|
|
||||||||
Department of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Especially with high-affinity peptides, TCR-MHC-peptide interaction is often followed by TCR down-regulation and internalization (7, 8, 9). Until recently, TCR down-regulation was presumed to depend on TCR dissociation from MHC-peptide complexes. However, it is well established that TCR-MHC-peptide interaction can cause T cells to rapidly absorb MHC and other molecules, including B7, from APC (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16). More recently, it has been shown that T cell absorption of molecules from APC is followed by internalization of these molecules (15, 16). Hence, TCR down-regulation may reflect internalization of intact TCR-MHC-peptide complexes. Surprisingly, T cell absorption and internalization of molecules from APC can also occur via CD28-B7 interaction, although not via LFA-1-ICAM-1 interaction (16).
The significance of T cell absorption and internalization of ligands derived from APC is uncertain. With high concentrations of specific peptide, T cell absorption of MHC-peptide complexes from APC renders T cells sensitive to fratricidal lysis by neighboring CTL (15). This mechanism could explain the exhaustion of T cells responding to high concentrations of viruses (17, 18) and may serve to guard against immunopathology resulting from overexuberant immune responses. Alternatively, T cell internalization of APC-derived ligands could be important for allowing T/APC dissociation, thus permitting effector T cells to leave lymphoid tissues and enter the circulation (16).
The form in which APC-derived molecules are absorbed by T cells is still unclear. In this respect it is notable that absorption includes bystander molecules on APC (16). Thus, when CD28-/- TCR-transgenic T cells are cultured with APC, addition of specific peptide causes the T cells to absorb (and internalize) not only the specific ligand recognized, i.e., MHC molecules, but also adjacent molecules on the APC, e.g., B7. Likewise, CD28-mediated uptake of B7 from APC (which is TCR independent) causes T cell uptake of both B7 and MHC molecules. It is likely, therefore, that T cells absorb APC-derived molecules as membrane fragments or vesicles. Whether these fragments/vesicles then fuse with the T cell membrane has yet to be studied.
In this paper, we investigated whether T cell absorption of molecules from APC requires direct T-APC interaction or can occur via uptake of cell fragments. Using latrunculin B (Lat B)3 (19, 20), we also examined the role of the cytoskeleton in T cell absorption and ligand internalization. The results show that the requirements for T cell absorption to the cell surface are highly complex and depend on the status of the T cells (resting vs activated), the T cell molecules involved (TCR vs CD28), and, for TCR-mediated absorption, the concentration of peptide on the APC. Likewise, T cell absorption requires the cytoskeleton in some situations but not in others. By contrast, the cytoskeleton plays a crucial role in ligand internalization.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
C57BL/6J (B6) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory
(Bar Harbor, ME). CD28-/- mice
(21) (originally purchased from The Jackson Laboratory),
2C 
TCR-transgenic mice (22), and
2C.CD28-/- mice were bred at The Scripps
Research Institute (La Jolla, CA). B7-2-/- mice
were provided by Arlene Sharp (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA)
(23) and maintained at The Scripps Research Institute.
B7-2-/-CD28-/- double
knockout mice were bred at The Scripps Research Institute. All mice
were on a B6 background except for B7-2-/-
mice, which were on a 129 background.
Cell lines and media
Drosophila APC were generated and maintained as described previously (24). RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME, and antibiotics was used for T cell culture.
Peptides
QL9 (QLSPFPFDL) and P1A (LPYLGWLVF) peptides were synthesized and purified as described previously (24). Ld-expressing APC were loaded with the peptides for 2 h at room temperature before use. For measuring CD28-mediated uptake of Ld, Ld expression on APC was stabilized by addition of 10 µM P1A peptide; this peptide binds strongly to Ld, but is not recognized by 2C TCR molecules.
Cell purification
T cells were purified by sequential mAb plus C killing as described previously (25). Briefly, total lymph node cells were treated with anti-HSA (J11D) and anti-IAb (28-16-8s) mAbs plus a combination of guinea pig and rabbit complement for 40 min at 37°C followed by Ficoll gradient centrifugation. For the purification of 2C CD8+ T cells, anti-CD4 (RL174) mAb was included in the killing process along with J11D and 28-16-8s mAbs. Preactivated T cells were prepared by culturing purified T cells overnight with PMA (10 nM; Sigma) and ionomycin (370 ng/ml; Sigma) in a 37°C humidified CO2 incubator. Dendritic cells (DC) were prepared as described previously (16, 26).
Preparation of cell sonicates
Sonicates of APC were prepared by using a Misonix sonicator (Misonix, Farmingdale, NY). Drosophila APC (5 x 106/ml) were subjected four times to a 5-s pulse of sonication (power 2, 15% input). Complete disruption of the cells was monitored by observing the sonicated cell suspension under the microscope.
Culture conditions
For the experiments using intact APC, 100 µl of purified resting T cells (8 x 106/ml) or preactivated T cells (5 x 106/ml) was incubated with 100 µl of APC (5 x 106/ml) in a 96-well plate for the indicated period of time. To ensure immediate contact among T cells and APC, the plates were briefly spun at low rpm (200 x g for 15 s). For the experiments using sonicates, 100 µl of resting (8 x 106/ml) or activated (5 x 106) T cells was incubated in a 96-well plastic tissue culture plate with 100 µl of sonicates prepared from the same number of APC as when intact APC were used. For the experiments using Transwells (Costar, Corning, NY), 200 µl of resting (8 x 106/ml) or preactivated (5 x 106/ml) T cells was added to a 24-well plate. Then, a Transwell (3-µm pore size, 6.5-mm diameter; Costar) was inserted, inside of which 200 µl of APC (1.5 x 107/ml) was added. For the experiments using Lat B (Calbiochem, CA), T cells were pretreated with the indicated dose of Lat B for 1 h at 37°C before use. Lat B was also kept in the culture during incubation of T cells with APC.
Abs and flow cytometric analysis
Anti-Ld (30-5-7) (27),
anti-CD8 (YTS-169), and anti-MHC class II (M5/114) mAbs were
prepared in ascites form in our laboratory. FITC-conjugated
anti-CD4 (L3T4), anti-B7-1 (16-10A1), anti-B7-2 (GL1),
anti-TCR
(H57-597), PE-conjugated anti-B7-1 (16-10A1),
anti-B7-2 (GL1), anti-IAb (AF6-120.1),
and anti-CD28 (37.51) mAbs were purchased from PharMingen (San
Diego, CA). PE-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG(H + L) (catalogue
no. 715-116-151) and Rhodamine Red-X-conjugated donkey anti-mouse
IgG(H + L) (catalogue no. 715-295-151) were purchased from Jackson
ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA). Cy-5-conjugated anti-CD8 (YTS.169)
and Alexa 568-conjugated anti-MHC class II (M5/114) mAbs were
prepared in our laboratory by using Cy-5 (Amersham, Arlington Heights,
IL) and Alexa 568 protein labeling kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR),
respectively. For staining of Lat B-treated cells, Lat B was included
during the staining procedure and was also present in the wash buffer.
A FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) was used for flow
cytometry, and CellQuest (Becton Dickinson) was used for data
analysis.
Laser scanning confocal microscopy
Specimens for confocal microscopy were prepared as described previously (16). Briefly, 100 µl of Lat B-treated and nontreated resting or preactivated T cells (8 x 106/ml) was incubated with 100 µl of Drosophila APC (8 x 106/ml) or DC (8 x 106) on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips in a 37°C humidified CO2 incubator for the indicated period of time. After incubation, cells on the coverslips were sequentially fixed with freshly prepared paraformaldehyde (2% in PBS) for 30 min at room temperature and permeabilized with saponin (0.05% in PBS) for 10 min. The fixed cells were treated with a blocking solution (1% BSA and 5% horse serum in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature and stained with mAbs for 30 min at room temperature. For staining for CD8, B7-1, B7-2, and IAb, directly conjugated mAbs (Cy5-CD8, FITC-B7-1, FITC-B7-2, and Alexa 568-MHC class II mAbs) were used. For Ld staining, Rhodamine Red X-conjugated donkey anti-mouse polyclonal Ab was used as a secondary Ab. The stained cells were observed using an Axiovert S100 TU inverted microscope (Zeiss, New York, NY). LaserSharp (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) software was used for creation and analysis of the images.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CD28-mediated absorption
As documented previously, T cell absorption of molecules from APC involves at least two receptor-ligand interactions, i.e., CD28-B7 and TCR-MHC-peptide interactions (15, 16). With culture of polyclonal normal B6 T cells, the absorption of molecules from APC is largely a reflection of CD28-B7 interaction, with little or no involvement of TCR molecules.
In confirmation of previous findings (16), short-term
(60-min) culture of normal B6 T cells with
B7-1.ICAM-1.Ld Drosophila APC led to
prominent absorption of both B7-1 and Ld
molecules from the APC as detected by FACS analysis (Fig. 1
). Such absorption applied to both
CD4+ cells (Fig. 1
) and
CD8+ cells (data not shown) and affected resting
T cells (Fig. 1
A) as well as preactivated T cells (T cells
exposed to PMA and ionomycin; Fig. 1
B). Confirming the
crucial role of CD28 in absorption, T cell uptake of both B7-1 and
Ld from APC was almost undetectable with
CD28-/- T cells (Fig. 1
B). This
finding implies that for absorption, CD28 binds B7-1 molecules that are
physically linked to Ld molecules. It should be
noted that uptake of B7-1 and Ld molecules from
APC was substantially higher with activated T cells than with naive T
cells (compare Fig. 1
, A vs B) As discussed
previously (16, 28, 29), this finding correlates with the
much higher expression of CD28 on activated T cells.
|
To examine the role of the cytoskeleton in T cell absorption of
APC-derived molecules, T cells were cultured with APC in the presence
of Lat B, an inhibitor of actin polymerization (19, 20).
For resting T cells, addition of Lat B at 20 µg/ml during direct
T-APC interaction almost totally inhibited T cell binding of
Ld and B7-1 (Figs. 2
A and 3A); this
finding applied to binding measured at 1060 min of culture (Fig. 3
A) and was observed even with
quite low doses of Lat B, i.e., 0.25 µg/ml (Fig. 2
B).
Different findings occurred with preactivated T cells (Figs. 2
C and 3A). With these T cells, even high doses
of Lat B (20 µg/ml) caused only partial inhibition of T cell binding
following direct T-APC interaction. By contrast, Lat B strongly
inhibited T cell binding in Transwell cultures (Figs. 2
C and
3B).
|
|
To examine whether the above findings with Drosophila APC
apply to normal APC, T cells were cultured with syngeneic B6 DC as APC;
the T cells were then stained for three molecules on the APC, i.e.,
B7-1, B7-2, and IAb. Since T cells are
B7-1- B7-2+
IA-, the T cells were prepared from
B7-2-/- mice; these mice were on a 129
(H2b) background. B7-2-/-
CD28-/- T cells were used as a control. For
resting CD4+ cells, absorption of B7-1, B7-2, and
IAb after short-term, direct culture with B6 DC
was strong for B7-2-/-
CD28+ T cells, but weak, although significant,
for B7-2-/- CD28-/- T
cells (Fig. 4
A), indicating a
marked, although not exclusive, role for CD28 in absorption from DC.
Significantly, as with Drosophila APC, T cell uptake of
molecules from DC was almost totally inhibited by Lat B (Fig. 4
A). This finding refers to resting T cells. With activated
T cells (Fig. 4
B), Lat B caused only partial inhibition of
absorption, i.e., as for activated T cells and Drosophila
APC. When activated T cells and DC were separated in Transwells, by
contrast, T cell absorption of molecules from DC (which was lower than
with Drosophila APC; see Discussion) was totally
inhibited by Lat B (Fig. 4
C). Collectively, these data with
DC as APC were thus in close accord with the data with
Drosophila APC.
|
Because of prominent absorption of APC-derived molecules via
CD28-B7 interaction, examining the role of TCR-MHC-peptide interaction
in absorption is best studied with TCR transgenic T cells on a
CD28-/- background. Confirming previous
findings (16), direct culture of resting
CD28-/- 2C-transgenic
CD8+ cells (H2b) with
Ld.B7-1.ICAM-1 Drosophila APC in the
presence of the highly immunogenic Ld-associated
QL9 peptide (10 µM) led to strong uptake of both
Ld and B7-1 molecules from the APC. Data for
uptake of B7-1 are shown in Fig. 5
A; no uptake occurred with
nonimmunogenic P1A peptide (data not shown). As for CD28-mediated
absorption by resting normal B6 T cells (Fig. 1
), uptake of
Ld and B7-1 molecules by resting
CD28-/- 2C CD8+ cells
required direct T-APC interaction, i.e., only very minimal uptake
occurred when T cells and APC were separated in Transwell plates (see
below). In marked contrast to CD28-mediated absorption by normal
resting B6 T cells (Figs. 2
and 3
), however, peptide-dependent
absorption by resting CD28-/- 2C
CD8+ cells was only partly inhibited by Lat B
(Fig. 5
A).
|
50%. With a low concentration of peptide
(0.001 µM), by contrast, Lat B totally blocked B7-1 absorption.
Similar results were obtained with preactivated
CD28-/- 2C cells (Fig. 5
The above findings indicated that TCR-mediated uptake of
molecules from APC became relatively resistant to Lat B when the
concentration of peptide was raised to a high level. These findings
applied to absorption via direct T-APC interaction. With T-APC
separation in Transwells, by contrast, absorption by T cells was
totally inhibited by Lat B even with a high concentration of peptide.
This finding applied to both resting and activated
CD28-/- 2C cells (Fig. 5
, C
and F); for resting T cells, absorption via Transwells was
very weak and apparent only with a high concentration of peptide.
In the above experiments, the use of
CD28-/- T cells precluded a possible
contribution of CD28 to TCR-mediated absorption. The effects of using
normal CD28+ 2C cells are shown in Fig. 6
. In this situation, 2C cell
coabsorption of B7-1 and Ld from APC in the
presence of QL9 peptide presumably involves both CD28-B7 and
TCR-MHC-peptide interaction; each of these interactions causes direct
binding of the specific ligand and, because of the physical association
between B7-1 and Ld, indirect binding of the
other ligand.
|
Direct comparison of TCR-mediated uptake of B7-1 by
CD28-/- vs CD28+ 2C cells
following direct T-APC interaction is shown in Fig. 6
, C and
F. In the absence of Lat B, it can be seen that
peptide-induced B7-1 absorption by CD28+ and
CD28-/- 2C cells was virtually identical for
both resting (Fig. 6
C) and activated (Fig. 6
F) 2C
cells; similar findings applied to the absorption of
Ld (data not shown). However, with addition of
Lat B to activated T cells, absorption induced by a high concentration
of peptide was appreciably (and reproducibly) higher with
CD28+ than CD28-/- cells;
this difference was not seen with resting T cells. Thus, CD28 had
little, if any, effect to enhance TCR-mediated absorption, but, if only
for activated T cells, was nevertheless able to promote resistance to
Lat B.
Ligand internalization
In previous studies, uptake of APC-derived molecules onto the surface of T cells was shown to be followed by rapid internalization of the ligands (15, 16). As for absorption to the cell surface, internalization reflected by either CD28-B7 or TCR-MHC-peptide interaction and applied to both the specific ligand recognized and adjacent ligands on APC. Using confocal microscopy, we examined whether T cell internalization of ligands from APC was Lat B sensitive.
In all situations examined, T cell internalization of ligands from APC proved to be highly sensitive to Lat B. The key finding was that Lat B blocked internalization in situations where Lat B only partly inhibited absorption on to the cell surface; this applied to both CD28-mediated and TCR-mediated uptake.
Data for CD28-mediated absorption of B7-1 from
Ld.B7-1.ICAM-1 Drosophila APC by
normal activated B6 CD8+ cells are shown in Fig. 7
A. In the absence of Lat B,
fixation and permeabilization of nondissociated cultures of T cells and
APC followed by staining for B7-1 (green) and CD8 (blue) revealed
intracellular distribution of B7-1 in the T cells; cultures were
examined after 60 min. In the presence of Lat B, by contrast,
intracellular B7-1 staining of the T cells was undetectable. In these
undisturbed cultures, conjugate formation between T cells and APC made
it difficult to detect B7-1 staining on the T cell surface. When the
cultures were dissociated before staining, B7-1 staining of T cells in
the absence of Lat B was apparent both on the cell surface and
intracellularly (Fig. 7
B). With addition of Lat B during
culture, however, B7-1 expression was limited to the cell surface; note
that with Lat B, surface staining of B7-1 on T cells was blue-green,
implying close association with the cell membrane. For CD28-mediated
absorption of B7-1 via Transwells, B7-1 (pink) staining of T cells was
apparent both intracellularly and on the cell surface when cells were
cultured without Lat B (Fig. 7
C). With addition of Lat B,
B7-1 staining of T cells was undetectable on the cell surface
(confirming the FACS data in Fig. 2
) or intracellularly (Fig. 7
C). Lat B also blocked internalization of B7-2 (Fig. 7
D) and IAb (Fig. 7
E) when
activated CD28+ B7-2-/-
CD8+ cells were cultured with B6 DC.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As shown here, the absorption of molecules from APC proved to be most efficient when T cells and APC were in direct contact. This requirement for direct cell-cell contact was most stringent for resting T cells. Thus, for both CD28-mediated and TCR-mediated absorption, uptake of molecules from APC by resting T cells was clearly apparent after direct T-APC interaction, but was very low or undetectable when T cells and APC were separated in Transwells or T cells were incubated with APC sonicates. Interestingly, however, activated T cells behaved differently. Thus, unlike resting T cells, activated T cells were able to absorb molecules from APC via Transwells and also from APC sonicates; as for direct cell contact, T cell uptake of this shed material from APC was TCR or CD28 dependent.
With regard to the mechanism of absorption, in other studies we have found that absorption of shed material from APC by activated T cells is under the critical control of LFA-1-ICAM-1 interaction and occurs only with ICAM-1+ APC (our unpublished observations). Thus, in contrast to the Ld.B7-1.ICAM-1 Drosophila APC used here, TCR- or CD28-mediated absorption from Drosophila APC expressing Ld and B7-1 but lacking ICAM-1 required direct T-APC interaction and did not occur via Transwells or from APC sonicates. This finding indicates that LFA-1-ICAM-1 interaction is not required for absorption following direct T-APC interaction, but is crucial for absorption of shed material from APC. Presumably, T cell binding of shed material is relatively weak, and for both TCR-and CD28-mediated absorption, such binding has to be stabilized by LFA-1-ICAM-1 interaction. In other systems it has been shown that the affinity of LFA-1 for ICAM-1 increases after T cell activation (30, 31, 32). Hence, for absorption of shed molecules from APC, the much stronger absorption by activated than resting T cells could be largely a reflection of enhanced LFA-1-ICAM-1 interaction by activated T cells. Note that T cell absorption of shed molecules from APC has a precedent in the old observation that T cells activated to MHC alloantigens were able to absorb these Ags from APC sonicates (33, 34).
It should be emphasized that for activated T cells, absorption of shed material from APC was much less than during direct T-APC interaction. Nevertheless, absorption of shed material from APC could be physiologically relevant because peptide-pulsed DC are reported to shed exosomes, which are highly immunogenic in vivo (35). Interestingly, exosome release in this study was much higher with immature than mature DC. This finding might account for why in our studies T cell absorption via Transwells was much lower with DC as APC than with Drosophila cells. Thus, mature DC were used in these studies, and we have yet to examine absorption from immature DC.
The observation that T cell uptake of APC-derived molecules is followed by rapid internalization of these molecules raised the question of whether this sequence of events involves the actin cytoskeleton. Since the cytoskeleton controls receptor-mediated endocytosis of soluble molecules, e.g., transferrin (36), and is also important for T cell activation by peptide-pulsed APC (8, 37, 38), we expected the actin cytoskeleton to play a key role in both T cell absorption and internalization of molecules from APC. For internalization of ligands, this was indeed the case. Thus, in all situations tested Lat B totally inhibited internalization of ligands from APC. For absorption of APC molecules onto the surface of T cells, however, the cytoskeleton was required in some situations but not in others. Here, for direct T-APC interaction, two factors were important, 1) the activation status of the T cells, and 2) in the case of TCR-mediated absorption, the concentration of peptide added to APC. To address these points, CD28- and TCR-mediated absorptions need to be considered separately.
For T cell uptake via CD28-B7 interaction, absorption was highly sensitive to Lat B for resting T cells, but was comparatively resistant for activated T cells. This difference could reflect greater mobility of CD28 in the membrane of activated than resting T cells. The possibility we favor, however, is that Lat B sensitivity is largely a reflection of CD28 density, the expression of CD28 being much higher on activated than resting T cells (5, 29). For resting cells, the low density of CD28 on these cells may severely limit contact with B7 on APC unless CD28 molecules are drawn into the T/APC contact site, presumably by an actin-dependent mechanism. For activated T cells, by contrast, mobilization of CD28 may be largely unnecessary because the pre-existing local density of CD28 at the contact site is sufficiently high to mediate B7 absorption; this model does not exclude the possibility that the CD28 molecules at the contact site form actin-independent microclusters (see below).
The effects of Lat B on absorption mediated by TCR-MHC-peptide
interaction were unexpected. Here, the notable finding was that
sensitivity of absorption to Lat B was inversely related to
peptide concentration. Thus, absorption was strongly Lat B
sensitive with low concentrations of peptide, but was relatively
resistant with high concentrations. The implication, therefore,
is that the actincytoskeleton does control TCR-mediated absorption,
but only when the concentration of MHC-bound peptide on APC is
relatively low. On this point there are close similarities with the
role of the actin cytoskeleton in T cell activation. Thus, for T cell
clones cultured with peptide-pulsed APC, a rise in the intracellular
Ca2+ concentration and IFN-
production
can be inhibited by cytochalasin D (CD), a drug that, like Lat B,
disrupts the actin cytoskeleton (37). Significantly,
however, the inhibitory effects of CD on T cell activation are much
less apparent with high concentrations of peptide.
In considering these findings, it is notable that although CD inhibits
stable "synapses" at the site of T/APC interaction, CD does not
block the formation of small clusters of molecules (CD3
) at the
contact site (39). Hence, with a high concentration of
peptide on APC, actin-independent microclustering of TCR molecules
interacting with a high density of MHC/peptide at the T/APC contact
site may be sufficient to induce T cell activation and also to allow
TCR-dependent absorption from the APC. Thus, under these particular
conditions the actin cytoskeleton is not required.
This scenario could also apply to CD28-B7 interaction mediated by activated T cells (see above). However, the situation may be different for LFA-1-ICAM-1 interaction. As discussed earlier, LFA-1-ICAM-1 interaction is largely unnecessary for absorption following direct T-APC interaction, but is crucial for absorption of shed material from APC. For absorption of shed material, there is thus an interesting correlation between the requirement for LFA-1-ICAM-1 interaction and the marked sensitivity to Lat B. To explain this correlation, one could postulate that LFA-1-ICAM-1 interaction is crucially dependent upon LFA-1 associating with the actin cytoskeleton. Indirect support for this idea is provided by the finding that treating T cells (but not APC) with CD prevents redistribution of ICAM-1 on APC during T-APC interaction (40).
As described above, there are striking parallels between the role of the actin cytoskeleton in T cell activation and TCR-mediated absorption to the cell surface. An obvious question here is whether T cell absorption (and internalization) of MHC and other molecules from APC plays a significant role in T cell triggering. This possibility seems unlikely in view of the evidence that T cells can be triggered in situations where T cell absorption of MHC/peptide presumably cannot occur, e.g., when T cells are stimulated by MHC/peptide conjugated to beads or plastic (38, 41). It is also notable that CD28 plays a crucial costimulatory role in T cell triggering, but does not seem to be required for TCR-mediated absorption. Thus, peptide-induced absorption of B7-1 and Ld molecules from APC was not higher with CD28+ 2C cells than with CD28-/- cells. In fact, for these cells the only difference observed was that for absorption by activated cells, CD28+ cells showed greater Lat B resistance than CD28-/- cells (which is difficult to explain). Despite the lack of correlation between TCR-mediated absorption and T cell triggering, there is an interesting correlation between TCR-mediated absorption and TCR down-regulation (8). Thus, following direct contact with APC, both processes occur in parallel and are largely CD28 and LFA-1 independent. The implication, therefore, is that, like TCR down-regulation, the extent of TCR-mediated absorption may directly reflect the intensity of TCR-MHC-peptide interaction. Thus, rather than correlating to T cell stimulation (which requires a combination of signals 1 and 2), TCR-mediated absorption may be a good guide to the strength of signal 1.
With regard to biological significance, we view T cell absorption of molecules during peptide-specific T-APC interactions as a manifestation of strong receptor/ligand interactions at the T/APC synapse. As mentioned earlier, internalization of the absorbed molecules may serve to disrupt the synapse after T cell activation, thus allowing stimulated T cells to dissociate from APC and migrate elsewhere to mediate their effector functions. A similar scenario may apply to CD28-mediated absorption. Thus, movement of normal resting T cells through the lymphoid tissues could be impeded by continuous contact of CD28 with B7 on APC. T cell absorption and ingestion of B7 could resolve this problem. In favor of this idea, T cell uptake of molecules from host cells in vivo is apparent for cells harvested from spleen and LN, but not from blood, implying that the absorbed molecules are rapidly internalized (or shed) before the cells enter the circulation (our unpublished observations).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jonathan Sprent, Department of Immunology, IMM4, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Lat B, latrunculin B; DC, dendritic cells; CD, cytochalasin D. ![]()
Received for publication December 7, 2000. Accepted for publication February 15, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-microglobulin (
2m) associations suggest that
2m facilitates the folding of the
1 and
2 domains during de novo synthesis. J. Immunol. 140:3522.[Abstract]
during T cell recognition. Science 289:1349.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Ford McIntyre, K. J. Young, J. Gao, B. Joe, and L. Zhang Cutting Edge: In Vivo Trogocytosis as a Mechanism of Double Negative Regulatory T Cell-Mediated Antigen-Specific Suppression J. Immunol., August 15, 2008; 181(4): 2271 - 2275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Aucher, E. Magdeleine, E. Joly, and D. Hudrisier Capture of plasma membrane fragments from target cells by trogocytosis requires signaling in T cells but not in B cells Blood, June 15, 2008; 111(12): 5621 - 5628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hao, Y. Liu, J. Yuan, X. Zhang, T. He, X. Wu, Y. Wei, D. Sun, and J. Xiang Novel Exosome-Targeted CD4+ T Cell Vaccine Counteracting CD4+25+ Regulatory T Cell-Mediated Immune Suppression and Stimulating Efficient Central Memory CD8+ CTL Responses J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 2731 - 2740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hudrisier, A. Aucher, A.-L. Puaux, C. Bordier, and E. Joly Capture of Target Cell Membrane Components via Trogocytosis Is Triggered by a Selected Set of Surface Molecules on T or B Cells J. Immunol., March 15, 2007; 178(6): 3637 - 3647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-J. Li, M.-C. Lu, S.-C. Hsieh, C.-H. Wu, H.-S. Yu, C.-Y. Tsai, and C.-L. Yu Release of surface-expressed lactoferrin from polymorphonuclear neutrophils after contact with CD4+T cells and its modulation on Th1/Th2 cytokine production J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2006; 80(2): 350 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bourbie-Vaudaine, N. Blanchard, C. Hivroz, and P.-H. Romeo Dendritic Cells Can Turn CD4+ T Lymphocytes into Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Carrying Cells by Intercellular Neuropilin-1 Transfer J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1460 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sprent Swapping Molecules During Cell-Cell Interactions Sci. Signal., March 1, 2005; 2005(273): pe8 - pe8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Wetzel, T. W. McKeithan, and D. C. Parker Peptide-Specific Intercellular Transfer of MHC Class II to CD4+ T Cells Directly from the Immunological Synapse upon Cellular Dissociation J. Immunol., January 1, 2005; 174(1): 80 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Vanherberghen, K. Andersson, L. M. Carlin, E. N. M. Nolte-`t Hoen, G. S. Williams, P. Hoglund, and D. M. Davis Human and murine inhibitory natural killer cell receptors transfer from natural killer cells to target cells PNAS, November 30, 2004; 101(48): 16873 - 16878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Poupot and J.-J. Fournie Spontaneous Membrane Transfer Through Homotypic Synapses Between Lymphoma Cells J. Immunol., September 1, 2003; 171(5): 2517 - 2523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Hurez, A. Saparov, A. Tousson, M. J. Fuller, T. Kubo, J. Oliver, B. T. Weaver, and C. T. Weaver Restricted Clonal Expression of IL-2 By Naive T Cells Reflects Differential Dynamic Interactions with Dendritic Cells J. Exp. Med., July 7, 2003; 198(1): 123 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Hwang, X. Shen, and J. Sprent Direct stimulation of naive T cells by membrane vesicles from antigen-presenting cells: Distinct roles for CD54 and B7 molecules PNAS, May 27, 2003; 100(11): 6670 - 6675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Espinosa, J. Tabiasco, D. Hudrisier, and J.-J. Fournie Synaptic Transfer by Human {gamma}{delta} T Cells Stimulated with Soluble or Cellular Antigens J. Immunol., June 15, 2002; 168(12): 6336 - 6343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. HUDRISIER and P. BONGRAND Intercellular transfer of antigen-presenting cell determinants onto T cells: molecular mechanisms and biological significance FASEB J, April 1, 2002; 16(6): 477 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K.H. McGavin, K. Badour, L. A. Hardy, T. J. Kubiseski, J. Zhang, and K. A. Siminovitch The Intersectin 2 Adaptor Links Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome Protein (WASp)-mediated Actin Polymerization to T Cell Antigen Receptor Endocytosis J. Exp. Med., December 17, 2001; 194(12): 1777 - 1787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |