|
|
||||||||


*
Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
Division of Developmental Immunology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, San Diego, CA 92121; and
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Universitiy of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, than those from WT mice. They secreted comparable amounts of
IL-4 and slightly but not significantly reduced amounts of IL-2. This
suggests that TG mice had reduced activation of
anti-Torpedo AChR Th1 cells, but increased
anti-AChR Ab synthesis, that likely resulted from IL-10-mediated
stimulation of anti-AChR B cells. Thus, EMG development is not
strictly dependent on Th1 cell activity. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ab against the muscle acetylcholine receptor
(MAChR)4 cause
myasthenia gravis (MG) and its animal model, experimental MG (EMG)
(4). Th1 cells and/or Th1 cytokines are involved in the
pathogenesis of MG (5, 6, 7) and EMG (8, 9, 10, 11, 12),
whereas Th2 or TGF-
-secreting cells (sometimes referred to as Th3
cells) may have a protective role (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20).
IL-10 is an important effector cytokine of Th2 cells and other cell types, including Ly-1 B cells, keratinocytes, activated macrophages, and mast cells. IL-10 has a broad range of activities that include anti-inflammatory activity, costimulation of thymocytes, stimulation of mast cell proliferation, and stimulation of B cells differentiation (1, 2, 21).
To understand the role of IL-10 in EMG, we have examined whether
transgenic (TG) expression of IL-10 influences susceptibility to EMG.
We have used wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 (B6) mice, and IL-10-TG mutants of
B6 background in which the T cell-specific human IL-2 promoter drives
the expression of mouse IL-10 transgene (22). The T cells
that synthesize TG IL-10 include activated, IL-2-secreting Th1 cells,
which produce IL-10 only transiently in response to T cell activation
(22). Thus, activated Th1 cells in these mice may
down-regulate their own activity, including secretion of TG IL-10.
Because of the transient expression of the transgene, the immune system
of these mice is not significantly different from the control
littermates: serum IgG levels and numbers and phenotype of T and B
cells are normal (22). Moreover, although IL-10 is a
potent down regulator of Th1 cells (1, 2, 3), IFN-
synthesis is reduced but not eliminated in these TG mice
(22). We have immunized IL-10 TG and WT mice with
acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and examined the appearance of EMG and
the characteristics of their anti-AChR Ab and T cell responses.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
WT breeders were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). TG breeders had been obtained from eggs of (B6 x C3H)F1 females mated to B6 males. Their establishment and characterization were described previously (22). Because the genetic background of mice influences their susceptibility to EMG (4) and the mice used to establish the TG mice were of mixed background, littermates with or without the IL-10 transgene could not be used to investigate the effects of TG expression of IL-10 on susceptibility to EMG. The susceptibility to EMG of B6 mice is well characterized (4). To obtain TG mice suitable for these studies, the IL-10 TG founders were back-crossed with B6 mice six times. Therefore, the genetic background of the resulting TG mice we used was almost entirely B6, and we could compare their susceptibility to EMG with that of WT mice.
Previous studies have characterized the properties of the immune system
and immune responses of the TG mice we used (22, 23). They
have normal T and B lymphocyte development. Their Th2 activity, as
judged by the secretion of IL-4, is similar to the control littermates
(22). They secrete more IL-10 than the control littermates
but less IFN-
, indicating that TG IL-10 secretion by the Th1 cells
results in a self-limitation of the activity of Th1 cells
(22). We bred both strains at the animal facility of the
University of Minnesota.
Purification of Torpedo AChR (TAChR)
We purified TAChR from electric tissue of Torpedo
californica as alkali-stripped TAChR-rich membrane fragments
(24). The AChR structure is very conserved along
evolution: TAChR is highly homologous to mammalian MAChR and suitable
to induce EMG (4). We measured the protein concentration
by the Lowry assay (25) and the TAChR concentration as
-bungarotoxin (
BTX)-binding sites (24). The TAChR
preparations we used contained 3.85.8 nmol of sites/mg protein.
SDS-PAGE analysis (24) showed that the TAChR preparations
contained only the four TAChR subunits as the main protein bands. For
cell cultures, we diluted the TAChR-rich membrane fragments in RPMI
1640 as needed and sterilized them by UV irradiation. For immunization
and Ab assay, we solubilized the membranes in 1% Triton X-100
(24), diluted them to 0.5 mg/ml in PBS, and stored them at
-80°C.
Peptides
We determined the epitope repertoire on the AChR
subunit,
which dominates the sensitization of anti-TAChR
CD4+ cells in B6 mice (24, 26), by
using a panel of synthetic peptides
20 residue long and overlapping
by
5 residues that spanned the sequence of the TAChR
subunit. We
reported their characterization previously (24). We used
solutions of the individual peptides in PBS sterilized by UV
irradiation and stored frozen.
Immunization
We immunized 8- to 10-wk-old female mice by s.c. injections
along the back and at the base of the tail of solubilized TAChR (
2
or 30 µg in 100 µl of PBS) emulsified with 100 µl of CFA. We
boosted them twice at 4-wk intervals with the same amount of TAChR in
incomplete CFA, and a third time 57 days before sacrifice. We have
shown previously that this immunization procedure, when using 2040
µg of AChR, induces EMG (e.g., Refs. 12, 15, 17, 18, 24, 26, 27). We used female mice because after they reach maturity and
until 6 mo of age, their weight is constant, both in the WT and the TG
strain, whereas the weight of males increases with age, thus making it
impossible to measure their strength with the holding test we used,
described below.
Evaluation of clinical symptoms of EMG
EMG symptoms in mice may not be obvious, and are difficult to
quantify by inspection (4). We quantified the EMG weakness
with a forced exercise, sensitized by a small amount of pancuronium
bromide (0.03 mg/kg i.p.) just before the test (27). The
mice hang from a grid: we measured the time it took them to release the
hold and fall three times (holding time). To verify the myasthenic
nature of the weakness, we injected i.p. edrophonium chloride
(Reversol; Organon, West Orange, NJ). Reversol is a cholinesterase
inhibitor and it immediately increased the strength of mice that have
EMG. We described this test in detail previously (12, 15, 17, 18, 27). The test is parametric and gives a quantitative and
reliable assessment of the severity of the muscle weakness, as verified
by the finding that repeated tests of the same mouse yield comparable
holding times (e.g., Ref. 12 ; also see left panels of Fig. 1
, A and B). The average holding time of 285
naive WT mice was 11.4 ± 1.55 min (12). Naive TG
mice had holding times indistinguishable from WT mice (also, see Ref.
18). We considered myasthenic the mice with holding times
of 8.3 min (holding time of normal mice - 2 SD) or less. Among
EMG mice, we differentiated the severity of the myasthenic weakness as
follows: mild EMG, holding times between 8.3 and 6.75 min (holding time
of normal mice - 3 SD); moderate EMG, holding times between 6.75
and 5.2 min (holding time of normal mice - 4 SD); severe EMG,
holding times of 5.2 min or less. Mice that were paralyzed or that died
of EMG are represented in the figures as having holding time of
zero.
|
0.05. Reduction of the MAChR content correlates with EMG severity (4). However, it can be measured only after sacrificing the mouse, whereas the holding test permits to follow the time course of the disease. In another study,5 we verified that a reduction in holding time correlated with reduced MAChR content of the muscle, measured at the time of the clinical observation: for mice with EMG there was a good statistical correlation between holding time and MAChR content.
Anti-AChR Ab assay
We obtained sera after each clinical testing. We measured the
serum concentration of anti-TAChR Ab by radioimmunoprecipitation
assay (RIPA), using TAChR solubilized in Triton X-100 and labeled by
125I-
BTX (23, 25). We express the
Ab concentration as µM precipitated 125I-
BTX
binding sites. We measured the concentration of Ab that cross-reacted
with mouse MAChR by a modification of the anti-TAChR Ab assay, with
Triton X-100 extract of muscle from naive B6 mice as the source of
solubilized MAChR, at a concentration of
1 nM/ml of
BTX binding
sites. We labeled the MAChR by overnight incubation with 4 nM
125I-
BTX. We set up precipitation curves by
using increasing amounts of serum (0.25 µl) in 96-well Immulon-4
Removawell plates (Dynex Technologies, Chantilly, VA), precoated by
overnight incubation at 4°C with PBS containing 0.01% sodium azide,
0.05% Tween 20, and 3% BSA (all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO). We used
0.2 pmol of MAChR per sample, and we usually set up triplicate or
quadruplicate samples for each of the serum amounts. After overnight
incubation, we precipitated the MAChR-Ab complexes by incubation with
20 µl of Zysorbin (Zymed Laboratories)/well for 2 h. All
incubations were at 4°C. We washed the plates four times with wash
buffer (24) and counted the individual wells in a 5500
gamma counter (Beckman, Fullerton, CA). We express the Ab concentration
as nanomolars precipitated 125I-
BTX binding
sites.
We used the two-factor ANOVA test with the MacANOVA program to
determine the statistical significance between the serum concentration
over time of anti-TAChR and anti-MAChR Ab in TG mice and WT
mice that had received the same TAChR immunization treatment. We used
the following model: response = treatment + time + E(mouse) +
treatment x time, where response was the Ab concentration,
treatment was the presence (or absence) of the IL-10 transgene, time
was the time of the individual test (measured as weeks after the
beginning of the immunization), and E(mouse) was the degrees of freedom
(a function of the number of the mice in the groups analyzed). We
considered a difference to be significant when p
0.05.
Assay of serum anti-TAChR IgG subclasses
We measured by ELISA the anti-TAChR IgG subclasses in sera obtained 4 wk after the second and third TAChR immunizations. We coated ELISA plates (Nunc, Karstrup, Denmark) by overnight incubation at 4°C with 100 µl/well of 25 µg/ml TAChR in 10 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6. We washed the plates four times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T) and blocked them with 200 µl/well of 2% BSA in PBS-T (PBS-TB) for 1 h at 37°C. After four washings with PBS-T, we added 100 µl/well of three appropriate serum dilutions (in duplicate) in PBS-TB and incubated the plates overnight at 4°C. We used sera from normal, untreated mice as negative control. We washed the plates six times with PBS-T, added 100 µl/well of 1 µg/ml biotinylated anti-mouse IgG subclass Ab (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) in PBS-TB, and incubated the plates for 1 h at 37°C. Mice carrying the Igh-1b allele, like B6 mice, do not express the IgG2a gene, but rather a related isotype, termed IgG2ab or IgG2c (28, 29). To detect anti-TAChR IgG2c in the mouse sera we used the mAb biotin anti-mouse IgG2ab (Igh-1b; BD PharMingen). After eight washings with PBS-T, we added 100 µl/well of 1 µg/ml avidin-peroxidase (Sigma) and incubated the plates for 1 h at 37°C. We washed the plates eight times with PBS-T, and added 100 µl/well of 0.3 mg/ml ABTS in 0.01% H2O2/citric acid buffer (ABTS peroxidase substrate system; Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD). After development of the blue-green color at room temperature, we stopped the enzymatic reaction by adding 100 µl/well of 1% SDS. We measured the absorbance at 405 nm with an automated microplate reader ELx800 (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT). We determined the specific absorbance by subtracting the absorbance of samples incubated with normal, untreated mice from that of samples incubated with the sera from TAChR-immunized mice. The serum concentration of anti-TAChR IgG subclasses was inferred from standard curves obtained by coating ELISA plates directly with 100 µl/well of purified mouse IgG subclasses (Sigma; from 0.097 to 100 ng/ml in 10 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6) and detecting their presence with the biotinilated anti-mouse IgG subclass/avidin-peroxidase system, described above. We could not construct a standard curve by using purified IgG2c, which is not commercially available; for IgG2c we used the standard curve obtained for IgG2a, which is highly homologous to IgG2c and likely to yield similar readings.
The standard curves we used are not ideal: ideal curves would have required the use of purified anti-TAChR IgG subclasses to bind to the TAChR coating the plate. Thus, the values of serum concentrations of the IgG subclasses that we obtained are not absolute. However, because our goal was to assess the percentage of the different anti-TAChR IgG subclasses in TG mice as compared with WT mice, we considered our standard curves satisfactory references, as internal standards that allowed comparison of results for the individual subclasses of different experiments.
We determined the serum concentration of IgG subclasses in naive WT and TG mice by using an ELISA similar to that described above and coating the plate with dilutions of the sera to be tested.
Detection of IgG, IgG subclasses, and complement at muscle synapses by immunofluorescence microscopy
We used hind limb muscle samples of TAChR-immunized or naive WT and TG mice frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. We used tissue from three different mice for each group (WT or TG mice, immunized with 30 or 2 µg of TAChR). We embedded the frozen tissues in OCT Compound Tissue-TEK (Miles Laboratories, Elkhart, IN) and sectioned it in the transverse direction into 10-µm sections with a Jung Frigout 2800E Kryostat (Leica, Nublach, Germany). We analyzed at least 10 sections from each mouse.
To detect simultaneously the presence of mouse IgG and complement at
the neuromuscular junction, we incubated the sections in PBS for 10
min, and for 1 h with a 1:200 dilution of biotin-conjugated goat
anti-mouse IgG polyclonal Ab (Sigma) in PBS containing 3% BSA. We
washed the sections with PBS for 15 min three times, and stained them
for 1 h with Texas Red-labeled
BTX (Molecular Probes, Eugene,
OR), FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse C3 Ab (Nordic Immunological
Laboratories, Capistrano Beach, CA), and AMCA-S-labeled streptavidin
(Molecular Probes) diluted, respectively, at 1:4000, 1:100, and 1:200
in PBS containing 3% BSA. For detection of different IgG subclasses,
we incubated the sections for 1 h with 1:20 dilutions in PBS of
mAbs specific for mouse IgG2b (Sigma; a rat mAb) or IgG2c (BD
PharMingen; mAb anti-mouse IgG2ab (Igh-1b) a mouse IgG3
mAb). We washed the sections three times for 15 min with PBS followed
by incubation with a biotin-conjugated secondary Ab, which was goat
anti-rat IgG polyclonal Ab (Sigma) for IgG2b and a mAb specific for
mouse IgG3 (BD PharMingen) for IgG2c. This was followed by staining
with Texas Red-labeled
BTX (Molecular Probes), and ALEXA 350-labeled
streptavidin (Molecular Probes), as described above. We washed the
sections three times for 15 min with PBS and viewed them in a
fluorescence microscopy (Eclipse E800; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). All
procedures were at room temperature. We collected digital images with
the program Image Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring,
MD).
Lymphocyte proliferation assay
Five to 7 days after the last TAChR immunization, we obtained
splenocytes (24) from two to three identically treated
mice. Because we administered the immunizations at multiple spots along
the mouse back and conducted the proliferation experiments 57 days
after the last boost, the spleen is a good source of TAChR-specific
CD4+ cells (e.g., Refs. 12, 24, 26). For the experiments described here, the splenocytes are a
better choice than lymph node cells because they can be obtained in
large numbers, and this allows both the depletion in
CD8+ cells (necessary to assess the cytokine
secretion by CD4+ cells), and the recovery of
enough cells to test a large number of Ags (necessary to determine the
epitope repertoire on the TAChR
subunit). We pooled the splenocytes
and depleted them in CD8+ cells by using
paramagnetic beads and rat anti-mouse CD8+ Ab
(BD PharMingen). We suspended the CD8+-depleted
splenocytes in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY)
supplemented with 10% heat inactivated FCS (Life Technologies), 50
µM 2-ME, 1 mM L-glutamine, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium
pyruvate, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (1 x
106 cells/ml), and seeded them in triplicate in 96-well
flat-bottom plates (200 µl/well). We added one of the following Ag or
stimulants: 10 µg/ml PHA (Sigma); 5 and 10 µg/ml TAChR; or 10
µg/ml of the individual
subunit peptides. Controls were
triplicate wells cultured without any Ag, or with a 20-residue control
peptide synthesized by the same method, unrelated to the TAChR sequence
(10 µg/ml). After 4 days, we labeled the cells for 16 h with
[3H]thymidine (1 µCi per well; sp. act. 6.7
Ci/mmol; DuPont, Boston, MA), harvested them (Titertek, Skatron,
Sterling, VA), and measured the [3H]thymidine
incorporation by liquid scintillation. We determined the significance
of the difference in the average incorporation of
[3H]thymidine in cultures exposed to a given Ag
and their basal incorporation in the absence of any stimulus by using a
two-tailed Students t test. We considered a difference to
be significant when p < 0.05.
Cytokine secretion by CD8+-depleted spleen cells in response to stimulation with TAChR
Five to 7 days after the last TAChR boost, we prepared
CD8+-depleted splenocytes from two to three identically
treated mice. We resuspended the cells at 5 x
106 cells/ml and cultured them with and without
10 µg/ml TAChR in 24-well plates. In some experiments, we set up
duplicate cultures. CD8+-depleted splenocytes
cultivated without any Ag served as controls for spontaneous secretion
of cytokines. We harvested the culture supernatants after 24 and
72 h. We measured the concentrations of IFN-
, IL-2, IL-4, and
IL-10 by capture ELISA, using duplicate samples. We used
anti-IFN-
, anti-IL-2, anti-IL-4, and anti-IL-10
monoclonal and polyclonal Ab (BD PharMingen), and recombinant IFN-
,
IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 (BD PharMingen) as standards, and followed the
manufacturers instructions. We determined the significance of the
difference in the average cytokine secretion of cultures exposed to the
TAChR and their average basal secretion in the absence of any stimulus
by using a two-tailed Students t test. We considered a
difference to be significant when p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a first experiment, we immunized 10 WT and 5 TG mice three
times with 2 µg of TAChR and used the hanging test to measure their
strength every 24 wk for 14 wk, starting just before the first TAChR
injection (time 0) (Fig. 1
A).
The shaded area in Fig. 1
A (left)
represents the holding times (8.3 min or less) that are indicative of
EMG. None of the WT mice developed EMG weakness. Some TG mice had
reduced holding time at week 4, and most or all of them after week 10:
at this time the difference in the average holding time of TG and WT
mice was significant (bar in left panel of Fig. 1
A). The
dashed lines in the left panels of Fig. 1
A represent the
holding time below which we consider the mice to have moderate and
severe EMG (6.75 and 5.2 min, respectively). In the right panels of
Fig. 1
A, we represent the results of this experiment as the
percentage of mice with clinical EMG at the different times. We have
indicated the presence of mild, moderate, and severe disease with
increasingly dark shaded areas.
In two other experiments, we immunized TG and WT mice three times with
30 µg of TAChR, a dose that induces EMG in WT B6 mice
(4). In the first of those experiments, we used 5 TG 5
five WT mice, and in the second we used 10 TG and 6 WT mice. We used
the hanging test to measure their strength every 24 wk for 14 wk,
starting just before the first TAChR injection (time 0). The two
experiments yielded consistent results, which are reported together in
Fig. 1
B. Similar to Fig. 1
A, we report in the
left panels the holding times of the individual mice observed in the
different tests. They illustrate well the consistency and reliability
of the holding test we used. In the right panels, we represent the
results of the same experiments as the percentage of mice with clinical
EMG at the different times. Among the mice with EMG, we have
differentiated, as in Fig. 1
A, the presence of mild,
moderate, or severe disease. TG mice developed more frequent and more
severe EMG than WT mice. About one-third of the WT mice had EMG,
usually mild or moderate, during the first 10 wk. At week 12, all WT
mice had EMG, which was mild in many of them, but >50% of them had
recovered by the end of the observation period. Of the TG mice, 75%
had EMG during the first 9 wk, which was moderate or severe in
50%
of the animals. By week 11, all TG mice had EMG, which was usually
moderate or severe and persisted for the whole duration of the
observation period. The difference in the holding times of TG and WT
mice was significant for the whole duration of the observation period
(p < 0.05; horizontal bar in the left panel of
Fig. 1
B).
Serum anti-AChR Ab concentrations in TG and WT mice
We measured by RIPA the anti-TAChR Ab concentration in sera of WT and TG mice immunized with low or high doses of TAChR.
Fig. 2
A reports the serum
anti-TAChR Ab concentrations of individual mice immunized with 2
µg of TAChR, and their averages. The sera were obtained 4, 8, and 14
wk after beginning the TAChR immunization. In agreement with previous
reports (4), we found mouse-to-mouse variations of the
serum anti-TAChR Ab. At each tested time, the average Ab
concentration in TG mice was higher than in WT mice. The curves
reflecting the time course of the appearance of serum anti-TAChR Ab
in the two strains were significantly different
(p < 0.001).
|
We measured by RIPA the concentration of Ab that cross-reacted with MAChR in the sera of WT and TG mice immunized with low or high doses of TAChR. Assay of the anti-MAChR Ab, the concentration of which in EMG induced by TAChR immunization is much lower than that of the anti-TAChR Ab (4), required rather large amounts of serum (up to 3040 µl/curve). For a few mice, we did not have enough serum, at least for some of the time points. As controls we used sera of WT mice sham-immunized with adjuvant alone in the same amounts and with the same injection schedule as the TAChR-immunizations.
We measured the serum anti-MAChR Ab concentration of individual WT and TG mice immunized with 2 µg of TAChR. The sera were obtained 4, 8, and 14 wk after the beginning of the immunization. The WT mice never had anti-MAChR Ab at 4 and 14 wk, and only one of them had a small amount of Ab (2.04 nM) at week 8. The IL-10 mice did not have measurable anti-MAChR Ab at weeks 4 and 14, but three of five of them had anti-MAChR Ab (12.13, 8.7, and 16.03 nM, respectively) at week 8.
We measured the anti-MAChR Ab in the sera of WT and TG mice
immunized with 30 µg of TAChR in the two experiments described above.
For both experiments we collected sera at 24 wk, at 8 wk, and at 14
wk. For the second experiments, we collected sera also at 6 and 11 wk.
For a few mice, we did not have enough serum for the week 14 samples.
Fig. 3
summarizes the results of both
those experiments.
|
Anti-TAChR IgG subclasses in WT and TG mice
We measured the percentage of anti-TAChR IgG subclasses in sera obtained 4, 8, and 14 wk after beginning the TAChR immunization in the mice immunized with low doses of TAChR and in the mice used in the first experiment in which we used high-dose TAChR immunization. In WT mice, the anti-TAChR Ab have been reported to be IgG2b and IgG1, with undetectable IgG3 (15, 17). The presence of IgG2c had not been investigated previously.
Fig. 4
A reports the averages
of the relative concentrations of anti-TAChR IgG1, IgG2b, and IgG2c
in sera of individual mice immunized with the low TAChR dose. We do not
show the values for the anti-AChR IgG3 because they were
undetectable. WT mice synthesized primarily IgG1 at weeks 4 and 8 and
comparable amounts of IgG1 and IgG2b by week 14. At all time points,
the IgG2c were a minor component of the anti-TAChR Ab. In contrast,
TG mice synthesized primarily anti-TAChR IgG2b at all time points
tested. They also synthesized substantial amounts of anti-TAChR
IgG2c (
30% of the anti-TAChR Ab at weeks 8 and 14), whereas the
synthesis of anti-TAChR IgG 1 was minimal (<10% at weeks 8 and
14). The relative serum concentration of anti-TAChR IgG1 was
significantly lower in the TG mice than in the WT mice at all the time
points. The relative concentrations of anti-TAChR IgG2b and IgG2c
were significantly higher in the TG mouse sera at all the time points,
with the only exception of IgG2c at week 4.
|
We measured amounts of serum IgG subclasses in naive WT and TG to see whether the two strains have a different profiles in IgG subclass production: no difference was detected (not shown).
TG and WT mice immunized with TAChR have IgG and complement at the neuromuscular junctions
We used immunofluorescence to determine the presence of mouse IgG
and complement at the neuromuscular junctions of WT and TG mice
immunized with either 2 or 30 µg of TAChR. We used three mice for
each group. As negative controls for unspecific binding of the
fluorescent probes to muscle, we used muscle sections from three naive
WT mice. For each mouse we analyzed at least 10 muscle sections in
which we could identify neuromuscular junctions by the binding of
fluorescent
BTX (red fluorescence). We identified the presence of
mouse IgG, IgG2b, IgG2c, and the C3 complement component by binding of
specific fluorescent Ab (blue and green fluorescence, respectively).
Fig. 5
reports representative muscle
sections from WT and TG mice immunized with 30 µg of TAChR. All mice
of both strains had IgG and complement bound to the
neuromuscular junctions, and they had both IgG2b and IgG2c. Also
WT and TG mice immunized with 2 µg of TAChR had detectable IgG and
complement at the neuromuscular junctions (data not shown). We could
not detect IgG, IgG2b, IgG2c or complement at the neuromuscular
junctions of naive mice (not shown).
|
After TAChR immunization, CD4+ cells of mice
with B6 background recognize primarily epitopes within the sequence
region 146169 of the TAChR
subunit (24, 26, 30, 31, 32).
CD4+ cells that recognize the immunodominant
sequence 146169 are strongly pathogenic, because lack of recognition
of the sequence by CD4+ cells correlates with
resistance to EMG induction (30, 31, 32). They recognize also
epitopes within residues 181200 and 360378 of the TAChR
subunit
(24) and other minor epitopes (26, 31). We
wished to examine whether the increased susceptibility to EMG of the TG
mice correlated with enhanced recognition of the TAChR by their
CD4+ cells, or with recognition of a different
CD4+ epitope repertoire. We used
CD8+-depleted splenocytes from WT and TG mice
immunized with 30 or 2 µg of TAChR, to determine their proliferative
response to the TAChR and to overlapping synthetic peptides spanning
the TAChR
subunit sequence.
We conducted one experiment with WT mice and two experiments with TG
mice immunized with 30 µg of TAChR that yielded consistent results
(Fig. 6
). Both strains recognized TAChR
vigorously. The CD8+-depleted splenocytes from TG
mice recognized the TAChR less strongly than those from the WT mice.
Given the limited number of experiments, we cannot decide whether this
was attributable to a reduced Th1 response (22) or to the
described variations in the proliferative response of individual mice
to the TAChR (15, 17, 18, 24, 26, 27).
CD8+-depleted splenocytes from WT and TG mice
immunized with 30 µg of TAChR recognized a similar repertoire of
subunit peptides. They always recognized most strongly the peptides
spanning the immunodominant sequence region 146169. Other peptides
were recognized less consistently and/or less intensely. WT mice
recognized also peptides
3047 and
360378. TG mice also
recognized, at least in one experiment, peptides
120,
3047,
6380, and
276295.
|
subunit sequence,
and to the peptides spanning the sequence regions 146169, 360378,
and 3047 (data not shown).
Thus, these experiments did not detect any substantial change in the
pattern of the recognition of TAChR
subunit epitopes in the TG
mice.
Cytokine secretion by anti-TAChR CD4+ cells
We investigated the production of cytokines in response to TAChR
stimulation in vitro by CD8+-depleted splenocytes
of WT and TG mice immunized with 30 µg of TAChR. We cultured
CD8+-depleted splenocytes with TAChR or without
any stimulus and measured IFN-
, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 in the culture
supernatants by ELISA (Fig. 7
). In
agreement with the characteristics of the immune response of the TG
mice (22), their CD8+-depleted
splenocytes secreted more IL-10 and less IFN-
than those from WT
mice, whereas their synthesis of IL-2 was slightly, but not
significantly, decreased as compared with the WT mice, and that of IL-4
was the same in both strains. Thus, TG IL-10 secretion led to a
decrease of the prototypic Th1 cytokine, IFN-
, but it neither caused
an increase in Th2 activity nor it disrupted significantly the
synthesis of IL-2 by Th1 cells.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The TG expression of IL-10 did not have a significant effect on the
serum concentration of anti-MAChR Ab, although after immunization
with 30 µg of TAChR, anti-MAChR Ab appeared in the sera of TG
mice earlier than in WT mice, and the few mice with high concentrations
of serum anti-MAChR Ab were in the TG group (Fig. 3
). Also, after
immunization with low doses of TAChR, TG mice had serum anti-MAChR
Ab more frequently than WT mice. The immune cross-reactivity between
the TAChR and MAChR is small, and anti-MAChR Ab may accumulate in
the serum only after the MAChR in the mouse muscles has been saturated.
Mice have a large MAChR content, and Ab binding to muscle AChR
accelerates its degradation and resynthesis (4), and
therefore absorption of more anti-MAChR Ab. Thus, the absence or
the presence of low amounts of anti-MAChR Ab in the serum may not
correlate with absent or mild EMG symptoms. A lack of correlation
between the concentration of anti-MAChR Ab and severity of EMG in
mice has been described (33). Also in MG, there is poor or
no correlation between the concentration of anti-AChR Ab in the
serum and the symptom severity (4). Paradoxically,
although Ab cross reactive with MAChR are the direct cause of EMG,
measurement of the total concentration of the anti-TAChR Ab in our
mice provided a better indicator of the effect of TG IL-10 expression
on the anti-AChR Ab response.
Complement activation at the neuromuscular junction is a likely pathogenic mechanism in EMG. For example, IL-12-deficient mice do not develop EMG after TAChR immunization and complement cannot be detected at their endplates (12). However, despite the increased synthesis of anti-TAChR IgG subclasses that bind complement in TG mice immunized with low doses of TAChR, we could not detect an increased deposition of complement at the neuromuscular junctions of TG mice, as compared with WT mice: all mice immunized with TAChR had C3 at their endplates. The immunofluorescence method we used to detect complement is strictly qualitative and may not detect small yet clinically significant changes in the amount of complement at the neuromuscular junction.
IL-10 facilitates the differentiation and proliferation of B cells and
production of Ig. It is a switch factor for a variety of Ig classes and
subclasses (34, 35, 36, 37, 38) and possibly for all IgG isotypes
(39). At the higher TAChR doses, the percentages of all
anti-TAChR IgG subclasses were similar in WT and TG mice (Fig. 4
B), indicating that TG mice had increased synthesis of all
anti-TAChR IgG subclasses, including those induced by Th1
cytokines. This suggests that the increased synthesis of anti-TAChR
Ab in TG mice was caused by the action of IL-10 on B cells, not by the
reduced anti-TAChR Th1 response (Fig. 7
). This is verified by the
finding that immunization of the TG mice with suboptimal doses of TAChR
resulted in preferential synthesis of Th1-induced IgG2b and IgG2c (Fig. 4
A). This is likely explained by the focal synthesis of the
TG IL-10 by Th1 cells simultaneous with IL-2 synthesis. In WT mice
immunized with low TAChR doses, the small amounts of anti-TAChR Ab
were primarily Th2-induced IgG1 after the first two TAChR injections,
and even after the third injection (week 14) the IgG1 were almost half
of the anti-TAChR IgG (Fig. 4
A). This is consistent with
a preferential activation of Th2 cells when their TCR are ligated at
low density by the MHC class II/epitope complexes (3, 21).
The action of IL-10 on B cells may be synergistic with IL-2, with or
without additional costimulatory signals (40, 41, 42, 43). The TG
expression of IL-10 in our TG mice might have been especially effective
in stimulating IgG synthesis by anti-TAChR B cells, because it
occurred simultaneously with secretion of IL-2, and at the same
location. The TG mice do not have overall increased levels of serum IgG
or of individual IgG subclasses (Ref. 22 and this study),
yet they had significantly higher concentrations of anti-TAChR Ab
than WT mice (Fig. 2
). This argues for a specific stimulatory effect of
the TG IL-10 on the B cells that synthesize anti-TAChR Ab,
resulting from the cognate interaction between TAChR-specific
CD4+ Th and B cells.
The TG expression of IL-10 occurs simultaneously with that of IL-2,
which might also contribute to EMG development and to the proliferation
and differentiation of anti-TAChR B cells. However, IL-2 is
unlikely to have had a role in the enhancement of EMG development in
the TG mice, because the IL-2 synthesis induced by challenge with TAChR
in cultures of CD8+-depleted splenocytes of
TAChR-immunized mice was modestly, albeit not significantly, decreased
in the TG mice as compared with the WT mice. This is consistent with
the decreased synthesis of IFN-
(Fig. 7
), described previously in TG
mice (22), which suggests that secretion of TG IL-10 by
the Th1 cells down-regulates the activity of the Th1 cells that express
the transgene. An important role of IL-10 in EMG development is
supported by studies of IL-10 gene knockout mice, which appeared to be
resistant to EMG induction (P. Christadoss, unpublished
observations).
IL-10 down-regulates Th1 responses by reducing the expression of
costimulatory molecules and cytokines by APC (44, 45, 46, 47) and
by inhibiting the transcription of the IL-12 genes during the primary
Ag stimulus (48). IL-10 also affects
CD4+ T cells and resting T cells by inhibiting
IL-2 production and T cell growth (49, 50). It induces a
long-term Ag-specific anergic state in human CD4+
cells when present during Ag challenge (51, 52) and might
be responsible for the increased T cell death mediated by Fas/Fas
ligand that occurs in human systemic lupus (53). Also, the
shift toward Th2 responses caused by TGF-
may be attributable to
inhibition of Th1 cells mediated by IL-10 (54). The
decreased secretion of IFN-
by CD8+-depleted
splenocytes from our TG mice, after stimulation in vitro with TAChR
(Fig. 7
), suggests that they had a reduced Th1 response to the TAChR.
This might have occurred because the activated Th1 cells down-regulated
their own activity because of the TG IL-10 expression induced by the
stimulation of IL-2 synthesis. Some Th1-mediated responses, like
anti-tumor activity and colitis, were reduced in the TG mice we
used (22).
IL-10, especially in combination with IL-2, facilitates CD8+ CTL responses (55, 56, 57, 58, 59). The role of CD8+ cells in EMG is not clear. Mice deficient in MHC class I molecules and CD8+ cells developed EMG with high frequency after immunization with AChR (60), suggesting that CD8+ cells do not have a pathogenic role in EMG. However, other studies suggested that CD8+ cells are necessary for EMG development. In Lewis rats, Ab-mediated depletion of CD8+ cells suppressed EMG development and reduced the synthesis of anti-AChR Ab (61). Also, mutant B6 mice that lacked CD8+ cells did not develop EMG and had reduced anti-AChR Ab responses (62). If CD8+ cells have a facilitating role in rodent EMG, a stimulation of CD8+ cells by the TG IL-10 may have a role in the increased susceptibility of the TG mice to EMG.
Nasal, s.c., or oral administration of TAChR sequences to B6 mice
caused activation of specific Th2 cells and protected from EMG (e.g.,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20). How can these results be reconciled with those we
report here? Activated Th2 cells secrete IL-4, which might help prevent
EMG directly because of its antiinflammatory properties and its
down-regulating action on Th1 cells (1, 2, 3). Also, IL-4 may
be a growth factor for modulatory CD4+ cells that
secrete TGF-
(also referred to as Th3 cells, Refs.
62, 63, 64 ; however, see Ref. 65). The TGF-
family of cytokines are potent immunomodulators (66) that
polarize CD4+ responses toward a Th2 phenotype
(66, 67) and block the effects of IL-12 in the development
of Th1 responses (66, 68, 69). Because Th3 cells do not
produce IL-4, they may be dependent on Th2 cells for proliferative
signals (3, 63). Thus, Th2 cells may down-regulate immune
responses indirectly, through the action of IL-4-induced Th3 cells.
In WT mice, activation of anti-TAChR Th2 cells might prevent EMG
because the protective action of IL-4 overshadows the stimulation of B
cells by IL-10. IL-10 itself may down-regulate Th1 cells and APC, and
contribute to protect from EMG after s.c. or nasal "tolerization"
procedures. TG mice did not have an increased production of IL-4 (Fig. 7
). Moreover, their transient secretion of large amounts of IL-10 by
activated anti-TAChR Th1 cells that also secreted IL-2 enhanced the
anti-TAChR B cell response. In TG mice, the anti-TAChR Th1
cells were down-regulated by their own TG IL-10 secretion, because they
produced less IFN-
than WT mice. However, this effect did not
suffice to curb the overstimulation of the anti-TAChR Ab
response.
Because of its ability to down-regulate Th1 cells and the synthesis of a variety of cytokines, IL-10 is considered as a possible therapy of undesirable immune responses (70, 71). However, the effects of IL-10 on T cell-mediated experimental autoimmune responses are complex and conflicting. For example, in nonobese diabetic mice, TG pancreatic expression of IL-10 accelerated autoimmune diabetes, and treatment with anti-IL-10 Ab prevented insulitis (72, 73, 74). Yet treatment with IL-10 or an adoptive transfer of islet specific T clones transfected with IL-10 cDNA prevented diabetes (75, 76, 77). The regulated production of IL-10 in T cells by the transgene we used here had a weak inhibitory effect in some mouse models of diabetes (23). Also in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) the effects of IL-10 are contrasting. IL-10 TG mice were resistant to EAE, and genetically IL-10-deficient mice were more susceptible than WT mice (78). Yet administration of IL-10 did not affect EAE development (79). IL-10 has an important pathogenic role in an Ab-mediated autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In SLE, the Ig production is IL-10 dependent, and an increased production of IL-10 by B cells and monocytes may be a critical pathogenic mechanism (80, 81). The finding that MG patients have increased blood levels of AChR-specific cells that secrete IL-10 is consistent with a pathogenic role of this cytokine in MG (82).
These results, and the pathogenic role of IL-10 in SLE (80, 81), raise concerns about the suitability of IL-10 to curb Ab-mediated autoimmune diseases, and suggest that IL-10 might be a target, rather than a tool, in the suppression of undesirable Ab responses.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Previously published under the name Bianca M. Conti-Tronconi. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Bianca M. Conti-Fine, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, 1479 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: MAChR, muscle acetylcholine receptor; AChR, acetylcholine receptor; MG, myasthenia gravis; EMG, experimental MG; B6, C57BL/6 mice;
BTX,
bungarotoxin; RIPA, radioimmunoprecipitation assay; TAChR, Torpedo AChR; TG, transgenic; WT, wild type; EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus. ![]()
5 C. Monfardini, P. I. Karachunski, N. Ostlie, W. Wang, M. Milani, D. K. Okita, J. Lindstrom, and B. M. Conti-Fine. Adoptive protection from experimental myasthenia gravis with T cells from mice treated nasally with acetylcholine receptor epitopes. Submitted for publication. ![]()
Received for publication March 6, 2000. Accepted for publication February 2, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
subunits of muscle acetylcholine receptor involved in formation of immunodominant CD4+ epitopes. J. Immunol. 152:4686.[Abstract]
subunit of human muscle acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis. Neurology 48:1643.[Abstract]
(IFN-
) is necessary for the genesis of acetylcholine receptor-induced clinical experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis in mice. J. Exp. Med. 186:385.
receptor deficiency are less susceptible to experimental myasthenia gravis. J. Immunol. 162:3775.
in neuromuscular junction. J. Exp. Med. 181:547.
or interleukin-12 has different effects on experimental myasthenia gravis in C57BL/6 mice. J. Immunol. 164:5236.
-expressing Th1-like cells and up-regulation of TGF-
mRNA in mononuclear cells. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 778:273.[Abstract]
subunits of Torpedo californica and murine acetylcholine receptors. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:2303.[Medline]
chain recognized by T-lymphocytes and by antibodies in EAMG-susceptible and nonsusceptible mouse strains after different periods of immunization with the receptor. Mol. Immunol. 31:833.[Medline]