|
|
||||||||


*
Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523; and
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Fort Collins, CO 80522
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several pharmacological activities have been characterized in tick saliva with important roles in blood feeding, including vasodilators, anticoagulants, and anesthetics (5, 6, 8, 9, 16). This body of observations makes it clear that ticks have evolved a remarkable array of biochemical weapons to keep the host at bay and assure their own success as a species. The protective functions of vector saliva may also have the important, though presumably inadvertent, effect of potentiating the transmission of various pathogens to hosts through the alteration of the immunologic microenvironment at the feeding site (1, 2) or the lymph nodes draining the site of attachment (17, 18, 19, 20).
Many examples of immunomodulatory functions of tick saliva have been described in various tick species that are disease vectors to humans and livestock (reviewed in Ref. 7 and 21). Much attention has been given to the nature of the immune response to ticks as well as to the effects of tick infestations on the hosts immune competence (7, 9, 21). Tick infestation of mice has been shown to result in significant modulations of cytokine production, with a general pattern of the inhibition of proinflammatory and Th1 cytokines accompanied by enhancement of Th2 cytokines (19, 22, 23).
It has been observed that the saliva or salivary gland extracts (SGE)3 of several tick species, including I. scapularis (16, 24), profoundly inhibit the proliferative response of mitogen-stimulated T lymphocytes. This phenomenon has been demonstrated with mouse T cells by using Con A (16, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28), PHA (24), and anti-CD3 (20). This effect has also been demonstrated on bovine lymphocytes with Con A stimulation (29, 30). This putative immunomodulatory phenomenon is particularly intriguing because of the central role played by T cells in the orchestration of the acquired immune response (31). Determining the mechanism of this inhibitory effect of saliva may have important ramifications regarding the inability of the host to mount effective immune responses to ticks and the pathogens they transmit.
Previous work with I. scapularis saliva has shown that this phenomenon is mediated by a protein(s) due to its lability to trypsin treatment. This inhibitory effect was not dependent on mouse haplotype or the T cell mitogenic lectin used to drive proliferation (24). It was also shown that the high levels of PGE2 in tick saliva cannot account for the degree of inhibition of mouse T cell proliferation caused by saliva (24). In contrast, evidence that PGE2 in Boophilus microplus saliva is the mediator of this effect on bovine lymphocytes does exist (29). Furthermore, it was demonstrated with ELISA and bioassays that treatment of spleen cells (SC) with tick saliva resulted in a decrease in IL-2 production (24). This observation has also been made by others working with different tick species (20, 23, 27, 30).
Our present work was undertaken to determine the mechanism by which tick saliva nonspecifically inhibits T cell proliferation. We report here on the identification of a proteinaceous tick salivary factor that binds murine and human IL-2. Furthermore, we demonstrate that tick saliva inhibits mitogen-driven human T cell proliferation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adult C57BL/6 mice, >6 wk old, were obtained from National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD). Female New Zealand White rabbits, 57 wk old, were obtained from Western Oregon Rabbit (Philomath, OR).
Human PBMC preparations
Blood was obtained from healthy human donors at the Student Health Center of Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO). PBMC were isolated from heparinized venous blood by separation on a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient (32). The cells were washed and resuspended at 1 x 106/ml in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 10 µg/ml gentamicin, and 10% heat-inactivated AB human serum (Pel-Freez Clinical Systems, Brown Deer, WI).
Reagents and chemicals
The anti-CD3 mAb-producing clone 145-2C11 (CRL-1975)
(33) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection
(Manassas, VA). [3H]TdR (5 Ci/mmol) was
obtained from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). Pilocarpine (P-6503),
PHA-L (leucoagglutinin; L-2769), trypsin (T-2271), and
soybean trypsin inhibitor (SBTI; T-6522) were obtained from Sigma (St.
Louis, MO). Recombinant mouse (rm)IL-2 (212-12), recombinant human
(rh)IL-2 (200-02), and rmIFN-
(315-05) were obtained from PeproTech
(Rocky Hill, NJ).
Ticks and saliva collection
All experiments were done with saliva from field-isolated ticks. Unfed adult female ticks were collected by flagging vegetation at a site in Bridgeport, CT (34) during the fall (September-November) in 19961999. For saliva collection, ticks were allowed to feed on the ears of rabbits for 57 days. Near-replete and replete ticks were removed and immobilized, a finely drawn capillary tube was fitted over their mouthparts, and 25 µl of 5% pilocarpine in methanol was applied topically to their dorsa (35). Saliva was collected over 12 h in a 37°C environment, pooled, and stored at -70°C until used. For cellular assays, saliva was sterilized with a 0.22-µm syringe filter before use. Except when indicated, the results depicted in the figures are from independent batches of saliva; however, each experiment described has been replicated with different batches of saliva.
Proliferation assays
Mouse SC were prepared as described previously at 5 x
106 cells/ml in supplemented DMEM
(24) and seeded at 5 x 105
well. Cultures were maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2
during the assays. The cells were stimulated with an anti-CD3 mAb
culture supernatant at 1:500 in the presence or absence of saliva (in
triplicate) as described in Fig. 6
. After 24 h, the cultures were
pulsed with 1 µCi/well of [3H]TdR for 18
h followed by harvesting and scintillation counting to determine the
proliferative response.
|
|
CTLL-2 cells were maintained in complete RPMI 10 medium in the
presence of 1 U/ml human IL-2 (36). All assays were
performed 23 days after the last cell feeding. Cells were washed
three times in sterile PBS and reseeded at 5000 cells/well in a final
volume of 50 µl in the presence of human or mouse IL-2 and saliva as
described in the Results and Fig. 7
. The cultures
were maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2 during the
assay. At 18 h, the wells were pulsed with 1 µCi/well
[3H]TdR for 8 h before harvesting and
scintillation counting. Preincubations of IL-2 with the T cell
inhibitory protein (TIP)-containing fraction were done in polypropylene
tubes for 90 min in 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.3), 150 mM NaCl. The TIP fraction
of tick saliva was obtained by gel filtration HPLC of 400 µl of
saliva (360 µg protein) on a Bio-Rad Bio-Sil size exclusion 125-5
column (125-0475; Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) that was perfused in 10 mM
HEPES (pH 7.3) and 150 mM NaCl. Parameters of the HPLC were essentially
as described previously (37).
|
ELISAs
The IL-2-specific and IFN-
-specific ELISAs were performed
using matched sets of rat mAbs obtained from BD PharMingen (San Diego,
CA), according to the manufacturers suggested protocol, on Nunc F96
Maxisorp plates (439454; Nunc, Naperville, IL). A rat anti-mouse
IL-2 capture mAb (rat IgG2a; 18161D) was used to capture IL-2.
Biotinylated rat anti-mouse IL-2 mAb (rat IgG2b; 18172D) was used
to detect captured IL-2. A rat anti-mouse IFN-
mAb (rat IgG1;
18181D) was used to capture IFN-
, and the biotinylated rat
anti-mouse IFN-
mAb (rat IgG1; 18112D) was used to detect
captured IFN-
. Both assays were developed with avidin-HRP (A-3151;
Sigma), and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB; Kirkegaard &
Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD) was used as the substrate.
Preincubation of saliva with mouse IL-2 and IFN-
was done in 96-well
polypropylene clusters (Costar 3790; Corning Glass, Corning, NY). A
serial dilution of saliva was prepared in DMEM supplemented with 5%
FCS. A serial dilution of the cytokine mouse IL-2 or IFN-
was also
prepared in DMEM supplemented with 5% FCS. Equal volumes of each
serially diluted reagent were combined on transverse axes, 01 µl
saliva on one axis and 04 pg of cytokine on the other, and incubated
for 24 h at 37°C. The saliva-cytokine mixtures were then
transferred to the capture Ab-coated plate and incubated overnight at
4°C. The ELISA was completed using standard procedures.
A control ELISA designed to test for possible Ab-binding by plated
saliva was performed as follows. Saliva (1 µl/well) was immobilized
in wells as described below. Following a wash step, wells were blocked
with Superblock (37535; Pierce, Rockford, IL). After another wash step,
each of the Abs used in the IFN-
and IL-2 ELISAs was added to the
wells at the concentrations used in the ELISAs and incubated for 2
h at room temperature. The samples were washed again and then incubated
with a 1:500 dilution of HRP-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (H+L)
(14-16[hypehn]12; Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories) in 5% FCS/1x PBS
(pH 7.4) for 45 min before a final wash and developed as described
above.
Biotinylation of cytokines
rmIL-2, rhIL-2, and rmIFN-
were biotinylated using
aminohexanoyl-biotin-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Zymed, San
Francisco, CA) and standard protocols for biotinylation of proteins in
solution (38). To clear the biotinylated cytokines of
excess quenched aminohexanoyl-biotin-N-hydroxysuccinimide
ester and exchange buffers, the biotinylation reactions were filtered
on Microcon ultrafiltration units with a molecular mass cutoff of 10
kDa that were passivated with Tween 20 following the manufacturers
suggested procedure (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The filter was washed
twice with 400 µl 1x PBS plus MgCl2 and
CaCl2, and then the biotinylated cytokine was
collected from the membrane in 100 µl 1x PBS plus
MgCl2 and CaCl2.
The concentration of the recovered biotinylated cytokines was
determined using competitive capture ELISAs with unlabeled cytokines of
known concentration as standards (39). The concentration
of the cytokines before dilution were: biotinylated (bio)-rmIL-2, 1.26
ng/µl; bio-rhIL-2, 0.3 ng/µl; and bio-rmIFN-
, 1.34 ng/µl.
Assays with plate-bound tick saliva
A serial dilution of tick saliva was plated on Nunc F96 Maxisorp
plates in standard ELISA carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C.
After washing with 1x PBS (pH 7.4), the plates were blocked with 3%
BSA/0.1% Tween 20/1x PBS (pH 7.4). Following another wash step, an
excess of bio-rmIL-2, -rhIL-2, or -rmIFN-
was added to the plate for
4 h at room temperature; the plate was then washed again. A blank
control of saliva-coated wells processed without a biotinylated
cytokine incubation step was also run. The plate was then incubated
with avidin-HRP for 30 min followed by a final wash step and
development with tetramethylbenzidine reagents (Kirkegaard & Perry
Laboratories). The reactions were stopped with sulfuric acid before the
absorbance was read at 450 nm. Before graphing, the blank control
absorbance values were subtracted from the data, and the absorbance
values were normalized to account for differential levels of
biotinylation of the various cytokines used. The specific activity of
each biotinylated cytokine was determined by graphical analysis of the
slope of the linear data range in the quantitative competitive ELISAs,
described above. Ratios of the slopes were used to derive normalization
factors for the various cytokines. The normalization factors relative
to the signal generated by bio-rmIL-2, which was set at a value of 1,
were determined to be 1.81x for bio-rhIL-2 and 1.65x for
bio-rmIFN-
. Thus, the specific activity of the bio-IFN-
and
bio-rhIL-2 are nearly equivalent, whereas the bio-rmIL-2 specific
activity is greater than either of the other reagents.
In the competitive binding assay, 2 µl of tick saliva was immobilized
in each well of the assay plate as above. Bio-rmIL-2 was premixed with
unlabeled rmIL-2 at the concentrations indicated in the
Results and Fig. 4
in 5% FCS supplemented with 1x PBS (pH
7.4) in polypropylene wells. These samples were transferred to the
plates with immobilized saliva and incubated for 3 h at room
temperature. The assay was completed as were the noncompetitive assays.
The positive control for bio-IFN-
was done using the plate-bound
capture Ab for the IFN-
ELISA (described above).
|
An aliquot of I. scapularis saliva was mixed with an equal volume of 1 mg/ml trypsin prepared in 10 mM Tris-HCl and 5 mM CaCl2 (pH 8). The negative control was prepared with water in place of saliva, and the positive control was prepared with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8) and 5 mM CaCl2 without trypsin. Trypsin-only and saliva-only controls were also prepared. All samples were incubated for 24 h at 37°C and then stopped with a 2x mass excess (relative to trypsin) of 10 mg/ml SBTI prepared in dH2O. An equivalent volume of dH2O was added to samples that were not treated with SBTI. One trypsin-only sample was combined with the saliva-only sample to generate the "saliva with trypsin plus SBTI" control. The variously treatment samples were then divided into two portions that were tested, respectively, in the IL-2 ELISA interference assay and the plate-bound saliva bio-rmIL-2 binding assays described above and in Results.
Statistics
The human proliferation assays were analyzed by ANOVA and the Student-Newman-Keuls method for pairwise multiple comparisons. Values of p < 0.05 were accepted as indicating a significant difference between treatments. Other experiments were run a minimum of three times, and the results of representative experiments are graphed as the mean of triplicate samples ± SD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The simplest apparent model for the T cell inhibitory capacity of
tick saliva would be a mechanism dependent upon a direct interaction of
a salivary factor(s) with T cells to mediate suppressive effects on T
cell proliferation. Previous work established that preincubation of
saliva with SC was not necessary to see the inhibitory effect of saliva
(24). This observation was extended by testing the ability
of tick saliva to mediate its effect on SC if the cells were
preincubated with saliva for several hours and then washed extensively
to remove saliva proteins that were not tightly interacting with cells
before mitogenic stimulation. The data depicted in Fig. 1
show that the ability to inhibit T cell
activity can be washed away from SC even after 24 h of preincubation
before stimulation. From looking at the results with the unwashed
saliva-treated samples, it is clear that the ability to inhibit is
still present even after 4 h of preincubation. These results
suggest that, although saliva must be present to mediate a suppressive
effect on proliferation, a direct and avid interaction with T cells
does not occur.
I. scapularis saliva inhibits detection of mouse IL-2 in an ELISA
The previous experiment presented the possibility that the
salivary T cell inhibitor does not interact directly with T cells.
Working with this information and the results of previous studies
showing decreases in the amount of IL-2 present in culture supernatants
of Con A-stimulated SC that were treated with saliva (24),
we hypothesized that saliva was binding IL-2. We tested this using a
mouse IL-2-specific ELISA, as shown in Fig. 2
A. For this experiment, tick
saliva was preincubated with mouse IL-2 before being transferred to
microtiter wells coated with the IL-2 capture Ab. As depicted in Fig. 2
A, the detection of IL-2 in this ELISA is diminished in a
dose-dependent fashion both in terms of the amount of saliva and the
amount of IL-2 present. This result supports the presence of an IL-2
binding factor in tick saliva that blocks one or both of the epitopes
recognized by the matched anti-IL-2 mAbs resulting in decreased
IL-2 detection in the ELISA. This activity was not influenced by the
glycosylation state of the mouse IL-2, because detection of both rIL-2
produced in Escherichia coli and native IL-2 from SC culture
supernatants were inhibited (data not shown).
|
was run using the same batch of saliva to test the specificity of the
IL-2 binding factor. This T cell cytokine was chosen as a control
because its production has also been shown to be markedly decreased by
in vitro-stimulated lymphocytes in the presence of SGE (19, 22, 23, 30, 40). As shown in Fig. 2
in a dose-dependent manner,
illustrating the specificity of the IL-2 binding activity defined in
Fig. 2
binding capacity under the conditions
tested. I. scapularis saliva binds both mouse and human IL-2
To directly verify the IL-2 binding capacity and specificity of
the I. scapularis IL-2 binding activity, tick saliva was
plated on microtiter wells, and then its ability to bind bio-IL-2 was
determined. Although mouse and human IL-2 sequences are 63% conserved
at the amino acid level (41), they are not fully
biologically interchangeable (42). Thus, the ability of
saliva to bind both mouse and human IL-2 was examined. The specificity
for IL-2 was again tested by the inclusion of an IFN-
control. The
results of these experiments are shown in Fig. 3
. The graphed data show that
plate-immobilized saliva binds bio-rmIL2 and bio-rhIL-2 in a
dose-dependent manner and at essentially equivalent levels. This result
implies a similar binding affinity for both species of IL-2. However,
the saliva does not show evidence of bio-rmIFN-
binding, even when
up to 8 µl of saliva is plated.
|
also
shows that the binding of the bio-IL-2 is not due to biotin binding
activity in tick saliva. Repeating this analysis with different batches
of saliva showed that the amount of IL-2 binding activity varies, but
is always present. This batch-to-batch variance was also evident when
the IL-2 ELISA interference assay was used (data not shown). The binding of bio-rmIL-2 by plated saliva can be specifically competed away with rmIL-2
As a more direct means of assessing the specificity of the IL-2
binding capacity of the saliva, the direct plate-binding assay was
adapted to a competitive binding format. This assay was also important
as a control for nonspecific signals generated by potential protein
contaminants present in the commercially obtained preparations of
rmIL-2 that were biotinylated during the generation of bio-rmIL-2. The
IL-2 supplier was chosen because they do not add any carrier protein to
their recombinant cytokines. The rmIL-2 and rhIL-2 were HPLC-purified
to >97%, and the rmIFN-
was >95% pure. A constant amount of
saliva was bound to each well and then incubated with a mixture that
contained a constant amount of bio-rmIL-2 (
13 pg) and varying
amounts of nonbiotinylated competitor rmIL-2. As illustrated in Fig. 4
, the signal from binding of bio-rmIL-2
was competed away by addition of between 8- and 16-fold of unlabeled
competitor and is essentially the same as theoretically predicted for a
competitive inhibitor with equal affinity for the binding site. As a
negative control, the assay was also run in parallel in wells that were
not plated with saliva.
The IL-2 binding factor is a protein
Because the majority of the inhibitory effect of tick saliva on T
cell proliferation has previously been shown to be due to a protein
(24), we used the same approach to test whether the IL-2
binding activity was due to a protein in the saliva. Saliva was
digested with trypsin for 24 h, the reaction was stopped with
excess SBTI, and then tested for its ability to inhibit the IL-2 ELISA
and bind bio-rmIL-2 using the assay systems described above. As shown
in Fig. 5
(groups C), trypsin
treatment eliminates the IL-2 binding capacity of the saliva;
therefore, the IL-2 binding factor is a protein. Control reactions
showed that trypsin treated with SBTI did not affect either in vitro
assay when added alone (Fig. 5
, groups D) and that saliva
was still capable of binding IL-2 when trypsin treated with SBTI was
added to each assay system (Fig. 5
, groups E).
|
Previous experimentation has established that tick saliva contains
a potent T cell proliferation inhibitor by using lymphocytes from a
variety of animal models including mice and cows. Due to the
identification of a novel cytokine binding activity in tick saliva
(described above), and because of the importance of I.
scapularis as a vector of human pathogens (11, 12, 15), we tested the ability of tick saliva to inhibit human T
cell proliferation. For these experiments, PBMCs were isolated from
healthy human donors and stimulated with the T cell mitogenic lectin,
PHA. As is evident in Fig. 6
, proliferation of T cells from all six donors was diminished from
5288% when treated with a 1:100 dilution of saliva
(p < 0.05), and the effect of the saliva could
be diluted away, as the difference between each of the three treatment
groups is significant (p < 0.05).
Saliva inhibits growth of an IL-2-dependent cell line
To assess the suggested mechanism of TIP as an IL-2 binding
protein (IL-2BP), the effects of the saliva on the growth of the
IL-2-dependent cell line CTLL-2 were tested. As CTLL-2 cells can be
stimulated with both human and mouse IL-2 (36), this
approach allows the hypothesis to be addressed with a bioassay system.
It was found in preliminary experiments that CTLL-2 cells are very
sensitive to even low concentrations of PGE2,
which is present in tick saliva at relatively high levels (24, 43). Thus, to obtain TIP without contaminating PGs, the
TIP-containing fraction of I. scapularis saliva was purified
using gel filtration HPLC. All three assays for TIP (descibed above)
showed that the TIP activity cofractionated with an apparent mass of
60 kDa (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 7
A, proliferation of CTLL-2
cells grown in the presence of 10 pg of human or mouse IL-2 are
inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by TIP.
If the inhibition of CTLL-2 proliferation is indeed the result of
IL-2BP neutralization of growth factor activity of IL-2, it should be
possible to negate this effect by adding extra IL-2 to the assay. This
experiment was done by preincubating IL-2 and TIP before addition to
the CTLL-2 cells. Results for the mouse and human IL-2 experiments are
shown in Fig. 7
B, where this prediction is fulfilled.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the hallmarks of T cell activation is the production of IL-2, which serves as an autocrine growth factor (44). Thus, it is not surprising that many studies have also identified a decrease in IL-2 production by lymphocytes exposed to tick SGE or saliva in vitro (16, 23, 24, 27) or in ex vivo-restimulated lymphocytes from tick-infested animals (20, 22). The full importance of this observation is brought into perspective when it is considered that IL-2 also acts as a paracrine growth factor and signaling molecule to activated T cells and other immune effector cells that express IL-2 receptors on their surface, including B cells, NK cells, CTLs, lymphokine-activated killers, monocytes, and macrophages (44, 45, 46). Thus, the nonspecific effect of tick saliva on T cell activation has potentially far-reaching consequences in the generation of anti-tick immunity and pathogen transmission. Of interest in this regard, it has been observed that the functions of NK cells (47, 48) and macrophages (24, 27) are also inhibited by tick saliva.
In the search for a mechanism of the T cell inhibitory action of tick
saliva, we hypothesized that the salivary factor(s) responsible for
inhibiting T cell proliferation interacted directly with T cells. The
ability to wash away saliva without residual inhibition of
proliferation demonstrated that this hypothesis was probably incorrect.
Although the results do not eliminate the possibility that T cell
inhibitors interact directly with T cells, they indicate that any
interactions are likely to be weak or to occur after T cell activation.
Furthermore, this experiment also illustrates the temporal requirement
for the presence of saliva during and after mitogenic stimulation of SC
to mediate its effect on the in vitro proliferation of T cells. This
result led us to test whether tick saliva was directly interfering with
IL-2 activity using an IL-2-specific ELISA. The results of this
analysis were in keeping with the observation that the presence of
saliva was necessary for the inhibited proliferation to be evident. T
cells produce IL-2 when they are stimulated, so the IL-2BP cannot
function until after T cell activation. Previous studies have also
shown that IFN-
production is decreased by tick SGE exposure
(23, 30, 40) or tick infestations (19, 22).
Although our analysis shows that I. scapularis saliva does
not appear to bind IFN-
under the tested conditions, it is known
that IL-2 induces T cells and NK cells to produce IFN-
(49). Thus, it is possible that the IL-2BP is responsible
for several identified effects of tick saliva on host immune effector
cells; however, clarifying this will require further studies that
address causal linkages between the observed phenomena.
The identification of Ig binding proteins (IGBPs) in the saliva
of several species of ixodid ticks (50, 51) raises the
caveat that the inhibition of the IL-2 ELISA is due to IGBP (though
this activity has not been reported in I. scapularis). The
lack of IFN-
ELISA inhibition by the saliva dispels this concern.
However, because the isotypes of the matched pairs of rat IgG
anti-cytokine mAbs used in the ELISAs were not all the same, the
ability of plate-bound I. scapularis saliva to bind each of
the mAbs used was tested (see Materials and Methods). This
experiment showed that there was not significant binding of any of the
rat mAbs by plate-bound saliva (data not shown). Thus, IGBP activity is
not a concern in the interpretation of the results of the experiments
depicted in Fig. 2
.
Most previous analyses of the immunomodulatory effects of tick saliva have focused on animal models, leaving the relevance to humans unaddressed. It has been suggested that ectoparasites are closely adapted to their hosts (5) so that they can counteract their hosts defenses. This idea has also been used to support observations that more robust resistance to tick feeding has typically been associated with unnatural tick-host associations (5, 21). In one report, Fuchsberger et al. demonstrated that Rhipicephalus appendiculatus SGE inhibits expression of several cytokine mRNAs in LPS-stimulated human PBMCs (40). Although they were not able to detect IL-2 mRNA, they did recognize that SGE effects on cytokine expression levels were dependent on stimulation of the PBMCs. Due to the significance of I. scapularis as a vector for several emerging human diseases, we included experiments that showed that tick saliva binds not only to mouse IL-2, but also to human IL-2 with similar affinities. Interspecies cross-reactivity of the IL-2BP points to the likelihood that the binding site on IL-2 is a conserved region or feature of the molecule. Furthermore, we used PBMCs from human donors to show that I. scapularis saliva acts as an inhibitor of human T cell proliferation. This finding was further supported by the use of a CTLL-2 cell bioassay to show that binding of IL-2 and neutralization of its growth factor activity appears to be the mechanism responsible for inhibition of both human and mouse T cell proliferation. These experiments support the idea that tick saliva may play a role in the transmission of diseases to humans and that the same phenomena identified in animal models are likely to occur in humans exposed to tick bites. The studies reported here were done with saliva from adult ticks, whereas, in the field, nymphal ticks are the primary threat for disease transmission to humans. Studies of saliva and SGE of nymphs are exceedingly challenging due to the difficulty of obtaining sufficient amounts of material for detailed analysis. However, we have done preliminary experiments that verified that T cell proliferation is inhibited by nymph SGE (R. D. Gillespie, unpublished data).
Support for the proposed IL-2 binding mechanism of inhibited T cell proliferation is provided indirectly by other studies. Zeidner et al. demonstrated that the passive administration of IL-2 to mice during challenge feeding by I. scapularis nymphs infected with the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, resulted in 50% protection from infection (52). In studies of the effects of passive rhIL-2 administration to rabbits during infestation with Ixodes ricinus adults, the European vector of Lyme disease spirochetes, it was found that the rabbits were more resistant to subsequent tick infestations and developed dramatically stronger delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions against SGE (53). Furthermore, the development of DTH to SGE occurred in the IL-2-treated animals after only one infestation, compared with the multiple infestations usually necessary for DTH development to SGE of I. ricinus (54). The importance of IL-2 to this phenomenon was established by showing that cyclosporin A treatment resulted in attenuation of the DTH response to SGE in rabbits (54). In a similar study, it was shown that acquired resistance to I. ricinus by the bank vole (a natural host for the ectoparasite) could be partially disrupted by cyclosporin A treatment (55).
Experiments using I. ricinus infestations of mice have shown
that the effects of tick saliva are mediated at the attachment site and
the lymph nodes draining the area (17, 18, 19, 20, 21), although
systemic effects have also been documented with I.
scapularis (22, 56). The IL-2 ELISA inhibition data
show that 1 µl of saliva is capable of binding
4 pg of IL-2,
although we routinely measure binding capacities ranging between
1
and 6 pg/µl in different batches of saliva using this assay. This
variability is not surprising, because the ticks are not truly
synchronized in their feeding/salivation state when they are removed
from the host for saliva collection. When it is considered that, on
average, a nearly replete adult I. scapularis female can be
induced to secrete 10 µl of saliva during a 1- to 2-h period after
being removed from the host (R. D. Gillespie, unpublished data),
and the tick feeds for 58 days salivating intermittently, it is quite
possible for IL-2BP to be present at levels likely to have marked
effects on the immune system of the host. At the local level of the
draining lymph node, IL-2 sequestration by IL-2BP would effect the
proliferation of naive T cells and Th1 cells, as Th2 cells are not
dependent on IL-2 for expansion after Ag stimulation (57, 58). This scenario fits nicely with the generalized model of Th1
cell and inflammation suppression and Th2 cell enhancement caused by
tick infestations (19, 20, 21, 22, 23). It is known that starvation
for IL-2 in activated T cells can lead to anergy of the activated cells
(59, 60); thus, IL-2BP may adversely effect the ability of
a host to develop adaptive immunity to ticks and tick-borne pathogens.
The full biological consequences of this activity are likely to depend
on the issue of scale, both with respect to the developmental stage of
the tick, i.e., larvae, nymph, or adult, and degree of infestation,
e.g., a heavy infestion on a small animal vs one or a few ticks on a
large animal.
It is important to note that recent studies using mice (61) and guinea pigs (62) have indicated that it is possible to generate adaptive immunity to I. scapularis that also results in the blocking of transmission of B. burgdorferi. This strategy required multiple infestations of the host with uninfected nymphal ticks before challenge with infected nymphs. However, this approach did not result in protection when using a mouse model for I. ricinus (63). Despite variable success, these studies provide the impetus for the pursuit of tick Ags that can protect the host from ticks and tick-borne pathogens.
The identification of a secreted IL-2 binding factor is quite novel for an ectoparasite system, and, to the best of our knowledge, the IL-2BP in I. scapularis saliva represents the first evidence for direct IL-2 targeting by any parasite or pathogen of mammals. Various means of subverting the immune system of hosts through their cytokines and chemokines have evolved in several classes of pathogens, although none of these directly target IL-2 (64). It has been suggested that no viral or bacterial pathogens have directly targeted IL-2 because the general immunosuppression that would ensue might give other pathogens a chance to successfully compete against them (64). Perhaps ectoparasites such as I. scapularis can succeed with the strategy of direct subversion of a central signaling cytokine because they do not multiply within the host. Alternatively, if the effect of tick saliva on host immune function is predominantly local rather than systemic, direct IL-2 targeting may not adversely effect the entire immune system of the host. In either case, this strategy may be important to the effectiveness of ticks as disease vectors.
The IL-2BP could be important to the potentiation of the feeding site for transmission of pathogens by aiding establishment of the infection. Indeed, the saliva of the vector should not only be considered a pharmacological milieu that allows for blood to be drawn over a protracted period and a vehicle for the transmission of pathogens, but also as an important vector competence factor (9).
Although we have functionally identified an IL-2BP in I. scapularis that may provide the mechanism for the inhibition of T cell proliferation by tick saliva, it will now be useful to know whether this IL-2 binding capacity is found in other tick species or other blood-feeding ectoparasites. Furthermore, is this the only example of cytokine-targeted host immunomodulation present in arthropods or other ectoparasites? This discovery can be seen as another example of how well evolved ectoparasite-host interactions appear to be. Thus, the simple and elegant mechanism of tick salivary IL-2BP, the sequestration of IL-2, has multiple potential effects on the quality and specificity of the immune response generated to any foreign Ags present during the feeding process, including those of pathogens introduced at the feeding site. Given the nature of this activitys assault on the immune system of the host, the discovery of this mechanism also raises important issues regarding the development of vaccines against ticks, an idea that has gained much support because it holds the potential of blocking transmission of several pathogens with a single vaccination (7, 8). The IL-2BP may inhibit the effectiveness of this approach and, thus, may turn out to be an important target that must be overcome for this strategy to be successful.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. R. Dean Gillespie, Department of Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: SGE, salivary gland extracts; IL-2BP, IL-2 binding protein; TIP, T cell inhibitory protein; SBTI, soybean trypsin inhibitor; SC, spleen cells; rm, recombinant mouse; rh, recombinant human; bio, biotinylated; IGBP, Ig binding proteins; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity. ![]()
Received for publication April 7, 2000. Accepted for publication January 19, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and TNF-
in the skin lesion of BALB/c mice undergoing repeated infestations with nymphal Ixodes ricinus ticks. Immunology 82:596.[Medline]
, IL-2, and IL-4 mRNA expression in the skin and draining lymph nodes of BALB/c mice repeatedly infested with nymphal Ixodes ricinus ticks. Cell. Immunol. 156:254.[Medline]
by nymph node cells from BALB/c mice infested with nymphal Ixodes ricinus ticks. Immunology 85:120.[Medline]
-induced macrophage microbicidal activity. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 64:279.[Medline]
chain (p70): role in mediating signals for LAK, NK, and proliferative activities. Science 238:75.
, interleukin-2, and interferon-
. J. Infect. Dis. 173:187.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Sa-Nunes, A. Bafica, L. R. Antonelli, E. Y. Choi, I. M. B. Francischetti, J. F. Andersen, G.-P. Shi, T. Chavakis, J. M. Ribeiro, and M. Kotsyfakis The Immunomodulatory Action of Sialostatin L on Dendritic Cells Reveals Its Potential to Interfere with Autoimmunity J. Immunol., June 15, 2009; 182(12): 7422 - 7429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Guo, C. J. Booth, M. A. Paley, X. Wang, K. DePonte, E. Fikrig, S. Narasimhan, and R. R. Montgomery Inhibition of Neutrophil Function by Two Tick Salivary Proteins Infect. Immun., June 1, 2009; 77(6): 2320 - 2329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sa-Nunes, A. Bafica, D. A. Lucas, T. P. Conrads, T. D. Veenstra, J. F. Andersen, T. N. Mather, J. M. C. Ribeiro, and I. M. B. Francischetti Prostaglandin E2 Is a Major Inhibitor of Dendritic Cell Maturation and Function in Ixodes scapularis Saliva J. Immunol., August 1, 2007; 179(3): 1497 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Scheckelhoff, S. R. Telford, M. Wesley, and L. T. Hu Borrelia burgdorferi intercepts host hormonal signals to regulate expression of outer surface protein A PNAS, April 24, 2007; 104(17): 7247 - 7252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Montgomery, D. Lusitani, A. de Boisfleury Chevance, and S. E. Malawista Tick Saliva Reduces Adherence and Area of Human Neutrophils Infect. Immun., May 1, 2004; 72(5): 2989 - 2994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Narasimhan, R. R. Montgomery, K. DePonte, C. Tschudi, N. Marcantonio, J. F. Anderson, J. R. Sauer, M. Cappello, F. S. Kantor, and E. Fikrig Disruption of Ixodes scapularis anticoagulation by using RNA interference PNAS, February 3, 2004; 101(5): 1141 - 1146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Valenzuela, I. M. B. Francischetti, V. M. Pham, M. K. Garfield, T. N. Mather, and J. M. C. Ribeiro Exploring the sialome of the tick Ixodes scapularis J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2002; 205(18): 2843 - 2864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |