|
|
||||||||
-Mediated Activation of Human Chondrocytes1




*
Division of Rheumatology, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037; and
Division of Arthritis Research, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and TNF-
-induced NO production in normal human articular
chondrocytes. The effect of the sugars on NO production is specific,
since several other monosaccharides, including glucose, glucuronic
acid, and N-acetylmannosamine, do not express this
activity. Furthermore, N-acetylglucosamine polymers,
including the dimer and the trimer, also do not affect NO production.
The observed suppression of IL-1
-induced NO production is associated
with inhibition of inducible NO synthase mRNA and protein expression.
In addition, N-acetylglucosamine also suppresses the
production of IL-1
-induced cyclooxygenase-2 and IL-6. The
constitutively expressed cyclooxygenase-1, however, was not affected by
the sugar. N-acetylglucosamine-mediated inhibition of
the IL-1
response of human chondrocytes was not associated with the
decreased inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinases c-Jun
N-terminal kinase, extracellular signal-related kinase, and p38, nor
with activation of the transcription factor NF-
B. In conclusion,
these results demonstrate that N-acetylglucosamine
expresses a unique range of activities and identifies a novel mechanism
for the inhibition of inflammatory processes. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many studies have demonstrated that cartilage from patients with OA is characterized by accelerated turnover of the cartilage matrix components and by inadequate repair (7, 8). Glucosamine (GlcN) salts (sulfate and chloride) represent a new generation of drugs, which possess potentially chondroprotective or disease-modifying properties (4, 9, 10), and were originally suggested to promote the repair of damaged cartilage. Since the first publication of W. Bohne in 1969 showing that GlcN can be used as a single pharmacologic agent to treat OA (11), the preparation has gained considerable popularity, and now is being consumed by many OA patients. Despite the increased use of GlcN in the treatment of OA, the mechanisms accounting for its in vivo and in vitro activity are still far from clear.
The current study presents experimental evidence that GlcN, and, to a
higher degree, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), possess a
unique range of anti-inflammatory activities and inhibit NO,
cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and IL-6 production induced in cultured
human articular chondrocytes by IL-1
.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Normal cartilage was obtained from autopsy services and tissue banks. Articular cartilage was harvested from the femoral condyles and the tibial plateaus. All tissue samples were graded according to a modified Mankin scale (12), and only cartilage without evidence of OA was used as a source of chondrocytes. The interval between death and the time the cartilage was harvested from these knee joints in the laboratory was at least 24 h and ranged up to 96 h. Cartilage shavings were harvested by the tissue banks within 24 post mortem, placed in tissue culture medium (DMEM, 10% FBS, penicillin, streptomycin), and shipped to the laboratory at 4°C. This tissue was processed in the laboratory within 24 h after harvest.
Chondrocytes were isolated from the cartilage by collagenase digestion and maintained in continuous monolayer cultures in DMEM containing 10% FBS. Cell viability after chondrocyte isolation by collagenase digestion of normal cartilage is >95%. This level is maintained for at least 96 h post mortem. Studies on IL-1 effects as a catabolic response showed no apparent changes as a function of variations in the time between death and tissue processing when NO and IL-6 release were measured.
Experiments reported in this work were performed with primary or first passage cells.
Monosaccharides and GlcNAc polymers
GlcN, GlcNAc, glucose, and glucuronic acid N-acetylmannosamine were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). GlcNAc dimer (N,N'-diacetylchitobiose) and GlcNAc trimer (N,N',N''-triacetylchitotriose) were purchased from TRC (Toronto, Canada).
Quantification of nitrites
Chondrocytes were plated at 40,000 cells/well in 96-well plates
in the presence of 1% FBS. After 48 h, the medium was changed,
and the cells were stimulated with IL-1
(Sigma) at a concentration
of 5 ng/ml for 24 h. NO production was detected as
NO2- accumulation in the
culture supernatants by the Griess reaction, as described elsewhere
(13).
IL-6 measurement
IL-6 in the culture supernatants was measured by ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) in accordance with the suppliers protocol.
Western blot analysis
Whole cell extracts were prepared from 3 x 106 chondrocytes stimulated as described in Results by lysing the cells on the plate with ice-cold lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 158 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and 0.5 mM PMSF, which was added immediately before use). The lysates were transferred to Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatants were transferred into fresh tubes, and the protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay. Similar amounts of protein were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose filter (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH) by electroblotting. The filter was blocked overnight in 5% milk powder/TBST solution and then further incubated with one of the following Abs: anti-inducible NO synthase (anti-iNOS; C-19; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-COX-2 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI), anti-COX-1 (H-3; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-phospho-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK; phospho-Thr183/Tyr185; New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), anti-phospho-p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP; phospho-Thr80/Tyr182; New England Biolabs), or anti-phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK; phospho-Thr180/Tyr182; New England Biolabs) for 2 h. The membranes were washed three times with TBST and then further incubated with the appropriate HRP-labeled secondary Ab in 5% milk powder/TBST and developed using an ECL system (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).
Northern blot analysis
Total RNA was isolated from 2 x 106 chondrocytes stimulated as described in Results using the STAT-60 reagent (Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX). The RNA from each sample was quantified photometrically, and 5 µg was separated on 1.2% agarose/6% formaldehyde gels. After electrophoresis, the gels were photographed, and the RNA was transferred onto Hybond-N nylon membranes (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) by capillary blotting. The membranes were air dried and incubated for 2 h at 80°C. Prehybridization was done for 2 h at 60°C in 5x SCC, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2% SDS, and 5x Denhardt solution. Radiolabeled probe was added and hybridization was conducted overnight at 60°C. After hybridization, the filters were rinsed twice in 2x SSC/0.1% SDS; washed once in 2x SSC/0.1% SDS at 60°C; and once in 0.2x SSC/0.1% SDS at 60°C. The membranes were covered with Saran wrap and exposed with intensifying screen for 12 h at -70°C. The probes used for the hybridization were prepared as described earlier (14, 15).
EMSA
Nuclear protein extracts were prepared as follows: 2 x
106 chondrocytes were stimulated as indicated in
Results. The cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed
once with ice-cold PBS, and lysed in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5)
containing 2 mM MgCl2, 140 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM DTT,
0.05% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 µg/ml
aprotinin. The nuclei were spun down, resuspended in 20 mM HEPES buffer
(pH 7.9) containing 25% glycerol, 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, 1
µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and rotated at 4°C for 30
min. After removal of the nuclear debris by centrifugation, the protein
concentration of the lysate was determined using the Bradford assay.
Equal amounts of the nuclear extracts (2 µg) were incubated for 15
min at room temperature with poly(dI-dC)poly(dI-dC) (0.1 mg/ml), BSA (1
mg/ml), 1 x 105 counts of double-stranded
radiolabeled oligodeoxynucleotide containing the NF-
B consensus DNA
binding site (sequence: 5'-GATCGAGGGGACTTTCCCTAGC-3') in 20 mM
HEPES buffer (pH 7.9) containing 10% glycerol, 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM PMSF.
For competition experiments, unlabeled NF-
B oligodeoxynucleotide or
oligodeoxynucleotide containing the Oct-1 consensus sequence was added
at 100-fold molar excess to the binding reactions 10 min before the
addition of radiolabeled NF-
B oligodeoxynucleotide. The binding
reactions were loaded onto 6% TGE (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 380 mM
glycine, and 2 mM EDTA) native polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed
for 2 h at 4°C. The gels were then dried and exposed for 1648
h with intensifying screen at -80°C.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of the generated data was performed with the aid of StatMost 32 program for Windows (Dataxiom Software, Los Angeles, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced NO production by cultured
human articular chondrocytes
IL-1
is known as a potent inducer of NO production in cultured
human articular chondrocytes (16). In the first series of
experiments, we demonstrated that both GlcN and GlcNAc were capable of
suppressing NO production triggered by IL-1
(Fig. 1
). The differences between NO production
in chondrocyte cultures stimulated with IL-1
and chondrocyte
cultures stimulated with IL-1
plus GlcN or GlcNAc were statistically
significant, p < 0.001. When used in equimolar
concentrations, GlcNAc demonstrated stronger inhibition of NO
production than GlcN (the difference between these two groups was
statistically significant, p < 0.01). Maximal
inhibitory effect of GlcNAc was observed with a concentration of 20 mM;
concentrations lower than 1 mM were insufficient in the suppression of
NO production (Fig. 2
). The
IC50 for GlcNAc was 4.1 ± 1.3 mM; the
IC50 for GlcN was 14.9 ± 2.1 mM,
p < 0.01.
|
|
Specificity of the NO inhibition
To analyze the sugar specificity of the discovered phenomenon, we
compared the effect of glucose, glucuronic acid,
N-acetylmannosamine, N-acetylgalactosamine,
GlcNAc, and GlcN on IL-1
-induced NO production. When used at a
concentration of 10 mM, only GlcNAc and
N-acetylgalactosamine demonstrated inhibitory activity,
suggesting specificity of this effect (Fig. 3
). GlcNAc polymers, including GlcNAc
dimer and GlcNAc trimer, did not express any inhibitory activity
against IL-1
-induced NO production (Fig. 4
).
|
|
To investigate whether GlcNAc suppresses the enzymatic activity of
iNOS, the expression of the corresponding protein, we analyzed the
effect of GlcNAc on the expression of both iNOS protein (Western
immunoblot) and iNOS mRNA (Nothern blot). Results of the experiments
clearly demonstrated that GlcNAc strongly inhibited the expression of
both iNOS mRNA and protein (Figs. 5
and 6
).
|
|
As a part of the analysis of its anti-inflammatory activities,
we studied the effect of GlcNAc on COX-2 expression in cultured human
articular chondrocytes stimulated with IL-1
. Results of the
experiments demonstrated that GlcNAc inhibited the expression of COX-2
protein measured in the Western immunoblot and COX-2 mRNA measured in
the Northern blot (Figs. 7
A
and 5). In contrast to COX-2, GlcNAc did not affect the expression of
COX-1 protein (Fig. 7
B).
|
-induced IL-6 production by cultured
human articular chondrocytes
In addition to NO and COX-2, GlcNAc was capable of
inhibiting IL-6 production in cultured human articular chondrocytes
stimulated with IL-1
(Fig. 8
). The
differences were statistically significant (p
< 0.001). Therefore, GlcNAc is capable of suppressing several
IL-1
-inducible products of inflammation, but does not inhibit
constitutively expressed molecules.
|
-induced phosphorylation of ERK, JNK,
and p38 MAP kinases
Intracellular signaling in the IL-1
pathway results in
activation of several protein kinases, including the MAP kinases
(18). GlcNAc residues participate in the dynamic process
of protein O-glycosylation, which utilizes serine residues
as anchoring sites. Therefore, by competing for the same binding sites,
O-glycosyl residues could diminish the efficacy of serine
phosphorylation and thus interfere with signal transduction. To address
this potential mechanism, we analyzed the effect of GlcNAc on ERK, JNK,
and p38 MAP kinase activation in chondrocytes induced by IL-1
. The
experiments demonstrated that GlcNAc does not inhibit the ERK, JNK, and
p38 MAP kinase activation (Fig. 9
).
|
-induced nuclear translocation of
NF-
B
IL-1
-mediated induction of certain mediators of inflammation,
including NO, COX-2, and IL-6, is associated with translocation of
NF-
B dimers from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where they bind
target genes and regulate their transcription (19, 20, 21).
The process of NF-
B activation depends on phosphorylation of two
serines (Ser32 and Ser36 in
I-
B
(inhibitory protein that dissociates from NF-
B)) in the
N-terminal regulatory domain of I-
B (22). To determine
whether GlcNAc-mediated suppression of IL-1
-induced NO, COX-2, and
IL-6 production depends upon suppression of the NF-
B activation, we
studied nuclear translocation of NF-
B in chondrocytes stimulated
with IL-1
alone in comparison with chondrocytes stimulated with
IL-1
and treated with GlcNAc. These studies demonstrated that GlcNAc
did not affect IL-1
-induced nuclear translocation of NF-
B (Fig. 10
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(27). GlcN-induced up-regulation of glycosaminoglycan
synthesis represents a complex metabolic process, which is potentially
mediated through several mechanisms, such as GlcN directly entering the
hexosamine pathway and circumventing the negative feedback control from
UDP-GlcNAc (28) and up-regulation of TGF
1
production (29). Recently, a novel mechanism of
GlcN-mediated chondroprotection was described, which involves the
inhibition of aggrecanase activity in bovine cartilage explants and rat
chondrosarcoma cells (30) via suppression of
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked proteins (31). Anti-inflammatory mechanisms, besides GlcN-induced up-regulation of glycosaminoglycan synthesis, are probably contributing to its antiarthritic activities as well. GlcN had anti-inflammatory activity and protected rats from paw edema induced by bradykinin, serotonin, and histamine (32). GlcN also protected animals against serositis induced by carragenan, rat peritonitis induced by Formalin, and mouse peritonitis induced by acetic acid (32). GlcN did not suppress COX or proteolytic enzymes in the inflamed rat paw, but it did suppress superoxide generation and lysosomal enzyme activities in rat liver (32). Orally administered GlcN also expressed anti-inflammatory activity in kaolin or adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats (33). However, in the studies cited above, antiexudative and anti-inflammatory activities of GlcN were lower as compared with those of acetylsalicylic acid or indomethacin. GlcN was found to be synergistic in its antiexudative activity with indomethacin, piroxicam, and diclofenac in a mouse model of aseptic inflammation (34).
The present study is the first to examine the effect of GlcN and GlcNAc
on human chondrocyte response toward the stimulation with IL-1
, and
it describes a novel mechanism of GlcN-mediated anti-inflammatory
activity. Results of our experiments clearly indicated that GlcN, and
to a higher degree, GlcNAc are capable of inhibiting IL-1
-induced NO
production in cultured human articular chondrocytes. The effect of
sugars on NO production is specific since several other
monosaccharides, including glucose, glucuronic acid, and
N-acetylmannosamine do not express this activity.
Furthermore, we demonstrated that GlcNAc polymers, including the dimer
and the trimer, also do not affect NO production. The observed
suppression of IL-1
-induced NO production is the consequence of
inhibition of iNOS protein and mRNA expression. In addition to its
NO-inhibitory activity, GlcNAc also suppressed the production of
IL-1
-induced COX-2 and IL-6. The expression of COX-1, however, was
not affected by the sugar. Previously, Setnikar et al.
(32) described a negative effect of GlcN on the COX
activity of inflamed rat paw tissues. These data do not contradict our
results for the following reasons. First, the authors used GlcN and not
GlcNAc. Second, the dose of GlcN used to treat rats was much lower than
the doses that express anti-inflammatory activities in vitro.
Third, the authors did not make any distinction between COX-1 and
COX-2.
GlcNAc did not suppress all responses in chondrocytes induced by
IL-1
. For example, it did not suppress the IL-1
-mediated increase
in hexosaminidase secretion (data not shown). Moreover, it was
synergistic with IL-1
in the induction of TGF
1 (data not shown).
Collectively, these findings suggest that GlcNAc selectively inhibits
cytokine-induced gene expression and the production of certain
proinflammatory mediators.
Several aspects of the discovered GlcNAc-mediated activity require more
detailed discussion. Our experiments showed that both GlcN and GlcNAc
in the lower millimolar range measurably inhibited NO production;
concentrations below 1 mM were not effective. This concentration range
is identical to that previously described for GlcN-induced
up-regulation of TGF-
production in cultured porcine mesangial cells
(29). The relatively high concentrations of GlcN and
GlcNAc required for the mediation of their anti-inflammatory
activity most likely reflect the competition between these sugars and
glucose from culture media for entering the cells via glucose
transporter molecules (35). It is important to state that
therapeutic concentrations of the aminosugars, which can be reached in
humans upon oral administration of GlcN at the accepted dose of 1500
mg/day, are much lower than those used in the present publication.
Therefore, the in vitro data regarding the anti-inflammatory
mechanisms of GlcNAc and GlcN activities cannot be directly applied for
explanation of the therapeutic efficacy of GlcN in patients with
OA.
GlcNAc has several potential advantages over GlcN as a potential therapeutic anti-inflammatory agent. First, upon entering the cell, GlcN undergoes phosphorylation by glucokinase and competes with glucose for binding to glucokinase (36), which can result in GlcN-induced insulin resistance (37). GlcNAc, on the other hand, has much lower affinity toward glucokinase as compared with glucose and GlcN, and therefore does not significantly affect glucose metabolism (38). Second, the product of GlcN phosphorylation, GlcN-6 phosphate, is an allosteric inhibitor of glucokinase (39). This limits the flux of GlcN via the hexosamine pathway. Third, upon entering the cell, GlcNAc undergoes phosphorylation by GlcNAc kinase and does not compete with glucose for phosphorylation (40). This product of phosphorylation enters the hexosamine pathway more distally than GlcN-6 phosphate, and does not possess known negative allosteric effects toward glucokinase.
The present study also addressed potential mechanism involved in
GlcNAc-mediated inhibition of the IL-1
response. One possibility is
a GlcNAc-mediated inhibition of phosphorylation events in the IL-1
signaling cascade. One of the end products of the hexosamine pathway,
UDP-GlcNAc, was shown to participate in the dynamic process of
protein O-glycosylation, which utilizes serine or threonine
residues as anchoring sides (41). Potentially,
O-glycosylation of the serine residues can compete with the
phosphorylation of the same residues, resulting in the impairment of
intracellular signal transduction cascades (42). To
address this possibility, we analyzed the effect of GlcNAc on ERK, JNK,
and p38 MAP kinase activation, and on nuclear translocation of NF-
B
in chondrocytes stimulated by IL-1
. The activation of these MAP
kinases and of NF-
B are central events in the chondrocyte response
to IL-1
and related cytokines. Results of the experiments revealed
that measurable GlcNAc did not inhibit IL-1
-induced activation of
ERK, JNK, and p38 MAP kinases, or the nuclear translocation of NF-
B.
Additional experiments will be focused on possible targets for
O-glycosylation interfering with IL-1
-activated signal
transduction cascade.
In conclusion, the study demonstrates that GlcNAc expresses anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective activities by interfering with cytokine-inducible gene expression in chondrocytes.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Martin Lotz, Division of Arthritis Research, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: OA, osteoarthritis; COX, cyclooxygenase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GlcN, glucosamine; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine; iNOS, inducible NO synthase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MAP, mitogen-activated protein. ![]()
Received for publication June 20, 2000. Accepted for publication February 6, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
involves increased transcription and correlates with increased TNF-
B and JNK activation. FEBS Lett. 418:135.[Medline]
is associated with activation of the transcription factor NF-
B. J. Surg. Res. 69:139.[Medline]
B kinase and NF-
B activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274:27339.
1 production is mediated by the hexosamine pathway in porcine glomerular mesangial cells. J. Clin. Invest. 101:160.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-H. Chang, C.-T. Horng, Y.-H. Chen, P.-L. Chen, C.-L. Chen, C.-M. Liang, M.-W. Chien, and J.-T. Chen Inhibitory Effects of Glucosamine on Endotoxin-Induced Uveitis in Lewis Rats Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2008; 49(12): 5441 - 5449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Xing, W. Feng, L. G. Not, A. P. Miller, Y. Zhang, Y.-F. Chen, E. Majid-Hassan, J. C. Chatham, and S. Oparil Increased protein O-GlcNAc modification inhibits inflammatory and neointimal responses to acute endoluminal arterial injury Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): H335 - H342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-T. Chen, J.-B. Liang, C.-L. Chou, M.-W. Chien, R.-C. Shyu, P.-I Chou, and D.-W. Lu Glucosamine Sulfate Inhibits TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma}-Induced Production of ICAM-1 in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells In Vitro Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 664 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Verbruggen Chondroprotective drugs in degenerative joint diseases Rheumatology, February 1, 2006; 45(2): 129 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-X. Zhang, S. Yu, B. Gran, and A. Rostami Glucosamine Abrogates the Acute Phase of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis by Induction of Th2 Response J. Immunol., December 1, 2005; 175(11): 7202 - 7208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Yang, S. G. Carlson, D. McBurney, and W. E. Horton Jr. Multiple Signals Induce Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Both Primary and Immortalized Chondrocytes Resulting in Loss of Differentiation, Impaired Cell Growth, and Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem., September 2, 2005; 280(35): 31156 - 31165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Bitler, T. M. Viale, B. Damaj, and R. Crea Hydrolyzed Olive Vegetation Water in Mice Has Anti-Inflammatory Activity J. Nutr., June 1, 2005; 135(6): 1475 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A R Shikhman, D Amiel, D D'Lima, S-B Hwang, C Hu, A Xu, S Hashimoto, K Kobayashi, T Sasho, and M K Lotz Chondroprotective activity of N-acetylglucosamine in rabbits with experimental osteoarthritis Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2005; 64(1): 89 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Sohanpal, S. El-Labany, M. Lahooti, J. A. Plumbridge, and I. C. Blomfield Integrated regulatory responses of fimB to N-acetylneuraminic (sialic) acid and GlcNAc in Escherichia coli K-12 PNAS, November 16, 2004; 101(46): 16322 - 16327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Poustie, J. Carran, K. McEleney, S. J. Dixon, T. P. Anastassiades, and S. M. Bernier N-Butyryl Glucosamine Increases Matrix Gene Expression by Chondrocytes J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2004; 311(2): 610 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ulrich-Vinther, M. D. Maloney, E. M. Schwarz, R. Rosier, and R. J. O'Keefe Articular Cartilage Biology J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2003; 11(6): 421 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pavelka, J. Gatterova, M. Olejarova, S. Machacek, G. Giacovelli, and L. C. Rovati Glucosamine Sulfate Use and Delay of Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis: A 3-Year, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-blind Study Arch Intern Med, October 14, 2002; 162(18): 2113 - 2123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ma, W. A. Rudert, J. Harnaha, M. Wright, J. Machen, R. Lakomy, S. Qian, L. Lu, P. D. Robbins, M. Trucco, et al. Immunosuppressive Effects of Glucosamine J. Biol. Chem., October 11, 2002; 277(42): 39343 - 39349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Shikhman, D. C. Brinson, J. Valbracht, and M. K. Lotz Cytokine Regulation of Facilitated Glucose Transport in Human Articular Chondrocytes J. Immunol., December 15, 2001; 167(12): 7001 - 7008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |