|
|
||||||||





*
Department of Dermatology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany;
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907;
Department of Dermatology, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, Cornell University, New York, NY 10021; and
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
UV-induced immunosuppression can be both local and systemic, and the effects of UVR on immunocompetent cells within the skin can be direct as well as indirect. To induce biological effects, photons have to be absorbed by chromophores. Basically, two major cutaneous chromophores for UVB have been identified in the epidermis, DNA and urocanic acid (UCA). Upon absorption of photons, DNA forms cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and (6-4)-photoproducts (5). UV-induced dimer formation in particular leads to the release of immunosuppressive cytokines from keratinocytes, such as IL-10 (6). Furthermore, in >90% of UV-induced human skin cancers, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers can be localized within the cell cycle regulatory gene p53, which also acts as a tumor suppressor gene, suggesting a significant role of UV-induced DNA damage in photocarcinogenesis (7, 8).
UCA, a histidine derivative synthesized by keratinocytes, accumulates within the epidermis in significant amounts since catabolic enzymes are absent from that site. Two isoforms exist, trans- and cis-UCA. Trans-UCA, the major cutaneous isomer of UCA, isomerizes to cis-UCA upon exposure to UV. Increased amounts of cis-UCA can be detected for several weeks after UV exposure in the skin as well as more transiently in the blood (reviewed in Ref. 9). Cis-UCA has been shown to suppress cellular immune reactions, such as delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to HSV (10). In addition, systemic application of cis-UCA prolonged allograft survival in mice (11). Topically applied trans-UCA in combination with chronic UVR treatment resulted in enhanced photocarcinogenesis in mice, indicating that cis-UCA may be involved in the generation of UV-induced skin cancer probably by causing immunosuppression (12). To this end, previous investigations by our group have shown that cis- but not trans-UCA inhibits the ability of Langerhans cells (LC), the primary APC in the skin, to present tumor Ag (TA), both for the induction and elicitation of antitumoral immune responses in mice (13). Since LC are important in the generation of antitumoral immunity, these findings are suggestive for a role of UCA in the development of UV-induced skin cancer.
IL-12 is a heterodimeric cytokine that is produced by a variety of immunocompetent cells, such as dendritic cells, macrophages, B cells, and even keratinocytes (Refs. 14, 15 ; reviewed in Ref. 16). Besides its activating effects on NK and cytotoxic T cells, IL-12 exerts costimulatory and regulatory effects on Th cells skewing immune responses toward the Th1 type. Accordingly, IL-12 is crucially involved in the induction of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) and DTH reactions (17, 18). In addition, IL-12 was shown to be the first cytokine able to antagonize UV-induced immunosuppression (19). Intraperitoneal injection of IL-12 into UV-irradiated mice enabled sensitization to take place, even when the hapten was applied onto UV-exposed skin, a procedure that usually fails to induce sensitization (20). Moreover, IL-12 is able to break established immunotolerance induced by UVR. UV-tolerized mice can be resensitized with the respective hapten, if IL-12 is administered before resensitization. The mechanisms by which IL-12 counteracts UV-induced immunosuppression are still not established.
Since cis-UCA plays an important role in UV-induced immunsuppression, we were interested in investigating whether IL-12 also antagonizes the immunoinhibitory effects of cis-UCA. Ex vivo treatment of epidermal LC with IL-12 completely prevented cis-UCA-induced suppression of the induction as well as the elicitation of protective tumor immunity. Accordingly, IL-12 prevented cis-UCA-induced inhibition of Ag presentation by LC, indicating that IL-12 can antagonize the immunosuppression induced by cis-UCA. To assess the in vivo relevance of cis-UCA-induced immunosuppression for photocarcinogenesis, chronically UV-exposed mice were treated with a mAb with specificity for cis-UCA. Ab treatment significantly reduced the probability of tumor development. Together, these data indicate an important role of cis-UCA in the development of UV-induced skin cancer and point to a therapeutic alternative in the prevention of photocarcinogenesis by inhibiting the effects of cis-UCA, possibly by application of IL-12.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Six- to 8-wk-old female A/J (H-2a/d) and BALB/c (H-2d) mice were obtained from Harlan-Winkelmann (Borchen, Germany). OVA-TCR-specific transgenic (DO11) mice (BALB/c; H-2d) originally generated by Murphy et al. (21) were kindly provided by Dr. T. Blankenstein (Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany).
Tumors
The S1509a methylcholanthrene-induced spindle cell tumor cell line, orginally derived from A/J mice, was kindly provided by Dr. M. I. Green (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). S1509a cells were maintained in tissue culture at 37°C and 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (PAA, Linz, Austria), 100 U/ml penicillin (PAA), 100 µg/ml streptomycin (PAA), 0.1 mM essential and nonessential amino acids (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), 2 mM L-glutamine (PAA), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Biochrom), and 0.01 M HEPES buffer (Life Technologies, Parsley, U.K.) (complete medium). S1509a cells usually grow progressively in naive syngeneic recipients and have been demonstrated to induce a variety of immunological responses (22).
Reagents
Murine rGM-CSF was a kind gift from Immunex (Seattle, WA). Murine rIL-12 (p70 heterodimer) was kindly provided by Dr. S. Wolf (Genetics Institute, Boston, MA). Anti-Thy-1.2 mAb (clone 53-2.1) was obtained from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA) and used at 1:2000. Low-toxicity rabbit complement was obtained from Harlan Sera-Lab (Loughborough, U.K.) and used at 1:40 in PBS. Enzymes used during preparation and dissociation of epidermal cells (EC) were dispase (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), DNase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and trypsin (Life Technologies).
Trans-UCA was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Cis-UCA was synthethized from trans-UCA in three steps by photoisomerization of the trans-methyl ester and saponification to the acid (23). The chemical and isomeric purity of cis-UCA was 99.5%, as tested by HPLC.
A mAb with specificity cis-UCA was generated in BALB/c mice, as described by Norval and colleagues (24, 25), and used as previously optimized. Mice were injected i.p. with 300 µl of 1/500 dilution of the cis-UCA Ab ascitic fluid (equivalent to 0.1 µg of IgG1) in PBS. For controls, mice were injected i.p. with the same amount of an irrelevant isotype-matched IgG1 Ab (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in 300 µl of PBS.
Soluble tumor-associated Ags (TA) were prepared from freeze-thaw lysates of S1509a tumor cells, as described elsewhere (22, 26). Briefly, S1509a cells (107/ml in complete medium) were disrupted by three freeze-thaw cycles and centrifuged at 600 x g for 20 min. The supernatant was collected and spun again at 13,000 x g for 1 h. The remaining supernatant was used as a source of soluble TA.
Preparation of epidermal cells and immunization protocol
EC were prepared using a standard protocol, as described elsewhere (22, 26). Briefly, truncal skins of shaved and chemically depilated (Pilca med Crème; Asid Bonz, Böblingen, Germany) mice were removed and depleted of s.c. panniculus carnosus. The skins were floated dermis side down on 0.5 U/ml dispase and 0.4% trypsin in Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS for 40 min at 37°C; epidermal sheets were then collected and dissociated by gentle stirring for 20 min. The resulting EC were filtered through nylon gauze (Nitex; Tetco, Elmsford, NY) and washed. Thy-1+-bearing cells were deleted by incubation in anti-Thy-1.2+ mAb for 30 min on ice, followed by washing and subsequent incubation in low-toxicity rabbit complement for 30 min at 37°C. Dead cells were removed by treatment with 0.05% trypsin and 80 µg/ml DNase in Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS for 5 min at room temperature. Typically, the EC population contained between 5 and 15% I-A+ cells. Viability and percentage of I-A+ cells were assessed by flow cytometry analysis immediately before injection into mice, and differences between groups within experiments were negligible.
EC were then incubated in trans- or cis-UCA (100 µg/ml) or complete medium and 50 U/ml GM-CSF for 16 h of culture at 37°C. Other groups of EC were cultured in 200 ng/ml IL-12 3 h before addition of 50 U/ml GM-CSF and cis-UCA or in GM-CSF, cis-UCA, and IL-12 together. Another group of EC was incubated in GM-CSF and cis-UCA for 16 h and subsequently exposed to IL-12 for 3 h. These concentrations were chosen according to previously published data (13, 20, 27). Control cells were cultured in 50 U/ml GM-CSF alone for 16 h. After depletion of dead cells by incubation for 3 min at room temperature in 0.05% trypsin and 80 mg/ml DNase, EC were washed three times and incubated in a suspension containing TA from 1 x 107/ml S1509a tumor cells or in complete medium alone for 2 h at 37°C. After TA pulsing, the EC were washed extensively to remove soluble TA. Each naive recipient was then injected s.c. on the lower back with 2 x 105 EC. This immunization was repeated three times at weekly intervals. One week after the last immunization, mice were challenged with 2 x 106 live S1509a tumor cells s.c. on the lower lateral abdomen, and tumor growth was assessed every 48 h by measurement with a Vernier caliper.
Earlier studies showed that this immunization protocol generates tumor immunity in immunized mice, leading to immunological rejection of the tumor over a period of 714 days. The specificity of tumor immunity in this system was previously demonstrated by showing that immunization with tumor cell lysates from an unrelated tumor line (UV-5496-1) did not lead to immunity against S1509a (22).
Elicitation of S1509a tumor immunity and measurement of DTH
Mice (n = 5) were immunized against S1509a by three injections of 0.51 x 106 dead S1509a cells (killed by repetitive freeze thawing) s.c. at 5- to 7-day intervals. Generation of protective immunity in these mice was confirmed by rejection of a subsequent tumor challenge and induction of DTH against this tumor (data not shown).
EC from naive donor mice were generated and Thy-1+ cells deleted, as described above. EC were then pulsed with S1509a TA for 2 h and washed extensively, and 5 x 105 cells then injected into a hind footpad of tumor-immune mice. Some groups of EC were treated with cis- or trans-UCA (100 µg/ml) for 3 h before TA pulsing. Other groups were treated with cis-UCA and various concentrations of IL-12 (200, 100, or 10 ng/ml) for 3 h. Specific footpad swelling was measured as the mean difference between the footpad thickness of the injected vs the uninjected side 24 h after injection.
Contact hypersensitivity (CHS)
CHS experiments were performed as described previously (28). Briefly, mice (groups n = 5) were sensitized by painting 25 µl of 0.5% 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene or 50 µl 2% oxazolone (both from Sigma-Aldrich), respectively, in acetone:corn oil (4:1) on the shaved back. For elicitation of CHS responses, 10 µl of 0.3% dinitrofluorobenzene, or 0.5% oxazolone, respectively, was painted on both sides of each ear 5 days after immunization. CHS was determined by the degree of ear swelling of the hapten-exposed ear compared with the ear thickness before challenge and measured with a micrometer (Mitutoyo, Tokyo, Japan) 24 h after challenge. Mice that were ear challenged without prior sensitization served as negative controls.
Cis- or trans-UCA were diluted in sterile endotoxin-free saline, and treatment (200 µg/200 µl) was performed i.p. 1 h before immunization. IL-12 was diluted in endotoxin-free saline, and treatment (100 ng/100 µl) was given 1 h before application of cis-UCA. This dose of IL-12 has been shown to effectively block UV-induced immunosuppression (19, 20). Heat-inactivated IL-12 (95°C for 30 min) was used as a negative control (data not shown).
OVA Ag presentation and Ag-processing assay (DO11 assay)
OVA is taken up by APCs, processed, and presented to T cells. On the other hand, the small OVA peptide323339 is only presented, but not processed by APCs. To investigate the effects of UCA on Ag processing or Ag presentation, EC were prepared and enriched for LC content, as described. These LC were then incubated in medium, medium plus cis- or trans-UCA (100 µg/ml) in the presence of either OVA (5 mg/ml) or OVA peptide323339 (5 µg/ml) for 24 h. OVA-TCR-specific T cells were prepared from the spleens of OVA-TCR transgenic (DO11) mice. Sixty to 70% of these transgenic T cells express a specific TCR that recognizes the processed small variant of OVA, the OVA peptide323339. The differently treated LC suspensions were incubated in serial dilutions with OVA-specific transgenic (DO11) T cells for 5 days. Subsequently, [3H]thymidine incorporation was used as a measure of T cell stimulation.
UV irradiation, tumor induction, and histology
Within the solar spectrum, the UVB range (290320 nm) is responsible for carcinogenesis and immunosuppression. Therefore, a bank of four Philips UV-B TL40W/12 sunlamps (Philips, Hamburg, Germany) with an emission spectrum from 280 to 350 nm with a peak at 306 nm was used for irradiation. These lamps deliver an average dose of 8 W/m2 as measured with an IL-1700 UV detector and a SED 24 (3124) filter (both from International Light, Newburyport, MA). The mice (BALB/c) were placed on a shelf 20 cm below the light bulbs for irradiation. The cage order was systematically rotated before each treatment to compensate for uneven lamp output along the shelf, as described before (29, 30, 31). The mice, 20 for each group (10 males and 10 females per cage), were shaved with electric clippers on the entire dorsum once per week. Beginning at 10 wk of age, mice were irradiated three times per week with 2.5 kJ/m2 for 4 wk, 5 kJ/m2 for 4 wk, and then 10 kJ/m2 for 4 mo. Before each UV treatment, one group of mice was injected i.p. with anti-cis-UCA Ab (0.1 µg/300 µl), and another group received an irrelevant IgG Ab (0.1 µg/300 µl). Afterward, all mice were observed twice weekly for tumor development for an additional 6 mo. The location and growth of each tumor exceeding 2 mm in diameter were recorded. Excision biopsies from all tumors were fixed in paraformaldehyde and embedded in parablast. Sections were stained with H&E and documented by a video computer-assisted digital image-processing technique (DISKUS version 3.99 for Windows 95; C. H. Hilgers, Königswinter, Germany).
Data generation and statistical evaluation
Tumor volumes were calculated as the product of the maximal tumor diameter in three perpendicular directions, measured with a Vernier caliper. This method has previously been confirmed to correlate well with the tumor weight (22, 26). To avoid unnecessary pain to the experimental animals, mice were sacrificed after the tumor volume exceeded 1000 mm3. To evaluate statistical differences between the mean tumor volume in the various experimental groups, the best-fit slope of the tumor growth in each animal was determined using Cricket Graph software (version 1.5.1; Computer Associates International, Islandia, NY) on a Macintosh computer and the significance of differences between the means of the slopes for the groups of interest was tested by the two-tailed Students t test for unpaired data. The significance of differences between the mean values obtained for CHS and DTH experiments was assessed by the two-tailed Students t test for unpaired data.
The method of Kaplan and Meier was used to describe the probability of tumor development in the carcinogenesis study. This is a life table analysis, and also takes into account animals that die before developing a tumor. Statistical differences for the development of tumors between the differentially treated groups of mice were determined using a log rank test by Peto et al. (32). The differences in tumor-latent periods were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cis- but not trans-UCA has been shown to
inhibit the function of LC to present TA for the induction and
elicitation of antitumoral immunity (13). To investigate
whether IL-12 can block the immunosuppressive effects of
cis-UCA on LC Ag-presenting function, epidermal cells were
prepared and enriched for LC. Groups of LC were treated with either
cis- or trans-UCA in the presence of GM-CSF for
16 h. IL-12 was added either along with cis-UCA, or
3 h before and 3 h after cis-UCA, respectively.
Subsequently, all groups were washed and pulsed with TA. Appropriate
controls (no IL-12, no cis-UCA, or no TA) were included. LC
were then washed extensively to remove all unbound TA and injected s.c.
into naive mice. These immunizations were repeated three times at
weekly intervals. One week after the last immunization, viable S1509a
tumor cells were injected s.c. at a site different from that of
immunization, and tumor size was scored over time. As demonstrated
previously (13, 22), GM-CSF-treated and TA-pulsed
epidermal cells induced protective tumor immunity, which was suppressed
upon exposure of LC with cis-UCA (Fig. 1
). Irrespective of whether given
together, before, or after cis-UCA, IL-12 treatment
completely prevented tumor growth. This indicates that IL-12 prevents
cis-UCA-induced inhibition of the induction of antitumoral
immune responses.
|
|
To study whether IL-12 protects from cis-UCA-induced
suppression only in the tumor immunity model or whether this applies
also for other types of immune responses, the CHS model was
used. Mice were immunized against the hapten oxazolone by
epicutaneous painting. One group was treated i.p. with
cis-UCA 1 h before immunization; another group received
IL-12 i.p. 1 h before cis-UCA application. Upon
challenge with oxazolone on the ear 24 h later, mice that were
only immunized mounted a significant ear-swelling response (positive
control), whereas mice that were only challenged without prior
immunization failed to do so (negative control). The data in Fig. 3
show that cis-UCA injection
significantly suppressed hapten-specific immune responses.
Interestingly, IL-12 treatment was able to protect mice from the
immunosuppressive effects of cis-UCA, since mice that were
injected with IL-12 before cis-UCA application and
immunization mounted a significant ear-swelling response after hapten
challenge indistinguishable from the positive control. Injection of
heat-inactivated IL-12 before cis-UCA did not restore the
CHS response (data not shown). These findings suggest that IL-12
prevents the inhibitory effects of cis-UCA on
hapten-specific immune responses in vivo.
|
To date little is known of how cis-UCA exerts its
inhibitory effects on APC. Our own investigations as well as others
revealed no significant effects of cis-UCA on the expression
of I-A or costimulatory molecules on LC or monocytes (13, 33). To determine whether cis-UCA affects Ag
processing and/or Ag presentation by LC, the OVA-DO11 assay was used.
To study Ag processing in this assay, LC are pulsed with the Ag OVA,
which is intracellularly processed and presented to transgenic OVA-DO11
T cells that express a TCR specific for the OVA
peptide323339 (Fig. 4
A). To evaluate Ag
presentation independent of processing, LC are exposed to the OVA
peptide323339 that is presented to transgenic
OVA-DO11 T cells without the necessity of being processed (Fig. 4
B). Subsequently, T cell proliferation can be quantitated
as a measure of stimulation. Three hours before exposure to OVA or
peptide, LC were exposed to cis-UCA, trans-UCA,
or left untreated. Cis- but not trans-UCA
significantly suppressed the Ag-processing function of OVA-pulsed LC
(Fig. 4
A). Ag presentation by peptide-pulsed LC was
significantly suppressed by cis- but not
trans-UCA to the same degree (Fig. 4
B), implying
that cis-UCA may exert its inhibitory effects primarily via
impairment of Ag presentation. Cis-UCA-induced inhibition of
both Ag processing and Ag presentation was completely lost when LC were
preincubated with IL-12 (Fig. 4
).
|
The data to date suggest that cis-UCA blocks Ag
presentation by LC, which can be reversed by IL-12. Accordingly, IL-12
prevents cis-UCA-induced inhibition of CHS and tumor
immunity. The inhibitory effect of cis-UCA on tumor Ag
presentation by LC as well as the elevated concentrations of
cis-UCA within the skin after UV treatment (13, 34) suggest that cis-UCA may play a role in the
development of UV-induced skin cancer. Accordingly, topical application
of UCA, followed by chronic UVB exposure resulted in augmented skin
tumor development (12). These data clearly indicated that
cis-UCA can promote photocarcinogenesis. However, due to the
external application of UCA, amounts greater than those found naturally
were present, and therefore this study does not give an answer as to
whether endogenously produced cis-UCA plays a role in
photocarcinogenesis. To address this issue, photocarcinogenesis
experiments were performed in which mice were injected with an
anti-cis-UCA Ab during chronic irradiation. Groups of
mice were UVB irradiated three times per week on their shaved backs for
6 mo. Immediately before the UV exposure, one group of animals was
treated i.p. with an anti-cis-UCA Ab (0.1 µg). Another
group of mice received equivalent amounts of an isotype-matched
irrelevant IgG Ab. The Ab treatment was discontinued after termination
of the irradiation period. One group of mice was only UVB irradiated as
a positive control. During the course of the experiment, skin tumor
development and tumor growth were documented over a period of 400 days
in total. The data in Fig. 5
indicate
that in the two control groups (untreated or IgG treated), all mice had
developed UV-induced skin tumors after
6 mo (
182 days). However,
the development of UV-induced cutaneous malignancies in the
anti-cis-UCA Ab-treated group of mice was significantly
reduced. At 200 days, only
50% of mice in the
anti-cis-UCA Ab-treated group developed tumors compared
with almost 100% of the mice for the other two groups. Together, these
findings suggest an important role for endogenous cis-UCA
during photocarcinogenesis.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is ample evidence that cis-UCA contributes to UV-induced immunosuppression (42), and may also be involved in photocarcinogenesis (12, 13). Accordingly, Reeve et al. (12) observed >10 years ago that topically applied UCA markedly increased the overt tumor yield and the degree of malignancy in hairless mice exposed chronically to UVR. Although this was the first in vivo demonstration that cis-UCA supports the development of UV-induced skin cancer, its implications concerning the role of endogenously produced cis-UCA were limited since UCA was applied topically, and thus, excess amounts of UCA were used. To answer whether endogenous cis-UCA is involved in the generation of UV-induced skin cancer, we used a cis-UCA Ab that reverses some of the effects of UV on the immune system (24) in the photocarcinogenesis model. Intraperitoneal injection of this Ab after each UV exposure caused a significant reduction in the development of skin tumors following an overall irradiation period of 6 mo. Thus, these findings demonstrate for the first time that endogenous cis-UCA does play a role in the development of UV-induced skin cancer in the murine model.
Despite the clear in vivo data presented in this study and in previous
reports (11, 43, 44, 45), it still remains to be determined
how cis-UCA impairs an immune response. Since incubation of
LC with cis-UCA inhibits the ability of these cells to
sensitize mice for CHS and DTH reactions against haptens and tumor Ags,
respectively, cis-UCA may directly suppress the function of
LC. These reports are in agreement with the finding that
cis-UCA altered vimentin expression among LC, leading to the
destruction of their cytoskeleton and reduced APC function
(46). Additionally, cis-UCA was able to
significantly suppress the mixed epidermal cell lymphocyte reaction,
but murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells exposed to
cis-UCA demonstrated only feeble impairment of their
allostimulatory capacity (47, 48). Although the epidermal
cell suspensions we used were enriched for LC, we were not using
purified LC. Therefore, an indirect effect mediated via contaminating
keratinocytes cannot be excluded. On the other hand, previous studies
have shown that incubation of keratinocytes with cis-UCA
does not induce the release of immunosuppressive cytokines, including
IL-10 or TNF-
, which ultimately may impair LC (13, 49).
In addition, release of PGE2 does not appear to
play an important role, since the inhibitory effects of
cis-UCA were still preserved in the presence of indomethacin
(13). In addition, cis-UCA does not affect the
expression of surface molecules, including MHC class II and
costimulatory molecules (33).
To test whether cis-UCA interferes with Ag processing, we used the OVA-DO11 assay. For studying Ag processing, LC are pulsed with OVA, while the OVA peptide323339 does not need to be processed. If cis-UCA exclusively interferes with Ag processing, the stimulatory response upon OVA pulse should be inhibited, while the peptide response should be unaltered. However, cis-UCA inhibited both OVA- and peptide-induced proliferation to the same extent, which excludes the possibility that cis-UCA interferes only with Ag processing. Based on the fact that OVA- and peptide-driven proliferation were equally affected by cis-UCA, it is likely that cis-UCA affects primarily Ag presentation.
Since UV-induced immunosuppression may lead to the exacerbation of infectious diseases and also contributes to photocarcinogenesis (reviewed in Refs. 3, 4 , and 50), strategies to counteract UV-induced immunosuppression are of practical importance. IL-12 has been recognized to exert such capacities (reviewed in Ref. 16). We and others observed that IL-12 is able to prevent UV-induced inhibition of the induction of CHS and DTH when injected i.p. between UV exposure and Ag application (19, 20). Even more importantly, IL-12 was found to be able to break established UV-mediated tolerance. Mice, which had been tolerized in a hapten-specific way by application of haptens onto UV-exposed skin, were rendered again susceptible to the respective hapten when IL-12 was injected i.p. before resensitization (20). Although the detailed mechanisms by which IL-12 breaks tolerance are not known, there are indications that IL-12 might protect APCs from apoptotic cell death induced by hapten-specific regulatory T cells (19).
Since cis-UCA also contributes to UV-induced immunosuppression, we were interested to study whether IL-12 is also able to antagonize the immunosuppressive effects of cis-UCA. The present study provides several lines of evidence that this is indeed the case. Intraperitoneal injection of IL-12 prevented the suppression of the induction of CHS caused by i.p. administered cis-UCA. In addition, in vitro exposure of LC to IL-12 prevented cis-UCA-mediated inhibition of the induction as well as the elicitation of tumor immunity. Interestingly, IL-12 protected the TA-presenting function of LC when administered before, together with, and even after cis-UCA incubation. Likewise, cis-UCA-mediated inhibition of both OVA- and peptide-induced proliferation in the OVA-DO11 assay was completely prevented when LC were preincubated with IL-12.
Taken together, the present study further confirms the immunosuppressive properties of cis-UCA both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, it shows for the first time that IL-12 is able to reverse the inhibitory effects of cis-UCA on the induction of CHS and tumor immunity. Inhibition of tumor immunity by cis-UCA may play a critical role in UV-induced carcinogenesis, since treatment with cis-UCA Ab in vivo is associated with a decreased incidence of skin tumors in the photocarcinogenesis model. In conclusion, these data indicate an important role of cis-UCA in the development of UV-induced skin cancer and point to an additional strategy for the prevention of photocarcinogenesis by inhibiting the effects of cis-UCA, possibly by the application of IL-12.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Stefan Beissert, Department of Dermatology, University of Münster, Von-Esmarch-Strasse 58, D-48149 Münster, Germany. E-mail address: beisser{at}uni-muenster.de ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: UVR, UV radiation; CHS, contact hypersensitivity; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity; EC, epidermal cell; LC, Langerhans cell; TA, tumor Ag; UCA, urocanic acid. ![]()
Received for publication July 13, 2001. Accepted for publication September 27, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. J. Invest. Dermatol. 114:149.
. J. Invest. Dermatol. 99:1992a69S.
. J. Immunol. 48:1992b3072.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kaneko, U. Smetana-Just, M. Matsui, A. R. Young, S. John, M. Norval, and S. L. Walker cis-Urocanic Acid Initiates Gene Transcription in Primary Human Keratinocytes J. Immunol., July 1, 2008; 181(1): 217 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Walterscheid, D. X. Nghiem, N. Kazimi, L. K. Nutt, D. J. McConkey, M. Norval, and S. E. Ullrich Cis-urocanic acid, a sunlight-induced immunosuppressive factor, activates immune suppression via the 5-HT2A receptor PNAS, November 14, 2006; 103(46): 17420 - 17425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rinaldi, P. Moroni, L. Leino, J. Laihia, M. J. Paape, and D. D. Bannerman Effect of cis-urocanic acid on bovine neutrophil generation of reactive oxygen species. J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2006; 89(11): 4188 - 4201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |