|
|
||||||||

TCRs Differ in the Degree of Their Specificity for the Positively Selecting MHC/Peptide Ligand1
Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912 Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|

TCRs, originally selected on class II MHC
(Ab) covalently bound with one peptide E
(5268) (Ep).
The transgenic TCR specific for the cytochrome c-derived
(4358) peptide was selected on Ab bound with different
arrays of endogenous peptides or the analogue of Ep covalently bound to
Ab, but not on the original AbEp complex. In
contrast, transgenic TCRs specific for two different analogues of the
Ep peptide and Ab did not mature as CD4+ T
cells in various thymic environments, including the
AbEpIi- mice. These results show that TCRs can
be promiscuous or specific for the selecting MHC/peptide complex, and
suggest that in mice described in this study transgenic expression of
the TCR changes the original requirements for the positively selecting
MHC/peptide complex. Future studies will determine whether the latter
phenomenon is general or specific for this
system. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|

TCRs) confront multiple MHC/peptide complexes present on
thymic stromal cells. TCRs are inherently biased to recognize MHC and
can discriminate between peptides bound to MHC within a wide range of
avidity (1, 2, 3, 4). Low-avidity interactions between TCRs on
immature T cells and self MHC/peptide ligand(s) result in positive
selection, which rescues selected thymocytes from programmed cell death
(5, 6). High-avidity interactions between TCRs and self
MHC/peptide complex(es) have an opposite outcome, i.e., the thymocyte
is classified as self-reactive and is induced to die during negative
selection (7, 8). The lack of recognition of self
MHC/peptide complexes by immature thymocytes allows programmed cell
death to occur and neglected immature T cells to die (9).
While the specificity of negative selection for a defined MHC/peptide
has been shown in multiple experiments, the contribution of self
peptide(s) presented by MHC during positive selection of T cells is
less known. Using mice deficient in intracellular chaperones involved
in Ag processing, it was demonstrated that efficient positive selection
of a wide repertoire of 
TCRs expressed on T cells requires many
different peptides to be associated with MHC molecules
(10, 11, 12, 13, 14). However, a noticeable number of
CD8+ T cells differentiated in fetal thymic organ
cultures of TAP1 or
2-microglobulin-deficient
mice when the expression of class I MHC was restored by adding a single
peptide (15, 16). Likewise, class II MHC molecules bound
with a dominant class II-associated invariant chain peptide
(CLIP)3 or single E
(52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68) peptide (Ep) could select a number of 
TCRs, suggesting
that positive selection of some 
TCRs may be promiscuous
(17, 18, 19, 20). Moreover, 
TCRs selected by a single
MHC/peptide complex could recognize antigenic peptides that were
different from the selecting peptide, implying that some of these
receptors may engage distinct MHC/peptide ligands
(21, 22, 23). Peptide specificity of positive selection of T cells has been commonly studied using TCR transgenic mice in which all T cells can express the same TCR. Transgenic expression of TCR preserves its original specificity for antigenic peptide and sensitivity to negative selection (7, 24, 25, 26). However, whether transgenic expression conserves the TCRs original requirements for positively selecting MHC/peptide complex is unknown. Indeed, thymic development of TCR transgenic T cells in a genuine thymic milieu can be manifested by highly enhanced or severely impaired positive selection (27, 28, 29, 30, 31). Since the TCR genes for transgenic mice are cloned from wild-type mice that express multiple MHC/peptide complexes, the natural, positively selecting MHC/peptide ligand(s) for a native TCR is not known and, therefore, its role in the selection of transgenic TCR could not be evaluated. In this study, we investigated the flexibility of positive selection of several transgenic TCRs originally selected in vivo in mice expressing one detectable class II MHC/peptide complex.
We cloned three TCRs selected in vivo on thymic epithelium expressing
Ab molecules covalently bound with a single
peptide (Ep), and specific for different peptides presented by
Ab (19). These TCRs were expressed
as transgenes using two different expression systems under the CD2 or
TCR promoters (32, 33). We then followed their in vivo
positive selection on thymic epithelium that expressed
Ab bound with many or few endogenous peptides or
covalently linked single peptides. Transgenic expression of each of
these TCRs arrested the development of transgenic T cells toward the
CD4+ lineage on the original, positively
selecting thymic epithelium expressing the AbEp
complex. However, one of the transgenic TCRs, specific for antigenic
peptide with no sequence homology to Ep peptide, was efficiently
selected on thymic epithelium expressing Ab bound
with different arrays of self peptides or a covalently bound analogue
of Ep. In contrast, transgenic TCRs specific for two different Ep
analogues were not selected as CD4+ T cells in
any of the tested thymic environments. Instead, transgenic T cells
bearing these TCRs differentiated as CD8+ or
CD4-CD8- T cells,
similarly to misselected MHC class II-restricted transgenic TCRs (such
as AND, DO11.10) that commit to the wrong lineage in the absence of the
optimal selecting class II MHC/peptide ligand or coreceptor
(34, 35, 36, 37, 38). These results demonstrate that the repertoire of
TCRs selected by the AbEp complex contains TCRs
with high or low specificity for the positively selecting MHC/peptide
ligand, and indicate that transgenic expression of 
TCR changes
the original requirement for the positively selecting MHC/peptide
ligand.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mice expressing Ab covalently bound with
the single peptide derived from E
(52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68) (Ep) were described
previously (19). We have produced mice expressing
covalently bound analogues of Ep (Ep58K and Ep63K) and pigeon
cytochrome c-derived peptide PCC (43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58) (Pacholczyk,
manuscript in preparation). All single Ab/peptide
mice were crossed to invariant chain knockout mice
(AbIi-) (kindly provided
by E. Bikoff, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and R. Germain,
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and mice deficient for wild-type
Ab (kindly provided by D. Mathis, Harvard Medical
School). The DM knockout mice were kindly provided by L. van Kaer
(Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN). C57BL/6
(Abwt), Abm12, and
TCR
-chain knockout mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory
(Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were housed under specific pathogen-free
conditions in the animal care facility at the Medical College of
Georgia (Augusta, GA). To generate chimeric mice, 8- to 12-wk-old
recipient animals were lethally irradiated (1100 rad) and reconstituted
on the same day with 5 x 106 fetal liver
cells from Ab fetuses (day 15, gestational age).
Alternatively, recipient mice were reconstituted with the bone marrow
of adult mice treated with anti-Thy-1.2 mAb (H.O.13.4.9) and
complement. Chimeras were used for experiments not earlier than 8 wk
after reconstitution. At least three mice or chimeras of each type were
analyzed.
Generation of Ag-specific T cell hybridomas
Hybridomas specific for E
(52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68) analogues and PCC were
generated as described (22, 39). Briefly, single peptide
mice expressing Ab covalently bound with peptide
derived from the E
molecule
(AbEpIi-) were irradiated
and reconstituted with fetal liver cells from C57BL/6 mice. Chimeras
were immunized with synthetic peptides Ep58K(ASFEAQKALANIAVDKA),
Ep63K(ASFEAQGALANKAVDKA), and PCC(AEGFSYTDANKNKGIT) in CFA (2.5
mg/ml). CD4+ T cells from the draining lymph
nodes were converted into T cell hybridomas, as described
(39). The PCC-specific hybridoma responded better to the
PCC(50V54A) analogue, and this peptide was then used as Ag in
proliferation assays. Hybridomas were analyzed using flow cytometry for
the expression of CD4 and TCR. Double-positive hybridomas were tested
for peptide-specific response using a standard IL-2 release assay
(40). In short, a T cell hybridoma (1 x
105) cell was stimulated in the presence or
absence of a specific peptide using 5 x 105
irradiated Abwt splenocytes. After 24 h,
supernatants were tested for the presence of IL-2 by measuring
proliferation of IL-2-dependent cells (HT-2) using an MTT assay (Sigma,
St.Louis, MO) (41).
Cloning TCRs from T cell hybridomas and generation of TCR transgenic mice
Total RNA was isolated using the Ultraspec RNA isolation system
(Biotex, Edmonton, Canada) based on the guanidium thiocyanate method
(42). The RNA was subjected to affinity chromatography on
oligo(dT) resin (Qiagen, San Francisco, CA). Sequences of the TCR genes
were obtained using two independent cloning strategies. We used V
-
and V
-specific primers to amplify and clone parts of the
- and
-chains. Alternatively, we used a linker PCR method to clone V
regions of the
- and
-chains starting with the 5' untranslated
sequences.
In the first approach, the first strand of the cDNA was synthesized
with AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI) and an oligo(dT)
primer. Aliquots of the cDNA reaction were used in the PCR reaction
with a collection of V
- or V
-specific oligonucleotides as 5'
primers and primers specific for
and
(TCR-C
3) C regions as
3' primers. We used modified linker PCR as the second approach to clone
TCR genes (42). Using this method, we were able to obtain
the sequences of V
- and V
-chain transcripts starting with the 5'
untranslated region. The two approaches used yielded the same results:
that is, the
- and
-chain clones isolated by amplification with
V
- and V
-specific primers had the identical
complementarity-determining region 3 sequences as isolated by the
linker PCR method. All hybridomas had nonproductive rearrangement of
one of the
loci. The DNA sequences obtained by the linker PCR
method contained the complete V
and V
sequences, starting 5' from
the start codon. The sequences obtained were used to search the GenBank
database. The PCC(50V54A)-specific TCR is encoded by
V
4.5-J
23/V
8.1-D
2-J
2.6 genes, the Ep58K-specific receptor
uses V
3.4-J
27/V
3-D
1-J
1.2 genes, and the Ep63K-specific
receptor uses V
2-J
26/V
14-D
2-J
2.6 genes. Based on
sequence information, we designed primers to amplify and clone the
-
and
-chains in TCR expression vectors pT and VA-hCD2 (kindly
provided by D. Mathis and D. Kioussis, National Institute of Medical
Research, London, U.K.). The PCC(50V54A)-specific TCR was cloned in
both pT and VA-hCD2 cassettes. The Ep58K- and Ep63K-specific TCRs were
cloned only into pT cassettes. The integrity of constructs was checked
by transfection using a variant of the 5KC hybridoma deficient in TCR
expression. Transfectants were analyzed by a stimulation assay with the
respective antigenic peptides and by staining with mAb specific for the
respective TCR V
(if available) and V
segments (data not shown).
All TCR transgenic mice were made by comicroinjection of the respective
TCR
and TCR
constructs into fertilized eggs of
F1 (C57BL/6 x CBA/Ca) mice. Two
founder mice were generated forPCC(VA), one for PCC(pT), three for
Ep58K(pT), and two for Ep63K(pT) constructs. No significant differences
in the phenotypes among the different mouse lines expressing the same
transgenic TCRs were noticed. In particular, founder lines expressing a
particular TCR transgene did not differ in the level of TCR expression
on thymocyte populations. Selected founder mice were crossed at least
four times with C57BL/6TCR
-/- mice. Mice
used as bone marrow donors were TCR transgenics that expressed
wild-type Ab and were deficient in the expression
of endogenous TCR
-chain.
Flow cytometry analysis
mAbs specific for CD4, CD8, and different V
and V
segments
of TCRs were self-prepared or purchased from PharMingen (San Diego,
CA). Standard staining procedures were used as previously described
(39). Cells were analyzed using a FACSCalibur instrument
(Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) and CellQuest software. Spleens were
strained through nylon mesh. Erythrocytes were lysed by treatment with
ammonium chloride solution. Cells were stained on ice with
anti-CD45R (B220) Ab and with Y3P or YAe. Gating on forward and
side scatter identified viable cells. Expression of total
Ab or Ab bound to Ep
peptide was determined on gated CD45R-positive cells.
Ag response of TCR transgenic cells
Proliferation of lymph node cells isolated from various chimeras
was measured in response to Ag. Lymph node cells from transgenic mice
and radiation chimeras reconstituted with bone marrow from
PCC(VA) or PCC(pT) TCR
- C57BL/6
transgenic mice were used in proliferation assays. Cells were
stimulated with the antigenic peptide PCC(50V54A) (50 µg/ml)
presented by the wild-type Ab APCs. A total of
5 x 105 irradiated APCs was mixed with
0.75 x 105, 1.5 x
105, and 3 x 105
responder cells. Lymph node cells from Ep58K(pT) and Ep63K(pT)
TCR
- transgenic mice and
Ep58K(pT)TCR
-
AbEpIi-
and
Ep63K(pT)TCR
-
AbEpIi-
radiation chimeras were stimulated with soluble antigenic peptides
Ep58K and Ep63K, respectively, (50 µg/ml) that were presented by
spleen cells expressing Ab and lacking class I
MHC expression due to knockout of the
2-microglobulin gene. In 96-well plate, 5
x 105 irradiated APCs were mixed with 1.25
x 105 and 2.5 x 105
responder cells. IgGVH (5974) peptide was used as a negative control,
and proliferation was measured after 3 days by the MTT assay
(41).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have followed the in vivo development of
CD4+ T cells expressing transgenic TCRs that were
originally positively selected on class II MHC
(Ab) bound with the known peptide (Ep). In mice
exclusively expressing the AbEp complex, more
than two-thirds of TCRs on CD4+ T cells were
found not tolerant to self peptides bound to Ab,
which led to their profound negative selection upon exposure to
wild-type Ab/peptide complexes (19, 39). In vivo studies of the development of
CD4+ T cells expressing such TCRs would have to
be limited to the original
AbEpIi- mice, and their
promiscuity or specificity for the selecting MHC/peptide ligand cannot
be determined in mice expressing Ab bound with
peptides different from Ep. Therefore, to isolate genes encoding TCRs
tolerant to self peptides and Ab, we produced
radiation chimeras by reconstituting lethally irradiated
AbEpIi- mice with fetal
liver cells from 15-day-old fetuses of C57BL/6 mice. In these chimeras,
the TCR repertoire of CD4+ T cells was positively
selected by radioresistant thymic epithelium expressing the
AbEp complex and was purged of TCRs reactive with
the natural set of self peptides by the donors APCs derived from
fetal liver. Expression of donor wild-type Ab
molecules in the periphery allowed us to prime
CD4+ T cells positively selected on
AbEp on thymic epithelium with antigenic
peptides, and to establish CD4+ T cell hybridomas
specific for antigenic peptides presented by Ab
(39). To have a better representation of the repertoire
originally positively selected by AbEp complex,
we cloned TCR genes from three different CD4+ T
cell hybridomas and used them to make TCR transgenic mice. All three
hybridomas had the second TCR
locus nonfunctionally rearranged, so
the TCR expressed on the surface had to mediate positive selection of
the parental CD4+ T cell (Ignatowicz, Kraj,
unpublished). All three hybridomas were also tolerant to covalent
AbEp complex and Ab bound
with self peptides.
The first hybridoma, 2.1.4, recognized the PCC (43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58) peptide or its
analogue PCC(50V54A), which had enhanced binding and stimulatory
properties over the original PCC peptide (43). The TCR
cloned from this CD4+ T cell hybridoma was
expressed in vivo using either the CD2 promoter (VA cassette) or
genuine TCR promoters (pT
/pT
cassettes) (32, 33). We
refer to these two transgenic TCRs as PCC(VA) and PCC(pT).
Two other CD4+ T cell hybridomas that we selected
as TCR gene donors expressed TCRs specific for two analogues of the Ep
peptide that each had a single TCR contact residue changed (22, 44). Hybridoma 221.15 was specific for the Ep analogue with
isoleucine replaced by lysine in position 63 (Ep63K). Another
hybridoma, 123.1, was specific for the Ep analogue with glycine
replaced by lysine in position 58 (Ep58K) (39). Both of
these TCRs were expressed as transgenes using pT
/pT
expression
cassettes. We refer to these two transgenic TCRs as Ep63K(pT) and
Ep58K(pT). The DNA sequences of TCRs isolated from the transgenic mice
were confirmed by DNA sequencing to exclude a possibility of mutation.
The progeny of founder mice for each transgenic TCR were backcrossed to
TCR
-chain-deficient (
-)
H-2b mice. Four selected mouse lines with
exclusive expression of the respective transgenic TCRs were produced
and used in all further studies.
Transgenic PCC(VA) and PCC(pT) TCRs are efficiently selected on Ab bound with different repertoires of self-derived peptides, some Ab/covalent peptide complexes, but are not positively selected by the original AbEp complex
We first analyzed two transgenic TCRs that recognized the
PCC(50V54A) analogue. As shown in Fig. 1
, the expression levels of the transgenic PCC(VA) or PCC(pT) TCRs on
CD4+CD8+ and
CD4+ subpopulations of thymocytes were slightly
different from the expression level of endogenous TCRs in wild-type
mice. The expression of the PCC(VA) TCR was higher then the expression
of native TCRs on CD4+CD8+
thymocytes, while the same TCR cloned in the (pT) cassettes was
expressed at lower levels. Moreover, thymocytes and peripheral
CD4+ T cells partially down-regulated expression
of the PCC(pT) TCR. This phenomenon was not associated with negative
selection as tested by TUNEL assay, staining with annexin V, or thymus
cellularity (data not shown). Noticeably, the PCC(VA) or PCC(pT) TCRs
were efficiently positively selected by wild-type
Ab/peptide complexes in the absence of
AbEp complex, and isolated transgenic
CD4+ T cells vigorously responded to antigenic
peptide (shown later in Fig. 4
, A and B).
Positive selection of the PCC(VA)- or PCC(pT)-expressing thymocytes
specifically depended on the presence of Ab
molecules. Lethally irradiated recipient mice expressing
AdEd (BALB/c) or
AkEk (CBA/Ca) molecules or
lacking Ab expression and which were
reconstituted with the bone marrow from these TCR transgenic mice did
not generate mature thymocytes (data not shown). Following these
initial observations, we investigated the peptide specificity of
positive selection of these two transgenic TCRs by reconstituting
lethally irradiated mice expressing Ab molecules
bound with different arrays of endogenous or covalently bound peptides
with T cell-depleted, transgenic bone marrow.
|
|
|
To test whether Ab molecules occupied with a more
limited set of self peptides would support positive selection of the
PCC(VA)- or PCC(pT)-expressing CD4+ T cells, we
made radiation chimeras using invariant chain-deficient mice
(AbIi-) as recipients. In
these mice, peptides bound to low levels of Ab
are distinct from peptides bound to Ab in
wild-type mice (49, 50, 51). Nevertheless, the
PCC(VA) TCR and PCC(pT) TCRs were positively selected by
Ab/self peptide complexes expressed on thymic
epithelium of AbIi- mice
(Fig. 2
, D and E). In contrast, the development
of transgenic T cells was arrested at the
CD4+CD8+ stage when bone
marrow from PCC(VA) or PCC(pT) mice was used to reconstitute H2-DM
knockout mice (AbDM-), in
which the majority of Ab molecules is occupied
with CLIP peptide (17, 18, 52) (Fig. 2
F and
data not shown). In conclusion, we found that, regardless of the
expression system used, the 
TCR expressed as a transgene is not
positively selected by its original, positively selecting class II
MHC/peptide ligand, but instead is selected on high or low levels of
Ab bound with different endogenous peptides.
Since both TCRs tested above were not selected in the original
AbEpIi- mice, we made new
transgenic mice that express Ab covalently bound
with two different variants of Ep. Each of these variants has a single
amino acid mutation in the residues identified as 
TCR contact
residues. Glycine at position 58 and isoleucine at position 63 were
substituted with lysine to produce Ep58K and Ep63K, respectively. We
also made transgenic mice that express PCC (43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58) peptide covalently
bound to Ab. This peptide has previously been
found to have the lowest affinity to Ab molecules
of all peptides tested in this study (22). We used mice
expressing the PCC/Ab complex to determine
whether low-abundant peptides that might have replaced the covalently
linked peptide positively selected transgenic
CD4+ T cells. None of the covalently bound Ep
variants or PCC peptides were recognized by the original 2.1.4 T cell
hybridoma. Transgenic mice expressing Ep variants or PCC covalently
bound to Ab were separately bred to obtain mice
without endogenous Ab and invariant chain
(11, 53). These mice, which we refer to as
AbEp58KIi-,
AbEp63KIi-, and
AbPCCIi- (Pacholczyk,
manuscript in preparation), were then lethally irradiated and
separately reconstituted with bone marrow from the PCC(VA) or PCC(pT)
TCR transgenics. Development of the PCC(VA)- or
PCC(pT)-bearing thymocytes was arrested at the double-positive stage in
AbPCCIi- and
AbEp63KIi- radiation
chimeras reconstituted with bone marrow from the relevant TCR
transgenic mouse (Fig. 3
, A
and B, and data not shown). In contrast, both PCC(VA) and
PCC(pT) TCRs were positively selected on thymic epithelium expressing
the AbEp58K complex (Fig. 3
, C and
D). The CD4+ T cells selected in
AbEp58KIi- recipients
repopulated the peripheral lymphoid organs and responded in vitro to
antigenic peptide (Fig. 4
, A
and B).
|
Two transgenic TCRs specific for the Ep63K and Ep58K analogues
were expressed in pT
/pT
cassettes since this system provides
genuine TCR regulatory sequences and because only quantitatively
different outcomes of positive selection were recorded for previously
analyzed PCC(VA) vs PCC(pT) transgenic T cells. As shown in Fig. 5
, mice expressing wild-type
Ab/peptide complexes and lacking endogenous
TCR
-chain had higher expression levels of the Ep63K(pT) or Ep58K(pT)
TCRs on some double-positive thymocytes, compared with the expression
of native TCRs. A similar expression pattern of these two transgenic
TCRs was a common feature found in five different founder lines (2 for
Ep63K(pT) and 3 for Ep58K(pT)). Thymocytes bearing the Ep63K(pT) or
Ep58K(pT) TCRs that developed in mice expressing wild-type
Ab bound with self peptides differentiated toward
CD8+ or
CD4-CD8- subpopulations
(Fig. 5
). The Ep58K(pT) and Ep64K(pT) transgenic T cells proliferated
in vitro in response to Ab and Ag, but showed no
cytotoxic activity (Fig. 4
C, and data not shown).
|
|
Ep transgene, AbEp
expression on thymic epithelium was reduced by approximately 30%
(assessed by comparing mean fluorescence intensities) in comparison
with homozygous mice (data not shown). The expression of
AbEp complex is diluted by expression of other
Ab/self peptide complexes in mice that have
endogenous Ab
-chain, lack an invariant chain,
and are transgenic for one copy of the Ab
Ep
chain
(AbwtAbEp+/-Ii-
mice) (Fig. 7
Ep
transgenic mice with H2-M-deficient mice to get
AbCLIPAbEpDM-
mice. In these mice, Abwt and transgenic
Ab molecules are dominantly bound by CLIP
peptide. The covalent Ep is cleaved in the presence of Ii, which
results in further reduction of AbEp expression
(Fig. 7
-chain,
but in the presence of Ii, the expression of AbEp
complex was the lowest of all mice tested (Fig. 7
|
Differentiation of the transgenic Ep63K(pT) and Ep58K(pT) TCRs also progressed toward CD4- cells in other tested chimeras, e.g., AbIi-, AbDM-, Abm12, similarly to other misselected, class II MHC-restricted transgenic TCRs (data not shown) (34). Importantly, the down-regulation of CD4 on transgenic T cells bearing the Ep63K(pT) TCR was not a result of the lack of tolerance to wild-type Ab/peptides expressed on bone marrow-derived thymic APCs. Bone marrow from mice expressing this TCR and devoid of Ab(Ep63K(pT)Ab-) was used to reconstitute lethally irradiated hosts expressing Ab bound with self peptides or covalent Ep, and transgenic thymocytes still differentiated only as CD4- T cells (data not shown).
Transgenic T cells are not positively selected on the thymic epithelium expressing AbEp complex in mixed bone marrow chimeras
Positive selection of T cells expressing transgenic TCRs depends
on the availability of the selecting MHC/peptide ligand. To determine
whether the block in positive selection of our transgenic TCRs results
from competition for a very small amount of the selecting
Ab/peptide ligand, we have made mixed bone marrow
chimeras. For that purpose, we reconstituted lethally irradiated
AbEpIi- mice with 7
x 106 bone marrow cells derived as follows: 80%
from TCR
knockout, 10% from PCC(VA) (or Ep63K(pT)), and 10% from
B6.PL donors. In this experiment, the majority of
CD4+CD8+ thymocytes did not
express a functional TCR, and only 520% expressed either the
transgenic TCR (and Thy-1.2) or endogenous TCRs (and Thy-1.1). As shown
in Fig. 8
, the reduced frequency of
thymocytes bearing rearranged transgenic TCRs did not restore their
positive selection. Based on this result, we concluded that the lack of
selection of bulk transgenic TCRs does not result from competition for
the limiting amount of the low-abundant MHC/peptide ligand.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several possible rationales can be offered to resolve the lack of
selection of the transgenic TCRs on the AbEp
complex. One may argue that the TCRs investigated in this study were
selected on contaminating peptides that replaced some of the covalently
attached Ep, or wild-type self peptides derived from donor bone marrow
(45, 57). However, selection of the transgenic TCRs was
followed in
Abwt
AbEpIi-
chimeras, that is, in the same environment that still contains the
contaminating or bone marrow-derived peptides. The experiments
conducted to date did not detect the presence of endogenous peptides in
the original AbEpIi- mice
(58, 59). The development of the majority of
CD4+ thymocytes was blocked in
AbEpIi- fetal thymic organ
culture with YAe Ab specific for the AbEp complex
(Pacholczyk, manuscript in preparation). Lowering the precursor
frequency in experiments with mixed bone marrow chimeras could not
restore positive selection of transgenic T cells. Together these
results suggest that the lack of selection of the transgenic cells is
not due to the limited availability of MHC/peptide ligand or growth
factors (55, 56). Conceivably, TCRs positively selected on
one highly abundant MHC/peptide ligand may represent abnormal
CD4+ T cells. It has been shown previously that T
cells isolated from single peptide mice have a normal surface phenotype
and respond to antigenic peptides in an MHC-restricted manner
(39). Also, the T cells expressing transgenic TCRs
specifically respond to their cognate antigenic peptides presented by
Ab. We have also defined the selecting MHC
backgrounds for the PCC-specific TCR and show that transgenic
CD4+ cells remained functional. In conclusion, we
did not find evidence that T cells selected on one MHC/peptide ligand
differ from T cells present in normal mice. Therefore, we favor the
explanation that transgenic expression of an 
TCR frequently
requires the use of an alternative peptide bound to the selecting MHC
haplotype. This is often accomplished in mice expressing MHC bound with
a wild-type repertoire of peptides, but not in mice expressing a single
class II MHC/peptide complex.
In several in vitro studies, chemically synthesized or naturally derived peptides bound to MHC positively selected a defined transgenic TCR in fetal thymic organ cultures (5, 6, 60, 61). However, when some of these peptides were genetically manipulated to bind to the selecting MHC molecules in vivo, the same transgenic TCRs were not positively selected (62, 63). Failure of the in vivo induced, positive selection of the transgenic TCR by the in vitro defined, positively selecting peptide indicates that manipulation of any of the TCR/MHC/peptide components may alter the final outcome of the selection processes. These results support the hypothesis that positive selection depends on the subtle avidity of the involved TCR/MHC/peptide complexes (64). Possibly, natively expressed TCRs adjust to the quantity of the selecting MHC/peptide ligand differently than the transgenic TCRs, which may explain the difficulty of achieving positive selection of the transgenic TCR on the original selecting MHC/peptide ligand.
Multiple lines of evidence indicate that recognition of MHC by developing thymocytes influences the T cell lineage commitment (28, 65, 66, 67). However, the ability of the TCR to engage class I or II MHC is not the only factor that determines coreceptor expression on mature T cells. Transgenic T cells expressing AND or DO11.10 TCRs differentiated as CD8+ or CD4-CD8- T cells in the absence of the optimal selecting MHC/peptide ligand (34, 68). Ligation of CD3 on C5 TCR transgenic thymocytes in fetal thymic organ cultures by anti-CD3 F(ab')2 reagents or an antagonistic peptide led to the differentiation of mature CD8+ thymocytes, irrespective of the MHC class II restriction specificity of this TCR. The tyrosine phosphorylation patterns in these thymocytes resembled patterns found in mature CD8+ T cells stimulated with antagonistic peptides (37). Hence, it has been proposed that the relative balance of signals delivered by TCR engagement and by p56lck activation is responsible for lineage commitment (69). The phenotype of Ep58K(pT) and Ep63K(pT) transgenic cells indicates that these cells did not receive an optimal selecting signal and were selected with the mismatched CD8 coreceptor. Recently, it was shown that such class II MHC-restricted TCR transgenic cells with the aberrant expression of a coreceptor methylate the CD8 gene, down-regulate its surface expression, and gradually convert to CD4-CD8- T cells that poorly survive in the periphery (38).
If transgenic expression unintentionally tests TCR flexibility for positive selection, our results show that the repertoire of TCRs selected on the single class II MHC/peptide complex consists of TCRs promiscuous or specific for the Ab and selecting peptide. The PCC-specific TCR was selected in different thymic environments, which correlated with its ability to bind unrelated MHC/peptide ligands (such as PCC v Ep). Positive selection of this transgenic TCR in mice different in the complexity of peptides bound to Ab, such as C57BL/6, Abm12, AbIi-, and AbEp58KIi-, suggests that this receptor is selected by different peptides bound to Ab rather than a single peptide ubiquitously present in all these mice. On the other hand, the only peptides we identified that were recognized by Ep58K(pT) and Ep63K(pT) TCRs were Ep or its close analogues. We hypothesize that these TCRs may have narrow requirements for positive selection. Various levels of AbEp ligand did not select both of these TCRs. In addition, these TCRs were not able to adopt an alternative, positively selecting ligand when tested in the same set of mice as the PCC-specific receptors. Therefore, we postulate that the TCR repertoire consists of TCRs specific and promiscuous in their choice of the positively selecting MHC/peptide ligand. The crystallographic data showing that the peptide contribution to the interaction between TCR and MHC/peptide complex varies support this conclusion (70, 71, 72).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Leszek Ignatowicz, Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-2600. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CLIP, class II-associated invariant chain peptide; PCC, pigeon cytochrome c-derived peptide. ![]()
Received for publication June 27, 2000. Accepted for publication November 21, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and
-chains is highly dependent on the level of selecting ligand. J. Immunol. 161:585.
peptide-I-Ab complex by isolated thymic stromal cells. Int. Immunol. 6:1949.
T-cell receptor determine the CD4/CD8 phenotype of T cells. Nature 335:229.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. MARCHALONIS, S. KAVERI, S. LACROIX-DESMAZES, and M. D. KAZATCHKINE Natural recognition repertoire and the evolutionary emergence of the combinatorial immune system FASEB J, June 1, 2002; 16(8): 842 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kraj, R. Pacholczyk, H. Ignatowicz, P. Kisielow, P. Jensen, and L. Ignatowicz Positive Selection of CD4+ T Cells Is Induced In Vivo by Agonist and Inhibited by Antagonist Peptides J. Exp. Med., August 13, 2001; 194(4): 407 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |