The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Talken, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Talken, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, R. W.
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 167: 562-568.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

T Cell Epitope Mapping of the Smith Antigen Reveals That Highly Conserved Smith Antigen Motifs Are the Dominant Target of T Cell Immunity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus1

Beth L. Talken*,{dagger}, Kim R. Schäfermeyer*,{dagger}, Craig W. Bailey*,{dagger}, David R. Lee{ddagger} and Robert W. Hoffman2,*,{dagger}

* Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212; {dagger} Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans Hospital, Columbia, MO 65201; and {ddagger} Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
B cell and T cell immunity to the Smith Ag (Sm) is a characteristic feature of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We have shown that T cell immunity against Sm can be detected in SLE patients, and that T and B cell immunity against Sm are linked in vivo. TCR usage by Sm-reactive T cells is highly restricted and characteristic of an Ag-driven immune response. Sm is a well-characterized complex Ag consisting of proteins B1, B2, D1, D2, D3, E, F, and G. A unique feature of all Sm proteins is the presence of homologous motifs, Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2. We used limiting dilution cloning and synthetic peptide Ags to characterize the human T cell immune response against Sm in seven SLE patients. We sought to determine the precise antigenic peptides recognized, the common features of antigenic structure recognized, and the evolution of the T cell response against Sm. We found there was a highly restricted set of Sm self-peptides recognized by T cells, with three epitopes on Sm-B and two epitopes on Sm-D. We found that T cell immunity against Sm-B and Sm-D was encoded within the highly conserved Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2, and that immunity against these epitopes appeared stable. The present study supports the concept that T cell immunity to Sm is an Ag-driven immune response directed against a highly restricted set of self-peptides, encoded within Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2, that is shared among all Sm proteins.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Immunity to the Smith Ag (Sm)3 is a characteristic feature of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We have shown that T cell immunity against Sm can be detected in PBMC of SLE patients and that T and B cell immunity against Sm are linked in vivo (1). Previously, we reported that Sm-reactive T cells have a typical T phenotype, expressing the cell surface markers CD4, CD45RO, and TCR {alpha}{beta}. Also, Sm-reactive T cells produce cytokines that are important in B cell help and differentiation, including IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, and IL-4 (1). Finally, we have previously shown for Sm-B (2) and recently shown for Sm-D (3) that TCR usage by Sm-reactive T cell is highly restricted and characteristic of an Ag-driven immune response.

B cell immunity to Sm is a characteristic feature of SLE, with autoantibodies directed against Sm present in 20–30% of patients with SLE (4). The presence of anti-Sm Abs is one of the criteria proposed by the American College of Rheumatology for disease classification of SLE and is widely used in clinical practice (5). Anti-Sm Abs are frequently of the IgG isotype, which is characteristic of a T cell-dependent response (6). B cell epitope-mapping studies of Sm and other autoantigens have suggested that in autoimmunity the immune response may be directed toward self-Ags that encode domains with important biological functions (7). Other studies implicate molecular mimicry against microbial agents, such as EBV, in the initiation of the anti-Sm immune response (8). A unified model of disease pathogenesis may need to encompass all these possibilities as contributory.

Sm is a well-characterized complex Ag that consists of proteins B1, B2, D1, D2, D3, E, F, and G. The Sm complex is highly conserved throughout evolution and is expressed in all tissues. Sm is part of the spliceosomal complex, whose biologic function is the splicing of precursor mRNA to mature mRNA (9). The Sm proteins serve an essential role in spliceosomal complex formation (10). A unique feature of Sm proteins is the presence of highly conserved motifs, called Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2 (see Fig. 1Go), that are hypothesized to be involved in protein-protein interactions (11). Detailed structural knowledge of this complex Ag provides the opportunity to seek insight into T and B cell immune responses against Sm.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. The amino acid sequence of the human Sm-B2 protein is shown. The regions that contain the T cell epitopes Sm-B-E1, Sm-B-E2, and Sm-B-E3 are indicated. Also indicated are the regions encoding Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2.

 
Currently, there exist several alternative hypotheses on the pathogenesis of SLE. These hypotheses include loss of Ag-specific tolerance with Ag-driven immunity against unmodified self-Ags, Ag driven immunity against self-Ags that have been modified (including apoptotic modification), immunity against self-Ags triggered through molecular mimicry by microbial agents, and generalized (nondirected) immune activation. Furthermore, multiple mechanisms could be operative. For example, molecular mimicry could require exposure of cryptic self-epitopes to elicit an autoimmune response. The work in the present study was designed to examine the hypothesis that SLE is in part a T cell-dependent, Ag-driven immune process in which T cell immunity is directed against a restricted set of self-peptides contained with the Sm Ag.

The goals of the present study were to characterize the T cell immune response against the Sm, including the precise Ag peptides recognized, the common features of antigenic structure recognized, and the evolution of the T cell response against Sm. We found that there was a highly restricted set of Sm self-peptides recognized by T cells, with three epitopes on Sm-B and two epitopes on Sm-D. T cell immunity against both Sm-B and Sm-D was encoded within the highly conserved Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2. Finally, T cell immunity against these T cell epitopes appeared stable over time.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

The seven patients (P1–7) selected for study met the classification criteria of SLE proposed by the American College of Rheumatology (5). Six patients were female. The University of Missouri institutional review board approved all studies involving human subjects. Sera were characterized for the presence of autoantibodies reactive with small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) polypeptides Sm-B and Sm-D using immunoblotting and ELISA (12). All patients had autoantibodies against snRNP Ags, including Sm-B (P1–7) and Sm-D (P1 and P3). HLA typing was performed using serologic and DNA-based typing methods as described previously (13). In brief, this was done using a combination of subfamily-specific PCR and direct DNA sequencing of PCR amplified products (14, 15). The HLA-DR genotypes of the patients were: P1, HLA-DRB1*0101, 1302, DRB3*0301; P2, HLA-DRB1*0401, 1301, DRB3*0101, DRB4*0101; P3, HLA-DRB1*0401, 1301, DRB3*0101, DRB4*0101; P4, HLA-DRB1*0101, 0401, DRB4*0101; P5, HLA-DRB1*0302, 1302, DRB3*0301; P6, HLA-DRB1*0301, 0401, DRB4*0101; and P7, HLA-DRB1*0101, DRB3*0301.

One patient, P1, was analyzed with T cell cloning performed at several time points over 2 yr. Clinically, this patient had longstanding disease of 20-yr duration with an SLE disease activity index of 0–6 in the first year of the study and 4–6 in the second year of the study (16). The patient took 400 mg/day hydroxychloroquine throughout the study and took 5–15 mg/day prednisone during the second year of the study.

Recombinant Ags

Full-length cDNA for snRNP peptides Sm-B3 and Sm-D1 were subcloned into the pMAL-c2 plasmid vector (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and were the gift of S. Hoch (La Jolla Institute for Experimental Medicine, La Jolla, CA) (1). When expressed, these constructs resulted in a fusion protein consisting of an snRNP peptide linked to a fragment of the maltose binding protein. Ags were analyzed by PAGE and immunoblotting for purity and antigenic activity. The protein concentration of each Ag was determined; the Ags were aliquoted and stored at -80°C before use.

Peptide design and synthesis

Peptides were synthesized using F-moc chemistry on an Applied Biosystems model 432A peptide synthesizer (Foster City, CA) or were purchased (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) (2). Peptides were analyzed for purity and sequence fidelity using HPLC and mass spectrometry. The peptides used were required to have at least 90% purity and unambiguous sequence fidelity.

Generation of human T cell clones

The T cell clones used in these studies were generated as described previously (17). In brief, cells were obtained by apheresis and then subjected to density gradient centrifugation using Histopaque (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Patient PBMC were used immediately or were cryopreserved for use as APC to restimulate clones. Cells (5 x 106) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) with 20 µg/ml gentamicin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 15% AB-positive human serum, and pooled peptides at a final concentration of 1 µg/ml. As Ags, a series of synthetic peptides, 25 residues in length, was used. Each peptide spanned the previous peptide in the series beginning at residue 13. The entire series of peptides were designed to span either Sm-B2 (including the sequence for the shorter splice variant Sm-B1, which lacks nine residues present on the carboxyl terminus of Sm-B2), or Sm-D1. The Sm-B2 Ag consisted of a pool of 19 peptides, whereas the Sm-D1 Ag consisted of a pool of nine peptides. Cells in a final volume of 5 ml were placed in a 25-cm2 flask and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Cells were restimulated with 5 x 106 autologous APC irradiated with 30 Gy and Ag in fresh medium on day 7. On day 14, T cell blasts were separated by centrifugation on a density gradient (Percoll; Pharmacia Fine Chemical, Piscataway, NJ) and cloned by limiting dilution in the presence of pooled peptides, fresh irradiated autologous APC and 10 U/ml IL-2 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) as described previously (1, 2, 17).

Proliferation assay

T cells (2 x 104) in complete medium were cultured for 48 h in 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates and then pulsed for 18 h with 1 µCi/well TdR. Cells were harvested, and TdR incorporation was detected by liquid scintillation counting.

Homozygous cell lines and Ab blocking of Ag-induced proliferation

To determine the MHC restriction element(s) used by T cell clones, Ag-induced proliferation was performed in the presence of blocking concentrations of mAbs specific for HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, HLA-DP, or HLA class I framework determinants or for clones derived from P1 using a series of well-characterized homozygous lymphoblastoid cell lines of known HLA genotypes (American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, Lenexa, KS) as APC (17, 18).

Searches for similarity with known DNA and protein sequences

Searches for similarities between T cell epitopes identified in the present study and all DNA and protein sequences in the GenBank database were performed using BLAST (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD). BLAST is an alignment search tool that allows rapid comparison of a query sequence to both DNA and protein databases. BLAST scores have a well-defined statistical interpretation, and BLAST uses a heuristic algorithm that is able to detect relationships between the query sequence and those in the databases that may share only isolated regions of similarity.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Sm-B-specific human T cell clones were generated from SLE patients

A total of 54 Sm-B reactive human T cell clones were generated from seven patients (P1–7). These are shown in Table IGo. Thirty clones were generated from P1, one from P2, three from P3, seven from P4, four from P5, one from P6, and eight from P7.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Epitopes recognized by human T cell clones specific for Sm-B

 
Three T cell epitopes were recognized by SLE patient T cell clones on the Sm-B protein

An iterative process was used to define the regions of the Sm-B2 protein recognized by human T cell clones. Clones were initially analyzed for proliferation against pools of 19 peptides, which together span Sm-B2. Clones were subsequently tested against smaller pools of peptides and eventually against individual peptides, 15 residues in length. Three regions were identified by Sm-specific T cell clones on the Sm-B protein. These epitopes are shown in Fig. 1Go and are labeled Sm-B-E1, Sm-B-E2, and Sm-B-E3. Sm-B-E1 spans residues 16–33, Sm-B-E2 spans residues 64–81, and Sm-B-E3 spans residues 136–153 of the full-length Sm-B2 protein. T cell clones were successfully generated from seven of seven patients. Clones were identified from five patients that reacted with Sm-B-E1 (P1–5). Additionally, clones were identified from six patients that reacted with Sm-B-E2 (P1 and P3–7), and finally clones were identified from three patients that reacted with Sm-B-E3 (P1, P4–P7; Table IGo).

Patient P1 selected for longitudinal cloning and analysis

One patient (P1) was selected for longitudinal cloning and analysis to further characterize the Sm-B-E1 epitope, which was recognized by the majority of patients. Clones generated at different points in the patient’s illness were examined to determine the stability of T cell epitopes recognized over time. As illustrated by representative clones in Fig. 2Go, a series of peptides, 15 residues in length (overlapping the previous peptide in the series by 12 residues), was used to more finely map the T cell epitope recognized by the panel of T cell clones. Only two peptides were significantly stimulatory, and these shared the core 12 residues, CILQDGRIFIGT. In longitudinal studies of P1, reactivity with the T cell epitope Sm-B-E1 remained unchanged over the 2 yr of study (data not shown).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Illustrated are individual peptides tested for their ability to stimulate four representative human T cell clones, originally generated using a pool of peptides that spans Sm-B. Only peptides containing the core sequence CILQDGRIFIGT were found to be stimulatory.

 
Minimal T cell epitope identified from Sm-B using overlapping peptides and truncated peptides

To determine the minimal region within the Sm-B-E1 epitope required for T cell recognition, truncated variants of the CILQDGRIFIGT peptide were synthesized and tested. Four representative Sm-B-reactive clones are described in Fig. 3Go. Stimulation of the clones was observed only when the truncated peptides contained the core sequence ILQDGRIFI (contained in the full-length Sm-B protein at positions 20–28).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Illustrated are a series of peptides, in which either the carboxyl- or amino-terminal residues have sequentially been deleted, tested for their ability to stimulate four different Sm-B-reactive human T cell clones. Only peptides containing the sequence ILQDGRIFI were found to stimulate the T cell clones.

 
MHC restriction element used in T cell recognition of minimal peptide determined

The MHC restriction element used by T cell clones from P1 was determined using Ag-induced proliferation in the presence of blocking concentrations of mAbs specific for HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, HLA-DP, or HLA class I determinants or using a series of well-characterized homozygous lymphoblastoid cell lines of known HLA genotypes as APC. All clones tested from P1 recognized Ag only in the context of HLA-DRB1*1302/B3*0301 (data not shown). Because the restriction elements HLA-DRB1*1302/B3*0301 exist in strong linkage disequilibrium among all cell lines available at the time of these studies, it could not be determined whether DRB1*1302 or DRB3*0301 was the HLA restriction element used by the clones reported here.

Alanine substitution defines essential contact residues on Sm-B peptides

To define residues critical for MHC binding or T cell contact, peptides with sequential alanine substitutions of the core peptide sequence ILQDGRIFI were synthesized and tested for their ability to induce proliferation of T cell clones. A representative experiment is described in Fig. 4Go. It was found that alanine substitution of residues at positions 1, 2, 4–6, and 9 abolished the stimulatory capacity of the peptide. Alanine substitution of the native residue at position 8 also markedly reduced the stimulatory capacity of the peptide. Substitution at positions 3 and 7 had no inhibitory influence and appeared to have an enhancing influence on T cell stimulation.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Using serial alanine substitutions of the Sm-B-E1 core peptide sequence ILQDGRIFI it was possible to define those residues in the peptide that were critical for HLA binding or TCR interaction. Alanine substitutions for native residues in the peptide at positions 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 9 resulted in loss of the T cell stimulatory capacity of the peptide.

 
Sequence similarity identified between Sm-B-E1 T cell epitope and hypothetical Mycobacterium protein

The core sequences identified within the Sm-B-E1, Sm-B-E2, Sm-B-E3, Sm-D-E1, and Sm-D-E2 epitopes were compared with known protein and DNA sequences in the GenBank database using BLAST. The epitope ILQDGRIFI within Sm-B-E1 shared an identical seven-residue segment with a Mycobacterium tuberculosis hypothetical protein Rv1061 (LQDGRIF) (19). The Sm-B-E2-E3 and Sm-D-E1-E2 epitopes did not have similarity with other proteins, except for related snRNP.

Sm-D-specific human T cell clones were generated from SLE patients

A total of 28 Sm-D reactive clones were successfully generated from three of seven patients. These are shown in Table IIGo. Nine clones were generated from P1, three from P2, and 16 from P3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Epitopes recognized by human T cell clones specific for Sm-D

 
Two T cell epitopes were recognized by SLE patient T cell clones on the Sm-D protein

The same iterative process used to characterize Sm-B was used to define the regions of the Sm-D1 protein recognized by human T cell clones. Clones were initially analyzed for proliferation against pools of nine peptides, which together span Sm-D1. Clones were subsequently tested against smaller pools of peptides and eventually against individual peptides, 15 residues in length. Two regions were identified by Sm-specific T cell clones on the Sm-D protein. These epitopes are illustrated in Fig. 5Go and are labeled Sm-D-E1 and Sm-D-E2. Sm-D-E1 spans residues 35–53, and Sm-B-E2 spans residues 53–67 of the Sm-D1 protein. There were individual clones generated from the three Sm-D-reactive patients that recognized Sm-D-E1 (P1–3) and others that recognized Sm-D-E2 (P1–3; Table IIGo).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. The amino acid sequence of the human Sm-D1 protein is shown. The regions that contain the T cell epitopes Sm-D-E1 and Sm-D-E2 are indicated. Also indicated are the regions encoding the Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2.

 
Patient P1 selected for longitudinal cloning and analysis

P1 was again analyzed in detail to define the regions within the Sm-D protein recognized by the majority of T cell clones. Longitudinal studies were also performed to delineate the stability of T cell epitopes recognized. The T cell epitopes identified in P1 were Sm-D-E1 and Sm-D-E2 (Fig. 5Go and Table IIGo). These were the regions identified repeatedly by cloning over 2 yr of study (data not shown). These appeared similar to results obtained in cross-sectional studies of two additional patients from whom Sm-D-reactive clones could be generated. Only for P3 was there a clear preponderance of reactivity to Sm-D-E1 (15 clones) compared with Sm-D-E2 (one clone; Table IIGo).

Minimal T cell epitope identified from Sm-D using overlapping peptides and truncated peptides

To determine the minimal region of the Sm-D-E1 and Sm-D-E2 epitopes required for T cell recognition, truncated peptides were designed and synthesized. Sm-D-E1 reactive clones are described in Figs. 6GoA and 7A. Sm-D-E2-reactive clones are described in Figs. 6GoB and 7B. As illustrated in Fig. 6Go, a series of peptides, 15 residues in length, was used to define more precisely the T cell stimulatory peptide contained within Sm-D-E1 and Sm-D-E2. For the Sm-D-E1 epitope the core peptide HLKAVKMTLK was identified (Figs. 6GoA and 7A), and for Sm-D-E2 the core peptide SIRGNNIRY was identified (Figs. 6GoB and 7B). As was observed for Sm-B, reactivity with Sm-D epitopes was similar among clones generated from P1 at different time points.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. A, A series of overlapping peptides, 15 residues in length, was used to define the Sm-D-E1 core stimulatory sequence NTHLKAVKMTLNRE. B, A series of overlapping peptides, 15 residues in length, was used to define the Sm-D-E2 core stimulatory sequence VQLETLSIRGNNIRY.

 
MHC restriction element used in T cell recognition of minimal peptide determined

The MHC restriction element used by T cell clones from P1 was determined using Ag-induced proliferation in the presence of blocking concentrations of mAbs specific for HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, HLA-DP, or HLA class I determinants or using a series of well-characterized homozygous lymphoblastoid cell lines of known HLA genotypes as APC. As was found for Sm-B-reactive clones, all Sm-D Ag-reactive clones recognized Sm-D peptides only in the context of HLA-DRB1*1302/B3*0301 (data not shown).

Alanine substitution defines essential contact residues on Sm-D peptides

To define residues critical for MHC binding or T cell contact, peptides with sequential alanine substitutions of the core peptide sequence SIRGNNIRY were synthesized and tested for their ability to induce proliferation of T cell clones. A representative experiment is shown in Fig. 8Go. It was found that alanine substitution of residues at positions 2 and 5–9 abolished the stimulatory capacity of the peptide. Substitution at positions 1, 3, and 4 had no influence on stimulation by the peptide.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Using serial alanine substitutions of the Sm-D-E1 core peptide SIRGNNIRY, it was possible to define those residues in the peptide that were critical for HLA binding or TCR interaction. Alanine substitutions for native residues in the peptide at positions 2 and 5–9 resulted in loss of the T cell stimulatory capacity of the peptide.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study was designed to examine the hypothesis that at least in part SLE is a T cell-dependent, Ag-driven immune process in which T cell immunity is directed against a restricted set of self-peptides contained within the Sm Ag. T cell epitope-mapping studies of the Sm Ag revealed that there were a limited number of T cell epitopes. As summarized in Figs. 1Go and 5Go and Tables IGo and IIGo, among the seven SLE patients studied there were three T cell epitopes on Sm-B and two T cell epitopes on Sm-D. Using truncated peptides for more precise delineation of the T cell stimulatory region, a core sequence ILQDGRIFI was identified within the epitope Sm-B-E1 (Figs. 2Go and 3Go). For the epitope Sm-D-E1, the core sequence HLKAVKMTLK was identified (Figs. 6GoA and 7A), and within Sm-D-E2 the core sequence SIRGNNIRY was identified (Figs. 6GoB and 7B). These findings are consistent with recent studies of TCR CDR3 use among Sm-B- and Sm-D-reactive clones, where limited clonal diversity of CDR3 was found (2, 3). In previous studies it was suggested that a limited number of immunodominant peptides could be the basis for highly selective TCR usage (2, 3). TCR CDR3 selectivity was marked, and in some cases identical CDR3 were used by T cell clones derived from different patients recognizing the Sm Ag (2, 3). The present study provides direct evidence that T cell recognition of Sm is targeted to a highly restricted set of self-peptides.

Analysis of the structural features of the epitopes recognized on the Sm Ag revealed a number of interesting characteristics. The dominant T cell epitopes identified in this study are regions encoding the so-called Sm motifs, Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2. These were first described by Hermann et al. and are 32 and 14 residues in length, respectively (11). The Sm motifs are believed to be involved in direct protein-protein interactions (10, 11, 20). Hermann et al. have demonstrated that these motifs share similarity among the different Sm core proteins B1, B2, D1, D2, D3, E, F, and G and are evolutionarily conserved. For example, the human D1 protein shares 78% homology with its putative homologue in rice and 99% homology with its homologue in the mouse. The reader is referred to Hermann et al. for a comprehensive discussion of this subject (11). The fact that the Sm motifs are encoded in all eight Sm proteins has been suggested to explain in part the immunologic cross-reactivity by monoclonal and polyclonal Abs between multiple Sm proteins (21, 22). Although we have no direct evidence demonstrating T cells cross-reactivity between Sm-B and Sm-D, the shared structural features of the Sm motif offers an intriguing structural explanation for T cell immunodominance directed against this highly restricted set of self-peptides. This will be a focus of future research.

Although additional studies of larger numbers of patients at various stages of disease are needed, another important finding of this study was that the T cell epitopes identified among a cross-sectional panel of seven patients and longitudinal analysis of one patient were similar. Future studies of patients with early disease will be of considerable interest to determine whether early T cell reactivity is directed against similar or different T cell epitopes.

The recognition of a limited set of self-peptides, as observed here for Sm, has been described for T cell recognition of other autoantigens, including such autoantigens as topoisomerase I in systemic sclerosis and myelin basic protein in multiple sclerosis (23, 24). It has been proposed that a fundamental feature of autoimmunity is T cell recognition of cryptic self-Ags (25). Consistent with this hypothesis, we now provide direct evidence that T cell recognition of the Sm self-Ag is highly restricted in SLE.

An alternative concept, which has been proposed to explain the loss of self-tolerance, is molecular mimicry (26). We investigated this possibility for Sm reactivity in SLE. Similarity searches were performed between the core T cell epitopes identified in the present study and the GenBank database. Interestingly, the Sm-B-E1 core sequence has a seven-residue segment identical with an M. tuberculosis hypothetical protein RV1061 (19). Consistent with a role for Mycobacterium in initiating autoimmunity, Mycobacterium bovis has been found to induce an anti-Sm immune response in NOD mice (27). However, in preliminary studies, the seven-residue Mycobacterium peptide LQDGRIF did not cross-stimulate clones reactive with the Sm-B-E1 sequence ILQDGRIFI (nor did longer M. tuberculosis-derived peptides; data not shown). Further studies exploring cross-reactivity between Sm-B-E1 and Mycobacterium peptides are in progress.

In other work related to mimicry, Harley and James (8) found that a region of Sm-B, PPPGMRPP, that has similarity to an EBV protein is one of the early dominant B cell epitopes recognized by anti-Sm Abs. They also found that PPPGRRPP peptides could initiate SLE-like disease in animals (28). Although the PPPGMRPP B cell epitope is distant from the T cell epitopes identified in the present study, the T cell epitopes Sm-B-E1 and Sm-B-E3 contain sequences recognized by non-cross-reactive anti-Sm Abs that develop late in the evolution of anti-Sm-B Ab epitope spreading (29). Finally, it is known that T and B cell epitopes may be distinct.

Studies were performed to characterize the molecular interactions of Sm with MHC molecules on APC. Experiments using blocking mAbs against HLA framework determinants and cell lines homozygous for HLA demonstrated that all clones studied were restricted in Ag presentation by HLA-DRB1*1302/DRB3*0301. Alanine substitution studies (Figs. 4Go and 8Go) demonstrated that key HLA binding sites or TCR contact residues for Sm-B-E1 were positions 1, 2, 4–6, and 9, and for Sm-D-E1 they were positions 2 and 5–9. These results are consistent with known HLA binding motifs for DRB1*1302/DRB3*0301 (30, 31). Future studies directly testing HLA binding and TCR interactions using site-directed mutagenesis of cloned TCR genes expressed in TCR-deficient Jurkat cell lines are in progress to more precisely define the molecular interactions among Sm self-reactive peptides, HLA, and the TCR (32, 33).

The present study provides direct evidence that SLE is at least in part a T cell-dependent, Ag-driven immune process in which T cell immunity is directed against a highly restricted set of self-peptides, encoded within Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2, that are shared among all Sm proteins. We provide direct evidence that this mechanism is operative. This is consistent with a broader model of etiopathogenesis in SLE in which tolerance to self-Ags is lost, perhaps through molecular mimicry and/or exposure to cryptic self-epitopes, and autoimmunity develops as an Ag-driven immune process against highly conserved self-Ags.

In summary, we found that there was a highly restricted set of Sm self-peptides recognized by T cells, with three epitopes on Sm-B and two epitopes on Sm-D. T cell immunity against both Sm-B and Sm-D was encoded within the highly conserved Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2. These T cell epitopes appeared to be stable over time. The findings of the present study support the concept that T cell immunity to Sm Ag is an Ag-driven immune response directed against a highly restricted set of self-peptides encoded within the functional domains of Sm motif 1 and Sm motif 2, which are found on all Sm proteins.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. A, A series of truncation mutations of Sm-D-E1 peptides was used to identify the minimal core peptide sequence HLKAVKMTLK. B, A series of truncation mutations of Sm-D-E2 peptides was used to identify the minimal core peptide sequence SIRGNNIRY.

 

    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Grant R01AR43308 from the National Institutes of Health and by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Robert W. Hoffman, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, MA427 HSC, University of Missouri, Columbia MO 65212. E-mail address: hoffmanr{at}health.missouri.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Sm, Smith Ag; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; snRNP, small nuclear ribonucleoprotein. Back

Received for publication January 4, 2001. Accepted for publication April 24, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Holyst, M.-M., D. L. Hill, S. O. Hoch, R. W. Hoffman. 1997. Analysis of human T cell and B cell responses against U-small nuclear ribonucleoprotein 70kD, B and D polypeptides among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease. Arthritis Rheum. 40:1493.[Medline]
  2. Talken, B. L., M.-M. Holyst, D. L. Hill, R. W. Hoffman. 1999. T cell receptor {beta}-chain third complementarity-determining region gene usage is highly restricted among Sm-B autoantigen-specific human T cell clones derived from patients with connective tissue disease. Arthritis Rheum. 42:703.[Medline]
  3. Talken, B. L., C. W. Bailey, S. L. Reardon, C. W. Caldwell, and R. W. Hoffman. 2001. Structural analysis of T cell receptor (TCR) {alpha} and {beta} chains from human T cell clones specific for small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptides Sm-D, Sm-B and U1–70kD: highly conserved TCR complementarity determining region 3 suggest that connective tissue diseases are antigen driven. Scand. J. Immunol. In press.
  4. Peng, S. L., J. E. Craft. 1996. Spliceosomal snRNPs autoantibodies. J. B. Peter, and Y. Shoenfeld, eds. Autoantibodies 774. Elsevier, New York.
  5. Tan, E. M., A. S. Cohen, J. F. Fries, A. T. Masi, D. J. McShane, N. F. Rothfield, J. G. Schaller, N. Talal, R. J. Winchester. 1982. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 31:219.
  6. Tsuzaka, K., T. Ogasawara, T. Tojo, T. Mimori, M. Satoh, M. Homma. 1993. Nonprecipitating IgG or IgM anti-Sm antibody: clinical significance and changes in immunoglobulin class. J. Rheum. 20:822.[Medline]
  7. Tan, E. M.. 1989. Antinuclear antibodies: diagnostic markers for autoimmune diseases and probes for cell biology. Adv. Immunol. 44:93.[Medline]
  8. Harley, J. B., J. A. James. 1999. Epstein-Barr virus infection may be an environmental risk factor for systemic lupus erythematosus in children and teenagers. Arthritis Rheum. 42:1782.[Medline]
  9. Kramer, A.. 1996. The structure and function of proteins involved in mammalian pre-mRNA splicing. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:367.[Medline]
  10. Will, C. L., R. Luhrmann. 1997. Protein functions in pre-mRNA splicing. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9:320.[Medline]
  11. Hermann, H., P. Fabrizio, V. A. Raker, K. Foulaki, H. Hornig, H. Brahms, R. Luhrmann. 1995. SnRNP Sm proteins share two evolutionarily conserved sequence motifs which are involved in Sm protein-protein interactions. EMBO J. 14:2076.[Medline]
  12. Burdt, M., R. W. Hoffman, S. L. Deutscher, G. S. Wang, J. C. Johnson, G. C. Sharp. 1999. Long-term outcome in mixed connective tissue disease: longitudinal clinical and serologic findings. Arthritis Rheum. 42:899.[Medline]
  13. Kaneoka, H., K.-C. Hsu, Y. Takeda, G. C. Sharp, R. W. Hoffman. 1992. Molecular genetic analysis of HLA-DR and HLA-DQ genes among anti-U1–70kD autoantibody positive connective tissue disease patients. Arthritis Rheum. 35:83.[Medline]
  14. Hoffman, R. W., L. J. Rettenmaier, Y. Takeda, J. E. Hewett, I. Pettersson, U. Nyman, A. M. Luger, G. C. Sharp. 1990. Human autoantibodies against the 70kD polypeptide of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein are associated with HLA-DR4 among connective tissue disease patients. Arthritis Rheum. 33:666.[Medline]
  15. Hsu, K.-C., D. Hill, R. W. Hoffman. 1992. HLA-DPB1*0401 is associated with the presence of autoantibodies reactive with the U1–70 kD polypeptide antigen of U1-small nuclear ribonucleoprotein among connective tissue disease patients. Tissue Antigens 39:272.[Medline]
  16. Bombardier, C., D. D. Gladman, M. B. Urowitz, D. Caron, C. H. Chang. 1992. Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients: the Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE. Arthritis Rheum. 35:630.[Medline]
  17. Hoffman, R. W., Y. Takeda, G. C. Sharp, D. R. Lee, K. Kaneoka, C. W. Caldwell. 1993. Human T cell clones reactive against U-small nuclear ribonucleoprotein autoantigens from connective tissue disease patients and healthy individuals. J. Immunol. 151:6460.[Abstract]
  18. Kimura, A., R. P. Dong, H. Harada, T. Sasazuki. 1992. DNA typing of HLA Class II genes in B-lymphoblastoid cell lines homozygous for HLA. Tissue Antigens 40:5.[Medline]
  19. Cole, S. T., R. Brosch, J. Parkhill, T. Garnier, C. Churcher, D. Harris, S. V. Gordon, K. Eiglmeier, S. Gas, C. E. Barry, et al 1998. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 393:537.[Medline]
  20. Fury, M. G., W. Zhang, I. Christodoulopoulos, G. W. Zieve. 1997. Multiple protein:protein interactions between the snRNP common core proteins. Exp. Cell Res. 1:63.
  21. Bahia, D., J. Font, A. Khaouja, N. Carreras, R. Espuny, R. M. Baretto Cicarelli, M. Ingelmo, M. Bach-Elias. 1999. Antibodies to yeast Sm motif 1 cross-react with human Sm core polypeptides. Eur. J. Biochem. 261:371.[Medline]
  22. Pruijn, G. J., F. Schoute, J. P. Thijssen, R. J. Smeenk, W. J. van Venrooij. 1997. Mapping of SLE-specific Sm B cell epitopes using murine monoclonal antibodies. J. Autoimmun. 10:127.[Medline]
  23. Kuwana, M., Jr T. A. Medsger, T. M. Wright. 1997. T cell clones specific for DNA topoisomerase I: recognition of an immunodominant epitope. J. Immunol. 158:485.[Abstract]
  24. Wucherpfennig, K. W., A. Sette, S. Southwood, C. Oseroff, M. Matsui, J. L. Strominger, D. A. Hafler. 1994. Structural requirements for binding of an immunodominant myelin basic protein peptide to DR2 isotypes and for its recognition by human T cell clones. J. Exp. Med. 179:279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sercarz, E. E., P. V. Lehmann, A. Amentani, G. Benichou, A. Miller, K. Moudgil. 1993. Dominance and crypticity of T cell antigenic determinants. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11:729.[Medline]
  26. Lanzavecchia, A.. 1995. How can cryptic epitopes trigger autoimmunity?. J. Exp. Med. 181:1945.[Free Full Text]
  27. Horsfall, A. C., R. Howson, P. Silveira, D. G. Williams, A. G. Baxter. 1998. Characterization and specificity of B-cell responses in lupus induced by Mycobacterium bovis in NOD/Lt mice. Immunology 95:8.[Medline]
  28. James, J. A., J. B. Harley. 1998. A model of peptide-induced lupus autoimmune B cell epitope spreading is strain specific and is not H-2 restricted in mice. J. Immunol. 160:502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Arbuckle, M. R., M. Reichlin, J. B. Harley, J. A. James. 1999. Shared early autoantibody recognition events in the development of anti-Sm B/B' in human lupus. Scand. J. Immunol. 50:447.[Medline]
  30. Boitel, B., U. Blank, D. Mège, G. Corradin, J. Sidney, A. Sette, O. Acuto. 1995. Strong similarities in antigen fine specificity among DRB1*1302-restricted tetanus toxin tt830–843-specific TCRs in spite of highly heterogeneous CDR3. J. Immunol. 154:3245.[Abstract]
  31. Rammensee, H.-G., J. Bachmann, S. Stevanovíc. 1997. MHC Ligands and Peptide Motifs Chapman and Hall, New York.
  32. Brawley, J. V., P. Concannon. 1996. Modulation of promiscuous T cell receptor recognition by mutagenesis of CDR2 residues. J. Exp. Med. 183:2043.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sugita, M., E. P. Grant, E. van Donselaar, V. W. Hsu, R. A. Rogers, P. J. Peters, M. B. Brenner. 1999. Separate pathways for antigen presentation by CD1 molecules. Immunity 11:743.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. L. Greidinger, Y. J. Zang, K. Jaimes, L. Martinez, M. Nassiri, and R. W. Hoffman
CD4+ T Cells Target Epitopes Residing within the RNA-Binding Domain of the U1-70-kDa Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Autoantigen and Have Restricted TCR Diversity in an HLA-DR4-Transgenic Murine Model of Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
J. Immunol., June 15, 2008; 180(12): 8444 - 8454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
U. S. Deshmukh, H. Bagavant, D. Sim, V. Pidiyar, and S. M. Fu
A SmD Peptide Induces Better Antibody Responses to Other Proteins within the Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Complex than to SmD Protein via Intermolecular Epitope Spreading
J. Immunol., February 15, 2007; 178(4): 2565 - 2571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Monneaux, J. Hoebeke, C. Sordet, C. Nonn, J.-P. Briand, B. Maillere, J. Sibillia, and S. Muller
Selective Modulation of CD4+ T Cells from Lupus Patients by a Promiscuous, Protective Peptide Analog
J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 5839 - 5847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. Riemekasten, D. Langnickel, P. Enghard, R. Undeutsch, J. Humrich, F. M. Ebling, B. Hocher, T. Humaljoki, H. Neumayer, G.-R. Burmester, et al.
Intravenous Injection of a D1 Protein of the Smith Proteins Postpones Murine Lupus and Induces Type 1 Regulatory T Cells
J. Immunol., November 1, 2004; 173(9): 5835 - 5842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. De Silva-Udawatta, S. R. Kumar, E. L. Greidinger, and R. W. Hoffman
Cloned Human TCR from Patients with Autoimmune Disease Can Respond to Two Structurally Distinct Autoantigens
J. Immunol., March 15, 2004; 172(6): 3940 - 3947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. M. Ercolini, J.-P. H. Machiels, Y. C. Chen, J. E. Slansky, M. Giedlen, R. T. Reilly, and E. M. Jaffee
Identification and Characterization of the Immunodominant Rat HER-2/neu MHC Class I Epitope Presented by Spontaneous Mammary Tumors from HER-2/neu-Transgenic Mice
J. Immunol., April 15, 2003; 170(8): 4273 - 4280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. L. Greidinger, M. F. Foecking, K. R. Schafermeyer, C. W. Bailey, S. L. Primm, D. R. Lee, and R. W. Hoffman
T Cell Immunity in Connective Tissue Disease Patients Targets the RNA Binding Domain of the U1-70kDa Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein
J. Immunol., September 15, 2002; 169(6): 3429 - 3437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Talken, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Talken, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, R. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS