The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parra, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mercola, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parra, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mercola, D.
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 166: 2437-2443.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Identification of a CD28 Response Element in the CD40 Ligand Promoter1

Eduardo Parra2,*, Tomas Mustelin§, Mikael Dohlsten{ddagger} and Dan Mercola*,{dagger}

* Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, San Diego, CA 92121; {dagger} The Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; {ddagger} Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Section for Tumor Immunology, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden; and § Laboratory of Signal Transduction, La Jolla Cancer Research Center, The Burnham Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ligation of the T cell coreceptor CD28 or CD2 by its cognate ligands B7-1 or LFA-3, respectively, greatly aids the Ag-induced up-regulation of several genes, including IL-2 and CD40 ligand (CD40L). Using luciferase reporter constructs under the control of the 1.2 kb of 5' noncoding region of the human CD40L gene, we have found that stimulation through CD28 was required for a strong transcriptional activity of the CD40L promoter in response to TCR ligation, while the activity induced by CD2 was slightly lower than CD28. Deletion analysis demonstrated that the transcriptional elements mediating this effect were located within a 300-bp region upstream of the start site. Further dissection of this region and gel shift analyses demonstrated the presence of a CD28 response element in a region located between nucleotides -170 to -164 relative to the start site. Transcriptional studies with a CD40L enhancer-promoter carrying a mutation in this putative CD28 response element revealed that the activity was reduced by 80 and 70% after B7-1 and LFA-3 costimulation, respectively. The transcription factor complex bound to this site contained at least JunD, c-Fos, p50, p65, and c-Rel, but not c-Jun. Mutations introduced into the CD28RE also blocked the binding of this complex. These observations identify an important role for the CD28 signaling pathway in the regulation of CD40L promoter transcriptional activity.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ligation of the TCR by Ag/MHC is crucial, but not sufficient, for the initiation of a productive T cell response. Under physiological conditions, the APC also expresses a number of additional surface molecules that provide costimulation for the T cell (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). Among the most important are the two B7 (CD80 and CD86) molecules that bind the CD28 molecule on the surface of T cells and leukocyte function-associated Ag-3 (LFA-3),3 which is a ligand for the T cell CD2 surface protein. These molecules contribute to T cell-target cell binding during the initial phase of cell activation but they also transduce costimulatory signals that determine the profile of an immune response (2, 6). Early studies using a rat model also demonstrated the role of CD2 in allograft rejection, suggesting a principal role of this pathway in T cell activation (9). However, costimulation through CD28 potentiates the transcription and stabilizes the mRNAs of several cytokine genes including IL-2, GM-CSF, TNF-{alpha}, IFN-{gamma}, and IL-4 (10, 11, 12). These CD28-induced effects promote an efficient T cell response, T cell proliferation and effector functions (9, 10, 11, 12). Signaling via the CD28 costimulatory pathway also prevents the development of T cell anergy (13) and protects cells from programmed cell death (14). Our preliminary studies suggest that LFA-3/CD2 interaction primarily supports autocrine production of IL-2, allowing the induction of clonal expansion and the production of cytokines such as TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma}, while B7-1/CD28 interaction supports paracrine production of IL-2 necessary to activate other cells of the immune response and to support long lasting T cell proliferation (6).

The CD28 molecule is a 44-kDa, disulfide-linked homodimer expressed on most T lineage cells (11, 12) and is a member of the Ig superfamily. Mature thymocytes have higher levels of CD28 than the immature cells and among peripheral T cells, 95% of CD4+ T cells and 50% of CD8+ T cells express CD28. Activation of T cells leads to enhanced CD28 expression (11). CD28 has also been detected on plasma cells and NK cells. The ligands for CD28 are the two B7 proteins, B7-1 or CD80 and B7-2 or CD86, which display a restricted pattern of expression on APCs, including on activated B cells (5, 16). Although ligation of CD28 alone does not cause measurable biochemical events, coligation of CD28 with the TCR leads to increased and sustained tyrosine phosphorylation of several cellular proteins compared with ligation of the TCR alone (17). The biochemical events triggered or facilitated by CD28 induce the formation of transcription factor complexes that recognize specific response elements in a number of genes (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). Accordingly, these elements are referred to as CD28 response elements (CD28RE)3, even if other costimulatory molecules or pharmacological agents can also induce binding of nuclear proteins to this DNA element (18). The transcription factor complexes that bind CD28REs are typically composed of members of the NF-{kappa}B/Rel family of NFs and members of the AP-1 family of transcription factors, like c-Fos, c-Jun, and JunD as well as with other nuclear proteins. The CD28RE in the IL-2 promoter (nucleotides -162 to -153) is crucial for transcriptional activation of the IL-2 gene (19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24) and probably works in conjunction with an adjacent AP-1 site (20, 25, 26).

We have studied the role of CD2 and CD28 costimulation in the transcriptional activation of the human CD40 ligand (CD40L) gene. Surface expression of CD40L is inducible on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (27, 28, 29, 30) and can be detected as soon as 16 h after TCR ligation. CD40L plays an important role in the development and maintenance of a T cell response (31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38). It appears that ligation of CD40L on the T cell by its APC-bound receptor, CD40, may affect the T cell both directly, by generating costimulatory signals, and indirectly through enhanced expression of B7-1 and B7-2 on the APC (27, 38). We have confirmed that CD2 and especially CD28 costimulation induced CD40L gene transcription. CD2 induced 8- to 10-fold lower levels of transcriptional activity of the IL-2 gene promoter compared with CD28. This suggests that the differences between CD2 and CD28, with respect to IL-2 production, may reside at the level of transcription.

Moreover, we find that CD28 and, to a lesser extent, CD2 costimulation greatly enhances TCR-induced transcriptional activation of luciferase reporter constructs under the control of the CD40L promoter. Deletion analyses, mutation studies, and gel-shift assays all indicate that the CD40L promoter contains a functional CD28RE localized between nucleotides -170 and -164 upstream of the start site and adjacent to an AP-1 site. Finally, we find that the transcription factor complex bound to this site contains the AP-1 factors JunD, c-Fos, p50, p65, and c-Rel, but not c-Jun. The sum of observations indicate a new mechanism of regulation of CD40L by the CD28 pathway and suggest a potential cooperation between the CD28RE and AP-1 site similar to that observed in the IL-2 promoter.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents

Staphylococcal enterotoxin E (SEE) was purchased from Toxin Technology (Madison, WI). The protease inhibitors PMSF, leupeptin, pepstatin, aprotinin, and bestatin were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). [{gamma}-32P]ATP was obtained from ICN Pharmaceutical (Costa Mesa, CA). T4 polynucleotide kinase and poly(dI-dC)2 were obtained from Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, NJ). Tris-borate-EDTA buffer and acrylamide-bisacrylamide (29:1) were obtained from Bio-Rad (Richmond, CA). Polyclonal Abs against c-Jun, c-Fos, JunD, p50, p65, and c-Rel were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Luciferase assay reagent, lysis buffer, and the pGL-2 luciferase vector were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). The transformed site-directed mutagenic kit was purchased from Clontech Laboratories (Palo Alto, CA).

Transfected cell lines

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with the cDNAs encoding the human HLA-DR, B7-1, and LFA-3 cell surface molecules have been described in detail elsewhere (5). Single and double transfectants expressing similar levels of the transfected molecules were established by repeated cell sorting (5) and they were periodically reanalyzed.

Cell culture and stimulation

The human T leukemia cell line Jurkat was maintained at logarithmic growth in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine and 10% FCS. The transfected CHO cells were maintained in the same medium plus G418 and/or L-methionine sulfoximine. Stimulation of the T cells with SEE was performed at a concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml in the presence of 0.1 x 106 cells/ml CHO cell transfectants at 37°C as previously described (5, 6, 19).

Plasmid construction and mutagenesis

A 1294-bp 5' noncoding fragment of the human CD40L gene, corresponding to nucleotides -1227 to +67, was kindly provided by David Lewis (University of Washington, Seattle, WA). This DNA was subcloned at the HindIII site of the luciferase reporter plasmid pGL-2 to yield a plasmid we call pGL1.2. Shorter pieces of 600, 300, or 95 bp from the same DNA were PCR amplified with a 3' reverse primer containing a HindIII site lying just 5' of the start codon and a 5' primer containing a BglII site. These products were subsequently cloned into the pGL-2 to yield plasmids pGL0.6, pGL0.3, and pGL0.095, respectively. The minimal human IL-2 promotor-enhancer fragment (20, 39, 40), nucleotides -500 to +60, was also subcloned into pGL-2. Mutant CD40L-luciferase constructs were created by incorporating the mutagenic primer carrying a 2-bp mutation using the Transformer site-directed mutagenesis kit from Clontech Laboratories. The 2-bp mutagenic primer for specific site in the CD40L is 5'-CAAAAAGcAcAGCCTGGAAG-3'. The identity and integrity of the resulting plasmid, pGL-2-CD40LM, was verified by restriction enzyme digests and by sequence analysis.

DNA transfection and luciferase activity analyses

Jurkat cells (8 x 106) were transfected with 10 µg of luciferase reporter plasmid by electroporation using an electro cell manipulator 600 (BTX, San Diego, CA) at 130 V and 1700 µF capacitance. After incubation for 24 h at 37°C in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FCS, the cells were incubated with the different CHO transfectants (see Transfected cell lines) in the presence or absence of SEE for another 8 h (or as indicated in the figures). Subsequently, the cells were washed twice in PBS and suspended in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-phosphate (pH 7.8), 2 mM DTT, 2 mM 1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N', N'-tetraacetic acid, 10% glycerol, and 1% Triton X-100), kept on ice for 5–10 min, and clarified by centrifugation at 13,000 x g for 1 min. The supernatants were mixed with luciferase reagent and measured in duplicate in a luminometer (MicroLumat LB 96 P; Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany) for 5 s. A background measurement was subtracted from each duplicate and experimental values are expressed either as recorded light units of luciferase activity or as activity relative to extracts from unstimulated cells (19).

Preparation of nuclear extracts

Nuclear extracts were prepared as previously described (19). Briefly, 3–5 x 107 Jurkat T cells were stimulated as above. After stimulation, the CHO cells were removed by plastic adherence. The T cells were washed once in ice-cold PBS, once in buffer A (10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 15 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 6 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM PMSF) and resuspended in buffer A with 0.2% Nonidet P-40. The pelleted nuclei were resuspended in buffer B (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, and 10% glycerol) in the presence of 0.3 M (NH4)2SO4 (pH 7.9) and rocked for 30 min at 4°C. The broken nuclei were then centrifuged for 10 min at 100,000 x g. A 125-µl aliquot of supernatant was transferred to a second tube and more (NH4)2SO4 was added to a final concentration of 1.5 M followed by a second centrifugation at 100,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in 50 µl of buffer B and stored at -70°C. The protein concentration in each extract was estimated using the Bio-Rad stain protein assay kit with bovine albumin as standard.

EMSAs

Three double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to elements in the CD40L promoter were synthesized. Their sense strand sequences are: oligonucleotide 1 (-254 to -214) 5'-CCA TTG TCT GTT AAG AAG TCT ATG ACA TTT CAA GGC AAG A-3'; oligonucleotide 2 (-213 to -173): 5'-TGA ATA TAT GGA AGA AGA AAC TTG TTT CTT CTT TAC TTA C-3'; oligonucleotide 3 (-172 to -144): 5'-AAA AGG AAA GCC TGG AAG TGA ATG ATA T-3'. Three mutant and 5-bp shorter versions of oligonucleotide 3 were prepared as follows (changed nucleotides in lower case): oligonucleotide 3, mutant 1 (changed at -168 to -165): 5'-AAA Acc ggA GCC TGG AAG TGA ATG-3'; oligonucleotide 3, mutant 2 (changed at -163 to -160): 5'-AAA AGG AAA ctt aGG AAG TGA ATG-3'; oligonucleotide 3, mutant 3 (changed at -157 to -154): 5'-AAA AGG AAA GCC TGG cct aGA ATG-3'. As a control, we used a 33-mer taken from the CD28RE of the human IL-2 promoter, 5'-GAT CGC CCA AAG AGG AAA ATT TGT TTC ATA CAG-3'. The AP-1 consensus sequence oligonucleotides was: 5'-CTA GTG ATG AGT CAG CCG GAT C-3'.

Two pmols of sense DNA were mixed with 25 µCi [{gamma}-32P]ATP, 1.5 µl 10 x kinase buffer, 8 units of T4-polynucleotide kinase and water to a final volume of 15 µl and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. After heating the mixture at 95°C for 10 min to denature the enzyme, 2 pmols of corresponding antisense oligonucleotide was added. After another 5 min at 95°C, the mixture was placed in a 65°C water bath, which was turned off, and incubated until the water bath was to room temperature. The labeled double-strand DNA was purified on 5% polyacrylamide gels in 89 mM Tris, 89 mM boric acid, and 2 mM EDTA. The gel was exposed to film and the band containing the double strand was excised and extracted for ~5 h. The labeled DNA was transferred to a mixture of 50% chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:1) and 50% of phenol, mixed, and centrifuged briefly. The upper aqueous layer was transferred to another tube containing only chloroform/isoamyl alcohol, mixed, and centrifuged. The upper phase was transferred to another tube containing 2.5 volume 95% alcohol and 0.1 volume 3 M sodium acetate, mixed, kept at 70°C for 20 min, and centrifuged for 15 min, and the supernatant was removed. The pellet was air dried for 15 min at 37°C and dissolved in 100 µl Tris-EDTA buffer. One microliter was counted in a scintillation counter.

A total of 1–2 µl of nuclear protein extract corresponding to 5–10 µg of protein was added to 4 µl binding buffer containing 2–3 µg of poly(dI-dC)2 as a nonspecific competitor. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 30 min with 15,000 cpm of double-stranded 32P-labeled oligonucleotides in a final volume of 15 µl. The samples were electrophoresed on 5% polyacrylamide gels in 89 mM Tris, 89 mM boric acid, 2 mM EDTA. The gels were fixed in 40% methanol and 10% acetic acid for 15 min, dried, and exposed to film.

For supershift analysis, the mixtures containing nuclear extracts were incubated with 1–2 µg of Abs against various transcription factors for 20 min before addition of 32P-labeled oligonucleotides. Purified rabbit IgG was used as a control Ab. Control experiments performed with the various Abs and DNA probes in the absence of nuclear extract demonstrated that none of the Abs bound directly to the target sequences (data not shown).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Induction of CD40L transcription by costimulation

The presentation of the superantigen SEE by CHO cells engineered to express human MHC class II (HLA-DR), alone or together with costimulatory molecules, is a close approximation of the normal presentation of Ag to T cells. This model system allows us to vary the presence of defined costimulatory molecules, such as B7-1, LFA-3, and ICAM (5, 6, 19, 26), and to use readily transfectable TCR-V{beta} + T leukemia line Jurkat. These cells express CD28 and require CD28 costimulation for the transcriptional activation of several genes that contain a CD28RE. We have used this model system extensively to study the role of regulatory elements such as CD28RE in the control of the IL-2 gene promoter (5, 6, 19, 25).

Fig. 1Go shows schematically the 5'-noncoding region of the human CD40L gene that we used as starting material and the location of the previously identified putative NFAT sites (41, 42) as indicated. First, we cloned the entire 1.2-kb region of the CD40L promoter into the pGL-2 plasmid upstream of the luciferase gene. This construct (pGL1.2) was transiently transfected into Jurkat T cells and the cells were stimulated with SEE presented by CHO-HLA-DR cells with or without costimulatory molecules. When the cells were lysed after various times and analyzed for luciferase activity, we observed that increased activity was detectable as early as 2 h after stimulation, greatly increased to maximum values at ~8 h, and then slowly declined (Fig. 2Go). This time-course is similar to that observed with reporter genes driven by the IL-2 promoter (19, 25). Importantly, the magnitude of the response was dependent on the expression of costimulatory molecules on the CHO cells with B7-1 being consistently more efficient than LFA-3 (Fig. 2Go). Thus, the 1.2-kb region contains sufficient regulatory elements to drive receptor-induced transcription in a CD28-dependent manner.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Schematic representation of the 1.2-kb human CD40L promoter region and the used promoter-reporter gene constructs used in this study. Nucleotide positions are given in relation to the start codon. The putative NFAT sites are indicated as black boxes.

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Time course of induced transcription from the 1.2-kb CD40L promoter. Luciferase activity was measured at the indicated times after presentation of SEE to the indicated CHO transfectants to Jurkat T cells transiently transfected with pGL1.2. The results are given as means ± SD from three independent experiments.

 
Only a minimal regulatory region of 300 bp is required for the full induction of CD40L transcription

Next we made three shorter constructs of the 5'-noncoding DNA from the CD40L gene having 600 bp (pGL0.6), 300 bp (pGL0.3), or 95 bp (pGL0.095) upstream of the start site. Transient transfection of the two former constructs into Jurkat T cells revealed that the luciferase activity could be induced to the same magnitude as the larger pGL1.2 and with the same dependence on B7-1 or LFA-3 costimulation (Fig. 3Go). In marked contrast, in parallel experiments the shortest construct having only 95 bp upstream of the start site could not be induced to exhibit luciferase activity at all (Fig. 3Go). We conclude that the most important transcriptional control elements in the CD40L gene must lie between nucleotides -300 and -95.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Deletion mapping of the CD40L promoter. Luciferase activity was measured 8 h after presentation of SEE to the indicated CHO transfectants to Jurkat T cells transiently transfected with empty vector, pGL0.095, pGL0.3, pGL0.6, or pGL1.2, as indicated. The results represent means ± SD from three independent experiments.

 
B7-1 costimulation is not a requirement for induction of CD40L transcriptional activity

A comparison of the luciferase activities induced by the minimal CD40L promoter (pGL0.3) and the minimal 500-bp IL-2 gene promoter (20) showed that the latter displayed a stronger dependence on B7-1 than the CD40L promoter (Fig. 4Go). LFA-3 expressing CHO cells induced >50% as much CD40L-driven luciferase activity compared with B7-1 expressing CHO cells, while induction of the IL-2 reporter activity showed little response to APCs having LFA-3 instead of B7-1 (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Comparison of the regulation of the minimal CD40L and IL-2 promoters. Luciferase activity was measured 8 h after presentation of SEE to the indicated CHO transfectants to Jurkat T cells transiently transfected with pGL0.3 or pGL-IL-2. The results are given as means ± SD of three independent experiments.

 
A putative NFAT site in the minimal CD40L promoter is not important for the induction of the CD40L promoter activity

It has been reported that the CD40L promoter contains several putative NFAT sites (41, 42) (see Fig. 1Go). Only one of these lies in the minimal 300-bp promoter region defined above. To evaluate whether this putative site plays any role in TCR plus CD28-induced activation, we introduced a 4-bp mutation at position -264 to -261. This mutation resulted in a small (< 20%) reduction in the induction of transcriptional activity (Fig. 5Go) and this decrease is not significant (0.06 < p < 0.46). The dependence on costimulation was not affected. We conclude that, while the NFAT site may moderately affect luciferase activity, it is not a crucial regulator of CD40L transcription at least under the condition of our assays.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Effect of a 4-bp mutation in the NFAT site in the minimal CD40L promoter. Luciferase activity was measured 8 h after presentation of SEE to the indicated CHO transfectants to Jurkat T cells transiently transfected with pGL0.3 or pGL0.3 bearing the mutation at position -264 to -261. The results represent means ± SD of three independent experiments.

 
The 300-bp region in the CD40L promoter contains a CD28RE

The dependence on CD28 costimulation for maximal induction of CD40L transcription suggests the presence of a CD28RE in the 300-bp minimal promoter. To examine this notion, we employed an EMSA to determine whether CD28 costimulation would induce the specific binding of nuclear proteins to CD40L promoter DNA and, if so, to localize the DNA region. First, we prepared three oligonucleotides corresponding to distinct candidate CD28REs within the 300 bp of the minimal CD40L promoter. As shown in Fig. 6GoA, a positive result was obtained with one of the oligonucleotides (oligonucleotide 3) corresponding to -172 to -144, but not with the other two oligonucleotides. Furthermore, a specific complex was detected only in cells stimulated through both TCR and CD28 but only weakly in cells stimulated through TCR plus CD2, and not in response to TCR stimulation alone or in the absence of stimulation. The binding of this complex was lost in samples containing excess unlabeled oligonucleotide 3, but not in samples with a 50-fold excess of a consensus AP-1 binding oligonucleotides (Fig. 6GoB). These results indeed suggest that a CD28RE is present in the CD40L promoter between nucleotides -172 and -144.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Binding of a protein complex to a CD28RE in the CD40L promoter. EMSAs using oligonucleotides corresponding to the indicated sequences in the minimal CD40L promoter. A, Results for three long nonoverlapping oligonucleotide sequences of the CD40L promoter. The two first panels represent longer exposure times than the third panel. B, Oligonucleotide 3 from A with competition of cold oligonucleotides. A long exposure time is shown. C, Three shorter and mutated versions of oligonucleotide 3 from A with the shown sequences; mutations in lower case letters. Nuclear extracts were prepared from Jurkat T cells stimulated for 8 h with SEE and the indicated CHO cell transfectants. The results from one of three similar experiments are shown.

 
To further localize the CD28RE, we synthesized three 5-bp shorter oligonucleotides (corresponding to nucleotides -172 to -149) with 4-bp mutations at the positions indicated in Fig. 6GoC. Two of these sequences still bound a protein complex in extracts from cells stimulated through the TCR plus CD28, while the most 5' mutation essentially abrogated any binding. These experiments suggest that nucleotides -168 to -165 are involved in binding and, therefore, are wholly or partly included in the CD28RE.

The CD28RE is required for B7-1- and LFA-3-induced CD40L transcription

Kinetic studies demonstrated that the CD40L promoter-luciferase reporter gene activity peaked at 8 h after B7-1 and LFA-3 costimulation (Fig. 2Go). To verify that the putative CD28RE plays a significant role in B7-1- and LFA-3-induced CD40L promoter transcription, we introduced a 2-bp mutation in the putative CD28RE sequence of the CD40L promoter (5'-168 to -165–3'). The mutation of the CD28RE site reduced the induction of CD40L transcription by 80% in CHO-DR/B7-1 and 70% in CHO-DR/LFA-3 costimulated Jurkat T cells (Fig. 7Go). These decreases are significant (p < 0.01) and the observations strongly indicate that the CD28RE sequence is specifically required for B7-1- and LFA-3-induced transcription.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Functional demonstration of the specificity of the CD28RE in the transcriptional activity of CD40L promoter. Activity of a mutated CD28RE CD40L promoter. Jurkat T cells were transfected with the wild-type CD40L promoter or the CD28RE mutant promoter, and the cells were stimulated with SEE and the CHO-DR, CHO-DR/B7-1, and CHO-DR/LFA-3 transfectants. Eight hours later, samples were harvested and analyzed for luciferase activity. The native CD28RE sequence of the CD40L promoter 5'-CAAAAAGGAAAGCCTGGAAG-3') was mutated to the 5'-CAAAAAGCACAGCCTGGAAG-3' sequence (mutation shown in boldface). Luciferase activity is expressed as arbitrary light units minus background units of buffer alone. Results from one of two similar experiments is shown.

 
The CD28RE binds NFs belonging to the Rel, Jun, and Fos families

To begin to characterize the complex of nuclear proteins that binds to the CD28RE, we repeated the EMSAs using oligonucleotide number 3 (-172 to -144) in the presence of Abs against known transcription factors. In these assays, the addition of Abs can cause "supershifts" or can block or inhibit DNA-protein complex formation as observed previously (43). Here, Abs specific for c-Fos, JunD, c-Rel, p65, and p50 all caused a decrease in the intensity of the DNA-protein complex band (Fig. 8Go). Indeed, digitization of the autoradiographs (e.g., Fig. 8Go) showed that the addition of most Abs (anti-c-Rel, anti-p65, and anti-p50) lead to a very similar integrated band intensities with an average of 48% of that of the complete complex (Fig. 8Go, lane 3). Addition of anti-c-Fos and anti-p50 lead to only slightly less reductions in band intensity to 54% and 57% respectively. No diminution or shift in position was observed upon addition of anti-c-Jun, a polyclonal sera that we have previously characterized (20). This results suggests that both, the NF-{kappa}B/Rel family proteins c-Rel, p65, and p50, and the AP-1 components c-Fos and JunD are parts of the CD28-induced complex that binds to the oligonucleotide corresponding to nucleotides -172 to -144 of the CD40L promoter. These results support the cross-talking between these two families of NFs as a requirement for inducing optimal transcriptional activity of the CD40L gene.



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Identification of components of the complex bound to the CD28RE. EMSA (supershift) in the presence of Abs to the indicated proteins using the oligonucleotide 5'-AAAAGGAAAGCCTGGAAGTGAATG-3' containing the putative CD28RE of the CD40L promoter (position -172 to -149). Nuclear extracts were prepared from Jurkat T cells stimulated for 8 h with SEE and CHO-DR/B7-1 transfectants. Results from one of two similar experiments are shown.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have shown that the major transcriptional control region in the CD40L promoter is contained within the first 300 bp upstream of the start site. We find that CD28 costimulation induces the association of a multicomponent protein complex that binds to a short DNA sequence from the CD40L promoter therefore identified as a CD28RE. Moreover reporter constructs containing this region are markedly stimulated upon stimulation by CD28 and LFA-3. At the same time, the dramatic reduction in transcriptional CD40L promoter activity is observed with a CD40L reporter construct containing a CD28RE mutant site further underlined the functional importance of this putative CD28RE for CD40L transcriptional activity. These observations indicate the presence of a functional CD28RE. Interestingly, both B7-1 and LFA-3 costimulation are affected by the CD28RE mutation, suggesting that B7-1- and LFA-3-driven CD40L transcription use CD28RE binding activity. There is also a good correlation between the binding of this protein complex and the transcriptional activation of the CD40L promoter in the presence of CHO-DR/B7-1 transfectants. Although our findings do not exclude the existence of additional important regulatory elements, they provide a sufficient molecular explanation for the observation that costimulation through CD28 enhances the expression of CD40L on T cells.

A comparison of the CD28RE in the CD40L promoter (within nucleotides -172 to -160: AAAaggaaaGCCT, probable binding site underlined) with the CD28RE in the IL-2 promoter (nucleotides -166 to -150: TTTAAagaaattcCAAA, binding site underlined) shows both similarities and interesting differences. Although a similar set of Fos, Jun, and Rel family proteins bound to the CD28RE in the CD40L as in the IL-2 promoter (20, 25, 26), the nucleotide sequences of each response element differ beyond the GAAA core. We also noted that the activation of the IL-2 promoter showed a much stricter requirement for CD28 costimulation while a partial CD40L activation can be achieved by coligation of CD2. The reason for this less strict requirement for CD28 costimulation remains unknown, but may be related to the overall structure of the promoter and the proximity of NF-AT or AP-1 sites to the CD28RE in the CD40L promoter (41, 42). This confirms earlier results that have linked NF-AT activation to the TCR signal transduction pathway (19). It has been demonstrated that up-regulation of CD40L is TCR dependent (44, 45) and several studies have demonstrated that the CD2 signal synergizes with TCR to increased activation signaling via the TCR (46, 47). These results suggest that strong signaling can occur in the absence of a CD28 signal, perhaps via a redundant signal transduction through other costimulatory molecules such as CD2. These data suggest that CD28 induces a quantitatively stronger signal along CD28 signal pathway, but that no major qualitative differences occur in the NF controlling the CD40L promoter. In both the CD40L and IL-2 promoters there is an adjacent potential AP-1 binding site suggesting a further cooperative effect between members of the AP-1 and Rel/NF-{kappa}B families in the regulation of transcription. In the case of the IL-2 promoter, transcriptional activation is reduced in the absence of this adjacent AP-1 site (20, 25, 26). We suggest that this is likely to be the case for the CD40L promoter where the putative AP-1 binding sequence TGATATG is located at nucleotides -148 to -142.

Both the IL-2 and CD40L promoters contain several NFAT elements. In the case of the CD40L, only one NFAT binding site (at -265 to -258) lies in the 300-bp fragment that is sufficient to drive a full transcription in our assays. Mutation of this site had a minor effect, suggesting that it is not crucial for the transcriptional activity of the 300-bp promoter. The exact molecular signaling events induced by CD28 coligation that subsequently result in the formation of the protein complex that binds to the CD28RE remains partly speculative. The transcription of the CD40L gene does not reach its peak activity until several hours after T cell stimulation. Thus, there is sufficient time for changes in the transcription, translation, and posttranslational regulation of many factors that may be involved in binding to the CD28RE and the adjacent AP-1, and perhaps to other parts of the promoter. Within this window of time, the genes for both c-fos and c-jun (and perhaps junD) are activated, resulting in increased levels of the corresponding proteins. Our experiments confirm the presence of c-Fos and JunD in the CD28RE binding complex. For transcriptional activity, these proteins also need to be phosphorylated by members of the mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase families, including extracellular signal-regulated kinase and c-Jun N-terminal kinase 48, 49). Thus, early activation of these kinases may be required for fos and jun gene activation, while kinase activity at later time points may be important for activation of the transactivating capacity of the Fos and Jun proteins. In our system, elevated extracellular signal-regulated kinase and c-Jun N-terminal kinase activity can still be detected 2 h after SEE presentation to T cells, particularly in the presence of B7-1 on the APC (data not shown).

Our experiments also revealed the presence of NF-{kappa}B/Rel family members in the protein complex that bound the CD28RE. The presence of these proteins in a functional complex following CD28 costimulation implies the activation of the protein kinases that phosphorylate I{kappa}B, IKK{alpha}, and IKK-{beta}, and induce the proteolytic breakdown of I{kappa}B (21). It is currently not known how CD28 signals to these kinases. However, TCR ligation alone is not sufficient to activate the IKKs (21). Thus, our finding that these factors bind the CD28RE in the CD40L promoter provides a molecular explanation for the requirement for CD28 or LFA-3 costimulation for the induction of CD40L expression.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. David Lewis for providing the CD40L promoter DNA. We are grateful to Arun Fotedar and Michael Croft for valuable discussions.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the Swedish Institute (to E.P.), The Swedish Medical Council (to E.P.), and Grants AI35603, AI41481, and AI40552 (to T.M.) and CA64783, CA76173, and CA84107 (to D.M.) from the National Institutes of Health. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Eduardo Parra, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 10835 Altman Row, San Diego, CA 92121. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CD28RE, CD28 response element; CD40L, CD40 ligand; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; SEE, staphylococcal enterotoxin E. LFA-3, leukocyte function-associated Ag-3. Back

Received for publication August 2, 2000. Accepted for publication December 6, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jr Janeway, C. A., M. Golstein. 1993. Lymphocyte activation and effector functions: the role of cell surface molecules. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 5:313.[Medline]
  2. Jenkins, M. K., J. G. Johnson. 1993. Molecules involved in T-cell costimulation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 5:361.[Medline]
  3. Dustin, M., M. Sander, S. Shaw, T. Springer. 1987. Purified lymphocyte function-associated antigen 3 binds to CD2 and mediates T lymphocyte adhesion. J. Exp. Med. 165:677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Isobe, M., H. Yagita, K. Okumura, A. Ihara. 1992. Specific acceptance of cardiac allograft after treatment with antibodies to ICAM-1 and LFA-1. Science 255:1125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Parra, E., A. Wingren, G. Hedlund, H. O. Sjögren, T. Kalland, D. Sansom, M. Dolhlsten. 1993. Human naive and memory T-helper cells display distinct adhesion properties to ICAM-1, LFA-3 and B7 molecules. Scand. J. Immunol. 38:508.[Medline]
  6. Parra, E., A. Wingren, G. Hedlund, M. Björklund, T. Leandersson, H. O. Sjögren, T. Kalland, D. Sansom, M. Dolhlsten. 1994. Costimulation of human CD4+ T cells with B7 and lymphocyte function-associated antigen-3 results in distinct cell activation profiles. J. Immunol. 153:2479.[Abstract]
  7. Liu, Y., B. Jones, A. Aruffo, K. M. Sullivan, P. S. Linsley, Jr C. A. Janeway. 1992. Heat-stable antigen is a costimulatory molecule for CD4 T cell growth. J. Exp. Med. 175:437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. DeBenedette, M. A., N. R. Chu, K. E. Pollok, J. Hurtado, W. F. Wade, B. S. Kwon, T. H. Watts. 1995. Role of 4-1BB ligand in co-stimulation of T-lymphocyte growth and its upregulation on M12 B lymphomas by cAMP. J. Exp. Med. 181:985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dengler, T. J., B. Sido, P. Muller, M. Reister, R. Zimmermann, G. Otto, S. Meuer. 1998. CD2-directed immunomodulation after rat heart transplantation. Heart Lung Transplant. 16:62.
  10. Yiling, L., A. Granelli-Piperno, J. M. Bjorndahl, C. A. Phillips, J. M. Trevillyan. 1992. CD28-induced T cell activation. J. Immunol. 149:24.[Abstract]
  11. Fraser, J. D., A. Weiss. 1992. Regulation of T cell lymphokine gene transcription by the accessory molecule CD28. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. June, C. H., A. Jeffrey, J. A. Ledbetter, P. S. Linsley, C. B. Thompson. 1990. Role of the CD28 receptor in T cell activation. Immunol. Today 11:211.[Medline]
  13. Harding, F. A., J. G. McArthur, J. A. Gross, D. H. Raluet, J. P. Allison. 1992. CD28-mediated signaling co-stimulates murine T cells and prevents induction of anergy in T cell clones. Nature 356:607.[Medline]
  14. Boise, L. H., A. J. Minn, P. J. Noel, C. H. June, M. A. Accavitti, T. Lindsten, C. B. Thompson. 1995. CD28 costimulation can promote T cell survival by enhancing the expression of Bcl-XL. Immunity 3:87.[Medline]
  15. Hathcock, K. S., G. Laszlo, C. Pucillo, P. Linsley, R. J. Hodes. 1994. Comparative analysis of B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory ligands: expression and function. J. Exp. Med. 180:631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kuchroo, V. K., J. A. Brown, A. M. Ranger, S. S. Zamvil, R. A. Sobel, H. L. Weiner, N. Nabavi, L. H. Glimcher. 1995. B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory molecules activate differentially the Th1/Th2 developmental pathways: application to autoimmune disease therapy. Cell 80:707.[Medline]
  17. Lenschow, D. J., T. L. Walunas, J. Bluestone. 1996. CD28/B7 system of T cell costimulation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:233.[Medline]
  18. Civil, A., M. Geerts, L. A. Aarden, C. L. Verweij. 1992. Evidence for a role of CD28RE as a response element for distinct mitogenic T cell activation signal. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:3041.[Medline]
  19. Mcguire, K., M. Lacobelli. 1997. Involvement of Rel, Fos and Jun proteins in binding activity to the interleukin 2 promoter CD28RE/AP-1 sequence in human T cells. J. Immunol. 159:1319.[Abstract]
  20. Parra, E., M. Varga, G. Hedlund, T. Kalland, M. Dohlsten. 1997. Costimulation by B7-1 and LFA-3 target distinct nuclear factors that bind to the interleukin-2 promoter, B7-1 negatively regulates LFA-3 induced NF-AT DNA binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:1314.[Abstract]
  21. Verma, I. M., J. K. Stevenson, E. M. Schwarz, D. Van Antwerp, S. Myamoto. 1995. Rel/NF-{kappa}B/I{kappa}B family: intimate tales of association and dissociation. Genes Dev. 9:2723.[Free Full Text]
  22. Ghos, P., T. Tan, N. R. Rice, A. Sica, H. A. Young. 1993. The interleukin-2 CD28 responsive complex contain at least three members of the {kappa}B family. c-Rel, p50, and p65. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:1696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Lai, J.-H., G. Horvath, J. Subleski, J. Bruder, P. Ghos, T.-H. Tan. 1995. Rel-A is a potent transcriptional activator of the CD28 response element within the interleukin-2 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4260.[Abstract]
  24. Verweij, C. L., M. Geerts, L. A. Aarden. 1991. Activation of interleukin-2 gene transcription via the T cell surface molecule CD28 is mediated through a NF-{kappa}B like response element. J. Biol. Chem. 266:1479.
  25. Parra, E., K. McGuire, G. Hedlund, M. Dohlsten. 1998. Overexpression of p65 and c-Jun substitutes for B7-1 costimulation by targeting the CD28RE within the IL-2 promoter. J. Immunol. 160:5374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Shapiro, V. S., K. E. Truitt, J. B. Imboden, A. Weiss. 1997. CD28 mediates transcriptional upregulation of the interleukin-2 (IL-2) promoter through a composite element containing the CD28RE and NF-IL-2B AP-1 sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:4051.
  27. Wu, Y., J. Xu, S. Shinde, I. Grewal, T. Henderson, R. A. Flavell, Y. Liu. 1995. Rapid induction of a novel costimulatory activity on B cell by CD40 ligand. Curr. Biol. 5:1303.[Medline]
  28. Grewal, I. S., H. G. Foellmer, K. D. Grewal, J. Xu, F. Hardardottir, J. L. Baron, Jr C. A. Janeway, R. A. Flavell. 1996. Requirement for CD40 ligand in costimulation induction, T cell, activation, and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Science 273:1864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Lederman, S., M. J. Yellin, A. Krichevsky, J. Belko, J. J. Lee, L. Chess. 1992. Identification of a novel surface protein on activated CD4+ T cells that induces contact-dependent B cell differentiation (help). J. Exp. Med. 175:1091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Noelle, R. J., J. A. Ledbetter, A. Aruffo. 1992. CD40 and its ligand, and essential ligand-receptor pair for thymus-dependent B-cell activation. Immunol. Today 13:431.[Medline]
  31. Campbell, K. A., P. J. Ovende, M. K. Kennedy, W. C. Fanslow, S. G. Reed, C. R. Maliszewski. 1996. CD40 ligand is required for protective cell-mediated immunity to Leishmania major. Immunity 4:283.[Medline]
  32. Buhlmann, J. E., T. M. Foy, A. Aruffo, K. M. Crassi, J. A. Ledbetter, W. R. Green, J. C. Xu, L. D. Shultz, D. Roopesian, R. A. Flavell, et al 1995. In the absence of a CD40 signal, B cell are tolerogenic. Immunity 2:645.[Medline]
  33. Hollenbaugh, D., H. D. Ochs, R. J. Noelle, J. A. Ledbetter, A. Aruffo. 1993. The role of CD40 and its ligand in the regulation of the immune response. Immunol. Rev. 138:23.
  34. Farrington, M., L. S. Grosmaire, S. Nonoyama, S. H. Fischer, D. Hollenbaugh, J. A. Ledbetter, R. J. Noelle, A. Aruffo, H. D. Ochs. 1994. CD40 ligand expression is defective in a subset of patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Grewal, I. S., J. Xu, R. A. Flavell. 1995. Impairment of antigen-specific T-cell priming in mice lacking CD40 ligand. Nature 378:617.[Medline]
  36. Banchereau, J., F. Bazan, D. Blanchard, F. Briere, J. P. Galizzi, C. van Kooten, J. Liu, F. Rousset, S. Saeland. 1994. The CD40 antigen and its ligand. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:881.[Medline]
  37. Grewal, I. S., R. A. Flavell. 1996. CD40-CD40L interactions in T-cell activation. Immunol. Rev. 153:342.
  38. van Essen, D., H. Kikutani, D. Gray. 1995. CD40 ligand-transduced costimulation of T cells in the development of helper function. Nature 378:620.[Medline]
  39. Granelli-Piperno, A., P. Nolan. 1991. Nuclear transcription factors that bind to elements of the IL-2 promoter. J. Immunol. 147:2743.
  40. Durand, D. B., J. Shaw, M. R. Bush, R. E. Replogle, R. Belagaje, G. A. Crabtree. 1988. Characterization of antigen receptor response elements within the interleukin-2 enhancer. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Tsytsykova, A. V., E. N. Tsitsikov, R. S. Geha. 1996. The CD40L promoter contain nuclear factor of activated T cells binding motifs which require AP-1 binding for activation of transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 271:3763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Schubert, L. A., G. King, R. Q. Cron, D. B. Lewis, A. Aruffo, D. Hollenbaugh. 1995. The human gp39 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 270:29624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Liu, C., J. Yao, I. de Belle, R.-P. Huang, E. Adamson, D. Mercola. 1999. The transcription factor EGR-1 suppresses transformation of human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells by coordinated induction of transforming growth factor-{beta}1, fibronectin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. J. Biol. Chem. 274:4400.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Roy, M., T. Waldschmidt, A. Aruffo, J. A. Ledbetter, R. J. Noelle. 1993. The regulation of the expression of gp39, the CD40 ligand, on normal and cloned CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 151:2497.[Abstract]
  45. Roy, M., A. Aruffo, J. Ledbetter, P. Linsley, M. Kehry, R. J. Noelle. 1995. Studies on the interdependence of gp39 and B7 expression and function during antigen-specific immune responses. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:596.[Medline]
  46. Bierer, B., E. A. Peterson, J. C. Gorga, S. H. Hermann, S. J. Burakoff. 1989. Synergistic T cell activation via the physiological ligand for CD2 and T cell receptor. J. Exp. Med. 168:1145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Kabelit, D.. 1990. Do CD2 and CD3 TCR T cell activation pathways function independently?. Immunol. Today 11:44.[Medline]
  48. Karin, M.. 1995. The regulation of AP-1 activity by mitogen-activated protein kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 270:16483.[Free Full Text]
  49. Schaeffer, H. J., M. J. Weber. 1999. Mitogen-activated protein kinases: specific messages from ubiquitous messengers. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:2435.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. C. Nolz, M. E. Fernandez-Zapico, and D. D. Billadeau
TCR/CD28-Stimulated Actin Dynamics Are Required for NFAT1-Mediated Transcription of c-rel Leading to CD28 Response Element Activation
J. Immunol., July 15, 2007; 179(2): 1104 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C.-R. Li and L. J. Berg
Cutting Edge: Itk Is Not Essential for CD28 Signaling in Naive T Cells
J. Immunol., April 15, 2005; 174(8): 4475 - 4479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Y. Shibuya, S. Kim, K. Nguyen, J. Do, C. E. McLaren, K.-T. Li, W.-P. Chen, P. Parikh, A. Wadhwa, X. Zi, et al.
Bioactive Suture: A Novel Immunotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 7088 - 7099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
M J Citores, I Rua-Figueroa, C Rodriguez-Gallego, A Durantez, M I Garcia-Laorden, C Rodriguez-Lozano, J C Rodriguez-Perez, J A Vargas, and P Perez-Aciego
The dinucleotide repeat polymorphism in the 3'UTR of the CD154 gene has a functional role on protein expression and is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus
Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2004; 63(3): 310 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Zhang, C. J. Fichtenbaum, D. A. Hildeman, J. D. Lifson, and C. Chougnet
CD40 Ligand Dysregulation in HIV Infection: HIV Glycoprotein 120 Inhibits Signaling Cascades Upstream of CD40 Ligand Transcription
J. Immunol., February 15, 2004; 172(4): 2678 - 2686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
C. Chougnet
Role of CD40 Ligand dysregulation in HIV-associated dysfunction of antigen-presenting cells
J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2003; 74(5): 702 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. A. Crist, T. S. Griffith, and T. L. Ratliff
Structure/Function Analysis of the Murine CD95L Promoter Reveals the Identification of a Novel Transcriptional Repressor and Functional CD28 Response Element
J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 35950 - 35958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
L. G. Thebeau and L. A. Morrison
Mechanism of Reduced T-Cell Effector Functions and Class-Switched Antibody Responses to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 in the Absence of B7 Costimulation
J. Virol., February 15, 2003; 77(4): 2426 - 2435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. A. Kosinski, J. Laughlin, K. Singh, and L. R. Covey
A Complex Containing Polypyrimidine Tract-Binding Protein Is Involved in Regulating the Stability of CD40 Ligand (CD154) mRNA
J. Immunol., January 15, 2003; 170(2): 979 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Sharma, N. Grandvaux, Y. Mamane, P. Genin, N. Azimi, T. Waldmann, and J. Hiscott
Regulation of IFN Regulatory Factor 4 Expression in Human T Cell Leukemia Virus-I-Transformed T Cells
J. Immunol., September 15, 2002; 169(6): 3120 - 3130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. F. McDyer, Z. Li, S. John, X. Yu, C.-y. Wu, and J. A. Ragheb
IL-2 Receptor Blockade Inhibits Late, But Not Early, IFN-{gamma} and CD40 Ligand Expression in Human T Cells: Disruption of Both IL-12-Dependent and -Independent Pathways of IFN-{gamma} Production
J. Immunol., September 1, 2002; 169(5): 2736 - 2746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. A. Schubert, R. Q. Cron, A. M. Cleary, M. Brunner, A. Song, L.-S. Lu, P. Jullien, A. M. Krensky, and D. B. Lewis
A T Cell-specific Enhancer of the Human CD40 Ligand Gene
J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2002; 277(9): 7386 - 7395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parra, E.