The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shi, Y.
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 166: 1983-1990.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Differential Regulation of the Expression of CD95 Ligand, Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand (RANKL), TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand (TRAIL), and TNF-{alpha} During T Cell Activation1 ,2

Ruoxiang Wang*, Liying Zhang*, Xiaoren Zhang*, Jose Moreno{dagger}, Xunyi Luo*, Mehrdad Tondravi{dagger} and Yufang Shi3,*

Departments of * Immunology and {dagger} Tissue Biology, Jerome H. Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross, Rockville, MD 20855


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Members of TNF superfamily are characterized by their ability to inflict apoptosis upon binding to their cognate receptors in a homotrimeric manner. These proteins are expressed on different cell types under various conditions. However, the mechanisms governing the expression of these molecules remain elusive. We have found that the TCR signal can elicit the expression of receptor activator of NF-{kappa}B ligand (RANKL), TNF-{alpha}, CD95L, and TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) in T cell hybridoma A1.1 cells, thus allowing us to examine the expression pattern of these molecules under precisely the same conditions. We have previously reported that CD95L expression requires both protein kinase C (PKC) translocation and Ca2+ mobilization and is inhibited by cyclosporin A, and dexamethasone. We demonstrate now that activation-induced expression of RANKL is mediated by Ca2+ mobilization. PKC activation does not induce RANKL expression nor does it synergize with the Ca2+ signal. Activation-induced RANKL expression is blocked by cyclosporin A, but not by dexamethasone. The expression of TNF, in contrast, is mediated by PKC, but not by Ca2+. TNF-{alpha} expression is not inhibited by cyclosporin A, but is sensitive to dexamethasone. A1.1 cells constitutively express TRAIL at low levels. Stimulation with anti-CD3 leads to an initial reduction and subsequent increase in TRAIL expression. TRAIL induction is not inhibited by cyclosporin A, but highly sensitive to dexamethasone. Therefore, expression of the TNF superfamily genes is regulated by distinct signals. Detailed understanding of the regulatory mechanisms could provide crucial information concerning the role of these molecules in the modulation of the immune system.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The TNFR superfamily, a group of type I transmembrane glycoproteins, represents a growing family of receptors fundamental for cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis during development and pathophysiological processes. Several family members have been identified in mammalian cells. Each member of the TNFR family binds to its distinct cognate ligand(s) (1, 2). The identification of this family of proteins is based on the shared homologies in their cysteine-rich extracellular ligand-binding domains and intracellular effector (death) domains (3). These receptors transmit their signals mainly via the interactions of their intracellular domains with intracellular proteins bearing death domain-containing proteins (4). The discovery of these domains has shed light on the overall architecture of the pathway leading from receptor ligation to the activation of signaling cascade and eventually to biological functions such as apoptosis, differentiation, proliferation, and cell survival.

Concomitantly, the ligands for these receptors, now referred to as the members of the TNF superfamily, have been identified as a series of type II transmembrane glycoproteins that bind to and signal through their cognate receptors (5). Although the biological role of some of these ligand-receptor pairs remains obscure, a number of studies have revealed insights into the mechanisms by which the expression of the TNF superfamily genes is regulated. TNF-{alpha} is produced by a variety of cell types in response to diverse stimuli. The regulation of TNF-{alpha} is best appreciated in response to signals from the TCR ligation. It has been reported that the production of TNF-{alpha} in T cell clones depends on Ca2+ mobilization induced by TCR stimulation (6). This Ca2+-dependent induction of TNF-{alpha} is blocked by cyclosporin A (6). In B cells, activation through Ag receptor or via the CD40 pathway also induces NF-AT-dependent expression of TNF-{alpha} that is blocked by cyclosporin A/FK506, although the promoter binding site of NF-AT may be different from that in T cells (7, 8, 9). Moreover, transfection of a cDNA encoding a constitutively active form of calcineurin is sufficient to activate the TNF-{alpha} promoter (10). Therefore, the induction of TNF-{alpha} expression by the TCR activation signals in lymphocytes is dependent on Ca2+ mobilization and the activation of NF-AT. On the other hand, it has been shown that the TNF-{alpha} promoter can be activated by phorbol esters (PMA) or LPS in human mononuclear cells, a process dependent on NF-{kappa}B (11, 12, 13). Interestingly, the existence of {kappa} elements in the promoter of TNF-{alpha} gene is not responsible for PMA- and LPS-induced TNF-{alpha} production (14). TNF-{alpha} promoter analysis revealed that the PMA-responsive element is activated by AP-1 (15, 16).

Our previous studies have demonstrated that activation-induced expression of CD95 ligand (CD95L)4 requires both protein kinase C (PKC) translocation and Ca2+ mobilization (17). The expression of CD95L can be blocked by either PKC inhibitors or blockers of Ca2+ mobilization (17). The same finding has also been reported by others (18). A recent study has demonstrated that the expression of CD95L is mediated by PKC{theta} (19). In addition, it has also been shown that CD95L expression is sensitive to cyclosporin A, retinoic acid, and dexamethasone (17, 20, 21, 22). Promoter analysis has revealed that the activation of CD95L transcription requires NF-{kappa}B (23, 24), NF-AT (25, 26), Nurr-77 (27), ALG-4 (28), Egr-3 (29), and AP-1 (30). Several of these transcription factors have been shown to directly regulate CD95L transcription in response to TCR activation. In addition, we have reported that activation-induced CD95L expression requires the participation of the protooncogene c-myc (31).

Receptor activator of NF-{kappa}B ligand (RANKL)/TNF-related activation-induced cytokine (TRANCE) has been shown to be expressed in T cells and other cell types (32, 33, 34). Its major function has been attributed to the regulation of skeletal homeostasis acting in concert with its decoy receptor osteoprotegerin (OPG) (35, 36). Therefore, this molecule has also been referred to as OPG ligand (OPGL)/ODF (osteoclast differentiation factor). Because this molecule is expressed on activated T cells and dendritic cells (35, 37), its principal function in the immune system has been suggested to be involved in T cell-dendritic cell interaction during an immune response (32, 38, 39). Interestingly, the expression of RANKL in B cells is also found to be induced by CD40L (35). Surprisingly, RANKL is also crucial for early lymphocyte development and lymph node organogenesis (40).

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (Apo2 ligand) is another member of TNF cytokine family. It shares homology with CD95L and also activates rapid apoptosis in many types of cancer cells (41). TRAIL is expressed in a wide variety of tissues. It can bind to several receptors including those containing a cytoplasmic death domain and those lacking a functional cytoplasmic death domain (decoy receptors) (1, 42). Most tissues are resistant to TRAIL cytotoxic action due to the presence of decoy receptors (1). In T cells, TRAIL expression induced by activation is blocked by cyclosporin A, rapamycin, and inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase, PKC, and protein tyrosine kinases (43). In addition, activation-induced TRAIL expression is enhanced by type I IFNs (44, 45).

Therefore, it is clear that the expression of these genes is differentially regulated. However, the information regarding the regulatory mechanisms of these genes is derived from various cell types in response to different stimuli. In the present study, we employed monoclonal T cell hybridoma A1.1 cells and examined the expression of TNF-{alpha}, TRAIL, RANKL, and CD95L. We have found that the expression of these proteins follows different kinetics in response to TCR stimulation. Interestingly, these genes exhibited different responses to inhibitors known to modulate TCR signals. Taken together, these studies begin to clarify the diverse biochemical events modulating the expression of genes of TNF superfamily. More detailed analysis of the expression patterns of these ligands and receptors on lymphocyte subpopulations will be necessary to define their different roles in immune activation and suppression.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cells

Murine T cell hybridoma A1.1 cells were originally obtained from Dr. Bhagirath Singh (University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada) (46). They were recloned and selected for the expression of TCR and the responsiveness to activation signals. A1.1 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies/BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 mM 2-ME, 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and 10 mM gentamicin. Cell cultures were incubated at 37°C in humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2/95% air.

Reagents

Ab to CD3 was produced by a hamster B cell hybridoma, 145-2C11{epsilon} (from Dr. Jeffery Bluestone, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL). PMA, N-(2-guanidinoethyl)-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide (HA 1004), 1-(5-isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-methylpiperazine (H7), GÖ6976, bisindolylmaleimide I, Calphostin C, and ionomycin were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). An inhibitor for intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, 8-(diethylamino)-octyl-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoate hydrochloride (TMB-8), dexamethasone, and retinoic acid were obtained from Sigma. Cyclosporine was a gift from Novartis Pharmaceuticals (East Hanover, NJ). FR901228 was obtained from Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company (Osaka, Japan). rDR5 was kindly provided by Dr. Youhai Chen (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). Anti-murine CD95L, MFL3, was purchased from PharMingen (La Jolla, CA), and rOPG was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Other chemicals used were the purest grade available from Sigma.

TCR activation

A1.1 cells were activated with anti-CD3 coated on tissue culture plastic. Plastic coating was conducted by overnight incubation with 0.05 M Tris-HCl (pH 9) containing 2.5 µg anti-CD3. Unbound Ab was washed away with PBS. Alternatively, the cells were also activated with the combination of PMA plus ionomycin. Activation was conducted for different periods, and samples were harvested for analysis.

TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in breast cancer cells

A1.1 cells (2 x 106/ml) were stimulated with plastic-bound anti-CD3 for 6 h. Supernatant was collected at 6 h postculture. Breast cancer cells (MDA-231, 80% confluence in 24-well plate) were treated with cycloheximide (8 µg/ml) for 2 h and then incubated with supernatant of activated A1.1 cells at 1/1 dilution with or without blocking reagents (DR5 at 16 µg/ml, or OPG at 500 ng/ml). Cells were collected at 16 h after treatment and assessed for apoptosis by DNA content analysis.

DNA content analysis

Flow cytometric analysis was employed to assay cellular DNA content, in which apoptotic cells were shown as a hypodiploid peak. After treatments, splenocytes were fixed with 70% ethanol for 30 min at 4°C, followed by two washes with PBS. The fixed splenocytes were then incubated in PBS containing propidium iodide (Sigma) at 50 µg/ml and RNase (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) at 0.1 mg/ml at room temperature for 30 min. DNA content was determined by flow cytometry on FACScan (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). The FL2 intensity was plotted as histograms on a linear scale.

Northern blotting

Total RNA was isolated with affinity columns (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), according to the protocol recommended by the manufacturer. RNA samples were fractionated on 1% agarose/2.2 M formaldehyde denaturing gel, and transferred onto Nytran membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH). The DNA probes were labeled with [32P]dCTP by random priming (Boehringer Mannheim) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Prehybridization and hybridization were conducted at 42°C in a solution containing 5x SSC (10x SSC is 1.5 M NaCl, 0.15 M sodium citrate), 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 5x Denhardt’s solution, 2 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 50 mM sodium phosphate, and 50% formamide. After washing with 0.2x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 56°C for 1 h, hybridization signals were detected by autoradiography.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Distinct expression kinetics of TNF family genes following TCR activation

The expression of the genes in the TNF family has been studied in various cellular systems in response to different stimuli. However, due to the inconsistency of the experimental systems, it is difficult to conclude the expression kinetics of these genes. The T cell hybridoma system has been employed as a model system to investigate activation-induced cell death (AICD) in T cells (47, 48, 49). It has been shown that AICD in this model system depends on activation-induced expression of CD95 and CD95L (20, 50). In the present study, we show that activation through the TCR also induces the expression of TNF-{alpha}, RANKL, and TRAIL. Therefore, this T cell hybridoma system provides us with a unique opportunity to investigate the expression kinetics of various TNF family members after activation through the TCR. We stimulated A1.1 cells with plastic-bound anti-CD3. Total RNA was isolated from these cells at half-hour intervals for a maximum of 9.5 h and transferred onto blotting membrane. The same membrane was examined for the expression of CD95L, TRAIL, RANKL, TNF-{alpha}, IL-2, and GAPDH by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 1Go). The induction of IL-2 indicates that the plastic-bound anti-CD3 activated this T cell hybridoma, and GAPDH reveals equal loading of the total RNA samples. CD95L starts to appear at 3.5–4 h after stimulation. The expression of TNF-{alpha} could be observed as early as 1.5 h postactivation. In contrast, the expression of RANKL was observed at 2.5 h after activation. Interestingly, A1.1 cells constitutively express TRAIL at low levels. Upon activation, there is an initial reduction and then an increase in the level of TRAIL. Therefore, our studies revealed differential expression of various TNF family genes in the same cell in response to the same stimulus, indicating that these genes are regulated by different mechanisms.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. The expression kinetics of TNF family members upon anti-CD3 stimulation. T cell hybridoma A1.1 cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 for different times. Total RNA was isolated from samples collected at 30-min intervals. The same RNA blot membrane was analyzed by Northern blotting for the expression of CD95L, TRAIL, RANKL, and TNF-{alpha}. GAPDH and IL-2 were included as controls.

 
The expression of CD95 and CD95L is solely responsible for activation-induced apoptosis

Previous studies have demonstrated that activation-induced apoptosis in T cell hybridomas is mediated by the interaction between CD95 and CD95L, as it could be blocked by soluble rCD95 protein (51). Because other members of the TNF family are also induced in A1.1 cells upon activation, we determined whether the proteins other than CD95L also participate in the induction of apoptosis. We employed OPG fusion protein (a decoy receptor of RANKL and TRAIL), DR5 fusion protein (an inhibitor of TRAIL) (52), anti-TNF, CD95 fusion protein, and anti-CD95L. We found that both CD95 fusion protein and anti-CD95L completely blocked activation-induced apoptosis. Blocking of TNF, RANKL, and TRAIL does not have any effect on anti-CD3-induced apoptosis (Fig. 2Go). The concentrations of OPG, anti-TNF, and DR5 used in our studies all blocked the biological activity of their respective ligands (data not shown). Therefore, even though several members of the TNF family proteins are expressed in A1.1 cells upon TCR activation, only CD95L participates in the induction of apoptosis. Nevertheless, this cellular system provides us with a model to examine the regulatory mechanisms controlling TCR signal-mediated expression of TNF family members.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Activation-induced apoptosis in T cell hybridoma A1.1 cells is solely mediated by CD95-CD95L interaction. A1.1 cells were activated on anti-CD3-coated plastic in the presence or absence of anti-FasL (40 ng/ml), Fas-Fc (10 ng/ml), DR5 (10 µg/ml), OPG (200 ng/ml), or anti-TNF (50 µg/ml). Cells were harvested at 12 h after activation, and cellular DNA content was analyzed by flow cytometry upon propidium iodide staining.

 
Differential requirement for PKC activation and Ca2+mobilization in TCR-activated expression of the genes of the TNF family

Signals generated by ligating the TCRs initiate a cascade of phosphorylation and enzyme activation, including the activation of multiple tyrosine kinases, phospholipases, PKC, and influx of Ca2+ (53, 54, 55). Ca2+ influx and the activation of PKC have been shown to be the key events of activation-induced cytokine production and proliferation in T cells, because the combination of PMA and Ca2+ ionophores could completely mimic the signals from the TCR (55, 56). Furthermore, inhibition of the Ca2+-dependent calcineurin phosphatase by cyclosporin A results in immune suppression (57), and the inhibition of apoptosis (48, 58). We tested the requirement for PKC translocation and Ca2+ mobilization in the regulation of the expression of the TNF family genes. We activated A1.1 cells with either PMA or ionomycin or their combination for 4 h and examined the expression of different genes by Northern blot analysis. Similar to our previous report (17), the expression of CD95L is induced only minimally by ionomycin. PMA treatment does not have any effect on CD95 expression. CD95 expression was, however, dramatically enhanced when treated with both PMA and ionomycin (Fig. 3Go). Interestingly, TRAIL is constitutively expressed at low levels. This expression is inhibited by atni-CD3 treatment for 4 h. The inhibitory effect by anti-CD3 is most likely through the activation of PKC, because ionomycin treatment did not alter TRAIL expression, while PMA did. With regard to the expression of RANKL, we found that the RANKL expression is mediated by Ca2+ mobilization alone. PKC activation is not required, nor does it affect Ca2+ mobilization-induced RANKL expression. The expression of TNF in this experimental system is induced by PKC activation. Ionomycin-induced Ca2+ mobilization has no effect on TNF production (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. The requirement of PKC activation and Ca2+ mobilization for the expression of different members of the TNF family. A1.1 cells were activated with anti-CD3, ionomycin (100 nM), PMA (30 nM), or both PMA and ionomycin for 4 h. Total RNA was isolated and analyzed for the expression of CD95L, TRAIL, RANKL, and TNF by Northern blotting analysis.

 
Mercep et al. (58) and we (48) have reported that blocking the calcineurin pathway with cyclosporin A completely inhibits AICD in T cell hybridomas and immature T cells. It has recently been reported that cyclosporine could inhibit activation-induced CD95L expression (21, 29). When the expression of other TNF family genes was examined, we found that cyclosporine also inhibited RANKL. It, however, did not have effect on anti-CD3-induced expression of TNF-{alpha}. Cyclosporin A also has no effect on constitutive expression of TRAIL (Fig. 3Go).

Because cyclosporin A does not have any effect on cytosolic Ca2+ levels and thus does not interfere with the interaction of Ca2+ with other proteins, we tested the effect of a general inhibitor of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, 8-(diethylamino)-octyl-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoate hydrochloride (TMB-8) (59). We have reported that TMB-8 completely blocked AICD and CD95L, but not CD95, expression (17). Similar to our finding of the role of ionomycin in the regulation of CD95L, we show that TCR activation-induced RANKL expression is also blocked by TMB-8. However, this inhibitor has no effect on TNF-{alpha} expression (Fig. 3Go). Thus, the effect of Ca2+ mobilization on the induction of RANKL and CD95L is exerted through the cyclosporine-sensitive calcineurin pathway. Interestingly, the constitutive expression of TRAIL is inhibited by TMB-8, but not by cyclosporine, indicating a role of calcineurin-independent Ca2+ in maintaining TRAIL expression.

Differential effect of dexamethasone on TCR activation-induced expression of TNF family genes

Dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid hormone, is one of the best-known immunosuppressants. It has been used to control autoimmunity, inflammation, and rejection of transplanted organs and tissues (60). Its immunosuppressive effect has been attributed to the inhibition of TCR-stimulated activation, proliferation, expression of cell surface molecules, and the production of soluble cytokines (61). Earlier studies have demonstrated that dexamethasone also inhibits activation-induced apoptosis in T cell hybridomas and in the thymocytes (62, 63, 64), a finding that leads to the discovery of the role of steroid hormones in positive selection (63, 65, 66). Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of dexamethasone on activation-induced T cell hybridoma death has been revealed due to its effect on activation-induced CD95L expression (20, 67). We have examined the effect of dexamethasone on anti-CD3-induced expression of various TNF family genes. Dexamethasone inhibited activation-induced expression of CD95L. It also blocked constitutive expression of TRAIL. Dexamethasone only has moderate effect on anti-CD3-induced TNF production. Interestingly, it does not have any effect on the activation-induced expression of RANKL (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Dexamethasone has different effects on the expression of TNF family genes. A1.1 cells were activated with plastic-bound anti-CD3 in the presence or absence of dexamethasone (1 µM) for 4 h. Total RNA was isolated and tested for the expression of CD95L, TRAIL, RANKL, and TNF-{alpha} by Northern blotting hybridization.

 
Differential requirement of protein synthesis for the expression of TNF family members

To determine whether the regulation of the TNF family members is at the transcriptional level, it is of interest to test whether it requires de novo protein synthesis. This possibility was examined in aggregates incubated in the presence of a 5 µM concentration of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (Fig. 5Go). In the presence of cycloheximide, induction of the CD95L, RANKL, and TNF gene by anti-CD3 was blocked, providing evidence that de novo protein synthesis was required for these two genes. Interestingly, the constitutive expression of TRAIL was also blocked by cycloheximide (Fig. 5Go). As a positive control, we show that OX40L expression is not affected by cycloheximide. The requirement for ongoing protein synthesis for the expression of these genes suggests either that the key transcription factors are turned over rapidly or that anti-CD3 induces the de novo synthesis of a missing regulatory protein (for CD95L, RANKL, and TNF).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Differential requirement of protein synthesis for the expression of TNF family members. A1.1 cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 in the presence or absence of cycloheximide (CHX) for 4 h. The levels of the expression of CD95L, TRAIL, RANKL, and TNF were detected by Northern blotting.

 
Activation-induced TRAIL is cytotoxic to breast cancer cells

It has been shown that breast cancer cell line MDA-231 is sensitive to TRAIL-induced apoptosis (68). We examined whether these cells are sensitive to the supernatant of anti-CD3-activated A1.1 cells. We found that the supernatant of activated A1.1, but not unactivated A1.1 cells, exhibited cytotoxic activity to MDA-231 cells (Fig. 6Go). To investigate whether the activity is due to activation-induced production of TRAIL, we employed soluble TRAIL receptor DR5 (69) and a decoy receptor OPG. DR5 is specific to TRAIL, and OPG blocks the activity of both TRAIL and RANKL (70). We found that both fusion proteins effectively blocked the cytotoxic activity of supernatant from activated A1.1 cells, indicating that the cytotoxic activity of the supernatant from activated A1.1 cells is due to the presence of TRAIL. Therefore, although not involved in AICD, activation-induced TRAIL expression is functional.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Activation-induced TRAIL is cytotoxic to breast cancer. A1.1 cells were stimulated with plastic-bound anti-CD3 for 6 h. Breast cancer cells were treated with cycloheximide for 2 h and then incubated with supernatant of activated A1.1 cells at 1/1 dilution with or without DR5 or OPG. Cells were collected at 16 h after treatment and assessed for apoptosis by DNA content analysis.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Recent studies have revealed that various members of the TNF family are expressed on T cells (71). Since the discovery of TNF, there has been much interest in the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms controlling its expression. Along with the identification of other members of the TNF family, a great amount of efforts have been focused on finding the mechanisms by which the expression of these genes is regulated. It is now known that the expression of these genes is regulated by different pathways. Unfortunately, because the available information regarding the regulation of these genes is drawn from various experimental systems, it has been difficult to establish a consensus concerning the regulation of these genes. In this study, we used monoclonal T cell hybridoma A1.1 cells (46, 48, 49) and examined the expression of TNF-{alpha}, TRAIL, RANKL, and CD95L under identical conditions, i.e., examined on the same blotting membranes. We show that the expression of these genes follows distinct kinetics in response to TCR stimulation. The expression of these genes requires continued protein synthesis. Ca2+ mobilization is important for the induction of RANKL and CD95, while PKC is important for modulating TRAIL and CD95L. Activation-induced RANKL and CD95L are blocked by cyclosporin A. Dexamethasone only blocked CD95L, TRAIL, and to some extent TNF. However, it has no effect on RANKL. Taken together, the expression of the genes of the TNF superfamily is regulated by distinct signals. A summary of our data is presented in Table IGo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Differential response of TNF family genes to the modulation of TCR signals

 
Our finding that different members of the TNF family are differentially regulated is important for the understanding of the diverse function of these molecules. It is important to point out that in in vivo situations, T cells at different stages of development, differentiation, and activation occupy distinct milieus in various tissues. The particular environment provides specific adhesion and costimulation molecules, which could well be used to activate certain members of this family of proteins. Detailed understanding of their regulatory mechanisms could provide pivotal information concerning the role of these molecules in the modulation of the immune system.

One important function of the members of the TNF family is to induce apoptosis in target cells in a receptor-specific manner (5). The best-characterized proteins that execute apoptosis are CD95L and TRAIL. It is well established that, upon activation, primary T cells express various members of the TNF/TNFR families. Among them, CD95L is the best studied. It has been shown to be involved in peripheral deletion of activated T cells and thus limiting the extent of an immune response. Mice with mutations in CD95 (lpr) or CD95L (gld) exhibit lymphoproliferative disorder and often develop autoimmune diseases (72). Human patients showing phenotypes (Canale-Smith syndrome or autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome) similar to those in lpr or gld mice also carry mutations in CD95 or CD95L (73). Therefore, activation-induced CD95L expression represents a key element in immune regulation. In our present study, we have found that CD95L is a key molecule in the modulation of AICD in T cell hybridomas.

Among the TNF family members, TRAIL is another apoptosis-inducing molecule. A recent study has revealed that this molecule on activated T cells is more important in causing tissue damage during autoimmune diseases (74) or in eliminating cancer cells (68). In fact, upon activation, TRAIL receptor expression was decreased, whereas TRAIL was up-regulated (74). Thus, unlike CD95L, TRAIL may not be involved in the regulation of T cell viability. We have found that even though TRAIL is not involved in AICD, it could induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells (Fig. 6Go). With regard to activation-induced TNF expression in A1.1 cells, we have shown that activation of 5 x 105 A1.1 cells in 200 µl media could lead to the production of TNF-{alpha} at 210 ± 27 pg/ml. This TNF-{alpha} is highly cytotoxic to cycloheximide-treated L929 cells, and the activity could be blocked by rabbit anti-murine TNF-{alpha} (data not shown).

We have mainly used mRNA levels as a determination of gene expression. An advantage of detecting mRNA is that one could use the same Northern blot membrane to examine the expression of several genes. The increase in mRNA levels correlated well with protein expression. We have determined CD95L expression on cell surface by surface staining and the cytotoxicity to B cell lymphoma A20 (data not shown). Activation-induced surface expression of CD95L is time dependent (data not shown). The expression of TRAIL could also be detected on the cell surface at 5–6 h after activation (data not shown). Secreted TRAIL could kill breast cancer cells (Fig. 6Go). In addition, we have found that activation-induced RANKL expression could be detected by Western blot analysis (data not shown). Interestingly, RANKL expressed on A1.1 cells could induce osteoclast formation. Therefore, the expression of mRNA correlated with the protein expression.

From our studies, it is clear that the expression of TNF family molecules is regulated by different mechanisms. Although it has been reported that activation of T cells could result in the up-regulation of both molecules, we have found that the initial activation signals are actually inhibitory to the expression of TRAIL in this T cell hybridoma system. Its expression only comes up at a later time. One explanation for this observation is that the TCR signal does not directly mediate the expression of TRAIL. The signals for TRAIL expression may just well be secondary to the production of some factor(s). Nevertheless, it has been reported that mature NK cells use Ca2+-dependent granule exocytosis and release of cytotoxic proteins, FasL, and membrane-bound or secreted TNF-{alpha} to induce target cell death. In contrast, TRAIL is expressed on immature NK cells (75). This is consistent with our observation that TRAIL is constitutively expressed, while activation leads to the reduction of TRAIL and simultaneously increases the expression of TNF and CD95L.

It is interesting to note that activation of this T cell hybridoma also induced expression of RANKL, a factor not only important for the formation of osteoclasts but that also plays an important role in the interaction between T cells and dendritic cells (39). Our study is the first to characterize the signaling mechanisms leading to the expression of RANKL in T cells. One question remaining is why the immune system and the skeletal system share the same molecule and how these two important functions are conserved on one molecule during evolution. One possible explanation is that during an immune response, an increase in blood calcium level released from the bone may be critical for full function of the immune system. Overall, the data reported in this study provide the first direct evidence for the differential regulation of the expression of TNF family members. We hope that our studies begin to clarify the diverse biochemical events modulating the expression of genes of the TNF superfamily. More detailed analysis of the expression patterns of these ligands and receptors on lymphocyte subpopulations will be necessary to define their different roles in immune activation and suppression.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. David Scott and Achsah Keegan for discussions, and Kristy Markos and Jennifer Solomon for reading this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI43384, CA76492, and AR44089. Back

2 This is publication number 107 of the Department of Immunology, Holland Laboratory of the American Red Cross. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Yufang Shi, Department of Immunology, Jerome H. Holland Laboratory of the American Red Cross, 15601 Crabbs Branch Way, Rockville, MD 20855. Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: CD95L, CD95 ligand; AICD, activation-induced cell death; FasL, Fas ligand; OPG, osteoprotegerin; PKC, protein kinase C; RANKL, receptor activator of NF-{kappa}B ligand; TMB-8, 8-(diethylamino)-octyl-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoate hydrochloride; TRAIL, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Back

Received for publication March 27, 2000. Accepted for publication October 31, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ashkenazi, A., V. M. Dixit. 1999. Apoptosis control by death and decoy receptors. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11:255.[Medline]
  2. Cosman, D.. 1994. A family of ligands for the TNF receptor superfamily. Stem Cells 12:440.[Medline]
  3. Gruss, H. J.. 1996. Molecular, structural, and biological characteristics of the tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily. Int. J. Clin. Lab. Res. 26:143.[Medline]
  4. Baker, S. J., E. P. Reddy. 1998. Modulation of life and death by the TNF receptor superfamily. Oncogene 17:3261.[Medline]
  5. Orlinick, J. R., M. V. Chao. 1998. TNF-related ligands and their receptors. Cell. Signal. 10:543.[Medline]
  6. Goldfeld, A. E., P. G. McCaffrey, J. L. Strominger, A. Rao. 1993. Identification of a novel cyclosporin-sensitive element in the human tumor necrosis factor {alpha} gene promoter. J. Exp. Med. 178:1365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Tsai, E. Y., J. Yie, D. Thanos, A. E. Goldfeld. 1996. Cell-type-specific regulation of the human tumor necrosis factor {alpha} gene in B cells and T cells by NFATp and ATF-2/JUN. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5232.[Abstract]
  8. Viola, J. P., A. Rao. 1997. Role of the cyclosporin-sensitive transcription factor NFAT1 in the allergic response. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 92:147.
  9. Park, J., A. Takeuchi, S. Sharma. 1996. Characterization of a new isoform of the NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells) gene family member NFATc: [Published erratum appears in 1996 J. Biol. Chem. 271:33705.]. J. Biol. Chem. 271:20914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Goldfeld, A. E., E. Tsai, R. Kincaid, P. J. Belshaw, S. L. Schrieber, J. L. Strominger, A. Rao. 1994. Calcineurin mediates human tumor necrosis factor {alpha} gene induction in stimulated T and B cells. J. Exp. Med. 180:763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Goldfeld, A. E., J. L. Strominger, C. Doyle. 1991. Human tumor necrosis factor {alpha} gene regulation in phorbol ester stimulated T and B cell lines. J. Exp. Med. 174:73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Vincenti, M. P., T. A. Burrell, S. M. Taffet. 1992. Regulation of NF-{kappa}B activity in murine macrophages: effect of bacterial lipopolysaccharide and phorbol ester. J. Cell. Physiol. 150:204.[Medline]
  13. Munoz, E., A. Israel. 1995. Activation of NF-{kappa}B by the Tax protein of HTLV-1. Immunobiology 193:128.[Medline]
  14. Brinkman, B. M., D. Zuijdeest, E. L. Kaijzel, F. C. Breedveld, C. L. Verweij. 1995. Relevance of the tumor necrosis factor {alpha} (TNF {alpha})-308 promoter polymorphism in TNF {alpha} gene regulation. J. Inflamm. 46:32.[Medline]
  15. Guha, M., W. Bai, J. L. Nadler, R. Natarajan. 2000. Molecular mechanisms of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} gene expression in monocytic cells via hyperglycemia-induced oxidant stress-dependent and -independent pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 275:17728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rhoades, K. L., S. H. Golub, J. S. Economou. 1992. The regulation of the human tumor necrosis factor {alpha} promoter region in macrophage, T cell, and B cell lines. J. Biol. Chem. 267:22102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wang, R., L. Zhang, D. Yin, R. A. Mufson, Y. Shi. 1998. Protein kinase C regulates Fas (CD95/APO-1) expression. J. Immunol. 161:2201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Toth, R., E. Szegezdi, G. Molnar, J. M. Lord, L. Fesus, Z. Szondy. 1999. Regulation of cell surface expression of Fas (CD95) ligand and susceptibility to Fas (CD95)-mediated apoptosis in activation-induced T cell death involves calcineurin and protein kinase C, respectively. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:383.[Medline]
  19. Villalba, M., S. Kasibhatla, L. Genestier, A. Mahboubi, D. R. Green, A. Altman. 1999. Protein kinase C{theta} cooperates with calcineurin to induce Fas ligand expression during activation-induced T cell death. J. Immunol. 163:5813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Yang, Y., M. Mercep, C. F. Ware, J. D. Ashwell. 1995. Fas and activation-induced Fas ligand mediate apoptosis of T cell hybridomas: inhibition of Fas ligand expression by retinoic acid and glucocorticoids. J. Exp. Med. 181:1673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Brunner, T., N. J. Yoo, D. LaFace, C. F. Ware, D. R. Green. 1996. Activation-induced cell death in murine T cell hybridomas: differential regulation of Fas (CD95) versus Fas ligand expression by cyclosporin A and FK506. Int. Immunol. 8:1017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Latinis, K. M., L. L. Carr, E. J. Peterson, L. A. Norian, S. L. Eliason, G. A. Koretzky. 1997. Regulation of CD95 (Fas) ligand expression by TCR-mediated signaling events. J. Immunol. 158:4602.[Abstract]
  23. Matsui, K., A. Fine, B. Zhu, A. Marshak-Rothstein, S. T. Ju. 1998. Identification of two NF-{kappa}B sites in mouse CD95 ligand (Fas ligand) promoter: functional analysis in T cell hybridoma. J. Immunol. 161:3469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hsu, S. C., M. A. Gavrilin, H. H. Lee, C. C. Wu, S. H. Han, M. Z. Lai. 1999. NF-{kappa}B-dependent Fas ligand expression. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:2948.[Medline]
  25. Holtz-Heppelmann, C. J., A. Algeciras, A. D. Badley, C. V. Paya. 1998. Transcriptional regulation of the human FasL promoter-enhancer region. J. Biol. Chem. 273:4416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Latinis, K. M., L. A. Norian, S. L. Eliason, G. A. Koretzky. 1997. Two NFAT transcription factor binding sites participate in the regulation of CD95 (Fas) ligand expression in activated human T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272:31427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. He, Y. W., M. L. Deftos, E. W. Ojala, M. J. Bevan. 1998. ROR{gamma} t, a novel isoform of an orphan receptor, negatively regulates Fas ligand expression and IL-2 production in T cells. Immunity 9:797.[Medline]
  28. Lacana, E., L. D’Adamio. 1999. Regulation of Fas ligand expression and cell death by apoptosis-linked gene 4. Nat. Med. 5:542.[Medline]
  29. Mittelstadt, P. R., J. D. Ashwell. 1998. Cyclosporin A-sensitive transcription factor Egr-3 regulates Fas ligand expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:3744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kasibhatla, S., T. Brunner, L. Genestier, F. Echeverri, A. Mahboubi, D. R. Green. 1998. DNA damaging agents induce expression of Fas ligand and subsequent apoptosis in T lymphocytes via the activation of NF-{kappa}B and AP-1. Mol. Cell 1:543.[Medline]
  31. Wang, R., T. Brunner, L. Zhang, Y. Shi. 1998. Fungal metabolite FR901228 inhibits c-Myc and Fas ligand expression. Oncogene 17:1503.[Medline]
  32. Anderson, D. M., E. Maraskovsky, W. L. Billingsley, W. C. Dougall, M. E. Tometsko, E. R. Roux, M. C. Teepe, R. F. DuBose, D. Cosman, L. Galibert. 1997. A homologue of the TNF receptor and its ligand enhance T-cell growth and dendritic-cell function. Nature 390:175.[Medline]
  33. Yasuda, H., N. Shima, N. Nakagawa, S. I. Mochizuki, K. Yano, N. Fujise, Y. Sato, M. Goto, K. Yamaguchi, M. Kuriyama, et al 1998. Identity of osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor (OCIF) and osteoprotegerin (OPG): a mechanism by which OPG/OCIF inhibits osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Endocrinology 139:1329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Yasuda, H., N. Shima, N. Nakagawa, K. Yamaguchi, M. Kinosaki, S. Mochizuki, A. Tomoyasu, K. Yano, M. Goto, A. Murakami, et al 1998. Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Yun, T. J., P. M. Chaudhary, G. L. Shu, J. K. Frazer, M. K. Ewings, S. M. Schwartz, V. Pascual, L. E. Hood, E. A. Clark. 1998. OPG/FDCR-1, a TNF receptor family member, is expressed in lymphoid cells and is up-regulated by ligating CD40. J. Immunol. 161:6113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Takahashi, N., N. Udagawa, T. Suda. 1999. A new member of tumor necrosis factor ligand family, ODF/OPGL/TRANCE/RANKL, regulates osteoclast differentiation and function. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 256:449.[Medline]
  37. et al. Wong, B. R., J. J. Rho, E. Arron, J. Robinson, M. Orlinick, S. Chao, E. Kalachikov, F. S. Cayani, W. N. Bartlett III, Frankel. 1997. TRANCE is a novel ligand of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family that activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase in T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272:25190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Wong, B. R., R. Josien, Y. Choi. 1999. TRANCE is a TNF family member that regulates dendritic cell and osteoclast function. J. Leukocyte Biol. 65:715.[Abstract]
  39. Kong, Y. Y., W. J. Boyle, J. M. Penninger. 1999. Osteoprotegerin ligand: a common link between osteoclastogenesis, lymph node formation and lymphocyte development. Immunol. Cell Biol. 77:188.[Medline]
  40. Kong, Y. Y., H. Yoshida, I. Sarosi, H. L. Tan, E. Timms, C. Capparelli, S. Morony, A. J. Oliveira-dos-Santos, G. Van, A. Itie, et al 1999. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature 397:315.[Medline]
  41. Golstein, P.. 1997. Cell death: TRAIL and its receptors. Curr. Biol. 7:R750.[Medline]
  42. Degli-Esposti, M.. 1999. To die or not to die: the quest of the TRAIL receptors. J. Leukocyte Biol. 65:535.[Abstract]
  43. Musgrave, B. L., T. Phu, J. J. Butler, A. P. Makrigiannis, D. W. Hoskin. 1999. Murine TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand) expression induced by T cell activation is blocked by rapamycin, cyclosporin A, and inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, protein kinase C, and protein tyrosine kinases: evidence for TRAIL induction via the T cell receptor signaling pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 252:96.[Medline]
  44. Sedger, L. M., D. M. Shows, R. A. Blanton, J. J. Peschon, R. G. Goodwin, D. Cosman, S. R. Wiley. 1999. IFN-{gamma} mediates a novel antiviral activity through dynamic modulation of TRAIL and TRAIL receptor expression. J. Immunol. 163:920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Kayagaki, N., N. Yamaguchi, M. Nakayama, H. Eto, K. Okumura, H. Yagita. 1999. Type I interferons (IFNs) regulate tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) expression on human T cells: a novel mechanism for the antitumor effects of type I IFNs. J. Exp. Med. 189:1451.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Fotedar, A., M. Boyer, W. Smart, J. Widtman, E. Fraga, B. Singh. 1985. Fine specificity of antigen recognition by T cell hybridoma clones specific for poly-18: a synthetic polypeptide antigen of defined sequence and conformation. J. Immunol. 135:3028.[Abstract]
  47. Mercep, M., J. A. Bluestone, P. D. Noguchi, J. D. Ashwell. 1988. Inhibition of transformed T cell growth in vitro by monoclonal antibodies directed against distinct activating molecules. J. Immunol. 140:324.[Abstract]
  48. Shi, Y. F., B. M. Sahai, D. R. Green. 1989. Cyclosporin A inhibits activation-induced cell death in T-cell hybridomas and thymocytes. Nature 339:625.[Medline]
  49. Shi, Y. F., M. G. Szalay, L. Paskar, B. M. Sahai, M. Boyer, B. Singh, D. R. Green. 1990. Activation-induced cell death in T cell hybridomas is due to apoptosis: morphologic aspects and DNA fragmentation. J. Immunol. 144:3326.[Abstract]
  50. Ju, S. T., D. J. Panka, H. Cui, R. Ettinger, M. el-Khatib, D. H. Sherr, B. Z. Stanger, A. Marshak-Rothstein. 1995. Fas(CD95)/FasL interactions required for programmed cell death after T-cell activation. Nature 373:444.[Medline]
  51. Brunner, T., R. J. Mogil, D. LaFace, N. J. Yoo, A. Mahboubi, F. Echeverri, S. J. Martin, W. R. Force, D. H. Lynch, C. F. Ware, et al 1995. Cell-autonomous Fas (CD95)/Fas-ligand interaction mediates activation-induced apoptosis in T-cell hybridomas. Nature 373:441.[Medline]
  52. Song, K. M., Y. G. Chen, R. Göke, A. Wilmen, A. Hareter, and Y. H. Chen. 2000. TRAIL as an inhibitor of autoimmune inflammation and cell cycle progression. J. Exp. Med. In press.
  53. Van Leeuwen, J. E., L. E. Samelson. 1999. T cell antigen-receptor signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11:242.[Medline]
  54. Weiss, A., D. R. Littman. 1994. Signal transduction by lymphocyte antigen receptors. Cell 76:263.[Medline]
  55. Miller, R. A., G. Garcia, C. J. Kirk, J. M. Witkowski. 1997. Early activation defects in T lymphocytes from aged mice. Immunol. Rev. 160:79.[Medline]
  56. Iwata, M., Y. Ohoka, T. Kuwata, A. Asada. 1996. Regulation of T cell apoptosis via T cell receptors and steroid receptors. Stem Cells 14:632.[Medline]
  57. Bierer, B. E.. 1994. Biology of cyclosporin A and FK506. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 390:203.[Medline]
  58. Mercep, M., P. D. Noguchi, J. D. Ashwell. 1989. The cell cycle block and lysis of an activated T cell hybridoma are distinct processes with different Ca2+ requirements and sensitivity to cyclosporine A. J. Immunol. 142:4085.[Abstract]
  59. Luckhoff, A., U. Pohl, A. Mulsch, R. Busse. 1988. Differential role of extra- and intracellular calcium in the release of EDRF and prostacyclin from cultured endothelial cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 95:189.[Medline]
  60. Bach, J. F.. 1993. Immunosuppressive therapy of autoimmune diseases. Immunol. Today 14:322.[Medline]
  61. Paliogianni, F., S. S. Ahuja, J. P. Balow, J. E. Balow, D. T. Boumpas. 1993. Novel mechanism for inhibition of human T cells by glucocorticoids: glucocorticoids inhibit signal transduction through IL-2 receptor. J. Immunol. 151:4081.[Abstract]
  62. Zacharchuk, C. M., M. Mercep, P. K. Chakraborti, Jr S. S. Simons, J. D. Ashwell. 1990. Programmed T lymphocyte death: cell activation- and steroid-induced pathways are mutually antagonistic. J. Immunol. 145:4037.[Abstract]
  63. Ashwell, J. D., L. B. King, M. S. Vacchio. 1996. Cross-talk between the T cell antigen receptor and the glucocorticoid receptor regulates thymocyte development. Stem Cells 14:490.[Medline]
  64. Iseki, R., M. Mukai, M. Iwata. 1991. Regulation of T lymphocyte apoptosis: signals for the antagonism between activation- and glucocorticoid-induced death. J. Immunol. 147:4286.[Abstract]
  65. King, L. B., M. S. Vacchio, K. Dixon, R. Hunziker, D. H. Margulies, J. D. Ashwell. 1995. A targeted glucocorticoid receptor antisense transgene increases thymocyte apoptosis and alters thymocyte development. Immunity 3:647.[Medline]
  66. King, L. B., M. S. Vacchio, J. D. Ashwell. 1994. To be or not to be: mutually antagonistic death signals regulate thymocyte apoptosis. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 105:355.[Medline]
  67. Cui, H., D. H. Sherr, M. el-Khatib, K. Matsui, D. J. Panka, A. Marshak-Rothstein, S. T. Ju. 1996. Regulation of T-cell death genes: selective inhibition of FasL- but not Fas-mediated function. Cell. Immunol. 167:276.[Medline]
  68. Walczak, H., R. E. Miller, K. Ariail, B. Gliniak, T. S. Griffith, M. Kubin, W. Chin, J. Jones, A. Woodward, T. Le, et al 1999. Tumoricidal activity of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vivo. Nat. Med. 5:157.[Medline]
  69. Song, K., Y. Chen, R. Goke, A. Wilmen, C. Seidel, A. Goke, B. Hilliard. 2000. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is an inhibitor of autoimmune inflammation and cell cycle progression. J. Exp. Med. 191:1095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Truneh, A., S. Sharma, C. Silverman, S. Khandekar, M. P. Reddy, K. C. Deen, M. M. McLaughlin, S. M. Srinivasula, G. P. Livi, L. A. Marshall, et al 2000. Temperature-sensitive differential affinity of TRAIL for its receptors: DR5 is the highest affinity receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 275:23319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Gravestein, L. A., J. Borst. 1998. Tumor necrosis factor receptor family members in the immune system. Semin. Immunol. 10:423.[Medline]
  72. Nagata, S.. 1996. A death factor: the other side of the coin. Behring Inst. Mitt. 97:1.
  73. Nagata, S.. 1998. Human autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, a defect in the apoptosis-inducing Fas receptor: a lesson from the mouse model. J. Hum. Genet. 43:2.[Medline]
  74. Wendling, U., H. Walczak, J. Dorr, C. Jaboci, M. Weller, P. H. Krammer, F. Zipp. 2000. Expression of TRAIL receptors in human autoreactive and foreign antigen-specific T cells. Cell Death Differ. 7:637.[Medline]
  75. Zamai, L., M. Ahmad, I. M. Bennett, L. Azzoni, E. S. Alnemri, B. Perussia. 1998. Natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity: differential use of TRAIL and Fas ligand by immature and mature primary human NK cells. J. Exp. Med. 188:2375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
C. Jursik, M. Prchal, R. Grillari-Voglauer, K. Drbal, E. Fuertbauer, H. Jungfer, W. H. Albert, E. Steinhuber, T. Hemetsberger, J. Grillari, et al.
Large-Scale Production and Characterization of Novel CD4+ Cytotoxic T Cells with Broad Tumor Specificity for Immunotherapy
Mol. Cancer Res., March 1, 2009; 7(3): 339 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Castellano, B. Vire, M. Pion, V. Quivy, D. Olive, I. Hirsch, C. Van Lint, and Y. Collette
Active Transcription of the Human FASL/CD95L/TNFSF6 Promoter Region in T Lymphocytes Involves Chromatin Remodeling: ROLE OF DNA METHYLATION AND PROTEIN ACETYLATION SUGGEST DISTINCT MECHANISMS OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL REPRESSION
J. Biol. Chem., May 26, 2006; 281(21): 14719 - 14728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Baumann, A. Dostert, N. Novac, A. Bauer, W. Schmid, S. C. Fas, A. Krueger, T. Heinzel, S. Kirchhoff, G. Schutz, et al.
Glucocorticoids inhibit activation-induced cell death (AICD) via direct DNA-dependent repression of the CD95 ligand gene by a glucocorticoid receptor dimer
Blood, July 15, 2005; 106(2): 617 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A.-H. Chou, H.-F. Tsai, Y.-Y. Wu, C.-Y. Hu, L.-H. Hwang, P.-I. Hsu, and P.-N. Hsu
Hepatitis C Virus Core Protein Modulates TRAIL-Mediated Apoptosis by Enhancing Bid Cleavage and Activation of Mitochondria Apoptosis Signaling Pathway
J. Immunol., February 15, 2005; 174(4): 2160 - 2166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Mirandola, C. Ponti, G. Gobbi, I. Sponzilli, M. Vaccarezza, L. Cocco, G. Zauli, P. Secchiero, F. A. Manzoli, and M. Vitale
Activated human NK and CD8+ T cells express both TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and TRAIL receptors but are resistant to TRAIL-mediated cytotoxicity
Blood, October 15, 2004; 104(8): 2418 - 2424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Malewicz, N. Zeller, Z. B. Yilmaz, and F. Weih
NF{kappa}B Controls the Balance between Fas and Tumor Necrosis Factor Cell Death Pathways during T Cell Receptor-induced Apoptosis Via the Expression of Its Target Gene A20
J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 32825 - 32833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
Q.-S. Mi, D. Ly, S.-E. Lamhamedi-Cherradi, K. V. Salojin, L. Zhou, M. Grattan, C. Meagher, P. Zucker, Y. H. Chen, J. Nagle, et al.
Blockade of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Exacerbates Type 1 Diabetes in NOD Mice
Diabetes, August 1, 2003; 52(8): 1967 - 1975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. Muller, S. M. Pfister, U. Grohs, J. Zweigner, R. Handgretinger, D. Niethammer, and G. Bruchelt
Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor {kappa}B Ligand Plays a Nonredundant Role in Doxorubicin-induced Apoptosis
Cancer Res., April 15, 2003; 63(8): 1772 - 1775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Omezzine, S. Chater, C. Mauduit, A. Florin, E. Tabone, F. Chuzel, R. Bars, and M. Benahmed
Long-Term Apoptotic Cell Death Process with Increased Expression and Activation of Caspase-3 and -6 in Adult Rat Germ Cells Exposed in Utero to Flutamide
Endocrinology, February 1, 2003; 144(2): 648 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. Giuliani, S. Colla, R. Sala, M. Moroni, M. Lazzaretti, S. La Monica, S. Bonomini, M. Hojden, G. Sammarelli, S. Barille, et al.
Human myeloma cells stimulate the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) in T lymphocytes: a potential role in multiple myeloma bone disease
Blood, December 15, 2002; 100(13): 4615 - 4621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Li, X. Qi, M. Williams, Y. Shi, and A. D. Keegan
Overexpression of Insulin Receptor Substrate-1, But Not Insulin Receptor Substrate-2, Protects a T Cell Hybridoma from Activation-Induced Cell Death
J. Immunol., June 15, 2002; 168(12): 6215 - 6223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shi, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS