The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goulet, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Coffman, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goulet, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Coffman, T. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Kidney Transplantation
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 167: 6631-6636.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Deficiency of 5-Lipoxygenase Accelerates Renal Allograft Rejection in Mice1

Jennifer L. Goulet*,{dagger}, Robert C. Griffiths*, Phillip Ruiz{ddagger}, Roslyn B. Mannon§, Pat Flannery*, Jeffrey L. Platt, Beverly H. Koller{dagger} and Thomas M. Coffman2,*

* Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Durham, NC 27705; {dagger} Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; {ddagger} Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33101; § Transplantation and Autoimmunity Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; and Departments of Immunology, Surgery, and Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Acute renal allograft rejection is associated with alterations in renal arachidonic acid metabolism, including enhanced synthesis of leukotrienes (LTs). LTs, the products of the 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) pathway, are potent lipid mediators with a broad range of biologic activities. Previous studies, using pharmacological agents to inhibit LT synthesis or activity, have implicated these eicosanoids in transplant rejection. To further investigate the role of LTs in acute graft rejection, we transplanted kidneys from CByD2F1 mice into fully allogeneic 129 mice that carry a targeted mutation in the 5lo gene. Unexpectedly, allograft rejection was significantly accelerated in 5-LO-deficient mice compared with wild-type animals. Despite the marked reduction in graft survival, the 5lo mutation had no effect on the hemodynamics or morphology of the allografts. Although LTB4 levels were reduced, renal thromboxane B2 production and cytokine expression were not altered in 5-LO-deficient allograft recipients. These findings suggest that, along with their proinflammatory actions, metabolites of 5-LO can act to enhance allograft survival.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Acute renal allograft rejection is characterized by infiltration of the kidney parenchyma by a mixed population of inflammatory cells. Intense renal vasoconstriction also occurs during rejection, causing marked reductions in glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow and eventually producing ischemic damage (1, 2, 3). Furthermore, the degree of functional impairment is often greater than expected from the morphologic appearance of the allograft (1, 2, 3). As a result, it has been suggested that infiltrating inflammatory cells produce locally acting compounds that impair renal hemodynamic function (2, 4). Previous studies have implicated products of the cyclooxygenase (COX)3 and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) pathways of arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism, released by these infiltrating cells, as important mediators of renal dysfunction and injury in acute rejection (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Tissue ischemia is an unavoidable component of organ harvest and transplantation. In addition to potential immunomodulatory actions, LTs and lipoxoins, which also depend on 5-LO for their synthesis, play key roles in the pathogenesis of ischemia-reperfusion injury (11).

Metabolism of AA by the 5-LO pathway produces two major biologically active species: LTB4 and the cysteinyl-LTs, LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4 (12, 13). LTB4 is synthesized predominantly by neutrophils and interacts with high-affinity G protein-coupled receptors that mediate a number of leukocyte functions. In particular, LTB4 is the most potent chemotactic and chemokinetic factor for neutrophils and stimulates adhesion of leukocytes to vascular endothelia for extravasation into adjacent tissue (14, 15, 16). LTB4 also initiates neutrophil aggregation and degranulation (16), and has been shown to enhance production of cytokines by T cells and monocytes, including IL-1, IL-2, and IFN-{gamma} (16, 17, 18, 19, 20). LTC4 and its metabolites, LTD4 and LTE4, are produced primarily by eosinophils, mast cells, and macrophages. They are potent vasoconstrictors (21, 22, 23, 24) and can cause contraction of endothelial cells, resulting in increased permeability of postcapillary venules (13, 14, 16). Cysteinyl-LTs also stimulate contraction of glomerular mesangial cells (25, 26, 27) and may alter production of other inflammatory mediators (28, 29). Based on their known biologic properties, enhanced synthesis of LTs during transplant rejection could therefore promote renal inflammation and injury through a variety of direct and indirect mechanisms.

Several studies by our group and others have suggested that LTs may be important in the process of transplant rejection (6, 7, 9, 10). Enhanced synthesis of LTB4 and cysteinyl-LTs has been observed in rat (9) and dog (6) models of acute renal allograft rejection. Data also suggest that LTs produced within grafts during rejection affect the function and survival of the transplants. Previously, we determined that administration of a specific LT inhibitor or cysteinyl-LT receptor antagonist significantly improved renal hemodynamic function in rat allograft recipients (9). Mangino et al. (7) found that treatment with a combined COX and LO inhibitor, but not a COX inhibitor alone, maintained glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow at levels similar to isograft controls, and reduced both the severity of inflammatory cell infiltrates and the degree of tissue damage in a dog model of renal allograft rejection.

Until recently, defining the contribution of LTs to transplant rejection has depended upon the use of pharmacological agents that selectively block LT activity, either by inhibiting LT biosynthesis or by antagonizing receptor binding. The development of mouse lines deficient in the ability to synthesize LTs, by introducing mutations into the 5lo gene (29, 30), has provided another means by which the role of these inflammatory mediators can be examined in vivo. The objective of the present study was to use 5-LO-deficient mice in a model of renal allograft rejection to further investigate the importance of LTs in transplantation. Based on previous data, we hypothesized that the loss of 5-LO would have beneficial effects on the course of rejection. Unexpectedly, we found that the absence of a functional 5lo gene had a significant detrimental effect on the survival of renal allograft recipients, suggesting that 5-LO metabolites play a key role in maintaining kidney allograft function.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

The generation of 5-LO-deficient mice has been previously described (30, 32). The 5lo-/- mice and corresponding wild-type animals are on an inbred 129 (H-2b) genetic background. CByD2F1/J ((BALB/cByJ x DBA/2J)F1) (H-2d) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were males at least 8 wk old, and were bred and maintained in specific pathogen-free animal barrier facilities at the University of North Carolina and the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Renal transplants

For the allograft groups, kidneys from 5lo+/+ CByD2F1/J (CBy) mice were transplanted into fully allogeneic 129 recipients. As nonrejecting isograft controls, kidneys from CBy donors were transplanted into CBy recipients. Renal transplants were performed as previously described (4, 33). Briefly, the donor kidney, ureter, and bladder were harvested en bloc, including the renal artery with a small aortic cuff and the renal vein with a small caval cuff. Anastamoses were created between the vascular cuffs and the recipient abdominal aorta and vena cava, respectively. Donor and recipient bladders were attached dome to dome. The total ischemic time averaged 30–40 min. The right native kidney was removed at the time of transplantation, and the left native kidney was removed through a flank incision 3–5 days later. Overall surgical mortality was ~25–30% and was not different between the experimental groups.

Renal hemodynamic studies

To precisely assess renal allograft function, clearances of inulin were measured 2 wk after transplantation, as previously described (n = 7 for isografts, n = 8 for 5lo+/+, and n = 7 for 5lo-/-) (4, 33). Inulin clearance is a measure of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Briefly, on the day of study, animals were anesthetized with 0.04 mg/g pentobarbital, and a polyethylene catheter (PE-90) was inserted into the trachea to facilitate spontaneous ventilation. The left carotid artery and left jugular vein were cannulated with polyethylene catheters (PE-10) for i.v. infusions, to monitor mean arterial pressure, and to allow intermittent sampling of arterial blood. After surgery, normal saline (2% of body weight) was infused i.v. over 20 min to replace surgical losses. A priming dose of carboxyl-[14C]inulin was given, followed by infusion of carboxyl-[14C]inulin in normal saline at a rate of 25 µl/min/100 g body weight. The bladder was cannulated via a suprapubic incision with a PE-50 catheter to facilitate collection of urine. After 30 min of equilibration, renal function was measured during at least two consecutive 30-min clearance periods. Carboxyl-[14C]inulin in plasma and urine was measured in a liquid scintillation counter (Nuclear Chicago-TM Analytical, Elk Grove, IL), and clearances were calculated using standard formula (inulin clearance = (urineInulin x urine flow rate)/plasmaInulin).

Histopathologic studies

Following the renal hemodynamic studies, a portion of the transplanted kidney was removed and placed in 10% buffered Formalin. After Formalin fixation, kidneys were sectioned and stained with H&E. All of the tissues were examined by a pathologist (P.R.) masked to the experimental groups. The overall severity of rejection was determined by examining the pattern and intensity of inflammatory cell infiltrates in both glomeruli and tubulointerstitial areas, and glomerular, tubular, and vascular abnormalities. As previously described (9, 34), grading was performed using a semiquantitative scale, in which 0 represented the absence of histologic abnormalities, and 1+, 2+, 3+, and 4+ represented mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe abnormalities, respectively. An overall histologic score for each kidney was obtained by summing the individual grades for the glomeruli, tubules, interstitium, and vasculature (34).

Immunohistology

Immunopathology was performed, as previously described (33). Briefly, separate portions of kidney allograft tissue were embedded in OCT and snap frozen in precooled 2-methylbutane. Tissue sections (4 µM) were cut with a cryostat, air dried, and fixed in acetone. Fixed sections are washed with PBS (pH 7.4), blocked with normal mouse serum, and stained with appropriately diluted primary mAb. Binding of the primary Ab was detected with affinity-purified FITC-labeled goat anti-rat IgG, followed by a secondary layer of affinity-isolated FITC rabbit anti-goat IgG (Cappel, Durham, NC). The primary rat mAbs used included: TIB126 (anti-MHC class I), TIB120 (anti-MHC class II), GK1.5 (anti-CD4), and 3.155 (anti-CD8), prepared as hybridoma supernatants (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA), along with 30-H122 (anti-Thy-1.2; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), RA36B2 (anti-B220), and M1/70HL (anti-CD11b/Mac-1; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA). The intensity and pattern of immunostaining were evaluated by an individual (J.L.P.) who was masked to the experimental groups.

Measurement of capacity for renal eicosanoid production

A portion of the transplanted kidney was removed and prepared for the measurement of the capacity for renal eicosanoid production, as previously described (9, 34). Briefly, the transplanted kidney was removed and then bisected, a central slice was obtained, and cortex was separated from medulla by macrodissection (n = 6 for isografts, n = 6 for 5lo+/+, and n = 7 for 5lo-/-). Portions of cortex were uniformly homogenized with a Tenbroeck tissue grinder and suspended in 2 ml of Kreb’s buffer containing the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 (20 µg/ml). The suspensions were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in 95% O2/5% CO2. Samples (measured in duplicate) were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and supernatants were stored at -70°C until eicosanoids were measured as described below. The tissue pellets were resuspended in 2 ml of Kreb’s buffer and stored at -20°C until protein concentrations were measured using the Coomassie brilliant blue dye-binding assay (35).

Concentrations of thromboxane (TX) B2 and LTB4 in unextracted supernatants from incubations of renal cortex were measured by direct RIA, as previously described (4). Antisera and standards for TXB2 were obtained from AMI-Seragen (Boston, MA). Antisera and standards for LTB4 were obtained from Amersham (Piscataway, NJ). Samples (measured in duplicate) and standards were incubated for 20 min at 4°C with a mixture of antisera and known quantities of tritiated standard. After incubation, free, unbound eicosanoids were removed from the mixture with a suspension of dextran-coated activated charcoal, and tritium remaining in the supernatants was measured with a liquid scintillation counter (TM Analytical). Sample concentrations were determined by a standard curve in which the logarithm of the concentration was plotted against the logit of the B/Bo value. The concentration of TXB2 was normalized for protein content of the cortical homogenates and is expressed as picograms per minute per milligrams of protein. Lipoxin A4 levels in the renal cortical homogenates were measured by using direct enzyme immunoassay analysis (Oxford Biomed, Oxford, MI).

Cytokine mRNA expression

A portion of the allograft was removed, and total RNA was prepared using TRIzol according to the manufacturer’s directions (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). mRNA expression for cytokines was quantified by RNase protection assay using two multiprobe template sets (BD PharMingen), as described previously (36). Riboprobes were prepared from one template set containing the cDNA for murine IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-15, GAPDH, and L32; and a second template set containing IL-12p35, IL-12p40, TNF-{alpha}, IL-1{alpha}, IL-1{beta}, IL-1RA, migration inhibition factor, IL-6, and IFN-{gamma}. Probes were prepared simultaneously using an in vitro transcription kit according to the manufacturer’s directions (BD PharMingen). A total of 10 µg total RNA was assayed in each sample using the RiboQuant kit, as outlined by the manufacturer (BD PharMingen). The protected fragments were size fractionated on an 8% acrylamide/8 M urea sequencing gel. Dried gels were placed on Kodak XAR film (Rochester, NY), with intensifying screens, for 24–120 h at -70°C. The intensity of autoradiographic signals was quantitated by laser densitometry. The results were expressed as arbitrary densitometry units that correspond to the area under the densitometric peak. Results were normalized for levels of GAPDH expression.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. For the hemodynamic studies, data points for each animal represent the mean of the values measured during at least two clearance periods. For quantitative data, statistical significance for comparisons between groups was assessed using an unpaired two-sample t test. Survival analysis was performed using the SAS software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), and statistical significance was determined using the Mann-Whitney U test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To evaluate the role of 5-LO in the recipient immune system during the course of renal allograft rejection, kidneys from CByD2F1/J (CBy) mice were transplanted into fully mismatched 5-LO-deficient and wild-type 129 mice. As shown in Fig. 1Go, the 5lo mutation had a significant detrimental effect on the survival of renal allografts. ~60% (11 of 18) of the 5-LO-deficient recipients died before week 3. In contrast, only 15% (3 of 19) of the wild-type allograft recipients died by the third week, and many of these animals survived for 5–6 wk after transplantation (Fig. 1Go, p = 0.0047). Moreover, mean survival time of 5lo-/- recipients was 27 ± 3.9 days, which was significantly less than that of wild-type recipients (39 ± 3.6 days; p = 0.015). All isograft controls survived 8 wk or more following transplantation.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Effect of the 5lo mutation on survival of renal allograft recipients. Mean survival time of wild-type recipients was 39 ± 3.6 days, and mean survival time of 5-LO-deficient recipients was 27 ± 3.9 days. There was a statistically significant difference in survival between wild-type and 5-LO-deficient allograft recipients (p < 0.05). All CBy isograft recipients survived past 8 wk posttransplantation. n, Number of mice in each group.

 
To determine whether differences in histopathology or graft function could be detected at a time point before graft failure occurs, we assessed renal function and morphology 2 wk after transplantation. Allograft function was determined by directly measuring GFR in transplanted animals. As shown in Fig. 2Go, GFR was substantially reduced in wild-type (2.9 ± 0.5 ml/min per kg) and 5-LO-deficient (2.4 ± 0.4 ml/min per kg) allografts compared with nonrejecting isografts (6.2 ± 0.2 ml/min per kg; p < 0.005). However, at 2 wk posttransplantation, the 5lo mutation had no significant effect on renal allograft function. The levels of GFR in the 5-LO-deficient allografts were similar to those in the wild-type group (Fig. 2Go, p = 0.220) and, in both groups, these levels are sufficient to support normal health and survival.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Effect of the 5lo mutation on renal allograft function. GFR, expressed as milliliters per minute per kilogram, was assessed by measuring inulin clearances in wild-type ({square}) and 5-LO-deficient () allograft recipients and CBy isograft ({blacksquare}) recipients at 2 wk following transplantation. GFR was significantly decreased in both wild-type and 5lo-/- allograft recipients compared with isograft controls (p < 0.005). However, renal hemodynamics in 5-LO-deficient recipients were not significantly different from wild-type allograft recipients (*, p < 0.005 vs 5lo+/+ or 5lo-/-).

 
To investigate whether the increased mortality of 5-LO-deficient allograft recipients was associated with discernible changes in graft histomorphology at an early time point, we compared the severity of renal morphologic abnormalities between the experimental groups at 2 wk after transplantation (Table IGo). In the isograft control group, renal histomorphology was normal and there was no evidence of infiltrating inflammatory cells, although mild to moderate levels of hypercellularity were detected in the glomeruli of some of the isografts. In contrast, wild-type and 5-LO-deficient allografts were markedly abnormal with histologic evidence of acute cellular rejection. In both allograft groups, the predominant finding was intense infiltration of inflammatory cells in interstitial and perivascular regions. Both focal and diffuse patterns of infiltration were seen. Glomerular and tubular pathologic changes were variable and less pronounced. As shown in Table IGo, there were no obvious differences in the pattern and/or severity of histomorphologic abnormalities between 5-LO-deficient and wild-type allograft groups when glomerular, tubular, interstitial, and vascular abnormalities were graded separately using a semiquantitative scale. To explore this issue further, we also performed immunostaining of allograft sections with Abs specific for T cells, CD4+ and CD8+ cells, macrophages, and B cells. There were no differences in the intensity and pattern of immune cell infiltration between allografts in wild-type and 5-LO-/- recipients at both 1 and 2 wk.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Effect of the 5lo mutation on renal histopathology1

 
To determine the effects of the 5lo mutation on the capacity for renal LT production, we measured levels of LTB4 in A23187-stimulated preparations of cortex from the transplanted kidneys. These data are illustrated in Fig. 3Go. We find that LTB4 production by the allografts in 5lo+/+ recipients (12.3 ± 1.7 pg/min per mg protein) is significantly higher than that of isografts (6.1 ± 0.5 pg/min per mg protein; p = 0.011 vs 5lo+/+) or allografts in 5lo-/- recipients (7.4 ± 0.8 pg/min per mg protein; p = 0.02 vs 5lo+/+). There was no significant difference in the capacity for LTB4 generation between the isografts and allografts in 5lo-/- recipients (p = 0.26).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Capacity for eicosanoid production of transplanted kidneys. TXB2, LTB4, and lipoxin A4 levels were determined by RIA or ELISA on calcium ionophore A23187-stimulated renal cortical homogenates from kidneys transplanted into wild-type ({square}) and 5-LO-deficient () allograft recipients and CBy isograft ({blacksquare}) recipients at 2 wk following transplantation. Values are mean ± SEM (*, p = 0.06 vs 5lo+/+ and p = 0.002 vs 5lo-/-; {ddagger}, p = 0.02 vs 5lo-/- and p = 0.011 vs isografts; **, p < 0.05 vs 5lo+/+ and 5lo-/-).

 
We and others have previously shown that the eicosanoid TXA2 is generated during rejection and mediates a substantial portion of the renal dysfunction observed in this model (4, 5, 8, 10). Additional studies have demonstrated that the loss of 5-LO may result in enhanced synthesis and activity of other eicosanoids, particularly COX metabolites (30, 32). Therefore, we explored the possibility that eicosanoid production may be altered in 5-LO-deficient allografts by measuring levels of TXB2 (the stable metabolite of TXA2) in cortical homogenates prepared from the transplanted kidneys and stimulated with the calcium ionophore A23187. As depicted in Fig. 3Go, the capacity for renal production of TXB2 was increased in both wild-type (14.6 ± 4.7 pg/min per mg protein) and 5lo-/- (15.1 ± 2 pg/min per mg protein) allografts compared with isografts (6.4 ± 1.2 pg/min per mg protein; p = 0.06 and 0.002, respectively). However, we found no significant differences in TXB2 levels in renal cortical homogenates from 5-LO-deficient allografts compared with the wild-type group (Fig. 3Go, p = 0.461).

In addition, we measured the capacity for lipoxin A4 production by allografts from the experimental groups. Significantly higher amounts of lipoxin A4 were detected in both wild-type (22.2 ± 3.9 pg/min per mg) and 5-LO-deficient (24 ± 4 pg/min per mg) allografts compared with nonrejecting CBy isografts (12.9 ± 1.9 pg/min per mg; p < 0.05). However, lipoxin A4 levels in renal cortical homogenates from 5lo-/- recipients were similar to those seen in the wild-type allograft group (p = 0.374).

To further examine the potential mechanism by which the 5lo mutation accelerates renal allograft rejection, we analyzed cytokine mRNA expression within the allografts at 1 wk following transplantation by RNase protection assay. Using a multiprobe template set, we evaluated a panel of cytokines that have been suggested to play a role in allograft rejection, including the cytokines IL-1{alpha}, IL-1{beta}, IL-2, IL-10, IL-15, IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, TGF-{beta}1–3, and migration inhibition factor, along with the chemokines RANTES, macrophage-inflammatory protein (MIP)-1{alpha}, MIP-1{beta}, MIP-2, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (37, 38). Expression of mRNAs for these inflammatory mediators was increased in allografts compared with isografts, but the levels of expression were similar in the 5lo+/+ and 5lo-/- groups (data not shown). Thus, accelerated rejection by 5-LO-deficient transplant recipients cannot be attributed to an altered profile of cytokine or chemokine expression.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we examined the role of LTs in kidney transplant rejection using mice that are genetically deficient in the 5-LO enzyme. Previous reports have suggested that LTs are involved in allograft rejection (6, 7, 9, 10, 34). Based on these findings and on the well-characterized proinflammatory activities of LTs, we expected that the 5lo mutation might have beneficial effects on the course of rejection, perhaps by improving renal function and histopathology and/or prolonging the survival of grafts. However, we have shown in this study that the absence of a functional gene for 5-LO results in a marked acceleration of the allograft rejection process. These findings are similar to those from a previous study in which we showed that the 5lo mutation decreased the survival of male MRL/MpJ-Faslpr mice, a model of autoimmune disease (39). In those experiments, we also demonstrated that, despite the increased mortality, glomerular filtration rate and renal histopathology measured at an early time point in the disease were similar between 5-LO-deficient and wild-type MRL/MpJ-Faslpr mice. In those studies, the major impact of 5-LO deficiency was seen in male mice. Sex differences in physiological responses have also been observed in LTB4 receptor-deficient mice (39). Because of technical constraints related to the transplant surgery procedure, we have used only male mice in the studies presented in this work, and potential sex differences in the contribution of LTs in this model of allograft rejection could not be assessed.

As we have described previously (9), the capacity for LTB4 production by kidney allografts in 5lo+/+ recipients is significantly higher than that of isografts. Levels of LTB4 were also higher in the allografts in 5lo+/+ recipients than 5lo-/- recipients consistent with the absence of functional 5-LO in the recipient mice. However, detectable LTB4 production was present in the allografts in 5lo-/- recipients. Since the kidney grafts came from 5lo+/+ donors, we assume that 5-LO associated with the donor tissue mediates LT production in this setting. As the levels of LTB4 in these allografts were virtually identical to those of isografts, we assume that these levels reflect the capacity of the kidney, along with its passenger leukocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages, to generate LTs. Furthermore, we infer that the enhanced capacity for LTB4 generation by the 5lo+/+ allografts is due to the influx of inflammatory cells that are associated with rejection. The generation of 5-LO products by these cells may contribute to the difference in transplant outcomes between the two allograft groups.

There are several potential explanations for the detrimental effects of the loss of a functional 5lo gene on graft rejection in addition to the absence of LTs. For example, the loss of 5-LO might enhance the synthesis and activities of other eicosanoids, particularly the COX products of AA metabolism, which can adversely contribute to transplant rejection. We have previously reported that macrophages from 5-LO-deficient animals released increased amounts of PGE2 and TXB2, compared with wild-type controls (30), and we found an enhanced role for prostanoids in several acute inflammatory processes in 5-LO-deficient mice (30, 32). Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated enhanced production of COX metabolites, specifically TXB2, in rat (5, 10, 41) and dog (10, 42) models of allograft rejection, and that TXB2 contributes to transplant rejection (4, 5, 8, 10). However, we found no differences in the levels of TXB2 measured in renal cortical homogenates from 5-LO-deficient allograft recipients compared with wild-type controls. In addition, expression of other inflammatory mediators, including cytokines such as IL-1, IL-2, and IFN-{gamma}, was similar between both experimental groups.

We next considered the possibility that functional 5-LO might be required for the production of other lipid mediators, such as lipoxins, that may exert antiinflammatory or cytoprotective actions in graft rejection. The major pathways of lipoxin production require 5-LO enzyme activity in combination with one of the other lipoxygenases, either 15-LO or 12-LO (43). Recent studies have shown that lipoxins play important immunoregulatory roles in leukocyte trafficking and inflammation, although a role for lipoxins in allograft rejection has not been identified (43). As the biochemical actions of 5-LO are a presumed requirement for lipoxin synthesis, we posited that lipoxin A4 production should be dramatically reduced in 5-LO-deficient mice. However, we detected similar levels of lipoxin A4 in allografts from both 5-LO-deficient and wild-type recipients. This suggests that 5-LO expressed in cells provided with the donor kidney is sufficient for lipoxin production. Alternatively, another pathway not requiring 5-LO may be responsible for lipoxin synthesis in this setting. Regardless of the exact source of lipoxin production, our findings do not support a model in which the detrimental affects of 5-LO deficiency on graft survival can be explained by reduced lipoxin production. However, because the renal cortical preparation used in these experiments may not directly reflect lipoxin A4 synthesis in vivo over the entire posttransplant period, further investigation of this pathway in transplant rejection may be warranted.

The adverse effects of the 5lo mutation in renal allograft rejection suggest an unexpected protective effect of LT in this model. Although the bulk of current evidence indicates that LTs act primarily as proinflammatory lipid mediators, this study along with our previous experiments in the MRL/MpJ-Faslpr model (39) indicate a potentially beneficial action of LTs in renal inflammation. Although the mechanism of this effect is not clear, it is possible that these actions may involve interactions with the family of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) (44). Emerging evidence suggests that various lipid mediators are ligands for PPARs, a family of nuclear receptors that can act as transcription factors. In particular, studies by Devchand et al. (45, 46) have suggested that LTB4 is a ligand for PPAR{alpha} and that activation of PPAR{alpha} by LTB4 may function to limit the inflammatory response. Since LTB4 levels were reduced in the allografts in 5lo-/- recipients, our findings raise the possibility that interruption of LTB4 activation of PPAR{alpha} in this setting might contribute to accellerated graft rejection. With the recent cloning of the receptors for LTB4 (47, 48, 49) and the peptidoleukotrienes (50), precise molecular dissection of the contributions of these different pathways to inflammatory responses such as allograft rejection should be possible. In this way, novel antiinflammatory pathways with strong influences on graft survival may be identified.

In summary, this study has shown that the absence of 5-LO accelerates renal allograft rejection in a mouse model of acute rejection. However, reduced survival was not associated with exaggerated impairment of renal hemodynamic function or enhanced pathological abnormalities at early time points. Similarly, the absence of 5-LO did not alter production of other inflammatory mediators by the allograft. These data demonstrate an unexpected protective role for 5-LO metabolites in allograft rejection.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank B. Hawkins, M. Key, and V. Wagoner for assistance with the animal husbandry and genotyping of the 5lo mice.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant PO1-DK38108 (to T.M.C. and B.H.K.), Duke Training Grant in Nephrology 5-T32-DK07731, and the Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas M. Coffman, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Building 6, Room 1100, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705. E-mail address: tcoffman{at}duke.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: COX, cyclooxygenase; 5-LO, 5-lipoxygenase; AA, arachidonic acid; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; LT, leukotriene; MIP, macrophage-inflammatory protein; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; TX, thromboxane. Back

Received for publication December 11, 2000. Accepted for publication September 27, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rosen, S. M., B. P. Truniger, H. R. Kriek, J. E. Murray, J. P. Merrill. 1967. Intrarenal distribution of blood flow in the transplanted dog kidney: effect of denervation and rejection. J. Clin. Invest. 46:1239.
  2. Hollenberg, N. K., A. B. Retik, S. M. Rosen, J. E. Murray, J. P. Merrill. 1968. The role of vasoconstriction in the ischemia of renal allograft rejection. Transplantation 6:59.[Medline]
  3. Gardner, L. B., R. D. Guttmann, J. P. Merrill. 1968. Renal transplantation in the inbred rat. IV. Alterations in the microvasculature in acute unmodified rejection. Transplantation 6:411.[Medline]
  4. Coffman, T. M., P. Ruiz, F. Sanfilippo, P. E. Klotman. 1989. Chronic thromboxane inhibition preserves function of rejecting rat renal allografts. Kidney Int. 35:24.[Medline]
  5. Coffman, T. M., W. E. Yarger, P. E. Klotman. 1985. Functional role of thromboxane production by acutely rejecting renal allografts in rats. J. Clin. Invest. 75:1242.
  6. Mangino, M. J., C. B. Anderson, K. Deschryver, J. Turk. 1987. Arachidonate lipoxygenase products and renal allograft rejection in dogs. Transplantation 44:805.[Medline]
  7. Mangino, M. J., M. D. Jendrisak, E. Brunt, C. B. Anderson. 1988. Eicosanoid synthesis inhibition and renal allograft function during acute rejection. Transplantation 45:902.[Medline]
  8. Mangino, M. J., E. M. Brunt, P. Von Doersten, C. B. Anderson. 1989. Effects of the thromboxane synthesis inhibitor CGS-12970 on experimental acute renal allograft rejection. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 248:23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Spurney, R. F., S. Ibrahim, D. Butterly, P. E. Klotman, F. Sanfilippo, T. M. Coffman. 1994. Leukotrienes in renal transplant rejection in rats: distinct roles for leukotriene B4 and peptidoleukotrienes in the pathogenesis of allograft injury. J. Immunol. 152:867.[Abstract]
  10. Spurney, R. F., T. M. Coffman. 1995. The role of eicosanoids in transplant rejection. R. R. Ruffolo, and M. A. Hollinger, eds. Inflammation—Mediators and Pathways 129. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  11. Chiang, N., K. Gronert, C. B. Clish, J. A. O’Brien, M. W. Freeman, C. N. Serhan. 1999. Leukotriene B4 receptor transgenic mice reveal novel protective roles for lipoxins and aspirin-triggered lipoxins in reperfusion. J. Clin. Invest. 104:309.[Medline]
  12. Samuelsson, B.. 1983. Leukotrienes: mediators of immediate hypersensitivity reactions and inflammation. Science 220:568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lewis, R. A., K. F. Austen, R. J. Soberman. 1990. Leukotrienes and other products of the 5-lipoxygenase pathway, biochemistry and relation to pathobiology in human diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 323:645.[Medline]
  14. Dahlen, S.-E., J. Bjork, P. Hedqvist, K.-E. Arfors, S. Hammarstrom, J.-A. Lindgren, B. Samuelsson. 1981. Leukotrienes promote plasma leakage and leukocyte adhesion in postcapillary venules: in vivo effects with relevance to the acute inflammatory response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:3887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Pettipher, E. R., E. D. Salter, R. Breslow, L. Raycroft, H. J. Showell. 1993. Specific inhibition of leukotriene B4 (LTB4)-induced neutrophil emigration by 20-hydroxy LTB4: implications for the regulation of inflammatory responses. Br. J. Pharmacol. 110:423.[Medline]
  16. Jr Henderson, W. R.. 1994. The role of leukotrienes in inflammation. Ann. Intern. Med. 121:684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Rola-Pleszczynski, M.. 1985. Differential effects of leukotriene B4 on T4+ and T8+ lymphocyte phenotype and immunoregulatory functions. J. Immunol. 135:1357.[Abstract]
  18. Rola-Pleszczynski, M., I. Lemaire. 1985. Leukotrienes augment interleukin 1 production by human monocytes. J. Immunol. 135:3958.[Abstract]
  19. Rola-Pleszczynski, M., P. A. Chavaillaz, I. Lemaire. 1986. Stimulation of interleukin 2 and interferon {gamma} production by leukotriene B4 in human lymphocyte cultures. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Med. 23:207.[Medline]
  20. Rola-Pleszczynski, M., L. Bouvrette, D. Gingras, M. Girard. 1987. Identification of interferon-{gamma} as the lymphokine that mediates leukotriene B4-induced immunoregulation. J. Immunol. 139:513.[Abstract]
  21. Rosenthal, A., C. R. Pace-Asciak. 1983. Potent vasoconstriction of the isolated perfused rat kidney by leukotrienes C4 and D4. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 61:325.[Medline]
  22. Badr, K. F., C. Baylis, J. M. Pfeffer, M. A. Pfeffer, R. J. Soberman, R. A. Lewis, K. F. Austen, E. J. Corey, B. M. Brenner. 1984. Renal and systemic hemodynamic responses to intravenous infusion of leukotriene C4 in the rat. Circ. Res. 54:492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Badr, K. F., B. M. Brenner, I. Ichikawa. 1987. Effects of leukotriene D4 on glomerular dynamics in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. 253:F239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Allen, D. E., M. Gellai. 1990. Hemodynamic responses to leukotriene receptor stimulation in conscious rats. Am. J. Physiol. 258:R1034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Barnett, R., P. Goldwasser, L. A. Scharschmidt, D. Schlondorff. 1986. Effects of leukotrienes on isolated rat glomeruli and cultured mesangial cells. Am. J. Physiol. 250:F838.
  26. Simonson, M. S., M. J. Dunn. 1986. Leukotriene C4 and D4 contract rat glomerular mesangial cells. Kidney Int. 30:524.[Medline]
  27. Badr, K. F., S. Mong, R. L. Hoover, M. Schwartzberg, J. Ebert, H. R. Jacobson, R. C. Harris. 1989. Leukotriene D4 binding and signal transduction in rat glomerular mesangial cells. Am. J. Physiol. 257:F280.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Feuerstein, N., M. Foegh, P. W. Ramwell. 1981. Leukotrienes C4 and D4 induce prostaglandin and thromboxane release from rat peritoneal macrophages. Br. J. Pharmacol. 72:389.[Medline]
  29. Omini, C., G. C. Folco, T. Vigano, G. Rossoni, G. Brunelli, F. Berti. 1981. Leukotriene-C4 induces generation of PGI2 and TXA2 in guinea-pig in vivo. Pharmacol. Res. Commun. 13:633.[Medline]
  30. Goulet, J. L., J. N. Snouwaert, A. M. Latour, T. M. Coffman, B. H. Koller. 1994. Altered inflammatory responses in leukotriene-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:12852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Chen, X.-S., J. R. Sheller, E. N. Johnson, C. D. Funk. 1994. Role of leukotrienes revealed by targeted disruption of the 5-lipoxygenase gene. Nature 372:179.[Medline]
  32. Goulet, J. L., R. S. Byrum, M. L. Key, M. Nguyen, V. A. Wagoner, B. H. Koller. 2000. Genetic factors determine the contribution of leukotrienes to acute inflammatory responses. J. Immunol. 164:4899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Coffman, T. M., S. Geier, S. Ibrahim, R. J. Griffiths, R. F. Spurney, O. Smithies, B. H. Koller, F. Sanfilippo. 1993. Improved renal function in mouse kidney allografts lacking MHC class I antigens. J. Immunol. 151:425.[Abstract]
  34. Spurney, R. F., P. Ruiz, D. S. Pisetsky, T. M. Coffman. 1991. Enhanced renal leukotriene production in murine lupus: role of lipoxygenase metabolites. Kidney Int. 39:95.[Medline]
  35. Bradford, M. M.. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principal of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248.[Medline]
  36. Mannon, R. B., K. Roberts, P. Ruiz, V. Laubach, T. M. Coffman. 1999. Inducible nitric oxide synthase promotes cytokine expression in cardiac allografts but is not required for efficient rejection. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 18:819.[Medline]
  37. Bach, F. H., D. H. Sachs. 1987. Current concepts: immunology. Transplantation immunology. N. Engl. J. Med. 317:489.[Abstract]
  38. Halloran, P. F., S. M. Cockfield, J. Madrenas. 1989. The mediators of inflammation (interleukin 1, interferon-{gamma}, and tumor necrosis factor) and their relevance to rejection. Transplant. Proc. 21:26.[Medline]
  39. Goulet, J. L., R. C. Griffiths, P. Ruiz, R. F. Spurney, D. S. Pisetsky, B. H. Koller, T. M. Coffman. 1999. Deficiency of 5-lipoxygenase abolishes sex-related survival differences in MRL-lpr/lpr mice. J. Immunol. 163:359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Haribabu, B., M. W. Verghese, D. A. Steeber, D. D. Sellars, C. B. Bock, R. Snyderman. 2000. Targeted disruption of the leukotriene B4 receptor in mice reveals its role in inflammation and platelet-activating factor-induced anaphylaxis. J. Exp. Med. 192:433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Gibbons, C. P., K. N. Wiley, N. J. Lindsey, M. Fox, S. Beck, D. N. Slater, F. E. Preston, C. B. Brown, A. T. Raftery. 1987. Cortical and vascular prostaglandin synthesis during renal allograft rejection in the rat. Transplantation 43:472.[Medline]
  42. Anderson, C. B., G. A. Sicard, D. W. McKeel, E. E. Etheredge. 1984. Prostaglandin synthesis associated with renal allograft rejection in the dog. Transplantation 37:438.[Medline]
  43. Serhan, C. N.. 1994. Lipoxin biosynthesis and its impact in inflammatory and vascular events. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1212:1.[Medline]
  44. Kerstein, S., B. Desvergne, W. Wahli. 2000. Roles of PPARs in health and disease. Nature 405:421.[Medline]
  45. Devchand, P. R., H. Keller, J. M. Peters, M. Velazquez, F. J. Gonzalez, W. Wahli. 1996. The PPAR{alpha}-leukotriene B4 pathway to inflammation control. Nature 384:39.[Medline]
  46. Devchand, P. R., A. K. Hihi, M. Perroud, W. D. Schleuning, B. M. Spiegelman, W. Wahli. 1999. Chemical probes that differentially modulate PPAR{alpha} and BLTR, nuclear and cell surface receptors for leukotriene B4. J. Biol. Chem. 274:23341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Yokomizo, Y., T. Izumi, K. Chang, Y. Takuwa, T. Shimizu. 1997. A G-protein coupled receptor for leukotriene B4 that mediates chemotaxis. Nature 387:620.[Medline]
  48. Yokomizo, T., K. Kato, K. Terawaki, T. Izumi, T. Shimizu. 2000. A second leukotriene B4 receptor, BLT2: a new threapeutic target in inflammation and immunological disorders. J. Exp. Med. 192:421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Kamohara, M., J. Takasaki, M. Matsumoto, T. Saito, T. Ohishi, H. Ishii, K. Furuichi. 2000. Molecular cloning and characterization of another leukotriene B4 receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 275:27000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Lynch, K. R., G. P. O’Neill, Q. Liu, D.-S. Im, N. Sawyer, K. M. Metters, N. Coulombe, M. Abramovitz, D. J. Figueroa, Z. Zeng, et al 1999. Characterization of the human cysteinyl leukotriene CysLT1 receptor. Nature 399:789.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Christmas, K. Tolentino, V. Primo, K. Z. Berry, R. C. Murphy, M. Chen, D. M. Lee, and R. J. Soberman
Cytochrome P-450 4F18 Is the Leukotriene B4 {omega}-1/{omega}-2 Hydroxylase in Mouse Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes: IDENTIFICATION AS THE FUNCTIONAL ORTHOLOGUE OF HUMAN POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUKOCYTE CYP4F3A IN THE DOWN-REGULATION OF RESPONSES TO LTB4
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7189 - 7196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
N. S. A. Patel, S. Cuzzocrea, P. K. Chatterjee, R. Di Paola, L. Sautebin, D. Britti, and C. Thiemermann
Reduction of Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in 5-Lipoxygenase Knockout Mice and by the 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitor Zileuton
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2004; 66(2): 220 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. E. Jones, S. Holden, L. Tenaillon, U. Bhatia, K. Seuwen, P. Tranter, J. Turner, R. Kettle, R. Bouhelal, S. Charlton, et al.
Expression and Characterization of a 5-oxo-6E,8Z,11Z,14Z-Eicosatetraenoic Acid Receptor Highly Expressed on Human Eosinophils and Neutrophils
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2003; 63(3): 471 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
S. SAADI, L. E. WRENSHALL, and J. L. PLATT
Regional manifestations and control of the immune system
FASEB J, June 1, 2002; 16(8): 849 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goulet, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Coffman, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goulet, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Coffman, T. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Kidney Transplantation


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS