|
|
||||||||


,
Departments of
*
Biochemistry,
Microbiology and Immunology, and
Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461; and
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
elements and the sequences of the complementarity-determining region 3
loops of their TCRs. Further experiments found that the E6 peptide can
act as an antagonist for VSV-specific T cell hybridomas. To determine
whether these differences in V
usage, complementarity-determining
region 3 sequences, and the switch from agonism to antagonism are
caused by a conformational change on the MHC, the peptide, or both, we
determined the crystal structure of the variant E6 peptide bound to
H-2Kb. This structure shows that the only significant
structural difference between H-2Kb/E6 and the previously
determined H-2Kb/VSV is limited to the side chain of
position 6 of the peptide, with no differences in the MHC molecule.
Thus, a minor conformational change in the peptide can profoundly alter
the biological outcome of the TCR-peptide/MHC
interaction. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
E substitution at position 6 (E6) of the naturally occurring
VSV peptide, can profoundly alter, both in vitro and in vivo, T cell
response. Analysis of the TCR-pMHC binding patterns of a set of T cell
clones specific for the VSV peptide showed that the Q
E substitution
alters the interface of TCR binding to the MHC compared with the
wild-type VSV peptide (4). Further, using mice with a
transgenic TCR
-chain, Wang et al. (5) have shown that
immunization with E6 elicits T cells with TCRs containing different
complementarity-determining region (CDR)-3
motifs than the TCRs on T
cells arising after immunization with VSV peptide. In addition, when
the V
element usage of these peptide-specific T cell populations was
analyzed, it was found that E6 peptide immunization induced a different
TCR V
usage than that found in VSV peptide-immunized mice
(6). Thus, the Q
E substitution at position 6 of the
peptide results in significant differences in the nature of the TCRs of
the responding T cell populations. In addition to these findings, we
have recently observed that the E6 peptide is able to antagonize an
H-2Kb/VSV-specific TCR (N30.7), indicating that
this alteration in the VSV peptide sequence is enough to inhibit the
recognition of the wild-type peptide by this particular TCR
(7).
Given the significant biological effects of the Q
E substitution on
the TCR structure and function, we decided to investigate whether these
functional alterations in the T cell responses were due to structural
changes on the heavy chain of the H-2Kb molecule
induced by this peptide variant. With this aim, we have determined the
crystal structure of the H-2Kb/E6 complex and
compared it with the H-2Kb/VSV structure. We
found that the Q
E substitution at position 6 of VSV peptide resulted
in structural changes limited to the peptide and that did not involve
the heavy chain of the MHC molecule. Thus, subtle conformational
changes in the ligand can cause profound alterations in the type of T
cell response triggered by the TCR-pMHC interaction.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
E6 (RGYVYEGL) was synthesized by the Peptide Synthesis Facility of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. The peptide was purified to >98% homogeneity by reversed-phase HPLC and the identity of the peptide was confirmed by mass spectrometry.
Production, folding, and crystallization of H-2Kb/E6 complex
As previously described by Zhang et al. (8),
transformed BL21 (DE3)pLysS cells were grown in Luria-Bertani medium,
lysed with a French press, and then processed by several cycles of
centrifugation and washing, resulting in >95% pure inclusion bodies.
The H-2Kb and
2-microglobulin (
2m)
inclusion bodies were solubilized in a buffered urea solution. Peptide,
H-2Kb, and
2m were mixed
in a molar ratio of 10:1:1 at an overall concentration of 0.3 mg/ml;
the mixture was dialyzed against aqueous buffer in 500 MWCO dialysis.
After dialysis, the material was concentrated and then purified on an
ion exchange column. The homogeneity and molecular mass of the complex
was assayed by gel exclusion chromatography (8, 9).
Conditions for crystallization were similar to those previously
established by Zhang et al. (8): using the hanging drop
vapor diffusion method with a reservoir buffer of 0.1 M calcium
acetate/0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 6.5)/1520% and polyethylene
glycol 8000.
Data collection, molecular replacement, and refinement
X-ray data was collected at the X-9B beamline at Brookhaven
National Laboratories Synchrotron Light Source on a Mar345 image plate
system using a single crystal at -165°C (Brookhaven Instruments,
Holtsville, NY). Data were processed with Denzo and Scalepack. The
crystal belongs to the space group P21 (unit cell
a = 89.3 Å, b = 82.3 Å, c = 66.4 Å and
=
111.0°) containing two pMHC complexes per asymmetric unit. See Table I
for dataset statistics.
|
2m with the
peptide coordinates removed (10). Using data to 4 Å,
AMoRe (11) located unambiguous rotation and translation
solutions with a correlation coefficient of 31.8. This result was
accepted and a second
H-2Kb/
2m complex was
introduced. Rotation and translation solutions were acquired, bringing
the correlation coefficient to 51.8 and the R factor to
44.8%. AMoRe rigid body refinement reduced the R factor to
36.7%.
X-Plor version 3.851 (12) was used to refine the structure
through multiple cycles of model building. A random set of 5% of
reflections were sequestered from further refinement and used for
calculation of Rfree (1733 reflections
for data to 2.3 Å). Bulk solvent corrections were applied to the Fo
throughout the refinement (13). Data were gradually
extended to 1002.3 Å with a F/
cutoff of 2.0, and individual
atomic B factors were used at the end of the refinement process. Areas
with poor geometry were fit using simulated annealing omit maps.
Although clear electron density for peptide could be seen from the
initial stages of model building, peptide residues were not included
until the final stages of refinement.
Because the Fo was noted to be somewhat anisotropic, an overall
anisotropic B factor correction (B11 = 21.094,
B22 = 9.853, B33 = 21.044)
was applied, resulting in a reduction of the
Rfree by 1.5% and a significant
improvement in electron density maps. The crystal form has two pMHC
complexes per asymmetric unit; these complexes are quite similar, with
C
carbon RMS deviation for the Ag presentation domains of 0.61 Å.
RMS deviation between the two peptides is 0.377 Å. There was no use of
noncrystallographic restraints during any part of the refinement. One
complex contains a peptide with a higher average B factor than the
other (71 Å2 vs 46 Å2).
Average B factors for the two heavy chains are more similar (53 Å vs
59 Å). Differences in average peptide B factor may be due to crystal
packing, but omit electron density maps (calculated from randomized
coordinates to reduce model bias) of both peptides are of high
quality.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To evaluate the structural changes that are responsible for the
different biological outcomes that result from the Q to E substitution
at position 6 of the VSV peptide,
H-2Kb/
2m/E6 was folded,
crystallized, and its structure was determined to 2.3 Å by x-ray
crystallography. This crystal structure was compared with the
previously reported H-2Kb/VSV structure with the
same space group (10), demonstrating that the glutamic
acid at position 6 of the E6 peptide (Fig. 1
, A and B) is
positioned differently in the cleft than the glutamine of position 6 in
the VSV wild type. The glutamic acid side chain of the E6 peptide is
1.5 Å closer to the
1 helix than the position 6 glutamine of the
wild-type VSV peptide; this orientation is conserved in both complexes
of the asymmetric unit (see Fig. 1
, C and D).
Although shifted, position 6 of E6 remains solvent exposed and a likely
TCR contact residue. This structural difference is attributable to the
hydrogen bond observed between the NE2 atom of the Q6 residue and the
glutamic acid at position 152 on the
2 helix of the
H-2Kb molecule. The negatively charged side chain
at position 6 of the E6 peptide no longer hydrogen bonds to the E152
residue of H-2Kb (Fig. 1
, C and
D). The position and conformation of other nearby residues
in the peptide and the Ag-binding groove are not significantly altered
by the Q
E replacement, including the position of E152. In both the
H-2Kb/E6 and H-2Kb/VSV
complexes, the carboxylate of E152 forms a salt bridge with the
positively charged side chain of R155, a nearby amino acid on the
2
helix; this may account for the relative immobility of residue 152
compared with the position 6 of the peptide. Thus, the only significant
conformational difference between the two structures attributable to
the Q
E substitution is limited to position 6 of the peptide. No
other structural differences attributable to the substituted amino
acids are noted. The Q
E replacement does alter the electrostatic
surface of the molecule, and this electrostatic change is likely the
only other significant difference between the two structures.
|
transgenic mice immunized with the VSV peptide, position 98
of the CDR3
loop of TCRs expressed on VSV-specific T cells contained
either a valine or threonine residue (5). In contrast,
immunization with the E6 peptide induced the expansion of T cells
containing positively charged amino acids at position 98 of the TCR
CDR3
loop. This compensatory charge at position 98 in the CDR3
sequence appears to be required for specific recognition of the of the
E6 peptide, adding further support to the notion that position 6 of the
VSV peptide is a critical contact for TCR recognition.
To further evaluate the role of the antigenic peptide structure in
controlling the nature of the responding TCR repertoire, the V
family usage in CD8+ T cell populations obtained
from TCR-
transgenic mice immunized with VSV or E6 peptide was
analyzed (6). Thus, in VSV peptide-immunized mice, the
predominant TCR V
gene element in CD8+ CTL
populations was V
13 (80%) (Fig. 2
A). This V
element
represented <5% of CD8+ T cells obtained from
naive TCR-
transgenic mice (p < 0.005). No
significant expansion of any other V
element was observed
(6). However, when TCR-
transgenic mice were immunized
with the E6 peptide variant, the predominant V
gene element
expressed by CD8+ T cells was V
7 (80%) (Fig. 2
A). This V
family was significantly expanded compared
both with naive and VSV-immunized mice (p <
0.0005). The alteration in the TCR V
usage caused by the Q to E
substitution at position 6 of VSV could be the result of a direct
interaction between that position of the peptide and the
germline-encoded CDR loops of the TCRs from the T cell clones expanded
after peptide immunization. This is noteworthy, because Ag recognition
has been perceived as a CDR3-mediated event, whereas the
germline-encoded CDR1 and CDR2 loops have been considered as being
important for the MHC restriction aspect of recognition
(14). However, the crystal structure of TCR-pMHC complexes
have shown that both CDR1
and CDR1
are likely to contact residues
on the N- and C-terminal half of the peptide, respectively, indicating
that CDR1 loops could be involved in the recognition of specific
peptides (15, 16, 17). Because our data indicate that the
Q
E substitution affects only the peptide bound to the
H-2Kb groove, it seems unlikely that the heavy
chain of the H-2Kb molecule could play a role in
the V
usage changes induced by the Q to E substitution at position 6
of VSV. This observation supports the notion that the V
usage change
caused by the Q
E replacement would be necessitated by an interaction
between the position 6 side chain of the E6 peptide and the TCR CDR1
loop of the responding CD8+ T cell
(6).
|
Our observation that the E6 peptide antagonizes the
H-2Kb/VSV-specific N30.7 TCR indicates that
structural changes limited to a single position of the antigenic
peptide are sufficient to cause TCR antagonism. Two previous studies in
which the structures of MHC molecules complexed with antagonist
peptides carrying single amino acid replacements were compared with the
wild-type agonist peptide showed minor structural changes in MHC
residues (18, 19, 20, 21). In agreement with our findings, those
studies indicated that alteration of TCR contact residues results in
only a small conformational change of the TCR-binding surface of the
pMHC complex. In addition to providing evidence that TCR antagonism can
be caused by limited changes in conformation and charge of peptide
residues that contact the TCR, our study indicates that these minor
conformational changes could also alter the TCR repertoire of the
entire CD8+ T cell population in response to
peptide immunization. Moreover, the limited conformational changes on
the TCR-binding surface of the pMHC complex caused by the Q
E
substitution of position 6 of the VSV peptide also support the notion
that alterations in the recognition contacts of T cell clones (4, 22) caused by single amino acid replacements in the antigenic
peptide are unlikely to be due to a major structural rearrangements of
the pMHC complex.
Considered together, the biological and structural observations presented here indicate that subtle structural changes in the pMHC complex can lead to profound changes in the biological response of T cells. The molecular understanding of the interactions controlling the T cell response is important for the design of strategies aimed to manipulating immune responses.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Stanley G. Nathenson, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Chanin Building 407, Bronx, NY 10461. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: pMHC, peptide/MHC class I; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus; CDR, complementarity-determining region;
2m,
2-microglobulin. ![]()
Received for publication November 6, 2000. Accepted for publication January 2, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:5217.
repertoire of the responding CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocyte population. J. Immunol. 162:7263.
of an MHC I-restricted TCR. J. Immunol. 165:280.
T cell receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:523.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Miley, I. Messaoudi, B. M. Metzner, Y. Wu, J. Nikolich-Zugich, and D. H. Fremont Structural Basis for the Restoration of TCR Recognition of an MHC Allelic Variant by Peptide Secondary Anchor Substitution J. Exp. Med., December 6, 2004; 200(11): 1445 - 1454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Gakamsky, I. F. Luescher, and I. Pecht T cell receptor-ligand interactions: A conformational preequilibrium or an induced fit PNAS, June 15, 2004; 101(24): 9063 - 9066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L.-D. de Cerio, J. J. Lasarte, N. Casares, P. Sarobe, M. Ruiz, J. Prieto, and F. Borras-Cuesta Engineering Th determinants for efficient priming of humoral and cytotoxic T cell responses Int. Immunol., June 1, 2003; 15(6): 691 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nilges, H. Hohn, H. Pilch, C. Neukirch, K. Freitag, P. J. Talbot, and M. J. Maeurer Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E7 Peptide-Directed CD8+ T Cells from Patients with Cervical Cancer Are Cross-Reactive with the Coronavirus NS2 Protein J. Virol., May 1, 2003; 77(9): 5464 - 5474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Zhang, S. Honda, F. Wang, T. P. DiLorenzo, A. M. Kalergis, D. A. Ostrov, and S. G. Nathenson Immunobiological Analysis of TCR Single-Chain Transgenic Mice Reveals New Possibilities for Interaction between CDR3{alpha} and an Antigenic Peptide Bound to MHC Class I J. Immunol., October 15, 2001; 167(8): 4396 - 4404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |