The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, T. N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Engelhard, V. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, T. N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Engelhard, V. H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 167: 5824-5831.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Manipulation of Avidity to Improve Effectiveness of Adoptively Transferred CD8+ T Cells for Melanoma Immunotherapy in Human MHC Class I-Transgenic Mice1

Timothy N. J. Bullock, David W. Mullins, Teresa A. Colella and Victor H. Engelhard2

Department of Microbiology and Carter Immunology Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The adoptive transfer of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells into tumor-bearing hosts provides an attractive alternative to vaccination-based active immunotherapy of melanoma. The development of techniques that result in the preferential expansion of tumor-reactive T cells is therefore of great importance. In this study, we report the generation of HLA-A*0201-restricted CD8+ T cell populations that recognize either tyrosinase369–376 or gp100209–217 from tolerant human class I MHC-transgenic mice by using single amino acid-substituted variant peptides. Low peptide concentration or restimulation with the parent peptide was used to enhance the functional avidity, defined by stimulation of IFN-{gamma} accumulation, and cross-reactivity of the resulting T cell populations. We found a direct correlation between the ability of a T cell population to respond in vitro to low concentrations of the precise peptide expressed on the tumor and its ability to delay the outgrowth of B16 melanoma after adoptive transfer. Surprisingly, we found that some T cells that exhibited high functional avidity and were effective in controlling tumor outgrowth exhibited low structural avidity, as judged by MHC-tetramer staining. Our results establish strategies for the development and selection of CD8+ T cell populations that persist despite peripheral tolerance, and that can control melanoma outgrowth. Furthermore, they support the use of human MHC class I-transgenic mice as a preclinical model for developing effective immunotherapies that can be rapidly extended into therapeutic settings.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The isolation of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from melanomas has resulted in the identification of many tumor-associated MHC class I-restricted peptide epitopes (1, 2). Major sources of these epitopes are melanocyte differentiation proteins (MDP),3foot;3158f3;10;ZPICKFOOT;> including gp100, Mart-1, tyrosinase, and tyrosinase-related proteins (TRP)-1 and -2. Because the peptides derived from these proteins are presented by tumors from many different patients (3, 4), they are attractive bases for immunotherapies that would be applicable to a broad patient population. On the other hand, it is clear that self-tolerance can limit the immune response to MDP (5, 6, 7). Thus, alternative methods to overcome this problem are under active investigation. An attractive approach to overcome the self-tolerance to MDP is through the in vitro expansion of residual MDP-reactive CD8+ T cells, followed by reinfusion into the tumor-bearing host (8, 9). The potential for the outgrowth of tumor variants that express decreased levels of the targeted Ag or MHC class I molecules (10, 11) means that effective adoptive immunotherapy will require the development of high avidity T cell populations, preferably to multiple Ags.

Two independent techniques have been described to isolate high-avidity CD8+ T cell populations in vitro. One approach is based on the original observation that the level of MHC-tetramer binding per T cell correlates with monovalent TCR affinity, as determined by surface plasmon resonance, and avidity (12, 13). Several studies have since used MHC-tetramer staining as a surrogate readout for TCR affinity, and have found that strong tetramer staining is correlated with high functional avidity, as measured by the dose of peptide required to stimulate an effector activity (14, 15, 16). Thus, MHC-tetramer staining has been used to isolate T cells from melanoma patients with enhanced tumor reactivity and sensitivity to lower concentrations of antigenic peptide pulsed onto target cells (16, 17). Alternatively, Alexander-Miller et al. (18) have demonstrated that HIV gp160-specific CD8+ T cells with higher functional avidity can be enriched by using lower concentrations of peptide during in vitro culture, and that such cells were more effective in limiting viral replication in vivo. This approach has been extended into tumor immunotherapy, in which the adoptive transfer of TRP-2-specific CD8+ T cells with higher functional avidity preferentially reduced the tumor burden in a B16 lung metastasis model (19).

We have previously studied the generation of CD8+ T cell responses to MDPs in transgenic mice expressing AAD, a chimeric MHC class I molecule composed of the {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 domains of HLA-A*0201, and {alpha}3 domain of H2-Dd. Because the murine and human MDP epitopes presented by HLA-A*0201/AAD are highly homologous or identical, this model provides information that can be usefully incorporated into the design of clinical trials using these Ags. We previously demonstrated that AAD-transgenic mice are unresponsive to HLA-A*0201-restricted epitopes derived from murine tyrosinase (Tyr369, FMDGTMSQV) (5) or gp100 (gp100209, ITDQVPFSV) (6). Although CD8+ T cell populations that react to these Ags could be generated by immunizing with single amino acid-substituted variant peptides, it had not been determined whether the cross-reactive T cells could be manipulated to recognize tumors. In this study, we have extended this work by making use of cumulative in vitro selection approaches, based on the manipulation of peptide concentration and specificity, to engineer high-avidity, tumor-reactive CD8+ T cell populations that are effective in controlling the outgrowth of the aggressive B16 melanoma after adoptive transfer.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

Transgenic mice expressing a chimeric MHC class I composed of the {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 domains of HLA-A*0201 and the {alpha}3 domain of H2-Dd (AAD) have been described previously (20). Mice were maintained in specific pathogen-free facilities at the University of Virginia.

Cell lines

C1R-AAD has been previously described (20). The C57BL/6-derived melanoma cell lines B16-F10 (CRL-6475) and B16-F1 (CRL-6323) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The generation of AAD+ transfectants of B16-F10 and B16-F1 is described in detail elsewhere (47). Transfectants were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 5% FBS supplemented with SerXtend (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA) and 300 µg/ml G418 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), and screened regularly by flow cytometric analysis for AAD expression using the HLA-A2-binding Abs CR11-351 or BB7.2.

Peptides

Synthetic peptides were made by standard F-moc chemistry using a model AMS422 peptide synthesizer (Gilson, Middleton, WI) in the Biomolecular Core Facility at the University of Virginia. All peptides were purified to >98% purity by reverse-phase HPLC on a C-8 column (Vydac, Hesperia, CA). Purity and identity were confirmed using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Finnigan, San Jose, CA).

Dendritic cells (DC)

DC were generated as described (21), with modifications (6). Immature DC were isolated on a StemSep column after incubation with a mixture of Abs that enrich for DC, then incubated at a 2:1 ratio overnight with irradiated CD40 ligand (CD40L)-transfected NIH-3T3 fibroblasts (a kind gift from R. Lapointe, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). These activated DC expressed high levels of MHC class I, MHC class II, CD80, CD86, and CD40, and demonstrated intracellular accumulation of IL-12 after a 5-h incubation in the presence of 10 µg/ml brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Immunization

DC were pulsed with the indicated concentration of peptide for 4 h at 37°C in HBSS containing 5% FBS and 5 µg/ml human {beta}2-microglobulin (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), washed twice, and resuspended in HBSS. Mice were injected in tail veins with 105 DC.

Generation of peptide-specific HLA-A*0201-restricted CD8+ T cells

Spleens from primed mice were harvested at least 3 wk after immunization. A total of 1.5 x 107 responder cells was incubated in upright 25-cm2 tissue culture flasks (Costar, Cambridge, MA) with 7 x 106 autologous irradiated (2500 rad) spleen cells that had been pulsed with the indicated concentration of peptide for 3 h at 37°C. After culture for 6–7 days, cytotoxic activity and cytokine production were assessed, as described above. T cell lines were established from the initial cultures and maintained by weekly restimulations, as described above, except that 5 x 105 T cells were incubated with 5 x 106 peptide-pulsed stimulators in 12-well plates (Costar) after week 2, and cultures were supplemented with 10 Cetus U/ml IL-2 on the day of restimulation and then 3 days later.

Intracellular cytokine staining

Cytokine expression was examined either ex vivo in freshly isolated spleen cells or in long-term T cell lines maintained in vitro. For ex vivo analysis, CD8+ T cells were isolated from spleens of immunized mice after incubation with a mixture of Abs to enrich for CD8 cells, followed by passage over StemSep column (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Preparations were consistently 85–95% CD8+, as assessed by flow cytometry. Enriched CD8+ T cells were then directly assessed for cytokine production after 5-h incubation with C1R-AAD stimulator cells that had been pulsed overnight with the indicated concentration of peptide.

To measure the production of intracellular cytokines, peptide-pulsed stimulator cells were incubated with T cells for 5 h at a ratio of 1:1 in medium supplemented with 50 U/ml IL-2 and 10 µg/ml brefeldin A. Stimulated cells were counterstained with a 1/1000 dilution of either PE- or APC-conjugated anti-CD8 (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA), washed, then fixed and permeabilized in PermWash/Fix (BD PharMingen), followed by staining with a 1/50 dilution of FITC-conjugated anti-IFN-{gamma} (BD PharMingen). Flow cytometry was conducted on a FACScan using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Normalized staining values were calculated by using the formula ((experimental value - background value for unpulsed stimulators)/(maximal value (using 100 µg/ml peptide-pulsed stimulators) - background value)) x 100.

Cytotoxicity assay

Lytic activity of T cell populations was assessed using standard chromium release assays. Briefly, target cells were labeled overnight with 51Cr (Amersham, Boston, MA) at a concentration of 100 µCi/106 cells. The target cells were washed and counted, and 2000 cells were aliquoted into wells containing the indicated concentration of peptide that had been diluted in medium containing 5 µg/ml {beta}2-microglobulin. After 2 h at 37°C, T cells were added at a ratio that had been predetermined to produce 65% lysis of target cells pulsed with 10 µg/ml peptide.

Tetramer staining

HLA-A*0201 tetramers that had been folded around ITDQVPFSV (gp100209) or IMDQVPFSV (gp100209(M)) were produced by the National Institutes of Health Tetramer Facility at Emory University (Atlanta, GA). T cells were coincubated for 45 min at room temperature with the indicated concentration of tetramer and a 1/1000 dilution of anti-CD8, washed twice, and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. Staining was quantitated on a FACScan using CellQuest software. Tetramer-staining values on a CD8+ T cell with irrelevant specificity were subtracted.

Adoptive transfer of CD8+ T cells

Subcutaneous tumors were established in AAD mice by injection of 4 x 105 B16-F1-AAD or B16-F10-AAD in 200 µl of saline. Tumor cells were 100% viable by trypan blue exclusion and >98% AAD+ by flow cytometric analysis on the day of injection. All animals developed palpable tumors by day 10, at which point 1 x 107 cells of the indicated CD8+ T cell line were injected directly into the tumor. A total of 500 Cetus units of IL-2 was coadministered with the T cells, and additional injections of 500 Cetus units of IL-2 were delivered i.p. on the subsequent 3 days. Tumor growth was measured every 48–72 h using a Vernier caliper, and was recorded as the product of two orthogonal diameters (a x b). The first diameter was identified as the longest surface length (a), with the second diameter being the subsequent orthogonal width (b). Repeated observations with the Vernier caliper resulted in <5% SD.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The requirement for variant peptides to activate MDP-reactive CD8+ T cell populations in AAD mice is not overcome by using CD40-activated DC

The generation of CD8+ T cell populations that can be used for adoptive transfer requires the in vitro expansion of Ag-experienced T cells. We previously showed that after immunization with recombinant vaccinia viruses or peptide-pulsed mature DC, responses to the self-Ags Tyr369 and gp100209 were extremely weak (5, 6). Since it has been reported that CD40L is a potent inducer of DC immunogenicity, we first asked whether populations of MDP-reactive memory cells that would be appropriate for further in vitro manipulation could be generated in AAD mice immunized with DC that had been activated in this manner. AAD mice were injected i.v. with CD40L-activated DC that had been incubated with either Tyr369 or gp100209 peptides, and CD8+ T cells were isolated 7 days later at the peak of the primary response. These cells were incubated with peptide-pulsed stimulator cells for 5 h and then analyzed by flow cytometry for the accumulation of IFN-{gamma}. No measurable number of gp100209-specific T cells was detected in any of seven mice immunized with gp100209, and only two of six mice showed a discernible response to Tyr369 (Table IGo). In contrast, consistently strong responses were seen in AAD mice immunized using DC pulsed with single amino acid-substituted variant peptides Tyr369(Y) or gp100209(M) (Table IGo). Tyr369(Y) is a variant of Tyr369 carrying a conservative F to Y substitution at the P1 position, while gp100209(M) is a variant of gp100209 with enhanced binding to HLA-A*0201 due to the substitution of M for T at P2 (22). Importantly, ~40% of the CD8+ T cells activated by immunization with Tyr369(Y) or gp100209(M) also produced IFN-{gamma} when stimulated with Tyr369 and gp100209, respectively (Fig. 1Go and Table IGo). These data confirm earlier work showing that T cells in AAD mice are largely unresponsive to immunization with gp100209 and Tyr369 self peptides, and demonstrate that CD40L-activated DC are not effective in altering this. However, immunization with closely related peptide variants enables the expansion of T cell populations that show appreciable cross-reactivity on the parental self peptides at the effector level, and provides a basis for the further development of MDP-reactive CD8+ T cell populations for adoptive transfer.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Summary of AAD mouse CD8+ T cell responses to immunization with MDP-derived peptides

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. CD40L-activated DC pulsed with variant peptides can expand CD8+ T cell populations that cross-react with the parent peptide. AAD-transgenic mice were primed i.v. with 105 activated DC that had been pulsed with 1 µg/ml of the indicated peptide. Spleens were removed 7 days after immunization. Splenocytes were enriched for CD8+ T cells, as described in Materials and Methods, and assayed for the accumulation of IFN-{gamma} after incubation for 5 h with C1R-AAD stimulator cells that had been previously pulsed with 100 µg/ml parent peptide ({blacksquare}) or variant peptide (), or left unpulsed ({square}). The results are the average of two mice per group, and the tyrosinase and gp100 arms of the experiment were performed independently. One experiment of three is presented.

 
Selection of CD8+ T cells with high functional avidity

Although the preceding results were encouraging, it was of concern that over several independent immunizations, on average over half of the CD8+ T cells activated with epitope variants, were not cross-reactive on the epitope itself (Table IGo and data not shown). Thus, further in vitro culture in the presence of the epitope variants might lead to loss of cross-reactive T cells altogether (6). On the other hand, the inability to demonstrate significant primary responses upon immunization with Tyr369 or gp100209 suggested that these peptides might be unable to drive in vitro proliferation of T cells. To evaluate these concerns directly, mice were immunized using DC pulsed with either 0.1 or 10 µg/ml gp100209(M). T cell lines were established from mice primed with the lower concentration of peptide by in vitro culture with 0.1 µg/ml of either gp100209(M) or gp100209, and corresponding lines were established from mice primed with the higher concentration by culture with 10 µg/ml of either peptide. CD8+ T cell lines were successfully generated in each case, demonstrating that gp100209 can stimulate proliferation of primed cells in vitro, despite its inability to stimulate naive T cells in vivo (Fig. 2Go and data not shown).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Functional avidity and cross-reactivity of T cell lines from mice immunized with gp100209(M). T cell lines were established by culture with 0.1 µg/ml gp100209(M) (A), 0.1 µg/ml gp100209 (B), 10 µg/ml gp100209(M) (C), or 10 µg/ml gp100209 (D) for a minimum of 6 wk. Accumulation of intracellular IFN-{gamma} was induced by incubation for 5 h with C1R-AAD stimulator cells that had been previously pulsed with the indicated concentration of either gp100209(M) ({blacksquare}) or gp100209 ({square}). Data for each T cell line have been normalized to equate the maximum response obtained after stimulation with the peptide used to establish the line to 100%. Data represent one of four similar assays.

 
The functional avidity of each line was determined as the concentration of gp100209(M) peptide that, when pulsed onto stimulator cells, induced half-maximal intracellular accumulation of IFN-{gamma} in a 5-h assay (SC50). gp100209(M) was chosen to measure functional avidity for all T cell lines because it was the peptide used to prime all T cells in vivo. The T cell lines maintained with 0.1 µg/ml of either gp100209 or gp100209(M) showed similar and relatively high functional avidities (SC50 of 3.7 x 10-9 and 2.9 x 10-9 g/ml, respectively; Fig. 2Go, A and B, and Table IIGo) compared with those of the T cell lines maintained with 10 µg/ml of either peptide (SC50 of 4.9 x 10-7 and 9.9 x 10-7 g/ml, respectively; Fig. 2Go, C and D, and Table IIGo). These relative differences in functional avidity for gp100209(M) among the lines were observed consistently in three independent experiments, and were in concordance with previously work demonstrating that the functional avidity of a T cell population inversely correlates with the concentration of Ag used to generate the T cells (18).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Cross-reactivity increases with functional avidity of Tyr369-specific T cells, but decreases for gp100209-specific T cells

 
We next determined the cross-reactivity of each line by measuring its functional avidity for gp100209, and determining the ratio of the SC50 values of the two peptides. The T cell line maintained with 0.1 µg/ml gp100209 recognized this peptide ~40-fold better than did the line maintained with 0.1 µg/ml gp100209(M), despite their similar avidities for gp100209(M) (Fig. 2Go, compare A and B, and see Table IIGo). Similarly, the T cell line maintained with 10 µg/ml gp100209 recognized this peptide ~6-fold better than did the line maintained with 10 µg/ml gp100209(M) (Fig. 2Go, compare C and D, and see Table IIGo). Similar results were observed by comparison of several other T cell lines developed from gp100209(M)-immunized mice (data not shown). Two important conclusions can be reached from these data. First, they demonstrate that there are conformational differences between gp100209 and gp100209(M) that are detectable by T cells, despite the fact that the residue altered between these two peptides is in a binding pocket and not directly accessible at the cell surface. Second, in vitro culture with gp100209 can select for T cells with enhanced reactivity for gp100209. This can occur without altering the functional avidity for the original stimulating Ag (gp100209(M)), and despite the inability of gp100209 to initiate T cell responses in vivo.

We next evaluated whether a similar process could be used to select T cells from AAD mice primed with Tyr369(Y). However, in contrast to what was observed above, very little CD8+ T cell expansion was observed after 1 wk of in vitro culture with Tyr369 compared with culture with Tyr369(Y), and we were unable to establish CD8+ T cell lines in this manner (T. A. Colella, T. N. J. Bullock, D. W. Mullins, and V. H. Engelhard, manuscript in preparation). We therefore asked whether CD8+ T cells with greater functional avidity and cross-reactive recognition of Tyr369 could be generated by manipulating the concentration of Tyr369(Y) used for in vitro culture. It was found that there was again an inverse correlation between the concentration of Tyr369(Y) used to establish and maintain T cell lines in vitro and the functional avidity of the lines, as measured by either IFN-{gamma} accumulation or cytotoxic activity (Fig. 3Go, A and B, and Table IIGo). Importantly, we also found that as functional avidity for Tyr369(Y) increased, there was a comparable increase in both the fraction of cells that recognized Tyr369 at the highest peptide dose, as well as the cross-reactivity measured as the ratio of SC50 values for Tyr369 and Tyr369(Y) (Fig. 3GoC and Table IIGo). Indeed, the T cell line maintained with the lowest concentration of Tyr369(Y) did not substantially discriminate between this peptide and Tyr369 (Fig. 3Go, B and C).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Functional avidity and cross-reactivity of T cell lines from mice immunized with Tyr369(Y). A, C1R-AAD cells were labeled with 51Cr and then incubated with increasing concentrations of Tyr369(Y) for 2 h. CD8+ T cells that had been generated by culture with graded concentrations of Tyr369(Y) were added at a predetermined E:T ratio, and lytic activity was determined 4 h after T cell addition. B and C, C1R-AAD were pulsed with increasing concentrations of peptide overnight, washed, and then incubated at a 1:1 ratio with CD8+ T cells for 5 h before staining for CD8 and accumulated IFN-{gamma}, as described in Materials and Methods. Data are representative of multiple experiments.

 
TCR structural avidity does not correlate with the functional avidity of gp100209-reactive T cell lines

The results obtained with the Tyr369(Y)-stimulated T cells were in keeping with our expectations, based on studies with Abs, that receptors with a higher affinity for Ag would also show greater cross-reactivity on closely related structures (23, 24). In contrast, the T cell lines maintained on 0.1 µg/ml of either gp100209 or gp100209(M) showed less cross-reactivity than T cell lines maintained on 10 µg/ml of either peptide (Table IIGo). To gain further insight into the reasons for this, we analyzed the interactions of TCR expressed on the four gp100209-reactive T cell lines with tetramers composed of HLA-A*0201 folded around either gp100209 or gp100209(M). Because of the multivalent nature of these interactions, we refer to this parameter as structural avidity. Unfortunately, <2% of the T cell lines maintained in the presence of 10 µg/ml of either gp100209 or gp100209(M) bound to either tetramer (data not shown). Thus, it was not possible to evaluate whether the higher cross-reactivity of these lines was reflected in the structural avidity of their TCR.

This analysis did reveal unexpected complexity in the tetramer staining of T cell lines maintained with 0.1 µg/ml of either peptide. More than 75% of both lines expressed TCRs that bound to tetramers at the highest concentrations tested (Fig. 4Go, A and B). Interestingly, however, the T cell line maintained with 0.1 µg/ml gp100209 bound to tetramers made with gp100209(M) only 5-fold better than to tetramers made with gp100209 (Fig. 4GoB), although there was a 25-fold difference in its functional avidity (Fig. 2GoB). Strikingly, the T cell line maintained with 0.1 µg/ml gp100209(M) bound both of the tetramers to a similar degree (Fig. 4GoA), although there was a 1000-fold difference in the respective functional avidities (Fig. 2GoA). Thus, for both T cell lines, the difference in functional avidity for gp100209 and gp100209(M) is always much larger than the difference in structural avidity for these two peptides. Most surprisingly, the structural avidities of the T cell line maintained with 0.1 µg/ml gp100209 were always much lower than those of the T cell line maintained with 0.1 µg/ml gp100209(M), despite the fact that its functional avidities for both peptides were equivalent or higher (cf Fig. 4Go, A and B, with Fig. 2Go, A and B). Taken together, these results indicate that the functional avidities of these T cell lines do not correlate with their structural avidities, and that significant differences in effector activity can occur upon interaction with Ags for which the TCR has similar nominal structural avidity.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Structural avidity of T cell lines from mice immunized with gp100209(M). T cell lines established and maintained with 0.1 µg/ml gp100209(M) (A) or gp100209 (B) were stained with serial dilutions of gp100209(M) ({blacksquare}) or gp100209 ({square}) tetramer in the presence of anti-CD8 Abs. Data represent one of two similar assays.

 
Functional avidity for parent peptide, not variant, correlates with in vitro recognition of tumor and in vivo therapy of tumor by adoptive transfer

Our ultimate goal was to develop CD8+ T cells that could be used for adoptive immunotherapy of tumors. We therefore screened the T cell lines described above for in vitro and in vivo reactivity with B16-F1 or B16-F10 melanoma cells that had been transfected to express AAD. Although ~50% of cells in the line maintained with 0.01 µg/ml Tyr369(Y) accumulated IFN-{gamma} when stimulated with B16-F1-AAD, only 2% of the line maintained with 0.1 µg/ml Tyr369(Y) did so, and no stimulation by B16-F1-AAD was detected in the lines maintained with 1 or 10 µg/ml of this peptide (Fig. 5GoA). Interestingly, none of these lines recognized B16-F10-AAD (data not shown), suggesting that it expresses a lower amount of this epitope than B16-F1-AAD. Among the T cell lines initiated with gp100209(M), the line maintained with 0.1 µg/ml gp100209 was stimulated to the greatest extent by B16-F10-AAD, while the lines cultured with either 10 µg/ml gp100209 or 0.1 µg/ml gp100209(M) were stimulated to a lower and similar extent, and the line cultured with 10 µg/ml gp100209(M) was not stimulated at all (Fig. 5GoB). In the case of the gp100209-reactive lines, recognition of the B16-F10-AAD tumor does not correlate with the functional avidity for the gp100209(M) peptide nor with structural avidity as measured with MHC-tetramers based on either peptide. Thus, the ability of these T cell populations to produce IFN-{gamma} upon recognition of this tumor in vitro correlates most closely with their functional avidities for Tyr369 or gp100209.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. In vitro tumor recognition by MDP-specific T cell lines correlates with their functional avidity for the parent peptide. A, T cell lines established and maintained on graded concentrations of Tyr369(Y) were incubated at a 1:1 ratio with B16F1 or B16F1-AAD for 5 h, and their accumulation of IFN-{gamma} was measured as described in Materials and Methods. B16F1-AAD is an AAD+ transfectant of the tyrosinase+ B16F1 murine melanoma. Data are representative of two similar experiments. B, T cell lines established and maintained on different concentrations of gp100209 or gp100209(M) were incubated at a 1:1 ratio with B16F10 or B16F10-AAD murine melanomas. B16F10-AAD is an AAD+ transfectant of the tyrosinase+ B16F10 murine melanoma. Data are representative of one of three experiments.

 
We next examined the ability of these T cell lines to control the outgrowth of established melanoma after adoptive transfer in vivo. Mice were injected s.c. with 4 x 105 tumor cells, rested for 10 days, and then 10 x 106 T cells were injected at the tumor site in conjunction with IL-2. For T cell lines maintained with Tyr369(Y), gp100209(M), or gp100209, there was a direct correlation between functional avidity and the ability to delay outgrowth of B16-F1-AAD or B16-F10-AAD (Fig. 6Go), in keeping with their ability to recognize these tumors in vitro. Surprisingly, T cell lines maintained with 1 µg/ml Tyr369(Y) or 10 µg/ml gp100209(M), which showed no recognition of tumor in vitro, slowed tumor outgrowth to a limited degree. Neither CD8+ T cells specific for an irrelevant epitope, which did not recognize B16-AAD cells in vitro (data not shown), nor administration of IL-2 alone had an effect on tumor outgrowth. Thus, the ability of the T cell lines maintained with 1 µg/ml Tyr369(Y) or 10 µg/ml gp100209(M) to control tumor in vivo was Ag specific, and demonstrated that the in vitro measurements of tumor reactivity underestimated their therapeutic potential. Nevertheless, the ability of these Tyr369- and gp100209-reactive T cell populations to control tumor outgrowth in vivo correlated most closely with their functional avidity, and not with their structural avidity, for these two Ags.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Adoptive transfer of MDP-reactive T cells delays the outgrowth of s.c. established melanoma. B16F1-AAD (A) or B16F10-AAD (B) melanomas were established by s.c. injection of 105 tumor cells. Ten days postinjection, 107 cells from T cell lines established and maintained with different concentrations of either Tyr369(Y) (A) or gp100209/gp100209(M) (B) were transferred into the site of the tumor, in the presence of IL-2. Supplemental IL-2 treatment was given via i.p. injection daily for the subsequent 3 days. Tumor outgrowth was not affected by IL-2 alone (•) or nonspecific T cell activity ({circ}). Error bars are hidden by the symbols.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we used single amino acid substitution peptide variants derived from tyrosinase and gp100 in conjunction with activated DC to generate populations of MDP-specific CD8+ T cells. We further developed T cell lines in vitro from these populations using techniques to enhance either functional avidity, or cross-reactivity, or both. We found an inverse correlation between concentrations of peptide used to maintain T cell lines and their functional avidities measured by stimulation of IFN-{gamma} accumulation. As expected, T cell lines with higher functional avidities for Tyr369(Y) also showed greater cross-reactivity on the parental Tyr369 peptide. However, this correlation was inverted for T cell lines from mice primed with gp100209(M). Surprisingly, we found that T cell lines with low cross-reactivity on gp100209, as determined using functional assays, exhibited similar structural avidities, as defined with MHC tetramers, for both peptides. However, the structural avidity of T cells maintained with gp100209 was substantially lower than the structural avidity of T cells maintained with gp100209(M). These results demonstrate that functional avidity, as measured by effector function, need not be directly correlated with structural avidity. Finally, we found that the ability of these T cells to control the outgrowth of a murine melanoma correlated with their functional avidity for the original parent peptides.

Effective adoptive immunotherapies against tumors are dependent upon the generation of large numbers of highly tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells. The data presented in this work and in previous studies (5, 6) demonstrate that the HLA-A*0201-restricted responses to Tyr369 and to several gp100-derived epitopes are usually undetectable in AAD mice, as is the response to gp10025–33 restricted by H-2Db (25). In contrast, responses to TRP-2181–188 restricted by H-2Kb were observed after single in vivo immunization (19, 26, 27). Collectively, these studies indicate that the immunogenicity of different class I MHC-associated MDP epitopes can vary significantly. Although intermediate to high MHC-binding affinity of foreign peptides has generally correlated with their ability to induce immune responses (28), many poorly immunogenic MDP-derived peptides have affinities in this range (5, 6). This suggests that self-tolerance also plays an important role in determining whether different MDP-derived peptides are effective immunogens. Successful expansion of highly tumor-reactive T cells will therefore depend on level of peptide presentation and the mechanism by which self-tolerance prevents responses to MDPs.

It is apparent from this study and previous work (5, 6) that peptide variants of the poorly immunogenic Tyr369 and gp100209 can provide an effective means to activate MDP-specific responses in AAD mice, and indicates that self-tolerance does not delete or inactivate all T cells reactive with these epitopes. The mechanism of action of these variant peptides remains to be elucidated. The relative weak HLA-A*0201-binding affinity exhibited by some MDP-derived peptides provided the rationale for the initial design of variant peptides (22), and enhanced responses were attributed to more stable MHC-peptide complexes, allowing more productive TCR engagement (6, 7, 22, 29, 30). However, the immunogenicity of Tyr369(Y) cannot be explained in this manner, as it binds to HLA-A*0201 with nearly identical affinity as Tyr369, and both peptides are equally immunogenic in AAD+ mice that do not express tyrosinase (5). An alternative explanation is that the Tyr369-specific T cells that persist in tyrosinase+ mice perceive this epitope as a partial or weak agonist (31, 32) that is capable of activating effector functions such as perforin and cytokine release, but not proliferation. However, these T cells would perceive Tyr369(Y) as a full agonist, which elicits the full range of effector activities and proliferation.

The substitution of Met for Thr at the P2 anchor position of gp100209 to produce gp100209(M) was originally shown to stabilize its binding to HLA-A*0201 while preserving its ability to be recognized by gp100209-reactive T cells (22). Indeed, some of the data reported in this work and elsewhere (6, 7) are consistent with this explanation of its improved immunogenicity. However, while the binding affinity of gp100209 for HLA-A*0201 is ~10-fold lower than that of gp100209(M) (Table IGo), the cross-reactivity of different T cell lines was up to 1000-fold lower. These results demonstrate that these two peptides are antigenically distinguishable by at least some T cells, and that for many of those cells gp100209 is perceived as a weak agonist. Interestingly, while some studies have demonstrated that stronger agonist epitopes, as measured by functional assays, exhibited relatively higher affinities for TCR (33, 34), others have shown that this correlation does not always hold (35, 36, 37). In the present work, the observation that a T cell line responded functionally to gp100209(M) up to 1000-fold better than gp100209, yet showed very similar structural avidities for these two peptides, is consistent with these latter observations. Furthermore, the T cell line maintained on gp100209 responded functionally to gp100209(M) and gp100209 equivalently and 100-fold better, respectively, than the line maintained on gp100209(M). However, the structural avidities of the former line were up to 1000-fold lower than those of the latter. These data demonstrate a significant disparity between functional and structural avidities. This suggests that differences in the efficiency with which signals are transduced by these receptors in response to each of these epitopes play an important role in shaping T cell functional avidity, and that this may also be shaped by in vitro culture conditions.

It remains to be determined how functional avidity can be regulated independently of structural avidity, and particularly how a T cell line with low structural avidity can show high functional avidity. The expression of CD8 was similar between the two cell lines (data not shown), and CD8 involvement in tetramer binding was prevented by Abs to CD8 (38, 39). Thus, differences in structural avidities between these cell lines cannot be accounted for by the differential involvement of CD8. In addition, when CD8 involvement was minimized in the functional assay, there was no change in the relative avidities for gp100209 and gp100209(M) (data not shown). Together, these data suggest that the differences in structural and functional avidities are independent of CD8 engagement and/or p56lck recruitment (40). It is interesting that both structural avidity and T cell functional activity have been shown to be augmented by the organization of TCR into membrane lipid rafts (41, 42, 43, 44). Thus, it is possible that the differences in these parameters for the lines maintained in gp100209 and gp100209(M) reflect differences in both the true affinity of their TCRs and the extent to which these TCR are distributed into lipid rafts.

Our data demonstrate that T cells with a high functional avidity may express TCR with a low structural avidity. Such dissociation of structural and functional avidity has also been noted in two other recent studies, suggesting that this phenomenon may be more prevalent than previously appreciated (45, 46). The implication of these observations is that the selection of T cell populations based solely on high structural avidity may exclude T cells that could have high functional avidity and be therapeutically useful. Thus, while tetramers are an important tool for monitoring the expansion of T cells in an immune response, functional studies are required to assess therapeutic potential of the activated populations.

The principal goal of this study was to use the AAD-transgenic mouse to examine strategies for the generation of CD8+ T cells specific for peptide Ags that are relevant to human melanoma. We have demonstrated a direct correlation between impact on tumor outgrowth and the T cell’s functional avidity for the exact peptide expressed on the tumor. Although these results are similar to those observed by others using either viral peptides or strongly immunogenic tumor-associated peptides (18, 19), we have extended this paradigm to include situations in which the tumor-associated peptides are weakly immunogenic at best. The challenge in this situation was to enrich for T cells that are capable of recognizing the tumor-associated Ag. We found that in one case, T cells with augmented cross-reactive recognition of the tumor-associated Ag could be selected simply by using very low concentrations of a closely related peptide variant. In the second case, however, selection of T cells with this specificity was augmented by sequential use of a relatively immunogenic peptide variant and the tumor-associated peptide, both in low concentration. It will be interesting to examine the utility of these alternative strategies to derive similar tyrosinase- or gp100-reactive CD8+ T cells for use in melanoma patients.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Janet Gorman and Caroline Flournoy for excellent technical assistance and animal husbandry, Dr. Claudio Mosse and Dr. John Luckey for invaluable discussion, and Dr. Rejean Lapointe for supplying the 3T3 cells that express CD40L.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Public Health Service Grants AI21393 and CA78400 (to V.H.E.). T.N.J.B. was the recipient of the Rudolph M. Montgelas Fellowship from the Cancer Research Institute. D.W.M. was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Training Grant AI07496 and is currently a Fellow of the American Cancer Society. T.A.C. was supported by Public Health Service Training Grants CA09109 and AI07496. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Victor H. Engelhard, Department of Microbiology and Carter Immunology Center, Room 4072C, MR4 Building, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908. E-mail address: vhe{at}virginia.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MDP, melanocyte differentiation protein; DC, dendritic cell; TRP, tyrosinase-related protein; CD40L, CD40 ligand. Back

Received for publication March 14, 2001. Accepted for publication September 10, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Engelhard, V. H.. 1996. Direct identification of tumor-associated peptide antigens. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 18:171.[Medline]
  2. Wang, R. F., S. A. Rosenberg. 1999. Human tumor antigens for cancer vaccine development. Immunol. Rev. 170:85.[Medline]
  3. Cox, A. L., J. C. Skipper, Y. Chen, R. A. Henderson, T. L. Darrow, J. Shabanowitz, V. H. Engelhard, D. F. Hunt, C. L. Slingluff. 1994. Identification of a peptide recognized by five melanoma-specific human cytotoxic T cell lines. Science 264:716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kawakami, Y., N. Dang, X. Wang, J. Tupesis, P. F. Robbins, R. F. Wang, J. R. Wunderlich, J. R. Yannelli, S. A. Rosenberg. 2000. Recognition of shared melanoma antigens in association with major HLA-A alleles by tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes from 123 patients with melanoma. J. Immunother. 23:17.
  5. Colella, T. A., T. N. J. Bullock, L. B. Russell, D. W. Mullins, W. Overwijk, C. J. Luckey, R. A. Pierce, N. P. Restifo, V. H. Engelhard. 2000. Self-tolerance to the murine homologue of a tyrosinase-derived melanoma antigen: implications for tumor immunotherapy. J. Exp. Med. 191:1221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bullock, T. N. J., T. A. Colella, V. H. Engelhard. 2000. The density of peptides displayed by dendritic cells affects immune responses to human tyrosinase and gp100 in HLA-A2 transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 164:2354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Irvine, K. R., M. R. Parkhurst, E. P. Shulman, J. P. Tupesis, M. Custer, C. E. Touloukian, P. F. Robbins, A. G. Yafal, P. Greenhalgh, R. P. Sutmuller, et al 1999. Recombinant virus vaccination against "self" antigens using anchor-fixed immunogens. Cancer Res. 59:2536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rosenberg, S. A., B. S. Packard, P. M. Aebersold, D. Solomon, S. L. Topalian, S. T. Toy, P. Simon, M. T. Lotze, J. C. Yang, C. A. Seipp. 1988. Use of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin-2 in the immunotherapy of patients with metastatic melanoma: a preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. 319:1676.[Abstract]
  9. Yee, C., S. R. Riddell, P. D. Greenberg. 1997. Prospects for adoptive T cell therapy. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9:702.[Medline]
  10. Restifo, N. P., F. Esquivel, Y. Kawakami, J. W. Yewdell, J. J. Mule, S. A. Rosenberg, J. R. Bennink. 1993. Identification of human cancers deficient in antigen processing. J. Exp. Med. 177:265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bodmer, W. F., M. J. Browning, P. Krausa, A. Rowan, D. C. Bicknell, J. G. Bodmer. 1993. Tumor escape from immune response by variation in HLA expression and other mechanisms. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 690:42.[Medline]
  12. Crawford, F., H. Kozono, J. White, P. Marrack, J. Kappler. 1998. Detection of antigen-specific T cells with multivalent soluble class II MHC covalent peptide complexes. Immunity 8:675.[Medline]
  13. Savage, P. A., J. J. Boniface, M. M. Davis. 1999. A kinetic basis for T cell receptor repertoire selection during an immune response. Immunity 10:485.[Medline]
  14. Nugent, C. T., D. J. Morgan, J. A. Biggs, A. Ko, I. M. Pilip, E. G. Pamer, L. A. Sherman. 2000. Characterization of CD8+ T lymphocytes that persist after peripheral tolerance to a self antigen expressed in the pancreas. J. Immunol. 164:191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Busch, D. H., E. G. Pamer. 1999. T cell affinity maturation by selective expansion during infection. J. Exp. Med. 189:701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yee, C., P. A. Savage, P. P. Lee, M. M. Davis, P. D. Greenberg. 1999. Isolation of high avidity melanoma-reactive CTL from heterogeneous populations using peptide-MHC tetramers. J. Immunol. 162:2227.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Dunbar, P. R., J. L. Chen, D. Chao, N. Rust, H. Teisserenc, G. S. Ogg, P. Romero, P. Weynants, V. Cerundolo. 1999. Cutting edge: rapid cloning of tumor-specific CTL suitable for adoptive immunotherapy of melanoma. J. Immunol. 162:6959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Alexander-Miller, M. A., G. R. Leggatt, J. A. Berzofsky. 1996. Selective expansion of high- or low-avidity cytotoxic T lymphocytes and efficacy for adoptive immunotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:4102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. III Zeh, H. J., D. Perry-Lalley, M. E. Dudley, S. A. Rosenberg, J. C. Yang. 1999. High avidity CTLs for two self-antigens demonstrate superior in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy. J. Immunol. 162:989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Newberg, M. H., D. H. Smith, S. B. Haertel, D. R. Vining, E. Lacy, V. H. Engelhard. 1996. Importance of MHC class I {alpha}2 and {alpha}3 domains in the recognition of self and non-self MHC molecules. J. Immunol. 156:2473.[Abstract]
  21. Inaba, K., M. Inaba, N. Romani, H. Aya, M. Deguchi, S. Ikehara, S. Muramatsu, R. M. Steinman. 1992. Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Exp. Med. 176:1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Parkhurst, M. R., M. L. Salgaller, S. Southwood, P. F. Robbins, A. Sette, S. A. Rosenberg, Y. Kawakami. 1996. Improved induction of melanoma-reactive CTL with peptides from the melanoma antigen gp100 modified at HLA-A*0201-binding residues. J. Immunol. 157:2539.[Abstract]
  23. Little, J. R., H. N. Eisen. 1969. Specificity of the immune response to the 2,4-dinitrophenyl and 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl groups: ligand binding and fluorescence properties of cross-reacting antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 129:247.[Abstract]
  24. Furusawa, S., Z. Ovary. 1988. Heteroclitic antibodies: differences in fine specificities between monoclonal antibodies directed against dinitrophenyl and trinitrophenyl haptens. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 85:238.[Medline]
  25. Overwijk, W. W., A. Tsung, K. R. Irvine, M. R. Parkhurst, T. J. Goletz, K. Tsung, M. W. Carroll, C. Liu, B. Moss, S. A. Rosenberg, N. P. Restifo. 1998. gp100/pmel 17 is a murine tumor rejection antigen: induction of "self"-reactive, tumoricidal T cells using high-affinity, altered peptide ligand. J. Exp. Med. 188:277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Bloom, M. B., D. Perry-Lalley, P. F. Robbins, Y. Li, M. el-Tamil, S. A. Rosenberg, J. C. Yang. 1997. Identification of tyrosinase-related protein 2 as a tumor rejection antigen for the B16 melanoma. J. Exp. Med. 185:453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kaplan, J. M., Q. Yu, S. T. Piraino, S. E. Pennington, S. Shankara, L. A. Woodworth, B. L. Roberts. 1999. Induction of anti-tumor immunity using dendritic cells transduced with adenovirus vector-encoding endogenous tumor-associated antigens. J. Immunol. 163:699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sette, A., A. Vitiello, B. Reherman, P. Fowler, R. Nayersina, W. M. Kast, C. J. Melief, C. Oseroff, L. Yuan, J. Ruppert. 1994. The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes. J. Immunol. 153:5586.[Abstract]
  29. Men, Y., I. Miconnet, D. Valmori, D. Rimoldi, J. C. Cerottini, P. Romero. 1999. Assessment of immunogenicity of human Melan-A peptide analogues in HLA-A*0201/Kb transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 162:3566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Rosenberg, S. A., J. C. Yang, D. J. Schwartzentruber, P. Hwu, F. M. Marincola, S. L. Topalian, N. P. Restifo, M. E. Dudley, S. L. Schwarz, P. J. Spiess, et al 1998. Immunologic and therapeutic evaluation of a synthetic peptide vaccine for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Nat. Med. 4:321.[Medline]
  31. Evavold, B. D., J. Sloan-Lancaster, B. L. Hsu, P. M. Allen. 1993. Separation of IL-4 production from Th cell proliferation by an altered T cell receptor ligand. J. Immunol. 150:3131.[Abstract]
  32. Hemmer, B., I. Stefanova, M. Vergelli, R. N. Germain, R. Martin. 1998. Relationships among TCR ligand potency, thresholds for effector function elicitation, and the quality of early signaling events in human T cells. J. Immunol. 160:5807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Matsui, K., J. J. Boniface, P. Steffner, P. A. Reay, M. M. Davis. 1994. Kinetics of T-cell receptor binding to peptide/I-Ek complexes: correlation of the dissociation rate with T-cell responsiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:12862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Alam, S. M., G. M. Davies, C. M. Lin, T. Zal, W. Nasholds, S. C. Jameson, K. A. Hogquist, N. R. Gascoigne, P. J. Travers. 1999. Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands. Immunity 10:227.[Medline]
  35. Baker, B. M., S. J. Gagnon, W. E. Biddison, D. C. Wiley. 2000. Conversion of a T cell antagonist into an agonist by repairing a defect in the TCR/peptide/MHC interface: implications for TCR signaling. Immunity 13:475.[Medline]
  36. Sykulev, Y., Y. Vugmeyster, A. Brunmark, H. L. Ploegh, H. N. Eisen. 1998. Peptide antagonism and T cell receptor interactions with peptide-MHC complexes. Immunity 9:475.[Medline]
  37. Al-Ramadi, B. K., M. T. Jelonek, L. F. Boyd, D. H. Margulies, A. L. Bothwell. 1995. Lack of strict correlation of functional sensitization with the apparent affinity of MHC/peptide complexes for the TCR. J. Immunol. 155:662.[Abstract]
  38. Daniels, M. A., S. C. Jameson. 2000. Critical role for CD8 in T cell receptor binding and activation by peptide/major histocompatibility complex multimers. J. Exp. Med. 191:335.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Bosselut, R., S. Kubo, T. Guinter, J. L. Kopacz, J. D. Altman, L. Feigenbaum, A. Singer. 2000. Role of CD8{beta} domains in CD8 coreceptor function: importance for MHC I binding, signaling, and positive selection of CD8+ T cells in the thymus. Immunity 12:409.[Medline]
  40. Slifka, M. K., J. L. Whitton. 2001. Functional avidity maturation of CD8+ T cells without selection of higher affinity TCR. Nat. Immun. 2:711.
  41. III Drake, D. R., T. J. Braciale. 2001. Cutting edge: lipid raft integrity affects the efficiency of MHC class I tetramer binding and cell surface TCR arrangement on CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 166:7009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Fahmy, T. M., J. G. Bieler, M. Edidin, J. P. Schneck. 2001. Increased TCR avidity after T cell activation: a mechanism for sensing low-density antigen. Immunity 14:135.[Medline]
  43. Viola, A., S. Schroeder, Y. Sakakibara, A. Lanzavecchia. 1999. T lymphocyte costimulation mediated by reorganization of membrane microdomains. Science 283:680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Viola, A.. 2001. The amplification of TCR signaling by dynamic membrane microdomains. Trends Immunol. 22:322.[Medline]
  45. Derby, M. A., J. Wang, D. H. Margulies, J. A. Berzofsky. 2001. Two intermediate-avidity cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones with a disparity between functional avidity and MHC tetramer staining. Int. Immunol. 13:817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Kalergis, A. M., N. Boucheron, M. A. Doucey, E. Palmieri, E. C. Goyarts, Z. Vegh, I. F. Luescher, S. G. Nathenson. 2001. Efficient T cell activation requires an optimal dwell-time of interaction between the TCR and the pMHC complex. Nat. Immun. 2:229.
  47. Mullins, D. W., T. N. J. Bullock, T. A. Colella, V. V. Robila, and V. H. Engelhard. Immune responses to the HLA-A*0201-restrictedepitopes of tyrosinase and gp100 enable control of melanoma outgrowth in HLA-A*0201-transgenic mice. J. Immunol. In press.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. J. Smithey, S. Brandt, N. E. Freitag, D. E. Higgins, and H. G. A. Bouwer
Stimulation of Enhanced CD8 T Cell Responses Following Immunization with a Hyper-Antigen Secreting Intracytosolic Bacterial Pathogen
J. Immunol., March 1, 2008; 180(5): 3406 - 3416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R.-H. Voss, R. A. Willemsen, J. Kuball, M. Grabowski, R. Engel, R. S. Intan, P. Guillaume, P. Romero, C. Huber, and M. Theobald
Molecular Design of the C{alpha} Interface Favors Specific Pairing of Introduced TCR{alpha} in Human T Cells
J. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 180(1): 391 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
R. M. Wong, R. R. Scotland, R. L. Lau, C. Wang, A. J. Korman, W. M. Kast, and J. S. Weber
Programmed death-1 blockade enhances expansion and functional capacity of human melanoma antigen-specific CTLs
Int. Immunol., October 1, 2007; 19(10): 1223 - 1234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
D.-W. Liu, Y.-C. Yang, H.-F. Lin, M.-F. Lin, Y.-W. Cheng, C.-C. Chu, Y.-P. Tsao, and S.-L. Chen
Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Responses to Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E5 and E7 Proteins and HLA-A*0201-Restricted T-Cell Peptides in Cervical Cancer Patients
J. Virol., March 15, 2007; 81(6): 2869 - 2879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. A. Johnson, B. Heemskerk, D. J. Powell Jr., C. J. Cohen, R. A. Morgan, M. E. Dudley, P. F. Robbins, and S. A. Rosenberg
Gene Transfer of Tumor-Reactive TCR Confers Both High Avidity and Tumor Reactivity to Nonreactive Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., November 1, 2006; 177(9): 6548 - 6559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. W. Mullins and V. H. Engelhard
Limited infiltration of exogenous dendritic cells and naive T cells restricts immune responses in peripheral lymph nodes.
J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 4535 - 4542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Yang, K.-Y. Tsang, and J. Schlom
Induction of Higher-Avidity Human CTLs by Vector-Mediated Enhanced Costimulation of Antigen-Presenting Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 11(15): 5603 - 5615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
R. Salerno-Goncalves, R. Wahid, and M. B. Sztein
Immunization of Volunteers with Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Strain Ty21a Elicits the Oligoclonal Expansion of CD8+ T Cells with Predominant V{beta} Repertoires
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2005; 73(6): 3521 - 3530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. Dorothee, I. Vergnon, F. El Hage, B. L. M. Chansac, V. Ferrand, Y. Lecluse, P. Opolon, S. Chouaib, G. Bismuth, and F. Mami-Chouaib
In Situ Sensory Adaptation of Tumor-Infiltrating T Lymphocytes to Peptide-MHC Levels Elicits Strong Antitumor Reactivity
J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 6888 - 6897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. W. Hodge, M. Chakraborty, C. Kudo-Saito, C. T. Garnett, and J. Schlom
Multiple Costimulatory Modalities Enhance CTL Avidity
J. Immunol., May 15, 2005; 174(10): 5994 - 6004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. A. Lyman, C. T. Nugent, K. L. Marquardt, J. A. Biggs, E. G. Pamer, and L. A. Sherman
The Fate of Low Affinity Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cells in Tumor-Bearing Mice
J. Immunol., March 1, 2005; 174(5): 2563 - 2572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Narayanan, A. Jaramillo, N. D. Benshoff, L. G. Campbell, T. P. Fleming, J. R. Dietz, and T. Mohanakumar
Response of Established Human Breast Tumors to Vaccination with Mammaglobin-A cDNA
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 15, 2004; 96(18): 1388 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. M.-L. Choi, J.-L. Chen, L. Wooldridge, M. Salio, A. Lissina, N. Lissin, I. F. Hermans, J. D. Silk, F. Mirza, M. J. Palmowski, et al.
High Avidity Antigen-Specific CTL Identified by CD8-Independent Tetramer Staining
J. Immunol., November 15, 2003; 171(10): 5116 - 5123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
D. W. Mullins, S. L. Sheasley, R. M. Ream, T. N.J. Bullock, Y.-X. Fu, and V. H. Engelhard
Route of Immunization with Peptide-pulsed Dendritic Cells Controls the Distribution of Memory and Effector T Cells in Lymphoid Tissues and Determines the Pattern of Regional Tumor Control
J. Exp. Med., October 6, 2003; 198(7): 1023 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. J. Pittet, V. Rubio-Godoy, G. Bioley, P. Guillaume, P. Batard, D. Speiser, I. Luescher, J.-C. Cerottini, P. Romero, and A. Zippelius
{alpha}3 Domain Mutants of Peptide/MHC Class I Multimers Allow the Selective Isolation of High Avidity Tumor-Reactive CD8 T Cells
J. Immunol., August 15, 2003; 171(4): 1844 - 1849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. N. J. Bullock, D. W. Mullins, and V. H. Engelhard
Antigen Density Presented By Dendritic Cells In Vivo Differentially Affects the Number and Avidity of Primary, Memory, and Recall CD8+ T Cells
J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 1822 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. K. Slifka, J. N. Blattman, D. J. D. Sourdive, F. Liu, D. L. Huffman, T. Wolfe, A. Hughes, M. B. A. Oldstone, R. Ahmed, and M. G. von Herrath
Preferential Escape of Subdominant CD8+ T Cells During Negative Selection Results in an Altered Antiviral T Cell Hierarchy
J. Immunol., February 1, 2003; 170(3): 1231 - 1239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Echchakir, G. Dorothee, I. Vergnon, J. Menez, S. Chouaib, and F. Mami-Chouaib
Cytotoxic T lymphocytes directed against a tumor-specific mutated antigen display similar HLA tetramer binding but distinct functional avidity and tissue distribution
PNAS, July 9, 2002; 99(14): 9358 - 9363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, T. N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Engelhard, V. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, T. N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Engelhard, V. H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS