The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thorstenson, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Khoruts, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thorstenson, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Khoruts, A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 167: 188-195.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Generation of Anergic and Potentially Immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T Cells In Vivo After Induction of Peripheral Tolerance with Intravenous or Oral Antigen1

Kristen M. Thorstenson and Alexander Khoruts2

Division of Gastroenterology and Center for Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells are thought to arise from the thymus as a distinct lineage of CD4 T cells specific for self Ags. We used the DO11.10 TCR transgenic adoptive transfer system to show that cells of similar phenotype may also arise in the course of peripheral tolerance induction. Such cells emerged within 1 wk following Ag exposure and correlated negatively with the number of initial cell divisions. Limiting i.v. Ag dose or using an oral tolerance protocol yielded the greatest numbers of Ag-specific CD25+CD4 T cells. In contrast, immunogenic Ag exposure in the presence of an adjuvant did not lead to emergence of CD25+CD4 T cells. The profound anergic phenotype of these cells and their potential immunoregulatory properties make them an especially desirable population to induce in the course of immunotherapy in numerous clinical settings. This experimental system may be useful in future studies designed to optimize immunologic tolerance induction.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There is now substantial evidence that a subpopulation of CD4 T cells that constitutively express CD25 contributes to maintenance of immunologic tolerance. These cells, which account for 5–15% of the normal peripheral CD4 T cell population, can control widespread autoimmunity that can be induced experimentally by T cell reconstitution of T cell-deficient mice (1, 2, 3). Immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells were also shown to be essential for protection of nonobese diabetic mice from onset of diabetes (4). Similar patterns of widespread and organ-specific autoimmunity, abrogated by transfer of CD25+CD4 T cells, have been observed in neonatally thymectomized mice (5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Recent work suggests that immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells arise in the thymus from a unique lineage of cells (8, 9, 10). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that anergic and potentially regulatory CD25+CD4 T cells can also arise in vivo following induction of peripheral immunologic tolerance to an exogenous foreign Ag.

We used the DO11.10 TCR transgenic adoptive transfer system to track the phenotype of Ag-specific CD4 T cells following Ag exposure. All donor mice were bred onto the RAG-2-deficient background and had few T cells expressing CD25. Peripheral tolerance was induced either by i.v. injection of peptide Ag or oral protein administration. Indeed, a subpopulation of CD4 T cells constitutively coexpressing CD25, phenotypically similar to immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells described previously (2, 11, 12), emerged within the lymphoid tissues of tolerized animals. In contrast, these cells did not appear following immunization with peptide and adjuvant. An inverse correlation between the numbers of CD25+CD4 T cells and number of cell divisions following Ag exposure was noted. The greatest yield of CD25+CD4 T cells followed a low dose tolerance protocol, which may be analogous to dietary Ag exposure. These results suggest that peripheral induction of CD25+CD4 T cells in response toward innocuous environmental Ags may contribute to the pool of immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells produced directly in the thymus in response to self Ags.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice and adoptive transfer protocol

The DO11.10 TCR transgenic mice (13), extensively backcrossed (>15 generations) onto the BALB/c background, were crossed with RAG-2-deficient mice purchased from Taconic (Germantown, NY). All donor mice were RAG-2-deficient DO11.10 TCR transgenic confirmed by staining peripheral blood cells for presence of KJ1-26+CD4 T cells and absence of B cells. Donor mice were maintained on autoclaved food and water in a specific pathogen-free facility in microisolator cages with filtered air according to National Institutes of Health guidelines. RAG-2-deficient DO11.10 CD4 T cells were adoptively transferred (2.5–5 x 106 cells per mouse) by i.v. injection into unirradiated BALB/c mice, as previously described (14). In some of the experiments, donor cells were labeled with CFSE (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) before transfer, using a technique previously described (15).

Abs and staining reagents

The following Abs and secondary reagents used for flow cytometry were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA): CyChrome-labeled anti-CD4, PerCP-labeled anti-CD4, allophycocyanin-labeled anti-CD25, PE-labeled anti-CD25, PE-labeled anti-IL-2, PE-labeled anti-IFN-{gamma}, PE-labeled anti-IL-4, PE-labeled anti-IL-5, PE-labeled anti-CTLA-4, and allophycocyanin-labeled streptavidin. The following Abs and secondary reagents were purchased from Caltag (Burlingame, CA): PE-labeled KJ1-26 and PE-labeled streptavidin. Biotin-labeled KJ1-26 was generously provided by M. K. Jenkins (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN). The following neutralizing Abs were used in the in vitro blocking studies: anti-IL-10, clone JES5-2A5 (PharMingen), and anti-TGF-{beta} (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Immunization and tolerance induction

A single i.v. injection of the OVA peptide 323–339, synthesized at Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL), at a dose of 5 µg per mouse, unless specified otherwise, was used to induce tolerance. LPS (25 µg), serotype Escherichia coli 026:B6 from Difco Laboratories (Detroit, MI), was mixed with the peptide and administered i.v. to induce priming.

Oral tolerance was induced by letting mice drink tap water containing OVA protein. Food and water were withheld from mice for 8 h, after which they were offered water containing OVA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 25 mg/ml concentration for 18 h overnight. The amount of water consumed was measured and averaged 1 ml.

In vitro lymph node cell cultures

Suppressive properties of Ag-specific CD25+ T cells were tested using approaches of their depletion from or addition to in vitro cultures.

For the depletion approach, axillary, brachial, inguinal, and cervical lymph nodes were taken from untreated, primed, or tolerized mice (at least 8 days after initial Ag exposure). Lymph node cells were resuspended in 10 ml media and split into two halves. One half was stained with an irrelevant biotinylated rat mAb, and one with biotinylated anti-CD25 (7D4). Streptavidin magnetic beads (Dynal, Lake Success, NY) were then used to deplete Ab-bound cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions. About 90% depletion of CD25+ T cells was achieved in most experiments. Lymph node cells (3–5 x 106/ml) were then incubated in 24-well plates in enriched Eagle’s medium (EHAA) medium (Biofluids, Rockville, MD) supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 20 µg/ml gentamicin, and 0.05 mM 2-ME at 37°C with or without OVA peptide at indicated concentrations, and supernatants were collected at different time points. The numbers of CD25+KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells and CD25-KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells put into each well were determined using flow cytometry.

Suppressive properties of CD25+ T cells were also tested by their addition to cultures containing naive RAG-2-deficient DO11.10 responder cells. CD25+ T cells from normal BALB/c mice (endogenous CD25+ T cells), or adoptively transferred and tolerized mice (endogenous and DO11.10 RAG-2-deficient CD25+ T cells), or naturally occurring CD25+ DO11.10 cells from wild-type transgenics were positively selected using magnetic streptavidin microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. These were cultured in 24-well plates with 50,000 RAG-2-deficient DO11.10 responder cells, 2.5 x 106 CD4-depleted BALB/c irradiated splenocytes as APCs. Each well contained equal numbers (2.5 x 106) of endogenous CD25+ T cells and differed only in the presence or absence of DO11.10 CD25+ T cells put in 1:1 ratio with the naive DO11.10 responder cells. Some of the wells were treated with 10 µg/ml anti-IL-10 and anti-TGF-{beta} Abs. IL-2 was measured in the 48-h supernatants, as described below.

Direct comparison of suppressive properties of Ag-specific (DO11.10 RAG-2-deficient) CD25+ T cells and endogenous CD25+ T cells was done with the aid of physical cell sorting. RAG-2-deficient DO11.10 cells were dyed with CFSE before adoptive transfer and tolerance induction. CD25+ T cells positively selected with magnetic beads were separated into CFSE-high (DO11.10+ CD25+ T cells) and CFSE-negative fractions (DO11.10- CD25+ T cells) using FACSVantage high speed sorting. Different numbers of CD25+ T cells were cultured with 10,000 naive RAG-2-deficient DO11.10 responder cells and 1 x 106 CD4-depleted irradiated splenocytes APCs in the presence or absence of 5 µM OVA peptide in 96-well plates. IL-2 was measured in the 48-h supernatants, and proliferative response of the responder cells was done by direct counting using FACS because CD25+ DO11.10 cells could be distinguished by residual CFSE dye.

Measurement of IL-2 in the supernatants using flow cytometry

A total of 1 x 106 latex beads (Interfacial Dynamics, Portland, OR) coated with anti-IL-2 capture mAb JES6-1A12 (PharMingen) and blocked with medium containing 10% FCS was incubated with culture supernatants for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were then washed, incubated with biotin-labeled detection anti-IL-2 mAb JES6-5H4 (PharMingen) for 1 h, washed again, and incubated with PE-labeled streptavidin for 10 min. Geometric mean fluorescence intensity of beads was then measured by flow cytometry and plotted on a standard curve generated using media with known concentrations of IL-2. This method had ~10-fold greater sensitivity and lesser variability compared with a sandwich ELISA using the same Ab pairs.

Measurement of IL-2 production in vivo in response to peptide Ag stimulation using flow cytometry

A modification of the method described previously (16) was used. One to two hours after mice were pulsed with 250 µg of the OVA Ag i.v., their lymph nodes or spleens were collected on ice. Single cell suspensions were Fc blocked and surface stained for CD4, CD25, and the DO11.10 transgenic TCR. Cells were then washed with PBS and fixed for 20 min with 2% formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS again and permeabilized with a buffer containing 0.3% saponin and 25% FCS. Intracellular staining was then done using PE-labeled anti-IL-2 mAb (PharMingen) for 30 min in the permeabilization buffer. Cells were then sequentially washed with a buffer containing 0.5% saponin and 2% FCS, PBS, and staining buffer (PBS, 2% FCS, 0.02% sodium azide). IL-2 production by individual cells was then measured using flow cytometry. KJ1-26-CD4+ T cells in the same tubes, as well as KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells from mice that did not receive the Ag pulse but were stained in parallel, served as negative controls. Surface staining for CD25 before permeabilization within the 1–2 h after Ag rechallenge ensured that intracellular CD25 induced by the Ag would not be detected.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Emergence of CD25+CD4 T cells following peripheral tolerance induction with i.v. peptide Ag

The DO11.10 TCR transgenic adoptive transfer system (14) was used to track the phenotype of Ag-specific CD4+ T cells in vivo following peripheral Ag exposure. It is well established that systemic, soluble Ag administration results in establishment of peripheral immunologic tolerance, but Ag administration accompanied by an adjuvant leads to immunologic priming (17, 18, 19). The DO11.10 TCR transgenic T cell adoptive transfer system was used previously to characterize the fate of Ag-specific CD4 T cells following these two different types of Ag exposure (14, 16, 20). Intravenous administration of the OVA peptide 323–339 alone results in initial proliferation of Ag-specific CD4 T cells until peak clonal expansion is reached on day 3, which is then followed by clonal deletion and functional inactivation of the remaining Ag-specific CD4 T cells. The net result of expansion and contraction of the Ag-specific CD4 T cell population following a single wave of Ag in this model is a population that is smaller than the starting one and also functionally hyporesponsive to restimulation at the level of an average individual cell (14, 20). In contrast, while addition of LPS to the Ag does not change the overall kinetics of the T cell response, the end result is an expanded population of Ag-specific CD4 T cells that on restimulation produce large amounts of IL-2 and gain ability to produce effector cytokines such as IFN-{gamma} (16, 20). The reported phenotypic characteristics of immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells resemble some of the phenotypic characteristics of CD4 T cells tolerized in vivo with i.v. peptide Ag. Thus, CD25+CD4 T cells are unable to make IL-2 in vitro and proliferate poorly following TCR stimulation. Therefore, we wished to see whether a population of immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells emerges following peripheral tolerance induction with i.v. peptide Ag.

About 5% of the DO11.10 CD4 T cells in the wild-type transgenic mice coexpress CD25 (9, 11 , and data not shown). Existence of these cells depends on expression of the second TCR resulting from endogenous rearrangement of the TCR {alpha}-chain. Therefore, to confine our investigation of origin of CD25+CD4 T cells exclusively to differentiation following peripheral Ag exposure, we bred the donor mice onto the RAG-2-deficient background. Fewer than 1% of the RAG-2-deficient DO11.10 CD4 T cells taken directly from the intact transgenics stain positively for CD25 (9 , and data not shown). Since the tolerant phenotype is established over the course of 1 wk following systemic Ag exposure (21), we looked at CD25 expression by DO11.10 T cells on day 8 or later following a single i.v. dose of Ag. Indeed, a subpopulation of CD25+CD4 T cells was noted to be present, but its size was inversely correlated with the dose of the tolerizing peptide (Fig. 1Go). The inverse relationship between Ag dose and CD25 expression by the DO11.10 T cells at this time in the immune response argued against CD25 representing a mere transient marker of activation. Furthermore, coadministration of an adjuvant, LPS, along with the low dose peptide Ag (5 µg) also did not lead to emergence of the Ag-specific CD25+CD4+ T cell population (Fig. 2Go). A more detailed kinetic analysis showed that transient expression of CD25 was seen on all Ag-specific T cells within 12 h of Ag administration regardless of adjuvant presence. However, Ag-specific CD4 T cells expressing CD25 at later time points were seen only following a tolerizing protocol. In fact, there was an increase in the numbers of the KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells expressing CD25 between day 3 and day 8 following the tolerizing Ag encounter (Fig. 2Go) despite the fall in the size of the total KJ1-26+CD4+ T cell population. Therefore, it is unlikely that the increased proportion of CD25+ Ag-specific T cells seen following a tolerance protocol can be explained merely by preferential death of the CD25- Ag-specific T cells. The total number of CD25+ Ag-specific T cells remained relatively constant on days 16 and 23 following Ag exposure (data not shown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. The number of Ag-specific CD4 T cells persistently expressing CD25 is greatest following the lowest dose of tolerizing peptide Ag. Expression of CD25 by KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells in spleen was measured by flow cytometry 8 days after various doses of OVA peptide were injected i.v. Each point shows the mean value from two individual mice. This experiment is representative of three independent experiments. Similar results were also seen in the lymph nodes (data not shown).

 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Late emergence of Ag-specific CD25+CD4 T cells in the primary response following Ag exposure occurs only in the absence of adjuvant. Mice were injected i.v. 5 µg OVA peptide alone or with 25 µg LPS. Spleens were harvested at different different time points of the immune response, and expression of CD25 by KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells in spleen was measured by flow cytometry. A, Representative histograms showing CD25 expression. Gray histograms show CD25 expression by naive KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells that were not exposed to Ag. Black, heavy histograms show CD25 expression at indicated times after Ag encounter. B, Left, total numbers of KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells in spleens of mice that received 5 µg peptide alone or with LPS at different times following Ag exposure; right, total numbers of CD25+KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells in the same mice. Each point shows the mean value from two individual mice. This experiment is representative of three independent experiments. Similar results were also seen in the lymph nodes (data not shown).

 
Inverse correlation of the number of cell divisions following Ag exposure and numbers of Ag-specific CD4+ T cells coexpressing CD25

The number of cell divisions following Ag stimulation has been shown to be a major variable controlling CD4+ T cell differentiation (22). Thus, greater number of cell divisions in the presence of appropriate cytokine signals correlates with differentiation into polarized Th1 and Th2 cell populations and ability to produce IFN-{gamma} and IL-4, respectively (22). Similarly, there is positive quantitative correlation between the number of cell divisions and ability to make IL-2 upon recall stimulation (23). The Ag dose dependence on the emergence of CD25+CD4 T cells seen in our studies also suggested a relationship to cell division history. To test this hypothesis, we labeled the donor DO11.10 T cells with CFSE and compared three different Ag exposure conditions: peptide alone at either low or high dose, or low dose peptide with LPS. Four-color flow cytometry was used to measure CD25 expression and cell division history of Ag-specific CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3Go). Several conclusions can be drawn from the analysis of these data. In all experimental conditions, CD25+CD4 T cells were seen to have gone through fewer cell divisions than CD25-CD4 T cells. Not surprisingly, higher Ag dose on average resulted in more cell divisions. Nevertheless, when the proportion of CD25+ T cells was measured within subpopulations of DO11.10 T cells that have undergone the same number of cell divisions, both high and low dose i.v. tolerance protocols were identical. Addition of adjuvant also led to more cell divisions for the total DO11.10 T cell population. However, the proportion of CD25+ T cells decreased more in the presence of adjuvant than would be predicted if cell division history were the sole variable controlling their induction.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Inverse correlation of Ag-specific CD25+CD4+ T cells with cell division history following peripheral Ag encounter. Mice received Ag alone or with LPS at indicated doses 8 days before this assay. Peripheral lymph nodes (axillary, brachial, and inguinal) and spleens from the same mice were analyzed separately. A, Representative density plots of gated KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells. Gates were drawn to define the population in terms of cell division history and CD25 expression. B, Plot of relationship between cell division history and CD25 expression. Error bars represent the range of values observed in this experiment. Each point shows the mean value from two individual mice. The experiment is representative of three independent experiments.

 
Emergence of CD25+CD4 T cells following induction of oral tolerance

Oral tolerance is a form of systemic, Ag-specific immunologic tolerance resulting from exposure to the Ag in the diet (24, 25). Many uncertainties remain about the mechanisms responsible for oral tolerance. Clonal deletion, clonal anergy, and active suppression have all been shown to participate in different experimental systems (25, 26, 27, 28). Therefore, we tested the possibility that CD25+CD4 T cells may arise following peripheral tolerance induction by oral Ag administration. Indeed, this proved to be the case (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Comparison of the i.v. and oral tolerance protocols by CFSE dilution of the Ag-specific CD4 T cells. Density plots of gated KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells show content of CFSE and CD25 expression. Mice received 5 µg OVA peptide i.v. or were fed OVA 9 days before this assay. All tissues are from the same mouse for each condition: left, axillary, brachial, and inguinal lymph nodes (LN's); middle, mesenteric (Mes.) lymph nodes; right, spleen. Values are representative of four mice from two separate experiments.

 
We allowed mice to consume ~25 mg OVA protein present in their drinking water in a single 18-h period, and examined the phenotype of adoptively transferred DO11.10 T cells at different time points after the feeding. The kinetics of the response (data not shown) as well as the extent of CFSE dilution suggests that the outcome of this oral tolerance protocol is qualitatively similar to the one that follows low dose peptide given i.v. In the oral tolerance protocol, there was relatively more dilution of the CFSE dye in the DO11.10 T cells taken from mesenteric lymph nodes as compared with sites more distant from the gut: axillary, brachial, inguinal lymph nodes, and spleen (Fig. 4Go).

Peripherally induced CD25+CD4+ T cells do not make IL-2 in vivo

One of the distinguishing features of the immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells described in the literature is their inability to make IL-2 (11, 12). To evaluate cytokine production by Ag-specific CD25+ and CD25- CD4 T cells, we measured cytokine production in response to Ag restimulation within individual cells using flow cytometry. Ag-specific CD4 T cells were stimulated in vivo using an i.v. pulse of peptide Ag, and cells were stained for cytokine content directly ex vivo following fixation (16, 29). This assay takes advantage of the efficient and synchronous Ag presentation in vivo within undisrupted lymphoid tissues. Peak cytokine signal is seen at 1–2 h in Ag-experienced T cells (29), with identical kinetics for both tolerized and primed CD4 T cells (21). Peak production of IL-2 by naive CD4 T cells occurs at 4–6 h (29). Only CD25- DO11.10 T cells were seen making IL-2 in vivo (Fig. 5Go). However, both CD25+ and CD25- DO11.10 T cells quickly up-regulated expression of CD69 in response to peptide rechallenge (data not shown). Both oral and i.v. tolerance protocols resulted in lesser ability of the DO11.10 T cells to make IL-2 upon peptide Ag rechallenge compared with DO11.10 T cells that experienced i.v. immunization with Ag and adjuvant. Staining for other cytokines, including IFN-{gamma}, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10, showed no detectable signal within either CD25+ or CD25- cell populations (data not shown).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Ag-specific CD25+CD4 T cells do not make IL-2 upon Ag restimulation, and tolerized CD25-CD4 T cells have a relative defect in IL-2 production. Mice were primed with i.v. 5 µg OVA peptide and 25 µg LPS or tolerized orally or with i.v. 5 µg OVA peptide alone. Eight days after initial Ag exposure, mice were given an i.v. pulse of peptide Ag or left untreated. After 1.5 h following peptide rechallenge, mesenteric lymph nodes (LN's) and spleens were taken from the animals. Density plots show IL-2 content and CD25 expression of gated KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells.

 
Peripherally induced CD25+CD4 T cells have regulatory properties in vitro

Naturally occurring CD4 T cells constitutively expressing CD25 can inhibit IL-2 production by CD25-CD4 T cells in vitro (11, 12). This suppressive effect requires Ag stimulation of the CD25+CD4 T cells, although the Ag specificity may differ from the responding CD25-CD4 T cell population. Therefore, we compared IL-2 concentrations in supernatants of Ag-stimulated cultures containing or lacking CD25+ T cells (Fig. 6Go). As shown above, only lymphoid tissues of adoptively transferred mice tolerized with i.v. administered low Ag dose contain significant numbers of DO11.10 CD25+CD4 T cells. In contrast, lymphoid tissues of adoptively transferred mice that were not exposed to Ag, or received Ag accompanied by LPS, contain only few DO11.10 CD25+CD4 T cells. All lymphoid tissues also contain endogenous, polyclonal CD25+CD4 T cells of unknown specificity. Single cell suspensions of lymph nodes taken from adoptively transferred naive, primed, and tolerized mice were split into equal volumes, stained with biotinylated anti-CD25 or biotinylated isotype control Abs, depleted using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads, and placed into culture with or without Ag. The number of CD25- DO11.10 T cells was identical among the undepleted and CD25 cell-depleted cultures. At 24 h of the in vitro assay, IL-2 was detectable only if Ag was added. Increased amounts of IL-2 were seen in all CD25-depleted cultures. However, IL-2 production increased the most in the tolerized group. Since only the tolerized group contained significant numbers of OVA-specific CD4+ T cells, this result is consistent with a suppressive property of peripherally generated DO11.10 CD25+CD4+ T cells that is dependent on Ag stimulation. Notably, somewhat improved IL-2 production in CD25-depleted cultures was also seen in the naive and primed groups. Therefore, it is possible that endogenous CD25+CD4 T cells, which massively outnumber the OVA-specific CD25+ T cells in these cultures, suppress by an Ag-independent mechanism, respond to self Ags or other Ags present in the medium, or merely consume IL-2.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Suppression of IL-2 by CD25+ cells in vitro. Axillary, brachial, inguinal, and cervical lymph nodes were taken from adoptively transferred mice 8 days following 5 µg peptide dose administered i.v. with or without LPS or mice that received no Ag. CD25 depletion using magnetic beads was performed on one half of the lymph node cells, whereas the other half experienced mock depletion. The absolute number of CD25- T cells in undepleted and depleted cultures was identical. Left, IL-2 production expressed in concentration found in the 24-h supernatants divided by the number of CD25-KJ1-26+CD4+ T cells present in the well; right, percentage of improvement in IL-2 production achieved by depletion of the CD25+ cell fraction. Cultures were set up in duplicate with (1 µM) or without OVA peptide, and the error bars represent the range between the two samples. Results of this experiment are representative of three independent experiments.

 
A more direct approach to test the suppressive ability of peripherally generated Ag-specific CD25+ T cells was used in add back experiments (Fig. 7Go). Identical numbers of naive DO11.10 responder cells were cultured with irradiated APCs and positively selected CD25+ cells, which either contained or did not contain a DO11.10+ CD25+ fraction. Endogenous CD25+ cells lacking OVA-specific T cells were obtained from the lymphoid tissues of normal BALB/c mice. CD25+ cells containing the peripherally generated OVA-specific fraction were obtained from adoptively transferred tolerized mice. A third group contained endogenous CD25+ T cells from unmanipulated BALB/c mice mixed with naturally occurring CD25+ DO11.10 T cells from intact wild-type DO11.10 transgenic mice. Thus, all cultures contained equal numbers of endogenous polyclonal CD25+ T cells, while the second and third groups also contained equal numbers of either peripherally generated CD25+ DO11.10 T cells or CD25+ DO11.10 T cells from the wild-type transgenic animals. OVA-specific CD25+ T cells were present in a 1:1 ratio with the naive DO11.10 RAG-2-deficient responder T cells. Both groups that contained Ag-specific CD25+ T cells had significantly less IL-2 in the supernatants, and suppressive potency of peripherally generated Ag-specific CD25+ T cells was similar to that of the naturally occurring DO11.10 CD25+ T cells from wild-type transgenic animals. Reversal of suppression was not achieved by neutralizing IL-10 and TGF-{beta} in the cultures, which is consistent with the phenotype of immune regulation by CD25+ T cells noted in the past that is different from type 1 regulatory T cells or Th3 cells.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Suppressive potency of peripherally generated DO11.10 CD25+ T cells is similar to that of naturally occurring DO11.10 CD25+ T cells from wild-type (WT) transgenics and independent of IL-10 and TGF-{beta}. Each culture contained identical numbers of APCs and endogenous polyclonal CD25+CD4 T cells. Group 1 contained no OVA-specific CD25+CD4 T cells, group 2 contained DO11.10 CD25+ T cells generated following peripheral tolerance induction with low dose i.v. Ag, and group 3 contained naturally occurring DO11.10 CD25+ T cells from wild-type transgenics. Cultures were set up in duplicate with (5 µM) or without OVA peptide, and the error bars represent the range between the two samples.

 
Finally, a direct comparison of the endogenous polyclonal CD25+ T cells with Ag-specific CD25+ DO11.10 T cells was made. Adoptive recipients were transferred CFSE-labeled DO11.10 cells and tolerized with i.v. peptide. CD25+ T cells were positively selected using magnetic microbeads 9 days after peptide administration. Since CD25+ undergo few cell cycles during the primary response, we used the CFSE content to physically sort DO11.10+ and DO11.10- CD25+ T cells by FACS. The CFSE-high or negative cells were then titrated to cultures containing naive DO11.10 T cells and CD4-depleted, irradiated splenocytes. Although DO11.10 CD25+CD4 T cells underwent a limited number of additional cell divisions during the 4 days of in vitro culture, they maintained sufficient content of the CFSE dye to separate them from the responder DO11.10 T cells by flow cytometry. Therefore, fold expansion of the responder cells was determined by counting their numbers using FACS. In these experiments, only Ag-specific CD25+ T cells could significantly reduce IL-2 measured in culture supernatants and the proliferative response of the responder cells (Fig. 8Go).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Suppression of IL-2 and proliferation of responder cells are seen only if CD25+ T cells are stimulated by Ag. Positively selected CD25+ T cells from adoptively transferred i.v. tolerized mice were sorted into DO11.10+ and DO11.10- using their CFSE content as a marker. They were then titrated to cultures containing 5 µM OVA peptide, irradiated CD4-depleted APCs, and naive RAG-2-deficient DO11.10 responder T cells. IL-2 concentration was measured in the supernatants at 48 h (A), and proliferative response of the responder cells was measured using flow cytometry to separate CFSE-positive suppressor and CFSE-negative responder DO11.10 T cells (B). Samples were run in triplicate, and error bars represent SDs.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There is ample evidence that a subpopulation of immunoregulatory CD4 T cells contributes to immunologic tolerance (30). Constitutive coexpression of CD25 defines at least a subset of this immunoregulatory CD4 T cell population. However, relatively little is understood about the origin of the CD25+CD4 T cells, their Ag specificity, and mechanisms of action. Existing evidence suggests that CD25+CD4 T cells arise directly from the thymus following a unique lineage of CD4 T cell development. Thus, appearance of autoimmunity in mice thymectomized 3 days after birth correlates with reduced numbers of immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells found in the peripheral lymphoid tissues. In addition, suppressive CD25+CD4+CD8- thymocytes can be shown to appear in the fetal thymic organ cultures in vitro, and emerge in vivo following direct thymic inoculation by CD4-CD8- precursors distinguished by congenic markers (9).

The goal of this study was to test the possibility that CD25+CD4 T cells with similar immunosuppressive phenotype can also be generated in the course of peripheral tolerance induction to a known Ag. Indeed, we found that to be possible, but only when Ag dose was low, such that cell cycle progression was limited. As anticipated, CD25 was promptly, but only transiently, expressed by Ag-specific CD4 T cells following Ag exposure. Late expression of CD25+ was seen only if Ag exposure was tolerogenic. The later expression of CD25 is unlikely to reflect acute activation because of the kinetically biphasic pattern of CD25 appearance, inverse correlation with Ag dose, and relative absence of CD25+CD4 T cells at these time points following priming with Ag and adjuvant. Phenotypically, peripherally generated Ag-specific CD25+CD4 T cells were indistinguishable in a number of assays from endogenous immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells. They were unable to make any detectable IL-2, expressed high levels of CTLA-4 (data not shown), and suppressed IL-2 in the supernatants and proliferation of naive responder cells of the same Ag specificity in vitro cultures. The Ag-specific CD25+CD4 T cells were indistinguishable from Ag-specific CD25-CD4 T cells by cell size, which was equal to that of resting naive T cells, and levels of CD5 (data not shown). Clearly, our mechanistic analysis of suppression seen in in vitro cultures was limited in this study. Future studies will be done to determine whether the peripherally generated CD25+CD4 T cells mediate their suppression in vitro according to the same rules that were defined for the naturally occurring polyclonal CD25+CD4 T cells, dependent on direct contact between responder and suppressor T cells, dependent on Ag stimulation, independent of regulatory effects on the APCs, and Ag nonspecific (11, 31). Nevertheless, at the minimum, there are sufficient similarities in the phenotypes of these cells to raise the possibility that a subpopulation of the naturally occurring polyclonal immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells may originate in the periphery rather than the thymus.

The data presented in this work are particularly relevant to the study of oral tolerance. Multiple uncertainties remain with regard to the mechanisms of oral tolerance as well as uptake and presentation of dietary Ags. Previous reports showed that orally administered Ag is encountered systemically within all lymphoid tissues (32), although detailed analyses of various feeding schedules are probably needed to further clarify this point. In this study, we attempted to compare an oral tolerance protocol with an i.v. peptide Ag protocol. Clearly, it is very difficult to estimate the amount of class II MHC/peptide complex seen by Ag-specific T cells following i.v. peptide Ag vs oral protein administration. Furthermore, the two routes of tolerance induction may differ in the types of APCs and costimulatory molecules provided. Nevertheless, the pattern of CFSE dilution in DO11.10 T cells suggested that our oral tolerance protocol is qualitatively similar to the low dose tolerance achieved with i.v. peptide Ag.

There is abundant literature suggesting that mechanisms of oral tolerance differ at different Ag doses (33). Relatively high Ag doses have been described to cause clonal deletion and anergy, while repeated administration of low Ag doses leads to development of suppressor T cells. Our results raise the possibility that CD25+CD4 T cells may indeed represent these suppressor cells and fit the Ag dose relationship noted in oral tolerance. If that were true, we would argue that peripheral induction of immunoregulatory T cells is not unique to oral tolerance. It may be that physiologic amounts of absorbed dietary Ags are typically in the low range; therefore, immunoregulatory mechanisms of tolerance may be more prominent in various oral tolerance protocols. Furthermore, the gastrointestinal tract along with the liver is a very efficient filter of LPS. Orally administered Ag delivered to distant lymph nodes is adjuvant free. In fact, commercial OVA protein given i.v. is relatively poor for tolerance induction. However, once LPS is extracted away, its potency is similar to that of synthesized peptide (A. Khoruts, unpublished observations). It is interesting to note that the percentage of CD25+CD4 Ag-specific T cells was greatest in the peripheral lymph nodes most distant from the gut, irrespective of cell division history. It is possible that some baseline exposure to bacterial products is present in the mesenteric lymph nodes, preventing optimal induction of the CD25+CD4 T cell subpopulation.

Ability to induce Ag-specific immunologic tolerance may be a strategy to treat autoimmune diseases and transplant rejection. The profound anergic phenotype of CD25+CD4 T cells and their potential immunoregulatory properties make them a very desirable subpopulation to be able to generate in the course of tolerance induction. The results presented in this work suggest that Ag encounter accompanied by minimal or no cell division are optimal conditions for peripheral induction of these cells from naive precursors. A number of clinically useful immunosuppressive agents (e.g., rapamycin, purine metabolites, cyclophosphamide, etc.) inhibit cell division. In addition, signals inhibitory to cell division are mediated through multiple endogenous immunoregulatory molecules (e.g., CTLA-4, TGF-{beta}, and IL-10). Future studies may test whether any of these agents can be used as adjuncts for optimal induction of Ag-specific immunologic tolerance. In addition, it will be clinically important to determine whether differentiated effector or memory CD4 T cells can also be driven to acquire an anergic and possibly immunoregulatory phenotype in vivo.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. Kristin Hogquist and Marc Jenkins for critical review of the manuscript and Janet Peller and Julie Pribyl for assistance with the cell sorting experiments.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DK02784-01 and Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Cell sorting was done using FACSVantage in the Flow Cytometry Core Facility of the University of Minnesota Cancer Center supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant P30 CA77598. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Alexander Khoruts, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, MMC 334, BSBE Building, 312 Church Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail address: khoru001{at}tc.umn.edu Back

Received for publication October 26, 2000. Accepted for publication April 26, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Sakaguchi, S., N. Sakaguchi, M. Asano, M. Itoh, M. Toda. 1995. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor {alpha}-chains (CD25): breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. 155:1151.[Abstract]
  2. Kuniyasu, Y., T. Takahashi, M. Itoh, J. Shimizu, G. Toda, S. Sakaguchi. 1998. Naturally anergic and suppressive CD25+CD4+ T cells as a functionally and phenotypically distinct immunoregulatory T cell subpopulation. Int. Immunol. 12:1145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Read, S., V. Malmstrom, F. Powrie. 2000. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 plays an essential role in the function of CD25+CD4+ regulatory cells that control intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 192:295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Salomon, B., D. Lenschow, L. Rhee, N. Ashourian, B. Singh, A. Sharpe, J. A. Bluestone. 2000. B7/CD28 costimulation is essential for the homeostasis of the CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells that control autoimmune diseases. Immunity 12:431.[Medline]
  5. Kojima, A., R. T. Prehn. 1981. Genetic susceptibility to post-thymectomy autoimmune diseases in mice. Immunogenetics 14:15.[Medline]
  6. Tung, K. S. K., S. Smith, C. Teushcer, C. Cook, R. E. Anderson. 1987. Murine autoimmune ooporitis, epididymoorchitis, and gastritis induced by day 3 thymectomy. Am. J. Pathol. 126:293.[Abstract]
  7. Taguchi, O., Y. Nishizuka. 1987. Self tolerance and localized autoimmunity: mouse models of autoimmune disease that suggest tissue-specific suppressor T cells are involved in self tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 165:146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Suri-Payer, E., A. Z. Amar, A. M. Thornton, E. M. Shevach. 1998. CD4+CD25+ T cells inhibit both the induction and effector function of autoreactive T cells and represent a unique lineage of immunoregulatory cells. J. Immunol. 160:1212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Itoh, M., T. Takahashi, N. Sakaguchi, Y. Kuniyasu, J. Shimizu, F. Otsuka, S. Sakaguchi. 1999. Thymus and autoimmunity: production of CD25+CD4+ naturally anergic and suppressive T cells as a key function of the thymus in maintaining immunologic self-tolerance. J. Immunol. 162:5317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Asano, M., M. Toda, N. Sakaguchi, S. Sakaguchi. 1996. Autoimmune disease as a consequence of developmental abnormality of a T cell subpopulation. J. Exp. Med. 184:387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Takahashi, T., Y. Kuniyasu, M. Toda, N. Sakaguchi, M. Itoh, M. Iwata, J. Shimizu, S. Sakaguchi. 1998. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25+CD4+ naturally anergic and suppressive T cells: induction of autoimmune disease by breaking their anergic/suppressive state. Int. Immunol. 10:1969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Thornton, A. M., E. M. Shevach. 1998. CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells suppress polyclonal T cell activation in vitro by inhibiting interleukin 2 production. J. Exp. Med. 188:287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Murphy, K. M., A. B. Heimberger, D. Y. Loh. 1990. Induction by antigen of intrathymic apoptosis of CD4+CD8TCRlo thymocytes in vivo. Science 250:1720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kearny, E. R., K. A. Pape, D. Y. Loh, M. K. Jenkins. 1994. Visualization of peptide-specific T cell immunity and peripheral tolerance induction in vivo. Immunity 1:327.[Medline]
  15. Lyons, A. B., C. R. Parish. 1994. Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry. J. Immunol. Methods 171:131.[Medline]
  16. Khoruts, A., A. Mondino, K. A. Pape, S. L. Reiner, M. K. Jenkins. 1998. A natural immunological adjuvant enhances T cell clonal expansion through a CD28-dependent, interleukin (IL)-2-independent mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 187:225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Dresser, D. W.. 1961. Effectiveness of lipid and lipidophilic substances as adjuvants. Nature 191:1169.[Medline]
  18. Dresser, D. W.. 1962. Specific inhibition of antibody production. II. Paralysis induced in adult mice by small quantities of protein antigen. Immunology 5:378.[Medline]
  19. Chiller, J. M., G. S. Habicht, W. O. Weigle. 1971. Kinetic differences in unresponsiveness of thymus and bone marrow cells. Science 171:813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Pape, K. A., A. Khoruts, A. Mondino, M. K. Jenkins. 1997. Inflammatory cytokines enhance the in vivo clonal expansion and differentiation of antigen-activated CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 159:591.[Abstract]
  21. Pape, K. A., R. Merica, A. Mondino, A. Khoruts, J. K. Jenkins. 1998. Direct evidence that functionally impaired CD4+ T cells persist in vivo following induction of peripheral tolerance. J. Immunol. 160:4719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Bird, J. J., D. R. Brown, A. C. Mullen, N. H. Moskowitz, M. A. Mahowald, J. R. Sider, T. F. Gajewski, C.-R. Wang, S. L. Reiner. 1998. Helper T cell differentiation is controlled by the cell cycle. Immunity 9:229.[Medline]
  23. Wells, A. D., M. C. Walsh, D. Sankaran, L. A. Turka. 2000. T cell effector function and anergy avoidance are quantitatively linked to cell division. J. Immunol. 165:2432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Mowat, A. M.. 1987. The regulation of immune responses to dietary protein antigens. Immunol. Today 8:93.
  25. Weiner, H. L.. 1997. Oral tolerance: immune mechanisms and treatment of autoimmune diseases. Immunol. Today 18:335.[Medline]
  26. Chen, Y., J. Inobe, R. Marks, P. Gonella, V. K. Kuchroo, H. L. Weiner. 1995. Peripheral deletion of antigen-reactive T cells in oral tolerance. Nature 376:177.[Medline]
  27. Whitacre, C. C., I. E. Gienapp, C. G. Orosz, D. Bitar. 1991. Oral tolerance in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. III. Evidence for clonal anergy. J. Immunol. 147:2155.[Abstract]
  28. Chen, Y., V. K. Kuchroo, J.-I. Inobe, D. A. Hafler, H. L. Weiner. 1994. Regulatory T-cell clones induced by oral tolerance: suppression of autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Science 265:1237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Merica, R., A. Khoruts, K. A. Pape, R. L. Reinhardt, M. K. Jenkins. 2000. Antigen-experienced CD4 T cells display a reduced capacity for clonal expansion in vivo that is imposed by factors present in the immune host. J. Immunol. 164:4551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Sakaguchi, S.. 2000. Regulatory T cells: key controllers of immunologic self-tolerance. Cell 101:455.[Medline]
  31. Thornton, A. M., E. M. Shevach. 2000. Suppressor effector function of CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells is antigen nonspecific. J. Immunol. 164:183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Gutgemann, I., A. M. Fahrer, J. D. Altman, M. M. Davis, Y. H. Chien. 1998. Induction of rapid T cell activation and tolerance by systemic presentation of an orally administered antigen. Immunity 8:667.[Medline]
  33. Strobel, S., A. M. Mowat. 1998. Immune responses to dietary antigens: oral tolerance. Immunol. Today 19:173.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
N. C. Peters, D. R. Kroeger, S. Mickelwright, and P. A. Bretscher
CD4 T cell cooperation is required for the in vivo activation of CD4 T cells
Int. Immunol., November 1, 2009; 21(11): 1213 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M.-C. St. Rose, H. Z. Qui, S. Bandyopadhyay, M. A. Mihalyo, A. T. Hagymasi, R. B. Clark, and A. J. Adler
The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cbl-b Regulates Expansion but Not Functional Activity of Self-Reactive CD4 T Cells
J. Immunol., October 15, 2009; 183(8): 4975 - 4983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M.-T. Huang, Y.-S. Dai, Y.-B. Chou, Y.-H. Juan, C.-C. Wang, and B.-L. Chiang
Regulatory T Cells Negatively Regulate Neovasculature of Airway Remodeling via DLL4-Notch Signaling
J. Immunol., October 1, 2009; 183(7): 4745 - 4754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
X. Zhu, M. Wang, C. H. Crump, and A. Mishra
An imbalance of esophageal effector and regulatory T cell subsets in experimental eosinophilic esophagitis in mice
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): G550 - G558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. S. Gregerson, N. D. Heuss, U. Lehmann, and S. W. McPherson
Peripheral Induction of Tolerance by Retinal Antigen Expression
J. Immunol., July 15, 2009; 183(2): 814 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. M. Ertelt, J. H. Rowe, T. M. Johanns, J. C. Lai, J. B. McLachlan, and S. S. Way
Selective Priming and Expansion of Antigen-Specific Foxp3-CD4+ T Cells during Listeria monocytogenes Infection
J. Immunol., March 1, 2009; 182(5): 3032 - 3038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
A M Westendorf, D Fleissner, L Groebe, S Jung, A D Gruber, W Hansen, and J Buer
CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell expansion induced by antigen-driven interaction with intestinal epithelial cells independent of local dendritic cells
Gut, February 1, 2009; 58(2): 211 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
B. Matta, P. Jha, P. S. Bora, and N. S. Bora
Tolerance to Melanin-Associated Antigen in Autoimmune Uveitis Is Mediated by CD4+CD25+ T-Regulatory Cells
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2008; 173(5): 1440 - 1454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
J. Kang, S. J. Huddleston, J. M. Fraser, and A. Khoruts
De novo induction of antigen-specific CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in vivo following systemic antigen administration accompanied by blockade of mTOR
J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2008; 83(5): 1230 - 1239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Verginis, K. A. McLaughlin, K. W. Wucherpfennig, H. von Boehmer, and I. Apostolou
Induction of antigen-specific regulatory T cells in wild-type mice: Visualization and targets of suppression
PNAS, March 4, 2008; 105(9): 3479 - 3484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Burmeister, T. Lischke, A. C. Dahler, H. W. Mages, K.-P. Lam, A. J. Coyle, R. A. Kroczek, and A. Hutloff
ICOS Controls the Pool Size of Effector-Memory and Regulatory T Cells
J. Immunol., January 15, 2008; 180(2): 774 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Siewert, U. Lauer, S. Cording, T. Bopp, E. Schmitt, A. Hamann, and J. Huehn
Experience-Driven Development: Effector/Memory-Like {alpha}E+Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells Originate from Both Naive T Cells and Naturally Occurring Naive-Like Regulatory T Cells
J. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 180(1): 146 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Chappert, M. Leboeuf, P. Rameau, D. Stockholm, R. Liblau, O. Danos, J. M. Davoust, and D.-A. Gross
Antigen-Driven Interactions with Dendritic Cells and Expansion of Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells Occur in the Absence of Inflammatory Signals
J. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 180(1): 327 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. M. Morton, B. McManus, P. Garside, A. McI. Mowat, and M. M. Harnett
Inverse Rap1 and Phospho-ERK Expression Discriminate the Maintenance Phase of Tolerance and Priming of Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells In Vitro and In Vivo
J. Immunol., December 15, 2007; 179(12): 8026 - 8034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Hansen, A. M. Westendorf, S. Reinwald, D. Bruder, S. Deppenmeier, L. Groebe, M. Probst-Kepper, A. D. Gruber, R. Geffers, and J. Buer
Chronic Antigen Stimulation In Vivo Induces a Distinct Population of Antigen-Specific Foxp3 CD25 Regulatory T Cells
J. Immunol., December 15, 2007; 179(12): 8059 - 8068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Wei, O. Duramad, O. A. Perng, S. L. Reiner, Y.-J. Liu, and F. X.-F. Qin
Antagonistic nature of T helper 1/2 developmental programs in opposing peripheral induction of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells
PNAS, November 13, 2007; 104(46): 18169 - 18174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
M. Dominguez-Villar, A. Munoz-Suano, B. Anaya-Baz, S. Aguilar, J. P. Novalbos, J. A. Giron, M. Rodriguez-Iglesias, and F. Garcia-Cozar
Hepatitis C virus core protein up-regulates anergy-related genes and a new set of genes, which affects T cell homeostasis
J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2007; 82(5): 1301 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. A. Kapp, K. Honjo, L. M. Kapp, K. Goldsmith, and R. P. Bucy
Antigen, in the Presence of TGF-beta, Induces Up-Regulation of FoxP3gfp+ in CD4+ TCR Transgenic T Cells That Mediate Linked Suppression of CD8+ T Cell Responses
J. Immunol., August 15, 2007; 179(4): 2105 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
J. L. Coombes, K. R.R. Siddiqui, C. V. Arancibia-Carcamo, J. Hall, C.-M. Sun, Y. Belkaid, and F. Powrie
A functionally specialized population of mucosal CD103+ DCs induces Foxp3+ regulatory T cells via a TGF-{beta} and retinoic acid dependent mechanism
J. Exp. Med., August 6, 2007; 204(8): 1757 - 1764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. So and M. Croft
Cutting Edge: OX40 Inhibits TGF-beta- and Antigen-Driven Conversion of Naive CD4 T Cells into CD25+Foxp3+ T cells
J. Immunol., August 1, 2007; 179(3): 1427 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Curti, S. Pandolfi, B. Valzasina, M. Aluigi, A. Isidori, E. Ferri, V. Salvestrini, G. Bonanno, S. Rutella, I. Durelli, et al.
Modulation of tryptophan catabolism by human leukemic cells results in the conversion of CD25- into CD25+ T regulatory cells
Blood, April 1, 2007; 109(7): 2871 - 2877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. A. MacKenzie, J. Schartner, J. Lin, A. Timmel, M. Jennens-Clough, C. G. Fathman, and C. M. Seroogy
GRAIL Is Up-regulated in CD4+ CD25+ T Regulatory Cells and Is Sufficient for Conversion of T Cells to a Regulatory Phenotype
J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2007; 282(13): 9696 - 9702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Carrier, J. Yuan, V. K. Kuchroo, and H. L. Weiner
Th3 Cells in Peripheral Tolerance. I. Induction of Foxp3-Positive Regulatory T Cells by Th3 Cells Derived from TGF-beta T Cell-Transgenic Mice
J. Immunol., January 1, 2007; 178(1): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. M. Venturi, R. M. Conway, D. A. Steeber, and T. F. Tedder
CD25+CD4+ Regulatory T Cell Migration Requires L-Selectin Expression: L-Selectin Transcriptional Regulation Balances Constitutive Receptor Turnover
J. Immunol., January 1, 2007; 178(1): 291 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J.-B. Sun, S. Raghavan, A. Sjoling, S. Lundin, and J. Holmgren
Oral Tolerance Induction with Antigen Conjugated to Cholera Toxin B Subunit Generates Both Foxp3+CD25+ and Foxp3-CD25- CD4+ Regulatory T Cells
J. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 177(11): 7634 - 7644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
H von Boehmer
Can studies of tolerance ever lead to therapy?
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2006; 65(suppl_3): iii41 - iii43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Gianfrani, M. K. Levings, C. Sartirana, G. Mazzarella, G. Barba, D. Zanzi, A. Camarca, G. Iaquinto, N. Giardullo, S. Auricchio, et al.
Gliadin-Specific Type 1 Regulatory T Cells from the Intestinal Mucosa of Treated Celiac Patients Inhibit Pathogenic T Cells
J. Immunol., September 15, 2006; 177(6): 4178 - 4186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
A. Vojdani and J. Erde
Regulatory T Cells, a Potent Immunoregulatory Target for CAM Researchers: Modulating Tumor Immunity, Autoimmunity and Alloreactive Immunity (III)
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., September 1, 2006; 3(3): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Song, Z. Guan, I. E. Gienapp, T. Shawler, J. Benson, and C. C. Whitacre
The Thymus Plays a Role in Oral Tolerance in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1500 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Hansen, K. Loser, A. M. Westendorf, D. Bruder, S. Pfoertner, C. Siewert, J. Huehn, S. Beissert, and J. Buer
G Protein-Coupled Receptor 83 Overexpression in Naive CD4+CD25- T Cells Leads to the Induction of Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells In Vivo
J. Immunol., July 1, 2006; 177(1): 209 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Sharabi, H. Zinger, M. Zborowsky, Z. M. Sthoeger, and E. Mozes
A peptide based on the complementarity-determining region 1 of an autoantibody ameliorates lupus by up-regulating CD4+CD25+ cells and TGF-beta
PNAS, June 6, 2006; 103(23): 8810 - 8815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. R. Locke, S. Stankovic, D. P. Funda, and L. C. Harrison
TCR{gamma}{delta} Intraepithelial Lymphocytes Are Required for Self-Tolerance.
J. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 176(11): 6553 - 6559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Fallarino, U. Grohmann, S. You, B. C. McGrath, D. R. Cavener, C. Vacca, C. Orabona, R. Bianchi, M. L. Belladonna, C. Volpi, et al.
The Combined Effects of Tryptophan Starvation and Tryptophan Catabolites Down-Regulate T Cell Receptor {zeta}-Chain and Induce a Regulatory Phenotype in Naive T Cells.
J. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 176(11): 6752 - 6761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. Valzasina, S. Piconese, C. Guiducci, and M. P. Colombo
Tumor-Induced Expansion of Regulatory T Cells by Conversion of CD4+CD25- Lymphocytes Is Thymus and Proliferation Independent.
Cancer Res., April 15, 2006; 66(8): 4488 - 4495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. L. Every, D. R. Kramer, S. I. Mannering, A. M. Lew, and L. C. Harrison
Intranasal Vaccination with Proinsulin DNA Induces Regulatory CD4+ T Cells That Prevent Experimental Autoimmune Diabetes.
J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 4608 - 4615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Ono, J. Shimizu, Y. Miyachi, and S. Sakaguchi
Control of Autoimmune Myocarditis and Multiorgan Inflammation by Glucocorticoid-Induced TNF Receptor Family-Related Proteinhigh, Foxp3-Expressing CD25+ and CD25- Regulatory T Cells.
J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 4748 - 4756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Lyddane, B. U. Gajewska, E. Santos, P. D. King, G. C. Furtado, and M. Sadelain
Cutting Edge: CD28 Controls Dominant Regulatory T Cell Activity during Active Immunization
J. Immunol., March 15, 2006; 176(6): 3306 - 3310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Alvarez, F. K. Swirski, T.-C. Yang, R. Fattouh, K. Croitoru, J. L. Bramson, M. R. Stampfli, and M. Jordana
Inhalation Tolerance Is Induced Selectively in Thoracic Lymph Nodes but Executed Pervasively at Distant Mucosal and Nonmucosal Tissues
J. Immunol., February 15, 2006; 176(4): 2568 - 2580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Ghoreishi and J. P. Dutz
Tolerance Induction by Transcutaneous Immunization through Ultraviolet-Irradiated Skin Is Transferable through CD4+CD25+ T Regulatory Cells and Is Dependent on Host-Derived IL-10
J. Immunol., February 15, 2006; 176(4): 2635 - 2644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
S. G. Zheng, L. Meng, J. H. Wang, M. Watanabe, M. L. Barr, D. V. Cramer, J. D. Gray, and D. A. Horwitz
Transfer of regulatory T cells generated ex vivo modifies graft rejection through induction of tolerogenic CD4+CD25+ cells in the recipient
Int. Immunol., February 1, 2006; 18(2): 279 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Chattopadhyay, S. Mehrotra, A. Chhabra, U. Hegde, B. Mukherji, and N. G. Chakraborty
Effect of CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- T Regulatory Cells on the Generation of Cytolytic T Cell Response to a Self but Human Tumor-Associated Epitope In Vitro
J. Immunol., January 15, 2006; 176(2): 984 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Marski, S. Kandula, J. R. Turner, and C. Abraham
CD18 Is Required for Optimal Development and Function of CD4+CD25+ T Regulatory Cells
J. Immunol., December 15, 2005; 175(12): 7889 - 7897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Romagnoli, D. Hudrisier, and J. P. M. van Meerwijk
Molecular Signature of Recent Thymic Selection Events on Effector and Regulatory CD4+ T Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 5751 - 5758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Ise, K. Nakamura, N. Shimizu, H. Goto, K. Fujimoto, S. Kaminogawa, and S. Hachimura
Orally Tolerized T Cells Can Form Conjugates with APCs but Are Defective in Immunological Synapse Formation
J. Immunol., July 15, 2005; 175(2): 829 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
Y. Chung, S.-H. Lee, D.-H. Kim, and C.-Y. Kang
Complementary role of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and TGF-{beta} in oral tolerance
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2005; 77(6): 906 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. D. Carter, G. M. Calabrese, M. Naganuma, and U. Lorenz
Deficiency of the Src Homology Region 2 Domain-Containing Phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) Causes Enrichment of CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells
J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 6627 - 6638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. P. Treschow, J. Backlund, R. Holmdahl, and S. Issazadeh-Navikas
Intrinsic Tolerance in Autologous Collagen-Induced Arthritis Is Generated by CD152-Dependent CD4+ Suppressor Cells
J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 6742 - 6750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
K. M. Thorstenson, L. Herzovi, and A. Khoruts
A model of suppression of the antigen-specific CD4 T cell response by regulatory CD25+CD4 T cells in vivo
Int. Immunol., April 1, 2005; 17(4): 335 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. W. Smith and C. Nagler-Anderson
Preventing Intolerance: The Induction of Nonresponsiveness to Dietary and Microbial Antigens in the Intestinal Mucosa
J. Immunol., April 1, 2005; 174(7): 3851 - 3857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. M. Herndon, P. M. Stuart, and T. A. Ferguson
Peripheral Deletion of Antigen-Specific T Cells Leads to Long-Term Tolerance Mediated by CD8+ Cytotoxic Cells
J. Immunol., April 1, 2005; 174(7): 4098 - 4104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. R. Walker, B. D. Carson, G. T. Nepom, S. F. Ziegler, and J. H. Buckner
De novo generation of antigen-specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells from human CD4+CD25- cells
PNAS, March 15, 2005; 102(11): 4103 - 4108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Higuchi, T. Maruyama, A. Jaramillo, and T. Mohanakumar
Induction of Obliterative Airway Disease in Murine Tracheal Allografts by CD8+ CTLs Recognizing a Single Minor Histocompatibility Antigen
J. Immunol., February 15, 2005; 174(4): 1871 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
S. Liang, P. Alard, Y. Zhao, S. Parnell, S. L. Clark, and M. M. Kosiewicz
Conversion of CD4+ CD25- cells into CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells in vivo requires B7 costimulation, but not the thymus
J. Exp. Med., January 3, 2005; 201(1): 127 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. A. Curotto de Lafaille, A. C. Lino, N. Kutchukhidze, and J. J. Lafaille
CD25- T Cells Generate CD25+Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells by Peripheral Expansion
J. Immunol., December 15, 2004; 173(12): 7259 - 7268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. A. Baldwin, K. A. Hogquist, and S. C. Jameson
The Fourth Way? Harnessing Aggressive Tendencies in the Thymus
J. Immunol., December 1, 2004; 173(11): 6515 - 6520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
D. T. Nardelli, M. A. Burchill, D. M. England, J. Torrealba, S. M. Callister, and R. F. Schell
Association of CD4+ CD25+ T Cells with Prevention of Severe Destructive Arthritis in Borrelia burgdorferi-Vaccinated and Challenged Gamma Interferon-Deficient Mice Treated with Anti-Interleukin-17 Antibody
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., November 1, 2004; 11(6): 1075 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Sela and E. Mozes
Therapeutic vaccines in autoimmunity
PNAS, October 5, 2004; 101(suppl_2): 14586 - 14592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Z. Liu and L. Lefrancois
Intestinal Epithelial Antigen Induces Mucosal CD8 T Cell Tolerance, Activation, and Inflammatory Response
J. Immunol., October 1, 2004; 173(7): 4324 - 4330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Yadav, V. Judkowski, M. Flodstrom-Tullberg, L. Sterling, W. L. Redmond, L. Sherman, and N. Sarvetnick
B7-2 (CD86) Controls the Priming of Autoreactive CD4 T Cell Response against Pancreatic Islets
J. Immunol., September 15, 2004; 173(6): 3631 - 3639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
H.-B. Park, D.-J. Paik, E. Jang, S. Hong, and J. Youn
Acquisition of anergic and suppressive activities in transforming growth factor-{beta}-costimulated CD4+CD25- T cells
Int. Immunol., August 1, 2004; 16(8): 1203 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
W. R. Godfrey, Y. G. Ge, D. J. Spoden, B. L. Levine, C. H. June, B. R. Blazar, and S. B. Porter
In vitro-expanded human CD4+CD25+ T-regulatory cells can markedly inhibit allogeneic dendritic cell-stimulated MLR cultures
Blood, July 15, 2004; 104(2): 453 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
N. Parameswaran, D. J. Samuvel, R. Kumar, S. Thatai, V. Bal, S. Rath, and A. George
Oral Tolerance in T Cells Is Accompanied by Induction of Effector Function in Lymphoid Organs after Systemic Immunization
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2004; 72(7): 3803 - 3811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. Apostolaki and N. A. Williams
Nasal Delivery of Antigen with the B Subunit of Escherichia coli Heat-Labile Enterotoxin Augments Antigen-Specific T-Cell Clonal Expansion and Differentiation
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2004; 72(7): 4072 - 4080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
M. R. Karlsson, J. Rugtveit, and P. Brandtzaeg
Allergen-responsive CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells in Children who Have Outgrown Cow's Milk Allergy
J. Exp. Med., June 21, 2004; 199(12): 1679 - 1688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
I. Apostolou and H. von Boehmer
In Vivo Instruction of Suppressor Commitment in Naive T Cells
J. Exp. Med., May 17, 2004; 199(10): 1401 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Peng, Y. Laouar, M. O. Li, E. A. Green, and R. A. Flavell
TGF-{beta} regulates in vivo expansion of Foxp3-expressing CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells responsible for protection against diabetes
PNAS, March 30, 2004; 101(13): 4572 - 4577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
J. Huehn, K. Siegmund, J. C.U. Lehmann, C. Siewert, U. Haubold, M. Feuerer, G. F. Debes, J. Lauber, O. Frey, G. K. Przybylski, et al.
Developmental Stage, Phenotype, and Migration Distinguish Naive- and Effector/Memory-like CD4+ Regulatory T Cells
J. Exp. Med., February 2, 2004; 199(3): 303 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Zhou, R. Borojevic, C. Streutker, D. Snider, H. Liang, and K. Croitoru
Expression of Dual TCR on DO11.10 T Cells Allows for Ovalbumin-Induced Oral Tolerance to Prevent T Cell-Mediated Colitis Directed against Unrelated Enteric Bacterial Antigens
J. Immunol., February 1, 2004; 172(3): 1515 - 1523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Cavani, F. Nasorri, C. Ottaviani, S. Sebastiani, O. De Pita, and G. Girolomoni
Human CD25+ Regulatory T Cells Maintain Immune Tolerance to Nickel in Healthy, Nonallergic Individuals
J. Immunol., December 1, 2003; 171(11): 5760 - 5768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. Dubois, L. Chapat, A. Goubier, M. Papiernik, J.-F. Nicolas, and D. Kaiserlian
Innate CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are required for oral tolerance and inhibition of CD8+ T cells mediating skin inflammation
Blood, November 1, 2003; 102(9): 3295 - 3301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
L. S.K. Walker, A. Chodos, M. Eggena, H. Dooms, and A. K. Abbas
Antigen-dependent Proliferation of CD4+ CD25+ Regulatory T Cells In Vivo
J. Exp. Med., July 21, 2003; 198(2): 249 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Kaji, S. Hachimura, W. Ise, and S. Kaminogawa
Proteome Analysis Reveals Caspase Activation in Hyporesponsive CD4 T Lymphocytes Induced in Vivo by the Oral Administration of Antigen
J. Biol. Chem., July 18, 2003; 278(30): 27836 - 27843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Boitelle, H. E. Scales, C. Di Lorenzo, E. Devaney, M. W. Kennedy, P. Garside, and C. E. Lawrence
Investigating the Impact of Helminth Products on Immune Responsiveness Using a TCR Transgenic Adoptive Transfer System
J. Immunol., July 1, 2003; 171(1): 447 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
W. W. J. Unger, W. Jansen, D. A. W. Wolvers, A. G. S. van Halteren, G. Kraal, and J. N. Samsom
Nasal tolerance induces antigen-specific CD4+CD25- regulatory T cells that can transfer their regulatory capacity to naive CD4+ T cells
Int. Immunol., June 1, 2003; 15(6): 731 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Paas-Rozner, M. Sela, and E. Mozes
A dual altered peptide ligand down-regulates myasthenogenic T cell responses by up-regulating CD25- and CTLA-4-expressing CD4+ T cells
PNAS, May 27, 2003; 100(11): 6676 - 6681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Grundstrom, L. Cederbom, A. Sundstedt, P. Scheipers, and F. Ivars
Superantigen-Induced Regulatory T Cells Display Different Suppressive Functions in the Presence or Absence of Natural CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells In Vivo
J. Immunol., May 15, 2003; 170(10): 5008 - 5017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
C. Vasu, S. R. Gorla, B. S. Prabhakar, and M. J. Holterman
Targeted engagement of CTLA-4 prevents autoimmune thyroiditis
Int. Immunol., May 1, 2003; 15(5): 641 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
N. M. Tsuji, K. Mizumachi, and J.-i. Kurisaki
Antigen-specific, CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell clones induced in Peyer's patches
Int. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 15(4): 525 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. T. Moses, K. M. Thorstenson, S. C. Jameson, and A. Khoruts
Competition for self ligands restrains homeostatic proliferation of naive CD4 T cells
PNAS, February 4, 2003; 100(3): 1185 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Sundstedt, E. J. O'Neill, K. S. Nicolson, and D. C. Wraith
Role for IL-10 in Suppression Mediated by Peptide-Induced Regulatory T Cells In Vivo
J. Immunol., February 1, 2003; 170(3): 1240 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Asai, S. Hachimura, M. Kimura, T. Toraya, M. Yamashita, T. Nakayama, and S. Kaminogawa
T Cell Hyporesponsiveness Induced by Oral Administration of Ovalbumin Is Associated with Impaired NFAT Nuclear Translocation and p27kip1 Degradation
J. Immunol., November 1, 2002; 169(9): 4723 - 4731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Lehmann, J. Huehn, M. de la Rosa, F. Maszyna, U. Kretschmer, V. Krenn, M. Brunner, A. Scheffold, and A. Hamann
Expression of the integrin alpha Ebeta 7 identifies unique subsets of CD25+ as well as CD25- regulatory T cells
PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 13031 - 13036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Zaliauskiene, S. Kang, K. Sparks, K. R. Zinn, L. M. Schwiebert, C. T. Weaver, and J. F. Collawn
Enhancement of MHC Class II-Restricted Responses by Receptor-Mediated Uptake of Peptide Antigens
J. Immunol., September 1, 2002; 169(5): 2337 - 2345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Y. Wu, F. J. Ward, and N. A. Staines
Histone Peptide-Induced Nasal Tolerance: Suppression of Murine Lupus
J. Immunol., July 15, 2002; 169(2): 1126 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
P. M. Cobelens, A. Kavelaars, R. van der Zee, W. van Eden, and C. J. Heijnen
Dynamics of mycobacterial HSP65-induced T-cell cytokine expression during oral tolerance induction in adjuvant arthritis
Rheumatology, July 1, 2002; 41(7): 775 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Martin, G. M. del Hoyo, F. Anjuere, C. F. Arias, H. H. Vargas, A. Fernandez-L, V. Parrillas, and C. Ardavin
Characterization of a new subpopulation of mouse CD8alpha + B220+ dendritic cells endowed with type 1 interferon production capacity and tolerogenic potential
Blood, June 28, 2002; 100(2): 383 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Hori, M. Haury, A. Coutinho, and J. Demengeot
Specificity requirements for selection and effector functions of CD25+4+ regulatory T cells in anti-myelin basic protein T cell receptor transgenic mice
PNAS, June 11, 2002; 99(12): 8213 - 8218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Chiffoleau, G. Beriou, P. Dutartre, C. Usal, J.-P. Soulillou, and M. C. Cuturi
Role for Thymic and Splenic Regulatory CD4+ T Cells Induced by Donor Dendritic Cells in Allograft Tolerance by LF15-0195 Treatment
J. Immunol., May 15, 2002; 168(10): 5058 - 5069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Zhang, L. Izikson, L. Liu, and H. L. Weiner
Activation of CD25+CD4+ Regulatory T Cells by Oral Antigen Administration
J. Immunol., October 15, 2001; 167(8): 4245 - 4253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thorstenson, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Khoruts, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thorstenson, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Khoruts, A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS