5 x 106 L-sellow tumor-draining LN T cells i.v. were divided into groups receiving different doses and numbers of OX-40R mAb injections. Although 150 µg of OX-40R mAb given twice was effective in enhancing adoptive immunotherapy, the same effects were evident with a single injection of 150 µg on the day of cell transfer (see Fig. 4Go). In fact, as little as 37.5 µg of OX-40R mAb given once was capable of augmenting the antitumor effects of transferred T cells. Thus, the dose for OX-40R mAb required to optimally potentiate T cell adoptive therapy is far less than the dose required for treatment of tumor as a single reagent.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Dose titration of OX-40R mAb for enhancement of adoptive immunotherapy. Experiment was designed identically to that described in Fig. 1Go, except different doses and frequencies of OX-40R mAb treatment were given. Each group consisted of five mice.

 
OX-40R is preferentially expressed on L-sellow CD4 LN cells, although it is briefly up-regulated on both CD4 and CD8 T cells in the course of in vitro activation

Previous studies suggest that the expression of OX-40R on T cells be confined mostly to the CD4 subset, although CD8 T cells may express the OX-40R if stimulated with mitogens such as Con A (31). To delineate the mechanism of OX-40R mAb-mediated enhancement of T cell antitumor function, we analyzed OX-40R expression on LN T cells freshly harvested, after 2-day activation with anti-CD3 mAb as well as after 5-day activation with both anti-CD3 and IL-2. It is noteworthy that only 5-day activated T cells were used for adoptive immunotherapy experiments. As depicted in Fig. 5Go, when freshly harvested, the greatest expression of OX-40R was observed on L-sellow CD4 LN T cells. By contrast, fresh LN CD8 T cells were essentially negative for OX-40R expression. However, after 2 days of activation with immobilized anti-CD3 mAb, all T cells demonstrated the expression of OX-40R, although the expression on L-sellow cells was greater than that on L-selhigh cells. After 3 more days of culture with IL-2 (4 U/ml), only CD4 T cells of the L-sellow phenotype remained positive for OX-40R. L-selhigh CD4 cells and all CD8 cells lost their OX-40R expression. This kinetics study suggests that OX-40R expression on T cells is regulated by the stage of activation, although its expression on L-sellow CD4 cells appears constant.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Expression of OX-40R on MCA 205 tumor-draining LN T cells. Both L-sellow and L-selhigh T cells were isolated from tumor-draining inguinal LNs. Freshly isolated anti-CD3 activated for 2 days and anti-CD3/IL-2 activated for 5 days LN T cells were stained with biotin-conjugated anti OX-40R Ab followed with PE-conjugated streptavidin. Cells were also stained with FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 or CD8. Each sample was gated on CD4 or CD8 T cells to display the histogram of OX-40R expression.

 
IL-2-mediated inhibition of the antitumor effects of immune T cells in vivo correlates with the failure of transferred cells to infiltrate the tumor mass

It has been well documented that, in adoptive immunotherapy, systemically transferred tumor-sensitized T cells must infiltrate the tumor mass to initiate tumor regression (29, 32). To study the impact of IL-2 vs OX-40R mAb treatment on the trafficking of transferred L-sellow LN T cells, we labeled T cells cytoplasmically with the green fluorescence dye, CFSE, which freely diffuses through the cell membrane and interacts with glutathione transferase, forming impermeable thioether adducts, which prevents the leakage (33, 34). Preliminary experiments indicated that CFSE-labeling did not interfere with effector T cell functions, including antitumor reactivity, proliferation, and trafficking.

Mice with 10-day established intracranial MCA 205 tumor were treated with 15 x 106 L-sellow tumor-draining LN T cells in conjunction with either IL-2 or OX-40R mAb. As depicted in Fig. 6Go, direct enumeration of fluorescent cells on sections of brain tumors 24 and 48 h after cell transfer revealed that the OX-40R mAb treatment did not result in an increased number of tumor-infiltrating T cells at either time point. This finding suggests that the mechanism of OX-40R mAb-mediated enhancement cannot be explained by its ability to promote T cell trafficking to the tumor. By contrast, concomitant treatment with IL-2 severely impeded tumor infiltration by the transferred cells. At both 24 and 48 h after T cell transfer, the number of transferred cells detected in the tumor were 10–15% of that detected in the control (see Fig. 6Go).



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Inhibition of T cell tumor infiltration by conjunctional IL-2 administration. Mice with 10-day established intracranial MCA 205 tumor were given i.v. transfer of 15 x 106 CFSE-labeled activated L-sellow tumor-draining LN T cells. Conjunctional OX-40R mAb and IL-2 treatments were the same as those described in Fig. 1Go. Twenty-four and forty-eight hours after cell transfer, sections of brain (three mice per group) were examined and the average number ± SD of fluorescent cells per mm2 tumor tissue were calculated (A). Significant differences at 24 h: control vs IL-2 treated, p < 0.001; control vs OX-40R mAb-treated, p = 0.31. Significant difference at 48 h: control vs IL-2 treated, p < 0.001; control vs OX-40R mAb-treated, p = 0.11. Shown are fluorescent confocal micrographs of tumor-infiltrating cells 48 h after the transfer of 15 x 106 CFSE-labeled L-sellow T cells (B). Conjunctional IL-2 treatment inhibited T cell infiltration into the tumor (upper) as compared with OX-40R mAb treatment (lower), which showed a similar cell distribution as mice receiving T cells alone.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of current studies document the therapeutic potency of activated tumor-draining LN T cells. In conjunction with sublethal WBI, the transfer of 50 x 106 unfractionated tumor-draining LN T cells alone was capable of eliminating virtually all metastases established for 10 days in the lung. With advanced intracranial tumors, in the past we used as many as 200 x 106 activated LN cells with no evidence of therapeutic effects. However, with purified L-sellow tumor-draining LN cells, the transfer of 15 x 106 cells cured all mice. It is noteworthy that purification of L-sellow T cells per se does not selectively isolate tumor-specific immune cells. It is therefore likely that only a fraction of the L-sellow T cells possess antigenic specificity. T cell adoptive immunotherapy, when developed optimally, may represent one of the most effective means to eradicate progressively growing tumors.

The rationale for the use of conjunctional IL-2 treatment in many clinical cellular therapies has been based on observations in animal experiments that IL-2 can stimulate in vivo proliferation of cultured T cells (11, 35, 36, 37). Our own and others’ publications (19, 20) have confirmed the in vivo augmenting effects of conjunctional IL-2 in several T cell immunotherapy models. However, augmentation was principally observed in therapies confined to the treatment of established pulmonary or hepatic metastases. In the subsequent course of analyzing requirements associated with the T cell therapy of established intracranial tumors, we noted that the enhancing effects of exogenous IL-2 for treating tumor metastases in the lung were not evident for the same tumor growing in the brain (21).

We have not yet ruled out the possibility that two distinct immune T cell subpopulations eradicate tumors in the lung and brain respectively, with only the latter subpopulation susceptible to inhibition by conjunctional IL-2. We are currently attempting to isolate immune T cells from regressing pulmonary tumors to confirm their equal capacity to traffic into and mediate rejection of intracranial tumors, as well as their capacity to establish long-term systemic immunological memory in secondary hosts. In other tumor models, inhibition of immunotherapy by systemically delivered IL-2 has also previously been described. In a murine graft-vs-leukemia system, the effects of allogeneic sensitized T cells were inhibited by IL-2 (38). In a study involving the transduction of murine tumors with the B7.1 (CD80) costimulatory molecule with or without additional IL-2 transduction, mice injected with tumor expressing both elements were cured, whereas no protective effects were seen if mice inoculated with B7.1-transduced tumors were given systemic IL-2 (39). Therefore, systemic IL-2 administration can, in certain situations, deter rather than facilitate immunotherapy.

Interaction of the TCR with its specific peptide/MHC counterreceptor is required for T cell activation. However, it is believed that this interaction alone is not sufficient to activate T cells under physiologic conditions (40, 41). Additional accessory signals are thought to contribute to and even be essential for proper activation to take place. These are commonly referred to as costimulatory signals, because by themselves they have no effect on T cells. For several years, attention has been given to the interaction between CD28 on the T cell and B7.1 and B7.2 receptors expressed on APCs (42). Although the expression of CD28 on T cells is constitutive, other inducible membrane molecules, mainly of the TNFR family, have been shown to share the ability to function as costimulators for amplification and maintenance of ongoing T cell responses. We have studied two of these activation-induced costimulatory molecules, 4-1BB and OX-40R, for their roles in the amplification of T cell immune responses during tumor growth (22, 23, 24). Although 4-1BB is expressed on both activated CD4 and CD8 T cells, OX-40R seems to be preferentially expressed on activated CD4 T cells. Although in vivo ligation of either costimulatory molecule on T cells with mAb demonstrated antitumor effects, the observed therapeutic efficacy was limited depending not only upon immunogenicity and burden of tumors, but also upon the location of tumor growth. We reasoned that the failure of treating advanced tumors by boosting costimulatory functions with these mAb might not be due to the inadequacy of activation but rather to inadequate numbers of tumor-sensitized T cells in tumor-bearing hosts. If this were the case, treatment of advanced tumors could be augmented if the mAb were administrated following adoptive transfer of tumor-immune T cells. Experimental results in our studies support this hypothesis.

Perhaps the most intriguing finding of the current work is that, unlike IL-2 adjunct treatment, augmentation of adoptive immunotherapy by OX-40R mAb was observed for the treatment of both pulmonary metastases and solitary tumor nodules in the brain. It is interesting to note that OX-40R expression was confined to CD4 T cells in the freshly isolated tumor-draining LN cells as well as in the activated cell population that was used for adoptive immunotherapy. It is possible that the target of OX-40R mAb is the transferred CD4 T cells, and ligation of OX-40R leads to an increase in proliferation and cytokine secretion by CD4 cells which secondarily amplify CD8 T cell antitumor reactivity. The ability of tumor-immune CD4 T cells to promote the proliferation and persistence of CD8 CTL has been well documented in animal studies (43). Alternatively, transferred CD8 T cells may be induced to up-regulate the expression of OX-40R upon antigenic stimulation at the tumor site, and the administered mAb may interact with these CD8 T cells directly and independently amplify their activation. This possibility is supported by the observation that tumor-draining LN CD8 T cells transiently express OX-40R after activation with anti-CD3 (see Fig. 5Go). More importantly, adoptively transferred, CD4-depleted T cells could still be therapeutically enhanced by conjunctional OX-40R mAb treatment (see Table IIGo). Additionally supporting this possibility is the observation that both CD4 and CD8 tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes express OX-40R (23).

The augmenting effects of OX-40R mAb in adoptive immunotherapy did not change the requirement for pretreatment of tumor-bearing animals with sublethal WBI. With advanced pulmonary metastases and intracranial tumors, it has frequently been demonstrated that WBI facilitate successful therapeutic efficacy of transferred cells (14, 21, 29). Although the physiological effects of WBI remain to be determined, it has been hypothesized that irradiation may eliminate tumor-induced immunosuppressor T cells that interfere with the reactivity of systematically transferred cells (44). Alternatively, pretreatment with irradiation has been reported to alter the permeability of endothelium cells and thus facilitate trafficking of the transferred T cells (45). Because irradiation alone slightly improved the survival of tumor-bearing animals, it is also possible that exposure of the tumor bed may have created an inflammatory or proapoptotic environment which enhanced antitumor efficacy of transferred cells. It is intriguing that our recent observations indicate that irradiation facilitates proliferation of transferred cells at the tumor site (data not shown).

One of the hallmarks of adoptive immunotherapy is that the transferred T cells must infiltrate into the tumor mass before an antitumor response is triggered (29, 32). While systematically transferred T cells rapidly gain access to tumor metastases in the lung, the numbers of infiltrating cells in the brain tumor increase with time. This indicates that the i.v. transferred cells continuously leave the blood stream and undergo a multistep process including activation of integrins, adhesion to endothelial ligands, diapedesis, and a series of undefined subsequent events before their localization in the brain tumor (46, 47). Thus, the immunoblasts within the tumor may behave differently from circulating lymphocytes. To investigate the mechanism of IL-2-induced inhibition, we studied the trafficking pattern of the transferred T cells. Although IL-2 can cross the blood-brain barrier and induce vascular leakage in the brain (48, 49), it can inhibit tumor infiltration by transferred T cells when used in conjunction with adoptive immunotherapy (see Fig. 6Go). One possibility is that IL-2 stimulation directly impedes the T cell’s capacity for transendothelial migration in the brain. However, it is more likely that the activation state induced by in vivo IL-2 renders T cells incapable of properly migrating and homing to the tumor. If this is true, delaying IL-2 administration until adequate intratumoral T cell accumulation has occurred might prove therapeutically beneficial, particularly for the treatment of tumors where effector T cell accumulation is initially less brisk, such as s.c. tumors (18, 29).

The mechanism of OX-40R mAb-mediated enhancement of adoptive T cell immunotherapy is not yet fully characterized. Engaging the OX-40R transmits a potent costimulatory signal that is involved in the specific up-regulation of IL-2 production by Ag-specific T cell lines in vitro (50). Sorting OX-40R positive cells from inflammatory lesions in both autoimmune disease and tumor-draining LN enriches for the Ag-specific T cells while leaving the peripheral repertoire undisturbed, rendering the OX-40R an attractive target to enhance Ag-specific responses (24, 50). To elucidate the significance of OX-40R-OX-40L interactions in long-term T cell immune responses, previous studies demonstrated that in OX-40-deficient mice, IL-2 production and T cell proliferation were diminished (51). Furthermore, OX-40-deficient mice could not generate normal numbers of Ag-specific T cells in the later stage of an immune response, and this led to severely impaired development of immunological memory. To support this notion, an agonist Ab when administered during a primary T cell response promoted a greater number of immune T cells to accumulate and to survive over time as memory cells. In other studies, under tolerizing conditions induced by bacterial superantigen administration, a dramatic increase in T cell survival was observed when LPS combined with OX-40R mAb was given to animals (52). Stimulation through OX-40R on T cells may prevent activation-induced cell death. The therapeutic effects of adoptive immunotherapy under our experimental conditions may not reflect or depend on the extent of immunologic memory, although cured mice did develop a long-term resistance to tumor challenges. Therefore, it is likely that the immediate effects following OX-40R mAb administration are a stimulation of greater proliferation and increased functional activity, while suppressing cell death of the transferred tumor-immune T cells. This is supported by our recent findings demonstrating that an early Ag-specific proliferation of the transferred T cells at the site of tumor was associated with tumor regression (data not shown).

With the use of purified, culture-activated L-sellow LN T cells, it is possible to cure virtually all mice of weakly immunogenic, advanced brain tumors (16, 17, 18). Analysis of OX-40R on LN cells revealed that the expression of OX-40R was associated with down-regulation of L-selectin, with the majority of OX-40R-positive cells being L-sellow. It is intriguing that OX-40R was detected mostly on CD4 LN T cells at the time of their isolation and at the time of adoptive immunotherapy (see Fig. 5Go). These findings raise an interesting possibility that the L-sellow OX-40R+ CD4 cells, if purified, could represent a most potent immune effector cell subpopulation. In fact, we have already demonstrated that CD4 T cells in the L-sellow fraction of LN cells alone can mediate antitumor effects (17).

Systemic IL-2 administration has been associated with significant toxicity in adoptive immunotherapy trials (8). In addition, there are sporadic reports that cancer patients treated with immunotherapy that involved IL-2 developed disease progression in the brain despite tumor regression at other sites (53). These observations have been interpreted as meaning that the CNS may be relatively inaccessible to tumor-immune T cells, and patients with CNS metastases are usually excluded from immunotherapy trials. Results in this paper give a new perspective to the current concept of immunotherapy of primary and metastatic brain tumors and suggest the possibility of enhancing therapeutic effects through modification and activation of costimulatory molecules on tumor-immune T cells.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Walter Urba for his extremely helpful critical review of this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grants R01 CA78263 and R01 CA89511. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Suyu Shu, Center for Surgery Research FF50, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail address: shus{at}ccf.org Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte; LN, lymph node; L-sel, L-selectin; CM, complete medium; WBI, whole body irradiation; MCA, 3-methylcholanthrene. Back

Received for publication June 8, 2001. Accepted for publication September 28, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kerr, W. G., J. J. Mule. 1994. Gene therapy: current status and future prospects. J. Leukocyte Biol. 56:210.[Abstract]
  2. Vieweg, J., E. Gilboa. 1995. Considerations for the use of cytokine-secreting tumor cell preparations for cancer treatment. Cancer Invest. 13:193.[Medline]
  3. Tanaka, K., E. Gorelik, M. Watanabe, N. Hozumi, G. Jay. 1988. Rejection of B16 melanoma induced by expression of a transfected major histocompatibility complex class I gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lee, K. H., E. Wang, M. B. Nielsen, J. Wunderlich, S. Migueles, M. Connors, S. M. Steinberg, S. A. Rosenberg, F. M. Marincola. 1999. Increased vaccine-specific T cell frequency after peptide-based vaccination correlates with increased susceptibility to in vitro stimulation but does not lead to tumor regression. J. Immunol. 163:6292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Greenberg, P. D.. 1991. Adoptive T-cell therapy of tumors: mechanisms operative in the recognition and elimination of tumor cells. Adv. Immunol. 49:281.[Medline]
  6. Shu, S., S. E. Strome, J. C. Krauss, G. E. Plautz, A. E. Chang. 1994. Tumor-draining lymph nodes as a source for generating therapeutic immune cells. A. E. Chang, and S. Shu, eds. Immunotherapy of Cancer with Sensitized T Lymphocytes 1. R.G. Landes, Austin, TX.
  7. Rosenberg, S. A., P. Spiess, R. Lafreniere. 1986. A new approach to the adoptive immunotherapy of cancer with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Science 233:1318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rosenberg, S. A., B. S. Packard, P. M. Aebersold, D. Solomon, S. L. Topalian, S. T. Toy, P. Simon, M. T. Lotze, J. C. Yang, C. A. Seipp. 1988. Use of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin-2 in the immunotherapy of patients with metastatic melanoma: a preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. 319:1676.[Abstract]
  9. Rosenberg, S. A., J. R. Yannelli, J. C. Yang, S. L. Topalian, D. J. Schwartzentruber, J. S. Weber, D. R. Parksinson, C. A. Seipp, J. H. Einhorn, D. E. White. 1994. Treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin 2. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 86:1159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Matis, L. A., S. Shu, E. S. Groves, S. Zinn, T. Chou, A. M. Kruisbeek, M. Rosenstein, S. A. Rosenberg. 1986. Adoptive immunotherapy of a syngeneic murine leukemia with a tumor-specific cytotoxic T cell clone and recombinant human IL-2: correlation with clonal IL-2 receptor expression. J. Immunol. 136:3496.[Abstract]
  11. Shu, S., T. Chou, S. A. Rosenberg. 1987. Generation from tumor-bearing mice of lymphocytes with in vivo therapeutic efficacy. J. Immunol. 139:295.[Abstract]
  12. Chou, T., A. E. Chang, S. Shu. 1988. Generation of therapeutic T lymphocytes from tumor-bearing mice by in vitro sensitization: culture requirements and characterization of immunologic specificity. J. Immunol. 140:2453.[Abstract]
  13. Yoshizawa, H., K. Sakai, A. E. Chang, S. Shu. 1991. Activation by anti-CD3 of tumor-draining lymph node cells for specific adoptive immunotherapy. Cell. Immunol. 134:473.[Medline]
  14. Wahl, W. L., J. J. Sussman, S. Shu, A. E. Chang. 1994. Adoptive immunotherapy of murine intracerebral tumors with anti-CD3/interleukin-2-activated tumor-draining lymph node cells. J. Immunother. 15:242.[Medline]
  15. Peng, L., S. Shu, J. C. Krauss. 1997. Treatment of subcutaneous tumor with adoptively transferred T cells. Cell. Immunol. 178:24.[Medline]
  16. Kagamu, H., J. E. Touhalisky, G. E. Plautz, J. C. Krauss, S. Shu. 1996. Isolation based on L-selectin expression of immune effector T cells derived from tumor-draining lymph nodes. Cancer Res. 56:4338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kagamu, H., S. Shu. 1998. Purification of L-selectinlow cells promotes the generation of highly potent CD4 antitumor effector T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 160:3444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Peng, L., J. Kjaergaard, G. E. Plautz, D. E. Weng, S. Shu, P. A. Cohen. 2000. Helper-independent, L-selectinlow CD8+ T cells with broad antitumor efficacy are naturally sensitized during tumor progression. J. Immunol. 165:5738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Yoshizawa, H., A. E. Chang, S. Shu. 1991. Specific adoptive immunotherapy mediated by tumor-draining lymph node cells sequentially activated with anti-CD3 and IL-2. J. Immunol. 147:729.[Abstract]
  20. Yoshizawa, H., A. E. Chang, S. Y. Shu. 1992. Cellular interactions in effector cell generation and tumor regression mediated by anti-CD3/interleukin 2-activated tumor-draining lymph node cells. Cancer Res. 52:1129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Sussman, J. J., W. L. Wahl, A. E. Chang, S. Shu. 1995. Unique characteristics associated with systemic adoptive immunotherapy of experimental intracerebral tumors. J. Immunother. 18:35.[Medline]
  22. Kim, J. A., B. J. Averbook, K. Chambers, K. Rothchild, J. Kjaergaard, R. Papay, S. Shu. 2001. Divergent effects of 4-1BB antibodies on antitumor immunity and on tumor-reactive T-cell generation. Cancer Res. 61:2031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kjaergaard, J., J. Tanaka, J. A. Kim, K. Rothchild, A. Weinberg, S. Shu. 2000. Therapeutic efficacy of OX-40 receptor antibody depends on tumor immunogenicity and anatomic site of tumor growth. Cancer Res. 60:5514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Weinberg, A. D., M. M. Rivera, R. Prell, A. Morris, T. Ramstad, J. T. Vetto, W. J. Urba, G. Alvord, C. Bunce, J. Shields. 2000. Engagement of the OX-40 receptor in vivo enhances antitumor immunity. J. Immunol. 164:2160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Shu, S., S. A. Rosenberg. 1985. Adoptive immunotherapy of newly induced murine sarcomas. Cancer Res. 45:1657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hart, I. R.. 1979. The selection and characterization of an invasive variant of the B16 melanoma. Am. J. Pathol. 97:587.[Abstract]
  27. Ausman, J. I., W. R. Shapiro, D. P. Rall. 1970. Studies on the chemotherapy of experimental brain tumors: development of an experimental model. Cancer Res. 30:2394.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. al-Shamkhani, A., M. L. Birkeland, M. Puklaver, M. H. Brown, W. James, A. N. Barclay. 1996. OX40 is differentially expressed on activated rat and mouse T cells and is the sole receptor for OX40 ligand. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1695.[Medline]
  29. Kjaergaard, J., S. Shu. 1999. Tumor infiltration by adoptively transferred T cells is independent of immunologic specificity but requires down-regulation of L-selectin expression. J. Immunol. 163:751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Mukai, S., H. Kagamu, S. Shu, G. E. Plautz. 1999. Critical role of CD11a (LFA-1) in therapeutic efficacy of systemically transferred antitumor effector T cells. Cell. Immunol. 192:122.[Medline]
  31. Baum, P. R., III R. B. Gayle, F. Ramsdell, S. Srinivasan, R. A. Sorensen, M. L. Watson, M. F. Seldin, E. Baker, G. R. Sutherland, K. N. Clifford. 1994. Molecular characterization of murine and human OX40/OX40 ligand systems: identification of a human OX40 ligand as the HTLV-1-regulated protein gp34. EMBO J. 13:3992.[Medline]
  32. Mukai, S., J. Kjaergaard, S. Shu, G. E. Plautz. 1999. Infiltration of tumors by systemically transferred tumor-reactive T lymphocytes is required for antitumor efficacy. Cancer Res. 59:5245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Weston, S. A., C. R. Parish. 1990. New fluorescent dyes for lymphocyte migration studies: analysis by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. J. Immunol. Methods 133:87.[Medline]
  34. Weston, S. A., C. R. Parish. 1992. Calcein: a novel marker for lymphocytes which enter lymph nodes. Cytometry 13:739.[Medline]
  35. Klarnet, J. P., L. A. Matis, D. E. Kern, M. T. Mizuno, D. J. Peace, J. A. Thompson, P. D. Greenberg, M. A. Cheever. 1987. Antigen-driven T cell clones can proliferate in vivo, eradicate disseminated leukemia, and provide specific immunologic memory. J. Immunol. 138:4012.[Abstract]
  36. Shrikant, P., M. F. Mescher. 1999. Control of syngeneic tumor growth by activation of CD8+ T cells: efficacy is limited by migration away from the site and induction of nonresponsiveness. J. Immunol. 162:2858.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Shrikant, P., A. Khoruts, M. F. Mescher. 1999. CTLA-4 blockade reverses CD8+ T cell tolerance to tumor by a CD4+ T cell- and IL-2-dependent mechanism. Immunity 11:483.[Medline]
  38. Schirrmacher, V., S. Muerkoster, V. Umansky. 1998. Antagonistic effects of systemic interleukin 2 on immune T cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia reactivity. Clin. Cancer Res. 4:2635.[Abstract]
  39. Bernard, A. L., F. Farzaneh, J. Gaken, D. Darling. 2000. Local versus systemic interleukin 2: tumor formation by wildtype and B7.1 positive murine melanoma cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 7:207.[Medline]
  40. van den Berg, R. H., M. C. Faber-Krol, R. B. Sim, M. R. Daha. 1998. The first subcomponent of complement, C1q, triggers the production of IL-8, IL-6, and monocyte chemoattractant peptide-1 by human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J. Immunol. 161:6924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Mueller, D. L., M. K. Jenkins, R. H. Schwartz. 1989. Clonal expansion versus functional clonal inactivation: a costimulatory signaling pathway determines the outcome of T cell antigen receptor occupancy. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 7:445.[Medline]
  42. Lenschow, D. J., T. L. Walunas, J. A. Bluestone. 1996. CD28/B7 system of T cell costimulation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:233.[Medline]
  43. Marzo, A. L., B. F. Kinnear, R. A. Lake, J. J. Frelinger, E. J. Collins, B. W. Robinson, B. Scott. 2000. Tumor-specific CD4+ T cells have a major "post-licensing" role in CTL mediated anti-tumor immunity. J. Immunol. 165:6047.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. North, R. J.. 1984. The murine antitumor immune response and its therapeutic manipulation. Adv. Immunol 35:89.[Medline]
  45. Trovec, T., Z. Kallay, S. Bezek. 1990. Effects of ionizing radiation on the blood brain barrier permeability to pharmacologically active substances. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 19:1581.[Medline]
  46. Springer, T. A.. 1994. Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell 76:301.[Medline]
  47. Butcher, E. C., L. J. Picker. 1996. Lymphocyte homing and homeostasis. Science 272:60.[Abstract]
  48. Saris, S. C., S. A. Rosenberg, R. B. Friedman, J. T. Rubin, D. Barba, E. H. Oldfield. 1988. Penetration of recombinant interleukin-2 across the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier. J. Neurosurg. 69:29.[Medline]
  49. Saris, S. C., N. J. Patronas, S. A. Rosenberg, J. T. Alexander, J. Frank, D. J. Schwartzentruber, J. T. Rubin, D. Barba, E. H. Oldfield. 1989. The effect of intravenous interleukin-2 on brain water content. J. Neurosurg. 71:169.[Medline]
  50. Kaleeba, J. A., H. Offner, A. A. Vandenbark, A. Lublinski, A. D. Weinberg. 1998. The OX-40 receptor provides a potent co-stimulatory signal capable of inducing encephalitogenicity in myelin-specific CD4+ T cells. Int. Immunol. 10:453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Gramaglia, I., A. Jember, S. D. Pippig, A. D. Weinberg, N. Killeen, M. Croft. 2000. The OX40 costimulatory receptor determines the development of CD4 memory by regulating primary clonal expansion. J. Immunol. 165:3043.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Maxwell, J. R., A. Weinberg, R. A. Prell, A. T. Vella. 2000. Danger and OX40 receptor signaling synergize to enhance memory T cell survival by inhibiting peripheral deletion. J. Immunol. 164:107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Mitchell, M. S.. 1989. Relapse in the central nervous system in melanoma patients successfully treated with biomodulators. J. Clin. Oncol. 7:1701.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. J. Gough, C. E. Ruby, W. L. Redmond, B. Dhungel, A. Brown, and A. D. Weinberg
OX40 Agonist Therapy Enhances CD8 Infiltration and Decreases Immune Suppression in the Tumor
Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 68(13): 5206 - 5215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L.-X. Wang, S. Shu, M. L. Disis, and G. E. Plautz
Adoptive transfer of tumor-primed, in vitro activated, CD4+ T effector cells (TEs) combined with CD8+ TEs provides intratumoral TE proliferation and synergistic antitumor response
Blood, June 1, 2007; 109(11): 4865 - 4876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L.-X. Wang, S. Shu, and G. E. Plautz
Host Lymphodepletion Augments T Cell Adoptive Immunotherapy through Enhanced Intratumoral Proliferation of Effector Cells
Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9547 - 9554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Song, X. Tang, K. M. Harms, and M. Croft
OX40 and Bcl-xL Promote the Persistence of CD8 T Cells to Recall Tumor-Associated Antigen
J. Immunol., September 15, 2005; 175(6): 3534 - 3541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
A. D. Weinberg, D. E. Evans, C. Thalhofer, T. Shi, and R. A. Prell
The generation of T cell memory: a review describing the molecular and cellular events following OX40 (CD134) engagement
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2004; 75(6): 962 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Andarini, T. Kikuchi, M. Nukiwa, P. Pradono, T. Suzuki, S. Ohkouchi, A. Inoue, M. Maemondo, N. Ishii, Y. Saijo, et al.
Adenovirus Vector-Mediated in Vivo Gene Transfer of OX40 Ligand to Tumor Cells Enhances Antitumor Immunity of Tumor-Bearing Hosts
Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 64(9): 3281 - 3287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
W. W. Overwijk, M. R. Theoret, S. E. Finkelstein, D. R. Surman, L. A. de Jong, F. A. Vyth-Dreese, T. A. Dellemijn, P. A. Antony, P. J. Spiess, D. C. Palmer, et al.
Tumor Regression and Autoimmunity after Reversal of a Functionally Tolerant State of Self-reactive CD8+ T Cells
J. Exp. Med., August 18, 2003; 198(4): 569 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page