|
|
||||||||



*
Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Cell Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208;
Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; and
Laboratory of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20852
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and Ig
by the Src family kinase Lyn and
association of the BCR with the actin cytoskeleton. However, the
mechanism by which BCR cross-linking initiates the cascade remains
obscure. In this study, using various A20-transfected cell lines,
biochemical and genetic evidence is provided that BCR cross-linking
leads to the translocation of the BCR into cholesterol- and
sphingolipid-rich lipid rafts in a process that is independent of the
initiation of BCR signaling and does not require the actin
cytoskeleton. Translocation of the BCR into lipid rafts did not require
the Ig
/Ig
signaling complex, was not dependent on engagement of
the FcR, and was not blocked by the Src family kinase inhibitor PP2 or
the actin-depolymerizing agents cytochalasin D or latrunculin. Thus,
cross-linking or oligomerization of the BCR induces the BCR
translocation into lipid rafts, defining an event in B cell activation
that precedes receptor phosphorylation and association with the actin
cytoskeleton. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/Ig
, which contains immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation
motifs (ITAMs) in the cytoplasmic domain (4). Upon Ag
binding and receptor cross-linking, the BCR initiates a signal
transduction cascade ending with the expression of a variety of genes
associated with B cell activation (5). Subsequently, the
BCR rapidly delivers Ag to intracellular compartments in which the Ag
is proteolytically cleaved and the resulting peptides bound to MHC
class II molecules for presentation to Th cells (6). The
accelerated Ag-targeting function of the BCR is signaling dependent
(7).
Although a great deal of the BCR signal transduction cascade has been
detailed in recent years (3, 8), at present the molecular
mechanisms underlying the initiation of BCR signaling and the
relationship to Ag targeting are not well defined. One of the earliest
events in BCR-mediated signal transduction is the activation of Lyn, a
53-/56-kDa signaling regulator that belongs to the Src family of
protein tyrosine kinases (9). Lyn is constitutively
acylated and consequently localizes to the plasma membrane. Lyn is
responsible for the initial phosphorylation of the ITAMs of Ig
and
Ig
cytoplasmic domains. The kinase activity of Lyn is regulated by
the phosphorylation of a carboxyl-terminal regulatory tyrosine by the
kinase Csk (10) and dephosphorylation by the phosphatase
CD45 (11, 12). Lyn is also activated by substrate binding
to its Src homology 2 domain. Recent evidence indicates that Csk is
recruited to the plasma membrane by a transmembrane phosphoprotein Cbp
(Csk-binding protein) that binds specifically to the Src homology 2
domain of Csk (13). Syk kinase is recruited to the
phosphorylated ITAMs of Ig
and Ig
, and an activation loop
tyrosine of Syk becomes phosphorylated either by Lyn or through
autophosphorylation (14, 15). The activation of Syk then
results in the induction of the calcium pathway by the recruitment of
the B cell linker protein (BLNK) and the activation of phospholipase
C-
2. Although these events are well documented to occur immediately
upon BCR cross-linking and oligomerization, the primary initiating
event in the signaling cascade triggered by receptor oligomerization is
not known (3). At present, it is unclear whether signaling
is induced by the activity of an as of yet unidentified signal
transducer or simply the result of BCR oligomerization induced by
multivalent Ag binding.
A previously unappreciated step in BCR-mediated signal transduction was
recently described (16, 17, 18). Namely, upon Ag binding and
receptor cross-linking, the BCR rapidly translocates from
detergent-soluble plasma membrane, where the phosphatase CD45R is
restricted, into detergent-insoluble cholesterol- and sphingolipid-rich
lipid rafts, where Lyn is concentrated and Ig
/Ig
are
phosphorylated. From the rafts, the BCR delivers the Ag in an
accelerated manner to degradative compartments for processing and
presentation. Thus, cross-linking or oligomerizing the BCR results in a
change in the BCR such that it preferentially localizes to the
cholesterol- and sphingolipid-rich microdomains of the plasma membrane.
Recent evidence indicates that BCR entry into lipid rafts is regulated
during B cell development (19) and by viral infection by
EBV (20), suggesting that rafts play important
physiological roles as platforms for B cell signaling.
An appreciation of this early translocation event focuses attention on
the transmembrane regions of the BCR Ig and Ig
/Ig
, which
initially reside in the detergent-soluble plasma membrane and following
translocation must be accommodated by the specialized environment of
the lipid rafts. The importance of the Ig transmembrane domain for BCR
function, including Ig
/Ig
association, signal transduction, and
Ag presentation, was demonstrated by a series of heavy chain
transmembrane mutants (21, 22, 23, 24). Mutations were introduced
into adjacent tyrosine and serine residues in the transmembrane domain
of a human µ-chain, which are predicted to face the lower leaflet of
the lipid bilayer. A mutant with a Y587
F
change associated with Ig
/Ig
and resulted in a
signaling-competent BCR that could be internalized, yet the Y/F mutant
BCR could not deliver Ag for MHC class II processing and presentation.
Because correct Ag targeting for processing is dependent on BCR
signaling (7), it may be assumed that the qualitative or
quantitative nature of the signal initiated from the Y/F BCR may not be
identical to that of the WT BCR. Additionally, a mutant Ig with a
Y587S588
VV change no
longer associated with Ig
/Ig
and was signaling incompetent, but
the mutant could still be internalized upon Ag binding. However, like
the Y/F BCR, the YS/VV mutant could not deliver Ag for presentation.
These transmembrane mutants provided an opportunity to assess the
requirement of the Ig
/Ig
signaling complex in translocation of
the BCR into lipid rafts. The results presented in this work provide
evidence that the initial event in BCR signaling is the translocation
of the BCR into lipid rafts, and that this event is not dependent on
phosphorylation of Ig
/Ig
or the attachment of the BCR to the
actin cytoskeleton.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell lines of the mouse B cell lymphoma A20 expressing an IgG2a
mouse BCR (H-2d,
Fc
RIIB1+) stably transfected with human
µ-chain either with a wild-type transmembrane region (WT) or
containing transmembrane mutations Y587
F (Y/F)
or Y587S588
VV (YS/VV)
(21) were maintained in supplemented DMEM and 15% FCS
(15% complete medium (CM)) (25) containing 600 µg/ml
G418. Expression of the human µ-chain by the mutant cell lines was
confirmed by both genomic PCR sequencing and flow cytometry using
FITC-labeled goat anti-human µ-chain. The mean fluorescence
intensity for WT was 400, for Y/F was 300, and for YS/VV was 200.
A20IIA1.6 cells that lack FcR were provided by Dr. John Cambier
(National Jewish Hospital, Denver, CO). Hen egg lysozyme and
p-aminophenylphosphorylcholine were purchased from Sigma
(St. Louis, MO), and chemically conjugated, as previously described
(21). Whole and F(ab')2 rabbit Abs
specific for human Fc5 µ (anti-µ); whole and
F(ab')2 rabbit Abs specific for mouse IgG and IgM
heavy and light chains (anti-mouse Ig); and HRP-labeled goat Abs
specific for human Fc5 µ (HRP anti-µ) and rabbit IgG (HRP
anti-rabbit Ig) were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West
Grove, PA). RC20H phosphotyrosine-specific recombinant mAb conjugated
to HRP was purchased from Transduction Laboratories (San Diego, CA).
Actin-depolymerizing agent cytochalasin D was purchased from Sigma, and
the Src family kinase inhibitor PP2 from Calbiochem (La Jolla,
CA).
Pervanadate treatment
Cells were stimulated with pervanadate, as previously described (26). Briefly, cells (1 x 108) were preincubated for 30 min with DMEM-BSA at 4°C and treated with a final concentration of 750 µM sodium orthovanadate and 0.075% hydrogen peroxide (Sigma) for 1 min. Cells were lysed and lipid rafts were isolated, as described below.
Isolation of lipid rafts
Lipid rafts were isolated by lysis of cells in 1% Triton X-100 at 4°C and flotation on a discontinuous sucrose gradient, as previously described (16). Briefly, 1 x 108 cells per sample were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed for 30 min on ice in 1% Triton X-100 in TNEV (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA; CLAP, 2.5 mg/ml each of chymostatin, leupeptin, antipain, and pepstatin A in DMSO; and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate). Nuclei and cellular debris were pelleted by centrifugation at 900 x g for 10 min, and 1 ml of cleared supernatant was mixed with 1 ml of 85% sucrose in a Beckman 14 x 89-mm centrifuge tube (Fullerton, CA). The sample was overlaid with 6 ml 35% sucrose in TNEV and finally 3.5 ml 5% sucrose in TNEV. The samples were centrifuged in a SW41 rotor at 200,000 x g for 1620 h at 4°C, and 1-ml fractions were collected from the top of the gradient. Fractions 35 were pooled as the raft-containing fractions, and fractions 1012 were pooled as the soluble fractions. Isolation of lipid raft membranes was confirmed by immunoblotting for GM1, Lyn, and CD45R, as described previously (16).
Actin depolymerization
Cells were incubated with 10 µM cytochalasin D (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 4°C, or latrunculin B (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) (27, 28) for 30 min at 37°C to disrupt actin filaments. Cells were then chilled on ice for 10 min, and incubated with rabbit anti-human IgM, Fc5 µ (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 30 min, and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for an additional 30 min. An aliquot of the cells was stained for trypan blue to ensure viability greater than 90%, and the samples were processed for lipid raft isolation, as described above.
For immunofluorescence microscopy, the cells were then chilled on ice for 10 min, and incubated with rabbit anti-human IgM, Fc5 µ (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 30 min, and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L; Jackson ImmunoResearch) for an additional 30 min. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. After fixation, cells were incubated with permeabilization buffer (1% gelatin, 0.05% saponin, 10 mM glycine, 10 mM HEPES) for 15 min. The cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated phalloidin (FL-phalloidin) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in permeabilization buffer for 30 min, washed, and mounted with Gel/mount (Biomeda, Foster City, CA) for viewing. Imaging was conducted on a scanning laser confocal microscope (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA; model MRC-1024). Images were acquired using a x60 objective, and cropped using Photoshop (Adobe, Mountain View, CA).
Measurement of HRP activity
An aliquot (100 µl) of each pooled fraction from the discontinuous sucrose gradient was incubated with 100 µl of substrate solution (5 mg/ml 2, 2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 4, with 0.015% H2O2). The absorbance was measured at 405 nm on an ELISA plate reader.
Immunoblotting
Samples were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto Millipore Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bedford, MA). The membranes were blocked for 1 h at 25°C in PBS/0.1% Tween 20 and 1% BSA and then probed with RC20H at a 1/2500 dilution in the same blocking buffer to detect phosphotyrosine-containing proteins. The blots were washed in PBS/0.1% Tween-20 (wash buffer) and visualized with ECL (Amersham-Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). The membranes were then rinsed in wash buffer and placed into BLOTTO containing 0.02% sodium azide for 30 min at 25°C, which inactivates HRP activity. The blots were then washed to eliminate the azide, reprobed with HRP goat anti-human µ, and visualized with ECL.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies showed that following cross-linking, the BCR
rapidly translocates into lipid rafts, an event that is accompanied by
initiation of protein tyrosine phosphorylation of raft-associated
proteins (16). To determine the requirement of BCR
signaling for raft translocation, two BCRs were analyzed that contain
mutations in the transmembrane regions: Y/F, a signaling-competent Ig
that associates with Ig
/Ig
but fails to target Ag for processing,
and YS/VV, a signaling-incompetent Ig that fails to associate with
Ig
/Ig
and also fails to target Ag. The behavior of the mutants
Y/F and YS/VV and the WT BCR following Ag binding were compared in
terms of their induction of protein tyrosine phosphorylation and
translocation into lipid rafts.
Cells were incubated on ice with whole rabbit anti-µ for 30 min,
washed, and then incubated with HRP anti-rabbit Ig for an
additional 30 min. The HRP anti-Ig served as a secondary
cross-linking reagent for the BCR and allowed detection of the
cross-linked BCR by assay for HRP enzyme activity. The cells were
solubilized in 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer, and the rafts were
isolated on sucrose density gradients. Cross-linking the BCR resulted
in the induction of protein tyrosine phosphorylation in the lipid rafts
in both the Y/F and WT cells (Fig. 1
A). Moreover, the protein
phosphotyrosine pattern in the Y/F rafts closely resembled that of the
WT cells. The protein phosphotyrosine patterns of the Y/F and WT cells
were also similar in the soluble fractions. In contrast, the
cross-linking of YS/VV did not result in significant protein
phosphorylation.
|
The temperature dependence of BCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and raft translocation
The results presented above indicated that the BCR in Y/F and WT
cells, but not in YS/VV, was both signaling and translocation
competent. It was of interest to determine whether signaling or
translocation was affected by temperature, which would affect the
fluidity of the membrane. Cells were incubated with the BCR
cross-linking Abs at 4°C, washed, and warmed for 2 min to 37°C.
Isolation and immunoblot comparison of the raft and detergent-soluble
fractions from WT and Y/F cells revealed that maximal tyrosine
phosphorylation within the rafts and BCR raft translocation occurs at
4°C, and that even 2 min following warming to 37°C, less BCR was
detected in the rafts and protein tyrosine phosphorylation within the
rafts was reduced (Fig. 2
). Thus, maximal
translocation and stable residency within the rafts occurred at 4°C
for the WT and Y/F BCR.
|
/Ig
association are not required for
translocation into lipid rafts. However, in the absence of the
associated Ig
/Ig
signal transduction complex, the BCR requires
higher temperatures and presumably a more fluid bilayer to translocate
into the rafts.
|
The observation that YS/VV translocates into lipid rafts following
cross-linking at 37°C strongly suggests that the level of protein
tyrosine phosphorylation in the raft regions that accompanies
translocation of the WT and Y/F BCR into lipid rafts is not required
for translocation. To further explore the requirement for protein
phosphorylation, the effect of the Src family kinase inhibitor PP2
(30) on the translocation of the WT and the Y/F BCR into
lipid rafts was assessed. Initial titration experiments determined that
50 µM PP2 reduced WT BCR-induced protein tyrosine phosphorylation to
undetectable levels by immunoblot probing with RC20H (data not shown).
Thus, WT and Y/F cells were incubated with 50 µM PP2 from 30 min
before the addition of BCR cross-linking Abs. Cells were solubilized in
Triton X-100 detergent, and the rafts were isolated on sucrose density
gradients. Incubation of both WT and Y/F cells with PP2 abolished
tyrosine phosphorylation in the raft and detergent-soluble fractions
(Fig. 4
A). Significantly, the
presence of PP2 did not block the translocation of the WT or Y/F BCR
into the lipid rafts as measured by immunoblotting for the µ-chain
(Fig. 4
B) and by HRP activity (Fig. 4
C),
indicating that tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins in the raft was
not essential for translocation. Treatment with PP2 decreases the
amount of BCR stably associating with the rafts, which may indicate a
need for Src family kinase in retaining the translocated BCR in the
rafts. As shown above, oligomerization of the YS/VV BCR yielded
insignificant levels of tyrosine phosphorylation. Upon treatment with
PP2, no detectable phosphoproteins were observed following BCR
cross-linking in YS/VV cells (Fig. 4
A), even upon long
exposures to film (data not shown). However, the YS/VV BCR still
translocated into the lipid rafts at 37°C even in the presence of PP2
(Fig. 4
, B and C). Thus, signaling as measured by
protein tyrosine phosphorylation was not necessary for translocation of
the BCR into lipid rafts following oligomerization. Moreover, induction
of tyrosine phosphorylation of the Ig
/Ig
ITAMs and other
phosphoproteins by treatment of WT, Y/F, and YS/VV cells with
pervanadate was not sufficient to result in BCR translocation in the
absence of BCR cross-linking (Fig. 4
C).
|
|
RIIB
The results presented above indicate that the BCR in Y/F and YS/VV
cells have the potential to translocate into lipid rafts upon
cross-linking. The cross-linking was accomplished using rabbit Abs that
have the ability to interact with the Fc
RIIB on the cells. To ensure
that BCR translocation following cross-linking was not dependent on FcR
function, translocation of an endogenous mouse BCR (IgG2a) was analyzed
in A20IIA1.6 cells lacking the Fc
RIIB. Cells were incubated on ice
with either whole or F(ab')2 rabbit
anti-mouse Ig, washed, and incubated with goat anti-rabbit Ig.
Both F(ab')2 and whole Ig used as primary
cross-linking reagents resulted in similar levels of tyrosine
phosphorylation of proteins in the rafts and soluble membranes (Fig. 6
A). The whole Ig was,
however, more effective in inducing translocation as compared with the
F(ab')2, presumably because it allowed more
extensive cross-linking of the BCR (Fig. 6
B). These results
indicate that translocation of the BCR occurs independently of the
Fc
RIIB. To directly rule out an effect of the Fc
RIIB on the
translocation of the WT and Y/F BCR into lipid rafts, cells were
preincubated with the FcR-specific mAb 2.4G2 that blocks Fc binding to
Fc
RIIB before the addition of HRP F(ab')2
anti-Ig or HRP anti-Ig. The presence of the 2.4G2 mAb before
cross-linking had no significant effect on the raft translocation of
the WT or Y/F BCR (Fig. 6
C).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At present, Lyn phosphorylation of the Ig
/Ig
ITAMs is the
earliest signaling event known. However, it is unclear how the
cross-linking of the BCR results in phosphorylation of the Ig
/Ig
complex and the initiation of the signal transduction cascade. An
intriguing possibility proposed for the high affinity IgE receptor
(Fc
R) (33) is that Fc
R translocation into lipid
rafts is the initiating event in the Fc
R signal transduction
cascade. The results presented in this work show that BCR translocation
into lipid rafts occurs when protein tyrosine phosphorylation is
inhibited and does not require the association of Ig with Ig
/Ig
.
Thus, BCR translocation occurs independently of signaling or
biochemical or conformational changes in Ig
/Ig
. These results are
consistent with the model for the initiation of BCR signaling in which
signaling is a repercussion of BCR translocation into a signaling
platform enriched with Lyn, where the Ig
/Ig
ITAMs become
phosphorylated and Syk is recruited to the phosphorylated ITAMs to
continue the signaling cascade.
The model predicts that Ag binding by the BCR would initiate oligomerization of the BCR, resulting in a conformation of the oligomerized BCR that prefers the lipid environment of the rafts. Thus, the initiation of the BCR signaling pathway would be solely dependent on the ability of Ag binding by the BCR to achieve the appropriate conformation of the oligomer that would lead to BCR translocation. Presumably, the key factors in achieving this conformation would be the affinity of the BCR for the Ag and the valency of the Ag as well as the spatial array of the BCR antigenic determinants on the Ag. In this regard, the initiating event in the BCR signaling pathway would be simply an Ag-sensing event. Indeed, recent unpublished results showed that the translocation of the BCR into lipid rafts was sensitive to the degree of cross-linking achieved is consistent with this model.
Our earlier results (16) and those presented in this work
suggest that the initiation of the kinase-dependent BCR signaling
cascade is restricted to lipid rafts. However, it is not known whether
encounter of the BCR with Lyn outside the microdomains might also
initiate signaling. While CD45 phosphatase is localized in the
detergent-soluble membrane fractions and is believed to play a role in
the activation of Lyn by dephosphorylating the carboxyl phosphotyrosine
of Lyn, the paucity of Lyn in the soluble fractions suggests that the
initiation of signal transduction is more likely to occur within lipid
rafts. It has been found recently that a key Lyn-regulatory protein,
Cbp, exists in lipid rafts as an acylated transmembrane phosphoprotein
(13). The phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic
Y314 of Cbp results in Csk binding, thereby
recruiting Csk to the lipid rafts. Csk is responsible for the
suppression of Lyn activity by phosphorylating the carboxyl tyrosine of
Lyn (10, 11). Under steady state conditions, Cbp is
basally phosphorylated, suggesting a low level of Csk is localized to
the rafts to keep Lyn quiescent. Upon BCR cross-linking, the Ig and
Ig
/Ig
enter into the lipid rafts, providing the ITAMs as
substrates for kinase binding and phosphorylation. Full activation of
the Src family kinases results in further phosphorylation of Cbp, which
recruits more Csk to the rafts, thus providing a mechanism by which
signaling can be terminated. Taken together, these findings suggest
that all the machinery necessary for the initiation and termination of
BCR signaling may be concentrated in the lipid rafts.
Although the molecular forces driving raft localization of integral
membrane proteins are unclear, previous studies of influenza membrane
protein hemagglutinin (HA) show that the transmembrane region of HA,
particularly the hydrophobic amino acid residues in the exoplasmic half
of the plasma membrane, is crucial for its ability to localize in lipid
rafts (34). HA is constitutively localized in raft
regions; however, the BCR and other immune receptors translocate into
rafts only upon aggregation, suggesting that the HA transmembrane
domain inherently prefers the raft lipid environment, while the BCR
must undergo an oligomerization-dependent change to allow stable
association with the rafts. Presumably, the nature of the BCR
transmembrane domain dictates whether the appropriate conformation of
the oligomer can be achieved such that translocation occurs. Clearly,
not all integral membrane proteins when cross-linked translocate into
lipid rafts. Studies using domain swapping in chimeric receptors
revealed that the transmembrane regions of the Fc
R
-chain and the
IL-2R allowed for raft translocation upon aggregation, although the
transmembrane region of the IL-1R did not (35). To date,
analysis of the transmembrane amino acid sequences of the molecules
capable of localizing to raft domains has not revealed any motifs or
patterns that would predict raft translocation. A conformational change
that occurs upon ligand binding, or summation of the partition
capabilities of individual transmembrane regions upon oligomerization
are other possible mechanisms of raft translocation
(36).
In this study, we used Ig transmembrane mutants to demonstrate that
raft translocation depended on the Ig transmembrane region and not on
Ig
/Ig
association or their tyrosine phosphorylation. The Ig
mutants contained amino acid substitutions facing the lower leaflet of
the lipid bilayer that differed in their association with Ig
/Ig
and signaling (21, 22, 23). A YS to VV double substitution
resulted in a BCR lacking Ig
/Ig
that was essentially incapable of
raft translocation under conditions in which the WT and Y/F BCR were
induced to translocate. The failure to translocate was overcome for the
YS/VV BCR by increasing the temperature. How the change in temperature
allowed translocation of the YS/VV BCR into lipid rafts remains to be
determined.
Previous biochemical studies showed that within 30 s of
cross-linking at 37°C, nearly 100% of the YS/VV BCR expressed in
J558L plasmacytoma cells became cytoskeletally attached, as defined by
insolubility in Nonidet P-40 detergent (31). The results
presented in this work reveal that the integrity of the actin
cytoskeleton does not affect BCR translocation into detergent-insoluble
lipid domains. Pretreatment of cells with cytochalasin D or latrunculin
and presence of the inhibition throughout the experiment did not block
BCR raft translocation. It was recently demonstrated that for the
Fc
R, aggregation at 4°C and actin disruption with cytochalasin D
at 22°C resulted in increased colocalization of the receptor with
Lyn, as determined by immunofluorescence microscopy, and increased
protein tyrosine phosphorylation (37). Thus, the available
evidence suggests BCR translocation into lipid rafts precedes any
involvement of the actin cytoskeleton. Our previous studies showed that
actin is associated with B cell lipid rafts (16). Lipid
rafts may facilitate the attachment of the BCR to the actin
cytoskeleton and the subsequent internalization and rapid delivery of
the BCR to the MHC class II peptide-loading compartment, as previously
described (29, 38, 39).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Susan K. Pierce, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/National Institutes of Health/Twinbrook II, 12441 Parklawn Drive, Room 200B, MSC 8180, Rockville, MD 20852-8180. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: BCR, B cell Ag receptor; Cbp, Csk-binding protein; HA, hemagglutinin; ITAM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif; WT, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication June 28, 2000. Accepted for publication January 5, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and Ig-
/
.
J. Biol. Chem. 268:25,776.

heterodimer. J. Immunol. 155:3769.[Abstract]
RI with detergent-resistant membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1753.
RI and lipid raft components are regulated by the actin cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci. 113:1009.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Aucher, E. Magdeleine, E. Joly, and D. Hudrisier Capture of plasma membrane fragments from target cells by trogocytosis requires signaling in T cells but not in B cells Blood, June 15, 2008; 111(12): 5621 - 5628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. Sohn, S. K. Pierce, and S.-J. Tzeng Live Cell Imaging Reveals that the Inhibitory Fc{gamma}RIIB Destabilizes B Cell Receptor Membrane-Lipid Interactions and Blocks Immune Synapse Formation J. Immunol., January 15, 2008; 180(2): 793 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. T. T. Nguyen, L. Charrier-Hisamuddin, G. Dalmasso, A. Hiol, S. Sitaraman, and D. Merlin Association of PepT1 with lipid rafts differently modulates its transport activity in polarized and nonpolarized cells Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): G1155 - G1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Kim, J. A. Rutan, and B. J. Vilen The transmembrane tyrosine of {micro}-heavy chain is required for BCR destabilization and entry of antigen into clathrin-coated vesicles Int. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 19(12): 1403 - 1412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Le Roux, D. Lankar, M.-I. Yuseff, F. Vascotto, T. Yokozeki, G. Faure-Andre, E. Mougneau, N. Glaichenhaus, B. Manoury, C. Bonnerot, et al. Syk-dependent Actin Dynamics Regulate Endocytic Trafficking and Processing of Antigens Internalized through the B-Cell Receptor Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2007; 18(9): 3451 - 3462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Reyes-Moreno, E. Sharif-Askari, J. Girouard, C. Leveille, M. Jundi, A. Akoum, R. Lapointe, A. Darveau, and W. Mourad Requirement of Oxidation-dependent CD40 Homodimers for CD154/CD40 Bidirectional Signaling J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2007; 282(27): 19473 - 19480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hudrisier, A. Aucher, A.-L. Puaux, C. Bordier, and E. Joly Capture of Target Cell Membrane Components via Trogocytosis Is Triggered by a Selected Set of Surface Molecules on T or B Cells J. Immunol., March 15, 2007; 178(6): 3637 - 3647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rovedo and R. Longnecker Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 2B (LMP2B) Modulates LMP2A Activity J. Virol., January 1, 2007; 81(1): 84 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Brown Lipid Rafts, Detergent-Resistant Membranes, and Raft Targeting Signals. Physiology, December 1, 2006; 21(6): 430 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. Sohn, P. Tolar, T. Jin, and S. K. Pierce Fluorescence resonance energy transfer in living cells reveals dynamic membrane changes in the initiation of B cell signaling PNAS, May 23, 2006; 103(21): 8143 - 8148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kono, C. Kyogoku, T. Suzuki, N. Tsuchiya, H. Honda, K. Yamamoto, K. Tokunaga, and Z.-I. Honda Fc{gamma}RIIB Ile232Thr transmembrane polymorphism associated with human systemic lupus erythematosus decreases affinity to lipid rafts and attenuates inhibitory effects on B cell receptor signaling Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2005; 14(19): 2881 - 2892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Allsup, A. S. Kamiguti, K. Lin, P. D. Sherrington, Z. Matrai, J. R. Slupsky, J. C. Cawley, and M. Zuzel B-Cell Receptor Translocation to Lipid Rafts and Associated Signaling Differ between Prognostically Important Subgroups of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 65(16): 7328 - 7337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mielenz, C. Vettermann, M. Hampel, C. Lang, A. Avramidou, M. Karas, and H.-M. Jack Lipid Rafts Associate with Intracellular B Cell Receptors and Exhibit a B Cell Stage-Specific Protein Composition J. Immunol., March 15, 2005; 174(6): 3508 - 3517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||