|
|
||||||||




*
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Durham, NC 27705;
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599;
Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33101;
Transplantation and Autoimmunity Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; and
¶ Departments of Immunology, Surgery, and Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metabolism of AA by the 5-LO pathway produces two major biologically
active species: LTB4 and the cysteinyl-LTs,
LTC4, LTD4, and
LTE4 (12, 13).
LTB4 is synthesized predominantly by neutrophils
and interacts with high-affinity G protein-coupled receptors that
mediate a number of leukocyte functions. In particular,
LTB4 is the most potent chemotactic and
chemokinetic factor for neutrophils and stimulates adhesion of
leukocytes to vascular endothelia for extravasation into adjacent
tissue (14, 15, 16). LTB4 also initiates
neutrophil aggregation and degranulation (16), and has
been shown to enhance production of cytokines by T cells and monocytes,
including IL-1, IL-2, and IFN-
(16, 17, 18, 19, 20).
LTC4 and its metabolites,
LTD4 and LTE4, are produced
primarily by eosinophils, mast cells, and macrophages. They are potent
vasoconstrictors (21, 22, 23, 24) and can cause contraction of
endothelial cells, resulting in increased permeability of postcapillary
venules (13, 14, 16). Cysteinyl-LTs also stimulate
contraction of glomerular mesangial cells (25, 26, 27) and may
alter production of other inflammatory mediators (28, 29).
Based on their known biologic properties, enhanced synthesis of LTs
during transplant rejection could therefore promote renal inflammation
and injury through a variety of direct and indirect mechanisms.
Several studies by our group and others have suggested that LTs may be important in the process of transplant rejection (6, 7, 9, 10). Enhanced synthesis of LTB4 and cysteinyl-LTs has been observed in rat (9) and dog (6) models of acute renal allograft rejection. Data also suggest that LTs produced within grafts during rejection affect the function and survival of the transplants. Previously, we determined that administration of a specific LT inhibitor or cysteinyl-LT receptor antagonist significantly improved renal hemodynamic function in rat allograft recipients (9). Mangino et al. (7) found that treatment with a combined COX and LO inhibitor, but not a COX inhibitor alone, maintained glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow at levels similar to isograft controls, and reduced both the severity of inflammatory cell infiltrates and the degree of tissue damage in a dog model of renal allograft rejection.
Until recently, defining the contribution of LTs to transplant rejection has depended upon the use of pharmacological agents that selectively block LT activity, either by inhibiting LT biosynthesis or by antagonizing receptor binding. The development of mouse lines deficient in the ability to synthesize LTs, by introducing mutations into the 5lo gene (29, 30), has provided another means by which the role of these inflammatory mediators can be examined in vivo. The objective of the present study was to use 5-LO-deficient mice in a model of renal allograft rejection to further investigate the importance of LTs in transplantation. Based on previous data, we hypothesized that the loss of 5-LO would have beneficial effects on the course of rejection. Unexpectedly, we found that the absence of a functional 5lo gene had a significant detrimental effect on the survival of renal allograft recipients, suggesting that 5-LO metabolites play a key role in maintaining kidney allograft function.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The generation of 5-LO-deficient mice has been previously described (30, 32). The 5lo-/- mice and corresponding wild-type animals are on an inbred 129 (H-2b) genetic background. CByD2F1/J ((BALB/cByJ x DBA/2J)F1) (H-2d) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were males at least 8 wk old, and were bred and maintained in specific pathogen-free animal barrier facilities at the University of North Carolina and the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Renal transplants
For the allograft groups, kidneys from
5lo+/+ CByD2F1/J
(CBy) mice were transplanted into fully allogeneic 129 recipients. As
nonrejecting isograft controls, kidneys from CBy donors were
transplanted into CBy recipients. Renal transplants were performed as
previously described (4, 33). Briefly, the donor kidney,
ureter, and bladder were harvested en bloc, including the renal artery
with a small aortic cuff and the renal vein with a small caval cuff.
Anastamoses were created between the vascular cuffs and the recipient
abdominal aorta and vena cava, respectively. Donor and recipient
bladders were attached dome to dome. The total ischemic time averaged
3040 min. The right native kidney was removed at the time of
transplantation, and the left native kidney was removed through a flank
incision 35 days later. Overall surgical mortality was
2530%
and was not different between the experimental groups.
Renal hemodynamic studies
To precisely assess renal allograft function, clearances of inulin were measured 2 wk after transplantation, as previously described (n = 7 for isografts, n = 8 for 5lo+/+, and n = 7 for 5lo-/-) (4, 33). Inulin clearance is a measure of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Briefly, on the day of study, animals were anesthetized with 0.04 mg/g pentobarbital, and a polyethylene catheter (PE-90) was inserted into the trachea to facilitate spontaneous ventilation. The left carotid artery and left jugular vein were cannulated with polyethylene catheters (PE-10) for i.v. infusions, to monitor mean arterial pressure, and to allow intermittent sampling of arterial blood. After surgery, normal saline (2% of body weight) was infused i.v. over 20 min to replace surgical losses. A priming dose of carboxyl-[14C]inulin was given, followed by infusion of carboxyl-[14C]inulin in normal saline at a rate of 25 µl/min/100 g body weight. The bladder was cannulated via a suprapubic incision with a PE-50 catheter to facilitate collection of urine. After 30 min of equilibration, renal function was measured during at least two consecutive 30-min clearance periods. Carboxyl-[14C]inulin in plasma and urine was measured in a liquid scintillation counter (Nuclear Chicago-TM Analytical, Elk Grove, IL), and clearances were calculated using standard formula (inulin clearance = (urineInulin x urine flow rate)/plasmaInulin).
Histopathologic studies
Following the renal hemodynamic studies, a portion of the transplanted kidney was removed and placed in 10% buffered Formalin. After Formalin fixation, kidneys were sectioned and stained with H&E. All of the tissues were examined by a pathologist (P.R.) masked to the experimental groups. The overall severity of rejection was determined by examining the pattern and intensity of inflammatory cell infiltrates in both glomeruli and tubulointerstitial areas, and glomerular, tubular, and vascular abnormalities. As previously described (9, 34), grading was performed using a semiquantitative scale, in which 0 represented the absence of histologic abnormalities, and 1+, 2+, 3+, and 4+ represented mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe abnormalities, respectively. An overall histologic score for each kidney was obtained by summing the individual grades for the glomeruli, tubules, interstitium, and vasculature (34).
Immunohistology
Immunopathology was performed, as previously described (33). Briefly, separate portions of kidney allograft tissue were embedded in OCT and snap frozen in precooled 2-methylbutane. Tissue sections (4 µM) were cut with a cryostat, air dried, and fixed in acetone. Fixed sections are washed with PBS (pH 7.4), blocked with normal mouse serum, and stained with appropriately diluted primary mAb. Binding of the primary Ab was detected with affinity-purified FITC-labeled goat anti-rat IgG, followed by a secondary layer of affinity-isolated FITC rabbit anti-goat IgG (Cappel, Durham, NC). The primary rat mAbs used included: TIB126 (anti-MHC class I), TIB120 (anti-MHC class II), GK1.5 (anti-CD4), and 3.155 (anti-CD8), prepared as hybridoma supernatants (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA), along with 30-H122 (anti-Thy-1.2; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), RA36B2 (anti-B220), and M1/70HL (anti-CD11b/Mac-1; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA). The intensity and pattern of immunostaining were evaluated by an individual (J.L.P.) who was masked to the experimental groups.
Measurement of capacity for renal eicosanoid production
A portion of the transplanted kidney was removed and prepared for the measurement of the capacity for renal eicosanoid production, as previously described (9, 34). Briefly, the transplanted kidney was removed and then bisected, a central slice was obtained, and cortex was separated from medulla by macrodissection (n = 6 for isografts, n = 6 for 5lo+/+, and n = 7 for 5lo-/-). Portions of cortex were uniformly homogenized with a Tenbroeck tissue grinder and suspended in 2 ml of Krebs buffer containing the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 (20 µg/ml). The suspensions were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in 95% O2/5% CO2. Samples (measured in duplicate) were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and supernatants were stored at -70°C until eicosanoids were measured as described below. The tissue pellets were resuspended in 2 ml of Krebs buffer and stored at -20°C until protein concentrations were measured using the Coomassie brilliant blue dye-binding assay (35).
Concentrations of thromboxane (TX) B2 and LTB4 in unextracted supernatants from incubations of renal cortex were measured by direct RIA, as previously described (4). Antisera and standards for TXB2 were obtained from AMI-Seragen (Boston, MA). Antisera and standards for LTB4 were obtained from Amersham (Piscataway, NJ). Samples (measured in duplicate) and standards were incubated for 20 min at 4°C with a mixture of antisera and known quantities of tritiated standard. After incubation, free, unbound eicosanoids were removed from the mixture with a suspension of dextran-coated activated charcoal, and tritium remaining in the supernatants was measured with a liquid scintillation counter (TM Analytical). Sample concentrations were determined by a standard curve in which the logarithm of the concentration was plotted against the logit of the B/Bo value. The concentration of TXB2 was normalized for protein content of the cortical homogenates and is expressed as picograms per minute per milligrams of protein. Lipoxin A4 levels in the renal cortical homogenates were measured by using direct enzyme immunoassay analysis (Oxford Biomed, Oxford, MI).
Cytokine mRNA expression
A portion of the allograft was removed, and total RNA was
prepared using TRIzol according to the manufacturers directions (Life
Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). mRNA expression for cytokines was
quantified by RNase protection assay using two multiprobe template sets
(BD PharMingen), as described previously (36).
Riboprobes were prepared from one template set containing the cDNA for
murine IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-15, GAPDH, and
L32; and a second template set containing IL-12p35, IL-12p40, TNF-
,
IL-1
, IL-1
, IL-1RA, migration inhibition factor, IL-6, and
IFN-
. Probes were prepared simultaneously using an in vitro
transcription kit according to the manufacturers directions (BD
PharMingen). A total of 10 µg total RNA was assayed in each sample
using the RiboQuant kit, as outlined by the manufacturer (BD
PharMingen). The protected fragments were size fractionated on an 8%
acrylamide/8 M urea sequencing gel. Dried gels were placed on Kodak XAR
film (Rochester, NY), with intensifying screens, for 24120 h at
-70°C. The intensity of autoradiographic signals was quantitated by
laser densitometry. The results were expressed as arbitrary
densitometry units that correspond to the area under the densitometric
peak. Results were normalized for levels of GAPDH expression.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. For the hemodynamic studies, data points for each animal represent the mean of the values measured during at least two clearance periods. For quantitative data, statistical significance for comparisons between groups was assessed using an unpaired two-sample t test. Survival analysis was performed using the SAS software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), and statistical significance was determined using the Mann-Whitney U test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
60% (11 of 18) of the 5-LO-deficient recipients died before week 3.
In contrast, only 15% (3 of 19) of the wild-type allograft recipients
died by the third week, and many of these animals survived for 56 wk
after transplantation (Fig. 1
|
|
|
|
In addition, we measured the capacity for lipoxin A4 production by allografts from the experimental groups. Significantly higher amounts of lipoxin A4 were detected in both wild-type (22.2 ± 3.9 pg/min per mg) and 5-LO-deficient (24 ± 4 pg/min per mg) allografts compared with nonrejecting CBy isografts (12.9 ± 1.9 pg/min per mg; p < 0.05). However, lipoxin A4 levels in renal cortical homogenates from 5lo-/- recipients were similar to those seen in the wild-type allograft group (p = 0.374).
To further examine the potential mechanism by which the 5lo
mutation accelerates renal allograft rejection, we analyzed cytokine
mRNA expression within the allografts at 1 wk following transplantation
by RNase protection assay. Using a multiprobe template set, we
evaluated a panel of cytokines that have been suggested to play a role
in allograft rejection, including the cytokines IL-1
, IL-1
, IL-2,
IL-10, IL-15, IFN-
, TNF-
, TGF-
13, and migration inhibition
factor, along with the chemokines RANTES,
macrophage-inflammatory protein (MIP)-1
, MIP-1
, MIP-2, and
monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (37, 38). Expression of
mRNAs for these inflammatory mediators was increased in allografts
compared with isografts, but the levels of expression were similar in
the 5lo+/+ and
5lo-/- groups (data not shown). Thus,
accelerated rejection by 5-LO-deficient transplant recipients cannot be
attributed to an altered profile of cytokine or chemokine
expression.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As we have described previously (9), the capacity for LTB4 production by kidney allografts in 5lo+/+ recipients is significantly higher than that of isografts. Levels of LTB4 were also higher in the allografts in 5lo+/+ recipients than 5lo-/- recipients consistent with the absence of functional 5-LO in the recipient mice. However, detectable LTB4 production was present in the allografts in 5lo-/- recipients. Since the kidney grafts came from 5lo+/+ donors, we assume that 5-LO associated with the donor tissue mediates LT production in this setting. As the levels of LTB4 in these allografts were virtually identical to those of isografts, we assume that these levels reflect the capacity of the kidney, along with its passenger leukocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages, to generate LTs. Furthermore, we infer that the enhanced capacity for LTB4 generation by the 5lo+/+ allografts is due to the influx of inflammatory cells that are associated with rejection. The generation of 5-LO products by these cells may contribute to the difference in transplant outcomes between the two allograft groups.
There are several potential explanations for the detrimental effects of
the loss of a functional 5lo gene on graft rejection in
addition to the absence of LTs. For example, the loss of 5-LO might
enhance the synthesis and activities of other eicosanoids, particularly
the COX products of AA metabolism, which can adversely contribute to
transplant rejection. We have previously reported that macrophages from
5-LO-deficient animals released increased amounts of
PGE2 and TXB2, compared
with wild-type controls (30), and we found an enhanced
role for prostanoids in several acute inflammatory processes in
5-LO-deficient mice (30, 32). Furthermore, several studies
have demonstrated enhanced production of COX metabolites, specifically
TXB2, in rat (5, 10, 41) and dog
(10, 42) models of allograft rejection, and that
TXB2 contributes to transplant rejection
(4, 5, 8, 10). However, we found no differences in the
levels of TXB2 measured in renal cortical
homogenates from 5-LO-deficient allograft recipients compared with
wild-type controls. In addition, expression of other inflammatory
mediators, including cytokines such as IL-1, IL-2, and IFN-
, was
similar between both experimental groups.
We next considered the possibility that functional 5-LO might be required for the production of other lipid mediators, such as lipoxins, that may exert antiinflammatory or cytoprotective actions in graft rejection. The major pathways of lipoxin production require 5-LO enzyme activity in combination with one of the other lipoxygenases, either 15-LO or 12-LO (43). Recent studies have shown that lipoxins play important immunoregulatory roles in leukocyte trafficking and inflammation, although a role for lipoxins in allograft rejection has not been identified (43). As the biochemical actions of 5-LO are a presumed requirement for lipoxin synthesis, we posited that lipoxin A4 production should be dramatically reduced in 5-LO-deficient mice. However, we detected similar levels of lipoxin A4 in allografts from both 5-LO-deficient and wild-type recipients. This suggests that 5-LO expressed in cells provided with the donor kidney is sufficient for lipoxin production. Alternatively, another pathway not requiring 5-LO may be responsible for lipoxin synthesis in this setting. Regardless of the exact source of lipoxin production, our findings do not support a model in which the detrimental affects of 5-LO deficiency on graft survival can be explained by reduced lipoxin production. However, because the renal cortical preparation used in these experiments may not directly reflect lipoxin A4 synthesis in vivo over the entire posttransplant period, further investigation of this pathway in transplant rejection may be warranted.
The adverse effects of the 5lo mutation in renal allograft
rejection suggest an unexpected protective effect of LT in this model.
Although the bulk of current evidence indicates that LTs act primarily
as proinflammatory lipid mediators, this study along with our previous
experiments in the MRL/MpJ-Faslpr model
(39) indicate a potentially beneficial action of LTs in
renal inflammation. Although the mechanism of this effect is not clear,
it is possible that these actions may involve interactions with the
family of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs)
(44). Emerging evidence suggests that various lipid
mediators are ligands for PPARs, a family of nuclear receptors that can
act as transcription factors. In particular, studies by Devchand et al.
(45, 46) have suggested that LTB4 is
a ligand for PPAR
and that activation of PPAR
by
LTB4 may function to limit the inflammatory
response. Since LTB4 levels were reduced in the
allografts in 5lo-/- recipients, our
findings raise the possibility that interruption of
LTB4 activation of PPAR
in this setting might
contribute to accellerated graft rejection. With the recent cloning of
the receptors for LTB4 (47, 48, 49) and
the peptidoleukotrienes (50), precise molecular dissection
of the contributions of these different pathways to inflammatory
responses such as allograft rejection should be possible. In this way,
novel antiinflammatory pathways with strong influences on graft
survival may be identified.
In summary, this study has shown that the absence of 5-LO accelerates renal allograft rejection in a mouse model of acute rejection. However, reduced survival was not associated with exaggerated impairment of renal hemodynamic function or enhanced pathological abnormalities at early time points. Similarly, the absence of 5-LO did not alter production of other inflammatory mediators by the allograft. These data demonstrate an unexpected protective role for 5-LO metabolites in allograft rejection.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas M. Coffman, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Building 6, Room 1100, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705. E-mail address: tcoffman{at}duke.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: COX, cyclooxygenase; 5-LO, 5-lipoxygenase; AA, arachidonic acid; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; LT, leukotriene; MIP, macrophage-inflammatory protein; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; TX, thromboxane. ![]()
Received for publication December 11, 2000. Accepted for publication September 27, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production by leukotriene B4 in human lymphocyte cultures. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Med. 23:207.[Medline]
as the lymphokine that mediates leukotriene B4-induced immunoregulation. J. Immunol. 139:513.[Abstract]
, and tumor necrosis factor) and their relevance to rejection. Transplant. Proc. 21:26.[Medline]
-leukotriene B4 pathway to inflammation control. Nature 384:39.[Medline]
and BLTR, nuclear and cell surface receptors for leukotriene B4. J. Biol. Chem. 274:23341.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Christmas, K. Tolentino, V. Primo, K. Z. Berry, R. C. Murphy, M. Chen, D. M. Lee, and R. J. Soberman Cytochrome P-450 4F18 Is the Leukotriene B4 {omega}-1/{omega}-2 Hydroxylase in Mouse Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes: IDENTIFICATION AS THE FUNCTIONAL ORTHOLOGUE OF HUMAN POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUKOCYTE CYP4F3A IN THE DOWN-REGULATION OF RESPONSES TO LTB4 J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7189 - 7196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. A. Patel, S. Cuzzocrea, P. K. Chatterjee, R. Di Paola, L. Sautebin, D. Britti, and C. Thiemermann Reduction of Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in 5-Lipoxygenase Knockout Mice and by the 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitor Zileuton Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2004; 66(2): 220 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Jones, S. Holden, L. Tenaillon, U. Bhatia, K. Seuwen, P. Tranter, J. Turner, R. Kettle, R. Bouhelal, S. Charlton, et al. Expression and Characterization of a 5-oxo-6E,8Z,11Z,14Z-Eicosatetraenoic Acid Receptor Highly Expressed on Human Eosinophils and Neutrophils Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2003; 63(3): 471 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. SAADI, L. E. WRENSHALL, and J. L. PLATT Regional manifestations and control of the immune system FASEB J, June 1, 2002; 16(8): 849 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |